摘要
低驾龄驾驶人是交通事故频发人群,这和驾驶经验有很大关系。然而,驾驶经验的初期积累却更多地存在于不安全驾驶行为多发的申领驾驶证后的前几年中,这是一个矛盾。在低驾龄阶段,身心条件特征对行车安全的影响尤为明显。本文着重研究低驾龄驾驶人的注意品质、紧张特性、信息处理能力和自我效能感等典型心理-行为特性,初步揭示影响低驾龄驾驶人驾车安全的内在要素。
首先,对低驾龄驾驶人的注意特征进行了测试分析。借鉴认知心理学的研究范式(如任务转换与双重任务研究范式等),对低驾龄驾驶人的注意集中、注意转移、注意分配及注意广度四种注意品质进行测试。鉴于四种注意特征属注意在不同时空维度上的表现,故对各注意特征分别进行数据处理与分析。结果显示:在基本注意能力上,低驾龄驾驶人组与对照组没有显著差别。但是,当模拟驾驶场景测试时,在注意集中特征方面,虽然方差分析未揭示各组被试在抗干扰性方面存在差异,但多重比较显示,低驾龄驾驶人组的抗干扰能力不如经验丰富驾驶人(MD=22.69,P=0.03;MD=23.55,P=0.04);在注意分配特征方面,低驾龄驾驶人组的注意分配能力不如经验丰富驾驶人组(MD=-1.47,P=0.01);在注意转移特征方面,低驾龄驾驶人组与对照组呈现显著差异(MD=69.54,P=0.03),前者的转换速度慢于后者;在任务转换方面,低驾龄驾驶人组与对照组未呈现显著差异(P=0.65);在注意广度特征方面,低驾龄驾驶人与对照组均未呈现显著差异(MD=1.93,P=0.81)。
其次,对低驾龄驾驶人的紧张特性做了探讨。分析了低驾龄驾驶人驾车过程中的紧张源。包括基于任务的紧张源、基于角色的紧张源、基于行为环境的紧张源。测试分析了两种典型情况下低驾龄驾驶人的紧张特性:有超车影响下低驾龄驾驶人普遍紧张;雨天行车时受试低驾龄驾驶人也表现出紧张并车速下降。
再次,对低驾龄驾驶人的信息处理能力做了分析。讨论了驾驶行为的特点,包括:复杂性、模糊性、随机性、相关性、连续性、突变性、离散性、自学习性、自适应性。测试比较了低驾龄驾驶人典型的信息处理能力——速度判断。驾驶人信息处理的限制不在于接受信息量的多少,而在于信息处理的速度上。对低驾龄驾驶人组和经验丰富驾驶人组进行信息处理速度能力测试,结果表明:低驾龄驾驶人组速度判断水平低于对照组(p<0.05)。其中包括:速度递增时、速度递减时、速度保持恒定时低驾龄驾驶人的速度判断水平均低于对照组。
最后,对低驾龄驾驶人的自我效能感进行了分析。构建了低驾龄驾驶人自我效能感量表。在充分遵守“领域的特殊性”和“领域的完整性”两个原则下,本文设计了6个因素25个题目,在此基础上形成初步的自我效能感问卷。用SPSS对数据进行因素分析。运用主成分正交旋转,取特征值大于1的因子。这样低驾龄驾驶人自我效能感量表最终包含20个项目,累积解释量达到70.23%。通过信度和效度检验,最后确定的低驾龄驾驶人自我效能感量表由5个因素、20个项目构成。
Novice drivers are accident repeaters in traffic system. This does something important with driving experience. However, the experiences are accumulated during first few years after they get driving license which is a traffic accident occurs frequently period. It is a contradiction. During this period, new drivers' physiological and psychological factors play an important role in driving safety. Novice drivers' attention ability, tension, information processing and autobiographical sense are deeply studied in this thesis. Some inherent factors which influence novice drivers' driving safety are uncovered.
First of all, novice drivers' attention ability is discussed by borrowing ideas from cognitive science those are task switching and dual task studying mode. New drivers' attention concentrating, attention diversion, attention distributing and attention extension are tested in this thesis. Allowing for these characteristics of attention ability possess deflections, those data getting from testing are disposed respectively. Results show that the basic attention ability remains scarcely difference between novice drivers and experienced drivers. But, when it comes to simulative driving scene, the attention ability is different distinctly between those two groups. New drivers' anti-jamming in attention concentrating is not so good as experienced drivers (MD=22.69, P=0.03; MD=23.55, P=0.04). Novice drivers' attention distributing is poorer than experienced drivers (MD=-1.47, P=0.01). New drivers' attention diversion is different remarkably from experienced drivers (MD=69.54, P=0.03). The former' switching speed are slower. On the other hand, the task switching between them shows little difference (P=0.65). Novice drivers and experienced drivers have scarcely any differences in attention extension (MD=1.93, P=0.81).
Secondly, stress during novice drivers' is probed into in this thesis. Above all, the source of driving stress is discussed. It includes stresses from driving task, driving role and driving environment. Further more, new drivers' stress under two typical situations in driving is tested. Novice drivers go through stress when overtaking happens. At the same time, their heart rate changes remarkably. The second typical situation is rainy day. New drivers undergo stress too in this situation. What is more, they are inclined to reduce their driving speed.
Thirdly, novice drivers' driving information processing ability is discussed. Based on the analysis of driving behavior, such as complexity, fuzzy trait, randomicity, associativity, continuity, mutation, self-educated and self-adapted, new drivers typical information processing ability is tested. What makes new drivers' this kind of ability different from experienced drivers is not the quantity but the speed. Test results show that new drivers' driving speed estimation ability is not good as experienced group (p<0.05). That is, when the driving speed increasing or reducing new drivers' estimating ability is worse than the other group. So is the speed holding situation.
Finally, novice drivers' autobiographical sense is studied. According to some former studies, the scale is formed to test new drivers' autobiographical sense. In this thesis, 6 factors and 25 items are brought forward. On the basis of this, questionnaire about autobiographical sense is erected. SPSS is used to process the data after testing. 20 items are chosen to test new drivers' autobiographical sense at last. Hermeneutic shows 70.23%. After reliability and validity testing, the scale of new drivers' autobiographical sense is formed which includes 5 factors and 20 items.
引文
[1] Edwards, M. L., & McKnight, A. J.. An evaluation of the effect of limited license suspension. Alexandria, VA: National Public Services Research Institute. 1986.
[2] Gregersen, N. P., Berg, G., Engstrom, I., Nolen, S., Nyberg, A., & Rimmo, P.Sixteen years age limit for learners in Sweden: an evaluation of safety effects. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32(1), 25- 35. 2000.
[3] Jones, B.. The effectiveness of provisional licensing in Oregon: an analysis of traffic safety benefits. Journal of Safety Research, 23(1), 33- 46. 1994.
[4] Katila, A., Keskinene, E., Laapotti, S., & Hatakka, M.. Changes in Slippery Road Accidents As An Effect Of Renewed Driver Training In Finland.Turku, Finland: University of Turku. 1995.
[5] Lin, M. L., & Fearn, K. T.. The provisional license: nighttime and passenger restrictions. Journal of Safety Research, 34(1), 51-61. 2003.
[6] Maycock, G., Lockwood, C. R., & Lester, J. F.. The accident liability of car drivers. TRL Research Report 315. Transport Research Laboratory,Crowthorne. 1991.
[7] McCartt, A. T., Leaf, W. T., Fanner, C. M., Ferguson, S. A., & Williams, F..Effects of Florida's Graduated Licensing Program on the behavior and attitudes of teenagers. Preusser Research Group, 92-002. 2000.
[8] Simons-Morton, B. G., Hartos, J. L., & Leaf, W. A.. Promoting parental management of teen driving. Injury Prevention, 8(Suppl. II), ii24- ii30.2002.
[9] Smith, A. M., Pierce, J., Upledger, R., & Murrin, P. A.. Motor v ehicle occupant crashes among teens: impact of the graduated licensing law in San Diego. 45th Annual Proceeding of the Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine (pp. 379-385). Barrington, IL: AAAM. 2001.
[10] Williams, A. F., & Ferguson, S. A.. Rationale for graduated licensing and the risks it should address. Injury Prevention, 8(Suppl. II), ii9 - ii16. 2002.
[11] Williams, A. F., Nelson, L. A., & Leaf, W. A.. Responses of teenagers to California's graduated licensing system. Accident Analysis and Prevention,34(6), 835-842, 2002.
[12] Cooper, P. J. , Pinili, M. , Chen, W. , An examination of the crash involvement rates of novice drivers aged 16-55.Accid.Anal.Prev.1995,27,89-104.
[13] Gregersen,N.P.,Berg,H.Y.,Engstrom.Sixteen years age limit for learner drivers in Sweden:an evaluation of safety effects.Accid.Anal.Prev.2000,32,25-35.
[14]张开冉.基于传递函数的机动车驾驶人各驾驶环节疲劳分析.人类工效学,2003(9)1:1-4.
[15] 张开冉,李国芳.限速条件下驾驶人行车速度选择问题研究.公路交通科技,2003(20)5:75-77.
[16] 张开冉,陈刚.道路边缘线对驾驶行为影响的研究.人类工效学,2001(7)3:15-17.
[17] Zhang kairan,Li guofang.A review of the relationship between driving speed and traffic safety.ICTE2007,EI检索.
[18] 张殿业,张开冉,金键.道路标线对驾驶行为模式的影响.中国公路学报,2001(14)4:89-90.
[19] E.Delhaye.Traffic safety: Speed limits,strict liability and a km tax.Transportation Research Part A 40 (2006) 205-226.
[20] Nils Petter Gregersen,Anders Nyberg,Hans-Yngve Berg.Accident involvement among learner drivers梐n analysis of the consequences of supervised practice.Accident Analysis and Prevention 35 (2003) 725 - 730.
[21] Pal Ulleberg,Torbj(?)rn Rundmo.Personality,attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers.Safety Science 41 (2003) 427-443.
[22] A.James McKnighta,Raymond C.Peck.Graduated driver licensing and safer driving.Journal of Safety Research 34 (2003) 85-89.
[23] 袁伟,付锐,郭应时,张建峰.汽车驾驶人感知-决策-校正行为模式,长安大学学报,2007(27)3:80-83.
[24] 毛恩荣,周一鸣.机动车驾驶人场依存性和速度估计能力对行车安全性的影响,中国农业大学学报,19972(2):114-118.
[25] 金会庆,余皖生,张树林,戴平,解梅,刘一帆,孙业桓,马恒之.机动车驾驶人身体素质条件及测评指标的研究,人类工效学,2001(7)3:1-6.
[26]金会庆,张树林,戴平,解梅,刘一帆.机动车驾驶人心理素质综合评价的研究,中华流行病学杂志,2000(21)5:369-371.
[27]金会庆,陈山荣.驾驶人个性与事故倾向研究概况,应用心理学,1994(9)1:47-50.
[28]刘援朝,孙忠友,魏玉桂.机动车驾驶人注意及相关因素的调查研究,社会心理科学,2007(22)2:89-100.
[29] 郑柯,任福田.高速公路顺直路段上驾驶人行车紧张性研究,北京工业大学学报,2003(29)2:199-201.
[30] 过秀成,盛玉刚,潘昭宇,潘敏荣,卢光明,何明.公路交通事故黑点总体特征分析,东南大学学报,2007(37)5:930-933.
[31] 沈玮,何存道.事故驾驶人与安全驾驶人人格特征的比较研究,心理科学,1994 (17) 5:281-286.
[32] 李风芝,攻击性驾驶行为与交通事故的关系研究,四川大学博士论文,2004.5.
[33] 裴玉龙,程国柱.高速公路车速离散性与交通事故的关系及车速管理研究,中国公路学报,2004(17)1:74-78.
[34] 王晓原,杨新月.基于决策树的驾驶行为决策机制研究,系统仿真学
[35] 闫莹.公路长大下坡路段线形指标对驾驶人心理生理影响的研究,长安大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[36] 潘晓东.人体信息技术在道路几何构造安全性评价中的应用.同济大学,2002.
[37] 郑柯.高速公路顺直路段上驾驶人行车紧张度研究.北京工业大学学报,2003
[38] 郑柯,荣建,任福田.驾驶人行车紧张度与平曲线半径和车速之间关系分析.土木工程学报,2003(36)7:57-60.
[39] 张智君,朱祖祥.追踪作业中几种心理负荷评估指标敏感性的研究.应用心理学,1997.
[40] 林英姿,余群.车辆转向操纵过程中驾驶人的生理/心理分析与测试.汽车工程,1998.
[41] 王欣,李文权,王炜.基于驾驶行为共性的回波速度解释及仿真,东南大学学报,2007(37)4:691-694.
[42] 陈雪梅,魏中华,高利.紧急状况下职业驾驶人适宜性评价遴选系统,北京工业大学学报,2007(33)8:838-842.
[43] 贾洪飞,司银霞,唐明.基于认知心理学的驾驶人信息加工模式研究,中国安全科学学报,2006(16)1:22-25.
[44] 隽志才,曹鹏,吴文静.基于认知心理学的驾驶人交通标志视认性理论分析,中国安全科学学报,2005(15)8:8-11.
[45] 刘江,田萍,荣建,任福田.驾驶人气质与行车速度关系的初步研究,北京工业大学学报,2006(32)1:27-31.
[46] 张恩亮,肖贵平,聂磊.交通环境对驾驶人心理的影响分析及对策研究,公路交通科技,2006(1):164-165.
[47] 王武宏,曹琦.汽车人机系统中驾驶人可靠性评价的新模型,中国公路学报,1994(7)1:134-140.
[48] 王武宏.汽车驾驶人行为模式及其心理因素对可靠性的影响,汽车技术,199411:13-17.
[49] 王武宏.驾驶行为形成模型及其在道路交通系统中的应用,北京工业大学学报,2001(10)3:331-336.
[50] 王书灵,陈金川,刘小明,荣建.基于驾驶人心理反应的安全坡度研究,公路交通科技,2007(24)2:126-129.
[51] 张殿业.驾驶人动态视野与行车安全可靠度,西南交通大学学报,2000(35) 3:319-322.
[52] 毛恩荣,周一鸣.汽车驾驶人注意品质与行车安全性关系的研究,人类工效学,1997(3) 1:18-20.
[53] 庄明科,白海峰,谢晓非.驾驶人员风险驾驶行为分析及相关因素研究,北京大学学报(自然科学版)2007(2)4:1-6.
[54] 郑柯.基于驾驶人心理生理反应的高速公路线形研究.北京工业大学博士学位论文,2003.
[55] 张殿业.汽车驾驶人暗适应能力与夜间安全行车分析[J].中国公路学报,1999,12(4):107-109
[56] 周柏松.驾驶人反应时间和暗适应测试结果分析及其意义[J].2001,27(4):411
[57] 张殿业.驾驶人动态视野与行车安全可靠度[J].西南交通大学学报2000,35(3):319-323
[58] 张殿业.乘务员动视力及相关指标判别[J].铁道学报,2000,22(3)30-32
[59] 李凤芝,李昌吉,龙云芳等,汽车驾驶人攻击性驾驶行为的心理因素分析[J],四川大学学报,2004,25(4),568-570
[60] 李永建,武振业,朱祖祥,不同反应通道(脚-手)和Go-Nogo反应对驾驶操作的影响[J],公路交通科技,1997,14(3),64-67
[61] 李永建,武振业,朱祖祥,驾驶操作中反应选择与反应触发的加工关系[J],中国公路学报,1997,10(4),97-102
[62] 李永建,武振业,朱祖祥,驾驶操作中反应选择与反应组织加工关系[J],人类工效学,1997,3(1),22-25
[63]王海勇、梁锋,基于人机工程学的驾驶疲劳模型[J],工业安全与环保,2005,31(2),45-46
[64] 焦昆,李增勇,王成焘,形成疲劳的利用与建模[J],汽车科技2002,6,13-15
[65] 金键,驾驶疲劳机理及馈选模式研究[M],四川:西南交通大学[博士论文],2002
[66] 王健,道路环境与驾驶行为[J],重庆交通学院学报,1990,9(3),21-25
[67] 吴立君,王永君,交通事故中驾驶行为与道路线形的关系,吉林建筑工程学院学报,2005,22(1),33-36
[68] 张殿业,张开冉,金键,道路标线对驾驶行为的影响,中国公路学报,2001,14(4),89-90
[69] 陈斌、魏庆曜、金炜东,道路交通系统驾驶人能力与系统任务的匹配与协调研究,交通科技,2002,195(6),78-80
[70] 戴冠军,叶增光,驾驶适合性及评价方法研究,1989,2(1)40-46
[71] 李江,多元统计方法在驾驶适应性研究中的应用,1995,25(3),23-29
[72] 王武宏,驾驶人失误机理辨识的可靠性静态模型,中国公路学报,8(2).23-26
[73] 王武宏,汽车驾驶人可靠性分析及评定,1994,汽车工程,16(4),12-15
[74] 王武宏,汽车人机系统中可靠性评价的新模型,1994,中国公路学报,7(1)32-40
[75] 王武宏,人机系统中人行为形成主因子的定量化辨识方法,1997,系统工程理论与实践,1-5
[76] 张殿业,驾驶人安全可靠性多因素分析,2000年,公路交通科技,2004,21(3),90-91
[77] 韩文涛,交通事故预防中人为失误驾驶失误的评估方法,黑龙江交通科技,2005,13(7),84-85
[78] 韩文涛,驾驶人判断决策失误风险评估方法的研究,山东交通科技,2005,25(2)1-6
[79] Jan Tornros.Hands-free mobile phone speech while driving degrades coordination and control.Transportation Research Part F. 9(2004), 298-306
[80] Bor-Shong Liu. Effects of car-phone use and aggressive disposition during critical driving maneuvers. Transportation Research Part F. 8(2005), 369-382
[81] Sonia Amado , Plnar Ulupinar. The effects of conversation on attention and peripheral detection: Is talking with a passenger and talking on the cell phone different. Transportation Research Part F. 8(2005), 384-393
[82] John D. Hill , Linda Ng Boyle .Driver stress as influenced by driving maneuvers and roadway conditions. Transportation Research Part F. 10(2007), 177-186
[83] Beirness, D. Do we really drive as we live? The role of personality factors in road crashes. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving,9(1993)., 126-143.
[84] Matthews, G. (2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics, 3(2),195-211.
[85] Matthews, G. , Dorn, L. , & Glendon, I. (1991). Personality correlates of driver stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(4), 565-571.
[86] Matthews, G., Sparkes, T. , & Bygrave, H. (1996). Attention overload, stress, and simulated driving performance. Human Performance, 9, 77 - 101.
[87] Matthews, G. , Tsuda, A., Xin, G., & Ozeki, Y. (1999). Individual differences in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics, 42(3), 401-415.
[88] Smart, R. , Stoduto, G. , Mann, R. , & Edward, M. (2004). Road rage experience and behavior: Vehicle, exposure, and driver factors.Traffic Injury Prevention, 5, 343 - 348.
[89] Mayou, R., & Bryant, B. (2003). Consequences of road traffic accidents for di?erent types of road user. Injury, 34, 197 - 202.
[90] Brewer, A. (2000). Road rage: what, who, when, where and how? Transport Reviews, 20(1), 49-64.
[91] Ulleberg, P., 2002a. Influencing Subgroups of Young Drivers and their Passengers: Motivational Influences of Personality Traits on Risk-taking Attitudes and Driving Behaviour. Transport onomisk institutt, Oslo.
[92] Ulleberg, P., 2002b. Personality subtypes of young drivers.Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement,and response to traffic safety campaign. Transportation Research Part F 4, 279 - 297.
[93] Ulleberg, P., Rundmo, T. , 2003. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science 41, 427-443.
[94]Brehmer B. Variable errors seta limit to adaptation. Ergonomics, 1990, 33:1231-1240
[95] Brown ID. Driver's margins of safety considered as a focus for research on error.Ergonomics, 1990, 33:1231-1240
[96] Groeger J A. Drivers errors in, and out of,context. Ergonomics, 1990, 33:1423-1430
[97] Ranney TA. Models of driving behavior: Are view of their evolution . Accident Analysis and Prevent,1994,20:733-750
[98] Dureman, E. I. , Boden, Ch. FATIGUE IN SIMULATED CAR DRIVING.Ergonomics, 1972, 15 (3):299-308.
[99] Erwin, C. W. , Volow, M. R. , Gray, B. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC INDICES OF DROWSINESS.SAE Prepr, 1973:7.
[100] Yajima, Kazuyoshi, Ikeda, Kenji, Oshima, Masamitsu, etal. FATIGUE IN AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS DUE TO LONG TIME DRIVING. SAE Prepr,1976:7.
[101] Crundall,David E., Underwood, Geoffrey. Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers . Ergonomics, 1998, 41(4):448-458.
[102] Sheridan, Thomas B., Meyer, John E., Roy, Serge H. etal.Physiological and psychological evaluations of driver fatigue during long term driving. SAE Tech Pap Ser,1991: 8.
[103] Healey Jennifer,Seger,Justin, Picard, Rosalind. Quantifying driver stress:Developing a system for collecting and processing bio-metric signals in natural situations.Bio.ed Sci Instrum,1999:193-198.
[104]Elizarova,V.V.Shardakova,E.F,Yampol'skaya,E.G..Electromyogra pby evaluating neuromuscular fatigue caused by working postures of loader drivers.Gig Tr Prof Zabol,1994:7-10.
[105] Goebel,Matthias,Springer,Johannes,Scherff,Joachim.Stress and strain of short haul bus drivers:Psychophysiology as a design oriented method for analysis.Ergonomics,1998.
[106] Myungsoon Chang,Juyoung Kim,Kyungwoo Kang,et al.Evaluation of Driver's Psychophysiological Load at Freeway Merging Area.TRB,2001.
[107]Furuichi,Tomoki,Iwasaki,Masato,Kadoma,Takeshi.Drivers' behavior in S curve negotiations on an urban motorway.Traffic and Transport.Studies Proc.of ICTTS 2002,2002,2:849-856.
[108] Lonero,L.P.,et al..Changing road user behaviour:what works in changing road user behaviour.Safety Research Office of the Safety Policy Branch of the Ontario Government in Canada.1995.
[109] SNRA.Graduated Driver Education:A Way to Better Road Safety for Novice Drivers.Publication 2000:77E.Swedish National Road Administration,Borl(?)nge,Sweden.
[110] Hilde Iversen.Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour.Transportation Research Part F 7 (2004) 135-150.
[111] Brown,I.D.,Groeger,J.A.,.Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status.Ergonomics 1988,31,585-597.
[112] Deery,H.A..Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers.Journal of Safety Research 1999,30,225-236.
[113] 世界卫生组织和世界银行.世界预防道路交通伤害报告{M].北京:人民卫生出版社2004.10
[114] 袁伟等.我国道路交通安全形势与事故特征分析[J].山西交通科技,2004,6(3):62
[115] 刘志强.中国交通安全技术分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(8):19-20
[116] 公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计资料汇编[Z].公安部交通竹理科学研究所,2003
[117] 公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计资料汇编[Z].公安部交通管理科学研究所,2005
[118] 刘强,陆化普等.我国道路交通事故特征分析与对策研究,中国安全科学学报,2006,16(6):123-128
[119] 公安部交通管理局,1998年道路交通事故情况综述,道路交通管理,1999,3:2-3
[120] 公安部交通管理局,1999年道路交通事故情况综述,道路交通管理,2000,3:46-47
[121] 公安部交通管理局,2004年全国道路交通事故情况,道路交通管理,2005,1:4-7
[122] 公安部交通管理局,2005全国道路交通事故概况,道路交通管理,2006,1:4-5
[123] 世界卫生组织,世界银行.世界预防道路交通伤害报告(WHO)翻译版)[M].刘光远,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.
[124] 巴布可夫.道路条件与交通安全[M].景天然,译.上海:同济大学出版社,1990
[125] 金会庆,余皖生等.机动车驾驶人身体素质条件及测评指标的研究,人类工效学,2001,7(3):1-6
[126] 宋华淼.航空心理测验法,1995.8
[127] 凌文辁,方俐洛.心理与行为测量,北京,机械工业出版社,2003.8
[128] 罗跃嘉,魏景汉.注意的认知神经科学研究,高等教育出版社,2004
[129] 武秀波,苗霖,吴丽娟,张辉.认知科学概论,科学出版社,2007
[130] 迟立忠.运动人群与非运动人群注意特征比较及注意机制研究,北京体育大学博士研究生学位论文,2004
[131] 方俐洛.工业劳动心理学,1998.3
[132] 周衍淑,张镜如.生理学,人民卫生出版社1983.10
[133] 李銮,张炜等.大众心电图普及读本,军事医学科学出版社,2002.9
[134] 瑞荣.心血管生理学,人民卫生出版社,1987.8
[135] 杨立能.心理生理学,江西科学技术出版社,1988.9
[136] 邓集贤等.随机过程,高等教育出版社,1992.4
[137] 郭邵建.概率统计及随机过程,航空工业出版社,1993.7
[138] 姜启源.数学模型,高等教育出版社,2000.9
[139] 胡广书.数字信号处理理论、算法与实现,清华大学出版社,1998.7
[140] 郑柯,任福田,高速公路顺直路段上驾驶人行车紧张性研究,北京工业大学学报,2003(29)2:199-201
[141] Musk,L..Climate as a factor in the planning and design of new roads and motorways[J].Highway Meteorology,1991(3):88-90.
[142] Ahlin,F.J..An investigation into the consistency of driver' speed choice[M].Department of Civil Engineering,University of Toronto.1979.
[143] 张开冉,李国芳.限速条件下驾驶人的行车速度选择问题研究.公路交通科技,2003(5):75-77.
[144] Edwards,J.B..Weather-related road accidents in England and Wales[J].Journal of Transport Geography,1996(4):121-124.
[145] 温学钧,杨屹东,方靖.高速公路运行速度研究.公路交通科技,2002(1):80-82.
[146] 郑柯,荣建,任福田.驾驶人行车紧张度与平曲线半径和车速之间关系分析,土木工程学报,2003(36)7:57-60
[147] Rienstra,S.A.,Rietveld,P..Speed behavior of car drivers.Transportation Research-D,1996(1):35-39.
[148] 张殿业.驾驶人反应能力与最高时速的安全可靠性分析.中国公路学报,1998(1):109-114.
[149] Department of Transport,The highway code[M].London:HMSO,1996.
[150] 任有.交通环境下驾驶行为模拟与应急驾驶可靠性建模,吉林大学工学博士学位论文,2007
[151] 姜华平,李磊.基于安全性目标的人-车-路系统研究[J].交通标准化,2003,118(06):33-35
[152] 李百川,孙建宏,肖利军.中国职业驾驶人适宜性检测标准制定研究[J].安全与环境学报,2006,1(06):7-10
[153] 王武宏.汽车驾驶人行为模式及其心理因素对可靠性的影响[J].汽车 技术,1994,11:13-18
[154] Regulinski T L,Askren W B.Stochastic modeling of human performance effectiveness functions[J].In Proc of 1972 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.1972,02:45-48
[155] 许洪国,何彪.道路交通事故分析与再现.警官教育出版社,1996,12:14-19
[156] 马俊.论驾驶人的感知特性及安全管理对策[J].交通科技,2000,17(10):89-92
[157] 何存道,欣兆生.道路交通心理学[M].安徽人民出版社,1989.06:75-91
[158] 黄曙东,甘卫平,戴立操.道路交通事故的人因失误分析[J].人类工效学,2006,12(09):49-52
[159] 韩济生.神经科学原理.1999,北京,北京医科大学出版社
[160] 凌文辁,方俐洛.心理与行为测量,北京,机械工业出版社,2003.8
[161] 金键.驾驶疲劳机理及馈选模式研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2002
[162] 戴彤宇,裴玉龙,陈瑜.基于驾驶人信息处理能力的高速公路作业区限速值计算方法,公路交通科技,2007(24)9:127-131
[163] 裴玉龙,程国丰.高速公路车速离散性与交通事故的关系及车速管理研究[J],中国公路学报,2004,17(1):74-78