农户沼气使用及生态环境效益评价：来自恩施州的证据
|
摘要
能源是现代人类生产生活的必备条件,是经济和社会发展的重要物质基础。工业革命以来,世界能源消费剧增,煤炭、石油、天然气等化石能源资源消耗迅速,不少化石能源资源面临枯竭、短缺、供应紧张的困境。我国已成为世界能源生产和消费大国,随着经济和社会的不断发展,我国的能源需求包括农村能源的需求将持续增长。增加生产生活的能源供应、保障能源安全、保护全国特别是中西部地区脆弱的生态环境、促进经济和社会的可持续发展,是国家一项现实而迫切的重大战略任务。
生态环境的保护需要发展可再生能源。我国政府对发展包括农村户用沼气在内的可再生能源极为重视。为解决农村能源供应的贫困问题,中国政府相继在广大农村地区推广了省柴节煤灶、户用沼气、小水电、风能、太阳能等节能项目和可再生能源项目,有效增加了农村地区的用能供给,提高了农村用能效率和用能水平,促进了农村的经济发展和农民生活条件的改善。近年来,随着农村经济的快速发展,农业生态环境脆弱、生物质资源利用率低,农产品安全等问题越来越突出。在这种背景下,我国政府选择了将沼气作为农村能源的重点推广项目,通过农村沼气建设推进农业循环经济模式,以期实现农村农业良性互动发展。尽管我国农村户用沼气的发展经历了试验和起步、技术突破与工艺技术完善、快速发展等相当漫长的不同阶段,但农村户用沼气建设、推广及使用从总体上看是比较成功的,形成了以“一池三改”为基本建设单元,同时根据不同地区的自然经济条件以及调整农业产业结构的实际需要,将沼气与农业产业发展相结合,创造性地发展出以南方“猪-沼-果”(养猪与沼气、种植果树等相结合)、北方“四位一体”(养猪与沼气、种植蔬菜、建日光温室等相结合)为典型代表的农村户用沼气生态能源发展模式。目前,随着国家投入的不断增加,我国中西部广大地区正在努力以沼气为纽带或龙头发展农村能源,发展生态型农业,深入推进社会主义新农村建设。
农户沼气发展过程中充满着机遇,同时也面临更加艰难的挑战。归纳起来,这些挑战与问题主要包括以下几个方面:(1)开发利用效率低与使用中的浪费现象并存;(2)能源资源供求分散,建设、运营和管理成本较高;(3)技术和服务支撑能力严重不足;(4)区域差距大,公共财政支持能力不足,难以实现能源的普遍服务:(5)政府扶持力度不大,体制机制落后;(6)部门利益驱动的干预脱离农户的实际需求等。
探讨一个问题可以有多个视角。目前关于农户沼气使用问题的研究更多的是从政府管理的角度出发,而从农户的现实处境出发,着眼于农户自身意愿与实际使用状况对农户沼气的推广乃至由此带来的效益的获取与评价,进一步发现出现问题与挑战的成因,找出出路和提出对策等角度的研究,尚不多见。
本文所关注的是,从农户行为分析的角度,考察农户在建造、使用沼气过程中表现出来的意愿是什么,从农户生计的角度考察他们建造使用沼气的投入产出问题,并探讨相关因素之间的内在关系,从实证的角度考察农户沼气能源对其产生的生态环境效益评价进行分析,探讨或者试图建立一个农户沼气能源产生的生态环境效益的评价指标框架体系。
在研究过程中,主要采取了文献研究、实地调查、案例分析、生态环境评价、计量经济分析、系统建模等多种研究与分析方法,运用来自湖北恩施州的大量的一手农户调查资料展开分析,力求做到问卷调查与定量相结合,理论分析与实证研究结合,探讨各种相关因素或者变量之间的相互关系及变化规律。
本文共分七章。第一章为概述,主要是全面介绍研究背景和研究目的、内容和方法等。第二章为理论与方法的综述,主要目的是对本文研究的相关概念、理论、方法做介绍与研究现状综述,为本文的实证分析研究提供依据。第三章是对调查地区的基本情况描述,主要目的是介绍调查地区的沼气发展概况与当地基本背景资料,在基本情况描述的同时还对一些调查研究的背景资料和数据做了分析。第四章是对农户沼气采用行为进行分析,主要目的是通过模型构建来分析影响农户选择沼气技术行为的主要因素并探讨相关因素之间的相互关系。第五章是对农户沼气系统使用做成本效益及能流分析,主要目的是分别从工程经济学和生态经济学角度计算分析沼气建设及沼气生态系统的投入产出效益。第六章是农户沼气生态环境效益评价的实证研究,主要目的是研究探讨建立一套简明可行、专门针对农户沼气能源生态环境效益评价的指标体系框架,为今后开展农户沼气能源的生态效益补偿以及建立相关补偿机制研究做一点尝试。第七章是本文的结论和建议。此外,本文还尝试运用系统动力学方法对恩施州农户沼气系统的综合效益发展趋势做了模拟预测。
本文的研究在借鉴国内外相关研究成果的基础上,基于大量一手的农户调查数据资料围绕研究目标进行分析,本文的创新具体体现在以下几个方面:
(1)研究角度创新。从农户角度出发对沼气的生态环境效益评价以及农户在使用沼气能源过程中的多种影响因素进行分析。目前对沼气系统产生效益多是从政府管理的角度对产生的综合效益进行研究,从农户行为角度专门就农户沼气使用及效益问题开展研究并不多见。
(2)评价指标体系创新。本文通过大量调查数据分析和实证分析,评述了现有生态环境效益评价的指标存在的主要问题,提出了简洁、可操作性强的户用沼气生态效益评价指标体系。本文考虑到沼气生态环境效益的产生直接与农户用能结构、沼气利用程度、生产行为相关联,因此从生态和环境效益两方面选取了供应农田有机肥、提高有机污水处理率、提高人畜粪便处理率,提高SO_2减排率,增加土地生态破坏率,减少森林破坏率共七个指标构建了两层指标体系,七个指标均可直接通过农户调查获取的第一手数据计算与转换得到,提供了一套新的具有一定实用价值的农村户用沼气能源生态效益评价体系。
(3)研究理论和方法的综合集成。本文综合运用了行为分析、案例分析、能流分析、系统评价、生态效益计量、系统动力学等多方面的理论和方法,多角度地对农村户用沼气能源的生态环境效益评价问题、农户沼气使用行为特征及影响因素等进行定性、定量的评价与分析,将生态经济学、生态环境科学、环境系统科学紧密结合,因此在理论和方法的综合集成运用方面具有一定创新性。
Energy is an essential condition for the production and living of modern human beings and the important physical foundation for the social and economic development. The global energy consumption has been dramatically increased since the Industrial Revolution. Many fossil energy resources are facing the plight of exhaustion, shortage and tension in supply as fossil energy resources such as coal, petroleum and natural gas are rapidly consumed. China has become a big energy producer and consumer in the world. With constant socioeconomic development, China's energy demand, including demand of rural energy, will continue to rise. It is the nation's strategic mission that is practical, pressing and significant to increase energy supply for production and livelihood, safeguard energy security and protect the ecological environments of the country, especially the fragile one in the central and west regions.
To protect eco-environments, renewable energy sources need to be developed. China's government has attached great importance to develop renewable energy sources including biogas. The government popularized energy saving and renewable energy source projects including coal and firewood saving ranges, household biogas, small hydropower stations, wind energy and solar energy for the purpose of alleviating rural poverty in supply of energy. These measures have effectively increased energy supply in rural areas, rural energy efficiency and energy using levels, promoted the economic development of the countryside and helped improve the living conditions of the farm households. With the rapid development of the rural economy in recent decades, problems such as weak agro-eco-environment, low efficiencies in biomass resources utilization and insecure agricultural products, have been increasingly highlighted. Under this background, the government chose biogas as a key popularizing project of rural energy source with the expectation of realizing a benign and interactive development between the countryside and the agriculture through the pattern of agricultural circular economy driven by rural biogas construction. Although the development of biogas for farm household use has been through quite long and different stages including pilot and launching, technical breakthrough and improvement of procedure and technologies, and rapid development, the construction, popularization and usage of biogas for farm household use are successful as a whole. A basic construction unit featuring "one pit (biogas generating pit) and reconstruction of three places (kitchen, toilet and pen)" has been formed. In addition, according to the natural and economic conditions in different regions and the practical need in adjusting the industrial structure of agriculture, ecological energy development modes of biogas for farm household use has been creatively developed with the southern "pig-biogas-fruit" (combination of pig raising with biogas and fruit trees planting) and the northern "four in one" (combination of pig raising with biogas, vegetable planting and sunlight greenhouse building) as typical models. At present, with the constant increase of government investment, the extensive central and west regions of China are making efforts to develop rural energy sources and ecological agriculture with biogas as the bond or leading source for further facilitating the construction of a new socialist countryside.
While farm household biogas development is filled with opportunities, there are more challenges. To summarize, these challenges mainly cover the following aspects: (1) co-existence of low efficiencies and wastes in use; (2) dispersed supply and demand of energy resources, relatively high cost in construction, operation and management; (3) severe deficiency of capability of technical and service support; (4) great regional disparity and insufficient capacity of public financial support, which makes difficult a far and wide service of energy; (5) weak governmental support and backward institutional arrangements; (6) deviation of farm households' practical need due to intervention driven by government departmental self interests.
Most of the current studies on usage of farm household biogas start from the perspective of government administration. It is rarely seen that studies set off from the actual situation of farm households with the views to further discover the causes for appearance of problems and challenges, find out ways out and proposing measures and coping strategies by taking into account farm households aspiration and actual use situation in promoting biogas development.
This dissertation pays attention to investigate farm households' inclination in the process of building and using biogas from the perspective of analyzing farm household behaviors. It studies the input-output of the building and using biogas from the perspective of farm household's livelihood. In addition, it discusses the internal relationship among relevant factors. What's more, it assesses, by means of empirical analysis, the eco-environmental benefits brought about by farm household's biogas energy use and attempts to establish an assessment index framework system for the eco-environmental benefits.
The various research and analytical approaches adopted involve literature review, fieldwork, case study, eco-environment assessment, econometric analysis, and system modeling. Large quantity of first-hand farm household data from Enshi, Hubei, is employed for the empirical analysis. Quantitative questionnaire survey and analysis are combined with qualitative analysis in an effort, and theoretical and empirical studies are jointly used together. Thereby, the relationship and rules of changes among each relevant factor or variable are discussed.
The disertation is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is an overview, which gives a general introduction of the research background, objectives, contents and approaches etc. The second chapter is an overview of the theories and empirical approaches. Its major objective is to introduce the basic concepts, theories and approaches pertinent to this study and the summary of the research status quo, which provides references for the empirical analysis of this study. The third chapter is a description of the background information of the study area. It mainly introduces the general situation of the biogas development in the study area and local background. The fourth chapter analyzes farm household behavior of adopting biogas. This is for the purpose of analyzing main factors affecting farm household behavior in choosing biogas technologies through modeling and discussing the relationship among relevant factors. The fifth chapter involves cost-benefit-analyzes of farm household biogas system and energy flow analysis, with a view of analyzing input-output benefit of biogas use and biogas ecological system from the perspective of engineering economics and ecological economics. The sixth chapter is an empirical study of the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas development. It focuses on studying and discussing the establishment of a simple and feasible index system framework specially aimed at the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas energy. It makes an attempt to help develop compensation on the eco-environment benefit of farm household biogas use and establish relevant compensation mechanisms. The seventh chapter is conclusions and suggestions. Besides, this dissertation tries to make a simulating prediction to the development trend of the overall benefit of the farm household biogas system in Enshi by means of system dynamics analysis.
The study of this dissertation has been based on scientific knowledge already available both domestically and internationally. It based on plenty of first-hand data and information from the study area and the study farm households. The main innovative points may include the following aspects:
(1) The new research perspective: It starts from the perspective of farm households to analyze the eco-environment assessment and multiple influential factors during the usage of biogas energy. Most of the current researches study the overall benefits produced from the perspective of government administration. It is rarely seen that a study that is developed on usage and benefits of farm household biogas utilization.
(2) An index system for household biogas assessment: This dissertation comments and discusses the principal problems of the existing eco-environment benefit assessment and proposes an eco-environment benefit assessment index system which is based on farm household biogas useI and is simple and easy to use practically. This dissertation takes into account the fact that the generation of biogas eco-environmental benefit is directly related to the energy use structure of the farm households, their utilization degree of biogas and action of production, whereby an index system of two levels (ecological and environmental benefits) consisting of seven chosen indexes (supply of organic fertilizers for farm land, increase of disposal rate of organic sewage, increase of disposal rate of animal and human excreta, increase exhaust rate of SO_2, increase of damage rate of land ecology and increase of damage rate of forestry). The seven indexes can be calculated and converted through the first-hand data obtained from household questionnaire survey. A set of new eco-environment benefit assessment system of biogas energy for farm household use is thus provided.
(3) Integration of research theories and approaches: This dissertation comprehensively applies diversified theories and approaches covering behavioral analysis, case studies, analysis of energy flow, system assessment, measurement of ecological benefit and system dynamics, to conduct qualitative and quantitative assessment and analysis on the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas use at farm household level, behavioral characteristics of farm household's biogas use and the influential factors etc. It closely combines ecological economics, the science of eco-environment and the science of environmental system, and has certain points of innovation in terms of integrated application of theories and approaches.
生态环境的保护需要发展可再生能源。我国政府对发展包括农村户用沼气在内的可再生能源极为重视。为解决农村能源供应的贫困问题,中国政府相继在广大农村地区推广了省柴节煤灶、户用沼气、小水电、风能、太阳能等节能项目和可再生能源项目,有效增加了农村地区的用能供给,提高了农村用能效率和用能水平,促进了农村的经济发展和农民生活条件的改善。近年来,随着农村经济的快速发展,农业生态环境脆弱、生物质资源利用率低,农产品安全等问题越来越突出。在这种背景下,我国政府选择了将沼气作为农村能源的重点推广项目,通过农村沼气建设推进农业循环经济模式,以期实现农村农业良性互动发展。尽管我国农村户用沼气的发展经历了试验和起步、技术突破与工艺技术完善、快速发展等相当漫长的不同阶段,但农村户用沼气建设、推广及使用从总体上看是比较成功的,形成了以“一池三改”为基本建设单元,同时根据不同地区的自然经济条件以及调整农业产业结构的实际需要,将沼气与农业产业发展相结合,创造性地发展出以南方“猪-沼-果”(养猪与沼气、种植果树等相结合)、北方“四位一体”(养猪与沼气、种植蔬菜、建日光温室等相结合)为典型代表的农村户用沼气生态能源发展模式。目前,随着国家投入的不断增加,我国中西部广大地区正在努力以沼气为纽带或龙头发展农村能源,发展生态型农业,深入推进社会主义新农村建设。
农户沼气发展过程中充满着机遇,同时也面临更加艰难的挑战。归纳起来,这些挑战与问题主要包括以下几个方面:(1)开发利用效率低与使用中的浪费现象并存;(2)能源资源供求分散,建设、运营和管理成本较高;(3)技术和服务支撑能力严重不足;(4)区域差距大,公共财政支持能力不足,难以实现能源的普遍服务:(5)政府扶持力度不大,体制机制落后;(6)部门利益驱动的干预脱离农户的实际需求等。
探讨一个问题可以有多个视角。目前关于农户沼气使用问题的研究更多的是从政府管理的角度出发,而从农户的现实处境出发,着眼于农户自身意愿与实际使用状况对农户沼气的推广乃至由此带来的效益的获取与评价,进一步发现出现问题与挑战的成因,找出出路和提出对策等角度的研究,尚不多见。
本文所关注的是,从农户行为分析的角度,考察农户在建造、使用沼气过程中表现出来的意愿是什么,从农户生计的角度考察他们建造使用沼气的投入产出问题,并探讨相关因素之间的内在关系,从实证的角度考察农户沼气能源对其产生的生态环境效益评价进行分析,探讨或者试图建立一个农户沼气能源产生的生态环境效益的评价指标框架体系。
在研究过程中,主要采取了文献研究、实地调查、案例分析、生态环境评价、计量经济分析、系统建模等多种研究与分析方法,运用来自湖北恩施州的大量的一手农户调查资料展开分析,力求做到问卷调查与定量相结合,理论分析与实证研究结合,探讨各种相关因素或者变量之间的相互关系及变化规律。
本文共分七章。第一章为概述,主要是全面介绍研究背景和研究目的、内容和方法等。第二章为理论与方法的综述,主要目的是对本文研究的相关概念、理论、方法做介绍与研究现状综述,为本文的实证分析研究提供依据。第三章是对调查地区的基本情况描述,主要目的是介绍调查地区的沼气发展概况与当地基本背景资料,在基本情况描述的同时还对一些调查研究的背景资料和数据做了分析。第四章是对农户沼气采用行为进行分析,主要目的是通过模型构建来分析影响农户选择沼气技术行为的主要因素并探讨相关因素之间的相互关系。第五章是对农户沼气系统使用做成本效益及能流分析,主要目的是分别从工程经济学和生态经济学角度计算分析沼气建设及沼气生态系统的投入产出效益。第六章是农户沼气生态环境效益评价的实证研究,主要目的是研究探讨建立一套简明可行、专门针对农户沼气能源生态环境效益评价的指标体系框架,为今后开展农户沼气能源的生态效益补偿以及建立相关补偿机制研究做一点尝试。第七章是本文的结论和建议。此外,本文还尝试运用系统动力学方法对恩施州农户沼气系统的综合效益发展趋势做了模拟预测。
本文的研究在借鉴国内外相关研究成果的基础上,基于大量一手的农户调查数据资料围绕研究目标进行分析,本文的创新具体体现在以下几个方面:
(1)研究角度创新。从农户角度出发对沼气的生态环境效益评价以及农户在使用沼气能源过程中的多种影响因素进行分析。目前对沼气系统产生效益多是从政府管理的角度对产生的综合效益进行研究,从农户行为角度专门就农户沼气使用及效益问题开展研究并不多见。
(2)评价指标体系创新。本文通过大量调查数据分析和实证分析,评述了现有生态环境效益评价的指标存在的主要问题,提出了简洁、可操作性强的户用沼气生态效益评价指标体系。本文考虑到沼气生态环境效益的产生直接与农户用能结构、沼气利用程度、生产行为相关联,因此从生态和环境效益两方面选取了供应农田有机肥、提高有机污水处理率、提高人畜粪便处理率,提高SO_2减排率,增加土地生态破坏率,减少森林破坏率共七个指标构建了两层指标体系,七个指标均可直接通过农户调查获取的第一手数据计算与转换得到,提供了一套新的具有一定实用价值的农村户用沼气能源生态效益评价体系。
(3)研究理论和方法的综合集成。本文综合运用了行为分析、案例分析、能流分析、系统评价、生态效益计量、系统动力学等多方面的理论和方法,多角度地对农村户用沼气能源的生态环境效益评价问题、农户沼气使用行为特征及影响因素等进行定性、定量的评价与分析,将生态经济学、生态环境科学、环境系统科学紧密结合,因此在理论和方法的综合集成运用方面具有一定创新性。
Energy is an essential condition for the production and living of modern human beings and the important physical foundation for the social and economic development. The global energy consumption has been dramatically increased since the Industrial Revolution. Many fossil energy resources are facing the plight of exhaustion, shortage and tension in supply as fossil energy resources such as coal, petroleum and natural gas are rapidly consumed. China has become a big energy producer and consumer in the world. With constant socioeconomic development, China's energy demand, including demand of rural energy, will continue to rise. It is the nation's strategic mission that is practical, pressing and significant to increase energy supply for production and livelihood, safeguard energy security and protect the ecological environments of the country, especially the fragile one in the central and west regions.
To protect eco-environments, renewable energy sources need to be developed. China's government has attached great importance to develop renewable energy sources including biogas. The government popularized energy saving and renewable energy source projects including coal and firewood saving ranges, household biogas, small hydropower stations, wind energy and solar energy for the purpose of alleviating rural poverty in supply of energy. These measures have effectively increased energy supply in rural areas, rural energy efficiency and energy using levels, promoted the economic development of the countryside and helped improve the living conditions of the farm households. With the rapid development of the rural economy in recent decades, problems such as weak agro-eco-environment, low efficiencies in biomass resources utilization and insecure agricultural products, have been increasingly highlighted. Under this background, the government chose biogas as a key popularizing project of rural energy source with the expectation of realizing a benign and interactive development between the countryside and the agriculture through the pattern of agricultural circular economy driven by rural biogas construction. Although the development of biogas for farm household use has been through quite long and different stages including pilot and launching, technical breakthrough and improvement of procedure and technologies, and rapid development, the construction, popularization and usage of biogas for farm household use are successful as a whole. A basic construction unit featuring "one pit (biogas generating pit) and reconstruction of three places (kitchen, toilet and pen)" has been formed. In addition, according to the natural and economic conditions in different regions and the practical need in adjusting the industrial structure of agriculture, ecological energy development modes of biogas for farm household use has been creatively developed with the southern "pig-biogas-fruit" (combination of pig raising with biogas and fruit trees planting) and the northern "four in one" (combination of pig raising with biogas, vegetable planting and sunlight greenhouse building) as typical models. At present, with the constant increase of government investment, the extensive central and west regions of China are making efforts to develop rural energy sources and ecological agriculture with biogas as the bond or leading source for further facilitating the construction of a new socialist countryside.
While farm household biogas development is filled with opportunities, there are more challenges. To summarize, these challenges mainly cover the following aspects: (1) co-existence of low efficiencies and wastes in use; (2) dispersed supply and demand of energy resources, relatively high cost in construction, operation and management; (3) severe deficiency of capability of technical and service support; (4) great regional disparity and insufficient capacity of public financial support, which makes difficult a far and wide service of energy; (5) weak governmental support and backward institutional arrangements; (6) deviation of farm households' practical need due to intervention driven by government departmental self interests.
Most of the current studies on usage of farm household biogas start from the perspective of government administration. It is rarely seen that studies set off from the actual situation of farm households with the views to further discover the causes for appearance of problems and challenges, find out ways out and proposing measures and coping strategies by taking into account farm households aspiration and actual use situation in promoting biogas development.
This dissertation pays attention to investigate farm households' inclination in the process of building and using biogas from the perspective of analyzing farm household behaviors. It studies the input-output of the building and using biogas from the perspective of farm household's livelihood. In addition, it discusses the internal relationship among relevant factors. What's more, it assesses, by means of empirical analysis, the eco-environmental benefits brought about by farm household's biogas energy use and attempts to establish an assessment index framework system for the eco-environmental benefits.
The various research and analytical approaches adopted involve literature review, fieldwork, case study, eco-environment assessment, econometric analysis, and system modeling. Large quantity of first-hand farm household data from Enshi, Hubei, is employed for the empirical analysis. Quantitative questionnaire survey and analysis are combined with qualitative analysis in an effort, and theoretical and empirical studies are jointly used together. Thereby, the relationship and rules of changes among each relevant factor or variable are discussed.
The disertation is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is an overview, which gives a general introduction of the research background, objectives, contents and approaches etc. The second chapter is an overview of the theories and empirical approaches. Its major objective is to introduce the basic concepts, theories and approaches pertinent to this study and the summary of the research status quo, which provides references for the empirical analysis of this study. The third chapter is a description of the background information of the study area. It mainly introduces the general situation of the biogas development in the study area and local background. The fourth chapter analyzes farm household behavior of adopting biogas. This is for the purpose of analyzing main factors affecting farm household behavior in choosing biogas technologies through modeling and discussing the relationship among relevant factors. The fifth chapter involves cost-benefit-analyzes of farm household biogas system and energy flow analysis, with a view of analyzing input-output benefit of biogas use and biogas ecological system from the perspective of engineering economics and ecological economics. The sixth chapter is an empirical study of the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas development. It focuses on studying and discussing the establishment of a simple and feasible index system framework specially aimed at the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas energy. It makes an attempt to help develop compensation on the eco-environment benefit of farm household biogas use and establish relevant compensation mechanisms. The seventh chapter is conclusions and suggestions. Besides, this dissertation tries to make a simulating prediction to the development trend of the overall benefit of the farm household biogas system in Enshi by means of system dynamics analysis.
The study of this dissertation has been based on scientific knowledge already available both domestically and internationally. It based on plenty of first-hand data and information from the study area and the study farm households. The main innovative points may include the following aspects:
(1) The new research perspective: It starts from the perspective of farm households to analyze the eco-environment assessment and multiple influential factors during the usage of biogas energy. Most of the current researches study the overall benefits produced from the perspective of government administration. It is rarely seen that a study that is developed on usage and benefits of farm household biogas utilization.
(2) An index system for household biogas assessment: This dissertation comments and discusses the principal problems of the existing eco-environment benefit assessment and proposes an eco-environment benefit assessment index system which is based on farm household biogas useI and is simple and easy to use practically. This dissertation takes into account the fact that the generation of biogas eco-environmental benefit is directly related to the energy use structure of the farm households, their utilization degree of biogas and action of production, whereby an index system of two levels (ecological and environmental benefits) consisting of seven chosen indexes (supply of organic fertilizers for farm land, increase of disposal rate of organic sewage, increase of disposal rate of animal and human excreta, increase exhaust rate of SO_2, increase of damage rate of land ecology and increase of damage rate of forestry). The seven indexes can be calculated and converted through the first-hand data obtained from household questionnaire survey. A set of new eco-environment benefit assessment system of biogas energy for farm household use is thus provided.
(3) Integration of research theories and approaches: This dissertation comprehensively applies diversified theories and approaches covering behavioral analysis, case studies, analysis of energy flow, system assessment, measurement of ecological benefit and system dynamics, to conduct qualitative and quantitative assessment and analysis on the eco-environment benefit assessment of biogas use at farm household level, behavioral characteristics of farm household's biogas use and the influential factors etc. It closely combines ecological economics, the science of eco-environment and the science of environmental system, and has certain points of innovation in terms of integrated application of theories and approaches.
引文
3 资料来源:寇建平2007年11月23日在中国农村能源发展国际研讨会上所做《中国农村能源现状及展望》的报告。
4 资料来源:寇建平2007年11月23日在中国农村能源发展国际研讨会上所做《中国农村能源现状及展望》的报告。
11 世界银行(2005),《中国西部地区农户能源》
1.卞有生.留民营农业生态工程能量流分析与计算[J].生态农业研究,1999.7(3):71-72
2.卞有生.农业生态工程中生态效益的计算与分析[J].农村生态环境,1999.IS(1):1-4
3.曹瑞钰.环境经济学与循环经济[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006
4.常秋玲.南水北调中线水源区(南阳市)生态环境综合研究.[博士学位论文].中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文,2007
5.陈波,支玲,刑红.中国森林生态效益补偿研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2007,1:5-11
6.陈传波,丁士军.中国小农户的风险及风险管理研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2004
7.陈奕民.檐州市农村沼气建设现状及发展对策[J].中国沼气,2004(3):47-48
8.陈应发.费用支出法—一种实用的森林游憩价值评估方法[J].生态经济,1996,3:27-31
9.成淦荣,林瑞如,林科锋.广东农村沼气建设现状与发展对策[J].中国沼气,2006,1:78-79
10.戴林,李子奈.农村能源综合建设项目社会经济效益及可推广性评价方法探讨[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(2):115-118
11.丁士军,陈传波,陈玉萍.南方水稻生产的干旱风险和农户的处理策略[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007
12.董小林,宋赦,周晶等.区域环境经济指标体系的构建[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(1):87-91
13.恩施市造林绿化情况介绍[EB/OL].http://www.eslinye.com.cn/Article/ShowArticle.asp?
14.符少怀,邝继云.海南省农村沼气建设的发展思路与对策[J].中国沼气,2005(4):54-56
15.高春风.生态环境质量指标体系的建立与应用[J].渤海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(3):215-219
16.高晶.生态环境影响评价方法研究.[硕士学位论文].吉林:吉林大学,2007
17.高岩,郭新望.应用特菲尔法结合层次分析法对医院人才量化分析研究[J].河南职工医学院学报,2005,17(4):247-249
18.胡宝清,严志强和廖赤眉等.区域生态经济学理论、方法与实践[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2005
19.胡继连,中国农户经济行为研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992
20.胡憲偷,宋曉琪,张添峻.BASF社会生态效益分析方法-Seebalance~R介绍.永續产业发展双月刊,35:49-55
21.黄素逸,高伟.能源概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2004,52-53
22.黄小青.南宁市协调发展系统动力学模型.[硕士学位论文].南宁:广西大学硕士学位论文图书馆,2003
23.黄子蔚,杨德刚,李秀萍等.塔里木河中下游农户能流分析及生态经济分形特征[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(03):308-312
24.黄祖辉,胡豹.经济学的新分支:行为经济学研究综述[J].浙江社会科学,2003(2):72-79
25.惠海峰,姜艳艳,刘雷.以沼气为纽带的农业循环经济模式效益分析[J].农业环境与发展,2006,3:58-59
26.贾向林.居住生态环境评价指标体系研究.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京林业大学图书馆,2007
27.姜晶梅.层次分析法与老年人生命质量的综合评价.[博士学位论文].北京:中国协和医科大学和中国医学科学院,2005
28.金鑫.江汉平原农户沼气使用的影响因素研究.[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学图书馆,2007
29.金雁.卞吾.农村公社、改革与革命、村社传统与俄国现代化之路[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996
30.康云海.云南山区农户发展沼气的行为分析[J].产业观察,2007,B05:290-294
31.寇建平,刘耕.让更多的人享受沼气文明.中国沼气.2007,25(6):3-4
32.寇建平.中国农村能源现状及展望.中国农村能源发展国际研讨会,2007,北京
33.兰家泉.湘西禾若村的沼气生态效益[J].中国沼气,2006,24(3):35
34.郎奎建,李长胜,殷有等.森林生态工程10种森林生态效益计量理论和方法[J].东北林业大学学报.2000,28(1):1-7
35.李华敏,吕建中,孙灵.会展旅游发展条件评价体系研究[J].旅游学刊.2007,(22)2:63-66
36.李加恩,王仲贵,宋贵永等.农作物秸秆机械还田技术.http://www.sdnj.gov.cn/data/2007-05/22072.htm/data/2007-05/
37.李梅,聂呈荣,龙兴.基塘系统生态环境质量评价指标体系的构建[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(1):386-390
38.李鹏雁,李刚.基于层次分析法的不良资产证券化风险评价[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(12):1949-1951
39.李轶,张玉龙和刘庆玉.“四位一体”北方农村能源生态模式的能流分析及其系统评价.2003国际农业生物环境与能源工程论坛论文集.2003,北京
40.李志华.生态家园建设环境效益评价研究.[硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学图书馆,2006
41.梁亚娟,樊京春.养殖场沼气工程经济分析[J].可再生能源,2004,115(3):49-51
42.林而达,李玉娥编著.全球气候变化和温室气体清单编制方法[M].北京:气象出版社,1998,22-32
43.林英华,李迪强.一种实用的野生动物价值评估方法—旅行费用支出法[J].东北林业大学学报,2000,28(2):61-64
44.刘东生.农村可再生能源建设项目环境影响评价方法及案例研究农村可再生能源建设项目环境影响评价方法案例研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学图书馆,2004
45.刘娟娟.生态果园综合评价指标体系与评价方法的研究.[硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学图书馆,2007
46.刘宪兵.《燃煤二氧化硫排放污染防治技术政策》简介.http://www.cnjlc.com/dq/6/200707087726.html.2007
47.陆慧.农村户用沼气对环境影响的指标体系与评价[J].太阳能学报,2007,28(3):340-344
48.马鸿运.中国农户经济行为研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1993
49.马慧民,张爽和,叶春明.专利技术产业化筛选评估指标体系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2005,5:65-69
50.满奕,李昌友.城市基础设施项目绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J].长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版),2007,8(4):187-189
51.孟昭利编著.企业能源审计方法[M].清华大学出版社,1997:197-208
52.彭新宇.畜禽养殖污染防治的沼气技术采纳行为及绿色补贴政策研究:以养殖专业户为例.[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业科学院学位论文,2007
53.邱凌,杨改河,毕于运.中国西部发展农村沼气的条件与对策研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005(3):200-204
54.任淑花,卢新卫.基于层次分析法的陕西省环境保护成效评价[J].干旱地研究,2008,1
55.沈东升.生活垃圾填埋生物处理技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003
56.盛凯,张衍林.我国农村户用沼气建设可持续发展思考[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版).2007,(4):50-52
57.施骏,童友怀等,罗守进.施用沼肥的土壤改良和作物增产效果[J].安徽农业科学,1995,1223:363-364
58.史清华,农户家庭经济资源利用效率及其配置方向比较[J].中国农村经济,2000(8):58-61
59.史雅娟,杨林书,李国学.沼气发酵残余物对减少叶菜硝酸盐积累的影响研究.中国生态农业学报,2002,10(4):58-61
60.斯葛.生态经济学模型支持下的松嫩平原可持续发展量化研究.[博士学位论文].吉林:吉林大学图书馆,2004
61.孙东川,林福永.系统工程引论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004
62.孙立达,孙保平.小流域综合治理的动态监测与效益评价研究进展[J].水土保持学报,1993,7(4):84-95
63.唐古辉,马逊风,马宏军.景观生态学理论在流域环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境评价,2004,(5):43-46
64.佟春生.系统工程的理论与方法概论[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2005:8
65.汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003:8
66.王秉铨.工业炉设计手册(第2版).北京:机械工业出版社,1996:76-79
67.王翠霞,贾仁安,邓群钊.中部农村规模养殖生态系统管理策略的系统动力学仿真分析[J],系统工程理论与实践.2007,158-169
68.王革华.农村能源建设对减捧SO_2和CO_2贡献分析方法[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(1):169-172
69.于广建,盛猛.森林生态效益计量方法及存在的问题[J].绿色财会,2007,3:54
70.王济川,郭志刚.Logistic回归模型方法-方法与应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001
71.王莲芬,许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990:2-5
72.王其藩.系统动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994
73.王其藩.系统动力学理论与方法的新进展[M].系统工程理论方法应用,1995,4:6-12
74.王微微.区域产业生态指标体系的构建与评价.[硕士学位论文].南京:河海大学图书馆.2007
75.王小艳,彭高军,董仁杰.农村沼气建设生态环境影响评价体系的初步构建[J].山西能源与节能,2007,6:7-18
76.王秀花.师宗县户用沼气池技术经济评价[M].可再生能源,2003,1:31-32
77.王远远.刘荣厚,沈飞等.沼液追肥对小白菜生物学性状和产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2008,1:13-16
78.王月梅,张金林,司宗信.甘肃省发展农村能源生态模式效应及应用实例[J].草业科学,2006,26(3):78-81
79.王珠娜,潘磊,余雪标等.退耕还林生态效益评价研究进展[J].西南林业学院学报,2007,27(2):92-97
80.王珠娜.三峡库区秭归县退耕还林工程生态效益计量评价研究.[硕士学位论文].海南:华南热带农业大学图书馆,2007.
81.魏小红.甘肃河西地区农田生态系统能流分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2001,3(36):55-60
82.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(二)[J].农村生态环境,1986,2(1):52-56
83.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(三)[J].农村生态环境,1986,2(2):48-51
84.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(一)[J].农村生态环境,1985,1(4):47-52
85.闻大中.农业生态系统能流和能量分析研究的某些新进展[J].农村生态环境,1995,11(2):43-48
86.闻大中.再论农业生态系统能流的研究方法[J].农村生态环境,1987,3(1):61-66
87.巫立长,黄志云等.关于生猪饲养成本及收益情况的调查[J].价格月刊,1996,12:27
88.吴世红,吴德让,廖植樨.用系统动力学分析农村能源及生态系统[M].力学与西部开发.2001,8:42-45
89.吴卫明.户用沼气对农村家庭能源消费影响及其效益评价一以安徽省贵池区为例.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学图书馆,2006
90.吴小萍,杨晓宇,冉茂平.图形叠置法在铁路噪声环境影响评价中的应用研究[J].交通环保,2004,2.25(1):15-17
91.武荣国,张钲.楚雄市农村能源建设的生态经济效益分析[J].楚雄师范学院学报,2004,19(3):104-107
92.向成华.川中浅丘不同林分类型的综合效益评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(1):61-68
93.谢识予.有限理性条件下的进化博弈理论[J].上海财经大学学报,2001,3(5):3-9
94.徐会,孙世群,王晓辉.安徽省外来物种风险评估指标体系的构建[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(1):248-249
95.殷志明,刘涟淮,曹安辉等.沼气技术在新农村节能减排中的效用和发展对策[J].农业环境与发展,2007,6:74-76
96.尤飞,王传胜.生态经济学基础理论、研究方法和学科发展趋势探讨[J].中国软科学,2003,(03):131-138
97.岳燕珍,李泽辉,朱华忠,杨雅萍,促进甘肃省可再生能源开发利用的资源调查与辅助决策地理信息系统[M],中国建设动态(阳光能源),2004
98.曾晶,郑翠娟.农村家庭能源系统的建立与效益的分析[J].贵州大学学报.2005
99.翟高粤.基于系统动力学方法的农村可再生能源开发动态模拟.中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库2004
100.张培栋.“四位一体”生态农业模式能流研究.[硕士学位论文].兰州:甘肃农业大学图书馆,2002
101.张全东,陈健,张红兵.生猪养殖污染防治技术探讨[J].海峡科学,2007,6:158-160
102.张绍铜,鲁冬林,宁奇雷.工程机械绿色设计评估[J].建筑机械化,2008,2:42-44
103.张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,上海三联书店,1996
104.张五常.佃农理论—应用于亚洲的农业和台湾的土地改革[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002
105.张衍林,邹岚.县级农村能源建设模拟研究[J].农业工程学报,2001,17:123-125
106.张跃进,刘志斌,王娟.模糊数学在区域环境评价中的应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2003,22(增刊):68-69
107.沼气生产效益[EB/OL].http://www.firedamp.net.cn/jishu/zqjs/200704/559.html
108.赵羿,李月辉.实用景观生态学[M].北京:科学出版社.2001:1
109.郑启寿,张衍林,曹凑贵等.恩施市“五改三建”生态家园建设模式及效益分析[J].中国沼气,2003,(21):103-108
110.郑启寿,张衍林等.恩施市“五改三建”生态家园建设模式及效益分析2003,21(增刊):103-108
111.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007
112.周能芹.类比分析法在环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境保护,1997,6:28-29
113.朱四海.中国农村能源政策:回顾与展望[J].农业经济问题,2007,9:20-25
114.邹树林,中国农业投入问题研究[M].武汉:武汉出版社,1994
115.2007年恩施州国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.0718.gov.cn/Html/zjgb/103944513.shtml
116.Aldrich,John,Forrest D.Nelson.Linear Probability,Logit,and Probit Models[M].Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications,1984:93-101
117.Applications,and Policy Baltimore MD.Singh,Inderjit,Lyn Squire,and John Strauss,eds.Agricultural Houshold Models:Extensions,Applications,and Policy.Baltimore MD[M].Johns Hopkins University Press,1986
118.Barnum,Howard N.and Lyn Squire."An Econometric Application of the Theory of the Farm-Household"[J],Journal of Development Economics,1979,6:79-102
119.Cindy F.Sorg,Louris J.Nelson.Net economic value of elk hunting in idaho.USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin.1986.RM-12
120.Dennis M.Donnelly.louris J.Nelson.Net economic value of deer hunting in idaho.USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletion.1986,RM-13
121.Eillis,F.Peasant Economics,Cambridge University Press,1988
122.G.S.Becket.Treatsi of the Trade[M].University of Chicago Press,1998
123.Hosmer,David W,Stanley Lemeshow.Applied Logistic Regression[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1989:88-97
124.IEA.Annual Energy Outlook 2005[EB/OL].www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/
125.IPCC,Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis.Cambridge Univentity Press,2001
126.Ja.w.Forrest.World Dynamics[M].Cambridge,Mass:The MIT Press,1971
127.Jong-Soo.Park Development of a co-generation system using biogas towards lower environmental pollution[J].Memoirs of the Graduate School of Agriculture Hokkaido University,2003,115-194
128.Katyal,J.C.,Rao,N.H.Reddy,M.N.Critical aspects of organic matter management in the Tropics:The example of India[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2001,61:77-8877-88.
129.Kizilaslan,N,Kizilaslan.H.Turkey's biogas energy potential[J].Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy,2007,277-286.
130.Low,A.Agricultural Development in Southern Africa:Farm Household Economics and the Food Crisis[M],London:James Currey.1986
131.M.S.Alam,B.K.Bala and A.M.Z.Huq.,Simulafion of Integrated Rural Energy System for Farming in Bangladesh[J].Fuel and Energy Abstracts,1998,39(1):70
132.Mullainathan,Sendhil and Thaler,Richard H.," Behavioral Economics" MIT Dept.of Economics Working Paper No.00-27.Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=245828
133.Odum H T.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M].New York:John wiley&sons,1996
134.Pearce D.W,R.K.Turner.Economics of Natund Resource and the Environment[M].UK:Harvester Wheatsheaf.1990
135.Rabin,Matthew.Psychology and Economics,Journal of Economic Literature,American Economic Ass,ociafion,1998,36(1):11-46
136.Rees W E,Wackernagel M.Our ecological footprint:Reducing human impact on the earth [M].New Society Publishers,1996
137.Robert Costanza,Ralph d'Arge,Rudolf de Groot,The value of the world's ecosystemservices and natural capital[J].Nature.1997,386:253-260
138.Saaty,T.L.,The U.S.-OPEC energy conflict,the Payoff matrix by the analytic hierarchy Process[J],International Journal of Game Theory,1979,8(4):225-234
139.Scoones,I.New ecology and the social sciences:What prospects for a fruitful engagement[J].Annu.Rev.Anthropol.1999,28:479-507
140.Scoones,I.Sustainable Rural Livelihoods:a Framework for Analysis,IDS Work Paper,Institute for Development Studies,Sussex,1999,72
141.Simon,H.A.,An Empirically Based Microeconomics[M].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1997.
142.Simon,H.A.,On simulating Simon:his monomania and its sources in bounded rationality,and its sources in bounded rationality[J],Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,2001,32(3),501-505
143.Singh,I.Squire,and Strauss,Agricultural Household Models:Extensions,Applications,and Policy Baltimore MD[M],Johns Hopkins University Press,1986
144.Theodore W.Schultz:Transforming Traditional Agriculture[M],New Haven:Yale University Press,1964
145.Yang HS.Resource management,soil fertility and sustainable crop production:Experiences of China[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2006,27-33
4 资料来源:寇建平2007年11月23日在中国农村能源发展国际研讨会上所做《中国农村能源现状及展望》的报告。
11 世界银行(2005),《中国西部地区农户能源》
1.卞有生.留民营农业生态工程能量流分析与计算[J].生态农业研究,1999.7(3):71-72
2.卞有生.农业生态工程中生态效益的计算与分析[J].农村生态环境,1999.IS(1):1-4
3.曹瑞钰.环境经济学与循环经济[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006
4.常秋玲.南水北调中线水源区(南阳市)生态环境综合研究.[博士学位论文].中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文,2007
5.陈波,支玲,刑红.中国森林生态效益补偿研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2007,1:5-11
6.陈传波,丁士军.中国小农户的风险及风险管理研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2004
7.陈奕民.檐州市农村沼气建设现状及发展对策[J].中国沼气,2004(3):47-48
8.陈应发.费用支出法—一种实用的森林游憩价值评估方法[J].生态经济,1996,3:27-31
9.成淦荣,林瑞如,林科锋.广东农村沼气建设现状与发展对策[J].中国沼气,2006,1:78-79
10.戴林,李子奈.农村能源综合建设项目社会经济效益及可推广性评价方法探讨[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(2):115-118
11.丁士军,陈传波,陈玉萍.南方水稻生产的干旱风险和农户的处理策略[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007
12.董小林,宋赦,周晶等.区域环境经济指标体系的构建[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(1):87-91
13.恩施市造林绿化情况介绍[EB/OL].http://www.eslinye.com.cn/Article/ShowArticle.asp?
14.符少怀,邝继云.海南省农村沼气建设的发展思路与对策[J].中国沼气,2005(4):54-56
15.高春风.生态环境质量指标体系的建立与应用[J].渤海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(3):215-219
16.高晶.生态环境影响评价方法研究.[硕士学位论文].吉林:吉林大学,2007
17.高岩,郭新望.应用特菲尔法结合层次分析法对医院人才量化分析研究[J].河南职工医学院学报,2005,17(4):247-249
18.胡宝清,严志强和廖赤眉等.区域生态经济学理论、方法与实践[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2005
19.胡继连,中国农户经济行为研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992
20.胡憲偷,宋曉琪,张添峻.BASF社会生态效益分析方法-Seebalance~R介绍.永續产业发展双月刊,35:49-55
21.黄素逸,高伟.能源概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2004,52-53
22.黄小青.南宁市协调发展系统动力学模型.[硕士学位论文].南宁:广西大学硕士学位论文图书馆,2003
23.黄子蔚,杨德刚,李秀萍等.塔里木河中下游农户能流分析及生态经济分形特征[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(03):308-312
24.黄祖辉,胡豹.经济学的新分支:行为经济学研究综述[J].浙江社会科学,2003(2):72-79
25.惠海峰,姜艳艳,刘雷.以沼气为纽带的农业循环经济模式效益分析[J].农业环境与发展,2006,3:58-59
26.贾向林.居住生态环境评价指标体系研究.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京林业大学图书馆,2007
27.姜晶梅.层次分析法与老年人生命质量的综合评价.[博士学位论文].北京:中国协和医科大学和中国医学科学院,2005
28.金鑫.江汉平原农户沼气使用的影响因素研究.[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学图书馆,2007
29.金雁.卞吾.农村公社、改革与革命、村社传统与俄国现代化之路[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996
30.康云海.云南山区农户发展沼气的行为分析[J].产业观察,2007,B05:290-294
31.寇建平,刘耕.让更多的人享受沼气文明.中国沼气.2007,25(6):3-4
32.寇建平.中国农村能源现状及展望.中国农村能源发展国际研讨会,2007,北京
33.兰家泉.湘西禾若村的沼气生态效益[J].中国沼气,2006,24(3):35
34.郎奎建,李长胜,殷有等.森林生态工程10种森林生态效益计量理论和方法[J].东北林业大学学报.2000,28(1):1-7
35.李华敏,吕建中,孙灵.会展旅游发展条件评价体系研究[J].旅游学刊.2007,(22)2:63-66
36.李加恩,王仲贵,宋贵永等.农作物秸秆机械还田技术.http://www.sdnj.gov.cn/data/2007-05/22072.htm/data/2007-05/
37.李梅,聂呈荣,龙兴.基塘系统生态环境质量评价指标体系的构建[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(1):386-390
38.李鹏雁,李刚.基于层次分析法的不良资产证券化风险评价[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(12):1949-1951
39.李轶,张玉龙和刘庆玉.“四位一体”北方农村能源生态模式的能流分析及其系统评价.2003国际农业生物环境与能源工程论坛论文集.2003,北京
40.李志华.生态家园建设环境效益评价研究.[硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学图书馆,2006
41.梁亚娟,樊京春.养殖场沼气工程经济分析[J].可再生能源,2004,115(3):49-51
42.林而达,李玉娥编著.全球气候变化和温室气体清单编制方法[M].北京:气象出版社,1998,22-32
43.林英华,李迪强.一种实用的野生动物价值评估方法—旅行费用支出法[J].东北林业大学学报,2000,28(2):61-64
44.刘东生.农村可再生能源建设项目环境影响评价方法及案例研究农村可再生能源建设项目环境影响评价方法案例研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学图书馆,2004
45.刘娟娟.生态果园综合评价指标体系与评价方法的研究.[硕士学位论文].杨凌:西北农林科技大学图书馆,2007
46.刘宪兵.《燃煤二氧化硫排放污染防治技术政策》简介.http://www.cnjlc.com/dq/6/200707087726.html.2007
47.陆慧.农村户用沼气对环境影响的指标体系与评价[J].太阳能学报,2007,28(3):340-344
48.马鸿运.中国农户经济行为研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1993
49.马慧民,张爽和,叶春明.专利技术产业化筛选评估指标体系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2005,5:65-69
50.满奕,李昌友.城市基础设施项目绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J].长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版),2007,8(4):187-189
51.孟昭利编著.企业能源审计方法[M].清华大学出版社,1997:197-208
52.彭新宇.畜禽养殖污染防治的沼气技术采纳行为及绿色补贴政策研究:以养殖专业户为例.[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业科学院学位论文,2007
53.邱凌,杨改河,毕于运.中国西部发展农村沼气的条件与对策研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005(3):200-204
54.任淑花,卢新卫.基于层次分析法的陕西省环境保护成效评价[J].干旱地研究,2008,1
55.沈东升.生活垃圾填埋生物处理技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003
56.盛凯,张衍林.我国农村户用沼气建设可持续发展思考[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版).2007,(4):50-52
57.施骏,童友怀等,罗守进.施用沼肥的土壤改良和作物增产效果[J].安徽农业科学,1995,1223:363-364
58.史清华,农户家庭经济资源利用效率及其配置方向比较[J].中国农村经济,2000(8):58-61
59.史雅娟,杨林书,李国学.沼气发酵残余物对减少叶菜硝酸盐积累的影响研究.中国生态农业学报,2002,10(4):58-61
60.斯葛.生态经济学模型支持下的松嫩平原可持续发展量化研究.[博士学位论文].吉林:吉林大学图书馆,2004
61.孙东川,林福永.系统工程引论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004
62.孙立达,孙保平.小流域综合治理的动态监测与效益评价研究进展[J].水土保持学报,1993,7(4):84-95
63.唐古辉,马逊风,马宏军.景观生态学理论在流域环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境评价,2004,(5):43-46
64.佟春生.系统工程的理论与方法概论[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2005:8
65.汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003:8
66.王秉铨.工业炉设计手册(第2版).北京:机械工业出版社,1996:76-79
67.王翠霞,贾仁安,邓群钊.中部农村规模养殖生态系统管理策略的系统动力学仿真分析[J],系统工程理论与实践.2007,158-169
68.王革华.农村能源建设对减捧SO_2和CO_2贡献分析方法[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(1):169-172
69.于广建,盛猛.森林生态效益计量方法及存在的问题[J].绿色财会,2007,3:54
70.王济川,郭志刚.Logistic回归模型方法-方法与应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001
71.王莲芬,许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990:2-5
72.王其藩.系统动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994
73.王其藩.系统动力学理论与方法的新进展[M].系统工程理论方法应用,1995,4:6-12
74.王微微.区域产业生态指标体系的构建与评价.[硕士学位论文].南京:河海大学图书馆.2007
75.王小艳,彭高军,董仁杰.农村沼气建设生态环境影响评价体系的初步构建[J].山西能源与节能,2007,6:7-18
76.王秀花.师宗县户用沼气池技术经济评价[M].可再生能源,2003,1:31-32
77.王远远.刘荣厚,沈飞等.沼液追肥对小白菜生物学性状和产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2008,1:13-16
78.王月梅,张金林,司宗信.甘肃省发展农村能源生态模式效应及应用实例[J].草业科学,2006,26(3):78-81
79.王珠娜,潘磊,余雪标等.退耕还林生态效益评价研究进展[J].西南林业学院学报,2007,27(2):92-97
80.王珠娜.三峡库区秭归县退耕还林工程生态效益计量评价研究.[硕士学位论文].海南:华南热带农业大学图书馆,2007.
81.魏小红.甘肃河西地区农田生态系统能流分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2001,3(36):55-60
82.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(二)[J].农村生态环境,1986,2(1):52-56
83.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(三)[J].农村生态环境,1986,2(2):48-51
84.闻大中.农业生态系统能流的研究方法(一)[J].农村生态环境,1985,1(4):47-52
85.闻大中.农业生态系统能流和能量分析研究的某些新进展[J].农村生态环境,1995,11(2):43-48
86.闻大中.再论农业生态系统能流的研究方法[J].农村生态环境,1987,3(1):61-66
87.巫立长,黄志云等.关于生猪饲养成本及收益情况的调查[J].价格月刊,1996,12:27
88.吴世红,吴德让,廖植樨.用系统动力学分析农村能源及生态系统[M].力学与西部开发.2001,8:42-45
89.吴卫明.户用沼气对农村家庭能源消费影响及其效益评价一以安徽省贵池区为例.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学图书馆,2006
90.吴小萍,杨晓宇,冉茂平.图形叠置法在铁路噪声环境影响评价中的应用研究[J].交通环保,2004,2.25(1):15-17
91.武荣国,张钲.楚雄市农村能源建设的生态经济效益分析[J].楚雄师范学院学报,2004,19(3):104-107
92.向成华.川中浅丘不同林分类型的综合效益评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(1):61-68
93.谢识予.有限理性条件下的进化博弈理论[J].上海财经大学学报,2001,3(5):3-9
94.徐会,孙世群,王晓辉.安徽省外来物种风险评估指标体系的构建[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(1):248-249
95.殷志明,刘涟淮,曹安辉等.沼气技术在新农村节能减排中的效用和发展对策[J].农业环境与发展,2007,6:74-76
96.尤飞,王传胜.生态经济学基础理论、研究方法和学科发展趋势探讨[J].中国软科学,2003,(03):131-138
97.岳燕珍,李泽辉,朱华忠,杨雅萍,促进甘肃省可再生能源开发利用的资源调查与辅助决策地理信息系统[M],中国建设动态(阳光能源),2004
98.曾晶,郑翠娟.农村家庭能源系统的建立与效益的分析[J].贵州大学学报.2005
99.翟高粤.基于系统动力学方法的农村可再生能源开发动态模拟.中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库2004
100.张培栋.“四位一体”生态农业模式能流研究.[硕士学位论文].兰州:甘肃农业大学图书馆,2002
101.张全东,陈健,张红兵.生猪养殖污染防治技术探讨[J].海峡科学,2007,6:158-160
102.张绍铜,鲁冬林,宁奇雷.工程机械绿色设计评估[J].建筑机械化,2008,2:42-44
103.张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,上海三联书店,1996
104.张五常.佃农理论—应用于亚洲的农业和台湾的土地改革[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002
105.张衍林,邹岚.县级农村能源建设模拟研究[J].农业工程学报,2001,17:123-125
106.张跃进,刘志斌,王娟.模糊数学在区域环境评价中的应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2003,22(增刊):68-69
107.沼气生产效益[EB/OL].http://www.firedamp.net.cn/jishu/zqjs/200704/559.html
108.赵羿,李月辉.实用景观生态学[M].北京:科学出版社.2001:1
109.郑启寿,张衍林,曹凑贵等.恩施市“五改三建”生态家园建设模式及效益分析[J].中国沼气,2003,(21):103-108
110.郑启寿,张衍林等.恩施市“五改三建”生态家园建设模式及效益分析2003,21(增刊):103-108
111.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007
112.周能芹.类比分析法在环境影响评价中的应用[J].环境保护,1997,6:28-29
113.朱四海.中国农村能源政策:回顾与展望[J].农业经济问题,2007,9:20-25
114.邹树林,中国农业投入问题研究[M].武汉:武汉出版社,1994
115.2007年恩施州国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.0718.gov.cn/Html/zjgb/103944513.shtml
116.Aldrich,John,Forrest D.Nelson.Linear Probability,Logit,and Probit Models[M].Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications,1984:93-101
117.Applications,and Policy Baltimore MD.Singh,Inderjit,Lyn Squire,and John Strauss,eds.Agricultural Houshold Models:Extensions,Applications,and Policy.Baltimore MD[M].Johns Hopkins University Press,1986
118.Barnum,Howard N.and Lyn Squire."An Econometric Application of the Theory of the Farm-Household"[J],Journal of Development Economics,1979,6:79-102
119.Cindy F.Sorg,Louris J.Nelson.Net economic value of elk hunting in idaho.USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin.1986.RM-12
120.Dennis M.Donnelly.louris J.Nelson.Net economic value of deer hunting in idaho.USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletion.1986,RM-13
121.Eillis,F.Peasant Economics,Cambridge University Press,1988
122.G.S.Becket.Treatsi of the Trade[M].University of Chicago Press,1998
123.Hosmer,David W,Stanley Lemeshow.Applied Logistic Regression[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1989:88-97
124.IEA.Annual Energy Outlook 2005[EB/OL].www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/
125.IPCC,Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis.Cambridge Univentity Press,2001
126.Ja.w.Forrest.World Dynamics[M].Cambridge,Mass:The MIT Press,1971
127.Jong-Soo.Park Development of a co-generation system using biogas towards lower environmental pollution[J].Memoirs of the Graduate School of Agriculture Hokkaido University,2003,115-194
128.Katyal,J.C.,Rao,N.H.Reddy,M.N.Critical aspects of organic matter management in the Tropics:The example of India[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2001,61:77-8877-88.
129.Kizilaslan,N,Kizilaslan.H.Turkey's biogas energy potential[J].Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy,2007,277-286.
130.Low,A.Agricultural Development in Southern Africa:Farm Household Economics and the Food Crisis[M],London:James Currey.1986
131.M.S.Alam,B.K.Bala and A.M.Z.Huq.,Simulafion of Integrated Rural Energy System for Farming in Bangladesh[J].Fuel and Energy Abstracts,1998,39(1):70
132.Mullainathan,Sendhil and Thaler,Richard H.," Behavioral Economics" MIT Dept.of Economics Working Paper No.00-27.Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=245828
133.Odum H T.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M].New York:John wiley&sons,1996
134.Pearce D.W,R.K.Turner.Economics of Natund Resource and the Environment[M].UK:Harvester Wheatsheaf.1990
135.Rabin,Matthew.Psychology and Economics,Journal of Economic Literature,American Economic Ass,ociafion,1998,36(1):11-46
136.Rees W E,Wackernagel M.Our ecological footprint:Reducing human impact on the earth [M].New Society Publishers,1996
137.Robert Costanza,Ralph d'Arge,Rudolf de Groot,The value of the world's ecosystemservices and natural capital[J].Nature.1997,386:253-260
138.Saaty,T.L.,The U.S.-OPEC energy conflict,the Payoff matrix by the analytic hierarchy Process[J],International Journal of Game Theory,1979,8(4):225-234
139.Scoones,I.New ecology and the social sciences:What prospects for a fruitful engagement[J].Annu.Rev.Anthropol.1999,28:479-507
140.Scoones,I.Sustainable Rural Livelihoods:a Framework for Analysis,IDS Work Paper,Institute for Development Studies,Sussex,1999,72
141.Simon,H.A.,An Empirically Based Microeconomics[M].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1997.
142.Simon,H.A.,On simulating Simon:his monomania and its sources in bounded rationality,and its sources in bounded rationality[J],Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,2001,32(3),501-505
143.Singh,I.Squire,and Strauss,Agricultural Household Models:Extensions,Applications,and Policy Baltimore MD[M],Johns Hopkins University Press,1986
144.Theodore W.Schultz:Transforming Traditional Agriculture[M],New Haven:Yale University Press,1964
145.Yang HS.Resource management,soil fertility and sustainable crop production:Experiences of China[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2006,27-33