莫莫格湿地扁杆藨草繁育特性与生态特性研究
|
摘要
由于各种原因,白鹤食源植物的生境却在逐年退化。通过实地考察和对白鹤排泄物等的分析,发现白鹤主要以扁杆藨草等植物的地下球茎及少量鱼虾类为食,而作为其主要食源植物的扁杆藨草(Scirpus planiculmis)的生境在近年也随之遭到了严重破坏,并使得白鹤在该地区的停歇地和食物有逐年递减的趋势,威胁到白鹤在此地的生存。
水资源的枯竭是莫莫格湿地退化最关键的因素。扁杆藨草是典型的湿生植物,其生长与水,尤其是土壤水分含量密切相关。湿地土壤含水量与扁杆藨草生长的定量分析是扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地恢复过程中的关键所在,也是合理利用和保护湿地生物多样性,保证湿地结构与功能完整性,实现区域可持续发展的重要手段。在分析其与土壤生境关系的同时,结合扁杆藨草自身繁殖特性,建立扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地的恢复技术。
由于扁杆藨草是典型的湿生植物,对水分要求比较严格,沿着土壤水分梯度,并根据扁杆藨草生长的高度和盖度,将扁杆藨草的生长等级分成四个等级,并对四个等级上的土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量进行研究,找到适宜扁杆生长的土壤含水量和土壤含盐量的最佳值及临界值,为扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地的恢复提供理论依据。同时,对扁杆藨草的繁殖机理进行试验研究,发现扁杆藨草主要通过地下球茎的根蘖能力进行营养繁殖。通过以上研究,得出以下主要结论:
扁杆藨草主要通过地下球茎进行营养繁殖,越冬球茎于每年4月中旬开始萌动形成地上植株,随着地上茎叶的不断生长,越冬球茎开始形成新的根状茎,新根状茎生长不久顶端膨大形成新的球茎,到5月下旬新根状茎、新球茎及再生根状茎、再生球茎的数量达到高峰。
从球茎分布规律看,主要集中在0~10cm的土层范围内,因此在做土壤水分和盐分等研究时,主要集中在0~10cm土层左右即可。
莫莫格湿地近年来遭受干旱侵袭,水资源有限,利用有限的水资源最大面积的恢复扁杆藨草的生长,是莫莫格湿地恢复的关键技术。
在扁杆藨草与土壤生境关系中,随着土壤水分含量的逐渐降低,土壤中的盐分含量逐渐增加,扁杆藨草生长呈衰弱趋势,逐步被碱蓬等旱生盐碱植物所代替,直至扁杆藨草消失完全被碱蓬等代替,土壤水分和盐分含量也达到扁杆藨草生长的极限值。
扁杆藨草生长与土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量的关系:当扁杆藨草处于最佳生长状态,其临界土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量分别为25%~27%,0.125%~0.375%;当土壤水分含量为21%~25%,土壤含盐量为0.375%~1%时,碱蓬等耐盐碱植物出现,但扁杆藨草仍能正常生长;当土壤水分含量降至20%~21%,土壤含盐量提高到1%~2.75%时,碱蓬等耐盐碱植物大量出现,取代扁杆藨草而成为群落的主导,扁杆藨草呈零星分布状态,丧失自我恢复的功能;而当土壤水分含量降至14%~17%,土壤含盐量增至1.75%~3.125%时,扁杆藨草在植物群落中被碱蓬等耐盐碱植物代替而完全消失。
For identify possible causes,the habitat of the plant which Grus leucogeranus depended on has been destroyed yearly.It was found out that the Grus leucogeranus live by the underground corm of the Scirpus planiculmis and some fingerling.As one of the important food of the Grus leucogeranus,the habitat of Scirpus planiculmis has been destroyed seriously . The food and the habitat decreased yearly. The living environment of the Grus leucogeranus are being destroyed.
The most key factor of the degradation in Momoge wetland is the dry up of the water resource. Scirpus planiculmi is emblematical hygrophytes,the growth of it closely related to the water resource especially the soil water content. Quantitative analysis between the soil water content of the wetland and the growth of Scirpus planiculmi is the key point during the rejuvenation in Momoge wetland and also is the important methed to protect and exploit wetland biodiversity reasonably, to guarantee the completeness of The structure and functions of wetland and to to realize the region sustainable development.In order to set up the restoration system of the Scirpus planiculmi in Momoge wetland,the relation between the growth of Scirpus planiculmi and soil habit and the propagation characteristic of Scirpus planiculmi has been studied.
As the emblematical hygrophytes,the growth of Scirpus planiculmi needs water strictly.The growth of the Scirpus planiculmi is divided into four levels by the height and coverage of Scirpus planiculmi along the soil gradation of moisture. In order to provide the theoretical base on the Scirpus planiculmi restoration technique in Momoge wetland and find out the best value and critical value on soil water conent and soil salinity content which suitable for Scirpus planiculmi,the soil water conent and soil salinity content has been studied .At the same time,the propagation mechanism of Scirpus planiculmi has been studied and shows that Scirpus planiculmi propagated by the underground corm.The main results are described as follows:
1.Scirpus planiculmi propagated by the underground corm,and the overwintering corm begin to bourgeon in middle third in April and form the overground part.With the uninterrupted growing of the overground Stem and leaf, the overwintering corm become to form new rhizome and the topmost of the new rhizome form new corm.When is comes to the last third of the month in May,the number of the new rhizome、new corm and reborn rhizome、new reborn corm reach to the peak.
2.From the distribution rule of the corm,it distribute in the soil in 0~10cm.When the soil water content and soil salinity content are studied ,the depth of the soil focus on the 0~10cm. 3.For the past few years, for the drought in Momoge wetland,the water resource is limited.How to restore the growth of the Scirpus planiculmi maximality with limited water resource is the key technology in Momoge wetland.
4.In the relation between the Scirpus planiculmi and soil habit ,for the soil water content bring down gradually,the soil salinity content increase gradually and the growth of Scirpus planiculmi comes to weak up until disappeared completely and instead by Suaeda glauca and other salt tolerant plants.The soil water content and soil salinity content also reach to the ultimate value at last.
5.The relation between the growthof Scirpus planiculmi and the soil water content and soil salinity content:when growth of the Scirpus planiculmi is in its best status,the critical soil water content and soil salinity content are 25%~27% and 0.125%~0.375%;when the soil water content break down to 21%~25% and the soil salinity content reached 0.375%~1%,the Suaeda glauca and othe salt tolerant plants appeared,but Scirpus planiculmi is still in its normal growth ;when the soil water content break down to 20%~21% and the soil salinity content reanched 1%~2.75%, Suaeda glauca appeared abundant and become the most important plant in the plant community instead of the Scirpus planiculml,and the Scirpus planiculml distributed Sporadically and forfeited the function for self-healing.When the soil water content reduced to 14%~17% and the soil sali nity went up to 1.75%~3.125%,the Scirpus planiculml disappeared completely.
水资源的枯竭是莫莫格湿地退化最关键的因素。扁杆藨草是典型的湿生植物,其生长与水,尤其是土壤水分含量密切相关。湿地土壤含水量与扁杆藨草生长的定量分析是扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地恢复过程中的关键所在,也是合理利用和保护湿地生物多样性,保证湿地结构与功能完整性,实现区域可持续发展的重要手段。在分析其与土壤生境关系的同时,结合扁杆藨草自身繁殖特性,建立扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地的恢复技术。
由于扁杆藨草是典型的湿生植物,对水分要求比较严格,沿着土壤水分梯度,并根据扁杆藨草生长的高度和盖度,将扁杆藨草的生长等级分成四个等级,并对四个等级上的土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量进行研究,找到适宜扁杆生长的土壤含水量和土壤含盐量的最佳值及临界值,为扁杆藨草在莫莫格湿地的恢复提供理论依据。同时,对扁杆藨草的繁殖机理进行试验研究,发现扁杆藨草主要通过地下球茎的根蘖能力进行营养繁殖。通过以上研究,得出以下主要结论:
扁杆藨草主要通过地下球茎进行营养繁殖,越冬球茎于每年4月中旬开始萌动形成地上植株,随着地上茎叶的不断生长,越冬球茎开始形成新的根状茎,新根状茎生长不久顶端膨大形成新的球茎,到5月下旬新根状茎、新球茎及再生根状茎、再生球茎的数量达到高峰。
从球茎分布规律看,主要集中在0~10cm的土层范围内,因此在做土壤水分和盐分等研究时,主要集中在0~10cm土层左右即可。
莫莫格湿地近年来遭受干旱侵袭,水资源有限,利用有限的水资源最大面积的恢复扁杆藨草的生长,是莫莫格湿地恢复的关键技术。
在扁杆藨草与土壤生境关系中,随着土壤水分含量的逐渐降低,土壤中的盐分含量逐渐增加,扁杆藨草生长呈衰弱趋势,逐步被碱蓬等旱生盐碱植物所代替,直至扁杆藨草消失完全被碱蓬等代替,土壤水分和盐分含量也达到扁杆藨草生长的极限值。
扁杆藨草生长与土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量的关系:当扁杆藨草处于最佳生长状态,其临界土壤水分含量和土壤盐分含量分别为25%~27%,0.125%~0.375%;当土壤水分含量为21%~25%,土壤含盐量为0.375%~1%时,碱蓬等耐盐碱植物出现,但扁杆藨草仍能正常生长;当土壤水分含量降至20%~21%,土壤含盐量提高到1%~2.75%时,碱蓬等耐盐碱植物大量出现,取代扁杆藨草而成为群落的主导,扁杆藨草呈零星分布状态,丧失自我恢复的功能;而当土壤水分含量降至14%~17%,土壤含盐量增至1.75%~3.125%时,扁杆藨草在植物群落中被碱蓬等耐盐碱植物代替而完全消失。
For identify possible causes,the habitat of the plant which Grus leucogeranus depended on has been destroyed yearly.It was found out that the Grus leucogeranus live by the underground corm of the Scirpus planiculmis and some fingerling.As one of the important food of the Grus leucogeranus,the habitat of Scirpus planiculmis has been destroyed seriously . The food and the habitat decreased yearly. The living environment of the Grus leucogeranus are being destroyed.
The most key factor of the degradation in Momoge wetland is the dry up of the water resource. Scirpus planiculmi is emblematical hygrophytes,the growth of it closely related to the water resource especially the soil water content. Quantitative analysis between the soil water content of the wetland and the growth of Scirpus planiculmi is the key point during the rejuvenation in Momoge wetland and also is the important methed to protect and exploit wetland biodiversity reasonably, to guarantee the completeness of The structure and functions of wetland and to to realize the region sustainable development.In order to set up the restoration system of the Scirpus planiculmi in Momoge wetland,the relation between the growth of Scirpus planiculmi and soil habit and the propagation characteristic of Scirpus planiculmi has been studied.
As the emblematical hygrophytes,the growth of Scirpus planiculmi needs water strictly.The growth of the Scirpus planiculmi is divided into four levels by the height and coverage of Scirpus planiculmi along the soil gradation of moisture. In order to provide the theoretical base on the Scirpus planiculmi restoration technique in Momoge wetland and find out the best value and critical value on soil water conent and soil salinity content which suitable for Scirpus planiculmi,the soil water conent and soil salinity content has been studied .At the same time,the propagation mechanism of Scirpus planiculmi has been studied and shows that Scirpus planiculmi propagated by the underground corm.The main results are described as follows:
1.Scirpus planiculmi propagated by the underground corm,and the overwintering corm begin to bourgeon in middle third in April and form the overground part.With the uninterrupted growing of the overground Stem and leaf, the overwintering corm become to form new rhizome and the topmost of the new rhizome form new corm.When is comes to the last third of the month in May,the number of the new rhizome、new corm and reborn rhizome、new reborn corm reach to the peak.
2.From the distribution rule of the corm,it distribute in the soil in 0~10cm.When the soil water content and soil salinity content are studied ,the depth of the soil focus on the 0~10cm. 3.For the past few years, for the drought in Momoge wetland,the water resource is limited.How to restore the growth of the Scirpus planiculmi maximality with limited water resource is the key technology in Momoge wetland.
4.In the relation between the Scirpus planiculmi and soil habit ,for the soil water content bring down gradually,the soil salinity content increase gradually and the growth of Scirpus planiculmi comes to weak up until disappeared completely and instead by Suaeda glauca and other salt tolerant plants.The soil water content and soil salinity content also reach to the ultimate value at last.
5.The relation between the growthof Scirpus planiculmi and the soil water content and soil salinity content:when growth of the Scirpus planiculmi is in its best status,the critical soil water content and soil salinity content are 25%~27% and 0.125%~0.375%;when the soil water content break down to 21%~25% and the soil salinity content reached 0.375%~1%,the Suaeda glauca and othe salt tolerant plants appeared,but Scirpus planiculmi is still in its normal growth ;when the soil water content break down to 20%~21% and the soil salinity content reanched 1%~2.75%, Suaeda glauca appeared abundant and become the most important plant in the plant community instead of the Scirpus planiculml,and the Scirpus planiculml distributed Sporadically and forfeited the function for self-healing.When the soil water content reduced to 14%~17% and the soil sali nity went up to 1.75%~3.125%,the Scirpus planiculml disappeared completely.
引文
[1]白军红,余国营.向海自然保护区湿地资源环境问题及对策分析[J].农村生态环境, 2001, 17 (1):17~20.
[2]白军红,余国营,叶宝莹,等.黄河三角洲湿地资源及其可持续利用对策[J].水土保持通报,2000,20(6):8~9.
[3]白红军,邓伟,张玉霞.莫莫格湿地土壤氮磷空间分布规律研究[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15 (4):79~81.
[4]包春红.1998 年洪水对镇赉县盐渍土景观格局的影响研究[D].长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文, 2005.
[5]卞建民,林年丰,汤洁. 吉林西部向海湿地环境退化及驱动机制研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版) 2004, 15 (4):575~578.
[6]陈宜瑜主编.中国湿地研究[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1995.
[7]崔保山.湿地生态系统特征变化及其可持续性问题[J].生态学杂志.1999,18(2):43~49.
[8]崔保山.我国自然湿地的基本特点[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(4):64~67.
[9]崔保山.吉林省典型湿地资源效益评价研究[J].资源科学,2001, 23 (3):55~61.
[10]邓伟,何岩,宋新山,等.松嫩平原西部盐沼湿地水环境化学特征[ J ].地理研究, 2000, 19 (2):113~119.
[11]郭跃东,何岩,邓伟,等.扎龙河滨湿地对地表径流氮磷污染物的净化作用[J].环境科学, 2005, 26 (3):49~55.
[12]黑龙江省水利水电勘测设计研究院.扎龙湿地水资源综合规划报告[ R ].哈尔滨: 黑龙江省水利水电勘测设计研究院,2005
[13]何春光,盛连喜,郎惠卿,等.向海湿地丹顶鹤迁徙动态及其栖息地保护研究[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15 (9):1523~1526 .
[14]何春光,宋榆均,郎惠卿,等.白鹤迁徙动态及其停歇地环境条件研究[J].生物多样性, 2002, 10 (3):286~290.
[15]何池全,崔保山,赵志春.吉林省典型湿地生态评价[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 12 (5):754~75
[16]黄锡畴主编.中国沼泽研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1988.
[17]黄锡畴.沼泽生态系统的性质[J].地理科学,1989,9 (2):97~104.
[18]郎惠卿,祖文辰,金树仁.中国沼泽[M].济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 1983.
[19]郎惠卿等.中国湿地保护与研究[M]上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998.
[20]郎惠卿,王升忠,罗维桢.松嫩平原的湿地环境与保护[J].野生动物, 1991, 18 (5):8~10.
[21]李颖,张养贞,张树文.三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其生态效应[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):677~682.
[22]李取生,邓伟,钱贞国.松嫩平原西部盐沼的形成与演化[J].地理科学, 2000, 20 (4):362~367.
[23]李旭东,何小娟,李绪谦,等.扎龙湿地水污染及其治理[J].水文地质工程地质, 2002, 6: 42~44.
[24]刘世江,卢仁富,陈会云.菠萝泡湿地引水工程的效益分析[J].东北水利水电, 2004, 22 (240):31~32.
[25]刘兴土,马学慧.三江平原自然环境变化与生态保育[M].北京:科学出版社,2002,170~171.
[26]刘兴土,黄锡畴.三江平原地区的生态环境和沼泽生态农业开发[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5 (2):12~18.
[27]刘权,马铁民,王忠静,等. 遥感技术在松嫩平原西部半干旱区扎龙湿地调水中应用研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2005,19(3):83~87.
[28]罗新正,孙广友.松嫩平原含盐碱斑的重度盐化草甸土种稻脱盐过程[J].生态环境, 2004, 13 (1):47~50.
[29]罗新正,朱坦,孙广友.松嫩平原大安古河道湿地的恢复和重建[J].生态学报, 2003, 23 (2):244~250.
[30]陆健健.中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1989.
[31]孟宪民,崔保山,邓伟,等.松嫩平原特大洪灾的醒示:湿地功能的再认识[J].自然资源学报, 1999, 14 (1):14～21.
[32] 那 守 海 , 张 杰 , 莽 虹 . 三 江 平 原 湿 地 生 态 环 境 建 设 刍 议 [J]. 东 北 林 业 大 学 学报,2004,32(2):78~80.
[33]牛焕光, 马学惠.我国的沼泽[M].北京:商务印书馆, 1985.
[34]邸志强,苗英,贾伟光等.东北地区湿地及其保护[J].地质与资源,2004,13(4):237~341.
[35] 邸志强 , 苗英 , 贾伟光等 . 东北地区水资源现状及可持续利用对策 [J]. 地质与资源,2004,13(2):112~115.
[36]阮伏水,周伏建.花岗岩侵蚀坡地重建植被的几个关键问题[J].水土保持学报,1995,9 (2):19~25.
[37]盛连喜,何春光,赵俊,等.向海湿地生态环境变化对丹顶鹤数量及其分布的影响分析[J].东北师范大学自然科学报版,2001,33(3):91~95.
[38] 谭 学 界 , 赵 欣 胜 . 水 深 梯 度 下 湿 地 植 被 空 间 分 布 与 生 态 适 应 [J]. 生 态 学志,2006,25(12):146~146
[39]田迅,张学勇,杨允菲.扎龙湿地长秆苔草种群的年龄结构[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 20 (1):57~61.
[40]汪爱华,张树清,张柏.三江平原沼泽湿地景观空间格局变化[J].生态学报, 2005
[41]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展[J]生态学杂志,1997,16 (1):58~62.
[42]王仁卿,刘纯惠,晁敏.从第五届国际湿地会议看湿地保护与研究趋势[J].生态学杂志.1997,16 (5):72~76.
[43] 王 宝 , 姜 维 军 . 莫 莫 格 湿 地 面 临 的 困 境 及 其 解 决 途 径 探 讨 [J]. 吉 林 林 业 科技,2004,33(6).29~31
[44]王娓,郭继勋. 松嫩草原碱茅群落环境因素与凋落物分解季节动态[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 12 (6):841~844.
[45]王国平,张淑琴.向海湿地孢粉记录及其环境意义[J]. 湿地科学, 2003, 1 (1):57~61.
[46]王海霞,王忠娟,于少鹏,等.松嫩平原距今 150 年湿地景观重建[J].东北师范大学报自然科学版, 2004,36 ( 2):75~81.
[47]许木启,黄玉瑶.受损水域生态系统恢复与重建研究[J].生态学报,1998,18 (5):547~558.
[48]俞穆清,田卫,刘景双,等.向海国家级自然保护区湿地资源与可持续利用探析[J].地理科学, 2000, 20 (2):193~196.
[49]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述[J].生态学报,1998, 18(5):539~546.
[50]余作岳,彭少鳞主编.热带亚热带退化生态系统植被恢复生态学研究[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,1996.
[51]张德同,付艳红.莫莫格湿地生态建设与水资源关系[J].吉林水利, 2004,01(257):10-11,13
[52]张永泽,王煊.自然湿地生态恢复研究综述[J].生态学报, 2001,21(2).309~314
[53]张艳红,邓伟,刘兆礼,等.向海自然保护区鹤类生境优化的水量调控[J].东北林业大学学报, 2003, 31 (2):28~30.
[54]张艳红,翟金良.向海自然保护区生态环境保护与可持续发展[J].中国人口、资源与环境, 2002, 61 (12):47~48.
[55]赵红艳.近 10a 来松嫩平原湿地研究的回顾与展望[J].湿地科学 2004,4(3)233~240
[56]张艳红,邓伟,翟金良.松嫩平原西部湖泡水环境问题、成因与对策[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2001, 15 (1):31~36.
[57]张艳红,邓伟.洪流洪泛湿地的功能特征及综合开发利用——以向海湿地为例[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2002,(1):51~53.
[58]郑冬梅.松嫩平原盐碱土水盐运移的节律性研究[D].长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文,2005
[59]赵魁义.1999.中国沼泽志[M].北京:科学出版社,246~252
[60]赵红艳,许林书,李波.吉林省西部湿地土壤资源及其合理利用[J].东北师范大学报自然科学版, 2002, 34:1~5.
[61]中国湿地植被编辑委员会编著.中国湿地植被[M]北京:科学出版社,1999.
[62]中国科学院长春地理研究所.三江平原沼泽[M].北京:科学出版社,1982.
[63]周密,崔庠,孙丽华,等.向海湿地环境及其保护对策[C] / /郎惠卿,林鹏,陆健健.中国湿地研究和保护.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1998:324~330.
[64]翟金良,何岩,邓伟.向海国家级自然保护区湿地功能研究[J].水土保持通报, 2002, 22 (3):5~9.
[65]Ambasht R S, Kumar R and Srivastava N K. Strategy formanaging the Rihand River riparian ecosystem deteriorating under rapid industrialization[J].In:M itsch W J ed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elswvier, Netherlands.1994.
[66]Beilfuss R D and Barzen J A. Hydro logicalwetland restoration in Mekong Delta,Vietnam[J]. In:Mitsch WJed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier,N etherlands, 1994.
[67]Edward B B, et al. Economic valuation of wetlands[J]. Ram sar Convention Bureau.Gland, Sw itzerland, 1997.
[68]Erwin K L , et al. Successful construction of a fresh water herbaceousmarsh in South Florida,U SA. In:M itschW Jed. Global wetland s: old world and new. Elsevier,Netherlands, 1994.
[69]Henry C P and Amoros C.Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands[J]:A scientific base. Environm ental anagement.1995, 19 (6) : 891~902.
[70]Kusler J A , et al. Wetland Scientific American[M], 1994, 1:58~62.
[71]Mitsch W J , et al. Wetlands of the old and new world: ecology and management.In:Mitsch W Jed. Global wetlands: old world and new.Elsevier,Netherlands, 1994.
[72]Mccoy M B and Rodriguex J M. Cattail (Typha dominguensis) eradication methods in the restoration of atropical,seasonal, freshwater marsh. In:M itschWJed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier,N etherlands, 1994.
[73]U S National Research Council. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosy stems. Nat Acad Press,Wash ington D C. 1992.
[2]白军红,余国营,叶宝莹,等.黄河三角洲湿地资源及其可持续利用对策[J].水土保持通报,2000,20(6):8~9.
[3]白红军,邓伟,张玉霞.莫莫格湿地土壤氮磷空间分布规律研究[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15 (4):79~81.
[4]包春红.1998 年洪水对镇赉县盐渍土景观格局的影响研究[D].长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文, 2005.
[5]卞建民,林年丰,汤洁. 吉林西部向海湿地环境退化及驱动机制研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版) 2004, 15 (4):575~578.
[6]陈宜瑜主编.中国湿地研究[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1995.
[7]崔保山.湿地生态系统特征变化及其可持续性问题[J].生态学杂志.1999,18(2):43~49.
[8]崔保山.我国自然湿地的基本特点[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(4):64~67.
[9]崔保山.吉林省典型湿地资源效益评价研究[J].资源科学,2001, 23 (3):55~61.
[10]邓伟,何岩,宋新山,等.松嫩平原西部盐沼湿地水环境化学特征[ J ].地理研究, 2000, 19 (2):113~119.
[11]郭跃东,何岩,邓伟,等.扎龙河滨湿地对地表径流氮磷污染物的净化作用[J].环境科学, 2005, 26 (3):49~55.
[12]黑龙江省水利水电勘测设计研究院.扎龙湿地水资源综合规划报告[ R ].哈尔滨: 黑龙江省水利水电勘测设计研究院,2005
[13]何春光,盛连喜,郎惠卿,等.向海湿地丹顶鹤迁徙动态及其栖息地保护研究[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15 (9):1523~1526 .
[14]何春光,宋榆均,郎惠卿,等.白鹤迁徙动态及其停歇地环境条件研究[J].生物多样性, 2002, 10 (3):286~290.
[15]何池全,崔保山,赵志春.吉林省典型湿地生态评价[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 12 (5):754~75
[16]黄锡畴主编.中国沼泽研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1988.
[17]黄锡畴.沼泽生态系统的性质[J].地理科学,1989,9 (2):97~104.
[18]郎惠卿,祖文辰,金树仁.中国沼泽[M].济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 1983.
[19]郎惠卿等.中国湿地保护与研究[M]上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998.
[20]郎惠卿,王升忠,罗维桢.松嫩平原的湿地环境与保护[J].野生动物, 1991, 18 (5):8~10.
[21]李颖,张养贞,张树文.三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其生态效应[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):677~682.
[22]李取生,邓伟,钱贞国.松嫩平原西部盐沼的形成与演化[J].地理科学, 2000, 20 (4):362~367.
[23]李旭东,何小娟,李绪谦,等.扎龙湿地水污染及其治理[J].水文地质工程地质, 2002, 6: 42~44.
[24]刘世江,卢仁富,陈会云.菠萝泡湿地引水工程的效益分析[J].东北水利水电, 2004, 22 (240):31~32.
[25]刘兴土,马学慧.三江平原自然环境变化与生态保育[M].北京:科学出版社,2002,170~171.
[26]刘兴土,黄锡畴.三江平原地区的生态环境和沼泽生态农业开发[J].地理学与国土研究,1989,5 (2):12~18.
[27]刘权,马铁民,王忠静,等. 遥感技术在松嫩平原西部半干旱区扎龙湿地调水中应用研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2005,19(3):83~87.
[28]罗新正,孙广友.松嫩平原含盐碱斑的重度盐化草甸土种稻脱盐过程[J].生态环境, 2004, 13 (1):47~50.
[29]罗新正,朱坦,孙广友.松嫩平原大安古河道湿地的恢复和重建[J].生态学报, 2003, 23 (2):244~250.
[30]陆健健.中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1989.
[31]孟宪民,崔保山,邓伟,等.松嫩平原特大洪灾的醒示:湿地功能的再认识[J].自然资源学报, 1999, 14 (1):14～21.
[32] 那 守 海 , 张 杰 , 莽 虹 . 三 江 平 原 湿 地 生 态 环 境 建 设 刍 议 [J]. 东 北 林 业 大 学 学报,2004,32(2):78~80.
[33]牛焕光, 马学惠.我国的沼泽[M].北京:商务印书馆, 1985.
[34]邸志强,苗英,贾伟光等.东北地区湿地及其保护[J].地质与资源,2004,13(4):237~341.
[35] 邸志强 , 苗英 , 贾伟光等 . 东北地区水资源现状及可持续利用对策 [J]. 地质与资源,2004,13(2):112~115.
[36]阮伏水,周伏建.花岗岩侵蚀坡地重建植被的几个关键问题[J].水土保持学报,1995,9 (2):19~25.
[37]盛连喜,何春光,赵俊,等.向海湿地生态环境变化对丹顶鹤数量及其分布的影响分析[J].东北师范大学自然科学报版,2001,33(3):91~95.
[38] 谭 学 界 , 赵 欣 胜 . 水 深 梯 度 下 湿 地 植 被 空 间 分 布 与 生 态 适 应 [J]. 生 态 学志,2006,25(12):146~146
[39]田迅,张学勇,杨允菲.扎龙湿地长秆苔草种群的年龄结构[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 20 (1):57~61.
[40]汪爱华,张树清,张柏.三江平原沼泽湿地景观空间格局变化[J].生态学报, 2005
[41]王宪礼,李秀珍.湿地的国内外研究进展[J]生态学杂志,1997,16 (1):58~62.
[42]王仁卿,刘纯惠,晁敏.从第五届国际湿地会议看湿地保护与研究趋势[J].生态学杂志.1997,16 (5):72~76.
[43] 王 宝 , 姜 维 军 . 莫 莫 格 湿 地 面 临 的 困 境 及 其 解 决 途 径 探 讨 [J]. 吉 林 林 业 科技,2004,33(6).29~31
[44]王娓,郭继勋. 松嫩草原碱茅群落环境因素与凋落物分解季节动态[J].应用生态学报, 2001, 12 (6):841~844.
[45]王国平,张淑琴.向海湿地孢粉记录及其环境意义[J]. 湿地科学, 2003, 1 (1):57~61.
[46]王海霞,王忠娟,于少鹏,等.松嫩平原距今 150 年湿地景观重建[J].东北师范大学报自然科学版, 2004,36 ( 2):75~81.
[47]许木启,黄玉瑶.受损水域生态系统恢复与重建研究[J].生态学报,1998,18 (5):547~558.
[48]俞穆清,田卫,刘景双,等.向海国家级自然保护区湿地资源与可持续利用探析[J].地理科学, 2000, 20 (2):193~196.
[49]殷康前,倪晋仁.湿地研究综述[J].生态学报,1998, 18(5):539~546.
[50]余作岳,彭少鳞主编.热带亚热带退化生态系统植被恢复生态学研究[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,1996.
[51]张德同,付艳红.莫莫格湿地生态建设与水资源关系[J].吉林水利, 2004,01(257):10-11,13
[52]张永泽,王煊.自然湿地生态恢复研究综述[J].生态学报, 2001,21(2).309~314
[53]张艳红,邓伟,刘兆礼,等.向海自然保护区鹤类生境优化的水量调控[J].东北林业大学学报, 2003, 31 (2):28~30.
[54]张艳红,翟金良.向海自然保护区生态环境保护与可持续发展[J].中国人口、资源与环境, 2002, 61 (12):47~48.
[55]赵红艳.近 10a 来松嫩平原湿地研究的回顾与展望[J].湿地科学 2004,4(3)233~240
[56]张艳红,邓伟,翟金良.松嫩平原西部湖泡水环境问题、成因与对策[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2001, 15 (1):31~36.
[57]张艳红,邓伟.洪流洪泛湿地的功能特征及综合开发利用——以向海湿地为例[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2002,(1):51~53.
[58]郑冬梅.松嫩平原盐碱土水盐运移的节律性研究[D].长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文,2005
[59]赵魁义.1999.中国沼泽志[M].北京:科学出版社,246~252
[60]赵红艳,许林书,李波.吉林省西部湿地土壤资源及其合理利用[J].东北师范大学报自然科学版, 2002, 34:1~5.
[61]中国湿地植被编辑委员会编著.中国湿地植被[M]北京:科学出版社,1999.
[62]中国科学院长春地理研究所.三江平原沼泽[M].北京:科学出版社,1982.
[63]周密,崔庠,孙丽华,等.向海湿地环境及其保护对策[C] / /郎惠卿,林鹏,陆健健.中国湿地研究和保护.上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1998:324~330.
[64]翟金良,何岩,邓伟.向海国家级自然保护区湿地功能研究[J].水土保持通报, 2002, 22 (3):5~9.
[65]Ambasht R S, Kumar R and Srivastava N K. Strategy formanaging the Rihand River riparian ecosystem deteriorating under rapid industrialization[J].In:M itsch W J ed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elswvier, Netherlands.1994.
[66]Beilfuss R D and Barzen J A. Hydro logicalwetland restoration in Mekong Delta,Vietnam[J]. In:Mitsch WJed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier,N etherlands, 1994.
[67]Edward B B, et al. Economic valuation of wetlands[J]. Ram sar Convention Bureau.Gland, Sw itzerland, 1997.
[68]Erwin K L , et al. Successful construction of a fresh water herbaceousmarsh in South Florida,U SA. In:M itschW Jed. Global wetland s: old world and new. Elsevier,Netherlands, 1994.
[69]Henry C P and Amoros C.Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands[J]:A scientific base. Environm ental anagement.1995, 19 (6) : 891~902.
[70]Kusler J A , et al. Wetland Scientific American[M], 1994, 1:58~62.
[71]Mitsch W J , et al. Wetlands of the old and new world: ecology and management.In:Mitsch W Jed. Global wetlands: old world and new.Elsevier,Netherlands, 1994.
[72]Mccoy M B and Rodriguex J M. Cattail (Typha dominguensis) eradication methods in the restoration of atropical,seasonal, freshwater marsh. In:M itschWJed. Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier,N etherlands, 1994.
[73]U S National Research Council. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosy stems. Nat Acad Press,Wash ington D C. 1992.