知识产品权研究
摘要
知识产品权是因合法持有知识产权产品而享有的权利,即经知识产权人或其授权人的许可而生产的知识产权产品,在投放市场后,凡合法取得该知识产权产品的人,只要不将其用于侵犯知识产权人的专用权活动,有权自由地使用、转卖、处置该知识产品。知识产品权是一种专有性的民事权利,它为知识产品所有人所专有。设立知识产品权的目的是为了能够消除知识产权的专有性对商品自由流通所产生的消极影响,区分创造性智力成果的所有人和创造性智力成果的载体即知识产品的所有人,并在附载知识产权的知识产品首次进入流通后将知识产权人的权利限制于生产领域,达到知识产权人对无形的创造性成果的垄断权与社会公众对知识产品的充分利用之间的平衡。
全文主体分四章,外加引言和结论。
引言分析了近日的知识产权的发展现状,知识产权过度垄断所带来的恶果和其原因,为知识产品权命题的提出奠定现实的基础。
第一章阐述知识产品权的基本理论。首先对知识产品权进行了定义,并通过知识产品权与知识产权、物权的比较,分析说明知识产品权虽然与相邻权有着密切的联系,但其具有独立存在的意义。知识产品权是因合法持有知识产权产品而享有的民事权利,具有专有性、权力范围的有限性和公开性的法律特征。它和知识产权关系密切,但两者之间在客体、主体和法定存续期限都存在着明显差别。知识产品权与物权存在紧密联系和区别,与物权客体的广泛性相反,知识产品范围明确具体,知识产品支配权也无法像物权一样完全绝对,它以知识产品负载的知识产权为限。在本部分的最后,本文强调了知识产品权的意义,即知识产品权平衡流通中知识产权人和知识产品人之间的利益冲突,体现法律追求公平与效率的本质,也维护了法律的秩序与自由。
第二章分析知识产品权的法律关系。知识产品权是一种财产权,它既体现了知识产品持有人对知识产品的控制,所以,知识产品权的主体即为知识产品权所有人。知识产品权的客体,是人们在科学、技术、文化等知识形态领域的创造性智力成果的载体,这是一种特别的民事权利客体,其具备无形精神成果附于其上、人为性、价值性和公开性等几个特征。知识产品的权利内容主要包括知识产品所有权、用益知识产品权和担保知识产品权。所谓知识产品所有权知识产品所有人依法对自己的知识产品享有占有、使用、收益和处分的权利;所谓用益知识产品权是指对不是自己所有的知识产品享有占有、使用、收益等权利;担保知识产品权是在借贷、买卖等民事活动中,债务人或者第三人可以将自己所有的有一定价值的知识产品作为履行债务的担保。
第三章探讨知识产品权行使和限制问题。知识产品权行使包括自行使用、转让和知识产品的反向工程等途径。自行使用即通过付出对价取得了知识产品后,知识产品持有人取得了知识产品占有权、知识产品使用权、知识产品收益权和知识产品处分权;知识产品权的转让,即知识产品权人将知识产品权让渡与他人的法律行为。通过该行为,知识产品权人失去了处分权利,受让人成为新的知识产品权主体;知识产品的反向工程,即知识产品权人对其合法持有的蕴含技术的知识产品,运用内部的技术力量对知识产品进行解剖分析,破译并获取所需的技术秘密和知识。知识产品权的限制是对知识产品权人在行使所享有的知识产权的限制,其功能在于通过知识产品权的合法合理限制,平衡知识产品权人与知识产权人之间的利益,确保知识产品持有人在占有和利用知识产品的同时,不侵犯知识产权人的专有权利。这种限制主要包括知识产品来源的合法性、不得侵犯知识产权人的权利和权利范围仅限于知识产品三个方面。
第四章探讨知识产品权的保护。司法救济和行政救济是知识产品权保护的基本手段。对知识产品权的侵权认定,应该有四个构成要件,即加害行为、损害事实、加害知识产品行为与知识产品损害事实之间有因果关系和过错。对知识产品权侵权一般表现为侵占、损坏、妨害和无权处分和非法出租等行为。鉴于知识产品的特殊性,知识产品权的侵权归责原则选择过错责任归责原则。对知识产品权侵权责任方式,可以通过赋予权利人以请求确认知识产品所有权、请求排除妨碍、请求恢复原状、请求返还原知识产品、请求赔偿损失等请求权的方法来实现。但当知识产品权和知识产权或其他合法权利发生冲突,当事人除了寻求司法救济,还可以通过行政措施寻找救济。
文章结论部分对所研究的问题作了最后的总结,并强调指出,知识产品权是一个独立的民事权利,它有自己法律的特征,知识产品权虽然与诸如知识产权、物权等相关权利既有密切的联系,但它也有自己较为独立而完整的权利体系。
The right of knowledge product is the right which has the legal keeping intellectual property rights product ,and it is authorized by the intellectual property rights product and the intellectual property rights person's permission produces. After putting into circulation the market place , all the people get a product what owes The right of knowledge product. As long as the special use not using to infringe upon the intellectual property rights, people weighs up an activity, entitled to be put into use , to be resold , be dealt with to owe knowledge a product freely. The knowledge product weighs up the civil rights being one kind of exclusive, it is that the knowledge product proprietor institute exclusive. And the purpose of setting up knowledge product right is to negative influence produced by free flow for exclusive being able to remove intellectual property rights to the commodity, Distinguishing creativeness intelligence achievement proprietor intelligence achievement carrier ,knowledge product proprietor with creativeness, taking subsidiary notes, the intellectual property rights knowledge product enters the queen who circulates first that right of intellectual property rights people is restricted in producing a field, and reaching the balance that the intellectual property rights people always explores to intangible creativeness between the achievement monopoly right and society the public fully utilizing to knowledge product.
The article is avoided to four parts, adding apposition foreword and conclusion. The foreword analyses recently the intellectual property rights present situation. Evil consequence causes brought about by excessive monopoly of intellectual property rights.
The first chapter elaborates knowledge product power elementary theory. it carries out definition on knowledge product right, comparing the knowledge product right comparison and intellectual property rights, and Analyses the explanation knowledge though product right having close connection with bordering right, But it has the significance there existing in independence. The knowledge product weighs up the civil rights being to have lawfulness and it has that holding the intellectual property rights product, the lurch finiteness and opening law characteristic. it has close relations of knowledge property, But they have obvious differences between the object, the main part and legal lasting and the deadline. the right of knowledge product and the real right also have the close relations and the differences. Opposite to the real right object's universality, The knowledge product scope is clear concretely. The knowledge product right to control is also unable the real right equally completely to be likely absolute, and It is limited to by the knowledge product load's intellectual property rights. Finally, This article emphasized the knowledge product power significance. knowledge product power balanced circulation between intellectual property rights person and knowledge product person's conflicts of interest, Manifests the legal pursue to be fair and efficiency essence and it maintains the legal order and the freedom.
In the second chapter, writer analysis the legal relationships. the knowledge product power is one property rights, and it has already manifested the knowledge product possessor to the knowledge product control. The people having the right of knowledge product is the people owing knowledge product. The knowledge product power's object, is the creating intelligence achievement carriers that people in knowledge shape domain science, technology, cultures and so on.. This is so special civil right object, containing the invisible energetic achievement attaches in above, artifact, the value and openness. this article writes three aspects, the knowledge product property rights, constructed the knowledge product right content with the profit knowledge product right and the guarantee knowledge product right. Knowledge product property rights knowledge product makes people have legally to their knowledge product hold the right to use, income and punish. Referring from with the profit knowledge product power is that the people who not owes knowledge product profit from holding rights for using and incoming. Finally, the guarantee knowledge product right is in lending money business , and on the civic action, the debtor and the third person may having certain value knowledge product to take the fulfillment debt the guarantee.
The third chapter is about the discussion knowledge product power exercising and the limit question. The knowledge product rights exercising includes uses, transfer and knowledge product ways voluntarily, and so on. The use means by paid the value to obtain the right of knowledge product voluntarily, the knowledge product possessor has rights obtained The right of knowledge product occupies authorized, the knowledge product right of use, the knowledge product usufruct and the knowledge product disposition right. the transferring behavior, owning knowledge product rights person makes knowledge product rights transfer to other people's legal act. by this behavior, the person lost the punishment right, making the grant become to the new one owns knowledge product rights. The knowledge product's reverse engineering, taking the knowledge product rights from the people for legal keeping's implication technology's knowledge product, it utilizes the internal technical force to carry on the dissection analysis to the knowledge product, and breaks technical secret which and knowledge and gains needs. the knowledge product rights limiting in this chapter, the knowledge product right’s limit is emphasis to limit the person who has the intellectual property rights. It’s just for balancing knowledge product person and intellectual property rights person's benefit by the knowledge product power legitimate reasonable limit, and making sure that the knowledge product possessor holds with use knowledge product, not encroaching upon the intellectual property rights person's appropriation right. Its content mainly includes: the validity which the knowledge product originates, not encroaching upon the intellectual property rights person's right and the right scope only restricted in the knowledge product.
The fourth chapter is about the discussion of knowledge product power protection. The judicial relief and the administrative relief are the essential methods of knowledge product right protection. The knowledge product right's abuse of authority must have the following component: the injuring behavior, the harming fact, the causal relation between the injuring the knowledge product behavior and the knowledge product harming fact, and the mistake. Its shows as invade, the damage, the hindrance, having no right to punish and illegal hiring and so on. Basing on view of the knowledge product's particularity, the way to turn over to the responsibility principle choice mistake responsibility knowledge product power's right infringement is turn over to the responsibility principle. To responsibility principle choice mistake responsibility, it aspect by entrusts to request the compensation loss methods realized., Including the confirmation knowledge product property rights, the request elimination hindrance, the request restore the original condition, the request to return to the return to original state knowledge product, request power ,and so on. When the knowledge product right , the intellectual property rights and other lawful rights has the conflict, the litigant except seeks the judicial relief, and may also seek for the relief through the executive action.
In the article conclusion part, It is up to the question which studied and makes the final summary. The knowledge product right is an independent civil right, having oneself law characteristic. Although the knowledge product right has close contacting with the intellectual property rights, the real right and so on, it also has the independent and complete right system.
全文主体分四章,外加引言和结论。
引言分析了近日的知识产权的发展现状,知识产权过度垄断所带来的恶果和其原因,为知识产品权命题的提出奠定现实的基础。
第一章阐述知识产品权的基本理论。首先对知识产品权进行了定义,并通过知识产品权与知识产权、物权的比较,分析说明知识产品权虽然与相邻权有着密切的联系,但其具有独立存在的意义。知识产品权是因合法持有知识产权产品而享有的民事权利,具有专有性、权力范围的有限性和公开性的法律特征。它和知识产权关系密切,但两者之间在客体、主体和法定存续期限都存在着明显差别。知识产品权与物权存在紧密联系和区别,与物权客体的广泛性相反,知识产品范围明确具体,知识产品支配权也无法像物权一样完全绝对,它以知识产品负载的知识产权为限。在本部分的最后,本文强调了知识产品权的意义,即知识产品权平衡流通中知识产权人和知识产品人之间的利益冲突,体现法律追求公平与效率的本质,也维护了法律的秩序与自由。
第二章分析知识产品权的法律关系。知识产品权是一种财产权,它既体现了知识产品持有人对知识产品的控制,所以,知识产品权的主体即为知识产品权所有人。知识产品权的客体,是人们在科学、技术、文化等知识形态领域的创造性智力成果的载体,这是一种特别的民事权利客体,其具备无形精神成果附于其上、人为性、价值性和公开性等几个特征。知识产品的权利内容主要包括知识产品所有权、用益知识产品权和担保知识产品权。所谓知识产品所有权知识产品所有人依法对自己的知识产品享有占有、使用、收益和处分的权利;所谓用益知识产品权是指对不是自己所有的知识产品享有占有、使用、收益等权利;担保知识产品权是在借贷、买卖等民事活动中,债务人或者第三人可以将自己所有的有一定价值的知识产品作为履行债务的担保。
第三章探讨知识产品权行使和限制问题。知识产品权行使包括自行使用、转让和知识产品的反向工程等途径。自行使用即通过付出对价取得了知识产品后,知识产品持有人取得了知识产品占有权、知识产品使用权、知识产品收益权和知识产品处分权;知识产品权的转让,即知识产品权人将知识产品权让渡与他人的法律行为。通过该行为,知识产品权人失去了处分权利,受让人成为新的知识产品权主体;知识产品的反向工程,即知识产品权人对其合法持有的蕴含技术的知识产品,运用内部的技术力量对知识产品进行解剖分析,破译并获取所需的技术秘密和知识。知识产品权的限制是对知识产品权人在行使所享有的知识产权的限制,其功能在于通过知识产品权的合法合理限制,平衡知识产品权人与知识产权人之间的利益,确保知识产品持有人在占有和利用知识产品的同时,不侵犯知识产权人的专有权利。这种限制主要包括知识产品来源的合法性、不得侵犯知识产权人的权利和权利范围仅限于知识产品三个方面。
第四章探讨知识产品权的保护。司法救济和行政救济是知识产品权保护的基本手段。对知识产品权的侵权认定,应该有四个构成要件,即加害行为、损害事实、加害知识产品行为与知识产品损害事实之间有因果关系和过错。对知识产品权侵权一般表现为侵占、损坏、妨害和无权处分和非法出租等行为。鉴于知识产品的特殊性,知识产品权的侵权归责原则选择过错责任归责原则。对知识产品权侵权责任方式,可以通过赋予权利人以请求确认知识产品所有权、请求排除妨碍、请求恢复原状、请求返还原知识产品、请求赔偿损失等请求权的方法来实现。但当知识产品权和知识产权或其他合法权利发生冲突,当事人除了寻求司法救济,还可以通过行政措施寻找救济。
文章结论部分对所研究的问题作了最后的总结,并强调指出,知识产品权是一个独立的民事权利,它有自己法律的特征,知识产品权虽然与诸如知识产权、物权等相关权利既有密切的联系,但它也有自己较为独立而完整的权利体系。
The right of knowledge product is the right which has the legal keeping intellectual property rights product ,and it is authorized by the intellectual property rights product and the intellectual property rights person's permission produces. After putting into circulation the market place , all the people get a product what owes The right of knowledge product. As long as the special use not using to infringe upon the intellectual property rights, people weighs up an activity, entitled to be put into use , to be resold , be dealt with to owe knowledge a product freely. The knowledge product weighs up the civil rights being one kind of exclusive, it is that the knowledge product proprietor institute exclusive. And the purpose of setting up knowledge product right is to negative influence produced by free flow for exclusive being able to remove intellectual property rights to the commodity, Distinguishing creativeness intelligence achievement proprietor intelligence achievement carrier ,knowledge product proprietor with creativeness, taking subsidiary notes, the intellectual property rights knowledge product enters the queen who circulates first that right of intellectual property rights people is restricted in producing a field, and reaching the balance that the intellectual property rights people always explores to intangible creativeness between the achievement monopoly right and society the public fully utilizing to knowledge product.
The article is avoided to four parts, adding apposition foreword and conclusion. The foreword analyses recently the intellectual property rights present situation. Evil consequence causes brought about by excessive monopoly of intellectual property rights.
The first chapter elaborates knowledge product power elementary theory. it carries out definition on knowledge product right, comparing the knowledge product right comparison and intellectual property rights, and Analyses the explanation knowledge though product right having close connection with bordering right, But it has the significance there existing in independence. The knowledge product weighs up the civil rights being to have lawfulness and it has that holding the intellectual property rights product, the lurch finiteness and opening law characteristic. it has close relations of knowledge property, But they have obvious differences between the object, the main part and legal lasting and the deadline. the right of knowledge product and the real right also have the close relations and the differences. Opposite to the real right object's universality, The knowledge product scope is clear concretely. The knowledge product right to control is also unable the real right equally completely to be likely absolute, and It is limited to by the knowledge product load's intellectual property rights. Finally, This article emphasized the knowledge product power significance. knowledge product power balanced circulation between intellectual property rights person and knowledge product person's conflicts of interest, Manifests the legal pursue to be fair and efficiency essence and it maintains the legal order and the freedom.
In the second chapter, writer analysis the legal relationships. the knowledge product power is one property rights, and it has already manifested the knowledge product possessor to the knowledge product control. The people having the right of knowledge product is the people owing knowledge product. The knowledge product power's object, is the creating intelligence achievement carriers that people in knowledge shape domain science, technology, cultures and so on.. This is so special civil right object, containing the invisible energetic achievement attaches in above, artifact, the value and openness. this article writes three aspects, the knowledge product property rights, constructed the knowledge product right content with the profit knowledge product right and the guarantee knowledge product right. Knowledge product property rights knowledge product makes people have legally to their knowledge product hold the right to use, income and punish. Referring from with the profit knowledge product power is that the people who not owes knowledge product profit from holding rights for using and incoming. Finally, the guarantee knowledge product right is in lending money business , and on the civic action, the debtor and the third person may having certain value knowledge product to take the fulfillment debt the guarantee.
The third chapter is about the discussion knowledge product power exercising and the limit question. The knowledge product rights exercising includes uses, transfer and knowledge product ways voluntarily, and so on. The use means by paid the value to obtain the right of knowledge product voluntarily, the knowledge product possessor has rights obtained The right of knowledge product occupies authorized, the knowledge product right of use, the knowledge product usufruct and the knowledge product disposition right. the transferring behavior, owning knowledge product rights person makes knowledge product rights transfer to other people's legal act. by this behavior, the person lost the punishment right, making the grant become to the new one owns knowledge product rights. The knowledge product's reverse engineering, taking the knowledge product rights from the people for legal keeping's implication technology's knowledge product, it utilizes the internal technical force to carry on the dissection analysis to the knowledge product, and breaks technical secret which and knowledge and gains needs. the knowledge product rights limiting in this chapter, the knowledge product right’s limit is emphasis to limit the person who has the intellectual property rights. It’s just for balancing knowledge product person and intellectual property rights person's benefit by the knowledge product power legitimate reasonable limit, and making sure that the knowledge product possessor holds with use knowledge product, not encroaching upon the intellectual property rights person's appropriation right. Its content mainly includes: the validity which the knowledge product originates, not encroaching upon the intellectual property rights person's right and the right scope only restricted in the knowledge product.
The fourth chapter is about the discussion of knowledge product power protection. The judicial relief and the administrative relief are the essential methods of knowledge product right protection. The knowledge product right's abuse of authority must have the following component: the injuring behavior, the harming fact, the causal relation between the injuring the knowledge product behavior and the knowledge product harming fact, and the mistake. Its shows as invade, the damage, the hindrance, having no right to punish and illegal hiring and so on. Basing on view of the knowledge product's particularity, the way to turn over to the responsibility principle choice mistake responsibility knowledge product power's right infringement is turn over to the responsibility principle. To responsibility principle choice mistake responsibility, it aspect by entrusts to request the compensation loss methods realized., Including the confirmation knowledge product property rights, the request elimination hindrance, the request restore the original condition, the request to return to the return to original state knowledge product, request power ,and so on. When the knowledge product right , the intellectual property rights and other lawful rights has the conflict, the litigant except seeks the judicial relief, and may also seek for the relief through the executive action.
In the article conclusion part, It is up to the question which studied and makes the final summary. The knowledge product right is an independent civil right, having oneself law characteristic. Although the knowledge product right has close contacting with the intellectual property rights, the real right and so on, it also has the independent and complete right system.
引文
1.陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视.哈尔滨学院学报,2004.9:117
2.(美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和法理学[M].张军等译,上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994:190
3.陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视.哈尔滨学院学报,2004.9:118
4.吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[M].法律出版社,2005.2.1: 60
5. 【苏】E-A-鲍加特赫.资本主义国家和发展中国家的专利法[A]国外专利法介绍[M].知识产权出版社,1980: 12
6. 仲 相,司艳丽.知识产权法中物权理论的应用[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2002.3:268-273
7. 吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[J].法律出版社, 2005.2.1:30
8. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:117
9. 陈宗波著“版权用尽的法理审视”[J].哈尔滨学院学报.2004.9:118
10. 谢在全.民法物权论[M].中国政法大学出版杜,1999:29
11.马克思恩格斯全集(第 1 卷)[M].北京人民出版社,1956:382
12.德莱豪斯.知识产权哲学 (A Philosophy of IntellectualProperty).达特茅斯出版有限公司,1996 年
13. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视.哈尔滨学院学报,2004.9:118
14. 孟勤国.中国物权制度的基本构思[A]杨振山.罗马法.中国法与民法典化.中国政法大学出版社,1995:
15. 孟勤国.占有概念的历史发展与中国占有制度[J].中国社会科学,1993.4:58
16.马克思恩格斯全集(第 1 卷)[M],北京人民出版社,1956:382
17. 王宝毅,张宝生.选择性反向工程与自主创新整合.科学学与科学技术管理.2006.04:85
18.1992 年 Atari Games Corp .v. Nintendo ofAmerica Inc.〔3〕案情大致如下:Atari 公司在花了两年的时间反编译 Nintendo 的软件失败之后的 1988 年,委托一名律师谎称因应诉的需要向美国版权局申请 Nintendo注册留存的样本,之后利用这些编码开发了一套针对Nintendo的破解程序。1989 年 Nintendo 提起侵权之诉。Atari 以版权法中的合理使用(fair use)为抗辩理由,并且声称 Nintendo 构成了版权的不当使用(copyright misuse)。初审由美国加州北区地区法院 Smith 法官审理,地区法院认为在反向工程过程中的复制行为构成了对原告版权的侵犯。而上诉法院(Federal Cir-cuit Court of Appeals)认为,对合法使用的目标程序进行反向工程构成对作品的“合理使用”,但是被告是以欺骗的手段从版权局获得的编码,因此不符合合理使用的条件。虽然基本维持了地区法院的判决,但是说理(reasoning)是不同的,上诉法院肯定了反向工程属于合理使用。
19.欧共体理事会于1991年通过了《计算机程序保护指令》(Direc-tive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs,以下简称《指令》)。《指令》第 6 条是关于反向工程的条款,对该问题的创造性规定是《指令》的突出成就之一该条明文规定,为了获得必要的信息来独立开发出兼容的程序,合法用户可以对程序进行复制和编译,而无须经过权利人的同意。
20.齐爱民.现代知识产权法学[M].苏州大学出版社,2005.7.1:322
21. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:116
22.〔美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社, 1994:185
23. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:118
24. .董安生.民事法律行为[M],中国人民大学出版社,1994:117
25. 转引王泽鉴.《民法学说与判例研究》(2)[M],中国政法大学出版社 1997:144
26.曾世雄.损害赔偿法原理[M].台湾三民书局,1996:16
【1】陈宗波.版权用尽研究[D].广西.广西师范大学,2001
【2】陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J],哈尔滨学院学报,2004,9:114-119
【3】陈宗波.版权用尽的经济学分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002.7.3:23-29
【4】唐昊.从知识产权到知识霸权——知识产权过度扩张所导致的国际体系危机[J].广东社会科学,2006.5:89-94
【5】王雪利,和金生,张 翔.反向工程的法律风险及其防范机制构建初探[J].现代财经,2006.6:59-62
【6】王雪利,和金生.论反向工程_技术创新与知识产权保护的协同发展[J].软科学,2006·20·3:101-104
【7】王宝毅,张宝生.选择性反向工程与自主创新整合[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006.04:82-85
【8】冯晓青.权利穷竭问题研究[J].北京科技大学学报( 社会科学版), 2007 .9 . 23 .3 :54-58
【9】贾继峰.浅议反知识产权垄断的重要性[J].黑河学刊,2005.3.2:87-90
【10】郭广平, 冯岩岩.软件反向工程的合法性研究[J].湖北经济学院学报( 人文社会科学版),2007. 9 . 4 :113-114
【11】张靓.《法国知识产权法》中的无形财产权理论[J].法学论丛 ,2004..6:41-42
【12】吴汉东.关于知识产权本体_主体与客体的重新认识_以财产所有权为比较研究对象[J].法学评论(双月刊) ,2000.5:3-13
【13】吴汉东.财产权客体制度论_以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象[J].法商研究,2000.4:45-58
【14】陈建峰.从知识产权与物权的相似性论知识产权在民法典中的地位[D].湘潭大学2006.5.8 民商法硕士毕业论文
【15】吴汉东.财产的非物质化革命与革命的非物质财产法[J].中国社会科学,2003.4:122-207
【16】王春燕.贸易中知识产权与物权冲突之解决原则———权利穷竭的含义、理论基础及效力范围[J].中国人民大学学报.2003.1:120-127
【17】何金梅.知识产权与物权的冲突与平衡———权利穷竭原则初探[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2005.1:60-66
【18】刘平、周祥.知识产权与物权比较研究[J].知识产权(双月刊),76.13:34-38
【19】尹田.论物权与知识产权的关系[J].法商研究,2002.5:13-16
【20】王宏军.论作为排他权与支配权的知识产权———从与物权比较的视角[J].知识产权,2007.5:9-15
【21】仲 相,司艳丽.知识产权法中物权理论的应用[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ,2002.3:268-273
【22】林莉红.论行政救济的原则[J],法制与社会发展,1999.4:69-71
【23】孟勤国.中国物权制度的基本构思[A],杨振山主编.罗马法.中国法与民法典化[M],中国政法大学出版社,995:21-28
【24】孟勤国.占有概念的历史发展与中国占有制度[J].中国社会科学,1993.4.:57-62
【25】[苏]B.A. 鲍加特赫等.资本主义国家和发展中国家的专利法[A],国外专利法介绍[M],知识出版社,1980.:87-92
【26】吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[M].法律出版社,2005. 1
【27】尹田.物权法理论评析与思考[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004.1
【28】马克思恩格斯全集.第 1 卷[M],北京人民出版社,1956
【29】〔美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社, 1994
【30】董安生.民事法律行为[M].中国人民大学出版社,1994
【31】王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(2)[M],中国政法大学出版社,1997
【32】曾世雄.损害赔偿法原理[M],台湾三民书局,996
【33】王利民.物权法研究[M]中国人民大学出版社,2002.5.1
【34】郑成思.知识产权论[M].社会科学文献出版社,2007.5.1
【35】郑成思.知识产权--应用法学与基本理论[M].人民出版社, 2005.5.1
【36】杨立新.侵权行为法专论.高等教育出版社,2005.1
【37】董茂云、朱淑娣、潘伟杰、刘志刚.行政法学[M]上海人民出版社,2005.8.1
【38】王立民 黄武双.知识产权法研究[M].北京大学出版社,2006.9.1
【39】杨振山.罗马法.中国法与民法法典化[M].中国政法大学出版社,1995
【40】王利明.物权法论[M].中国政法大学出版社,1998
【41】吴汉东.知识产权教程[M].法律出版社,1993
【42】齐爱民.现代知识产权法学[M].苏州大学出版社,2005.7.1
【43】Robert P. Merges, Peters S. Menell, Mark A. Lemley ,intellectual property in the new technological age, 2006 Statutory Supplement, ASPEN publishers, 2006
【44】Robert P. Merges ,Intellectual Property 2006 Statutory Supplement, Aspen Publishers,2006
【45】Phyllis L. Speser,The Art and Science of Technology Transfer, Oversea Publishing House ,2005
【46】Robert P. Merges ,Copyright in a Global Information Economy 2006 Statutory Supplement, Aspen Publishers ,2006
【47】Robin Paul Malloy. Law in a market context : an introduction to market concepts in legal reasoning, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
【 48 】 Alexander I. Poltorak, Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property, Changbai Mountain in Jilin Press,2004
【50】Maria Julia Oliva, Intellectual Property in the FTAA: Little Opportunity and Much Risk, Washington College of Law, American University American University International Law Review, 2003,19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 45
【51】W.R.Cornish,Intellectual Property:Patents,Copyright,Trade Marks and Allied Rights,London:Sweet&Maxwell,1996,Third Edition
【52】Walker,On Early Patent of United States(A.Deller ed.,1964)
2.(美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和法理学[M].张军等译,上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1994:190
3.陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视.哈尔滨学院学报,2004.9:118
4.吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[M].法律出版社,2005.2.1: 60
5. 【苏】E-A-鲍加特赫.资本主义国家和发展中国家的专利法[A]国外专利法介绍[M].知识产权出版社,1980: 12
6. 仲 相,司艳丽.知识产权法中物权理论的应用[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2002.3:268-273
7. 吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[J].法律出版社, 2005.2.1:30
8. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:117
9. 陈宗波著“版权用尽的法理审视”[J].哈尔滨学院学报.2004.9:118
10. 谢在全.民法物权论[M].中国政法大学出版杜,1999:29
11.马克思恩格斯全集(第 1 卷)[M].北京人民出版社,1956:382
12.德莱豪斯.知识产权哲学 (A Philosophy of IntellectualProperty).达特茅斯出版有限公司,1996 年
13. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视.哈尔滨学院学报,2004.9:118
14. 孟勤国.中国物权制度的基本构思[A]杨振山.罗马法.中国法与民法典化.中国政法大学出版社,1995:
15. 孟勤国.占有概念的历史发展与中国占有制度[J].中国社会科学,1993.4:58
16.马克思恩格斯全集(第 1 卷)[M],北京人民出版社,1956:382
17. 王宝毅,张宝生.选择性反向工程与自主创新整合.科学学与科学技术管理.2006.04:85
18.1992 年 Atari Games Corp .v. Nintendo ofAmerica Inc.〔3〕案情大致如下:Atari 公司在花了两年的时间反编译 Nintendo 的软件失败之后的 1988 年,委托一名律师谎称因应诉的需要向美国版权局申请 Nintendo注册留存的样本,之后利用这些编码开发了一套针对Nintendo的破解程序。1989 年 Nintendo 提起侵权之诉。Atari 以版权法中的合理使用(fair use)为抗辩理由,并且声称 Nintendo 构成了版权的不当使用(copyright misuse)。初审由美国加州北区地区法院 Smith 法官审理,地区法院认为在反向工程过程中的复制行为构成了对原告版权的侵犯。而上诉法院(Federal Cir-cuit Court of Appeals)认为,对合法使用的目标程序进行反向工程构成对作品的“合理使用”,但是被告是以欺骗的手段从版权局获得的编码,因此不符合合理使用的条件。虽然基本维持了地区法院的判决,但是说理(reasoning)是不同的,上诉法院肯定了反向工程属于合理使用。
19.欧共体理事会于1991年通过了《计算机程序保护指令》(Direc-tive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs,以下简称《指令》)。《指令》第 6 条是关于反向工程的条款,对该问题的创造性规定是《指令》的突出成就之一该条明文规定,为了获得必要的信息来独立开发出兼容的程序,合法用户可以对程序进行复制和编译,而无须经过权利人的同意。
20.齐爱民.现代知识产权法学[M].苏州大学出版社,2005.7.1:322
21. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:116
22.〔美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社, 1994:185
23. 陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J].哈尔滨学院学报 2004.9:118
24. .董安生.民事法律行为[M],中国人民大学出版社,1994:117
25. 转引王泽鉴.《民法学说与判例研究》(2)[M],中国政法大学出版社 1997:144
26.曾世雄.损害赔偿法原理[M].台湾三民书局,1996:16
【1】陈宗波.版权用尽研究[D].广西.广西师范大学,2001
【2】陈宗波.版权用尽的法理审视[J],哈尔滨学院学报,2004,9:114-119
【3】陈宗波.版权用尽的经济学分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002.7.3:23-29
【4】唐昊.从知识产权到知识霸权——知识产权过度扩张所导致的国际体系危机[J].广东社会科学,2006.5:89-94
【5】王雪利,和金生,张 翔.反向工程的法律风险及其防范机制构建初探[J].现代财经,2006.6:59-62
【6】王雪利,和金生.论反向工程_技术创新与知识产权保护的协同发展[J].软科学,2006·20·3:101-104
【7】王宝毅,张宝生.选择性反向工程与自主创新整合[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006.04:82-85
【8】冯晓青.权利穷竭问题研究[J].北京科技大学学报( 社会科学版), 2007 .9 . 23 .3 :54-58
【9】贾继峰.浅议反知识产权垄断的重要性[J].黑河学刊,2005.3.2:87-90
【10】郭广平, 冯岩岩.软件反向工程的合法性研究[J].湖北经济学院学报( 人文社会科学版),2007. 9 . 4 :113-114
【11】张靓.《法国知识产权法》中的无形财产权理论[J].法学论丛 ,2004..6:41-42
【12】吴汉东.关于知识产权本体_主体与客体的重新认识_以财产所有权为比较研究对象[J].法学评论(双月刊) ,2000.5:3-13
【13】吴汉东.财产权客体制度论_以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象[J].法商研究,2000.4:45-58
【14】陈建峰.从知识产权与物权的相似性论知识产权在民法典中的地位[D].湘潭大学2006.5.8 民商法硕士毕业论文
【15】吴汉东.财产的非物质化革命与革命的非物质财产法[J].中国社会科学,2003.4:122-207
【16】王春燕.贸易中知识产权与物权冲突之解决原则———权利穷竭的含义、理论基础及效力范围[J].中国人民大学学报.2003.1:120-127
【17】何金梅.知识产权与物权的冲突与平衡———权利穷竭原则初探[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2005.1:60-66
【18】刘平、周祥.知识产权与物权比较研究[J].知识产权(双月刊),76.13:34-38
【19】尹田.论物权与知识产权的关系[J].法商研究,2002.5:13-16
【20】王宏军.论作为排他权与支配权的知识产权———从与物权比较的视角[J].知识产权,2007.5:9-15
【21】仲 相,司艳丽.知识产权法中物权理论的应用[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ,2002.3:268-273
【22】林莉红.论行政救济的原则[J],法制与社会发展,1999.4:69-71
【23】孟勤国.中国物权制度的基本构思[A],杨振山主编.罗马法.中国法与民法典化[M],中国政法大学出版社,995:21-28
【24】孟勤国.占有概念的历史发展与中国占有制度[J].中国社会科学,1993.4.:57-62
【25】[苏]B.A. 鲍加特赫等.资本主义国家和发展中国家的专利法[A],国外专利法介绍[M],知识出版社,1980.:87-92
【26】吴汉东、胡开忠.无形财产权制度研究[M].法律出版社,2005. 1
【27】尹田.物权法理论评析与思考[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004.1
【28】马克思恩格斯全集.第 1 卷[M],北京人民出版社,1956
【29】〔美〕罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社, 1994
【30】董安生.民事法律行为[M].中国人民大学出版社,1994
【31】王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(2)[M],中国政法大学出版社,1997
【32】曾世雄.损害赔偿法原理[M],台湾三民书局,996
【33】王利民.物权法研究[M]中国人民大学出版社,2002.5.1
【34】郑成思.知识产权论[M].社会科学文献出版社,2007.5.1
【35】郑成思.知识产权--应用法学与基本理论[M].人民出版社, 2005.5.1
【36】杨立新.侵权行为法专论.高等教育出版社,2005.1
【37】董茂云、朱淑娣、潘伟杰、刘志刚.行政法学[M]上海人民出版社,2005.8.1
【38】王立民 黄武双.知识产权法研究[M].北京大学出版社,2006.9.1
【39】杨振山.罗马法.中国法与民法法典化[M].中国政法大学出版社,1995
【40】王利明.物权法论[M].中国政法大学出版社,1998
【41】吴汉东.知识产权教程[M].法律出版社,1993
【42】齐爱民.现代知识产权法学[M].苏州大学出版社,2005.7.1
【43】Robert P. Merges, Peters S. Menell, Mark A. Lemley ,intellectual property in the new technological age, 2006 Statutory Supplement, ASPEN publishers, 2006
【44】Robert P. Merges ,Intellectual Property 2006 Statutory Supplement, Aspen Publishers,2006
【45】Phyllis L. Speser,The Art and Science of Technology Transfer, Oversea Publishing House ,2005
【46】Robert P. Merges ,Copyright in a Global Information Economy 2006 Statutory Supplement, Aspen Publishers ,2006
【47】Robin Paul Malloy. Law in a market context : an introduction to market concepts in legal reasoning, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
【 48 】 Alexander I. Poltorak, Essentials of Licensing Intellectual Property, Changbai Mountain in Jilin Press,2004
【50】Maria Julia Oliva, Intellectual Property in the FTAA: Little Opportunity and Much Risk, Washington College of Law, American University American University International Law Review, 2003,19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 45
【51】W.R.Cornish,Intellectual Property:Patents,Copyright,Trade Marks and Allied Rights,London:Sweet&Maxwell,1996,Third Edition
【52】Walker,On Early Patent of United States(A.Deller ed.,1964)