摘要
网络产业互联互通的接入定价研究一直是电信业乃至网络产业的一个焦点领域,更是理论界和实务界广泛探讨的重要议题之一。20世纪80年代以来,发达国家在网络产业,特别是电信业相继放松价格规制、打破垄断、引入竞争,实施规制改革。由于各国历史、文化、法律制度等背景不同,规制改革的出发点也有所不同,但30年来世界各国电信业规制改革的基本目标却是一致:通过打破垄断、引人竞争,促进电信行业的有效竞争。自从电信业引入竞争以来,电信网间互联互通成为电信监管的重中之重,而制定一个合理的网间接入定价是解决互联互通问题的关键。但是,由于电信网络结构的复杂性、业务种类的多样性,因此,很难确定一种各方都认同并且科学合理的定价方案。随着世界各国电信改革的不断深入,建立一种能同时最大化电信网络营运的社会效益、企业效益和消费者效用的互联互通接入定价模式,是实现电信市场有效竞争的关键。基于上述原因,本文试图利用数理分析法研究互联互通中的接入定价对市场结构的影响,同时分析在特定的假设条件下,单向接入、双向接入中的在位运营商和进入运营商在其各个业务领域的产品定价、接入定价的影响因素,从而为制定价格规制政策提供理论和实践建议。
全文主要包括六方面内容:
1、第二章在对网络经济的相关文献研究的基础上,分析总结网络的概念及其分类以及网络经济、网络效用的概念,进而归纳网络产业的基本特征。
2、第三章从网络产业的基本特征之一——网络外部性角度,把互联互通的接入定价引入到市场结构的研究范围内,建立数理模型,分析接入定价的变化对社会福利水平及市场结构的影响,得出:接入定价的变化对社会福利水平及市场垄断势力的改变取决于改变接入定价运营商的规模的大小。
3、第四章主要研究在政府规制条件下,当存在规制激励时,单向接入中的在位运营商、进入运营商在各自业务领域的产品定价以及接入定价的影响因素,进而引申出政府在制定对运营商的转移支付时,既要考虑运营商的成本,又需考虑运营商的垄断势力,同时提出了提高产业的网络外部性,是利用市场手段降低产品定价的途径之一
4、第五章研究双向接入条件下,针对中国电信业固定电话、移动通讯业务领域的特殊格局,分别运用区域性双寡头垄断模型和双寡头价格博弈模型,分析接入定价的高低对生产者利润、社会福利及生产者合谋的影响,同时给出市场失灵的条件。
5、第六章结合中国电信业规制的特殊经济背景,分析单向接入条件下激励机制、规制收买对受规制运营商和进入运营商的产品定价以及接入定价的影响。当存在有规制收买的可能性时,规制机构说真话的概率越大,受规制运营商的产品定价越高,同时,给出了规制收买是否可以发生的临界概率值;进入运营商产品的定价结构及接入定价结构不会受规制收买的直接影响,但会通过产品价格、需求量对其产生间接影响。
6、第七章在前述分析中国电信业相关内容的基础上,进一步分析电信业发展的趋势——三网融合。从三网融合概念、原因及途径对三网融合进行理论分析,同时对国外某些国家和我国的三网融合现状作一简单的比较分析,并提出相应的政策建议。
本文研究的主要特点和具有创新性的地方在于:
1、在分析电信业的市场结构、有效竞争时,尝试从网络外部性特点把互联互通接入定价引入到数理模型中,研究接入定价的变化对运营商的利润、社会福利以及市场结构的影响。
2、在前人研究的基础上,本文提出接入价格并非外生变量,而是接入数量的函数,从是否存在政府规制的角度建立理论模型。同时,在分析政府边际转移支付对受规制运营商在垄断领域的产品定价影响时,首次从成本效应、垄断势力效用两方面进行解释,并分析了技术进步、网络外部性对受规制运营商在竞争领域的产品定价的影响。
3、在互联互通的双向接入定价方面,针对中国目前固定电话的“北网通南电信”的经营模式,区别对待固——固、移——移的双向接入问题,建立区域性双寡头垄断模型和双寡头价格博弈模型分析了接入定价的确定对运营商的利润及社会福利水平的影响。
4、结合中国电信业现有的行政体制及社会因素,在接入定价的建模分析时考虑规制收买这一特殊因素及变量特征并提出相应的变量特征假定,同时设计一个激励机制,研究受规制运营商和进入运营商的产品定价以及接入定价问题,力图为中国电信业互联互通接入定价的规制提出有意义的建议。
Access pricing of network interconnection in telecommunications industries and networks industrise is one of the most important issues facing our industrial economics. Since the 80s of the 20th century, in the telecommunications industries, developed countries have successively relaxed price regulation, introduced competition to break the monopoly, and promoted regulatory reform.
Although every country has their unparalleled economic environment, such as its respective history, culture and legal system, all countries have the common objective in the telecommunications regulatory reform:promoting competition in the telecommunications industries, and breaking the monopoly. In fact, developing a reasonable access pricing has been the key to design incentive regulation for the telecommunications industries.
However, because of the complexity of the telecommunications network infrastructure, the uncertainty of business process path and the diversity of product cost, it is hard to find a universal pricing scheme.
In this paper, I research the influence of access prices in interconnection industries on the market structure. At the same time, under several different assumptions, one-way access pricing, two-way access pricing and corresponding product pricing are studied which are involved to both the incumbent enterprises and access enterprises. The last part of the dissertation is relevant measures.
The paper consists of four aspects. First, taking into account the externalities of network industries, in the view of interconnection, I establish some models by introducing the access pricing to the market structure, to analyze the influence of access prices on social welfare and market structure. It is shown that access price's impact on social welfare and market monopoly power depends on the size of enterprise who changes access prices.
Secondly, the influence of government regulation is analyzed. When there is incentive regulation, I study one-way access pricing and corresponding product pricing of incumbent enterprises and access enterprises in the two conditions of monopoly and competition. I find that it is necessary to consider the costs of enterprises, but also to consider the enterprises'monopoly power, when the government makes transfer payments to enterprises. And it is pointed that improving network externalities is effective method to lower price by market mechanism.
Thirdly, based on China's telecommunications industry regulatory system, on the condition of one-way access, I analyze the influences of incentive mechanism and regulation captures on one-way access pricing and corresponding product pricing of incumbent enterprises and access enterprises. I find that when there may be regulation captures, the greater the probability of the regulatory agencies'telling the truth is, the higher the product prices of regulated enterprise will be. And the critical probability value is given to whether regulation captures will happen. It is also shown that pricing structure and access pricing structure are not affected directly by regulation captures, but affected indirectly by regulation captures through product prices and demand.
Fourthly, based on the special structure of China's fixed-line telecommunications and mobile communications services, on the condition of two-way access, using regional duopoly two-step game model and duopoly game model of price fixing, I study the level of access prices'influence on the producer profits, social welfare and collusion of producers, and give the conditions of market failure.
In this paper, the main features and innovative part include four points. In the first place, analyzing the telecommunications industries'market structure and effective competition, I introduce access pricing of interconnections to pricing model, and research access price's influence on profits, social welfare and market structure.
In the second place, on the basis of previous research, because the access price is not an exogenous variable, but is decided by the access number, I establish a theoretical model from the perspective of government regulation. At the same time, analyzing the effect of marginal government transfer payments on product pricing of regulated enterprises in the monopoly fields, for the first time, I study from the two aspects of both cost-effectiveness and monopoly power. And then I analyze the impact of the advances in technology, network externalities on product pricing of regulated enterprises in the competitive fields.
Thirdly, based on China's current fixed-line's "North Netcom South Telecom" business model, in the views of two fields of both fixed phones and mobile, using regional duopoly two-step game model and duopoly game model of price fixing, I study the level of access prices'influence on the producer profits and social welfare.
At the last, combined with the existing system of China's telecommunications industry, I study the features and impacts of regulation captures, and design an incentive mechanism to solve the question of regulation captures, and analyze the question of both access pricing and product pricing, strive for the Chinese telecom industry interconnection access pricing regulation to make meaningful suggestions..
引文
第一章 导论
Shapiro,19851,19862,19943; Farrell, Saloner,1985,1986,1992; Economides,
1 Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility. the American Economic Review,1985,75 (3):424-440
2 Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economics,1986,94 (4):822-841
3 Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994,8 (2):93-115
4 Cancina M, Bills A, Bergstrom T. Hotelling Location Problems with Directional Constraints:An Application to Television News Scheduling. Journal of Industrial Economics,1995,43:121-124
5 Steiner P. Program Patterns and Preferences and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1952,66:194-223
6 Nilssen T,I Sorgard. Time Schedule and Program Profile:TV News in Norway and Denmark. Journal of Economics Management Strategy,1998,7:209-235
7 Novos I, Waldman M. The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection:An Analytical Approach. Journal of Political Economy,1984,92:236-246
8 Johason W. The Economics of Copying, Journal of Political Economy,1985,93:158-174
9 Besen S. Private Copying, Reprodution Costs, and the Supply of Intellectual Property. Information Economics and Policy,1986,2:5-22
10 Conner K, Rumelt R. Software Piracy:An Analysis of Protection Strategies. Management Science,1991, 37:125-139
11 Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E. Software Piracy:Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion. Journal of Marketing,1995,59:29-37
12 Tarkka J. Approaches to Deposit Pricing:A Study in the Determination of Deposit Interest and Bank Service Charges, Helsinki:Bank of Finland Studies,1995, E:2
13 Sharpe S. The Effect of Consumer Switching Costs on Prices:A Theory and Its Applications to Bank Deposit Market. Review of Industrial Organization,1997,12:79-94
14 Shy O, Tarkka J. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2002, 32 (2):299-314
15 Berechman J, Poddar S, O Shy. Network Structure and Entry in the Deregulated Airline Industry. Keio Economic Studies,1998,35:71-82
1杜云.网络经济中的垄断与公共政策分析.当代财经,2006(3):11-15
2张丽芳,张清辨.网络经济与市场结构变迁——新经济条件下垄断与竞争关系的检验分析.财经研究,2006(5):108-118
3周和荣,张金隆.虚拟合作竞争:机理、系统模型及实证研究.中国工业经济,2007(8):66-74
4聂清凯,夏健明.网络经济时代企业组织架构重建研究.外国经济与管理,2004(11):26-30
5张春法,韩耀.网络经济下企业组织的非一体化趋势与超契约治理.世界经济与政治论坛,2005(2):112-116
6冯海华,张为付.网络经济下模块化价值创新.世界经济与政治论坛,2007(2):114-119
7李怀.基于规模经济和网络经济的自然垄断理论创新“—辅以中国自然垄断产业的经验检验.管理世界,2004(4):61-77
8薛伟贤,冯宗宪,王健庆.中国网络经济水平测度指标体系设计.中国软科学,2004(8):51-19
9刘戒骄.产品兼容、网络效应与企业竞争力.中国工业经济,2002(7):28-33
10于同申.“创造性毁灭”和网络经济条件下的自主科技创新.中国工业经济,2006(5):64-71
11王学斌.银行卡的网络经济特征:一个文献综述.世界经济文汇,2007(4):88-99
12弗雷德,盖思米等.电信成本——电信管制政策及成本代理模型.第1版.忻展红译.2002
13 Hank Interven.电信规制手册.第1版.管云翔译.北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2001
14让·雅克·拉丰,让·泰勒尔.电信竞争.第1版.唐守廉译.北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2001
15让·雅克·拉丰,让·泰勒尔.政府采购与规制中的激励理论.第1版.石磊、王永钦译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003
1张维迎,盛洪.从电信业看中国的反垄断问题.改革,1998(2):31-33
2吴永涛,张群,李毅.电信运营寡占市场不对称竞争博弈分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2002(2):P41-43
3王子君.市场结构与技术创新——以美国AT&T公司的拆分为例.经济研究,2002(12):70-79
4朱江.论收敛于马歇尔缓冲区的有效竞争——中外电信改革理论与实证研究.财经研究,2003(9):56-61
5王俊豪.垄断性产业市场结构重组后的分类管制与协调政策——以中国电信、电力产业为例.中国工业经济,2005(11):67-73
6刘俊杰.技术创新、规制重建与中国电信产业的发展.当代财经,2005(5):94-97
7张耀寰,梁雄健.当前我国电信业实现有效竞争的政策取向.宏观经济研究,2006(1):17-20
8柳思维,李荣华.本地电信网自然垄断的弱化及竞争有效性研究.宏观经济研究,2007(2):53-56
9王斌,蔡宏波.电信市场演化与政府管制——基于随机试验的模型分析.南开经济研究,2007(2):56-72
10李荣华,傅天明,欧阳晓风.中国移动“一家独大”的经济学分析,财经科学(6):81-90
11黄浩,吕廷杰.电信行业有效竞争辨析.电信科学,2007(12):1-4
12于良春,杨骞.行政垄断制度选择的一般分析框架——以我国电信业行政垄断制度的动态变迁为例.中国工业经济,2007(12):38-45
13曹艳秋,林木西.电信行业管制的国际比较及对我国的启示.经济社会体制比较,2002(6):64-68
14滕颖,唐小我,李仕明.放松规制的路径与电信市场结构的演进.经济体制改革,2004(5):124-128
15张承耀.电信企业改制与发展战略.中国工业经济,2001(2):28-32
16汪秋明.规制定价机制的激励强度权衡与模型设计——以我国电信产业的规制定价总体模型设计为例.中国工业经济,2006(3):38-45
17刘戒骄.英国电信产业的放松管制和对主导运营商BT的再管制.中国工业经济,2002(1):32-40
18朱旭峰.制度的预期与结果市场改革历程分析:中国电信业.管理世界,2003(10):78-87
19于良春,丁启军.自然垄断产业进入管制的成本收益分析——以中国电信业为例的实证研究.中国工业经济,2007(1):14-20
1 Laffont J J, Tirole J. Access Pricing and Competition. European Economic Review,1994,38 (9):1673-1710
2 Armstrong M, Cowan S, Vickers J. Regulatory Reform:Economic Analysis and British Experience. Cambridge:MIT Press,1994
3 Baumol W J, Sidak J G. Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Cambridge:MIT Press,1994
4 Joo J H, KuHM, Kim J C. Optimal Access Pricing with Interconnection Obligation. Information Economics and Policy,2001,13:331-338
5肖旭,刘秀清.关于网络行业竞争与接入定价的理论分析.中国工业经济,2002(9):46-50
6肖兴志,陈艳利.纵向一体化网络的接入定价研究.中国工业经济,2003(6):21-28
7肖兴志,陈艳利.论公用事业的有效成分定价规则.经济与管理研究,2004(4):25-27
8曲延芬.关于电信业互联互通资费的思考.工业技术经济,2006(2):84-86
9于立,姜春海.网络产业Ramsey接入定价方法研究.当代财经,2007(9):84-90
10陈宝国.存在效用遗传性的电信网之间互联互通的决策分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2004(12):39-43
11钟俊英.我国电信网间接入价格模型的实证分析:接入价格的确定.数量经济技术经济研究,2005(12):34-43
12李荣华,柳思维.瓶颈垄断、市场势力与我国电信网间互联规制研究.当代财经,2007(3):86-91
13王俊豪,程肖君.,自然垄断产业的网络瓶颈与接入管制政策.财经问题研究,2007年(12):36-41
14 Laffont J J, Rey P, Tirole J. Network Competition:(Ⅰ):Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing. The Rand Journal of Economics,1998a,29(1):1-37
15 Laffont J J, Rey P, Tirole J. Network Competition:(Ⅱ):Price Discrimination. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1998b. 29(1): 38-56
1 Cambini C. Competition between Vertically Integrated Networks. Information Economics and Policy, 2001, 13: 137-165
2 Berge U. Two-Way Interconnection and the Collusive Role of the Access Charge. Mimeo, Vienna University of Economics and BA, 2002
3 Dessein W. Network Competition in Nonlinear Pricing. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2003. 34: 593 ?611
4 Gans J, King S. Mobile Network Competition, Customer Ignorance and Fixed-to-Mobile Call Prices. Information Economics and Policy, 2000, 12(4): 301?28
5 Gans .1, King S. Using "Bill and Keep"" Interconnection Arrangements to Soften Network Competition. Economics Letters, 2001, 71: 413?20
6 Wright.1. Access Pricing under Competition: An Application to Cellular Networks. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2002, 9: 289-315
7 Peitz M. Asymmetric Regulation of Access and Price Discrimination in Telecommunications. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2005, 28(3): 327?43
8 Peitz M. Asymmetric Access Price Regulation in Telecommunications Markets. European Economic Review, 2005, 49: 341-358
9 王字庆.引入竞争时期西方国家的电信资费新政策.世界经济,2001(7):55-60
10 陈小洪,马骏.关于中国1匕信资费体系改革的基本看法.中国工业经济,2002(1):23一31
11 张利,汪贵浦,李琪资费调整对电信市场发展影响的经济分析中国软科学,2003(ll):57~60
12 奚国华,刘仲英.我国电信资费改革探索.数量经济技术经济研究,2004(l):5一14
13 周纲,苑春荟,吴建平.不完全竞争市场中的电信普遍服务运行体系.当代经济科学,2006(l):11~16
14 王德财,张维华,骆品亮.对等收费下网络之间的价格竞争.复旦学报:自然科学版,2001(6):665一669
15 王琦,吕廷杰.互联网骨干网间直联博弈对管制政策的影响.数量经济技术经济研究,2005(2):74一86
16 程巨中,姚俭.电信产业的价格竞争模型与接入费水平.上海理工大学学报,2005(5):417一420
17 欧阳思山,邹删刚.双向接入定价的经济模型分析—以电信网为例.系统工程,2006(2):83一86
18 肯莉,陈宏民,潘小军.消费者多方持有行为与厂商的兼容性选择:基于双边市场理论的探讨.世界经济, 2006(12):28-40
1张帆,刘新梅.互联互通双向接入的利益分配机制.系统工程,2007(1):60-65
2姜宇,袁正.网络效应、互联互通与来自中国电信业的经验.财经问题研究,2007(4):31-34
3石奇,孔群喜.接入定价、渠道竞争与规制失败.经济研究,2009(9):116-126
4谭劲松,林润辉.TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择.管理世界,2006(6):71-84
5陶雄强.对建设TD—SCDMA的几点思考.宏观经济研究,2007(11):28-30
6陶长琪,常贵阳.SP外资买卖行为的博弈分析.财经研究,2007(11):60-71
1 李荣华,我国电信市场后进入者的有效竞争研究,中南大学博士论文,2008年。
1山栋明,电信管制视角下多运营商互联格局中的互联资费政策研究,上海交通大学博士论文,上海,2007年。
1 安玉兴、田华,电信网络竞争与接入理论综述,辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007年第6期。
1 李峰(2005)利用Montc Carl0模拟,研究结果发现,MAIC不仅可以改善PP检验的检验水平,而且几乎可以使所有单位根检验方法的检验水平都得到改善。
1 彭英,我国电信价格规制的理论与实证研究,南京航天航空大学博士学位论文,2007年。
[1]卡尔·夏皮罗,哈尔·瓦里安.信息规则:——网络经济的策略指导.第1版.张帆译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000年.152-164
[2]阚凯力.市话与移动的结算结构亟待调整.IT时代周刊,2003(7):32
[3]Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, the American Economic Review,1985,75 (3):424-440
[4]Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economics,1986,94 (4):822-841
[5]Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8 (2):93-115
[6]Cancina M, Bills A, Bergstrom T. Hotelling Location Problems with Directional Constraints:An Application to Television News Scheduling. Journal of Industrial Economics,1995,43:121-124
[7]Steiner P. Program Patterns and Preferences and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1952,66:194-223
[8]Nilssen T,1 Sorgard. Time Schedule and Program Profile:TV News in Norway and Denmark. Journal of Economics Management Strategy,1998,7:209-235
[9]Novos I, Waldman M. The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection:An Analytical Approach. Journal of Political Economy,1984,92:236-246
[10]Johason W. The Economics of Copying, Journal of Political Economy,1985,93:158-174
[11]Besen S. Private Copying, Reprodution Costs, and the Supply of Intellectual Property. Information Economics and Policy,1986,2:5-22
[12]Besen S, Kirby S. Private Copying, Appropriability,and Optimal Copying Royalties. Journal of Law and Economics,1989,32:255-280
[13]Conner K, Rumelt R. Software Piracy:An Analysis of Protection Strategies. Management Science,1991,37:125-139
[14]Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E. Software Piracy:Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion. Journal of Marketing,1995,59:29-37
[15]Tarkka J. Approaches to Deposit Pricing:A Study in the Determination of Deposit Interest and Bank Service Charges. Helsinki:Bank of Finland Studies,1995, E:2
[16]Sharpe S. The Effect of Consumer Switching Costs on Prices:A Theory and Its Applications to Bank Deposit Market. Review of Industrial Organization,1997,12:79-94
[17]Shy O, Tarkka J. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2002,32 (2):299-314
[18]Kim M, Kliger D, Vale B. Estimating Switching costs and Oligopolistic Behavior. The University of Haifa and the Wharton School, Jan.2001
[19]Economides N, Salop S. Competition and Integration Among Complements and Network Market Structure. Journal of Industrial Economics,1992,40:105-123
[20]Matutes C, Padilla A J. Shared ATM networks and Banking Competition. European Economic Review,1994,38:1113-1138
[21]Bittlingmayer G. Efficiency and Entry in a Simple Airline Network. International Journal of Industrial Organization,1990,8:245-257
[22]Berechman J, Poddar S, O Shy. Network Structure and Entry in the Deregulated Airline Industry. Keio Economic Studies,1998,35:71-82
[23]杜云.网络经济中的垄断与公共政策分析.当代财经,2006(3):11-15
[24]张丽芳,张清辨.网络经济与市场结构变迁——新经济条件下垄断与竞争关系的检验分析.财经研究,2006(5):108-118
[25]周和荣,张金隆.虚拟合作竞争:机理、系统模型及实证研究.中国工业经济,2007(8):66-74
[26]周绍东,朱乾龙.网络经济下垄断的动态效率探析.南方经济,2006(11):5-13
[27]聂清凯,夏健明.网络经济时代企业组织架构重建研究.外国经济与管理,2004(11):26-30
[28]张春法,韩耀.网络经济下企业组织的非一体化趋势与超契约治理.世界经济与政治论坛,2005(2):112-116
[29]冯海华,张为付.网络经济下模块化价值创新.世界经济与政治论坛,2007(2):114-119
[30]刘戒骄.产品兼容、网络效应与企业竞争力.中国工业经济,2002(7):28-33
[31]于同申.“创造性毁灭”和网络经济条件下的自主科技创新.中国工业经济,2006(5):64-71
[32]王学斌.银行卡的网络经济特征:一个文献综述.世界经济文汇,2007(4):88-99
[33]谭劲松,林润辉.TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择.管理世界,2006(6):71-84
[34]陶雄强.对建设TD-SCDMA的几点思考.宏观经济研究,2007(11):28-30
[35]李荣华,傅天明,欧阳晓风.中国移动“一家独大”的经济学分析.财经科学,2006(6):81-90
[36]陶长琪,常贵阳.SP外资买卖行为的博弈分析.财经研究,2007(11):60-71
[37]陆伟刚,刘志阔.电信网络外部性的一个注释及管制实践含义.当代财经,2007(6):71-75
[38]石磊,马十国.网络外部效应对产业投资的影响:以电信业为例.数量经济技术经济研究,2006(7):90-96
[39]李怀.基于规模经济和网络经济的自然垄断理论创新“一辅以中国自然垄断产业的经验检验.管理世界,2004(4):61-77
[40]薛伟贤,冯宗宪,王健庆.中国网络经济水平测度指标体系设计.中国软科学,2004(8): 51-19
[41]Economides N. The Economics of Network. International Journal of Industrial Organization,1996,14(6):673-699
[42]Shapiro c, Varian HaI R. The art of standard wars. California Management Review,1999, 41(2):9-32
[43]Liebowitz S J, S E Margolis. Network Extemality:An Uncommon Tragedy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8(2):133-150
[44]Katz Michael, Carl Shapiro. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economics Review,1985,75:424-440.
[45]Economides N, white L J. One-Way Networks, Two-Way Networks, Compatibility, and Antitrust. Working Paper EC-93-14, Stem School of Business, N.Y.U.,1993
[46]Economides N, white L J. Networks and Compatibility:Implications for Antitrust. European Economic Review,1994,38:651-662
[47]Rohlfs J. A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service. Bell Journal of Economics and management,1974,5:16-37
[48]Farrell J, Saloner G. Installed Base and Compatibility:Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation. American Economic Review,1986,72 (5):940-955
[49]Katz M L, Shapiro C. Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Extemalities. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94:822-841.
[50]奥兹·谢伊.网络产业经济学.第1版.张磊译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002
[51]刘戒骄.产品兼容、网络效应与企业竞争力.中国工业经济,2002(7):28-29
[52]David Paul A, Shane Greenstein. The Economics of Compatibility Standard:An Introduction to Recent Research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,1990,1 (1):3-41
[53]史晋川,董雪兵.法律·规制·竞争.北京:经济科学出版社,2008
[54]Katz M L, Shapiro C. Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8 (2):93-115
[55]大卫·范胡斯.电子商务经济学.第1版.刘悦欣等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2003
[56]弗雷德,盖思米等.电信成本——电信管制政策及成本代理模型.第1版.忻展红译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2002
[57]Hank Interven.电信规制手册.第1版.管云翔译.北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2001
[58]让·雅克·拉丰,让·泰勒尔.电信竞争.第1版.唐守廉译.北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2001
[59]张维迎,盛洪.从电信业看中国的反垄断问题.改革,1998(2):31-33
[60]吴永涛,张群,李毅.电信运营寡占市场不对称竞争博弈分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2002(2):P41-43
[61]王子君.市场结构与技术创新——以美国AT&T公司的拆分为例.经济研究,2002(12):70-79
[62]朱江.论收敛于马歇尔缓冲区的有效竞争——中外电信改革理论与实证研究.财经研 究,2003(9):56-61
[63]王俊豪.垄断性产业市场结构重组后的分类管制与协调政策——以中国电信、电力产业为例.中国工业经济,2005(11):67-73
[64]刘俊杰.技术创新、规制重建与中国电信产业的发展.当代财经,2005(5):94-97
[65]姜正新.我国电信产业不对称双限资费规制模式.经济理论与经济管理,2006(3):55-60
[66]张耀寰,梁雄健.当前我国电信业实现有效竞争的政策取向.宏观经济研究,2006(1):17-20
[67]柳思维,李荣华.本地电信网自然垄断的弱化及竞争有效性研究.宏观经济研究,2007(2):53-56
[68]王斌,蔡宏波.电信市场演化与政府管制——基于随机试验的模型分析.南开经济研究,2007(2):56-72
[69]李荣华,傅天明,欧阳晓风.中国移动“一家独大”的经济学分析,财经科学(6):81-90
[70]黄浩,吕廷杰.电信行业有效竞争辨析.电信科学,2007(12):1-4
[71]于良春,杨骞.行政垄断制度选择的一般分析框架——以我国电信业行政垄断制度的动态变迁为例.中国工业经济,2007(12):38-45
[72]Domon K, Ota K. Access pricing and market structure. Information Economics and Policy, 2001,13:77-93
[73]郑奇宝.国外电信行业规制改革比较及启示.经济经纬,200(4):42-44.
[74]牟清.中国电信业产业组织研究.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007
[75]周其仁.数网竞争.上海:三联书店,2001
[76]刘戒骄.英国电信产业的放松管制和对主导运营商BT的再管制.中国工业经济,2002年(1):32-40
[77]刘刚.德国电信行业价格管制的发展变化.中国物价,2004(12):38-39
[78]宋杰,朱莹莹,徐静,李剑华等.电信业竞争分析方法与实践.北京:人民邮电出版社,2009
[79]Farrell Joseph, Shapiro Carl. Asset ownership and market structure in oligopoly. Rand Journal of Economics,1990,21(2):275-292
[80]Laoffont J J, Tirole J. Access Pricing and Competition. European Economics Review,1994, 38 (9),1673-1710
[81]Armstrong M, Doyle C, Vickers J. The Access Pricing Problem:A Synthesis. Journal of Industrial Economics,1996,44(2):131-150
[82]Baumol W J, Sidak G J. The Pricing of Input Sold to Competitors. Yale Journal on Regulation,1994,11(1):171-202
[83]Baumol W J, Sidak G J. Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Washington D C:The MIT Press,1994
[84]Joo J H, ku H M, Kim J C. Optimal Access Pricing With Interconnection Obligation. Information Economics And Policy,2001,13:331-338
[85]肖旭,刘秀清.关于网络行业竞争与接入定价的理论分析.中国工业经济,2002(9):46-50
[86]肖兴志,陈艳利.纵向一体化网络的接入定价研究.中国工业经济,2003(6):21-28
[87]肖兴志,陈艳利.论公用事业的有效成分定价规则.经济与管理研究,2004(4):25-27
[88]钟俊英.我国电信网间接入价格模型的实证分析:接入价格的确定.数量经济技术经济研究,2005(12):34-43
[89]曲延芬.关于电信业互联互通资费的思考.工业技术经济,2006(2):84-86
[90]于立,姜春海.网络产业Ramsey接入定价方法研究.当代财经,2007(9):84-90
[91]陈宝国.存在效用遗传性的电信网之间互联互通的决策分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2004(12):39-43
[92]李荣华,柳思维.瓶颈垄断、市场势力与我国电信网间互联规制研究.当代财经,2007(3):86-91
[93]王俊豪,程肖君.,自然垄断产业的网络瓶颈与接入管制政策.财经问题研究,2007年(12):36-41
[94]Noam E. Interconnection Practices. In:Cave M, Majumdar S, Vogelsang I, eds. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics. Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishers,2002:385-421.
[95]Vogelsang I. Price Regulation of Access to Telecommunications Networks. Journal of Economic Literature,2003,41 (3):830-862
[96]OECD. Access Pricing in Telecommunications.2004
[97]Laffont J J, Rey P, Tirole J. Network competition:(I):Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing. The Rand Journal of Economics,1998,29(1):1-37
[98]Cambini C. Competition between Vertically Integrated Networks. Information Economics and Policy,2001,13:137-165
[99]Laffont J J, Tirole J. Access Pricing and Competition. European Economic Review,1994, 38 (9):1673-1710
[100]Armstrong M, Cowan S, Vickers J. Regulatory Reform:Economic Analysis and British Experience. Cambridge:MIT Press,1994
[101]莫长炜.电信产业的接入定价理论研究综述.外国经济与管理,2006年(6):49-55
[102]Domon K, Ota K. Access Pricing and Market Structure. Information Economics and Policy, 2001,13:77-93
[103]Baumol W J, Sidak J G. Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1994
[104]J Gregory Sidak, Daniel F Spulber. Deregulatory Takings and the Regulatory Contract: The Competitive Transformation of Network Industries in the United States, Cambridge University Press,1998
[105]Joo J H, Ku H M, Kim J C. Optimal Access Pricing with Interconnection Obligation. Information Economics and Policy,2001,13:331-338
[106]Fraja G De. Regulation and Access Pricing with Asymmetric Information. European Economic Review,1999,43:109-134
[107]Dobbs I. Intertemporal price cap regulation under uncertainty. Economic Journal,2004, 114 (495):421-440
[108]Shin R T, Ying J S. Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone. The Rand Journal of Economics,1992,23(2):171-183
[109]拉丰,泰勒尔.政府采购与规制中的激励理论.第1版.石磊、王永钦译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003
[110]张昕竹,让·拉丰,安·易斯塔什.网络产业:规制与竞争理论.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[111]Laffont J J, Rey P, Tirole J. Network Competition:(Ⅰ):Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing. The Rand Journal of Economics,1998a,29(1):1-37
[112]Laffont J J, Rey P, Tirole J. Network Competition:(Ⅱ):Price Discrimination. The Rand Journal of Economics,1998b,29(1):38-56
[113]Cambini C. Competition between Vertically Integrated Networks. Information Economics and Policy,2001,13:137-165
[114]Berge U. Two-Way Interconnection and the Collusive Role of the Access Charge. Mimeo, Vienna University of Economics and BA,2002
[115]Dessein W. Network Competition in Nonlinear Pricing. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2003,34:593-611
[116]Gans J, King S. Using "Bill and Keep" Interconnection Arrangements to Soften Network Competition. Economics Letters,2001,71:413-420
[117]Armstrong M. Mobile Telephony in the UnitedKingdom. Regulation Initiative Discussion Paper No.15, London Business School,1997
[118]Gans J, King S. Mobile Network Competition, Customer Ignorance and Fixed-to-Mobile Call Prices. Information Economics and Policy,2000,12(4):301-328
[119]Wright J. Access Pricing under Competition:An Application to Cellular Networks. Journal of Industrial Economics,2002,9:289-315
[120]Stennek J, Tangeras T P. Competition vs. Regulation in Mobile Telecommunications. NET Institute Working Paper 08-09
[121]Peitz M. Asymmetric Regulation of Access and Price Discrimination in Telecommunications. Journal of Regulatory Economics,2005,28(3):327-343
[122]Peitz M. Asymmetric Access Price Regulation in Telecommunications Markets. European Economic Review,2005,49:341-358
[123]王学庆.引入竞争时期西方国家的电信资费新政策.世界经济,2001(7):55-60
[124]陈小洪,马骏.关于中国电信资费体系改革的基本看法.中国工业经济,2002(1):23-31
[125]张利,汀贵浦,李琪.资费调整对电信市场发展影响的经济分析.中国软科学,2003(11):57-60
[126]奚国华,刘仲英.我国电信资费改革探索.数量经济技术经济研究,2004(1):5-14
[127]周纲,苑春荟,吴建平.不完全竞争市场中的电信普遍服务运行体系.当代经济科学,2006(1):11-16
[128]王德财,张维华,骆品亮.对等收费下网络之间的价格竞争.复旦学报:自然科学版,2001(6):665-669
[129]王琦,吕廷杰.互联网骨干网网间直联博弈对管制政策的影响.数量经济技术经济研究,2005(2):74-86
[130]程巨中,姚俭.电信产业的价格竞争模型与接入费水平.上海理工大学学报,2005(5):417-420
[131]欧阳恩山,邹删刚.双向接入定价的经济模型分析——以电信网为例.系统工程,2006(2):83-86
[132]王求泰,刘伟明.电信业互联互通的囚徒困境与接入定价问题研究.企业经济,2006(3):102-104.
[133]胥莉,陈宏民,潘小军.消费者多方持有行为与厂商的兼容性选择:基于双边市场理论的探讨.世界经济,2006(12):28-40
[134]张帆,刘新梅.互联互通双向接入的利益分配机制.系统工程,2007(1):60-65
[135]纪汉霖,王小芳.双边市场视角下平台互联互通问题的研究.南方经济,2007(11):72-82
[136]姜宇,袁正.网络效应、互联互通与来自中国电信业的经验.财经问题研究,2007(4):31-34
[137]石奇,孔群喜.接入定价、渠道竞争与规制失败.经济研究,2009(9):116-126
[138]房林,邹卫星.多种单位根检验法的比较研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2007(1):151-159
[139]Fuller W A. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York:Wiley,1976.
[140]Dickey D, Fuller W. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1979,74:427-431
[141]Kwiatowski D, Phillips P C B, Schmidt P, Shin Y. Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics,1992,54: 159-178
[142]Elliott G, Rothenberg T J, Stock J H. Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica,1996,64:813-836
[143]张晓峒,白仲林.退势单位根检验小样本性质的比较.数量经济技术经济研究,2005(5):40-49
[144]李峰.关于单位根检验的可靠性.第五届中国经济年会论文,2005
[145]Mitnick B M. The Pilitical Economy of Regulation. New York:Columbia University Press, 1980
[146]Gellhorn E, Pierce R J. Regulated Industries. Sr Paul:West Publishing,1982
[147]植草益.微观规制经济学.第1版.朱绍文译.北京:中国发展出版社,1992
[148]王俊豪.中国自然垄断经营产品管制价格形成机制研究.北京:中国经济出版社,2002
[149]Posner R A. Theories of Economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1974,5:335-358
[150]Stigler G J. What can the Regulators regulate:The Case of Electricity. Journal of Law and Economics,1962,5:1-16
[151]M A Utton. The Economics of Regulation Industry. Basil Blackwell,1986
[152]W Kip viscusi, John M Vernon, Joseph E Harring. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Cambridge:The MIT Press,1995
[153]Stigler G J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1971,2 (1),3-21
[154]Bentley A F. Process of Government. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1908
[155]Jordan W A. Producer Protection, Prior Market Structure and the Effects of Government Regulation. Journal of Law & Economics,1972,15(1):151-176
[156]Peltzman. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 1976,19:210-240
[157]Becker G S. A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1983,98 (3):371-400
[158]Hettich waiter, Stanley L Winer. Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure. American Economic Review,1988,78 (4):701-712
[159]McChesney F S. Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation. Journal of Legal Studies,1987,16(1):101-18
[160]Baron D, Myerson R. Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs. Econometrica,1982, 50:911-930
[161]Sappington D. Optimal Regulation of Research and Development under Imperfect Information. Bell Journal of Economics,1982,13:354-368
[162]陈代云.电信网络规制改革研究.外国经济与管理,2000(8):12-17
[163]曹艳秋,林木西.电信行业管制的国际比较及对我国的启示.经济社会体制比较,2002(6):64-68
[164]李克,翟启江译.电信业改革:新加坡的经验.经济社会体制比较,2004(6):35-43
[165]滕颖,唐小我,李仕明.放松规制的路径与电信市场结构的演进.经济体制改革,2004(5):124-128
[166]李明德.拉美电信业的改革——技术变革与劳动生产率,拉丁美洲研究.2005(3):61-65
[167]欧阳武.美国的电信改革及其对中国的启示.国际经济评论,2000(6):51-55
[168]郭勇,李一军,梁雪峰,张春.美国UNE政策失败的原因与启示.中国软科学,2006(12):36-43
[169]张承耀.电信企业改制与发展战略.中国工业经济,2001(2):28-32
[170]汪秋明.规制定价机制的激励强度权衡与模型设计——以我国电信产业的规制定价总体模型设计为例.中国工业经济,2006(3):38-45
[171]刘戒骄.英国电信产业的放松管制和对主导运营商BT的再管制.中国工业经济,2002(1):32-40
[172]朱旭峰.制度的预期与结果市场改革历程分析:中国电信业.管理世界,2003(10):78-87
[173]于良春,丁启军.自然垄断产业进入管制的成本收益分析——以中国电信业为例的实证研究.中国工业经济,2007(1):14-20
[174]肖兴志,王靖.中国电信产业规制效果的实证研究.财经论丛,2008(5):8-14
[175]信息产业部经济调节与通信清算司.电信资费管理——发展与改革.北京:人民邮电出版社,2006
[176]常欣.放松管制与规制重建——中国基础部门引入竞争后的政府行为分析.www.cei.gov.cn/.2001.09.13
[177]于良春,黄莉.英、美电信产业管制体制之比较研究及其对我国的启示.经济评论,2002(5):118-121
[178]刘新梅,刘胜强.我国电信管制机构改革研究.经济社会体制比较,2004(6):46-48
[179]安·易斯塔什,张昕竹.基础设施规制与中国经济制度.数量经济技术经济研究,1999(7):11-16
[180]马健.产业融合理论研究评述.经济学动态,2002(5):78-81
[181]周振华.产业融合:产业发展及经济增长的新动力.中国工业经济,2003(4):49
[182]Maney Kevin. Magemedia Shakeout:the Inside Story of the Leaders and the Loser in the Exploding Communications Industry. New York:John Willey & Sons,1995
[183]傅玉辉.大媒体产业:从媒介融合到产业融合——中美电信业和传媒业关系研究.北京:中国广播电视出版社,2008
[184]European Commission. On the Convergence of the Telecommunications, Media and Information Technology Sectors, and the Implications for Regulation Towards an Information Society Approach. Green Paper,1997
[185]Yoffice D B. Competing in the age of digital convergence. Bosten:Harvard Business School Press,1998
[186]植草益.信息通讯业的产业融合.中国工业经济,2001(2):24-27
[187]许道友.信息通讯产业融合下的产业边界和市场结构分析——以电信、广播电视、出版三大产业融合为案例.科技和产业,2007(9):13-14
[188]D Ypslanti, P Xavier. Towards Next Generation Regulation. Telecommunications Policy, 1998,22(8):643-659
[189]邹文英.三网融合态势下电信竞争与管制的新取向.未来与发展,2005(3):36-39
[190]http://www.sina.com.cn2010年01月24日
[191]郑大永,郑宏剑.借IPTV促三网融合.中国电信业,2007(9):46-49
[192]http://www.sina.com.cn2010年01月24日
[193]迈克尔·波特.国家竞争优势.第1版.李明轩,邱如美译.北京:华夏出版社,2002.534-541.
[194]刘璇,马凌.国外电信业基于产业融合环境的发展模式比较研究.商场现代化,2008(1):365-366
[195]中共中央关于制定“十一五”规划的建议.新华网,http://news.xinhuanet.com/Politics /2005-10/18/content--3640318.htm,2005-10-18
[196]许志强,张兆安.发展数字电视产业推进“三网融合”.通信与信息技术,2009(6):56-59
[197]罗小卫.广西电信IPTV遇阻三网融合摔下第一跤.华夏时报,2010