我国县域农村金融市场结构与绩效研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
县域作为我国经济体系中一个承上启下的重要环节,联结着农村和城市,县域经济的发展和壮大对缓解城乡收入差距、推动城乡统筹发展具有重大的战略意义。县域农村金融作为县域农村经济发展的核心,是实现县域农村收入增长的保证。新世纪以来,我国农村金融领域开展了一系列改革和制度创新,但农村金融发展却始终滞后于农村经济的快速增长。市场垄断、金融机构覆盖率低等问题导致了农村金融市场的低效率;垄断性和商业化程度越来越高的农村金融机构,支农功能逐步弱化,逐利目标使其实际供给远小于预期,更加剧了农村地区资金供求不平衡的状况。为了从根本上解决我国农村金融市场竞争不充分、低效率等问题,党的十七届三中全会明确提出,要建立现代农村金融制度,完善多层次、功能健全、运行安全的农村金融体系。2006年12月20日,银监会发布了《关于调整放宽农村地区银行业金融机构准入政策,更好支持社会主义新农村建设的若干意见》,提出要按照商业可持续原则,适度调整和放宽农村地区银行业金融机构准入政策,降低准入门槛。2010年中央1号文件再次强调要“加快培育村镇银行、贷款公司、农村资金互助社,有序发展小额贷款组织,引导社会资金投资设立适应‘三农’需要的各类新型金融组织”。引入外部竞争主体,打破市场垄断成为解决县域农村金融难以满足县域经济发展需要的改革方向,更是目前理论研究和实践领域中关注的焦点。
     理论分析和部分发展中国家的农村金融市场开放实践证明,引入外部竞争者可以促进金融部门的竞争,从而推动农村金融市场的发展,传统产业组织理论的分析框架亦向我们揭示了市场结构对企业行为和绩效的影响。然而,作为区域金融的一个典型代表,县域金融市场具有突出的地域性特征。受地理区位、经济环境、制度环境等多种因素的影响,我国县域农村金融市场发育水平差异巨大。同时,农村地区普遍存在的金融抑制使得农村金融市场结构与农村金融机构行为与绩效关系更加复杂,相同的市场开放政策在不同地区的效果可能会存在差异。现有的对农村金融市场结构、农村金融机构行为与绩效的分析只是零散于诸多研究农村金融相关问题的文献之中,缺少相对系统和完整的分析,其内在的影响和传导机制尚不明确,在县域农村金融领域的金融产业组织分析框架仍未形成。
     本文借助产业组织理论的分析范式对我国县域农村金融市场结构、农村金融机构行为以及农村金融市场绩效之间的关系进行了理论研究和实证分析,旨在揭示我国县域农村金融市场结构的变化规律以及传统的“结构-行为-绩效”范式在县域农村金融市场上的表现和机制。从而为构建竞争性农村金融市场体系提供一定的理论基础和政策建议。全文共分为7个部分,研究的主要内容和结论如下:
     研究内容一:我国县域农村金融市场结构分析
     本文对我国县域农村金融市场结构的研究采用比较研究方法:一是分别运用结构与非结构法对县域农村金融市场的市场集中度和竞争度进行测算,以更加客观全面地反映县域农村金融市场结构的特征和变化规律;二是通过对不同经济发展水平县域农村金融市场结构的比较,揭示县域金融市场结构的区域性差异。
     研究结果表明,在县域农村金融市场上,农信社凭借其自身的地理和信息优势,拥有较高的市场份额,处于相对的垄断地位,我国农村金融市场属于以农信社为主体的垄断竞争结构;降低市场准入限制,不论是在欠发达地区引入新型农村金融机构,还是在发达地区引入商业性和外资金融机构对提升农村金融市场的竞争水平都是有效的;鉴于集中度和竞争度这两个指标在我国县域农村金融市场的差异,运用非结构方法分析更能体现出市场开放进程中我国县域农村金融市场结构的动态变化。
     研究内容二:县域农村金融机构竞争行为分析
     在逐步放开的县域农村金融市场上,寡头竞争成为一种趋势。在县域范围内的各家金融机构资源禀赋各异,各自拥有不同的比较优势,为了占领市场,机构间展开错位竞争,包括价格竞争和非价格竞争两种形式。竞争促进了县域农村金融机构逐步采取商业银行的定价方法,降低贷款价格,以维持优质的客户资源;突出产品差异化和产品创新,充分发挥其比较优势;注重技术创新,采用新的信贷技术以降低贷款风险和交易成本,扩大贷款面。
     通过构建农信社信贷配置选择模型,分析了在不同竞争市场条件下,农信社对贷款数量配置和贷款价格的调整,结论表明降低农村金融市场准入限制以后,企业贷款市场比农户贷款市场竞争更加激烈,由此改变了农信社在两个市场上的信贷资金配置策略行为,使其增加了对农户的贷款配置,并降低了贷款价格。
     研究内容三:县域农村金融市场绩效分析
     本文对县域金融市场的绩效评价从机构和功能两个维度展开。通过不同的绩效指标对2000-2009年间江苏省37家农信社的经营状况进行分析,并对县域农村金融市场结构与农信社经营绩效的关系进行了实证检验。结果表明,在不同的市场竞争条件下,考察期内农村信用社经营绩效的各项指标都是上升的,江苏的县域农村金融市场结构与农信社经营绩效的关系符合效率假说,即农信社的绩效提升主要是由于效率的提升,其市场份额增加、市场集中度变化是效率提高的结果。本文对县域农村金融市场的绩效评价主要是围绕农村金融市场的资金配置效率展开,分别以对农户贷款数量和贷款价格为评价指标。文章分别实证了县域农村金融市场结构与农信社对农户贷款数量和贷款价格的关系,发现县域农村金融市场竞争程度和农户平均贷款数量正相关,和农信社贷款价格负相关,农信社的经营效率与农户贷款数量正相关,和贷款价格负相关。
     本文将金融机构和金融市场功能的绩效作为判断农村金融市场结构是否合意的标准,即合意的县域农村金融市场结构应该满足两个条件:一是有利于促进金融机构经营绩效的提升,以保持经营的可持续性;二是能够促进农村金融市场的资源配置效率,以提高金融市场的整体福利水平。根据本文的研究结论,不论从机构的角度还是从功能的角度,与当前快速发展的县域农村经济最匹配的农村金融市场结构应该是竞争性的。但根据不同县域农村经济发展特征,市场竞争程度应该是差异性的,经济发达地区竞争更充分,而经济欠发达地区则应是以农信社为主体的寡头竞争市场。
As an important link between the rural and urban economy in China, county economic development is of great significance to reduce the income gap and to accelerate coordinate development in the urban and rural area. County rural finance is the core of county rural economy, which is necessary to promote the rural income growth. Since the new century, there has been a series of reform and system innovation in rural finance, but the rural financial development still falls behind the rapid growth of the rural economy. Market monopoly and low coverage of financial institutions led to the low efficiency of rural financial market. Increasingly monopoly and commercialized rural financial institutions deduced rural credit supply, which worsen the shortage of fund supply in rural areas. In order to increase the credit supply, the Party's 17th third session definitely put forward to build modern rural financial system.
     On Dec.20,2006, CBRC published the policy "Increase the banking market access in rural areas to better support the construction of the new socialist countryside", which aims at moderately reducing the access restriction according to the business sustainable principle. The Central First Document of 2010 also emphasized to "accelerate the development of village banks, loan companies and rural mutual fund cooperatives and introduce social capital investment to rural financial market to establish the suitable new rural financial institutions for'three agriculture'". Introducing external competition entities and breaking monopoly have become the reform direction of solving the credit problem in rural areas. In addition, it's the focus which is concerned by theoretic studies and practice areas at present.
     Theory and rural financial market opening practice in some developing countries have proved that the introduction of external competitors could promote competition in the financial sector, so as to accelerate the development of rural financial market. The traditional industrial organization theory also proves that market structure has influence on enterprise's conduct and performance. However, as a typical representative of the regional finance, county rural financial market is of prominent regional characteristics. In China, rural financial market development stituations are quite different because of the difference in counties'geographical location, economic environment and policy environment. Meanwhile, the SCP paradigm in rural banking may be more complex due to the financial repression, which may lead to the different effect of the same market open policy in different regions. The existing research on this problem only scatters in many relevant literatures, and the systematic and completed research are still in shortage. The internal influence and conduction mechanism of rural financial market structure and perforrnance is unclear, and county financial industry organization analysis framework has not been formed.
     Based on the paradigm of Industrial Organization Theory, this thesis makes some theoretic and empirical analysis on the relationship between county rural financial market structure, rural financial institutions behavior and rural financial market performance, which aims at revealing the change rules of rural financial market structure and its influencing factors, and the mechanism of traditional SCP paradigm in county rural financial market. Finally, we provide some policy suggestions for rural financial market construction. The main contents and conclusions of the study are as follows:
     Part 1:the structure of county rural financial market
     We analysis the county rural financial market structure through comparative studies in the following two aspects:(1) we measure the structure of county rural financial market by structure method and non-structure method respectively to reveal the changing rule and characteristic; (2) we compare the structures between counties of different economic development level to disclose the regional differences of county financial market structure.
     The results show that China's county rural financial market is monopolistic competition, which is monopolized by Rural Credit Cooperatives (RCCs) with its geographical and information advantages. It is effective to promote the competition in counties by increasing the market access including cultivating new types of rural financial institutions in undeveloped counties and introducing commercial and foreign financial institutions in developed areas. In terms of the characteristics of China's rural economy and finance development non-structure estimation technique is more applicable and reliable than the traditional structural techniques in evaluating the dymatic change of China's county financial market competition during the procession of rural financial market opening.
     Part 2:Conduct of county rural financial institutions
     In the gradually opened county rural financial market, oligarchic competition becomes a trend. Different kinds of county financial institutions have different comparative advantages, which leads to their different competitive behavior including non-price competition and price competition. Under the completion pressure, rural financial institutions have taken a series of competitive strategies to keep their market share. Firstly, they reduce the loan price to keep the profitable customers by adopting commercial bank's pricing method. Secondly, they execute different lending policies and loan prices for different kinds of customers. Thirdly, they pay more attention to product innovation and try to adopt new credit technology to reduce loan cost and risk. Finally, they positively reform the organizational structure through organizing rural agricultural bank to improve their management and governance efficiency.
     We establish the RCCs credit distributing choice model based on comparative information advantage theory, which shows that the different competitive situation between enterprise and fanner loan markets has greatly changed the RCC's loan distributing strategy since the rural financial market entry was increased. RCC increase the farmer loan to maximize its profit, and RCC lowers the credit price because of completion.
     Part 3:Performance of the county rural financial market
     We evaluate the performance of the county rural financial market in two dimensions: institution and function. The empirical study of Jiangsu Province shows that in different competition situations, every performance index of RCCs is increasing. Efficient-structure hypothesis was supported in Jiangsu. We also evaluate the financial market performance of Jiangsu's county in terms of farmer loan account and loan price. The results show that both the average amount of farmer loan and the coverage were significantly increased. The loan price lowered due to the competition, while the business loan price decreased more than farmer loan because of the more competitive situation.
     The optimal rural financial market structure should meet two conditions:(1) to promote the development of financial institutions:(2) to realize the function of rural financial market and improve the welfare of the demanders. In conclusion. no matter from the institution or from the function, the optimal structure which matches the rapid development of county economy is competitive. Furthermore, according to the difference of economic development level, the degree of competition is quite different. The financial market structure of developed rural area should be pefect competitive, while in undeveloped rual area the structure should be oligarchic competition by RCCs.
引文
3杨建文等,产业经济学,北京:学林出版社,2005,P68。
    4[美]帕特里克T哈克(Patrick T.Harker),[美]斯塔夫罗斯A.泽尼奥斯(Stavros A.Zenios),《金融机构的绩效、效率、创新和监管》,中国金融出版社,2005,P7。
    5王国生、安同良、刘志彪编著,《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2002,P211-219。
    6杨建文、周冯琦、胡晓鹏著,《产业经济学》,学林出版社,2004,P37-41。
    7弗雷克斯(Freixas.X.)(美)等著,刘锡良主译,《微观银行学》,2000年,P49-50。
    9陈伟光著,《银行产业组织与中国银行业结构》,中国金融出版社,2007,P21-22。
    10张晓山、何安耐主编,《农村金融转型与创新——关于合作基金会的思考》,山西经济出版社,2002年。
    12 Richard Caves,1967, American Industry:Structure, Conduct and performance, Prentice-Hall, P16.
    13 Bain, J. S.1950, Workable Competition in Oligopoly. Ameirician Economics Review,40, p.38
    14 Schcrer, R.1990. Industrial market structure and economics performance,3th edition, Houghton Mifflin Company.
    15杨建文等著,产业经济学,北京:学林出版社,2005,P91—92.
    16郭利华,《中国农村金融市场反垄断管制问题研究》,知识产权出版社,2008年,P174-177。
    17何广文,中国农村金融转型与金融机构多元化,《中国农村观察》,2004(2)。
    18中国银监会网站公布数据http://bankmap.cbrc.gov.cn/bank/index_pro.jsp。
    19杨菁、何广文,中国农村信贷市场深化,《银行家》,2007(6)。
    20何广文,中国农村金融组织体系创新路径探讨,《金融与经济》,2007(8)。
    21王双正,《中国农村金融发展研究》,中国市场出版社,2008年,P120。
    22鲁靖,我国农村金融体系中的金融压制与突破,《农业经济问题》,2007(11)。
    24范云峰,张长建著,《银行营销》,中国经济出版社,2006,P28-29。
    25臧旭恒、徐向艺、杨惠馨主编:《产业经济学》,经济科学出版社,2004年,P196。
    26马蔚华,《创新之魂-商业银行金融创新理论与招商银行实践》,华夏出版社,2007年。
    27约瑟夫·熊彼特:《资本主义、社会主义与民主》,商务印书馆,2000年版,P150-176。
    28臧旭恒、徐向艺、杨慧馨,《产业经济学》(第三版),经济科学出版社,2005,P234。
    31何广文等著,《中国农村金融发展与制度变迁》,中国财政经济出版社,2005年,P11。
    32褚保金、程恩江、卞月波;江苏省农村信用社改革的实践,《中国农村经济》,2004(5)
    [1]Abiad, A.; Oomes, N. and Ueda, K. The Quality Effect:Does Financial Liberalization Improve the Allocation of Capital? International Monetary Fund,2004.
    [2]Angelini, P. and Cetorelli, N. "The Effects of Regulatory Reform on Competition in the Banking Industry." Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2003,35(5), pp.663-84.
    [3]Arellano, Manuel and Bond, Stephen. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data:Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations." The Review of Economic Studies,1991, 55(2), pp.277-97.
    [4]Arrow, K. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," UMI,1962.
    [5]Arun, T. and Annim, S.K. Economic Governance of Mfis:Inside the Black Box. IZA,2010.
    [6]Awusabo-Asare, K.; Annim, SK; Abane, AM and Asare-Minta, D. "Who Is Reaching Whom? Depth of Outreach of Rural Micro Finance Institutions in Ghana." International NGO Journal,2009,4(4), pp.132-41.
    [7]Bain, J.S. "Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration:American Manufacturing,1936-1940." The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1951,65(3), pp.293.
    [8]Bain, J.S. "Workable Competition in Oligopoly:Theoretical Considerations and Some Empirical Evidence." The American Economic Review,1950,40(2), pp.35-47.
    [9]Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. "Market Timing and Capital Structure." The Journal of Finance,2002, 57(1), pp.1-32.
    [10]Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data." Empirical economics,1995,20(2), pp.325-32.
    [11]Baumol, W.J. "Contestable Markets:An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure." American Economic Review,1982,72(1), pp.1-15.
    [12]Beccalli, E. "Does It Investment Improve Bank Performance? Evidence from Europe." Journal of banking & finance,2007,31(7), pp.2205-30.
    [13]Bencivenga, V.R. and Smith, B.D. "Financial Intermediation and Endogenous Growth." The Review of Economic Studies,1991,55(2), pp.195.
    [14]Berger, A.N. "The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking-Tests of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure Hypotheses." Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,1995,27(2), pp.404-31.
    [15]Berger, A.N.; DeYoung, R.; Genay, H. and Udell, G.F. "Globalization of Financial Institutions: Evidence from Cross-Border Banking Performance." Brookings-Wharton papers on financial services, 2000,3(1), pp.23-136.
    [16]Berger, A.N. and Hannan, T.H. "The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry:A Test of the Quiet Life" and Related Hypotheses." Review of Economics and Statistics,1998,80(3), pp. 454-65.
    [17]Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B. "Efficiency of Financial Institutions:International Survey and Directions for Future Research* 1." European Journal of Operational Research,1997,98(2), pp. 175-212.
    [18]Berger, A.N.; Rosen, R.J. and Udell, G.F. "Does Market Size Structure Affect Competition? The Case of Small Business Lending." Journal of banking & finance,2007,37(1), pp.11-33.
    [19]Berger, A.N.; Saunders, A.; Scalise, J.M. and Udell, G.F. "The Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lendingl." Journal of financial Economics,1998,50(2), pp. 187-229.
    [20]Berger, A.N. and Udell, G.F. "The Institutional Memory Hypothesis and the Procyclicality of Bank Lending Behavior." Journal of Financial Intermediation,2004,73(4), pp.458-95.
    [21]Berger, A.N. and Udell, G.F. "Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending:The Importance of Bank Organisational Structure." The Economic Journal,2002,112(477), pp. F32-F53.
    [22]Besley, T. "How Do Market Failures Justify Interventions in Rural Credit Markets?" The World Bank Research Observer,1994,9(1), pp.27.
    [23]Bikker, J.A. and Haaf, K. "Competition, Concentration and Their Relationship:An Empirical Analysis of the Banking Industry." Journal of banking & finance,2002,26(11), pp.2191-214.
    [24]Bond, StephenR. "Dynamic Panel Data Models:A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice." Portuguese Economic Journal,2002,7(2), pp.141-62.
    [25]Bose, N. and Cothren, R. "Equilibrium Loan Contracts and Endogenous Growth in the Presence of Asymmetric Information." Journal of Monetary Economics,1996,35(2), pp.363-76.
    [26]Boucher, S.R.; Carter, M.R. and Guirkinger, C. "Risk Rationing and Wealth Effects in Credit Markets:Theory and Implications for Agricultural Development." American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2008,90(2), pp.409-23.
    [27]Bresnahan, T.F. "Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power." Handbook of industrial organization,1989,2, pp.1011-57.
    [28]Burgess, R. and Pande, R. "Do Rural Banks Matter? Evidence from the Indian Social Banking Experiment." The American Economic Review,2005,95(3), pp.780-95.
    [29]Carter. D.A. and McNulty, J.E. "Deregulation, Technological Change, and the Business-Lending Performance of Large and Small Banks." Journal of banking & finance,2005,29(5), pp.1113-30.
    [30]Carter, M.R. "Equilibrium Credit Rationing of Small Farm Agriculture* 1." Journal of Development Economics,1988,25(1), pp.83-103.
    [31]Caves, R.E. American Industry:Structure, Conduct, Performance. Prentice-Hall,1964.
    [32]Claessens, S. and Laeven, L. "What Drives Bank Competition? Some International Evidence." Journal of Money, Credit & Banking,2004,36(3).
    [33]Coccorese, P. "Market Power in Local Banking Monopolies." Journal of banking & finance,2009, 33(7), pp.1196-210.
    [34]Congress, Econometric Society. World; Wallis, K.F. and Kreps, D.M. Advances in Economics and Econometrics:Theory and Applications. Cambridge University Press,1997.
    [35]Conning, J. and Udry, C. "Rural Financial Markets in Developing Countries." Handbook of Agricultural Economics,2007,3, pp.2857-908.
    [36]Corvoisier, S. and Gropp, R. "Bank Concentration and Retail Interest Rates* 1." Journal of banking & finance.2002,26(11). pp.2155-89.
    [37]Davis, J.R. and Hare, P.G. "Reforming the Systems of Rural Finance Provision in Romania:Some Options for Privatisation and Change." Quarterly journal of international agriculture,1997,36(3), pp. 213-34.
    [38]Degryse, H. and Ongena, S. "Competition and Regulation in the Banking Sector:A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Sources of Bank Rents." Handbook of financial intermediation and banking,2008, pp.483-554.
    [39]Dell'Ariccia, G. "Asymmetric Information and the Structure of the Banking Industry." European Economic Review,2001,45(10), pp.1957-80.
    [40]Dell'Ariccia, G.; Friedman, E. and Marquez, R. "Adverse Selection as a Barrier to Entry in the Banking Industry." The RAND Journal of Economics,1999,30(3), pp.515-34.
    [41]Demirguc-Kunt, A.; Laeven, L. and Levine, R. "Regulations, Market Structure. Institutions, and the Cost of Financial Intermediation," National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2003.
    [42]Demsetz, H. "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy." Journal of Law and economics,1973,76(1), pp.1-9.
    [43]Dennis, WC and Jeffrey, MP. "Modern Industrial Organization." NY:Addison-Wesley,2000.
    [44]Dorward. A.; Poulton, C. and Kydd, J. "Rural and Farmer Finance:An International Perspective." ADU Working Papers,2001.
    [45]Dufhues, T.B.; Dung, P.T.M.; Hanh, H.T. and Buchenrieder, G. "Information and Targeting Policies and Their Principal-Agent Relationships--the Case of the Vietnam Bank for the Poor." Quarterly journal of international agriculture,2002,41(4), pp.335-62.
    [46]Farrell, M.J. "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General),1957,120(3), pp.253-90.
    [47]Ferrari, A. Increasing Access to Rural Finance in Bangladesh:The Forgotten" Missing Middle". World Bank Publications,2008.
    [48]Freixas, X. and Rochet, J.C. Microeconomics of Banking. The MIT Press,1997.
    [49]Ghosh, P. and Ray, D. Information and Enforcement in Informal Credit Markets. Boston University. Institute for Economic Development,1999.
    [50]Hoff, K. and Stiglitz, J.E. "Introduction:Imperfect Information and Rural Credit Markets:Puzzles and Policy Perspectives." The World Bank Economic Review,1990,4(3), pp.235-50.
    [51]Hoff, K.R.; Braverman, A. and Stiglitz. J.E. The Economics of Rural Organization. Oxford Univ. Pr.,1993.
    [52]Hung, F.S. and Cothren, R. "Credit Market Development and Economic Growth." Journal of Economics and Business,2002,54(2), pp.219-37.
    [53]Jackson III, W.E. "Market Structure and the Speed of Price Adjustments:Evidence of Non-Monotonicity." Review of Industrial Organization,1997,72(1), pp.37-57.
    [54]Jappelli, T. and Pagano, M. "Information Sharing, Lending and Defaults:Cross-Country Evidence." Journal of banking & finance.2002,26(10), pp.2017-45.
    [55]Jaramillo, F.; Schiantarelli, F.; Sembenelli, A. and., CV Starr Center for Applied Economics. Are Adjustment Costs for Labor Asymmetric?:An Econometric Test on Panel Data for Italy. CV Starr Center for Applied Economics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Economics,1992.
    [56]Jensen, F.E. "The Farm Credit System as a Government-Sponsored Enterprise." Review of agricultural economics,2000,22(2), pp.326.
    [57]Jeon, Y. and Miller, S.M. "Bank Performance:Market Power or Efficient Structure?" Manuscript, University of Nevada, Las Vegas,2004.
    [58]King, R.G. and Levine, R. "Finance and Growth:Schumpeter Might Be Right." The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108(3), pp.717.
    [59]Kochar, A. "An Empirical Investigation of Rationing Constraints in Rural Credit Markets in India." Journal of Development Economics,1997,55(2), pp.339-71.
    [60]Kovsted, J.; Rand, J.; Tarp, F.; NGUYEN, TD; NGUYEN, HV and TA, TM. "Financial Sector Reforms in Vietnam:Selected Issues and Problems." CIEM and NIAS Discussion Paper,2003.
    [61]La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. "Government Ownership of Banks," National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA,2000.
    [62]Laderman, E.S. "Changes in Twelfth District Local Banking Market Structure During a Period of Industry Consolidation." 1 Inflation Targeting under Commitment and Discretion, pp.15.
    [63]Lamberte, M.B. and Desrocher, M. "Efficiency and Expense Preference in Philippines'Cooperative Rural Banks." 2002.
    [64]Leibenstein, H. "Allocative Efficiency Vs." X-Efficiency"." The American Economic Review,1966, 56(3), pp.392-415.
    [65]Levine, R. "Financial Development and Economic Growth:Views and Agenda." Journal of economic literature,1997,35(2), pp.688-726.
    [66]Levine, R. "Stock Markets, Growth, and Tax Policy." The Journal of Finance,1991,46(4), pp. 1445-65.
    [67]Ma, C.H. and Smith, B.D. "Credit Market Imperfections and Economic Development:Theory and Evidence." Journal of Development Economics,1996,48(2), pp.351-87.
    [68]Marquez, R. "Competition, Adverse Selection, and Information Dispersion in the Banking Industry." Review of Financial Studies,2002,75(3), pp.901.
    [69]Maudos, J. and De Guevara, J.F. "The Cost of Market Power in Banking:Social Welfare Loss Vs. Cost Inefficiency." Journal of banking & finance,2007,31(1), pp.2103-25.
    [70]McKinnon, R.I. Money and Capital in Economic Development. Brookings Institution Press,1973.
    [71]Merton, R.C. and Bodie, Z. "Deposit Insurance Reform:A Functional Approach," Elsevier,1993, 1-34.
    [72]Meslier-Crouzille, C茅line; Nys, Emmanuelle and Sauviat, Alain. "Contribution of Rural Banks to Regional Economic Development:Evidence from the Philippines." Regional Studies.
    [73]Meyer, R.L. "Performance of Rural Financial Markets:Comparative Observations from Asia, Latin American and the Us," 2002.
    [74]Meyer, R.L. and Nagarajan. G. Rural Financial Markets in Asia:Paradigms, Policies, and Performance. Oxford University Press,2000.
    [75]Nagarajan, G. and Meyer, R.L. "Rural Finance:Recent Advances and Emerging Lessons, Debates, and Opportunities." Ohio State University.2005.
    [76]Neuberger, D. "Structure, Conduct and Performance in Banking Markets." Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory,1997.
    [77]Noulas, A. "Profitability and Efficiency of the Greek Banks (1993-1998)." Journal of the Banking Association of Greece,1999,79(20), pp.53-60.
    [78]Ogura, Y. "Learning from a Rival Bank and Lending Boom." Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2006,75(4), pp.535-55.
    [79]Panzar, J.C. and Rosse, J.N. "Testing For" Monopoly" Equilibrium." The Journal of Industrial Economics,1987, pp.443-56.
    [80]Park, A.; Brandt, L. and Giles, J. "Competition under Credit Rationing:Theory and Evidence from Rural China." Journal of Development Economics,2003,71(2), pp.463-95.
    [81]Peltzman, S. "The Gains and Losses from Industrial Concentration," National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA,1977.
    [82]Peria, M.S.M. and Mody, A. "How Foreign Participation and Market Concentration Impact Bank Spreads:Evidence from Latin America." Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2004, pp.511-37.
    [83]Rhoades, S.A. Bank Mergers and Banking Structure in the United States,1980-98. DIANE Publishing.
    [84]Ross, L. "Finance and Growth:Theory. Evidence, and Mechanisms."forthcoming in Philippe Aghion and Steve Durlauf eds. Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam, North-Holland,2004.
    [85]Sapienza, P. "The Effects of Government Ownership on Bank Lending* 1." Journal of financial Economics,2004,72(2), pp.357-84.
    [86]Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton Mifflin Boston,1990.
    [87]Schmalensee, R. "Industrial Economics:An Overview." The Economic Journal,1988,98(392), pp. 643-81.
    [88]Seibel, H.D. "Does History Matter? The Old and the New World of Microfinance in Europe and Asia." From moneylenders to microfinance:Southeast Asia's credit revolution in institutional, economic and cultural perspective,2005, pp.7-8.
    [89]Shaffer, S. "Ownership Structure and Market Conduct among Swiss Banks." Applied Economics, 2002,34(16), pp.1999-2009.
    [90]Shaffer,S. "Patterns of Competition in Banking." Journal of Economics and Business,2004,56(4), pp.287-313.
    [91]Shaffer, S. "The Winners Curse in Banking." Journal of Financial Intermediation,1998,7(4), pp. 359-92.
    [92]Shaw, E.S. Financial Deepening in Economic Development. Oxford University Press,1973.
    [93]Shepherd, W.G. The Economics of Industrial Organization:Analysis, Markets, Policies. Prentice Hall,1997.
    [94]Shepherd, W.G. "Tobin's Q and the Structure-Performance Relationship:Comment." The American Economic Review,1986,76(5), pp.1205-10.
    [95]Sinha, S. "Nepal Country Study in Asian Development Bank 2000" Published in the Role of Central Banks in Microfinance in Asia and the Pacific." ADB:Manila,2000.
    [96]Smirlock, M.; Gilligan, T. and Marshall, W. "Tobin's Q and the Structure-Performance Relationship." The American Economic Review,1984,74(5), pp.1051-60.
    [97]Solis, L. and Maudos, J. "The Social Costs of Bank Market Power:Evidence from Mexico." Journal of Comparative Economics,2008,36(3), pp.467-88.
    [98]Stein, J.C. "Information Production and Capital Allocation:Decentralized Versus Hierarchical Firms." The Journal of Finance,2002,57(5), pp.1891-921.
    [99]Stigler, G.J. "A Theory of Oligopoly." The Journal of Political Economy,1964, pp.44-61.
    [100]Stiglitz, J.E. and Weiss, A. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information." The American Economic Review,1981,77(3), pp.393-410.
    [101]Stiroh, K.J. and Strahan, P.E. "Competitive Dynamics of Deregulation:Evidence from Us Banking." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking,2003,35(5), pp.801-28.
    [102]Tchuigoua, H.T. "Microfinance Institutions Performance. What Matters About the Interaction of Location and Legal Status?" Working Papers CEB.
    [103]Timme, S.G. and Yang, W.K. On the Use of a Direct Measure of Efficiency in Testing Structure-Performance Relationships in Us Commercial Banking. Georgia State University,1991.
    [104]Tsai, K.S. "Imperfect Substitutes:The Local Political Economy of Informal Finance and Microfinance in Rural China and India." World Development,2004,32(9), pp.1487-507.
    [105]Varghese, A. "Bank-Moneylender Linkage as an Alternative to Bank Competition in Rural Credit Markets." Oxford Economic Papers,2005,57(2), pp.315.
    [106]Yaron, J.; Benjamin, M.D.P. and Piprek, G.L. Rural Finance:Issues, Design, and Best Practices. World Bank,1997.
    [107]Yildirim, H.S. and Philippatos, G.C. "Restructuring, Consolidation and Competition in Latin American Banking Markets." Journal of banking & finance,2007,31(3), pp.629-39.
    [108]Zeller, M. "Determinants of Credit Rationing:A Study of Informal Lenders and Formal Credit Groups in Madagascar." World Development,1994,22(12), pp.1895-907.
    [109]Zeller, M. and Meyer, R.L. The Triangle of Microfinance:Financial Sustainability, Outreach, and Impact. Johns Hopkins University Press,2002.
    [110]蔡四平、岳意定, 《中国农村金融组织体系重构-基于功能视角的研究》,经济科学出版社,2007年。
    [111]陈鹏、刘锡良,当前农村金融利率机制是有效的吗, 《中国农村经济》,2009(11)。
    [112]陈伟光著, 《银行产业组织与中国银行业结构》,中国金融出版社,2007年。
    [113]陈艳华、王家传,中国农村信贷配给效率的实证分析, 《农业经济问题》,2009(5)。
    [114]程恩江、褚保金、刘大耕,我国农村信用社经营状况、补贴及其政策含义:以江苏为例, 《金融研究》,2003(3)。
    [115]程郁、韩俊、 罗丹,供给配给与需求压抑交互影响下的正规信贷约束:来自1874户农户金融需求行为考察, 《世界经济》,2009(5)。
    [116]褚保金、卢亚娟、张龙耀,信贷配给下农户借贷的福利效果分析, 《中国农村经济》,2009(6)
    [117]褚保金、张兰、王娟,中国农村信用社运行效率及其影响因素分析—以苏北地区为例, 《中国农村观察》,2007(1)
    [118]褚保金、程恩江、卞月波,江苏省农村信用社改革的实践, 《中国农村经济》,2004(5)
    [119]褚保金、卢亚娟、张龙耀,信贷配给下农户借贷的福利效果分析, 《中国农村经济》,2009(6)。
    [120]崔红,我国农村金融市场结构的集中度分析, 《当代财经》,2008(4)。
    [121]戴季宁、樊金元,安徽省农村信用社贷款利率定价机制模式探索,《财贸研究》,2006(6)。
    [122]范云峰、张长建著, 《银行营销》,北京市:中国经济出版社,2006年。
    [123]冯兴元、何梦笔、何广文,试论中国农村金融的多元化—一种局部知识范式视角, 《中国农村观察》,2004(5)。
    [124]冯兴元、何梦笔、何广文,试论中国农村金融的多元化:一种局部知识范式视角, 《中国农村观察》,2004(5)
    [125]弗雷克斯(Freixas. X.)让.夏尔.罗歇(Jean-CharlesRochet)(美)著,刘锡良译,《微观银行学》,西南财经大学出版社,2000年。
    [126]郭利华,《中国农村金融市场反垄断管制问题研究》,知识产权出版社,2008年。
    [127]何德旭、饶明,我国农村金融市场供求失衡的成因分析:金融排斥性视角, 《经济社会体制比较》,2008(2)。
    [128]何广文,合作金融组织的制度性绩效探析, 《中国农村经济》,1999(2)
    [129]何广文,中国农村金融组织体系创新路径探讨, 《金融与经济》,2007(8)。
    [130]何广文,中国农村金融转型与金融机构多元化, 《中国农村观察》,2004(2)
    [131]何广文著, 《中国农村金融发展与制度变迁》,中国财政出版社,2005年。
    [132]黄祖辉、刘西川、程恩江,中国农户的信贷需求:生产性抑或消费性—方法比较与实证分析,《管理世界》,2009(3)。
    [133]黄旭平,市场竞争导致的银行集中、制度与净利息边际收入,南京师大学报,2007(1)
    [134]姜长云,农村金融制度对农业结构调整的不适应性及其制度根源, 《产业经济研究》,2003(5)
    [135]焦兵,农村金融需求的结构性与层次性分析, 《学术界》,2007(1)。
    [136]刘易斯.卡布罗著,胡汉辉译, 《产业组织导论》,人民邮电出版社,2002年。
    [137]孔荣、Calum Turvey、罗剑朝,信任、利率与农村金融市场竞合关中国农村小额信贷市场的理论模型系, 《农业技术经济》,2007(5)。
    [138]李锐、朱喜,农户金融抑制及其福利损失的实证分析, 《经济研究》,2007(2)。
    [139]李喜梅, 《基于功能视角的我国农村金融发展研究》,博士学位论文,湖南大学,2006。
    [140]李喜梅、彭建刚,经济变迁中的中国农村金融体系:一个从隐功能角度的解释框架,《农业经济问题》,2005(10)。
    [141]林毅夫,金融改革与农村经济发展.北京大学中国经济研究中心讨论稿,NO.C200023,2003年。
    [142]林毅夫、姜哗,经济结构、银行业结构与经济发展—基于分省面板数据的实证分析, 《金融研究》,2006(1)
    [143]刘西川、程恩江,贫困地区农户的正规信贷约束:基于配给机制的经验考察, 《中国农村经济》,2009(6)。
    [144]刘锡良、洪正,多机构共存下的小额信贷市场均衡, 《金融研究》,2005(3)
    [145]鲁靖,我国农村金融体系中的金融压制与突破, 《农业经济问题》,2007(11)
    [146]马九杰、刘海英、温铁军,农村信贷约束与农村金融体系创新,《中国农村金融》,2010(2)。
    [147]马蔚华, 《创新之魂-商业银行金融创新理论与招商银行实践》,北京:华夏出版社,2007。
    [148]孟建华,金融企业性质、法人治理与贷款定价——对农村信用社贷款利率浮动政策执行效果的实证分析, 《金融研究》,2006(4)
    [149]蒲勇健、宋军,农村信贷市场:特征、效率与组织重构, 《南方金融》,2003(9)。
    [150]齐树天,商业银行绩效、效率与市场结构—基于中国1994~2005年的面板数据, 《国际金融研究》,2008(3)。
    [151]唐要家, 《反垄断经济学:理论与政策》,中国社会科学出版社,2008年
    [152]王聪、谭正勋,我国商业银行的效率结构研究, 《经济研究》,2007(07)
    [153]王聪、邹朋飞,基于资本结构和风险考虑的中国商业银行X-效率研究, 《管理世界》,2006(11) 。
    [154]王曙光,新型农村金融机构运行绩效与机制创新, 《中共中央党校学报》,2008(4)
    [155]王双正, 《中国农村金融发展研究》,中国市场出版社,2008年。
    [156]王元,信息处理、博弈参与和农村金融服务中介, 《金融研究》2006(10)。
    [157]温涛、冉光和、熊德平,中国金融发展与农民收入增长, 《经济研究》,2005(9)。
    [158]谢平、徐忠,公共财政、金融支农与农村金融改革, 《经济研究》,2006(4)。
    [159]谢平,农村信用合作社改革争论, 《金融研究》,2001(1)。
    [160]谢玉梅,新一轮农村利率改革:垄断竞争定价的温州案例, 《经济问题》,2006(4)。
    [161]徐威、周明栋,对江苏沭阳东吴村镇银行运行情况的调查, 《金融纵横》,2008(11)
    [162]徐忠、程恩江,利率政策、农村金融机构行为与农村信贷短缺, 《金融研究》,2004(12)。
    [163]许圣道、田霖,我国农村地区金融排斥研究, 《金融研究》,2008(7)。
    [164]闫章秀、高锁平,对我国农村金融组织的SCP范式研究, 《农业经济问题》,2009(2)
    [165]杨建文、周冯琦、胡晓鹏, 《产业经济学》,学林出版社,2004年。
    [166]杨菁、何广文,中国农村信贷市场深化, 《银行家》,2007(6)
    [167]杨小凯、张永生,新兴古典发展经济学导论, 《经济研究》,1999(7)
    [168]姚耀军,中国农村金融改革绩效评价, 《江苏社会科学》2007(1)。
    [169]岳意定、胡愈、陈伯军,中国农村金融组织架构的帕累托最优状态分析, 《系统工程》2006(12)。
    [170]约瑟夫·熊彼特, 《资本主义、社会主义与民主》,商务印书馆,2000年。
    [171]臧旭恒、徐向艺、杨惠馨主编, 《产业经济学》,经济科学出版社,2004年。
    [172]张兵、左平桂,江苏省农村贷款效率的实证分析, 《南京社会科学》,2009(1)
    [173]王国生、安同良、刘志彪编著, 《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2002年。
    [174]张兰、褚保金,农村信用社产权改革效果的实证研究——基于江苏省调查数据的分析, 《农业技术经济》,2007(4)。
    [175]张晓山、何安耐主编, 《农村金融转型与创新——关于合作基金会的思考》,山西经济出版社,2002年。
    [176]赵旭,银行利差多维度量及影响因素:基于中国银行业1998-2006年经验证据,《金融研究》,2009(1)
    [177]中国人民银行衡阳市中心支行课题组,竞争性农村金融市场问题研究——以衡阳市为例,《武汉金融》,2008(11)
    [178]中国人民银行南宁中心支行课题组,贷款利率上限放开对农信社利率定价的影响分析——以广西为视角, 《南方金融》,2007(4)
    [179]周立,农村金融供求失衡与政策调整, 《农业经济问题》,2005(7)
    [180]周立,农村金融市场四大问题及其演化逻辑, 《财贸经济》,2007(2)
    [181]周立、林荣华,新一轮农村利率改革成效与经济解释—闽东地区调查与垄断市场分析, 《财贸经济》,2005(5)
    [182]朱守银、张照新、张海阳、汪承先,中国农村金融市场供给和需求—以传统农区为例, 《管理世界》,2003(3)
    [183]朱喜、李子奈,改革以来我国农村信贷的效率分析, 《管理世界》,2006(7)
    [184]朱喜、李子奈,我国农村正式金融机构对农户的信贷配给—一个联立离散选择模型的实证分析, 《数量经济技术经济研究》,2006(3)
    [185]朱喜、马晓青、史清华,信誉、财富与农村信贷配给一欠发达地区不同农村金融机构的供给行为研究,《财经研究》,2009(8)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700