危机矿山接替资源找矿专项经济社会效果分析
|
摘要
2004年9月6日,国务院常务会议审议通过《全国危机矿山接替资源找矿规划纲要(2004-2010年)》,这是是国家扶持老矿山、促进资源型城市经济转型的一大决策。中央财政、地方财政及矿山企业配套投资达40亿元,目的是在老矿山的周边和深部新探明一批资源储量,延长矿山服务年限。
本文主要内容分为两个板块:一是理论分析找矿专项的合理性和可行性,二是对找矿专项已开展的工作及取得的成效进行科学、合理、实事求是的评估,并为下一轮的找矿工作提供经验。具体内容如下:
第一部分主要阐述了政策效果评估的基本理论,本文揭示了由独立性和研究能力均较强的高校科研人员作为评估主体保证了评估的科学性和客观公正性;政策效果评估的主要理论依据是福利经济学“效率和公平”问题,政策的成功需要在效率和公平之间找到恰当的平衡点。
第二部分主要是理论分析,从理论上论证了危机矿山接替资源找矿专项的合理性、可行性。本文认为计划经济体制造成的历史包袱是矿山危机的重要原因,专项的实施是政府对老矿山的一种“反哺”,是补偿性的政策,符合公平原则;这项补偿性的政策从经济学角度(“贫困恶性循环”、“大推动”理论、“市场失灵”、“系统论与协同论”)考虑是有效率的,有利于全国经济的稳定发展。
第三部分通过大量数据来说明危机矿山接替资源找矿专项实施4年来的经济、社会效果,截止到2008年底,总计投入33.5亿元,几种典型矿产的潜在价值达2.6万亿;平均延长矿山服务年限13年,矿山企业稳定就业人数达65万人,经济效果、社会效果突出。
第四部分是案例分析,以内蒙古苏尼特右旗金曦黄金矿业有限公司为典型案例,分析了该公司实施危机矿山接替资源找矿专项2年以来的资源增加效益、经济效益、社会效益、管理创新效益等。
本文选题切合实际,在对危机矿山接替资源找矿专项定性方面有新的突破,指出专项政府的补偿性政策,其找矿成果属准公共产品。
In September 6, 2004, the State Council examined and adopted the "national crisis mines Resources Prospecting Project (2004-2010)", which is the national support for old mines. This project is another big decision to promote resource-based urban economic restructure. The central government, local governments and mining enterprises invested 40 billion, aimed at finding a number of new reserves from the old mines, extending the service life of mine.
This paper is divided into two sections: one is theoretical exploration of Project rationality and feasibility, the other is a scientific, rational and realistic assessment to evaluate the work already undertaken and hope for providing experiences for the next round of exploration work. The details are as follows:
The first part is to describe the basic theory of policy impact assessment, this paper reveals university research apartment can do the assessment work more efficiently because they are rational and impartial; welfare economics issue "efficiency and fairness" is the main theoretical basis of policy impact assessment. A successful policy need to keep a balance between efficiency and fairness.
The second part is the main theoretical analysis. We try to demonstrate theoretically that resource exploration project is reasonable and feasible. Historical burdens caused the planned economic system is an important reason for mine crisis, this project can be seen as a "feedback" of these old mines. Secondly, the compensatory policy is efficient from an economic point, which is a "big push" force and can help to break the "vicious circle of poverty", government regulation makes up for the "failure" of pure market mechanism. This implementation which has a special relationship to the mining industry, mining, miners, mining town (referred to as the" four mine ") is conducive to the stable development of the regional and the national economy.
The third part is to illustrate economic and social effects through large amounts of data. Total investment is 3.35 billion until the end of 2008, and the potential value of some typical minerals is more than 2.6 trillion, equivalent to 6% of 2009’s GDP, which means per million invest can output 77.6 billion potential value, the economic effect is obvious; The average service life of old mines extends 13 years, and enterprises employee increase 65 million, that is to say, 5,254 RMB can stay an employment and social effects outstanding.
The fourth part is a case. We take SuNiTeYouQi Jinxi Gold Mines Limited corporation as a typical example, we have done an objective analysis of the company's economic, social, effectiveness of management innovation.
we define the achievement of this project quasi-public goods, this explain is quite innovate and is a new breakthrough.
本文主要内容分为两个板块:一是理论分析找矿专项的合理性和可行性,二是对找矿专项已开展的工作及取得的成效进行科学、合理、实事求是的评估,并为下一轮的找矿工作提供经验。具体内容如下:
第一部分主要阐述了政策效果评估的基本理论,本文揭示了由独立性和研究能力均较强的高校科研人员作为评估主体保证了评估的科学性和客观公正性;政策效果评估的主要理论依据是福利经济学“效率和公平”问题,政策的成功需要在效率和公平之间找到恰当的平衡点。
第二部分主要是理论分析,从理论上论证了危机矿山接替资源找矿专项的合理性、可行性。本文认为计划经济体制造成的历史包袱是矿山危机的重要原因,专项的实施是政府对老矿山的一种“反哺”,是补偿性的政策,符合公平原则;这项补偿性的政策从经济学角度(“贫困恶性循环”、“大推动”理论、“市场失灵”、“系统论与协同论”)考虑是有效率的,有利于全国经济的稳定发展。
第三部分通过大量数据来说明危机矿山接替资源找矿专项实施4年来的经济、社会效果,截止到2008年底,总计投入33.5亿元,几种典型矿产的潜在价值达2.6万亿;平均延长矿山服务年限13年,矿山企业稳定就业人数达65万人,经济效果、社会效果突出。
第四部分是案例分析,以内蒙古苏尼特右旗金曦黄金矿业有限公司为典型案例,分析了该公司实施危机矿山接替资源找矿专项2年以来的资源增加效益、经济效益、社会效益、管理创新效益等。
本文选题切合实际,在对危机矿山接替资源找矿专项定性方面有新的突破,指出专项政府的补偿性政策,其找矿成果属准公共产品。
In September 6, 2004, the State Council examined and adopted the "national crisis mines Resources Prospecting Project (2004-2010)", which is the national support for old mines. This project is another big decision to promote resource-based urban economic restructure. The central government, local governments and mining enterprises invested 40 billion, aimed at finding a number of new reserves from the old mines, extending the service life of mine.
This paper is divided into two sections: one is theoretical exploration of Project rationality and feasibility, the other is a scientific, rational and realistic assessment to evaluate the work already undertaken and hope for providing experiences for the next round of exploration work. The details are as follows:
The first part is to describe the basic theory of policy impact assessment, this paper reveals university research apartment can do the assessment work more efficiently because they are rational and impartial; welfare economics issue "efficiency and fairness" is the main theoretical basis of policy impact assessment. A successful policy need to keep a balance between efficiency and fairness.
The second part is the main theoretical analysis. We try to demonstrate theoretically that resource exploration project is reasonable and feasible. Historical burdens caused the planned economic system is an important reason for mine crisis, this project can be seen as a "feedback" of these old mines. Secondly, the compensatory policy is efficient from an economic point, which is a "big push" force and can help to break the "vicious circle of poverty", government regulation makes up for the "failure" of pure market mechanism. This implementation which has a special relationship to the mining industry, mining, miners, mining town (referred to as the" four mine ") is conducive to the stable development of the regional and the national economy.
The third part is to illustrate economic and social effects through large amounts of data. Total investment is 3.35 billion until the end of 2008, and the potential value of some typical minerals is more than 2.6 trillion, equivalent to 6% of 2009’s GDP, which means per million invest can output 77.6 billion potential value, the economic effect is obvious; The average service life of old mines extends 13 years, and enterprises employee increase 65 million, that is to say, 5,254 RMB can stay an employment and social effects outstanding.
The fourth part is a case. We take SuNiTeYouQi Jinxi Gold Mines Limited corporation as a typical example, we have done an objective analysis of the company's economic, social, effectiveness of management innovation.
we define the achievement of this project quasi-public goods, this explain is quite innovate and is a new breakthrough.
引文
[1]全国危机矿山接替资源找矿规划纲要(2004-2010年)
[2]全国危机矿山接替资源找矿专项2007年、2008年度成果报告,全国危机矿山接替资源找矿专项管理办公室技术管理处
[3]产业经济学,苏东水,高等教育出版社,2004年1月
[4]产业经济学,李悦,中国人民大学出版社,2000年10月
[5]刘海明.我区获得危机矿山找矿专项资金2840万元[J].西部资源, 2009,(01)
[6]湖南省有色地勘局危机矿山接替资源勘查结硕果[J].矿业研究与开发, 2009,(03)
[7]马冬,秦仁高.危机矿山接替资源勘查实践——以安庆铜矿为例[J].安徽地质, 2009,(02)
[8]地质研究分会,矿业企业的可持续发展[M].北京:地质出版社,2006
[9]齐中英朱彬:公共项目管理与评估[M].武汉:科学出版社,2004
[10]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用.中国人民大学出版社.1998:5
[11]佟芳庭:浅析公共事业项目的经济评价[J]经济论坛,2005,22:40～42
[12]顾海军:公共项目经济评价问题研究[博士论文].南京:河海大学,2007
[13]张三力,项目后评价,北京,清华大学出版社,1998
[14]王五英等,投资项目社会评价指南,北京,经济管理出版社,1998
[15]杨华峰等,投资项目经济评价,北京,经济出版社,1997
[16]王立国,投资项目评估学,大连,东北财经大学出版社,1998
[17]朱志刚.财政支出绩效评价研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.25
[18]郭友群.扩大公共支出,缓解经济失衡[J].商业研究,2007.11(367):150-152
[19]洪银兴,刘建平.公共经济学导论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003,84-90
[20]刘月明.公共投资决策存在的问题及对策思考[J].北京市经济管理干部学院学报,2002,17(4):34-35
[21]程浩,管磊.对公共产品理论的认识[J].河北经贸大学学报,2002,18(6):10-17
[22]王春阳,尹贻林.浅谈政府投资项目的投资控制体系[J].天津理工学院学报,2002,35(6):20-23
[23]姚光业.投资项目后评价机制研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002
[24]王晓霞.项目后评价综述[J].江苏交通工程,2002,(2):40-43
[18]白思俊.关于项目后评价的探讨[J].管理工程学报,2002,16,增刊:5-7.
[25]徐尚友:我国公共项目经济评价问题研究[ J ] .商业研究,2005,23:109～112
[26]王信东.经济效果评价指标体系及评价方法的改进[J].中国软科学,2000,10:105-109.
[27]宋小敏.项目投资经济效益评价原理与方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(l):45-48.
[28]胡永铨.基于和谐发展观的项目社会评价体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,1:129-131
[29]申书海、陈学安.财政支出效益评价[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002:121-127
[30] International Project Management Association. International Project Management Association Competency Baseline [M].2000, 556-583
[31] Shaohua Chen and Martin Ravallion. Hidden Impact of Ex-Post Evaluation of an Anti-Poverty Program[R]. Development Research Group World Bank, Washington, 2003:219-247.
[32] Ulf Wiberg,Bruno Jansson&Linda Lundmark. Ex-Post Evaluation of Objective 6 Program for the period 1995-1999 Country Report for Sweden[R].Department of the Social and Economic Geography Umea University Sweden, December 2002:103-112.
[2]全国危机矿山接替资源找矿专项2007年、2008年度成果报告,全国危机矿山接替资源找矿专项管理办公室技术管理处
[3]产业经济学,苏东水,高等教育出版社,2004年1月
[4]产业经济学,李悦,中国人民大学出版社,2000年10月
[5]刘海明.我区获得危机矿山找矿专项资金2840万元[J].西部资源, 2009,(01)
[6]湖南省有色地勘局危机矿山接替资源勘查结硕果[J].矿业研究与开发, 2009,(03)
[7]马冬,秦仁高.危机矿山接替资源勘查实践——以安庆铜矿为例[J].安徽地质, 2009,(02)
[8]地质研究分会,矿业企业的可持续发展[M].北京:地质出版社,2006
[9]齐中英朱彬:公共项目管理与评估[M].武汉:科学出版社,2004
[10]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用.中国人民大学出版社.1998:5
[11]佟芳庭:浅析公共事业项目的经济评价[J]经济论坛,2005,22:40～42
[12]顾海军:公共项目经济评价问题研究[博士论文].南京:河海大学,2007
[13]张三力,项目后评价,北京,清华大学出版社,1998
[14]王五英等,投资项目社会评价指南,北京,经济管理出版社,1998
[15]杨华峰等,投资项目经济评价,北京,经济出版社,1997
[16]王立国,投资项目评估学,大连,东北财经大学出版社,1998
[17]朱志刚.财政支出绩效评价研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.25
[18]郭友群.扩大公共支出,缓解经济失衡[J].商业研究,2007.11(367):150-152
[19]洪银兴,刘建平.公共经济学导论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003,84-90
[20]刘月明.公共投资决策存在的问题及对策思考[J].北京市经济管理干部学院学报,2002,17(4):34-35
[21]程浩,管磊.对公共产品理论的认识[J].河北经贸大学学报,2002,18(6):10-17
[22]王春阳,尹贻林.浅谈政府投资项目的投资控制体系[J].天津理工学院学报,2002,35(6):20-23
[23]姚光业.投资项目后评价机制研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002
[24]王晓霞.项目后评价综述[J].江苏交通工程,2002,(2):40-43
[18]白思俊.关于项目后评价的探讨[J].管理工程学报,2002,16,增刊:5-7.
[25]徐尚友:我国公共项目经济评价问题研究[ J ] .商业研究,2005,23:109～112
[26]王信东.经济效果评价指标体系及评价方法的改进[J].中国软科学,2000,10:105-109.
[27]宋小敏.项目投资经济效益评价原理与方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(l):45-48.
[28]胡永铨.基于和谐发展观的项目社会评价体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,1:129-131
[29]申书海、陈学安.财政支出效益评价[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002:121-127
[30] International Project Management Association. International Project Management Association Competency Baseline [M].2000, 556-583
[31] Shaohua Chen and Martin Ravallion. Hidden Impact of Ex-Post Evaluation of an Anti-Poverty Program[R]. Development Research Group World Bank, Washington, 2003:219-247.
[32] Ulf Wiberg,Bruno Jansson&Linda Lundmark. Ex-Post Evaluation of Objective 6 Program for the period 1995-1999 Country Report for Sweden[R].Department of the Social and Economic Geography Umea University Sweden, December 2002:103-112.