关系营销导向对集群内企业间联盟绩效的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
广东制造业集群正面临转型升级的发展瓶颈,而企业集群的品牌化升级是其中一个重要的潜在路径。集群品牌与企业品牌之间存在着良性互动,尤其是依托型集群品牌,由于有企业个体名牌的依托点,对于产业集群内贴牌和无牌企业的自主品牌创建能起到很好的辐射与带动作用。而对于集群内企业而言,通过搭建集群品牌的合作网络,实现配套产业的联盟升级,能够增强产业集群品牌的溢出效应,从而提升集群的整体竞争力。另一方面,随着竞争环境的变化和网络经济时代的到来,企业深深意识到单凭自身有限的内部资源已难以在激烈竞争中占据一席之地。为此,企业需寻求外部组织的支持,从构建的关系网络中通过异质性知识的共享以及互补性资源的交换,扩展并延伸企业对资源的获取能力,提升企业的创新能力和绩效,从而取得持续竞争优势。对此,网络位置理论的学者更多关注企业占据网络有利位置的重要性以及网络结构为企业带来的资源和权力价值,资源基础观则强调企业内部吸收能力在提升创新能力和企业绩效中扮演的关键角色,也有少数学者开始思考两个流派的结合,以期更好明晰企业绩效的提升机制。那么什么样的经营管理理念既可以有效帮助企业获取发展所需的外部资源,同时又能有助于提升企业吸收和应用外部知识的能力,从而共同促进企业竞争力和绩效的进一步提升呢?这些研究中尚未对这个问题进行探究。
     实际上,当企业间关系成为企业的一项重要资产,作为关系营销理论的实践载体,关系营销导向也已成为形成关系能力,获取关系资本的战略性经营理念。这种导向有利于企业与同一价值网络的顾客、供应商、分销商、竞争者、政府、科研和金融机构等利益相关者发展互动关系,缔结为企业的联盟关系资本,对企业绩效的提升具有积极影响作用。而集群作为区域竞争的新单元,集群内企业之间将通过合作发展成为纵横交错互相依存的战略网络关系,实现集群内企业从个体间的竞争转向集群利益共同体的竞争。因此,如何提升集群中企业之间的联合效率已成为越来越多企业所重点关注的问题。而目前文献中关系营销导向与企业联盟绩效的关系研究尚属空白点。因此,本研究整合社会网络理论和关系营销理论,融合企业内部吸收能力与外部网络资源两个视角,对企业关系营销导向影响集群内企业间联盟绩效的作用机制进行深入探究。
     基于珠三角地区214家集群内企业的数据调查和实证分析,本研究主要得出以下研究结论:(1)关系营销导向对集群内企业间的联盟绩效具有直接正向影响;(2)关系营销导向对企业的网络结构位置具有显著正向影响;(3)关系营销导向对吸收能力具有显著正向影响;(4)网络结构和吸收能力对联盟绩效均具有显著正向影响,其中网络结构相比企业的吸收能力对联盟绩效的影响作用更大;(5)网络结构和吸收能力在关系营销导向影响联盟绩效的过程中均充当了部分中介作用,同时吸收能力在网络结构与联盟绩效中也具有部分中介效应;(6)环境动态性在网络开放性影响联盟绩效的过程中具有正向调节作用;(7)环境动态性在网络中心性和网络密度影响企业吸收能力的过程中具有负向调节作用。
     本研究明晰了关系营销导向影响集群内企业间联盟绩效的作用机制,并由此得到如下管理启示:首先,在当今企业广泛借助外部网络构建战略合作关系的趋势下,企业应关注关系营销导向对企业联盟绩效的重要提升作用,尤其对于集群背景下的关系营销导向企业,在提高自身与合作伙伴联合效率的同时,也有助于以点带面产生联动效应,从而最终提升集群的整体竞争力,推动产业集群的升级。其次,企业内部的吸收能力与企业间的联盟效果均受到企业所嵌入网络的结构位置的促进与限制,因此,企业应重视外部网络的构建,借助关系营销导向有助于企业寻求并缔结外部合作关系的行为占据有利的网络结构位置。同时,企业应培养和提升自身吸收能力,才能充分利用有利的结构位置带来的信息和资源的价值,有效用于自身创新能力和联盟绩效的提升。最后,企业应依据环境变化,适时调整策略,在市场环境高度波动时,更应该进一步提高网络的开放性,在加强原有合作以降低交易成本共抗风险的同时,应积极寻求、接纳新合作伙伴以挖掘新的市场机遇应对市场变动。
Guangdong manufacturing clusters are facing an obstacle of transformation andupgrading, and the upgrading of cluster brand is one of the important potential paths. There isa positive interaction between cluster brands and enterprise brands, especially for therelying-on cluster brands. Relying on the famous individual brand, the OEMs in the clustersmay well create their own brands because of the radiation and leading effects of the industrialcluster brand. As for firms in the cluster, building up a network of cooperation via clusterbrand to achieve upgrade of supporting industries alliance, can enhance the spillover effectof industrial cluster brand, so as to enhance the overall competitiveness of the cluster.Meanwhile, in the network economy era, the dynamic changes of competitive environmentmake firms deeply aware that their own limited internal resources are getting hard to helpthem occupy a place in the fierce market competition. They have to seek the support fromexternal organizations and build up a relationship network, from which they are able to shareheterogeneous knowledge and exchange complementary resources. And this will help firms toexpand and extend resource obtaining, so as to improve innovation and performance,achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. Scholars based on network position theorymore focus on the value of resources and power benefiting from a favorable network position,while scholars of resource-based view emphasize the key role of internal absorption capacityin enhancing innovation and business performance, and a few scholars begin to concern aboutboth streams with an attemptto better clarify the enhancing mechanism of businessperformance. To further enhance the competitiveness and performance, however, what kindof management philosophy can effectively help firms to obtain the required external resourcesfor development, while helping to enhance their capacity to assimilate and apply externalknowledge? This issue remains uncovered in these studies.
     As a matter of fact, when relationship between firms becomes an important asset forbusiness, as a practical carrier of relationship marketing theory, relationship marketingorientation has become a strategic business philosophy, which can help firms to formrelationship ability as well as to access relationship capital. This orientation helps firms tobetter interact with customers, suppliers, distributors, competitors, governments, research andfinancial institutions as well as the other stakeholders in the same value network to obtainalliance relationship capital. Researches indicate that relationship marketing orientationpositively influence business performance. On the other hand, as an industrial cluster becomesa new unit of regional competition, cooperation relationship among cluster firms will construct an interdependent strategic network, turning competitions between individuals intocluster interest community. As a result, how to improve the joint efficiency has become anincreasing concern for more and more firms. Yet, researches on relationship betweenrelationship marketing orientation and alliance performance still remain uncovered. Hence,the impact mechanism of relationship marketing orientation on alliance performance isexplored in this paper, with an integration of social network theory and relationship marketingtheory, as well as a perspective combination of internal absorption capacity and externalnetwork resources.
     Based on the data survey and empirical analysis of214manufacturing firms in industrialclusters in the PRD, the conclusions are reached as follows:(1) Relationship marketingorientation has a significantly direct influence on alliance performance of cluster firms;(2)Relationship marketing orientation has a significantly positive influence on network structuralposition;(3) Relationship marketing orientation has a significantly positive influence onabsorptive capability;(4) Both network structure and absorptive capability have significantlypositive influence on alliance performance, while network structure has an impact on allianceperformance much more strong than absorptive capability does;(5) Both network structureand absorptive capability act as partial mediating effect between relationship marketingorientation and alliance performance, also absorptive capability acts as partial mediatingeffect between network structure and alliance performance;(6) Environmental dynamicspositively moderate the path that network openness impacts on alliance performance;(7)Environmental dynamics negatively moderate the paths that network centrality and networkdensity impact on absorptive capability.
     The impact mechanism of relationship marketing orientation on alliance performance isexamined in this paper, and management implications comes as follows: firstly, as more andmore firms take advantage of external networks to build up strategic partnerships, theimportance of relationship marketing orientation in improving alliance performance should beunderlined. Especially for firms in industrial clusters, relationship marketing orientation notonly helps to improve their joint performance, but also generatesa total effect, whichultimately improves competitiveness and promotes upgrade of the industrial cluster as awhole. Secondly, the improvement of absorption capacity and alliances performance issubject to the structural position embedded in that network. Therefore, emphasis should belaid on the building of external networks, with the aid of relationship marketing orientation tobetter seeking and building external partnerships, thus occupying a favorable network position.At the same time, firms should nurture and improve internal absorption capacity, so as to make full use of information and resources benefiting from a favorable structural position, toeffectively contribute to the improvement of innovation and alliance performance. Finally,firms should employ the right strategies at the right time in accordance with dynamicenvironmental changes. Especially in the highly dynamic market, firms are suggested tofurther increase the openness of the network. Specifically, for better respond to marketchanges, firms should make every effort to seek and accept new partners to exploit newmarket opportunities, while strengthen the existing cooperation to reduce transaction costsand risks.
引文
[1] Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study.[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45:425-455.
    [2] Arikan A.T. Interfirm knowledge exehanges and the knowledge creation capability ofclusters Academy of Management Review,2009,34(4):658-676.
    [3] Andrew V. Shipilobinsead, France Stan Xiao Li. Canada Can You Have Your Cake and EatIt Too? Structural Holes’ Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance inCollaborative Networks [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,(53):73-108.
    [4] Ambler T., Styles C. The future of relational research in international marketing:Constructs and conduits [J]. International Marketing Review,2000,17(6):492-508.
    [5] Akbar Z. Giuseppe S. Network evolution: the origins of structural holes[J]. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,2009,(54):1-31.
    [6] Antia K.D., Frazier G.L. The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channelrelationships [J]. Journal of Marketing,2001,(65):67–81.
    [7] Andersson T., et al. The Cluster Policies Whitebook [R]. Stockholm: IKED,2004.
    [8] Arino A. Measures of strategic alliance performance: an analysis of construct validity [J].Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(1):66-79.
    [9] Aaker D.A. Building strong brands [M]. The Free Press, New York,1996.
    [10] Arias J. T. G. A relationship marketing approach to guanxi [J]. European Journal ofMarketing,1998,32(1/2):145-156.
    [11] Aulakh, Preet, S., Kotabe, Masaaki,&Sahay, Arvind. Trust and performance incross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach [J]. Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies,1996,27(5):1005-1032.
    [12] Anderson E.&Weitz B.The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment indistribution channel[J]. Journal of Marketing Researeh,1992,29(1):18-34.
    [13] Aydalot, P., Keeble, D. High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments [M].Routledge, London, UK,1988.
    [14] Amara, N., Landry, R.. Sources of Information as Determinants of Novelty of Innovationin Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from the1999Statistics Canada Innovation survey[J]. Technovation,2005,(25):245-259.
    [15] Barney, J.B. Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal ofManagement,1991,17:99-120.
    [16] Barney, J.B., Hansen, M.H. Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(8)(Winter):175-190.
    [17] Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese,T., Silverman, B. Don’t go it alone: alliance networkcomposition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology [J]. StrategicManagement Journal,2000,21(3):267-294.
    [18] Bell, S.J, Tracey, P., Heide, J.B. The organization of regional clusters [J]. Academy ofManagement Review,2009,34(4):623–642.
    [19] Burt, R.The Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology,2004,110(2):349-399.
    [20] Burt, R. The contingent value of social capital [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:339-65.
    [21] Burt, R. The network structure of social capital [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2000,22:345-423.
    [22] Burt, R. Structural Holes, The social structure of competition [M]. Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press,1992
    [23] Beckman, C.M., Haunschild, P.R., Phillips, D.J. Friends or strangers? Firm specificuncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection [J]. Organization Science,2004,15:259-275.
    [24] Boland R.J., Tenkasi R.V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities ofknowing [J]. Organization Science,1995,6:350-372.
    [25] Berry L. L., Parasuraman, A. Marketing services. Competing through quality[M]. NewYork: The Free Press,1991.
    [26] Bian Y. J. Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and JobSearches in China [J]. American Sociological Review,1997,62.
    [27] Bathelt H., Malmberg A, Maskell, P. Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, GlobalPipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation [J]. Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(1):31-56.
    [28] Boyd, B. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resourcedependence model [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:419-430
    [29] Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: AComparison between U.S. and Janpaneses Automakers [J]. Management Science,1995,41:147-192.
    [30] Bourgeois L.J. Strategic Goal, Perceived Uncertainty and Economic Performance inVolatile Environments [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1985,28(3):548-573.
    [31] Borys B., Jemison D.B. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliance: Theoretical Issues inOrganizational Combinations [J]. Academy of Management Review,1989,14(2):234-249.
    [32] Burgelman, R. A. Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47:325-357.
    [33] Britton J. Network structure of an industrial cluster: electronics in Toronto [J].Environment and Planning,2003,(6):983-1006.
    [34] Becker W., Peters J. Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation[C]. Working Paper,2000.
    [35] Cohen, S.S., Fields, G. Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley [J]. CaliforniaManagement Review,1999,41:108–130.
    [36] Camarero, C. Relationship orientation or service quality? What is the trigger ofperformance in financial and insurance services?[J]. International Journal of BankMarketing,2007,25(6):406-426.
    [37] Caloghirou, Y., I. Kastelli, and A. Tsakanikas. Internal Capabilities and ExternalKnowledge Sources: Complements or Substitutes for Innovative Performance?[J].Technovation,2004,24(1):29-39.
    [38] Capello R., Faggian A. Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local InnovationProcesses [J]. Regional Studies,2005,39(1):75-87.
    [39] Clark, G.L., Tracey P. and H. Lawton Smith. Agents, endowments and path dependence:A model of multi-jurisdictional regional development [J]. Geographische Zeitschrift,2001,89:165-80.
    [40] Capello, R. Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: LearningVersus Collective Learning Processes [J]. Regional Studies,1999,33(4):353-365.
    [41] Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal D. A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learningand Innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.
    [42] Cullen J.B, Johnson J.L, Sakano T. Success through Commitment and Trust:The SoftSide of Strategic Alliance Management[J].Journal of World Business,2000,35:223-240
    [43] Crosby L.A., Kenneth R.E., Cowles D. Relationship quality in service selling: aninterpersonal influence perspective [J]. Journal of Marketing,1990,54:68-81.
    [44] Child, J. and D. Faulkner. Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks andjoint ventures [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1998.
    [45] Cannon, J. P., Homburg, C. Buyer-supplier relationship and customer firm costs [J].Journal of Marketing,2001,65:29-43.
    [46] Day G.S. maintaining the competitive edge: creating and sustaining advantage indynamic competitive environment [M]. Wharton on dynamic competitive strategies.New York: John Wiley,1997,48-75.
    [47] Day G. S. Managing Market Relationships [J]. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science,2000,28(1):24-30.
    [48] Davies H, Leung T.K.P., Luk, S.T.K.et al. The benefits of “guanxi”: The value ofrelationship in developing Chinese market [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,1995,24(3):207-214.
    [49] Dwyer F. R., Schurr P. H., Oh S. Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships [J]. Journal ofMarketing,1987,51:11–27.
    [50] Das T.K., Teng B.S. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partnercooperation in alliances [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23:491-512.
    [51] Das T.K., Teng B.S. A Resource-based theory of strategic alliance [J]. Journal ofManagement,2000,26(1):31-61.
    [52] Dyer J.H. and Singh H. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Resource ofInterorganizational Competitive Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23:660-669.
    [53] Droge, C., Calantone, R.,&Harmancioglu, N. New product success: Is it reallycontrollable by managers in highly turbulent environments?[J]. Journal of ProductInnovation Management,2008,25:272-286.
    [54] Eisenhardt K.M., Schoonhoven C.B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms [J]. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136-150.
    [55] Eisingerich A. B., Bell S. J., Tracey P. How can clusters sustain performance? The roleof network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty [J]. ResearchPolicy,2010,39(2):239-253.
    [56] Eisingerich A. B., Rubera G., Seifert M. Managing service innovation andinterorganizational relationships for firm performance: to commit or diversify?[J].Journal of Service Research,2009,11:344-356.
    [57] Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities:What are they?[J]. StrategicManagement Journal,2000,21:1105-1121.
    [58] Ellen G., Johnson, M. S. The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment incustomer relationships [J]. Journal of Marketing,1999,63:70-87.
    [59] Escribano A., Fosfuri A., Tribo J.A. Managing External Knowledge Flows: TheModerating Role of Absorptive Capacity [J]. Research Policy,2009,38:96-105.
    [60] Fan, Y. Guanxi’s consequences: Personal gains at social cost [J]. Journal of BusinessEthics,2002,38:371-380.
    [61] Flora F. Gu, Kineta Hung, David K. Tse. When Does Guanxi Mailer? Issues ofCapitalization and Its Dark Sides [J]. Journal of Marketing,2008,72(7):12-28.
    [62] Flatten T.C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S.A., Brettel M. A measure of absorptive capacity:Scale development and validation [J]. European Management Journal,2011,29:98-116
    [63] Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6):1360-1380.
    [64] Granovetter, M.S. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91:481-510.
    [65] Gulati R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(4):293-317.
    [66] Gulati R., Gargiulo, M. Where do organizational networks come from?[J]. AmericanJournal of Sociology,1999,104:1439-1493.
    [67] Gulati R., Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40:619-652.
    [68] Gulati R., Higgins M. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects ofinterorganizational partnerships on IPO Success [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24:127-144.
    [69] Gulati, R., Nohria, N., Zaheer, A. Strategic networks [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:203-215.
    [70] Grant, R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,1996,17:109-122.
    [71] Gertler M. S., and Wolfe. D. A. Spaces of Knowledge Flows: Clusters in a GlobalContext, in Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations
    [M]. ed. by Asheim B., Cooke P. and Martin R., New York: Routledge,2006:218-236.
    [72] Giuliani, E., Bell, M. The Micro-Determinants of Meso-Level Learning and Innovation:Evidence from a Chilean Wine Cluster [J]. Research Policy,2005,34:47-68.
    [73] Gordon, M. Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?[J].Urban Studies,2000,37(3):513-532.
    [74] Geels F. and Deuten J. J. Local and Global Dynamics in Technological Development: ASocio-Cognitive Perspective on Knowledge Flows and Lessons from ReinforcedConcrete [J]. Science and Public Policy,2006,33(4):265-275.
    [75] Gummesson, E. Relationship marketing-The Emperor’s new clothes or a paradigm shift?[J]. Marketing and Research Today,1997, February,53-60.
    [76] Gummesson, E. Relationship marketing and imaginary organizations: A synthesis [J].European Journal of Marketing,1996,30(2):31-46.
    [77] Gronroos C. Marketing redefined [J]. Management Decision,1990,28(8):5-9.
    [78] Gronroos C. Relationship Marketing: Strategic and Tactical Implications [J].Management Decision,1996,34(3):5-14.
    [79] Gronroos C. Internation, dialogue and value Processes of relationship marketing [C].Proceedings of the5th International Colloquium on Relationship Marketing, CranfieldSchool of Management. Cranfield,1997, November.
    [80] Gemunden H.G., Ritter T., Heydebreck P. Network configuration and innovation success:an empirical analysis in German high tech industries [J]. International Journal ofResearch in Marketing,1996,13(5):449-462.
    [81] Geringer J. M., Hebert Louis. Measuring performance of international joint ventures [J].Journal of International Business Studies,1991,22(2):249-263.
    [82] Gupa V. C., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within the multinational corporation [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:473-496.
    [83] Gupta V. C., Govindarajan V. Resource sharing among SBUs: strategic antecedents andadministrative implications [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1986,29(4):695-714.
    [84] Gray C. Absorptive capacity, Knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurialsmall firms [J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research,2006,12(6):345-360.
    [85] Gnyawai D. R.&Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: astructure embeddness perspective [J]. The Academy of Management Review,2001,26(3):431-445.
    [86] Gresov C., Stephens C. The Context of Interunit Influence Attempts [J]. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1993,38(2):252-276.
    [87] Gold A. H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H. Knowledge management: an organizationalcapabilities perspective [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2001,18(1):185-214.
    [88] Graham J., Hooleya G. E. Greenleya J. W., Cadogana J. F. The performance impact ofmarketing resources [J]. Journal of Business Research,2005,(58):18-27.
    [89] Hwang, K. K. Knowledge and Action: A Social Psychological Interpretation of ChineseCultural Tradition [M].(in Chinese). Taipei: Psychological Publication Co.,1995.
    [90] Homburg,C., Pflesser,C.. A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented OrganizationalCulture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes [J]. Journal of MarketingResearch,2000,37(4):449-62.
    [91] Harrison, B. Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?[J]. Regional Studies,1992,26:469-483.
    [92] Hagedoon J, Link A.N., Vonortas N.S. Research Partnerships[J]. Research Policy,2000,29:567-586.
    [93] Hideki Yamawaki. The evolution and structure of industrial clusters in Japan [J]. SmallBusiness Economic,2002,(18):121-140.
    [94] Heide J. B., John G. Alliances in industrial purchasing: the determinants of joint action inbuyer supplier relationships [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1990,(27):4236
    [95] Hult,G.T.M.,Ketchen,D.J. Dose Market Orientation Matter? A Test of the Relationshipbetween Positional Advantage and Performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,(22):899-906.
    [96] Harrigan K. R. Joint ventures and competitive strategy [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(2)
    [97] Hamel G., Doz Y. L., Prahalad C. K. Collaborate with your competitors-and win[J].Harvard Business Review,1989,67(1):133-139.
    [98] Hansen G, Wernerfelt B. Determination of firm performance: the relative importance ofeconomic and organizational factors [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1984,10(5):399-411.
    [99] Hart S. and Banbury C. How Strategy-making Processes can Make a Difference [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:251-269.
    [100] Hakansson H., Snehota I. Developing Relationships in Business Networks [M].Routledge Press,1995.
    [101] Hagedoom, J.&Duysters, G. Learning in Dynamic Inter-firm Networks: the Efficacyof Multiple Contacts [J]. Organization Studies,2002,23(4):525-548.
    [102] Inkpen, A., Tsang, E. W. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer [J].Academy of Management Review,2005,30:146-165.
    [103] Inkpen, A. C., Beamish, P. W. Knowledge, Bargaining Power and International JointVenture Stability [J]. Academy of Management Review,1997,22:177-202.
    [104] Inken A., Dinur A. Knowledge management process and international joint venture [J].Organization Science,1998,9(4):454-468.
    [105] Johnston R. Clusters: a review of their basis and development in Australia [J].Innovation Management, Policy&Practice,2004,(3):380-391.
    [106] Johnson J. L, Raven, P.V. Relationship Quality, Satisfaction and Performance in ExportMarketing Channels [J]. Journal of marketing channels,1996,21:163-181.
    [107] Jansen J.J.P., Bosch F.A.J.V.D., Volberda H.W. Managing potential and realizedabsorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?[J]. Academy ofManagement Journal,2005,48(6):999.
    [108] Jay et al. Understanding and Measuring the Effect of Social Capital on KnowledgeTransfer within Clusters of Small-Medium Enterprise[C].16th Annual Conference ofSmall Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand,2003-10
    [109] Jaworski B J, Kohli A K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences [J].Journal of Marketing,1993,57(7):53-70.
    [110] Koka, B.R., Prescott, J.E. Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23:795-811.
    [111] Kenis, P., Knoke, D. How organizational field networks shape interorganizationaltie-formation rates [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27:275-293.
    [112] Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, andmanagerial implications [J]. Journal of Marketing,1990,54(4):1-18
    [113] Keebled, W. High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe
    [C]. Vermont: A shgate Published Limited,2000.
    [114] Kogut, B. R.The stability of joint ventures reciprocity and competitive [J]. The Journalof Industrial Economics,1989,38(2):183-198.
    [115] Kogut. B., Zande U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and thereplication of technology [J]. Organization Scientce,1992,3(3):383-397.
    [116] Kale P., Singh H. and Pelmutter H. Learning&Protection of Proprietary Assets inStrategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:217-238.
    [117] Kumar R. Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process andoutcome discrepancy model [J]. Organization science,9(3):356-367.
    [118] Kim, L. Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building inCatching-up at Hyundai Motor [J]. Organization Science,1998,9(4):506-521.
    [119] Lorenzen M. Localized Learning: Why Are Inter-Firm Learning PatternsInstitutionalized?[D]. Copenhagen: Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy,Copenhagen Business School,1998,10August.
    [120] Lundvall, B. A. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation andinteractive learning [M]. London: Pinter,1992.
    [121] Larsson, S., Malmberg, A. Innovations, competitiveness and local embeddedness. Astudy of machinery producers in Sweden [J]. Geografiska Annaler,1999,81B:1-18.
    [122] Lee Don Y., Dawes, P. L. Guanxi, Trust, and Long-Term Orientation in ChineseBusiness Markets [J]. Journal of International Marketing,2005,13(2):28-56.
    [123] Lechner C., Frankenberger K. Floyd S.W. Task Contingencies in the curvilinearrelationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance [J]. Academy ofManagement Journal,2010,53(4):865-889.
    [124] Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and theComplementariy of organizational Learning Processes [J]. Academy of ManagementJournal,2009,52(4):822-846.
    [125] Li, F., Nicholls, J. A. F..Transactional or Relationship Marketing: Determinants ofStrategic Choices [J]. Journal of Marketing Management,2000,16:449-464.
    [126] Lindgreen A., Swaen V. Corporate Citizenship: Let Not Relationship Marketing Escapethe Management Tool-box [J].Corporate Reputation Review,2005,7(4):346-363.
    [127] Liao J.,Welsch H., Stoica M. Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Responsiveness:An empirical Investigation of Growth-oriented Small&Medium-Sized Enterprises [J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,28(1),63-85.
    [128] Lane P. J., Koka B.R.&Pathak S. The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A CriticalReview and Rejuvenation of the Construct [J]. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4):833-863.
    [129] Lane P., Lubatkin, M. Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(5):461-477.
    [130] LinNan. Social Networks and Status Attainment [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1999,25:467-488.
    [131] LinNan, Ensel W. M., Vaughn J. C. Social Resources and Strength of Ties: StructuralFactors in Occupational Status Attainment [J]. American Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393-405.
    [132] Morgan, R. M., Hunt, S. D. The Commitment-Trust Theory of relationship marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing,1994,58(3):20-38.
    [133] Maskell, P., Malmberg, A., Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999,23:167-185.
    [134] Murovec, N. Strukturni model absorbcijske sposobnosti podjetij in njen vpliv nainovacije, Doctoral dissertation. Ljubljana: Institute for economic research,2007.
    [135] McEvily, B., Zaheer, A., Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitivecapabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133-1156.
    [136] McEvily B., Mareus A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities.Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(11):1033-1055.
    [137] Mors M.L. Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too muchdiversity [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(8):847-872.
    [138] Malmberg A. Industrial geography, location and learning[J]. Progress in HumanGeography,1997,21:573-82.
    [139] Murray J.Y., Kotabe M., Zhou J.N. Strategic alliance-based sourcing and marketperformance: Evidence from foreign firms operating in China[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies,2005,(36):187-208.
    [140] McKendrick, D., Doner, R., Haggard, S. From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Locationand Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry [M]. Stanford UniversityPress, Thousand Oaks, CA,2000.
    [141] Menguc, B. and Auh, S. Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizingon market orientation and innovativeness [J]. Journal of the Academy of marketingScience,2006,34(1):63-73.
    [142] Miller, D. Friesen, P. Strategy-making and environment:The third link [J]. Strategicmanagement Journal,1983,4:221-235.
    [143] Miller, D. The Structural and Environmental Correlates of Business Strategy [J].Strategic Management Journal,1987:8(1):55-76.
    [144] Mohr J. J., Spekman R.E. Characteristics of partnership success:Partnership attributes,communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques [J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,1994,15(2):135-152.
    [145] Mowery D.C., Oxley, J.E. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role ofnational innovation systems [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1995,19:67-93.
    [146] Martin Kidulff, Wenpin Tsai. Social Networks and Organization [M]. Sage PublicationLtd.,2003,232
    [147] Marsden P V. Network data and measurement [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1990,16:435-463.
    [148] Maskell, P., Malmberg, A. The competitiveness of firms and regions.‘Ubiquitification’and the Importance of localized learning [J]. European Urban and Regional Studies,1999,6(1):9-25.
    [149] Nonaka, I.A. Dynamic Theory of Organization Knowledge Creation [J]. OrganizationScience,1994,5(1):14-37.
    [150] Narasimhan O., Rajiv S., Dutta S. Absorptive capacity in high-technology markets:Thecompetitive advantage of the haves. Marketing Science [J].2006,25:510-524.
    [151] Owen-Smith J., Powell W.W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: theeffects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community [J]. Organization Science,2004,15(1):5-21.
    [152] Osland, Gregory, E.,&Cavusgil, S., Tamer. Performance issues in U.S.-China jointventures [J]. California Management Review,1996,38(2):106-130.
    [153] Powell W. Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization [J].Research in Organizational Behavior,1990,12:295-336.
    [154] Powell, Koput, Smith-doerr. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Local ofInnovation-Networks of Learning in Biotechnology [J]. Administrative ScienceQuarterly,1996,41:116-145.
    [155] Porter, M.E. and.Fuller M.B. Competition in Global Industries [M]. Boston, MA:Harvard Business Press,1986.
    [156] Porter, M.E. The economic performance of regions [J]. Regional Studies,2003,37:549-578.
    [157] Porter, M.E. Locations, clusters and company strategy [J]. In: Clark, G.L., Feldman,M.P.,2000.
    [158] Parkhe, A. Strategic Alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction on costexamination of interfirm cooperation [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(4):794-829.
    [159] Parkhe, A. Partner nationality and the structure performance relationship in strategicalliances [J]. Organization Science,1993,4(2):301-324.
    [160] Power D.,Lundmark M. Working through Knowledge Pools: Labour Market Dynamics,the Transference of Knowledge and Ideas, and Industrial Clusters, in Clusters in Urbanand Regional Development [J].ed.by A. Cumbers and D. MacKinnon, London and NewYork: Routledge,2006:56-74.
    [161] Pederson, A. C. The process of connecting business relationships [C]. Paper for the8thNordic Workshop on Inter-organisational Research. Denmark: Arhus,1998.
    [162] Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the socialdeterminants of economic action [J]. American Journal of Sociolog,1993,98:1320-1350
    [163] Ring P.S., VandeVen A.H. Developmental Processes of Cooperative InterorganizationalRelationships [J]. Academy of Management Review,1994,19(1):90-118.
    [164] Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. The acquisition and utilization of information in newproduct alliances:a strength-of-ties perspective [J]. Journal of Marketing,2001,65:1-18
    [165] Romanelli, E., Khessina, O.M. Regional industrial identity: cluster configurations andeconomic development [J]. Organization Science,2005,16:344-358.
    [166] Pak Y.S., Park Y.R. A framework of knowledge transfer in cross-border joint ventures:an empirical test of the Korean context [J].Management International Review,2004,44(4):417-434.
    [167] Rosenkopf L., Schilling M. A. Comparing alliance network structure across industries:observations and explanations [J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2007,1:191-209.
    [168] Rodan S., Galunic C. More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneityinfluences managerial performance and innovativeness [J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,2004,25:541-562.
    [169] Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt, D. Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysisof Structural and Relational Embeddendess in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:369-386.
    [170] Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility [J].Management Science,2003,49:751.
    [171] Rugman, A.M., D’Cruz, J.R. Multinationals as flagship firms: regional businessnetworks.[J]. Management International Review,2002,42,347-352.
    [172] Sin L.Y.M., Tse A.C.B, Yau O.H.M.et al. The effect of relationship marketingorientation on business performance in a service-oriented economy[J]. Journal ofServices Marketing,2002,16(7):656-676.
    [173] Sin L.Y.M, Tse A.C. B, Yau O. H. M. et al. Market Orientation, RelationshipMarketing Orientation, and Business Performance: The Moderating Effects ofEconomic Ideology and Industry Type [J]. Journal of International Marketing,2005a,13(1):36-57.
    [174] Sin L.Y.M., Tse A.C.B., Yau O.H.M.,Chow R. P. M., Lee, J. S.Y.,L.B.Y.. RelationshipMarketing Orientation: Scale Development and Cross-Cultural Validation [J]. Journalof Business Research,2005b,58(2):185-194.
    [175] Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategicalliance formation in a high-technology industry [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998,43(3):668-698.
    [176] Shenkar, O.&Li, J. Knowledge Search in International Cooperative Ventures [J].Organization Science,1999,10(2):134-143.
    [177] Selnes F., Sallis J. Promoting relationship learning [J]. Journal of marketing,2003,67(July):80-95.
    [178] Schein, E. H.. Organizational Culture and Leadership [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-bass,1985:22-25.
    [179] Stuart T.E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study ofgrowth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry [J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,2000,21(8):791-811.
    [180] Shan W. An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurialhigh-technology [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(2):129-139.
    [181] Schilling M. A., Steensma K. The use of modular organizational forms: an industrylevel analysis [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44:1149-1169.
    [182] Schilling M.A., Phelps C. Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scalenetwork structure on firm innovation [J]. Management Science,2007,53(7):1113-1127.
    [183] Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Kraimer M. L. Social networks and theperformance of individuals and groups [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(2):316.
    [184] Saxena G. Relationship, networks and the learning regions: case evidence from the PeakDistrict National Park [J]. Tourism Management,2003,11(4):1-13.
    [185] Saxenian, A. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley andRoute128[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1994.
    [186] Storper M.. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy [M]. NewYork: The Guildford Press,1997.
    [187] Spekman R. E., Isabella L.A., MacAvoy T. C.&Forbes T. Creating strategic allianceswhich endure [J]. Long Range Planning,1998,29(3):346-357.
    [188] Shapiro D. L., Sheppard B. H. and Cheraskin L. Business on a handshake [J].Negotiation Journal,1992,8:365-377.
    [189] Szulanski, G. Exploring stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice withinthe firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(Winter Special Issue):27-43.
    [190] Schmitz, H., Nadvi, K. Clustering and industrialization: introduction [J]. WorldDevelopment,1999.27,1503-1514.
    [191] Salman N.&Salves A. L. Indirect Network: An Intangible Resource for BiotechnologyInnovation [J]. R&D Management,2005,35(2):203-215.
    [192] Song M., Droge C., Hanvanich S., Calantone R. Marketing and technology resourcecomplementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:259–276.
    [193] Sun P.Y.T., Anderson M. H. An examination of the relationship between absorptivecapacity and organizational learning, and a proposed integration[J]. InternationalJournal of Management Reviews,2008.
    [194] Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: the Role of intra-firm networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41:464-478.
    [195] Tsai E., A., Tsai W. Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of NetworkEmbeddedness [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,(3):219-238.
    [196] Tsai, W. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of NetworkPosition and Absorptive Capacity on Business-unit Innovation and Performance [J].Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(5):996-1004.
    [197] Tsai Y. C. Effect of social capital and absorptive capability on innovation in internetmarketing [J]. International Journal of Management,2006,23(1):157-166.
    [198] Tsai W. Social capital, strategical relatedness and the formation of intraorganizationallinkages [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(9):925-939.
    [199] Tracey P., Clark G. L. Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy: rethinking clusterof innovation [J]. Growth and Change,2003,34(1):1-16.
    [200] Teece, D.J. Competition, cooperation and innovation: organizational arrangements forregimes of rapid technological progress [J]. Journal of Economic Behaviour andOrganization,1992,18:1-25.
    [201] Teece, D.J. Managing intellectual capital [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2000.
    [202] Tichy N. M., Tushman, M. L., Fombrun, C. Social Network Analysis for Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review,1979,4(4):507-519.
    [203] Todorova G. Durisin B. Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a Reconceptualization [J].Academy of Management Review,2007,32(3):774-786.
    [204] Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performanceof organizations: the network effect [J]. American Sociological Review,1996,61:674-698.
    [205] Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox ofembeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:35-67.
    [206] Venkatesan R. Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make [J]. Harvard Business Review,1992,70(6):98-107.
    [207] Vanden Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda H.W. Michiel deBoer. Coevolution of Firm AbsorptiveCapacity and Knowledge Environment:Organizational Forms and CombinativeCapabilities [J]. Organization Science,1999,10(5):551-568.
    [208] Verhoef P.C. Understanding the effect of customer relationship management efforts oncustomer retention and customer share development [J]. Journal of Marketing,2003,67:30-45.
    [209] Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G.,&Noorderhaven, N. External technology sourcingthrough alliances or acquisitions: an analysis of the application-specific integratedcircuits industry [J]. Organization Science,2002,13(6):714-733.
    [210] Watson J. Modeling the Relationship between Networking and Firm Performance [J].Journal of Business Venturing,2007,22(6):852-874.
    [211] Wong, Y. H., and Chan, R. Y. Relationship marketing in China: Guanxi, favoritism andadapt ation [J]. Journal of Business Ethics,1999,22(2):107-118.
    [212] Winklhofer H., Pressey A. and Tzokas, N.A. Cultural Perspective of RelationshipOrientation: Using Organisational Culture to Support a Supply Relationship Orientation[J]. Journal of Marketing Management,2006,22:169-194.
    [213] Webster C. Towards the Measurement of the Marketing Culture of a Service Firm [J].Journal of Business Research,1990,21:345-362.
    [214] Wilson D.T., Mummalaneni V. Bonding and commitment in supplier relationship:apreliminary conceptualization[J]. Industrial Marketing and Purchasing,1986,1(3):58-66
    [215] Yang Z., Wang C.L. Guanxi as a governance mechanism in business markets: Itscharacteristics, relevant theories, and future research directions [J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,2011,40:492–495.
    [216] Yau O. H.M., McFetridge P. R., Chow R. P.M., et al. Is Relationship Marketing forEveryone?[J]. European Journal of Marketing.2000,34(9):1111-1127.
    [217] Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E.&Sapienza, H. J. Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, andKnowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms [J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,2001,22(6/7):587-613.
    [218] Yamagishi, Toshio, Karen S. Cook, and Motoki, Watabe. Uncertainty, Trust andCommitment Formation in the United States and Japan [J]. The American Journal ofSociology,1998,104:165-194.
    [219] Zahara S.A. Technology Strategy and Financial Performance: Examining theModerating Role of the Firm Competitive Environment [J]. Journal of BusinessVenture,1996.11:189-219.
    [220] Zahara S. A., George G. Absorptive Capacity: A review, reconceptualization, andextension [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203.
    [221] Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(5):373-392.
    [222] Zaheer A., McEvily B. and Perrone V. Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects ofInterorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance [J]. Organization Science,1998,9(2):141-159.
    [223] Zaheer A., Bell G. G. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structuralholes, and performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:809-285.
    [224] Zaheer, A., George, V.P. Reach out or reach within? Performance implications ofalliances and location in biotechnology [J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2004,25:437–452.
    [225]宝贡敏,王庆喜.战略联盟关系资本的建立与维护[J].研究与发展管理,2004(3):9-14.
    [226]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及功能[J].中国社会科学,2000,(2):87-99.
    [227]巴泽尔.产业集群研究的新视角[J].世界地理研究,2005,14(1):105-110.
    [228]常荔,李顺才,邹珊刚.论基于战略联盟的关系资本的形成[J].外国经济与管理,2002,24(7):29-33.
    [229]陈律睿,李文瑞,陈世杰.中小企业联盟关系与联盟绩效影响因素之研究[J].中华管理评论,2009,12(3).
    [230]蔡宁,潘松挺.网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协调演化——以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J].中国工业经济,2008,(4):36.
    [231]蔡宁,吴结兵.产业集群内企业网络体系——系统建构与结构[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2006,12(2):9-14.
    [232]蔡玮,陈晓红.园区集群网络结构、资源获取对企业绩效影响机制[J].系统工程,2010,28(8):31-38.
    [233]窦红宾,王正斌.网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究——利用性学习、探索性学习的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(3):15-25.
    [234]窦红宾,王正斌.网络结构、吸收能力与企业创新绩效——基于西安通信设备制造产业集群的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2010,5:25-30
    [235]方世荣,张嘉雯,黄识铭.组织间关系长期导向之影响因素的探讨——中小企业特质的干扰作用[J].台湾管理学刊,2003,3(1):101-124.
    [236]冯文娜.网络能力、网络结构对企业成长的影响——以济南中小软件企业为例[J].中央财经大学学报,2010,32(8):135-143.
    [237]范秀成.从交易营销到关系营销:营销学领域的一场重要变革[J].国际经贸研究,1998,3:10-17.
    [238]费孝通.乡土中国[M].上海:上海三联书店,1985.
    [239]傅勇,杨华.国美格力互下“封杀令”,新旧渠道最后的搏弈[N].经济参考报,2004年3月18日.
    [240]符正平.现代管理与企业集群成长[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2003,43(6):94-99.
    [241]耿小庆.组织知识创新与企业能力成长:一个实证分析[J].软科学,2011,25(8):21-25-34.
    [242]高怡冰,林平凡.产业集群创新与升级——以广东产业集群发展为例[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2010.
    [243]高展军,李垣.战略网络结构对企业技术创新的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(3):474-479.
    [244]黄纯,蔡宁.企业创业与集群跨层面升级的探索式多案例研究[J].科学与科学技术管理,2012,33(2):96-102.
    [245]胡海青,张宝建,张道宏.网络能力、网络位置与创业绩效[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4):67-74.
    [246]黄俊,李传昭,张旭梅等.战略联盟管理与联盟绩效的实证:基于动态能力的观点[J].科研管理,2007,28(6):98-106.
    [247]黄嫚丽,蓝海林.基于吸收能力的联盟企业组织学习研究[J].科技管理研究,2005,10:89-91
    [248]纪莺莺.文化、制度与结构:中国社会关系研究[J].社会学研究,2012,2:60-85
    [249]黄中伟.基于网络结构的产业集群创新机制和绩效分析[J].宁波大学学报,2004,(3):94-98.
    [250]焦豪,周江华,谢振东.创业导向与组织绩效间关系的实证研究——基于环境动态性的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,11:70-76.
    [251]焦俊,李垣.基于联盟网络的企业知识获得和技术创新[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(1):104-109.
    [252]金耀基.关系和网络的建构:一个社会学的诠释[M].中国社会与文化,香港:牛津大学出版社,1992.
    [253]纪莺莺.文化、制度与结构:中国社会关系研究[J].社会学研究,2012,2:60-85.
    [254]科特勒,凯勒.营销管理[M].王永贵等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:25-26
    [255]李春苗.人际关系协调与冲突解决[M].广州:广东经济出版社,2001.
    [256]李大垒,仲伟周.产业集群品牌发展模式转换的实证研究[J].商业经济与管理,2008,202(8):53-60.
    [257]李凯,李世杰.装备制造业集群网络结构研究与实证[J].管理世界,2004,(12):68-76.
    [258]李贞,杨洪涛.创新绩效的影响研究—来自科技型中小企业的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(1):79-89.
    [259]李志刚,汤书昆,梁晓艳等.产业集群网络结构与企业创新绩效关系研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(4):777-782.
    [260]李颖灏.关系营销导向对营销创新的影响研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(3):42-28.
    [261]李运河.企业间知识转移对战略联盟绩效影响的实证研究[J].湖北社会科学,2011,8:98-101.
    [262]李平.企业网络组织理论研究述评[J].科技与管理,2007:(2),19-21..
    [263]李秀起.基于信任的供应链合作伙伴关系管理研究[D].江苏大学硕士学位论文,2010.
    [264]刘友金等.共生理论视角下产业集群式转移演进过程机理研究[J].中国软科学,2012,(8):122.
    [265]刘汴生,王凯.企业集群网络结构及其绩效研究综述[J].工业技术经济,2007,26(9):125-128.
    [266]刘璐.企业外部网络对企业绩效影响研究:基于吸收能力视角[D].山东大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [267]刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
    [268]刘东等.企业网络论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
    [269]罗家德.社会网络分析讲义.第二版[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.
    [270]路红艳.生产性服务与制造业结构升级——基于产业互动、融合的视角[J].财贸经济,2009,(9):126-131.
    [271]黎熙元,廖慧妍.文化冲突与在中国经营的跨国企业人力资源管理[R].2003.
    [272]蓝庆新,韩晶.网络组织成员合作的稳定性模型分析[J].财经问题研究,2006,6:49-52
    [273]林南.社会资本——关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].上海:上海出版社,2005.
    [274]林昭文,张同健,蒲勇健.基于互惠动机的个体间隐性知识转移研究[J].科研管理,2008(4):28-33.
    [275]毛蕴诗,戴勇. OEM, ODM到OBM:新兴经济的企业白主创新路径研究[J].经济管理,2006,(20):10-15.
    [276]彭伟,符正平.联盟网络对企业竞争优势的影响:知识资源获取的中介效应与环境不确定性的调节效应[J].软科学,2012,26(4):17-22.
    [277]邱海雄等.珠江三角洲产业集群发展模式与竞争力研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2008.
    [278]钱璐.广东省制造业集群对区域竞争力影响的实证分析[D].暨南大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [290]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置-吸收能力与创新绩效_一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010(5):118-129.
    [291]沈必扬,王晓明.基于吸纳能力、技术机遇和知识溢出的企业创新绩效分析[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(4):126-129.
    [292]沈灏,李垣.联盟关系、环境动态性对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(1):77-85.
    [293]宋华,王岚.企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(3):1-10
    [294]宋铁波,孔令才.企业网络能力与不连续性技术创新战略选择关系研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(S1):224-229.
    [295]任春红.集群产业优势对区域品牌形成的作用机理研究----以柳市低压电器集群为例[D].吉林财经大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [296]沙振权,周飞,何美贤.企业间关系嵌入对供应链合作绩效的影响机制研究[J].经济管理,2013(2):87-95.
    [297]沙振权,周飞.企业网络能力对集群间企业合作绩效的影响研究[J].管理评论,2013,25(6):95-103.
    [298]沙振权,何美贤,周飞.关系营销导向对集群内企业间联盟绩效的影响研究[J].软科学,2014,28(5):57-61.
    [299]谭劲松,何铮.集群研究文献综述及发展趋势[J].管理世界,2007,12:97-101.
    [300]王凤荣,王慧.价值链理论视角的我国企业集群隐性升级[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2007(06):81-89.
    [301]王晓霞,张轶慧.产业集群升级:基于网络结构的视角[J].求实,2010(12):46-49.
    [302]王缉慈.创新的空间:企业集群与区域发展[M].北京大学出版社.2001.
    [303]王建军.人情关系质量在关系营销中的作用研究[D].大连理工大学博士论文.2012.
    [304]王霄宁,王轶.新经济社会学视角下基于社会网络分析的产业集群定量化研究[J].系统工程,2005,(2):95-99.
    [305]汪建成,毛蕴诗,邱楠.由OEM到ODM再到OBM的自主创新与国际化路径——格兰仕技术能力构建与企业升级案例研究[J].管理世界,2008,(6):148-155.
    [306]吴波,贾生华.区域产业集群演进中集群内企业网络化成长机制与模式研究[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008.
    [307]吴结兵,徐梦周.网络密度与集群竞争优势:集聚经济与集体学习的中介作用——2001~2004年浙江纺织业集群的实证分析[J].管理世界,2008,8:69-76.
    [308]吴俊杰,盛亚.网络强度、网络开放度对产业集群绩效的影响机制研究——以浙江产业集群为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(11):1867-1872.
    [309]吴隆增,徐长青,梁娉娉等.吸收能力对组织学习和组织创新的影响——珠三角地区高科技企业的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2008,28(5):135-138.
    [310]吴晓波,刘雪峰,胡松翠.全球制造网络中本地企业知识获取实证研究[J].科学学研究,2007(3).
    [311]武志伟等.企业间关系质量的测度与绩效分析—基于近关系理论的研究[J].预测,2007(2):8-15.
    [312]邢小强,仝允桓.网络能力:概念、结构与影响因素分析[J].科学学研究,2006(12):558-563.
    [313]徐二明,张晗.企业知识吸收能力与绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6);841-848.
    [314]徐金发,许强,王勇.企业的网络能力剖析[J].外国经济与管理,2001(11):41-47.
    [315]熊伟,奉小斌,张群祥.持续改进与渐进式创新整合:基于组织学习视角.科技进步与对策[J].2010,27(18):13-16.
    [316]应洪斌,产业集群中关系嵌入性对企业创新绩效的影响机制研究:基于关系内容的视角[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2010.
    [317]姚伟坤.集群内企业品牌网络关系的形成及对群内个体品牌的驱动研究[D].中国矿业大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [318]杨俊峰.沃尔玛与宝洁:供应链协同的双赢模式[J].经理人,2007,(7):100-101.
    [319]杨玲丽.产业升级——一个共生学的解释[N].社科网,2010.
    [320]杨锐,黄国安.网络位置和创新—杭州收集产业集群的社会网络分析[J].工业技术经济,2005,24(7):114-118.
    [321]杨瑞龙.企业理论:现代观点[M].中国人民大学出版社,2005.
    [322]袁国华,甘碧群.关系营销理论的局限性评析[J].经济管理,2004,6(12):65-69.
    [323]阎云翔.差序格局与中国文化的等级观[J].社会学研究,2006,第4期.
    [324]曾萍.知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究[J].科学学研究,2009,27(8):1271-12.
    [325]庄贵军,周筱莲,徐文.关系营销导向:量表重新设计与检验[J].商业经济与管理,2007,191(9):42-48.
    [326]张方华.网络嵌入影响企业创新绩效的概念模型与实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2010,4:110-119.
    [327]张其仔.社会资本论:社会资本与经济增长[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002
    [328]张小兵.知识吸收能力研究评述[J].技术经济与管理研究,2010,3:48-50.
    [329]翟学伟.关系与中国社会[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
    [330]翟学伟.是"关系"还是社会资本[C].第二届社会网络与关系学术会议,南京:南京大学,2007.
    [331]朱秀梅,费宇鹏.关系特征、资源获取与初创企业绩效关系实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(3):125-135.
    [332]赵阳,刘益,张磊楠.战略联盟控制机制、知识共享及合作绩效关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(6):51-54.
    [333]张旸.关系导向、涉网度对关系质量的影响研究[D].大连理工大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [334]邹爱其.企业网络化成长.国外企业成长研究新领域[J].外国经济与管理,2005(10):10-18.
    [335]章丹,胡祖光.网络结构洞对企业技术创新活动的影响研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(6):34-35.
    [336]周青.技术联盟与创新绩效:理论分析与实证检验[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700