基于破产风险的可转换债券融资决策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文主要研究可转换债券投资者的转换策略、回售策略以及企业的赎回策略问题,通过分析三种策略实施的条件及时间对可转换债券融资决策的影响,建立了基于破产风险的可转换债券融资决策模型.主要工作如下:
     资本投资收益率决定了企业的融资资本结构,已有的研究多是将资本投资收益率用随机变量来表示,而人们对于企业的资本投资收益率常用“高”、“低”等模糊语言来描述,资本的未来投资收益率不仅具有随机性还具有模糊性,本文在随机环境和随机模糊环境下分别建立了基于破产风险的融资决策模型.
     本文在确定投资者的转换条件和转换数量时考虑了投资者风险偏好和信息不对称的存在.具有风险偏好的投资者在实施转换时要求一定的转换溢价,而所有投资者的转换溢价具有一定的模糊性,本文根据所要求的转换溢价数值的大小将投资者分为三类,并分别对三类投资者的转换条件和转换数量进行了定量分析,给出了不同风险偏好投资者实施转换的条件以及最优转换量.
     鉴于企业赎回的目的是强迫投资者实施转股,本文在考虑投资者的转换条件及赎回公告期对企业赎回策略的影响下,提出了企业实施赎回的股票价格约束和赎回成本约束,并根据企业的经营目标给出了赎回期望值准则.
     投资者实施回售不仅要考虑到当前股票价格的下跌情况,还要根据影响股票价格的因素综合考虑过去股票价格下跌的程度以及所持续的时间.本文通过给定过去股票价格下跌程度及持续时间对回售的影响权重,给出了新的回售条件.
     本文通过对投资者的转换策略、回售策略以及企业赎回策略的实施条件及时间进行分析,建立了考虑破产风险的可转换债券融资决策模型,并根据可转换债券融资的两个极端结果给出了可转换债券的发行范围.
In this dissertation, the conversion strategy, the sale strategy and the call strategy are studied. Through analyzing the effect of the actualizing condition and the time of three strategies on the convertible bond financing, the convertible bond financial decision-making model with bankruptcy risk is set up. The main work is as follows.
     The return on total capital determines the capital structure of corporate. The return on total capital is characterized as random variable in past studies. In fact, the profit of a corporate in future is always characterized by vague linguistic descriptions such as " high profit ", " low profit ". The return on total capital is not only stochastic but also fuzzy. Here the financial decision-making model based on bankruptcy risk is established in stochastic environment and random fuzzy environment, respectively.
     The conversion condition and conversion amount are studied in which the investor's risk preference and the asymmetry information are taken into account. The investor with risk preference requires a conversion premium and the conversion premiums of total investors are characterized as fuzzy variable. According to the conversion premium the investors can be classed into three sorts. In the conversion strategy, the conversion condition and the conversion amount of the three sorts investors are analyzed.
     The call aim of corporate is to force the investor to convert. Under taking the effect of conversion condition and the notice period on the call strategy, the stock price restriction and the call cost restriction are supplied. Finally, the call expected payout rule is given according to the aim of the corporate.
     The investors who decide to sale need take into account not only the stock price current but also the stock price past. Given the degree and the period of stock price under the conversion price certain weight factor, the sale condition of investors can be found.
     Under analyzing the condition and the time of three strategies actualizing, the amount of convertible bond remained can be got. According to the amount of convertible bond remained, the convertible bond financing decision-making model based on bankruptcy can be established. Due to two extreme results of the financing decision, the financing scope of convertible bond can be gained. .
引文
[1] Altintig Z. A. and Butler A. W., Are they still called late? the effect of notice period on calls of convertible bonds, Journal of Corporate Finance, 2005, 11: 337-350.
    [2] Asquith P. and Mullins D. W., Convertible debt: corporate call policy and voluntary conversion, Journal of Finance, 1991, 4: 1273-1289.
    [3] Balebail M. S., An analysis of convertible debt: theory and evidence, PhD. Dissertation, University of Indiana, 1990.
    [4] Black F. and Cox J., Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions, Journal of Finance, 1976, 31(2): 351-367.
    [5] Brennan M. J. and Schwartz E. S., The case for convertibles, Chase Financial Quarterly, 1982: 27-46.
    [6] Black F. and Scholes M. S., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81: 637-654.
    [7] Brennan M. J. and Schwartz E. S., Corporate income taxes, valuation, and the problem of optimal capital structure, Journal of Business, 1978, 51: 103-114.
    [8] Brennan M. J. and Schwartz E. S., Convertible bonds: valuation and optimal strategies for call and conversion, Journal of Finance, 1977, 32(5): 1699-1715.
    [9] Brennan M. J. and Schwartz E. S., Analying convertible bonds, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1980, 15(4): 907-929.
    [10] Brigham E. F., An analysis of convertible debentures: theory & some empirical evidence, Journal of Finance, 1966, 21: 35-54.
    [11] Bühler W. and Koziol C, Valuation of convertible bonds with sequential conversion, Schmalenbach Business Review, 2002, 54: 302-334.
    [12] Buetow G. W. Jr. and Buell S. G., An alternative call policy for convertible debt, Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 1995, 8(3): 27-41.
    [13] Butler A., Revisiting optimal call policy for convertibles, Financial Analysis Journal, 2002, 58(1): 50-55.
    [14] Campbell C. J., Ederington and Vankudre P. Tax shields, sample selection bias, and the information content of convertible bond calls, Journal of Finance, 1991, 46(4): 1291-1323.
    [15] Casey, C, Corporate valuation, capital structure and risk management: a stochastic DCF approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 135: 311-325.
    [16] Chiu C. Y. and Park C. S., Fuzzy cash flow analysis using present worth criterion, The Engineering Economist, 1994, 39: 113-137.
    [17] Constantinides G. M. and Rosentbal R. W., Strategic analysis of the competitive exercise of certain financial options, Journal of Economic Theory, 1984, 32: 128-138.
    [18] Constantinides G. M. and Grundy B. D., Call and conversion of convertible corporate bonds: theory and evidence, Working paper, 1985.
    [19] Emanuel D. C, Warrant valuation and exercise strategic, Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 12: 211-235.
    [20] Fan H. and Sundaresan S. M., Debt valuation, renegotiation, and optimal dividend policy, The Review of Financial Studies, 2000, 13(4): 1057-1099.
    [21] Fischer E. O., Heinkel R. and Zechner J., Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests, The Journal of Finance, 1989, 1: 19-40.
    [22] Fran(?)ois P. and Morellec E., Capital structure and asset prices: some effects of bankruptcy procedures, Journal of Business, 2004, 77(2): 387-411.
    [23] Galai D., Raviv A. and Wiener Z., Liquidation triggers and the valuation of equity and debt, Working paper, 2003.
    [24] Goldstein R., Ju N. and Leland H., An EBIT-based model of dynamic capital structure, Journal of Business, 2001, 74(4): 483-512.
    [25] Green R., Investment incentives, debt and warrants, Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13: 115-136.
    [26] Grouby M. and Galai D., The interaction between the financial and investment decisions of the firm: the case of issuing warrants in a levered firm, Journal of Banking and Finance, 1994, 18: 861-880.
    [27] Haley CH. W. and Schall L. D., The Theory of Financial Decisions, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
    [28] Harris M. and Raviv A., A sequential model of convertible debt call policy, Journal of Finance, 1985, 40: 1263-1282.
    [29] Ingersoll J. E., A contingent-claims valuation of convertible securities, Journal of Financial Economics, 1977, 4(3): 289-322.
    [30] Ingersoll J. E., An examination of corporate call policies on convertible securities, Journal of Finance, 1977, 32(2): 463-478.
    [31] Isagawa N., Convertible debt: an effective financial instrument to control managerial opportunism, Review of Financial Economics, 2000, 9: 15-26.
    [32] Isagawa N., Callable convertible debt under managerial entrenchment, Journal of Corporate Finance, 2002, 8: 255-270.
    [33] Jaffee D. and Shleifer A., Costs of financial distress, delayed calls of convertible bonds, and the role of investment banks, Journal of Business, 1990, 63: S107-S124.
    [34] Kahraman C., Ruan D. and Tolga E., Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows , Information Sciences, 2002, 142: 57-76.
    [35] Kaufmann A., Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
    [36] Kurasawa M. and Yamada S., Convertible bond financing as an optimal capital structure, Working paper, 2001.
    [37] Lavely J. A., Comparative usage of bond-wrrant and convertible bond issues, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, 1971.
    [38] Leland H. E., Corporate debt value, bond convenants, and optimal capital structure, The Journal of Finance, 1994, 47(4): 1213-1252.
    [39] Liu B., Uncertain Programming[M], New York: Wiley, 1999.
    [40] Liu B., Theory and Practice of Uncertain Programming, Heidelberg: Physica Verlag, 2002.
    [41] Liu B. and Liu Y. K., Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2002, 10(4): 445-450.
    [42] Liu Y. and Liu B., Expected value operator of random fuzzy variable and random fuzzy expected value models, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems, 2003, 11: 195-215.
    [43] Liu Y. and Liu B., Random fuzzy programming with chance measures defined by fuzzy integrals, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2002, 36(4-5): 509-524.
    [44] Mayers D., Why firms issue convertible bonds: the matching of financial and real investment options, Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, 47: 83-102.
    [45] Mikkelson W. H., Convertible calls and security returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 1981, 9: 237-264.
    [46] Miller M. H., Debt and taxes, Journal of Finance, 1977, 5: 337-347.
    [47] Modigliani F. and Miller M. H., The cost of capital,corporation finance and the investment, American Economic Review, 1958, 48(3): 261-297.
    [48] Modigliani F. and Miller M. H., Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction, American Economic Review, 1963, 53(3): 443-453.
    [49] Moraux F., Valuing corporate liabilities when the default threshold is not an absorbing barrier, Working paper, 2001.
    [50] Myers S. C, The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, 1984, 39: 575-592.
    [51] Ofer A. R. and Natarajan A., Convertible call policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 1987, 19: 91-108.
    [52]Nahmias S.,Fuzzy variables,Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1:97-110.
    [53]Phiosophov L.V.and Phiosophov V.L.,Optimization of corporate capital structure a probabilistic bayesian approach,International Review of Financial Analysis,1999,8(3):199-214.
    [54]Ross S.A.,Westerfield R.W.and Jaffe J.F.,Corporate Finance(吴世农,沈艺峰,王志强等译),北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
    [55]Scott J.H.Jr.,A theory of optimal capital structure,The Bell Journal of Economics,1976:33-54.
    [56]Sheen J.N.,Fuzzy financial profitability analyses of demand side management alternatives from participant perspective,Information Sciences,2005,169:329-364.
    [57]Spall J.,An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization,Johns Hopkins Apl Technical Digest,1998,19:482-492.
    [58]Stein J.C.,Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing,Journal of Financial Economics,1992,32:3-21.
    [59]Taggart R.A.JR.,Taxes and corporate capital structure in an incomplete market,The Journal of Finance,1980,35(3):645-659.
    [60]Ward T.L.,Discounted fuzzy cash flow analysis,Proceeding of 1985 Fall Industrial Engineering Conference,Institute of Industrial Engineers,1985:476-481.
    [61]Yao J.S.,Chen M.S.and Lin H.W.,Valuation by using a fuzzy discounted cash flow model,Expert Systems with Applications,2005,28:209-222.
    [62]Zadeh L.A.,Fuzzy sets,Information and Control,1965,8:338-353.
    [63]Zadeh L.A.,Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1978,1(1):3-28.
    [64]陈琨.发行可转换债券能提高企业融资效率吗,财经科学,2005,2:162-167.
    [65]陈韦,程海英.论可转换债券的价值评估,交通财会,2004,6:47-50.
    [66]范辛亭.离散时间条件下企业可转换债券的最优赎回策略,管理工程学报,2001.3:46-50.
    [67]方晓霞.中国企业融资:制度变迁与行为分析,北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
    [68]高荣祥,宋伟官.企业价值模型的建立与最优资本结构存在性的证明,沈阳工业学院学报,2001,3:65-69.
    [69]葛结根.上市公司的股权融资偏好分析,中国流通经济,2003,5:61-64.
    [70]郭多祚,程海洋.可转换债券的未定权益分析,金融教学与研究,2004,1:42-44.
    [71]何春姣,企业最佳资本结构的确定,中南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2003,2:100-103.
    [72]贺琼,程希骏.企业投资与融资决策,北京:科学出版社,2000.
    [73]胡庆平.对可转换债券的价格及相关问题的研究,新疆石油教育学院学报,2004,2:23-27.
    [74]胡振华,聂艳晖.风险态度与最优资本结构的确定,湖南工程学院学报,2002,2:9-10.
    [75]黄少安,张岗.中国上市公司的股权融资偏好分析,经济研究,2001,11:12-21.
    [76]黄智猛,张则斌,吴冲锋.基于违约风险的企业融资结构和成本,系统工程理论方法应用,2000,1:23-27.
    [77]姜爱华,高锦萍.公司资本结构优化中确定负债比率的量化方法,陕西经贸学院学报,1999,4:20-23.
    [78]金燕虹.基于AHP的企业资本结构优化分析,价值工程,2005,4:112-114.
    [79]敬志勇,欧阳令南.不确定条件下公司负债的利息抵税效应分析,中国管理科学,2003,5:8-11.
    [80]李保红,杨宏志.企业资本结构的分析与决策,数学的实践与认识,2001,2:196-201.
    [81]李秉祥,张华伦.对企业资本结构评价标准的实证研究,西安理工大学学报,1998,14:305-308.
    [82]李健等.中国金融发展种的结构问题,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [83]李燕媛.中国上市公司可转换债券融资的思考,天津商学院学报,2004,1:34-37.
    [84]连海蓉,企业最优资本结构决策,内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,1:76-79.
    [85]梁龙,苗维亚.基于线性规划和灰色关联投影法的资本结构优化模型,价值工程,2004,6:96-98.
    [86]林仪相,孙建冬,何嫒媛等.可转换债券投资分析何运作,上海:上海远东出版社,1998.
    [87]刘娥平.上市公司股权结构对融资行为的影响,南方金融,2004,7:43-44.
    [88]柳松.西方资本结构理论演进的述评及其研究启示,学术交流,2003,109(4):54-58.
    [89]刘晓峰.浅论企业资本结构与财务风险,经济研究参考,2001,44:45-48.
    [90]刘志远.财务管理,天津:南开大学出版社,1999.
    [91]卢俊.资本结构理论研究译文集,上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
    [92]陆正飞,叶康涛.中国上市公司股权融资偏好解析,经济研究,2004,4:50-59.
    [93]孟爱兰.可转换债券转换为股票的博弈分析,统计与金融,2005,1:51-53.
    [94]宋东风,郝晓雁.企业资本结构优化理论探讨,山西统计,2003,5:55-56.
    [95]汤海溶,黄登仕.改变上市公司资本结构的因素分析,管理评论,2004,17:3-9.
    [96]童勇.资本结构的动态调整和影响因素,财经研究,2004,10:96-104.
    [97]汪元培.不可赎回可转换债券的价格分析,华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,4:25-32.
    [98]王一平,何亮.我国上市公司可转债发行动机探析,特区经济,2005,1:67-68.
    [99]王永海,范明.资产专用性视角下的资本结构动态分析,中国工业经济,2004,1:93-98.
    [100]魏成龙.现代企业金融-证券市场下的企业投融资,北京:中国经济出版社,2000.
    [101]夏敏,刘晓娟.谈如何建立企业最优资本结构,工业技术经济,2000,4:51-52.
    [102]谢代银,刘岸东.企业资本结构与融资抉择方法研究,西南农业大学学报,2000,5:472-474.
    [103]熊楚熊.公司筹资策略,深圳:海天出版社,2001.
    [104]徐士良.C常用算法程序集,清华大学出版社,北京,1995.
    [105]阎达五,耿建新,刘文鹏.我国上市公司股权融资行为的实证研究,会计研究,2001,9:21-27.
    [106]严太华,邹文彦.企业资本结构动态优化模型研究及实证,系统工程理论与实践,2003,5:26-30.
    [107]严小明,欧阳令南,高汉.破产概率限定下的最优资本结构模型,技术经济与管理研究,2002,6:46-47.
    [108]杨成炎.企业最优资本结构问题探析,长沙交通学院学报,1998,4:80-82.
    [109]杨宝臣,刘铮.基于CAPM理论的公司资本结构模型,系统工程学报,1999,3:258-264.
    [110]杨宝臣,刘铮,张玉桂.公司最优资本结构模型研究,管理工程学报,2000,2:35-38.
    [111]杨绍华.对可转换债券策略问题的一点探讨与思考,技术经济与管理研究,2004,4:100-101.
    [112]姚立根.最优资本结构的决策方法研究,数量经济技术经济研究,1997,12:36-41.
    [113]余扬新,范盱阳.可转债发行动机与外部融资成本,统计与决策,2005,3:50-51.
    [114]张海燕.资本结构和现代企业融资决策,吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2000,21(4):86-88.
    [115]张婷,黄本笑.熵权系数法在资本结构优化中的应用,理论月刊,2004,3:67-68.
    [116]张志宏.论最优资本结构,中南财经大学学报,2000,1:66-69.
    [117]张卓元.国企改革理论的新突破:明确股份制是公有制的主要实现形式,人民日报.www.china.org.cn/chinese/zhuanti/sljszqh/443448.htm,2003.
    [118]郑家喜.企业最优资本结构的定量决策方法述评,湖北社会科学,2004,4:56-58.
    [119]郑振龙,林海.可转换债券发行公司的最优决策,财经问题研究,2004,11:35-39.
    [120]中新社.普查显示:股份制正成为中国公司所有制主要形式.www.china.org.cn/chinese/2003/May/338119.htm.
    [121]朱霞,曾繁荣.基于EBIT-EPS分析确定最优资本结构,桂林电子工业学院学报,2003,3:45-48.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700