兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源评价、监测与开发研究
|
摘要
湿地是人类生存发展重要的生态环境和自然资源,是保障国家、全球生态安全和经济社会可持续发展的重要战略资源,是功能独特而不可替代的自然综合体。正是由于这个原因,湿地的研究受到各国政府、科研机构及社会各届的关注,已经成为全世界的热点和焦点。生态学、地理学、旅游学、遥感学、经济数学等诸多学科的加入,使之成为一个交叉学科。目前,各学科的研究重点集中在有效的利用和开发湿地资源,保护和恢复湿地功能,或者尽最大可能降低对湿地生态系统的破坏,维护湿地脆弱的生态系统等方面。生态旅游正是顺应了这一要求,是湿地景观最重要、最合理的可持续利用方式之一。
国内外关于湿地生态旅游资源方面的研究较少,现有的研究缺乏系统性,尤其在湖泊湿地生态旅游资源方面的研究刚刚开始。
本文以兴凯湖国家级湿地自然保护区生态旅游资源为研究对象,在全面调查、广泛收集相关资料的基础上,采用调查分析法、层次分析法、旅游图表法、聚类分析法、遥感技术等研究方法,通过对兴凯湖国家级湿地自然保护区生态旅游资源评价、监测及开发的研究,旨在对湖泊湿地生态旅游的基本理论和实践进行探讨。
(1)建立了湖泊湿地生态旅游资源分类标准。①参照中华人民共和国国家标准《旅游资源分类、调查与评价》(GB/T18972---2003),简称《标准》,以兴凯湖为例,依据湖泊湿地的特点,对《标准》中的资源分类进行了调整补充,建立分类释义表,共分为8个主类,22个亚类,50个基本类型,建立了湖泊湿地生态旅游资源分类标准。并按此分类标准将兴凯湖115个旅游资源个体进行归类。②分析了兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源构成特点。结论为,生物景观资源类型(占标准类型的63.64%)、水域风光类型(占到标准类型43.75%)是兴凯湖湿地旅游资源的主体,建筑与设施旅游资源类型比例较大,人文景系资源潜力较大,非物质类资源亟待开发。从资源丰度上看,湿地主类资源齐全,亚类资源较多(占标准亚类的70.96%),资源基类覆盖面较广(占标准基类32.25%),在全国、全省属于旅游资源相对丰沛区域。
(2)对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行评价。①对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源进行了总体定性评价,概括出了其五大特点,即季节分明各具特色的四季景观、丰富的野生动植物景观、奇特的地质遗迹景观、悠久的历史文化资源和巨大的冬季冰雪景观。②对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源单体进行了评价,运用了《标准》中的旅游资源评价体系,将旅游资源普查中确定的115个资源单体进行分级,评出了五级资源6个,四级资源7个,三级资源16个,一级和二级资源42个,总计有71个资源为入级资源,占资源总数的61.74%。得出的结论为兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源数量大、类型齐、品质高,并月.具有原生态的特点。③选取评价因子,运用层次分析法(AHP)确定因子的权重,建立适应湖泊湿地的生态旅游资源评价体系,并运用此体系对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行评价。构建了3个层次的评价指标体系,设立了生态价值、资源价值、开发价值和湖泊湿地特色价值4个评价项目层指标,因素层设定21个评价因子,设立了分等定级的标准,并利用此体系对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源进行了评价,评价的最终得分为75.35分,评价结果为优良,说明兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源丰富,开发潜力巨大。
(3)对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的动态变化进行监测。①在对2001年9月25日、2004年6月5日和2007年6月14日TM遥感影像进行数据提取的基础上,分别对兴凯湖湿地的10种湿地景观类型,即林地、草甸、灌木、旱地、村镇、水田、水域、沼泽、未利用地和休闲地进行了湿地景观变化特征分析,从景观变化方面来看,研究区在2001-2007年间景观格局总体上趋于稳定,林地和未利用地受人为干扰逐渐增加,其中,灌木和沼泽景观分别减少了10124.46ha和11300.49ha,水田和休闲地面积大幅度增加15174.81ha和7044.3ha,水域作为主导景观,变化不大。②选取了2001年-2007年斑块数(NP)、平均斑块面积(MPS)、斑块面积标准差(PSSD)、斑块面积变异系数(PSCV)、面积加权的平均形状因子(AWMSI)和平均形状指数(MSI)6种景观格局指数进行了湿地景观格局指数分析。在景观指数分析方面看,水域景观的异质性低,景观较为完整,对兴凯湖地区景观有着明显的影响和控制作用；其它景观相比之下较为破碎,异质性高。水域的面积、平均形状指数在2001-2007年间变化不大,趋于平和。林地和未利用地近年来受人为干扰程度逐渐增大,草甸景观的破碎化程度开始变高,灌木景观变得更为复杂,更不规则。而沼泽景观受人为干扰加大,景观变得更为简单、规则。林地和未利用地景观向更加规则方向发展。③运用马尔科夫模型对兴凯湖湿地2010-2016年的景观动态变化进行了预测,结果显示,在保持2001-2004年的干扰强度下,耕地将呈现出快速增长的趋势,天然湿地和林地将有不同程度的下降,其它景观变化不大。④对景观格局变化的驱动力进行了分析。兴凯湖湿地景观格局变化是在自然驱动力和人为活动影响的双重作用下的结果。其中,由于气候变化造成了湿地水文变化,从而间接影响湿地景观格局,而人类对湿地的开发及经济驱动是湿地景观动态变化的主要驱动因子。
(4)因地制宜制定兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的开发利用策略。①对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行SWOT分析,归纳出兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的六大优势,五大劣势,四大机遇及三大威胁。②确定了开发六原则,并提出了努力将兴凯湖湿地自然保护区建设成国家AAAA级景区、创建国际生态旅游度假基地的战略构想。③旅游产品布局上围绕“一弧六点”展开,确立了六大旅游景区,即以北大荒文化旅游为重点的当壁镇景区,以湿地生态观光旅游及农家乐旅游为重点的莲花景区,以会议旅游和休闲度假湖滨旅游为重点的二闸景区,以农业观光和休闲度假湖滨旅游为主的金沙滩景区和以科考、探秘及边防体验为主的龙王庙景区。④通过游客市场调查,确定了产品开发的重点,即开发中要主打生态牌；要突出特色；坚持旅游项目多样性；交通先行及旅游服务网络化建设等。⑤制订了旅游产品策划的五大原则,并据此进行了四季旅游产品策划,提出12项生态旅游产品,春季的湿地观岛节,天鹅湖主题游,兴凯湖开湖游；夏季的百里金沙主题游,十里莲花游,渔歌唱晚游；秋季的白鱼宴主题游,湖畔“铁人”三项赛,金秋主题游；冬季的冰湖之旅,冰上汽车拉力赛及冬季渔猎游。⑥在生态旅游环境控制的研究上,提出了环境控制的五大原则,旅游环境容量控制及质量控制的重点,并提出了景区分级及景区资源分类的控制思路。
As the essential ecological environment and natural resources, wetlands play an important role in human's survival and development. They are also significant strategic resources for supporting the national and global ecological security and the sustainable development of economy and society. They are natural comprehensive and irreplaceable systems with unique functions. Therefore, the wetland research has been one of hotspots and issues for different governments, research institutions and the public. The involvements of geography, tourism, remote sensing and mathematical economics lead to a new multidisciplinary wetland science. At present, the research focuses on the efficient wetland utilization and development, wetland conservation and restoration, reduction of wetland ecosystem damage and wetland maintenance. In light of this kind of requests, the eco-tourism is the most important and reasonable sustainable way of wetland resource development.
There are few references on wetland eco-tourism resources in corresponding researches and the current issues are not systematic. The research on lake and wetland eco-tourism is at an initial stage.
On the basis of comprehensive survey and investigations, the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake National Wetland Nature Reserve were evaluated by different methods including survey analysis, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), tourism chart, cluster analysis, remote sensing. The research objectives were to discuss and explore the basic theories and practices of the lake wetland eco-tourism with a case study in the assessment, monitoring and development of eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake National Wetland Nature Reserve. The results were as follows:
(1) Establishing the classification standards of the eco-tourism resources for lakes and wetlands.①According to the Standard of Classification, Survey and Evaluation of Tourism Resources (GB/T18972-2003) in P.R.C, (hereafter refer to Standard), Xingkai Lake were taken as a specific example, based on the characteristics of lake wetlands. There were some supplements for the resources classification in the Standard and category interpretation forms were established. The forms were divided into 8 main categories,22 subcategories and 50 basic types to accomplish the classification standard for lake and wetland eco-tourism resources. Referring to the standard,115 tourism resources in the Xingkai Lake were classified.②Analyzing the structure characteristics of eco-tourism resources of the wetlands in Xingkai Lake. The major tourism resources were biological landscape (accounting for 63.64%) and water scenery resources (accounting for 43.75%) and building and facilities tourism resources had a large proportion in the area. There were more potential in humanities landscape resources and non-material resources were in the urgent need of development. From the perspective of the resources, there were complete major category resources, more subcategory resources (accounting for 70.96% of standard subcategory). There was a large part of area covered by basic resources (accounting for 32.25% of the standard basic category) and belonged to abundant area of tourism resource in Heilongjiang province, even in China.
(2) Evaluating the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetland.①A comprehensive and qualitative evaluation on the wetland eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake was carried out and five major characteristics were summarized, namely,4 distinctive seasonal landscape, abundant wildlife landscape, spectacular geological landscape, culture resources with long history and unique ice-snow landscapes in winter.②Individual evaluation on eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetland. The tourism resources evaluation system in the Standard was used to classify the 115 resource individuals in tourism resources survey and 6 five-level resources,7 four-level resources,16 three-level resources,42 one and two-level resources, and a total of 71 resources were listed as level resources, accounting for 61.74% of the total resources. The wetland resources in Xingkai Lake were characterized with large quantity, complete types, high quality and natural feature.③Selecting the evaluation factors and determining the weight of factors by AHP to establish accurate evaluation system which was suitable for the eco-tourism resources of wetlands in Xingkai Lake. A three-level evaluation index system were set up and 4 evaluative program-level indexes of ecology value, resource value, developing value and the charscteristic value of lake wetlands were determined. There were 21 evaluation factors and standards for classification and grading were established. The system was used to evaluate the eco-tourism resources of the wetlands of Xingkai Lake and the final score was 75.35. The excellent evaluation results indicated that eco-tourism resources are abundant and the developing potential is great.
(3) Dynamic monitoring the wetland eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lak.①On the basis of remote sensing images of the 25/9/2001,5/6/2004 and 14/6/2007, we analyzed 10 kinds of wetland landscape types(woodlands, meadows, shrubs, dry lands, towns and villages, paddy fields, water area, marshes, unused lands and fallow lands). The results showed that the overall landscape pattern in research area was steady from 2001 to 2007 and man-made interferences to woodlands and unused lands increased gradually. The area of shrubs and marsh declined respectively by 10124.46ha and 11300.49ha, paddy fields and fallow land areas increased significantly by 15174.81ha and 7044.3ha, water area did not change greatly as the dominant landscape.②Choosing the number of 6 kinds of landscape pattern indexes, namely, patches (NP), mean patch size (MPS), patch size standard deviation (PSSD), plaque area coefficient of variation (PSCV), area-weighted average shape factor (AWMSI) and mean shape index (MSI) from 2001 to 2007 and analyzing the indexes of wetland landscape patterns. We found that the average heterogeneity of water landscape was low and landscape was more complete which had significant controlling effects on the Xingkai Lake landscape. Compare with it, other landscapes were more fragile and the heterogeneity was high. The average shape index of water areas was tending to even from 2001 to 2007. In recent years, effects of human disturbance on woodlands and unused lands increased gradually and the fragmentation of meadow was significant, the landscape of shrubs became more complex and irregular. While more human disturbance influenced the marshes and the landscape was more simple and regular. The landscape of forest lands and unused lands developed to a more regular direction.③Predicting the dynamic changes of landscapes from 2010 to 2016 with Markov Model and the results showed that croplands would show a fast growing trend with maintaining the interference strength of 2001-2004, natural wetlands and woodlands decrease differently and other landscapes change little.④Analyzing the driving force of landscape patterns. The landscape-pattern change of the wetlands of Xingkai Lake was the result of dual effects of natural and human activities. Climate change led to the change of wetland hydrology and thus indirectly affected wetland landscape patterns, while the human development on wetlands and economic driving force were main driving factors for the wetland landscape dynamic change.
(4) Accomplishing the reasonable developing strategies of the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetlands.①Summarizing six major advantages, five weaknesses, four opportunities and three threats of the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetlands with the SWOT analyses②Identifying six principles of development and putting efforts on constructing Wetland Nature Reserve of Xingkai Lake into a national AAAA level spot and creating the strategy suitable for the international eco-tourism resort.③Spreading tourism product layout around "an arc, six points", establishing six major tourism areas including the Dangbizhen Resort of the cultural tourism of Great Northern Wilderness, the Lotus Resort of wetland eco-tour and farm travelling, the Two Brake Resort of the conference tourism and lakeside travel for leisure, the Golden Sand Beach Resort of farming and leisure travel in lakefronts and the Dragon King Temple Resort of exploring mysteries and frontier experience.④Determining the focus of product development with the survey of tourist markets, namely, developing major eco-brands, highlighting the characteristics, upholding the diversity of tourism projects, providing excellent travel service of traffic and network construction.⑤Establishing five major principles for tourism products and carrying out the travel product plans of four seasons, planning 12 eco-tourism products(the Island-Visiting Festival of Wetland,Swan Lake Tour, the Open Lake Swim of Xingkai Lake in spring; Golden Sands Tour, Lotus Tour, Fishing accompanied by songs at night in summer; Whitefish Dinner Tour, Three items of "Iron Man" in lakesides, Autumn Tour; the Glacial Lake Tour, the Rally on ice and Fishing & Hunting in winter).⑥Deciding five major principles for environmental controlling, tourism capacity, environmental capacity and quality control and proposing the critical ideas of grading systems and resource classifications.
国内外关于湿地生态旅游资源方面的研究较少,现有的研究缺乏系统性,尤其在湖泊湿地生态旅游资源方面的研究刚刚开始。
本文以兴凯湖国家级湿地自然保护区生态旅游资源为研究对象,在全面调查、广泛收集相关资料的基础上,采用调查分析法、层次分析法、旅游图表法、聚类分析法、遥感技术等研究方法,通过对兴凯湖国家级湿地自然保护区生态旅游资源评价、监测及开发的研究,旨在对湖泊湿地生态旅游的基本理论和实践进行探讨。
(1)建立了湖泊湿地生态旅游资源分类标准。①参照中华人民共和国国家标准《旅游资源分类、调查与评价》(GB/T18972---2003),简称《标准》,以兴凯湖为例,依据湖泊湿地的特点,对《标准》中的资源分类进行了调整补充,建立分类释义表,共分为8个主类,22个亚类,50个基本类型,建立了湖泊湿地生态旅游资源分类标准。并按此分类标准将兴凯湖115个旅游资源个体进行归类。②分析了兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源构成特点。结论为,生物景观资源类型(占标准类型的63.64%)、水域风光类型(占到标准类型43.75%)是兴凯湖湿地旅游资源的主体,建筑与设施旅游资源类型比例较大,人文景系资源潜力较大,非物质类资源亟待开发。从资源丰度上看,湿地主类资源齐全,亚类资源较多(占标准亚类的70.96%),资源基类覆盖面较广(占标准基类32.25%),在全国、全省属于旅游资源相对丰沛区域。
(2)对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行评价。①对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源进行了总体定性评价,概括出了其五大特点,即季节分明各具特色的四季景观、丰富的野生动植物景观、奇特的地质遗迹景观、悠久的历史文化资源和巨大的冬季冰雪景观。②对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源单体进行了评价,运用了《标准》中的旅游资源评价体系,将旅游资源普查中确定的115个资源单体进行分级,评出了五级资源6个,四级资源7个,三级资源16个,一级和二级资源42个,总计有71个资源为入级资源,占资源总数的61.74%。得出的结论为兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源数量大、类型齐、品质高,并月.具有原生态的特点。③选取评价因子,运用层次分析法(AHP)确定因子的权重,建立适应湖泊湿地的生态旅游资源评价体系,并运用此体系对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行评价。构建了3个层次的评价指标体系,设立了生态价值、资源价值、开发价值和湖泊湿地特色价值4个评价项目层指标,因素层设定21个评价因子,设立了分等定级的标准,并利用此体系对兴凯湖湿地的生态旅游资源进行了评价,评价的最终得分为75.35分,评价结果为优良,说明兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源丰富,开发潜力巨大。
(3)对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的动态变化进行监测。①在对2001年9月25日、2004年6月5日和2007年6月14日TM遥感影像进行数据提取的基础上,分别对兴凯湖湿地的10种湿地景观类型,即林地、草甸、灌木、旱地、村镇、水田、水域、沼泽、未利用地和休闲地进行了湿地景观变化特征分析,从景观变化方面来看,研究区在2001-2007年间景观格局总体上趋于稳定,林地和未利用地受人为干扰逐渐增加,其中,灌木和沼泽景观分别减少了10124.46ha和11300.49ha,水田和休闲地面积大幅度增加15174.81ha和7044.3ha,水域作为主导景观,变化不大。②选取了2001年-2007年斑块数(NP)、平均斑块面积(MPS)、斑块面积标准差(PSSD)、斑块面积变异系数(PSCV)、面积加权的平均形状因子(AWMSI)和平均形状指数(MSI)6种景观格局指数进行了湿地景观格局指数分析。在景观指数分析方面看,水域景观的异质性低,景观较为完整,对兴凯湖地区景观有着明显的影响和控制作用；其它景观相比之下较为破碎,异质性高。水域的面积、平均形状指数在2001-2007年间变化不大,趋于平和。林地和未利用地近年来受人为干扰程度逐渐增大,草甸景观的破碎化程度开始变高,灌木景观变得更为复杂,更不规则。而沼泽景观受人为干扰加大,景观变得更为简单、规则。林地和未利用地景观向更加规则方向发展。③运用马尔科夫模型对兴凯湖湿地2010-2016年的景观动态变化进行了预测,结果显示,在保持2001-2004年的干扰强度下,耕地将呈现出快速增长的趋势,天然湿地和林地将有不同程度的下降,其它景观变化不大。④对景观格局变化的驱动力进行了分析。兴凯湖湿地景观格局变化是在自然驱动力和人为活动影响的双重作用下的结果。其中,由于气候变化造成了湿地水文变化,从而间接影响湿地景观格局,而人类对湿地的开发及经济驱动是湿地景观动态变化的主要驱动因子。
(4)因地制宜制定兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的开发利用策略。①对兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源进行SWOT分析,归纳出兴凯湖湿地生态旅游资源的六大优势,五大劣势,四大机遇及三大威胁。②确定了开发六原则,并提出了努力将兴凯湖湿地自然保护区建设成国家AAAA级景区、创建国际生态旅游度假基地的战略构想。③旅游产品布局上围绕“一弧六点”展开,确立了六大旅游景区,即以北大荒文化旅游为重点的当壁镇景区,以湿地生态观光旅游及农家乐旅游为重点的莲花景区,以会议旅游和休闲度假湖滨旅游为重点的二闸景区,以农业观光和休闲度假湖滨旅游为主的金沙滩景区和以科考、探秘及边防体验为主的龙王庙景区。④通过游客市场调查,确定了产品开发的重点,即开发中要主打生态牌；要突出特色；坚持旅游项目多样性；交通先行及旅游服务网络化建设等。⑤制订了旅游产品策划的五大原则,并据此进行了四季旅游产品策划,提出12项生态旅游产品,春季的湿地观岛节,天鹅湖主题游,兴凯湖开湖游；夏季的百里金沙主题游,十里莲花游,渔歌唱晚游；秋季的白鱼宴主题游,湖畔“铁人”三项赛,金秋主题游；冬季的冰湖之旅,冰上汽车拉力赛及冬季渔猎游。⑥在生态旅游环境控制的研究上,提出了环境控制的五大原则,旅游环境容量控制及质量控制的重点,并提出了景区分级及景区资源分类的控制思路。
As the essential ecological environment and natural resources, wetlands play an important role in human's survival and development. They are also significant strategic resources for supporting the national and global ecological security and the sustainable development of economy and society. They are natural comprehensive and irreplaceable systems with unique functions. Therefore, the wetland research has been one of hotspots and issues for different governments, research institutions and the public. The involvements of geography, tourism, remote sensing and mathematical economics lead to a new multidisciplinary wetland science. At present, the research focuses on the efficient wetland utilization and development, wetland conservation and restoration, reduction of wetland ecosystem damage and wetland maintenance. In light of this kind of requests, the eco-tourism is the most important and reasonable sustainable way of wetland resource development.
There are few references on wetland eco-tourism resources in corresponding researches and the current issues are not systematic. The research on lake and wetland eco-tourism is at an initial stage.
On the basis of comprehensive survey and investigations, the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake National Wetland Nature Reserve were evaluated by different methods including survey analysis, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), tourism chart, cluster analysis, remote sensing. The research objectives were to discuss and explore the basic theories and practices of the lake wetland eco-tourism with a case study in the assessment, monitoring and development of eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake National Wetland Nature Reserve. The results were as follows:
(1) Establishing the classification standards of the eco-tourism resources for lakes and wetlands.①According to the Standard of Classification, Survey and Evaluation of Tourism Resources (GB/T18972-2003) in P.R.C, (hereafter refer to Standard), Xingkai Lake were taken as a specific example, based on the characteristics of lake wetlands. There were some supplements for the resources classification in the Standard and category interpretation forms were established. The forms were divided into 8 main categories,22 subcategories and 50 basic types to accomplish the classification standard for lake and wetland eco-tourism resources. Referring to the standard,115 tourism resources in the Xingkai Lake were classified.②Analyzing the structure characteristics of eco-tourism resources of the wetlands in Xingkai Lake. The major tourism resources were biological landscape (accounting for 63.64%) and water scenery resources (accounting for 43.75%) and building and facilities tourism resources had a large proportion in the area. There were more potential in humanities landscape resources and non-material resources were in the urgent need of development. From the perspective of the resources, there were complete major category resources, more subcategory resources (accounting for 70.96% of standard subcategory). There was a large part of area covered by basic resources (accounting for 32.25% of the standard basic category) and belonged to abundant area of tourism resource in Heilongjiang province, even in China.
(2) Evaluating the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetland.①A comprehensive and qualitative evaluation on the wetland eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake was carried out and five major characteristics were summarized, namely,4 distinctive seasonal landscape, abundant wildlife landscape, spectacular geological landscape, culture resources with long history and unique ice-snow landscapes in winter.②Individual evaluation on eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetland. The tourism resources evaluation system in the Standard was used to classify the 115 resource individuals in tourism resources survey and 6 five-level resources,7 four-level resources,16 three-level resources,42 one and two-level resources, and a total of 71 resources were listed as level resources, accounting for 61.74% of the total resources. The wetland resources in Xingkai Lake were characterized with large quantity, complete types, high quality and natural feature.③Selecting the evaluation factors and determining the weight of factors by AHP to establish accurate evaluation system which was suitable for the eco-tourism resources of wetlands in Xingkai Lake. A three-level evaluation index system were set up and 4 evaluative program-level indexes of ecology value, resource value, developing value and the charscteristic value of lake wetlands were determined. There were 21 evaluation factors and standards for classification and grading were established. The system was used to evaluate the eco-tourism resources of the wetlands of Xingkai Lake and the final score was 75.35. The excellent evaluation results indicated that eco-tourism resources are abundant and the developing potential is great.
(3) Dynamic monitoring the wetland eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lak.①On the basis of remote sensing images of the 25/9/2001,5/6/2004 and 14/6/2007, we analyzed 10 kinds of wetland landscape types(woodlands, meadows, shrubs, dry lands, towns and villages, paddy fields, water area, marshes, unused lands and fallow lands). The results showed that the overall landscape pattern in research area was steady from 2001 to 2007 and man-made interferences to woodlands and unused lands increased gradually. The area of shrubs and marsh declined respectively by 10124.46ha and 11300.49ha, paddy fields and fallow land areas increased significantly by 15174.81ha and 7044.3ha, water area did not change greatly as the dominant landscape.②Choosing the number of 6 kinds of landscape pattern indexes, namely, patches (NP), mean patch size (MPS), patch size standard deviation (PSSD), plaque area coefficient of variation (PSCV), area-weighted average shape factor (AWMSI) and mean shape index (MSI) from 2001 to 2007 and analyzing the indexes of wetland landscape patterns. We found that the average heterogeneity of water landscape was low and landscape was more complete which had significant controlling effects on the Xingkai Lake landscape. Compare with it, other landscapes were more fragile and the heterogeneity was high. The average shape index of water areas was tending to even from 2001 to 2007. In recent years, effects of human disturbance on woodlands and unused lands increased gradually and the fragmentation of meadow was significant, the landscape of shrubs became more complex and irregular. While more human disturbance influenced the marshes and the landscape was more simple and regular. The landscape of forest lands and unused lands developed to a more regular direction.③Predicting the dynamic changes of landscapes from 2010 to 2016 with Markov Model and the results showed that croplands would show a fast growing trend with maintaining the interference strength of 2001-2004, natural wetlands and woodlands decrease differently and other landscapes change little.④Analyzing the driving force of landscape patterns. The landscape-pattern change of the wetlands of Xingkai Lake was the result of dual effects of natural and human activities. Climate change led to the change of wetland hydrology and thus indirectly affected wetland landscape patterns, while the human development on wetlands and economic driving force were main driving factors for the wetland landscape dynamic change.
(4) Accomplishing the reasonable developing strategies of the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetlands.①Summarizing six major advantages, five weaknesses, four opportunities and three threats of the eco-tourism resources in Xingkai Lake wetlands with the SWOT analyses②Identifying six principles of development and putting efforts on constructing Wetland Nature Reserve of Xingkai Lake into a national AAAA level spot and creating the strategy suitable for the international eco-tourism resort.③Spreading tourism product layout around "an arc, six points", establishing six major tourism areas including the Dangbizhen Resort of the cultural tourism of Great Northern Wilderness, the Lotus Resort of wetland eco-tour and farm travelling, the Two Brake Resort of the conference tourism and lakeside travel for leisure, the Golden Sand Beach Resort of farming and leisure travel in lakefronts and the Dragon King Temple Resort of exploring mysteries and frontier experience.④Determining the focus of product development with the survey of tourist markets, namely, developing major eco-brands, highlighting the characteristics, upholding the diversity of tourism projects, providing excellent travel service of traffic and network construction.⑤Establishing five major principles for tourism products and carrying out the travel product plans of four seasons, planning 12 eco-tourism products(the Island-Visiting Festival of Wetland,Swan Lake Tour, the Open Lake Swim of Xingkai Lake in spring; Golden Sands Tour, Lotus Tour, Fishing accompanied by songs at night in summer; Whitefish Dinner Tour, Three items of "Iron Man" in lakesides, Autumn Tour; the Glacial Lake Tour, the Rally on ice and Fishing & Hunting in winter).⑥Deciding five major principles for environmental controlling, tourism capacity, environmental capacity and quality control and proposing the critical ideas of grading systems and resource classifications.
引文
[1]国家林业局《湿地公约》履约办公室.湿地公约履约指南.中国林业出版社,2001,7：126-133
[2]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展.生态学杂志,1997,16(1)：58-62
[3]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述,生态学报,1998,18(5)：539-547
[4]倪晋仁,殷康前,赵智杰.湿地综合分类研究.自然资源学报,1998,13(3)：214-221
[5]吕宪国,黄锡畴.我国湿地研究进展.地理科学,1998,18(4)：293-300
[6]金相灿,刘树坤,章宗涉.中国湖泊环境.北京：海洋出版社,1998：72-107
[7]国家林业局.中国湿地保护行动计划.北京：中国林业出版社,2000(9)
[8]中国湿地植被编辑委员会.中国湿地植被.北京：科学出版社,1999(8)第一版：358-478
[9]国家林业局.湿地管理与研究方法.北京：中国林业出版社,2001(7)：166-259
[10]张合平,何平,梁文斌,陈建华,刘富华,王阳.南洞庭湖湿地景观多样性与保护对策的研究.湖南林业科技,2001(4)：30-33
[11]Hodgson G., Dixon J. A. Logging versus fisheries and tourism in Palawan. Honolulu:East--West Environmental Policy Institute Occasional Paper. East-West Center,1988
[12]Boesch M N, Josselyn A J, MeHta, et al. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loess, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue,1994(20):1-103
[13]Farber S., costanza R. The economic value of wetland system. J. Environmcnt Management,1987(1):53-58
[14]黑龙江省第十届人民代表大会第四次会议.《黑龙江省国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划纲要》.黑龙江日报,2006年2月14日
[15]Mitsch W J, Gosselink J G. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold,1993:1-43
[16]Mitsch W J. Globle Wetlands. Elsevier Sciences B. V,1994:1-30
[17]Rebecca R S, et al. Wetlands Ecology and Management,1993,2(4):171-174
[18]Mitsch W J. Global Wetlands. Elsevier Sciences B. V,1994:1-30
[19]Kadlee R H, Knight R L. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers,1996:1-124
[20]Mitsch WJ, Jorgensen SE. Ecological Engineering. New York:John Wiley&Sons, 1989
[21]Mitsch WJ. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know2how, time, and self2design. Ecol App,1996(6):77
[22]Odum EP. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science,1969(164):262-270
[23]Van der Hoek. The influence of water level management on vegetation deve lopment.A grit Water Man,1988(14):423-437
[24]Van der Valk. Succession theory and wetland restoration. Australia: Proceedings of INTECOL VInternational Wetlands Conference, Perth,1999
[25]Johnstone IM.Plant invasion windows:a time based classification of invasion potential. Biol Rev,1986(61):369-394
[26]Ward JV. The serial discontinuity concept:extending the model to Floodplain Rivers. Res Man,1989(10):159-168
[27]Middleton B. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,1999
[28]Connell J H. Diversity in tropical rainforest and coral reefs. Science, 1978(199):1302-1310
[29]Forman RTT. Land Mosaics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999
[30]M. J.O'Connell. Detecting, measuring and reversing changes to wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2003(11):397-401
[31]L Reinelt, R Horner, A Azous. Impacts of urbanization on Palestine (digressional freshwater) wetlands—research and management in the Puget Soundregion. Urban Ecosystems,1998(2):219-236
[32]C L M Hargiss, E S DeKeyser,D R Kirby,M J Ell. Regional assessment of wetland plant communities using the index of plant community integrity. Ecological indicators,2008(8):303-307
[33]美国环境保护局近海监测处.环境监测指标.北京：海洋出版社,1997,112-143.
[34]张晓萍,杨勤科,李锐.流域健康诊断指标一种生态环境评价的新方法.水土保持通报,1998,18(4)：57-62.
[35]Rapport DJ.1989. Whatconstitutesecos ystemhealth? PersBiolMed,33:120-132
[36]黄锡畴,冯慧芳.我国沼泽研究回顾与展望.地理科学.1988,8(1)：10-14
[37]王洪道.中国湖泊资源.北京：科学出版社,1989：23-45
[38]黄锡畴.中国沼泽研究.北京：科学出版社,1988：35-47
[39]牛焕光,马学慈.我国的沼泽.北京：商务印书馆,1985：51-65
[40]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展.生态学杂志,1997,16(1)：58-62
[41]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述.生态学报,1998,18(5)：539-547
[42]陆健健.中国湿地.上海：华东师范大学出版社,1990：21-156
[43]陈宜瑜.中国湿地研究.长春：吉林科学技术出版社,1995
[44]谢炳庚,李晓青.湿地景观生态学理论和方法研究.长沙：中南工业大学出版社,1997,12：8-156
[45]国家林业局.中国湿地保护行动计划.北京：中国林业出版社,2000.9
[46]湿地保护—我们的责任和考题.工人日报,2007.9.1
[47]Dayid A. Fennell. Ecotourism:an Lntroduction. London:New Yord Routlege, 1999
[48]David Western. Defining Ecotourism in Ecotourism:A Guide For Planners and Managers, voll. Hawkins TIES,2002
[49]丁季华,吴娟娟.中国湿地旅游初探.旅游科学,2002(2)：11-14
[50]Geoffrey Wall. Implications of Global Climate Change forTourism and Recreation in Wetlnad Areas. Climatic Change,1998(40):371-389
[51]Hall C M. Ecotourism in Antarctica and adjacent sub-Antarctic islands. Development Impacts Management,1993(2):117-122
[52]Martha H. Paying the price of ecotourism. Americas,1994(6):40-47
[53]OlgaG. ChristoPoulou, EfstathiosTsachalidis. Conservation policies for protected areas(wetlands)in Greece:A Survey ofLocal Residents. Water Air and Soil Pollution:Focus,2004(4):445-457
[54]张杰,那守海.黑龙江省湿地旅游资源与开发对策.东北林业大学学报.2004,32(3)：91-93
[55]王健,丁武军,刘运珍.鄱阳湖西部湿地保护与生态旅游互动开发研究.华东交通大学学报.2004,21(3)：25-28
[56]仇昊.江苏海滨湿地生态旅游可持续发展模式研究.南京：南京师范大学,2003
[57]王仰麟等.中国典型地区沿海滩涂资源开发.北京：科学出版社,2005：104-134
[58]鲁铭.湿地旅游可持续发展研究.武汉：华中师范大学,2002,5-45
[59]陈洪全.江苏沿海湿地旅游资源的开发与保护.盐城师范学院学报,2004,24(3)：99-102
[60]凌申.江苏九龙口湿地生态旅游的开发.资源调查与环境,2003,24(4)：275-280
[61]黄震方,海滨生态旅游地的开发模式研究.南京：南京师范大学,2002,120-125
[62]胡远东,许大为,缪丹.大庆市湿地生态旅游资源的保护与开发对策.国土与自然资源研究,2005(1)：65-66
[63]曹新向,丁圣彦.探析自然保护区旅游开发的景观生态调控.生态经济,2002(12)：57-59
[64]李平,李艳,李万立,张萍萍.黄河三角洲湿地资源生态旅游开发利用研究.海洋科,2004,28(11)：33-38
[65]赵立军,李江风.湖北石首天鹅洲湿地旅游资源综合评价.资源开发与市场,2004,20(2)：141-143
[66]梅燕.若尔盖高原湿地生态旅游开发构想.生态经济,2003(10)：120-121
[67]朱新敏.小海子垦区湿地的保护与开发.西部探矿工程,2005,17(B07)：439
[68]鲁铭,龚胜生.湿地旅游可持续发展研究.世界地理研究所,2002,11(2)：72-78
[69]耿英姿,张鸿鸣,刘昱等.杭州西溪湿地文化生态旅游开发研究.浙江大学学报,2005,5(5)：44-48
[70]Ecological Indicators (生态学指导),2004(4):245-253
[71]Forest Ecology and Management (林业生态与管理),2001(151):353-370
[72]Ecological Engineering (生态工程),2002(18):543-554
[73]Ecological Indicators (生态学指导),2003(3):181-193,195-202
[74]Journal of Envoronment Management (环境管理杂志) 2005(74):217-237
[75]Kosz M. Valuing riverside wetlands:the case of the Konga Auen National park. Ecological Economics,1996(2):109-127
[76]S. Bork. Wetland Development and Degeadation. AMBI0,1991(7):502-505
[77]Tiner, It. W Wetlands ofthe United States:current status and recent treads. Fish and wildlife Service,1984:38-47
[78]Wilen B 0, et al. Wetland of the US. In:Whigham cd. Wetlands of the world. Kluver Academic I'ublishcrs, Netherlands and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue,1993(20):1-103
[79]Duffus, D. A. and P. Dearden. Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation:A conceptual framework. Biological Conservation,1990(53):213-231
[80]Robert K. davis. Recreatian planning as economic problem. Natural Resources Journa,1963,13(2):201-213
[81]Williams M.Wetlands:a threatened landscape, oxford Bdsackwell,1990:68-79
[82]Boesch M N, Josselyn A J, MeHta, et al. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loess, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue,1994(20):1-103
[83]Jeglum, J. K. and Boissonneau, A. N. A regional level of wetlands mapping for the Northern Clay Section of Ontario. Remote Sensing,1975:349-359
[84]Geoffery Wall. Implication of Global Climate Change For Tourism and B Recreation In Wetland Areas. Nerthland:Kluwer Academic Publisher,1998
[85]克雷格·S·坎贝尔.湿地与景观.北京：中国林业出版社,2005
[86]李世杰.中国湖泊的变迁.森林与人类,2007,27(7)：6-25
[87]段晓男,王效科,陈琳,牟玉静,欧阳志云.对乌梁素海湖泊湿地植物区甲烷排放规律.环境科学,2007,28(3)：455-499
[88]王引义,宿松沿江湖泊湿地植被初步调查.安徽农学通报,2006,12(3)
[89]谢应忠,李炳玺.银川平原典型湖泊湿地植物群落物种多样性研究.中国生态学会2006学术年会论文荟萃,2006
[90]何春光,郎惠卿,卜兆君,邹丽芳.松嫩平原湖泊湿地植物群落多样性及其保护研究.国土与自然资源研究,2006(3)：53-54
[91]姜加虎,黄群,孙占东.长江流域湖泊湿地生态环境状况分析.生态环境,2006,15(2)：424-429
[92]高娟.浅水湖泊湿地生态安全评价研究.北京：首都师范大学,2006
[93]申锐莉,鲍征宇.湖泊湿地生态地球化学评价的标准体系.地质通报,2005(Z1)：114-122
[94]徐慧,崔广柏.湖泊湿地利用与保护临界的经济学准则探讨.资源科学,2006,28(1)：51-56
[95]郝伟罡,李畅游,魏永富,张生.干旱区草型湖泊湿地价值量化评估.生态经济,2007,5(4)：274-280
[96]肖飞.洪湖湿地结构与生态功能评价及系统稳定性研究.北京：中国科学院研究生院(测量与地球物理研究所),2003
[97]邵宁平,刘小鹏,渠晓毅.银川湖泊湿地生态系统服务价值评估.生态学杂志,2008,27(9)：1625-1630
[98]龙圣智.对江河流域和湖泊湿地保护的思考.中南林业调查规划,2000,19(4)：58-61
[99]张汉华.湖北省湖泊湿地综合生态环境及其保护.渔业致富指南,1999,(19)：15
[100]郭艳波,刘世兴,崔利广.谈扎龙湿地生态环境保护措施及其对策.水利科技与济,2002,8(4)：213-214
[101]周立志,朱文忠,李进华,顾长明.安庆沿江湖泊湿地生物多样性保护战略.循环·整合·和谐—第二届全国复合生态与循环经济学术讨论会论文集,2005
[102]万一,黄永生,王晖.南水北调东线工程调蓄湖泊湿地环境影响评价及保护措施.环境科学研究,2003,16(4)：5-11
[103]王学雷,刘兴士,吴宜进.洪湖水环境特征与湖泊湿地净化能力研究.武汉大学学报,2003,49(2)：217-220
[104]张芸,李文体.河北省湖泊型湿地水环境状况及保护建议.南水北调与水利科技,2007,5(1)：78-81
[105]刘玉虎,陈后银,鲁坚.枞阳县湖泊湿地生态环境现状及保护对策.现代农业科技(上半月刊),2005(10)：68-70
[106]王晓辉,张之源,蒋宗豪,贾良清,潘成荣.小型湖泊湿地自然保护区功能区划探讨合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(7)
[107]陈正言,宫明达.大庆油田湖泊湿地景观生态设计探讨.油气田环境保护,2006,16(3)：55-57
[108]韩芳,李兴华.内蒙古达里诺尔湖泊湿地动态的遥感监测.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(1)：74-78
[109]方芳.长江中游湖泊湿地复合生态农业建设的实践与思考.环境科学与技术,2000(S1)
[110]罗新正,刘宁豫.大安古河道区湖泊湿地的生态环境与农业可持续发展.地域研究与开发,1997,16(2)：22-24
[111]辛良杰.南四湖湖泊湿地生态环境需水量初步研究.济南：山东师范大学,2005
[112]段水强.德令哈盆地湖泊湿地变化与生态需水初步研究.中国农村水利水电,2005(9)：25-26
[113]王保忠.南洞庭湖湿地生态旅游资源的数字化和开发研究.长沙：中南林学院,2002
[114]王永洁,李伟晔,邓伟.扎龙湿地旅游资源的开发和保护.高师理科学刊,2003,23(2)：63-65
[115]王健,丁武军,刘运珍.鄱阳湖西部湿地保护与生态旅游互动开发研究.华东交通大学学报,2004(3)：25-28
[116]李景奇.我国湖泊风景资源研究.中国园林,1997,13(1)：50-52
[117]周映梅.青海湖旅游景观价值初评.旅游学刊,1992,7(5)：8-10
[118]朱仰石.洪泽湖风景资源评价与开发.中国园林,1993,9(4)：41-47
[119]钟永德,张合平,何平.南洞庭湖生态旅游开发与利用研究.中南林学院学报,1999,19(4)：58-64
[120]GB/T18972-2003,《旅游资源分类、调查与评价》.北京：中国标准出版社,2003：1
[121]卢云亭.中国最美六大沼泽湿地.中国国家地理,2005(10)
[122]鸡西市兴凯湖自然保护区管理委员会.兴凯湖自然保护区总体发展规划.鸡西：鸡西市兴凯湖自然保护区管理委员会,2008.9
[123]鸡西市旅游局.黑龙江省鸡西市兴凯湖精品旅游区规划.鸡西：鸡西市旅游局,2009.10
[124]于文涛.兴凯湖春季鸟类迁徙监测分析报告.黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2006(2)
[125]冯尚柱.兴凯湖国家级自然保护区管理对策的探讨.哈尔滨：东北林业大学,2004
[126]李健,俞益武.基于国标在浙江旅游资源普查的思考.旅游学刊,2006,21(2)：7-8
[127]王凤昆,刘化金,冯尚柱.2005年兴凯湖中俄湿地鹤类调查.野生动物,2006,27(6)：15-16
[128]Greig-smith P. Quantitative Plant Ecology. (3rd ed.). Berkeley:Univ. Of California Press,1983
[129]Risser P. G. Landscape ecology:directions and approaches. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey. Special Publication,2009
[130]Gardner R. H. and R. V. O'neill. Pattern, process, and predictability: The use of neutral models for landscape analysis. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology,2007,22(1)15-29
[131]Krummel J, Gardner R, Sugihara G, et al. Landsacape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos,1987,48(3):321-324
[132]Turner n G, Wear D N, Flamm R O. Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Application,1996,6(4):1150-1172
[133]Wickham J D, O'neill R V, Jones K B. Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(2):171-179
[134]Alados C L, Pueyo Y, Barrantes O, et al. Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landscape Ecology,2004,19(5):543-559
[135]周维才.兴凯湖湿地资源遥感监测技术研究.北京：中国林业科学研究院,2007：2,4,8,11-16,25,57-58
[136]殷力,张树清.中国湿地信息系统的建立.东北测绘,2001,24(3)：7-10
[137]汪爱华,张树清,张柏.遥感和地理信息系统技术在湿地研究中的应用.遥感技术与应用,2001,16(3)：200-204
[138]汪爱华,张树清,何艳芬.RS和GIS支持下的三江平原沼泽湿地动态变化研究.地理科学,2002,22(5)：636-640
[139]衣伟宏,杨柳,张正祥.基于ETM+影像的扎龙湿地遥感分类研究.湿地科学,2004,2(3)：208-212
[140]王庆光.多光谱遥感数据最佳波段选择研究.广东水利电力职业技术学院学报,2007,5(2)：63-65
[141]陈文波,肖笃宁,郑蕉,郭福良,姜英鹏.内蒙古毕拉河林区近十年森林景观变化及驱动力浅析.应用生态学报,2004,15(5)：741-747
[142]傅国斌,李克让.全球变暖与湿地生态系统的研究进展.地理研究,2001,20(1)：120-128
[143]程实,张怀清,陈永富.兴凯湖湿地资源综合评价研究.林业科学研究,2008,21(增刊)：85-90
[144]黑龙江省统计局.黑统发(2007)57号《鸡西市旅游数据》(黑SWH342).哈尔滨：黑龙江省统计局,2008,3
[145]鸡西市旅游局.2008年统计年报.鸡西：鸡西市旅游局,2009,3
[146]国家质检总局.《旅游区(点)质量等级的划分与评定》.北京：国家质检总局,2003：2
[2]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展.生态学杂志,1997,16(1)：58-62
[3]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述,生态学报,1998,18(5)：539-547
[4]倪晋仁,殷康前,赵智杰.湿地综合分类研究.自然资源学报,1998,13(3)：214-221
[5]吕宪国,黄锡畴.我国湿地研究进展.地理科学,1998,18(4)：293-300
[6]金相灿,刘树坤,章宗涉.中国湖泊环境.北京：海洋出版社,1998：72-107
[7]国家林业局.中国湿地保护行动计划.北京：中国林业出版社,2000(9)
[8]中国湿地植被编辑委员会.中国湿地植被.北京：科学出版社,1999(8)第一版：358-478
[9]国家林业局.湿地管理与研究方法.北京：中国林业出版社,2001(7)：166-259
[10]张合平,何平,梁文斌,陈建华,刘富华,王阳.南洞庭湖湿地景观多样性与保护对策的研究.湖南林业科技,2001(4)：30-33
[11]Hodgson G., Dixon J. A. Logging versus fisheries and tourism in Palawan. Honolulu:East--West Environmental Policy Institute Occasional Paper. East-West Center,1988
[12]Boesch M N, Josselyn A J, MeHta, et al. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loess, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue,1994(20):1-103
[13]Farber S., costanza R. The economic value of wetland system. J. Environmcnt Management,1987(1):53-58
[14]黑龙江省第十届人民代表大会第四次会议.《黑龙江省国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划纲要》.黑龙江日报,2006年2月14日
[15]Mitsch W J, Gosselink J G. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold,1993:1-43
[16]Mitsch W J. Globle Wetlands. Elsevier Sciences B. V,1994:1-30
[17]Rebecca R S, et al. Wetlands Ecology and Management,1993,2(4):171-174
[18]Mitsch W J. Global Wetlands. Elsevier Sciences B. V,1994:1-30
[19]Kadlee R H, Knight R L. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers,1996:1-124
[20]Mitsch WJ, Jorgensen SE. Ecological Engineering. New York:John Wiley&Sons, 1989
[21]Mitsch WJ. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know2how, time, and self2design. Ecol App,1996(6):77
[22]Odum EP. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science,1969(164):262-270
[23]Van der Hoek. The influence of water level management on vegetation deve lopment.A grit Water Man,1988(14):423-437
[24]Van der Valk. Succession theory and wetland restoration. Australia: Proceedings of INTECOL VInternational Wetlands Conference, Perth,1999
[25]Johnstone IM.Plant invasion windows:a time based classification of invasion potential. Biol Rev,1986(61):369-394
[26]Ward JV. The serial discontinuity concept:extending the model to Floodplain Rivers. Res Man,1989(10):159-168
[27]Middleton B. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,1999
[28]Connell J H. Diversity in tropical rainforest and coral reefs. Science, 1978(199):1302-1310
[29]Forman RTT. Land Mosaics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999
[30]M. J.O'Connell. Detecting, measuring and reversing changes to wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2003(11):397-401
[31]L Reinelt, R Horner, A Azous. Impacts of urbanization on Palestine (digressional freshwater) wetlands—research and management in the Puget Soundregion. Urban Ecosystems,1998(2):219-236
[32]C L M Hargiss, E S DeKeyser,D R Kirby,M J Ell. Regional assessment of wetland plant communities using the index of plant community integrity. Ecological indicators,2008(8):303-307
[33]美国环境保护局近海监测处.环境监测指标.北京：海洋出版社,1997,112-143.
[34]张晓萍,杨勤科,李锐.流域健康诊断指标一种生态环境评价的新方法.水土保持通报,1998,18(4)：57-62.
[35]Rapport DJ.1989. Whatconstitutesecos ystemhealth? PersBiolMed,33:120-132
[36]黄锡畴,冯慧芳.我国沼泽研究回顾与展望.地理科学.1988,8(1)：10-14
[37]王洪道.中国湖泊资源.北京：科学出版社,1989：23-45
[38]黄锡畴.中国沼泽研究.北京：科学出版社,1988：35-47
[39]牛焕光,马学慈.我国的沼泽.北京：商务印书馆,1985：51-65
[40]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展.生态学杂志,1997,16(1)：58-62
[41]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述.生态学报,1998,18(5)：539-547
[42]陆健健.中国湿地.上海：华东师范大学出版社,1990：21-156
[43]陈宜瑜.中国湿地研究.长春：吉林科学技术出版社,1995
[44]谢炳庚,李晓青.湿地景观生态学理论和方法研究.长沙：中南工业大学出版社,1997,12：8-156
[45]国家林业局.中国湿地保护行动计划.北京：中国林业出版社,2000.9
[46]湿地保护—我们的责任和考题.工人日报,2007.9.1
[47]Dayid A. Fennell. Ecotourism:an Lntroduction. London:New Yord Routlege, 1999
[48]David Western. Defining Ecotourism in Ecotourism:A Guide For Planners and Managers, voll. Hawkins TIES,2002
[49]丁季华,吴娟娟.中国湿地旅游初探.旅游科学,2002(2)：11-14
[50]Geoffrey Wall. Implications of Global Climate Change forTourism and Recreation in Wetlnad Areas. Climatic Change,1998(40):371-389
[51]Hall C M. Ecotourism in Antarctica and adjacent sub-Antarctic islands. Development Impacts Management,1993(2):117-122
[52]Martha H. Paying the price of ecotourism. Americas,1994(6):40-47
[53]OlgaG. ChristoPoulou, EfstathiosTsachalidis. Conservation policies for protected areas(wetlands)in Greece:A Survey ofLocal Residents. Water Air and Soil Pollution:Focus,2004(4):445-457
[54]张杰,那守海.黑龙江省湿地旅游资源与开发对策.东北林业大学学报.2004,32(3)：91-93
[55]王健,丁武军,刘运珍.鄱阳湖西部湿地保护与生态旅游互动开发研究.华东交通大学学报.2004,21(3)：25-28
[56]仇昊.江苏海滨湿地生态旅游可持续发展模式研究.南京：南京师范大学,2003
[57]王仰麟等.中国典型地区沿海滩涂资源开发.北京：科学出版社,2005：104-134
[58]鲁铭.湿地旅游可持续发展研究.武汉：华中师范大学,2002,5-45
[59]陈洪全.江苏沿海湿地旅游资源的开发与保护.盐城师范学院学报,2004,24(3)：99-102
[60]凌申.江苏九龙口湿地生态旅游的开发.资源调查与环境,2003,24(4)：275-280
[61]黄震方,海滨生态旅游地的开发模式研究.南京：南京师范大学,2002,120-125
[62]胡远东,许大为,缪丹.大庆市湿地生态旅游资源的保护与开发对策.国土与自然资源研究,2005(1)：65-66
[63]曹新向,丁圣彦.探析自然保护区旅游开发的景观生态调控.生态经济,2002(12)：57-59
[64]李平,李艳,李万立,张萍萍.黄河三角洲湿地资源生态旅游开发利用研究.海洋科,2004,28(11)：33-38
[65]赵立军,李江风.湖北石首天鹅洲湿地旅游资源综合评价.资源开发与市场,2004,20(2)：141-143
[66]梅燕.若尔盖高原湿地生态旅游开发构想.生态经济,2003(10)：120-121
[67]朱新敏.小海子垦区湿地的保护与开发.西部探矿工程,2005,17(B07)：439
[68]鲁铭,龚胜生.湿地旅游可持续发展研究.世界地理研究所,2002,11(2)：72-78
[69]耿英姿,张鸿鸣,刘昱等.杭州西溪湿地文化生态旅游开发研究.浙江大学学报,2005,5(5)：44-48
[70]Ecological Indicators (生态学指导),2004(4):245-253
[71]Forest Ecology and Management (林业生态与管理),2001(151):353-370
[72]Ecological Engineering (生态工程),2002(18):543-554
[73]Ecological Indicators (生态学指导),2003(3):181-193,195-202
[74]Journal of Envoronment Management (环境管理杂志) 2005(74):217-237
[75]Kosz M. Valuing riverside wetlands:the case of the Konga Auen National park. Ecological Economics,1996(2):109-127
[76]S. Bork. Wetland Development and Degeadation. AMBI0,1991(7):502-505
[77]Tiner, It. W Wetlands ofthe United States:current status and recent treads. Fish and wildlife Service,1984:38-47
[78]Wilen B 0, et al. Wetland of the US. In:Whigham cd. Wetlands of the world. Kluver Academic I'ublishcrs, Netherlands and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue,1993(20):1-103
[79]Duffus, D. A. and P. Dearden. Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation:A conceptual framework. Biological Conservation,1990(53):213-231
[80]Robert K. davis. Recreatian planning as economic problem. Natural Resources Journa,1963,13(2):201-213
[81]Williams M.Wetlands:a threatened landscape, oxford Bdsackwell,1990:68-79
[82]Boesch M N, Josselyn A J, MeHta, et al. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loess, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue,1994(20):1-103
[83]Jeglum, J. K. and Boissonneau, A. N. A regional level of wetlands mapping for the Northern Clay Section of Ontario. Remote Sensing,1975:349-359
[84]Geoffery Wall. Implication of Global Climate Change For Tourism and B Recreation In Wetland Areas. Nerthland:Kluwer Academic Publisher,1998
[85]克雷格·S·坎贝尔.湿地与景观.北京：中国林业出版社,2005
[86]李世杰.中国湖泊的变迁.森林与人类,2007,27(7)：6-25
[87]段晓男,王效科,陈琳,牟玉静,欧阳志云.对乌梁素海湖泊湿地植物区甲烷排放规律.环境科学,2007,28(3)：455-499
[88]王引义,宿松沿江湖泊湿地植被初步调查.安徽农学通报,2006,12(3)
[89]谢应忠,李炳玺.银川平原典型湖泊湿地植物群落物种多样性研究.中国生态学会2006学术年会论文荟萃,2006
[90]何春光,郎惠卿,卜兆君,邹丽芳.松嫩平原湖泊湿地植物群落多样性及其保护研究.国土与自然资源研究,2006(3)：53-54
[91]姜加虎,黄群,孙占东.长江流域湖泊湿地生态环境状况分析.生态环境,2006,15(2)：424-429
[92]高娟.浅水湖泊湿地生态安全评价研究.北京：首都师范大学,2006
[93]申锐莉,鲍征宇.湖泊湿地生态地球化学评价的标准体系.地质通报,2005(Z1)：114-122
[94]徐慧,崔广柏.湖泊湿地利用与保护临界的经济学准则探讨.资源科学,2006,28(1)：51-56
[95]郝伟罡,李畅游,魏永富,张生.干旱区草型湖泊湿地价值量化评估.生态经济,2007,5(4)：274-280
[96]肖飞.洪湖湿地结构与生态功能评价及系统稳定性研究.北京：中国科学院研究生院(测量与地球物理研究所),2003
[97]邵宁平,刘小鹏,渠晓毅.银川湖泊湿地生态系统服务价值评估.生态学杂志,2008,27(9)：1625-1630
[98]龙圣智.对江河流域和湖泊湿地保护的思考.中南林业调查规划,2000,19(4)：58-61
[99]张汉华.湖北省湖泊湿地综合生态环境及其保护.渔业致富指南,1999,(19)：15
[100]郭艳波,刘世兴,崔利广.谈扎龙湿地生态环境保护措施及其对策.水利科技与济,2002,8(4)：213-214
[101]周立志,朱文忠,李进华,顾长明.安庆沿江湖泊湿地生物多样性保护战略.循环·整合·和谐—第二届全国复合生态与循环经济学术讨论会论文集,2005
[102]万一,黄永生,王晖.南水北调东线工程调蓄湖泊湿地环境影响评价及保护措施.环境科学研究,2003,16(4)：5-11
[103]王学雷,刘兴士,吴宜进.洪湖水环境特征与湖泊湿地净化能力研究.武汉大学学报,2003,49(2)：217-220
[104]张芸,李文体.河北省湖泊型湿地水环境状况及保护建议.南水北调与水利科技,2007,5(1)：78-81
[105]刘玉虎,陈后银,鲁坚.枞阳县湖泊湿地生态环境现状及保护对策.现代农业科技(上半月刊),2005(10)：68-70
[106]王晓辉,张之源,蒋宗豪,贾良清,潘成荣.小型湖泊湿地自然保护区功能区划探讨合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,27(7)
[107]陈正言,宫明达.大庆油田湖泊湿地景观生态设计探讨.油气田环境保护,2006,16(3)：55-57
[108]韩芳,李兴华.内蒙古达里诺尔湖泊湿地动态的遥感监测.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(1)：74-78
[109]方芳.长江中游湖泊湿地复合生态农业建设的实践与思考.环境科学与技术,2000(S1)
[110]罗新正,刘宁豫.大安古河道区湖泊湿地的生态环境与农业可持续发展.地域研究与开发,1997,16(2)：22-24
[111]辛良杰.南四湖湖泊湿地生态环境需水量初步研究.济南：山东师范大学,2005
[112]段水强.德令哈盆地湖泊湿地变化与生态需水初步研究.中国农村水利水电,2005(9)：25-26
[113]王保忠.南洞庭湖湿地生态旅游资源的数字化和开发研究.长沙：中南林学院,2002
[114]王永洁,李伟晔,邓伟.扎龙湿地旅游资源的开发和保护.高师理科学刊,2003,23(2)：63-65
[115]王健,丁武军,刘运珍.鄱阳湖西部湿地保护与生态旅游互动开发研究.华东交通大学学报,2004(3)：25-28
[116]李景奇.我国湖泊风景资源研究.中国园林,1997,13(1)：50-52
[117]周映梅.青海湖旅游景观价值初评.旅游学刊,1992,7(5)：8-10
[118]朱仰石.洪泽湖风景资源评价与开发.中国园林,1993,9(4)：41-47
[119]钟永德,张合平,何平.南洞庭湖生态旅游开发与利用研究.中南林学院学报,1999,19(4)：58-64
[120]GB/T18972-2003,《旅游资源分类、调查与评价》.北京：中国标准出版社,2003：1
[121]卢云亭.中国最美六大沼泽湿地.中国国家地理,2005(10)
[122]鸡西市兴凯湖自然保护区管理委员会.兴凯湖自然保护区总体发展规划.鸡西：鸡西市兴凯湖自然保护区管理委员会,2008.9
[123]鸡西市旅游局.黑龙江省鸡西市兴凯湖精品旅游区规划.鸡西：鸡西市旅游局,2009.10
[124]于文涛.兴凯湖春季鸟类迁徙监测分析报告.黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2006(2)
[125]冯尚柱.兴凯湖国家级自然保护区管理对策的探讨.哈尔滨：东北林业大学,2004
[126]李健,俞益武.基于国标在浙江旅游资源普查的思考.旅游学刊,2006,21(2)：7-8
[127]王凤昆,刘化金,冯尚柱.2005年兴凯湖中俄湿地鹤类调查.野生动物,2006,27(6)：15-16
[128]Greig-smith P. Quantitative Plant Ecology. (3rd ed.). Berkeley:Univ. Of California Press,1983
[129]Risser P. G. Landscape ecology:directions and approaches. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey. Special Publication,2009
[130]Gardner R. H. and R. V. O'neill. Pattern, process, and predictability: The use of neutral models for landscape analysis. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology,2007,22(1)15-29
[131]Krummel J, Gardner R, Sugihara G, et al. Landsacape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos,1987,48(3):321-324
[132]Turner n G, Wear D N, Flamm R O. Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Application,1996,6(4):1150-1172
[133]Wickham J D, O'neill R V, Jones K B. Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(2):171-179
[134]Alados C L, Pueyo Y, Barrantes O, et al. Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landscape Ecology,2004,19(5):543-559
[135]周维才.兴凯湖湿地资源遥感监测技术研究.北京：中国林业科学研究院,2007：2,4,8,11-16,25,57-58
[136]殷力,张树清.中国湿地信息系统的建立.东北测绘,2001,24(3)：7-10
[137]汪爱华,张树清,张柏.遥感和地理信息系统技术在湿地研究中的应用.遥感技术与应用,2001,16(3)：200-204
[138]汪爱华,张树清,何艳芬.RS和GIS支持下的三江平原沼泽湿地动态变化研究.地理科学,2002,22(5)：636-640
[139]衣伟宏,杨柳,张正祥.基于ETM+影像的扎龙湿地遥感分类研究.湿地科学,2004,2(3)：208-212
[140]王庆光.多光谱遥感数据最佳波段选择研究.广东水利电力职业技术学院学报,2007,5(2)：63-65
[141]陈文波,肖笃宁,郑蕉,郭福良,姜英鹏.内蒙古毕拉河林区近十年森林景观变化及驱动力浅析.应用生态学报,2004,15(5)：741-747
[142]傅国斌,李克让.全球变暖与湿地生态系统的研究进展.地理研究,2001,20(1)：120-128
[143]程实,张怀清,陈永富.兴凯湖湿地资源综合评价研究.林业科学研究,2008,21(增刊)：85-90
[144]黑龙江省统计局.黑统发(2007)57号《鸡西市旅游数据》(黑SWH342).哈尔滨：黑龙江省统计局,2008,3
[145]鸡西市旅游局.2008年统计年报.鸡西：鸡西市旅游局,2009,3
[146]国家质检总局.《旅游区(点)质量等级的划分与评定》.北京：国家质检总局,2003：2