鄂尔多斯盆地中东部地区古生界热演化史与天然气成藏
|
摘要
近年来随着石油天然气勘探开发的不断深入,盆地热演化史恢复已成为地质领域研究的热点。鄂尔多斯盆地绥德县以南、志丹县以东、宜川县以西、洛川县以北地区古生界含气层系多,气藏类型多样,是天然气勘探和研究程度相对较低的地区,到目前为止还没有针对该区古生界开展系统的热演化史、生烃史、排烃史及天然气成藏等研究。因此对于该地区古生界热演化史及天然气成藏研究有助于对天然气勘探进行客观评价,为勘探目标优选提供依据。
对研究范围内白垩系残存地区、中东部镜质体反射率数据较多的地区和缺乏地化测试数据的地区,分别采取声波时差外推法、镜质体反射率法和沉积体模型法,恢复出了早白垩世以来各套地层剥蚀厚度和剥蚀厚度总量。地层剥蚀总量具有自西向东逐渐增大的规律,西部志丹地区不到900m,东部宜川地区剥蚀量最大可达2000m以上。以沉积地层学为原理,采用剥蚀厚度相对数值法,恢复了加里东运动时期马家沟组剥蚀厚度,剥蚀数值范围在0～185m之间。
通过磷灰石裂变径迹模拟法,建立了多种地质演化模型,通过对比分析,精确地刻画了研究区早白垩世晚期以来的演化过程。精细刻画结果表明：研究区早白垩世晚期以来可以细分为快速抬升阶段(96Ma-40Ma),抬升速率较快；缓慢抬升阶段(40Ma-23Ma),抬升速率不大；再次快速抬升阶段(23Ma～今),抬升速率最大。
根据含油气盆地理论,采用国际最先进的盆地模拟软件PetroMod,结合油气田勘探开发生产资料,设定合理的地质参数,建立研究区古生界地质模型并恢复埋藏史,揭示了研究区埋藏沉降史规律,指出埋藏沉降史分为四大演化阶段,其中快速沉降阶段发生在中-晚三叠世。在早白垩世晚期地层达到最大埋深之后,又经历了快速抬升-缓慢抬升-再次快速抬升的演化过程。
在对研究区古大地热流值、各种岩性的热导率等参数讨论的基础上,采用EASY%Ro法恢复了研究区古生界热演化史,并进行了古今地温平面对比、重点层位地温平面演化史、热演化史剖面特征和重点地区热史的差异性对比。研究结果认为：古生界各套烃源岩自沉积后,经历温度逐渐增高,三叠纪末,整体达到了成熟阶段；侏罗纪末,大部分地区处于高成熟阶段；最大埋深期,整体处于生气阶段,西部埋深大的地区,局部达到了干气阶段；之后整体抬升,地层温度逐渐降低。
统计了研究区古生界烃源岩的类型、丰度及成熟度。在对生烃动力学、有机碳恢复系数、生烃潜力图版等模拟参数选取的基础上,从二维和三维的角度对重点烃源岩层位的生烃强度演化史进行了模拟,并最终进行了生烃量的计算。研究认为山西组生烃量最多,对整个古生界生烃量的贡献率达到37%。各套烃源岩在晚侏罗世至早白垩世生烃贡献率最大,达到整个历史时期的72%。晚白垩世以来的后期抬升阶段,生烃演化可划分为三个次一级的生烃阶段：96～40Ma、40～23Ma和23Ma～现今,其生烃强度逐渐减小至零。
采用物质平衡法、压差法等技术和原理,在选取适合研究区的排烃参数的基础上,进行了排烃史模拟。模拟结果认为累计排气量以志丹-安塞-延安地区最高,占总排气量的67%。研究区排烃强度可分为四大阶段。其中第三个阶段(晚侏罗世-早白垩世晚期),排气强度最高,志丹县以东地区达到了18.6×108m3/km2,此阶段排烃量为24.66×1012m3,占历史上总排烃量的78%。
采用烃源岩生烃演化史及关键时刻分析方法和包裹体测温技术指出研究区上古生界石盒子组天然气充注在晚侏罗世(167～153Ma)和早白垩世(147～126Ma)。古生界所有烃源岩层位在晚侏罗世至早白垩世期间,均处在大量生、排烃期,此阶段天然气充注强度大,为天然气主要成藏期。
In recent years, oil and gas basin simulation has become a hot spot in the study of geological field. The region, which is bounded by the SuiDe county, ZhiDan county, YiChuan county and LuoChuan county, has a variety of Paleozoic gas reservoirs. The gas exploration and research level is relatively low in the region, and so far there has no research in Palaeozoic thermal evolution, hydrocarbon generation history, hydrocarbon expulsion history and accumulation. Based on above reasons, the research of thermal evolution helps to evaluate objectively the exploration target and provides the optimization basis.
Various erosion thickness restoration method have been used. The Cretaceous residual region used the acoustic time extrapolation method. The central areas, where has vitrinite reflectance data use the vitrinite reflectance method. The region, where is lack of geochemistry data, use the uniform thickness method. The total erosion thickness is restored. It is increased gradually from the west to the east. The ZhiDan county is less than900m. The largest amount in the eastern YiChuan county is up to2000m above. With the sedimentary stratigraphical principle and the erosion thickness relative numerical method, the majiagou erosion thickness has been restored. The erosion thickness distribution is irregular, numerical range from0m to185m.
With the apatite-fission simulation, a variety of tectonic evolution model was established, and the accurate depiction of the evolution process(since early Cretaceous) has been made. The results showed that since the early Cretaceous late, the study area can be subdivided into rapid uplift stage (96Ma～40Ma), uplifting rate quickly; slow lifting stage (40Ma～23Ma) once again rapid uplift stage (23Ma～now), maximum uplifting rate.
With the international most advanced basin simulation software PetroMod and practical gas exploration data, the research area burial history is established. The Paleozoic structure evolution is also been recovered. It is pointed out that the burial subsidence history can be divided into four evolutionary stages. The rapid subsidence stage is in the middle-late Triassic. After the time when the formation achieved the maximum buried depth in Cretaceous, the region experienced rapid uplift-slow rise-rapid uplift again-deposition evolution process.
The paleo-surface temperature, paleo-heat flow, thermal conductivity and heat generation rate are all discussed. With the EASY%R。method, the Paleozoic thermal history has been rebuild. The thermal history has been presented in virous way, including the comparison between paleo-temperature and present temperature, horizontal and sectional temperature characters, comparison between different region. Modeling result shows that the temperature gradually increase since the sedimentation began. The Source rock enters into oil threshold in late Triassic, enters into gas threshold in early Jurassic, reaches the maximum temperature in late period of early Cretaceous, and afterwards the gradual lowering of temperature. The temperature of ZhiDan county is higher than any other places.
Statistically, the source rock type, abundance and maturity have been discussed in the study area. The hydrocarbon dynamics, organic carbon recovery coefficient, hydrocarbon generation potential parameters chart are all been rebuild. In the view of2d and3d, the hydrocarbon generation capability and generation amount are all been calculated. The ShanXi formation provides the highest contributive rate, nearly about37%. The period between late Jurassic and early Cretaceous provides the highest contributive rate, nearly about72%. The hydrocarbon generation since the late Cretaceous can be divided into three sub stages:96-40Ma,40-23Ma and23Ma-now.
With the material balance method and the pressure disparity method together, the proper expulsive parameters and the expulsive amount are been calculated. The maximum accumulated expulsive amount is in the center of ZhiDan-AnSai-YanAn region, reaching67%of the expulsive amount. The expulsive intensity and expulsive amount can be divided into four stages. The last stage(since late Cretaceous) can be divided into three sub stages:96-40Ma,40-23Ma and23Ma-now. The maximum expulsive intensity is to the east of ZhiDan county, reaching18.6×108m3/km2.
Using hydrocarbon-generating key moment analysis method and inclusion thermometry, it is pointed out that the upper Palaeozoic hydrocarbon injection is happened in late Jurassic period (167-153Ma) and early Cretaceous(147-126Ma). Late Jurassic to early Cretaceous is the time when all the Palaeozoic plentifully expulsion happens. It is also the main gas accumulation time.
The natural gas accumulation is controlled by hydrocarbon generating ability and tectonic thermal evolution history.
对研究范围内白垩系残存地区、中东部镜质体反射率数据较多的地区和缺乏地化测试数据的地区,分别采取声波时差外推法、镜质体反射率法和沉积体模型法,恢复出了早白垩世以来各套地层剥蚀厚度和剥蚀厚度总量。地层剥蚀总量具有自西向东逐渐增大的规律,西部志丹地区不到900m,东部宜川地区剥蚀量最大可达2000m以上。以沉积地层学为原理,采用剥蚀厚度相对数值法,恢复了加里东运动时期马家沟组剥蚀厚度,剥蚀数值范围在0～185m之间。
通过磷灰石裂变径迹模拟法,建立了多种地质演化模型,通过对比分析,精确地刻画了研究区早白垩世晚期以来的演化过程。精细刻画结果表明：研究区早白垩世晚期以来可以细分为快速抬升阶段(96Ma-40Ma),抬升速率较快；缓慢抬升阶段(40Ma-23Ma),抬升速率不大；再次快速抬升阶段(23Ma～今),抬升速率最大。
根据含油气盆地理论,采用国际最先进的盆地模拟软件PetroMod,结合油气田勘探开发生产资料,设定合理的地质参数,建立研究区古生界地质模型并恢复埋藏史,揭示了研究区埋藏沉降史规律,指出埋藏沉降史分为四大演化阶段,其中快速沉降阶段发生在中-晚三叠世。在早白垩世晚期地层达到最大埋深之后,又经历了快速抬升-缓慢抬升-再次快速抬升的演化过程。
在对研究区古大地热流值、各种岩性的热导率等参数讨论的基础上,采用EASY%Ro法恢复了研究区古生界热演化史,并进行了古今地温平面对比、重点层位地温平面演化史、热演化史剖面特征和重点地区热史的差异性对比。研究结果认为：古生界各套烃源岩自沉积后,经历温度逐渐增高,三叠纪末,整体达到了成熟阶段；侏罗纪末,大部分地区处于高成熟阶段；最大埋深期,整体处于生气阶段,西部埋深大的地区,局部达到了干气阶段；之后整体抬升,地层温度逐渐降低。
统计了研究区古生界烃源岩的类型、丰度及成熟度。在对生烃动力学、有机碳恢复系数、生烃潜力图版等模拟参数选取的基础上,从二维和三维的角度对重点烃源岩层位的生烃强度演化史进行了模拟,并最终进行了生烃量的计算。研究认为山西组生烃量最多,对整个古生界生烃量的贡献率达到37%。各套烃源岩在晚侏罗世至早白垩世生烃贡献率最大,达到整个历史时期的72%。晚白垩世以来的后期抬升阶段,生烃演化可划分为三个次一级的生烃阶段：96～40Ma、40～23Ma和23Ma～现今,其生烃强度逐渐减小至零。
采用物质平衡法、压差法等技术和原理,在选取适合研究区的排烃参数的基础上,进行了排烃史模拟。模拟结果认为累计排气量以志丹-安塞-延安地区最高,占总排气量的67%。研究区排烃强度可分为四大阶段。其中第三个阶段(晚侏罗世-早白垩世晚期),排气强度最高,志丹县以东地区达到了18.6×108m3/km2,此阶段排烃量为24.66×1012m3,占历史上总排烃量的78%。
采用烃源岩生烃演化史及关键时刻分析方法和包裹体测温技术指出研究区上古生界石盒子组天然气充注在晚侏罗世(167～153Ma)和早白垩世(147～126Ma)。古生界所有烃源岩层位在晚侏罗世至早白垩世期间,均处在大量生、排烃期,此阶段天然气充注强度大,为天然气主要成藏期。
In recent years, oil and gas basin simulation has become a hot spot in the study of geological field. The region, which is bounded by the SuiDe county, ZhiDan county, YiChuan county and LuoChuan county, has a variety of Paleozoic gas reservoirs. The gas exploration and research level is relatively low in the region, and so far there has no research in Palaeozoic thermal evolution, hydrocarbon generation history, hydrocarbon expulsion history and accumulation. Based on above reasons, the research of thermal evolution helps to evaluate objectively the exploration target and provides the optimization basis.
Various erosion thickness restoration method have been used. The Cretaceous residual region used the acoustic time extrapolation method. The central areas, where has vitrinite reflectance data use the vitrinite reflectance method. The region, where is lack of geochemistry data, use the uniform thickness method. The total erosion thickness is restored. It is increased gradually from the west to the east. The ZhiDan county is less than900m. The largest amount in the eastern YiChuan county is up to2000m above. With the sedimentary stratigraphical principle and the erosion thickness relative numerical method, the majiagou erosion thickness has been restored. The erosion thickness distribution is irregular, numerical range from0m to185m.
With the apatite-fission simulation, a variety of tectonic evolution model was established, and the accurate depiction of the evolution process(since early Cretaceous) has been made. The results showed that since the early Cretaceous late, the study area can be subdivided into rapid uplift stage (96Ma～40Ma), uplifting rate quickly; slow lifting stage (40Ma～23Ma) once again rapid uplift stage (23Ma～now), maximum uplifting rate.
With the international most advanced basin simulation software PetroMod and practical gas exploration data, the research area burial history is established. The Paleozoic structure evolution is also been recovered. It is pointed out that the burial subsidence history can be divided into four evolutionary stages. The rapid subsidence stage is in the middle-late Triassic. After the time when the formation achieved the maximum buried depth in Cretaceous, the region experienced rapid uplift-slow rise-rapid uplift again-deposition evolution process.
The paleo-surface temperature, paleo-heat flow, thermal conductivity and heat generation rate are all discussed. With the EASY%R。method, the Paleozoic thermal history has been rebuild. The thermal history has been presented in virous way, including the comparison between paleo-temperature and present temperature, horizontal and sectional temperature characters, comparison between different region. Modeling result shows that the temperature gradually increase since the sedimentation began. The Source rock enters into oil threshold in late Triassic, enters into gas threshold in early Jurassic, reaches the maximum temperature in late period of early Cretaceous, and afterwards the gradual lowering of temperature. The temperature of ZhiDan county is higher than any other places.
Statistically, the source rock type, abundance and maturity have been discussed in the study area. The hydrocarbon dynamics, organic carbon recovery coefficient, hydrocarbon generation potential parameters chart are all been rebuild. In the view of2d and3d, the hydrocarbon generation capability and generation amount are all been calculated. The ShanXi formation provides the highest contributive rate, nearly about37%. The period between late Jurassic and early Cretaceous provides the highest contributive rate, nearly about72%. The hydrocarbon generation since the late Cretaceous can be divided into three sub stages:96-40Ma,40-23Ma and23Ma-now.
With the material balance method and the pressure disparity method together, the proper expulsive parameters and the expulsive amount are been calculated. The maximum accumulated expulsive amount is in the center of ZhiDan-AnSai-YanAn region, reaching67%of the expulsive amount. The expulsive intensity and expulsive amount can be divided into four stages. The last stage(since late Cretaceous) can be divided into three sub stages:96-40Ma,40-23Ma and23Ma-now. The maximum expulsive intensity is to the east of ZhiDan county, reaching18.6×108m3/km2.
Using hydrocarbon-generating key moment analysis method and inclusion thermometry, it is pointed out that the upper Palaeozoic hydrocarbon injection is happened in late Jurassic period (167-153Ma) and early Cretaceous(147-126Ma). Late Jurassic to early Cretaceous is the time when all the Palaeozoic plentifully expulsion happens. It is also the main gas accumulation time.
The natural gas accumulation is controlled by hydrocarbon generating ability and tectonic thermal evolution history.
引文
[1]任战利.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系研究[J].石油学报,1996,17(1)：17-24.
[2]于强,任战利,曹红霞.鄂尔多斯盆地研究区下古生界热演化史[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,2011,47(5)：24-29
[3]于强.鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界热演化史及其与多种能源关系研究[D].西北大学,2009
[4]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化程度异常分布区及形成时期探讨[J].地质学报,2006,80(5)：674-684
[5]任战利等.陕甘宁盆地热演化史研究进展.刘池阳编著：盆地多种能源矿产共存富集成藏(矿)研究进展,北京：科学出版社,2005,17-25
[6]张杰,崔宏俊.模糊数学综合评价方法在储层预测中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长气田东部地区上古生界为例[J].陕西科技大学学报：自然科学版,2011,29(6)：112-116
[7]张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界层序地层划分及演化[J].沉积学报,2009,27(2)：289-298
[8]苏楠,田景春,隆昊等.苏里格气田东区上古生界盒8段、山1段物源区分析研究[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(5)：4-6
[9]魏柳斌,陈洪德,朱平等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界盒8段南北储层差异性对比[J].断块油气田,2011,18(3)：285-288
[10]徐波,韩宗元.米脂气田上古生界盒8段储层特征及成岩作用评价[J].西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2011,26(5)：17-22
[11]王国茹.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界物源及层序岩相古地理研究[D].成都理工大学,2011
[12]任来义,杨超,刘宝平等.鄂尔多斯东部上古生界物源及山西组构造背景[J].西南石油大学学报,2011,33(5)：49-53
[13]罗东明,陈舒薇,张广权.大牛地气田上古生界沉积相与天然气富集规律的再认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(3)：368-374
[14]谭晨曦.大牛地气田上古生界沉积相及储层研究[D].西北大学,2010
[15]Darcilea Ferreira Castro, Dilce De Fatima Rossetti, Luiz Carlos Ruiz Pessenda. Facies,δ13C,δ15N and C/N analyses in a late Quaternary compound estuarine fill, northern Brazil and relation to sea level[J]. Marine Geology,2010,274(1-4):135-150
[16]Youfeng GAO, Pujun WANG, Rihui CHENGet al. Description of Cretaceous Sedimentary Sequence of the First Member of the Qingshankou Formation Recovered by CCSD-SK-Is Borehole in Songliao Basin:Lithostratigraphy, Sedimentary Facies, and Cyclic Stratigraphy [J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2009,16(2):314-323
[17]Janos Haas, Annette E. Gotz, Jozsef Palfy. Late Triassic to Early Jurassic palaeogeography and eustatic history in the NW Tethyan realm:New insights from sedimentary and organic facies of the Csovar Basin (Hungary)[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2010,291(3-4): 456-468
[18]Pujun WANG, Youfeng GAO, Rihui CHENGet al. Description of Cretaceous Sedimentary Sequence of the Second and Third Member of the Qingshankou Formation Recovered by CCSD-SK-Is Borehole in Songliao Basin:Lithostratigraphy, Sedimentary Facies and Cyclic Stratigraphy [J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2009,16(2):288-313
[19]王勇.靖边气田沉积特征及其成藏规律[D].西北大学,2007
[20]Krzysztof Bak. Deep-water facies succession around the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the Outer Carpathian basin:Sedimentary, biotic and chemical records in the Silesian Nappe, Poland[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2007,248(3-4):255-290
[21]Minh Hoang Truong, Van Lap Nguyen, Thi Kim Oanh Taet al. Changes in late Pleistocene-Holocene sedimentary facies of the Mekong River Delta and the influence of sedimentary environment on geotechnical engineering properties[J]. Engineering Geology,2011,122(3-4):146-159
[22]张道锋,杨文敬,漆亚玲等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区上古生界山西组物源分析[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(6)：902-906
[23]许威.米脂地区上古生界山2段沉积作用特征及对储层物性的影响[J].中国科技博览,2011(35)：16-22
[24]姜亭,李玉宏,张慧元等.鄂尔多斯盆地延川地区上古生界山西组-石盒子组储集条件及其影响因素分析——以延X井为例[J].长江大学学报：自然科学版,2011,8(12)：33-35
[25]袁珍,邢晓莉.鄂尔多斯延长气田下二叠统山西组山2段储层特征[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(5)：33-36
[26]李振宏,胡健民.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系孔洞充填特征分析[J].地质论评,2011,57(3)：444-456
[27]管英柱.鄂尔多斯盆地靖边古潜台东侧马五1+2储层综合研究[D].成都理工大学,2007
[28]王建民.鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳岩溶古地貌与储层特征[D].西北大学,2011
[29]罗静兰,魏新善,姚泾利等.物源与沉积相对鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界天然气优质储层的控制 [J].地质通报,2010,29(6)：811-820
[30]Yijun LI, Yong ZHAO, Renchao YANGet al. Detailed sedimentary facies of a sandstone reservoir in the eastern zone of the Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Mining Science and Technology (China),2010,20(6):891-903
[31]Mauro Papini, Marco Benvenuti. The Toarcian-Bathonian succession of the Antsiranana Basin (NW Madagascar):Facies analysis and tectono-sedimentary history in the development of the East Africa-Madagascar conjugate margins[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences,2008,51(1):21-38
[32]Wenxiang Zhang, Hucai Zhang, Qingzhong Minget al. The 8Ce-ΣREE Instruction on the Sedimentary Facies[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,2011,2(0):334-339
[33]罗晓容.数值盆地模拟方法在地质研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2)：6-10
[34]王震亮,罗晓容,陈荷立.沉积盆地地下古水动力场恢复-原理与方法[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),1997,27(2)：155-159
[35]Jessica L. Allen, Cari L. Johnson. Facies control on sandstone composition (and influence of statistical methods on interpretations) in the John Henry Member, Straight Cliffs Formation, Southern Utah, USA[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2010,230(1-2):60-76
[36]战沙,张金功,席辉.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区上古生界主要裂缝的测井识别[J].内蒙古石油化工厂,2010,36(10)：64-66
[37]罗晓容.数值盆地模拟方法在地质研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2)：6-10
[38]林锡祥,华保钦.鄂尔多斯盆地靖边一绥德地区古生界天然气运移和聚集的数值模拟[J].沉积学报,1996,14(3)：139-148
[39]A. S. Chandio, T. S. Lee, M. S. Mirjat. The extent of waterlogging in the lower Indus Basin (Pakistan)-A modeling study of groundwater levels[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,426-427(0):103-111
[40]Nigel W. T. Quinn. Adaptive implementation of information technology for real-time, basin-scale salinity management in the San Joaquin Basin, USA and Hunter River Basin, Australia[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2011,98(6):930-940
[41]邓明亮,孟军田.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界油气资源数值模拟[J].河南石油,2006,20(2)：3-6
[42]史新磊.应用构造沉积综合法恢复剥蚀厚度[D].中国海洋大学,2011
[43]Yosuke Yamakawa, Ken'ichirou Kosugi, Naoya Masaokaet al. Combined geophysical methods for detecting soil thickness distribution on a weathered granitic hillslope[J]. Geomorphology,2012,145-146(0):56-69
[44]G. E. Shephard, L. Liu, R. D. Mulleret al. Dynamic topography and anomalously negative residual depth of the Argentine Basin[J]. Gondwana Research,2011,23(5):113-119
[45]T. C. Hales, K. M. Scharer, R. M. Wooten. Southern Appalachian hills lope erosion rates measured by soil and detrital radiocarbon in hollows[J]. Geomorphology,2012,138(1):121-129
[46]郑秋枫,陈延哲,李红进.简析沉积盆地剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].科协论坛：下半月
[47]Guan Shuwei, Chen Zhuxin, Fang Shihu. Three potential exploration areas of Southern Junggar Basin, NW China:Arguments from structural modeling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):43-50
[48]Yevhen I. Holubnyak, Steven B. Hawthorne, Blaise A. F. Mibecket al. Modeling CO2-H2S-water-rock interactions at Williston Basin reservoir conditions[J]. Energy Procedia,2011,4(0):3911-3918
[49]Jonathan E. Wu, Ken McClay, Paul Whitehouseet al.25-4D analogue modelling of transtensional pull-apart basins [J],2012:700-730
[50]陈刚,王志维,白国绢等.鄂尔多斯盆地中新生代峰值年龄事件及其沉积-构造响应[J].中国地质,2007,34(3)：375-383
[51]丁超,陈刚,李振华等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部构造热演化史的磷灰石裂变径迹分析[J].现代地质,2011,25(3)：581-588
[52]任战利.利用磷灰石裂变径迹法研究鄂尔多斯盆地地热史[J].地球物理学报,1995,38(3)：339-349
[53]孙建博.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部中新生代构造事件及其天然气成藏效应[D].西北大学,2008
[54]赵红格.鄂尔多斯盆地西部构造特征及演化[D].西北大学,2003
[55]陈刚,孙建博,周立发等.鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘中生代构造事件的裂变径迹年龄记录[J].中国科学：D辑,2007,37(A01)：110-118
[56]赵红格,刘池洋,翁望飞等.新近纪鄂尔多斯盆地东西部的构造反转及其意义[J].石油学报,2007,28(6)：6-11
[57]Mary K. Roden-Tice, J. Dykstra Eusden Jr., Robert P. Wintsch. Apatite fission-track evidence for the Cretaceous development of kilometer-scale relief and steady-state Tertiary topography in New England[J]. Geomorphology,2012,141-142(0):114-120
[58]刘武生,秦明宽,漆富成等.运用磷灰石裂变径迹分析鄂尔多斯盆地周缘中新生代沉降隆升史[J].铀矿地质,2008,24(4)：221-227
[59]Vivi Kathrine Pedersen, S(?)ren Bom Nielsen, Kerry Gallagher. The post-orogenic evolution of the Northeast Greenland Caledonides constrained from apatite fission track analysis and inverse geodynamic modelling[J]. Tectonophysics,2012,530-531(0):318-330
[60]M. Ganer(?)d, D. M. Chew, M. A. Smethurstet al. Geochronology of the Tardree Rhyolite Complex, Northern Ireland:Implications for zircon fission track studies, the North Atlantic Igneous Province and the age of the Fish Canyon sanidine standard[J]. Chemical Geology,2011,286(3-4):222-228
[61]Mukhtar Ahmed Rana. Mechanisms and kinetics of nuclear track etching and annealing:Free energy analysis of damage in fission fragment tracks[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment,2012,672(0): 57-63
[62]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.鄂尔多斯盆地构造热演化史及其成藏成矿意义[J].中国科学：D辑,2007,37(A01)：23-32
[63]崔军平.海拉尔盆地热演化史与油气成藏史研究[D]：西北大学,2004
[64]任战利.中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史恢复及其对比研究[D].西北大学,1998
[65]Narjes Setoodeh, Rahbar Rahimi, Abolhasan Ameri. Modeling and determination of heat transfer coefficient in a basin solar still using CFD[J]. Desalination,2011,268(1-3):103-110
[66]T. Aus Der Beek, F. VoB, M. Florke. Modelling the impact of Global Change on the hydrological system of the Aral Sea basin[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C,2011,36(13): 684-695
[67]John M. Johnston, Daniel J. McGarvey, M. Craig Barberet al. An integrated modeling framework for performing environmental assessments:Application to ecosystem services in the Albemarle-Pamlico basins (NC and VA, USA)[J]. Ecological Modelling,2011,222(14):2471-2484
[68]任战利,赵重远,张军,于忠平.鄂尔多斯盆地古地温研究[J].沉积学报,1994,12(1)：56-65
[69]任战利.利用磷灰石裂变径迹法研究鄂尔多斯盆地地热史[J].地球物理学报,1995,95.38(3)：339-349
[70]任战利.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系研究[J].石油学报,1996,17(1)：17-24
[71]任战利,赵重远.鄂尔多斯盆地与沁水盆地中生代晚期地温场对比研究[J].沉积学报,1997,15(2)：134-137
[72]张福礼.多旋回与鄂尔多斯盆地石油天然气[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(2)：138-142
[73]匡耀求,黄宁生,胡振宇等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生代晚期以来大地热流的变化及其对生态环境格局 和演变的影响[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2004,23(4)：318-325
[74]戴世立,杨智,李弘等.鄂尔多斯盆地塔巴庙地区上古生界源岩热演化特征[J].海洋石油,2009,29(1)：15-20
[75]朱春俊,王延斌.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部上古生界煤系地层成煤特征分析[J].西安科技大学学报,2010,30(6)：687-692
[76]倪春华,周小进,王果寿等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部平凉组烃源岩特征及其成烃演化分析[J].石油实验地质,2010(6)：572-577
[77]薛会,张金川,徐波等.鄂尔多斯北部杭锦旗探区上古生界烃源岩评价[J].成都理工大学学报：自然科学版,2010(1)：21-28
[78]王桂成,吕友学.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界天然气勘探潜力分析[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(30)：1-2
[79]朱建辉,吕剑虹,缪九军等.鄂尔多斯西南缘下古生界烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(6)：662-670
[80]王伟,崔晓朵.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥岩在油气成藏中的作用[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2010(4)：24-28
[81]张洁.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界富有机质泥页岩特征分析[J].科技创新导报,2011(35)：123-124
[82]王兆云,赵文智,王云鹏.中国海相碳酸盐岩气源岩评价指标研究[J].自然科学进展,2004,14(11)：1236-1243
[83]叶加仁,赵鹏大.鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界油气地质动力学研究[J].中国科学：D辑,2000,30(1)：40-46
[84]Xiaowen Guo, Keyu Liu, Sheng Heet al. Petroleum generation and charge history of the northern Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China:Insight from integrated fluid inclusion analysis and basin modelling[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,32(1):21-35
[85]Xiaowen Guo, Sheng He, Keyu Liuet al. Modelling the petroleum generation and migration of the third member of the Shahejie Formation (Es3) in the Banqiao Depression of Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2011,40(1):287-302
[86]Christophe Y. Galerne, Olivier Galland, Else-Ragnhild Neumannet al.3D relationships between sills and their feeders:evidence from the Golden Valley Sill Complex (Karoo Basin) and experimental modelling[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,2011,202(3-4):189-199
[87]E. Eseme, B. M. Krooss, R. Littke. Evolution of petrophysical properties of oil shales during high-temperature compaction tests:Implications for petroleum expulsion[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,31(1):110-124
[88]Huang Jinliang, Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhonget al. Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Southern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):75-8
[89]柳广弟,郝石生.鄂尔多斯地区古生界生烃史和排烃史的模拟[J].石油大学学报：自然科学版,1996,20(1)：13-18
[90]米敬奎,李新虎,刘新华等.利用生烃动力学研究鄂尔多斯盆地抬升后上古生界源岩生气作用结束时间[J].地球化学,2004,33(6)：561-566
[91]李贵红,张泓.鄂尔多斯盆地晚古生代煤层作为气源岩的成烃贡献[J].天然气工业,2009(12)：5-8
[92]陈义才,李延军,等.碳酸盐烃源岩排烃模拟模型及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(3)：203-206
[93]P. R. Van Oel, A. Van der Veen. Using agent-based modeling to depict basin closure in the Naivasha basin, Kenya:a framework of analysis[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2011,7(0):32-37
[94]Katrine Juul Andresen, Mads Huuse.'Bulls-eye' pockmarks and polygonal faulting in the Lower Congo Basin:Relative timing and implications for fluid expulsion during shallow burial[J]. Marine Geology,2011,279(1-4):111-127
[95]Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Stefan Bunz, Jurgen Mienert. Repeated fluid expulsion through sub-seabed chimneys offshore Norway in response to glacial cycles[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2011,305(3-4):297-308
[96]王胜利,许化政.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界流体压力分布与成冈[J].石油实验地质,2010(6)：536-540
[97]马德文,邱楠生,许威.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田异常低压成因机制研究[J].地质科学,2011,46(4)：1055-1067
[98]江涛,陈刚,丁超等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木-米脂地区上古生界天然气藏压力分布特征[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(3)：48-51
[99]Jiang Fujie, Pang Xiongqi. Quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon resource potential and its distribution in the Bozhong Sag and surrounding areas, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(1):23-29
[100]F. Gaitzsch, A. Gabler, M. Kraume. Analysis of droplet expulsion in stagnant single water-in-oil-in-water double emulsion globules[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2011,66(20): 4663-4669
[101]Li Rongxi, T. Guzmics, Liu Xiaojieet al. Migration of immiscible hydrocarbons recorded in calcite-hosted fluid inclusions, Ordos Basin:a case study from Northern China[J]. Russian Geology and Geophysics,2011,52(11):1491-1503
[102]米敬奎,张水昌,何坤.群体包裹体地球化学特征及在油气源对比中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(2)：188-192
[103]王乃军,赵靖舟,罗静兰等.利用流体包裹体法确定成藏年代——以鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾地区三叠系延长组为例[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,2010,46(2)：22-25
[104]王春连,侯中健,刘丽红.鄂尔多斯盆地西北部上古生界流体包裹体特征及其与油气演化的关系[J].四川地质学报,2010,30(1)：45-50
[105]王兰萍.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系气液包裹体特征及研究意义[J].科技创新导报,2010(31)：109-110
[106]张文忠.榆林气田储层成岩作用与烃类充注期次研究[J].特种油气藏,2010(1)：49-53
[107]刘小洪,冯明友,罗静兰等.鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区盒8、山1段储层流体包裹体特征及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(3)：360-366
[108]万永平,李园园,梁晓.基于流体包裹体的储层微裂缝研究——以陕北斜坡上古生界为例[J].地质与勘探,2010(4)：711-715
[109]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.伊盟隆起东胜地区热演化史与多种能源矿产的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2)：187-193
[1 10]李艳霞,赵靖舟,李净红.鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界气藏成藏史[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,201 1,47(3)：29-34
[111]谭梦琦,董昭雄,刘忠群等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界煤成气及其砂岩气藏成藏模式[J].西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2010,25(5)：33-36
[112]张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界岩性圈闭类型探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2010(2)：243-250
[113]赵忠英,柳广弟,孙明亮等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气藏类型辨析[J].现代地质,2010,24(4)：703-708
[114]王永成,高海仁,李云.陕北地区上古生界天然气成藏特征及其控制因素分析[J].录井工程,2010,21(4)：49-54
[115]王明健,何登发,包洪平等.鄂尔多斯盆地伊盟隆起上古生界天然气成藏条件[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(1)：30-39
[116]陈安清,陈洪德,林良彪等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界东、西部岩性-地层气藏的差异性[J].成都理工大学学报：自然科学版,2010,37(2)：120-126
[117]廖友运,李文厚,王若谷.研究区延153井古生界储层物性特征及主控因素研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2010(7)：168-170
[118]赵靖舟,王力,孙兵华等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部构造演化对上古生界大气田形成的控制作用[J].天然气地球科学,2010(6)：875-881
[119]胡朝元,钱凯,王秀芹等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界多藏大气田形成的关键因素及气藏性质的嬗变[J].石油学报,2010,31(6)：879-884
[120]任战利,刘丽,崔军平等.盆地构造热演化史在油气成藏期次研究中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(4)：502-506.
[2]于强,任战利,曹红霞.鄂尔多斯盆地研究区下古生界热演化史[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,2011,47(5)：24-29
[3]于强.鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界热演化史及其与多种能源关系研究[D].西北大学,2009
[4]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化程度异常分布区及形成时期探讨[J].地质学报,2006,80(5)：674-684
[5]任战利等.陕甘宁盆地热演化史研究进展.刘池阳编著：盆地多种能源矿产共存富集成藏(矿)研究进展,北京：科学出版社,2005,17-25
[6]张杰,崔宏俊.模糊数学综合评价方法在储层预测中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长气田东部地区上古生界为例[J].陕西科技大学学报：自然科学版,2011,29(6)：112-116
[7]张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界层序地层划分及演化[J].沉积学报,2009,27(2)：289-298
[8]苏楠,田景春,隆昊等.苏里格气田东区上古生界盒8段、山1段物源区分析研究[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(5)：4-6
[9]魏柳斌,陈洪德,朱平等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界盒8段南北储层差异性对比[J].断块油气田,2011,18(3)：285-288
[10]徐波,韩宗元.米脂气田上古生界盒8段储层特征及成岩作用评价[J].西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2011,26(5)：17-22
[11]王国茹.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界物源及层序岩相古地理研究[D].成都理工大学,2011
[12]任来义,杨超,刘宝平等.鄂尔多斯东部上古生界物源及山西组构造背景[J].西南石油大学学报,2011,33(5)：49-53
[13]罗东明,陈舒薇,张广权.大牛地气田上古生界沉积相与天然气富集规律的再认识[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(3)：368-374
[14]谭晨曦.大牛地气田上古生界沉积相及储层研究[D].西北大学,2010
[15]Darcilea Ferreira Castro, Dilce De Fatima Rossetti, Luiz Carlos Ruiz Pessenda. Facies,δ13C,δ15N and C/N analyses in a late Quaternary compound estuarine fill, northern Brazil and relation to sea level[J]. Marine Geology,2010,274(1-4):135-150
[16]Youfeng GAO, Pujun WANG, Rihui CHENGet al. Description of Cretaceous Sedimentary Sequence of the First Member of the Qingshankou Formation Recovered by CCSD-SK-Is Borehole in Songliao Basin:Lithostratigraphy, Sedimentary Facies, and Cyclic Stratigraphy [J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2009,16(2):314-323
[17]Janos Haas, Annette E. Gotz, Jozsef Palfy. Late Triassic to Early Jurassic palaeogeography and eustatic history in the NW Tethyan realm:New insights from sedimentary and organic facies of the Csovar Basin (Hungary)[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2010,291(3-4): 456-468
[18]Pujun WANG, Youfeng GAO, Rihui CHENGet al. Description of Cretaceous Sedimentary Sequence of the Second and Third Member of the Qingshankou Formation Recovered by CCSD-SK-Is Borehole in Songliao Basin:Lithostratigraphy, Sedimentary Facies and Cyclic Stratigraphy [J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2009,16(2):288-313
[19]王勇.靖边气田沉积特征及其成藏规律[D].西北大学,2007
[20]Krzysztof Bak. Deep-water facies succession around the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the Outer Carpathian basin:Sedimentary, biotic and chemical records in the Silesian Nappe, Poland[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2007,248(3-4):255-290
[21]Minh Hoang Truong, Van Lap Nguyen, Thi Kim Oanh Taet al. Changes in late Pleistocene-Holocene sedimentary facies of the Mekong River Delta and the influence of sedimentary environment on geotechnical engineering properties[J]. Engineering Geology,2011,122(3-4):146-159
[22]张道锋,杨文敬,漆亚玲等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区上古生界山西组物源分析[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(6)：902-906
[23]许威.米脂地区上古生界山2段沉积作用特征及对储层物性的影响[J].中国科技博览,2011(35)：16-22
[24]姜亭,李玉宏,张慧元等.鄂尔多斯盆地延川地区上古生界山西组-石盒子组储集条件及其影响因素分析——以延X井为例[J].长江大学学报：自然科学版,2011,8(12)：33-35
[25]袁珍,邢晓莉.鄂尔多斯延长气田下二叠统山西组山2段储层特征[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(5)：33-36
[26]李振宏,胡健民.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系孔洞充填特征分析[J].地质论评,2011,57(3)：444-456
[27]管英柱.鄂尔多斯盆地靖边古潜台东侧马五1+2储层综合研究[D].成都理工大学,2007
[28]王建民.鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳岩溶古地貌与储层特征[D].西北大学,2011
[29]罗静兰,魏新善,姚泾利等.物源与沉积相对鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界天然气优质储层的控制 [J].地质通报,2010,29(6)：811-820
[30]Yijun LI, Yong ZHAO, Renchao YANGet al. Detailed sedimentary facies of a sandstone reservoir in the eastern zone of the Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Mining Science and Technology (China),2010,20(6):891-903
[31]Mauro Papini, Marco Benvenuti. The Toarcian-Bathonian succession of the Antsiranana Basin (NW Madagascar):Facies analysis and tectono-sedimentary history in the development of the East Africa-Madagascar conjugate margins[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences,2008,51(1):21-38
[32]Wenxiang Zhang, Hucai Zhang, Qingzhong Minget al. The 8Ce-ΣREE Instruction on the Sedimentary Facies[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,2011,2(0):334-339
[33]罗晓容.数值盆地模拟方法在地质研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2)：6-10
[34]王震亮,罗晓容,陈荷立.沉积盆地地下古水动力场恢复-原理与方法[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),1997,27(2)：155-159
[35]Jessica L. Allen, Cari L. Johnson. Facies control on sandstone composition (and influence of statistical methods on interpretations) in the John Henry Member, Straight Cliffs Formation, Southern Utah, USA[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2010,230(1-2):60-76
[36]战沙,张金功,席辉.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区上古生界主要裂缝的测井识别[J].内蒙古石油化工厂,2010,36(10)：64-66
[37]罗晓容.数值盆地模拟方法在地质研究中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2)：6-10
[38]林锡祥,华保钦.鄂尔多斯盆地靖边一绥德地区古生界天然气运移和聚集的数值模拟[J].沉积学报,1996,14(3)：139-148
[39]A. S. Chandio, T. S. Lee, M. S. Mirjat. The extent of waterlogging in the lower Indus Basin (Pakistan)-A modeling study of groundwater levels[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,426-427(0):103-111
[40]Nigel W. T. Quinn. Adaptive implementation of information technology for real-time, basin-scale salinity management in the San Joaquin Basin, USA and Hunter River Basin, Australia[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2011,98(6):930-940
[41]邓明亮,孟军田.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界油气资源数值模拟[J].河南石油,2006,20(2)：3-6
[42]史新磊.应用构造沉积综合法恢复剥蚀厚度[D].中国海洋大学,2011
[43]Yosuke Yamakawa, Ken'ichirou Kosugi, Naoya Masaokaet al. Combined geophysical methods for detecting soil thickness distribution on a weathered granitic hillslope[J]. Geomorphology,2012,145-146(0):56-69
[44]G. E. Shephard, L. Liu, R. D. Mulleret al. Dynamic topography and anomalously negative residual depth of the Argentine Basin[J]. Gondwana Research,2011,23(5):113-119
[45]T. C. Hales, K. M. Scharer, R. M. Wooten. Southern Appalachian hills lope erosion rates measured by soil and detrital radiocarbon in hollows[J]. Geomorphology,2012,138(1):121-129
[46]郑秋枫,陈延哲,李红进.简析沉积盆地剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].科协论坛：下半月
[47]Guan Shuwei, Chen Zhuxin, Fang Shihu. Three potential exploration areas of Southern Junggar Basin, NW China:Arguments from structural modeling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):43-50
[48]Yevhen I. Holubnyak, Steven B. Hawthorne, Blaise A. F. Mibecket al. Modeling CO2-H2S-water-rock interactions at Williston Basin reservoir conditions[J]. Energy Procedia,2011,4(0):3911-3918
[49]Jonathan E. Wu, Ken McClay, Paul Whitehouseet al.25-4D analogue modelling of transtensional pull-apart basins [J],2012:700-730
[50]陈刚,王志维,白国绢等.鄂尔多斯盆地中新生代峰值年龄事件及其沉积-构造响应[J].中国地质,2007,34(3)：375-383
[51]丁超,陈刚,李振华等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部构造热演化史的磷灰石裂变径迹分析[J].现代地质,2011,25(3)：581-588
[52]任战利.利用磷灰石裂变径迹法研究鄂尔多斯盆地地热史[J].地球物理学报,1995,38(3)：339-349
[53]孙建博.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部中新生代构造事件及其天然气成藏效应[D].西北大学,2008
[54]赵红格.鄂尔多斯盆地西部构造特征及演化[D].西北大学,2003
[55]陈刚,孙建博,周立发等.鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘中生代构造事件的裂变径迹年龄记录[J].中国科学：D辑,2007,37(A01)：110-118
[56]赵红格,刘池洋,翁望飞等.新近纪鄂尔多斯盆地东西部的构造反转及其意义[J].石油学报,2007,28(6)：6-11
[57]Mary K. Roden-Tice, J. Dykstra Eusden Jr., Robert P. Wintsch. Apatite fission-track evidence for the Cretaceous development of kilometer-scale relief and steady-state Tertiary topography in New England[J]. Geomorphology,2012,141-142(0):114-120
[58]刘武生,秦明宽,漆富成等.运用磷灰石裂变径迹分析鄂尔多斯盆地周缘中新生代沉降隆升史[J].铀矿地质,2008,24(4)：221-227
[59]Vivi Kathrine Pedersen, S(?)ren Bom Nielsen, Kerry Gallagher. The post-orogenic evolution of the Northeast Greenland Caledonides constrained from apatite fission track analysis and inverse geodynamic modelling[J]. Tectonophysics,2012,530-531(0):318-330
[60]M. Ganer(?)d, D. M. Chew, M. A. Smethurstet al. Geochronology of the Tardree Rhyolite Complex, Northern Ireland:Implications for zircon fission track studies, the North Atlantic Igneous Province and the age of the Fish Canyon sanidine standard[J]. Chemical Geology,2011,286(3-4):222-228
[61]Mukhtar Ahmed Rana. Mechanisms and kinetics of nuclear track etching and annealing:Free energy analysis of damage in fission fragment tracks[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment,2012,672(0): 57-63
[62]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.鄂尔多斯盆地构造热演化史及其成藏成矿意义[J].中国科学：D辑,2007,37(A01)：23-32
[63]崔军平.海拉尔盆地热演化史与油气成藏史研究[D]：西北大学,2004
[64]任战利.中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史恢复及其对比研究[D].西北大学,1998
[65]Narjes Setoodeh, Rahbar Rahimi, Abolhasan Ameri. Modeling and determination of heat transfer coefficient in a basin solar still using CFD[J]. Desalination,2011,268(1-3):103-110
[66]T. Aus Der Beek, F. VoB, M. Florke. Modelling the impact of Global Change on the hydrological system of the Aral Sea basin[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C,2011,36(13): 684-695
[67]John M. Johnston, Daniel J. McGarvey, M. Craig Barberet al. An integrated modeling framework for performing environmental assessments:Application to ecosystem services in the Albemarle-Pamlico basins (NC and VA, USA)[J]. Ecological Modelling,2011,222(14):2471-2484
[68]任战利,赵重远,张军,于忠平.鄂尔多斯盆地古地温研究[J].沉积学报,1994,12(1)：56-65
[69]任战利.利用磷灰石裂变径迹法研究鄂尔多斯盆地地热史[J].地球物理学报,1995,95.38(3)：339-349
[70]任战利.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系研究[J].石油学报,1996,17(1)：17-24
[71]任战利,赵重远.鄂尔多斯盆地与沁水盆地中生代晚期地温场对比研究[J].沉积学报,1997,15(2)：134-137
[72]张福礼.多旋回与鄂尔多斯盆地石油天然气[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(2)：138-142
[73]匡耀求,黄宁生,胡振宇等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生代晚期以来大地热流的变化及其对生态环境格局 和演变的影响[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2004,23(4)：318-325
[74]戴世立,杨智,李弘等.鄂尔多斯盆地塔巴庙地区上古生界源岩热演化特征[J].海洋石油,2009,29(1)：15-20
[75]朱春俊,王延斌.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部上古生界煤系地层成煤特征分析[J].西安科技大学学报,2010,30(6)：687-692
[76]倪春华,周小进,王果寿等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部平凉组烃源岩特征及其成烃演化分析[J].石油实验地质,2010(6)：572-577
[77]薛会,张金川,徐波等.鄂尔多斯北部杭锦旗探区上古生界烃源岩评价[J].成都理工大学学报：自然科学版,2010(1)：21-28
[78]王桂成,吕友学.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界天然气勘探潜力分析[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(30)：1-2
[79]朱建辉,吕剑虹,缪九军等.鄂尔多斯西南缘下古生界烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(6)：662-670
[80]王伟,崔晓朵.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥岩在油气成藏中的作用[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2010(4)：24-28
[81]张洁.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界富有机质泥页岩特征分析[J].科技创新导报,2011(35)：123-124
[82]王兆云,赵文智,王云鹏.中国海相碳酸盐岩气源岩评价指标研究[J].自然科学进展,2004,14(11)：1236-1243
[83]叶加仁,赵鹏大.鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界油气地质动力学研究[J].中国科学：D辑,2000,30(1)：40-46
[84]Xiaowen Guo, Keyu Liu, Sheng Heet al. Petroleum generation and charge history of the northern Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China:Insight from integrated fluid inclusion analysis and basin modelling[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,32(1):21-35
[85]Xiaowen Guo, Sheng He, Keyu Liuet al. Modelling the petroleum generation and migration of the third member of the Shahejie Formation (Es3) in the Banqiao Depression of Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2011,40(1):287-302
[86]Christophe Y. Galerne, Olivier Galland, Else-Ragnhild Neumannet al.3D relationships between sills and their feeders:evidence from the Golden Valley Sill Complex (Karoo Basin) and experimental modelling[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,2011,202(3-4):189-199
[87]E. Eseme, B. M. Krooss, R. Littke. Evolution of petrophysical properties of oil shales during high-temperature compaction tests:Implications for petroleum expulsion[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,31(1):110-124
[88]Huang Jinliang, Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhonget al. Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Southern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):75-8
[89]柳广弟,郝石生.鄂尔多斯地区古生界生烃史和排烃史的模拟[J].石油大学学报：自然科学版,1996,20(1)：13-18
[90]米敬奎,李新虎,刘新华等.利用生烃动力学研究鄂尔多斯盆地抬升后上古生界源岩生气作用结束时间[J].地球化学,2004,33(6)：561-566
[91]李贵红,张泓.鄂尔多斯盆地晚古生代煤层作为气源岩的成烃贡献[J].天然气工业,2009(12)：5-8
[92]陈义才,李延军,等.碳酸盐烃源岩排烃模拟模型及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(3)：203-206
[93]P. R. Van Oel, A. Van der Veen. Using agent-based modeling to depict basin closure in the Naivasha basin, Kenya:a framework of analysis[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2011,7(0):32-37
[94]Katrine Juul Andresen, Mads Huuse.'Bulls-eye' pockmarks and polygonal faulting in the Lower Congo Basin:Relative timing and implications for fluid expulsion during shallow burial[J]. Marine Geology,2011,279(1-4):111-127
[95]Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Stefan Bunz, Jurgen Mienert. Repeated fluid expulsion through sub-seabed chimneys offshore Norway in response to glacial cycles[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2011,305(3-4):297-308
[96]王胜利,许化政.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界流体压力分布与成冈[J].石油实验地质,2010(6)：536-540
[97]马德文,邱楠生,许威.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田异常低压成因机制研究[J].地质科学,2011,46(4)：1055-1067
[98]江涛,陈刚,丁超等.鄂尔多斯盆地神木-米脂地区上古生界天然气藏压力分布特征[J].特种油气藏,2010,17(3)：48-51
[99]Jiang Fujie, Pang Xiongqi. Quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon resource potential and its distribution in the Bozhong Sag and surrounding areas, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(1):23-29
[100]F. Gaitzsch, A. Gabler, M. Kraume. Analysis of droplet expulsion in stagnant single water-in-oil-in-water double emulsion globules[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2011,66(20): 4663-4669
[101]Li Rongxi, T. Guzmics, Liu Xiaojieet al. Migration of immiscible hydrocarbons recorded in calcite-hosted fluid inclusions, Ordos Basin:a case study from Northern China[J]. Russian Geology and Geophysics,2011,52(11):1491-1503
[102]米敬奎,张水昌,何坤.群体包裹体地球化学特征及在油气源对比中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(2)：188-192
[103]王乃军,赵靖舟,罗静兰等.利用流体包裹体法确定成藏年代——以鄂尔多斯盆地下寺湾地区三叠系延长组为例[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,2010,46(2)：22-25
[104]王春连,侯中健,刘丽红.鄂尔多斯盆地西北部上古生界流体包裹体特征及其与油气演化的关系[J].四川地质学报,2010,30(1)：45-50
[105]王兰萍.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系气液包裹体特征及研究意义[J].科技创新导报,2010(31)：109-110
[106]张文忠.榆林气田储层成岩作用与烃类充注期次研究[J].特种油气藏,2010(1)：49-53
[107]刘小洪,冯明友,罗静兰等.鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区盒8、山1段储层流体包裹体特征及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(3)：360-366
[108]万永平,李园园,梁晓.基于流体包裹体的储层微裂缝研究——以陕北斜坡上古生界为例[J].地质与勘探,2010(4)：711-715
[109]任战利,张盛,高胜利等.伊盟隆起东胜地区热演化史与多种能源矿产的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2)：187-193
[1 10]李艳霞,赵靖舟,李净红.鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界气藏成藏史[J].兰州大学学报：自然科学版,201 1,47(3)：29-34
[111]谭梦琦,董昭雄,刘忠群等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界煤成气及其砂岩气藏成藏模式[J].西安石油大学学报：自然科学版,2010,25(5)：33-36
[112]张满郎,李熙喆,谷江锐等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界岩性圈闭类型探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2010(2)：243-250
[113]赵忠英,柳广弟,孙明亮等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气藏类型辨析[J].现代地质,2010,24(4)：703-708
[114]王永成,高海仁,李云.陕北地区上古生界天然气成藏特征及其控制因素分析[J].录井工程,2010,21(4)：49-54
[115]王明健,何登发,包洪平等.鄂尔多斯盆地伊盟隆起上古生界天然气成藏条件[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(1)：30-39
[116]陈安清,陈洪德,林良彪等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界东、西部岩性-地层气藏的差异性[J].成都理工大学学报：自然科学版,2010,37(2)：120-126
[117]廖友运,李文厚,王若谷.研究区延153井古生界储层物性特征及主控因素研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2010(7)：168-170
[118]赵靖舟,王力,孙兵华等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部构造演化对上古生界大气田形成的控制作用[J].天然气地球科学,2010(6)：875-881
[119]胡朝元,钱凯,王秀芹等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界多藏大气田形成的关键因素及气藏性质的嬗变[J].石油学报,2010,31(6)：879-884
[120]任战利,刘丽,崔军平等.盆地构造热演化史在油气成藏期次研究中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(4)：502-506.