论我国不可量物侵害制度的问题与完善
|
摘要
不可量物起源于罗马法,是现代民法上的一个重要概念,是指煤气、臭气、烟气、噪音、震动等及来自于他人的土地的类似物质的侵害,以及消极侵害和观念侵害。这些侵害因其难以衡量性和对他人造成的财产的、人身的侵害而统称为不可量物侵害。不可量物具有不特定性、难以衡量性、范围性、危害的递减性、种类和强度随科技发展和工业活动的扩大逐步增加等特征。对于不可量物侵害的性质,学界先后有“相邻关系说”、“侵权行为说”、“环境权说”等。对于其判断标准、救济方式和举证责任分配等也存在着不同的学说。
我国对于不可量物侵害的相关规定散见于《民法通则》、《物权法》、《侵权责任法》中环境侵权部分,以及作为公法的《环境保护法》、《大气污染防治法》等。但是这些规定存在着很多的问题和缺陷,脱离社会,滞后于现实,具体的救济方式也缺乏规定,在实践中难以适用和把握,不利于纠纷的解决和权利的维护。基于此,我国有必要对不可量物侵害进行深入研究,并结合我国具体国情建立相应的完整的、独立的法律制度。
德国民法典中的不可量物侵害制度以相邻权为基础,将其范围扩大到消极侵害以及观念侵害,将其判断标准从“不可计量”变化为“知觉可能性”,并规定了容忍义务。法国民法以判例和学说确立了“近邻妨害”责任,同样以“过度性”作为侵害责任成立的实质要件。日本对于此类侵害称为“公害”并在环境法中加以规制,日本对于“公害”侵害的责任构成上发展了忍受限度论、无过失责任原则和因果关系推定制度等,并在救济方式上尤其是侵害排除上开拓了发达的理论。英美法上无所谓物权制度,因此其关于不可量物侵害的制度自成立以来便是一种独立的侵权行为类型,即私益妨害制度,是一种无过错责任的制度。
我国对于不可量物侵害制度的构建,结合我国的具体国情和法律环境,应从理论基础和实践应用两个方面进行研究。理论基础方面主要包括不可量物概念界定、构成要件、种类扩大、适用范围和原则的应用。不可量物概念的界定方式包括列举式和概括列举式两种,目前单纯的列举式已经不能囊括全部的不可量物侵害现象,所以应采用概括列举式的形式。不可量物的构成要件可以参照其他各国的经验,将“过度性”作为唯一实质要件,而在具体操作中,则需对“过度性”进行标准化的规定,在受害者的容忍义务部分来进行基准性的考量。对于不可量物侵害的种类,我国在建立不可量物制度时,社会的发展已经需要不仅对有体的不可量物侵害进行规范,也要对无体的不可量物即消极侵害和观念侵害进行规范,以此保证体系的完整。对于不可量物的适用范围,依据我国的法律传统,以行政许可才可进行的经营活动所产生的不可量物侵害可以由环境法、行政法等公法进行调整,不可量物侵害制度是私法层面的制度,其调整范围应界定为不须行政许可即可从事的经营活动和一般生活活动所产生的不可量物侵害。容忍义务作为不可量物侵害制度的核心内容,其需要以利益衡量原则和禁止权利滥用原则作为指导思想,利益衡量原则用以调节社会经济发展与公民生活环境利益的冲突,而禁止权利滥用原则用以调节不可量物侵害各方当事人之间的冲突。实践应用的进一步完善包括两方面的内容：容忍义务和救济方式。容忍义务是衡量不可量物侵害是否成立、受害者能否得到救济的最主要标准,也是实践中进行衡量的难点,如何确定被害人是否负有容忍义务以及容忍义务的程度,需要有原则性的指导、特别法中的标准化规定以及法官的“自由裁量权”相结合加以认定。对于不可量物侵害的救济方式,物权法救济方式与侵权法救济方式相结合的模式能够更好的保护当事人的合法权益。物权法的救济方式应至少包括衡量补偿请求权和侵害排除请求权,分别适用于基于利益衡量原则扩张了受害人的容忍义务和特殊管道侵害等不同情况。侵权法的救济方式适用无过错责任原则,责任构成要件包括损害、行为的违法性和因果关系等。另外,现代环境侵权除要求侵权人承担损害赔偿责任外,还应设立停止行为请求权的责任形式。
Immission comes from Roman Law. It is one of the key concepts in modern civil law. It means the invasion that comes from gas, fetor, smoke, noise, shaking or materials from other's ground, and also including negativity and mental violation. These invasions are called Immision by a joint name because of their unspecific and harm to the property and personality of others. Immission's properties are just as follows:unspecific, limitation, degression of damage, and its changes on types and strength as the enlargement of technology and industry. So, the academic members call Immission as " Neighboringrelationship", " Infringement ", or " Environment Right " and so on. However, in fact, there are also some different theories about its judgement standard, rescue method and its proof burden.
In China, we can also see something about Immission not only in Civil Law, Property Law, and the part of environment tort in Product Liability, but also in Environmental Protection Law, Prevention and Control of Air pollution, which are regarded as the public laws. But there are still so many problems and weaknesses in these rules, for example, devorcing from social life, lacking behind the real need, difficult to applying to and mastering, going against to the disputes settlement and preservation for mankind's right.. By this measure, it is necessary for us to carry on a thorough research on Immission, and establish a legal system which is independent and keep the integrality of contents.
In Germany, Immission in Civil Code is based on neighboring rights, and then expands to the negativity and mental violation. It also ruled the duldungspflicht, and thinks its judgement standard is " Intuition possibility ", but not immeasurability. French civil law set up the responsibility of Neighbor Hamper by case law and theory, and in French civil law, interim is an important condition to make sure if the responsibility of harm establish. In Japan, this kind of invasion is called " nuisance " and be ruled in environmental law. Japan is not only developed the theory of tolerance limits, principle of Liability Without Fault and presumption system of effect relationship about the responsibility from the invasion, but also developed healthy theory on the way of rescue method, especially on the injunction. And in fact, as there is no so called real rights in Britain, France and the United States, so the system about the Immission is independent wrong since it is established, which means the individual interests system is no—fault liability.
The establishment of Immission in our country, should be combined with our national situation and the legal environment, and started from two ways: theoretical basis and practical application. Theoretical basis includes: the definition of Immission, constitutive requirements, enlargements of kind, applicability and the application of principle. There are two ways to definite Immission—enumeration and summarization. Right now, the injury phenomena of Immission could not be included in simply enumeration completely, so most of time, we use summarizatim. About the constitutive requirements of Immission, we can model on the successful plan used in other countries, regarding " temporary" as the only real element. But in operation, it is necessary to standardize a way on " temporary ", for example, providing a basic principle on duty of tolerance. As the society develops so quickly, so when we establish the system of immission, we are not only standard the specific invasion of immission, but also the abstract invasion of immision and its mental invasion, so that, we can ensure the integrity of this system. Based on China's traditional laws, the applicability of immission also be limited. For example, the first, environment law and administrative law could adjust the invasion of immission from operating activities which permitted by the agencies; the second, as the immission is a kind of private law, its adjustment range should be defined the invasion that from the operating activities and daily activities which needn't to have the administrative licensing. The core content of the immission is duldungspflicht, which means we should regard the Principle of Measuring the Interest and Forbidding Misuse of Rights Rule as the guidelines. Because the Principle of Measuring the Interest aims on adjust the conflict of socioeconomic development and the interest of civic life, and Forbidding Misuse of Rights Rule aims on adjust the conflict that between invasion of immission and every parties. There are two aspects in further perfection of practical application: duldungspflicht and rescue method. Duldungspflicht is the key criteria that to sure if the invasion is true and if the victim could get the relief. This is also the difficulty in practical operation. It is necessary to have a principled instruction to ensure if the victim should tolerate and the degree of the tolerance. In special law, it defined that standardization should be combined with the "discretion" that offered by the judges. It is believed that the model which relief combined with tort law could better protect the interests of parties. Of course, the contents of Property Law should be conclude two aspects at least:claim of compensation and claim of injunction. These two rights can be used in these situations:first, the Principle of Measuring the Interest against the duldungspflicht of the victim:second, the Principle of Measuring the Interest against the special pipeline violations of the victims. The rescue method of immission is true of non-fault responsibilities, constitution elements and the illegality and causation of the actions. In addition, the modern environmental tort asks that the tortfeasors should not only shoulder the responsibility of compensating for damage, but also establish a form of liability which ask for recourse of stopping the performance.
我国对于不可量物侵害的相关规定散见于《民法通则》、《物权法》、《侵权责任法》中环境侵权部分,以及作为公法的《环境保护法》、《大气污染防治法》等。但是这些规定存在着很多的问题和缺陷,脱离社会,滞后于现实,具体的救济方式也缺乏规定,在实践中难以适用和把握,不利于纠纷的解决和权利的维护。基于此,我国有必要对不可量物侵害进行深入研究,并结合我国具体国情建立相应的完整的、独立的法律制度。
德国民法典中的不可量物侵害制度以相邻权为基础,将其范围扩大到消极侵害以及观念侵害,将其判断标准从“不可计量”变化为“知觉可能性”,并规定了容忍义务。法国民法以判例和学说确立了“近邻妨害”责任,同样以“过度性”作为侵害责任成立的实质要件。日本对于此类侵害称为“公害”并在环境法中加以规制,日本对于“公害”侵害的责任构成上发展了忍受限度论、无过失责任原则和因果关系推定制度等,并在救济方式上尤其是侵害排除上开拓了发达的理论。英美法上无所谓物权制度,因此其关于不可量物侵害的制度自成立以来便是一种独立的侵权行为类型,即私益妨害制度,是一种无过错责任的制度。
我国对于不可量物侵害制度的构建,结合我国的具体国情和法律环境,应从理论基础和实践应用两个方面进行研究。理论基础方面主要包括不可量物概念界定、构成要件、种类扩大、适用范围和原则的应用。不可量物概念的界定方式包括列举式和概括列举式两种,目前单纯的列举式已经不能囊括全部的不可量物侵害现象,所以应采用概括列举式的形式。不可量物的构成要件可以参照其他各国的经验,将“过度性”作为唯一实质要件,而在具体操作中,则需对“过度性”进行标准化的规定,在受害者的容忍义务部分来进行基准性的考量。对于不可量物侵害的种类,我国在建立不可量物制度时,社会的发展已经需要不仅对有体的不可量物侵害进行规范,也要对无体的不可量物即消极侵害和观念侵害进行规范,以此保证体系的完整。对于不可量物的适用范围,依据我国的法律传统,以行政许可才可进行的经营活动所产生的不可量物侵害可以由环境法、行政法等公法进行调整,不可量物侵害制度是私法层面的制度,其调整范围应界定为不须行政许可即可从事的经营活动和一般生活活动所产生的不可量物侵害。容忍义务作为不可量物侵害制度的核心内容,其需要以利益衡量原则和禁止权利滥用原则作为指导思想,利益衡量原则用以调节社会经济发展与公民生活环境利益的冲突,而禁止权利滥用原则用以调节不可量物侵害各方当事人之间的冲突。实践应用的进一步完善包括两方面的内容：容忍义务和救济方式。容忍义务是衡量不可量物侵害是否成立、受害者能否得到救济的最主要标准,也是实践中进行衡量的难点,如何确定被害人是否负有容忍义务以及容忍义务的程度,需要有原则性的指导、特别法中的标准化规定以及法官的“自由裁量权”相结合加以认定。对于不可量物侵害的救济方式,物权法救济方式与侵权法救济方式相结合的模式能够更好的保护当事人的合法权益。物权法的救济方式应至少包括衡量补偿请求权和侵害排除请求权,分别适用于基于利益衡量原则扩张了受害人的容忍义务和特殊管道侵害等不同情况。侵权法的救济方式适用无过错责任原则,责任构成要件包括损害、行为的违法性和因果关系等。另外,现代环境侵权除要求侵权人承担损害赔偿责任外,还应设立停止行为请求权的责任形式。
Immission comes from Roman Law. It is one of the key concepts in modern civil law. It means the invasion that comes from gas, fetor, smoke, noise, shaking or materials from other's ground, and also including negativity and mental violation. These invasions are called Immision by a joint name because of their unspecific and harm to the property and personality of others. Immission's properties are just as follows:unspecific, limitation, degression of damage, and its changes on types and strength as the enlargement of technology and industry. So, the academic members call Immission as " Neighboringrelationship", " Infringement ", or " Environment Right " and so on. However, in fact, there are also some different theories about its judgement standard, rescue method and its proof burden.
In China, we can also see something about Immission not only in Civil Law, Property Law, and the part of environment tort in Product Liability, but also in Environmental Protection Law, Prevention and Control of Air pollution, which are regarded as the public laws. But there are still so many problems and weaknesses in these rules, for example, devorcing from social life, lacking behind the real need, difficult to applying to and mastering, going against to the disputes settlement and preservation for mankind's right.. By this measure, it is necessary for us to carry on a thorough research on Immission, and establish a legal system which is independent and keep the integrality of contents.
In Germany, Immission in Civil Code is based on neighboring rights, and then expands to the negativity and mental violation. It also ruled the duldungspflicht, and thinks its judgement standard is " Intuition possibility ", but not immeasurability. French civil law set up the responsibility of Neighbor Hamper by case law and theory, and in French civil law, interim is an important condition to make sure if the responsibility of harm establish. In Japan, this kind of invasion is called " nuisance " and be ruled in environmental law. Japan is not only developed the theory of tolerance limits, principle of Liability Without Fault and presumption system of effect relationship about the responsibility from the invasion, but also developed healthy theory on the way of rescue method, especially on the injunction. And in fact, as there is no so called real rights in Britain, France and the United States, so the system about the Immission is independent wrong since it is established, which means the individual interests system is no—fault liability.
The establishment of Immission in our country, should be combined with our national situation and the legal environment, and started from two ways: theoretical basis and practical application. Theoretical basis includes: the definition of Immission, constitutive requirements, enlargements of kind, applicability and the application of principle. There are two ways to definite Immission—enumeration and summarization. Right now, the injury phenomena of Immission could not be included in simply enumeration completely, so most of time, we use summarizatim. About the constitutive requirements of Immission, we can model on the successful plan used in other countries, regarding " temporary" as the only real element. But in operation, it is necessary to standardize a way on " temporary ", for example, providing a basic principle on duty of tolerance. As the society develops so quickly, so when we establish the system of immission, we are not only standard the specific invasion of immission, but also the abstract invasion of immision and its mental invasion, so that, we can ensure the integrity of this system. Based on China's traditional laws, the applicability of immission also be limited. For example, the first, environment law and administrative law could adjust the invasion of immission from operating activities which permitted by the agencies; the second, as the immission is a kind of private law, its adjustment range should be defined the invasion that from the operating activities and daily activities which needn't to have the administrative licensing. The core content of the immission is duldungspflicht, which means we should regard the Principle of Measuring the Interest and Forbidding Misuse of Rights Rule as the guidelines. Because the Principle of Measuring the Interest aims on adjust the conflict of socioeconomic development and the interest of civic life, and Forbidding Misuse of Rights Rule aims on adjust the conflict that between invasion of immission and every parties. There are two aspects in further perfection of practical application: duldungspflicht and rescue method. Duldungspflicht is the key criteria that to sure if the invasion is true and if the victim could get the relief. This is also the difficulty in practical operation. It is necessary to have a principled instruction to ensure if the victim should tolerate and the degree of the tolerance. In special law, it defined that standardization should be combined with the "discretion" that offered by the judges. It is believed that the model which relief combined with tort law could better protect the interests of parties. Of course, the contents of Property Law should be conclude two aspects at least:claim of compensation and claim of injunction. These two rights can be used in these situations:first, the Principle of Measuring the Interest against the duldungspflicht of the victim:second, the Principle of Measuring the Interest against the special pipeline violations of the victims. The rescue method of immission is true of non-fault responsibilities, constitution elements and the illegality and causation of the actions. In addition, the modern environmental tort asks that the tortfeasors should not only shoulder the responsibility of compensating for damage, but also establish a form of liability which ask for recourse of stopping the performance.
引文
1杨娟.不可量物侵权法律制度研究[硕士学位论文].西南财经大学,2005
2邱汉平.罗马法.中国方正出版社,2004年版,第229页
3蔡伟.不可量物初论.甘肃行政学院学报,2003年第4期
4中国物权法课题研究组.中国物权法草案建议稿条文、说明、理由与参考立法例.社会科学文献出版社,2000年版
5陈华彬.物权法研究.金桥文化出版社(香港)有限公司,2001年版,第325-327页
6张玉霞.我国不可量物侵害制度之构建.[硕士学位论文],北京工商大学,2006
7马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究.现代法学,2003
8贺艳红.不可量物侵害比较研究[硕士学位论文], 山东大学,2005
9崔世君.不可量物解析.法制与社会,2009(12)
10魏怡琴.环境相邻关系制度研究[硕士学位论文].湖南大学,2008.
11郑冲、贾红梅译.德国民法典.北京：法律出版社,1999.213-214.
12陈华彬.外国物权法.北京：法律出版社,2004.162
13马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究[J].现代法学,2003(1)
14李亚虹.美国侵权法.北京：法律出版社,1999.154
15邱聪智.民法研究(一).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002；325.
16张平华.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2006(6).
17[日]原田尚彦著,于敏译.环境法.法律出版社1999年版.第21页.
[1]中国物权法课题研究组.中国物权法草案建议稿条文、说明、理由与参考立法例.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[2]曹明德.环境侵权法.北京：法律出版社2000
[3]陈华彬.外国物权法.北京：法律出版社,2004
[4][德]鲍尔.施迪尔纳著.张双根译,德国物权法(上).北京：法律出版社2004
[5][美]理查德.A.波斯纳著,蒋兆康等译.法律的经济分析(上).北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997
[6]吴道霞.物权法比较研究.北京：中国人民公安大学出版社,2000
[7]叶知年.生态文明构建与物权制度变革.北京：知识产权出版社,2010
[8][德]克雷斯蒂安.冯.巴尔著,焦美华译.欧洲比较侵权行为法(下卷).北京：法律出版社,2002
[9]陈华彬.物权法研究.香港：金桥文化出版社(香港)有限公司,2001
[10]邱汉平.罗马法.北京：中国方正出版社,2004
[11]邱聪智.民法研究(一),北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002
[12][日]原田尚彦著,于敏译.环境法.北京：法律出版社,1999
[13]郑冲、贾红梅译.德国民法典.北京：法律出版社,1999
[1]蔡伟.不可量物初论.甘肃行政学院学报,2003年第4期
[2]马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究.现代法学,2003
[3]崔世君.不可量物解析.法制与社会,2009(12)
[4]曹克睿.不可量物侵害制度研究.法学研究,2005年增刊
[5]陈华彬.法国近邻妨害问题研究——兼论中国的近邻妨害制度及其完善.民商法论丛(第5卷),第319页
[6]马俊驹等.日本环境民事责任研究.现代法学,2003年第1期
[7]金瑞林.环境侵权与民事救济——兼论环境立法中存在的问题.北京大学法学院、香港城市大学法学院第二次法学学术讨论会论文,第5页
[8]王丽萍.国外不可量物侵害制度及对我国物权立法的启示.法学论坛,2000(2)
[9]王友军、李萍.论不可量物的侵害及救济.中央党校学报,2006,(8)
[10]张华平.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2005,(3)
[11]刘秀清、王晓燕、柴长俞.不可量物侵害的民事救济机制.河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版),2008(12)
[12]丁孟佳.关于相邻不可量物侵害的比较法研究.广州广播电视大学学报,2009(10)
[13]郑晓剑、邱鹭风.不可量物侵害制度比较研究.西南政法大学学报,2009(6)
[14]董安生、施允丹.论不可量物侵害分类及容忍义务,2009(1)
[15]郭奎君、刘宝春.论我国的民事环境权——以我国物权法中不可量物侵害制度为切入点.长沙民政职业技术学院学报,2009(6)
[16]胡中华.德国不可量物侵害责任制度的经验及对我国的借鉴.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2006(9)
[17]张平华.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2006(11)
[1]杨娟.不可量物侵权法律制度研究.[硕士学位论文].西南财经大学,2005
[2]张玉霞.我国不可量物侵害制度之构建.[硕士学位论文].北京工商大学,2006
[3]贺艳红.不可量物侵害比较研究.[硕士学位论文].山东大学,2005
[4]刘金荣.不可称量物侵害制度立法模式选择研究.[硕士学位论文].内蒙古大学,2008
[5]刘博.不可量物侵害制度比较研究.[硕士学位论文].黑龙江大学,2008
[6]丁晨星.论我国环境相邻权制度的建立和完善.[硕士学位论文].山东大学,2009
[7]戴江波.不可量物侵权制度研究.[硕士学位论文].山西大学,2009
[8]王春海.论环境权的私法救济.[硕士学位论文].东北林业大学,2006
[9]邸焱红.公民环境权侵权损害司法救济研究.[硕士学位论文].内蒙古大学,2003
[10]魏怡琴.环境相邻关系制度研究.[硕士学位论文]》湖南大学,2008
[1]Roger Bernhardt & AnnM, Burkhart.Real Property Law, Thomas/West Publishing Co. nutshelled,2005
[2]John G. Sprankling, Understanding Property Law. Matthew Bender & Company,Inc,2nded.2007
[3]George C. Christie & James E. Meeks. Csses and Materials on The Law of Torts(Second Edition)
[4]Steven L. Emanuel,Torts. Emanuel Law Outilnes,Inc.4thed,1991
[5]Fontaineblue Hotel Corp. V. Forty-Five, Inc.114 So.2d.357,1959
[6]Edward D. Re&Joseph R. Re, Remedies, Foundation Press. At 2,2000
[7]Steven L. Emanuel,Torts. Citic publishing House.
[1]George C. Christie & James E. Meeks.Cases and Materials on The Law of Torts(Second Edition)
2邱汉平.罗马法.中国方正出版社,2004年版,第229页
3蔡伟.不可量物初论.甘肃行政学院学报,2003年第4期
4中国物权法课题研究组.中国物权法草案建议稿条文、说明、理由与参考立法例.社会科学文献出版社,2000年版
5陈华彬.物权法研究.金桥文化出版社(香港)有限公司,2001年版,第325-327页
6张玉霞.我国不可量物侵害制度之构建.[硕士学位论文],北京工商大学,2006
7马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究.现代法学,2003
8贺艳红.不可量物侵害比较研究[硕士学位论文], 山东大学,2005
9崔世君.不可量物解析.法制与社会,2009(12)
10魏怡琴.环境相邻关系制度研究[硕士学位论文].湖南大学,2008.
11郑冲、贾红梅译.德国民法典.北京：法律出版社,1999.213-214.
12陈华彬.外国物权法.北京：法律出版社,2004.162
13马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究[J].现代法学,2003(1)
14李亚虹.美国侵权法.北京：法律出版社,1999.154
15邱聪智.民法研究(一).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002；325.
16张平华.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2006(6).
17[日]原田尚彦著,于敏译.环境法.法律出版社1999年版.第21页.
[1]中国物权法课题研究组.中国物权法草案建议稿条文、说明、理由与参考立法例.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000
[2]曹明德.环境侵权法.北京：法律出版社2000
[3]陈华彬.外国物权法.北京：法律出版社,2004
[4][德]鲍尔.施迪尔纳著.张双根译,德国物权法(上).北京：法律出版社2004
[5][美]理查德.A.波斯纳著,蒋兆康等译.法律的经济分析(上).北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1997
[6]吴道霞.物权法比较研究.北京：中国人民公安大学出版社,2000
[7]叶知年.生态文明构建与物权制度变革.北京：知识产权出版社,2010
[8][德]克雷斯蒂安.冯.巴尔著,焦美华译.欧洲比较侵权行为法(下卷).北京：法律出版社,2002
[9]陈华彬.物权法研究.香港：金桥文化出版社(香港)有限公司,2001
[10]邱汉平.罗马法.北京：中国方正出版社,2004
[11]邱聪智.民法研究(一),北京：中国人民大学出版社,2002
[12][日]原田尚彦著,于敏译.环境法.北京：法律出版社,1999
[13]郑冲、贾红梅译.德国民法典.北京：法律出版社,1999
[1]蔡伟.不可量物初论.甘肃行政学院学报,2003年第4期
[2]马俊驹、罗丽.日本环境侵权民事责任研究.现代法学,2003
[3]崔世君.不可量物解析.法制与社会,2009(12)
[4]曹克睿.不可量物侵害制度研究.法学研究,2005年增刊
[5]陈华彬.法国近邻妨害问题研究——兼论中国的近邻妨害制度及其完善.民商法论丛(第5卷),第319页
[6]马俊驹等.日本环境民事责任研究.现代法学,2003年第1期
[7]金瑞林.环境侵权与民事救济——兼论环境立法中存在的问题.北京大学法学院、香港城市大学法学院第二次法学学术讨论会论文,第5页
[8]王丽萍.国外不可量物侵害制度及对我国物权立法的启示.法学论坛,2000(2)
[9]王友军、李萍.论不可量物的侵害及救济.中央党校学报,2006,(8)
[10]张华平.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2005,(3)
[11]刘秀清、王晓燕、柴长俞.不可量物侵害的民事救济机制.河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版),2008(12)
[12]丁孟佳.关于相邻不可量物侵害的比较法研究.广州广播电视大学学报,2009(10)
[13]郑晓剑、邱鹭风.不可量物侵害制度比较研究.西南政法大学学报,2009(6)
[14]董安生、施允丹.论不可量物侵害分类及容忍义务,2009(1)
[15]郭奎君、刘宝春.论我国的民事环境权——以我国物权法中不可量物侵害制度为切入点.长沙民政职业技术学院学报,2009(6)
[16]胡中华.德国不可量物侵害责任制度的经验及对我国的借鉴.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2006(9)
[17]张平华.不可量物侵害的私法救济.法学杂志,2006(11)
[1]杨娟.不可量物侵权法律制度研究.[硕士学位论文].西南财经大学,2005
[2]张玉霞.我国不可量物侵害制度之构建.[硕士学位论文].北京工商大学,2006
[3]贺艳红.不可量物侵害比较研究.[硕士学位论文].山东大学,2005
[4]刘金荣.不可称量物侵害制度立法模式选择研究.[硕士学位论文].内蒙古大学,2008
[5]刘博.不可量物侵害制度比较研究.[硕士学位论文].黑龙江大学,2008
[6]丁晨星.论我国环境相邻权制度的建立和完善.[硕士学位论文].山东大学,2009
[7]戴江波.不可量物侵权制度研究.[硕士学位论文].山西大学,2009
[8]王春海.论环境权的私法救济.[硕士学位论文].东北林业大学,2006
[9]邸焱红.公民环境权侵权损害司法救济研究.[硕士学位论文].内蒙古大学,2003
[10]魏怡琴.环境相邻关系制度研究.[硕士学位论文]》湖南大学,2008
[1]Roger Bernhardt & AnnM, Burkhart.Real Property Law, Thomas/West Publishing Co. nutshelled,2005
[2]John G. Sprankling, Understanding Property Law. Matthew Bender & Company,Inc,2nded.2007
[3]George C. Christie & James E. Meeks. Csses and Materials on The Law of Torts(Second Edition)
[4]Steven L. Emanuel,Torts. Emanuel Law Outilnes,Inc.4thed,1991
[5]Fontaineblue Hotel Corp. V. Forty-Five, Inc.114 So.2d.357,1959
[6]Edward D. Re&Joseph R. Re, Remedies, Foundation Press. At 2,2000
[7]Steven L. Emanuel,Torts. Citic publishing House.
[1]George C. Christie & James E. Meeks.Cases and Materials on The Law of Torts(Second Edition)