企业R&D项目的过程控制与绩效评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在全球经济一体化的今天,技术创新在提高国家竞争力中发挥着越来越重要的作用。作为技术创新活动的核心,研究与开发(Research & Development,简称R&D)的作用日益凸现。一个企业要扩大自身的竞争优势,就必须不断储备技术潜力,不失时机地将这些潜力转化为有竞争力的产品与科技成果,而R&D的作用正是创造出这些技术潜力。伴随着R&D作用和地位的日益增强,R&D管理也受到了越来越多的重视,企业开始注意组织手段对R&D的重要作用,处理好R&D部门与其他职能部门的互动关系,并开始关注R&D项目生命周期内的成本、质量和进度,以及项目的不确定性、冲突和项目的执行、控制等问题。这种管理是建立在现代项目管理理论基础上的,需要有效的技术战略与构建创新导向的组织制度、采取更先进的管理方法。其管理的重点是通过时间控制、成本控制来提高R&D的投入产出比,进一步提高R&D的绩效。
     本文运用现代项目管理理论和评价理论,分析R&D项目的生命周期并结合其中最重要的环节和有关活动,分别从进度控制、成本控制和绩效管理三方面入手,分析R&D项目过程管理中应当遵循的原则,提出有效的管理工具和方法,结合具体案例对所建立的方法体系进行了应用。
     首先,本文对R&D项目管理的理论、方法与模型的研究成果进行了阐述,结合已有的观点对R&D的概念进行了界定。围绕企业R&D项目管理的特点,重新将企业R&D项目的生命周期划分为四个阶段,对各个阶段的基本活动与投入要素进行了具体的描述,结合生命周期分析了R&D项目的进度风险以及成本风险。其次,基于时间对R&D项目的约束作用,将进度控制作为R&D项目管理成功的关键,指出R&D项目进度控制的原则与重点。从项目时间管理的角度,分析了R&D项目的进度计划的制定过程,针对传统CPM、PERT方法的不足,进一步提出了最小化最大遗憾值寻找关键路径的方法,并在R&D项目进度优化的基础上提出了进度计划控制及其选择的方法。接下来,将R&D项目成本控制作为R&D项目管理的核心,确定了R&D项目成本管理的方法和实施步骤,对R&D项目成本管理的目标进行了完整的描述并对成本投入要素进行了分析,立足于项目全生命周期成本,进行了全生命周期视角的限额设计,提出了基于R&D项目生命周期成本限额设计的成本优化实施程序。在进度和成本优化的基础上,结合生命周期提出了静态与动态相结合的绩效评价思想,依据R&D项目绩效评价的特点和原则,建立了全面评价R&D项目绩效的指标体系,选取经济、财务和非财务指标并进行归一化处理,基于模糊积分的基本原理构建了R&D项目静态绩效评价模型,采用数据包络分析(DEA)方法构建了R&D项目动态绩效评价模型,通过综合评价来更加清晰地认识R&D项目生命周期各阶段的绩效水平并据此对项目进行动态管理。最后,本文结合哈尔滨动力设备股份有限公司的R&D项目,对所建立的方法进行了应用,提出了改进R&D项目管理的对策。
Under the circumstance of global economic integration, technology innovation plays a more and more important role in enhancing the country competitive power. As the core in technology innovation activities, Research & Development’s (referred to as the R&D) function becomes more and more outstanding. In order to enlarge its own competition advantages, an enterprise should reserve technical potential unceasingly and convert such potential into competitive products and technical achievements. The function of R&D is just to create such technical potential. Along with the enhancement of R&D’s function and status, more and more attention is paid to the R&D management.
     Enterprises is now starting to pay attention to the function of organization means over R&D, coordinate the mutual relations between R&D department and others, and begin to concern the cost, quality, and progress in lifecycle of R&D project, and some aspects about R&D project such as uncertainty, interference, performance and control. This sort of management is established on the basis of modern project management theory, which needs the effective technical strategies, innovation-oriented construction system, and more advanced management methods. The focus of such management is to enlarge ratio of input and output, and to enhance farther performance of R&D project by the means of time and cost control.
     By using the modern theory of project management and evaluation, this paper analyzes the life cycle of R&D project. Combining with the most important parts and relevant activities, the paper analyzes the principles to be followed in R&D projects management, puts forward the effective method and applies such method by combining with the specific cases from three aspects such as progress, optimization, cost management and performance management.
     First of all, this article expatiates the theory, method and the results of model research of the R&D project management, and further defines the concept of R&D by combining with the existing views of R&D. According to the characteristics of enterprise R&D project management, this article re-divides the life cycle of R&D project management into four stages,and makes specific description over the basic activities and input elements in each stage, and analyzes the risk in progress and cost by combining with the life cycle.
     Secondly, basing on time restriction on the R&D project, the article points out the progress control is the most important part of the R&D project management success, and indicates the principle and emphasis of the progress control of R&D project. From the view of project time management, this article analyzes the process of the establishment for R&D project process schedule. Aiming at the disadvantage of traditional method of CPM、PERT, the article raises the best way to seek the key by minimizing the most regret value. Further more, taking the cost control of R&D project as the core of R&D project management, the article determines the method and steps for the cost control of R&D project, and completely describes the target of R&D project cost control and analyzes the input factors of the cost. Basing on the cost of entire life cycle of the project, the article designs the cost quota with the views of the entire life cycle, and puts forward the optimum implement program basing on the cost of the life cycle of R&D projects quota design. Also on basis of the optimization of process and cost, along with the life cycle, this article proposes the performance evaluation ideas, which combined the static and dynamic evaluation together. According to the performance evaluation characteristics of R&D project, a comprehensive indicators system of R&D project performance evaluation is established.
     In this system, economic, financial and non-financial indicators are selected and normalized; the static model for the R&D project performance evaluation is established basing on the basic principles of fuzzy integral.
     By using data envelopment analysis (DEA) method, the dynamic model for R&D project performance evaluation is build, which clearly recognizes the performance of R&D projects at various stages of the life cycle by a comprehensive evaluation, and then the dynamic project management is realized. Finally, basing on the R&D projects of Harbin Power Equipment Co., Ltd, the method putted forward in this article is applied and the solutions to improve the R&D project management are proposed.
引文
1刘国新,李勃.论企业规模和R&D投入相关性.管理科学学报. 2001, 4(4):68~72
    2廖迎春,杨庆文,李家其.科研项目评估理论述评.求索. 2004, (8):110~111
    3 Bruno Cassiman. In Search of Complementarily in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science. 2006, 52(1): 68~82
    4张运生,曾德明,秦吉波,张利飞.基于主成分分析的R&D绩效评价系统.研发与发展管理. 2004, (4):1~6
    5 Shewhart, Walter A. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company. 1931, (13):325~329
    6李方,王敬川.工程机械新产品研发项目过程控制的探讨.工程机械与维修. 2008, (4):87~94
    7田兆丰,杨建斌.强化项目过程控制提高工程整体质量.中国西部科技. 2008, 7(14):51~52
    8迈克尔波特.竞争优势.陈小月译.华夏出版社. 2005: 15~20
    9管海波,黄敬前.项目生命周期对于项目管理的重要性.管理咨询. 2004, (11):45~47
    10曾建春,蔡建国.面向产品生命周期的环境、成本和性能多指标评价.中国机械工程. 2000, 11(9):975~978
    11李欣先.基于R&D项目阶段的评估研究.河北工业大学学报. 2005, (12):13~14
    12陈劲.研发项目管理.机械工业出版社. 2004:35~38
    13赖志松.政府资助研发机构计划绩效评估之研究——以经济部科技专案为例.国立交通大学. 2001, (6):36~38
    14李占强. R&D项目风险评价指标体系及其评价方法研究.价值工程. 2005, (12):115~117
    15孙晓蕾,李建平,陈建民.基于项目生命周期观的R&D风险管理分析.科技管理研究. 2006, (5):32~36
    16 Sivathanu, A. Joshi, K. Srinivas Rao. Performance Measurement of R&D Projects in a Multi-project, Concurrent Engineering Environment. International Journal ofProject Management. 2001, (20):165~177
    17长广仁藏著,中田庆雄审译.研究与开发活动的运营与定量评价:新商品的开发手段.复旦大学出版社. 1999:125~131
    18 S.L.Tang, S.W.Poon, S.M. Ahmed. Modern Construction Project Management. Dragon Vision limited. 1998, (8):84~87
    19白思俊.现代项目管理.机械工业出版社. 2004:324~340
    20张纪守.甘特:用图说话的管理大师.企业改革与管理. 1998, (8):32~33
    21周小桥.关键路径法.确定项目工期及活动时差.项目管理技术. 2006, (3):42~45
    22 Matthew J. Liberators. Critical Path Analysis With Fuzzy Activity Times. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management. 2008, 2(55):329~337
    23 Eduardo Conde. A Minmax Regret Approach to the Critical Path Method with Task Interval Times. European Journal of Operational Research. 2008, 197(1):235~242
    24朱曙.项目进度控制方法从CPM/PERT到CCM.硅谷. 2008, (2):82~83
    25俞高明. GERT在评审硅现场供应方案上的运用.安徽大学学报(自然科学版). 2000, 24(2):79~83
    26张亚娟,孙大宁,张英俊.图示评审法在管理中的应用.北方工业大学学报. 2008, 20(3):67~70
    27 Eliyahu Goldratt. Critical Chain.罗嘉颖译.电子工业出版社. 2006:171~178
    28 Lawrence P Leaeh. Critieal Chain Project Management Improves Project Performance. Project Management Journal. 1999, (6):39~52
    29王培,杨玲.基于关键链方法的单资源约束项目进度计划优化.现代商业. 2008, (9):143~144
    30夏勇.信息系统建设的项目时间管理研究.价值工程. 2008, (1):101~103
    31 Astebro, T.Key Success Factors for Technological entrepreneurs’R&D Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2004, 51(3):314~321
    32刘武,杜志达,刘祥瞻. PERT网络活动时间参数估计的改进.统计与决策. 2008, (4):150~152
    33张云宁,孙喜禧.改进的PERT模型在项目进度风险分析中的应用研究.科技进步与对策. 2008, (25)10: 94~96
    34马俊海,刘凤参,楼梦丹.企业R&D项目评价的蒙特卡罗模拟方法及其应用.系统工程理论与实践. 2008, (10):13~21
    35王力群,吴永利.巧用前锋线比较法解实际进度与计划进度的差异.安徽建筑. 2000, (5):85
    36李伟.工程项目施工进度的综合比较法.工业技术经济. 2004, 23(1):104~ 105
    37于洋,朱宏光,刘秋深. WBS在施工项目管理中的应用.科技信息. 2008, (10):82
    38 Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, C. Annique Un. Regional Economic Integration and R&D Investment. Research Policy. 2007, (36):227~246
    39陈志新.项目成本控制管理.石油化工建设. 2007, 29(2):38~42
    40 Ingham, M. & Labbe, E. Quality Management in R&D Process: Levers and or Inhibitors in Knowledge Codification? Oviedo: Toulon-Verone Conference. 2003, (6):33~36
    41任国强,黄建瓯.建设项目成本管理理论研究综述.西安建筑科技大学学报. 2008, 27(3):64~69
    42丁国庆.工程项目成本控制.行业管理. 2007, (7):194
    43 Pells, David. Trend in Project Management. Management by Projects. 2002, (1): 101~103
    44李卫星.突破项目管理难点从WBS到计划.电子工业出版社. 2006:62~ 68
    45郭健,魏法杰.国外项目挣值管理研究及对我国的启示.生产力研究. 2007, (16):102~104
    46 ThamhainxH.T. Integrating Project Management Tools with the Project Team. Annual Project Management Institute Seminars and Symposium. 1998, (33): 15~17
    47 Viana Vargas, Ricardo. Using Earned Value Management Indexes as Team Development Factor and a Compensation tool. Cost Engineering. 2005, 47(5): 20~25
    48 Solomon, Paul. Integrating Systems Engineering with Earned value Management. Defense & AT-L. 2004, 33(3):42~46
    49 Kenzo Kurihara Nobuyuki Nishiuchi Efficient Monte Cario Simulation Method of CER-TtyPe Newtokrofr Project Management. Com Puters & Industrial Engineering. 2002,(42):521~531
    50由立新,朱健颖.论项目管理与项目成本控制.煤炭技术. 2007, 26(4): 139~ 141
    51秦学广.浅谈如何做好工程项目成本控制.铁路采购与物流. 2007, (10): 18~19
    52王雄,岳宝顺.浅谈项目成本控制的几种措施.管理科学. 2007, 36(4):108
    53 Simon Coldrick, Philip Longhurst, Paul Ivey, John Hannis. An R&D Options Selection Model for Investment Decisions. Technovation. 2005, (25):185~193
    54袁洁秋,张英娜.企业绩效考核中的偏差分析.东北财经大学学报. 2004, 36 (6):44~47
    55 Quentin W Fleming & Joel Koppelman. Integrated Project Development Teams Another Fad or a Permanent Change. International of Project Management. 1996, 4(3):163~168
    56 K. L. Poh, B. W. Ang, F. Bai. A Comparative Analysis of R&D Project Evaluation Methods. R&D Management. 2001, (1):63~75
    57 Jackson. Decision Methods for Evaluation R&D Projects. Research Management. 1983, (7):16~21
    58 Souder & Mandakovic. R&D project Selection Model. Research Management. 1986, 29(4):36~42
    59 Schmidt RL, Freeland JR. Recent Progress in Modeling R&D Project Selection Process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.1992, 39(2):189~201
    60 Atkinson. Strategic Performance Measurement and Incentive Compensation. European Management Journal. 1998, 16(5):552~560
    61 Lopes & Flavell. Project Appraisal-a Framework to Assess non-Financial Aspects of Projects During the Project life cycle. International Journal of Project Management. 1998,16(4):223~233
    62 Moon & Bates. Core Analysis in Strategic Performance Appraisal. Management Accounting Research. 1993, 4(2):139~152
    63 Moon & Fitzgerald. Delivering the Goods at TNT: the Role of The Performance Measurement System. Management Accounting Research. 1996, (7):431~457
    64 Nixon. Research and Development Performance Measurement: a Case Study. Management Accounting Research. 1998, (9):329~355
    65 Kerssens-van Drongelen & Cook. Design Principles for the Developing of Measurement Systems for Research and Development Processes. 1997, 27(4): 345~357
    66 Bollen. Real Option and Product Life Cycles. Management Science. 1999, 45 (5):670~684
    67 Lint and Pennings. R&D as an Option on Market Introduction. R&D Management. 1998, 28(4):279~286
    68 Newton & Pearson. Application of Option Pricing theory to R&D. R&D Management. 1994, 24(1):83~89
    69 Werner & Souder. Measuring R&D Performance-U.S. and German Practices. Research. Technology Management. 1997, (3):28~32
    70 Brown, M. G., Svenson. R. A. Measuring R&D Productivity. Research Technongy Management. 2001, (31):11~15
    71 Shenhar,A.J., Tisheler, A.& Dvir,D., et al. Refining the Search for Project Success Factors: a Multi-variate, Typological Approach. R&D Manage. 2002, (32): 11~26
    72梁莱歆,刘建秋.高新技术企业R&D绩效评价方法探索.科学学与科学技术管理. 2004, (11):29~32
    73模燕.区域R&D绩效评价.科研管理. 2004, (1):114~117
    74郑智.研发竞争的实物期权评价模型研究.南京理工大学. 2004, (3):9~10
    75梁莱歆.谈高新技术企业R&D绩效评价中应重视的几个问题.科技管理研究. 2005, (3):70~72
    76杜先进,孙树栋,欧立雄.多阶段R&D项目平衡组合选择模式研究.科学学与科学技术管理. 2006, 27(11):41~45
    77 Thomas Finne. R&D Collaboration: The Process, Risks and Checkpoints. Information Systems Control Journal. 2003, (2):88~104
    78 Martin Powell. The Application of a Risk Management Approach Inpharmaceutical R&D Organizations. Working paper of Cambrideg Management & Research. www. Cambridge-mr.co.uk.
    79李平,顾新. R&D项目进度费用风险优化的研究.管理工程学报. 2006, 20 (2):14~18
    80 West,J.& Iansiti,M. Experience, Experimentation, and the Accumulation of Knowledge:the Evolution of R&D in the Semiconductor Industry. Research Policy. 2003, (32):809~825
    81 Drongelen, I.C.& Bilderbeek, J.R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics. R&D Management. 1999, 29(1):35~46
    82赵涛,潘欣鹏.项目时间管理.北京中国纺织出版社. 2005:87~93
    83 Kanasan, Pinar, Yaman. The Robust Shortest Path Problem with Interval Data. Optimization Online. 2001, (3):103~122
    84 J.Chataway, J. Tait, D. Wield, Understanding Company R&D strategies in Agro-Biotechnology:Trajectories and Blind Spots, Res. Policy 2004, (33):1041~1057
    85 Amir R, Evstigneev I, Wooders J. Noncooperative Versus Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Spillover Rates. Games and Economic Behavior. 2003, 42(1): 183~207
    86刘津明.工程项目进度计划优化方法的研究.天津大学学报.2003, 36(5): 31~32
    87 Magdalena Rogalska, Wojciech Bo?ejko, Zdzis?aw Hejducki. Time/cost Optimization Using Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm in Construction Project Scheduling. Automation in Construction. 2008, (18):24~31
    88 Coskun. Optimal Probabilistic Compression of PERT Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1984, 110(4):437~446
    89李文华,谭燕秋.不确定网络直接优化规划模型建立.系统工程理论与实践. 2000, (12):97~101
    90 Ghaleb Y. Abbasi. & Adnan M. Mukattash. Crashing PERT Networks using Mathematical Programming. International Journal of Project Management. 2001, 19(3):181~188
    91 Amir R. Modeling Imperfectly Appropriable R&D Via Spillovers. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2000, 18(7):1013~1032
    92 Bjorn. M, Werner, William. E, Souder. Measuring R&D Performance-State of the art. Research Technology Management. 2001, 44(5):30~36
    93 Mark G. Brown, Raynold A. Avension. Measuring R&D Productivity. Research Technology Management. 1988, (6):30~35
    94 James E. Diekmann. Cost-plus contractor selection: An analytical method. Engineering Costs and Production Economics. 1983, 7(2):147~158
    95 T.Alhazmd, R. McCaffer. Procurement System Selection Model. Journal of Construction. Engineering and Management. 2006, 26(3):176~184
    96 Samiran Banerjee, Ping Lin. Downstream R&D, Raising Rivals cost and Input Price Contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2003, (6): 225~247
    97 R.Balachandra. Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management. 1997, 44(3):276~286
    98 Lukonen and Gronow, T Scientific and Research Evaluation: a Review of Methods and Various Contexts of Their Application. R&D Management. 1987,17(3):207~211
    99 Brown, K., Schmied, H. & Tarondeau, J.C. Success Factors in R&D: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical literature and Derived Implications for Design Management. Design Management Journal. 2002, (2):72~87
    100 Kathy A. Paulson Gjerde, Susan A. Slotnick, Matthew J. Sobel. New Product Innovation With Multiple Features and Technology Constraints. Management Science. 2002, 48(10):1268~1284
    101 Fahrni. An Application-oriented Guide to R&D Project Selection and Evaluation Methods. R&D Management. 1990, 20(2):155~170
    102 Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. R&D Cooperation and Spillovers:Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review. 2002, 92 (4):1169~1184
    103 Robert Szakonyi. Measuring R&D Effectiveness. RTM. 1994, (8):27~32
    104 Whelan. J. Project Profile Reports Measure R&D Effectiveness. Research Management. 2003, 14(5):188~203
    105闫红,朱启超,匡兴华.我国R&D绩效评估研究现状述评.科技管理研究. 2004, (1):109~112
    106张晓燕,胡玉明.基于企业生命周期的绩效评价制度研究.经济问题探索. 2005, (7):66~69
    107曾德明,陈立勇.利益相关者致力于企业绩效关系研究综述.经济学动态. 2003, (3) :86~88
    108谢禹,王雅林,林洪进.基于模糊积分的企业信用评级方法研究.中国软科学. 2004, (9):146~150
    109纪爱兵,庞佳宏,李树环.基于Choquet模糊积分的非线性组合预测及其应用.模糊系统与数学. 2006, 20(3):145~149
    110 Tsai Huihua, Lu Iuanyuan. The Evaluation of Service Quality Using Generalized Choquet Integral. Information Sciences. 2006, 176(6):640~663
    111毕克新,孙金花,张铁柱.基于模糊积分的区域中小企业技术创新测度与评价.系统工程理论与实践. 2005, 25(2):40~46
    112刘井建,陈伟.基于数据包络分析的高新技术企业R&D绩效综合评价研究.科技进步与对策. 2008, (7):148~151
    113 Lucy O’Shea, Alistaie Ulph. The Role of Pest Resistance in Biotechnology R&D Investment Strategy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2008, (55):213~228

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700