聚合双反义分支酶基因对稻米淀粉理化特性的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
稻米淀粉主要由直链淀粉与支链淀粉两部分组成,两者的组成和结构与稻米食用品质、蒸煮加工品质、甚至于产量都有着密切的联系,同时也是决定其工业用途的最重要因素之一。直链淀粉由于其特殊的分子结构目前在食品等工业领域中的应用越来越广泛。目前,科学家们已经利用基因工程等技术,对控制支链淀粉合成的分支酶基因进行遗传操作,在玉米和马铃薯等作物中培育出了直链淀粉高达70%以上的新品种,然而在水稻中还没有相关报导。本研究是在已经分别获得转单个反义分支酶基因Sbe1和Sbe3水稻材料的基础上通过常规杂交技术,将两个反义分支酶基因聚合入同一水稻植株内,以期高效抑制水稻胚乳中Sbe基因的表达,达到抑制支链淀粉合成进而相对提高稻米直链淀粉含量的目的。本研究对两个反义分支酶基因在同一水稻植株内的遗传、表达及其对抑制内源分支酶基因表达和稻米淀粉理化特性等的影响作了较为详细的研究,主要结果如下:
     1、利用籼稻协青早转反义Sbe3基因(XB3)和龙特甫转反义Sbe1基因(LB1)材料,分别组配了2个杂交组合XB3-3/LB1-5和XB3-2/LB1-2,经连续3次自交,并结合对导入基因的分子检测,从其自交后代中分别选育到了双纯合体材料。对成熟种子中直链淀粉含量的测定结果表明,聚合两个反义分支酶基因的双纯合体植株种子中的直链淀粉含量与未转化对照亲本、转单个反义Sbe基因亲本等比较并没有明显提高。
     2、利用籼稻龙特甫转反义Sbe3基因(LB3-1)和特青转反义Sbe1基因(TB1-1)
Rice endosperm starch consists of amylose and amylopectin, and both their composition and structure, i.e. the ratio of amylose to amylopectin and the distribution of branching chain-length of amylopectin, largely affect not only the cooking and eating quality, the processing quality, and even the productivities of rice, but also the properties of starch applied in industrial production. For example, the high amylase content starch has been used widely in industrial fields, especially in food industry.Through the manipulation of the genes encoding the starch branching enzymes, scientists have bred selected several novel varieties with high amylose content (AC) in maize and potato, but up to now it wasn't achieved in rice. In the previous study, a few transgenic rice lines containing the antisense Sbe1 or Sbe3 gene have been generated in our laboratory. Thus, in present study, the introduced two antisense Sbe genes were combined into the same rice plants via conventional crossing with the aim to simultinously decrease the expression of both endosgenous Sbe genes for maxiumly increasing the apparent amylose content of starch in transgenic rice plants. The experiments were performed to test the inheritance and expression of both antisense Sbe genes in the
    subsequent the physichemical properties of endosperm starch. The main results were showed as followings.1. Two hybrids, XB3-3/LB1-5 and XB3-2/LB1-2, produced by the crossing between the transgenic rice of Xieqingzhao containing the antisense Sbe3 gene (XB3) and that of Longtefu transferred by the antisense Sbel gene (LB1). After three generations of self-pollination, the transgenic rice plants containing both homozygous antisense Sbe genes were screened. But the results from AC analysis showed that the AC in the mature seeds of these homozygous transgenic lines were measured to be comparable with that of either the non-transformed wild types or the transgenic rice containing the single antisense Sbe gene.2. Another hybrid LB3-1/TB1-1 was generated from the crossing between the transgenic rice of Longtefu containing the antisense Sbe3 gene (LB3-1) and that of Teqing containing the antisense Sbel gene (TB1-1). The inheritance of both transgenes was carefully studied in the subsequent five selfing generations, but, unfortunately, no transgenic rice line with both homozygous antisense Sbe genes was selected. The mechanism was not known. Thus, only the offsprings containing both heterozygous antisense Sbe genes were selected for further study. Contrarily, among F3 to F5 generation, the AC in mature seeds of the selected transgenic offsprings carrying both heterozygous transgenes was measured to much higher than that of the un-transferred wild type or transgenic rice containing the single antisense Sbe gene, and the highest reached to 46.9% in one combined plants in F3 generation, while it was only 28.54% and 27.65% in the non-transformed parents Longtefu and Teqin, respectively. Therefore, these heterozygous transgenic lines were selected for further analysis.3. Several offsprings in F4 generation derived from the hybrid LB3-1/TB1-1 containing different combination of transgenes, such as only antisense Sbel, only antisense Sbe3, both of them, or neither of them were selected, and the expression of endogenous Sbe genes in these lines were analyzed by both Northern blot and immunoblot hybridization. The results showed that the expression of endogenous Sbe genes were much lower in immature seeds of the plants containing both antisense Sbe genes than these in the plants containing neither of them, whereas the expression level in the plants carrying the single antisense Sbel gene was comparable with that in the non-transfomed wild types.4. The starch gelatinization property and absorbance spectrum were much poorer in the endosperm of mature seeds of individual rice plant containing both antisense Sbe genes than that of either un-transferred wild type or transgenic rice containing only the single antisense Sbe gene, indicated that the starch in transgenic rice plant by simult
引文
包劲松,夏英武(1999)水稻淀粉合成的分子生物学研究进展 植物学通报16(4)
    宾金华,傅家瑞(1988)优质稻米籽粒发育过程中直链淀粉含量和分支酶活性变化。种子(6):16~17
    陈秀花(2003)转反义Sbe基因提高稻米直链淀粉含量的研究 博士学位论文(扬州大学)
    陈秀花,刘巧泉,吴信淦,王宗阳,顾铭洪(2003)水稻分支酶基因Shel和She3 cDNA的克隆及全序列分析中国水稻科学 17(2):109-112
    宫明,宫锋(1996)反义RNA调控的不同方式,生命的化学,16(4):17
    胡开林,单彭义(1998)苦瓜的开花习性及影响其花粉萌发率的因素 中国蔬菜(5):16-18
    黄发林,孙宗修,胡培松等(1998)食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望 中国水稻科学 12(3):172-176。
    李太贵,沈波,陈能,罗玉坤(1997)Q酶在水稻籽粒垩白形成中作用的研究 作物学报 23(3):338-344。
    李欣,顾铭洪,潘学彪等(1990)稻米直链淀粉含量的遗传及选择效应的研究《谷类作物品质性状遗传研究进展》江苏科学技术出版社
    刘后利主编,《农作物品质育种》湖北科学技术出版社,2001,54。
    刘巧泉(2002)基因工程技术提高稻米赖氨酸含量,博士学位论文(扬州大学)
    闵绍楷等编,《水稻育种学》,中国农业出版社,1996,322-350。
    唐湘如,余铁桥(1991)灌浆成熟期温度对稻米品质及有关生理生化特性的影响。湖南农学院学报(1):1~8
    谢冬绿,王宗阳,洪孟民(1999)水稻转座子Tourist-Os6从Sbel基因启动子区切离的证明植物生理学报25(3):274~280
    徐军望,李旭刚,朱祯(2000)基因工程改良淀粉品质 生物技术通报:11-19
    赵步洪,张文杰,常二华等(2004)水稻灌浆期籽粒中淀粉合成关键酶的活性变化及其与灌浆速率和蒸煮品质的关系中国农业科学 37(8):1123-1129
    翟凤林等编注,作物品质育种,农业出版社,1988,249-272。
    Xu JW(徐军望),Zhu Z(朱桢),Li XG(李旭刚)(2001)Isolation and identification of starch synthase eDNA using a simple procedure based on PCR. High Technology Comma. (高技术通讯),8:1-6.(in Chinese)
    Zheng FQ(郑霏琴), Wang ZY(王宗阳), Gao JP(高继平) (1993) Isolation of total RNA from rice endosperm. Plant Physiology Commu. (植物生理学通讯) 29(6): 438~440. (in Chinese)
    Adkins GK, Greenwood CT, Hourston DJ (1970) Studies on starches of high amylose content: Ⅺ. Some physicochemical properties of dispersions of amylomaize starch, and observations on the nature of high-amylose starches. Cereal Chem. 47: 13-18
    Baba T, Kim S-J, Arai Y (1983) Treatment of amylomaize starch granules with urea: comparison with normal maize starch. Carbohydr Res. 124: 344-348
    Beatty, M.K., Rahman, A., Cao, H., Woodman, W., et al (1999) Purification and molecular genetic characterization of ZPUl, a pullulanase-type starch debranching enzyme from maize. Plant physiol. 119: 255-266
    Bhattacharyya MK, Smith AM, Ellis THN, Hedley C, Martin C (1990) The wrinkled seed character of pea described by Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch branching enzyme. Cell 60: 115-122
    Blauth SL, Kim KN, Klucinec J, et al (2002) Identification of mutator insertional mutants of starch branching enzyme Ⅰ (Sbel) in Zea mays L. Plant Mol Biol. 48: 287-297
    Boyer CD, Preiss J (1978a) Multiple forms of (1-4)-α-D-glucan, (1-4)-α-D-glucan-6-glycosyl transferase from developing Zea mays L. kernels. Carbohydr Res. 61: 321-334
    Boyer CD, Preiss J, (1978b) Multiple forms of starch branching enzyme of maize: evidence for independent genetic control. Biochem Biophys Res. Commun 80: 169-175
    Burton RA, Bewley JD, Smith AM, Bhattacharyya MK, Tatge H, Ring S, Bull V, Hamilton WDO, Martin C (1995) Starch branching enzymes belonging to distinct enzyme families are differentially expressed during pea embryo development. Plant J. 7: 3-15
    Chen XH, Liu QQ, et al (2002) Introduction of an antisense waxy gene into the main parent lines of indica hybrid rice. Chinese Sci. Bull. 47:1192-1195.
    Denyer K, Johnson P, Zeeman S, Smith AM(2001) The control of amylose synthesis, J Plant Physiol. 158: 479-487
    Fisher MB, Boyer CD (1983) Immunological characterization of maize starch branchingenzymes. Plant Physiol. 72: 813-816
    Fujita, N., Kubo, A., Francisco Jr., P.B., et al (1999) Purification, characterization, and cDNA structure of isoamylase from developing endosperm of rice. Planta 208: 283-293
    Gao M, Fisher DK, Kim KN, Shannon JC, Guiltinan MJ (1996) Evolutionary conservation and expression patterns of maize starch branching enzyme Ⅰ and Ⅱb genes suggests isoform specialization. Plant Mol Biol. 30: 1223-1232
    Gao M, Fisher DK, Kim KN, Shannon JC, Guiltinan MJ (1997) Independent genetic control of
    ??maize starch branching enzymes Ⅱ a and Ⅱb: isolateion and characterization of a Sbe2a cDNA. Plant Physiol. 114: 69-78
    Grierson D, Fray RG, Hamiltton AT,Smith CJS and Watson CF(1991) Does co-suppression of sense genes in transgenic plants involve antisense RNA? Trends Biotechnol. 9:122-123
    Guan H, Li P, Imparl-Radosevich J, Preiss J, Keeling P (1997) Comparing the properties of Escherichia coli branching enzyme and maize branching enzyme. Arch Biochem Biophys 342: 92-98
    Guan HP, Preiss J (1993) Differentiation of the propertyes of the branching isozymes from maize (Zea mays). Plant PhysioL 102:1269-1273
    Hamada S, Nozaki K, Ito H, Yoshimoto Y, et al (2001) Two starch branching enzyme isoforms occur in different fractions developing seeds of kidney bean. Biochem J. 359: 23-34
    Hannah LC (1997) Starch synthesis in the maize seed. In: Larkins BA, Vasil IK (eds) Cellular and molecular biology of plant seed development. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 375-405
    Hikaru satoh, Aiko nishi, Kazuhiro Yamashita, et al (2003) Starch branching enzyme I -deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant physiol. 133: 1111-1121
    Hirano.HY, Tabayashi N, Matsumua T, Tanida M, Komeda Y and Sano Y (1995) Tissue-dependent expression of the rice Wx+ gene promoter in transgenic rice and petunia, Plant Cell PhysioL 36: 37-44.
    Jane J, Chen YY, Lee LF, et al (1999) Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem. 76: 629-637
    Jianchang Yang, Jianhua Zhang, Zhiqing Wang et al (2004) Activities of Key Enzymes in Sucrose-to-Starch Conversion in Wheat Grains Subjected to Water Deficit during Grain Filling, Plant PhysioL 135: 1621-1629
    Jiang HW, Dian WM, Wu P (2003) Effect of high temperature on fine structure of amylopectin in rice endosperm by reducing the activity of the starch branching enzyme, Phytochemistry 63 :53-59
    Kalichevsky MT, Orford PD, Ring SG (1990) The retrogradation and gelation of amylopectin from various botanical sources. Carbohydr Res. 198: 49-55
    Kaushik RP, Khush GS (1991) Genetic analysis of endosperm mutants in rice Oryza sativa L. Theor Appl Genet 83: 146-152
    Kawasaki T, Mizuno K, Baba T, Shimada H (1993) Molecular analysis of the gene encoding a rice starch branching enzyme, Mol. Gen. Genet 237: 10-16
    Kawasaki T, Mizuno K,Shimada H et al,1996. Coordinated regulation of the genes participating in starch biosynthesis by the rice Floury-2 locus. Plant Physiol. 110: 89~96
    Kossmann J and Lloyd J, (2000) Understanding and influencing starch biochemistry. Critical Rev. in Plant Sci. 19: 171-226.
    Kossmann.J and Lloyd.J, (2000) Understanding and influenceing starch biochemistry. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35: 141-196
    Kubo A, Rahman S, Utsumi Y, Li ZY, et al (2005) Complementation of sugary-1 Phenotype in Rice
    Endosperm with the Wheat Isoamylasel Gene Supports a Direct Role for Isoamylasel in Amylopect in Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 137: 43-56
    Kyung-Nam kim, Dane K.Fisher, et al (1998) Molecular cloning and characterizeation of the Amylose-Extender gene encoding starch branching enzyme Ⅱb in maize. Plant Molecular Biology 38: 945-956
    Larsson C-T, Hofvander P, Khoshnoodi J, Ek B, Rask L, Larsson H (1996) Three isoforms of starch synthase and two isoforms of branching enzyme are present in potato tuber starch. Plant Sci 117: 9-16
    Larsson C-T, Khoshnoodi J, Ek B, Rask L, Larsson H (1998) Molecular cloning and characterization of starchbranching enzyme Ⅱ from potato. Plant Mol Biol. 37: 505-511
    Lee E. Y. C. and Whelan, W. J. (1971) Glycogen and starch debranching enzymes. In the enzymes, Vol. 5. Edited by boyer P.D. pp. 191-234. Academic Press, New York
    Liu QQ, et al (2003) Stable inheritance of the antisense waxy gene in transgenic rice with reduced amylose level and improved quality. Transgenic Res. 12: 71-82.
    Lu S, Chen L-N, Lii C-Y (1997) Correlations between the fine structure, physicochemical properties, and retrogradation of amylopectins from Taiwan rice varietyes. Cereal Chem. 74: 34-39
    Martha G James, Kay Denyer and Alan M Myers,(2003) Starch synthesis in the cereal endosperm. current opinion in plant biology 6: 215-222
    Martin C, Smith AM (1995) Starch biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7: 971-985
    Mizuno K, Kawasaki T, Shimada H, Satoh H, Kobayashi E Okumura S, Arai Y, Baba T (1993) Alteration of the structural properties of starch components by the lack of an isoform of starch branching enzyme in rice seeds. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 19084-19091
    Mizuno K, Kobayashi E, Tachibana M, Kawasaki T, et al (2001) Characterization of an isoform of rice starch branching enzyme, RBE4, in developing seeds. Plant Physiol 42: 349-357
    Morell MK, Blermow A, Kosar-Hashemi B, Sarnuel MS (1997) Differential expression and properties of starch branching enzyme isoforms in developing wheat endosperm. Plant Physiol 113: 201-208
    Myers, AM., Morell, et al (2000) Recent progresss forwardd understanding biosynthesis of amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 122: 989-997
    Nakamura. Y. (2002) Towards a better understanding of the metabolic system for amylopectin biosynthesis in plants: rice endosperm as a model tissue. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 718-725
    Nakamura, Y. (1996) Some properties of starch debranching enzymes and their possible roles in amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 121: 1-18
    Nakamura Y, Takeichi T, Kawaguchi K, Yamanouchi H (1992a) Purification of two forms of starch branching enzyme (Q-enzyme) from developing rice endosperm. Physiol Plant 84: 329-335
    Nakamura, Y.; Sakurai, A.; Inaba, Y.; Kimura, K.; Iwasawa, N.; Nagamine, T (2002) The fine structures of amylopectin in endosperm from Asian cultivated rice can be largely classified into two classes. Starch/Staerke 54: 117-131
    Nakamura Y, Fujita N, Kubo A, et al (2003) Engineering of amylopectin biosynthesis in ice endosperm. J Appl Glycosci. 50: 197-200
    Nakamura, Y. and Yamanouchi, H. (1992b). Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding starch-branching enzyme, or Q-enzyme Ⅰ, from rice endosperm. Plant Physiol, 99: 1265-1266.
    Nakamura Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Minobe Y (1994) Linkage localization of starch branching enzyme Ⅰ (Q-enzyme Ⅰ) gene in rice. Theor Appl Genet 89: 859-860
    Naoko Fujita, Akiko Kubo, Dong Soon Suh, et al (2003) Antisense inhibition of isoamylase alters the structure of amylopectin and the physicochemical properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 44(6): 607-618
    Nelson OE, Rines HW(1962) The enzymeatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biochem biophys Res Commun. 9: 297-300
    Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, et al (2001) Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 127: 459-472
    Okagaki RJ, Wessler SR, (1988) Comparison of non-mutant and mutant waxy genes in rice and maize. Genetics, 120(4): 1137~1143.
    Preiss (1997) Modulation of starch synthesis. In: Foyer CH, Quick WP (eds) A molecular approach to primary metabolism in higher plants. Taylor and Francis, London: 81-104
    Safford R, Jobling SA, Sidebottom CM, Westcott RJ, et al (1998) Consequences of antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme activity on properties of potato starch. Carbohydr Polym. 35: 155-168
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989.
    Sanders EB, Thompson DB, Boyer CD (1990) Thermal behavior during gelatinization and amylopectin fine structure for selected maize genotypes as expressed in four inbred lines. Cereal Chem. 67: 594-602
    Sano Y (1984) Different regulation of waxy gene expression in rice endosperm. Theor Appl Genet 68: 4567-4573
    Schock T.J. (1942) Non-carbohydrate substances in cereal starches. [J], J. Am. Chem. Soc, 64,2957
    Scwhall GP et al (2000) Production of very high amylose potato starch of SBE A and SBE B. Nature Biotech. 18(5): 551-554
    Shi Y-C, Seib PA (1992) The structure of four waxy starchs related to gelatinization and retrogradation. Carbohydr Res.227: 131-145
    Shure M, Wessler S, Federoff N(1983) Molecular identifyication and isolation of the Waxy locus in maize. Cell 35:225-233
    Slattery et al (2000) Engineering starch for increased quantity and quality. Trends in Plant Sci. 5: 291-298.
    Smith, Denyer, K. and Martin, C.(1997) The synthesis of the starch granule. Annu.Rev. Plant PhysioL Plant Mol. Biol.48:67-87
    Stephen A. Jobling, Gerhard P. Schwall, Roger J. Westcott, Christopher M. Sidebottom, Martine Debet, Michael J. Gidley, Roger Jeffcoat and Richard Safford (1999) A minor form of starch branching enzyme in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers has a major effect on starch structure: cloning and characterization of multiple forms of SBE A. Plant Cell 18: 163-171.
    Sun C, Sathish P, AhlandSberg S, Deiber A, Jansson C (1997) Identification of four starch-branching enzymes in barley endosperm: partial purification of forms I, Ha, and Ⅱb. New Phytol 137: 215-222
    Sun C, Sathish P, AhlandSberg S, and Jansson C (1998) The Two Genes Encoding Starch-Branching Enzymes Ⅱa and Ⅱb Are Differentially Expressed in Barley. Plant PhysioL 118: 37-49
    Susan L. Blauth, Yuan Yao, Jeffery D. Klucinec, et al (2001) Identification of mutator insertional mutants of starch branching enzymes 2a in corn.. 125: 1396-1405
    Takeda Y, Guan HP, Preiss J (1993) Branching of amylose by the branching isoenzymes of maize endosperm. Carbohydr Res. 240: 253-263
    Tester RF, Morrison WR (1990) Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches: Ⅱ. Waxy rice starches. Cereal Chenu 67: 558-563
    Thompson,D.B.(2000) On the non-random nature of amylopectin branching. Carbohydr. Res. 43: 223-239
    Vander KAR, et al (1988) Antisense genes in plants: an overview. Gene 72 : 45-54.
    Vander Krol AR and Stuitje AR(1988) Antisense genes in plants: an overview. Gene 72:45-50
    Waterhouse, et al (1998) Virus resistance and gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense and antisense RNA. Proa Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95: 13959 -13964.
    Yamnouchi H, Nakamura Y (1992c) Organ specificity of isoforms of starch branching enzyme (Q-enzyme) in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 33: 985-991
    Yuan RC, Thompson DB, Boyer CD (1993) Fine structure of amylopectin in relation to gelatinization and retrogradation behavior of maize starches from three wx-containing genotype in two inbred lines. Cereal Chem. 70: 81-89
    Yuan Y, Donald B.T, and Mark J.G (2004) Maize Starch-Branching Enzyme Isoforms and Amylopec tin Structure. In the Absence of Starch-Branching Enzyme Ⅱb, the Further Absence of Starch- Bran ching Enzyme Ia Leads to Increased Branching. Plant Physiol. 136:3515-3523
    Zeeman S.C, Smith S.M, and Smith M.A (2002) The Priming of Amylose Synthesis in Arabidopsis Leaves.Plant PhysioL 128: 1069-1076

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700