用于群体研讨支持系统的主持人支持系统研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
群体支持系统(Group Support Systems, GSS)通过在群体任务、主意生成以及群体沟通方面提供多种工具辅助以提高群体工作的效率和效果。GSS可以提高群体工作的效率,减少项目时间。先前研究表明:GSS平均可以减少50%的成本以及90%的项目时间。尽管GSS有提高群体绩效很大的潜力,但是GSS在组织中并没有得到广泛的应用。经验和理论均表明仅仅提供技术并不能带来群体的效率和效果。主持人及协助技术已经成为技术支持的群体协作成功的一个关键因素,可能已经成为GSS广泛应用的瓶颈,尤其是GSS大量的应用于分布式群体这一媒体丰富度低的环境下。故寻求有效的协助策略与支持技术变得更加紧迫,具体表现在以下几个方面:①群体协助已经成为GSS广泛应用的瓶颈因素;②GSS大量的应用于分布式群体环境;③群体协助是一项复杂的社会-技术(Social-Technology)任务。协助(Facilitation)是一项复杂的任务,不仅需要有社会动力学(Social Dynamics)方面的经验,对群体活动的基本原理有很深的认识,还需要有GSS技术方面的知识。
     协助是一个动态过程,包括管理人、任务和技术之间的关系,组织任务,以及促成会议有效达成目标等方面的辅助工作。设计有效的协助支持技术,通过合适的技术手段降低主持人的协助负担是一个有效的途径。本文正是基于这样一个思路,通过IT技术降低主持人的认知负担并提高协助效率,提供了一个如何识别群体的研讨状态并做出反应的框架,开发了多项工具,并设计实验证明了这些工具的效果。
     本论文的主要工作包括以下几个方面:
     1.提出了一个面向解决复杂任务的群体支持系统的概念框架。该概念框架从两个级别管理决策任务:决策任务的管理和群体任务的管理;根据认知过程和各个任务需要的知识及技术,将决策过程分为六个阶段:生成议案、任务识别、任务认知与分解、生成方案、方案选择与进度安排、方案执行与反馈。同时,我们设计了多个工具来支持群体协作。对于决策任务的每个阶段,选择不同的工具集合来支持不同的群体任务。该框架可以降低任务复杂性,辅助任务的分配和人员安排。
     2.基于GASS的概念框架,给出了主持人支持系统的系统结构。并基于解决复杂问题的Cynefin框架,从群体交互信息和研讨文本两个角度,识别出了共识水平与状态、关注水平与状态、群体贡献率、群体参与水平四个指标,设计并实现了文本聚类和摘要技术,形成了“感知—理解—响应”的概念结构,辅助主持人设计干涉技术,并选择适当的协助工具。
     3.通过分析开放持续公共决策环境下对权重的新的需求及现有权重确定方法的不足,提出了一种群体成员权重确定方法:根据背景信息得到的职能权重和专业权重,作为群体成员的基础权重,并周期性的根据群体的参与意愿、主题把握能力以及发言质量计算研讨绩效权重,作为基础权重的修正。实验表明通过该模型可以达到80%的准确性,即能够作为研讨用户信息质量的一个有效测度。
     4.在界定研讨信息属性、定义信息结构及其关系的基础上,按照语义关系,提出共识点、分歧点和争议点的概念,结合共识水平及共识状态、关注水平及关注状态、共识水平变化趋势、关注水平变化趋势四个指标,建立智能可视化模型,并用Java和XML技术设计并实现了基于Web的共识评价、预测及分析智能可视化。以一个实例给出了以人-机结合的系统思想为指导的共识评价和预测方法以及通过共识分析,形成群体注意力聚焦的示范应用。最后用实验的方法分析了智能可视化的应用效果。
     5.识别了GASS环境下自动化主题聚类的一些挑战,在简要综述相关技术的基础上,结合GASS的研讨模式、研讨文本特征及中文文本分析的要求,给出了中文分词、停词表处理以及有效词语识别的文本分析技术。提出基于主题分析的特征向量选择方法,并基于自组织映射的神经网络(Self-Organization Map,SOM)思想,用Java语言设计并开发了一个自动聚类工具。实验表明,该工具可以达到0.28的聚类准确率,0.35的聚类全面率,产生0.83的聚类错误率。最后讨论了实验结果,并给出了进一步的研究方向。
The physical dispersion of current organizations, escalating complexity of problems and poor productivity of traditional meetings has lead to the increasing technological support to group collaboration, by means of Group Support Systems (GSS/GDSS), which was designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of group work by offering a variety of tools to assist the group in the structuring of activities, generating ideas and improving group communication. Despite the potential GSS has to provide great benefit to groups, GSS has not diffused widely in organizations. Experience and theory shows that implementing technology alone seldom is the answer to effective and efficient collaboration. Facilitation is one of the key success factors for effective electronic meetings. Despite the importance of facilitation to the success of GSS applications, most technology developments in the past did not focus on the facilitator. Only recently is research taking the direction of supporting the facilitator for three potential reasons:①the facilitator may be a bottleneck for the widespread diffusion of GSS;②increasingly use the distributed GSS, which are more difficult than face-to-face meetings for both participants and the facilitator; and③Facilitation is complex social-technology task, which need the knowledge of GSS and the group dynamics.
     Facilitation is a dynamic process that involves managing relationships between people, tasks and technology, as well as structuring tasks and contributing to the effective accomplishment of the meeting’s outcome. It is an effect way to design and develop some suit tools to support facilitator to reduce complexity of facilitation. This dissertation argues that IT-based tools will improve the performance of facilitation. We provide a framework of how to sense, understand and respond, develop some tools, and then design some experiments to prove that these tools will enhance the ability of facilitator. The main contents and conclusions of this dissertation are listed as followed:
     1. Group members reach outside their boundaries, the need for computer-mediated collaboration increases. Previous researches focus on the small, face-to-face group meeting, which may be not able to support complex tasks. In a variety of domains, people develop routines to cope with complexity. In order to improve the ability of solving complex tasks and their productivity, and then derive more value from the GASS we design a conceptual framework for solving complex tasks based on group argument support systems (GASS), which divides the decision-making process into six phases based on the cognitive process of management and the skills & knowledge needed: generating motions, motions to tasks, tasks cognition & decomposition, sub-tasks to issues, issues solving and final decision-making.
     2. Facilitation is one of the key success factors for effective electronic meetings. However, facilitation is a very complex task requiring high experience on social dynamics and also a person knowledgeable of the GSS technology and the facilitator may be a bottleneck for the widespread diffusion of GSS. Hence, the requirement to develop effective support for the facilitator becomes critical. Firstly, this paper presented the conceptual framework of GASS, then designed a system to support the facilitator in the full meeting life cycle based on the GASS, and the implement alternatives for each module was discussed.
     3. Group argument support systems(GASS) is a effective support tool to gather public intelligence and form common wisdom. Weighting is an important hub to achieve conversion from qualitative to quantitative. In the context of public decision-making, in order to give the weight of the argument members in the open and loose structure of the organization, we analysis the new requirement and the limitation of the traditional methods, and then based on the weighting of position and the weighting of specialty, design the weighting of argument performance, which works as the periodic modify of the argument members’weighting. Experiment results indicate that the model has a precision of 80% and it is an effect indicator of the comments’value.
     4. Time and consensus are two important factors in the process of group decision. In this paper, an intelligent visualization technology to evaluating, forecasting and analyzing consensus is presented. On the base of strictly analyzing and designing the attributes, the structure and the relationships of argument information, according to semantic relationship, we advance the conception of consensus point aggregate, branching point aggregate, disputed point aggregate, and integrate four Indies of the consensus level and the consensus status, attention level and the attention status, consensus level trend, attention level trend, to build the model of intelligent visualization, then design and implement the visualization system, which based on the web, using the technology of Java & xml. Finally, using an example demonstrates the application of the visualization system, and designing a experiment to analyze the effect of intelligent visualization.
     5. In Group Argument Support Systems (GASS), the characteristics of parallel and anonymous data entry often result in Information overload and knowledge breakout while improving group performance. This research presented a automatic topic clustering tool to enhance participants’cognitive ability. First, we identified some challenges to automatic textual clustering. Then, we briefly reviewed the relative technologies, and described a textual analysis method involving Chinese segment, stop list and effective terms identification. Third, proposing a topic analysis method to obtain eigenvector. Fourth, using java, we designed and implemented a automatic clustering tool based on the self-Organization Map. Experiment indicated that the tool can achieve clustering recall of 0.35, clustering precision of 0.28 and clustering error of 0.83. Finally, we gave some discussions and future directions.
引文
[1] McGrath, J.E., Groups: Interaction and Performance[M]: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
    [2] Fisher, B.A., Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process[M]: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
    [3] Hart, S.L. Toward quality criteria for collective judgments[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36(2): 209-228.
    [4] Hill, G.W. Group versus individual performance: Are N+ 1 heads better than one[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91(3): 517-539.
    [5] McGrath, J.E., I. Altman, Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field[M]: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
    [6] Davis, J.H., Group Performance[M]: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
    [7] Shaw, M.E., Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior[M]: McGraw-Hill College, 1981.
    [8] Steiner, I.D., Group process and productivity[M]: Academic Press New York, 1972.
    [9] Connolly, T., L.M. Jessup, J.S. Valacich. Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups[J]. Management Science, 1990, 36(6): 689-703.
    [10] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 张兴学. 群体研讨支持系统的智能可视化研究——共识评价、预测与分析技术[J]. 管理科学学报(已收录), 2007.
    [11] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域--开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [12] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [13] Nunamakar, J.F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [14] Adkins, M., M. Burgoon, J.F. Nunamaker. Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2003, 34(3): 315-337.
    [15] de Vreede, G.J., et al. Fifteen years of in-situ GSS use: A comparison across time and national boundaries[J]. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2003.
    [16] Grohowski, R., et al. Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1990, 14(4): 369-383.
    [17] Post, B.Q. A business case framework for group support technology[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1992, 9(3): 7-26.
    [18] Briggs, R.O. Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19(4): 31-64.
    [19] Briggs, R.O., et al. A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the USS CORONADO[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1998, 15(3): 151-195.
    [20] den Hengst, M., et al. Which facilitation functions are most challenging: A Global Survey of Facilitators[J]. 2005.
    [21] Ho, T., P. Antunes. Developing a tool to assist electronic facilitation ofdecision-making groups[J]. String Processing and Information Retrieval Symposium, 1999 and International Workshop on Groupware, 1999: 243-252.
    [22] Anson, R., R. Bostrom, B. Wynne. An Experiment Assessing Group Support System and Facilitator Effects on Meeting Outcomes[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(2): 189-208.
    [23] Dickson, G.W., et al. Facilitating computer-supported meetings: A cumulative analysis in a multiple-criteria task environment[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5(1): 51-72.
    [24] Morton, A., F. Ackermann, V. Belton. Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy, and key concepts[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2003, 12(2): 110-126.
    [25] Adkins, M., R. Younger, R. Schwarz. Information technology augmentation of the skilled facilitator approach[J]. System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2003: 10.
    [26] Mittleman, D.D., R.O. Briggs, J.F. Nunamaker Jr. Best practices in facilitating virtual meetings: Some notes from initial experience[J]. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 2000, 2(2): 5-14.
    [27] Romano Jr, N.C., et al. Distributed GSS facilitation and participation: field actionresearch[J]. System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 1999.
    [28] Bostrom, R.P., R. Anson, V.K. Clawson. Group facilitation and group support systems[J]. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, 1993: 146-168.
    [1] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [2] Dennis, A.R., et al. Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(4): 591-624.
    [3] Huber, G.P. A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(1): 47-71.
    [4] Zigurs, I., B.K. Buckland. A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1998, 22(3): 313-334.
    [5] Pinsonnealult, A., K.L. Kraemer. The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1989, 5(2): 197-216.
    [6] Nunamakar, J.F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [7] Dennis, A.R., J.F. Nunamaker Jr, D.R. Vogel. A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1991, 7(3): 107-135.
    [8] Johansen, R., GroupWare: Computer Support for Business Teams[M]: The Free Press New York, NY, USA, 1988.
    [9] DeSanctis, G., M.S. Poole. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(2): 121-147.
    [10] DeSanctis, G., J.R. Snyder, M.S. Poole. The meaning of the interface: a functionaland holistic evaluation of a meeting software system[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1994, 11(4): 319-335.
    [11] McGrath, J.E., A.B. Hollingshead, Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda[M]: Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1993.
    [12] Vickers, B. Designing Layered Functionality within Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1994, 11(1): 83-99.
    [13] Turoff, M., et al. Distributed Group Support Systems[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(4): 399-417.
    [14] Fjermestad, J. An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004, 37(2): 239-263.
    [15] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 张兴学. 群体研讨支持系统的智能可视化研究——共识评价、预测与分析技术[J]. 管理科学学报(已收录), 2007.
    [16] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域--开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [17] Bostrom, R.P., R. Anson, V.K. Clawson. Group facilitation and group support systems[J]. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, 1993: 146-168.
    [18] Clawson, V.K., R.P. Bostrom, R. Anson. The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings[J]. Small Group Research, 1993, 24(4): 547.
    [19] Lewicki, R.J., S.E. Weiss, D. Lewin. Models of Conflict, Negotiation and Third Party Intervention: A Review and Synthesis[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992, 13(3): 209-252.
    [20] George, J.F., A.R. Dennis, J.F. Nunamaker. An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1992, 1(1): 57-70.
    [21] Benbasat, I., L.H. Lim. The Effects of Group, Task, Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies[J]. Small Group Research, 1993, 24(4): 430.
    [22] Dennis, A.R., et al. Bringing automated support to large groups: the Burr-Brown experience[J]. Information and Management, 1990, 18(3): 111-121.
    [23] Keller, R.T. Transformational Leadership and the Performance of Research andDevelopment Project Groups[J]. Journal of Management, 1992, 18(3): 489.
    [24] Zhang, P., J. Sun, H. Chen. Frame-based argumentation for group decision task generation and identification[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005, 39(4): 643-659.
    [25] Sun, J., P. Zhang, S. Chen. A framework for argumentation of decision task generation and identification[J]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003: 10.
    [26] Adkins, M., M. Burgoon, J.F. Nunamaker. Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2003, 34(3): 315-337.
    [27] Ackermann, F. Participants'perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5(1): 93-112.
    [28] Schwartz, R.M. The skilled facilitator[J]. John-Bass Publishers, 1994.
    [29] Schwarz, R., The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches[M]: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
    [30] Briggs, R.O. Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19(4): 31-64.
    [31] Hirokawa, R.Y., D.S. Gouran. Facilitation of Group Communication: A Critique of Prior Research and an Agenda for Future Research[J]. Management Communication Quarterly, 1989, 3(1): 71.
    [32] Jessup, L.M., J.S. Valacich, Group Support Systems: New Perspectives[M]: Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1992.
    [33] Poole, M.S., et al. Group decision support systems as facilitators of quality team efforts[J]. Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings, 1995: 299?321.
    [34] Dickson, G.W., J.E.L. Partridge, L.H. Robinson. Exploring Modes of Facilitative Support for GDSS Technology[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(2): 173-194.
    [35] Gallupe, R.B., G. DeSanctis, G.W. Dickson. Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(2): 277-296.
    [36] Zigurs, I., M.S. Poole, G.L. DeSanctis. A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(4): 625-644.
    [37] 宿彦, et al. 用户驱动的研讨信息可视化平台的设计与实现[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2007, 23(43): 106-109.
    [38] Jarvenpaa, S.L., V.S. Rao, G.P. Huber. Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(4): 645-666.
    [39] Dickson, G.W., et al. Facilitating computer-supported meetings: A cumulative analysis in a multiple-criteria task environment[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5(1): 51-72.
    [40] Eden, C. The Unfolding Nature of Group Decision Support[J]. Tackling Strategic Problems-The Role Of Group Decision Support, 1990.
    [41] Griffith, T.L., M.A. Fuller, G.B. Northcraft. Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects[J]. Information Systems Research, 1998, 9(1): 20-36.
    [42] Wheeler, B.C., J.S. Valacich. Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment[J]. Information Systems Research, 1996, 7(4): 429-450.
    [43] Anson, R., R. Bostrom, B. Wynne. An Experiment Assessing Group Support System and Facilitator Effects on Meeting Outcomes[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(2): 189-208.
    [44] Phillips, L.D., M.C. Phillips. Faciliated Work Groups: Theory and Practice[J]. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1993, 44(6): 533-549.
    [45] Miranda, S.M., R.P. Bostrom. Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1999, 15(4): 89-114.
    [46] Niederman, F., C.M. Beise, P.M. Beranek. Issues and Concerns about Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator's Perspective[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(1): 1-22.
    [47] Limayem, M., P. Banerjee, L. Ma. Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2006, 42(2): 945-957.
    [48] Kraemer, K.L., J.L. King. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 1988, 20(2): 115-146.
    [49] Pinsonneault, A., K.L. Kraemer, i. Groupe de réflexion sur les stratégies, The Effectsof Electronic Meetings on Group Processes and Outcomes: An Assessment of the Empirical Research[M]: école des hautes études commerciales, 1990.
    [50] Fordyce, J.K., R. Weil, Managing with People: A Manager's Handbook of Organization Development Methods[M]. Reading, Mass ed: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1971.
    [51] Schein, E.H., Organizational culture and leadership: a dynamic view[M]: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
    [52] McGoff, C.J., L. Ambrose, B. Ibm. Empirical information from the field: a practitioners' view ofusing GDSS in business[J]. System Sciences, 1991. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 1991, 3.
    [53] Fordyce, J.K., R. Weil. Managing with People; A Manager[J]. 1971.
    [54] de Vreede, G.J., F. Niederman, I. Paarlberg. Towards an Instrument to Measure Participants' Perceptions on Facilitation in Group Support Systems Meetings[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2002, 11(2): 127-144.
    [55] Clawson, V.K., R.P. Bostrom. Research-driven facilitation training for computer-supported environments[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5(1): 7-29.
    [56] den Hengst, M., et al. Which facilitation functions are most challenging: A Global Survey of Facilitators[J]. 2005.
    [57] den Hengst, M., M. Adkins. The Demand Rate of Facilitation Functions[J]. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005: 43c-43c.
    [58] Niederman, F., R. Volkema. Influence of agenda creation and use on meeting activities and outcomes: report on initial results[J]. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research, 1996: 192-205.
    [59] de Vreede, G.J., J. Boonstra, F. Niederman. What is effective GSS facilitation? A qualitative inquiry into participants' perceptions[J]. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2002: 616-627.
    [60] Morton, A., F. Ackermann, V. Belton. Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy, and key concepts[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2003, 12(2): 110-126.
    [61] Hayne, S.C. The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for groupsupport systems design[J]. ACM SIGMIS Database, 1999, 30(3-4): 72-91.
    [62] Adkins, M., R. Younger, R. Schwarz. Information technology augmentation of the skilled facilitator approach[J]. System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2003: 10.
    [63] Adkins, M., R. Schwarz. Embedded facilitation requirements using The Skilled Facilitator approach: with and across time and space[J]. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2002: 560-567.
    [64] den Hengst, M., M. Adkins. Which collaboration patterns are most challenging: A global survey of facilitators[J]. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.
    [65] Lopez, A.V., et al. Embedding facilitation in group support systems to manage distributed group behavior[J]. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2002: 588-596.
    [66] Zhao, J.L., J.F. Nunamaker Jr, R.O. Briggs. Intelligent Workflow Techniques for Distributed Group Facilitation[J]. 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2002.
    [67] Bostrom, R.P., S.T. Kinney, R.T. Watson, Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour[M]: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York, NY, USA, 1992.
    [68] Dickson, G.W., M.S. Poole, G. DeSanctis. An overview of the GDSS research project and the SAMM system[J]. Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.
    [69] Dubs, S., S.C. Hayne. Distributed facilitation: a concept whose time has come?[J]. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 1992: 314-321.
    [70] AlKen, M.W., O. Sheng, D.R. Vogel. Integrating Expert Systems With Group Decision Support Systems[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1991, 9(1): 75-95.
    [71] Antunes, P., et al. Beyond formal processes: augmenting workflow with group interaction techniques[J]. Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, 1995: 1-9.
    [72] Ngwenyama, O.K., N. Bryson, A. Mobolurin. Supporting facilitation in group supportsystems: Techniques for analyzing consensus relevant data[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1996, 16(2): 155-168.
    [73] Consensus Response Keypad. Available from: www.reactivesystems.com.
    [74] Council2. Available from: www.covision.com.
    [75] Facilitation Website. Available from: www.facilitate.com.
    [76] Facilicom. Available from: www.facili.com.
    [77] Mastering Meetings, in The 3M Meeting Management Team. 1994, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
    [78] Gameshow Pro 2 and Gameshow P.A.L. Available from: www.learningware.com.
    [79] Thunderbolt Thinking. Available from: www.tdrweb.com.
    [1] Nunamaker Jr, J.F., R.O. Briggs, D.D. Mittleman. Electronic meeting systems: ten years of lessons learned[J]. Groupware: technology and applications table of contents, 1995: 149-193.
    [2] Bamber, E.M., M.C. Hill, R.T. Watson. Audit groups and group support systems: A framework and propositions for future research[J]. Journal of Information Systems, 1998, 12(2): 45-73.
    [3] Nunamaker, J.F., et al. Group support systems research: Experience from the lab and field[J]. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, 1993: 125-145.
    [4] Steiner, I.D., Group process and productivity[M]: Academic Press New York, 1972.
    [5] Diehl, M., W. Stroebe. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1987, 53(3): 497-509.
    [6] Janis, I.L., Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes[M]: Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
    [7] Nunamakar, J.F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [8] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域--开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [9] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [10] Ellis, C.A., S.J. Gibbs, G.L. Rein. Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(1): 38-58.
    [11] Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1994, 37(1): 92-105.
    [12] Chen, H., et al. Toward intelligent meeting agents[J]. Computer, 1996, 29(8): 62-70.
    [13] Nunamaker, J.R. Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1997, 47(3): 357-385.
    [14] Briggs, R.O., et al. Group support systems: a cornucopia of research opportunities[J]. System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on, 1998, 1.
    [15] Sillince, J.A.A., M.H. Saeedi. Computer-mediated communication: problems and potentials of argumentation support systems[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1999, 26(4): 287-306.
    [16] Alexander, C., The timeless way of building[M]: Oxford University Press New York, 1979.
    [17] Lakoff, G., M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought[M]: Basic Books, 1999.
    [18] Nooteboom, B., Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies[M]: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    [19] Wood, R.E. Task complexity: definition of the construct[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes(Print), 1986, 37(1): 60-82.
    [20] Armstrong, J.S., W.B. Denniston, M.M. Gordon. The use of the decomposition principle in making judgments[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 14(2): 257-263.
    [21] Bailey, R.W., Human performance engineering: designing high quality professional user interfaces for computer products, applications and systems[M]: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996.
    [22] Brodie, C.B., C.C. Hayes. DAISY: a decision support design methodology for complex, experience-centered domains[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 32(1): 50-71.
    [23] Dennis, A.R., et al. Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1999, 23(1): 95-108.
    [24] Simon, H.A., The New Science of Management Decision[M]: Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1977.
    [25] Simon, H.A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization[J]. New York, 1945.
    [26] Simon, H.A., The Sciences of the Artificial[M]: MIT Press, 1996.
    [27] Sabherwal, R., V. Grover. Computer support for strategic decision-making processes: review and analysis[J]. Decision Sciences, 1989, 20(1): 54-76.
    [28] Ackerman, P.L. A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge[J]. Intelligence, 1996, 22(2): 227-257.
    [29] Bower, J.L., Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment[M]: Harvard Business School Press, 1986.
    [30] 张鹏翥, 智能决策支持系统理论技术及应用. 1998, 西安: 陕西人民出版社.
    [31] 张朋柱, 韩崇昭. 智能决策支持系统的问题识别环境及实现方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 1993, 8(001): 1-8.
    [32] 张朋柱, 汪应洛. 决策人员的自主和代理理论 (Ⅰ)――决策者的自主和代理[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 1997, 6(003): 19-24.
    [33] 顾基发, 高飞. 从管理科学角度谈物理―事理―人理系统方法论[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18(008): 1-5.
    [34] 王浣尘. 综合集成系统开发的系统方法思考[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2002, 11(001): 1-7.
    [35] 王浣尘. 难度自增殖系统及其方法论[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 1992, 26(005): 5-11.
    [36] Briggs, R.O. Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19(4): 31-64.
    [37] Adkins, M., J. Kruse, R. Younger. A language technology toolset for development of a large group augmented facilitation system[J]. System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2004: 37-45.
    [38] Tung, L., E. Turban. A proposed research framework for distributed group support systems[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1998, 23(2): 175-188.
    [39] Turoff, M., et al. Distributed Group Support Systems[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(4): 399-417.
    [40] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 张兴学. 群体研讨支持系统的智能可视化研究——共识评价、预测与分析技术[J]. 管理科学学报(已收录), 2007.
    [41] Zhang, P., J. Sun, H. Chen. Frame-based argumentation for group decision task generation and identification[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005, 39(4): 643-659.
    [42] Sun, J., P. Zhang, S. Chen. A framework for argumentation of decision task generation and identification[J]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003: 10.
    [43] Zhang, P., J. Sun, Y. Jiang. Group Decision Tasks Structuring: Comparing the Efficiency of Four Argumentation Produces. in the 6th Wuhan E-Business International Conference. 2007.
    [1] Nunamakar, J.F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [2] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域--开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [3] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [4] Briggs, R.O. Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19(4): 31-64.
    [5] Briggs, R.O., et al. A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the USS CORONADO[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1998, 15(3): 151-195.
    [6] Adkins, M., M. Burgoon, J.F. Nunamaker. Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2003, 34(3):315-337.
    [7] Anson, R., R. Bostrom, B. Wynne. An Experiment Assessing Group Support System and Facilitator Effects on Meeting Outcomes[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(2): 189-208.
    [8] Dickson, G.W., et al. Facilitating computer-supported meetings: A cumulative analysis in a multiple-criteria task environment[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996, 5(1): 51-72.
    [9] Clawson, V.K., R.P. Bostrom, R. Anson. The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings[J]. Small Group Research, 1993, 24(4): 547.
    [10] Adkins, M., R. Younger, R. Schwarz. Information technology augmentation of the skilled facilitator approach[J]. System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2003: 10.
    [11] Mittleman, D.D., R.O. Briggs, J.F. Nunamaker Jr. Best practices in facilitating virtual meetings: Some notes from initial experience[J]. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 2000, 2(2): 5-14.
    [12] den Hengst, M., M. Adkins. Which collaboration patterns are most challenging: A global survey of facilitators[J]. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.
    [13] Romano Jr, N.C., et al. Distributed GSS facilitation and participation: field actionresearch[J]. System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 1999.
    [14] George, J.F., A.R. Dennis, J.F. Nunamaker. An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1992, 1(1): 57-70.
    [15] Miranda, S.M., R.P. Bostrom. Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1999, 15(4): 89-114.
    [16] den Hengst, M., et al. Which facilitation functions are most challenging: A Global Survey of Facilitators[J]. 2005.
    [17] Adkins, M., R. Schwarz. Embedded facilitation requirements using The Skilled Facilitator approach: with and across time and space[J]. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2002: 560-567.
    [18] Lopez, A.V., et al. Embedding facilitation in group support systems to manage distributed group behavior[J]. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2002: 588-596.
    [19] McQuaid, M.J., et al. Tools for Distributed Facilitation[J]. 2000.
    [20] Morton, A., F. Ackermann, V. Belton. Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy, and key concepts[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2003, 12(2): 110-126.
    [21] Zhao, J.L., J.F. Nunamaker Jr, R.O. Briggs. Intelligent Workflow Techniques for Distributed Group Facilitation[J]. 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2002.
    [22] Ho, T., P. Antunes. Developing a tool to assist electronic facilitation ofdecision-making groups[J]. String Processing and Information Retrieval Symposium, 1999 and International Workshop on Groupware, 1999: 243-252.
    [23] Nunamaker Jr, J.F., et al. Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1996, 13(3): 163-207.
    [24] Sun, J., P. Zhang, S. Chen. A framework for argumentation of decision task generation and identification[J]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003: 10.
    [25] Zhang, P., J. Sun, H. Chen. Frame-based argumentation for group decision task generation and identification[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2005, 39(4): 643-659.
    [26] Aiken, M.W., et al. ESP: an expert system for pre-session group decision supportsystems planning. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1990.
    [27] Antunes, P., et al. Beyond formal processes: augmenting workflow with group interaction techniques[J]. Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, 1995: 1-9.
    [28] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 李嘉. 群体研讨支持系统用于公共决策时群体成员权重确定算法初探[J]. 管理科学学报, 2007(在审).
    [29] Nunamaker, J., et al. GroupSystems[J]. Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour, 1991.
    [30] Valacich, J.S., A.R. Dennis, J.F. Nunamaker Jr. Electronic meeting support: the GroupSystems concept[J]. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991, 34(2): 261-282.
    [31] Facilitation Website. [cited; Available from: www.facilitate.com.
    [32] Nunamaker, J.F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [33] Zhang, P., J. Sun, Y. Jiang. Group Decision Tasks Structuring: Comparing the Efficiency of Four Argumentation Produces. in the 6th Wuhan E-Business International Conference. 2007.
    [34] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 张兴学. 群体研讨支持系统的智能可视化研究——共识评价、预测与分析技术[J]. 管理科学学报(已收录), 2007.
    [35] 宿彦, et al. 用户驱动的研讨信息可视化平台的设计与实现[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2007, 23(43): 106-109.
    [36] 孙景乐, 张朋柱. 一种互补的研讨框架的设计与实现[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 360-365.
    [37] 程少川, 卢明德. 群体决策争议的支持模式研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 366-370.
    [38] Grisé, M.L., R.B. Gallupe. Information overload: addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1999, 16(3): 157-185.
    [39] Chen, H., et al. Automatic concept classification of text from electronic meetings[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1994, 37(10): 56-73.
    [40] Kurtz, C.F., D.J. Snowden. The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world[J]. IBM Systems Journal, 2003, 42(3): 462-483.
    [41] Snowden, D.J., M.E. Boone. Un marco para la toma de decisiones del líder[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2007, 85(11): 122-132.
    [42] Ballmer, T.T., W. Brennenstuhl, Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs[M]: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
    [43] Toulmin, S.E., The Uses of Argument[M]: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    [44] Karacapilidis, N., C. Pappis. Computer-supported collaborative argumentation and fuzzy similarity measures in multiple criteria decision making[J]. Computers andOperations Research, 2000, 27(7-8): 653-671.
    [45] 谭俊峰, 张朋柱, 黄丽宁. 综合集成研讨厅中的研讨信息组织模型 [J][J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(1): 86-92.
    [46] 程少川, 张朋柱. 电子公共大脑设计的信息组织研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 21(001): 42-47.
    [47] 顾基发, 唐锡晋. 有关综合集成研究的若干进展[C]. in 西部开发与系统工程(中国系统工程学会第 12 届年会论文集). 2002. 昆明: 北京:海洋出版社.
    [48] 程少川, 卢明德. 群体过程信息的树状结构及其定性收敛的研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 371-375.
    [49] Schwartz, R.M. The skilled facilitator[J]. John-Bass Publishers, 1994.
    [50] Schwarz, R., The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches[M]: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
    [1] 张鹏柱, 刁石京. 我国政府宏观决策任务的分类研究[J][J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(5): 354-359.
    [2] 蒋御柱, 张朋柱, 张兴学. 群体研讨支持系统中的智能可视化研究--共识评价、预测及分析技术[J]. 管理科学学报, 2007(forcoimg).
    [3] 顾基发. 意见综合――怎样达成共识[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 340-348.
    [4] Cosier, R.A., G.L. Rose. Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 19(3): 378-91.
    [5] 程少川, 马高华. 权重在可持续公共智能发展中的应用机制研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 26(3): 24-28.
    [6] 谭俊峰, et al. 面向研讨过程的群体成员权重算法[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2005, 14(2): 97-103.
    [7] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学的新领域—— 开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J][J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [8] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [9] 程少川, 张朋柱, 王刊良. 电子公共大脑设计的信息组织研究[J][J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 21(1): 42-47.
    [10] 顾基发, 唐锡晋. 有关综合集成研究的若干进展[C]. in 西部开发与系统工程(中国系统工程学会第 12 届年会论文集). 2002. 昆明: 北京:海洋出版社.
    [11] 薛耀文, 张朋柱. 省级区域经济发展趋势预测的集成方法研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2003, 6: 129-133.
    [12] 攀千根, 薛耀文, 张朋柱. 对省级 GDP 增长率预测的集成过程分析[J]. 生产力研究, 2003, 6: 128-130.
    [13] 科技领导力研究”课题组, 中. 领导影响力研究[J]. 领导科学, 2006, 12.
    [14] Mintzberg, H., Power in and around organizations[M]: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
    [15] Bobbio, N., Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power[M]: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
    [16] Van den Honert, R.C. Decisional Power in Group Decision Making: A Note on the Allocation of Group Members' Weights in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2001, 10(3): 275-286.
    [17] Lourenco, R.P., J.P. Costa. Discursive e-Democracy Support[J]. System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2006, 4.
    [18] Sproull, L., S. Kiesler. Computers, Network and Work[J]. Scientific American, 1991, 265(3).
    [19] Zhu, B., H. Chen. Social visualization for computer-mediated communication: a knowledge management perspective[J]. Proc Eleventh Workshop on Information Technologies And Systems 2001, 2001.
    [20] Zhu, B. Visualizing a computer mediated communication (CMC) process to facilitate knowledge management[J]. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2002: 562-563.
    [21] Ahuja, M.K., K.M. Carley. Network structure in virtual organizations[J]. Organization Science, 1999, 10(6): 741-757.
    [1] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域--开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [2] DeSanctis, G., R.B. Gallupe. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [3] Trauth, E.M., L.M. Jessup. Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(1): 43-79.
    [4] 孙景乐, 张朋柱. 一种互补的研讨框架的设计与实现[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001,16(005): 360-365.
    [5] 程少川, 卢明德. 群体决策争议的支持模式研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 366-370.
    [6] Grisé, M.L., R.B. Gallupe. Information overload: addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1999, 16(3): 157-185.
    [7] Chen, H., et al. Automatic concept classification of text from electronic meetings[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1994, 37(10): 56-73.
    [8] 谭俊峰, et al. 群体研讨中的共识分析和评价技术[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2005, 14(001): 55-61.
    [9] 李莉, 冯珊. 面向决策支持系统的可视化用户界面[J]. 武汉城市建设学院学报, 1998, 15(003): 5-9.
    [10] 王继龙. 计算机科学领域的可视化技术[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2000(006): 19-21.
    [11] Larkin, J., H. Simon. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth then 10000 words[J]. Cognitive Science, 1987, 15.
    [12] 张兴学, 张朋柱. 群体决策研讨意见分布可视化研究--电子公共大脑视听室 (ECBAR) 的设计与实现[J]. 管理科学学报, 2005, 8(4): 15-27.
    [13] Priem, R.L., D.A. Harrison, N.K. Muir. Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making[J]. Journal of Management, 1995, 21(4): 691.
    [14] Fjermestad, J., S.R. Hiltz. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1998, 15(3): 7-149.
    [15] Bourgeois Iii, L.J. Strategic Goals, Perceived Uncertainty, and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28(3): 548-573.
    [16] Dess, G.G. Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8(3): 259-277.
    [17] Bennis, W.G., H.A. Shepard. A Theory of Group Development'[J]. Sensitivity Training and the Laboratory Approach: Readings about Concepts and Applications, 1970, 9: 415- 437.
    [18] 顾基发. 意见综合――怎样达成共识[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 340-348.
    [19] Cosier, R.A., G.L. Rose. Cognitive Conflict and Goal Conflict Effects on Task Performance[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984, 19: 37- 39.
    [20] 戴汝为, 操龙兵. 综合集成研讨厅的研制[J]. 管理科学学报, 2002, 5(003): 10-16.
    [21] Ballmer, T.T., W. Brennenstuhl, Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs[M]: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
    [22] Toulmin, S.E., The Uses of Argument[M]: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    [23] Karacapilidis, N., C. Pappis. Computer-supported collaborative argumentation and fuzzy similarity measures in multiple criteria decision making[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2000, 27(7-8): 653-671.
    [24] 谭俊峰, 张朋柱, 黄丽宁. 综合集成研讨厅中的研讨信息组织模型 [J][J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(1): 86-92.
    [25] 程少川, 张朋柱. 电子公共大脑设计的信息组织研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 21(001): 42-47.
    [26] 顾基发, 唐锡晋. 有关综合集成研究的若干进展[J]. 顾基发. 西部开发与系统工程 (中国系统工程学会第 12 届年会论文集), 2002, 335.
    [27] 程少川, 卢明德. 群体过程信息的树状结构及其定性收敛的研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2001, 16(005): 371-375.
    [1] 蒋御柱, et al. 群体研讨支持系统中的智能可视化研究--共识评价、预测及分析技术. 管理科学学报. 2007(forcoimg).
    [2] 钱学森, et al. 一个科学的新领域—— 开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志. 1990, 13(1): 3-10.
    [3] DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R. B. A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems. Management Science. 1987, 33(5): 589-609.
    [4] Trauth, E. M. and Jessup, L. M. Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use. MIS Quarterly. 2000, 24(1): 43-79.
    [5] Connolly, T., et al. Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups. Management Science. 1990, 36(6): 689-703.
    [6] Nunamaker, J. F., et al. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM. 1991, 34(7): 40-61.
    [7] Gris, M. L. and Gallupe, R. B. Information overload: addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1999, 16(3): 157-185.
    [8] Chen, H., et al. Automatic concept classification of text from electronic meetings. Communications of the ACM. 1994, 37(10): 56-73.
    [9] Gallupe, R. B. and Cooper, W. H. Brainstorming electronically. Sloan Management Review. 1993, 35(1): 27-36.
    [10] Hiltz, S. R. and Turoff, M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communications of the ACM. 1985, 28(7): 680-689.
    [11] 孙景乐 and 张朋柱. 一种互补的研讨框架的设计与实现[J]. 系统工程学报. 2001, 16(5): 360-365.
    [12] 程少川, et al. 群体决策争议的支持模式研究[J]. 系统工程学报. 2001, 16(5): 366-367.
    [13] Orwig, R. E., et al. A graphical, self-organizing approach to classifying electronic meeting output. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1997, 48(2): 157-170.
    [14] Roussinov, D. G. and Chen, H. Document clustering for electronic meetings: An experimental comparison of two techniques. Decision Support Systems. 1999, 27(1): 67-79.
    [15] Chen, H. Collaborative systems: solving the vocabulary problem. Computer. 1994, 27(5): 58-66.
    [16] Furnas, G. W., et al. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM. 1987, 30(11): 964-971.
    [17] Furnas, G. W., et al. Statistical semantics: analysis of the potential performance of keyword information systems. Human factors in computer systems table of contents. 1984: 187-242.
    [18] Ambriola, V. and Gervasi, V. Experiences with domain-based parsing of natural language requirements. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. 1999: 145?48.
    [19] Hopfield, J. J. Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1982, 79(8): 2554-2558.
    [20] Kohonen, T. Self-organization and associative memory.1989, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
    [21] Kohonen, T. Self-Organization Maps. Proc of IEEE. 1990, 78(9): 1464-1480.
    [22] Salton, G. Automatic text processing. Addison-Wesley Series In Computer Science. 1988: 450.
    [23] Salton, G. Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer.1989, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA.
    [24] Rasmussen, E. Clustering algorithms. Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms table of contents. 1992: 419-442.
    [25] Hartigan, J. A. Clustering Algorithms.1975, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
    [26] Kohonen, T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics. 1982, 43(1): 59-69.
    [27] Caudill, M. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing (neural nets). AI Expert. 1993,8(6): 1622.
    [28] Hiotis, A. Inside a self-organizing map. AI Expert. 1993, 8(4): 3843.
    [29] Ritter, H. and Kohonen, T. Self-organizing semantic maps. Biological Cybernetics. 1989, 61(4): 241-254.
    [30] Lin, X., et al. A self-organizing semantic map for information retrieval. Proceedings of the 14th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 1991: 262-269.
    [31] Kwok, K. L. Comparing representations in Chinese information retrieval. ACM SIGIR Forum. 1997, 31: 34-41.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700