航运企业船舶租赁融资优化决策及风险控制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
航运企业属于资金密集行业,无论造船、买船还是租赁船舶都需巨额资金投入。与工程项目、高科技产业相比,船舶融资项目的投资回收期长,风险性更高,所需要协调的环节更多。尤其是在当今的航运市场,运价跌宕起伏,存在着许多不可控制的因素。航运企业一旦出现战略性的经营失误,就可能面临巨额损失,甚至导致企业破产。因此,如何优化船舶融资决策,预防与规避船舶融资项目的风险对航运企业来说无疑是关系到企业的生死存亡的头等大事。
     开展科学决策和风险管控是航运企业船舶融资业务的核心内容。只有运用科学的决策方法,有效识别风险类别及其产生原因,并评估其兑现时的影响,才能有效地管理风险。由于目前我国租赁融资业务发展历史不长,船舶租赁融资更是刚刚开始,与我国实际相结合的船舶租赁融资的相关理论和技术尤其欠缺,特别是航运企业的船舶租赁融资项目的风险评价体系还不健全,相关的控制措施研究方面更有待加强。正是在这样的背景下,本文试图对航运企业船舶租赁融资的理论、技术、实际运用以及风险评估与控制进行深入、系统地研究。该研究将有助于推动我国航运企业加强对船舶租赁融资项目决策的科学性及风险管理的有效性,使租赁融资真正成为我国航运企业融资的一种重要途径,从而促进我国航运企业健康、快速发展。
     本文重点研究船舶租赁融资优化决策问题。通过科学界定船舶租赁融资概念的内涵,从系统性风险和非系统性风险两个方面,剖析了船舶融资租赁项目风险的成因和特点;在深入研究船舶租赁融资优化决策理论的基础上,提出了航运企业完整的船舶租赁优化决策框架,构建了船舶租赁融资的优化决策模型,并从博弈论视角探讨了航运企业在租船决策的行动策略;在船舶租赁融资风险因素的评判、汇集的基础上,提出了科学客观的评价指标体系,运用现代非线性数学方法对航运企业船舶融资租赁项目的风险状态进行评价,为航运企业船舶租赁融资提供决策依据。
     本文主要研究结论如下:
     (1)船舶租赁融资作为国内航运企业船舶融资的一条重要渠道,具有其独特的优势,但由于投入资金量巨大、租赁期长、外部环境不确定因素多,使得项目本身存有较高的风险。根据航运企业对船舶租赁融资项目风险的可控制程度,本文界定船舶租赁融资项目的系统风险主要包括:航运市场风险、宏观政策风险、宏观经济环境风险;非系统性风险主要包括:公司治理风险、公司管理风险、公司资信风险、公司财务能力风险、项目因素风险。
     (2)航运企业获取标的船舶使用权的过程是一个风险型决策过程,该决策系统由六个子决策问题构成,这些决策问题逐层递进,共同决定和影响着航运企业的风险收益状况,在此过程中,航运企业进行策略性行动至关重要。
     (3)基于对航运企业船舶租赁融资项目的风险研究,本文构建了船舶租赁融资项目的风险评估指标体系。该风险指标评价体系准则层指标有八个,主要是该项目的系统风险与非系统风险。指标层为二十五个影响准则层的指标。
     (4)本文研究结果表明,项目因素风险、公司财务能力风险与公司资信风险三个一级指标的权重系数在所有一级指标中列前三位,意味着这三个风险指标在整个风险指标体系中占有非常重要的位置,在航运企业的风险管理中尤其要重视。
Maritime enterprises are capital-intensive, whether to build, buy or charter a ship, financially require huge capital investment. Compared with construction projects or high-tech industry, the ship financial leasing project has a longer payback period with higher risk and more aspects needed to be coordinated. Especially in today's shipping market, with tariffs up and down, there are many uncontrollable factors. Once the strategic operations went wrong, maritime enterprises may be faced with huge losses or even led to bankruptcy. Therefore, how to optimize the ship financing decision-making to prevent and avoid the risk of ship financing projects is undoubtedly related to the survival of the enterprise, which is a top priority for maritime enterprises.
     Carrying out scientific decision-making and risk management and control are the core contents of the maritime enterprises'ship financing business. Only by adopting scientific decision-making, effectively identifying categories of risks and its causes, and assessing the impact of its occurrence, can risks be effectively managed. In China, financial leasing does not have a long history, let alone ship financial leasing. There is also a lack of concerning theories and technologies combined with actual situation in China, especially that ship financial leasing project risk evaluation system is not perfect, researches on controlling measures need to be strengthened. It is in this context, this paper attempted to study in-depth and systematically on maritime enterprises'ship leasing financing theory, technology, practical application, and risk assessment. The study will help promote China's maritime enterprises to strengthen the effectiveness of scientific decision-making and risk management, and make financial leasing project truly become an important way for the financing of maritime enterprises, thereby contributing to the healthy and fast development of maritime enterprise.
     This paper mainly studied the optimization decision problem on ship leasing financing. Through defining the concept of ship leasing financing scientifically, this paper deeply analyzed the causes and characteristics of ship leasing financing project risks from two aspects——the systematic risks and the unsystematic risks. Based on the ship leasing financing optimization decision theory, a full set of maritime enterprises' ship leasing financing optimization decision framework was proposed, and a model of it was constructed. Then from the angle of Game Theory, the paper discussed the strategies about charter decisions. On the basis of the factors influencing the risks of ship leasing financing, put forward a scientific and objective evaluation index system. Then using modern nonlinear mathematical method, evaluated the risks of maritime enterprises'ship leasing financing, which would provide decision basis for ship leasing financing.
     The main conclusions of this paper are as follows:
     (1)As an important way of financing for domestic maritime enterprises, ship financial leasing has its unique advantages. However, with huge amount of investment, long leasing period and the uncertainty of various external environments, ship financial leasing project will have a higher risk. According to the control degree of the risk factors in ship financial leasing project, this paper defined systematic risk and non-systematic risk of ship financial leasing project. The systematic risks included the risk of shipping market, the risk of macroeconomic policy and the risk of macroeconomic environment. The non-systematic risks included the risk of corporate governance, the risk of management, the credit risk of the company, the risk of company's financial ability and the risk of project.
     (2) The process of maritime enterprises to obtain the target ship's right of use is als o a process of risk decision. The decision system consists of six sub-decision problems, these decisions are progressive, and influence the shipping enterprise risk-benefit situati on jointly. In this session, strategic action of maritime enterprises is essential.
     (3) Based on studies on risk of ship financial leasing of maritime enterprises, this paper established a risk assessment indicators system for ship financial leasing projects. The system has eight standard layer indicators, which mainly indicates the project's system risk and non-system risk. There are twenty five indexes that affect the standard layer.
     (4) The results indicated that project risks, financial risks and enterprise credit risks weighted the top three among all the first level indicators, which meant that the three indicators were very important in the risk index system, especially in the risk management of maritime enterprises.
引文
[1]王孟霞.船舶融资:瓶颈与构想[J].中国船检,2003,(12):24-27
    [2]墨君.船舶融资呼唤理性[J].中国船检,2003,(6):36-39
    [3]朱宝奎.我国造船工业贷款与融资机制探讨[J].船海工程,2003,(5):56-58
    [4]安飞.谁为中小船厂融资买单——从出口船保单看中国船舶融资环境[J].中国船检,2006,(9): 37-38
    [5]张杰,张德海.我国船舶投融资现状分析[J].中国水运(学术版),2006,(6):204-205
    [6]段心鑫.融资风险加大船舶业谨防陷入国际资金陷阱[N].中国工业报,2008-5-12
    [7]马智宏.大型集装箱船舶投融资决策研究[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2001
    [8]刘凤连,莫燕霞.美国现代租赁融资业的发展及其对我国的借鉴[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(6):44-46
    [9]徐向娟.从飞机租赁融资的应用看我国船舶租赁融资[D].大连海事大学博士论文,2007:67-70
    [10]孙峻岩,董晓永,陈家源.船舶投资多目标的综合评价模型[J].大连海事大学学报,2003,(1):5-8
    [11]王罡.交通运输项目投融资决策研究[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2006
    [12]刘晓东.船舶租赁融资决策分析与风险规避[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2007:19-23
    [13]李毅臣.船舶租赁融资实例分析[J].水运管理,2011,(8)
    [14]Shawn D. Halladay & Sudhir P. Amembal. Lease Securitization[J]. Amembal & Halladay, 1994, (9)
    [15]Grenadier, Steven R. Leasing and credit risk[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1996, (42): 333
    [16]Peter K. Nevitt, Frank J. Fabozzi CFA, Equipment Leasing[J]. World Shipping,2000,(27): 211-220
    [17]Sudhir P. Amembal. International leasing:the Complete Guide[J]. Amembal & Associates, 2000,(8):73-79
    [18]Haim Levy & Marshall Sarnat. Leasing, Borrowing and Financial Risk [P]. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers.
    [19]邢立娟.船舶融资租凭中银行风险规避的法律问题研究[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2004:51-53
    [20]霍煜.银行在船舶租赁融资中的风险及其规避[D].华中科技大学硕士论文,2007:78
    [21]雕钢.关于船舶租赁融资风险防范的研究[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2006
    [22]吴莉婧.论船舶租赁融资交易的合同架构与风险防范[J].商业研究,2007,(4)
    [23]刘静来.银行在船舶融资中的风险规避[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2007:41-47
    [24]徐剑华.船舶融资的跨国风险评估[J].航运市场,1996,(10):48
    [25]杨荣波,杜力夫.论国际船舶租赁融资的商业风险及利益保障[J].世界海运,2004,(1):38-40
    [26]徐剑华.运输船舶投资决策中的不确定性与风险分析[J].上海海运学院学报,1983,(3):15-35
    [27]杨华龙,李德源,杨永志.运输项目风险分析与评价研究[J].大连海事大学学报,1999,(2):49-52
    [28]孙静芹,张春梅.租赁业务的风险及防范[J].经济论坛,2000,(18):24-25
    [29]何平.论融咨租赁的风险及对策研究[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,(3):56-58
    [30]田昕.船舶租赁融资风险及保障机制[J].世界海运,2002,25(5):28-29
    [31]张陶新.租赁融资合同风险评估的模型和算法[J].湘潭大学自然科学学报,2003,(3):14-16
    [32]栾复恺.船舶投资风险管理研究[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2003
    [33]徐公达,攀延新等.飞机租赁融资的风险管理[J].工业技术经济,2003,(1):25
    [34]田琦,赵凤SCERT在项目融资风险评估中的应用研究[J].工业技术经济,2004,(12):77-79
    [35]田琦.项目融资风险及基于影响图的风险评估[D].西南财经大学硕十论文,2005
    [36]龙志林.租赁融资风险与防范[J].武汉商业服务学院学报,2006,(9):44-46
    [37]郭鹰.宏观调控对租赁融资的影响[J].石家庄经济学院学报,2008,(2):22-24
    [38]索岚.我国租赁融资信用风险控制的研究[D].上海海事大学,2007
    [39]谭威.基于VaR模型的干散货航运市场分析研究[D].上海海事大学,2008
    [40]丁静.商业银行物流融资风险评估模型的构建[D].复旦大学,2008
    (41]梁飞媛.租赁融资的风险与控制[J].浙江金融,2008,(11):60
    [42]黄彦菁.试论租赁融资风险产生的机制与管理[J].中国总会计师,2009,(7):70-71
    [43]章连标,马连锋.飞机租赁融资风险模糊综合评判模型[J].中国民用航空,2007,(1):60-61
    [44]何琳,肖翔.我国铁路租赁融资的风险识别与控制[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008,7(2):76-80
    [45]王东强,田书芹.租赁融资风险分析和防范体系重构[J].财会与金融,2008,3:13-15
    [46]邓卫国.航运企业船舶租赁融资财务风险研究[J].交通财会,2009,7:28-32
    [47]王疾风.世界船舶租赁融资扫描[J].交通建设与管理,2006,(12)
    [48]李莅.国际航运市场及船舶融资方式[J].船艇,2008,(5)
    [49]雷海.浅谈船舶租赁融资[J].中国远洋航务,2007,(4):14-18
    [50]王豫川.金融租赁导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997
    [51]薛文瑾.租赁融资公司风险管理研究[D].北京交通大学硕士论文,2007:45
    [52]国际会计准则委员会网站:www.iasc.org.uk
    [53]王涵生.金融租赁国际比较研究[D].河北大学硕士论文,2010:92
    [54]英国财务报告委员会网站www.frc.org.uk
    [55]中国注册会计师协会.税法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010:67-71
    [56]史燕平.租赁融资原理与实务[M].北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2005
    [57]卞启印.船舶租赁融资的风险及防范[J].中国海商法年刊,2010,21(1):61-67
    [58]司玉琢.海商法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:235
    [59]郑田卫.船舶租赁融资合同的法律适用研究——兼议海事诉讼中不便审理法院原则[J].中 国海商法年刊,2004,(1):60-75
    [60]刘子先.租赁融资企业的风险控制研究及实证分析[D].天津大学硕士论文,2010
    [61]沈隽.船舶租赁融资的风险管理研究[D].上海交通大学硕士论文,2010
    [62]Myers, S. C., Dill, D. A.& Bautista, A. J. Valuation of financial lease contracts[J]. The Journal of Finance,1976,31 (3):799-819
    [63]Franks, J.&Hodges, S. D. Valuation of financial lease contracts:a note[J]. Journal of Finance, 1978, (33):657-669
    [64]Bowman, R. G. The debt equivalent of leases:an empirical investigation [J]. Accounting Review,1980, (55):237-53
    [65]Ang, J.& Peterson, P. P. The leasing puzzle [J]. Journal of Finance,1984,(39):1055-1065
    [66]Finucane, T. J. Some empirical evidence on the use of financial leases [J]. Journal of Financial Research.1988, (11):321-33
    [67]张立群,张丽.租赁融资基础理论的简要评述[J].中国管理信息化,2008,(1)
    [68]Marston, F.& Harris, R. S. Substitutability of leases and debt in corporate capital structures [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,1988, (3):147-170
    [69]Lasfer, M. A.& Levis, M. The determinants of the leasing decision of small and large companies [J]. European Financial Management,1998,4(2):159-184
    [70]胡春静.租赁融资影响因素的实证分析[D].浙江大学硕十论文,2009
    [71]Yan, A. Leasing and debt financing:Substitutes or complements? [J]. Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis,2006,41(3):709-731
    [72]Brick, I. E., Fung,W.& Subrahmanyam, M. Leasing and financial intermediation:comparative tax advantages[J]. Financial Management,1987, (16):55-59
    [73]Lease R. C., McConnell J. J.& Schallheim, J. S. Realized returns and the default prepayment experience of financial leasing contracts[J]. Financial Management.1990, (19):11-20
    [74]Mehran, H., Taggart, R. A.& Yermack, D. CEO ownership, leasing, and debt financing[J]. Financial Management,1999,28(2):5-14
    [75]Barclay, M.J.& Smith, C.W. The priority structure of corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Finance, 1995, (50):899-916
    [76]Smith, C.W. And I. M. Wakeman, Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy[J]. Journal of Finance,1985,45(2):895-908
    [77]Stulz, R. M.& Johnson, H. An analysis of secured debt[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1985,14:501-521
    [78]Leeth, J.D. and J.A. Scott. The incidence of secured debt:Evidence from the small business community[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1989,24:379-394
    [79]Barclay, M.J.& Smith, C.W. The priority structure of corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Finance, 1995, (50):899-916
    [80]Sharpe, S. A.& Nguyen, H. H. Capital market imperfection and the inventive to lease[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1995, (39):271-294
    [81]Graham J. R., Lemmon, M. L.& Schallheim, J. S. Debt, leases, taxes, and the endogeneity of corporate tax status[J]. Journal of Finance,1998, (53):131-162
    [82]吕鑫.关于在我国推行船舶租赁融资的研究[D].上海交通大学硕士论文,2009
    [83]胡群峰.船舶售后回租融资模式研究[J].中国水运,2010,(3)
    [84]王涵生.金融租赁的国际比较研究[D].河北大学硕士论文,2010,(5)
    [85]王志诚,周春生.金融风险管理研究进展:国际文献综述[J].管理世界,2006,(4)
    [86]陈嘉智.风险管理理论综述[J].特区经济,2008,(6):278-279
    [87][英]马克·洛尔,列夫·博罗多夫斯基,陈斌等译.金融风险管理手册[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003:546
    [88]谢志华.内部控制、公司治理、风险管理:关系与整合[J].会计研究,2007,(10)
    [89]吴莉婧.论船舶租赁融资交易的合同架构与风险防范[J].商业研究,2007,(4)
    [90]陈国平,刁兆峰.管理学原理[M].武汉:武汉理工大学出版社,2003:8-9
    [91][美)丹尼尔·豪斯曼著,丁建峰译.经济学的哲学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007:137
    [92]Alchain, A., Demsetz H. Production, Information Cost and Economic Organization[J]. American Economic Review,1972,62(3):777-795
    [93]McMillan, J. Games, Strategies, and Managers:How Managers Can Use Game Theory to Make Better Business Decisions [M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1996:65-66
    [94]Ansoff. Corporate Strategy[M]. New York:McGraw Hill,1965:177-183
    [95]James W. Friedman. Games Theory with Applications to Economics[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1990:33-35
    [96]Drew Fudenberg & Jean Tirole. Games Theory[M]. Cambridge Mass:MIT Press,1991: 421-428
    [97]David M. Kreps. ACourse in Microeconomic Theory[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1990:409-410
    [98]杨良宜.船舶融资与抵押[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2003:119-121
    [99]刘毅彬,胡群峰.境外期租融资在航运企业中的实证研究[C].许如清等主编.第四届中国交通运输业财务与会计学术研讨会论文集[M].北京:新华出版社,2008:361-377
    [100]王惠珍,冯寅.境外船舶期租中与保险有关的若干问题[J].天津航海,2004,(3):39-41
    [101]赵成国,董华.船舶租赁业务中的会计思考[J].上海会计,2004,(3):23-25
    [102]John Wiley. International Marking and Purchasing of Industrial Goods[J]. American Marking Management,1982,26(1):217-231
    [103]陈玉和,姜秀娟等.风险评价[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2009
    [104]张鹏飞.基于模糊评价的租赁融资企业风险研究[D].北京交通大学硕士论文,2011
    [105]石帅.面向民营航运企业的船舶租赁融资项目风险评价研究[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2010
    [106]杜栋,庞庆华等.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008
    [107]陈衍泰,陈国宏.综合评价方法分类及进展研究[J].管理科学学报,2004,(4):69-79
    [108]刘次华等.概率论与数理统计[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003
    [109]王能超.数值分析简明教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003
    [110]中国注册会计师协会.财务成本管理[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2008
    [111]蒋泽军.模糊数学教程[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2003
    [112]万莉,陈长彬,吴隽.多级模糊综合评价在供应商选择中的应用[J].茂名学院学报,2008,(1)
    [113]孙铭文,张仁颐.多层次多目标模糊优选模型在船舶融资决策中的应用[J].水运管理,2004,(7):33-37
    [114]刘思峰,郭天榜,党耀国.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:57-59
    [115]陈锐,魏津瑜,毕然.基于BP神经网络的供应商选择研究[J].天津理工大学学报,2008,(1):18-23
    [116]胡国胜,张国红.基于支持向量机和神经网络的供应商选择方法比较[J].交通科技与经济,2007,(2)
    [117]胡燕京,高会丽,徐建锋.BP人工神经网络:金融风险预警新视角[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部经济论坛),2003,(2):25-30
    [118]王其藩.系统动力学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2009
    [119]钟永光.系统动力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2009
    [120]谢季坚等.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2003
    [121]刘晓东,张桂戌.模糊层次分析法在供应商选择评价中的应用研究[J].物流科技,2007,(4):112-116
    [122]邵瑞庆.国际航运船舶投资风险[J].水运管理,2005
    [123]关吴.干散货国际航运市场及其波动周期研究[D].复旦大学硕士论文,2009
    [124]丁敏.中国造船市场分析[J].世界海运,2007,(6)
    [125]方世华.航运企业融资战略研究[D].大连海事大学硕士论文,2007
    [126]郑义彬,高峻.水运企业风险融资方式探析[J].交通企业管理,2002,(7)
    [127]王颖.运输价格波动风险[J].世界海运,2001,(3)
    [128]马辉.油价高企的背景下国内航运企业燃油风险及风险控制策略研究[D].复旦大学硕士论文,2008
    [129]张倩.航运安全风险[J].交通企业管理,2003,(10)
    [130]杨海丛.我国上市航运企业的财务战略[J].上海海运学院学报.2003,(6)
    [131]朱吴,林国龙.基于SOP的航运企业管理模式[J].水运管理,2007,29(10)
    [132]陈舜.班轮运输企业资质信誉评估指标体系的研究[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2004
    [133]殷惠.南京水运公司财务预警系统研究[D].武汉理工大学硕士论文,2007
    [134]王琪,李宜军.航运市场风险及其规避策略浅析[J].水运管理,2002,(4)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700