绿盲蝽对寄主植物挥发物的趋性及忌避研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
绿盲蝽(Lygus lucorum Meyer-Dur)属半翅目盲蝽科,国内分布几遍全国。其寄主广泛,可以危害很多作物,如棉花、豆类、苜蓿和各种果树等。绿盲蝽具有活动、扩散能力强,繁殖率高等特性,易在短期内形成庞大的种群数量。近年来,绿盲蝽发生越来越重,严重影响果树和农作物的生产。为了进一步探明植物挥发性物质中对绿盲蝽起主要引诱和驱避作用的有效成分,筛选绿盲蝽引诱剂和驱避剂的配方,进行绿盲蝽的无公害综合防治,我们利用气相色谱-质谱联用技术以及生物测定的方法对绿盲蝽寄主植物挥发物进行了研究。首先,利用动态顶空采集法和气相色谱-质谱联用技术对绿盲蝽几种寄主植物包括棉花(Gossypium spp.)、苜蓿(Medicago sativa)、黄豆(Glycine max)、紫边眉豆(Dolichos lablabl)、绿豆(Vigna radiata)、茄子(Solanum melongena)、辣椒(Capsicum frutescens)和架豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)的挥发物成分进行了分析比较,进一步探究绿盲蝽对寄主植物不同选择程度的差异性。然后对受绿盲蝽危害的黄豆和枣树植株的挥发物进行了比较分析,结合绿盲蝽的行为学测定,探明了对绿盲蝽起主要引诱和驱避作用的有效成分的来源。最后利用几种筛选出来的标准化合物及其不同的混配物对绿盲蝽进行了趋性反应测定,筛选出了绿盲蝽引诱剂和驱避剂的配方组成。具体研究结果如下:
     1.在绿盲蝽几种寄主植物中共鉴定出26种化合物,包括醇类、醛类、酮类、酯类、萜烯类、烃类和芳香族化合物。在寄主植物黄豆、棉花、苜蓿、架豆、紫边眉豆、绿豆和辣椒中含量最高的化合物都是己内酰胺,而在寄主植物茄子中含量最高的化合物是乙苯。2-乙基-1-己醇是黄豆所特有的挥发性化合物,β-蒎烯、β-月桂烯和1-癸炔是棉花所特有的挥发性化合物,己醛、反式-2-己烯醛、1-乙烯基己醇、3-辛酮、β-芳樟醇、2,4-二甲基环己醇和β-环柠檬醛是苜蓿特有的挥发性化合物,2-乙烯基-1,1-二甲基-3-亚甲基环己烷是架豆特有的挥发性化合物, 2,4-二异丙烯基-1-甲基-1-乙烯基环己烷是辣椒特有的挥发性化合物。
     2.绿盲蝽雌虫的行为学测定表明,被害植物虫口数量不同,绿盲蝽雌虫的行为反应不同。与健康黄豆相比,被害黄豆(26头)对绿盲蝽雌虫有更强的吸引作用,被害黄豆(34头)对绿盲蝽雌虫有显著的驱避作用;与空气和健康枣树相比,被害枣树(30头)对绿盲蝽雌虫也均有显著的驱避作用。结合对被害寄主植物挥发物的分析比较,我们发现,对绿盲蝽起引诱作用的L36来源于寄主植物(黄豆和枣树);对绿盲蝽起驱避作用的E93和H26分别来源于被害植物(枣树)和绿盲蝽群体本身。
     3.筛选出了绿盲蝽引诱剂和驱避剂的配方,绿盲蝽引诱剂配方成分只有1种,即L36;绿盲蝽驱避剂的配方成分有2种,即H26和P10,其含量比为34∶1,并且研究发现,不同单体化合物混合在一起后与原来各自单体相比较,会产生增效或拮抗作用。
Lygus lucorum Meyer-Dur belongs to hemiptera miridae, the distribution is almost all over the country in China. Its host is rather widespread, and it does harm to a lot of crops such as cotton, beans, alfalfa and some kinds of fruit trees, etc. In recent years, so many Lygus lucorum occur , and have seriously effect on the fruit trees and crop production. In order to further explore the effective components of attraction and repellent to Lygus lucorum in the volatiles of the plant, and to screen the recipe of attractant and repellent to Lygus lucorum, thus preventing and controing Lygus lucorum in comprehensive pollution free way, we researched the volatiles of host plant of Lygus lucorum by the GC-MS and biometric method. Firstly we analysed and compared the ingredient of the volatiles of some host plants such as Gossypium spp., Medicago sativa, Glycine max, Dolichos lablabl, Vigna radiate, Solanum melongena, Capsicum frutescens and Phaseolus vulgaris and further explored the difference in the degree of different choices of Lygus lucorum to host plant. And then we analysed the volatiles of Glycine max and Zizyphus jujube damaged by Lygus lucorum and explored the sources of the material effective components of attraction and repellent to Lygus lucorum combined with the behavior determination of Lygus lucorum. Finally we screened the recipe of attractant and repellent to Lygus lucorum. The concrete results of the study are as follows:
     1.26 compounds were analysized by GC-MS in these host plants, mainly including alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, terpenes, hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds. The highest content of compounds in Gossypium spp., Medicago sativa, Glycine max, Dolichos lablabl, Vigna radiate, Capsicum frutescens and Phaseolus vulgaris is Caprolactam, and the highest content of compounds in Solanum melongena is Ethylbenzene. The unique compounds in Glycine max is 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol; andβ- Pinene,β-Myrcene, and 1-Decyne is the unique compounds in Gossypium spp.; Hexanal, E-2-Hexenal, 1-Vinyl hexanol, 3-Octanone,β-Linalool, Cyclohexanol, 2,4-dimethyl-, andβ-Cyclocitral are the unique compounds in Medicago sativa; Cyclohexane, 2-ethenyl-1,1-dimethyl-3-methylene- is the unique compounds in Phaseolus vulgaris; Cyclohexane, 2,4-diisopropenyl-1-methyl-1- vinyl-, (1S, 2R, 4R)-(-)- is the unique compounds in Capsicum frutescens.
     2.The behavior determination shows that when the Population quantity is different, the behavior of the female Lygus lucorum is different. Glycine max harmed (26) has the stronger attraction to the female Lygus lucorum than the healthy plant, while Glycine max harmed (34) has the prominent repellent to the female Lygus lucorum. Zizyphus jujube harmed (30) has the prominent repellent to the female Lygus lucorum compared with the healthy plant and the air. Combine the analysis and comparison of the volatiles of the plant harmed, we found that L36 attract the female Lygus lucorum is derived from host plant (Glycine max and Zizyphus jujube). E93 and H26 repelling the female Lygus lucorum are root in host plant (Zizyphus jujube) and the Lygus lucorum itself.
     3.We screened out the recipe of the attractant and repellent to Lygus lucorum, the ingredient of the attractant is L36; the ingredient of the repellent are H26 and P10, the ratio is 34∶1. We also found that the mixture of different monomer compounds will produce synergy and antagonism effect compared with the monomer.
引文
[1]刘中一.昆虫与植物的关系综述以及对一些问题的讨论[J].农家之友,2010,2:17-21.
    [2]杨伟伟,李振基,安钰,等.植物挥发性气体(VOCs)研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(8): 1386-1392.
    [3] D’Alessandrom, Turlings TC J. Advances and challenges in the identification of volatiles thatmediate interactions among plants and arthropods. The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006, 131, 24-32.
    [4]宋晓君,唐超,覃伟权,等.虫害诱导植物挥发物的释放机制及应用[J].中国农学通报,2009, 25(13):161-165.
    [5]蔡晓明,孙晓玲,董文霞,等.虫害诱导植物挥发物(HIPVs):从诱导到生态功能[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3969-3980.
    [6]孟凡立,刘立承,李文滨,等.蚜虫取食和机械损伤对大豆真叶中异黄酮的诱导作用[J].大豆科学,2010,29(2):264-267.
    [7] DeMoraescm., LewisW J, ParPW, et al. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attractparasitoids. Nature, 1998, 393, 570-573.
    [8] Tooker JF, KoenigWA, Hanks LM. Altered host plant volatiles are proxies for sex pheromones in the gallwaspAntistrophus rufus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe USA, 2002,99: 15486-15491.
    [9] Reddy GVP. Plant volatiles mediate orientation and plant preference by the predator Chrysoperla carneastephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). BiologicalControl, 2002,25: 49-55.
    [10]孙绪艮,尹淑艳.针叶小爪螨—寄主植物—芬兰钝绥螨相互关系的研究Ⅱ·挥发性物质在寄主植物—针叶小爪螨—芬兰钝绥螨之间的作用[J].林业科学,2002,38(2):73-77.
    [11]周强,徐涛,张古忍,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱的驱避作用[J].昆虫学报,2003, 46 (6): 739-744.
    [12] Camors F B Jr&Payne T L. Response of Heydenia unica (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) pheromones and a host-tree terpene [J]. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1972, 65:31-33.
    [13] Vinson S B&Williams H J. Host selection behavior of Campoletis sonorensis:A model system [J]. BioControl, 1994, l:107-117.
    [14]王振华,赵晖,李金甫,等.植物源挥发物对昆虫信息素的增效作用及其增效机制[J].应用生态学报, 2008,19(11):2533-2537.
    [15]曾春,黄健生,丁保福,等.信息化合物对昆虫行为的影响及其在生物防治中的应用[J].江西植保,2009,32(2):63-67.
    [16]赵连吉,王兆荣,赵博,等.昆虫信息素在害虫防治上的应用[J].吉林林业科技,2003,32(2):68,72.
    [17]薛皎亮,贺珺,谢映平.植物挥发物对天敌昆虫异色瓢虫的引诱效应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,14(4):494-498.
    [18]孙阳,张淑颖.甲基丁香酚挥发物对桔小实蝇成虫的引诱作用[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(20): 8685-8687.
    [19] Rasmann S, Kollner T G, Degenhardt J, et al. Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature, 2005,434,732-737.
    [20] Koschier E H, Sedy K A, Novak J.Influence of plant volatiles on feeding damage caused by the onion thrips Thrips tabaci.Crop Protection,2002,21(5):419-425.
    [21] Dicke M, Gols R, Ludeking D, et a1. Jasmonic acid and herbivory differentially induce carnivore- attracting plant volatiles in lima bean plants. Journal of Chemical ecology, 1999,25(8): l907-l922.
    [22] Dean1 J M, Moraes C M D. Effects of Genetic Modification on Herbivore-Induced Volatiles from Maize, Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2006,32(4):713-724.
    [23]高景林,赵冬香.昆虫信息化合物[J].热带农业科学,2005,25(4):86-91.
    [24]马惠芬,郭玉红,和丽萍,等.麻疯树树叶的挥发性化学成分研究[J].木材加工,2011,5:58-60.
    [25]徐伟,严善春,廖月枝,等.落叶松(Larix gemelinii)苗挥发物两种收集方法的对比分析[J].生态学报, 2009,29(6):2884-2892.
    [26]郑浩,杨长举,华红霞.与昆虫有关的植物挥发性次生物质的研究方法[J].昆虫知识, 2002,39(1): 9-13.
    [27] Tollsten L,Bergstrom G. Headspace volatiles of whole plants and macerated plant parts of Brassica and Sinapis[J]. Phytochemistry.,1988,27(12):4013-4018.
    [28] Heath R.R.,Manukian A.An automated system for use in collecting volatile chemicals released from plants[J].Chem.Ecol.,1994,20(3):593-608.
    [29] Buchbauer G,Jirovetz L,Wasicky M.Comparative investigation of Douglas fir headspace samples,essential oils,and extracts(needles and twigs)using GC-FID and GC-FTIR-MS[J]. Agric Food Chem,1994,42(12):2852-2854.
    [30]胡国文,梁天锡,刘光杰,等.抗白背飞虱水稻品种挥发性次生物质的提取、组分鉴定与生测[J].中国水稻科学, 1994,8(4): 223-230.
    [31]许宁,陈宗懋,游小清.引诱茶尺蠖天敌寄生蜂的茶树挥发物的分离与鉴定[J].昆虫学报,1999, 42(2):126-131.
    [32]高逢敬,蒲彪,黄公武.花椒香气成分提取方法的研究现状[J].四川食品与发酵,2006,(4): 5-7.
    [33]田厚军,杨广.挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)采样方法的研究进展[J].华东昆虫学报,2008, 17(2): 136-142.
    [34] Arthur C L, Pawliszyn J. Solid phase micro extraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers [J]. Anal Chem, 1990, 62: 2145-2148.
    [35] Zhang Z, Yang M J, Pawliszyn J. Solid phase micro extraction: a new solvent-free alternative for sample preparation [J]. Anal Chem, 1994, 66: 844A-854A.
    [36]董学畅,刘春波,刘志华,等.动态顶空技术及其在天然产物分析中的应用[J].云南化工,2010,37(1):15-18.
    [37]陈明顺,仵均祥,张国辉.植物诱导性直接防御[J].昆虫知识,2009,46(2):175-186.
    [38]曾任森,苏贻娟,叶茂,等.植物的诱导抗性及生化机理.华南农业大学学报,2008,29(2):1-6.
    [39] Fatouros N E , Broekgaarden C , Bukovinszkine 'Kiss G, et al. Male-derived butterfly antiaphrodisiac mediates induced indirect plant defense[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2008,105(29):10033-10038.
    [40] Kessler A, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. Silencing the jasmonate cascade: Induced plant defenses and insect populations[J]. Science, 2004,305: 665-668.
    [41] Bruinsma M, Dicke M. Herbivore-induced indirect defence: From induction mechanisms to community ecology. In: Schaller A ed. Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory. Springer Publishers, Berlin. 2008, 31-60.
    [42] Bernays EA. Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores: Success seen as different ways to eat without being eaten[J]. Bioscience, 1998,48: 35-44.
    [43] Jongsma MA, Bakker PL, Peters J, et al. Adaptation of Spodoptera exigua larvae to plant proteinase inhibitors by induction of gut proteinase activity insensitive to inhibition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1995,92: 8041-8 045.
    [44] Zhu-Salzman K, Bi JL, Liu TX. Molecular strategies of plant defense and insect counter-defense[J]. Insect Science,2005,12:3-15.
    [45] Will T, Tjallingii W F, Thonnessen A, et al. Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007,104( 25):10536—10541.
    [46] Wu K, Li W, Feng H, et al Seasonal abudance of the mirides, Lygus lucorum and Adelphocoris spp. (Hemiptera:Miride) on Bt cotton in North China[J]. Crop protection, 2002(21): 997-1002.
    [47]张立娟.绿盲蝽寄主选择性及其机理研究[D].河北农业大学,2010.
    [48]戴建青,韩诗畴,杜家纬.植物挥发性信息化学物质在昆虫寄主选择行为中的作用[J].环境昆虫学报,2010, 32(3): 407-414.
    [49]李欣,白素芬.寄主植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三重营养关系中化学生态学的研究进展[J].河南农业大学学报,2003,37(3):224~232.
    [50] Hatanaka Akikazu. The biogeneration of green odour by green leaves[J]. Phytochemistry, 1993, 34(5):1201~1218.
    [51]张康,任丽燕,李科明,等.植物挥发性气味物质对中红侧沟茧蜂的趋向行为影响及田间诱集效果[J].中国生物防治学报,2011, 27(2):157-164.
    [52] Sun X G, Qiao L Q. The effect on the selectivity of Tetranychus viennensis for different host plants by volatiles from plant[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 110: 181-189.
    [53]孔祥波,张真,王鸿斌,等.侧柏挥发性化学成分的鉴定及其对双条杉天牛的触角电位反应[J].林业科学研究,2005,18(3):260-266.
    [54]泽桑梓,闫争亮,张真,等.华山松不同部位挥发性单萜烯的含量及其对华山松木蠹象行为的影响[J].环境昆虫学报, 2010, 32(1): 36-40.
    [55]王茹琳,杨伟,杨佐忠,等.华山松大小蠹对9种植物挥发物的EAG和行为反应[J].中国森林病虫,2011,30(1):23-26.
    [56]杜秀娟,宋丽文,高长启,等.松果梢斑螟不同危害期红松挥发性物质及与寄主选择的关系[J].林业科学,2010,46(8):107-113.
    [57] Fatzinger C W, Merkel E P. Oviposition and feeding preferences of the southern pine coneworm for different host-plant-materials and observations on monoterpenes as an oviposition stimulant[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1985,11(6):689 - 699.
    [58] Hanula J L, Berisford C W, Debarr G L. Monoterpene oviposition stimulants of Diorytria amatella in volatiles from fusiform rust galls and second-year loblolly pine cones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,1985, 11(7):943-952.
    [59]韩宝瑜,周成松.茶梢和茶花信息物引诱有翅茶蚜效应的研究[J].茶叶科学,2004,24(4):249-254.
    [60]韩宝瑜,周成松.茶梢和茶花主要挥发物对门氏食蚜蝇和大草蛉引诱效应[J].应用生态学报, 2004,15(4): 623-626.
    [61]卢芙萍,赵冬香,王爱萍.中华稻蝗对植物挥发性化学物质的触角电生理和行为反应[J].热带作物学报,2008,29(2):225-230.
    [62]马双,王松莹,谷少华,等.苜蓿盲蝽化学感受蛋白Alin-CSP6的气味结合特性[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(14):2926-2934.
    [63]陈展册,苏丽,戈峰,等.绿盲蝽对性信息素类似物和植物挥发物的触角电位反应[J].昆虫学报, 2010, 53(1): 47-54.
    [64]陈友铃,吴文珊.爱玉子花序挥发物成分以及对其传粉小蜂的吸引作用[J].生态学报, 2010,30(8):2212-2219.
    [65]陈春,宋启示,张光明,等.榕果挥发物对传粉榕小蜂的吸引作用[J].生态学报,2004,24(12): 2794-2798.
    [66]周强,徐涛,张古忍,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱的驱避作用[J].昆虫学报,2003, 46(6): 739-744.
    [67] Honda T,Kainoh Y, Honda H.The persistence of a learned response in the egg-larval parasitoid Ascogaster reticulates Watanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) [J]. Entomol.Sci,1999, 2(3): 335 -340.
    [68]李继泉,樊慧,金幼菊.光肩星天牛对损伤后复叶械植株的行为反应[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(5):42-46.
    [69] Smith R. F. , Pierce H. D. , Borden J. H. Sex pheromone of the mullein bug, Campylomma verbasci ( Meyer ) (Heteroptera: Miridae) [J]. Chem. Ecol., 1991,17:1437-1447.
    [70] Dickens J. C. , Callahan F. E. , Wergin W. P. , et al. Olfaction in a hemimetabolous insect: Antennal-specific protein in adult Lygus lineolaris ( Heteroptera: Miridae) [J]. Insect Physiol., 1995,41: 857-867.
    [71] Groot A. T. , Schuurman A. , Visser J. H. , et al. Laboratory bioassay of sex pheromone activity in Lygocoris pabulinus ( L. ) ( Heteroptera: Miridae) . In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ISCE Meeting,Prague. International Society of Chemical Ecology. 1996. 189.
    [72]苏建伟,陈展册,张广珠,等.绿盲蝽雌虫的浸提物分析[J].昆虫知识,2010,47(6):1113-1117.
    [73]陈展册,苏丽,戈峰,等.绿盲蝽对性信息素类似物和植物挥发物的触角电位反应[J].昆虫学报,2010, 53(1): 47-54.
    [74]刘英胜,严善春,程红,等.落叶松毛虫对兴安落叶松9种挥发性物质的行为反应[J].林业科学,2009,45(4):72-77.
    [75]陈良,鲍毅新.野生动物环境容纳量的研究现状[J].浙江师范大学学报, 2006, 29(4): 448-454.
    [76]孙绪艮,尹淑艳.针叶小爪螨—寄主植物—芬兰钝绥螨相互关系的研究(挥发性物质在寄主植物—针叶小爪螨—芬兰钝绥螨之间的作用)[J].林业科学,2002,38(2):73-77.
    [77]苏远萍,杨长举,华红霞,等.13种植物乙醇提取物对褐飞虱的生物活性研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(1):198-202.
    [78]杨长龙,江世宏,徐汉虹.植物源驱避剂研究进展[J].植物保护,2006,32(6):4-9.
    [79]李菁,骆有庆,石娟,等.利用植物源引诱剂监测与控制舞毒蛾[J].北京林业大学学报,2011,33(4): 85-90.
    [80]曹兵求,刘定忠,樊文华,等.不同性引诱剂与诱捕器组合对棉铃虫诱测效果[J].江西棉花,2011,33(增刊1):100-101.
    [81]李述举,邱钰,高俊,等.果瑞特引诱剂对柑桔大实蝇的防治效果研究[J].中国南方果树, 2011,40(6):40-41.
    [82]高有华,于江南.白星花金龟引诱剂的筛选[J].新疆农业大学学报,2011,34(4):332-334.
    [83]田艳,陈桂芳,李果,等.引诱剂诱捕松褐天牛成虫对比研究[J].植物保护学,2011,13:154, 162.
    [84]吴敌,林凤敏,陆宴辉,等.绿盲蝽和中黑盲蝽对不同抗性和虫害处理棉花的选择趋性[J].昆虫学报,2010,53(6):696-701.
    [85]张立娟,崔建州,李继泉,等.绿盲蝽对不同处理具花枣枝挥发物的趋性反应[J].河北农业大学学报,2010,33(4):81-84.
    [86]张尚卿,高占林,党志红,等.绿盲蝽对四种挥发性物质的触角电位和行为反应[J].华北农学报,2011, 26(3):189-194.
    [87] Landolt P J, Adams T, Zack R S, et al. Field Response of Alfalfa Looper and Cabbage Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Plusiinae) to Single and Binary Blends of Floral Odorants[J]. Enviromental Entomology, 2006, 35(2): 276-281.
    [88] Mourad L, Shonouda. New Approach to Evaluate the Antennal Response of an Adult Predator Insect to Different Volatile Chemical Compounds by Using Electroantenogram Technique[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2008, 8(9): 1692-1698.
    [89]樊慧,李继泉,金幼菊.光肩星天牛对寄主植物挥发物的电生理和行为反应[J].中国林学(英文版) ,2003, 5(1) :25-29.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700