二连盆地侏罗纪—白垩纪原型盆地恢复
|
摘要
综合钻井、取心、地震、区域地质调查报告及野外踏勘等资料,对二连盆地侏罗纪—白垩纪残留地层岩性特征与对比、残留厚度进行了系统研究。认为中—下侏罗统分为南北两个残留盆地区,上侏罗统火山岩地层主要沿大兴安岭隆起及盆地南缘分布,下白垩统在盆地内部53个断陷均有分布、各断陷均有1~4个残留厚度中心,上白垩统主要分布于盆地西部临近巴音宝力格隆起一带。
系统总结了早白垩世盆地伸展正断层的平面、剖面组合样式和反转构造样式类型及形成机制;以板块活动论为指导,分析了二连盆地中、新生代盆地演化特征及动力学机制,欧亚板块和太平洋板块等板块之间的相互作用,以及蒙古—鄂霍次克碰撞缝合带的碰撞效应均为影响盆地演化的重要因素。
提出了叠合构造样式的概念,建立了构造样式叠合模式,即K1简单伸展构造模式、K1拉张—K1末期挤压反转构造叠合模式、J1+2—K1继承性伸展构造叠合模式、K1走滑拉张—K1末期走滑挤压的走滑反转构造叠合模式、J1+2拉张—J3挤压—K1拉张—K1末期挤压的多期复杂构造叠合模式,明确了构造运动与构造样式之间的耦合关系。
在沉积相类型及构造特征研究基础上,探讨了早白垩世断陷湖盆不同类型断层及构造带对沉积充填的控制。其中铲式陡坡带沉降、沉积中心一致,发育冲积扇、近岸水下扇、扇三角洲及湖底扇。分析了单断箕状断陷湖盆幕式演化对沉积充填的影响,总结了陡坡带、缓坡带沉积相类型及演化模式,陡坡带较缓坡带沉积类型丰富、演化模式复杂。
通过沉积地层、构造及物源等方面综合研究,认为早—中侏罗世发育南、北两个次级盆地区,为发育含煤碎屑岩的陆相断—拗型盆地。晚侏罗世,受区域性挤压反转,在大兴安岭隆起及盆地南缘凹陷发育火山岩地层。早白垩世,在破碎基底构造格局、窄长条形盆地形态等静态要素,以及前期多旋回演化、右旋剪切应力场等动态要素联合作用下,具有独特的强分割性成盆特征,为拉张断陷型盆地群。晚白垩世,仅在少数地区发育河流—湖泊沉积体系,属热沉降坳陷盆地。
Based on drilling data,seismic interpretation, the area geological survey report and the field recording data, I studied the formation’s lithologic characteristic, stratigraphic correlation and thicknesses of remnant formations of the Jurassic-Cretaceous residual basin,drew the distribution maps. The early-middle jurassic basin is separated into two residual basins, which were the north basin and the south basin. The late Jurassic volcanic stratigraphy distributed along the Daxinganling and basin margin.The lower cretaceous distribute all fifty-three depressions,and each depression has 1~4 residual thickess center. The upper cretaceous distributed along the region near the Bayinbaolige uplift.
Structure types and dynamic mechanism about the assemble pattern of extensional normal faults in the plane and profile, and inversion structures,was comprehensively summarized; based on the plate structure theory, tectonic evolution and dynamic mechanism of the Meso-Cenozoic basin was studied together. The conclusion was that basin evolution effect from many ways,such as the interaction of the Eurasian plate and Pacific plate, also the collision effect the Mongolia-Okhotsk suture belt.
In this paper, the superimposed structural style was put forward for the first time, and the superimposed models about the structural stytle wers constructed,such as K1 single extension-structure modle, inversion-structure model corresponding to K1 extension-K1 terminal com-pression, J1+2-K1 inherited extension-structure model, strike-slip structure model correspondding to K1strike-slip extension-K1 terminal strike-slip compression, multi-phase of structure model corresponding to J1+2 extension-J3 compression-K1 extension-K1 ter-minal secondary compression,what’s more,the coupling relationship between the structural evolution and structural stytle is confirmed.
Based on the intergrated research of sedimentary and structural feature, the crucial connection between sedimentary filling and different kinds of fault or the secondary structural belts had been discussed. One law was that depoccenter was in accordance with subsidence center, alluvial fansnearshore subaqueous fan, fan delata and sublacustrine-fan were developed in the aera of listric stytle faults. Also, those types of sedimentary facies and evolution model in the aera of steep slope belt or gentle slope belt were discussed, then, the control action of sedimentary filling from the episodic evolution of the half graben rift was confirmed, generally speaking, the character of the steep slope was more complex than the gentle slope.
Those last conclusions were as follows. There were two separate basin during the early-middle Jurassic, they were continental rift-subsiding basin with coal-bearing clastic rocks. Because of the regional compression and inversion,the late Jurassic volcanic stratigraphy distributed along the deep faults in the aera of Daxinganling uplift and the basin margin. The early cretaceous basin was an extensional faulted basin due to static factors including crushing basement framework and long strip basin shape,dynamic factors including the prebious multicycle evolution and dectral shear stress field at the same time, so the basin formation model was special and strong senmentation.The thermodynamic subsidence was the genetic mechanism of the late cretaceous basin with river-lake deposition system in some aera.
系统总结了早白垩世盆地伸展正断层的平面、剖面组合样式和反转构造样式类型及形成机制;以板块活动论为指导,分析了二连盆地中、新生代盆地演化特征及动力学机制,欧亚板块和太平洋板块等板块之间的相互作用,以及蒙古—鄂霍次克碰撞缝合带的碰撞效应均为影响盆地演化的重要因素。
提出了叠合构造样式的概念,建立了构造样式叠合模式,即K1简单伸展构造模式、K1拉张—K1末期挤压反转构造叠合模式、J1+2—K1继承性伸展构造叠合模式、K1走滑拉张—K1末期走滑挤压的走滑反转构造叠合模式、J1+2拉张—J3挤压—K1拉张—K1末期挤压的多期复杂构造叠合模式,明确了构造运动与构造样式之间的耦合关系。
在沉积相类型及构造特征研究基础上,探讨了早白垩世断陷湖盆不同类型断层及构造带对沉积充填的控制。其中铲式陡坡带沉降、沉积中心一致,发育冲积扇、近岸水下扇、扇三角洲及湖底扇。分析了单断箕状断陷湖盆幕式演化对沉积充填的影响,总结了陡坡带、缓坡带沉积相类型及演化模式,陡坡带较缓坡带沉积类型丰富、演化模式复杂。
通过沉积地层、构造及物源等方面综合研究,认为早—中侏罗世发育南、北两个次级盆地区,为发育含煤碎屑岩的陆相断—拗型盆地。晚侏罗世,受区域性挤压反转,在大兴安岭隆起及盆地南缘凹陷发育火山岩地层。早白垩世,在破碎基底构造格局、窄长条形盆地形态等静态要素,以及前期多旋回演化、右旋剪切应力场等动态要素联合作用下,具有独特的强分割性成盆特征,为拉张断陷型盆地群。晚白垩世,仅在少数地区发育河流—湖泊沉积体系,属热沉降坳陷盆地。
Based on drilling data,seismic interpretation, the area geological survey report and the field recording data, I studied the formation’s lithologic characteristic, stratigraphic correlation and thicknesses of remnant formations of the Jurassic-Cretaceous residual basin,drew the distribution maps. The early-middle jurassic basin is separated into two residual basins, which were the north basin and the south basin. The late Jurassic volcanic stratigraphy distributed along the Daxinganling and basin margin.The lower cretaceous distribute all fifty-three depressions,and each depression has 1~4 residual thickess center. The upper cretaceous distributed along the region near the Bayinbaolige uplift.
Structure types and dynamic mechanism about the assemble pattern of extensional normal faults in the plane and profile, and inversion structures,was comprehensively summarized; based on the plate structure theory, tectonic evolution and dynamic mechanism of the Meso-Cenozoic basin was studied together. The conclusion was that basin evolution effect from many ways,such as the interaction of the Eurasian plate and Pacific plate, also the collision effect the Mongolia-Okhotsk suture belt.
In this paper, the superimposed structural style was put forward for the first time, and the superimposed models about the structural stytle wers constructed,such as K1 single extension-structure modle, inversion-structure model corresponding to K1 extension-K1 terminal com-pression, J1+2-K1 inherited extension-structure model, strike-slip structure model correspondding to K1strike-slip extension-K1 terminal strike-slip compression, multi-phase of structure model corresponding to J1+2 extension-J3 compression-K1 extension-K1 ter-minal secondary compression,what’s more,the coupling relationship between the structural evolution and structural stytle is confirmed.
Based on the intergrated research of sedimentary and structural feature, the crucial connection between sedimentary filling and different kinds of fault or the secondary structural belts had been discussed. One law was that depoccenter was in accordance with subsidence center, alluvial fansnearshore subaqueous fan, fan delata and sublacustrine-fan were developed in the aera of listric stytle faults. Also, those types of sedimentary facies and evolution model in the aera of steep slope belt or gentle slope belt were discussed, then, the control action of sedimentary filling from the episodic evolution of the half graben rift was confirmed, generally speaking, the character of the steep slope was more complex than the gentle slope.
Those last conclusions were as follows. There were two separate basin during the early-middle Jurassic, they were continental rift-subsiding basin with coal-bearing clastic rocks. Because of the regional compression and inversion,the late Jurassic volcanic stratigraphy distributed along the deep faults in the aera of Daxinganling uplift and the basin margin. The early cretaceous basin was an extensional faulted basin due to static factors including crushing basement framework and long strip basin shape,dynamic factors including the prebious multicycle evolution and dectral shear stress field at the same time, so the basin formation model was special and strong senmentation.The thermodynamic subsidence was the genetic mechanism of the late cretaceous basin with river-lake deposition system in some aera.
引文
[1]于英太,马家驹.二连盆地石油勘探回顾与展望[R].中国石油天然气总公司,二连盆地石油地质特征及油气聚集规律论文集(内部报告),1988
[2]焦贵浩,王同和,郭绪杰等.二连裂谷构造演化与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[3]赵澄林,祝玉衡.二连盆地储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[4]杜金虎.二连盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[5]汪新文.中国东北地区中—新生代盆地构造演化与油气关系[M].北京:地质出版社,2007
[6]高长林.盆地原型之理解[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(4):385
[7]刘和甫.沉积盆地地球动力分类及构造样式分析[J].地球科学,1993,18(6):699-724
[8]杜旭东,漆家福,陆克政等.大港探区中生代原型盆地恢复及成盆模式[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,1999,7(3):230-239
[9]何登发,贾承造,童晓光等.叠合盆地概念辨析[J].石油勘探与发,2004,31(1):1-7
[10]陈发景,汪新文.中国西北地区早—中侏罗世盆地原型分析[J].地学前缘,2000, 7(4):459-469
[11] Kleme H D. Petroleum basin: classifications and characteristics[J].Journal of petroleum Geology, 1980, 27: 30-66
[12]李伟,吴智平,周瑶琪.济阳坳陷中生代地层剥蚀厚度恢复、原始厚度恢复及原型盆地研究[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):507-516
[13]赵文智,靳久强,薛良清等.中国西北地区侏罗纪原型盆地形成和演化[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000
[14]靳久强,赵文智,薛良清.中国西北地区侏罗纪原型盆地与演化特征[J].地质论评,1999,45(1):92-104
[15]许坤等.中国北方侏罗系(Ⅶ)东北地层区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[16]蔡希源等.中国油气区反转构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001
[17]李心宁,王同和.二连盆地反转构造与油气[J].中国海上油气地质,1997,11(2):106-110
[18]马新华,肖安成.内蒙古二连盆地的构造反转历史[J].西南石油学院学报,2000,22(2):1-4
[19]杜维良,李先平.二连盆地反转构造及其与油气的关系[J].科技导报,2007,25(11):45-47
[20]肖安成.二连盆地形成的地球动力学背景[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(2):137-145
[21]任建业,李思田,焦贵浩.二连断陷盆地群伸展构造系统及其发育的深部背景[J].地球科学,1998,23(6):567-573
[22]费宝生.从二连盆地看东北亚地区裂谷盆地群油气勘探[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(3):7-12
[23] Ren J Y, Li S T, Lin C S. Late Mesozoic intracontinental rifting and basin formation in Eastern China[J].Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1997,8(1): 40-44
[24]赵志刚,李亮,李书民等.二连盆地赛汗塔拉组构造样式及凹陷成因类型研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):11-14
[25]叶得泉等.中国北方含油气区白垩系[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1990:146-185
[26]刘朝露.济阳坳陷中生代原型盆地恢复与油气成藏条件分析[D].广州:中科院广州地化所,2006
[27]何中波.二连盆地马尼特坳陷中新生代构造—沉积演化与砂岩型铀矿成矿作用[D].北京:核工业北京地质研究院,2006
[28]祝玉衡,张文朝.二连盆地下白垩统沉积相及含油性[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:1-55
[29]段宏亮.柴达木盆地西部中生代原型盆地恢复[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007
[30]彭兆蒙.华北东部中生代地层划分、对比及展布[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007
[31]全国地层委员会.中国地层指南纪中国地层指南说明书(修订版)[M].北京:地质出版社,2001
[32]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—西乌珠沁旗幅(1:200000),1978
[33]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—锡林浩特幅(1:200000),1974
[34]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—苏尼特左旗幅(1:200000),1965
[35]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—二连乃达布斯幅(1:200000),1965
[36]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—苏尼特右旗幅(1:200000),1965
[37]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—赛罕乌力吉幅(1:200000),1976
[38]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—脑木根幅(1:200000),1980
[39]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—白音查干、准索伦、桑根达来幅(1:200000),1980
[40] Miall A D. Principles of sedimentary basin analysis [M].New York: Spring-Verlag,1990: 414-415
[41] Perrdon A. Petroleum system: models and applications [J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology,1992,15(3): 319-325
[42] Kleme H D. Effective petroleum source rocks of the word: stratigraphic distribution and controlling depositional factors [J].AAPG Bull,1991,75(12): 1148-1159
[43]李宏容.内蒙古二连盆地中生代介形类[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989
[44]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典—白垩系[M].北京:地质出版社,2000
[45]赵传本.二连盆地早白垩世孢粉组合[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987
[46]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—二连浩特幅(1:200000),1978
[47]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—西力庙幅(1:200000),1978
[48]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—查干敖包幅(1:200000),1978
[49]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—查干哈达幅(1:200000),1978
[50]李金良.白音查干凹陷层序地层研究与有利区带预测[D].北京:中国地质大学,2002
[51]阎存凤,袁剑英,赵应成.蒙、甘、青地区侏罗纪孢粉组合序列及古气候[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(5):634-639
[52]陈发景.伸展断陷盆地分析[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[55]沈华,陈发景,尹薇.伸展构造体系中反转构造研究[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(1):23-25
[56]宋建国,窦立荣.中国东部中新生代含油气盆地构造与油气系统[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997
[57]王骏,王东坡,乌沙科夫等.东亚沉积盆地的形成演化及含油气远景[M].北京:地质出版社,1997
[58]周蒂,孙珍,陈汉宗.南海及其围区中生代岩相古地理和构造演化[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):204-219
[59]张国仁,江淑娥,杨占兴等.辽宁寒岭—偏岭平移断裂带特征及形成动力机制[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):183-193
[60]程三友.中国东北地区区域构造特征与中—新生代盆地演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006
[61]刘俊,杨洪,沈华等.构造对沉积的控制作用[J].中国矿业,2006,15(11):98-101
[62]于秀英.裂谷盆地构造控制地形—沉积体系演化研究与面临问题[J].世界地质,2004,21(2):123-127
[63]田景春,林会喜.陆相断陷湖盆断裂构造对沉积体系及砂体的控制作用研究—以济阳坳陷孤北~桩海地区沙河街组和东营组为例[J].物探化探计算技术,2008,30(1):34-38
[64]路智勇.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷古近系构造样式对沉积及储集层的影响[J].古地理学报,2008,10(3):277-285
[65]李丕龙等.陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式—陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[66]张福顺.二连盆地白音查干凹陷构造沉降对沉积的控制作用[J].地质力学学报,2003,9(2):136-142
[67]刘震,付东阳,肖伟等.二连盆地三种典型构造带岩性油藏形成模式分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):32-39
[68]刘震,郝琦,赵贤正等.二连盆地砂岩体形成和分布的多元控制特征分析[J].地质科学,2007,42(2):319-334
[69]王红才,王薇.油田三维构造应力场数值模拟与油气运移[J].地球学报,2002,23(2):175-178
[70]安欧.构造应力场[M].北京:地震出版社,1992:563-567
[71]汤良杰,贾承造.中国西北叠合盆地的主要构造特征[J].地学前缘,2003,10(增刊):118-122
[72]韩保清,罗群,黄捍东.叠合盆地及其基本地质特征[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4):12-14
[73]姚超,焦贵浩.中国含油气构造样式[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[74]何治亮,徐宏节,段铁军.塔里木多旋回盆地复合构造样式初步分析[J].地质科学,2005,40(2):153-166
[75]刘磊,陆梅娟.声波时差法恢复剥蚀量在二连盆地中的应用[J].小型油气藏,2007,12(3):15-18
[76]任战利,刘池阳,冯建辉.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷热演化史研究[J].石油学报,2000,21(4):42-45
[77]任战利.中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史恢复及对比研究[D].西安:西北大学,2007:50-85
[78]常亮,李正文,秦云龙等.巴音都兰凹陷含油气综合评价及勘探研究方向[R].华北油田公司勘探开发研究院(内部报告),2007
[79]张福顺,樊太亮,孙宜朴等.二连盆地白音查干凹陷构造沉降对沉积的控制作用[J].地质力学学报,2003,9(12):136-142
[80]张福顺,樊太亮,毕研斌等.白音查干凹陷断层活动对沉积的控制作用[J].华东地质学院学报,2003,26(1):24-27
[81]管穆兰,库国正,尹哲等.白音查干凹陷构造沉降充填演化与油气关系[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(3):7-10
[82] Gupta S, Cowie P. Processes and controls in the stratigraphic development of extensional basins [J]. Basin Research , 2000 ,12(3): 185-194
[83]李思田,路凤香,林畅松等.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:3-53
[84]吴福元,叶茂,张世红.中国满州里—绥芬河地学断面域的地球动力学模型[J].地球科学,1995,20(5):535-539
[2]焦贵浩,王同和,郭绪杰等.二连裂谷构造演化与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[3]赵澄林,祝玉衡.二连盆地储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[4]杜金虎.二连盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[5]汪新文.中国东北地区中—新生代盆地构造演化与油气关系[M].北京:地质出版社,2007
[6]高长林.盆地原型之理解[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(4):385
[7]刘和甫.沉积盆地地球动力分类及构造样式分析[J].地球科学,1993,18(6):699-724
[8]杜旭东,漆家福,陆克政等.大港探区中生代原型盆地恢复及成盆模式[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,1999,7(3):230-239
[9]何登发,贾承造,童晓光等.叠合盆地概念辨析[J].石油勘探与发,2004,31(1):1-7
[10]陈发景,汪新文.中国西北地区早—中侏罗世盆地原型分析[J].地学前缘,2000, 7(4):459-469
[11] Kleme H D. Petroleum basin: classifications and characteristics[J].Journal of petroleum Geology, 1980, 27: 30-66
[12]李伟,吴智平,周瑶琪.济阳坳陷中生代地层剥蚀厚度恢复、原始厚度恢复及原型盆地研究[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):507-516
[13]赵文智,靳久强,薛良清等.中国西北地区侏罗纪原型盆地形成和演化[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000
[14]靳久强,赵文智,薛良清.中国西北地区侏罗纪原型盆地与演化特征[J].地质论评,1999,45(1):92-104
[15]许坤等.中国北方侏罗系(Ⅶ)东北地层区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[16]蔡希源等.中国油气区反转构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001
[17]李心宁,王同和.二连盆地反转构造与油气[J].中国海上油气地质,1997,11(2):106-110
[18]马新华,肖安成.内蒙古二连盆地的构造反转历史[J].西南石油学院学报,2000,22(2):1-4
[19]杜维良,李先平.二连盆地反转构造及其与油气的关系[J].科技导报,2007,25(11):45-47
[20]肖安成.二连盆地形成的地球动力学背景[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(2):137-145
[21]任建业,李思田,焦贵浩.二连断陷盆地群伸展构造系统及其发育的深部背景[J].地球科学,1998,23(6):567-573
[22]费宝生.从二连盆地看东北亚地区裂谷盆地群油气勘探[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(3):7-12
[23] Ren J Y, Li S T, Lin C S. Late Mesozoic intracontinental rifting and basin formation in Eastern China[J].Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1997,8(1): 40-44
[24]赵志刚,李亮,李书民等.二连盆地赛汗塔拉组构造样式及凹陷成因类型研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):11-14
[25]叶得泉等.中国北方含油气区白垩系[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1990:146-185
[26]刘朝露.济阳坳陷中生代原型盆地恢复与油气成藏条件分析[D].广州:中科院广州地化所,2006
[27]何中波.二连盆地马尼特坳陷中新生代构造—沉积演化与砂岩型铀矿成矿作用[D].北京:核工业北京地质研究院,2006
[28]祝玉衡,张文朝.二连盆地下白垩统沉积相及含油性[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:1-55
[29]段宏亮.柴达木盆地西部中生代原型盆地恢复[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007
[30]彭兆蒙.华北东部中生代地层划分、对比及展布[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007
[31]全国地层委员会.中国地层指南纪中国地层指南说明书(修订版)[M].北京:地质出版社,2001
[32]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—西乌珠沁旗幅(1:200000),1978
[33]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—锡林浩特幅(1:200000),1974
[34]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—苏尼特左旗幅(1:200000),1965
[35]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—二连乃达布斯幅(1:200000),1965
[36]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—苏尼特右旗幅(1:200000),1965
[37]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—赛罕乌力吉幅(1:200000),1976
[38]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—脑木根幅(1:200000),1980
[39]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—白音查干、准索伦、桑根达来幅(1:200000),1980
[40] Miall A D. Principles of sedimentary basin analysis [M].New York: Spring-Verlag,1990: 414-415
[41] Perrdon A. Petroleum system: models and applications [J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology,1992,15(3): 319-325
[42] Kleme H D. Effective petroleum source rocks of the word: stratigraphic distribution and controlling depositional factors [J].AAPG Bull,1991,75(12): 1148-1159
[43]李宏容.内蒙古二连盆地中生代介形类[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989
[44]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典—白垩系[M].北京:地质出版社,2000
[45]赵传本.二连盆地早白垩世孢粉组合[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987
[46]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—二连浩特幅(1:200000),1978
[47]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—西力庙幅(1:200000),1978
[48]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—查干敖包幅(1:200000),1978
[49]内蒙古自治区地质局.区域地质调查报告—查干哈达幅(1:200000),1978
[50]李金良.白音查干凹陷层序地层研究与有利区带预测[D].北京:中国地质大学,2002
[51]阎存凤,袁剑英,赵应成.蒙、甘、青地区侏罗纪孢粉组合序列及古气候[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(5):634-639
[52]陈发景.伸展断陷盆地分析[M].北京:地质出版社,2004
[55]沈华,陈发景,尹薇.伸展构造体系中反转构造研究[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(1):23-25
[56]宋建国,窦立荣.中国东部中新生代含油气盆地构造与油气系统[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997
[57]王骏,王东坡,乌沙科夫等.东亚沉积盆地的形成演化及含油气远景[M].北京:地质出版社,1997
[58]周蒂,孙珍,陈汉宗.南海及其围区中生代岩相古地理和构造演化[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):204-219
[59]张国仁,江淑娥,杨占兴等.辽宁寒岭—偏岭平移断裂带特征及形成动力机制[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):183-193
[60]程三友.中国东北地区区域构造特征与中—新生代盆地演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006
[61]刘俊,杨洪,沈华等.构造对沉积的控制作用[J].中国矿业,2006,15(11):98-101
[62]于秀英.裂谷盆地构造控制地形—沉积体系演化研究与面临问题[J].世界地质,2004,21(2):123-127
[63]田景春,林会喜.陆相断陷湖盆断裂构造对沉积体系及砂体的控制作用研究—以济阳坳陷孤北~桩海地区沙河街组和东营组为例[J].物探化探计算技术,2008,30(1):34-38
[64]路智勇.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷古近系构造样式对沉积及储集层的影响[J].古地理学报,2008,10(3):277-285
[65]李丕龙等.陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式—陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[66]张福顺.二连盆地白音查干凹陷构造沉降对沉积的控制作用[J].地质力学学报,2003,9(2):136-142
[67]刘震,付东阳,肖伟等.二连盆地三种典型构造带岩性油藏形成模式分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):32-39
[68]刘震,郝琦,赵贤正等.二连盆地砂岩体形成和分布的多元控制特征分析[J].地质科学,2007,42(2):319-334
[69]王红才,王薇.油田三维构造应力场数值模拟与油气运移[J].地球学报,2002,23(2):175-178
[70]安欧.构造应力场[M].北京:地震出版社,1992:563-567
[71]汤良杰,贾承造.中国西北叠合盆地的主要构造特征[J].地学前缘,2003,10(增刊):118-122
[72]韩保清,罗群,黄捍东.叠合盆地及其基本地质特征[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4):12-14
[73]姚超,焦贵浩.中国含油气构造样式[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[74]何治亮,徐宏节,段铁军.塔里木多旋回盆地复合构造样式初步分析[J].地质科学,2005,40(2):153-166
[75]刘磊,陆梅娟.声波时差法恢复剥蚀量在二连盆地中的应用[J].小型油气藏,2007,12(3):15-18
[76]任战利,刘池阳,冯建辉.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷热演化史研究[J].石油学报,2000,21(4):42-45
[77]任战利.中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史恢复及对比研究[D].西安:西北大学,2007:50-85
[78]常亮,李正文,秦云龙等.巴音都兰凹陷含油气综合评价及勘探研究方向[R].华北油田公司勘探开发研究院(内部报告),2007
[79]张福顺,樊太亮,孙宜朴等.二连盆地白音查干凹陷构造沉降对沉积的控制作用[J].地质力学学报,2003,9(12):136-142
[80]张福顺,樊太亮,毕研斌等.白音查干凹陷断层活动对沉积的控制作用[J].华东地质学院学报,2003,26(1):24-27
[81]管穆兰,库国正,尹哲等.白音查干凹陷构造沉降充填演化与油气关系[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(3):7-10
[82] Gupta S, Cowie P. Processes and controls in the stratigraphic development of extensional basins [J]. Basin Research , 2000 ,12(3): 185-194
[83]李思田,路凤香,林畅松等.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997:3-53
[84]吴福元,叶茂,张世红.中国满州里—绥芬河地学断面域的地球动力学模型[J].地球科学,1995,20(5):535-539