鸭源鸡杆菌抗体消长规律研究及抗脂多糖单抗杂交瘤细胞株的建立
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
鸭源鸡杆菌(Gallibacterium anatis)是巴氏杆菌科,鸡杆菌属的代表种。该菌可参与感染产蛋母鸡,引发一系列慢性、进行性生殖道疾病,如输卵管炎、输卵管囊肿,是引起产蛋量下降的一个重要病原体。近年来,国内外对于鸭源鸡杆菌的研究主要是针对其致病性和发病机理,对于鸭源鸡杆菌的血清学研究较少。
     本研究利用实验室保存的鸭源鸡杆菌菌株YU-PDS-RZ-1-SLG制备超声波裂解抗原,建立了可以检测鸭源鸡杆菌所有血清型抗体的间接ELISA方法:包被抗原浓度为10μg·mL~(-1),包被条件为37℃2h,然后4℃过夜,封闭液为1%明胶,封闭条件为37℃1h,阴、阳性血清最佳稀释度为1:100,酶标二抗工作浓度为1:1000,底物显色时间为15min。经交叉性试验、阻断试验和重复性试验证实建立的ELISA方法重复性好,特异性强。板内变异系数为2.01%~5.75%,板间变异系数为2.43%~6.20%。间接ELISA方法的灵敏度是微量凝集试验的25~100倍。利用所建立的ELISA方法检测了人工感染鸭源鸡杆菌的3日龄SPF鸡在感染后不同阶段感染组,同居组和空白对照组的血清抗体1:10稀释后的OD450,根据感染后不同阶段所测OD450绘制抗体消长曲线,大致了解了其抗体消长的规律:抗体水平在感染后2个月左右达到高峰,但维持时间较短,随后逐渐下降。建立的间接ELISA方法可以用于临床病例的血清学快速检测,为进行鸭源鸡杆菌的血清流行病学调查、免疫程序的制定及免疫效果的评价提供了手段。
     利用实验室保存的鸭源鸡杆菌菌株YU-PDS-RZ-1-SLG提取鸭源鸡杆菌脂多糖(lipopolysaccharides,LPS)作为检测抗原,确定ELISA方法的最佳工作条件:包被抗原的浓度为2.77μg·mL~(-1),包被条件为37℃1.5h,4℃过夜,封闭液为1%明胶,封闭条件为37℃1h,阴、阳性血清最佳稀释度为1:1600,酶标二抗工作浓度为1:3000,底物显色时间为15min。
     将鸭源鸡杆菌裂解抗原及提取的脂多糖用PBS稀释到适当浓度,加入弗氏完全/不完全佐剂制成乳化抗原免疫Balb/c小鼠。按常规方法进行融合,用间接ELISA方法进行筛选,采用有限稀释法,经过4次亚克隆,最终获得3株抗鸭源鸡杆菌脂多糖的杂交瘤细胞株,分别命名为1H11、1B12和4D4。经过长期的体外培养和长期的冻存复苏后,3株杂交瘤细胞分泌抗体的能力略有降低,但仍能均一分泌抗体。间接ELISA方法检测3株杂交瘤细胞上清效价分别为:1:3200、1:6400、1:3200,小鼠腹水效价分别为1:80000、1:100000和1:80000。交叉试验结果显示,所制备的3株单抗与多杀性巴氏杆菌、羊布氏杆菌、鸡福氏志贺菌及大肠杆菌均无交叉反应。经鉴定,3株单抗的亚型分别为IgM、IgG2a、IgG2a。制备的3株能够分泌抗鸭源鸡杆菌脂多糖单克隆抗体的杂交瘤细胞株,为鸭源鸡杆菌病原的快速诊断方法的建立及其他相关科学研究提供了技术保障。
Gallibacterium anatis (G.anatis) is the type species of Gallibacterium which is grouped as a new genus within the family Pasteurellaceae. As a important pathogen to affect the egg production, G.anatis could infect layers to cause a series of chronic and progressive diseases of reproductive tracts, such as salpingitis and oviduct cysts. The researches mainly studied on the pathogenicity and etiopathogenesis of G.anatis in recent years, but there is a little study on serology of G. anatis.
     A indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed in this study for detection of all serotypes antibodies against G.anatis in chickens. The coating antigen was made by ultrasonie method with the strain YU-PDS-RZ-1-SLG (1-S) of G.anatis. The optimum G.anatis antigen concentration was found to be 10μg·mL~(-1), coating time was 2 hours at 37℃and then overnight at 4℃. The blocking material was 1% gelatin and blocking time was 1 hour at 37℃. The dilution of the positive or negative sera was 1:100, and the optimum dilution of rabbit-anti-chicken IgG labelled with horseradish peroxidase was 1:1000. The optimum reaction time of the enzyme-substrate was determined as 15 min. The indirect ELISA was confirmed to be reproducible and specific by cross-assay, blocking-assay and reproductive assay. The coefficient of variation within plate was 2.01%~5.75%, and the coefficient of variation with between plates was 2.43%~6.20%. The sensitivity of indirect ELISA was 25 to 100 times than micro-agglutination test. Three groups of 20 three-day-old SPF chinkens were used and divided into 3 groups, one group was inoculated with 1.4×10~6 colony-forming units of G.anatis strain 1-S, the other two groups were used as cohabitating group and negative control group. The indirect ELISA technique was used for testing the antibodies against G.anatis from these chickens in different time after infection. The response curve was established when the OD450nm values were varies along with the time, the changes of the antibodies were observed that the antibody level reached the peak in two months post-infection,but the lasting duration of the antibodies was short,and then the antibody level dropped gradually. The results showed that the indirect ELISA could be used for detecting the sera of chickens from clinical cases and to predict the efficiency of vaccination.
     Lipopolysaccharide(LPS) obtained from G.anatis strain 1-S was used as coating antigen for detection of antibody against G.anatis, and the optimum work conditions for indirect ELISA were developed as follows: the concentration of coating antigen was 2.77μg·mL~(-1) ;coating time at 37℃was 1.5 hours and then at 4℃overnight; the blocking material was 1% gelatin and blocking time at 37℃was 1 hour; the dilution of the positive or negative sera was 1:1600; the optimum dilution of goat-anti-mouse IgG labelled horseradish peroxidase was 1:3000, and the optimum reaction time of the enzyme-substrate was determined as 15 min.
     Three hybridoma cell strains secreting monoclonal antibodies (McAbs) against G. anatis LPS were developed by cell fusion after immunizing the Balb/c mice with G. anatis LPS antigen and named as 1H11, 1B12 and 4D4. These hybridoma cell strains can stably secrete McAbs after twenty-five serial passages and freezing-thawing three times within a three-month storage at -196℃.The ELISA titers of antibodies against G. anatis LPS in culture supernatant were 1:3200, 1:6400 and 1:3200 ,and in ascites were 1:80000, 1:100000, 1:80000 for strains 1H11, 1B12 and 4D4, respectively. Pathogen detection of indirect ELISA showed the McAb had no cross-reaction with Pasteurella multocida, Brucella melitensis, Chicken Sh. flexneri and E.coli.The subtypes of three McAbs were IgM, IgG2a and IgG2a, respectively. The development of the three hybridoma cell strains secreting McAbs against G.anatis LPS laid the foundation for rapid and accurate monitoring of pathogen diagnosis and relevant scientific research of G.anatis in chickens.
引文
[1] Hansen B. Oviduct peritonitis in hens due to pathogenic‘cloacal bacteria’[J]. Nord Vetmed, 1950, 2: 523~531.
    [2] Kohlert R. Studies on the etiology of in?ammation of the oviduct in the hen Monatsh[J]. Monatsh Vetmed, 1968, 23: 392~395.
    [3] Mra′z O, Vlad?′k P, Boha′cek. Actinobacilli in domestic fowl[J]. Zentbl Bakteriol Hyg I Abt Orig A, 1976, 236: 294~307.
    [4] Bisgaard M. Isolation and characterization of some previously unreported taxa from poultry with phenotypical characters related to Actinobacillus and Pasteurella species[J]. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B, 1982, 90: 59~67.
    [5] Mutters R, Ihm P, Pohl S, et al. Reclassification of the genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the basis of deoxyribonucleic acid homology, with proposals for the new species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa[J]. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 1985, 35: 309~322.
    [6] Christensen H, Bisgaard M, Bojesen A M, et a1. Genetic relationships among avain isolates classified as Pasteurella haemolytica, Actinobacillus salpingitidis or Pasteurella anatis with proposal of Gallibacterium anatis gen. nov, comb. nov and description of additional genomospeciles within Gallibacterium gen. nov [J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2003, 53: 275~287.
    [7] Christensen H, Foster G, Christensen J P, et al.Phylogenetic analysis by 16S rDNA gene sequence comparison of avian taxa of Bisgaard and characterization and description of two new taxa of Pasteurellaceae[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2003, 95: 354~363.
    [8] Bisgaard M, Korczak B M, Busse H J, et al. Classification of the taxon 2 and taxon 3 complex of Bisgaard within Gallibacterium and description of Gallibacterium melopsittaci sp. nov., Gallibacterium trehalosifermentans sp. nov. and Gallibacterium salpingitidis sp. nov[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary M icrobiology, 2009, 59: 735~744.
    [9] Zepeda V A, Calderón-Apodaca N L, Paasch M L, et al. Histopathologic findings in chickens experimentally infected with Gallibacterium anatis by nasal instillation[J]. Avian Dis., 2010, 54(4): 1306~1309.
    [10] Bojesen A M, Vazquez M E, Bager R J, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and tetracycline resistance determinant genotyping of Gallibacterium anatis[J]. Vet. Microbiol., 2011. 148(1): 105~110.
    [11] Bisgaard M. Incidence of Pasteurella haemolytica in the respiratory tract of apparentlyhealthy chickens and chickens with infectious bronchitis Characterization of 213 strains[J]. Avian Pathology, 1977, 6(4): 285~292.
    [12] Addo P B, Mohan K. Atypical Pasteurella haemolytica type A from poultry [J]. Avian Disease, 1984,29: 214~217.
    [13] Mirle C, Schongarth M, Meinhart H, et a1. Studies into incidence of pasteurella-haemolytica infentions and their relevance to hens, with particular reference to diseases of the egg-laying apparatus[J]. Monatshafte fnr die Veterinarmedizin, 1991, 46(15): 545~549.
    [14] Bisgaard M. Incidence of Pasteurella haemolytica in the respiratory tract of apparently healthy chickens and chickens with infectious bronchitis Characterization of 213 strains[J]. Avian Pathology,1977, 6(4): 285~292.
    [15] Bojesen A M, Nielsen O L. In vivo studies of Gallibacterium anatis infection in chickens [J]. Avian Pathology, 2004, 33:145~152.
    [16]刘慧敏,邝爱丽,王川庆,等.鸡输卵管囊肿病的病理学观察及相关病原的初步检测[J].河南农业科学, 2009, (6): 123~1126.
    [17]刘慧敏,陈陆,杨霞,等. SPF蛋鸡人工感染鸡杆菌的病理形态学观察[J].中国兽医学报. 2010, 30(7): 969~973.
    [18] Bojesen A M, Torpdahl M, Christensen H, et al. Genetic diversity of Gallibacterium anatis isolates from different chicken flocks[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, 7(8): 2737~2740.
    [19] Bojesen A M, Christensen H, Nielsen O L, et al. Detection of Gallibacterium spp.in chickens by fluorescent 16S rRNA in situ hybridization[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, 41(11): 5167~5172.
    [20] Bojesen A M, Vazqez M E, Robles F, et al. Specific identification of Gallibacterium by a PCR using primers targeting the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2007, 123(1): 262~268.
    [21] Bojesen A M, Torpdahl M, Christensen, et al.Genetic diversity of Gallibacterium anatis isolates from different chicken flocks[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, 41(6): 2737~2740.
    [22]付仁一.晋、鲁、豫三省鸡杆菌感染情况调查及RAPD分型方法的建立与应用[D].郑州:河南农业大学硕士毕业论文, 2010.
    [23] Bojesen M, Christensen H, Nielsen O L, et al. Detection of Gallibacterium spp.in chickens by fluorescent 16S rRNA in situ hybridization[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, 41(11): 5167~5172.
    [24] Christensen H, Kuhnert P. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, speciesand subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2007, 57: 166~178.
    [25]郑鹿平,杨霞,陈陆,等. 45株鸡杆菌的分离鉴定[J].中国兽医学报, 2010, 30(3): 347~351.
    [26]皇甫和平,王川庆,陈陆,等.鸡卡氏杆菌的分子鉴定及其16S rRNA基因序列分析[J]. Agricultural Science&Technology. 2009, 10 (1): 43~46.
    [27] Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP:a new technique for DNA fingerprinting[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1995, 23(21): 4407~4414.
    [28]王川庆,陈陆,杨霞,等.蛋鸡群卡氏杆菌感染情况的初步研究[J].河南农业科学. 2008(3): 97~100.
    [29]王珊,陈陆,付仁一,等.我国部分地区蛋鸡群鸭源鸡杆菌血清流行病学调查[J].中国预防兽医学报, 2011, 33(2): 114~117.
    [30]王健.脂多糖对抗原递呈细胞作用的影响[J].国外医学免疫学分册, 2005, 28(3): 166~169.
    [31]王华,徐德祥.细菌脂多糖发育毒作用研究进展[J].国外医学卫生学分册, 2008, 35(3): 170~173.
    [32]蒋建新.细菌内毒素基础与临床[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2004: 10~14.
    [33]刘中原,李延平.细菌脂多糖的生物活性及作用机制[J].医学综述, 2010, (2): 166~169.
    [34]高崧,吴晓东,张扬,等.禽大肠杆菌外膜蛋白、脂多糖疫苗的免疫保护试验[J].中国兽医学报, 2002, 22(5): 457~459.
    [35]刘霞,刁有祥,禚宝山,等.猪胸膜肺炎放线杆菌脂多糖的制备及对小鼠的免疫保护作用[J].中国预防兽医学报,2006,28(5):549~552.
    [36]周珍辉主编.动物细胞培养技术[M].中国环境科学出版社, 2006: 188~192.
    [37]刘文明,童德文,李立,等.抗肿瘤单克隆抗体药物的研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报, 2006, 34(8): 44~48.
    [38]董增祥,王清清,宋海峰.治疗性单克隆抗体的研究进展及其免疫偶联物的抗肿瘤应用[J].中国新药杂志, 2008, 17(15): 1286~1290.
    [39] Chung K Y, Sahz L B. Antibody-based therapies for colorect cancer[J]. Oncologist, 2005, 10(9): 701~709.
    [40] Scott A M, Liu Z, Murone C, et a1. Immunological effects of chimeric anti-GD3 monoclonal antibody KM871 in patients with metastatic melanoma [J]. Cancer Immun., 2005, 5(3): 49~53.
    [41]孙思凡,张部昌,靳彦文.治疗性单克隆抗体研究进展[J].生物技术通讯, 2009, 20(2): 258~262.
    [42] Bisgaard M. Ecology and significance of Pasteurellaceae in animals [J]. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, 1993, 279(1): 7~26.
    [43] Bojesen A M, Nielsen S S, Bisgaard M. Prevalence and transmission of haemolytic Gallibacterium species in chicken production systems with different biosecurity levels[J]. Avian Pathology, 2003, 32(5): 503~510.
    [44]王捷主编.动物细胞培养技术与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2004, 5.
    [45]杨立国,胡少昶,魏平华,等.酶免疫测定技术[M].南京大学出版社, 1998.
    [46]蒋成淦主编.酶免疫测定法[M].人民卫生出版社, 1984.
    [47]汪家政,范明主编.蛋白质技术手册[M].科学出版社, 2001(第1版): 38~41.
    [48]朱立平,陈学清.免疫学常用实验方法[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2000(第1版).
    [49]徐建国主编.分子医学细菌学[M].科学出版社, 2000, 116~130.
    [50] Bruggemann S. Quantitative detection of antibodies to M Saipneumoniae in Pigs sera by an enzyme一linked immunosorbent assay[J].Veterinary Record, 1977, 101: 109~111.
    [51] Evans R T. An Enzyme一linked Immunosorbent assay for the Retection of chlamydial antibody in duek sera[J]. Avian Pathology. 1983(12): 117~124.
    [52]刘军,刘家彦,宋克磊,等.人工感染鸡白痢菌抗体消长规律的试验研究[J].畜牧兽医科技信息, 2006, 5: 16~17.
    [53]刘亚刚,刘内生,岳华,等.安宁河流域鸭瘟、鸭霍乱综合防制研究——免疫鸭体内巴氏杆菌抗体消长规律[J].中国兽医学报, 1998, 1: 60~63.
    [54]邝爱丽.抗猪传染性胃肠炎病毒S蛋白单克隆抗体的制备及初步应用[D].郑州:河南农业大学硕士毕业论文, 2009.
    [55]宋宏新,刘晓阳,李宏.改良热酚水法制备大肠杆菌O157:H7脂多糖抗原的研究[J].食品科学, 2006, 27(10): 273~275.
    [56]张艳红,杜元钊,吴延功.肠炎沙门氏菌脂多糖的提取与制备[J].动物医学进展,2001, 22(3):79~80.
    [57]刘秋艳.分别分泌抗鸡传染性法氏囊病毒和鸡志贺菌脂多糖单克隆抗体杂交瘤细胞株的建立及初步应用[D].郑州:河南农业大学硕士毕业论文, 2007.
    [58]秦爱建,邵红霞,钱琨,等.抗禽流感病毒H5和H9亚型血凝素特异性单克隆抗体的研制及应用[J].中国预防兽医学报, 2003, 25(3): 161~163.
    [59]司徒振强,吴军正.细胞培养[M].西安:世界图书出版西安公司,1996.
    [60]薛庆善主编.体外培养的原理与技术[M].北京:科学出版社, 2001, 2.
    [61] R.I.弗雷谢尼著,章静波,徐存拴,等译.动物细胞培养:基本技术指南[M].北京:科学出版社, 2004.
    [62]罗立新编著.细胞融合技术与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2004.
    [63]马东礼.单克隆抗体生产技术的现状与前景[J].《国外医学》预防、诊断、治疗用生物制品分册, 2001, 24(1): 16~19.
    [64]斯佩克特等著,黄培堂译.细胞实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社, 2001.
    [65] Richard P D, Robert E W, Hancock. Procedure for Isolation of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides from Both Smooth and Rough Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium strains [J]. Journal of bacteriology, 1983, 155(2): 831~838.
    [66]潘劲草,黄志成,余文炳,等.肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7脂多糖抗原的制备及鉴定[J].中国人兽共患病杂志, 1999, 15(3): 59~61.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700