罗尔斯政治哲学中的理性（reasonableness）观念研究
|
摘要
罗尔斯一生追寻的问题即“正义的民主社会如何可能”。具体而言,就是在民主社会多元论事实的背景中,探索秩序良好的正义民主社会之现实可能性问题。在传统社会中,社会统一的基础是一种真理性一致同意,但是民主社会多元论的事实使社会统一的真理性基础不再适用。理性观念是罗尔斯取代真理概念,并用来衡量政治领域中有关宪法根本和基本正义问题的标准。罗尔斯的理性观念要具体结合实践理性以及相关社会和人的基本理念来理解,即隐含于民主社会公共政治文化中的两个基本理念:公平合作系统的社会理念和自由且平等的公民理念。这种理性观念的作用范围仅限于政治领域,是政治证成的标准,并且通过公民的政治德性表现出来。同时,这种理性观念是实质性观念,它的规范性内容由作为公平合作系统的社会理念以及自由且平等的公民理念赋予,突出地表现为自由平等公民的两种意愿和倾向:一是提出并遵守公平的社会合作条件之意愿,二是认识到判断的负担并接受其后果之意愿。罗尔斯的理性观念是个实践范畴,针对的是民主社会中的多元论事实。运用这种理性观念能够在宽容最大范围冲突的前提下,在各种理性的完备性学说之间获得一种政治正义观念的重叠共识,继而使得由这种政治正义观念规导的民主社会达到基于正当理由的稳定性。在理性观念的帮助下,罗尔斯完成了秩序良好的正义民主社会之现实可能性的论证。如果结合罗尔斯对政治哲学主旨的定位来看,这种理性观念不仅有助于实现政治哲学在民主社会公共文化中的公共作用和教育作用,而且也有助于有效发挥政治哲学在公共政治文化中的实践作用、定向作用和调和作用。因此,以此理性观念为切入点,能够更加准确地理解和把握罗尔斯政治哲学观的精髓,从而进一步推进对罗尔斯政治哲学观的整体性理解。
That how it is possible for there to exist over time a just democratic society is the problem Rawls tried to work out all his life. In some specific terms, he tried to explore the practical possibility of a just well-ordered society in the face of reasonable pluralism in democratic society. Social unity is based on an agreement of truth in traditional society, but this kind of unity is unavailable owing to the fact of pluralism in a democratic society. Rawlsian reasonableness is an alternative as the criterion for deciding issues concerning constitutional essentials and questions of basic justice. This kind of reasonableness needs to be understood by the practical reason in union with conceptions of society as a fair system of cooperation and persons as free and equal citizens. Rawlsian reasonableness works as a criterion of political justification in the domain of political. It also works through the political virtues. Besides, Rawlsian reasonableness is a substantial conception. Its normative content is derived from the fundamental idea of society as a fair system of cooperation and the idea of persons as free and equal citizens. Accordingly, it presents two dispositions of free and equal citizens. The first basic aspect of the reasonable is the willingness to promote fair terms of cooperation and to abide by them provided others do. The second basic aspect of the reasonable is the willingness to recognize the burdens of judgment and to accept the consequences. Rawlsian reasonableness is a conception pointing to practice, namely the fact of pluralism in a democratic society. For using this kind of reasonableness, a political conception of justice can secure an overlapping consensus among reasonable comprehensive doctrines. Subsequently, the democratic society regulated by this political conception of justice secure a kind of stability for right reasons. In virtue of Rawlsian reasonableness, Rawls completed his argument for the practical possibility of a just well-ordered society. Considering the aim of Rawls' political philosophy, this kind of reasonableness is helpful to realize political philosophy's public role and educational role as part of the public culture in a democratic society. It is also helpful for political philosophy to promote the realization of its practical role, orientation role and reconciliation role as part of the public political culture in a democratic society. Finally, we can secure the essentials of Rawls' political philosophy correctively to advance the comprehensive understanding of Rawls' political philosophy further.
That how it is possible for there to exist over time a just democratic society is the problem Rawls tried to work out all his life. In some specific terms, he tried to explore the practical possibility of a just well-ordered society in the face of reasonable pluralism in democratic society. Social unity is based on an agreement of truth in traditional society, but this kind of unity is unavailable owing to the fact of pluralism in a democratic society. Rawlsian reasonableness is an alternative as the criterion for deciding issues concerning constitutional essentials and questions of basic justice. This kind of reasonableness needs to be understood by the practical reason in union with conceptions of society as a fair system of cooperation and persons as free and equal citizens. Rawlsian reasonableness works as a criterion of political justification in the domain of political. It also works through the political virtues. Besides, Rawlsian reasonableness is a substantial conception. Its normative content is derived from the fundamental idea of society as a fair system of cooperation and the idea of persons as free and equal citizens. Accordingly, it presents two dispositions of free and equal citizens. The first basic aspect of the reasonable is the willingness to promote fair terms of cooperation and to abide by them provided others do. The second basic aspect of the reasonable is the willingness to recognize the burdens of judgment and to accept the consequences. Rawlsian reasonableness is a conception pointing to practice, namely the fact of pluralism in a democratic society. For using this kind of reasonableness, a political conception of justice can secure an overlapping consensus among reasonable comprehensive doctrines. Subsequently, the democratic society regulated by this political conception of justice secure a kind of stability for right reasons. In virtue of Rawlsian reasonableness, Rawls completed his argument for the practical possibility of a just well-ordered society. Considering the aim of Rawls' political philosophy, this kind of reasonableness is helpful to realize political philosophy's public role and educational role as part of the public culture in a democratic society. It is also helpful for political philosophy to promote the realization of its practical role, orientation role and reconciliation role as part of the public political culture in a democratic society. Finally, we can secure the essentials of Rawls' political philosophy correctively to advance the comprehensive understanding of Rawls' political philosophy further.
引文
1 Richard Arneson,"Introduction to A Symposium on Rawlsian Theory of Justice:Recent Development",Ethics 99,pp.695-710.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,上海:译林出版社,2000年,第3-5页。
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2007.此书中文译本尚未出版。
1 姚大志:《现代之后--二十世纪晚期西方哲学》,北京:东方出版社,2000年,第21页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
1 转引自约翰·塞尔:《心灵、语言和社会》,译文出版社2001年版,第21页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社1988年版,第1页。
3 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第2页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
2 Michael Sandel,liberalism and the limits of justice,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness,The Philosophical Review,Vol.67,No.2,pp.164-194;John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1971,p.120.
4 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.15-16.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.53,n.7.
6 许多学者认为罗尔斯在《政治自由主义》中转向纯粹实践问题的讨论,少了哲学性。Jean Hampton,"Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?",Ethics 99:pp.791-814.
1 Jurgen Habermas,"Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",The Journal of Philosophy,Vol.92,No.3,pp.109-131.
2 Jeremy Waldron,"Disagreements about justice",Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75,1994,pp.372-387;
Samuel Scheffler,"The Appeal of Political Liberalism",Ethics 105,1994,pp.4-22.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第5页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第25页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第1-2页。
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.101.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.3.
2 John Rawls,The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.7,No.1,p.1.
3 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.1.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.lⅹⅱ,n.40.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.lⅹⅱ.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第638页。
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48;
Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
2 Juergen Habermas,"Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Journal of Philosophy 92,1995,pp.109-131.
3 Gerald Gauss,"Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political:How the Weakness of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by Justificatory Liberalism",Inquiry 42,1999,pp.259-284.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
1 龚群:《道德乌托邦的重建--哈贝马斯交往伦理思想研究》,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第109页。
2 张汝伦:《历史与实践》,上海:上海人们山版社,1995年,第270页。
3 汪子嵩:《希腊哲学史》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1987年,第455页。
1 葛力:《18世纪法国哲学》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,1991年,第781页。
1 哈贝马斯:《交往行动理论》第1卷,烘佩郁、蔺青译,重庆:重庆出版社,1994年,第15页。
2 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.39.
1 章国锋:《关于一个公正世界的“乌托邦”构想》,济南:山东人民出版社,2001年,第13页。
2 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Btackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.39.
3 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.65.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.49.
2 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.31.
4 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.53.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.62.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.83.
4 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.31.
5 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,pp.6-7.
1 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.83.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.107.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
1 亚里士多德:《尼各马克伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,1113a。
1 北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译,《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆,1999年,第316页。
2 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第17页。
3 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第30页。
4 北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译,《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆, 1999年,第318页。
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.253.
1 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第26页。
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000,pp.164-165.
3 John Rawls,The Law of Peoples,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1999,p.87;Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1999,p.613.
4 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000,p.164.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,pp.555-556.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.556.
2 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,pp.557-558.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
2 Samuel Freeman,Rawls,London;New York:Routledge,2007,p.345.
3.John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,p.177.
1 John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,pp.178-179.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第18页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第19页。
1 Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.31.
2 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.528.
3 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.528.
1 要求正义原则要具有一般性、普遍性、次序性、终极性等,详细分析可见:约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第131-135页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第132页。
1 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.529.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.50.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.51.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.18;pp.120-121;pp.446-447;p.516;p.582.
3 Robert Paul Wolff,Understanding Rawls,Gloucester,MA:Peter Smith,1990.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.352;p.580.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.31.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.95.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.300;cf.pp.4-5.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.582.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.26;cf.John Pawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.18;p.21.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.86;cf.John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.72-73.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.73.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.72.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.201;p.362.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.141.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.9.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.19.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.3.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.119,n.1.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.72-81.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.79.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.90.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.381.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.580.
2 Patrick Neal,"Does He Mean What He Says?(Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn",Polity 27.1,1994,p.81.
1 Charles Larmore,"Political liberalism",Political Theory 18.3,1990,p.354.
2 Patrick Neal,"Does He Mean What He Says?(Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn",Polity 27.1,1994,p.89.
1 Joseph Raz,"Facing Diversity:The Case of Epistemic Abstinence",Philosophy and Public Affairs 19.1,1990,pp.9-10.
2 Joseph Raz,"Facing Diversity:The Case of Epistemic Abstinence",Philosophy and Public Affairs 19.1,1990,p.15.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹ;cf.p.94.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.214.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.329.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.140-141;cf.pp.147-148.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.111;cf.p.126,n.34.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.127.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.64.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.19.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.13.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.134.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.176.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.192.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.221;cf.p.447.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
4 Joshua Cohen,"Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus",The Idea of Democracy,eds.David Copp,Jean Hampton,and John Roemer,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993,p.281.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.50.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.134.
2 John Rawls,PoliticaILiberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅵ.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.170.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.149.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.147.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.147.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 Jon Mandle,"The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness",Canadian Journal of Political Science 29,1999,p.98.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.143.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.159.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.159-164.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.90.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.137.
3 Macedo,"Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism:The Case of God vs.John Rawls",Ethics 1995(105.3),pp.474-475.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.ⅹⅵ-ⅹⅶ
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.81-86;
A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.462-479.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.252.
1 Macedo,"Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism:The Case of God v.John Rawls",Ethics 1995(105.3),p.470.
2 Jeremy Waldron,"Justice Revisited",Times Literary Supplement 1993(5).
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.220.
2 Harry Brighouse,"Is There Any Such Thing as Political Liberalism",Pacific Philosophy Quarterly,1994(75),p.331,n.21.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.149.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.89-90.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.579.
1 John RaMs,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.394;pp.426-427.
2 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.28.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.386.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.387.
3 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.144.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,pp.144-145.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.141,n.16.
1 John RaMs,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.437.
2 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.195.
3 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.62.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.54-58.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.83.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.394-395.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.55.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.17.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
1 Juergen Habermas,The Inclusion of the Other,Polity Press,1998,p.88.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.48-49,n.1.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.505-506.
3 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.259.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.29-34.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.32.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.478.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.134.
1 John Rawls,PoliticalLiberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅵ.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅵ.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.10.
4 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.219.
2 John RaMs,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.614.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.58.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
2 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.191.
1 Miriam Galston,"Rawlsian Dualism and the Autonomy of Political Thought",Columbia Law Review 1994(6),pp.1847-1848.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60,n.14.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.191.
4 Erin Kelly and Lionel McPherson,"On Tolerating the Unreasonable",The Journal of Political Philosophy 2001(1),pp.38-55.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.61.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.244,n.32.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60,n.14.
4 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.86,n.33.
5 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.613.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.94;
The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.87.
7 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.76.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.581-583.
2 John Pawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.303.
3 Joshua Cohen,"Pluralism and Proceduralism",Chicago-Kent Law Review,1994(69),pp.589-618.
4 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.310-323.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.324-331.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.581.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.243.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.227.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.297f..
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.xilv.
3 T.M.Scanlon,What We Owe To Each Other,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1998,p.192.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.241.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.220.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.478-479.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.162.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.478-479.
1 John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,1987(1),p.1.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.37.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.38.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.38,n.41.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.58.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.4.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.44.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.xlvii.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.11-12.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.13-14.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.14.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.6;p.156.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.93.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.103.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.94.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.129.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.98.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.15.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.40.
1 有关罗尔斯阐述的细节,可见:John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.169-171.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.168.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.168.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.147-148.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.141.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.142.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.143.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅹⅸ,n.5.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.15.
1 Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.164.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.394;pp.426-427.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.4.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.213.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.133.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.227.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.214-215.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.220-222.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.214-215.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.135.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.231-236.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.223-224.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.224.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.144.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.p.137.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.137-138.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.135-136.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999, pp.145-146.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.145.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.578.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.579.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.490-496.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.141.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.15-16.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.578.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.135n..
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.427.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429n..
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429n..
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.428.
4 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.353.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.393.
1 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.90.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.584.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
1 John Rawls,"The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good",Philosophy & Public Affairs,Fall 1988,p.275.
2 James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995,p.253.
3 James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995,p.254.
1 Huemer,"Rawls' Problem of Stability",Social Theory and Practice 22(3),1996,p.382.
1 Patrick Neal,"Against Liberal Public Reason",paper presented at the Annual General Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.148.
1 John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,1987(1),p.1.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.1.罗尔斯在“Reply to Habermas”一文中也有类似的说明,参见:John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.427.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.4.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.6.
3 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,pp.3-9.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,pp.10-11;另有更详尽的论述,参见John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,pp.1-5.
1 Eric Alterman,"Rawls and Us",The Nation Dec.23,2002.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.35.
2 王南湜:“从‘理想国'到‘法治国'--现实性的马克思主义政治哲学何以可能”,《天津社会科学版》,2006年第5期。
[1]约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年。
[2]约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,南京:译林出版社,2000年。
[3]约翰·罗尔斯:《万民法.公共理性观念新论》,张晓辉等译,长春:吉林人民出版社,2001年。
[4]约翰·罗尔斯:《道德哲学史讲义》,张国清译,上海:上海三联出版社,2003年。
[5]约翰·罗尔斯:《作为公平的正义:正义新论》,姚大志译,上海:上海三联书店,2002年。
[6]约翰·罗尔斯等:《政治自由主义:批评与辩护》,万俊人等译,广州:广东人民出版社,2003年。
[7]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯选集》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1995年。
[8]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯全集》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1995年。
[9]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯全集》第三卷,北京:人民出版社,2002年。
[10]赵敦华:《劳斯的<正义论>解说》,香港:香港三联书店,1989年。
[11]石元康:《罗尔斯》,南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2004年。
[12]乔德兰·库卡塔斯、菲利普·佩迪特:《罗尔斯》,姚建宗、高申春译,黑龙江人民出版社,1999年。
[13]川本隆史:《罗尔斯--正义原理》,詹献斌译,石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001年。
[14]何怀宏:《契约伦理与社会正义》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993年。
[15]何怀宏:《公平的正义:解读罗尔斯<正义论>》,济南:山东人民出版社,2002年。
[16]龚群:《罗尔斯政治哲学》,北京:商务印书馆,2006年。
[17]万俊人:《罗尔斯读本》,北京:中央编译出版社,2006年。
[18]李小科,李蜀人:《正义女神的新传人--约翰·罗尔斯》,保定:河北大学出版社,2005年。
[19]列奥·斯特劳斯、约瑟夫克罗波希编:《政治哲学史》,李天然等译,石家庄:河北人民出版社,1993年。
[20]威尔·金里卡:《当代政治哲学》,刘莘译,上海:上海三联书店,2003年。
[21]圭·多德·拉吉罗:《欧洲自由主义史》,杨军译,长春:吉林人民出版社,2001年。
[22]亚当·斯威夫特:《政治哲学导论》,萧韶译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2006年。
[23]戴维·米勒:《社会正义原则》,应奇译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2001年。
[24]布莱恩·巴里:《正义诸理论》,孙晓春、曹海军译,吉林人民出版社,2004年。
[25]迈克尔·H.莱斯诺夫:《二十世纪的政治哲学家》,冯克利译,北京:商务印书馆,2001年。
[26]姚大志:《现代之后--二十世纪晚期西方哲学》,北京:东方出版社,2000年。
[27]姚大志:《何谓正义:当代西方政治哲学研究》,北京:人民出版社,2007年。
[28]徐向东:《自由主义、社会契约与政治辩护》,北京:北京大学出版社,2005年。
[29]徐向东:《道德哲学与实践理性》,北京:商务印书馆,2006年。
[30]顾肃:《自由主义基本理念》,北京:中央编译出版社,2003年。
[31]应奇:《从自由主义到后自由主义》,北京:北京三联书店,2003年。
[32]张桂林:《西方政治哲学--从古希腊到当代》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999年。
[33]慈继伟:《正义的两面》,上海:三联书店,2001年。
[34]柏拉图:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1986年。
[35]亚里士多德:《政治学》,颜一译,北京:中国人民出版社,2003年。
[36]亚里士多德:《尼各马克伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[37]卢梭:《社会契约论》,何兆武译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[38]卢梭:《论人类不平等的起源》,李常山译,北京:商务印书馆,1982年。
[39]休谟:《人性论》下册,关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,2004年。
[40]康德:《法的形而上学原理》,北京:商务印书馆,1991年。
[41]康德:《历史理性批判文集》,北京:商务印书馆,1990年。
[42]康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[43]康德:《道德形而上学基础》,孙少伟译,北京:九州出版社,2007年。
[44]黑格尔:《法哲学原理》,范扬、张企泰译,北京:商务印书馆,1962年。
[45]约翰·密尔:《论自由》,郭志嵩译,北京:商务印书馆,2007年。
[46]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《交往行动理论》,洪佩郁、蔺青译,重庆:重庆出版社,1994年。
[47]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《包容他者》,曹卫东译,上海:上海人民出版社,2002年。
[48]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《后形而上学思想》,曹卫东译,南京:译林出版社,2001年。
[49]北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译:《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆,1999年。
[50]胡真圣:《两种正义观:马克思、罗尔斯正义思想比论》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004年。
[51]郭夏娟:《为正义而辩:女性主义与罗尔斯》,北京:人民出版社,2004年。
[52]刘永红:《政治自由主义发展的逻辑》,武汉:湖北人民出版社,2007年。
[53]曹瑞涛:《多元时代的“正义方舟”--罗尔斯后期政治哲学思想研究》,杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008年。
[1]陈晏清、王新生:“政治哲学的当代复兴及其意义”,《哲学研究》,2005年第6期。
[2]陈晏清、赵前苗:“后形而上学转向与政治思维方式的变更”,《天津社会科学》,2006年第1期。
[3]陈晏清:“政治哲学的时代使命”,《求实学刊》,2006年第3期。
[4]王南湜:“从‘理想国'到‘法治国'--现实性的马克思主义政治哲学何以可能”,《天津社会科学版》,2006年第5期。
[5]李淑梅:“罗尔斯的自由观:自由与平等结合”,《求是学刊》,2005年第3期。
李淑梅“当代西方政治哲学的理性建构方式及其启示”,《求是学刊》,2006年第3期。
[6]阎孟伟:“欧洲近代政治哲学的兴起与分化”,《求实学刊》,2006年第3期。
[7]顾肃:“正义与自由的不懈追求”,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
顾肃“论社会公正与自由的关系”,《学海》,2004年第2期。
顾肃“重叠共识何以可能?--后期罗尔斯的自由主义理念”,《南京大学学报》,1999年第3期。
顾肃“当代自由主义对社群主义理论挑战的回应”,《哲学动态》,2002年第11期。
[8]盛庆琜:“对罗尔斯理论的若干批评”,《中国社会科学》,2000年第5期。
[9]盛晓明:“从多元到一体--由哈贝马斯与罗尔斯的分歧谈起”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
[10]应奇:“罗尔斯对古典自由主义的超越--从社会基本结构理念的角度看”,《南京社会科学》,2003年第12期。
应奇“两种政治观的对话--关于哈贝马斯与罗尔斯的争论”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
应奇“罗尔斯与近代西方政治文化传统”,《浙江社会科学》,1999年第6期。
应奇“后《正义论》时期罗尔斯思想的发展”,《浙江大学学报》,1998年第3期。
[11]童世骏:“国际政治中的三种普遍主义--伊拉克战争以后对罗尔斯和哈贝马斯的国际政治理论的比较”,《华东师范大学学报》,2003年第6期。
[12]万俊人:“罗尔斯问题”,《求是学刊》,2007年第1期。
万俊人“罗尔斯的政治哲学遗产(上)”,《马克思主义与现实》,2006年第1期。
万俊人“从政治正义到社会和谐--以罗尔斯为中心的当代政治哲学反思”,《哲学动态》,2005年第6期。
万俊人“正义的和平如何可能?--康德‘永久和评论'与罗尔斯‘万民法'的批判性解读”,《江苏社会科学》,2004年第5期。
万俊人“政治自由主义的现代建构--罗尔斯《政治自由主义》读解”,《政治自由主义》,第558-632页。
[13]姚大志:“罗尔斯与功利主义”,《社会科学战线》,2008年第7期。
姚大志“罗尔斯正义理论的基本理念”,《社会科学研究》,2008年第4期。
姚大志“罗尔斯的契约主义与政治哲学的证明”,《江苏社会科学》,2004年第5期。
姚大志“罗尔斯:从自由到平等”,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
姚大志“罗尔斯正义论的道德基础”,《江海学刊》,2002年第2期。
姚大志“何谓正义:罗尔斯与哈贝马斯”,《浙江学刊》,2001年第4期。
姚大志“打开‘无知之幕'--正义原则与社会稳定性”,《开放时代》,2001年第3期。
姚大志“《正义论》之后的罗尔斯”,《哲学动态》,2000年第10期。
姚大志“自由与平等的张力--罗尔斯的正义理论述评”,《长春市委党校学报》,1999 年第2期。
[14]程广云:“从理想原则到现实关怀--罗尔斯理性主义解析”,《哲学动态》,2005年第5期。
[15]包利民:“重建公共伦理规范基础的不同途径--论罗尔斯与哈贝马斯之争”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
包利民“社会契约:现实与理想”,《哲学研究》,2001年第8期。
包利民“公共理性、信仰与理念--从罗尔斯的宗教观谈起”,《哲学研究》,2003年第5期。
[16]李业兴:“罗尔斯政治哲学中‘理性'的界定与作用”,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》,2006年第5期。
[17]刘莘:“对罗尔斯宣言的一种解读”,《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2007年第2期。
[18]赵祥禄:“罗尔斯的建构主义解读”,《道德与文明》,2006年第3期。
[19]贾中海:“哈贝马斯对罗尔斯事实与价值关系二元论的批判”,《学习与探索》,2005年第3期。
贾中海“哈耶克进化论理性主义对罗尔斯理性建构主义的批判”,《学习与探索》,2006年第4期。
贾中海“析罗尔斯正义论的精神价值”,《学术交流》,1999年第6期。
贾中海“正当与善--桑德尔对罗尔斯‘正当优先于善'的批判”,《北方论丛》,2006年第2期。
[20]杨伟清:“罗尔斯正义理论中的‘稳定性问题'”,《学术月刊》,2007年4月。
[21]许纪霖:“公共正义的基础-对罗尔斯‘原初状态'和‘重叠共识'理念的讨论”,《知识分子论丛第2辑》,南京:江苏人民出版社,2003年。
[22]李小科:“当前国内外罗尔斯研究介绍”,《石油大学学报(社会科学版)》,2003年第4期。
李小科“《政治自由主义》以后的罗尔斯”,《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2002年第2期。
李小科“罗尔斯学术生平”,《世界哲学》,2003年第2期。
李小科“‘现实的乌托邦'释义”,《开放时代》,2003年第4期。
李小科“Statesman:罗尔斯心目中的理想‘政治家'--罗尔斯对‘政治家'和‘政客'的区分及其溯源”,《西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2003年第2期。
[23]B.G.布鲁萨克:“政治学、宗教和公善”,何小玲、李小科译,《世界哲学》,2003年第2期。
[24]理查德.F.冯德勒:“罗尔斯与他的正义理论”,李小科译,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
[25]约翰·罗尔斯:“广岛罹难50年祭”,李小科译,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
[26]何怀宏:“罗尔斯的思想遗产”,《书城》,2003年第1期。
[27]徐友渔:“在自由与公正之间--当代西方政治哲学简介”,《教师之友》,2004年第 7期。
李小科“关于自由和平等的当代思考”,《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》,2003年第3期。
李小科“当代西方政治哲学中的若干新问题和新动向(上)”,《国外社会科学》,2002年第6期。
李小科“当代西方政治哲学中的若干新问题和新动向(下)”,《国外社会科学》,2003年第1期。
李小科“我是如何研究罗尔斯的?”《世界哲学》,2008年第4期。
[28]曹海军:“国际正义与全球治理的哲学思考--罗尔斯‘万民法'思想评述”,《云南行政学院学报》,2007年第5期。
[29]刘德定:“罗尔斯《正义论》与构建和谐社会的路径分析”,《黑龙江社会科学》,2007年第1期。
[30]王秀华、程瑞山:“‘原初状态'与‘反思平衡':罗尔斯道德哲学方法论”,《内蒙古社会科学》,2004年第6期。
[31]王培通、杨晓东:“刍议罗尔斯契约论方法的抽象性”,《社会科学研究》,2006年第4期。
[32]孙显蔚:“从古典自由主义到新自由主义--洛克和罗尔斯自由观念评析”,《教学与研究》,1999年第10期。
[33]宇文宏、刘珂:“从原初状态到正义原则--评析罗尔斯的契约论证明”,《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2004年第2期。
[34]孙君恒:“分配正义的两种当代模式--罗尔斯的公平论与诺齐克的权利论”,《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2003年第5期。
[35]刘永红:“论罗尔斯对功利主义的批判”,《北京行政学院学报》,2005年第3期。
[36]黄正华:“自由优先于功利?--从罗尔斯对功利主义的批评来看”,《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2004年第4期。
[37]薛长绪:“国内学者对罗尔斯《正义论》的研究综述”,《石油大学学报(社会科学版)》,2002年第2期。
[38]封海鹏、封传兵:“十七大报告中公平正义问题解读--从罗尔斯两条正义原则出发探究社会公正”,《广西财经学院学报》,2008年第4期。
[39]王俊骏:“罗尔斯的正义理论对构建和谐社会的启示”,《中共济南市委党校学报》,2008年第3期。
[40]张卫明:“理性妥协与社会和谐--论罗尔斯理性妥协思想的启示意义”,《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》,2008年第4期。
[41]陈家刚:“协商民主研究在东西方的兴起与发展”,《毛泽东邓小平理论研究》,2008年第7期。
[42]王秋梅:“罗尔斯与德沃金的平等思想比较”,《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2008年第4期。
[43]虞新胜:“论罗尔斯政治哲学中的‘正当优先性'”,《天津社会科学》,2007年第6 期。
虞新胜“罗尔斯社会基本结构中的平等自由观”,《学术论坛》,2007年第11期。
[44]王立:“平等的范式”,《社会科学研究》,2008年第4期。
[45]王冠生:“论罗尔斯的公共理性理念”,《台湾哲学学会2008年学术研讨会议》,2008年。
[46]谢世民:“后启蒙的哲学计画:罗尔斯的政治自由主义”,《二十一世纪》第75期。
[47]任剑涛:“思想的张力--当代西方自由主义与社群主义之争在中国”,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》,2006年第4期。
[1]虞新胜:《论罗尔斯的“正当优先于善”》,南开大学马克思主义哲学专业,2008年。
[2]许祥云:《从思辨正义到实践正义》,吉林大学马克思主义哲学专业,2008年。
[3]钟英法:《罗尔斯公共理性思想研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2007年。
[4]徐清飞:《罗尔斯正义理论的发展》,吉林大学法学理论专业,2008年。
[5]贾中海:《社会价值的分配正义:罗尔斯自由主义政治哲学批判》,吉林大学马克思主义哲学专业,2003年。
[6]尹松波:《理性与正义--罗尔斯<正义论>研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2004年。
[7]李志江:《罗尔斯分配正义理论研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2004年。
[8]曹海军:《文本与语境:罗尔斯正义理论研究》,吉林大学政治学理论专业,2006年。
[9]王峰:《契约式谋划:关于罗尔斯万民法的分析》,吉林大学法学理论专业,2007年。
[1]Catherine Audard,John Rawls,Montreal:McGill-Queen's University Press,2007.
[2]Paul Graham,Rawls,Oxford:Oneworld,2007.
[3]Chandran Kukathas eds.,John Rawls:Critical Assessment of Leading Political Philosophers,London;New York:Routledge,2003.
[4]Davion,Virginia and Clark Wolf,eds.,The Idea of a Political Liberalism:Essays on Rawls,Lanham,MD:Rowman and Littlefield,1999.
[5]Gerald Gauss,Justificatory Liberalism,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996.
[6]Henry Richardson and Paul Weithman eds.,The Philosophy of Rawls:A Collection of Essays,in 5 volumes,New York:Garland,1999.
[7]James Bohman and William Rehg ed.,Deliberative Democracy:Essays on Reason and Politics,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1997.
[8]James Bohman,Public Deliberation:Pluralism,Complexity,and Democracy,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2000.
[9]John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971.
[10]John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
[11]John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.
[12]John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.
[13]John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000.
[14]John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001.
[15]John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2007.
[16]Jon Mandle,What's left of liberalism:An Interpretation and Defense of Justice as Fairness,Lanham,MD:Lexington Books,2000.
[17]Juergen Habermas,The Inclusion of the Other,Polity Press,1998.
[18]Juergen Habermas,The Theory of Communication Action,trans,by Thomas McCarthy,Boston:Beacon Press,1984.
[19]Michael Sandel,Liberalism and the Limits of Justice,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982;second edition,1998.
[20]Norman Daniels,Justice and Justification,Cambridge:UK:Cambridge University Press,1996.
[21]Roberto Alejandro,The Limits of Rawlsian Justice,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins Press,1998.
[22]Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[23]Samuel Freeman,Justice and the Social Contract,New York:Oxford University Press,2007.
[24]Samuel Freeman,Rawls,London;New York:Routledge,2007.
[25]Shaun P.Young,Beyond Rawls:An Analysis of the Concept of Political Liberalism,Lanham,MD:University Press of America,2002.
[26]Thomas W.Pogge,Realizing Rawls,Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1989.
[27]Thomas W.Pogge,John Rawls,His life and Theory of Justice,Michelle Kosch,trans.,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2006.
[28]Ville Paivansalo,Balancing Reasonable Justice:John Rawls and Crucial Beyond,Aldershot,Hampshire,England;Burlington,VT:Ashgate,2007.
[29]Stephen Mulhall,Adam Swift,Liberalism & Communitarians,Blackwell Publishing,1996.
[30]Rober Nozick,Anarchy,State and Utopia,New York:Basic Books,1974.
[31]Robert Paul Wolff,Understanding Rawls,Gloucester,MA:Peter Smith 1990;originally published by Princeton University Press,1977.
[32]B.N.Ray eds,John Rawls and the Agenda of Social Justice,Anamika Publishers,2000.
[33]Kukathas and Philip Pettit,Rawls:A Theory of Justice and its Critics,Polity,1999.
[34]Norman Daniels eds.,Reading Rawls,Basic Books,1975.
[35]J.H.Wellbank,Denis Snook,David T.Mason ed.,John Rawls and His Critics:An Annotated Bibliography,New York:Garland,1982.
[1]Andre Van de Putte,"Rawls' Political Liberalism:Foundations and Principles",Ethical Perspectives 2,1995:107-129.
[2]Alessandro Ferrara,"Public Reason and the Normativity of the Reasonable",Philosophy &Social Criticism 30,2004:579-596.
[3]Alexander Kaufman,"Rawls's Practical Conception of Justice:Opinion,Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism",Journal of moral philosophy 3.1,2006:23-43.
[4]Anthony Simon Laden,"The House That Jack Built:Thirty Years of Reading Rawls",Ethics 113,2003:367-390.
[5]Brian Barry,"John Rawls and the Search for Stability",Ethics 105,1995:874-915.
[6]Brace Ackerman,"Political Liberalisms",The Journal of Philosophy 71(7),1994:364-386.
[7]Charles Larmore,"The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism",The Journal of Philosophy 12,2002:599-625.
[8]David Estlund,"The Insularity of the Reasonable:Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth",Ethics 108,1998:252-275.
[9]David M.Rasmussen,"Defending Reasonability:the Centrality of Reasonability in the Later Rawls",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:525-540.
[10]Fred D'Agostino,"The Legacies of John Rawls",Journal of Moral Philosophy 1.3,2004:349-365.
[11]Gerald Gauss,"Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political:How the Weakness of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by Justificatory Liberalism",Inquiry 42,1999:259-284.
[12]Griffin,Stephen and Lawrence Solum,"Symposium on John Rawls's Political liberalism ",in Chicago-Kent Law Review 69,1994:549-842.
[13]James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995:253-279.
[14]James W.Boettcher,"What is Reasonableness?",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:597-621.
[15]John Horton,"Rawls,Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification",Contemporary Political Theory 2,2003:5-23.
[16]John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,177-97.
[17]John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980:515-72.
[18]John Rawls,"Justice as Fairness:Political not Metaphysical," Philosophy and Public Affairs 14,1985:223-51.
[19]John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.7,No.1,1987:1-25.
[20]John Rawls,"The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus",New York University Law Review 64,1989:233-255.
[21]John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995:132-180.
[22]John Rawls,"The Idea of Public Reason Revisited",The University of Chicago Law Review 64,1997:765-807.
[23]Jon Mandle,"The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness",Canadian Journal of Political Science 29,1999:75-108.
[24]Jonathan Wolff,"John Rawls:Liberal Democracy Restated",Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol I,No.3,2001:347-361.
[25]Jonathan Harmon,"Introducing John Rawls:A Review of The Cambridge Companion to Rawls",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:643-663.
[26]Joshua Cohen,"The Importance of Philosophy:Reflections on John Rawls",South African Journal of Philosophy 23,2004:113-119.
[27]Joshua Cohen,"Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus," The Idea of Democracy,eds.David Copp,Jean Hampton,and John Roemer,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993:270-91.
[28]Juergen Habermas,"Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Journal of Philosophy 92,1995:109-131.
[29]Kurt Baier,"Justice and the Aims of Political Philosophy",Ethics 99,1989:771-790.
[30]Lloyd,S.A.,"John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Special Double Issue of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75,1994.
[31]Margaret Moore,"On Reasonableness",Journal of Applied Philosophy 13,1996:167-178.
[32]Onora O'Neill,"Political Liberalism and Public Reason:A Critical Notice of John Rawls's Political Liberalism",The Philosophy Review,Vol.106,1997:411-428.
[33]Paul Weithman,"Liberalism and the Political Character of Political Philosophy",in Liberalism and Community Values,ed.,C.F.Delaney,189-211.Lanham,MD:Rowman and Littlefield,1994.
[34]Samuel Freeman,"Political Liberalism and the Possibility of a Just Democratic Constitution",Chicago-Kent Law Review 69,No.3,1994:619-668.
[35]Sebastiano Maffettone,"John Rawls:An Interpretation",Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol.I,No.3,2001:189-216.
[36]Sebastiano Maffettone,"Political Liberalism:Reasonableness and Democratic Practice", Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:541-577.
[37]Shaun P.Young,"Rawlsian Reasonableness:A Problematic Presumption?",Canadian Journal of Political Science 39:1,2006:159-180.
[38]Shaun P.Young,"The(Un)Reasonableness of Rawlsian Rationality",South African Journal of Philosophy 24,2005:308-320.
[39]Shaun P.Young,"Divide and Conquer:Separating the Reasonable from the Unreasonable",Journal of Social Philosophy 32,2001:53-69.
[40]Thomas McCarthy,"Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism:Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue",Ethics 105,October 1994:44-63.
[41]W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953:554-560.
[42]Eric Alterman,"Rawls and Us",The Nation Dec.23,2002.
[43]Martha Nussbaum,"The Enduring Significance of John Rawls",The Chronicle Review,July 20,2001.
[44]"John Rawls:For the Record",an interview with The Harvard Review of Philosophy,vol.1,no.1.1999:38-47.
[45]"In Memoriam:John Rawls(1921-2002)",The Review of Metaphysics 56,2003:711-713.
[46]"John Rawls",Proceedings of the American Philosophy society,vo1.149,No.1,2005:113-117.
[47]Fabienne Peter,"Rawls' Idea of Public Reason and Democratic Legitimacy",Politics and Ethics Review,3(1) 2007:129-143.
[48]Micah Lott,"Restraint of Reasons and Reasons for A Problem for Rawls' Public Reason",Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87,2006:75-95.
[49]Leif Wenar,"Political Liberalism:An Internal Critique",Ethics,vol.106,No.1,1995:32-62.
[50]Vincent J.Samar,"Justice Society:A Review of John Rawls,Political Liberalism",Business Ethics Quarterly,vol.5,iss.3,1995:629-645.
[51]Frank Ⅰ.Michelman,"The Subject of Liberalism",Stanford Law Review,vol.46,No.6,1994:1807-1833.
[52]Richard Arneson,"Introduction to A Symposium on Rawlsian Theory of Justice:Recent Development",Ethics 99,1989:695-710.
[1]John Rawls,Wikipedia,the Free Encyclopedia.
[2]John Rawls,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[3]John Rawls,The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,上海:译林出版社,2000年,第3-5页。
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2007.此书中文译本尚未出版。
1 姚大志:《现代之后--二十世纪晚期西方哲学》,北京:东方出版社,2000年,第21页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
1 转引自约翰·塞尔:《心灵、语言和社会》,译文出版社2001年版,第21页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社1988年版,第1页。
3 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第2页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
2 Michael Sandel,liberalism and the limits of justice,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness,The Philosophical Review,Vol.67,No.2,pp.164-194;John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1971,p.120.
4 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.15-16.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.53,n.7.
6 许多学者认为罗尔斯在《政治自由主义》中转向纯粹实践问题的讨论,少了哲学性。Jean Hampton,"Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?",Ethics 99:pp.791-814.
1 Jurgen Habermas,"Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",The Journal of Philosophy,Vol.92,No.3,pp.109-131.
2 Jeremy Waldron,"Disagreements about justice",Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75,1994,pp.372-387;
Samuel Scheffler,"The Appeal of Political Liberalism",Ethics 105,1994,pp.4-22.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第5页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第25页。
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第1-2页。
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.101.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.3.
2 John Rawls,The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.7,No.1,p.1.
3 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.1.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第3页。
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.lⅹⅱ,n.40.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.lⅹⅱ.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社,2000年,第638页。
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48;
Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
2 Juergen Habermas,"Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Journal of Philosophy 92,1995,pp.109-131.
3 Gerald Gauss,"Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political:How the Weakness of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by Justificatory Liberalism",Inquiry 42,1999,pp.259-284.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
1 龚群:《道德乌托邦的重建--哈贝马斯交往伦理思想研究》,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第109页。
2 张汝伦:《历史与实践》,上海:上海人们山版社,1995年,第270页。
3 汪子嵩:《希腊哲学史》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1987年,第455页。
1 葛力:《18世纪法国哲学》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,1991年,第781页。
1 哈贝马斯:《交往行动理论》第1卷,烘佩郁、蔺青译,重庆:重庆出版社,1994年,第15页。
2 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.39.
1 章国锋:《关于一个公正世界的“乌托邦”构想》,济南:山东人民出版社,2001年,第13页。
2 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Btackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.39.
3 Rogger Trigg,Rationality and Science,Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers UK,1993,p.65.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.49.
2 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.31.
4 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.82.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.53.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.62.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.83.
4 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.31.
5 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,pp.6-7.
1 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.83.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.107.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
1 亚里士多德:《尼各马克伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,1113a。
1 北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译,《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆,1999年,第316页。
2 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第17页。
3 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第30页。
4 北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译,《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆, 1999年,第318页。
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.253.
1 康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第26页。
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000,pp.164-165.
3 John Rawls,The Law of Peoples,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1999,p.87;Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1999,p.613.
4 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000,p.164.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,pp.555-556.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.556.
2 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,pp.557-558.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48.
1 W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953,p.560.
2 Samuel Freeman,Rawls,London;New York:Routledge,2007,p.345.
3.John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,p.177.
1 John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,pp.178-179.
1 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第18页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第19页。
1 Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.31.
2 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.528.
3 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.528.
1 要求正义原则要具有一般性、普遍性、次序性、终极性等,详细分析可见:约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第131-135页。
2 约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第132页。
1 John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980,p.529.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.50.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.51.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.18;pp.120-121;pp.446-447;p.516;p.582.
3 Robert Paul Wolff,Understanding Rawls,Gloucester,MA:Peter Smith,1990.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.352;p.580.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.31.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.95.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.300;cf.pp.4-5.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.582.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.26;cf.John Pawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.18;p.21.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.86;cf.John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.72-73.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.73.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.72.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.201;p.362.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.141.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.9.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.19.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.3.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.119,n.1.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.72-81.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.79.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.90.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.381.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.580.
2 Patrick Neal,"Does He Mean What He Says?(Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn",Polity 27.1,1994,p.81.
1 Charles Larmore,"Political liberalism",Political Theory 18.3,1990,p.354.
2 Patrick Neal,"Does He Mean What He Says?(Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn",Polity 27.1,1994,p.89.
1 Joseph Raz,"Facing Diversity:The Case of Epistemic Abstinence",Philosophy and Public Affairs 19.1,1990,pp.9-10.
2 Joseph Raz,"Facing Diversity:The Case of Epistemic Abstinence",Philosophy and Public Affairs 19.1,1990,p.15.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹ;cf.p.94.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.214.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.329.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.140-141;cf.pp.147-148.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.111;cf.p.126,n.34.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.127.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.64.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.19.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.13.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.134.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.176.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.192.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.221;cf.p.447.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
4 Joshua Cohen,"Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus",The Idea of Democracy,eds.David Copp,Jean Hampton,and John Roemer,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993,p.281.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.50.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.134.
2 John Rawls,PoliticaILiberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅵ.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.170.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.59.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.149.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.147.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.147.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
1 Jon Mandle,"The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness",Canadian Journal of Political Science 29,1999,p.98.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.143.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.159.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.159-164.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.90.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.137.
3 Macedo,"Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism:The Case of God vs.John Rawls",Ethics 1995(105.3),pp.474-475.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.ⅹⅵ-ⅹⅶ
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.81-86;
A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.462-479.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.252.
1 Macedo,"Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism:The Case of God v.John Rawls",Ethics 1995(105.3),p.470.
2 Jeremy Waldron,"Justice Revisited",Times Literary Supplement 1993(5).
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.220.
2 Harry Brighouse,"Is There Any Such Thing as Political Liberalism",Pacific Philosophy Quarterly,1994(75),p.331,n.21.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.136.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.149.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.89-90.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.579.
1 John RaMs,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.394;pp.426-427.
2 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.28.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.386.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.387.
3 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.144.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,pp.144-145.
2 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.141,n.16.
1 John RaMs,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.437.
2 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.195.
3 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.62.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.48.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.54-58.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.52.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.83.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.394-395.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.55.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.17.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
1 Juergen Habermas,The Inclusion of the Other,Polity Press,1998,p.88.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.48-49,n.1.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.16.
2 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.505-506.
3 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.259.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.29-34.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.32.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.56-57.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.478.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.134.
1 John Rawls,PoliticalLiberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅵ.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅵ.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.10.
4 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
1 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.219.
2 John RaMs,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.614.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.58.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.63.
2 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.191.
1 Miriam Galston,"Rawlsian Dualism and the Autonomy of Political Thought",Columbia Law Review 1994(6),pp.1847-1848.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60,n.14.
3 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.191.
4 Erin Kelly and Lionel McPherson,"On Tolerating the Unreasonable",The Journal of Political Philosophy 2001(1),pp.38-55.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.61.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.244,n.32.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.60,n.14.
4 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.86,n.33.
5 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.613.
6 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.94;
The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.87.
7 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.76.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.581-583.
2 John Pawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.303.
3 Joshua Cohen,"Pluralism and Proceduralism",Chicago-Kent Law Review,1994(69),pp.589-618.
4 John RaMs,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.310-323.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.324-331.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.581.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.243.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.227.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.297f..
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.xilv.
3 T.M.Scanlon,What We Owe To Each Other,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1998,p.192.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.241.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.220.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.478-479.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.162.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.478-479.
1 John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,1987(1),p.1.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.36.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.37.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.38.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.38,n.41.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.58.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.4.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.44.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.xlvii.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.11-12.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.12.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.13-14.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.14.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.6;p.156.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.93.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.103.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.94.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.129.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.98.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.15.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.40.
1 有关罗尔斯阐述的细节,可见:John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.169-171.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.168.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.168.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.147-148.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.141.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.142.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.143.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.ⅹⅹⅹⅸ,n.5.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.15.
1 Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.164.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.394;pp.426-427.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.4.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.213.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.133.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.227.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.214-215.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.220-222.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.214-215.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.135.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.231-236.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.223-224.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.224.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.144.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.p.137.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.137-138.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,pp.135-136.
2 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999, pp.145-146.
1 John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.145.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.578.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.579.
3 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,pp.490-496.
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.141.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,pp.15-16.
2 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.578.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.135n..
4 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.427.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429n..
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429n..
2 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.429.
3 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.428.
4 John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.353.
5 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.393.
1 John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,p.90.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.217.
1 John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999,p.584.
1 John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995,p.150.
1 John Rawls,"The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good",Philosophy & Public Affairs,Fall 1988,p.275.
2 James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995,p.253.
3 James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995,p.254.
1 Huemer,"Rawls' Problem of Stability",Social Theory and Practice 22(3),1996,p.382.
1 Patrick Neal,"Against Liberal Public Reason",paper presented at the Annual General Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.148.
1 John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,1987(1),p.1.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.1.罗尔斯在“Reply to Habermas”一文中也有类似的说明,参见:John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.427.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.4.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.6.
3 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,pp.3-9.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
1 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,p.10.
2 John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,Samuel Freeman Edited,the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2007,pp.10-11;另有更详尽的论述,参见John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001,pp.1-5.
1 Eric Alterman,"Rawls and Us",The Nation Dec.23,2002.
1 John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.35.
2 王南湜:“从‘理想国'到‘法治国'--现实性的马克思主义政治哲学何以可能”,《天津社会科学版》,2006年第5期。
[1]约翰·罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年。
[2]约翰·罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,南京:译林出版社,2000年。
[3]约翰·罗尔斯:《万民法.公共理性观念新论》,张晓辉等译,长春:吉林人民出版社,2001年。
[4]约翰·罗尔斯:《道德哲学史讲义》,张国清译,上海:上海三联出版社,2003年。
[5]约翰·罗尔斯:《作为公平的正义:正义新论》,姚大志译,上海:上海三联书店,2002年。
[6]约翰·罗尔斯等:《政治自由主义:批评与辩护》,万俊人等译,广州:广东人民出版社,2003年。
[7]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯选集》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1995年。
[8]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯全集》第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1995年。
[9]马克思、恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯全集》第三卷,北京:人民出版社,2002年。
[10]赵敦华:《劳斯的<正义论>解说》,香港:香港三联书店,1989年。
[11]石元康:《罗尔斯》,南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2004年。
[12]乔德兰·库卡塔斯、菲利普·佩迪特:《罗尔斯》,姚建宗、高申春译,黑龙江人民出版社,1999年。
[13]川本隆史:《罗尔斯--正义原理》,詹献斌译,石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001年。
[14]何怀宏:《契约伦理与社会正义》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993年。
[15]何怀宏:《公平的正义:解读罗尔斯<正义论>》,济南:山东人民出版社,2002年。
[16]龚群:《罗尔斯政治哲学》,北京:商务印书馆,2006年。
[17]万俊人:《罗尔斯读本》,北京:中央编译出版社,2006年。
[18]李小科,李蜀人:《正义女神的新传人--约翰·罗尔斯》,保定:河北大学出版社,2005年。
[19]列奥·斯特劳斯、约瑟夫克罗波希编:《政治哲学史》,李天然等译,石家庄:河北人民出版社,1993年。
[20]威尔·金里卡:《当代政治哲学》,刘莘译,上海:上海三联书店,2003年。
[21]圭·多德·拉吉罗:《欧洲自由主义史》,杨军译,长春:吉林人民出版社,2001年。
[22]亚当·斯威夫特:《政治哲学导论》,萧韶译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2006年。
[23]戴维·米勒:《社会正义原则》,应奇译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2001年。
[24]布莱恩·巴里:《正义诸理论》,孙晓春、曹海军译,吉林人民出版社,2004年。
[25]迈克尔·H.莱斯诺夫:《二十世纪的政治哲学家》,冯克利译,北京:商务印书馆,2001年。
[26]姚大志:《现代之后--二十世纪晚期西方哲学》,北京:东方出版社,2000年。
[27]姚大志:《何谓正义:当代西方政治哲学研究》,北京:人民出版社,2007年。
[28]徐向东:《自由主义、社会契约与政治辩护》,北京:北京大学出版社,2005年。
[29]徐向东:《道德哲学与实践理性》,北京:商务印书馆,2006年。
[30]顾肃:《自由主义基本理念》,北京:中央编译出版社,2003年。
[31]应奇:《从自由主义到后自由主义》,北京:北京三联书店,2003年。
[32]张桂林:《西方政治哲学--从古希腊到当代》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999年。
[33]慈继伟:《正义的两面》,上海:三联书店,2001年。
[34]柏拉图:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1986年。
[35]亚里士多德:《政治学》,颜一译,北京:中国人民出版社,2003年。
[36]亚里士多德:《尼各马克伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[37]卢梭:《社会契约论》,何兆武译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[38]卢梭:《论人类不平等的起源》,李常山译,北京:商务印书馆,1982年。
[39]休谟:《人性论》下册,关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,2004年。
[40]康德:《法的形而上学原理》,北京:商务印书馆,1991年。
[41]康德:《历史理性批判文集》,北京:商务印书馆,1990年。
[42]康德:《实践理性批判》,韩水法译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年。
[43]康德:《道德形而上学基础》,孙少伟译,北京:九州出版社,2007年。
[44]黑格尔:《法哲学原理》,范扬、张企泰译,北京:商务印书馆,1962年。
[45]约翰·密尔:《论自由》,郭志嵩译,北京:商务印书馆,2007年。
[46]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《交往行动理论》,洪佩郁、蔺青译,重庆:重庆出版社,1994年。
[47]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《包容他者》,曹卫东译,上海:上海人民出版社,2002年。
[48]尤尔根·哈贝马斯:《后形而上学思想》,曹卫东译,南京:译林出版社,2001年。
[49]北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译:《西方哲学原著选读》下卷,北京:商务印书馆,1999年。
[50]胡真圣:《两种正义观:马克思、罗尔斯正义思想比论》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004年。
[51]郭夏娟:《为正义而辩:女性主义与罗尔斯》,北京:人民出版社,2004年。
[52]刘永红:《政治自由主义发展的逻辑》,武汉:湖北人民出版社,2007年。
[53]曹瑞涛:《多元时代的“正义方舟”--罗尔斯后期政治哲学思想研究》,杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008年。
[1]陈晏清、王新生:“政治哲学的当代复兴及其意义”,《哲学研究》,2005年第6期。
[2]陈晏清、赵前苗:“后形而上学转向与政治思维方式的变更”,《天津社会科学》,2006年第1期。
[3]陈晏清:“政治哲学的时代使命”,《求实学刊》,2006年第3期。
[4]王南湜:“从‘理想国'到‘法治国'--现实性的马克思主义政治哲学何以可能”,《天津社会科学版》,2006年第5期。
[5]李淑梅:“罗尔斯的自由观:自由与平等结合”,《求是学刊》,2005年第3期。
李淑梅“当代西方政治哲学的理性建构方式及其启示”,《求是学刊》,2006年第3期。
[6]阎孟伟:“欧洲近代政治哲学的兴起与分化”,《求实学刊》,2006年第3期。
[7]顾肃:“正义与自由的不懈追求”,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
顾肃“论社会公正与自由的关系”,《学海》,2004年第2期。
顾肃“重叠共识何以可能?--后期罗尔斯的自由主义理念”,《南京大学学报》,1999年第3期。
顾肃“当代自由主义对社群主义理论挑战的回应”,《哲学动态》,2002年第11期。
[8]盛庆琜:“对罗尔斯理论的若干批评”,《中国社会科学》,2000年第5期。
[9]盛晓明:“从多元到一体--由哈贝马斯与罗尔斯的分歧谈起”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
[10]应奇:“罗尔斯对古典自由主义的超越--从社会基本结构理念的角度看”,《南京社会科学》,2003年第12期。
应奇“两种政治观的对话--关于哈贝马斯与罗尔斯的争论”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
应奇“罗尔斯与近代西方政治文化传统”,《浙江社会科学》,1999年第6期。
应奇“后《正义论》时期罗尔斯思想的发展”,《浙江大学学报》,1998年第3期。
[11]童世骏:“国际政治中的三种普遍主义--伊拉克战争以后对罗尔斯和哈贝马斯的国际政治理论的比较”,《华东师范大学学报》,2003年第6期。
[12]万俊人:“罗尔斯问题”,《求是学刊》,2007年第1期。
万俊人“罗尔斯的政治哲学遗产(上)”,《马克思主义与现实》,2006年第1期。
万俊人“从政治正义到社会和谐--以罗尔斯为中心的当代政治哲学反思”,《哲学动态》,2005年第6期。
万俊人“正义的和平如何可能?--康德‘永久和评论'与罗尔斯‘万民法'的批判性解读”,《江苏社会科学》,2004年第5期。
万俊人“政治自由主义的现代建构--罗尔斯《政治自由主义》读解”,《政治自由主义》,第558-632页。
[13]姚大志:“罗尔斯与功利主义”,《社会科学战线》,2008年第7期。
姚大志“罗尔斯正义理论的基本理念”,《社会科学研究》,2008年第4期。
姚大志“罗尔斯的契约主义与政治哲学的证明”,《江苏社会科学》,2004年第5期。
姚大志“罗尔斯:从自由到平等”,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
姚大志“罗尔斯正义论的道德基础”,《江海学刊》,2002年第2期。
姚大志“何谓正义:罗尔斯与哈贝马斯”,《浙江学刊》,2001年第4期。
姚大志“打开‘无知之幕'--正义原则与社会稳定性”,《开放时代》,2001年第3期。
姚大志“《正义论》之后的罗尔斯”,《哲学动态》,2000年第10期。
姚大志“自由与平等的张力--罗尔斯的正义理论述评”,《长春市委党校学报》,1999 年第2期。
[14]程广云:“从理想原则到现实关怀--罗尔斯理性主义解析”,《哲学动态》,2005年第5期。
[15]包利民:“重建公共伦理规范基础的不同途径--论罗尔斯与哈贝马斯之争”,《浙江学刊》,2000年第6期。
包利民“社会契约:现实与理想”,《哲学研究》,2001年第8期。
包利民“公共理性、信仰与理念--从罗尔斯的宗教观谈起”,《哲学研究》,2003年第5期。
[16]李业兴:“罗尔斯政治哲学中‘理性'的界定与作用”,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》,2006年第5期。
[17]刘莘:“对罗尔斯宣言的一种解读”,《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2007年第2期。
[18]赵祥禄:“罗尔斯的建构主义解读”,《道德与文明》,2006年第3期。
[19]贾中海:“哈贝马斯对罗尔斯事实与价值关系二元论的批判”,《学习与探索》,2005年第3期。
贾中海“哈耶克进化论理性主义对罗尔斯理性建构主义的批判”,《学习与探索》,2006年第4期。
贾中海“析罗尔斯正义论的精神价值”,《学术交流》,1999年第6期。
贾中海“正当与善--桑德尔对罗尔斯‘正当优先于善'的批判”,《北方论丛》,2006年第2期。
[20]杨伟清:“罗尔斯正义理论中的‘稳定性问题'”,《学术月刊》,2007年4月。
[21]许纪霖:“公共正义的基础-对罗尔斯‘原初状态'和‘重叠共识'理念的讨论”,《知识分子论丛第2辑》,南京:江苏人民出版社,2003年。
[22]李小科:“当前国内外罗尔斯研究介绍”,《石油大学学报(社会科学版)》,2003年第4期。
李小科“《政治自由主义》以后的罗尔斯”,《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2002年第2期。
李小科“罗尔斯学术生平”,《世界哲学》,2003年第2期。
李小科“‘现实的乌托邦'释义”,《开放时代》,2003年第4期。
李小科“Statesman:罗尔斯心目中的理想‘政治家'--罗尔斯对‘政治家'和‘政客'的区分及其溯源”,《西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2003年第2期。
[23]B.G.布鲁萨克:“政治学、宗教和公善”,何小玲、李小科译,《世界哲学》,2003年第2期。
[24]理查德.F.冯德勒:“罗尔斯与他的正义理论”,李小科译,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
[25]约翰·罗尔斯:“广岛罹难50年祭”,李小科译,《开放时代》,2003年第1期。
[26]何怀宏:“罗尔斯的思想遗产”,《书城》,2003年第1期。
[27]徐友渔:“在自由与公正之间--当代西方政治哲学简介”,《教师之友》,2004年第 7期。
李小科“关于自由和平等的当代思考”,《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》,2003年第3期。
李小科“当代西方政治哲学中的若干新问题和新动向(上)”,《国外社会科学》,2002年第6期。
李小科“当代西方政治哲学中的若干新问题和新动向(下)”,《国外社会科学》,2003年第1期。
李小科“我是如何研究罗尔斯的?”《世界哲学》,2008年第4期。
[28]曹海军:“国际正义与全球治理的哲学思考--罗尔斯‘万民法'思想评述”,《云南行政学院学报》,2007年第5期。
[29]刘德定:“罗尔斯《正义论》与构建和谐社会的路径分析”,《黑龙江社会科学》,2007年第1期。
[30]王秀华、程瑞山:“‘原初状态'与‘反思平衡':罗尔斯道德哲学方法论”,《内蒙古社会科学》,2004年第6期。
[31]王培通、杨晓东:“刍议罗尔斯契约论方法的抽象性”,《社会科学研究》,2006年第4期。
[32]孙显蔚:“从古典自由主义到新自由主义--洛克和罗尔斯自由观念评析”,《教学与研究》,1999年第10期。
[33]宇文宏、刘珂:“从原初状态到正义原则--评析罗尔斯的契约论证明”,《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2004年第2期。
[34]孙君恒:“分配正义的两种当代模式--罗尔斯的公平论与诺齐克的权利论”,《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2003年第5期。
[35]刘永红:“论罗尔斯对功利主义的批判”,《北京行政学院学报》,2005年第3期。
[36]黄正华:“自由优先于功利?--从罗尔斯对功利主义的批评来看”,《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,2004年第4期。
[37]薛长绪:“国内学者对罗尔斯《正义论》的研究综述”,《石油大学学报(社会科学版)》,2002年第2期。
[38]封海鹏、封传兵:“十七大报告中公平正义问题解读--从罗尔斯两条正义原则出发探究社会公正”,《广西财经学院学报》,2008年第4期。
[39]王俊骏:“罗尔斯的正义理论对构建和谐社会的启示”,《中共济南市委党校学报》,2008年第3期。
[40]张卫明:“理性妥协与社会和谐--论罗尔斯理性妥协思想的启示意义”,《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》,2008年第4期。
[41]陈家刚:“协商民主研究在东西方的兴起与发展”,《毛泽东邓小平理论研究》,2008年第7期。
[42]王秋梅:“罗尔斯与德沃金的平等思想比较”,《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》,2008年第4期。
[43]虞新胜:“论罗尔斯政治哲学中的‘正当优先性'”,《天津社会科学》,2007年第6 期。
虞新胜“罗尔斯社会基本结构中的平等自由观”,《学术论坛》,2007年第11期。
[44]王立:“平等的范式”,《社会科学研究》,2008年第4期。
[45]王冠生:“论罗尔斯的公共理性理念”,《台湾哲学学会2008年学术研讨会议》,2008年。
[46]谢世民:“后启蒙的哲学计画:罗尔斯的政治自由主义”,《二十一世纪》第75期。
[47]任剑涛:“思想的张力--当代西方自由主义与社群主义之争在中国”,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》,2006年第4期。
[1]虞新胜:《论罗尔斯的“正当优先于善”》,南开大学马克思主义哲学专业,2008年。
[2]许祥云:《从思辨正义到实践正义》,吉林大学马克思主义哲学专业,2008年。
[3]钟英法:《罗尔斯公共理性思想研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2007年。
[4]徐清飞:《罗尔斯正义理论的发展》,吉林大学法学理论专业,2008年。
[5]贾中海:《社会价值的分配正义:罗尔斯自由主义政治哲学批判》,吉林大学马克思主义哲学专业,2003年。
[6]尹松波:《理性与正义--罗尔斯<正义论>研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2004年。
[7]李志江:《罗尔斯分配正义理论研究》,复旦大学外国哲学专业,2004年。
[8]曹海军:《文本与语境:罗尔斯正义理论研究》,吉林大学政治学理论专业,2006年。
[9]王峰:《契约式谋划:关于罗尔斯万民法的分析》,吉林大学法学理论专业,2007年。
[1]Catherine Audard,John Rawls,Montreal:McGill-Queen's University Press,2007.
[2]Paul Graham,Rawls,Oxford:Oneworld,2007.
[3]Chandran Kukathas eds.,John Rawls:Critical Assessment of Leading Political Philosophers,London;New York:Routledge,2003.
[4]Davion,Virginia and Clark Wolf,eds.,The Idea of a Political Liberalism:Essays on Rawls,Lanham,MD:Rowman and Littlefield,1999.
[5]Gerald Gauss,Justificatory Liberalism,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996.
[6]Henry Richardson and Paul Weithman eds.,The Philosophy of Rawls:A Collection of Essays,in 5 volumes,New York:Garland,1999.
[7]James Bohman and William Rehg ed.,Deliberative Democracy:Essays on Reason and Politics,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1997.
[8]James Bohman,Public Deliberation:Pluralism,Complexity,and Democracy,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2000.
[9]John Rawls,A Theory of Justice,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971.
[10]John Rawls,Political Liberalism,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
[11]John Rawls,The Law of peoples,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.
[12]John Rawls,Collected Papers,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1999.
[13]John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy,edited by Barbara Herman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000.
[14]John Rawls,Justice as Fairness:A Restatement,edited by Erin Kelley,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2001.
[15]John Rawls,Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,edited by Samuel Freeman,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2007.
[16]Jon Mandle,What's left of liberalism:An Interpretation and Defense of Justice as Fairness,Lanham,MD:Lexington Books,2000.
[17]Juergen Habermas,The Inclusion of the Other,Polity Press,1998.
[18]Juergen Habermas,The Theory of Communication Action,trans,by Thomas McCarthy,Boston:Beacon Press,1984.
[19]Michael Sandel,Liberalism and the Limits of Justice,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982;second edition,1998.
[20]Norman Daniels,Justice and Justification,Cambridge:UK:Cambridge University Press,1996.
[21]Roberto Alejandro,The Limits of Rawlsian Justice,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins Press,1998.
[22]Samuel Freeman eds.,The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[23]Samuel Freeman,Justice and the Social Contract,New York:Oxford University Press,2007.
[24]Samuel Freeman,Rawls,London;New York:Routledge,2007.
[25]Shaun P.Young,Beyond Rawls:An Analysis of the Concept of Political Liberalism,Lanham,MD:University Press of America,2002.
[26]Thomas W.Pogge,Realizing Rawls,Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1989.
[27]Thomas W.Pogge,John Rawls,His life and Theory of Justice,Michelle Kosch,trans.,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2006.
[28]Ville Paivansalo,Balancing Reasonable Justice:John Rawls and Crucial Beyond,Aldershot,Hampshire,England;Burlington,VT:Ashgate,2007.
[29]Stephen Mulhall,Adam Swift,Liberalism & Communitarians,Blackwell Publishing,1996.
[30]Rober Nozick,Anarchy,State and Utopia,New York:Basic Books,1974.
[31]Robert Paul Wolff,Understanding Rawls,Gloucester,MA:Peter Smith 1990;originally published by Princeton University Press,1977.
[32]B.N.Ray eds,John Rawls and the Agenda of Social Justice,Anamika Publishers,2000.
[33]Kukathas and Philip Pettit,Rawls:A Theory of Justice and its Critics,Polity,1999.
[34]Norman Daniels eds.,Reading Rawls,Basic Books,1975.
[35]J.H.Wellbank,Denis Snook,David T.Mason ed.,John Rawls and His Critics:An Annotated Bibliography,New York:Garland,1982.
[1]Andre Van de Putte,"Rawls' Political Liberalism:Foundations and Principles",Ethical Perspectives 2,1995:107-129.
[2]Alessandro Ferrara,"Public Reason and the Normativity of the Reasonable",Philosophy &Social Criticism 30,2004:579-596.
[3]Alexander Kaufman,"Rawls's Practical Conception of Justice:Opinion,Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism",Journal of moral philosophy 3.1,2006:23-43.
[4]Anthony Simon Laden,"The House That Jack Built:Thirty Years of Reading Rawls",Ethics 113,2003:367-390.
[5]Brian Barry,"John Rawls and the Search for Stability",Ethics 105,1995:874-915.
[6]Brace Ackerman,"Political Liberalisms",The Journal of Philosophy 71(7),1994:364-386.
[7]Charles Larmore,"The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism",The Journal of Philosophy 12,2002:599-625.
[8]David Estlund,"The Insularity of the Reasonable:Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth",Ethics 108,1998:252-275.
[9]David M.Rasmussen,"Defending Reasonability:the Centrality of Reasonability in the Later Rawls",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:525-540.
[10]Fred D'Agostino,"The Legacies of John Rawls",Journal of Moral Philosophy 1.3,2004:349-365.
[11]Gerald Gauss,"Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political:How the Weakness of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by Justificatory Liberalism",Inquiry 42,1999:259-284.
[12]Griffin,Stephen and Lawrence Solum,"Symposium on John Rawls's Political liberalism ",in Chicago-Kent Law Review 69,1994:549-842.
[13]James Bohman,"Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism:Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflicts",Political Theory 23,1995:253-279.
[14]James W.Boettcher,"What is Reasonableness?",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:597-621.
[15]John Horton,"Rawls,Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification",Contemporary Political Theory 2,2003:5-23.
[16]John Rawls,"Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics," Philosophical Review 60,1951,177-97.
[17]John Rawls,"Kantian Construction in Moral Theory:The Dewey Lectures 1980," Journal of Philosophy 77,1980:515-72.
[18]John Rawls,"Justice as Fairness:Political not Metaphysical," Philosophy and Public Affairs 14,1985:223-51.
[19]John Rawls,"The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus",Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol.7,No.1,1987:1-25.
[20]John Rawls,"The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus",New York University Law Review 64,1989:233-255.
[21]John Rawls,"Reply to Habermas",The Journal of Philosophy,March 1995:132-180.
[22]John Rawls,"The Idea of Public Reason Revisited",The University of Chicago Law Review 64,1997:765-807.
[23]Jon Mandle,"The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness",Canadian Journal of Political Science 29,1999:75-108.
[24]Jonathan Wolff,"John Rawls:Liberal Democracy Restated",Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol I,No.3,2001:347-361.
[25]Jonathan Harmon,"Introducing John Rawls:A Review of The Cambridge Companion to Rawls",Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:643-663.
[26]Joshua Cohen,"The Importance of Philosophy:Reflections on John Rawls",South African Journal of Philosophy 23,2004:113-119.
[27]Joshua Cohen,"Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus," The Idea of Democracy,eds.David Copp,Jean Hampton,and John Roemer,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993:270-91.
[28]Juergen Habermas,"Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason:Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Journal of Philosophy 92,1995:109-131.
[29]Kurt Baier,"Justice and the Aims of Political Philosophy",Ethics 99,1989:771-790.
[30]Lloyd,S.A.,"John Rawls's Political Liberalism",Special Double Issue of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75,1994.
[31]Margaret Moore,"On Reasonableness",Journal of Applied Philosophy 13,1996:167-178.
[32]Onora O'Neill,"Political Liberalism and Public Reason:A Critical Notice of John Rawls's Political Liberalism",The Philosophy Review,Vol.106,1997:411-428.
[33]Paul Weithman,"Liberalism and the Political Character of Political Philosophy",in Liberalism and Community Values,ed.,C.F.Delaney,189-211.Lanham,MD:Rowman and Littlefield,1994.
[34]Samuel Freeman,"Political Liberalism and the Possibility of a Just Democratic Constitution",Chicago-Kent Law Review 69,No.3,1994:619-668.
[35]Sebastiano Maffettone,"John Rawls:An Interpretation",Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol.I,No.3,2001:189-216.
[36]Sebastiano Maffettone,"Political Liberalism:Reasonableness and Democratic Practice", Philosophy & Social Criticism 30,2004:541-577.
[37]Shaun P.Young,"Rawlsian Reasonableness:A Problematic Presumption?",Canadian Journal of Political Science 39:1,2006:159-180.
[38]Shaun P.Young,"The(Un)Reasonableness of Rawlsian Rationality",South African Journal of Philosophy 24,2005:308-320.
[39]Shaun P.Young,"Divide and Conquer:Separating the Reasonable from the Unreasonable",Journal of Social Philosophy 32,2001:53-69.
[40]Thomas McCarthy,"Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism:Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue",Ethics 105,October 1994:44-63.
[41]W.M.Sibley,"The Rational Versus the Reasonable",The Philosophical Review,Vol.62,No.4,1953:554-560.
[42]Eric Alterman,"Rawls and Us",The Nation Dec.23,2002.
[43]Martha Nussbaum,"The Enduring Significance of John Rawls",The Chronicle Review,July 20,2001.
[44]"John Rawls:For the Record",an interview with The Harvard Review of Philosophy,vol.1,no.1.1999:38-47.
[45]"In Memoriam:John Rawls(1921-2002)",The Review of Metaphysics 56,2003:711-713.
[46]"John Rawls",Proceedings of the American Philosophy society,vo1.149,No.1,2005:113-117.
[47]Fabienne Peter,"Rawls' Idea of Public Reason and Democratic Legitimacy",Politics and Ethics Review,3(1) 2007:129-143.
[48]Micah Lott,"Restraint of Reasons and Reasons for A Problem for Rawls' Public Reason",Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87,2006:75-95.
[49]Leif Wenar,"Political Liberalism:An Internal Critique",Ethics,vol.106,No.1,1995:32-62.
[50]Vincent J.Samar,"Justice Society:A Review of John Rawls,Political Liberalism",Business Ethics Quarterly,vol.5,iss.3,1995:629-645.
[51]Frank Ⅰ.Michelman,"The Subject of Liberalism",Stanford Law Review,vol.46,No.6,1994:1807-1833.
[52]Richard Arneson,"Introduction to A Symposium on Rawlsian Theory of Justice:Recent Development",Ethics 99,1989:695-710.
[1]John Rawls,Wikipedia,the Free Encyclopedia.
[2]John Rawls,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[3]John Rawls,The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.