辨证针刺对恶性肿瘤短期化疗患者生存质量影响研究
|
摘要
本文以辨证针刺对恶性肿瘤短期化疗生存质量影响研究为切入点,引入中西医结合生存质量量表,对生存质量进行研究。
研究背景:肿瘤是目前威胁人类生命的主要疾病之一。近年来,恶性肿瘤发病率呈明显上升趋势。据世界卫生组织统计,全球每年新发现恶性肿瘤患者超过1000万人。随着医学模式由生物医学模式向生物-心理-社会医学模式转变,恶性肿瘤的治疗思路也从单纯地追求消灭或缩小肿瘤实体,转变为灭瘤同时注重机体及精神状态的改善,提高生存质量。自从上世纪70年代,医学界尤其是肿瘤领域提出和引入生存质量这一概念,恶性肿瘤患者生存质量问题越来越多地受到关注。近年来,中医药介入到恶性肿瘤患者生活质量的研究中,针灸对恶性肿瘤治疗生活质量有一定潜力,但相关研究较少。因此,本研究选择辨证针刺方法对改善恶性肿瘤患者生活质量的作用进行研究。
研究创新点:
1将生存质量研究引入到针刺治疗恶性肿瘤临床疗效评价之中,适合了现代在恶性肿瘤治疗中开始重视患者生存质量的新理念及其注重生理—心理—社会医学新模式转变的需求。
2对现有中西医结合生存质量量表应用范围加以扩展,并对相关中医临床症状及其变化用“症状频数”转化进行统计分析。
研究目的:观察辨证针刺方法对恶性肿瘤患者生存质量的影响,客观评价辨证针刺提高恶性肿瘤患者生存质量的临床疗效,为临床提高恶性肿瘤患者的生存质量提供新的思路和方法。
研究方法:
病例来源:病例采集时间为2007年2月～2007年11月。所有恶性肿瘤病例均为山东省烟台市肿瘤医院化疗科的住院病人。
随机分组情况:本研究共观察了符合病例纳入标准的92例住院治疗的恶性肿瘤患者。按随机数字表法,随机分为辨证针刺组、非辨证针刺对照组(简称非辨证针刺组)、西药基础治疗对照组(简称西药对照组),不同组别比例为1∶1∶1。
治疗方法:辨证针刺组采用西医基础治疗(包括化疗、对症治疗和支持治疗等)结合辨证针刺治疗。辨证分为实证和虚证,实证针刺选取太冲、合谷、血海、丰隆、膻中,虚证针刺选取气海、关元、足三里、三阴交、太溪。非辨证针刺组采用西医基础治疗结合非辨证针刺治疗,根据文献资料检索结果选取穴位应用频率最高的前5位,针刺选取足三里、三阴交、内关、关元、合谷。西药对照组仅采用西医基础治疗。本研究中生存质量包括生理领域、心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域、情感领域及整体健康领域。应用中西医结合生存质量量表,测评治疗前和治疗后生存质量以及六个领域评分,进行治疗前后评分比较。另外,还对治疗前后生存质量量表中出现的症状进行了归纳统计,并对治疗前后血白细胞计数、肝肾功能变化情况进行研究。
观察疗程:选择恶性肿瘤用药相对集中的化疗周期中的一个短期阶段作为疗效观察期,即化疗周期的第1～7天。7天为一个疗程,全部病例均治疗一个疗程。
统计方法:计量资料应用方差分析,计数资料应用X~2检验。
研究结果:
生存质量总评分,不同组别治疗前后生存质量总评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗前后生存质量总评分,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组及西药对照组治疗前后生存质量总评分差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗前后差值组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组相比,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,显著提高恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的生存质量,非辨证针刺治疗和西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的生存质量影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。具体影响指标包括:
1、生理领域
不同组别治疗前后生理领域评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗后生理领域评分提高,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组治疗后生理领域评分提高,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);西药对照组治疗后生理领域评分降低,但差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别生理领域评分治疗前后差值组间比较,辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异极其显著(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组相比,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,能够显著改善恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的生理领域功能状况,非辨证针刺治疗和西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间生理领域功能状况影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。
2、心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域和情感领域
不同组别心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域和情感领域评分治疗前后组内比较、治疗前后差值组间比较及治疗后组间比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,不同组别治疗对观察期间恶性肿瘤患者心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域及情感领域功能状况影响均不明显。
3、整体健康领域
不同组别治疗前后整体健康领域评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗后整体健康领域评分提高,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组治疗后整体健康领域评分提高,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);西药对照组治疗后整体健康领域评分降低,但差异不显著(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗前后整体健康领域评分差值组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗和非辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,能够显著改善恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的整体健康领域功能状况,西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的整体健康领域功能状况影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。
4、症状
总体症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与空白对照比较,差异均有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。
消化系统症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。
疼痛症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。
其他症状改善情况组间比较,辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。
说明,辨证针刺治疗能显著改善总体症状、消化系统症状、疼痛症状以及其他症状,且能够预防化疗毒副反应的发生,减少症状的加重和新症状的发生。
5、生化指标
不同组别治疗后血白细胞计数、肝肾脏功能变化组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,不同组别治疗对观察期间恶性肿瘤患者血白细胞计数、肝肾脏功能影响均不明显。
研究结论:
研究结果显示,辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高观察期间恶性肿瘤患者生存质量,具体改善指标包括:
1、生理领域
辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的生理领域评分。
2、整体健康领域
辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高观察期间恶性肿瘤患者的整体健康领域评分。
3、症状
辨证针刺治疗能显著改善总体症状、消化系统症状、疼痛症状以及其他症状,且能够预防化疗毒副反应的发生,减少症状的加重和新症状的发生。
由此可见,辨证针刺治疗组能够提高恶性肿瘤患者的生存质量,改善生理领域和整体健康领域功能状况,有效改善症状,减缓症状的加重和新症状的发生。为恶性肿瘤患者化疗期间生存质量的改善提供了有效手段,具有积极的临床意义。
The breakthrough point of this study is the influence on quality of life(QOL) of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification. The QOL is studies using the quality of life scale(DQOL) in integrated traditional medicine and western medicine area.
BACKGROUND
Tumor is one of the main diseases endangering human life nowadays.It is increasing obviously now.There are more than 10,000,000 new patients diagnosed to be malign tumors globally every year according to the statistics from WHO.The therapeutic route for malign tumors has changed from extinguishing or reducing the solid of tumors into emphasizing the improvement of body,spirit and QOL at the same time of extinguishing tumors when medical model changed from biomedical model into biopsychosocial medical model.The QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors has been paid more and more attention to since 1970's especially since that the concept of QOL was drawn in tumor field. Traditional medicine starts to be used in studies on the QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors recently.Acupuncture is very potential on improving the QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors.But there are very few researches on this aspect.So this study is about the influence on QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification.
INNOVATIONS
1.Drawing study on QOL in evaluation of clinical curative effect of acupuncture on malign tumors corresponds with the new thought of emphasizing the QOL of patients and the need of biopyschosocial medical model.
2.Expand the applied range of DQOL.Calculate and analyze relative clinical symptoms in TCM and their change in frequence of symptoms.
OBJECTIVE
To observe the influence on QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification;to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effectiveness on QOL by acupuncture according to patterns identification objectively.And to provide new thinking and methods for improving QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors in clinic.
METHOD
Resource:
All the patients are from chemical treatment department of Yantai Tumor Hospital of Shandong Province.
Time:
The collection of cases is from February to November,2007.
Random:
Consistent with inclusive criteria,92 cases of patients suffering from malign tumors was observed in the study.According to the random digits table,they were randomly divided into acupuncture group according to patterns identification,acupuncture control group and western medicine control group,with the ratio 1:1:1.
Treatment:
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification was applied for conventional therapy of western medicine(including chemotherapy,symptomatic treatment and supportive treatment,etc.) plus acupuncture treatment with patterns identification; Acupuncture control group was applied for conventional therapy of western medicine combined with the acupuncture treatment without patterns identification;Western medicine control group was only applied for the conventional therapy.
The QOL of this study included physiology,psychology,independence,living conditions and whole status of health.QOL scale of integrated medicine was used to evaluate patients' life quality with six items and compare the result before and after treatments.
In addition,the changes of leucocyte count,hepatic function and renal function before and after treatment were studied.
Course of treatment:
A short period of time which was 1~(st)-7~(th) day within cycles of chemotherapy was selected for observing effectiveness.7 days was a course of treatment,and each group was treated one course.
Statistics:
SPSS13.0 was used in the statistical analysis.Measurement data were compared with analysis of variance.The enumeration data were compared with the X~2 test.
Results:
QOL:
The comparison of scores of QOL within the groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:the difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group and Western medicine control group: The differences were not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of QOL among different groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was not significant(P＞0.05).Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with acupuncture control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).
1.physiology
The comparison of scores of physiology within the groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:The score increased after treatment. The difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was significant(P＜0.05). Western medicine control group:The score decreased after treatment.The difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of physiology among different groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was not significant(P＞0.05).Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with acupuncture control group:the difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).And so was the comparison between Acupuncture group according to patterns identification and acupuncture control group.
2.psychology,independence,living conditions
The comparison of scores of these ideas no matter within or among groups before and after treatment:The differences were not significant.(P＞0.05)
3.whole status of health
The comparison of scores of whole status of health within groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was significant (P＜0.05).Western medicine control group:The score decreased after treatment.The difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of whole status of health among different groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was very significant(P＜0.01).No matter the comparison between acupuncture control group and western medicine control group or that between Acupuncture group according to patterns identification and acupuncture control group,the differences were not significant.(P＞0.05)
4.symptoms
The comparisons of amelioration of total symptoms,digestive system symptoms,pain symptoms,other symptoms among groups:acupuncture group according to patterns identification showed a distinctive significance compared with western medicine group and acupuncture control group.
5.biochemical index
The comparisons of leukocyte count,the functional changes of liver and kidney:the comparisons all among different groups were not significant(P＞0.05).
Conclusions:
QOL:
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of QOL,which showed better life quality.
1.physiology
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of physiology,and the change of score evaluation showed increasing trend.
2.whole status of health
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of whole status of health,and the change of score evaluation showed increasing trend.
3.symptoms
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could ameliorate total symptoms, or those in digestive system,pain symptoms etc.It could prevent the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy.
All in all,the results showed that acupuncture group according to patterns identification could raise the total scores of QOL,ameliorate symptoms and decrease the aggravation of symptoms as well as prevent the new ones.
研究背景:肿瘤是目前威胁人类生命的主要疾病之一。近年来,恶性肿瘤发病率呈明显上升趋势。据世界卫生组织统计,全球每年新发现恶性肿瘤患者超过1000万人。随着医学模式由生物医学模式向生物-心理-社会医学模式转变,恶性肿瘤的治疗思路也从单纯地追求消灭或缩小肿瘤实体,转变为灭瘤同时注重机体及精神状态的改善,提高生存质量。自从上世纪70年代,医学界尤其是肿瘤领域提出和引入生存质量这一概念,恶性肿瘤患者生存质量问题越来越多地受到关注。近年来,中医药介入到恶性肿瘤患者生活质量的研究中,针灸对恶性肿瘤治疗生活质量有一定潜力,但相关研究较少。因此,本研究选择辨证针刺方法对改善恶性肿瘤患者生活质量的作用进行研究。
研究创新点:
1将生存质量研究引入到针刺治疗恶性肿瘤临床疗效评价之中,适合了现代在恶性肿瘤治疗中开始重视患者生存质量的新理念及其注重生理—心理—社会医学新模式转变的需求。
2对现有中西医结合生存质量量表应用范围加以扩展,并对相关中医临床症状及其变化用“症状频数”转化进行统计分析。
研究目的:观察辨证针刺方法对恶性肿瘤患者生存质量的影响,客观评价辨证针刺提高恶性肿瘤患者生存质量的临床疗效,为临床提高恶性肿瘤患者的生存质量提供新的思路和方法。
研究方法:
病例来源:病例采集时间为2007年2月～2007年11月。所有恶性肿瘤病例均为山东省烟台市肿瘤医院化疗科的住院病人。
随机分组情况:本研究共观察了符合病例纳入标准的92例住院治疗的恶性肿瘤患者。按随机数字表法,随机分为辨证针刺组、非辨证针刺对照组(简称非辨证针刺组)、西药基础治疗对照组(简称西药对照组),不同组别比例为1∶1∶1。
治疗方法:辨证针刺组采用西医基础治疗(包括化疗、对症治疗和支持治疗等)结合辨证针刺治疗。辨证分为实证和虚证,实证针刺选取太冲、合谷、血海、丰隆、膻中,虚证针刺选取气海、关元、足三里、三阴交、太溪。非辨证针刺组采用西医基础治疗结合非辨证针刺治疗,根据文献资料检索结果选取穴位应用频率最高的前5位,针刺选取足三里、三阴交、内关、关元、合谷。西药对照组仅采用西医基础治疗。本研究中生存质量包括生理领域、心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域、情感领域及整体健康领域。应用中西医结合生存质量量表,测评治疗前和治疗后生存质量以及六个领域评分,进行治疗前后评分比较。另外,还对治疗前后生存质量量表中出现的症状进行了归纳统计,并对治疗前后血白细胞计数、肝肾功能变化情况进行研究。
观察疗程:选择恶性肿瘤用药相对集中的化疗周期中的一个短期阶段作为疗效观察期,即化疗周期的第1～7天。7天为一个疗程,全部病例均治疗一个疗程。
统计方法:计量资料应用方差分析,计数资料应用X~2检验。
研究结果:
生存质量总评分,不同组别治疗前后生存质量总评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗前后生存质量总评分,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组及西药对照组治疗前后生存质量总评分差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗前后差值组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组相比,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,显著提高恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的生存质量,非辨证针刺治疗和西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的生存质量影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。具体影响指标包括:
1、生理领域
不同组别治疗前后生理领域评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗后生理领域评分提高,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组治疗后生理领域评分提高,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);西药对照组治疗后生理领域评分降低,但差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别生理领域评分治疗前后差值组间比较,辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异极其显著(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组相比,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组相比,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,能够显著改善恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的生理领域功能状况,非辨证针刺治疗和西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间生理领域功能状况影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。
2、心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域和情感领域
不同组别心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域和情感领域评分治疗前后组内比较、治疗前后差值组间比较及治疗后组间比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,不同组别治疗对观察期间恶性肿瘤患者心理领域、独立性领域、生活条件领域及情感领域功能状况影响均不明显。
3、整体健康领域
不同组别治疗前后整体健康领域评分组内比较:辨证针刺组治疗后整体健康领域评分提高,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组治疗后整体健康领域评分提高,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);西药对照组治疗后整体健康领域评分降低,但差异不显著(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗前后整体健康领域评分差值组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。不同组别治疗后组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,辨证针刺治疗和非辨证针刺治疗能够显著拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,能够显著改善恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的整体健康领域功能状况,西药治疗对恶性肿瘤患者观察期间患者的整体健康领域功能状况影响不明显,且辨证针刺治疗明显优于西药治疗和非辨证针刺治疗。
4、症状
总体症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与空白对照比较,差异均有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。
消化系统症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。
疼痛症状改善情况组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。
其他症状改善情况组间比较,辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P＜0.01);非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05)。
说明,辨证针刺治疗能显著改善总体症状、消化系统症状、疼痛症状以及其他症状,且能够预防化疗毒副反应的发生,减少症状的加重和新症状的发生。
5、生化指标
不同组别治疗后血白细胞计数、肝肾脏功能变化组间比较:辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,非辨证针刺组与西药对照组比较,辨证针刺组与非辨证针刺组比较,差异均无显著性意义(P＞0.05)。说明,不同组别治疗对观察期间恶性肿瘤患者血白细胞计数、肝肾脏功能影响均不明显。
研究结论:
研究结果显示,辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高观察期间恶性肿瘤患者生存质量,具体改善指标包括:
1、生理领域
辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高恶性肿瘤患者在观察期间的生理领域评分。
2、整体健康领域
辨证针刺治疗能够拮抗化疗药物毒副作用,提高观察期间恶性肿瘤患者的整体健康领域评分。
3、症状
辨证针刺治疗能显著改善总体症状、消化系统症状、疼痛症状以及其他症状,且能够预防化疗毒副反应的发生,减少症状的加重和新症状的发生。
由此可见,辨证针刺治疗组能够提高恶性肿瘤患者的生存质量,改善生理领域和整体健康领域功能状况,有效改善症状,减缓症状的加重和新症状的发生。为恶性肿瘤患者化疗期间生存质量的改善提供了有效手段,具有积极的临床意义。
The breakthrough point of this study is the influence on quality of life(QOL) of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification. The QOL is studies using the quality of life scale(DQOL) in integrated traditional medicine and western medicine area.
BACKGROUND
Tumor is one of the main diseases endangering human life nowadays.It is increasing obviously now.There are more than 10,000,000 new patients diagnosed to be malign tumors globally every year according to the statistics from WHO.The therapeutic route for malign tumors has changed from extinguishing or reducing the solid of tumors into emphasizing the improvement of body,spirit and QOL at the same time of extinguishing tumors when medical model changed from biomedical model into biopsychosocial medical model.The QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors has been paid more and more attention to since 1970's especially since that the concept of QOL was drawn in tumor field. Traditional medicine starts to be used in studies on the QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors recently.Acupuncture is very potential on improving the QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors.But there are very few researches on this aspect.So this study is about the influence on QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification.
INNOVATIONS
1.Drawing study on QOL in evaluation of clinical curative effect of acupuncture on malign tumors corresponds with the new thought of emphasizing the QOL of patients and the need of biopyschosocial medical model.
2.Expand the applied range of DQOL.Calculate and analyze relative clinical symptoms in TCM and their change in frequence of symptoms.
OBJECTIVE
To observe the influence on QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors treated by acupuncture according to patterns identification;to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effectiveness on QOL by acupuncture according to patterns identification objectively.And to provide new thinking and methods for improving QOL of patients suffering from malign tumors in clinic.
METHOD
Resource:
All the patients are from chemical treatment department of Yantai Tumor Hospital of Shandong Province.
Time:
The collection of cases is from February to November,2007.
Random:
Consistent with inclusive criteria,92 cases of patients suffering from malign tumors was observed in the study.According to the random digits table,they were randomly divided into acupuncture group according to patterns identification,acupuncture control group and western medicine control group,with the ratio 1:1:1.
Treatment:
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification was applied for conventional therapy of western medicine(including chemotherapy,symptomatic treatment and supportive treatment,etc.) plus acupuncture treatment with patterns identification; Acupuncture control group was applied for conventional therapy of western medicine combined with the acupuncture treatment without patterns identification;Western medicine control group was only applied for the conventional therapy.
The QOL of this study included physiology,psychology,independence,living conditions and whole status of health.QOL scale of integrated medicine was used to evaluate patients' life quality with six items and compare the result before and after treatments.
In addition,the changes of leucocyte count,hepatic function and renal function before and after treatment were studied.
Course of treatment:
A short period of time which was 1~(st)-7~(th) day within cycles of chemotherapy was selected for observing effectiveness.7 days was a course of treatment,and each group was treated one course.
Statistics:
SPSS13.0 was used in the statistical analysis.Measurement data were compared with analysis of variance.The enumeration data were compared with the X~2 test.
Results:
QOL:
The comparison of scores of QOL within the groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:the difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group and Western medicine control group: The differences were not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of QOL among different groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was not significant(P＞0.05).Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with acupuncture control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).
1.physiology
The comparison of scores of physiology within the groups before and after treatment: Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:The score increased after treatment. The difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was significant(P＜0.05). Western medicine control group:The score decreased after treatment.The difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of physiology among different groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was not significant(P＞0.05).Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with acupuncture control group:the difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).And so was the comparison between Acupuncture group according to patterns identification and acupuncture control group.
2.psychology,independence,living conditions
The comparison of scores of these ideas no matter within or among groups before and after treatment:The differences were not significant.(P＞0.05)
3.whole status of health
The comparison of scores of whole status of health within groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was very significant(P＜0.01).Acupuncture control group:The score increased after treatment.The difference between them was significant (P＜0.05).Western medicine control group:The score decreased after treatment.The difference between them was not significant(P＞0.05).
The comparison of scores of whole status of health among different groups before and after treatment:Acupuncture group according to patterns identification compared with Western medicine control group:the difference between them was significant(P＜0.05).Acupuncture control group compared with Western medicine control group:The difference was very significant(P＜0.01).No matter the comparison between acupuncture control group and western medicine control group or that between Acupuncture group according to patterns identification and acupuncture control group,the differences were not significant.(P＞0.05)
4.symptoms
The comparisons of amelioration of total symptoms,digestive system symptoms,pain symptoms,other symptoms among groups:acupuncture group according to patterns identification showed a distinctive significance compared with western medicine group and acupuncture control group.
5.biochemical index
The comparisons of leukocyte count,the functional changes of liver and kidney:the comparisons all among different groups were not significant(P＞0.05).
Conclusions:
QOL:
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of QOL,which showed better life quality.
1.physiology
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of physiology,and the change of score evaluation showed increasing trend.
2.whole status of health
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could antagonize the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy,raise the total scores of whole status of health,and the change of score evaluation showed increasing trend.
3.symptoms
Acupuncture group according to patterns identification could ameliorate total symptoms, or those in digestive system,pain symptoms etc.It could prevent the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy.
All in all,the results showed that acupuncture group according to patterns identification could raise the total scores of QOL,ameliorate symptoms and decrease the aggravation of symptoms as well as prevent the new ones.
引文
[1]WHO.The Development of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument[Z].Geneva:WHO,1993.
[2]Dunlop R.Cancer:Palliative Care.Richard Powell Editorial and Production Services[M].Basigstoke,Hants RG224TX,1998.140.
[3]Bussiere M,Hopman W,Day A,etal.Indicators of functional status for primary malignant brain tumour patients.[J].Can J Neurol Sci,2005,32(1):50-56.
[4]Efficace F,Bottom Ley A,Vanvoorden V,etal.Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(2):187-197.
[5]H jermstad M J,Fayers PM,B jordal K,etal.Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire:the QLQ-C30(+3)[J].Clin Oncoi,1998,16:1188-i196.
[6]Montazseri A,Gillis CR,Mc Ewen J.Quality of life in patients with lung cancer:a review of literature from1970 to 1995[J].Chest,1998,113(2):467-481.
[7]Efficace F,Biganzoli L,Piccart M,etal.Baseline health-related quality-of-life data as prognostic factors in a phase Ⅲ multicentre study of women with metastatic breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(7):1021-1030.
[8]Arias V F,Dominguez M A,Manterola,B A,etal.Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas.Preliminary results of a phaseⅡ,single-institutional trial[J].Clin Transl Oncoi,2005,7(2):60-65.
[9]何湛,林长缨,陈捷,等.食管癌贲门癌术后患者生活质量评价[J].中国临床康复,2004,8,(5):806-807.
[10]陈其龙.胰十二指肠切除术后患者生存质量研究[D].浙江大学医学部,2006.
[11]马胜军,刁连英,尹刚.食管癌切除胃或结肠颈部吻合术后疗效及生活质量评价[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,1998,5(4):249-250.
[12]马胜军,乔以泽,尹刚,等.三切口食管癌切除胃与结肠代食管术疗效及生活质量评价[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1998,14(4):封3.
[13]Bahannan AA,Zabrodsky M,Cerny L,Chovanec M,etal.Quality of life following endoscopic resection or radio-therapy for early glottic cancer[J].Saudi Med J,2007,28(4):598-602.
[14]周芙玲,李明众,邵引娣,等.宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量评价[J].西安交通大学学报,2004,25(3):301-303.
[15]YanevaMP,Semerdjieva MA.Assessment of the effect of palliative radiotherapy for cancer patients with intracranial metastases using EORTC-QOL-C30questionnaire[J].Folia Med(Plovdiv),2006,48(2):23-9.
[16]Dagnelie P,Pijls-Johannesma M,Lambin P,etal.Impact of fatigue on overall quality of life in lung and breast cancer patients selected for high-dose radiotherapy[J].Ann Oncol,2007,18(5):940-4.
[17]邓晶,何江娟,钟林,等.恶性肿瘤患者化疗期间生活质量研究[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2007,22,(1):48-50.
[18]钱勇,潘跃银,孙国平,等.食管癌新辅助化疗患者生活质量的定量研究[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(4):233-236.
[19]江妙玲,王妙君,黄华兰.化疗对肿瘤患者生活质量的影响[J].护理学杂志,2007,22(1):29-30.
[20]邓立力,陈广洲.肺癌患者应用新一代铂类抗肿瘤药物过程中心理健康和生活质量的变化[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(12):70-72.
[21]欧阳卫平,陈德玉,初玲,等.妇科肿瘤患者的抑郁症状和生活质量的调查分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2004,20(12):56-57.
[22]沈丽达,张灿珍,任宏轩,等.参芪扶正注射液对恶性肿瘤忠者生活质量影响[J].中国肿瘤,2005,14(10):652-653.
[23]刘永叶,谢晓冬,刘大为,等.补中益气汤改善晚期恶性肿瘤忠者生活质量:48例疗效观察[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(32):7242-7243.
[24]张红.中药干预妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗问期及康复期生存质量的研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2006.
[25]朱红,申良方,涂青松.参附注射液辅助治疗中晚期恶性肿瘤对提高生活质量的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2003,13(6):39-41.
[26]卢义,张越,景年财.针刺对肿瘤患者生活质量影响的临床研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2005,19(4):299-301.
[27]吴晓明,李宁,牛海杰,等.甲强龙提高晚期肿瘤患者生活质量临床观察[J].医学研究杂志,2006,35(6):37-38.
[28]艾斌.恶性肿瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植后的生活质量[D].北京:中国协和医科大学研究生院,2004.
[29]余南生,赵多兰,谢保琴,等.极高频电磁波-特超声波辐照对恶性肿瘤放化疗患者生存质量的影响[J].中医药临床杂志,2007,19(1):6-7.
[30]黄慧强,蔡清清,黄欣,等.冻干人胎盘因子对肿瘤放化疗患者生活质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2006,13(2):107-110,113.
[31]Karvinen KH,Courneya KS,North S,et al.Associations between Exercise and Quality of Life in Bladder Cancer Survivors:A Population-Based Study[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey,2007,16(5):984-90.
[32]Daley AJ,Crank H,Saxton JM,et al.Randomized trial of exercise therapy in women treated for breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(13):1713-21.
[33]夏玉卿,李汉友,李宝顺等.电热针治疗皮肤癌疗效及机理研究[J].中国针灸,1994,14(2):5-8.
[34]辛育龄.电针治疗颌面部肿瘤的临床效果[J].针刺研究,1997,(4):255-258.
[35]吴耀持,许帼光,庄月华等.毫米波循经传导穴位辐照治疗肿瘤的作用[J].上海针灸杂志,1998,17(2):15-16.
[36]王中栋,建峰,李钧烈.保尔佳穴位注射治疗晚期恶性肿瘤疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,1995,5(4):16.
[37]胡广银.穴位注射合中药治疗化疗后白细胞减少症临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(3):51.
[38]杨卫兵,王家辉,李宁.穴位注射加中药治疗肿瘤化疗所致的白细胞减少症[J].四川中医,2004,22(7):91-92.
[39]杜建华.穴位注射治疗肿瘤病人放化疗后白细胞减少[J].上海针灸杂志,2000,19(增刊):11-13.
[40]卢建华.足三里穴位注射地塞米松对肿瘤化疗病人血白细胞的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2003,5(3):215-216.
[41]沈雪勇,费伦,吴耀持等.特定波段红外灸对放化疗肿瘤忠者升白细胞作用观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,24(4):1-3.
[42]李秋荐,裴兰英,郭英昌.温和灸治疗肿瘤放化疗后白细胞减少症87例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(1):41.
[43]王晓.艾灸治疗化疗后白细胞下降的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1997,17(1):13-15.
[44]马泽云,张舒雁,许文波.太乙雷火神针治疗白细胞减少症的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,17(4):207-209.
[45]刘安,陈刚,史培泉等.穴位刺激疗法减轻化疗毒性反应的临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,1998,17(6):8-9.
[46]段萍,吕永麟,叶国瑜等.穴位电刺激法治疗恶性肿瘤化疗后白细胞降低[J].四川中医,2001,19(10):63-64.
[47]陈闯,张作军,黎汉忠等.电针足三里穴对化疗减毒作用的临床观察[J].新中医,2004,36(3):46-47.
[48]胡定政.穴位注射对恶性肿瘤化疗的解毒作用[J].中国针灸,2003,23(10):587-588.
[49]施琴.针刺足三里、内关穴预防化疗胃肠道反应疗效观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2004,24(5):481.
[50]张青,王笑民,胡凤山等.针刺特定穴位防治肿瘤患者化疗呕吐的临床观察[J].中医杂志,2006,47(3):209-210.
[51]余南生,谢鸿寿,陆克亮等.IZL-2003免疫治疗系统穴位辐照对恶性肿瘤放化疗减毒作用的观察[J].安徽中医学院学报,2007,26(1):33-35.
[52]李哗,于耀才,戴铁成.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤放化疗副反应的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,17(6):327-328.
[53]沈国伟,肖扬,高雍康.针灸足一里对抗化疗呕吐反应临床研究[J].中国针灸,2001,21(3):158-160.
[54]陈闯,张作军,黎汉忠等.电针足三里穴对化疗减毒作用的临床观察[J].新中医,2004,36(3):46-47.
[55]叶芳,陈少宗,刘伟明.电针疗法对28例化疗患者免疫功能的影响[J].山东中医杂志, 2001,20(4):221-222.
[56]赵蓉,杨金洪,郁美娟等.针刺对放、化疗患者免疫功能的调节作用[J].中国针灸,1994,14(3):38-40.
[57]丹宇,梁亚兵,陶冶.针刺对癌症疼痛镇痛作用的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1998,18(1):17-18.
[58]刘长君,王金道,赵美玉.耳针加穴位注射治疗癌性疼痛[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(11):2118.
[59]沈素娥.腕踝针加药物对恶性肿瘤患者止痛效果临床观察[J].中国针灸,2000,20(3):143-14.
[60]孙亚林,于连荣.齐刺留针法治疗肝癌疼痛80例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2000,20(4):211-212.
[61]胡侠,凌昌全,周庆辉.腕踝针治疗中晚期肝癌疼痛的临床观察[J].中国针灸,2004,24(3):149-151.
[62]陈大燕.穴位注射小剂量氯胺酮治疗癌性疼痛[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(17):3230-3231.
[63]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[64]谢新平,徐崇明.电针与耳贴治疗肿瘤性呃逆疗效观察[J].肿瘤防治研究,2005,32(1):42-43.
[65]刘雪梅,吴丽霞,黄智芬.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤患者顽固性呃逆32例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(2):214-215.
[66]陈学农,张世忠,赵开祝等.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留60例疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2006,25(3):13-14.
[67]郑新杰.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留97例[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(29):6497.
[68]解英.温针灸治疗宫颈癌术后膀胱麻痹的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2001,21(10):593-594.
[69]李培训,贾英杰.针刺治疗晚期消化道肿瘤厌食症27例疗效观察[J].新中医,2006,38(4):67-68.
[70]王作胜,刘超英,王克杰.胃复安双足三里穴位封闭防治化疗所致呕吐的疗效观察[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2001,8(2):219.
[71]王梅,李凌,高庆玉.针刺加穴位注射治疗卵巢癌术后腹胀的观察[J].针灸临床杂志, 2002,18(2):734.
[72]元建国,周荣兴,周鸣生,等.针剌对恶性肿瘤患者外周血T细胞及其亚群的影响[J].针刺研究,1993:18(3):174-177.
[73]赵蓉等.针刺对放化疗患者T细胞及其亚群的影响[J].上海针灸杂志,1994:13(6):253-254.
[74]吴滨,周荣兴,周呜生,等.针刺对恶性钟瘤忠者外周血白细胞介素-2含量及自然杀伤细胞活性的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994:14(9):537-539.
[75]刘丽军,郭诚杰,焦新民,等.针灸对移植性乳腺癌小鼠免疫功能及病理组织学的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1995:15(10):615.
[76]赵加增,陈汉平,赵粹英,等.艾灸及其结合免疫调节剂对肿瘤细胞凝集素受体表达影响的实验研究[J].中国针灸,1995:15(4):38.
[77]刘宏伟,冯晓东,庞波.针灸对小白鼠移植瘤活血化瘀作用实验研究[J].中国针灸,1997:(11):659.
[78]李英,冯明秀,黄喜梅.电针对化疗大鼠胃肠功能影响的实验研究[J].中国针灸,1996:16(3):31.
[79]黄喜梅,李英,冯明秀,等.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤化疗中胃肠反应的疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994,1(10):618.
[80]黄喜梅.电针足三里对恶性肿瘤化疗中胃肠功能影响的临床及实验研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1996,15(3):11.
[81]杨金洪,郁美娟,赵蓉,等.放化疗对恶性肿瘤患者内分泌功能的影响及针灸调节作用[J].针刺研究,1995,20(1):1.
[82]党文.针刺对抗环磷酰胺所致小白鼠白细胞减少症的实验研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1994,13(5):234.
[83]杨金洪,赵蓉,袁纪阁,等.针刺防治化疗副反应的实验研究[J].针刺研究,1994,14(1):75
[1]张荣芹.应用生存质量表对比三种方法抗肿瘤的疗效[D].上海:第二军医大学,2004.
[2]李艳春.针刺对晚期肿瘤患者的止痛研究[J].长春中医学院学报,1998,14(3):29.
[3]丹宇,梁亚兵,陶冶.针刺对癌症疼痛镇痛作用的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1998,(1):17—18
[4]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[5]卢义,张越,景年财.针刺对肿瘤患者生活质量影响的临床研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2005,19(4):299-301.
[6]王芳,郜启全.针灸治疗癌症患者顽固性呃逆56例[J].上海针灸杂志,2004,23(1):22.
[7]胡定政.穴位注射对恶性肿瘤化疗的解毒作用[J].中国针灸,2003,23(10):587-588.
[8]陈学农,张世忠,赵开祝等.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留60例疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2006,25(3):13-14.
[9]徐进华,李创鹏,谌剑飞.电针配合三阶梯止痛法治疗癌性疼痛15例[J].上海针灸杂志,1999,18(5):21-22.
[10]陈群雄.针灸中药治疗介入后呕吐60例观察[J].新中医,1998,30(7):20-21.
[11]陈连生,杨光华.足三里穴位注射地塞米松对肿瘤化疗病人白细胞的影响[J].西南国防医药,2005,15(2):183-184.
[12]高炳豪,李斌.足三里注射治疗肿瘤化疗胃肠反应19例[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2000,6(4):291.
[13]王绍霞,郭嬿,张秀兰.穴位注射治疗恶性肿瘤放疗所致腹痛的观察与护理[J].中国实用护理杂志,2004,20(7):1-2.
[14]沈雪勇,费伦,吴耀持等.特定波段红外灸对放化疗肿瘤患者升白细胞作用观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,24(4):1-3.
[15]解英.温针灸治疗宫颈癌术后膀胱麻痹的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2001,21(10):593-594.
[16]张淑君.灸法控制化疗所致的胃肠反应[J].针刺研究1997;22(3):193.
[17]赵小青,郭晓原.针灸治疗肿瘤化疗后所致骨髓抑制38例[J].山东中医杂志,2001,20(5):349-350.
[18]李晔,于耀才,戴铁成.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤放化疗副反应的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,(6):327-328.
[19]吴红娟,吕吉雅,张美英,等.毫米波循经传导在癌性疼痛患者治疗中的应用及护理[J].中国 实用护理杂志,2007,23(8):54.
[20]李秋荐,裴兰英,郭英昌.温和灸治疗肿瘤放化疗后白细胞减少症87例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(1):41.
[21]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[22]秦爱云.温针灸加指压利尿穴治疗宫颈癌术后神经支配障碍性尿潴留疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(3):361.
[23]郑沛仪,阮经文.针灸配合心理治疗对的影响[J].L}J国中医药信息杂志,2002,9(11):63-64.
[24]WHO.The Development of the WHO Quality of life Assessment Instrument[Z].Geneva:WHO,1993.
[25]SPITZER WO,DOBSON A J,HALL J,etal.Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients:a concise QL-index for use by physicians[J].J Chronic Dis,1981,34(12):585.
[26]SCHIPPER H,CLINCH J,MCMURRAY A,etal.Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients:the Functional Living Index-Cancer:development and validation[J].J Olin Oncol,1984,2(5):472.
[27]SCHAG CA,CANZ PA,HEINRICH R.Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system-short form(CARES-SF).A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument[J].Cancer,1991,68:1406.
[28]CELLA DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,etal.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale:development and validation of the general measure[J].J Cain Oncol,1993,11(3):570.
[29]王建平,陈仲庚,林文娟,等,中国恶性肿瘤病人生活质量的测定-EORTC QLQ-C30在中国的试用.心理学报,2000,32(4):438-442.
[30]方积乾.生活质量测定方法及应用[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社.
[31]王吉平,刘香君,舒莉等.肿瘤忠者生活质量调查与相关因素分析[J].上海护理,2005,5(2):4-6.
[32]钱勇.食管癌化疗忠者生活质量的定量研究[D].安徽医科大学,2006.
[33]谭达人.辨证治疗肿瘤放化疗所致肝损害12例总结[J].湖南中医杂志,2007,13(5):10-11.
[34]李庆玲.恶性肿瘤放、化疗后的辨证分型施治[J].实用中医内科杂志,2002,16(2):79.
[35]李晓峰,叶德富,陈强,等.恶性肿瘤患者载脂蛋合代谢及免度功能与中医虚实辫证关系的临床研究[J].新中医,2005,37(12):21-23.
[36]毛喜莲,张春虎.胃肠道肿瘤术后化疗患者辅助中医治疗及辨证施护效果探讨[J].护理学杂志,2005,20(23):33-34.
[2]Dunlop R.Cancer:Palliative Care.Richard Powell Editorial and Production Services[M].Basigstoke,Hants RG224TX,1998.140.
[3]Bussiere M,Hopman W,Day A,etal.Indicators of functional status for primary malignant brain tumour patients.[J].Can J Neurol Sci,2005,32(1):50-56.
[4]Efficace F,Bottom Ley A,Vanvoorden V,etal.Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(2):187-197.
[5]H jermstad M J,Fayers PM,B jordal K,etal.Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire:the QLQ-C30(+3)[J].Clin Oncoi,1998,16:1188-i196.
[6]Montazseri A,Gillis CR,Mc Ewen J.Quality of life in patients with lung cancer:a review of literature from1970 to 1995[J].Chest,1998,113(2):467-481.
[7]Efficace F,Biganzoli L,Piccart M,etal.Baseline health-related quality-of-life data as prognostic factors in a phase Ⅲ multicentre study of women with metastatic breast cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2004,40(7):1021-1030.
[8]Arias V F,Dominguez M A,Manterola,B A,etal.Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas.Preliminary results of a phaseⅡ,single-institutional trial[J].Clin Transl Oncoi,2005,7(2):60-65.
[9]何湛,林长缨,陈捷,等.食管癌贲门癌术后患者生活质量评价[J].中国临床康复,2004,8,(5):806-807.
[10]陈其龙.胰十二指肠切除术后患者生存质量研究[D].浙江大学医学部,2006.
[11]马胜军,刁连英,尹刚.食管癌切除胃或结肠颈部吻合术后疗效及生活质量评价[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,1998,5(4):249-250.
[12]马胜军,乔以泽,尹刚,等.三切口食管癌切除胃与结肠代食管术疗效及生活质量评价[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1998,14(4):封3.
[13]Bahannan AA,Zabrodsky M,Cerny L,Chovanec M,etal.Quality of life following endoscopic resection or radio-therapy for early glottic cancer[J].Saudi Med J,2007,28(4):598-602.
[14]周芙玲,李明众,邵引娣,等.宫颈癌放疗患者生活质量评价[J].西安交通大学学报,2004,25(3):301-303.
[15]YanevaMP,Semerdjieva MA.Assessment of the effect of palliative radiotherapy for cancer patients with intracranial metastases using EORTC-QOL-C30questionnaire[J].Folia Med(Plovdiv),2006,48(2):23-9.
[16]Dagnelie P,Pijls-Johannesma M,Lambin P,etal.Impact of fatigue on overall quality of life in lung and breast cancer patients selected for high-dose radiotherapy[J].Ann Oncol,2007,18(5):940-4.
[17]邓晶,何江娟,钟林,等.恶性肿瘤患者化疗期间生活质量研究[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2007,22,(1):48-50.
[18]钱勇,潘跃银,孙国平,等.食管癌新辅助化疗患者生活质量的定量研究[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(4):233-236.
[19]江妙玲,王妙君,黄华兰.化疗对肿瘤患者生活质量的影响[J].护理学杂志,2007,22(1):29-30.
[20]邓立力,陈广洲.肺癌患者应用新一代铂类抗肿瘤药物过程中心理健康和生活质量的变化[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(12):70-72.
[21]欧阳卫平,陈德玉,初玲,等.妇科肿瘤患者的抑郁症状和生活质量的调查分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2004,20(12):56-57.
[22]沈丽达,张灿珍,任宏轩,等.参芪扶正注射液对恶性肿瘤忠者生活质量影响[J].中国肿瘤,2005,14(10):652-653.
[23]刘永叶,谢晓冬,刘大为,等.补中益气汤改善晚期恶性肿瘤忠者生活质量:48例疗效观察[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(32):7242-7243.
[24]张红.中药干预妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗问期及康复期生存质量的研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2006.
[25]朱红,申良方,涂青松.参附注射液辅助治疗中晚期恶性肿瘤对提高生活质量的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2003,13(6):39-41.
[26]卢义,张越,景年财.针刺对肿瘤患者生活质量影响的临床研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2005,19(4):299-301.
[27]吴晓明,李宁,牛海杰,等.甲强龙提高晚期肿瘤患者生活质量临床观察[J].医学研究杂志,2006,35(6):37-38.
[28]艾斌.恶性肿瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植后的生活质量[D].北京:中国协和医科大学研究生院,2004.
[29]余南生,赵多兰,谢保琴,等.极高频电磁波-特超声波辐照对恶性肿瘤放化疗患者生存质量的影响[J].中医药临床杂志,2007,19(1):6-7.
[30]黄慧强,蔡清清,黄欣,等.冻干人胎盘因子对肿瘤放化疗患者生活质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2006,13(2):107-110,113.
[31]Karvinen KH,Courneya KS,North S,et al.Associations between Exercise and Quality of Life in Bladder Cancer Survivors:A Population-Based Study[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey,2007,16(5):984-90.
[32]Daley AJ,Crank H,Saxton JM,et al.Randomized trial of exercise therapy in women treated for breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(13):1713-21.
[33]夏玉卿,李汉友,李宝顺等.电热针治疗皮肤癌疗效及机理研究[J].中国针灸,1994,14(2):5-8.
[34]辛育龄.电针治疗颌面部肿瘤的临床效果[J].针刺研究,1997,(4):255-258.
[35]吴耀持,许帼光,庄月华等.毫米波循经传导穴位辐照治疗肿瘤的作用[J].上海针灸杂志,1998,17(2):15-16.
[36]王中栋,建峰,李钧烈.保尔佳穴位注射治疗晚期恶性肿瘤疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,1995,5(4):16.
[37]胡广银.穴位注射合中药治疗化疗后白细胞减少症临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(3):51.
[38]杨卫兵,王家辉,李宁.穴位注射加中药治疗肿瘤化疗所致的白细胞减少症[J].四川中医,2004,22(7):91-92.
[39]杜建华.穴位注射治疗肿瘤病人放化疗后白细胞减少[J].上海针灸杂志,2000,19(增刊):11-13.
[40]卢建华.足三里穴位注射地塞米松对肿瘤化疗病人血白细胞的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2003,5(3):215-216.
[41]沈雪勇,费伦,吴耀持等.特定波段红外灸对放化疗肿瘤忠者升白细胞作用观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,24(4):1-3.
[42]李秋荐,裴兰英,郭英昌.温和灸治疗肿瘤放化疗后白细胞减少症87例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(1):41.
[43]王晓.艾灸治疗化疗后白细胞下降的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1997,17(1):13-15.
[44]马泽云,张舒雁,许文波.太乙雷火神针治疗白细胞减少症的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,17(4):207-209.
[45]刘安,陈刚,史培泉等.穴位刺激疗法减轻化疗毒性反应的临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,1998,17(6):8-9.
[46]段萍,吕永麟,叶国瑜等.穴位电刺激法治疗恶性肿瘤化疗后白细胞降低[J].四川中医,2001,19(10):63-64.
[47]陈闯,张作军,黎汉忠等.电针足三里穴对化疗减毒作用的临床观察[J].新中医,2004,36(3):46-47.
[48]胡定政.穴位注射对恶性肿瘤化疗的解毒作用[J].中国针灸,2003,23(10):587-588.
[49]施琴.针刺足三里、内关穴预防化疗胃肠道反应疗效观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2004,24(5):481.
[50]张青,王笑民,胡凤山等.针刺特定穴位防治肿瘤患者化疗呕吐的临床观察[J].中医杂志,2006,47(3):209-210.
[51]余南生,谢鸿寿,陆克亮等.IZL-2003免疫治疗系统穴位辐照对恶性肿瘤放化疗减毒作用的观察[J].安徽中医学院学报,2007,26(1):33-35.
[52]李哗,于耀才,戴铁成.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤放化疗副反应的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,17(6):327-328.
[53]沈国伟,肖扬,高雍康.针灸足一里对抗化疗呕吐反应临床研究[J].中国针灸,2001,21(3):158-160.
[54]陈闯,张作军,黎汉忠等.电针足三里穴对化疗减毒作用的临床观察[J].新中医,2004,36(3):46-47.
[55]叶芳,陈少宗,刘伟明.电针疗法对28例化疗患者免疫功能的影响[J].山东中医杂志, 2001,20(4):221-222.
[56]赵蓉,杨金洪,郁美娟等.针刺对放、化疗患者免疫功能的调节作用[J].中国针灸,1994,14(3):38-40.
[57]丹宇,梁亚兵,陶冶.针刺对癌症疼痛镇痛作用的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1998,18(1):17-18.
[58]刘长君,王金道,赵美玉.耳针加穴位注射治疗癌性疼痛[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(11):2118.
[59]沈素娥.腕踝针加药物对恶性肿瘤患者止痛效果临床观察[J].中国针灸,2000,20(3):143-14.
[60]孙亚林,于连荣.齐刺留针法治疗肝癌疼痛80例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2000,20(4):211-212.
[61]胡侠,凌昌全,周庆辉.腕踝针治疗中晚期肝癌疼痛的临床观察[J].中国针灸,2004,24(3):149-151.
[62]陈大燕.穴位注射小剂量氯胺酮治疗癌性疼痛[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(17):3230-3231.
[63]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[64]谢新平,徐崇明.电针与耳贴治疗肿瘤性呃逆疗效观察[J].肿瘤防治研究,2005,32(1):42-43.
[65]刘雪梅,吴丽霞,黄智芬.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤患者顽固性呃逆32例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(2):214-215.
[66]陈学农,张世忠,赵开祝等.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留60例疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2006,25(3):13-14.
[67]郑新杰.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留97例[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(29):6497.
[68]解英.温针灸治疗宫颈癌术后膀胱麻痹的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2001,21(10):593-594.
[69]李培训,贾英杰.针刺治疗晚期消化道肿瘤厌食症27例疗效观察[J].新中医,2006,38(4):67-68.
[70]王作胜,刘超英,王克杰.胃复安双足三里穴位封闭防治化疗所致呕吐的疗效观察[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2001,8(2):219.
[71]王梅,李凌,高庆玉.针刺加穴位注射治疗卵巢癌术后腹胀的观察[J].针灸临床杂志, 2002,18(2):734.
[72]元建国,周荣兴,周鸣生,等.针剌对恶性肿瘤患者外周血T细胞及其亚群的影响[J].针刺研究,1993:18(3):174-177.
[73]赵蓉等.针刺对放化疗患者T细胞及其亚群的影响[J].上海针灸杂志,1994:13(6):253-254.
[74]吴滨,周荣兴,周呜生,等.针刺对恶性钟瘤忠者外周血白细胞介素-2含量及自然杀伤细胞活性的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994:14(9):537-539.
[75]刘丽军,郭诚杰,焦新民,等.针灸对移植性乳腺癌小鼠免疫功能及病理组织学的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1995:15(10):615.
[76]赵加增,陈汉平,赵粹英,等.艾灸及其结合免疫调节剂对肿瘤细胞凝集素受体表达影响的实验研究[J].中国针灸,1995:15(4):38.
[77]刘宏伟,冯晓东,庞波.针灸对小白鼠移植瘤活血化瘀作用实验研究[J].中国针灸,1997:(11):659.
[78]李英,冯明秀,黄喜梅.电针对化疗大鼠胃肠功能影响的实验研究[J].中国针灸,1996:16(3):31.
[79]黄喜梅,李英,冯明秀,等.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤化疗中胃肠反应的疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994,1(10):618.
[80]黄喜梅.电针足三里对恶性肿瘤化疗中胃肠功能影响的临床及实验研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1996,15(3):11.
[81]杨金洪,郁美娟,赵蓉,等.放化疗对恶性肿瘤患者内分泌功能的影响及针灸调节作用[J].针刺研究,1995,20(1):1.
[82]党文.针刺对抗环磷酰胺所致小白鼠白细胞减少症的实验研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1994,13(5):234.
[83]杨金洪,赵蓉,袁纪阁,等.针刺防治化疗副反应的实验研究[J].针刺研究,1994,14(1):75
[1]张荣芹.应用生存质量表对比三种方法抗肿瘤的疗效[D].上海:第二军医大学,2004.
[2]李艳春.针刺对晚期肿瘤患者的止痛研究[J].长春中医学院学报,1998,14(3):29.
[3]丹宇,梁亚兵,陶冶.针刺对癌症疼痛镇痛作用的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1998,(1):17—18
[4]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[5]卢义,张越,景年财.针刺对肿瘤患者生活质量影响的临床研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2005,19(4):299-301.
[6]王芳,郜启全.针灸治疗癌症患者顽固性呃逆56例[J].上海针灸杂志,2004,23(1):22.
[7]胡定政.穴位注射对恶性肿瘤化疗的解毒作用[J].中国针灸,2003,23(10):587-588.
[8]陈学农,张世忠,赵开祝等.电针治疗宫颈癌术后尿潴留60例疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2006,25(3):13-14.
[9]徐进华,李创鹏,谌剑飞.电针配合三阶梯止痛法治疗癌性疼痛15例[J].上海针灸杂志,1999,18(5):21-22.
[10]陈群雄.针灸中药治疗介入后呕吐60例观察[J].新中医,1998,30(7):20-21.
[11]陈连生,杨光华.足三里穴位注射地塞米松对肿瘤化疗病人白细胞的影响[J].西南国防医药,2005,15(2):183-184.
[12]高炳豪,李斌.足三里注射治疗肿瘤化疗胃肠反应19例[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2000,6(4):291.
[13]王绍霞,郭嬿,张秀兰.穴位注射治疗恶性肿瘤放疗所致腹痛的观察与护理[J].中国实用护理杂志,2004,20(7):1-2.
[14]沈雪勇,费伦,吴耀持等.特定波段红外灸对放化疗肿瘤患者升白细胞作用观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,24(4):1-3.
[15]解英.温针灸治疗宫颈癌术后膀胱麻痹的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2001,21(10):593-594.
[16]张淑君.灸法控制化疗所致的胃肠反应[J].针刺研究1997;22(3):193.
[17]赵小青,郭晓原.针灸治疗肿瘤化疗后所致骨髓抑制38例[J].山东中医杂志,2001,20(5):349-350.
[18]李晔,于耀才,戴铁成.针刺治疗恶性肿瘤放化疗副反应的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1997,(6):327-328.
[19]吴红娟,吕吉雅,张美英,等.毫米波循经传导在癌性疼痛患者治疗中的应用及护理[J].中国 实用护理杂志,2007,23(8):54.
[20]李秋荐,裴兰英,郭英昌.温和灸治疗肿瘤放化疗后白细胞减少症87例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(1):41.
[21]王绪红,钱春艳,陈剑波.针刺治疗肿瘤病人并发呃逆89例[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(1):17.
[22]秦爱云.温针灸加指压利尿穴治疗宫颈癌术后神经支配障碍性尿潴留疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(3):361.
[23]郑沛仪,阮经文.针灸配合心理治疗对的影响[J].L}J国中医药信息杂志,2002,9(11):63-64.
[24]WHO.The Development of the WHO Quality of life Assessment Instrument[Z].Geneva:WHO,1993.
[25]SPITZER WO,DOBSON A J,HALL J,etal.Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients:a concise QL-index for use by physicians[J].J Chronic Dis,1981,34(12):585.
[26]SCHIPPER H,CLINCH J,MCMURRAY A,etal.Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients:the Functional Living Index-Cancer:development and validation[J].J Olin Oncol,1984,2(5):472.
[27]SCHAG CA,CANZ PA,HEINRICH R.Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system-short form(CARES-SF).A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument[J].Cancer,1991,68:1406.
[28]CELLA DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,etal.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale:development and validation of the general measure[J].J Cain Oncol,1993,11(3):570.
[29]王建平,陈仲庚,林文娟,等,中国恶性肿瘤病人生活质量的测定-EORTC QLQ-C30在中国的试用.心理学报,2000,32(4):438-442.
[30]方积乾.生活质量测定方法及应用[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社.
[31]王吉平,刘香君,舒莉等.肿瘤忠者生活质量调查与相关因素分析[J].上海护理,2005,5(2):4-6.
[32]钱勇.食管癌化疗忠者生活质量的定量研究[D].安徽医科大学,2006.
[33]谭达人.辨证治疗肿瘤放化疗所致肝损害12例总结[J].湖南中医杂志,2007,13(5):10-11.
[34]李庆玲.恶性肿瘤放、化疗后的辨证分型施治[J].实用中医内科杂志,2002,16(2):79.
[35]李晓峰,叶德富,陈强,等.恶性肿瘤患者载脂蛋合代谢及免度功能与中医虚实辫证关系的临床研究[J].新中医,2005,37(12):21-23.
[36]毛喜莲,张春虎.胃肠道肿瘤术后化疗患者辅助中医治疗及辨证施护效果探讨[J].护理学杂志,2005,20(23):33-34.