机电产品知识模块本体的集成及应用研究
|
摘要
知识集成技术是制造业信息化中的关键技术之一。本体技术的出现,为知识提供了语义集成的基础,在这种背景下,各种本体建模方法应运而生,模块本体就是其中之一。模块本体是基于知识共享和重用的实际需求,利用本体内在的关联性,通过模块化处理,简化本体应用,集成相关本体,为帮助实现知识共享和重用提供技术支持。论文结合国家高技术研究发展专项基金资助项目“基于本体的面向业务协作的异构系统集成技术研究及应用(项目编号:2006AA04Z157)”、“企业间专利资源协同管理模式及其软件使能技术研究(项目编号:2007AA04Z101)”及国家科技支撑计划基金资助项目“家电行业(企业)的数字化综合集成技术开发与应用(项目编号:2006BAF01A02)”展开研究工作。本文从本体及模块本体的基本理论、方法和技术出发,针对机电类制造企业在知识管理过程中遇到的异构、低查询效率等问题,结合模块本体理论的思想,给出了机电产品知识模块本体的构建方法,重点对机电产品知识模块本体的构建、异构现象及映射、集成、查询与检索进行研究,并在某家电集团公司的信息化工程项目中进行了具体应用。论文主要内容如下:
第一章阐述了论文的研究背景、本体与语义Web的关系和产品本体的研究现状;重点分析模块本体在机电产品知识管理中的需求;给出本论文拟解决的问题及意义、论文的主要研究内容及论文的整体框架和结构。
第二章主要阐述机电产品知识模块本体的构建方法。对机电产品知识模块本体进行了定义,即机电产品知识模块本体是高度关联性的知识共享词汇及其概念模型的明确形式化规范说明;给出了机电产品知识模块本体的构建原则。重点对机电产品知识的模块划分、本体语言选择和本体构建过程进行了分析。以实例具体说明机电产品知识模块本体的构建过程。
第三章主要对机电产品知识模块本体的异构及映射问题进行研究。重点对机电产品知识模块本体中的异构现象进行分析;给出了机电产品知识模块本体映射过程的基本模型;提出了基于结构—语义—特性的机电产品知识模块本体的映射算法来解决机电产品知识的异构问题。
第四章在对已有本体集成方法进行比较的基础上,提出基于结构—语义—特性的机电产品知识模块本体集成方法,从结构、语义和特性三个层次对机电产品知识进行集成,并对集成过程的可满足性和一致性进行检验,验证其可行性。
第五章对机电产品知识模块本体的查询和检索进行研究。提出用户需求驱动的机电产品知识模块本体查询和检索体系结构;给出了把企业外部用户需求转换成结构化的企业内部用户需求知识模块本体的过程;对机电产品知识模块本体的查询进行结构化描述,给出从机电产品知识模块本体数据模式到XML数据模式的转换方法。
第六章根据机电产品知识模块本体的构建、映射、集成和查询等研究,以某家电企业集团公司的储水式电热水器为实例对本文的研究进行应用。
第七章对全文工作进行了总结,并对后续研究工作进行了展望。
Knowledge integration is a key technology in manufacturing information technologies. The emergence of ontology technologies provides the basis of semantic integration for knowledge. Based on this background, a variety of modeling methods came into being including the module ontology. In order to provide technical support for achieving knowledge sharing and reuse, module ontology boasts its intrinsic relevance to simplify ontology applications and integrates relevant ontologies through the modular processing. The paper research is supported by technological research for heterogeneous system integration and application of business-oriented collaboration based on ontology of the National High-Tech. R&D Program for CIMS of China (No. 2006AA04Z157), research of co-management model and its software enabling inter-enterprise resource co-management model patents and software enabling technology for inter-enterprise patent resources of the National High-Tech. R&D Program for CIMS of China (No.: 2007AA04Z101) and development and application of digital comprehensive integration technology for appliances industry (enterprise) of the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (No.2006BAF01A02).
This paper begins with the basic theory, methods and techniques of module ontology, faces heterogeneous, low query efficiency and other issues in the process of the knowledge management for eletromachanical manufacturing enterprises, and combines the idea of module ontology theory, a construction method of knowledge module ontologies for electromachanical product is given. Construction, heterogeneous phenomena, mapping, integration, query and retrieval of knowledge module ontology of eletromachancal product are mainly researched. And the research is specifically used in information projects of an appliance group company. The dissertation is divided into the chapters as follows:
The first chapter is devoted to research background and significance of the thesis, the relationship between standards and ontology, the relationship between semantic web and ontology, and review of product ontology. The requirement of module ontology in management of product knowledge is analyzed. The question raised in the dissertation will be resolved and its significance, main research content and overall framework and structure of the paper are given.
The second chapter focuses on the construction method for knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. The definition and meaning of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product are presented. Construction principle of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product is given. Module partition of product knowledge, language selection of ontology construction and building process about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product are discussed. An example is used to specify the construction process.
The third chapter conducts a specific analysis of the heterogeneous and mapping problems of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. A basic model of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product mapping process is proposed. A structure- semantics- characteristics ontology mapping algorithm of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product to solve the heterogeneous problems is presented.
In the fourth chapter, based on the existing ontology integration methods, an integration method of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product on the basis of structure- semantics- characteristics integration is presented. Product knowledge is integrated by the method from the structure, semantic and characteristics levels. Consistency and satisfiability of integration process is tested to validate the feasibility of integration method.
The fifth chapter is dedicated to the research of the query and retrieval of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. A query and retrieval framework of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product driven by user requirement is presented. A process that changes outside user needs of enterprises into modular ontology of inside user knowledge needs of enterprises is given. The query about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product is described through the structured method. A transforming method from the data mode about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product to XML data mode is given.
In the sixth chapter, according to the construction, mapping, query and integration research about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product, storage-type electric water heater products of an appliance group company are used as an example to verify the significance of the research.
The last chapter serves as conclusion and outlook. The achievements of the paper are summarized, and the innovations are given. The future research works are put forward to outlook.
第一章阐述了论文的研究背景、本体与语义Web的关系和产品本体的研究现状;重点分析模块本体在机电产品知识管理中的需求;给出本论文拟解决的问题及意义、论文的主要研究内容及论文的整体框架和结构。
第二章主要阐述机电产品知识模块本体的构建方法。对机电产品知识模块本体进行了定义,即机电产品知识模块本体是高度关联性的知识共享词汇及其概念模型的明确形式化规范说明;给出了机电产品知识模块本体的构建原则。重点对机电产品知识的模块划分、本体语言选择和本体构建过程进行了分析。以实例具体说明机电产品知识模块本体的构建过程。
第三章主要对机电产品知识模块本体的异构及映射问题进行研究。重点对机电产品知识模块本体中的异构现象进行分析;给出了机电产品知识模块本体映射过程的基本模型;提出了基于结构—语义—特性的机电产品知识模块本体的映射算法来解决机电产品知识的异构问题。
第四章在对已有本体集成方法进行比较的基础上,提出基于结构—语义—特性的机电产品知识模块本体集成方法,从结构、语义和特性三个层次对机电产品知识进行集成,并对集成过程的可满足性和一致性进行检验,验证其可行性。
第五章对机电产品知识模块本体的查询和检索进行研究。提出用户需求驱动的机电产品知识模块本体查询和检索体系结构;给出了把企业外部用户需求转换成结构化的企业内部用户需求知识模块本体的过程;对机电产品知识模块本体的查询进行结构化描述,给出从机电产品知识模块本体数据模式到XML数据模式的转换方法。
第六章根据机电产品知识模块本体的构建、映射、集成和查询等研究,以某家电企业集团公司的储水式电热水器为实例对本文的研究进行应用。
第七章对全文工作进行了总结,并对后续研究工作进行了展望。
Knowledge integration is a key technology in manufacturing information technologies. The emergence of ontology technologies provides the basis of semantic integration for knowledge. Based on this background, a variety of modeling methods came into being including the module ontology. In order to provide technical support for achieving knowledge sharing and reuse, module ontology boasts its intrinsic relevance to simplify ontology applications and integrates relevant ontologies through the modular processing. The paper research is supported by technological research for heterogeneous system integration and application of business-oriented collaboration based on ontology of the National High-Tech. R&D Program for CIMS of China (No. 2006AA04Z157), research of co-management model and its software enabling inter-enterprise resource co-management model patents and software enabling technology for inter-enterprise patent resources of the National High-Tech. R&D Program for CIMS of China (No.: 2007AA04Z101) and development and application of digital comprehensive integration technology for appliances industry (enterprise) of the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (No.2006BAF01A02).
This paper begins with the basic theory, methods and techniques of module ontology, faces heterogeneous, low query efficiency and other issues in the process of the knowledge management for eletromachanical manufacturing enterprises, and combines the idea of module ontology theory, a construction method of knowledge module ontologies for electromachanical product is given. Construction, heterogeneous phenomena, mapping, integration, query and retrieval of knowledge module ontology of eletromachancal product are mainly researched. And the research is specifically used in information projects of an appliance group company. The dissertation is divided into the chapters as follows:
The first chapter is devoted to research background and significance of the thesis, the relationship between standards and ontology, the relationship between semantic web and ontology, and review of product ontology. The requirement of module ontology in management of product knowledge is analyzed. The question raised in the dissertation will be resolved and its significance, main research content and overall framework and structure of the paper are given.
The second chapter focuses on the construction method for knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. The definition and meaning of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product are presented. Construction principle of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product is given. Module partition of product knowledge, language selection of ontology construction and building process about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product are discussed. An example is used to specify the construction process.
The third chapter conducts a specific analysis of the heterogeneous and mapping problems of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. A basic model of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product mapping process is proposed. A structure- semantics- characteristics ontology mapping algorithm of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product to solve the heterogeneous problems is presented.
In the fourth chapter, based on the existing ontology integration methods, an integration method of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product on the basis of structure- semantics- characteristics integration is presented. Product knowledge is integrated by the method from the structure, semantic and characteristics levels. Consistency and satisfiability of integration process is tested to validate the feasibility of integration method.
The fifth chapter is dedicated to the research of the query and retrieval of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product. A query and retrieval framework of knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product driven by user requirement is presented. A process that changes outside user needs of enterprises into modular ontology of inside user knowledge needs of enterprises is given. The query about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product is described through the structured method. A transforming method from the data mode about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product to XML data mode is given.
In the sixth chapter, according to the construction, mapping, query and integration research about knowledge module ontology of eletromachanical product, storage-type electric water heater products of an appliance group company are used as an example to verify the significance of the research.
The last chapter serves as conclusion and outlook. The achievements of the paper are summarized, and the innovations are given. The future research works are put forward to outlook.
引文
[Anutariya, 2007] C Anutariya, R Ungrangsi, V Wuwongse. PSKQORE: A Framework for Semantic Query Based Ontology Retrieval/ Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
[Arpirez, 1998] JC Arpirez, AG Perez. (onto)~2 agent: An ontology-based www broker to select ontologies [C]// Proceedings of Workshop on Applications Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, United Kingdom: Brighton, 1998: 16-24.
[Bailey, 2005] J Bailey, F Bry, T Furche, et al. Web and Semantic Web Query Languages: A Survey /Reasoning Web [M], Springer Berlin/ Heidelberg, 2005, 3564: 33-133.
[Bao, 2004A] J Bao and V Honavar. Ontology Language Extensions to Support Localized Semantics, Modular Reasoning, and Collaborative Ontology Design and Ontology Reuse [R]. USA, Iowa State University, 2004.
[Bao, 2004B] J Bao and V Honavar. Ontology Language Extensions to Support Collaborative Ontology Building [C]//Proceedings of the 3nd International Semantic Web Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 7-11.
[Bao, 2006A] J Bao, V Honavar. Divide and Conquer Semantic Web with Modular Ontologies - A Brief Review of Modular Ontology Language Formalisms [C]// Proceedings of the ISWC 2006 Workshop on Modular Ontologies, Georgia: Athens, 2006.
[Bao, 2006B] J Bao, D Caragea, VG Honavar. Modular Ontologies - A Formal Investigation of Semantics and Expressivity [M]. The Semantic Web ASWC 2006 , Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006,616-631.
[Bao, 2006C] J Bao, V Honavar. Representing and Reasoning with Modular Ontologies [C]// AAAI 2006 Fall Symposium on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition, Arlington: Hyatt Crystal, 2006.
[Becket, 2000] D Beckett, B McBride. RDF/ XML Syntax Specification( Revised). World Wide Web Consortium. http:// www. w3. org/tr/ rdf2syntax2grammar/.
[Berners-Lee, 1998] T Berners-Lee. Semantic Web road map. http :// www. w3. org/ Design Issues/ Semantic. html, 1998.
[Berners-Lee, 2001] T Berners-Lee , J Hendler , O Lassila. The semantic Web [J]. Scientific American , 2001 ,284 (5): 34-43.
[Bernstein, 2005] A Bernstein, E Kaufmann, A Gohring, et al. Querying Ontologies: A Controlled English Interface for End-Users/The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005 [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2005,3729:112-126.
[Borgida, 2002] A Borgida, L Serafini. Distributed description logics: Directed domain correspo ndences in federated information sources[G]. In: R M eersman, Z Tari, eds, On the Move to Meaningful Intern et Systems, LNCS 2519, Berlin: Springer, 2002, 36-53.
[Borgida, 2003] A Borgida, L Serafini. Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources [J]. Journal of Data Semantics, 2003, 1(1): 153-184.
[Borgo, 1997] S Borgo, N Guarino, C Masolo, et al. Using a Large Linguistic Ontology for Internet-Based Retrieval of Object-Oriented Components [C]// In Proceedingsof 1997 Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Knowledge Systems Institute, IL: Snokie, 1997.
[Borst, 1997] WN Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse [D]. Enschede: University of Twente, 1997.
[Brickley, 2000] D Brickley , RV Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 110: RDF Schemal World Wide Web Consortium. http:// www.w3. org/ tr/rdf2schema/.
[Bui, 2007] NP Bui, S Lee, T Chung. Query Distributed Ontology over Grid Environment/Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA [M], Berlin: Springer 2007,4707: 140-153.
[Burdick, 1995] D Burdick. Product Data Management: Enabling Enterprisewide Design Collaboration, CIM Strategic Analysis Report [R], Gratner Group, 1995.
[Choi, 2006] N Choi, IY Song, H Han. A Survey on Ontology Mapping [J]. SIGMOD Record, 35(3): 34-41.
[COHEN, 2003] WW COHEN, P RAVIKUMAR, SE FIENBERG. A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Mactching Tasks [C]// Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco: IJCAI, 2003: 73-78.
[Cost, 2002] RS Cost, T Finin, A Joshi, et al. ITTALKS: A case study in DAML and the semantic Web [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,2002, 17 (1): 40-47.
[Courses, 2007] E Courses, T Surveys. Ontology-Based Integration of Data Sources [C]// International Conference of Information Fusion. Canada: ICIF, 2007: 1-8.
[Daltio, 2008] J Daltio, CB Medeiros. Aonde : An ontology Web service for interoperability across biodiversity applications [J]. Information Systems, 2008, 33(7-8): 724-753.
[Diggelen, 2009] J Diggelen, RJ Beun, RM Eijk. Efficient semantic information exchange for ambient intelligence [J]. The computer journal, 2009,4: 1-14.
[Doran, 2006] P Doran. Ontology reuse via ontology modularization[C] // Proceedings of KnowledgeWeb PhD Symposium 2006, Montenegro: Budva, 2006.
[Dou, 2006] D Dou, P LePendu. S Kim, et al. Integrating databases into the semantic Web through an ontology-based framework [C]// In: Proe of the 3rd Int'l Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Pres, 2006.
[Ehrig, 2004] M Ehrig, S Staab. QOM-Quick Ontology Mapping/ The Semantic Web-ISWC 2004 [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 3298.
[Fadhil, 2007] A Fadhil, V Haarslev. OntoVQL: A Graphical Query Language for OWL Ontologies [C]// 20th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-2007), Italy: Brixen-Bressanone., 2007.
[Farinas, 1994] L Farinas, A Herzig. Interference logic = conditional logic +frame axiom [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1994, 9 (1): 119-130.
[Farquhar, 1997] A Farquhar, R Fikes, J Rice. The Ontolingua Server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction [J]. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies, 1997, 46(6): 707-727.
[Fensel, 2000] D Fensel, et al. OIL in a nutshell [C]//The 12th International. Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Juan-les-Pins , France, 2000.
[Fensel, 2001] D Fensel, D Ying, S Ellen, et al. Product Data Integration in B2B E-commerce [J]. Intelligent Systems, 2001, 16(4): 1-18.
[Gime'nez, 2008] DM Gime'nez, M Vegetti, HP Leone, et al. PRoduct ONTOlogy: Defining product-related concepts for logistics planning activities [J]. Computers in Industry, 2008,59:231-241.
[Giunchiglia, 1993] F Giunchiglia. Contextual Reasoning [C]/ Proceedings IJCAI'93 Workshop on Using Knowledge in its Context, France: Chambery, 1993: 39-49.
[Glimm, 2004] B Glimm, I Horrocks. Query Answering Systems in the Semantic Web [C]// Proceedings of the KI-04 Workshop on Applications of Description Logics. Manitoba: Winnipeg, 2004.
[Grau, 2005] BC Grau, B Parsia, E Sirin, et al. Modularizing OWL Ontologies [C]// Proceeding of K-CAP 2005 Workshop on Ontology Management, Canada: Banff, 2005.
[Grau, 2007A] BC Grau, O Kutz. Modular Ontology Languages Revisited [C]// IJCAI Workshop on Semantic Web for collaborative knowledge Acquisition, India: Hyderabad,2007.
[Grau, 2007B] BC Grau, Y Kazakov, I Horrocks, et al. A Logical Framework for Modular Integration of Ontologies [C]// The twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, India: Hyderabad,2007.
[Gruber, 1993] TR Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications [J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5: 199-220.
[Gruber, 1995] TR Gruber. Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing [J]. Journal of human computer Studies, 1995,43: 907-928.
[Guarino, 1994] N Guarino. The Ontological Level[M]. In R. Casati, B. Smith and G. White (eds.),Philosophy and the Cognitive Science. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, 443-456.
[Guarino, 1997] N Guarino. Semantic Matching : Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction, and Integration// Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology [M], Springer Verlag, 1997, 1299:139-170.
[Guo, 2003] M Guo, S Li, J Dong, et al. Ontology-based Product Data Integration [C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, IEEE, 2003.
[Harmelen, 2000] F Harmelen, J Hendler, I Horrocks, et al. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www. w3. org/tr/ owl/ref.
[Heflin, 2000] J Heflin, J Hendler. Searching the web with SHOE [M]. Artificial Intelligence for Web Search. Menlo Park, CA : AAAI Press, 2000: 35-40.
[Hollingsworth, 2004] D Hollingsworth. The Workflow Reference Model-10 Years On/ Workflow Handbook [R], 2004, 295-312.
[Horrocks, 1998] I Horrocks. The FaCT system[C]// Proceedings of TABLEAUX-98. Oisterwijk, Netherlands, 1998, 307-312.
[Horrocks, 2002] I Horrocks, PF Patel-Schneider, F Harmelen. Reviewing the design of DAML + OIL: An ontology language for the semantic Web [C]// Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI220021 Edmonton , Alberta , Canada : AAAI Press, 2002.
[Horrocks, 2003] I Horrocks. The FaCT system [OL]. http://www cs man.ac uk/ - horrocks/FaCT/, 2003.
[Jean, 2006] S Jean, Y Ait-Ameur, G Pierra. Querying Ontology Based Database Using OntoQL (An Ontology Query Language)/ On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2006,4275: 704-721.
[KALFOGLOU, 2003] Y KALFOGLOU, M SCHORLEMMER. Ontology mapping: the state of the art[J]. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2003, 18(1):1-31.
[Karp, 1999] PD Karp, VK Chaudhri , J Thomere. XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language. AI Center, SRI International, TechRep : 559, 1999.
[Kim, 2006] K Kim, M Tark, H Lee, et al. PROMOD: A Modeling Tool for Product Ontology [M]. Data Engineering Issues in Commerce and Services, Berlin: Springer, 2006, 4055: 278-287.
[Laamari, 2007] N Laamari, BB Yaghlane. Uncertainty in Semantic Ontology Mapping: An Evidential Approach[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin, 2007: 418-429.
[Lee, 2005] I Lee, S Lee, T Lee, et al. Practical Issues for Building a Product Ontology System [C]// Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce, IEEE, 2005.
[Lee, 2006] T Lee, I Lee, S Lee, et al. Building an operational product ontology system [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2006, 5: 16-28.
[Lee, 2007] JY Lee, K Kim. A distributed product development architecture for engineering collaborations across ubiquitous virtual enterprises [J]. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 33: 59-70.
[Lee,2008A]MC Lee,KH Tsai,TI Wang.A practical ontology query expansion algorithm for semantic-aware learning objects retrieval[J].Computers & Education,2008,50(4):1240-1257.
[Lee,2008B]H Lee,J Shim.Electric Commerce/Product Ontology and OWL Correspondence [M].Berlin:Springer,2008,110:1-14.
[Lee,2009]J Lee,H Chae,CH Kim,et al.Design of product ontology architecture for collaborative enterprises[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,63(2):2300-2309.
[Lin,2008]F Lin,K Sandkuhl.User-Based Constraint Strategy in Ontology Matching/Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing[M].Berlin:Springer,2008:5061:687-696.
[MacGregor,1991]RM MacGregor.Inside the LOOM description classifier[J].ACM SIGART Bulletin,1991,2(3):88-92.
[McDermott,2002]D McDermott,D Dou.Representing disjunction and quantifiersin RDF[C]//In:Proc of the lst Int'l Semantic Web Conference.Berlin:Springer,2002:250-263.
[Meersman,2007]D.Meersman.ON the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007:OTM 2007Workshops/ Market Driven Product Ontologies[M].Berlin:Springer,2007,4805:275-283.
[MILLER,1995]GA MILLER.WordNet:a lexical database for English[J].Communications of the ACM,1995,38(11):39-41.
[Ming,2003]G Ming,L Shanping,D Jinxiang,et al.Ontology-based Product Data Integration [C]// Proceedings of thel7th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications,USA:IEEE,2003:530-533.
[Motta,1998]E Motta.An overview of the OCML modelling language[C]//The 8th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering:Methods & Languages(KEML98),Karlsruhe,Germany,1998.
[Neches,1991]R Neches,RE Fikes,TR Gruber,et al.Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing[J].AIMagazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
[Noy,2001]NF Noy,DL McGuinness.Ontology Development 101:A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology[R].USA,Stanford University:Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880,2001.
[NOY, 2004] NF NOY. Semantic integration: A survey of ontology base approaches [J]. SIGMOD Record, 2004, 33 (4) : 65-70.
[Opdahl, 2001] AL Opdahl, B Henderson-Sellers. Grounding the OML metamodel in ontology [J]. The Journal of Systems & Software, 2001, 57(2): 119-143.
[Perez, 1999] AG Perez, VR Benjamins. Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods [C]// Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (IJCAI99). KRR5: deAgosto, 1999: 1-15.
[Poole, 1988] D. Poole. A logical framework for default reasoning [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1988, 36(1): 27-47.
[Rahm, 2001] E Rahm, PA Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching [J]. The VLDB Journal, 2001, 10(4): 334-350.
[Ram, 2004] S Ram, J Park. Semantic conflict resolution ontology(SCROL): an ontology for detecting and resolving data and schema-level semantic conflicts [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions, 2004, 16(2): 189-202.
[Rector, 2003] A Rector. Modularisation of Domain Ontologies Implemented in Description Logic and Related Formalisms including OWL [C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture. Sanibel Island: ACM Press, 2003: 121-128.
[Reddy, 1994] MP Reddy, BE Prasad, PG Reddy, et al. A methodology for integration of heterogeneous databases [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1994, 6(6): 920-933.
[RUCKHAUS, 2008] E RUCKHAUS, E RUIZ, ME VIDAL. Query evaluation and optimization in the semantic web [J]. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2008, 8(3): 393-409.
[Serafini, 2005] L Serafini, A Borgida, A Tamilin. Aspects of Distributed and Modular Ontology Reasoning [C]// International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Scotland: Edinburgh, 2005.
[STEP part 11, 1992] ISO 10303-11, Industry Automation System and Integration - Production Data Representation and Exchange - Part 11, Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual [S], 1992.
[Stevens, 2000] R Stevens, P Baker, S Bechhofer, et al. TAMBIS: Transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources [J]. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16 (2): 184-185.
[Stoutenburg, 2008] SK Stoutenburg. Acquiring advanced properties in ontology mapping [C]// Proceeding of the 2nd PhD workshop on Information and knowledge management, California: Napa Valley, 2008: 9-16.
[Stuckenschmidt, 2003] H Stuckenschmidt, M Klein. Integrity and Change in Modular Ontologies [C]// Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI: Compiegne Cedex, 2003: 900-905.
[Stuckenschmidt, 2007] H Stuckenschmidt, M Klein. Reasoning and change management in modular ontologies [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2007, 23(2): 200-223.
[Studer, 1998] R Studer, VR Benjamins, D Fensel. Knowledge Engineering, Principles and Methods [J]. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1998,25(12): 161 -197.
[SU, 2006] XM SU, AG JON. An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2006, 58 (1): 47-69.
[TANG, 2006] J TANG, JZ LI, BY LIANG, et al. Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping [J]. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2006,4 (4): 243-262.
[Thatcher, 1968] JW Thatcher, JB Wright. Generalized finite automata theory with an application to a decision problem of second-order logic [J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 1968, 2(1): 57-81.
[Tseng, 1998] FSC Tseng, JJ Chiang, WP Yang. Integration of relations with conflicting schema structures in heterogeneous database systems [J]. Data& Knowledge Engineering, 1998, 27(2): 231-248.
[Ungrangsi, 2007] R Ungrangsi, C Anutariya, V Wuwongse. PSKQORE-Based Ontology Retrieval System/ Database and Expert Systems Applications [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
[Uschold, 1996] M Uschold, M Gruninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods, and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1996, 11(2): 93-155.
[Vinoski, 1997] S Vinoski. CORBA: integrating diverse applications within distributed heterogeneous environments [J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 1997, 35(2): 46-55.
[Viegas,2006]R Viegas,V Soares.Querying a Geographic Database using an Ontology-Based Methodology/Advances in Geoinformatics[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2006,165-182.
[Wache,2001]H Wache,T V(o|¨)gele,U Visser,et al.Ontology-Based Integration of Information-A Survey of Existing Approaches[C]// International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Seattle,Washington,USA:[s.n.],2001:108-117.
[Wessel,2005]M Wessel,R Moller.A High Performance Semantic Web Query Answering Engine[C]//2005 International Workshop on Description Logics,Scotland:Edinburgh,2005.
[陈磊,2006]陈磊,韩颖,李三立.信息网格中基于本体的Web服务动态集成和重构[J].软件学报,2006,17(11):2255-2263.
[陈玉琨,1992]陈玉琨,王宣武,黄树新.实用成组技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1992.
[邓家禔,2002]邓家禔,韩晓建,曾硝等.产品概念设计[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
[邓志鸿,2002]邓志鸿,唐世渭,张铭等.Ontology研究综述[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(5):730-738.
[董金祥,1993]董金祥,杨小虎.产品数据表达与交换标准STEP及其应用[M].机械工业出版社,1993.
[董峥,2006]董峥,徐晓飞,战德臣.基于领域复合语义的产品结构非精确匹配模型与算法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(7):981-989.
[杜云艳,2005]杜云艳,周成虎,苏奋振等.海岸带及近海科学数据集成与共享研究[M].海洋出版社,2005.
[杜云艳,2008]杜云艳,张丹丹,苏奋振等.基于地理本体的海湾空间数据组织方法--以辽东湾为例[J].地球信息科学,2008,10(1):7-13.
[范莉娅,2008]范莉娅,肖田元.基于多层本体方法的信息集成研究[J].计算机工程,2008,34(2):187-192.
[冯兰萍,2007]冯兰萍,朱礼军,张继国.一种基于模块本体的知识组织方法研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2007,12:30-33.
[付相君,2005A]付相君.基于本体和SemanticWeb技术的产品知识集成基础研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[付相君,2005B]付相君,李善平,郭鸣.产品数据模型的本体知识表达[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2005,17(3):570-577.
[付相君,2006]付相君,李善平.严品的相似性推理:一种描述逻辑的方法[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2006,18(4):568-573.
[高鹏,2003]高鹏,林兰芬,蔡铭.基于本体映射的产品配置模型自动获取[J].计算机集成制造系统,2003,9(9):810-816.
[高鹏,2005]高鹏.网络化制造环境下基于语义的制造知识管理技术若干问题的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2005.
[高英,2007]高英,郭荷清,邹智敏.分布式环境下基于形式化领域本体的查询处理[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(1):112-117.
[顾新建,2007]顾新建,祁国宁,谭建荣.现代制造系统工程导论[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2007.
[郭健彬,2008]郭健彬,曾声奎,陈云霞.面向RMTSS综合设计的PDM系统集成技术[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2008,20(7):933-938.
[郭剑锋,2007]郭剑锋,顾新建,祁国宁等.产品模块化库中基于本体的智能搜索引擎的研究与实现[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(4):639-645.
[郭鸣,2004]郭鸣,李善平,董金祥等.基于本体论及语义Web的产品信息模型研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(1):22-28.
[韩亚洪,2005]韩亚洪,刘永革.本体的查询与推理机制研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,9:82-85.
[郝永平,2005]郝永平,谢来勇,邵伟平等.基于XML的产品信息模型网络转换技术研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,35:82-100.
[黄善琦,2006]黄善琦,夏榆滨.基于领域元模型的PLM-ERP数据集成研究[J].工业控制计算机,2006,19(5):64-66.
[蒋运承,2006]蒋运承,史忠植,汤庸等.一种分布式动态描述逻辑[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(9):1603-1608.
[李善平,2004]李善平,尹奇,胡玉杰等.本体论研究综述[J].计算机研究与发展,2004,41(7):1041-1052.
[李善平,2002]李善平,刘乃若,郭鸣.产品数据标准与PDM[M].清华大学出版社,2002.
[李志平,2004]李志平,孙瑜.基于本体的查询系统研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,34:186-188.
[林松涛,2006]林松涛.模块本体建设研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学博士学位论文,2006.
[马辉,2006]马辉.产品设计知识建模与演化关键技术研究[M].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
[马军,2007A]马军,祁国宁,顾新建等.基于PLIB本体的产品资源公共模型研究与实现[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(4):631-637.
[马军,2007B]马军,祁国宁,顾新建.基于网络化零件库资源集成框架及其关键技术[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(8)91-96.
[马军,2008]马军.零件资源分类建模与共享技术及其在零件库中的应用研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[梅翔,2006]梅翔,孟祥武,陈俊亮等.一种基于语义关联的查询优化方法[J].北京邮电大学学报,2006,29(6):107-110.
[倪益华,2004]倪益华,顾新建,吴昭同.知识集成的本体理论和框架研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(21):1954-1958.
[倪益华,2005]倪益华.基于本体的制造企业知识集成技术研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文.2005.
[瞿裕忠,2008]瞿裕忠,胡伟,郑东栋等.关系数据库模式和本体间映射的研究综述[J].计算机研究与发展,2008,45(2):300-309.
[申德荣,2004]申德荣,于戈,张蓉.Web服务合成中的异构问题[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(3):220-222.
[史忠植,2004A]史忠植,蒋运承,张海俊等.基于描述逻辑的主体服务匹配[J].计算机学报,2004,27(5):625-635.
[史忠植,2004B]史忠植,董明楷,蒋运承等.语义Web的逻辑基础[J].中国科学(E辑),2004,34(10):1123-1138.
[孙丽,2004]孙丽.工艺知识管理及其若干关键技术研究[M].大连:大连交通大学博士学位论文,2004.
[唐杰,2006]唐杰,梁邦勇,李涓子等.语义Web中的本体自动映射到[J].计算机学报,2006,29(11):1956-1976.
[童秉枢,2000]童秉枢,李建明.产品数据管理(PDM)技术[M].清华大学出版社/施普林格出版社,2000.
[童时中,2000]童时中.模块化原理设计方法及应用[D].北京:中国标准出版社,2000.
[王宗杰,2007]王宗杰,侯贵法,王成耀等.基于元数据的分布异构数据集成研究[J].微计 算机信息,2007,23(9-3):211-213.
[汪智勇,2007]汪智勇.本体查询气推理研究及其实现[D].长沙:中南大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[王有远,2006]王有远,谢强,王云等.基于本体的概念设计产品信息建模[J].2006,39(1):126-130.
[王真星,2007]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青等.本体集成的研究[J].计算机工程,2007,33(2):4-6.
[温有奎,2003]温有奎,徐国华.知识元链接理论[J].情报学报,2003,22(6):665-670.
[吴健,2005]吴健,陈珂,董金祥.基于语义网的产品配置知识表达及检索[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2005,17(1):129-136.
[杨春立,2004]杨春立.产品知识管理系统研究[M].大连:大连理工大学博士学位论文,2004.
[杨林,2005]杨林,张田文.复杂产品虚拟样机异构的结构信息集成研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(12):1678-1691.
[杨志雄,2004]杨志雄.面向大批量定制的Web零件库的若干关键技术和系统研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2004.
[杨志雄,2005]杨志雄,祁国宁,顾新建.面向大规模定制的Web零件库的研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(4):541-547.
[杨先娣,2008]杨先娣,彭智勇,吴黎兵等.基于树结构的多策略本体映射算法[J]武汉大学学报(理学版),2007,23(3):338-342.
[叶作亮,2006]叶作亮.基于制造网格的制造资源管理若干关键技术研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006.
[尹建伟,2006]尹建伟,潘苹萍,董金祥等.基于本体的PDM产品编码管理中间件研究与实现[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(11):1821-1826.
[应杭,2004]应杭,李善平,郭鸣等.本体在产品知识S-B-F表达模型中的应用研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2004,10(专刊):30-38.
[闫健卓,2008]闫健卓,方丽英,史斌等.异构数据库信息集成冲突检测和消解策略[J].北京工业大学学报,2008,34(1):37-42.
[袁家政,2006]袁家政,须德,鲍泓.基于结构与文本关键词相关度的XML网页分类研究[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(8):1361-1367.
[张和明,2001]张和明,熊光楞.产品需求获取及结构化建模方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2001,7(10):18-21.
[张和明,2006]张和明,熊光楞.制造企业的产品生命周期管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
[张太华,2007]张太华,顾新建.基于FCM算法的零件簇编码分析[J].中国机械工程,2007,18(21):2585-2587.
[张太华,2009]张太华,顾新建,叶作亮等.制造网格资源知识和信息获取的系统框架[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2009,43(1):77-82.
[张维明,2006]张维明,宋峻峰.面向语义Web的领域本体表示、推理与集成研究[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(1):101-108.
[张维一,2007]张维一,陆汝占.本体模块化的研究与实现[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(11):206-209.
[赵燕伟,2004]赵燕伟,胡坚,张国贤.基于OWL本体建模的概念产品配置[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(19):1725-1728.
[朱文博,2006]朱文博,李爱平,刘雪梅.基于本体的冲压工艺知识表示方法研究[J].中国机械工程,2006,17(6):616-620.
[Arpirez, 1998] JC Arpirez, AG Perez. (onto)~2 agent: An ontology-based www broker to select ontologies [C]// Proceedings of Workshop on Applications Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, United Kingdom: Brighton, 1998: 16-24.
[Bailey, 2005] J Bailey, F Bry, T Furche, et al. Web and Semantic Web Query Languages: A Survey /Reasoning Web [M], Springer Berlin/ Heidelberg, 2005, 3564: 33-133.
[Bao, 2004A] J Bao and V Honavar. Ontology Language Extensions to Support Localized Semantics, Modular Reasoning, and Collaborative Ontology Design and Ontology Reuse [R]. USA, Iowa State University, 2004.
[Bao, 2004B] J Bao and V Honavar. Ontology Language Extensions to Support Collaborative Ontology Building [C]//Proceedings of the 3nd International Semantic Web Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 7-11.
[Bao, 2006A] J Bao, V Honavar. Divide and Conquer Semantic Web with Modular Ontologies - A Brief Review of Modular Ontology Language Formalisms [C]// Proceedings of the ISWC 2006 Workshop on Modular Ontologies, Georgia: Athens, 2006.
[Bao, 2006B] J Bao, D Caragea, VG Honavar. Modular Ontologies - A Formal Investigation of Semantics and Expressivity [M]. The Semantic Web ASWC 2006 , Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006,616-631.
[Bao, 2006C] J Bao, V Honavar. Representing and Reasoning with Modular Ontologies [C]// AAAI 2006 Fall Symposium on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition, Arlington: Hyatt Crystal, 2006.
[Becket, 2000] D Beckett, B McBride. RDF/ XML Syntax Specification( Revised). World Wide Web Consortium. http:// www. w3. org/tr/ rdf2syntax2grammar/.
[Berners-Lee, 1998] T Berners-Lee. Semantic Web road map. http :// www. w3. org/ Design Issues/ Semantic. html, 1998.
[Berners-Lee, 2001] T Berners-Lee , J Hendler , O Lassila. The semantic Web [J]. Scientific American , 2001 ,284 (5): 34-43.
[Bernstein, 2005] A Bernstein, E Kaufmann, A Gohring, et al. Querying Ontologies: A Controlled English Interface for End-Users/The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005 [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2005,3729:112-126.
[Borgida, 2002] A Borgida, L Serafini. Distributed description logics: Directed domain correspo ndences in federated information sources[G]. In: R M eersman, Z Tari, eds, On the Move to Meaningful Intern et Systems, LNCS 2519, Berlin: Springer, 2002, 36-53.
[Borgida, 2003] A Borgida, L Serafini. Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources [J]. Journal of Data Semantics, 2003, 1(1): 153-184.
[Borgo, 1997] S Borgo, N Guarino, C Masolo, et al. Using a Large Linguistic Ontology for Internet-Based Retrieval of Object-Oriented Components [C]// In Proceedingsof 1997 Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Knowledge Systems Institute, IL: Snokie, 1997.
[Borst, 1997] WN Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse [D]. Enschede: University of Twente, 1997.
[Brickley, 2000] D Brickley , RV Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 110: RDF Schemal World Wide Web Consortium. http:// www.w3. org/ tr/rdf2schema/.
[Bui, 2007] NP Bui, S Lee, T Chung. Query Distributed Ontology over Grid Environment/Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA [M], Berlin: Springer 2007,4707: 140-153.
[Burdick, 1995] D Burdick. Product Data Management: Enabling Enterprisewide Design Collaboration, CIM Strategic Analysis Report [R], Gratner Group, 1995.
[Choi, 2006] N Choi, IY Song, H Han. A Survey on Ontology Mapping [J]. SIGMOD Record, 35(3): 34-41.
[COHEN, 2003] WW COHEN, P RAVIKUMAR, SE FIENBERG. A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Mactching Tasks [C]// Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco: IJCAI, 2003: 73-78.
[Cost, 2002] RS Cost, T Finin, A Joshi, et al. ITTALKS: A case study in DAML and the semantic Web [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,2002, 17 (1): 40-47.
[Courses, 2007] E Courses, T Surveys. Ontology-Based Integration of Data Sources [C]// International Conference of Information Fusion. Canada: ICIF, 2007: 1-8.
[Daltio, 2008] J Daltio, CB Medeiros. Aonde : An ontology Web service for interoperability across biodiversity applications [J]. Information Systems, 2008, 33(7-8): 724-753.
[Diggelen, 2009] J Diggelen, RJ Beun, RM Eijk. Efficient semantic information exchange for ambient intelligence [J]. The computer journal, 2009,4: 1-14.
[Doran, 2006] P Doran. Ontology reuse via ontology modularization[C] // Proceedings of KnowledgeWeb PhD Symposium 2006, Montenegro: Budva, 2006.
[Dou, 2006] D Dou, P LePendu. S Kim, et al. Integrating databases into the semantic Web through an ontology-based framework [C]// In: Proe of the 3rd Int'l Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Pres, 2006.
[Ehrig, 2004] M Ehrig, S Staab. QOM-Quick Ontology Mapping/ The Semantic Web-ISWC 2004 [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 3298.
[Fadhil, 2007] A Fadhil, V Haarslev. OntoVQL: A Graphical Query Language for OWL Ontologies [C]// 20th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-2007), Italy: Brixen-Bressanone., 2007.
[Farinas, 1994] L Farinas, A Herzig. Interference logic = conditional logic +frame axiom [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1994, 9 (1): 119-130.
[Farquhar, 1997] A Farquhar, R Fikes, J Rice. The Ontolingua Server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction [J]. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies, 1997, 46(6): 707-727.
[Fensel, 2000] D Fensel, et al. OIL in a nutshell [C]//The 12th International. Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Juan-les-Pins , France, 2000.
[Fensel, 2001] D Fensel, D Ying, S Ellen, et al. Product Data Integration in B2B E-commerce [J]. Intelligent Systems, 2001, 16(4): 1-18.
[Gime'nez, 2008] DM Gime'nez, M Vegetti, HP Leone, et al. PRoduct ONTOlogy: Defining product-related concepts for logistics planning activities [J]. Computers in Industry, 2008,59:231-241.
[Giunchiglia, 1993] F Giunchiglia. Contextual Reasoning [C]/ Proceedings IJCAI'93 Workshop on Using Knowledge in its Context, France: Chambery, 1993: 39-49.
[Glimm, 2004] B Glimm, I Horrocks. Query Answering Systems in the Semantic Web [C]// Proceedings of the KI-04 Workshop on Applications of Description Logics. Manitoba: Winnipeg, 2004.
[Grau, 2005] BC Grau, B Parsia, E Sirin, et al. Modularizing OWL Ontologies [C]// Proceeding of K-CAP 2005 Workshop on Ontology Management, Canada: Banff, 2005.
[Grau, 2007A] BC Grau, O Kutz. Modular Ontology Languages Revisited [C]// IJCAI Workshop on Semantic Web for collaborative knowledge Acquisition, India: Hyderabad,2007.
[Grau, 2007B] BC Grau, Y Kazakov, I Horrocks, et al. A Logical Framework for Modular Integration of Ontologies [C]// The twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, India: Hyderabad,2007.
[Gruber, 1993] TR Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications [J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5: 199-220.
[Gruber, 1995] TR Gruber. Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing [J]. Journal of human computer Studies, 1995,43: 907-928.
[Guarino, 1994] N Guarino. The Ontological Level[M]. In R. Casati, B. Smith and G. White (eds.),Philosophy and the Cognitive Science. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, 443-456.
[Guarino, 1997] N Guarino. Semantic Matching : Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction, and Integration// Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology [M], Springer Verlag, 1997, 1299:139-170.
[Guo, 2003] M Guo, S Li, J Dong, et al. Ontology-based Product Data Integration [C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, IEEE, 2003.
[Harmelen, 2000] F Harmelen, J Hendler, I Horrocks, et al. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www. w3. org/tr/ owl/ref.
[Heflin, 2000] J Heflin, J Hendler. Searching the web with SHOE [M]. Artificial Intelligence for Web Search. Menlo Park, CA : AAAI Press, 2000: 35-40.
[Hollingsworth, 2004] D Hollingsworth. The Workflow Reference Model-10 Years On/ Workflow Handbook [R], 2004, 295-312.
[Horrocks, 1998] I Horrocks. The FaCT system[C]// Proceedings of TABLEAUX-98. Oisterwijk, Netherlands, 1998, 307-312.
[Horrocks, 2002] I Horrocks, PF Patel-Schneider, F Harmelen. Reviewing the design of DAML + OIL: An ontology language for the semantic Web [C]// Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI220021 Edmonton , Alberta , Canada : AAAI Press, 2002.
[Horrocks, 2003] I Horrocks. The FaCT system [OL]. http://www cs man.ac uk/ - horrocks/FaCT/, 2003.
[Jean, 2006] S Jean, Y Ait-Ameur, G Pierra. Querying Ontology Based Database Using OntoQL (An Ontology Query Language)/ On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2006,4275: 704-721.
[KALFOGLOU, 2003] Y KALFOGLOU, M SCHORLEMMER. Ontology mapping: the state of the art[J]. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2003, 18(1):1-31.
[Karp, 1999] PD Karp, VK Chaudhri , J Thomere. XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language. AI Center, SRI International, TechRep : 559, 1999.
[Kim, 2006] K Kim, M Tark, H Lee, et al. PROMOD: A Modeling Tool for Product Ontology [M]. Data Engineering Issues in Commerce and Services, Berlin: Springer, 2006, 4055: 278-287.
[Laamari, 2007] N Laamari, BB Yaghlane. Uncertainty in Semantic Ontology Mapping: An Evidential Approach[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin, 2007: 418-429.
[Lee, 2005] I Lee, S Lee, T Lee, et al. Practical Issues for Building a Product Ontology System [C]// Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce, IEEE, 2005.
[Lee, 2006] T Lee, I Lee, S Lee, et al. Building an operational product ontology system [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2006, 5: 16-28.
[Lee, 2007] JY Lee, K Kim. A distributed product development architecture for engineering collaborations across ubiquitous virtual enterprises [J]. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 33: 59-70.
[Lee,2008A]MC Lee,KH Tsai,TI Wang.A practical ontology query expansion algorithm for semantic-aware learning objects retrieval[J].Computers & Education,2008,50(4):1240-1257.
[Lee,2008B]H Lee,J Shim.Electric Commerce/Product Ontology and OWL Correspondence [M].Berlin:Springer,2008,110:1-14.
[Lee,2009]J Lee,H Chae,CH Kim,et al.Design of product ontology architecture for collaborative enterprises[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,63(2):2300-2309.
[Lin,2008]F Lin,K Sandkuhl.User-Based Constraint Strategy in Ontology Matching/Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing[M].Berlin:Springer,2008:5061:687-696.
[MacGregor,1991]RM MacGregor.Inside the LOOM description classifier[J].ACM SIGART Bulletin,1991,2(3):88-92.
[McDermott,2002]D McDermott,D Dou.Representing disjunction and quantifiersin RDF[C]//In:Proc of the lst Int'l Semantic Web Conference.Berlin:Springer,2002:250-263.
[Meersman,2007]D.Meersman.ON the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007:OTM 2007Workshops/ Market Driven Product Ontologies[M].Berlin:Springer,2007,4805:275-283.
[MILLER,1995]GA MILLER.WordNet:a lexical database for English[J].Communications of the ACM,1995,38(11):39-41.
[Ming,2003]G Ming,L Shanping,D Jinxiang,et al.Ontology-based Product Data Integration [C]// Proceedings of thel7th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications,USA:IEEE,2003:530-533.
[Motta,1998]E Motta.An overview of the OCML modelling language[C]//The 8th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering:Methods & Languages(KEML98),Karlsruhe,Germany,1998.
[Neches,1991]R Neches,RE Fikes,TR Gruber,et al.Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing[J].AIMagazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
[Noy,2001]NF Noy,DL McGuinness.Ontology Development 101:A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology[R].USA,Stanford University:Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880,2001.
[NOY, 2004] NF NOY. Semantic integration: A survey of ontology base approaches [J]. SIGMOD Record, 2004, 33 (4) : 65-70.
[Opdahl, 2001] AL Opdahl, B Henderson-Sellers. Grounding the OML metamodel in ontology [J]. The Journal of Systems & Software, 2001, 57(2): 119-143.
[Perez, 1999] AG Perez, VR Benjamins. Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods [C]// Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (IJCAI99). KRR5: deAgosto, 1999: 1-15.
[Poole, 1988] D. Poole. A logical framework for default reasoning [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1988, 36(1): 27-47.
[Rahm, 2001] E Rahm, PA Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching [J]. The VLDB Journal, 2001, 10(4): 334-350.
[Ram, 2004] S Ram, J Park. Semantic conflict resolution ontology(SCROL): an ontology for detecting and resolving data and schema-level semantic conflicts [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions, 2004, 16(2): 189-202.
[Rector, 2003] A Rector. Modularisation of Domain Ontologies Implemented in Description Logic and Related Formalisms including OWL [C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture. Sanibel Island: ACM Press, 2003: 121-128.
[Reddy, 1994] MP Reddy, BE Prasad, PG Reddy, et al. A methodology for integration of heterogeneous databases [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1994, 6(6): 920-933.
[RUCKHAUS, 2008] E RUCKHAUS, E RUIZ, ME VIDAL. Query evaluation and optimization in the semantic web [J]. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2008, 8(3): 393-409.
[Serafini, 2005] L Serafini, A Borgida, A Tamilin. Aspects of Distributed and Modular Ontology Reasoning [C]// International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Scotland: Edinburgh, 2005.
[STEP part 11, 1992] ISO 10303-11, Industry Automation System and Integration - Production Data Representation and Exchange - Part 11, Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual [S], 1992.
[Stevens, 2000] R Stevens, P Baker, S Bechhofer, et al. TAMBIS: Transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources [J]. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16 (2): 184-185.
[Stoutenburg, 2008] SK Stoutenburg. Acquiring advanced properties in ontology mapping [C]// Proceeding of the 2nd PhD workshop on Information and knowledge management, California: Napa Valley, 2008: 9-16.
[Stuckenschmidt, 2003] H Stuckenschmidt, M Klein. Integrity and Change in Modular Ontologies [C]// Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI: Compiegne Cedex, 2003: 900-905.
[Stuckenschmidt, 2007] H Stuckenschmidt, M Klein. Reasoning and change management in modular ontologies [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2007, 23(2): 200-223.
[Studer, 1998] R Studer, VR Benjamins, D Fensel. Knowledge Engineering, Principles and Methods [J]. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1998,25(12): 161 -197.
[SU, 2006] XM SU, AG JON. An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2006, 58 (1): 47-69.
[TANG, 2006] J TANG, JZ LI, BY LIANG, et al. Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping [J]. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2006,4 (4): 243-262.
[Thatcher, 1968] JW Thatcher, JB Wright. Generalized finite automata theory with an application to a decision problem of second-order logic [J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 1968, 2(1): 57-81.
[Tseng, 1998] FSC Tseng, JJ Chiang, WP Yang. Integration of relations with conflicting schema structures in heterogeneous database systems [J]. Data& Knowledge Engineering, 1998, 27(2): 231-248.
[Ungrangsi, 2007] R Ungrangsi, C Anutariya, V Wuwongse. PSKQORE-Based Ontology Retrieval System/ Database and Expert Systems Applications [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2007.
[Uschold, 1996] M Uschold, M Gruninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods, and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1996, 11(2): 93-155.
[Vinoski, 1997] S Vinoski. CORBA: integrating diverse applications within distributed heterogeneous environments [J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 1997, 35(2): 46-55.
[Viegas,2006]R Viegas,V Soares.Querying a Geographic Database using an Ontology-Based Methodology/Advances in Geoinformatics[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2006,165-182.
[Wache,2001]H Wache,T V(o|¨)gele,U Visser,et al.Ontology-Based Integration of Information-A Survey of Existing Approaches[C]// International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Seattle,Washington,USA:[s.n.],2001:108-117.
[Wessel,2005]M Wessel,R Moller.A High Performance Semantic Web Query Answering Engine[C]//2005 International Workshop on Description Logics,Scotland:Edinburgh,2005.
[陈磊,2006]陈磊,韩颖,李三立.信息网格中基于本体的Web服务动态集成和重构[J].软件学报,2006,17(11):2255-2263.
[陈玉琨,1992]陈玉琨,王宣武,黄树新.实用成组技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1992.
[邓家禔,2002]邓家禔,韩晓建,曾硝等.产品概念设计[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
[邓志鸿,2002]邓志鸿,唐世渭,张铭等.Ontology研究综述[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(5):730-738.
[董金祥,1993]董金祥,杨小虎.产品数据表达与交换标准STEP及其应用[M].机械工业出版社,1993.
[董峥,2006]董峥,徐晓飞,战德臣.基于领域复合语义的产品结构非精确匹配模型与算法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(7):981-989.
[杜云艳,2005]杜云艳,周成虎,苏奋振等.海岸带及近海科学数据集成与共享研究[M].海洋出版社,2005.
[杜云艳,2008]杜云艳,张丹丹,苏奋振等.基于地理本体的海湾空间数据组织方法--以辽东湾为例[J].地球信息科学,2008,10(1):7-13.
[范莉娅,2008]范莉娅,肖田元.基于多层本体方法的信息集成研究[J].计算机工程,2008,34(2):187-192.
[冯兰萍,2007]冯兰萍,朱礼军,张继国.一种基于模块本体的知识组织方法研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2007,12:30-33.
[付相君,2005A]付相君.基于本体和SemanticWeb技术的产品知识集成基础研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[付相君,2005B]付相君,李善平,郭鸣.产品数据模型的本体知识表达[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2005,17(3):570-577.
[付相君,2006]付相君,李善平.严品的相似性推理:一种描述逻辑的方法[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2006,18(4):568-573.
[高鹏,2003]高鹏,林兰芬,蔡铭.基于本体映射的产品配置模型自动获取[J].计算机集成制造系统,2003,9(9):810-816.
[高鹏,2005]高鹏.网络化制造环境下基于语义的制造知识管理技术若干问题的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2005.
[高英,2007]高英,郭荷清,邹智敏.分布式环境下基于形式化领域本体的查询处理[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(1):112-117.
[顾新建,2007]顾新建,祁国宁,谭建荣.现代制造系统工程导论[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2007.
[郭健彬,2008]郭健彬,曾声奎,陈云霞.面向RMTSS综合设计的PDM系统集成技术[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2008,20(7):933-938.
[郭剑锋,2007]郭剑锋,顾新建,祁国宁等.产品模块化库中基于本体的智能搜索引擎的研究与实现[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(4):639-645.
[郭鸣,2004]郭鸣,李善平,董金祥等.基于本体论及语义Web的产品信息模型研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(1):22-28.
[韩亚洪,2005]韩亚洪,刘永革.本体的查询与推理机制研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,9:82-85.
[郝永平,2005]郝永平,谢来勇,邵伟平等.基于XML的产品信息模型网络转换技术研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,35:82-100.
[黄善琦,2006]黄善琦,夏榆滨.基于领域元模型的PLM-ERP数据集成研究[J].工业控制计算机,2006,19(5):64-66.
[蒋运承,2006]蒋运承,史忠植,汤庸等.一种分布式动态描述逻辑[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(9):1603-1608.
[李善平,2004]李善平,尹奇,胡玉杰等.本体论研究综述[J].计算机研究与发展,2004,41(7):1041-1052.
[李善平,2002]李善平,刘乃若,郭鸣.产品数据标准与PDM[M].清华大学出版社,2002.
[李志平,2004]李志平,孙瑜.基于本体的查询系统研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,34:186-188.
[林松涛,2006]林松涛.模块本体建设研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学博士学位论文,2006.
[马辉,2006]马辉.产品设计知识建模与演化关键技术研究[M].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
[马军,2007A]马军,祁国宁,顾新建等.基于PLIB本体的产品资源公共模型研究与实现[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(4):631-637.
[马军,2007B]马军,祁国宁,顾新建.基于网络化零件库资源集成框架及其关键技术[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(8)91-96.
[马军,2008]马军.零件资源分类建模与共享技术及其在零件库中的应用研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[梅翔,2006]梅翔,孟祥武,陈俊亮等.一种基于语义关联的查询优化方法[J].北京邮电大学学报,2006,29(6):107-110.
[倪益华,2004]倪益华,顾新建,吴昭同.知识集成的本体理论和框架研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(21):1954-1958.
[倪益华,2005]倪益华.基于本体的制造企业知识集成技术研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文.2005.
[瞿裕忠,2008]瞿裕忠,胡伟,郑东栋等.关系数据库模式和本体间映射的研究综述[J].计算机研究与发展,2008,45(2):300-309.
[申德荣,2004]申德荣,于戈,张蓉.Web服务合成中的异构问题[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(3):220-222.
[史忠植,2004A]史忠植,蒋运承,张海俊等.基于描述逻辑的主体服务匹配[J].计算机学报,2004,27(5):625-635.
[史忠植,2004B]史忠植,董明楷,蒋运承等.语义Web的逻辑基础[J].中国科学(E辑),2004,34(10):1123-1138.
[孙丽,2004]孙丽.工艺知识管理及其若干关键技术研究[M].大连:大连交通大学博士学位论文,2004.
[唐杰,2006]唐杰,梁邦勇,李涓子等.语义Web中的本体自动映射到[J].计算机学报,2006,29(11):1956-1976.
[童秉枢,2000]童秉枢,李建明.产品数据管理(PDM)技术[M].清华大学出版社/施普林格出版社,2000.
[童时中,2000]童时中.模块化原理设计方法及应用[D].北京:中国标准出版社,2000.
[王宗杰,2007]王宗杰,侯贵法,王成耀等.基于元数据的分布异构数据集成研究[J].微计 算机信息,2007,23(9-3):211-213.
[汪智勇,2007]汪智勇.本体查询气推理研究及其实现[D].长沙:中南大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[王有远,2006]王有远,谢强,王云等.基于本体的概念设计产品信息建模[J].2006,39(1):126-130.
[王真星,2007]王真星,但唐仁,叶长青等.本体集成的研究[J].计算机工程,2007,33(2):4-6.
[温有奎,2003]温有奎,徐国华.知识元链接理论[J].情报学报,2003,22(6):665-670.
[吴健,2005]吴健,陈珂,董金祥.基于语义网的产品配置知识表达及检索[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2005,17(1):129-136.
[杨春立,2004]杨春立.产品知识管理系统研究[M].大连:大连理工大学博士学位论文,2004.
[杨林,2005]杨林,张田文.复杂产品虚拟样机异构的结构信息集成研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(12):1678-1691.
[杨志雄,2004]杨志雄.面向大批量定制的Web零件库的若干关键技术和系统研究[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2004.
[杨志雄,2005]杨志雄,祁国宁,顾新建.面向大规模定制的Web零件库的研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(4):541-547.
[杨先娣,2008]杨先娣,彭智勇,吴黎兵等.基于树结构的多策略本体映射算法[J]武汉大学学报(理学版),2007,23(3):338-342.
[叶作亮,2006]叶作亮.基于制造网格的制造资源管理若干关键技术研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006.
[尹建伟,2006]尹建伟,潘苹萍,董金祥等.基于本体的PDM产品编码管理中间件研究与实现[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(11):1821-1826.
[应杭,2004]应杭,李善平,郭鸣等.本体在产品知识S-B-F表达模型中的应用研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2004,10(专刊):30-38.
[闫健卓,2008]闫健卓,方丽英,史斌等.异构数据库信息集成冲突检测和消解策略[J].北京工业大学学报,2008,34(1):37-42.
[袁家政,2006]袁家政,须德,鲍泓.基于结构与文本关键词相关度的XML网页分类研究[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(8):1361-1367.
[张和明,2001]张和明,熊光楞.产品需求获取及结构化建模方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2001,7(10):18-21.
[张和明,2006]张和明,熊光楞.制造企业的产品生命周期管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
[张太华,2007]张太华,顾新建.基于FCM算法的零件簇编码分析[J].中国机械工程,2007,18(21):2585-2587.
[张太华,2009]张太华,顾新建,叶作亮等.制造网格资源知识和信息获取的系统框架[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2009,43(1):77-82.
[张维明,2006]张维明,宋峻峰.面向语义Web的领域本体表示、推理与集成研究[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(1):101-108.
[张维一,2007]张维一,陆汝占.本体模块化的研究与实现[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(11):206-209.
[赵燕伟,2004]赵燕伟,胡坚,张国贤.基于OWL本体建模的概念产品配置[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(19):1725-1728.
[朱文博,2006]朱文博,李爱平,刘雪梅.基于本体的冲压工艺知识表示方法研究[J].中国机械工程,2006,17(6):616-620.