多式联运型物流企业并购的网络协同效应研究
|
摘要
本世纪以来,全球接二连三发生并购事件,可以断定产业整合将达到一个新的历史性高度,以强强联合为主要内容的并购重组在新一轮并购活动中将占据主导地位。在这种背景下,我国多式联运型产业“大企业、大物流、大品牌”发展战略的实施,使其必然面临全球范围内来自成本、效率、服务水平等方面的压力与挑战,振兴规划出台后随着综合物流业在经济体系中的重要作用日益突显。因此,我国传统多式联运企业必须进行彻底的改革,通过并购、重组等方式,从根本上改变目前分割、零散、重复、浪费、效率低的状况,建立我国专业化、社会化的综合物流体系,依此作为提高其核心竞争力的重要途径。
多式联运型物流企业并购是企业组合的一个重要运行机制,是通过容纳另一个企业或多个企业,形成经营要素的重新组合,管理流程不断调整,企业内部机构进行新一轮的配置,组织网络规模日趋合理,信息网络日益通畅,业务网络运营日益强大,使企业能够在更大范围和更合理结构基础上,满足价值网的增值要求。
本文通过实际调研与文献分析,综合运用企业并购理论、现代物流理论和方法以及系统协同学理论,收集国内外相关文献资料、在深入研究我国多式联运企业物流管理现状和问题基础上,剖析了多式联运物流企业并购的深刻内涵,进而研究其并购后网络协同的深刻含义,提出了以物流组织网络、信息网络和业务网络为并购后网络协同体系的观点。在此基础上,通过探讨多式联运物流企业并购后网络协同与网络协同度关系,建立了衡量网络协同度的一般化模型和指标体系。最后,应用实证分析,来验证本文的研究结果。研究成果将为从事多式联运、货代等业务的综合物流企业制定发展规划和技术政策提供决策依据；研究成果也可将为丰富多式联运行业实现综合物流管理理论以及企业并购理论做出积极贡献。
论文主要研究工作的创新点,具体体现在以下方面：
1.论文在多式联运物流企业并购理论研究中,分析了多式联运物流企业并购的内涵、特征和方式,提出了“以物流网络为基础,以物流组织为能力保障,以物流信息为技术支撑”的指导思想,从物流组织网络、物流信息网络和物流业务网络三方面论述了多式联运物流企业并购的框架与内容以及三者的逻辑关系。既为解决多式联运物流企业并购问题提供了理论依据,也对其他行业研究并购问题具有一定的参考价值。
2.论文创新性工作在于提出多式联运物流企业并购网络协同概念,建立了基于物流组织网络、物流信息网络和物流业务网络为体系的网络协同概念模型。并以此为切入点,实现多式联运物流企业并购网络协同效应的最大化,为我国多式联运物流企业的健康持续发展,提供具有理论价值和现实意义的解决方案。
3.论文在建立多式联运型物流企业并购后网络协同效应模型方面。概述了并购网络协同效应,进而证明网络协同效应与网络协同度的正向关系。通过建立并购网络协同度一般化计算模型,来衡量多式联运型物流企业并购网络内部要素、要素之间以及与外部环境的协同程度。通过专家调查方法,构建协同度指标体系。同时以原始资料对模型进行了实证研究,验证了研究成果的科学性和可操作性。
本文中共有图56幅,表59个,引据参考文献篇。
Since from this century, M&A happened all over the world one after another, it can be concluded that industrial integration which will achieved a new altitude historically, with the main content association between strong enterprise, M&A will play a very important role in new M&A activities. Under this background, the multimodal transportation industry in our country,within "big enterprise、big logistics、big brand" implementation, making it is faced with the challenge and pression from cost, efficiency, standard of service. So that traditional multimodal enterprises have to reform thoroughly in our country, through M&A, change the present situation on segmentation、scattered、repeat、waste、low-efficiency, establish profession、social comprehensive logistic system, in turn as the important way to enhance core competitiveness.
Multimodal transportation logistics enterprises are one of the important operating mechanism in enterprises combined, management process adjust all the time, and allocation is operated inside the enterprise, organization network size tend to be reasonable, information network tend to be more unobstructed day after day, business network will be stronger every day, it make enterprises content value net demand within more lager range and more reasonable structure.
This article through the field research and literature analysis, the integrated use of enterprise merger theory, modern logistics theory and method and system synergetic theory, collects the domestic and foreign relevant literature, based on the thoroughly research on the present situation and problems of multimodal transport enterprise logistics management in our country, analyzed on the profound connotation of the multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging, and studies on after the merger, the profound meaning of the network synergetic, put forward the logistics network organization, information network and business network are the network synergetic system after merge. On this basis, through the discussion the relation of network synergetic and the degree of network synergetic after the multimodal transport logistics enterprise merged, establish an index system to measure network synergetic degree and generalization model. Finally, verified the results of this research through applying demonstration analysis. Research results will be engaged in multimodal transportation、 freight business such as comprehensive logistics enterprises formulation development planning and technical policies-making advise providing, and it will also be in order to enrich the multimodal transport industry to realize comprehensive logistics management theory and enterprise merger theory make positive contribution.
The main innovation points of this paper are embodied in the following respects:
1. In the area of merger theoretical study of multimodal transport logistics enterprise, analyzed the connotation of the merger of multimodal transport logistics enterprises, features and methods, and then proposed "the logistic network as the basis, logistics organization for ability guarantees, and logistics information as technical support" guiding ideology, from logistics organization network, logistics information network and logistics business network are discussed from three aspects:the multimodal transport logistics enterprise merger framework and content, and its logic relationship. Both for solving multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging issues, also providing a theoretical basis for other industry research M&A to provide some reference value.
2. The innovation of this paper is that have proposed multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergic concept, and established network synergetic conceptual modal based on the system of logistics organization network and logistics information network and logistics business network. As the breakthrough point, realized the maximization of multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergy, provided a theoretic value and practical significance of solutions for a sustainable development of multimodal transport logistic enterprises in our country.
3. On the aspect of establishing the modal of network synergy efficient after multimodal transport logistic enterprise logistics after the enterprises have merged, this paper summarized the M&A network synergies and then proved the positive relation between network synergies and network synergy degree. Through establishing the generalization calculation model of M&A network synergetic degree, it can measure the degree of multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergy, and its intern element、extern element and their synergy degrees with external environment. On the method of expert investigation, this paper constructed the index system of synergy degree. At the same time, it has done empirical research within original material, proved to be scientific and operable.
In this thesis, there are graphics, tables and pieces of references consulted.
多式联运型物流企业并购是企业组合的一个重要运行机制,是通过容纳另一个企业或多个企业,形成经营要素的重新组合,管理流程不断调整,企业内部机构进行新一轮的配置,组织网络规模日趋合理,信息网络日益通畅,业务网络运营日益强大,使企业能够在更大范围和更合理结构基础上,满足价值网的增值要求。
本文通过实际调研与文献分析,综合运用企业并购理论、现代物流理论和方法以及系统协同学理论,收集国内外相关文献资料、在深入研究我国多式联运企业物流管理现状和问题基础上,剖析了多式联运物流企业并购的深刻内涵,进而研究其并购后网络协同的深刻含义,提出了以物流组织网络、信息网络和业务网络为并购后网络协同体系的观点。在此基础上,通过探讨多式联运物流企业并购后网络协同与网络协同度关系,建立了衡量网络协同度的一般化模型和指标体系。最后,应用实证分析,来验证本文的研究结果。研究成果将为从事多式联运、货代等业务的综合物流企业制定发展规划和技术政策提供决策依据；研究成果也可将为丰富多式联运行业实现综合物流管理理论以及企业并购理论做出积极贡献。
论文主要研究工作的创新点,具体体现在以下方面：
1.论文在多式联运物流企业并购理论研究中,分析了多式联运物流企业并购的内涵、特征和方式,提出了“以物流网络为基础,以物流组织为能力保障,以物流信息为技术支撑”的指导思想,从物流组织网络、物流信息网络和物流业务网络三方面论述了多式联运物流企业并购的框架与内容以及三者的逻辑关系。既为解决多式联运物流企业并购问题提供了理论依据,也对其他行业研究并购问题具有一定的参考价值。
2.论文创新性工作在于提出多式联运物流企业并购网络协同概念,建立了基于物流组织网络、物流信息网络和物流业务网络为体系的网络协同概念模型。并以此为切入点,实现多式联运物流企业并购网络协同效应的最大化,为我国多式联运物流企业的健康持续发展,提供具有理论价值和现实意义的解决方案。
3.论文在建立多式联运型物流企业并购后网络协同效应模型方面。概述了并购网络协同效应,进而证明网络协同效应与网络协同度的正向关系。通过建立并购网络协同度一般化计算模型,来衡量多式联运型物流企业并购网络内部要素、要素之间以及与外部环境的协同程度。通过专家调查方法,构建协同度指标体系。同时以原始资料对模型进行了实证研究,验证了研究成果的科学性和可操作性。
本文中共有图56幅,表59个,引据参考文献篇。
Since from this century, M&A happened all over the world one after another, it can be concluded that industrial integration which will achieved a new altitude historically, with the main content association between strong enterprise, M&A will play a very important role in new M&A activities. Under this background, the multimodal transportation industry in our country,within "big enterprise、big logistics、big brand" implementation, making it is faced with the challenge and pression from cost, efficiency, standard of service. So that traditional multimodal enterprises have to reform thoroughly in our country, through M&A, change the present situation on segmentation、scattered、repeat、waste、low-efficiency, establish profession、social comprehensive logistic system, in turn as the important way to enhance core competitiveness.
Multimodal transportation logistics enterprises are one of the important operating mechanism in enterprises combined, management process adjust all the time, and allocation is operated inside the enterprise, organization network size tend to be reasonable, information network tend to be more unobstructed day after day, business network will be stronger every day, it make enterprises content value net demand within more lager range and more reasonable structure.
This article through the field research and literature analysis, the integrated use of enterprise merger theory, modern logistics theory and method and system synergetic theory, collects the domestic and foreign relevant literature, based on the thoroughly research on the present situation and problems of multimodal transport enterprise logistics management in our country, analyzed on the profound connotation of the multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging, and studies on after the merger, the profound meaning of the network synergetic, put forward the logistics network organization, information network and business network are the network synergetic system after merge. On this basis, through the discussion the relation of network synergetic and the degree of network synergetic after the multimodal transport logistics enterprise merged, establish an index system to measure network synergetic degree and generalization model. Finally, verified the results of this research through applying demonstration analysis. Research results will be engaged in multimodal transportation、 freight business such as comprehensive logistics enterprises formulation development planning and technical policies-making advise providing, and it will also be in order to enrich the multimodal transport industry to realize comprehensive logistics management theory and enterprise merger theory make positive contribution.
The main innovation points of this paper are embodied in the following respects:
1. In the area of merger theoretical study of multimodal transport logistics enterprise, analyzed the connotation of the merger of multimodal transport logistics enterprises, features and methods, and then proposed "the logistic network as the basis, logistics organization for ability guarantees, and logistics information as technical support" guiding ideology, from logistics organization network, logistics information network and logistics business network are discussed from three aspects:the multimodal transport logistics enterprise merger framework and content, and its logic relationship. Both for solving multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging issues, also providing a theoretical basis for other industry research M&A to provide some reference value.
2. The innovation of this paper is that have proposed multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergic concept, and established network synergetic conceptual modal based on the system of logistics organization network and logistics information network and logistics business network. As the breakthrough point, realized the maximization of multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergy, provided a theoretic value and practical significance of solutions for a sustainable development of multimodal transport logistic enterprises in our country.
3. On the aspect of establishing the modal of network synergy efficient after multimodal transport logistic enterprise logistics after the enterprises have merged, this paper summarized the M&A network synergies and then proved the positive relation between network synergies and network synergy degree. Through establishing the generalization calculation model of M&A network synergetic degree, it can measure the degree of multimodal transport logistics enterprises merging network synergy, and its intern element、extern element and their synergy degrees with external environment. On the method of expert investigation, this paper constructed the index system of synergy degree. At the same time, it has done empirical research within original material, proved to be scientific and operable.
In this thesis, there are graphics, tables and pieces of references consulted.
引文
[1]Agra, Anup, Jeffrey F. Jaffe, and Gershon N. Mandelker. The Post-Mergers Performance of Acquiring Finns:A Re-ex-amination of an Anomaly[J]. Journal of Finance,1992,9:1605-1621
[2]Andrew Campbell等著,任通海等译.2000.战略协同.第1版.北京：机械工业出版社,97～103
[3]Ansoff H.Igor..Corporate Strategy [M].1965.
[4]Berkovitch, Elazar, and M. P. Narayanan. Motives for Takeovers:An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,9:347-362.
[5]Bradley, M., Anand Desai, and E. Han Kim. Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and their Division Between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988,21:3-40.
[6]Burt R.S., Corporate Profits and Cooptation:Net-works of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy [M], New York:Academic Pres.1983
[7]Liang Cheng, Chen Wen, Cheng Lee. Multi-objective optimization of multi-echelonsupply chain networks with uncertain product demands and prices[J].Computers and Chemical Engineering.2004.28.1131-1144.
[8]Chan, F.T.S. and Qi, HJ. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management, Supply Chain Management:An International Journal,2003,3 (8):209-223
[9]Chatterjee, S.1986. Types of Synergy and Economic Value:The Impact of Acquisitions on Mergering and Rival Firms. Strategic Management Journal,7:119-139
[10]Demsetz, H., Villalonga, B., Ownership structure and corporate performance [J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2001, (7):209-233.
[11]Dobbs R, Goedhart M, Suonio H. Are companies getting better at M&A [J].McKinsey Perspective on Corporate Finance and Strategy,2007, (22):7-11.
[12]Dos Santos, M., Errunza, V., Miller, D., Does corporate international diversification destroy value [J].Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, (32):2716-2724.
[13]Doukas, J., Kan, O., Investment decisions and internal capital markets:Evidence from acquisitions [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2008, (32):1484-1498.
[14]Dube, S., Glascock, J.L., Effects of the method of payment and the mode of acquisition on performance and risk metrics [J]. International Journal of Managerial Finance,2006, (2): 176-195.
[15]Dyer JH, Singh H. The relational view:cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23, (4):660-679.
[16]Dyer JH, Kale P, Singh H. When to ally and when to acquire [J]. Harvard Business Review,2004, 82(7):109-115.
[17]Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. Dynamic capabilities:what are they [J]? Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue,2000,21, (10-11):1105-1121.
[18]Fama, E.F., Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1998, (49):283-306.
[19]Fields, L. P., D. R. Fraser, and J. W. Kolari, Bidder returns in bank assurance mergers:is there evidence of synergy [J]?. Journal of Banking & Finance,2007, (31):3646-3662.
[20]Fuller, K., Netter, J., Stegemoller, M., What do returns to acquiring firms tell us. Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,2002, (57):1763-1794.
[21]Geyskens I, Steenkamp JEM, Kumar N. Make, buy, or ally:a transaction cost theory meta-analysis [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49, (3):519-543.
[22]Ghosh, A., Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2001, (7):151-178.
[23]Goergen, M.,& Renneboog, L. L. R. u. n. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids [J]. European Financial Management,2004,10, (1):9-45.
[24]Gompers, P., Ishii, j., Metrick, A., Corporate governance and equity prices [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003, (118):107-155.
[25]Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal [J], Winter Special Issue,1996, (17):109-122.
[26]Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C., Yurtoglu, B. B.,& Zulehner, C. The effects of mergers:An international comparison [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003,21, (5): 625-654.
[27]Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C.,& Yurtoglu, B. Corporate governance and the returns on investment [J]. Journal of Law & Economics,2004,47, (2):589-633.
[28]Gwendolynk. Lee and Marvinb. Lieberman, Acquisition vs. Internal development as modes of market entry [J], Strategic Management Journal,2010, (31):140-158.
[29]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2002, (14):67-89.
[30]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. External sources of innovative capabilities:the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2002, (39): 167-188.
[31]Haibin Yang, Zhang (John) Lin, et.al. A multilevel framework of firm boundaries:Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes [J], Strategic Management Journal, 2010, (31):237-261.
[32]Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance [J]:a behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,2009,44, (1):29-56.
[33]Harford, J., Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,2007,54, (6): 1969-2007.
[34]Harrison J, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. Resource complementarity in business combinations:extending the logic to organizational alliances [J]. Journal of Management,2001, (27):679-693.
[35]Hayward MLA. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23, (1):21-39.
[36]Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback, Does corporate performance improve after mergers, Journal of Financial Economics,1992, (31):135-175.
[37]Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution [J]:A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review,2003, (9):7-26.
[38]Jarrell, G A., J. A. Brickley, and J. M. Netter. The Market for Corporate Control:The Empirical Evidences Since 1980[J]. Journal of Economies Perspectives,1988,2:49-68
[39]Jensen M.C.R.S.Ruback,1983; Jarrell,Brickley and Netter,1988; Journal of Financial Economics. 1988,21:3-40.
[40]Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review,1996,74(1):75-85.
[41]Lauri O. Changing Logistical Patterns and Policies in Northern Europe[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management,1993,4(2):25-40.
[42]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2002, (14):67-89.
[43]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. External sources of innovative capabilities:the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2002, (39):167-188.
[44]Haibin Yang, Zhang (John) Lin, et.al. A multilevel framework of firm boundaries:Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes [J], Strategic Management Journal, 2010, (31):237-261.
[45]Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance [J]:a behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44, (1):29-56.
[46]Harford, J., Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,1999,54, (6): 1969-1997.
[47]Harrison J, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. Resource complementarity in business combinations:extending the logic to organizational alliances [J]. Journal of Management,2001, (27):679-693.
[48]Hayward MLA. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23, (1):21-39.
[49]Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback, Does corporate performance improve after mergers, Journal of Financial Economics,1992, (31):135-175.
[50]Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution [J]:A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review,2003, (9):7-26.
[51]Heron, R., Lie, E., Operating performance and the method of payment in Takeovers [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2002, (37):137-155.
[52]Hoffmann WH, Schaper-Rinkel W. Acquire or ally? A strategy framework for deciding between acquisition and cooperation [J]. Management International Review,2001, (41):131-159.
[53]Hotchkiss, E., Strickland, D., Does shareholder composition matter? Evidence from the market reaction to corporate earnings announcements [J]. Journal of Finance,2003, (58):1469-1498.
[54]H.Igor.Ansoff. The new corporate strategy.JohnWiley&Sons,1998:58.
[55]Lee H. L, Whang S. Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. International Journal of Technology Management.2000,20(3):373-387.
[56]Lihua Wang and Edward J. Zajac, Alliance or acquisitions? a dyadic perspective on inter-firm resource combinations [J], Strategic Management Journal,2007, (28):1291-1317.
[57]Linn, S., Switzer, J., Are cash acquisitions associated with better Post combination operating performance than stock acquisitions [J]? Journal of Banking and Finance,2001, (25):1113-1138.
[58]Loughran T. and Vijh A.M. Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisition [J]. The Journal of Finance,1997,12, (5):1765-1790.
[59]Mark L Sirower.1997. The Synergy Trap:How Companies Lose The Acquisition Game?, lrd ed. Trademarks of Simon & Schuster Ine,12-15
[60]Mauro Caputo, Valeria Mininno. Internal, vertical and horizontal logistics integration in Italian grocery distribution [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1996,26(9):64-90
[61]Micheal Bradley, Anand Desai and E.Han Kim.Synergestic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between.the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms[J].
[62]M. Lubatkin. Merger strategies and stockholder value [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1987, 8:39-53
[63]Nonaka&Konno.The Concept of "Ba":Building aFoundation for Knowledge Creation [J].California Management Review,1998,40 (3).
[64]R. K. AhujaJ. B. Orlin,S. Pallottino, M. P Scaparra, M. G. Scutella. A Multi-Exchange Heuristic for the Single-Source Capacitated Facility Location Problem. Management Science.2004,50(6): 749-760.
[65]Ttirkay M,.Oru C, Fujita K, Asakura T.Multi-Company. Collaborative Supply Chain Management with Economical and Environmental Considerations [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering,2004,28:985-992.
[66]Tai-Yuan Huang, Jer-San Hu,et.al. The influence of market and product knowledge resource embeddedness on the international mergers of advertising agencies:The case-study approach [J]. International Business Review,2008, (17):587-599.
[67]Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26, (2):97-119.
[68]Tze-Yu Yen, Paul Andr, Ownership structure and operating performance of acquiring firms: The case of English-origin countries [J]. Journal of Economics and Business,2007, (59):380-405.
[69]Vermeulen F, Barkema H. Learning through acquisitions [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,(44):457-476.
[70]Villalonga B, McGahan AM. The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26, (13):1183-1208.
[71]Wang L, Zajac EJ. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28, (13):1291-1317.
[72]Weir, C., Laing, D.,& McKnight, P. J. Internal and external governance mechanisms:Their impact on the performance of large UK public companies [J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,2002,29, (5/6):579-611.
[73]Zollo M, Singh H. Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions:post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25, (13): 1233-1256.
[74]Andrew Campbell等著,任通海等译.战略协同[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000：97-103.
[75]斯蒂格.通向垄断和寡占之路[M].转载于产业组织和政府管制,上海三联书店,1996.
[76][弗雷德.威斯通等著,李秉祥等译.接管、重组与公司治理(第1版)[M].辽宁：东北财经大学出版社,2000.
[77]白雪洁,王鹏姬.集装箱多式联运与现代物流[J].城市管理,2002,(6)：18-20
[78]蔡定萍.企业物流系统综合评价指标体系设计.物流技术.2006.(3).186-187
[79]陈仕娜,郑龙.浅析我国第三方物流业并购的原因及其影响[J].物流技术,2005,7：13-15.
[80]程铁.现代物流与国际多式联运之关联[J].南通航运职业技术学院学报,2005,4(1)：32-34.
[81]蔡勇,邓爱民,周中定,周艳辉.基于产业生命周期的物流企业并购形式演变[J].现代管理科学,2008,2：31-33.
[82]成耀荣.传统的道路货运企业向物流企业转化研究[D].长安大学,博士论文.
[83]陈志祥.敏捷供需协调绩效评价指标体系研究.计算机集成制造系统.2004.10(1).P99-105
[84]德.赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学—大自然构成的奥秘.第1版.上海.世纪出版集团,上海译文出版社.2005.5.P100-119
[85]丁立.迅速崛起的加拿大太平洋轮船公司[J].海运情报,2001(8)：16
[86]丁铭华.基于自组织的企业集团资源协同管理研究[D].同济大学管理学博士学位论文,2008.
[87]冯淳,陈顺卿.物流企业并购中的财务协同与财务整合[J].现代物流,2008,(5)：23-25.
[88]方建.“物流业调整和振兴规划”与物流业发展[J].中国远洋航务,2010,3：64-65.
[89]GB/T 20000.1-2002.标准化工作指南第1部分：标准化和相关活动的通用词汇.2002,6.
[90]顾保国,方晓军.基于协同力的企业集团共有资源配置分析[J].唯实2004,(7)：20-23
[91]国佳.信息生态系统下的企业信息协同模式研究[D].吉林大学,2009.
[92]弋亚群,刘益,李垣.组织资源的协同机制及其效应分析[J].经济管理,2003,(16)：14
[93]郭治安.协同学入门.第1版.成都.四川人民出版社.1988.6.P21-30
[94]郭治安,沈小峰.协同论.第1版.太原.山西经济出版社.1991.12.P20-30.
[95]侯定丕.管理科学定量分析引论[M].中国科学技术大学出版社,1993.
[96]赫尔曼·哈肯.高等协同学[M].北京：科学出版社,1989.
[97]霍佳震,马秀波.基于流程的供应链绩效评价.商业研究.2005.(5).1-4
[98]霍佳震,隋明刚.集成化供应链整体绩效评价体系构建.同济大学学报：自然科学版.2002.30(4).495-499
[99]黄坷,刘作义.加强各种运输方式的衔接配合,促进我国国际集装箱多式联运的发展[J].集装箱化,2004,(2)：34-36.
[100]韩雷.现代物流企业发展战略研究[J].铁道运输经济,2005,27(6)：30-31.
[101]胡美芬.我国物流企业并购的探索[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2004.
[102]郝鑫浩.我国国际多式联运发展中的问题[J].合作经济与科技,2008,(2)：10-11.
[103]金国盛.航运企业多式联运物流发展战略研究[D].武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[104]孔东晨.物流信息网络安全风险分析及解决方案.计算机安全,2004,(10)：5
[105]刘斌、陈双喜.国际海运业合并兼并的动机和方式研究(三)[J].世界海运,2001(5).
[106]李殿伟.基于价值网理论的电信企业商业模式研究[D].天津大学管理学院,2007.
[107]李航.我国第三方物流企业横向并购动因研究[J].2006,(12)：13-16.
[108]兰洪杰.食品冷链物流系统协同研究[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2009.
[109]刘罗军.以“组合港”为枢纽的多式联运物流网络[D].广东省城乡规划研究院专业论文,2009,5.1-11.
[110]李松庆.蕾振宁.张毕西.物流企业的跨国并购动机[J].企业改革与管理.2005,6：42-43.
[111]刘文纲..企业购并中的无形资产协同效应分析[J].经济体制改革,1999,6：74～78
[112]陆玉明.论企业兼并中的协同效应[J].中国软科学,1999,2：43-45.
[113]李子聪,王健.谈我国物流企业并购形式及其效应[J].商业时代,2006,30：22-23.
[114]刘振峰.基于创新能力的中国航运企业竞争力评价研究[D].大连海事大学博士论文,2008.
[115]李章军,梁慧星.国际海运承运人责任制度研究[M].法律出版社,2006.
[116]刘子玲,姜沁池,吕永波,田芬.基于平衡计分卡的物流企业绩效评价指标体系研究.物流技术.2006.(12).45-47
[117]马克.L.赛罗沃.协同效应的陷阱[M].上海远东出版社,2000.
[118]明溪.2004年五大物流并购经典案例[J].医药经济报,2005,(8)：1.
[119]宁自登.S公司实施绿色供应链整体绩效评价的研究[D].昆明理工大学学位论文,2008.
[120]秦寿康.综合评价原理[M].电子工业出版社,2003.
[121]秦杨勇.平衡积分卡与战略管理[M].中国经济出版社,2010.
[122]罗伯特D.巴泽尔等.战略与绩效[M].华夏出版社,2000.
[123]汝宜红,田源.物流学[M].高等教育出版社,2009.
[124]帅斌.物流产业经济[M].北京：科学出版社,2006.
[125]薛娇,王宫.打造无缝衔接的多式联运体系团.运输经理世界,2006,(12)：16.
[126]施俊庆.集装箱无缝运输理论与方法的研究[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[127]孙清华.基于价值网的汽车供应：链协同管理研究[D].北京交通大学,2010.
[128]石永贵.企业网络资源协调研究[D].河北工业大学博士论文,2009,(6)：39-42.
[129]孙振球,王乐三.医学综合评价方法及其应用.北京：化学工业出版社,2006
[130]唐卫宁,徐福缘.面向大批量定制的集成协同物流运作管理[J].企业经济,2007(2)：47-49.
[131]陶学宗,杨德旭,刘德军,魏利华,何凤宇.粮食多式联运无缝衔接方案优化模型与求解[J].物流科技,2010,(8)：22-24.
[132]吴爱东.中国现代物流产业发展与制度创新研究[D].南开大学博士论文,2009.
[133]王长征.企业并购整合——基于企业能力论的一个综合性理论分析框架[M].湖北：武汉 大学出版社,2002.265～270
[134]王凤洲,陆消遣,吴秋明.基于系统整合观的多式联运系统特征分析[J].系统辩证学学报,2005,13(4)：74-78.
[135]魏宏森.系统论：系统科学哲学[M].世界图书出版公司,2009.
[136]魏娟,欧国立,邢占文.协同理论在公路运输领域的应用 [J]物流技术,2010,29(4)：88-92.
[137]魏际刚,荣朝和.我国集装箱多式联运系统的协调问题[J].集装箱化,2000,(2)：18-24.
[138]吴利军.物流无缝连接及其实现团.物流技术,2008,27(4)：219-222.
[139]吴少艾.浅析现代物流与多式联运的关系[J].经济论坛,2009,10：37.
[140]王艳,张艳奎.现代物流与国际多式联运的关系[J].集装箱化,2005,1：23-25.
[141]王杨堃.现代多式联运的发展及其经济组织[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2010.
[142]汪应洛.系统工程学.第3版.北京.高等教育出版社.2007.
[143]王志灵.国际巨头TNT集团8亿元收购华宇物流100%股权.中国经济网,2002
[144]西宝.管理科学研究方法[M].高等教育出版社,2008.
[145]肖炳烜.基于组织协同的战略实施整合模型[J].生态经济,2010,(8)：94-98.
[146]谢红燕.第三方物流企业并购分析[J].政策与探讨,2005,155.
[147]谢红燕.第三方物流企业并购分析[J].改革与探讨,2006.
[148]徐杰,鞠颂东.物流网络的内涵分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2005,4(2)：22-26
[149]许明波.试论企业兼并的财务协同效应[J].四川会计,1997,7：10-11
[150]肖培耻.并购协同效应的分类及作用机制[J].商场现代化,2007,11：142-143.
[151]许天雷,李刚.基于网络环境下的协同组织结构及评价体系研究[J].经营管理,2009,2：65-66.
[152]夏新平,宋光耀.企业并购中协同效应的计[J]算.华中理工大学学报,1999,3：34～36
[153]英.安迪·尼利等著.李剑峰等译.战略绩效管理：超越平衡计分卡.北京.电子工业出版社.2004,4.124-143
[154]杨崇瑞.模糊数学及其应用[M].北京：农业出版社,1995.
[155]鄢飞,董千里.物流网络的协同效应分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2009,8(1)：28-32.
[156]余光,杨荣.企业购并股价效应的理论分析和实证分析[J].当代财经,2000,7：70～4
[157]颜建军.企业集成创新网络构建及机制研究[D].中南大学,2009.
[158]闫嘉有.论我国第三方物流企业并购问题[J],商业经济,2009,11：13-16.
[159]原楠楠.完善国际货物多式联运经营人责任制度的建议——以《联合国运输法公约》为视角[J].物流技术,2009,28(7)：56-58.
[160]杨志刚,王立坤,周鑫.国际集装箱多式联运实务与法规[M].化学工业出版社,2008.
[161]周爱国.物流客户关系管理实务[M].中国物资出版社,2010.
[162]周琳.企业并购的资源协同[M].中国经济出版社,2007.
[163]郑立群,王佳.企业综合绩效方法研究——基于ANP、平衡计分卡和绩效棱柱理论.西安电子科技大学学报：社会科学版.2007.17(4)：1-7
[164]赵杨.物流公司进入“运输并购”时代.国际融资.2005年第10期.57-60
[165]周良毅.从物流企业生长曲线看物流企业并购的复杂性[J].物流技术,2005,7：104-105.
[166]张建华.环球航运兼并本格森的重要启示[J].中国远洋航务公告,2003(7)
[167]邹建平.论中国物流企业的上市与并购[J.]科技创业月刊,2005,10：9-11.
[168]赵晶晶毛雅娟.我国企业多元化并购动因分析[J].现代管理科学,2009,(6)：65-67.
[169]张家庆,程显胜.集装箱多式联运[M].中国人民大学出版社,2010
[170]张金鑫.并购谁：并购双方资源匹配战略分析[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[171]周启发.汽车物流企业并购价格均衡研究[J].中国物流与采购,2007,18：74-75.
[172]张秋生,王冬.企业兼并与收购[M].北京：北方交通大学出版社,2001,289～298
[173]张戎,刘志旗.多式联运中心信息平台框架研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(2)：201-206.
[174]张圣利.折现现金流量法在物流企业并购中的运用[J].中国水运(学术版),2006,6(7)：209-211.
[175]宗铁.铁水无缝对接助推集装箱多式联运[J].中国水运,2007,(7)：62.
[176]邹晓美.我国物流立法存在的问题及其完善—以《物流业调整和振兴规划》为视角[J].中国流通经济,2010,(6)：65-68.
[177]曾艳,宗蓓华.集装箱多式联运系统的协同模型[J].中国航海,2006,69(4)：92-95,104.
[178]赵杨.国际物流企业并购浪潮背后[J].中国交通报.2005,6：15-17.
[179]张妍.我国第三方物流企业并购的理论研究[D].长安大学硕士论文,2008.
[180]褚英双.协同理论在集装箱物流中的应用[J].港工技术,2009,46(1)：15-16.
[181]中远集装箱运输有限公司史编纂委员会.中远集装箱运输有限公司(上海远洋运输公司)史[M]上海人民出版社,2004.
[182]中远集装箱运输有限公司-2009年报
[183]中远集装箱运输有限公司网站http://www.coscon.com/home.screen.
[184]中远集装箱运输公司编纂委员会.中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴2000[M].上海人民出版社2001.
[185]许立荣.2002中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2002.
[186]许立荣,中远集装箱运输公司.2003中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2003.
[187]许立荣.2004中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2004.
[188]许立荣,吴树雄.2005中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2005
[189]中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴编纂委员会2006中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2006.
[190]中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴编纂委员会.2007中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2007
[191]孙家康.2008中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2008.
[192]孙家康.2009中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2009.
[193]国家发展和改革委员会经济运行,局国家统计局贸易外经司,中国物流与采购联合会.2007年全国重点企业物流统计调查报告[J]中国包装工业,2008,(5)：43-44.
[194]中国物流与采购联合会.中国物流信息中信.2006年上半年我国物流运行情况分析[J].铁道货运,2006,(10)：8-10
[195]国家经贸委·世界银行国际集装箱多式联运系统研究组.中国国际集装箱多式联运系统研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,1996.
[196]中华人民共和国国家标准.物流术语.2001,7.
[197]中华人民共和国国家标准物流术语GB/T18354(修订版).2006.
[198]中华人民共和国国家标准：多式联运服务质量要求.2008.
[199]多式联运服务质量要求[M].中国标准出版社,2009.
[2]Andrew Campbell等著,任通海等译.2000.战略协同.第1版.北京：机械工业出版社,97～103
[3]Ansoff H.Igor..Corporate Strategy [M].1965.
[4]Berkovitch, Elazar, and M. P. Narayanan. Motives for Takeovers:An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,9:347-362.
[5]Bradley, M., Anand Desai, and E. Han Kim. Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and their Division Between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988,21:3-40.
[6]Burt R.S., Corporate Profits and Cooptation:Net-works of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy [M], New York:Academic Pres.1983
[7]Liang Cheng, Chen Wen, Cheng Lee. Multi-objective optimization of multi-echelonsupply chain networks with uncertain product demands and prices[J].Computers and Chemical Engineering.2004.28.1131-1144.
[8]Chan, F.T.S. and Qi, HJ. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management, Supply Chain Management:An International Journal,2003,3 (8):209-223
[9]Chatterjee, S.1986. Types of Synergy and Economic Value:The Impact of Acquisitions on Mergering and Rival Firms. Strategic Management Journal,7:119-139
[10]Demsetz, H., Villalonga, B., Ownership structure and corporate performance [J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2001, (7):209-233.
[11]Dobbs R, Goedhart M, Suonio H. Are companies getting better at M&A [J].McKinsey Perspective on Corporate Finance and Strategy,2007, (22):7-11.
[12]Dos Santos, M., Errunza, V., Miller, D., Does corporate international diversification destroy value [J].Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, (32):2716-2724.
[13]Doukas, J., Kan, O., Investment decisions and internal capital markets:Evidence from acquisitions [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2008, (32):1484-1498.
[14]Dube, S., Glascock, J.L., Effects of the method of payment and the mode of acquisition on performance and risk metrics [J]. International Journal of Managerial Finance,2006, (2): 176-195.
[15]Dyer JH, Singh H. The relational view:cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23, (4):660-679.
[16]Dyer JH, Kale P, Singh H. When to ally and when to acquire [J]. Harvard Business Review,2004, 82(7):109-115.
[17]Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. Dynamic capabilities:what are they [J]? Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue,2000,21, (10-11):1105-1121.
[18]Fama, E.F., Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1998, (49):283-306.
[19]Fields, L. P., D. R. Fraser, and J. W. Kolari, Bidder returns in bank assurance mergers:is there evidence of synergy [J]?. Journal of Banking & Finance,2007, (31):3646-3662.
[20]Fuller, K., Netter, J., Stegemoller, M., What do returns to acquiring firms tell us. Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,2002, (57):1763-1794.
[21]Geyskens I, Steenkamp JEM, Kumar N. Make, buy, or ally:a transaction cost theory meta-analysis [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49, (3):519-543.
[22]Ghosh, A., Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2001, (7):151-178.
[23]Goergen, M.,& Renneboog, L. L. R. u. n. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids [J]. European Financial Management,2004,10, (1):9-45.
[24]Gompers, P., Ishii, j., Metrick, A., Corporate governance and equity prices [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003, (118):107-155.
[25]Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal [J], Winter Special Issue,1996, (17):109-122.
[26]Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C., Yurtoglu, B. B.,& Zulehner, C. The effects of mergers:An international comparison [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003,21, (5): 625-654.
[27]Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C.,& Yurtoglu, B. Corporate governance and the returns on investment [J]. Journal of Law & Economics,2004,47, (2):589-633.
[28]Gwendolynk. Lee and Marvinb. Lieberman, Acquisition vs. Internal development as modes of market entry [J], Strategic Management Journal,2010, (31):140-158.
[29]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2002, (14):67-89.
[30]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. External sources of innovative capabilities:the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2002, (39): 167-188.
[31]Haibin Yang, Zhang (John) Lin, et.al. A multilevel framework of firm boundaries:Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes [J], Strategic Management Journal, 2010, (31):237-261.
[32]Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance [J]:a behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,2009,44, (1):29-56.
[33]Harford, J., Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,2007,54, (6): 1969-2007.
[34]Harrison J, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. Resource complementarity in business combinations:extending the logic to organizational alliances [J]. Journal of Management,2001, (27):679-693.
[35]Hayward MLA. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23, (1):21-39.
[36]Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback, Does corporate performance improve after mergers, Journal of Financial Economics,1992, (31):135-175.
[37]Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution [J]:A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review,2003, (9):7-26.
[38]Jarrell, G A., J. A. Brickley, and J. M. Netter. The Market for Corporate Control:The Empirical Evidences Since 1980[J]. Journal of Economies Perspectives,1988,2:49-68
[39]Jensen M.C.R.S.Ruback,1983; Jarrell,Brickley and Netter,1988; Journal of Financial Economics. 1988,21:3-40.
[40]Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review,1996,74(1):75-85.
[41]Lauri O. Changing Logistical Patterns and Policies in Northern Europe[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management,1993,4(2):25-40.
[42]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2002, (14):67-89.
[43]Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. External sources of innovative capabilities:the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2002, (39):167-188.
[44]Haibin Yang, Zhang (John) Lin, et.al. A multilevel framework of firm boundaries:Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes [J], Strategic Management Journal, 2010, (31):237-261.
[45]Haleblian J, Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance [J]:a behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44, (1):29-56.
[46]Harford, J., Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions [J]. Journal of Finance,1999,54, (6): 1969-1997.
[47]Harrison J, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. Resource complementarity in business combinations:extending the logic to organizational alliances [J]. Journal of Management,2001, (27):679-693.
[48]Hayward MLA. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995 [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23, (1):21-39.
[49]Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback, Does corporate performance improve after mergers, Journal of Financial Economics,1992, (31):135-175.
[50]Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution [J]:A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review,2003, (9):7-26.
[51]Heron, R., Lie, E., Operating performance and the method of payment in Takeovers [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2002, (37):137-155.
[52]Hoffmann WH, Schaper-Rinkel W. Acquire or ally? A strategy framework for deciding between acquisition and cooperation [J]. Management International Review,2001, (41):131-159.
[53]Hotchkiss, E., Strickland, D., Does shareholder composition matter? Evidence from the market reaction to corporate earnings announcements [J]. Journal of Finance,2003, (58):1469-1498.
[54]H.Igor.Ansoff. The new corporate strategy.JohnWiley&Sons,1998:58.
[55]Lee H. L, Whang S. Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. International Journal of Technology Management.2000,20(3):373-387.
[56]Lihua Wang and Edward J. Zajac, Alliance or acquisitions? a dyadic perspective on inter-firm resource combinations [J], Strategic Management Journal,2007, (28):1291-1317.
[57]Linn, S., Switzer, J., Are cash acquisitions associated with better Post combination operating performance than stock acquisitions [J]? Journal of Banking and Finance,2001, (25):1113-1138.
[58]Loughran T. and Vijh A.M. Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisition [J]. The Journal of Finance,1997,12, (5):1765-1790.
[59]Mark L Sirower.1997. The Synergy Trap:How Companies Lose The Acquisition Game?, lrd ed. Trademarks of Simon & Schuster Ine,12-15
[60]Mauro Caputo, Valeria Mininno. Internal, vertical and horizontal logistics integration in Italian grocery distribution [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1996,26(9):64-90
[61]Micheal Bradley, Anand Desai and E.Han Kim.Synergestic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between.the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms[J].
[62]M. Lubatkin. Merger strategies and stockholder value [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1987, 8:39-53
[63]Nonaka&Konno.The Concept of "Ba":Building aFoundation for Knowledge Creation [J].California Management Review,1998,40 (3).
[64]R. K. AhujaJ. B. Orlin,S. Pallottino, M. P Scaparra, M. G. Scutella. A Multi-Exchange Heuristic for the Single-Source Capacitated Facility Location Problem. Management Science.2004,50(6): 749-760.
[65]Ttirkay M,.Oru C, Fujita K, Asakura T.Multi-Company. Collaborative Supply Chain Management with Economical and Environmental Considerations [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering,2004,28:985-992.
[66]Tai-Yuan Huang, Jer-San Hu,et.al. The influence of market and product knowledge resource embeddedness on the international mergers of advertising agencies:The case-study approach [J]. International Business Review,2008, (17):587-599.
[67]Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26, (2):97-119.
[68]Tze-Yu Yen, Paul Andr, Ownership structure and operating performance of acquiring firms: The case of English-origin countries [J]. Journal of Economics and Business,2007, (59):380-405.
[69]Vermeulen F, Barkema H. Learning through acquisitions [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,(44):457-476.
[70]Villalonga B, McGahan AM. The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26, (13):1183-1208.
[71]Wang L, Zajac EJ. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28, (13):1291-1317.
[72]Weir, C., Laing, D.,& McKnight, P. J. Internal and external governance mechanisms:Their impact on the performance of large UK public companies [J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,2002,29, (5/6):579-611.
[73]Zollo M, Singh H. Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions:post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25, (13): 1233-1256.
[74]Andrew Campbell等著,任通海等译.战略协同[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000：97-103.
[75]斯蒂格.通向垄断和寡占之路[M].转载于产业组织和政府管制,上海三联书店,1996.
[76][弗雷德.威斯通等著,李秉祥等译.接管、重组与公司治理(第1版)[M].辽宁：东北财经大学出版社,2000.
[77]白雪洁,王鹏姬.集装箱多式联运与现代物流[J].城市管理,2002,(6)：18-20
[78]蔡定萍.企业物流系统综合评价指标体系设计.物流技术.2006.(3).186-187
[79]陈仕娜,郑龙.浅析我国第三方物流业并购的原因及其影响[J].物流技术,2005,7：13-15.
[80]程铁.现代物流与国际多式联运之关联[J].南通航运职业技术学院学报,2005,4(1)：32-34.
[81]蔡勇,邓爱民,周中定,周艳辉.基于产业生命周期的物流企业并购形式演变[J].现代管理科学,2008,2：31-33.
[82]成耀荣.传统的道路货运企业向物流企业转化研究[D].长安大学,博士论文.
[83]陈志祥.敏捷供需协调绩效评价指标体系研究.计算机集成制造系统.2004.10(1).P99-105
[84]德.赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学—大自然构成的奥秘.第1版.上海.世纪出版集团,上海译文出版社.2005.5.P100-119
[85]丁立.迅速崛起的加拿大太平洋轮船公司[J].海运情报,2001(8)：16
[86]丁铭华.基于自组织的企业集团资源协同管理研究[D].同济大学管理学博士学位论文,2008.
[87]冯淳,陈顺卿.物流企业并购中的财务协同与财务整合[J].现代物流,2008,(5)：23-25.
[88]方建.“物流业调整和振兴规划”与物流业发展[J].中国远洋航务,2010,3：64-65.
[89]GB/T 20000.1-2002.标准化工作指南第1部分：标准化和相关活动的通用词汇.2002,6.
[90]顾保国,方晓军.基于协同力的企业集团共有资源配置分析[J].唯实2004,(7)：20-23
[91]国佳.信息生态系统下的企业信息协同模式研究[D].吉林大学,2009.
[92]弋亚群,刘益,李垣.组织资源的协同机制及其效应分析[J].经济管理,2003,(16)：14
[93]郭治安.协同学入门.第1版.成都.四川人民出版社.1988.6.P21-30
[94]郭治安,沈小峰.协同论.第1版.太原.山西经济出版社.1991.12.P20-30.
[95]侯定丕.管理科学定量分析引论[M].中国科学技术大学出版社,1993.
[96]赫尔曼·哈肯.高等协同学[M].北京：科学出版社,1989.
[97]霍佳震,马秀波.基于流程的供应链绩效评价.商业研究.2005.(5).1-4
[98]霍佳震,隋明刚.集成化供应链整体绩效评价体系构建.同济大学学报：自然科学版.2002.30(4).495-499
[99]黄坷,刘作义.加强各种运输方式的衔接配合,促进我国国际集装箱多式联运的发展[J].集装箱化,2004,(2)：34-36.
[100]韩雷.现代物流企业发展战略研究[J].铁道运输经济,2005,27(6)：30-31.
[101]胡美芬.我国物流企业并购的探索[D].上海海事大学硕士论文,2004.
[102]郝鑫浩.我国国际多式联运发展中的问题[J].合作经济与科技,2008,(2)：10-11.
[103]金国盛.航运企业多式联运物流发展战略研究[D].武汉大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[104]孔东晨.物流信息网络安全风险分析及解决方案.计算机安全,2004,(10)：5
[105]刘斌、陈双喜.国际海运业合并兼并的动机和方式研究(三)[J].世界海运,2001(5).
[106]李殿伟.基于价值网理论的电信企业商业模式研究[D].天津大学管理学院,2007.
[107]李航.我国第三方物流企业横向并购动因研究[J].2006,(12)：13-16.
[108]兰洪杰.食品冷链物流系统协同研究[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2009.
[109]刘罗军.以“组合港”为枢纽的多式联运物流网络[D].广东省城乡规划研究院专业论文,2009,5.1-11.
[110]李松庆.蕾振宁.张毕西.物流企业的跨国并购动机[J].企业改革与管理.2005,6：42-43.
[111]刘文纲..企业购并中的无形资产协同效应分析[J].经济体制改革,1999,6：74～78
[112]陆玉明.论企业兼并中的协同效应[J].中国软科学,1999,2：43-45.
[113]李子聪,王健.谈我国物流企业并购形式及其效应[J].商业时代,2006,30：22-23.
[114]刘振峰.基于创新能力的中国航运企业竞争力评价研究[D].大连海事大学博士论文,2008.
[115]李章军,梁慧星.国际海运承运人责任制度研究[M].法律出版社,2006.
[116]刘子玲,姜沁池,吕永波,田芬.基于平衡计分卡的物流企业绩效评价指标体系研究.物流技术.2006.(12).45-47
[117]马克.L.赛罗沃.协同效应的陷阱[M].上海远东出版社,2000.
[118]明溪.2004年五大物流并购经典案例[J].医药经济报,2005,(8)：1.
[119]宁自登.S公司实施绿色供应链整体绩效评价的研究[D].昆明理工大学学位论文,2008.
[120]秦寿康.综合评价原理[M].电子工业出版社,2003.
[121]秦杨勇.平衡积分卡与战略管理[M].中国经济出版社,2010.
[122]罗伯特D.巴泽尔等.战略与绩效[M].华夏出版社,2000.
[123]汝宜红,田源.物流学[M].高等教育出版社,2009.
[124]帅斌.物流产业经济[M].北京：科学出版社,2006.
[125]薛娇,王宫.打造无缝衔接的多式联运体系团.运输经理世界,2006,(12)：16.
[126]施俊庆.集装箱无缝运输理论与方法的研究[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[127]孙清华.基于价值网的汽车供应：链协同管理研究[D].北京交通大学,2010.
[128]石永贵.企业网络资源协调研究[D].河北工业大学博士论文,2009,(6)：39-42.
[129]孙振球,王乐三.医学综合评价方法及其应用.北京：化学工业出版社,2006
[130]唐卫宁,徐福缘.面向大批量定制的集成协同物流运作管理[J].企业经济,2007(2)：47-49.
[131]陶学宗,杨德旭,刘德军,魏利华,何凤宇.粮食多式联运无缝衔接方案优化模型与求解[J].物流科技,2010,(8)：22-24.
[132]吴爱东.中国现代物流产业发展与制度创新研究[D].南开大学博士论文,2009.
[133]王长征.企业并购整合——基于企业能力论的一个综合性理论分析框架[M].湖北：武汉 大学出版社,2002.265～270
[134]王凤洲,陆消遣,吴秋明.基于系统整合观的多式联运系统特征分析[J].系统辩证学学报,2005,13(4)：74-78.
[135]魏宏森.系统论：系统科学哲学[M].世界图书出版公司,2009.
[136]魏娟,欧国立,邢占文.协同理论在公路运输领域的应用 [J]物流技术,2010,29(4)：88-92.
[137]魏际刚,荣朝和.我国集装箱多式联运系统的协调问题[J].集装箱化,2000,(2)：18-24.
[138]吴利军.物流无缝连接及其实现团.物流技术,2008,27(4)：219-222.
[139]吴少艾.浅析现代物流与多式联运的关系[J].经济论坛,2009,10：37.
[140]王艳,张艳奎.现代物流与国际多式联运的关系[J].集装箱化,2005,1：23-25.
[141]王杨堃.现代多式联运的发展及其经济组织[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2010.
[142]汪应洛.系统工程学.第3版.北京.高等教育出版社.2007.
[143]王志灵.国际巨头TNT集团8亿元收购华宇物流100%股权.中国经济网,2002
[144]西宝.管理科学研究方法[M].高等教育出版社,2008.
[145]肖炳烜.基于组织协同的战略实施整合模型[J].生态经济,2010,(8)：94-98.
[146]谢红燕.第三方物流企业并购分析[J].政策与探讨,2005,155.
[147]谢红燕.第三方物流企业并购分析[J].改革与探讨,2006.
[148]徐杰,鞠颂东.物流网络的内涵分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2005,4(2)：22-26
[149]许明波.试论企业兼并的财务协同效应[J].四川会计,1997,7：10-11
[150]肖培耻.并购协同效应的分类及作用机制[J].商场现代化,2007,11：142-143.
[151]许天雷,李刚.基于网络环境下的协同组织结构及评价体系研究[J].经营管理,2009,2：65-66.
[152]夏新平,宋光耀.企业并购中协同效应的计[J]算.华中理工大学学报,1999,3：34～36
[153]英.安迪·尼利等著.李剑峰等译.战略绩效管理：超越平衡计分卡.北京.电子工业出版社.2004,4.124-143
[154]杨崇瑞.模糊数学及其应用[M].北京：农业出版社,1995.
[155]鄢飞,董千里.物流网络的协同效应分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2009,8(1)：28-32.
[156]余光,杨荣.企业购并股价效应的理论分析和实证分析[J].当代财经,2000,7：70～4
[157]颜建军.企业集成创新网络构建及机制研究[D].中南大学,2009.
[158]闫嘉有.论我国第三方物流企业并购问题[J],商业经济,2009,11：13-16.
[159]原楠楠.完善国际货物多式联运经营人责任制度的建议——以《联合国运输法公约》为视角[J].物流技术,2009,28(7)：56-58.
[160]杨志刚,王立坤,周鑫.国际集装箱多式联运实务与法规[M].化学工业出版社,2008.
[161]周爱国.物流客户关系管理实务[M].中国物资出版社,2010.
[162]周琳.企业并购的资源协同[M].中国经济出版社,2007.
[163]郑立群,王佳.企业综合绩效方法研究——基于ANP、平衡计分卡和绩效棱柱理论.西安电子科技大学学报：社会科学版.2007.17(4)：1-7
[164]赵杨.物流公司进入“运输并购”时代.国际融资.2005年第10期.57-60
[165]周良毅.从物流企业生长曲线看物流企业并购的复杂性[J].物流技术,2005,7：104-105.
[166]张建华.环球航运兼并本格森的重要启示[J].中国远洋航务公告,2003(7)
[167]邹建平.论中国物流企业的上市与并购[J.]科技创业月刊,2005,10：9-11.
[168]赵晶晶毛雅娟.我国企业多元化并购动因分析[J].现代管理科学,2009,(6)：65-67.
[169]张家庆,程显胜.集装箱多式联运[M].中国人民大学出版社,2010
[170]张金鑫.并购谁：并购双方资源匹配战略分析[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[171]周启发.汽车物流企业并购价格均衡研究[J].中国物流与采购,2007,18：74-75.
[172]张秋生,王冬.企业兼并与收购[M].北京：北方交通大学出版社,2001,289～298
[173]张戎,刘志旗.多式联运中心信息平台框架研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(2)：201-206.
[174]张圣利.折现现金流量法在物流企业并购中的运用[J].中国水运(学术版),2006,6(7)：209-211.
[175]宗铁.铁水无缝对接助推集装箱多式联运[J].中国水运,2007,(7)：62.
[176]邹晓美.我国物流立法存在的问题及其完善—以《物流业调整和振兴规划》为视角[J].中国流通经济,2010,(6)：65-68.
[177]曾艳,宗蓓华.集装箱多式联运系统的协同模型[J].中国航海,2006,69(4)：92-95,104.
[178]赵杨.国际物流企业并购浪潮背后[J].中国交通报.2005,6：15-17.
[179]张妍.我国第三方物流企业并购的理论研究[D].长安大学硕士论文,2008.
[180]褚英双.协同理论在集装箱物流中的应用[J].港工技术,2009,46(1)：15-16.
[181]中远集装箱运输有限公司史编纂委员会.中远集装箱运输有限公司(上海远洋运输公司)史[M]上海人民出版社,2004.
[182]中远集装箱运输有限公司-2009年报
[183]中远集装箱运输有限公司网站http://www.coscon.com/home.screen.
[184]中远集装箱运输公司编纂委员会.中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴2000[M].上海人民出版社2001.
[185]许立荣.2002中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2002.
[186]许立荣,中远集装箱运输公司.2003中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2003.
[187]许立荣.2004中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2004.
[188]许立荣,吴树雄.2005中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2005
[189]中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴编纂委员会2006中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2006.
[190]中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴编纂委员会.2007中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2007
[191]孙家康.2008中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2008.
[192]孙家康.2009中远集装箱运输有限公司年鉴[M].上海人民出版社,2009.
[193]国家发展和改革委员会经济运行,局国家统计局贸易外经司,中国物流与采购联合会.2007年全国重点企业物流统计调查报告[J]中国包装工业,2008,(5)：43-44.
[194]中国物流与采购联合会.中国物流信息中信.2006年上半年我国物流运行情况分析[J].铁道货运,2006,(10)：8-10
[195]国家经贸委·世界银行国际集装箱多式联运系统研究组.中国国际集装箱多式联运系统研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,1996.
[196]中华人民共和国国家标准.物流术语.2001,7.
[197]中华人民共和国国家标准物流术语GB/T18354(修订版).2006.
[198]中华人民共和国国家标准：多式联运服务质量要求.2008.
[199]多式联运服务质量要求[M].中国标准出版社,2009.