信息系统中信息实现过程分析及建模
|
摘要
在信息系统学科中一方面认为信息是信息系统学科最重要和最基本的概念,对信息本质的理解有意或无意地指导和影响着信息系统的理论研究和实践应用;另一方面在信息系统领域中关于信息、数据和意义存在多样且混乱的概念和术语,而这些混乱又造成了现有关于信息系统研究的孤立不连接的且矛盾的知识混合体。到目前,关于“信息本身难以琢磨的天性以及研究者没有办法在研究工作中处理信息本质”这个问题,信息系统学科范围内尚未给出系统、深刻的答案。所以,对如何理解和处理信息本质的研究和探讨,无论对信息系统学科的理论研究,还是对信息系统的成功实施,都具有特别重要的意义。
本论文的研究内容主要有:
1.获取了理解和处理信息本质的新视角和关键点。本文吸取信息哲学的研究成果,将“如何连接信息的各种说法”作为获取理解和处理信息本质新视角的出发点,针对信息系统领域中有关信息研究的四条线索,从“信息、数据、意义三者关系”和“信息本质处理方法”两维度出发,分析了各类信息观点所蕴含的基本哲学观点,进一步理解了信息系统领域中有关信息研究所取得的成果和局限,由此提出了理解和处理信息本质新视角和关键点。信息实现机理的理解和处理是理解和处理信息本质的关键,信息实现过程也是精通知识的信息工作者解释意义的过程。
2.选择了合理的信息实现机理的理论基础,并从中抽取了信息实现的一般过程。信息实现过程是信息意义解释的过程,而意义的解释属于释义学(Hermeneutics)的研究范畴;信息实现过程也是人与人的交流过程,在这人与人交流的过程中,人们完成了对自己和别人的理解,所以这个交流过程也是理解过程。这样的过程一方面体现了信息、数据、意义三者之间的关系,同时它本身又是通过这三者的联系交互而得以完成。我们承认有独立于接受者的客观信息存在,但又认为“信息为什么能被称为是信息”需要从信息、数据、意义的关系中才能体现出来,也即只有在与人的存在关联中才能体现出来。基于这样的基本认识,再结合信息实现过程的基本特征,选择了合适的释义学思想作为信息实现机理的理论基础;通过对这种释义学思想的详细分析获取了信息实现机理所涉及的一般过程、过程所涉及的元素和阶段,从而形成了信息实现机理的半结构化模型。
3.分析了信息意义的基本形态并初步实现了信息意义的形式化表示。如何创生或者解释意义是理解和处理信息本质的关键。如果说意义是通过一特定的解释活动所获得也就是通过信息实现过程而获得,但意义是什么样的?主体间性意义和主体性意义的本质是什么?意义如何表示?这些问题至今没有很好地系统研究。本文认为:如果意义是通过解释获得的,那么意义只有对解释者(我们将其称为精通信息的知识工作者)才有存在的价值。而关于解释者——人的研究是海德格尔《存在与时间》的研究主题,所以本文基于海德格尔关于此在的研究分析信息实现过程中意义的解释者(也即精通信息的知识工作者)的存在结构和本质特征,从中理解主体间性意义和主体性意义的本质,并确认了意义与“数据-信息”勾连的关系,在此基础上选择Galois格和形式化场景初步实现了信息意义的表示。
4.进一步讨论了基于数据的信息意义,分析了数据、信息、意义三者之间的不同关系与不同知识概念之间的关系。首先基于形式化场景分析了基于数据的信息意义的四种基本连接形态,分别将其定义为:完全匹配形态、第一类部分匹配形态、第二类部分匹配形态和不完全匹配形态,并获得了这四种连接形态的物理意义,分析了它们在信息意义格中的表现。由于,Dretske认为知识概念与数据对信息内容的提供有紧密的关系。所以,一方面运用Dretske语义信息理论分析了信息意义四种连接形态的信息熵状况;另一方面从它们的信息熵状况分析数据对信息内容的表现力和信息内容被数据的表现状况从而理解不同信息意义连接形态与不同知识概念之间的关系。最后,在分析不同信息意义连接与不同知识概念之间关系时,涉及了不确定的模糊知识,所以进一步用粗糙集理论分析了这四种形态在粗糙集中的表现,从而用信息意义的不同连接形态定义各类不确定性知识,加深了对不确定性知识的理解。
5.研究了信息实现过程的形式化建模。信息实现过程的语义层、反思层、本体层都以数据为基础而展开,所以,从数据的特点出发分析了多层信息意义与信息实现过程之间的关系。利用符号学理论分析信息实现过程,认为信息意义就是双面性解释实体,而信息意义具有系统性结构,从而将信息实现过程的多重信息意义和多层信息意义的解释转换为信息理论中的某些问题,进而选择了Barwise和Seligman的渠道理实现了信息实现过程的形式化建模,并进一步从分布式系统角度分析了信息意义、信息意义的四种连接形态、多重信息意义和多层信息意义的形式化表示。
6.将“基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型”和“基于信息渠道理论的信息实现过程形式化模型”相结合应用于本体的交互和进化研究。首先通过分析海德格尔的本体论获取了本体与释义之间的关系,认为本体的本质问题就是解释问题;然后分析了知识工程中本体交互和进化现象,进一步说明了无论本体的交互与进化都涉及交流问题,而这种交流是人们通过对数据的信息内容的解读而实现的,因此,认为基于释义学的信息实现机理可作为知识工程的本体进化、获取或实现的理论基础;利用基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型,应用信息渠道理论对基于主体间组合信息内容多对一的本体交互和进化进行了分析,获取了主体间交流的形式化框架和主体间组合信息内容多对一解释过程的建模步骤。最后,通过一实例详细展开了信息实现过程的半结构化模型和形式化模型在知识工程中的应用。
本论文的创新点和主要贡献有:
第一,通过分析各信息观点的哲学基础,提出:从“信息何被称为信息”出发通过信息、数据、意义三者之间关系的理解,才能真正理解信息的本质和处理信息的本质。特别是,经解释的具体活动和行为而得以创生新意义的,或者可实践创造的信息本质论,是新信息本质理论的关键点,这些都体现在信息的实现过程中,信息实现的过程也是信息意义解释的过程。
第二,通过分析信息系统中信息实现过程的基本特征和基本假设,选择利科释义学思想和海德格尔释义学思想相结合的释义学理论作为信息实现过程的哲学基础,抽取了信息实现过程的半结构化模型,突破了释义学理论在信息系统中的应用,也进一步系统化地展现和实现了Mingers的有关信息与意义之间的模拟数字化过程。
第三,从海德格尔的此在的分析出发理解信息意义、主体性意义和主体间性意义,完成现有信息本质研究中有关意义的论述,补充和完善了Floridi和Mingers的信息研究。
第四,以符号学为中介分析信息实现过程的基本问题,连接了基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型和信息渠道理论间的关系,从而实现了信息实现过程的形式化分析。
第五,将信息实现机理作为知识工程的本体进化、获取或实现的理论基础;基于信息实现机理,构建了主体间组合信息内容多对一的解释过程,进一步扩展了本体进化和交互的研究。
The notion of 'information' is probably the most important and the most fundamental one for the discipline of information systems. Whether realising it or not, people's understanding of this notion guides and affects their theoretic study and application of information systems. However, there appear many inconsistent and often conflicting views and terms for information, data and meaning in the literature Such a situation seems to have resulted in the body of knowledge in this field being an inconsistent and confusing mixture. Thus far, there does not seem a systematic and convincing solution to the problem that the nature of information is elusive and extremely hard to handle. Therefore, any serious investigation into the nature of information would seem highly desirable and important both for theoretic research and practice.
The main topics that have been investigated and are to be reported in this thesis are as follows:
1. A new and helpful perspective and some crucial elements for understanding and processing information have been developed or identified. We absorb research results in information philosophy and take how to link various approaches to information as a starting point of our work. We analyze the basic philosophical foundations of these approaches in terms of relationships between information, data, and meaning and approaches to the nature of information, which constitute a two-dimension conceptual framework. This helps us further understand the state of the art of this field and arrive at a fundamental insight, namely the process of information realization is also a process that a knowledge worker takes to obtain meaning from what she/he observes through interpretation. The revelation of the mechanism whereby the impact of information is realized appears to the key to understand the nature of information.
2. We have chosen appropriate theoretical foundations for investigating this aforementioned mechanism and discovered the general process of information realization. The process of information realization is a process of interpretation, which results in meaning, and such a process belongs firmly to Hermeneutics. Moreover, such a process is also that of communication between people during which people understand one another and themselves. The process of communication is also that of understanding. Understanding between people embodies relationships between information, data and meaning, and at the same time, the latter enables the former. The existence of Information is independent of its receiver, but at the same time the reason why something is taken as information is because it has the potential to inform the receiver in that it would result in the reduction of some uncertainty that is relevant to her/him. And this can only be realized through certain relationships of information to data and meaning. That is, information is fundamentally associated with people. Based on this view, taking into account the basic characteristics of information systems, we choose hermeneutic thinking as the theoretical foundation for our investigation. As a result, a general process including its elements and stages is identified and a semi-structured model developed.
3. We have investigated basic forms of the meaning of information. How to obtain meaning through interpretation is the key to understand and process information. If meaning is created through interpretation, which is what we mean by 'information realization', then how does it happen? What is the nature of inter-subject meaning and subject meaning? We have not found systematic study in the literature on these questions thus far. We observe that meaning is only valuable to the interpreter, whom we call knowledge worker who is skilled in handling information. Interpreters, i.e., people, are of the topic of "Existence and Time" by Heiderger. We draw on Heiderger's work on 'being' to investigate the structure and essential characteristics of information realization with which to understand the essence of inter-subjective meaning and subjective meaning, to analyze links between information and data, and finally to use Galois lattice and formal context to visualize the meaning of information.
4. We have further discussed the meaning of information that is based on data, and we have analyzed the relationship between data, information and meaning. We analyze four basic relationships between information and dada based by using formal context, namely, fully matched, the first partly matched, the second partly matched and unmatched, and obtain physical signification and their manifestation in meaning lattices. Dretske observes that an essential component for the notion of 'to know' is information provision. Following Dretske, we analyze information entropy of the four types of meaning. Then using the information entropy obtained, we look at how data convey information content, and how the types of meaning relate to different concepts in knowledge. Finally, we realize that uncertain knowledge is involved in all the above, therefore we further express the four types of meaning (i.e., four types of connections between information and data) by using Rough Set, which deepens our understanding of uncertain knowledge.
5. How the information realization process may be modeled formally was investigated. The semantic layer, the reflective layer and the ontological layer of the information realization process are all carried out on the basis of data. Hence relationships between multiple layers of the meaning of information and the information realization process are analyzed in terms of the characteristics of data. We analyze the information realization process by using semiotics, and take the view that the meaning of information be a double interpretative entity and has a systematic structure. How to interpret multiple meaning and multiple layers of meaning of information in an information realization process is transformed into questions that information theory covers, therefore we choose Barwise and Seligma's channel theory to model information realization process formally, and discuss formal representations of the meaning of information, four types of meaning, multiple meaning and multiple layers of meaning from the perspective of distributed systems.
6. The semi-structured model based on Hermeneutics and the formal model based on information channel theory about information realization process were combined and then applied to the problem of ontological interoperability and evolution. By using Heidegger's ontologism, we obtain the relationship between ontology and Hermeneutics, analyze the phenomenon of ontological interoperability and evolution in knowledge engineering. We observe that the problem of ontological interoperability and evolution is that of communication, and communication is realized through people's interpretation and attainment of information content from data. Thus the mechanism of information realization based on Hermeneutics is a theoretic foundation for ontological evolution, attainment and realization in knowledge engineering. We use the semi-structured model of information realization process, we apply information channel theory to the analysis of ontological interoperability and evolution, which are based on many-to-one correspondences of information content between human subjects, we obtain a formal framework about communication between human subjects and the modeling steps about an interpretation process of many-to-one correspondences of information content between human subjects. Finally, we describe a case study where the semi-structured model and the formal model of information realization process are applied to knowledge engineering.
The main contributions of the thesis:
1. By analyzing the philosophical bases of various views of information, we conclude that through understanding relationships between information, data and meaning, we can truly understand the nature of information. Especially, new meanings are created through interpretation activities, behavior or by practice, which are crucial points of this thesis. We demonstrate that the process of information realization is also that of interpretation of the meaning of information.
2. By analyzing basic characteristics and assumptions of the process of information realization, we choose Heidegger's Hermeneutics combined with Ricoeur's Hermeneutics as the basis and formulate a semi-structural model of information realization. This represents an extention of current application of the hermeneutical theory to information systems. This also systematically elaborates the digitalization process that underlies the transformation from information to meaning as obversed by Mingers.
3. We have achieved a better understanding of the meaning of information, subjective meaning and inter-subjective meaning by drawing on Heiderger's analysis of 'being'. We expand the study of meaning in contemporary studies on the nature of information, which we believe, supplements and improves Floridi's and Mingers' studies on information.
4. We analyze the fundamentals of the process of information realization by drawing on principles of semiotics, which serves as a link between the aforementioned semi-structural model of information realization and the information channel theory. As a result, we have arrived at a formal analysis of information realization.
5. Based on the mechanism for information realization that we have formulated, we have built a 'many to one' interpretation process for combing information content, which we believe extends current research reported on ontology evolution and interoperability in knowledge engineering.
本论文的研究内容主要有:
1.获取了理解和处理信息本质的新视角和关键点。本文吸取信息哲学的研究成果,将“如何连接信息的各种说法”作为获取理解和处理信息本质新视角的出发点,针对信息系统领域中有关信息研究的四条线索,从“信息、数据、意义三者关系”和“信息本质处理方法”两维度出发,分析了各类信息观点所蕴含的基本哲学观点,进一步理解了信息系统领域中有关信息研究所取得的成果和局限,由此提出了理解和处理信息本质新视角和关键点。信息实现机理的理解和处理是理解和处理信息本质的关键,信息实现过程也是精通知识的信息工作者解释意义的过程。
2.选择了合理的信息实现机理的理论基础,并从中抽取了信息实现的一般过程。信息实现过程是信息意义解释的过程,而意义的解释属于释义学(Hermeneutics)的研究范畴;信息实现过程也是人与人的交流过程,在这人与人交流的过程中,人们完成了对自己和别人的理解,所以这个交流过程也是理解过程。这样的过程一方面体现了信息、数据、意义三者之间的关系,同时它本身又是通过这三者的联系交互而得以完成。我们承认有独立于接受者的客观信息存在,但又认为“信息为什么能被称为是信息”需要从信息、数据、意义的关系中才能体现出来,也即只有在与人的存在关联中才能体现出来。基于这样的基本认识,再结合信息实现过程的基本特征,选择了合适的释义学思想作为信息实现机理的理论基础;通过对这种释义学思想的详细分析获取了信息实现机理所涉及的一般过程、过程所涉及的元素和阶段,从而形成了信息实现机理的半结构化模型。
3.分析了信息意义的基本形态并初步实现了信息意义的形式化表示。如何创生或者解释意义是理解和处理信息本质的关键。如果说意义是通过一特定的解释活动所获得也就是通过信息实现过程而获得,但意义是什么样的?主体间性意义和主体性意义的本质是什么?意义如何表示?这些问题至今没有很好地系统研究。本文认为:如果意义是通过解释获得的,那么意义只有对解释者(我们将其称为精通信息的知识工作者)才有存在的价值。而关于解释者——人的研究是海德格尔《存在与时间》的研究主题,所以本文基于海德格尔关于此在的研究分析信息实现过程中意义的解释者(也即精通信息的知识工作者)的存在结构和本质特征,从中理解主体间性意义和主体性意义的本质,并确认了意义与“数据-信息”勾连的关系,在此基础上选择Galois格和形式化场景初步实现了信息意义的表示。
4.进一步讨论了基于数据的信息意义,分析了数据、信息、意义三者之间的不同关系与不同知识概念之间的关系。首先基于形式化场景分析了基于数据的信息意义的四种基本连接形态,分别将其定义为:完全匹配形态、第一类部分匹配形态、第二类部分匹配形态和不完全匹配形态,并获得了这四种连接形态的物理意义,分析了它们在信息意义格中的表现。由于,Dretske认为知识概念与数据对信息内容的提供有紧密的关系。所以,一方面运用Dretske语义信息理论分析了信息意义四种连接形态的信息熵状况;另一方面从它们的信息熵状况分析数据对信息内容的表现力和信息内容被数据的表现状况从而理解不同信息意义连接形态与不同知识概念之间的关系。最后,在分析不同信息意义连接与不同知识概念之间关系时,涉及了不确定的模糊知识,所以进一步用粗糙集理论分析了这四种形态在粗糙集中的表现,从而用信息意义的不同连接形态定义各类不确定性知识,加深了对不确定性知识的理解。
5.研究了信息实现过程的形式化建模。信息实现过程的语义层、反思层、本体层都以数据为基础而展开,所以,从数据的特点出发分析了多层信息意义与信息实现过程之间的关系。利用符号学理论分析信息实现过程,认为信息意义就是双面性解释实体,而信息意义具有系统性结构,从而将信息实现过程的多重信息意义和多层信息意义的解释转换为信息理论中的某些问题,进而选择了Barwise和Seligman的渠道理实现了信息实现过程的形式化建模,并进一步从分布式系统角度分析了信息意义、信息意义的四种连接形态、多重信息意义和多层信息意义的形式化表示。
6.将“基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型”和“基于信息渠道理论的信息实现过程形式化模型”相结合应用于本体的交互和进化研究。首先通过分析海德格尔的本体论获取了本体与释义之间的关系,认为本体的本质问题就是解释问题;然后分析了知识工程中本体交互和进化现象,进一步说明了无论本体的交互与进化都涉及交流问题,而这种交流是人们通过对数据的信息内容的解读而实现的,因此,认为基于释义学的信息实现机理可作为知识工程的本体进化、获取或实现的理论基础;利用基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型,应用信息渠道理论对基于主体间组合信息内容多对一的本体交互和进化进行了分析,获取了主体间交流的形式化框架和主体间组合信息内容多对一解释过程的建模步骤。最后,通过一实例详细展开了信息实现过程的半结构化模型和形式化模型在知识工程中的应用。
本论文的创新点和主要贡献有:
第一,通过分析各信息观点的哲学基础,提出:从“信息何被称为信息”出发通过信息、数据、意义三者之间关系的理解,才能真正理解信息的本质和处理信息的本质。特别是,经解释的具体活动和行为而得以创生新意义的,或者可实践创造的信息本质论,是新信息本质理论的关键点,这些都体现在信息的实现过程中,信息实现的过程也是信息意义解释的过程。
第二,通过分析信息系统中信息实现过程的基本特征和基本假设,选择利科释义学思想和海德格尔释义学思想相结合的释义学理论作为信息实现过程的哲学基础,抽取了信息实现过程的半结构化模型,突破了释义学理论在信息系统中的应用,也进一步系统化地展现和实现了Mingers的有关信息与意义之间的模拟数字化过程。
第三,从海德格尔的此在的分析出发理解信息意义、主体性意义和主体间性意义,完成现有信息本质研究中有关意义的论述,补充和完善了Floridi和Mingers的信息研究。
第四,以符号学为中介分析信息实现过程的基本问题,连接了基于释义学的信息实现过程半结构化模型和信息渠道理论间的关系,从而实现了信息实现过程的形式化分析。
第五,将信息实现机理作为知识工程的本体进化、获取或实现的理论基础;基于信息实现机理,构建了主体间组合信息内容多对一的解释过程,进一步扩展了本体进化和交互的研究。
The notion of 'information' is probably the most important and the most fundamental one for the discipline of information systems. Whether realising it or not, people's understanding of this notion guides and affects their theoretic study and application of information systems. However, there appear many inconsistent and often conflicting views and terms for information, data and meaning in the literature Such a situation seems to have resulted in the body of knowledge in this field being an inconsistent and confusing mixture. Thus far, there does not seem a systematic and convincing solution to the problem that the nature of information is elusive and extremely hard to handle. Therefore, any serious investigation into the nature of information would seem highly desirable and important both for theoretic research and practice.
The main topics that have been investigated and are to be reported in this thesis are as follows:
1. A new and helpful perspective and some crucial elements for understanding and processing information have been developed or identified. We absorb research results in information philosophy and take how to link various approaches to information as a starting point of our work. We analyze the basic philosophical foundations of these approaches in terms of relationships between information, data, and meaning and approaches to the nature of information, which constitute a two-dimension conceptual framework. This helps us further understand the state of the art of this field and arrive at a fundamental insight, namely the process of information realization is also a process that a knowledge worker takes to obtain meaning from what she/he observes through interpretation. The revelation of the mechanism whereby the impact of information is realized appears to the key to understand the nature of information.
2. We have chosen appropriate theoretical foundations for investigating this aforementioned mechanism and discovered the general process of information realization. The process of information realization is a process of interpretation, which results in meaning, and such a process belongs firmly to Hermeneutics. Moreover, such a process is also that of communication between people during which people understand one another and themselves. The process of communication is also that of understanding. Understanding between people embodies relationships between information, data and meaning, and at the same time, the latter enables the former. The existence of Information is independent of its receiver, but at the same time the reason why something is taken as information is because it has the potential to inform the receiver in that it would result in the reduction of some uncertainty that is relevant to her/him. And this can only be realized through certain relationships of information to data and meaning. That is, information is fundamentally associated with people. Based on this view, taking into account the basic characteristics of information systems, we choose hermeneutic thinking as the theoretical foundation for our investigation. As a result, a general process including its elements and stages is identified and a semi-structured model developed.
3. We have investigated basic forms of the meaning of information. How to obtain meaning through interpretation is the key to understand and process information. If meaning is created through interpretation, which is what we mean by 'information realization', then how does it happen? What is the nature of inter-subject meaning and subject meaning? We have not found systematic study in the literature on these questions thus far. We observe that meaning is only valuable to the interpreter, whom we call knowledge worker who is skilled in handling information. Interpreters, i.e., people, are of the topic of "Existence and Time" by Heiderger. We draw on Heiderger's work on 'being' to investigate the structure and essential characteristics of information realization with which to understand the essence of inter-subjective meaning and subjective meaning, to analyze links between information and data, and finally to use Galois lattice and formal context to visualize the meaning of information.
4. We have further discussed the meaning of information that is based on data, and we have analyzed the relationship between data, information and meaning. We analyze four basic relationships between information and dada based by using formal context, namely, fully matched, the first partly matched, the second partly matched and unmatched, and obtain physical signification and their manifestation in meaning lattices. Dretske observes that an essential component for the notion of 'to know' is information provision. Following Dretske, we analyze information entropy of the four types of meaning. Then using the information entropy obtained, we look at how data convey information content, and how the types of meaning relate to different concepts in knowledge. Finally, we realize that uncertain knowledge is involved in all the above, therefore we further express the four types of meaning (i.e., four types of connections between information and data) by using Rough Set, which deepens our understanding of uncertain knowledge.
5. How the information realization process may be modeled formally was investigated. The semantic layer, the reflective layer and the ontological layer of the information realization process are all carried out on the basis of data. Hence relationships between multiple layers of the meaning of information and the information realization process are analyzed in terms of the characteristics of data. We analyze the information realization process by using semiotics, and take the view that the meaning of information be a double interpretative entity and has a systematic structure. How to interpret multiple meaning and multiple layers of meaning of information in an information realization process is transformed into questions that information theory covers, therefore we choose Barwise and Seligma's channel theory to model information realization process formally, and discuss formal representations of the meaning of information, four types of meaning, multiple meaning and multiple layers of meaning from the perspective of distributed systems.
6. The semi-structured model based on Hermeneutics and the formal model based on information channel theory about information realization process were combined and then applied to the problem of ontological interoperability and evolution. By using Heidegger's ontologism, we obtain the relationship between ontology and Hermeneutics, analyze the phenomenon of ontological interoperability and evolution in knowledge engineering. We observe that the problem of ontological interoperability and evolution is that of communication, and communication is realized through people's interpretation and attainment of information content from data. Thus the mechanism of information realization based on Hermeneutics is a theoretic foundation for ontological evolution, attainment and realization in knowledge engineering. We use the semi-structured model of information realization process, we apply information channel theory to the analysis of ontological interoperability and evolution, which are based on many-to-one correspondences of information content between human subjects, we obtain a formal framework about communication between human subjects and the modeling steps about an interpretation process of many-to-one correspondences of information content between human subjects. Finally, we describe a case study where the semi-structured model and the formal model of information realization process are applied to knowledge engineering.
The main contributions of the thesis:
1. By analyzing the philosophical bases of various views of information, we conclude that through understanding relationships between information, data and meaning, we can truly understand the nature of information. Especially, new meanings are created through interpretation activities, behavior or by practice, which are crucial points of this thesis. We demonstrate that the process of information realization is also that of interpretation of the meaning of information.
2. By analyzing basic characteristics and assumptions of the process of information realization, we choose Heidegger's Hermeneutics combined with Ricoeur's Hermeneutics as the basis and formulate a semi-structural model of information realization. This represents an extention of current application of the hermeneutical theory to information systems. This also systematically elaborates the digitalization process that underlies the transformation from information to meaning as obversed by Mingers.
3. We have achieved a better understanding of the meaning of information, subjective meaning and inter-subjective meaning by drawing on Heiderger's analysis of 'being'. We expand the study of meaning in contemporary studies on the nature of information, which we believe, supplements and improves Floridi's and Mingers' studies on information.
4. We analyze the fundamentals of the process of information realization by drawing on principles of semiotics, which serves as a link between the aforementioned semi-structural model of information realization and the information channel theory. As a result, we have arrived at a formal analysis of information realization.
5. Based on the mechanism for information realization that we have formulated, we have built a 'many to one' interpretation process for combing information content, which we believe extends current research reported on ontology evolution and interoperability in knowledge engineering.
引文
[1]Benbasat,I.,and Zmud,R.W."The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline:Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties," MIS Quarterly(27:2),June 2003,pp.183-194.
[2]Weber,R."Research commentary:Diversity in information systems research:Threat,promise,and responsibility," Information Systems Joural(5:3),1995,pp.203-223.
[3]Weber,R."Toward a Theory of Artifacts:A Paradigmatic Basis for Information Systems Research," The Journal of Information Systems(1:2),1987,pp.3-19.
[4]Weber,R."Still Desperately the IT Artifact—Editor's Comments," MIS Quarterly(27:2),June 2003,pp.Ⅲ-Ⅺ.
[5]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."Toward a Theory of the Deep Structure of Information Systems," in Proceedings of the 11~(th)International Conference on Information Systems,Copenhagen,Denmark,December 1990,pp.16-19.
[6]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."An Ontological Analysis of Some Fundamental Information Systems Concepts," in Proceedings of the 9~(th)International Conference on Information Systems,Minneapolis,MN,Nov 30-Dec 3,1988
[7]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."Research Commentary:Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling----A Research Agenda," Information Systems Research,Vol.13,No.4,2002,pp.363-376.
[8]Davis,G.B."Strategies for Information Requirements Determination," IBM Systems Journal 21,1982,pp.4-30
[9]Boehm,B.W.Software Engineering Economics.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1981
[10]Floridi,L.2002," What is the Philosophy of Information? ",Metaphilosophy,33.1-2,2002,pp.123-145.
[11]Floridi,L.Is Information Meaningful Data?.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2005, 70.2, 351-370.
[12]Floridi, L. Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell, 2004.
[13]Lewis, P. "The decision making basis for information systems: the contribution of Vickers' concept of appreciation to a soft systems perspective," European Journal of Information Systems, 1, 1991, p.33-43.
[14]Stampr, R., 1973, information in Business and Administration Systems. Batsford, London.
[15]Stamper, R. Organisation Semiotics. In Information Systems: an Emerging Discipline?[M], edt. Mingers,J. and Stowell F. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 1997, p.267-283.
[16]Mingers, J. 1995. Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account, Info Systems J, 5, 285-306.
[17]Mingers.J. Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization, 11(2001), 103.-128.
[18]Mingers.J. Realizing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2004), 87-103.
[19]Davis, G. and Olsont, M. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1985, p.200
[20]Mylopoulos, J. "Information modeling in the time of the revolution," Information Systems, Vol.23, No.3/4, 1998, pp.127-155
[21]Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., and Lyytinen, K. Information systems development and data modeling, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[22]Boland, R.J, Jr. " The In-formation of Information Systems," in Critical Issues in InformationSystems Research, Edited by R.J.Boland Jr. and R.A.Hirschheim, John Wiley & Sons LTD, 1987, chapter 14, pp.363-379.
[23]Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems—Making Sense of the field. John Wiley &Sons Ltd. ,1998, pp.88
[24] Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester., 1990, pp.303
[25]Liu Kecheng.Semiotics in information Systems Engineering,University of Cambridge Press,2000.
[26]岳剑波.信息管理基础,清华大学出版社,1999.
[27]邬焜.信息哲学.[M]商务印书馆,2005.
[28]Dretske,F.I.1981.Knowledge and the Flow of Information,Oxford,Basil Blackwell
[29]Barwise.J.and Seligman.J.Information Flow—the logic of distributed systems.Cambridge University Press,1997.
[30]Bar-Hillel,Y.and Carnap,R.1953,"An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information",rep.in Bar-Hillel 1964,pp.221-274.
[31]Mingers,J.A review of the Soft Systems Methodology and Information Systems Seminar,Warwick University,25th March 1992.Systemist,14,3,79-81.
[32]Mingers,J.SSM and information systems:an overview.Systemist,14,3,1992,pp.82-88.
[33]Boland,R.J.Jr.Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process.In Information Systems Research:Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions,edt.Hans-Erik Nissen,Heinz K.Klein,Rudy Hirschheim.1991,pp.439-458
[34]张汝伦.意义的探究——当代西方释义学.辽宁出版社,1985.
[35]Heidegger,M.Being and Time,Basil Blackwell,Oxford,1962.
[36]海德格尔著.陈嘉映,王庆节译.存在与时间.三联书店,1986.
[37]Gadamer,H.Truth and Method,Translated by Barden,G.and Cumming,J.Seabury Press,New York,1975.
[38]Gadamer,H.Philosophical Hermeneutics,University of California Press,Berkeley,CA,1976.
[39]Ricoeur,P.The Conflict of Interpretations:Essays in Hermeneutics,Northwestern University Press,Evanston,1974.
[40]Ricoeur,P."Hermeneutics:Restoration of Meaning or Reduction of Illusion?" in Critical Sociology,Selected Readings,P.Connerton(ed.),Penguin Books Ltd,Harmondsworth,1976,pp.194-203.
[41]Ricoeur,P.Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1981.
[42]Heidegger,M.The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays.Harper Torchbooks,New York,1977.
[43]冈特.绍伊博尔德著.宋祖亮译.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.中国社会科学出版社,1998.11.
[44]倪梁康著.现象学及其效应——胡塞尔与当代德国哲学.三联书店,1994.10.
[45]埃德蒙德.胡塞尔著.克劳斯.黑尔德编.倪梁康译.现象学的方法.上海译文出版社,1985.
[46]斯蒂芬.哈格等.信息时代的管理信息系统(第二版).北京:机械工业出版社,2000,6.
[47]Pernelle.N.,Marie-Christine Rousset,Henry Soldano,Veronique Ventos.ZooM:a nested Galois lattices-based system for conceptual clustering.Journal of Experimental Information Systems meet Description Logics.Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases(KRDB'99):46-49.
[54]Prediger.S.,Wille.R.The Lattice of Concept Graphs of a Relationally Scaled Context.Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures,ICCS'99:401-414
[55]Priss,U.(1997).A Graphical Interface for Document Retrieval Based on Formal Concept Analysis.In E.Santos(Ed.),Proceedings of the 8th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference.AAAI Technical Report CF-97-01,66-70.
[56]Priss,U.(1998).Relational Concept Analysis:Semantic Structures in Dictionaries and Lexical Databases,(PhD Thesis).Aachen:Shaker,1998.
[57]Priss,U.(2000).Lattice-based Information Retrieval.Knowledge Organization,27,3,132-142.
[58]Priss,U.A Triadic Model of Information Flow.In:Proceedings of the 9~(th)International Conference on Conceptual Structures,Stanford,C.A,.USA,August 2001
[59]Priss.U.Formal Concept Analysis in Information Science.http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/arist.pdf,2006-12-16.
[60]Ganter.B.and Wille.R.(1999).Formal Concept Analysis.Mathematical Foundations,Springer Verlag.
[61]Ganter.B and Wille.R.Applied Lattice Theory:Formal Concept Analysis.http://www.math.tu-dresden.de/～ganter/psfiles/concept.ps.
[62]史忠植著.知识发现.清华大学出版社,2002,1.
[63]刘清著.Rough集及Rough推理.科学出版社,2001.
[64]李幼蒸.理论符号学导论.中国社会科学出版社,1992.
[65]Devlin.K.Logic and Information.Cambridge University Press,1995.
[66]Cimiano.P,Andreas Hotho,Gerd Stumme,Julien Tane.Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies.Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis,ICFCA 2004:189-207
[67]Kalfoglou.Y.,Schorlemmer.W.M.Formal Support for Representing and Automating Semantic Interoperability.First European Semantic Web Symposium,ESWS 2004:45-60.
[68]Kalfoglou.Y.,Schorlemmer.W.M.IF-Map:An Ontology-Mapping Method Based on Information-Flow Theory.Journal on Data Semantics I,(2003):98-127.
[69]金芝.基于本体的需求自动获取.计算机学报,2000,23(5),pp.486-492.
[70]陆汝钤,金芝,陈刚.面向本体的需求分析.软件学报,2000,11(8),pp.1009-1017.
[71]金芝,陆汝钤,David A.Bell.多范例自动需求建模和分析一种基于本体的方法.中国科学(E辑),2003,33(4),pp.297-113.
[72]陆汝钤主编.世纪之交的知识工程与知识科学.清华大学出版社,2001,9.
[73]Neches,R.,Fikes,RE.,Finin,T.,Gruber,TR.,Senator,T.and Swartout,WR.Enabling technology for knowledge sharing.AI Magazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
[74]Gruber.T.R.Ontolingua:A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.Knowledge Acquisition,1993,5(2),199-200.
[75]Gruber.T.R.Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing.Int.J.Human-Computer Studies,1995,43:907-928
[76]Studer,R.,Benjamins,VR.and Fensel,D.Knowledge engineering,principles and methods.Data and knowledge Engineering,1998,25(1-2):161-197.
[77]Kent R.E.The Information Flow Foundation for Conceptual Knowledge Organization.In:Dynamism and Stability in Knowledge Organization.Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference.Advances in Knowledge Organization 7(2000)111-117.Ergon Verlag,Wurzburg.
[78]Kent,R.E.The information Flow Framework.Starter document for IEEE P1600.1,the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology working Group, http://suo.ieee.org/IFF/.2001.
[79]Kent, R. E The IFF Approach to Semantic Integration. Presentation at the Boeing Mini-Workshop on Semantic Integration, 7 November 2002b.
[80]Kent, R.E. Distributed Conceptual Structures. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Relational Methods in Computer Science (RelMiCS 6). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2561.,2000a.Springer, Berlin.
[81]Artz. J.. "A crash course on metaphysics for the database designer". Journal of database management 8(4):25-30,1997
[82]Baader. F., Nutt. W. Basic Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 47-100.
[83]Baader. F. and Sattler. U. An Overview of Tableau Algorithms for Description Logics. Studia Logica, 69:5-40, 2001
[84]Banseler,J., and Bodker, K. "A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context," ACM Transactions on Information Systems(11:2), 1993,pp.165-193.
Banville,C. and Landy,M. "Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined?," Communications of the ACM(32:1), 1989, pp.48-60.
[85]Batini, C, Ceri, S., and Navathe, S.B. Conceptual Database Design: An Eentity-relationship Approach Redwood City in Calif, Benjamin/Cummings, 1992.
[86]Batra, D., Hoffer, J.A. and Bostrom, R.P. "A Comparison of User Performance Between the Relational and the Extended Entity Relationship Models in the Discovery Phase of Database Design, " Communications of the ACM (23,2), February, 1990, pp. 126-139.
[87]
[88]R.J. Boland,Jr. and R.A. Hirschheim. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1987.
[89]Borgida. A., Brachman. R. J. Conceptual Modelling with Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, RF. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 359-381.
[90]Borgida. A. 'On the relative expressive power of Description Logics and Predicate Calculus', Artificial Intelligence 82 (1996) 353-367.
[91]Borgida A. Lenzerini M., Rosati. R. Description Logics for Databases. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 472-494.
[92]Borgida A. 'Description Logics in Data Management', IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering vol.7, No. 5, October 1995, pages 671-682.
[93]Borgmann A. Holding on to reality-the nature of information at the turn of the millennium. The University of Chicago Press , Chicago and London, Publeshed 1999.
[94]Buchheit, M., Jeusfeld, M., Nutt, W., Staudt, M., 'Subsumption between Queries to Object-Oriented Databases', Information Systems, pp 33-54, January 1994.
[95]Buchheit. M. Terminological Cycles: Semantics and Computational Properties. Principles of Semantic Networks, ed. by John F. Sowa, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991, p.331-362.
[96]Buchheit. M., Francesco M. Donini and Andrea Schaerf. Decidable Reasoning in Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993),pp. 704-709.
[97]Buchheit. M., Francesco M. Donini, W. Nutt and Andrea Schaerf. A Refined Architecture for Terminological Systems: Terminology=Schema+Views. Artif. Intell. 99(2): 209-260 (1998).
[98]Brachman. R., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Resnick, L., Borgida, A.. Living with CLASSIC: When and how to use a KL-ONE-like language. In: Principles of Semantic Networks, edited by John Sowa, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pages 401-456.
[99]Brachman Ronald J., James G. Schmolze. An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science 9(2):171-216,1985.
[100] Calvanese D., Lenzerini M., Nardi D. 'Description Logics for Conceptual Data Modeling', Logics for Databases and Information Systems, J. Chomicki and G. Saake eds., Kluwer, 1998, pages 229-263.
[101] Calvanese. D., Giacomo. G. D., Lenzerini. M., and Nardi.D. 'Reasoning in expressive description logics', in: A. Robinson and A. Voronkov, editors, Handbook of Automated Reasoning. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 2001, pages 1581-1634.
[102] Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K. and Siau, K.L. "Conceptual Level Versus Logical Level User-Database Interaction," in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems, New York, Dec. 1991, pp. 29-40
[103] Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. "A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems," Communications of the A CM (31:11), 1988, PP. 1268-1287.
[104] Davis, GB. Strategies for Information Requirements Determination[J]. IBM Systems Journal 21,1982,pp.4-30
[105] Dearden,J. "MIS Is a Mirage," Harvard Business Review(50:1), 1972, pp.90-99.
[106] Denning, PJ. "A New Social Contract for Research," Communications of the ACM (40:2), February 1997, pp. 591-624.
[107] Donini, F., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A., 'Reasoning in Description Logics', in: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, edited by G. Brewka; Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CLSI Publications, pp 193-238, 1996.
[108] Donini. F. Complexity of Reasoning. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 101-141.
[109] Drucker, P.F. "The Coming of the New Organization," Harvard Business Review (66:1), Jan-Feb, 1988, pp.45-53.
[110] Drucker, RF. "The New Productivity Challenge," Harvard Business Review (69:6), Nov-Dec, 1991, pp.45-53.
[111] Ebbinghaus. H. D., Flum.J., Thomas. W. Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, 1984. (A rigorous book; chapters 1, 2 and 3)
[112] EI Sawy, O., and Pauchant, T. "Triggers, Templates and Twitches in the Tracking of Emerging Strategic Issues," Strategic Management Journal (9), 1988, pp. 445-473.
[113] Ein-Dor, P. "An Epistemological Approach to the Theory of Information Systems," in Proceedings of the 18~(th) Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Honolulu, Hawai, November 1986, pp.563-565.
[114] Elizabeth J. Davidson. Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination. MIS Quarterly (26:4), December 2002, pp. 329-358.
[115] Enderton. H. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press, 2001. (A rigorous book; chapters 1 and 2 up to 2.6)
[116] Ferre, F. Philosophy of Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice Hall, 1988.
[117] Flynn, D. 1998. Information Systems Requirements: Determination & Analysis 2nd edn. London, McGraw-Hill.
[118] Galton.A. Logic for Information Technology. Wiley, 1990. (Simple but too verbose; chapters 1 to 6)
[119] Gorry, GA. and Scott-Morton, M.A. "A Framework for Management Information Systems," Sloan Management Review, October 1971, pp.55-70.
[120] Guarino, N. Understanding, building and using ontologies. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 1995, 46:293-310.
[121] G. Van Heijst, A. TH. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga. Using explicit ontogies in KBS development. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 1997, 45:183-292.
[122] Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. "Design Science in Information Systems Research.," MIS Quarterly, (28:1), March 2004, pp.75-105.
[123] Hartmanis, J. and Lin, H. Computing the Future: A Broader Agenda for Computer Science and Engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1992.
[124] Hintikka, J. and P. Suppes 1970, Information and inference (Dordrecht: Reidel) (important collection of philosophical essays on information theory, graduate level).
[125] Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., and Lyytinen, K. "Exploring the intellectual Structures of Information Systems Development: A Social Action Theoretic Perspective," Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (6:1/2).1996,pp.1-64.
[126] Hollunder, B., Nutt, W., 'Subsumption Algorithms for Concept Languages', DFKI report, RR-90-04, Saarbruecken Germany, 1990; extended version of a previously published paper in proc. ECAI'90, pp 348-353.
[127] Ihde. D. Technics and Praxis. D.Reidel Publishing Company, 1979. p. 104
[128] Ives, B., Hamilton, S. and Davis, GB. "A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems," Management Science (26:9), September 1980, pp. 910-934.
[129] Izak Benbasat. "The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties," MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. 183-194.
[130] Jenkins, M.A. "Research Methodologies and MIS Research," in Mumford, E., et.al.(eds) Research Methodologies in Information Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland), 1985, pp. 103-117.
[131] Keen, Peter G.W.(1980) "Reference Displines and a Cumulative Tradition," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, December 1980, pp.9-18.
[132] Kent, W. Data and Reality, North Holland, 1978.
[133] Kent, W. "Limitations of Record-based Information Models", ACM Transactions on Database Systems (4:1), March 1979, pp. 107-131.
[134] Kelly.J. The Essence of Logic. Prentice Hall, 1997. (The simplest book to learn the basics of logic; chapters 1, 2, (4), 6, (7) and 8)
[135] Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1970.
[136] Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, GL. and Zytkow, J.M. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1987.
[137] Lenat D.B and Feiganbaum E.A. On the Thresholds of Knowledge. Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint of Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI-87), 1173-1182, 1987
[138] Levesque.H. J. and Brachman. R. J. Expressiveness and tractability in knowledge representation and reasoning. Computational Intelligence journal 3, 78-93 (1987).
[139] Loucopoulos, P., and Zicari, R. 1992. Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and CASE - An Integrated View of Information Systems Development. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[140] Lucas D. Introna and Fernando M. Ilharco. The ontological screening of contemporary life: a phenomenological analysis of screens. European Journal of Information Systems(2004) 13, 221-234.
[141] Madnick, S.E. "The Challenge: To Be Part of the Solution Instead of Being Part of the Problem," in Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop on Information Technology, Dallas Texas, December 1992, pp. 12-13.
[142] March, S. T., and Smith, G. "Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology," Decision Support Systems (15:4), December 1995, pp. 251-266.
[143] Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. "A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Process," MIS Quarterly (26:3), September, 2002, pp. 179-212
[144] Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. "A Program for Research on Management Information Systems, " Management Science, January 1973, pp.475-485.
[145] Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2~(nd) ed.SAGE Publications, Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, 1994
[146] Mendelson. E. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Chapman and Hall, 1997. (Not my favourite; chapters 1 and 2)
[147] Mumford.E., Hirschheim.R., Fitzgerald.G. and Trevor Wood-Harper. Research Methods in Information Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1985.
[148] Hand-Erik Nissen, Heinz K.Klein and Rudy Hirschheim. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991
[149] Nardi.D., Brachman. R. J. An Introduction to Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 5-44.
[150] Nardi. D., Sattler.U., D. Calvanese, R. Molitor. Relationships with other formalisms. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 142-183.
[151] Nardi D., Brachman. R. J. An Introduction to Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 5-44.
[152] Nebel. B. Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 422, Springer-Verlag, 1990. Chapters 1 -6.
[153] Nebel.B. and Smolka. G. Attributive Description Formalisms... and the rest of the world. In C. Rollinger O. Herzog, editor, Text Understanding in LILOG, LNAI 546. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1991, pages 439-452.
[154] Norman, D.A. "Cognitive Engineering," in Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W.(eds), User Centred System Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp.31-61.
[155] Old L J, Priss U. Metaphor and Information Flow. In: Proceedings of the 12~(th) Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, Ohio, April 2001.
[156] Orlikowski, W., and Gash, D. "Technology Frames: Making Science of Information Technology in Organizations," ACM Transactions on Information Systems (12:2), 1994, pp. 174-207.
[157] Parsons, J. and Wand, Y. "Guidelines for Evaluating Classes in Data Modelling," in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas TX, December 1992, pp. 1-8
[158] Pawlak Z. Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1982, 11:341-356.
[159] Pawlak Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
[160] Rathswohl, E.J. Applying Don Idhe's Phenomenology of Instrumentation as a Framework for Designing Research in Information Science. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, edt. Hans-Erik Nissen, Heinz K. Klein, Rudy Hirschheim. 1991, pp.421-43 8
[161] Robey, D. "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Opportunity, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research (7:4), 1996, pp.400-408.
[162] Schaerf, A., 'Reasoning with individuals in concept languages', Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol 13(2), pp 141-176, 1994.
[163] Schild. K. 'A correspondence theory for terminological logics: preliminary report', IJCAI-91, pp 466-471, October 1991.
[164] Schild K. "Tractable reasoning in a universal description logic', Proceedings of 1st Workshop KRDB'94, Saarbrucken, Germany, September 20-22, 1994.
[165] Schorlemmer M, Kalfoglou Y. On Semantic Interoperability and the Flow of Information. ISWC'03 Workshop on Semantic Integration, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 2003.
[166] Shannon, CE. Collected Papers, ed. By N. J. A. Sloane and A. D. Wyner (Los Alamos, Ca: IEEE Computer Society Press), 1993
[167] Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial (2~(nd) ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
[168] Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial (3~(nd) ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
[169] Solvberg. A. A contribution to the definition of concepts for expressing users' information system requirements. Proceedings International Conference on the E-R Approach to Systems Analysis and Design(1979).
[170] Tichy,W. "Should Computer Scientists Experiment More?" IEEE Computer (31:5), May 1998, pp. 32-40.
[171] Tsichritzis, D. C, and Lochovsky, F. H. 1982. Data Models. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
[172] Tsichrizis, D. "The Dynamics of Innovation," in Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, PJ. Denning and R.m. Metcalfe(eds.), Copernicus Books, New York, 1998, pp. 259-265.
[173] Walls,J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., and ei Sawy, O.A. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," information Systems Research (3:1), March 1992, pp.36-59.
[174] Walz, D., Elam, J., and Curtis, B. "Inside a Software Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing, and Integration," Communications of the ACM (36:10), 1993, pp. 63-77.
[175] Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston,445-470.
[176] Wille, R. (1992). Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23, 493-515.
[177] Wille, R. (1997a). Conceptual landscapes of knowledge: a pragmatic paradigm for knowledge processing. In W., Gaul, & Locarek-Junge (Eds.), Classification in the Information Age. Berlin: Springer, 1999, 344-356.
[178] Wille, R. (1997b). Conceptual Graphs and Formal Concept Analysis. In D. Lukose, H. Delugach, M. Keeler, L. Searle, & J. F. Sowa (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream. Proc. ICCS'97. LNAI 1257. Berlin: Springer, 290-303.
[179] Wille, R. (1997c). Introduction to formal concept analysis. In G. Negrini (Ed.), Modelli e modellizzazione. Models and modelling. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Instituto di Studi sulli Ricerca e Documentazione Scientifica, Roma, 39-51.
[180] Wille, R. (2000a). Contextual logic summary. In G. Stumme (Ed.), Working with Conceptual Structures. Contributions to ICCS 2000. Aachen: Shaker, 265-276.
[181] Wille, R. (2000b). Boolean Concept Logic. In B. Ganter, & G. Mineau (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic and Computational Issues. LNAI 1867. Berlin: Springer, 317-331.
[182] Wille, R. (2001). Why Can Concept Lattices Support Knowledge Discovery in Databases? In E. Mephu Nguifo (Eds.), ICCS 2001 International Workshop on Concept Lattice-Based Theory, Methods and Tools for Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Stanford University, Palo Alto (CA), July 30th, 2001, 7-20.
[183] Wille, R. (2002). Existential Concept Graphs of Power Context Families. In U. Priss, D. Corbett, & G. Angelova (Eds.), Conceptual Structures Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. LNAI 2393, Berlin: Springer, 382-395.
[184] Wille, R. (2004). Preconcept Algebras and Generalized Double Boolean Algebras.In P. Eklund (Ed.), Concept Lattices: Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, LNCS 2961. Berlin: Springer, 1-13. Wolff, K. E. (1994). A first course in formal concept analysis - how to understand line diagrams. In F. Faulbaum (Ed.), SoftStat'93, Advances in statistical software, Volume 4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, 429-438.
[185] Wolff, K. E. (2004). Particles and Waves as Understood by Temporal Concept Analysis, In K. E. Wolff, H. Pfeiffer, & H. Delugach (Eds.), Conceptual Structures at Work:12th International Conference on Conceptual Structures.Berlin:Springer,126-141.
[186]Woods W.A.Important Issues in Knowledge Representation.Proceedings of the IEEE,Vol.74,No.10,1986
[187]Woods W.A.What's in a link:Foundations for semantic networks.In Representation and Understanding:Studies in Cognitive Science,ed.D.G.Bobrow and A.M.Collins.35-82.Academic Press.Republished in Brachman and Levesque 1985.
[188]Yao Y Y Concept lattices in rough set theory.Proceedings of the 23~(rd)International Meeting the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society,2004:796-801.
[189]Yao Y Y.Constructive and algebraic methods of theory of rough set approximation.Information Sciences,1998,1:239-259.
[190]Yao Y Y.Two views of the theory of rough sets in finite universe.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,1996,15:291-317.
[191]Zelkowitz,M.,and Wallace,D."Experimental Models for Validating Technology,"IEEE Computer(31:5),May 1998,pp.23-31.
[192]ZHANG Wenxiu,WEI Ling,QI Jianjun.Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept lattice.SCIENCE IN CHINA(INFORMATION SCIENCES),2005 Vol.48 No.6 P.713-726.
[193]泰奥多.德布尔著.李河译.胡塞尔思想的发展.三联书店,1995.4.
[194]陈波著.逻辑哲学导论.中国人民出版社,1999.
[195]H.G.伽达默尔著.王才勇译.真理与方法.辽宁人民出版社,1987.
[196]海德格尔著.陈嘉映,王庆节译.存在与时间.三联书店,1986.
[197]汉斯-格奥尔格.伽达默尔著.夏镇平,宋建平译.哲学解释学.上海译文出版社,2004,7.
[198]陆汝钤编著.人工智能(下).科学出版社,2000,6.
[199]斯皮格尔伯格著.王炳文,张金言译.现象学运动.北京:商务印书 馆,1981.
[200]陈嘉明著.知识与确证——当代知识论引论.上海人民出版社,2003,4.
[201]Kenneth H.Rosen.离散数学及其应用.机械工业出版社,2003,3.
[202]Timothy J.Ross 著.钱同惠,沈其聪,葛晓滨等译.模糊逻辑及其工程应用.电子工业出版社,2001,10
[203]高济.基于知识的软件智能化技术.浙江大学出版社,2000.1
[204]吕苗荣,古德生.对信息本质问题的探讨.系统科学学报,2007,15(1):13-17.
[205]严春友.宇宙统一于信息——答施启良先生.太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2007,6(1):11-18.
[206]郑成兴.基于FSM模型的信息系统生存性计算.计算机工程与应用,2007,43(2):1401-44.
[207]王德禄,李子祎.基于信息熵理论的网络组织结构分析.现代管理科学,2007年01期,pp.65-66.
[208]吴国仕,何所惧.内容全球化管理系统的设计与实现.北京航空航天大学学报,2007年02期,pp.233-237.
[209]陈源蒸.交流理论的形成、发展及其意义.国家图书馆学刊,2007年01期,pp.12-17.
[210]钟义信.从“统计”到“理解”,从“传输”到“认知”.电子学报,1998,126(7):1-8.
[211]钟义信.论“信息-知识-智能转换规律”.北京邮电大学学报,2007,30(1):1-8.
[212]朱婕,靖继鹏.基于“意义建构”之上的“信息差”理论及模型.图书情报知识,2006年01期,pp.57-61.
[213]王博涛,舒华英.基于自组织理论的信息系统演化研究.北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(1):43-47.
[214]陈颖仪.后网络时代信息系统的持续竞争能力.图书与情报,2006年01期,pp.88-90,95.
[215]童小英,易树平,杨文彩,丁婧.人-信息系统交互效率影响因素及其作用机理.重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(2):23-27.
[216]林雪纲,熊华,叶进星,许榕生.信息系统生存性分析研究综述.计算机工程,2006,32(5):1-3,6.
[217]吴德伟,戚君宜.基于信息论方法的军事电子信息系统综合.军事运筹与系统工程,2006,20(1):57-61.
[218]刘丹,谢益武.面向智能体的信息系统开发方法研究.计算机技术与发展,2006,16(3):101-103.
[219]邬焜.关于复杂信息系统理论研究的思考.江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,5(1):36-38.
[220]荣毅虹,田也壮,梁战平.基于信息交互模型的企业Web展示.情报科学,2006,24(4):603-606,611.
[221]
[222]余传明.一种新的信息系统——语义信息系统.情报理论与实践,2006年03期,pp.345-348.
[223]郭爱华.论数字信息的中心—用户结构模式.情报杂志,2006年06期,pp.30-32.
[224]何志兰.论信息系统的生态对称性.情报杂志,2006年06期,pp.92-94.
[225]孙铁昆,杨新轩.管理信息系统需求管理工具的研究与实现.计算机工程与设计,2006,27(12):2256-2258.
[226]
[227]杨晓光,邵海鹏,云美萍.交通语言系统结构.系统工程,2006,24(7):1-7.
[228]张肇富,熊健,李孟军.航天工程项目信息流分析与信息管理框架设计.华北航天工业学院学报,2006,16(4):1-2,5.
[229]张德喜,李晓宇.绝对信息量不完备信息系统的数据补齐算法.计算机工程与应用,2006年22期,pp.155-157,191.
[230]秦克云,杜卫锋.知识约简的逻辑特征.计算机工程与应用,2006年26期,pp.7-9.
[231]欧阳毅 姚莉 戴长华.面向信息系统需求的数据元提取方法研究.计算机工程,2006,32(18):42-44,47.
[232]施芸虹,涂耀旭,危辉,白宇.基于框架复合的语义限定.计算机应用,2006,(9):2031-2033.
[233]田忠和,尚军.通用社会信息采集系统分析与设计.计算机与数字工程,2006,34(9):117-119.
[234]杨亚罗,王润孝,库祥臣,王力刚.组态概念发展的新趋势.计算机应用研究,2006年09期,pp.13-17.
[235]蔡宏志.个性化信息推荐服务模式.情报杂志,2006年09期,pp.116-118,121.
[236]杨红,杨德礼,林正奎.目标驱动的复杂信息系统开发方法研究.计算机工程与设计,2006,27(18):3267-3372.
[237]袁新娣.本体及本体在信息系统中的应用.科技广场,2006年07期,pp.76-78.
[238]冯花朴.用户信息需求研究发展.图书情报工作,2006,50(2):40-44.
[239]石凤.图书馆知识管理应该引向知识点信息管理.图书馆杂志,2006,25(5):14-17.
[240]顾潇华,吴现杰.智力资源管理与信息管理、知识管理.中国图书馆学报,2005年05期,pp.34-36,40.
[241]刘广,戴昌钧.基于心理学视角的信息和知识界定的方法.图书情报工作,2005,49(12):57-60.
[242]汪社教.信息学本质与发展方向.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):51-54.
[243]刘廷元.现代科学信息交流的体系与服务模式.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):59-62.
[244]陈忆金.现代情报学的理论基础——信息哲学.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):55-58,62.
[245]曹锦丹,齐艳丽,刘春艳.网络空间信息表征与用户认知的交互作用机制.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):19-22,86.
[246]荆宁宁,程俊瑜.数据、信息、知识与智慧.情报科学,2005,23(12):1786-1790.
[247]毕新华,尚伟昌,徐杨.信息系统成长理论模型的比较分析.情报科学,2005,23(11):1601-1605.
[248]谢友才,胡汉辉.标准的哲学解析与技术创新.中国软科学,2005年10期,pp.95-99.
[249]沙勇忠,任立肖.网络用户信息查寻行为研究述评.图书情报工作,2005,49(1):128-132,111.
[250]赵静.信息商的提出:概念及内涵.图书情报工作,2005,49(1):26-28.
[251]张在昭.基于信息论的信息测度研究基础.情报杂志,2005年11期,pp.92-94.
[252]潘钦,刘春年.关于信息增值研究的若干问题.情报杂志,2005年11期,pp.88-89.
[253]吴国林.量子信息的本质探究.科学技术与辩证法,2005,22(6):32-35.
[254]仇国芳,陈劲.概念知识系统与概念信息粒格.工程数学学报,2005,22(6):963-969.
[255]李鸿儒,宋笑雪,魏平.信息系统诱导出的形式背景及其性质.工程数学学报,2005,22(6):971-974.
[256]张辑哲.论“信息所指”“信息所指对象”和“信息能指”的认识论价值.档案学通讯,2005年06期,pp.25-26.
[257]吴显中.再谈信息本质问题——兼与张辑哲老师商榷.档案学通讯,2005年06期,pp.27-30.
[258]刘启和,李凡,闵帆,叶茂,杨国纬.一种基于新的条件信息熵的高效知识约简算法.控制与决策,2005,20(8):878-882.
[259]周明,吴宝亮.主观信息的信息量表达方法研究.科技进步与对策,2005年07期,pp.56-58.
[260]陈文萍.论信息管理的过程控制机能.情报杂志,2005年07期,pp.71-73.
[261]袁志秀.从哲学视角看信息的中介属性.情报杂志,2005年07期,pp.67-68.
[262]牛德雄 武友新 江恭和.基于统一信息交换模型的信息交换研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年21期,pp.195-197,226.
[263]A.B.沃罗诺夫,文华摘译.信息化的前景:关于信息过程的科学和新的信息化方法及研制项目.国外社会科学,2005年04期,pp.38-41.
[264]姜璐.信息与符号信息.系统工程理论与实践,2005年05期,pp.136-138.
[265]汪洋.信息构建与知识管理的互动.情报理论与实践,2005,28(3):238-240.
[266]姚全珠,张志锋,任雪利,张作鹏.基于构件的信息系统形式化需求分析方法的研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年18期,pp.176-178,232.
[267]李鸿.基于条件信息量的知识相对约简算法.中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(3),pp.378-382,389.
[268]李金锋,黄崇福,宗恬.反精确现象与形式化研究.系统工程理论与实践,2005年04期,pp.128-132.
[269]黄兵,周献中,张蓉蓉.基于信息量的不完备信息系统属性约简.系统工程理论与实践,2005年04期,pp.55-60.
[270]曹志彤,朱蕾,方加忠.意识特性的理论框架.心理科学, 2005,28(2):416-419.
[271]王穗苹,迟毓凯,王瑞明,吴岩.不同性质语篇背景信息的激活与抑制.心理科学,2005,28(2):342-346.
[272]桑标,任真,邓赐平.自闭症儿童的心理理论与中心信息整合的关系探讨.心理科学,2005,28(2):295-299.
[273]魏辅轶,何源.IA“信息结构”与IA反馈机制.现代图书情报技术,2005年04期,pp.68-71.
[274]常宏宇.信息量和熵的关系.数学的实践与认识,2005,35(5):137-140.
[275]董明哲,张同军.基于信息语义的异构信息集成方法.计算机工程,2005,31(2):202-203,221.
[276]刘云生,彭建平.信息融合的研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年03期,pp.181-183.
[277]王虹,张文修,李鸿儒.粗糙模糊集的不确定性度量.计算机工程与应用.2005年02期,pp.51-52,186.
[278]
[279]林代茂,胡岚,郭云彪,周琳娜.广义信息隐藏技术的机理与模型.北京邮电大学学报,2005,28(1):1-5.
[280]吴顺明,张靖.信息构建与知识管理比较研究.情报杂志,2005年01期,pp.12-13,16.
[281]张洋,邱均平.网络信息计量学的兴起及其哲学思考.情报杂志,2005年01期,pp.2-5.
[282]林鸿飞,杨志豪,赵晶.基于内容和合作模式的信息推荐机制.中文信息学报,2005,19(1):48-55.
[283]邓自立,高媛.快速信息融合Kalman滤波器.控制与决策,2005,20(1):27-31.
[284]任衍具,禤宇明,傅小兰.视觉短时记忆与视知觉的信息整合.心理科 学进展,2007,15(2):301-307.
[285]牛盾,高志强.不同信息负荷下注意选择性研究.心理科学,2007,30(2):341-343,315.
[286]孙瑞英.信息异化问题的理性思考.情报科学,2007,25(3):340-344.
[287]王宝丽,梁吉业.信息系统中的知识距离与知识粗糙熵.计算机科学,2007,34(3):151-154.
[288]孙和平,丛杭青.信息哲学视域下的工程伦理媒介基础转换.自然辩证法研究,2007,23(1):64-67.
[289]刘桃,刘秉权,徐志明,王晓龙.领域术语自动抽取及其在文本分类中的应用.电子学报,2007,35(2):328-332.
[290]李卫华,李师贤.信息流理论及其应用研究.计算机科学,2006,33(7):11-15.
[291]俞立平.信息资源与知识传播处理机制的构建及比较研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006年12期,pp.101-105.
[292]毕新华,余翠玲.信息技术吸纳能力及其过程模型研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006年12期,pp.42-46.
[293]丁晟春,李岳盟,甘利人.基于顶层本体的领域本体综合构建方法研究.情报理论与实践,2007,30(2):236-240.
[294]李超,王兰成.应用领域本体的Web信息知识集成研究.情报科学,2007,25(3):430-434.
[295]贾秀玲,文敦伟.面向文本的本体学习研究概述.计算机科学,2007,34(2):181-185.
[296]王洪伟,伊磊,张元元.本体模型的逆向获取研究.计算机科学,2007,34(2):166-170.
[297]王洪伟,伊磊,王洪滨.面向关系模式的领域本体获取.计算机工程,2007,33(3):1-3,23.
[298]徐德智,肖文芳,王怀民.本体映射过程中的概念相似度计算.计算机 工程与应用,2007,43(9):167-169.
[299]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青,刘岩,吕腾,丁天怀.本体集成的研究.计算机工程,2007,33(2):4-5,33.
[300]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青,刘岩,吕腾,丁天怀.基于本体的协同知识交流模型.计算机工程,2007,33(2):158-162.
[301]岳静,张自力.本体表示语言研究综述.计算机科学,2006,33(2):158-162.
[302]周文,刘宗田,陈慧琼.FCA与本体结合研究的综述.计算机科学,2006,33(2):8-12.
[303]黄美丽,刘宗田.基于形式概念分析的领域本体构建方法研究.计算机科学,2006,33(1):210-212,239.
[304]马妮,韩秋红.20世纪西方哲学本体论研究概述.学习与探索,2006年06期,pp.19-23.
[305]高英,郭荷清,邹智敏.分布式环境下领域本体的自动提取.计算机科学,2006,33(12):164-168,186.
[306]章远,李师贤.基于范畴论的形式化本体研究.计算机科学,2006,33(9):1-3,117.
[307]何扬帆,何克清,王翀.一种支持可靠的语义互操作的本体管理方法.计算机工程与应用,2006年34期,pp.8-9,25.
[308]马文峰,杜小勇.领域本体进化研究.图书情报工作,2006,50(6):71-75.
[309]邓卫华,易明.基于本体的知识共享研究.图书情报工作,2006,50(4):56-59.
[310]杜小勇,李曼,王珊.本体学习研究综述.软件学报,2006,17(9):1837-1847.
[311]徐剑波,王仁武,陈家训.基于本体的概念辨析.现代图书情报技术,2006年06期,pp.34-38.
[312]杨明华,钱乐秋,赵文耘,彭鑫.特定领域本体的构造方法.计算机工程, 2006,32(11):80-82.
[313]谌群芳.基于本体的内容管理模式探讨.图书馆论坛,2006,26(2):75-77.
[314]沈洁,罗建利.基于多Agent系统的分布式知识管理研究.系统工程理论与实践,2006年01期,pp.42-47.
[315]梁启华,何晓红.基于本体论的企业隐性知识转化与共享系统框架.情报科学,2006,24(1):84-87.
[2]Weber,R."Research commentary:Diversity in information systems research:Threat,promise,and responsibility," Information Systems Joural(5:3),1995,pp.203-223.
[3]Weber,R."Toward a Theory of Artifacts:A Paradigmatic Basis for Information Systems Research," The Journal of Information Systems(1:2),1987,pp.3-19.
[4]Weber,R."Still Desperately the IT Artifact—Editor's Comments," MIS Quarterly(27:2),June 2003,pp.Ⅲ-Ⅺ.
[5]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."Toward a Theory of the Deep Structure of Information Systems," in Proceedings of the 11~(th)International Conference on Information Systems,Copenhagen,Denmark,December 1990,pp.16-19.
[6]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."An Ontological Analysis of Some Fundamental Information Systems Concepts," in Proceedings of the 9~(th)International Conference on Information Systems,Minneapolis,MN,Nov 30-Dec 3,1988
[7]Wand,Y.and Weber,R."Research Commentary:Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling----A Research Agenda," Information Systems Research,Vol.13,No.4,2002,pp.363-376.
[8]Davis,G.B."Strategies for Information Requirements Determination," IBM Systems Journal 21,1982,pp.4-30
[9]Boehm,B.W.Software Engineering Economics.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1981
[10]Floridi,L.2002," What is the Philosophy of Information? ",Metaphilosophy,33.1-2,2002,pp.123-145.
[11]Floridi,L.Is Information Meaningful Data?.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2005, 70.2, 351-370.
[12]Floridi, L. Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell, 2004.
[13]Lewis, P. "The decision making basis for information systems: the contribution of Vickers' concept of appreciation to a soft systems perspective," European Journal of Information Systems, 1, 1991, p.33-43.
[14]Stampr, R., 1973, information in Business and Administration Systems. Batsford, London.
[15]Stamper, R. Organisation Semiotics. In Information Systems: an Emerging Discipline?[M], edt. Mingers,J. and Stowell F. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 1997, p.267-283.
[16]Mingers, J. 1995. Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account, Info Systems J, 5, 285-306.
[17]Mingers.J. Embodying information systems: the contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization, 11(2001), 103.-128.
[18]Mingers.J. Realizing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2004), 87-103.
[19]Davis, G. and Olsont, M. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1985, p.200
[20]Mylopoulos, J. "Information modeling in the time of the revolution," Information Systems, Vol.23, No.3/4, 1998, pp.127-155
[21]Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., and Lyytinen, K. Information systems development and data modeling, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[22]Boland, R.J, Jr. " The In-formation of Information Systems," in Critical Issues in InformationSystems Research, Edited by R.J.Boland Jr. and R.A.Hirschheim, John Wiley & Sons LTD, 1987, chapter 14, pp.363-379.
[23]Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems—Making Sense of the field. John Wiley &Sons Ltd. ,1998, pp.88
[24] Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester., 1990, pp.303
[25]Liu Kecheng.Semiotics in information Systems Engineering,University of Cambridge Press,2000.
[26]岳剑波.信息管理基础,清华大学出版社,1999.
[27]邬焜.信息哲学.[M]商务印书馆,2005.
[28]Dretske,F.I.1981.Knowledge and the Flow of Information,Oxford,Basil Blackwell
[29]Barwise.J.and Seligman.J.Information Flow—the logic of distributed systems.Cambridge University Press,1997.
[30]Bar-Hillel,Y.and Carnap,R.1953,"An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information",rep.in Bar-Hillel 1964,pp.221-274.
[31]Mingers,J.A review of the Soft Systems Methodology and Information Systems Seminar,Warwick University,25th March 1992.Systemist,14,3,79-81.
[32]Mingers,J.SSM and information systems:an overview.Systemist,14,3,1992,pp.82-88.
[33]Boland,R.J.Jr.Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process.In Information Systems Research:Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions,edt.Hans-Erik Nissen,Heinz K.Klein,Rudy Hirschheim.1991,pp.439-458
[34]张汝伦.意义的探究——当代西方释义学.辽宁出版社,1985.
[35]Heidegger,M.Being and Time,Basil Blackwell,Oxford,1962.
[36]海德格尔著.陈嘉映,王庆节译.存在与时间.三联书店,1986.
[37]Gadamer,H.Truth and Method,Translated by Barden,G.and Cumming,J.Seabury Press,New York,1975.
[38]Gadamer,H.Philosophical Hermeneutics,University of California Press,Berkeley,CA,1976.
[39]Ricoeur,P.The Conflict of Interpretations:Essays in Hermeneutics,Northwestern University Press,Evanston,1974.
[40]Ricoeur,P."Hermeneutics:Restoration of Meaning or Reduction of Illusion?" in Critical Sociology,Selected Readings,P.Connerton(ed.),Penguin Books Ltd,Harmondsworth,1976,pp.194-203.
[41]Ricoeur,P.Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1981.
[42]Heidegger,M.The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays.Harper Torchbooks,New York,1977.
[43]冈特.绍伊博尔德著.宋祖亮译.海德格尔分析新时代的技术.中国社会科学出版社,1998.11.
[44]倪梁康著.现象学及其效应——胡塞尔与当代德国哲学.三联书店,1994.10.
[45]埃德蒙德.胡塞尔著.克劳斯.黑尔德编.倪梁康译.现象学的方法.上海译文出版社,1985.
[46]斯蒂芬.哈格等.信息时代的管理信息系统(第二版).北京:机械工业出版社,2000,6.
[47]Pernelle.N.,Marie-Christine Rousset,Henry Soldano,Veronique Ventos.ZooM:a nested Galois lattices-based system for conceptual clustering.Journal of Experimental Information Systems meet Description Logics.Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases(KRDB'99):46-49.
[54]Prediger.S.,Wille.R.The Lattice of Concept Graphs of a Relationally Scaled Context.Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures,ICCS'99:401-414
[55]Priss,U.(1997).A Graphical Interface for Document Retrieval Based on Formal Concept Analysis.In E.Santos(Ed.),Proceedings of the 8th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference.AAAI Technical Report CF-97-01,66-70.
[56]Priss,U.(1998).Relational Concept Analysis:Semantic Structures in Dictionaries and Lexical Databases,(PhD Thesis).Aachen:Shaker,1998.
[57]Priss,U.(2000).Lattice-based Information Retrieval.Knowledge Organization,27,3,132-142.
[58]Priss,U.A Triadic Model of Information Flow.In:Proceedings of the 9~(th)International Conference on Conceptual Structures,Stanford,C.A,.USA,August 2001
[59]Priss.U.Formal Concept Analysis in Information Science.http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/arist.pdf,2006-12-16.
[60]Ganter.B.and Wille.R.(1999).Formal Concept Analysis.Mathematical Foundations,Springer Verlag.
[61]Ganter.B and Wille.R.Applied Lattice Theory:Formal Concept Analysis.http://www.math.tu-dresden.de/～ganter/psfiles/concept.ps.
[62]史忠植著.知识发现.清华大学出版社,2002,1.
[63]刘清著.Rough集及Rough推理.科学出版社,2001.
[64]李幼蒸.理论符号学导论.中国社会科学出版社,1992.
[65]Devlin.K.Logic and Information.Cambridge University Press,1995.
[66]Cimiano.P,Andreas Hotho,Gerd Stumme,Julien Tane.Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies.Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis,ICFCA 2004:189-207
[67]Kalfoglou.Y.,Schorlemmer.W.M.Formal Support for Representing and Automating Semantic Interoperability.First European Semantic Web Symposium,ESWS 2004:45-60.
[68]Kalfoglou.Y.,Schorlemmer.W.M.IF-Map:An Ontology-Mapping Method Based on Information-Flow Theory.Journal on Data Semantics I,(2003):98-127.
[69]金芝.基于本体的需求自动获取.计算机学报,2000,23(5),pp.486-492.
[70]陆汝钤,金芝,陈刚.面向本体的需求分析.软件学报,2000,11(8),pp.1009-1017.
[71]金芝,陆汝钤,David A.Bell.多范例自动需求建模和分析一种基于本体的方法.中国科学(E辑),2003,33(4),pp.297-113.
[72]陆汝钤主编.世纪之交的知识工程与知识科学.清华大学出版社,2001,9.
[73]Neches,R.,Fikes,RE.,Finin,T.,Gruber,TR.,Senator,T.and Swartout,WR.Enabling technology for knowledge sharing.AI Magazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
[74]Gruber.T.R.Ontolingua:A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.Knowledge Acquisition,1993,5(2),199-200.
[75]Gruber.T.R.Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing.Int.J.Human-Computer Studies,1995,43:907-928
[76]Studer,R.,Benjamins,VR.and Fensel,D.Knowledge engineering,principles and methods.Data and knowledge Engineering,1998,25(1-2):161-197.
[77]Kent R.E.The Information Flow Foundation for Conceptual Knowledge Organization.In:Dynamism and Stability in Knowledge Organization.Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference.Advances in Knowledge Organization 7(2000)111-117.Ergon Verlag,Wurzburg.
[78]Kent,R.E.The information Flow Framework.Starter document for IEEE P1600.1,the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology working Group, http://suo.ieee.org/IFF/.2001.
[79]Kent, R. E The IFF Approach to Semantic Integration. Presentation at the Boeing Mini-Workshop on Semantic Integration, 7 November 2002b.
[80]Kent, R.E. Distributed Conceptual Structures. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Relational Methods in Computer Science (RelMiCS 6). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2561.,2000a.Springer, Berlin.
[81]Artz. J.. "A crash course on metaphysics for the database designer". Journal of database management 8(4):25-30,1997
[82]Baader. F., Nutt. W. Basic Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 47-100.
[83]Baader. F. and Sattler. U. An Overview of Tableau Algorithms for Description Logics. Studia Logica, 69:5-40, 2001
[84]Banseler,J., and Bodker, K. "A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context," ACM Transactions on Information Systems(11:2), 1993,pp.165-193.
Banville,C. and Landy,M. "Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined?," Communications of the ACM(32:1), 1989, pp.48-60.
[85]Batini, C, Ceri, S., and Navathe, S.B. Conceptual Database Design: An Eentity-relationship Approach Redwood City in Calif, Benjamin/Cummings, 1992.
[86]Batra, D., Hoffer, J.A. and Bostrom, R.P. "A Comparison of User Performance Between the Relational and the Extended Entity Relationship Models in the Discovery Phase of Database Design, " Communications of the ACM (23,2), February, 1990, pp. 126-139.
[87]
[88]R.J. Boland,Jr. and R.A. Hirschheim. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1987.
[89]Borgida. A., Brachman. R. J. Conceptual Modelling with Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, RF. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 359-381.
[90]Borgida. A. 'On the relative expressive power of Description Logics and Predicate Calculus', Artificial Intelligence 82 (1996) 353-367.
[91]Borgida A. Lenzerini M., Rosati. R. Description Logics for Databases. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 472-494.
[92]Borgida A. 'Description Logics in Data Management', IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering vol.7, No. 5, October 1995, pages 671-682.
[93]Borgmann A. Holding on to reality-the nature of information at the turn of the millennium. The University of Chicago Press , Chicago and London, Publeshed 1999.
[94]Buchheit, M., Jeusfeld, M., Nutt, W., Staudt, M., 'Subsumption between Queries to Object-Oriented Databases', Information Systems, pp 33-54, January 1994.
[95]Buchheit. M. Terminological Cycles: Semantics and Computational Properties. Principles of Semantic Networks, ed. by John F. Sowa, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991, p.331-362.
[96]Buchheit. M., Francesco M. Donini and Andrea Schaerf. Decidable Reasoning in Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993),pp. 704-709.
[97]Buchheit. M., Francesco M. Donini, W. Nutt and Andrea Schaerf. A Refined Architecture for Terminological Systems: Terminology=Schema+Views. Artif. Intell. 99(2): 209-260 (1998).
[98]Brachman. R., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Resnick, L., Borgida, A.. Living with CLASSIC: When and how to use a KL-ONE-like language. In: Principles of Semantic Networks, edited by John Sowa, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pages 401-456.
[99]Brachman Ronald J., James G. Schmolze. An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science 9(2):171-216,1985.
[100] Calvanese D., Lenzerini M., Nardi D. 'Description Logics for Conceptual Data Modeling', Logics for Databases and Information Systems, J. Chomicki and G. Saake eds., Kluwer, 1998, pages 229-263.
[101] Calvanese. D., Giacomo. G. D., Lenzerini. M., and Nardi.D. 'Reasoning in expressive description logics', in: A. Robinson and A. Voronkov, editors, Handbook of Automated Reasoning. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 2001, pages 1581-1634.
[102] Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K. and Siau, K.L. "Conceptual Level Versus Logical Level User-Database Interaction," in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems, New York, Dec. 1991, pp. 29-40
[103] Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. "A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems," Communications of the A CM (31:11), 1988, PP. 1268-1287.
[104] Davis, GB. Strategies for Information Requirements Determination[J]. IBM Systems Journal 21,1982,pp.4-30
[105] Dearden,J. "MIS Is a Mirage," Harvard Business Review(50:1), 1972, pp.90-99.
[106] Denning, PJ. "A New Social Contract for Research," Communications of the ACM (40:2), February 1997, pp. 591-624.
[107] Donini, F., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A., 'Reasoning in Description Logics', in: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, edited by G. Brewka; Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CLSI Publications, pp 193-238, 1996.
[108] Donini. F. Complexity of Reasoning. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 101-141.
[109] Drucker, P.F. "The Coming of the New Organization," Harvard Business Review (66:1), Jan-Feb, 1988, pp.45-53.
[110] Drucker, RF. "The New Productivity Challenge," Harvard Business Review (69:6), Nov-Dec, 1991, pp.45-53.
[111] Ebbinghaus. H. D., Flum.J., Thomas. W. Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, 1984. (A rigorous book; chapters 1, 2 and 3)
[112] EI Sawy, O., and Pauchant, T. "Triggers, Templates and Twitches in the Tracking of Emerging Strategic Issues," Strategic Management Journal (9), 1988, pp. 445-473.
[113] Ein-Dor, P. "An Epistemological Approach to the Theory of Information Systems," in Proceedings of the 18~(th) Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Honolulu, Hawai, November 1986, pp.563-565.
[114] Elizabeth J. Davidson. Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination. MIS Quarterly (26:4), December 2002, pp. 329-358.
[115] Enderton. H. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press, 2001. (A rigorous book; chapters 1 and 2 up to 2.6)
[116] Ferre, F. Philosophy of Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice Hall, 1988.
[117] Flynn, D. 1998. Information Systems Requirements: Determination & Analysis 2nd edn. London, McGraw-Hill.
[118] Galton.A. Logic for Information Technology. Wiley, 1990. (Simple but too verbose; chapters 1 to 6)
[119] Gorry, GA. and Scott-Morton, M.A. "A Framework for Management Information Systems," Sloan Management Review, October 1971, pp.55-70.
[120] Guarino, N. Understanding, building and using ontologies. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 1995, 46:293-310.
[121] G. Van Heijst, A. TH. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga. Using explicit ontogies in KBS development. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 1997, 45:183-292.
[122] Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. "Design Science in Information Systems Research.," MIS Quarterly, (28:1), March 2004, pp.75-105.
[123] Hartmanis, J. and Lin, H. Computing the Future: A Broader Agenda for Computer Science and Engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1992.
[124] Hintikka, J. and P. Suppes 1970, Information and inference (Dordrecht: Reidel) (important collection of philosophical essays on information theory, graduate level).
[125] Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., and Lyytinen, K. "Exploring the intellectual Structures of Information Systems Development: A Social Action Theoretic Perspective," Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (6:1/2).1996,pp.1-64.
[126] Hollunder, B., Nutt, W., 'Subsumption Algorithms for Concept Languages', DFKI report, RR-90-04, Saarbruecken Germany, 1990; extended version of a previously published paper in proc. ECAI'90, pp 348-353.
[127] Ihde. D. Technics and Praxis. D.Reidel Publishing Company, 1979. p. 104
[128] Ives, B., Hamilton, S. and Davis, GB. "A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems," Management Science (26:9), September 1980, pp. 910-934.
[129] Izak Benbasat. "The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties," MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. 183-194.
[130] Jenkins, M.A. "Research Methodologies and MIS Research," in Mumford, E., et.al.(eds) Research Methodologies in Information Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland), 1985, pp. 103-117.
[131] Keen, Peter G.W.(1980) "Reference Displines and a Cumulative Tradition," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, December 1980, pp.9-18.
[132] Kent, W. Data and Reality, North Holland, 1978.
[133] Kent, W. "Limitations of Record-based Information Models", ACM Transactions on Database Systems (4:1), March 1979, pp. 107-131.
[134] Kelly.J. The Essence of Logic. Prentice Hall, 1997. (The simplest book to learn the basics of logic; chapters 1, 2, (4), 6, (7) and 8)
[135] Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1970.
[136] Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, GL. and Zytkow, J.M. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1987.
[137] Lenat D.B and Feiganbaum E.A. On the Thresholds of Knowledge. Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint of Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI-87), 1173-1182, 1987
[138] Levesque.H. J. and Brachman. R. J. Expressiveness and tractability in knowledge representation and reasoning. Computational Intelligence journal 3, 78-93 (1987).
[139] Loucopoulos, P., and Zicari, R. 1992. Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and CASE - An Integrated View of Information Systems Development. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[140] Lucas D. Introna and Fernando M. Ilharco. The ontological screening of contemporary life: a phenomenological analysis of screens. European Journal of Information Systems(2004) 13, 221-234.
[141] Madnick, S.E. "The Challenge: To Be Part of the Solution Instead of Being Part of the Problem," in Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop on Information Technology, Dallas Texas, December 1992, pp. 12-13.
[142] March, S. T., and Smith, G. "Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology," Decision Support Systems (15:4), December 1995, pp. 251-266.
[143] Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. "A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Process," MIS Quarterly (26:3), September, 2002, pp. 179-212
[144] Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. "A Program for Research on Management Information Systems, " Management Science, January 1973, pp.475-485.
[145] Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2~(nd) ed.SAGE Publications, Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, 1994
[146] Mendelson. E. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Chapman and Hall, 1997. (Not my favourite; chapters 1 and 2)
[147] Mumford.E., Hirschheim.R., Fitzgerald.G. and Trevor Wood-Harper. Research Methods in Information Systems. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1985.
[148] Hand-Erik Nissen, Heinz K.Klein and Rudy Hirschheim. Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991
[149] Nardi.D., Brachman. R. J. An Introduction to Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 5-44.
[150] Nardi. D., Sattler.U., D. Calvanese, R. Molitor. Relationships with other formalisms. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 142-183.
[151] Nardi D., Brachman. R. J. An Introduction to Description Logics. In the Description Logic Handbook, edited by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pages 5-44.
[152] Nebel. B. Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 422, Springer-Verlag, 1990. Chapters 1 -6.
[153] Nebel.B. and Smolka. G. Attributive Description Formalisms... and the rest of the world. In C. Rollinger O. Herzog, editor, Text Understanding in LILOG, LNAI 546. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1991, pages 439-452.
[154] Norman, D.A. "Cognitive Engineering," in Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W.(eds), User Centred System Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, pp.31-61.
[155] Old L J, Priss U. Metaphor and Information Flow. In: Proceedings of the 12~(th) Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, Ohio, April 2001.
[156] Orlikowski, W., and Gash, D. "Technology Frames: Making Science of Information Technology in Organizations," ACM Transactions on Information Systems (12:2), 1994, pp. 174-207.
[157] Parsons, J. and Wand, Y. "Guidelines for Evaluating Classes in Data Modelling," in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas TX, December 1992, pp. 1-8
[158] Pawlak Z. Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1982, 11:341-356.
[159] Pawlak Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
[160] Rathswohl, E.J. Applying Don Idhe's Phenomenology of Instrumentation as a Framework for Designing Research in Information Science. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, edt. Hans-Erik Nissen, Heinz K. Klein, Rudy Hirschheim. 1991, pp.421-43 8
[161] Robey, D. "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Opportunity, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research (7:4), 1996, pp.400-408.
[162] Schaerf, A., 'Reasoning with individuals in concept languages', Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol 13(2), pp 141-176, 1994.
[163] Schild. K. 'A correspondence theory for terminological logics: preliminary report', IJCAI-91, pp 466-471, October 1991.
[164] Schild K. "Tractable reasoning in a universal description logic', Proceedings of 1st Workshop KRDB'94, Saarbrucken, Germany, September 20-22, 1994.
[165] Schorlemmer M, Kalfoglou Y. On Semantic Interoperability and the Flow of Information. ISWC'03 Workshop on Semantic Integration, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 2003.
[166] Shannon, CE. Collected Papers, ed. By N. J. A. Sloane and A. D. Wyner (Los Alamos, Ca: IEEE Computer Society Press), 1993
[167] Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial (2~(nd) ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
[168] Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial (3~(nd) ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
[169] Solvberg. A. A contribution to the definition of concepts for expressing users' information system requirements. Proceedings International Conference on the E-R Approach to Systems Analysis and Design(1979).
[170] Tichy,W. "Should Computer Scientists Experiment More?" IEEE Computer (31:5), May 1998, pp. 32-40.
[171] Tsichritzis, D. C, and Lochovsky, F. H. 1982. Data Models. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
[172] Tsichrizis, D. "The Dynamics of Innovation," in Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, PJ. Denning and R.m. Metcalfe(eds.), Copernicus Books, New York, 1998, pp. 259-265.
[173] Walls,J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., and ei Sawy, O.A. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," information Systems Research (3:1), March 1992, pp.36-59.
[174] Walz, D., Elam, J., and Curtis, B. "Inside a Software Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing, and Integration," Communications of the ACM (36:10), 1993, pp. 63-77.
[175] Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston,445-470.
[176] Wille, R. (1992). Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23, 493-515.
[177] Wille, R. (1997a). Conceptual landscapes of knowledge: a pragmatic paradigm for knowledge processing. In W., Gaul, & Locarek-Junge (Eds.), Classification in the Information Age. Berlin: Springer, 1999, 344-356.
[178] Wille, R. (1997b). Conceptual Graphs and Formal Concept Analysis. In D. Lukose, H. Delugach, M. Keeler, L. Searle, & J. F. Sowa (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream. Proc. ICCS'97. LNAI 1257. Berlin: Springer, 290-303.
[179] Wille, R. (1997c). Introduction to formal concept analysis. In G. Negrini (Ed.), Modelli e modellizzazione. Models and modelling. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Instituto di Studi sulli Ricerca e Documentazione Scientifica, Roma, 39-51.
[180] Wille, R. (2000a). Contextual logic summary. In G. Stumme (Ed.), Working with Conceptual Structures. Contributions to ICCS 2000. Aachen: Shaker, 265-276.
[181] Wille, R. (2000b). Boolean Concept Logic. In B. Ganter, & G. Mineau (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic and Computational Issues. LNAI 1867. Berlin: Springer, 317-331.
[182] Wille, R. (2001). Why Can Concept Lattices Support Knowledge Discovery in Databases? In E. Mephu Nguifo (Eds.), ICCS 2001 International Workshop on Concept Lattice-Based Theory, Methods and Tools for Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Stanford University, Palo Alto (CA), July 30th, 2001, 7-20.
[183] Wille, R. (2002). Existential Concept Graphs of Power Context Families. In U. Priss, D. Corbett, & G. Angelova (Eds.), Conceptual Structures Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. LNAI 2393, Berlin: Springer, 382-395.
[184] Wille, R. (2004). Preconcept Algebras and Generalized Double Boolean Algebras.In P. Eklund (Ed.), Concept Lattices: Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, LNCS 2961. Berlin: Springer, 1-13. Wolff, K. E. (1994). A first course in formal concept analysis - how to understand line diagrams. In F. Faulbaum (Ed.), SoftStat'93, Advances in statistical software, Volume 4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, 429-438.
[185] Wolff, K. E. (2004). Particles and Waves as Understood by Temporal Concept Analysis, In K. E. Wolff, H. Pfeiffer, & H. Delugach (Eds.), Conceptual Structures at Work:12th International Conference on Conceptual Structures.Berlin:Springer,126-141.
[186]Woods W.A.Important Issues in Knowledge Representation.Proceedings of the IEEE,Vol.74,No.10,1986
[187]Woods W.A.What's in a link:Foundations for semantic networks.In Representation and Understanding:Studies in Cognitive Science,ed.D.G.Bobrow and A.M.Collins.35-82.Academic Press.Republished in Brachman and Levesque 1985.
[188]Yao Y Y Concept lattices in rough set theory.Proceedings of the 23~(rd)International Meeting the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society,2004:796-801.
[189]Yao Y Y.Constructive and algebraic methods of theory of rough set approximation.Information Sciences,1998,1:239-259.
[190]Yao Y Y.Two views of the theory of rough sets in finite universe.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,1996,15:291-317.
[191]Zelkowitz,M.,and Wallace,D."Experimental Models for Validating Technology,"IEEE Computer(31:5),May 1998,pp.23-31.
[192]ZHANG Wenxiu,WEI Ling,QI Jianjun.Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept lattice.SCIENCE IN CHINA(INFORMATION SCIENCES),2005 Vol.48 No.6 P.713-726.
[193]泰奥多.德布尔著.李河译.胡塞尔思想的发展.三联书店,1995.4.
[194]陈波著.逻辑哲学导论.中国人民出版社,1999.
[195]H.G.伽达默尔著.王才勇译.真理与方法.辽宁人民出版社,1987.
[196]海德格尔著.陈嘉映,王庆节译.存在与时间.三联书店,1986.
[197]汉斯-格奥尔格.伽达默尔著.夏镇平,宋建平译.哲学解释学.上海译文出版社,2004,7.
[198]陆汝钤编著.人工智能(下).科学出版社,2000,6.
[199]斯皮格尔伯格著.王炳文,张金言译.现象学运动.北京:商务印书 馆,1981.
[200]陈嘉明著.知识与确证——当代知识论引论.上海人民出版社,2003,4.
[201]Kenneth H.Rosen.离散数学及其应用.机械工业出版社,2003,3.
[202]Timothy J.Ross 著.钱同惠,沈其聪,葛晓滨等译.模糊逻辑及其工程应用.电子工业出版社,2001,10
[203]高济.基于知识的软件智能化技术.浙江大学出版社,2000.1
[204]吕苗荣,古德生.对信息本质问题的探讨.系统科学学报,2007,15(1):13-17.
[205]严春友.宇宙统一于信息——答施启良先生.太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2007,6(1):11-18.
[206]郑成兴.基于FSM模型的信息系统生存性计算.计算机工程与应用,2007,43(2):1401-44.
[207]王德禄,李子祎.基于信息熵理论的网络组织结构分析.现代管理科学,2007年01期,pp.65-66.
[208]吴国仕,何所惧.内容全球化管理系统的设计与实现.北京航空航天大学学报,2007年02期,pp.233-237.
[209]陈源蒸.交流理论的形成、发展及其意义.国家图书馆学刊,2007年01期,pp.12-17.
[210]钟义信.从“统计”到“理解”,从“传输”到“认知”.电子学报,1998,126(7):1-8.
[211]钟义信.论“信息-知识-智能转换规律”.北京邮电大学学报,2007,30(1):1-8.
[212]朱婕,靖继鹏.基于“意义建构”之上的“信息差”理论及模型.图书情报知识,2006年01期,pp.57-61.
[213]王博涛,舒华英.基于自组织理论的信息系统演化研究.北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2006,8(1):43-47.
[214]陈颖仪.后网络时代信息系统的持续竞争能力.图书与情报,2006年01期,pp.88-90,95.
[215]童小英,易树平,杨文彩,丁婧.人-信息系统交互效率影响因素及其作用机理.重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(2):23-27.
[216]林雪纲,熊华,叶进星,许榕生.信息系统生存性分析研究综述.计算机工程,2006,32(5):1-3,6.
[217]吴德伟,戚君宜.基于信息论方法的军事电子信息系统综合.军事运筹与系统工程,2006,20(1):57-61.
[218]刘丹,谢益武.面向智能体的信息系统开发方法研究.计算机技术与发展,2006,16(3):101-103.
[219]邬焜.关于复杂信息系统理论研究的思考.江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,5(1):36-38.
[220]荣毅虹,田也壮,梁战平.基于信息交互模型的企业Web展示.情报科学,2006,24(4):603-606,611.
[221]
[222]余传明.一种新的信息系统——语义信息系统.情报理论与实践,2006年03期,pp.345-348.
[223]郭爱华.论数字信息的中心—用户结构模式.情报杂志,2006年06期,pp.30-32.
[224]何志兰.论信息系统的生态对称性.情报杂志,2006年06期,pp.92-94.
[225]孙铁昆,杨新轩.管理信息系统需求管理工具的研究与实现.计算机工程与设计,2006,27(12):2256-2258.
[226]
[227]杨晓光,邵海鹏,云美萍.交通语言系统结构.系统工程,2006,24(7):1-7.
[228]张肇富,熊健,李孟军.航天工程项目信息流分析与信息管理框架设计.华北航天工业学院学报,2006,16(4):1-2,5.
[229]张德喜,李晓宇.绝对信息量不完备信息系统的数据补齐算法.计算机工程与应用,2006年22期,pp.155-157,191.
[230]秦克云,杜卫锋.知识约简的逻辑特征.计算机工程与应用,2006年26期,pp.7-9.
[231]欧阳毅 姚莉 戴长华.面向信息系统需求的数据元提取方法研究.计算机工程,2006,32(18):42-44,47.
[232]施芸虹,涂耀旭,危辉,白宇.基于框架复合的语义限定.计算机应用,2006,(9):2031-2033.
[233]田忠和,尚军.通用社会信息采集系统分析与设计.计算机与数字工程,2006,34(9):117-119.
[234]杨亚罗,王润孝,库祥臣,王力刚.组态概念发展的新趋势.计算机应用研究,2006年09期,pp.13-17.
[235]蔡宏志.个性化信息推荐服务模式.情报杂志,2006年09期,pp.116-118,121.
[236]杨红,杨德礼,林正奎.目标驱动的复杂信息系统开发方法研究.计算机工程与设计,2006,27(18):3267-3372.
[237]袁新娣.本体及本体在信息系统中的应用.科技广场,2006年07期,pp.76-78.
[238]冯花朴.用户信息需求研究发展.图书情报工作,2006,50(2):40-44.
[239]石凤.图书馆知识管理应该引向知识点信息管理.图书馆杂志,2006,25(5):14-17.
[240]顾潇华,吴现杰.智力资源管理与信息管理、知识管理.中国图书馆学报,2005年05期,pp.34-36,40.
[241]刘广,戴昌钧.基于心理学视角的信息和知识界定的方法.图书情报工作,2005,49(12):57-60.
[242]汪社教.信息学本质与发展方向.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):51-54.
[243]刘廷元.现代科学信息交流的体系与服务模式.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):59-62.
[244]陈忆金.现代情报学的理论基础——信息哲学.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):55-58,62.
[245]曹锦丹,齐艳丽,刘春艳.网络空间信息表征与用户认知的交互作用机制.图书情报工作,2005,49(8):19-22,86.
[246]荆宁宁,程俊瑜.数据、信息、知识与智慧.情报科学,2005,23(12):1786-1790.
[247]毕新华,尚伟昌,徐杨.信息系统成长理论模型的比较分析.情报科学,2005,23(11):1601-1605.
[248]谢友才,胡汉辉.标准的哲学解析与技术创新.中国软科学,2005年10期,pp.95-99.
[249]沙勇忠,任立肖.网络用户信息查寻行为研究述评.图书情报工作,2005,49(1):128-132,111.
[250]赵静.信息商的提出:概念及内涵.图书情报工作,2005,49(1):26-28.
[251]张在昭.基于信息论的信息测度研究基础.情报杂志,2005年11期,pp.92-94.
[252]潘钦,刘春年.关于信息增值研究的若干问题.情报杂志,2005年11期,pp.88-89.
[253]吴国林.量子信息的本质探究.科学技术与辩证法,2005,22(6):32-35.
[254]仇国芳,陈劲.概念知识系统与概念信息粒格.工程数学学报,2005,22(6):963-969.
[255]李鸿儒,宋笑雪,魏平.信息系统诱导出的形式背景及其性质.工程数学学报,2005,22(6):971-974.
[256]张辑哲.论“信息所指”“信息所指对象”和“信息能指”的认识论价值.档案学通讯,2005年06期,pp.25-26.
[257]吴显中.再谈信息本质问题——兼与张辑哲老师商榷.档案学通讯,2005年06期,pp.27-30.
[258]刘启和,李凡,闵帆,叶茂,杨国纬.一种基于新的条件信息熵的高效知识约简算法.控制与决策,2005,20(8):878-882.
[259]周明,吴宝亮.主观信息的信息量表达方法研究.科技进步与对策,2005年07期,pp.56-58.
[260]陈文萍.论信息管理的过程控制机能.情报杂志,2005年07期,pp.71-73.
[261]袁志秀.从哲学视角看信息的中介属性.情报杂志,2005年07期,pp.67-68.
[262]牛德雄 武友新 江恭和.基于统一信息交换模型的信息交换研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年21期,pp.195-197,226.
[263]A.B.沃罗诺夫,文华摘译.信息化的前景:关于信息过程的科学和新的信息化方法及研制项目.国外社会科学,2005年04期,pp.38-41.
[264]姜璐.信息与符号信息.系统工程理论与实践,2005年05期,pp.136-138.
[265]汪洋.信息构建与知识管理的互动.情报理论与实践,2005,28(3):238-240.
[266]姚全珠,张志锋,任雪利,张作鹏.基于构件的信息系统形式化需求分析方法的研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年18期,pp.176-178,232.
[267]李鸿.基于条件信息量的知识相对约简算法.中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(3),pp.378-382,389.
[268]李金锋,黄崇福,宗恬.反精确现象与形式化研究.系统工程理论与实践,2005年04期,pp.128-132.
[269]黄兵,周献中,张蓉蓉.基于信息量的不完备信息系统属性约简.系统工程理论与实践,2005年04期,pp.55-60.
[270]曹志彤,朱蕾,方加忠.意识特性的理论框架.心理科学, 2005,28(2):416-419.
[271]王穗苹,迟毓凯,王瑞明,吴岩.不同性质语篇背景信息的激活与抑制.心理科学,2005,28(2):342-346.
[272]桑标,任真,邓赐平.自闭症儿童的心理理论与中心信息整合的关系探讨.心理科学,2005,28(2):295-299.
[273]魏辅轶,何源.IA“信息结构”与IA反馈机制.现代图书情报技术,2005年04期,pp.68-71.
[274]常宏宇.信息量和熵的关系.数学的实践与认识,2005,35(5):137-140.
[275]董明哲,张同军.基于信息语义的异构信息集成方法.计算机工程,2005,31(2):202-203,221.
[276]刘云生,彭建平.信息融合的研究.计算机工程与应用,2005年03期,pp.181-183.
[277]王虹,张文修,李鸿儒.粗糙模糊集的不确定性度量.计算机工程与应用.2005年02期,pp.51-52,186.
[278]
[279]林代茂,胡岚,郭云彪,周琳娜.广义信息隐藏技术的机理与模型.北京邮电大学学报,2005,28(1):1-5.
[280]吴顺明,张靖.信息构建与知识管理比较研究.情报杂志,2005年01期,pp.12-13,16.
[281]张洋,邱均平.网络信息计量学的兴起及其哲学思考.情报杂志,2005年01期,pp.2-5.
[282]林鸿飞,杨志豪,赵晶.基于内容和合作模式的信息推荐机制.中文信息学报,2005,19(1):48-55.
[283]邓自立,高媛.快速信息融合Kalman滤波器.控制与决策,2005,20(1):27-31.
[284]任衍具,禤宇明,傅小兰.视觉短时记忆与视知觉的信息整合.心理科 学进展,2007,15(2):301-307.
[285]牛盾,高志强.不同信息负荷下注意选择性研究.心理科学,2007,30(2):341-343,315.
[286]孙瑞英.信息异化问题的理性思考.情报科学,2007,25(3):340-344.
[287]王宝丽,梁吉业.信息系统中的知识距离与知识粗糙熵.计算机科学,2007,34(3):151-154.
[288]孙和平,丛杭青.信息哲学视域下的工程伦理媒介基础转换.自然辩证法研究,2007,23(1):64-67.
[289]刘桃,刘秉权,徐志明,王晓龙.领域术语自动抽取及其在文本分类中的应用.电子学报,2007,35(2):328-332.
[290]李卫华,李师贤.信息流理论及其应用研究.计算机科学,2006,33(7):11-15.
[291]俞立平.信息资源与知识传播处理机制的构建及比较研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006年12期,pp.101-105.
[292]毕新华,余翠玲.信息技术吸纳能力及其过程模型研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006年12期,pp.42-46.
[293]丁晟春,李岳盟,甘利人.基于顶层本体的领域本体综合构建方法研究.情报理论与实践,2007,30(2):236-240.
[294]李超,王兰成.应用领域本体的Web信息知识集成研究.情报科学,2007,25(3):430-434.
[295]贾秀玲,文敦伟.面向文本的本体学习研究概述.计算机科学,2007,34(2):181-185.
[296]王洪伟,伊磊,张元元.本体模型的逆向获取研究.计算机科学,2007,34(2):166-170.
[297]王洪伟,伊磊,王洪滨.面向关系模式的领域本体获取.计算机工程,2007,33(3):1-3,23.
[298]徐德智,肖文芳,王怀民.本体映射过程中的概念相似度计算.计算机 工程与应用,2007,43(9):167-169.
[299]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青,刘岩,吕腾,丁天怀.本体集成的研究.计算机工程,2007,33(2):4-5,33.
[300]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青,刘岩,吕腾,丁天怀.基于本体的协同知识交流模型.计算机工程,2007,33(2):158-162.
[301]岳静,张自力.本体表示语言研究综述.计算机科学,2006,33(2):158-162.
[302]周文,刘宗田,陈慧琼.FCA与本体结合研究的综述.计算机科学,2006,33(2):8-12.
[303]黄美丽,刘宗田.基于形式概念分析的领域本体构建方法研究.计算机科学,2006,33(1):210-212,239.
[304]马妮,韩秋红.20世纪西方哲学本体论研究概述.学习与探索,2006年06期,pp.19-23.
[305]高英,郭荷清,邹智敏.分布式环境下领域本体的自动提取.计算机科学,2006,33(12):164-168,186.
[306]章远,李师贤.基于范畴论的形式化本体研究.计算机科学,2006,33(9):1-3,117.
[307]何扬帆,何克清,王翀.一种支持可靠的语义互操作的本体管理方法.计算机工程与应用,2006年34期,pp.8-9,25.
[308]马文峰,杜小勇.领域本体进化研究.图书情报工作,2006,50(6):71-75.
[309]邓卫华,易明.基于本体的知识共享研究.图书情报工作,2006,50(4):56-59.
[310]杜小勇,李曼,王珊.本体学习研究综述.软件学报,2006,17(9):1837-1847.
[311]徐剑波,王仁武,陈家训.基于本体的概念辨析.现代图书情报技术,2006年06期,pp.34-38.
[312]杨明华,钱乐秋,赵文耘,彭鑫.特定领域本体的构造方法.计算机工程, 2006,32(11):80-82.
[313]谌群芳.基于本体的内容管理模式探讨.图书馆论坛,2006,26(2):75-77.
[314]沈洁,罗建利.基于多Agent系统的分布式知识管理研究.系统工程理论与实践,2006年01期,pp.42-47.
[315]梁启华,何晓红.基于本体论的企业隐性知识转化与共享系统框架.情报科学,2006,24(1):84-87.