高管团队行为整合与企业绩效的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
经济转型背景下,我国企业所处的技术环境、市场环境和制度环境越来越动态和复杂,加剧了企业高管团队的认知局限性,高管团队通过行为整合过程开发出来的稀缺的决策能力必须聚焦到企业最突出的矛盾问题上来才能有效提升企业绩效。然而,现有高管团队行为整合与企业绩效之间关系的研究大多基于高阶理论,决策质量作为二者之间关系的解释过于模糊,缺乏具体可操作性,高管团队行为整合与企业长期绩效及短期绩效之间的关系也存在争议。
     本研究基于动态能力理论,认为高管团队行为整合过程能够产生高阶动态能力,并促进企业协调与整合探索式创新与开发式创新的双元能力,通过双元能力的中介作用,高管团队行为整合促进企业长期及短期绩效的提升,从而为高管团队行为整合与企业长期及短期绩效的作用关系提供了新的理论视角及中介机制。双元能力的提出能够从高管团队运作过程层面有效解决企业当前面临的探索与开发之间的两难困境,即为了适应环境变化,企业究竟应该继续固守现有业务,对资源和能力持续开发与改进,还是承担必要的风险,探索新的能力和新的竞争优势之间的两难选择与组织困境。
     为了验证双元能力的中介效应,本研究使用动态能力理论对变量之间的关系进行假设推演,并通过20家企业的小样本预试及环渤海省市98家企业高管团队的大样本问卷调查实证检验了高管团队行为整合、双元能力以及企业绩效之间的关系,双元能力的中介作用得到验证。
     主要研究结论如下:
     第一,协调与整合探索式创新和开发式创新达到相对平衡的双元能力是高管团队行为整合与企业长期及短期绩效之间的不完全中介变量。第二,虽然开发式创新同样能够在高管团队行为整合与企业长期及短期绩效之间起不完全中介效应,但平衡与整合两种创新活动的双元能力的不完全中介效应更好,通过双元能力的中介作用,企业长期绩效和短期绩效的提升更为平稳,企业的环境适应性更好。第三,探索式创新和开发式创新的相对平衡必须通过组织层面的双元能力进行协调与整合,而不仅仅是两种创新活动在财务层面的简单线性组合。第四,探索式创新在高管团队行为整合与企业长期绩效间起不完全中介效应,对企业长期绩效的影响最为显著,但对企业短期绩效的影响不显著,对短期绩效的中介效应也不显著。
Under the background of economic transformation, the technology environment,market environment and the institutional environment which enterprises of our countryfaces become more and such more dynamic and complex that the cognitive limitations oftop management team grows intensified. Therefore it is necessary for the enterprises tofocus the decision-making resources that are developed from behavioral integrationprocess of top management team on the most pivotal issues to promoteperformance.However, the recent researches on the the relationship between topmanagement team behavioral integration and firm performance base on the upperechelons theory through decision-making quality as the interpretation mechanism whichis obscure and lack of specific operability. Moreover, the relationship between behavioralintegration and firm short and long-term performance is also a matter of debate.
     Based on the dynamic capability theory, this study proposes that top managementteam’s behavioral integration process can raise high order dynamic capability, andpromote the ambidexterity capability which is defined as the ability to integrate andcoordinate exploratory innovation and exploration innovation. Through ambidexteritycapability’s intermediary effect, top management team’s behavioral integration processcan promote firm’s long-term and short-term performance. Dynamic capability theorycan be a new theoretical perspective between top management team behavioralintegration and firm performance. Ambidexterity capability can be regarded as a criticalmeasure to solve the dilemma between exploratory innovation and explorationinnovation namely the organizational dilemma, in order to adapt to environmentalchanges, whether enterprises should continue to stick to the existing business, continuousexploit and improve exisiting resource and ability, or take some necessary risks toexplore new ability and the new competitive advantage.
     In order to verify the mediation effect of the ambidexterity capability,based ondynamic capability theory this study proposes hypothesises of the relationship amongambidexterity capability, behavioral integration and firm performance. Throughquestionnaire survey based on a small sample of20companies’ top management teamand a larger sample of98companies’ top management team around Bohai Sea Districtof,this study empirically test the hypothesises of the relationships among variables above, and the intermediary role of ambidexterity capability.
     The main research conclusions are as follows:
     First, the ambidexterity capability which is defined as the ability to integrate andcoordinate exploratory innovation and exploration innovation is the incompleteintervening variable between short and long-term performance and top managementteam’s behavioral integration. Second, although exploration innovation can also play aincompletely intermediary effect between short and long-term performance and topmanagement team’s behavioral integration, the ambidexterity capability’s role is moreimportant. Through ambidexterity capability, the promotion of firm’s long-termperformance and short-term performance is more stable and the environment adaptabilityis better. Third, it is firm level ambidexterity capability that makes exploratoryinnovation and exploration innovation coordination and integration. Ambidexterity is notthe simple linear combination of exploratory innovation and exploration innovationfinancial level. Fourth, exploratory innovation is the incomplete intervening variablebetween long-term performance and top management team’s behavioral integration andhas the most significant impact on firm’s long-term performance, but has no significanteffects on firm’s short-term performance. The intermediary effect is not significant forshort-term performance and top management team’s behavioral integration.
引文
①赵昌文,许召元.国际金融危机以来中国企业转型升级的调查研究[J].管理世界,2013,04:8-15+58.
    ①赵昌文,许召元.国际金融危机以来中国企业转型升级的调查研究[J].管理世界,2013,04:8-15+58.
    ②武亚军,李兰,彭泗清,潘建成,韩岫岚,郝大海.中国企业战略:现状、问题及建议——2010年中国企业经营者成长与发展专题调查报告[J].管理世界,2010,06:83-97.
    ①姚振华,孙海法.高管团队组成特征与行为整合关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2010(13)
    ①Mooney, A. C.2000. The antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioralintegration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
    ①Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M., A. Watkins, M. D. A. Dynamic Model of Top Management Team Effectiveness:Managing Unstrucked Task Streams. The Leadership Quarterly,2003,(14):297-325.
    ①Li, H., and Zhang,Y.2002. Founding team comprehension and behavioral integration: Evidence from newtechnology ventures in China. In D. Nagao (Ed.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:1-6. New York:Briarcliff Manor.
    ①Leonard Barton, D A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development [J].St rategic Management Journal,1992,13:111-125.
    ②Levitt, D A, and March J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1988,14:319-340.
    ③March, J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science,1991,2:71-87.
    ①Levinthal, D A, and March J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:95-112.
    ①March,J. G.,1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science,2:71-87.
    ①March,J. G.,1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science,2:71-87.
    ②Leonard Barton, D A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development [J].St rategic Management Journal,1992,13:111-125.
    ③Levitt, D A, and March J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1988,14:319-340.
    ④March, J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science,1991,2:71-87.
    ⑤Levinthal,D A, and March J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:95-112.
    ①王凤彬,陈建,勋杨阳.探索式与开发式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界,2012.3
    ②王凤彬,陈建,勋杨阳.探索式与开发式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界,2012.3
    ①郑晓明,丁玲,欧阳桃花.双元能力促进企业服务敏捷性_海底捞公司发展历程案例研究[J].管理世界,2012(2)
    ②邓少军,芮明杰.高层管理者认知与企业双元能力构建_基于浙江金信公司战略转型的案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2013(11)
    ①李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2004
    ②马庆国.管理统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2002
    ③韩振华,任剑峰.社会调查研究中的社会称许性偏见效应[J].华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002.(3):47-50
    ④[美]艾尔.巴比著,邱泽奇译.社会研究方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005
    ①李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2004
    ①Podsakoff, P. M. and D.W. Organ,"Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects."Journal ofManagement,1986, Vol.12, No.4, pp.531-544.
    [1] Abraham, C., John, S.. Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, DecisionQuality, and Organizational Decline. Leadership Quarterly,2006,17(5):441
    [2] Adam, R., Niels, S. and Andrew Wei, H. The influence of market orientation onE-business innovationand performance: the role of top management team [J].Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,2008,16,7
    [3] Adler P S, Goldoftas B, Levine D I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study ofmodel changeovers in the Toyota production system[J]. Organization Science,1999,10(1):43-68
    [4] Ancona D G, Nadler D A. Top hats and executive tales: Designing the seniorteam[J]. Sloan Management Revies,1989,31(1):19-28
    [5] Atuahene-Gima, K.: Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new productinnovation'. Journal of Marketing,,2005,(69):61-83
    [6] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration and process management: Theproductivity dilemma revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):238-256
    [7] Carmeli, A. and Halevi, M. Y.(2009).‘How top management team behavioralintegration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: themoderating role of contextual ambidexterity’. Leadership Quarterly,20,207–18
    [8] Carmeli, Abraham; Schaubroeck, John; Tishler, Asher. How CEO empoweringleadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firmperformance. Leadership Quarterly. Apr2011, Vol.22Issue2, p399-411.13p
    [9] Carmen, C., Ana Beatriz, H., Ramon, V. The relationship between top managementteams and innovation capability in companies [J].Journal Management Development,2005,24(8):683-705
    [10] CEPEDA G, VERA D. Dynamic Capabilities and Operational Capabilities:Aknowledge Management Perspective [J].Journal of Business Research,2007,60(5):426-437
    [11] Chen,G.Q., Liu, C. H., Tjosvold, D. Conflict management for effective topmanagement teams and innovation in China [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2005,42(2):277-300
    [12] Ci-Rong Li,Chen-Ju Lin,Chih-Peng Chu. The Nature of Market Orientation and theAmbidexterity of Innovations[J]. Management Decision,2008,46(7):1002-1026.
    [13] Collins L A, Smith A J, Hannon P D. Discovering entrep reneurship: an exp lorationof a tripartite app roach to develop ing entrep reneurial capacities[J]. Journal ofEuropean Industrial Training,2006,30(3):188-205.
    [14] Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margaret Peteraf, HarbirSingh, David Teece and Sidney G.Winter. Dynamic Capabilities: UnderstandingStrategic Change in Organizations[M]. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA,2007.
    [15] Constance E.Helfat&Margaret A.Peteraf.Understanding Dynamic CapabilitiesProgress along a Developmental Path[J].Stategic Organization,2009,7(1):91-102.
    [16] Cyert, R., and March, J.1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New York:Prentice-Hall.
    [17] Dess,G. G.,and Beard,D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:52-73.
    [18] Dorothy Leonard-Barton. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox inmanaging new product development[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(1):111-125.
    [19] Duncan,R. B.,1976,“The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures forInnovation”,Kilmann,R.H. Pondy,L. R. and D. Selvin,eds. The Management ofOrganization,North-Holland,New York,1,pp.167~188.
    [20] Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M., A. Watkins, M. D. A. Dynamic Model of TopManagement Team Effectiveness: Managing Unstrucked Task Streams. TheLeadership Quarterly,2003,(14):297-325.
    [21] Eisenhardt KM, MartinM. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?[J].StrategicManagement Journal,2000,21(10):1105-21.
    [22] Eisenhardt,K. M.,2000,“Paradox,Spirals,Ambivalence: The New Language ofChange and Pluralism”,Academy of Management Review,25,pp.703~705.
    [23] Ensley, Michael D.; Pearson, Allison; Pearce, Craig L. Human ResourceManagement Review. Summer2003, Vol.13Issue2, p329
    [24] Fang E. and Shaoming Zou. Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing DynamicCapabilities (MDCs) in International Joint Ventures [J] Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies,40(5),742-761,2009.
    [25] Gibson,C. B. and Birkinshaw,J.,2004,“The Antecedents,Consequences andMediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity”,Academy of ManagementJournal,47,pp.209~226.
    [26] Gupta,A. K.,Smith,K. G. and Shalley,C. E.,2006,“The Interplay between Explorationand Exploitation”,Academy of Management Journal,4,pp.693~706.
    [27] Hambrick D C. Corporate coherence and the top management team[J]. Strategy andLeadership,1997,25(5):24-29
    [28] HAMBRICK D C. Top Management Groups:A Conceptual Integration andReconsideration of the “Team” Label[M]//B M CUMMINGS. Research inOrganizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press,1994(16):171-213.
    [29] Hambrick, D. C.. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academyof ManagementReview,2007,32(2):334-343.
    [30] He Z, Wong P. Exploration vs exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterityhypothesis[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(4):481-494
    [31] Hitt MA, et al. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategicflexibility and competitive advantage in the21stcentury.[J]. Academy ofManagement Executive.1998,12(4):22-42.
    [32] IAN P. MCCARTHY THOMAS B. LAWRENCE BRIAN WIXTED and BRIAN R.GORDON.A MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF INVIRONMENTAL VELOCITY[J]. Academy of Management Review,2010,4(35):604–626.
    [33] Jansen J J, George G, Van den Bosch F J, et al. Senior team attributes andorganizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership[J].Journal of Management Studies,2008,45:982-1007
    [34] Jansen J P, Van den Bosch F J, Volberda H W. Managing potential and realizedabsorptive capability: How do organizational antecedents matter?[J]. Academy ofManagementJournal,2005,48(6):999-1015
    [35] Jansen,J. J. P.,van den Bosch,F. A. J. and Volberda,H. W.,2005,“ExploratoryInnovation,Exploitative Innovation and Ambidexterity: the Impact of Environmentaland Organizational Antecedents”,Schmalenbach Business Review,57,pp.351~363.
    [36] Katz, R.. The Effects of Group Longevity on Communication and Performance.Administration Science Quarterly,1982,27:81-104.
    [37] Katzenbach, Jon R., The irony of senior leadership teams.[J]. Journal for Quality&Participation,1998(21)
    [38] Keck L, TushmanM L. Environmental and organizational context and executiveteam[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(6):114-133
    [39] L.Raes, A. M., Heijltjes, M. G., and Roe, R. A.,“The Interface of the TopManagement Team and Middle Managers: A Process Model”, Academy ofManagement Journal, Vol.36, No.1,2011.
    [40] Lawrence P R, Lorsch J W. Organization and environment: Managing differentiationand integration[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1967
    [41] Lawrence, B. S.. The Black Box of Organizational Demography. OrganizationScience,1997,8(1):1-22.
    [42] Lee H-U. The impact of CEO and top management team characteristics on strategicflexibility and firm performance [D]. Texas AandM University,2002.
    [43] Lee J,Lee H. Exploration and Exploitation in the Presence of NetworkExternalities[J]. Management Science,2003,49:553–570.
    [44] Leonard Barton, D A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managingnew product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13:111-125.
    [45] Levinthal, D A, and March J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic ManagementJournal,1993,14:95-112.
    [46] Levitt, D A, and March J G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review ofSociology,1988,14:319-340.
    [47] LI J, HAMBRICK D C. Factional Groups: A New Vantage on DemographicFaultines, Conflict, and Disintegration in Work Teams[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2005,48(5):794-813.
    [48] Li, H., and Zhang,Y.2002. Founding team comprehension and behavioralintegration: Evidence from new technology ventures in China. In D. Nagao (Ed.),Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:1-6. New York: BriarcliffManor.
    [49] Li, J., Hambrick, D. C.. Factional Groups: A New Vantage on DemographicFaultines, Conflict, and Disintegration in Work Teams. Academy of ManagementJournal,2005,48(5):794-813.
    [50] Lubatkin, Michael H.; Simsek, Zeki; Yan Ling; Veiga, John F.. Ambidexterityand Performance in Small-to-Medium-sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of TopManagement Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management,2006,32(5):646.
    [51] March, J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. OrganizationScience,1991,2:71-87.
    [52] March,J. G.,1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J].Organization Science,2:71-87.
    [53] Mason, A. C., Marta, A. G., Wm Gerard, S. Upper Echelons Research Revisited:Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition.Journal of Management,2004,30(6):749-778.
    [54] Matusik,S.,and Hill,C. The utilization of contingent work,knowledge creation andcompetitive advantage[J].Academyof Management Review,1998,23(4):68-98.
    [55] Mom,T. J. M.,van den Bosch,F. A. J. and Volberda,H. W.,2007,“InvestigatingManagers’Exploration andExploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-down,Bottom-up and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows”, Journal of Management Studies,44(6).pp.910~931.
    [56] Neil Turner, Juani Swart1and Harvey Maylor. Mechanisms for ManagingAmbidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda[J]. International Journal ofManagement Reviews,2013(15):317–332.
    [57] Nelson R R, Winter S G. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Boston:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1982
    [58] Nelson R.N.Why Do Firms Differ and How Does It Matter?[J] StrategicManagement Journal,1991,14:61-74.
    [59] Sebastian R S, Birkinshaw J J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes,and moderators[J]. Journal of Management,2008,34:375-409
    [60] Sebastian R, Julian B,Gilbert P, et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: BalancingExploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance[J]. Organization Science,2009,20(4):685-695.
    [61] SIMSEK Z, VEIGA J F, LUBATKIN M H, et al. Modeling the MultilevelDeterminants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration[J]. Academy ofManagement Journal,2005,48(1):69-84.
    [62] Simsek,Z.,2009,“Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a MultilevelUnderstanding”, Journal of Management Studies,46(4)
    [63] Smith K G, Smith K A, Olian J D, et al. Topmanagement team demography andprocess: The role of social integration and communication[J]. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1994,39:412-438
    [64] Smith W K, Tushman M L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top managementmodel for managing innovation streams[J]. Organization Science,2005,16:522-536
    [65] Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533
    [66] Teece D J, Pisano G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firm: An Introduction [J].Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,(3):537-555
    [67] Teece. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of(sustainable) enterp rise performance[J]. StrategicManagement Journal,2007,28(4):1319-1350
    [68] Tushman, M. L., and O’Reilly, C. A., III.1997. Winning through innovation.Boston: Harvard Business School Press
    [69] Tushman,M. L. and O’Reilly,C. A.,1996,“Ambidextrous Organizations: ManagingEvolutionary and Revolutionary Change”,California Management Review,38,pp.8~30
    [70] WANG C L, AHMED P K.Dynamic Capabilities: Are View and ResearchAgenda[J]. International Journal of Management Review,2007,9(1):31-51
    [71] West, Michael A. and Anderson, Neil R. Innovation in Top Management Teams [J].Journal of Applied Psychology.1996,81(6):680-693
    [72] Young J E, Sexton D L. Entrepreneurial learning: a concep tual framework[J].Journal of Enterp rising Culture,1997,5(3):223-48
    [73] Zahra,S, Sapienza,H.J, Davidsson,P. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: aReview Model and Research Agenda[J]. Journal of Management,2006
    [74] Zi-Lin He, Poh-Kam Wong. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of theAmbidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science,2004,15(4):481-494
    [75] ZolloM, Winter S G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities[J]. Organization Science,2002,13(3):339–351
    [76] Uotila,J.,M. Maula,T. Keil,and S. A. Zahra,Exploration,Exploitation,and Financial Performance: Analysis of S&P500Corporations,StrategicManagement Journal,2009,30(2):221-231.
    [77] Henry Mintzberg,Bruce Ahlstrand and Joseph Lampel.战略历程[M].魏江译.北京:机械工业出版社,2012
    [78] Thomas Biedenbach and Anders Soderholm.超竞争行业组织变革的挑战[J].管理世界,2010(12)
    [79][美]艾尔.巴比著,邱泽奇译.社会研究方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005
    [80]陈建勋.高层变革型领导行为与组织绩效间关系的理论整合与实证检验_陈建勋[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011(9)
    [81]陈守明,李汝.双元性技术战略与企业绩效关系研究——基于我国电子信息制造业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,09:70-74
    [82]崔瑜,焦豪:企业家学习对动态能力的影响机制研究—基于企业家能力理论的视角[J].科学学研究,2009(2)
    [83]戴天婧,汤谷良,彭家钧.企业动态能力提升、组织结构倒置与新型管理控制系统嵌入——基于海尔集团自主经营体探索型案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2012(2)
    [84]党兴华,孙永磊,宋晶.不同信任情景下双元创新对网络惯例的影响[J].管理科学,2013,04:25-34
    [85]丁安娜,刘景江.高管团队行为整合_创新行为与创新绩效关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(12)
    [86]董保宝,葛宝山,王侃.资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J].管理世界,2011(3)
    [87]董保宝,李全喜.竞争优势研究脉络梳理与整合研究框架构建——基于资源与能力视角[J].外国经济与管理,2013(3)
    [88]邓少军,芮明杰.高层管理者认知与企业双元能力构建_基于浙江金信公司战略转型的案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2013(11)
    [89]冯军政,魏江.国外动态能力维度划分及测量研究综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2011(07)
    [90]傅晓,李忆,司有和.结构差异化_跨职能接口对创新的影响_一个整合模型[J].科技与经济,2011(12)
    [91]高媛,李阳,谢佩洪.组织双元研究述评与展望[J].现代管理科学,2010(12)
    [92]高媛,孟宪忠,谢佩洪.利用与探索在组织学习与技术创新领域的研究视角整合[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(1)
    [93]郭菊娥,白云涛和席酉民等.权威类型、决策程序对高管决策过程影响研究[J].管理科学学报,2008(6)
    [94]韩振华,任剑峰.社会调查研究中的社会称许性偏见效应.华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(3):47-50
    [95]何爱琴.企业战略变革理论及其与组织学习能力的关系研究述评[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2011,02:101-109
    [96]何强.基于行为生态学的企业战略演化研究[D].博士学位论文,天津大学,2011
    [97]何铮,谭劲松,陆园园.组织环境与组织战略关系的文献综述及最新研究动态[J].管理世界,2006(11)
    [98]胡冬梅,陈维政.双元战略及其实现路径[J].软科学,2012,10:30-34
    [99]胡冬梅,陈维政.双元战略及其实现路径[J].软科学,2012(10)
    [100]黄旭,李卫民,王之莉.企业高层管理团队与企业战略关系研究述评[J].河北经贸大学学报,2011,02:87-92.
    [101]焦豪.企业动态能力绩效机制及其多层次影响要素的实证研究[D].博士学位论文,上海交通大学,2010
    [102]焦豪.双元型组织竞争优势的构建路径_基于动态能力理论的实证研究[J].管理世界,2011(11)
    [103]李华晶.高管团队特征与企业创新关系的实证研究_以科技型中小企业为例[J].商业经济与管理,2006(5)
    [104]李桦,储小平和郑馨.双元性创新的研究进展和研究框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011(4)
    [105]李桦.双元性创新的研究进展和研究框架[A].中国管理现代化研究会.第五届(2010)中国管理学年会——技术与创新管理分会场论文集[C].中国管理现代化研究会,2010:9
    [106]李桦.战略柔性与企业绩效:组织双元性的中介作用[J].科研管理,2012,09:87-94
    [107]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2004
    [108]李剑力.探索性创新_开发性创新及其平衡研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2009(3)
    [109]李剑力.探索性创新_开发性创新与企业绩效关系研究_基于冗余资源调节效应的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2009(9)
    [110]李晶晶,柴俊武,井润田.我国民营企业高层管理团队内聚力之案例研究[J].管理学报,2007(5)
    [111]李乾文,赵曙明,张玉利.组织探索能力_开发能力与企业绩效的实证研究[J].当代财经,2009(6)
    [112]李同正,孙林岩,魏泽龙.开放式学习、双元创新对企业绩效的影响分析[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,03:74-78.
    [113]李忆,司有和.探索式创新、开发式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响,南开管理评论,2008,11(5):4-12
    [114]李忆,司有和.探索式创新_开发式创新与绩效_战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论,2008(11)
    [115]李忆,司有和.组织结构_创新与企业绩效_环境的调节作用[J].管理工程学报,2009(4)
    [116]李垣.外部双元能力、组织学习与新产品开发的关系研究[A].中国科学学与科技政策研究会、中国技术与创新管理专业委员会.第五届中国科技政策与管理学术年会暨研究会理事会论文集[C].中国科学学与科技政策研究会、中国技术与创新管理专业委员会,2009:28
    [117]凌鸿,赵付春,邓少军.双元性理论和概念的批判性回顾与未来研究展望[J].外国经济与管理,2010(1)
    [118]刘斌.后金融危机时期的转型升级研究[J].管理世界,2013,04:172-173
    [119]刘海潮.不同战略变化路径下冗余资源的角色差异性——基于竞争视角的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011(1)
    [120]刘新梅,韩骁和白杨等.控制机制、组织双元与组织创造力的关系研究[J].科研管理,2013,10:1-9
    [121]刘新民,王垒和吴士健. CEO继任类型对战略变革的影响研究:高管团队重组的中介作用[J].管理评论,2013,08:102-112+123
    [122]刘鑫,薛有志,周杰.国外基于CEO变更视角的公司战略变革研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2013,11:37-47
    [123]吕鸿江,程明和刘洪.企业复杂适应性影响因素的实证研究:不同环境特征和战略选择的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(5)
    [124]马福萍.高层管理团队特征与技术创新的相关性研究_基于文献综述[J].科学管理研究,2012(4)
    [125]马富萍,郭晓川.高管团队异质性与技术创新绩效的关系研究_以高管团队行为整合为调节变量[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(12)
    [126]马洪丽.双元性组织的实现路径研究[J].中国商贸,2012,30:91-92
    [127]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2002
    [128]逄晓霞,邹国庆,宋方煜.家长式领导风格与高管团队行为整合的关系[J].中国流通经济,2012(5)
    [129]彭泗清,李兰和潘建成等.经济转型与创新:认识、问题与对策——2013·中国企业家成长与发展专题调查报告[J].管理世界,2013,09:9-20
    [130]邱茜,徐向艺.上市公司高管团队知识结构特征对技术创新的影响研究[J].东岳论丛,2012(2)
    [131]任丽丽,罗珉.组织间关系_界面规则的双元模式及其演进机理研究_以利丰供应链网络为例[J].经济管理,2010(12)
    [132]沈灏,李垣,蔡昊雯.双元型组织对创新的影响及其构建路径分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9)
    [133]沈鲸.中国企业国际化经营的战略分析——基于双元性理论的视角[J].现代经济探讨,2013,05:65-69
    [134]石盛林.高管团队认知风格对技术创新的影响_基于中国制造企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011(8)
    [135]宋华,王岚.企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究[J].科研管理,2012(3)
    [136]孙海法,伍晓奕.企业高层管理团队研究的进展[J].管理科学学报,2003(4)
    [137]王朝晖,冷晓君.KHRM、情境双元型创新与企业绩效关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,09:44-54
    [138]王朝晖.战略人力资源管理对情境双元型创新的影响研究[D].中南大学,2012.
    [139]王冬冬.战略变革中的核心刚性研究——以柯达公司为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,05:97-105.
    [140]王凤彬,陈建和勋杨阳.探索式与开发式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界,2012.3
    [141]王凤彬,杨阳.跨国企业对外直接投资行为的分化与整合——基于上市公司市场价值的实证研究[J].管理世界,2013,03:148-171
    [142]王铁民,李鹏和邹洁等.联想集团“双模式”战略实施中的双元能力培育[J].企业管理,2013,02:78-80
    [143]王晓萍,胡峰.基于企业利基战略实施过程的本土代工企业双元能力平衡构建机制研究:GVC/NVC双重网络嵌入的视角[J].科技管理研究,2013,08:228-233
    [144]王耀德,李俊华.双元性组织创新平衡机制“四力五维”模型的构建[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(4)
    [145]王益民,梁萌.政治关联、治理机制对战略双元的影响——基于中国上市公司数据的实证研究[A].中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会、山东大学、中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所、《中国管理科学,编辑部.第十四届中国管理科学学术年会论文集(上册)[C].中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会、山东大学、中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所、《中国管理科学,编辑部,2012:7
    [146]魏嵘,杜宁.基于动态能力视角的双元组织路径构建[J].商业经济与管理,2013,08:26-33
    [147]吴俊杰.企业家社会网络、双元性创新与技术创新绩效[D].浙江工商大学,2013
    [148]伍勇,梁巧转和魏泽龙.双元技术创新与市场导向对企业绩效的影响研究:破坏性创新视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,06:140-151
    [149]武亚军,李兰和彭泗清等.中国企业战略:现状、问题及建议——2010年中国企业经营者成长与发展专题调查报告[J].管理世界,2010,06:83-97
    [150]肖丁丁.跨界搜寻对组织双元能力影响的实证研究[D].华南理工大学,2013
    [151]谢凤华.高层管理团队异质性与企业技术创新绩效关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008(6)
    [152]谢蓉,凌鸿和张诚.流程柔性研究:组织双元性理论的借鉴[J].软科学,2012,06:121-124
    [153]许晖,李文.高科技企业组织学习与双元创新关系实证研究[J].管理科学,2013,04:35-45
    [154]杨学儒,李新春和梁强等.平衡开发式创新和探索式创新一定有利于提升企业绩效吗[J].管理工程学报,2011(4)
    [155]姚振华,郭忠金.高管团队行为整合与组织绩效_基于国企_民企和欧美外企的对比[J].学术研究,2012(5)
    [156]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队行为整合的构念和测量_基于行为的视角[J].商业经济与管理,2009(12)
    [157]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队研究_从资源整合到过程整合[J].商业经济与管理,2011(1)
    [158]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队组成特征_沟通频率与组织绩效的关系[J].软科学,2011(6)
    [159]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队组成特征与行为整合关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2010(1)
    [160]姚振华.高管团队行为整合_一个案例研究[J].现代管理科学,2011(1)
    [161]臧金娟,李垣和魏泽龙.双元模式选择对企业绩效的影响——基于跨层视角的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,09:105-112
    [162]曾萍,邬绮虹.女性高管参与对企业技术创新的影响_基于创业板企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2012(5)
    [163]张军成,凌文辁.悖论视角下的领导者_追随者契合研究探析[J].外国经济与管理,2013(1)
    [164]张平.高管团队异质性与企业绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2004(5)
    [165]张玉利,李乾文.公司创业导向_双元能力与组织绩效[J].管理科学学报,2009(2)
    [166]张玉利,李乾文.双元型组织研究评介[J].外国经济与管理,2006(1)
    [167]赵昌文,许召元.国际金融危机以来中国企业转型升级的调查研究[J].管理世界,2013,04:8-15+58
    [168]赵洁,李垣和魏泽龙.治理机制、组合能力对创新双元性的影响研究[A].中国管理现代化研究会.第五届(2010)中国管理学年会——技术与创新管理分会场论文集[C].中国管理现代化研究会:2010:5
    [169]郑晓明,丁玲,欧阳桃花.双元能力促进企业服务敏捷性_海底捞公司发展历程案例研究[J].管理世界,2012(2)
    [170]周丹.“资源整合”与“资源重构”两大构念比较——基于资源观视角[J].外国经济与管理,2012(8)
    [171]周俊,薛求知.双元型组织构建研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2009(1)
    [172]朱朝辉,陈劲.探索性学习与挖掘性学习及其平衡研究[J].外国经济与管理,2007(10)
    [173]朱朝辉.探索性学习_挖掘性学习和创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2008(4)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700