多元化业务企业集团并购方向研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
并购是我国企业集团实现快速成长的重要途径。在外部压力和内部整合需求的双重作用下,并购越来越受到企业集团的关注。本文以企业集团这一特殊经济组织的并购重组作为专门分析和研究的对象,引入资源要素,并充分结合企业集团的性质和特征探讨其成长过程中的并购方向选择问题。
     本文以资源基础观在个体层次、组合层次、企业层次的主要观点和主导思想作为分析基础,提出了更适用于并购研究的企业资源分类,在此基础上结合每一类资源的特性,重点、深入地分析了各类资源对并购方向选择的偏好;另外,考虑到企业集团这一经济组织的特殊性质和特征,本文从基于关系视角的网络观出发,着重强调了跨组织资源的重要性,分析了企业集团资源网络的系统特性,提出了以企业集团资源网络系统优化为最终目标的并购战略全局观;最后,本文总结了企业集团并购方向决策流程,并应用案例研究法,将该决策流程应用于鲁银投资集团股份有限公司的多元化业务并购方向决策。
     本文在以下几方面进行了有益的探索和尝试:
     (1)将并购方向决策涉及的业务、地域、时机三个维度整合起来,并引入资源要素,构建了本文的分析框架。
     本文认为并购方向的选择即立足于集团当前的资源现状,以建立、巩固和增强并购后企业集团的持续竞争优势为最根本的长远目标,寻求集团资源与拟选择的业务、地域和时机三个维度之间的最佳匹配。鉴于此,本文引入资源要素作为决策的关键构建模块,将并购方向决策中的业务、地域和时机这三个主要维度整合起来,构建了全文的并购方向决策分析框架,从而探讨基于资源基础的企业并购发展方法与不同战略发展方向之间的适应性结合。
     该分析框架解决了以往研究中因区分公司层面和业务层面战略而产生的不同层面战略之间的冲突分歧和重叠领域别忽视的问题,以及因区分战略发展方向和发展方法所产生的两者之间关系被人为割裂而实践指导性大大削弱的问题。
     同时,该分析框架在已有研究的基础上作了进一步深入,如从资源相关性(而非业务相关性)的角度研究企业并购方向决策中的业务维度选择;在地域市场选择方面,考虑到企业并购活动受地方政府的政策扶持以及地域文化差异影响更为明显的特性,将地域维度进一步细化到了境内跨省份的并购,而非简单地区分为境内并购和跨国并购。
     (2)基于网络视角,将企业集团作为资源网络系统,应用社会网分析方法对并购前后集团资源网络系统的变化进行分析和定量刻画。
     将企业集团这一特殊的经济组织作为资源网络系统,比照传统的基于企业内部资源的资源基础理论,强调了集团内部跨组织网络资源的重要性。考虑到集团资源网络具有开放性、相关性、整体性等系统的基本特性,本文引入社会学的研究方法,将企业集团内部的各业务类比为网络中的节点,将它们之间的资源关系类比为网络中的边,运用UCINET软件和图论的相关算法对集团网络系统的连通性、距离、关系强度、小团体特征进行了分析和定量刻画,这样可以更加全面的描述企业集团资源网络系统,符合企业集团可持续发展的目标。
     分析不同并购方向方案对于企业集团资源网络连通性、距离、关系强度、小团体特征的影响,以集团资源网络系统优化确定为并购方向决策的原则,确定最终的并购方向决策。
     (3)提出了适用于企业并购研究的资源分类体系,研究了每一类资源的特性,并探讨了各类资源在稀缺或闲置的情况下,对并购方向决策的偏好或倾向性。
     以往研究中对于资源之间可能存在的四种关系(包括替代关系、互补关系、增进关系和抑制关系)的界定给本文的研究提供了非常有益的启示。但同时,本文认为对于资源的研究不应仅停留在资源间关系的层面,而应深入到每一类资源内部,结合每一类资源的特性,探讨为实现某一特定资源与其他资源间的有效替代、互补和增进关系,避免与其他资源间的抑制和冲突,它将对并购方向的选择产生怎样的偏好。本文在这方面进行了有益的探索,在所提出的适用于企业并购研究的资源分类体系的基础上,研究了每一类资源的特性,探讨了各类资源在稀缺或闲置的情况下,对并购方向决策的偏好或倾向性。
     (4)将并购方向决策流程化,并以鲁银投资集团为例进行案例应用研究
     依据所提出的并购方向决策分析框架,提出了更具实践指导性的企业集团并购方向决策流程,并以鲁银投资集团为例进行案例应用研究,验证了并购方向分析框架及决策流程的科学性和可执行性。
Nowadays,the pressure resulting from globalization in the world economy,and the inherent requirement for development are making M&A the most important way to choose for enterprise groups in our country.The reality calls for the need to study how to implement M&A successfully,and accordingly M&A direction is one of the key problems to be answered.Thus,this paper focuses on M&A of enterprise groups,a special economic organization,and mainly discusses the relevant issues of decision-making on M&A direction.
     Based on a detailed review of the main ideas of resource-based view(RBV),the paper puts forward a category system of firm resources,which is more adaptable for research of M&A activities,and further analyzes the priority of each resource on M&A direction in different situations,in consideration of resources' unique traits.In addition, the paper complements the traditional RBV with another resource perspective,the relational view,which puts a great emphasis on inter-organizational relationships.Then the paper describes the characteristics of groups' resource network system and confirms that the objective of groups' decision is to optimize the resource network system to the greatest extent.Finally the paper generalizes the flow of decision-making on M&A direction for enterprise groups,and then applies it to a detailed case study.
     The paper makes several useful explorations and experimentations,which are listed as below.
     (1)The paper introduces into resources,and integrates industrial relatedness selecting,locating,and timing into a complete analyzing framework.
     This paper introduces into resources when making strategic decision,discussing where M&A should head and when to start.This study can help solving the problem resulted from separating both business-level and corporate-level strategy,and strategic direction and method for development.
     The paper makes a progress in extending and integrating previous study results. For example,it emphasizes on resource relatedness when selecing business,and is more concerned about key success factors.And when it comes down to location selection,the paper also discusses cross-province M&A.In a word,decision on M&A direction of enterprise groups should be established in the current status of firm resources,seeking the superior fit between resources and the industry,location and timing being chosen.
     (2)Based on the relational view of network,the paper takes enterprise groups as resource network systems,and applies analytical method of social network to desribe the change of groups' resource network.
     As enterprise groups evolve towards network structure,their internal corporate members depend on each other and shape an interrelational network.In the network system,corporate member is a heterogenous node,and the relationships between different nodes are resource connections.The resource attached to this cooperation network is also a source of competitive advantage,and should be put great attention.
     Resource network has the characteristics of openness,relatedness and integrity, which make it possible for us to apply network perspective in analyzing resource network of groups.Thus,the paper analogizes social network to resource network, viewing each business as the node of the network,while interorganizational relationship as the side of the network.Furthermore,the paper applies software UCINET in describing the connectedness,distance,intensity of relationships,and sub-groups of group's network,and also in measuring the effects of M&A on the network,such as whether and to what extent M&A optimize the network.The final decision of M&A direction is made according to the comparison of respective effects being measured.
     (3)Analyzing the priority of each category of resources on the M&A direction.
     Previous studies have defined four kinds of resource relationships,including substituting,complementary,enhancing and suppressing relationship,which provides great inspiration to this study.Taking for consideration of the trait of each category of resources,the paper analyzes the priority of resources on M&A direction in conditions of resource scarcity and excess,in order to realize effective substitution, complementation,and enhacement and to avoid confict as much as possible.
     (4)Generalizing a feasible flow of decision-making on M&A direction.
     Regarding the conceptual framework of M&A direction,and based on the application of combining theoretical foundation,the paper puts forward the flow of decision-making and makes a detailed case study to verify the feasibility of the flow.
引文
[1]阿兰·斯密德.制度与行为经济学[M].刘璨,吴水荣译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004
    [2]艾云.企业购并、价值链重构与持久竞争优势的创造[J].东华大学学报:自然科学版,2001,(4):52-55
    [3]安德鲁·坎贝尔等著.战略协同[M],任通海等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2000
    [4]安景玲,齐二石,李中阳等.基于资源与能力的竞争力理论研究综述[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(5):336-340
    [5]奥瑞克·J.C.,琼克·J.J.,威伦·R.E..企业基因重组:释放公司的价值潜力[M].高远洋等译.北京:电子工业出版社,2003
    [6]查尔斯·甘瑟尔,艾琳·罗杰斯,马克·雷诺.并购中的企业文化整合[M].干春晖等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004
    [7]常绍舜.系统科学与管理[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998
    [8]陈共,周升业,吴晓求.公司购并原理与案例[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998
    [9]陈佳贵,黄速建.企业经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1998
    [10]陈琼.从跨国并购的区位选择看湖南引资[J].民族论坛,2004年,第11期
    [11]程兆谦,徐金发.资源观理论框架的整理[J].外国经济与管理,2002,第24卷第7期
    [12]崔新有.企业的资源整合能力和企业的运行能力[J].天津商学院学报,2004,(11):22-24
    [13]杜慕群.资源、能力、外部环境、战略与竞争优势的整合研究[J].管理世界,2003年,第10期
    [14]丁焕明,弗里茨·克勒格尔,斯蒂芬·蔡塞尔.科尔尼并购策略[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004
    [15]戴维·J·科利斯等著,王永贵、杨永恒等译.公司战略:基于资源论的观点[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2006年1月
    [16]范徽.基于知识资本的企业核心能力的研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2001
    [17]范从来,袁静.成长性、成熟性和衰退性产业上市公司并购绩效的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2002年,第8期
    [18]冯·贝塔朗菲.一般系统论基础发展和应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1987
    [19]方芳,闫晓彤.中国上市公司并购绩效与思考[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002年,第8期
    [20]方甲.产业组织理论与政策研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993
    [21]费显政.资源依赖学派之组织与环境关系理论评介[J].武汉大学学报,2005年,第4期
    [22]冯根福,吴林江.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].经济研究,2001,第1期
    [23]高见,陈歆玮.中国证券市场资产重组效应分析[J].经济科学,2000年,第1期
    [24]高愈湘.中国上市公司控制权市场研究[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2004
    [25]葛京,席酉民.企业集团跨国经营中的资源获取、转移与整合[J].中国软科学,2000年,第11期,74-77
    [26]格里·约翰逊,凯万·斯科尔斯著.王军等译.战略管理[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2004年1月
    [27]郭培民.基于企业资源论的母子公司性质及管理策略研究[D].浙江:浙江大学,2001
    [28]郭咸纲,陈伟邦.资源导向型理性决策模式[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005
    [29]韩伯棠,杨业功,姜莹.基于企业核心竞争力的资源协同分析[J].企业经济,2004,(2):8-10
    [30]韩瑞珠.社会经济系统中扩散现象的复杂性研究[D],南京:东南大学,2002
    [31]何庆明.基于智力资本管理的企业战略并购问题研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2005
    [32]何云,李新春.企业跨地域扩张战略的初步研究——以广东工业类上市公司为例[J].管理世界,2000年,第6期
    [33]贺小刚.企业持续竞争优势的资源观阐释[J].南开管理评论,2002,(4):5-9
    [34]黄旭,程林林.西方资源基础理论评析[J].财经科学,2005年,第3期
    [35]金占明.战略管理——超竞争环境下的选择[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1999
    [36]靳云汇,贾昌杰.惯性与并购战略选择[J].金融研究,2003年,第12期
    [37]贾良定,张君君,钱海燕,崔荣军,陈永霞.企业多元化的动机、时机和产业选择——西方理论和中国企业认识的异同研究[J].管理世界,2005年,第8期
    [38]贾根良.网络组织:超越市场与企业两分法[J].经济社会体制比较,1998年,第4期:13-19
    [39]李善民,陈玉罡.上市公司兼并与收购的财富效应[J].经济研究,2002,(11):27-35
    [40]李善民,曾昭灶,王彩萍等.上市公司并购绩效及其影响因素研究[J].世界经济,2004,
    [41]李维安,武立东.企业集团的公司治理——规模起点、治理边界及子公司治理[J].南开管理评论,1999年,第4期:4-8
    [42]李维安等.网络组织——组织发展的新趋势[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003
    [43]李玉菊,张秋生.以企业资源为基础的会计要素研究[J].会计研究,2006,(1):54-62
    [44]蓝海林.集团公司——一种什么样的组织?[J].企业管理,2004年,第8期,86-88
    [45]林梅,蓝海林.转型经济时期中国企业集团战略学习、能力与战略选择研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006
    [46]林梅,蓝海林.战略学习与中国企业国际化的借鉴[J].经济管理,2005年,第17期
    [47]林润辉,李维安.网络组织——更具环境适应能力的新型组织模式[J].南开管理评论,2000年,第3期:4-7
    [48]刘丽华,扬乃定.针对案例研究局限性的案例研究方法操作过程设计[J].科学管理研究,2005年,第6期,118-121
    [49]刘文纲.企业购并中的竞争优势转移研究:兼论企业购并中的无形资产协同效应[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004
    [50]刘文纲.企业购并中的无形资产协同效应分析[J].经济体制改革,1999,(6):74-78
    [51]刘晓琳,李荣喜.企业战略联盟的价值链优势分析[J].西南交通大学学报:社会科学版,2003,(4):51-54
    [52]刘永清,姜理.企业并购中价值链目标控制的一种诊断模型[J].华南理工大学学报:自然科学版,1999,27(8):116-119
    [53]刘焰,刘颖.我国上市公司购并研究[J].经济管理,2001年,第18期
    [54]罗仲伟.网络组织的特性及其经济学分析[J].外国经济与管理,2000,第7期:13-28
    [55]鲁明鸿.外国直接投资区域分布与中国投资环境评估[J].经济研究,1997年,第12期
    [56]鲁明鸿.制度因素与国际直接投资区位分布:一项实证研究[J].经济研究,1999年,第7期
    [57]吕源,姚俊,蓝海林.企业集团的理论综述与探讨[J].南开管理评论,2005年,第4期,28-35
    [58]马迎贤.组织间关系:资源依赖视角的研究综述[J].管理评论,2005年,第2期
    [59]马洪伟.蓝海林,企业多元化与绩效研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004年
    [60]毛蕴诗.跨国公司战略竞争与国际直接投资(第二版)[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2001
    [61]毛蕴诗.多元化经营三维模型及多元化经营的几个命题[J].中山大学学报,2004年,第6期
    [62]毛蕴诗.多元化经营三维模型及多元化经营的几个命题[J].中山大学学报,2004年,第6期
    [63]戚汝庆.企业并购目标的选择战略[J].山东师大学报,2001年,第6期
    [64]秦喜杰,陈洪.成功并购:目标企业选择论[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004
    [65]欧阳桃花.试论工商管理学科的案例研究方法[J].南开管理评论,2004年,第2期,100-105
    [66]孙国强.网络组织的内涵、特征与构成要素[J].南开管理评论,2001,第4期:38-40
    [67]伍柏麟,胡雄飞.关于发展大型企业集团的若干思考[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究(沪),1988年,第4期
    [68]汪建成,毛蕴诗.中国上市公司扩展的业务、地域多元化战略研究[J].管理世界,2006,第2期
    [69]王长征.企业并购整合:基于企业能力论的一个综合性理论分析框架[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002
    [70]王丰,宣国良,范徵.资源基础观点及其在企业理论中的应用[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2002年,第4期
    [71]王凤彬.集团公司与企业集团组织——理论·经验·案例[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003年
    [72]王延中.大型企业的多元化发展一论石家庄市东方热电燃气集团的多元化战略[J].经济管理,2002,第16期
    [73]王岳平.我国大企业集团的效益及效率分析[J].经济研究参考,2002年,第49期
    [74]魏江.企业购并战略新思维——基于核心能力的企业购并与整合管理模式[M].北京:科学出版社,2002
    [75]威斯通·J.F.并购、重组与公司控制[M].第一版.唐旭译.北京:经济科学出版社,1998
    [76]威斯通·J.F.接管、重组与公司治理[M].第二版.李秉祥等译.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2000
    [77]威斯通·J.F.接管、重组与公司治理[M].第四版.张秋生,张海珊,陈扬译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006
    [78]吴金希,于永达.浅议管理学中案例研究方法——特点、方法设计与有效性讨论[J].科学学研究,2004年,第22卷,增刊,105-111
    [79]席酉民主编,盛昭翰,肖条军著.企业集团管理决策的数理分析[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002
    [80]席酉民主编,葛京,杨莉、李武著.跨国企业集团管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002
    [81]席酉民主编,梁磊,王洪涛等著.企业集团发展模式与运行机制比较[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002
    [82]肖政,维克特.盖斯特勒格.影响外商直接投资的因素:兼论中国沿海与西部地区差别[J].世界经济,2001年,第3期
    [83]项保华,张建东.案例研究方法和战略管理研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2005年,第5期,62-66
    [84]徐林.寻找产业链的关键控制点,21世纪经济报道,2005年,11月2日刊
    [85]徐康康,上市企业集团多元化经营与绩效关系的比较研究[D],上海:复旦大学,2003年
    [86]薛汉喜.区位进入理论与企业集团的国际化扩张——以海尔集团为例[J].地理研究,2002年,第4期,519-527
    [87]晏双生,章仁俊.企业资源基础理论与企业能力基础理论辨析及其逻辑演进[J].科技进步与对策,2005年,5月号
    [88]姚俊,蓝海林.我国企业集团的演进及组织模式研究[J].经济经纬,2006年,第1期,82-85
    [89]姚俊,吕源,蓝海林.转型时期企业集团多元化、结构与绩效的实证研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005年
    [90]杨华江,席酉民.集团公司战略风险管理模型探讨[J].中国软科学,2002年,第8期,61-66
    [91]叶厚原,李必强.论企业并购的原理与风险识别[J].武汉理工大学学报,2002年10月,第24卷第5期,56-59
    [92]叶正欣.资源基础理论与跨国并购[J].经济学动态,2005年,第4期
    [93]余菁.案例研究与案例研究方法[J].经济管理,2004年,第20期
    [94]曾国军.外商直接投资在华区位选择的影响因素研究[J].学术研究,2005年,第11期
    [95]曾颖.成熟期企业并购战略初探[J].会计研究,1999年,第9期
    [96]赵民杰、刘松博.网络组织模式内涵研究[J].兰州学刊,2004年,第6期
    [97]张生太,段兴民.企业集团的隐性知识传播模型研究[J].系统工程,2004年,第4期,62-65
    [98]张义芳.企业购并中的目标企业决策分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,1999年,第3期
    [99]张金鑫.并购谁:并购双方资源匹配的战略分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006
    [100]张海珊.战略并购双方的匹配性研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007
    [101]张秋生.并购论坛2005[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005
    [102]郑群英.多元化大公司的内部管理[M].北京:中信出版社,2003
    [103]周琳.企业并购中资源协同的机理分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2006
    [104]朱传耿.论跨国公司的空间组织模式[J].中国软科学,2003年,第12期,115-119
    [105]朱敏.中国企业集团的形成及其作用[M].中国企业发展年鉴(1988),北京:中国展望出版社,1988
    [106]朱镇邦等.中国企业集团管理[M].上海:社会科学出版社,1988
    [107]朱宝宪,王怡凯.1998年中国上市公司并购实践的效应分析[J].经济研究,2002年,第11期
    [108]Agrawal A.,Jaffe J.F.and Mandelker G.N.,The post-merger performance of acquiring firms:a re-examination of an anomaly,Journal of Finance,1992,47(4),1605-1621.
    [109]Amburgey,T.L.and Miner,A.S.,Strategic Momentum:The effects of repetitive,positional,and contextual momentum on merger activity,Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(5):335-348.
    [110]Amit R.and Schoemaker P.J.,Strategic assets and organizational rent,Strategic Management Journal,1993,14,33-46.
    [111]Andrews K.R.,The concept of corporate strategy,Homewood,Illinois:Dow Jones Irwin,1971
    [112]Andre Lemelin,Relatedness in the Patterns of Interindustry Diversification,Review of Economics and Statistics,1982,pp.179-198.
    [113]Barney,J.B.,Organizational culture:can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Academy of Management Review,1986,11(July):656-665.
    [114]Barney J.B.,Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,Journal of Management,1991,17(1),99-120.
    [115]Bartlett CA,Ghoshal S.,Managing across boarders:the transnational solution[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,MA,1989.
    [116]Becker G.S.,Human capital:a theoretical and empirical analysis,with special reference to Education,New York:Columbia University Press,1964.
    [117]Bergen M,Dutta S,Shugan SM.,Branded variants:a retail perspective,Journal of Marketing Research,1996,33:9-19.
    [118]Bergen M,Dutta S,Shugan SM.,Branded variants:a retail perspective,Journal of Marketing Research,1996,33:9-19.
    [119]Bettis,R.A.,Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms,Strategic Management Journal,1981,2:379-394.
    [120]Black,J.A.,Boal,K.B.,Strategic resources:traits,configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage,Strategic Management Journal,1994,Vol.15 No.Summer,131-48.
    [121]Capron,L.,The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions,Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(11),987-1018.
    [122]Capron L,P.Dussuage,W.Mitchell,Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America,1988-92,Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(7):631-661.
    [123]Chang,S.J.,Choi,U.,Strategy,structure and performance of Korean business groups:a transactions cost approach,Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,37(2):141-159.
    [124]Chang,S.J.,Hong,J.,Economic performance of the group-affiliated companies in Korea:resources sharing and internal business transaction,Academy of Management Journal,2000,(43):429-448.
    [125]Chatterjee S.,Types of synergy and economic value:the impact of acquisitions on rival firms,Strategic Management Journal,1986,7,119-39.
    [126]Chatterjee S.and Wernerfelt B.,The link between resources and type of diversification:theory and evidence,Strategic Management Journal,1991,12,33-48.
    [127]Chen,C.H.,Regional determinants of foreign direct investment in mainland China,Journal of Economic Studies,1996,23:18-30.
    [128]Chung,C.N.,Markets,culture and institutions:the emergence of large bBusiness groups in Taiwan,1950s-1970s,Journal of Management Studies,2001,38(5):719-745.
    [129]Collis D.J.and Montgomery C.A.,Competing on resources:Strategy in 1990s,Harvard Business Review,1995,73(4),118-129.
    [130]Cynthia A.Montgomery and Birger Wernerfelt,Diversification,Richardian Rents,and Tobin' s q,Rand Journal of Economics,Winter 1988,pp.623-632.
    [131]Das,T.K.,B.S.Teng.,Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process,Journal of Management,1998,24:21-42.
    [132]Das,T.K.,B.S.Teng.,A resource-based theory of strategic alliances,Journal of Management,2000,26(1):31-61.
    [133]Dierickx L.and Cool K.,Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,Management Science,1989,35:1504-1510.
    [134]Doz Y.and G.Hamel,Alliance Advantage,Harvard Business School Press,1998.
    [135]Dunning,J.H.,Location and the multinational enterprise:a neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies,1998,29:461-491.
    [136]Dyer J H,Nobeoka K.,Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:The Toyota case,Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:214-236.
    [137]Dyer J H,Singh H.,The relational view:cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage,Academy of Management Review,1998.
    [138]Dennis Maillat et al.,Innovation networks and territorial dynamics:a tentative typology,Patterns of a Network Economy,1993,Springer-Verlag,125-136.
    [139]Elgers RT.and Clark J J.,Merger types and shareholder returns:additional evidence,Financial Management.Summer,1980,66-72.
    [140]Flanagan D.J.,Announcements of purely related and purely unrelated mergers and shareholder returns:reconciling the relatedness paradox,Journal of Management,1996,22(6):823-835.
    [141]Gerry Johnson& Kevan Scholes,Exploring Corporate Strategy,Pearson Education limited,2002.
    [142]Ghemawat,P.,Khanna,T.,The nature of diversified business groups:a research design and two case studies,Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,XVLI(1):35-61.
    [143]Granovetter,M.,Business groups,Handbook of Economic Sociology,1994,453-475.
    [144]Grant R.M.,The resource-based theory of competitive advantage:Implications for strategy formulation,California Management Review,(1991)33(3),114-135.
    [145]Grant,R.M.,Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm,Strategic Management Journal,1996,17.
    [146]Green,M.B.,Mergers and Acquisitions:Geographical and Spatial Perspectives London:Routledge Inc.,1990.
    [147]Guill e n,M.F.,Business groups in emerging economics:a resource-based view,Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):362-380.
    [148]Guill e n,M.F.,Limits of convergence,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001.
    [149]Gulati,R.,Nohria,N.and Zaheer,A.,Strategic networks,Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):203-215.
    [150]Guthrie,D.,Between markets and politics:organizational responses to reform in China,American Journal of Sociology,1997,102(5):1258-1304.
    [151]Hakansson H.and Snehota I.,Developing relationships in business networks,London:Routledge,1995.
    [152]Haspeslagh P.,Maintaining momentum in mergers,European Business Forum,issue 4,Winter 2000,pp.53-56.
    [153]Hoskisson,R.,Hitt,M.A.,Downscoping:How to Tame the Diversified Firm,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1994.
    [154]James M.MacDonald,R&D and the Direction of Diversification,Review of Economics and Statistics,1985,pp.583-590.
    [155]Jemison D.& P.Haspeslagh,Managing Acquisitions:Creating Value through corporate renewal,Free Press,1991.
    [156]Jensen,M.C.and W.H.Meckling,Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure,Journal of Financial Economics,1976,(10):305-360.
    [157]Johnson J.,Mattson L.G.,Interorganization relations in industrial system,International Journal of Management and Organization,1990,(3).
    [158]Keister,L.,Social ties and the formation of Chinese business groups,Sociological Analysis,1998,1(2):99-117.
    [159]Kenneth R.Andrews,The Concept of Corporate Strategy(Burr Ridge,IL.:Dow-Jones-Irwin,1971).
    [160]Khanna,T.,Palepu,K.,Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets,Harvard Business Review,1997,75(4):41-51.
    [161]Khanna,T.,Palepu,K.,Policy shocks,market intermediaries,and corporate strategy:the evolution of business groups in Chile and India,Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,1999,8(2):271-310.
    [162]Khanna,T.,Palepu,K.,Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? an analysis of diversified Indian business groups,Journal of Finance,2000,55(2):867-892.
    [163]Khanna,T.,Rivkin,J.W.,Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets,Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(1):45-74.
    [164]Klein,A.S.,Masi,R.J.,and Weidner,C.K.,Organization culture,distribution and amount of control,and perceptions of quality:an empirical study of linkages,Group & Organization Management,1995,20(2),122-148.
    [165]Kogut,B.and U.Zender,Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities and the replication of technology,Organization Science,1992,3(3):383-397.
    [166]Larsson Rikard,The handshake between invisible and visible hands,International Studies of Management & Organization,1993,Spring,(23):87.
    [167]Lee,C.,k.Lee,J.M.Pennings,Internal capabilities,external networks,and performance:a study on technology-based ventures,Strategic Management Journal,2001,22:615-640.
    [168]Lippman,S.A.and R.P.Rumelt.,Uncertain imitability:an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition,The Bell Journal of Economics,1982,13:418-438.
    [169]Lubatkin M.,Mergers and the performance of the acquiring firm,Academy of Management Review,1983,8:218-225.
    [170]Lubatkin,M.H.,Merger strategies and stockholder value,Strategic Management Journal,1987,8:39-53.
    [171]Lubatkin,M.& O'Neill,H.,Merger strategies,economic cycles,and stockholder value,Interfaces,1988,(18):65-71.
    [172]Marshall Van Alstyne,The state of network organization:a survey in three frameworks,Forthcoming in Journal of Organization,1997,7(3).
    [173]McEvily B,Zaheer A.,Bridging ties:a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities,Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133-1156.
    [174]Meyer M H,Utterback J M.,The product family and the dynamics of core capability,Sloan Management Review,1993,34(3):29-47.
    [175]Michael E.Porter,From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy,Harvard Business Review,May-June 1987,pp.43-59.
    [176]Miller,D.and J.Shamsie.,The resource-based view of the firm in two environments:the Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965,Academy of Management Journal,1996,39:519-543.
    [177]Moshe Faroun,Beyond Industry Boundaries:Human Expertise,Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups,Organization Science,1994,pp.185-199.
    [178]Montgomery C.A.& S.Hariharan,Diversified Expansion in Large Established Firms,Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization,1991,pp.71-89.
    [179]Montgomery & Wilson,Research note and communication mergers that last:a predictable pattern?,Strategic Management Journal,1986,(7):91-96.
    [180]Montgomery,C.A.and S.Hariharan,Diversified expansion by large established firms, Journal of Economic Behavior,1991,71-89.
    [181]Mowery,D.S.,J.E.Oxley and B.S.Silverman,Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation:implications for the resource-based view of the firm,Research Policy,1998,27(5):507-523.
    [182]Nahavandi A.and Malekzadeh A.R.,Acculturation in mergers and acquistions,Academy of Management Review,1988,13(1):79-90.
    [183]Nohria N.,Is a network perspective a useful way of studing organizations? in N.Nohria &R.G.Eccles(Eds.),Networks and Organizations:Structure,Form and Action(pp1-22).Boston,MA:Harvard Business School Press,1992.
    [184]Oliver Christine,Determinations of interorganizational relationships:integration and future directions,Academy of Management Review,1990,15(2):241-265.
    [185]Peteraf M.A.,The cornerstones of competitive advantage:a resource-based view,Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:179-191.
    [186]Penrose E.,The Theory of the Growth of the Firm,London,UK:Basil Blackwell,1959.
    [187]Porter,M.,From competitive advantage to corporate strategy,Harvard Business Review,1987,May-June:43-59.
    [188]Powell T.,The knowledge value chain(KVC):How to fix it when it breaks,in Williams M.E.(ed.),Proceedings of the 22nd National online Meeting.Medford,N J:Information Today,Inc.,2001.
    [189]Prahalad C.K.and Doz Y.L.,The Multi-national Mission:Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision,Lond:The Free Press,1986.
    [190]Prahalad C.K.and Hamel G.,The Core Competence of the Corporation Strategy,Harvard Business Review,1990,68(3),79-93.
    [191]Ramanujam.V.& P.Varadarajan,Research on corporate diversification:A hypothesis,Strategic Management Journal,1989.
    [192]Ravenscraft D.J.& F.M.Scherer,Mergers,Sell-Offs,and Economic Efficiency,Washington,DC:The Brookings Institution,1987.
    [193]RaviS.Achrol and Philip Kotler,Marketing in the Network Economy,Journal of Marketing,1999.
    [194]Reddy S.K.,S.L.Holak,S.Bhat.,To extend or not to extend:success determinants of line extensions,Journal of Marketing Research,1994,31:243-262.
    [195]Richard P.Rumelt,How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management Journal,March 1991,pp.167-185.
    [196]Richardson G.B.,The Organization of Industry,Economic Journal,1972,Issue 82:895.
    [197]Rossiter J.R.and L.Percy.,Advertising Communications and Promotion Management,McGraw-Hill:New York,1997.
    [198]Rumelt,R.,Toward a strategic theory of the firm,Competitive Strategic Management,1984,Prentice-Hall.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:556-570.
    [199]Rumelt R.P.,How much does industry matter?,Strategic Management Journal,1991,12:167-185.
    [200]Sales A.and Mirvis P.,When cultures collide:Issues in acquisitions,in Kimberly J.and Quinn R.(eds),New Futures:The Challenge of Managing Corporat Transitions,107-133,New York:Dow-Jones Irwin,1984.
    [201]Salter,M.and W.Weinhold,Diversification through acquisition:strategy for creating economic value,The Free Press,New York,1979.
    [202]Sanchez,R.and A.Heene.,Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management,N.Y.:John Wiley and Sons,1997.
    [203]Savill B.and P.Wright,Success factors in Acquisitions,European Business Forum,issue 4,Winter 2000,pp.29-33.
    [204]Schmalensee R.,Do Markets Differ Much? American Ecomomic Review,1985,pp.341-351.
    [205]Schweiger D.M.and Walsh J.P.,Mergers and acquisitions:An interdisciplinary view,Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,1990,8,41-107.
    [206]Schweiger D.M.,Csiszar E.N.and Napier N.K.(1994),‘Implementing international acquisitions',Human Resource Planning,16,53-70.
    [207]Seed A.H.,Why corporate marriages fail,Financial Executive,1974,11,56-62.
    [208]Seth,Value creation in acquisitions:a reexamination of performance issues,Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:99-115.
    [209]Shelton,L.M.,Strategic business fits and corporate acquisition:Empirical evidence,Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(3):279-287.
    [210]Shelton L.M.,Merger market dynamics:insights into the behavior of target and bidder firms,Ournal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2000,41(4),363-383.
    [211]Simons R.,Levers of Control(Boston,Harvard Business School Press,1995)
    [212]Singh,H.and C.Montgomery,Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance,Strategic Management Journal,1987,8(4):377-386.
    [213]Srivastava,R.K.,T.A.Shervani and L.Fahey,Market-based assets and shareholder value:a framework for analysis,Journal of Marketing,1998,January.
    [214]Subba Narasirnha,P.N.,Salience of knowledge in a strategic theory of the firm,Journal of Intellectual Capital,2001,2(3):215-24.
    [215]Teece D.J.,Pisano G.and Shuen A.,Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533.
    [216]Tomer J.F.,Organizational Capability:Competing Productivity and Well-being,Praeger,New York,1987.
    [217]Walsh J.P.and Ellwood J.W,Mergers,acqusitions and the pruning of managerial deadwood,Strategic Management Journal,1991,12,201-217.
    [218]Walsh J.P.and Kosnik R.D.,Corporate raiders and their disciplinary role in the market for corporate control,Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(4),671-700.
    [219]Walter G.,Culture collisions in mergers and acquisitions,in Frost P.,Moore L.and Louis M.et al.(eds),Organisational Culture,1985,Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.
    [220]Wernerfelt B.,A resource-based view of the firm,Strategic Management Journal,1984,5(2):171-180.
    [221]Whipple J.and R.Frankel,Strategic alliance success factors,Journal of Supply Chain Management,vol.39,no.3,2000,pp.21-31.
    [222]Williamson O.E.,Understanding the employment relations:The analysis of idiosyncratic exchange,The Bell Journal of Economics,1975,(6):978-1002.
    [223]Winter S.G.,Knowledge and competence as strategic assets,In Teece D.J.(ed),The Competitive Challenge,1987,Berkeley,CA:Harper and Row,159-184.
    [224]Winter S.G.,The satisfying principle in capability learning,Strategic Management Journal,2000,21,981-996.
    [225]Yin,R.K.,Case study research:design and method[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage Publication,1994.
    [226]Yiu,D.,Bruton,G.,Lu,Y.,Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy,Journal of Management Studies,2005,42(1 ):183-206.
    [227]Zajac E.J.,Kraatz M.S and Bresser R.F.,Modeling the Dynamics of Strategic Fit:A Normative Approach to Strategic Change,Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:429-453.
    [228]Zhang Qiusheng,Asia Pacific Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions,Science Press USA Inc.,2005.
    [229]Zollo M.and Singh H.,Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions:post-acquisition strategies and integration capabilities in U.S.bank mergers,Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(13),1233-56.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700