结构洞分类理论及其在CoPS创新网络中的应用
|
摘要
复杂产品系统对技术深度和宽度的要求使得复杂产品系统的集成商必须寻求外部利益相关者力量来完成系统创新,复杂产品系统创新实际上就是在由外部利益相关者组成的创新网络中完成的。外部利益相关者网络结构是否合理对复杂产品系统创新的成功与否至关重要,如何构建合理有外部利益相关者网络结构成为复杂产品系统创新的一个关注点。
博特的结构洞理论是一个网络重构理论,它注重的是通过网络绒构的重构来改变关系方向和信息流向,从网络重构中取得对关系的控制。这个理论对复杂产品系统创新外部利益相关者网络重构有着重要意义。以博特结构洞理论为基础,本文回顾了结构洞理论的历史溯源和发展历程,总结了结构洞网络结构的形成原因和特点,并通过跨案例研究方法分析了在CoPS创新网络中的结构洞思想,提出了结构洞分类理论。
在此基础上,本文通过对杭氧空分设备创新网络进行了深入的单案例研究,分析了其中存在的自益性结构洞网络结构和共益性结构洞网络结构,并对两种网络结构在杭氧空分设备创新网络中的效果做了探讨。该案例验证和完善了结构洞分类理论,并为结构洞分类理论在CoPS创新网络中的应用提供了一定经验。
Because of the requirements of technology depth and width, CoPS system integrators must resort to outer stakeholders to accomplish system innovation, so CoPS innovation actually is done in the innovation network formed by outer stakeholders. Herein, the network structure of outer stakeholders is important to the success of CoPS innovation, and how to construct an effective network structure of outer stakeholders has become a key factor of CoPS innovation.
Burt's structural hole theory is a network reconstruction theory, and it focuses on altering relationship orientation and information flow and attain the control of relationship through network reconstruction. The theory has a great significance for the network reconstruction of outer stakeholders in CoPS.Based on Burt's structural hole theory, This paper reviews the development and historical source of the structural hole theory, summarizes the forming reason and characteristics of the structural hole network structure, and through cross-case study analyzes the thought of the structural hole theory in CoPS, puts forward the structural hole classification theory.
On this basis, by in-depth single case study on Hangyang air separation plant innovation network, this paper analyzes the self-benefit structural hole and the total-benefit structural hole in it, discusses the effectiveness of the two network structure on Hangyang air separation plant innovation network. The case study validates and improves the structural hole classification theory and provides some experience for the application of the structural hole classification theory on CoPS innovation network.
博特的结构洞理论是一个网络重构理论,它注重的是通过网络绒构的重构来改变关系方向和信息流向,从网络重构中取得对关系的控制。这个理论对复杂产品系统创新外部利益相关者网络重构有着重要意义。以博特结构洞理论为基础,本文回顾了结构洞理论的历史溯源和发展历程,总结了结构洞网络结构的形成原因和特点,并通过跨案例研究方法分析了在CoPS创新网络中的结构洞思想,提出了结构洞分类理论。
在此基础上,本文通过对杭氧空分设备创新网络进行了深入的单案例研究,分析了其中存在的自益性结构洞网络结构和共益性结构洞网络结构,并对两种网络结构在杭氧空分设备创新网络中的效果做了探讨。该案例验证和完善了结构洞分类理论,并为结构洞分类理论在CoPS创新网络中的应用提供了一定经验。
Because of the requirements of technology depth and width, CoPS system integrators must resort to outer stakeholders to accomplish system innovation, so CoPS innovation actually is done in the innovation network formed by outer stakeholders. Herein, the network structure of outer stakeholders is important to the success of CoPS innovation, and how to construct an effective network structure of outer stakeholders has become a key factor of CoPS innovation.
Burt's structural hole theory is a network reconstruction theory, and it focuses on altering relationship orientation and information flow and attain the control of relationship through network reconstruction. The theory has a great significance for the network reconstruction of outer stakeholders in CoPS.Based on Burt's structural hole theory, This paper reviews the development and historical source of the structural hole theory, summarizes the forming reason and characteristics of the structural hole network structure, and through cross-case study analyzes the thought of the structural hole theory in CoPS, puts forward the structural hole classification theory.
On this basis, by in-depth single case study on Hangyang air separation plant innovation network, this paper analyzes the self-benefit structural hole and the total-benefit structural hole in it, discusses the effectiveness of the two network structure on Hangyang air separation plant innovation network. The case study validates and improves the structural hole classification theory and provides some experience for the application of the structural hole classification theory on CoPS innovation network.
引文
[1].包昌火,谢新洲,申宁.人际网络分析[J].情报学报,2003(6)：365-374.
[2].蔡宁等.企业集群风险的研究：一个基于网络的视角[J].中国工业经济,2003,(4).
[3].陈劲.永续发展一企业技术创新透析[M].北京：第一版,科学出版社,2001.
[4].陈劲,童亮,龚焱.复杂产品系统创新评估指标体系研究[J].研究与发展管理,2003,15(4)：59-65.
[5].陈劲,黄建樟.复杂产品系统的技术开发模式[J].研究与发展管理,2004年第5期.
[6].陈劲,童亮,黄建樟,周永庆.复杂产品系统创新对传统创新管理的挑战[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(9)：47-51.
[7].陈劲,景劲松和童亮.复杂产品系统创新项目风险因素实证研究[J].研究与发展管理.2005,(17)5：62-67
[8].陈劲,桂彬旺,陈钰芬.基于模块化开发的复杂产品系统创新案例研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(6)：1-8.
[9].陈明,陈云,陈炳森.复杂产品研发中的技术风险管理[J].制造业自动化,2005,27(10)：6-16.
[10].陈婷婷.结构洞——关系的制胜点[J].三峡大学学报,2007(29)：31-32.
[11].党兴华,蒋军锋.网络环境下企业技术创新过程中信息流网络结构研究[J].中国软科学,2004,(3).
[12].高建.程源和徐河军.技术转型管理的研究及在中国的战略价值[J].科研管理,2004,25(1)：49-54.
[13].胡春蕾,王德海.结构洞在国际发展援助项目资源配置中的负功能研究[J].社科纵横,2008.
[14].胡鲜,杨建梅,李得荣.企业竞争关系演变的复杂网络分析-以广东省软件产业为例[J].软科学,2008(22)：52-57.
[15].霍云福.企业创新网络研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(10)：50-53.
[16].江若尘.大企业利益相关者问题研究[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2004：141,148
[17].江若尘, 陈宏军.企业间关系的类型与选择[J].商业经济与管理,2008(5)：29-34.
[18].姜文杰.集群制造企业外部利益相关者的分类[J].华东经济管理,2007(7)：107-111.
[19].李正锋,叶金福.复杂产品系统创新网络的构建及分析[J].工业工程,2008(11)2：12-16
[20].缪小明,徐济超..复杂产品创新：市场结构与企业战略[J].研究与发展管理,2007(19/1)：60.
[21].刘友金.中小企业集群式创新[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2004.
[22].刘玉翠,苏敬勤.产业生态网络中企业共生关系类型的实证研究[J].沿海企业与科技,2007(5)：107-111.
[23].龙静,吕四海.基于网络视角的企业知识创造与管理.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(7)：87-92.
[24].骆群.结构洞理论分析职务犯罪根源的启示[J].甘肃理论学刊,2006(2)
[25].盛亚,单航英,陶锐.基于利益相关者的企业创新管理模式：案例研究[J].科学学研究,2007(6)：106-109.
[26].盛亚,尹宝兴.复杂产品系统创新的利益相关者作用机理：ERP为例[J].科学学研究,2009,(27)1：154-160.
[27].王大洲.企业创新网络的进化与治理：一个文献综述[J].科研管理,2001,(5).
[28].王道平,李林,秦国文.论区域创新网络与中小企业技术创新[J].求索,2003, (1).
[29].王缉慈.知识创新和区域创新环境[J].经济地理,1999, (1).
[30].王星莹.国有转制单位的内部网络变迁研究——对某国有转制单位的个案研究[D].复旦大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[31].魏江.产业集群——创新系统与技术学习[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[32].吴贵生.技术创新网络和技术外包[J].科研管理,2000,21(10)：21-24.
[33].伍佳妮,夏维力.基于知识管理的复杂产品系统创新机制研究[J].情报杂志,2008(11)：130-133.
[34].许小虎,项保华.企业网络理论发展脉络与研究内容综述[J].科研管理,2006(1)：114-119.
[35].杨志刚,吴贵生.复杂产品系统的创新及其管理闭.研究与发展管理,2003,15(3)：32-37.
[36].姚小涛、席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003年第3期.
[37].喻小军,江涛.复杂产品系统的技术创新及其风险分析[J].科技进步与对策,2006(9)：29-36
[38].张梦中.(美)马克·霍哲.案例研究方法论[J].《中国行政管理》2002年第1期(总199期)
[39].张伟峰,万威武.企业创新网络的构建动因与模式研究[J].研究与发展管理,2004(6)：62-68.
[40].赵凌云.结构洞与政治精英的控制优势——个分化型村庄的个案研究[J].社会学研究,2006(5)：165-167.
[41].周九常.产业集群网络组织间竞争情报模式.图书情报知识,2007(11)：16-20.
[42].周九常.产业集群网络组织间竞争情报模式[J].图书·情报·知识,2007(120)
[43].徐芳,孙媛媛,沙伟影.结构洞理论与中介组织的网络招聘[J].经济理论与经济管理,200710)
[44].周长城.经济社会学[M].中国人民大学出版社,2003-04.
[45].邹树梁,陈甲华和刘兵.面向复杂产品系统的虚拟企业建模研究-以核电站项目为例田[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2005,6(1)：20-25.
[46]. Andrew Davies. Competitive Complex Product Systems:the Case of Mobile Communications [R]. IPIS Report,1997,19:26-31.
[47]. Andrew V. Shipilov Insead. Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006, Vol.49, No.3,590-604.
[48].Barlow J. Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):973-989.
[49].Blair M, M. Ownership and control; rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century, The Brooking Institution, Washington D C,1995.
[50].Bogdon, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. Qualitative Research for Education:An Introduction to Theory and Methods, (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, Mass:Allyn & Bacon,1992.
[51].Bonaccorsi, A. & Giuri, P. When shakeout doesn't occur:The evolution of the turboprop engine industry[J]. Research Policy.2000,29:847-870
[52].Brusoni S, Prencipe A. Managing knowledge in loosely coupled networks:Exploring the links between product and knowledge dynamics [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2001,38(7):1019-1035.
[53].Carroll, A, B. Ethics and stakeholder management(2nd ed). Cincinnati:SouthWestern,
1993.
[54].Chakravarthy, B. S. and Doz, Y. L.,1992, "Strategy Process Research", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.5-14.
[55].Clarkson, M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory, Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,1994.
[56].Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. Introduction:Entering the field of qualitative research.. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (eds.). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, pp.1-34. Thousand Oaks, Califonia:Sage,1998.
[57].Eisenhardt, K.M.,1989. "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, pp.532-550.
[58].Eisenhardt, K. M. Better Stories and Better Constructs:the Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic. Academy of Management Review,16, pp.620-627.
[59].Freeman, R, E. Strategic Management, A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Pitman, Boston, 1984.
[60]. Freeman C. Networks of innovators:A synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy, 1991,20:499-514.
[61].Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973(78): 1365.
[62].Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. Effective Evaluation. San Francisco:Massachusetts:Ally & Bacon,1981.
[63].Hansen K, Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product Systems:Emerging issues in innovation management[J]. Technovation,1998,18(9):555-561.
[64].Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization[J]. Research Policy,1998,26:689-710.
[65].Hansen K, Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product Systems:Emerging issues in innovation management[J]. Technovation,1998,18(9):555-561.
[66].Hobday M, Rush H. Technology management in complex product systems(CoPS):Ten question answered [J]. International Journal of Technology Management,1999(17): 618-638.
[67].Hobday M, Rush H, Tidd J. Innovation in complex products and system [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):793-804.
[68].Imai K,, Y Baba. Systemic innovation and erues-border networks:Transcending markets and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system, OECD(1991), Technology and productivity:The Challenge for Economic Policy, OECD, Paris,1989.
[69]. Jones O, Conway Teward S. Social interaction & Organizational Change:An Analytical Review of Innovation Networks. November,1999.
[70].Kash D E, Rycoft RW. Patterns of innovating complex technologies:A framework for adaptive net-work strategies [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):819-831.
[71].Kash D E, Rycroft R. Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2002(69):581-606.
[72].Kumpe and Bolwijn, PletT. Towards the innovative firm-Challenge for R&D management.R.T.M. Jan-Feb,1994,13, (4):42-49.
[73].LeCompte, M. D. & Preissle, J. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, (2nd ed.). San Diego:Academic Press,1993, pp.69.
[74]. Marshall, N. & Brady, T. Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: illustrations from complex products and systems[J]. European Journal of Information Systems.2001,10:99-112.
[75].Merriam, S. B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in education. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1998, pp.60-61.
[76].Miller R, Hobday M. Innovation in complex systems industries:The case of flight simulation [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1995,4(2):362-400.
[77].Nightingale, P. The Product-process-organization relationship in complex development project[J]. Research Policy.2000,29:913-930.
[78].Mitchell, R, K,, Agle, B, R, and Wood, D, J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4),853-886.
[79].Nonaka, I, Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-creating Company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation[M]. Oxford University Press,1995.
[80].Paoli M, Prencipe A. The role of knowledge bases in complex product systems:Some empirical evidence from the aero engine industry [J]. Journal of Management and Governance,1999,3:137-160.
[81].Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Reaearch Methods, (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: sage,1990.
[82].Pettigrew, A. M. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change:Theory and Practice"[J]. Organization Science,1990, Vol.1, No.3, pp.97-115.
[83].Prahalad C K, Hamel G Strategic Intent[J]. McKinsey Quarterly,1990(2):36-61.
[84].R Burt. Structural Holes[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[85].Scott J. Social network analysis is a handbook [M]. Sage Publications,2000.
[86]. Starik, M. Should trees have managiral standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,1995,14 (1):207-217.
[87].Wellman Barry, S D Berkowitz. Social Structures:A Network Approach[M]. Cambridge University Press,1988.
[88].Yin, R. K. Case Study Research:Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi:sage,2002.
[89].Zhixing Xiao, Anne S. Tsui. When Brokers May Not Work:The Cultural Contingency of Social Capital in Chinese High-tech Firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007, 52:1-31.
[2].蔡宁等.企业集群风险的研究：一个基于网络的视角[J].中国工业经济,2003,(4).
[3].陈劲.永续发展一企业技术创新透析[M].北京：第一版,科学出版社,2001.
[4].陈劲,童亮,龚焱.复杂产品系统创新评估指标体系研究[J].研究与发展管理,2003,15(4)：59-65.
[5].陈劲,黄建樟.复杂产品系统的技术开发模式[J].研究与发展管理,2004年第5期.
[6].陈劲,童亮,黄建樟,周永庆.复杂产品系统创新对传统创新管理的挑战[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(9)：47-51.
[7].陈劲,景劲松和童亮.复杂产品系统创新项目风险因素实证研究[J].研究与发展管理.2005,(17)5：62-67
[8].陈劲,桂彬旺,陈钰芬.基于模块化开发的复杂产品系统创新案例研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(6)：1-8.
[9].陈明,陈云,陈炳森.复杂产品研发中的技术风险管理[J].制造业自动化,2005,27(10)：6-16.
[10].陈婷婷.结构洞——关系的制胜点[J].三峡大学学报,2007(29)：31-32.
[11].党兴华,蒋军锋.网络环境下企业技术创新过程中信息流网络结构研究[J].中国软科学,2004,(3).
[12].高建.程源和徐河军.技术转型管理的研究及在中国的战略价值[J].科研管理,2004,25(1)：49-54.
[13].胡春蕾,王德海.结构洞在国际发展援助项目资源配置中的负功能研究[J].社科纵横,2008.
[14].胡鲜,杨建梅,李得荣.企业竞争关系演变的复杂网络分析-以广东省软件产业为例[J].软科学,2008(22)：52-57.
[15].霍云福.企业创新网络研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(10)：50-53.
[16].江若尘.大企业利益相关者问题研究[M].上海：上海财经大学出版社,2004：141,148
[17].江若尘, 陈宏军.企业间关系的类型与选择[J].商业经济与管理,2008(5)：29-34.
[18].姜文杰.集群制造企业外部利益相关者的分类[J].华东经济管理,2007(7)：107-111.
[19].李正锋,叶金福.复杂产品系统创新网络的构建及分析[J].工业工程,2008(11)2：12-16
[20].缪小明,徐济超..复杂产品创新：市场结构与企业战略[J].研究与发展管理,2007(19/1)：60.
[21].刘友金.中小企业集群式创新[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2004.
[22].刘玉翠,苏敬勤.产业生态网络中企业共生关系类型的实证研究[J].沿海企业与科技,2007(5)：107-111.
[23].龙静,吕四海.基于网络视角的企业知识创造与管理.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(7)：87-92.
[24].骆群.结构洞理论分析职务犯罪根源的启示[J].甘肃理论学刊,2006(2)
[25].盛亚,单航英,陶锐.基于利益相关者的企业创新管理模式：案例研究[J].科学学研究,2007(6)：106-109.
[26].盛亚,尹宝兴.复杂产品系统创新的利益相关者作用机理：ERP为例[J].科学学研究,2009,(27)1：154-160.
[27].王大洲.企业创新网络的进化与治理：一个文献综述[J].科研管理,2001,(5).
[28].王道平,李林,秦国文.论区域创新网络与中小企业技术创新[J].求索,2003, (1).
[29].王缉慈.知识创新和区域创新环境[J].经济地理,1999, (1).
[30].王星莹.国有转制单位的内部网络变迁研究——对某国有转制单位的个案研究[D].复旦大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[31].魏江.产业集群——创新系统与技术学习[M].北京：科学出版社,2003.
[32].吴贵生.技术创新网络和技术外包[J].科研管理,2000,21(10)：21-24.
[33].伍佳妮,夏维力.基于知识管理的复杂产品系统创新机制研究[J].情报杂志,2008(11)：130-133.
[34].许小虎,项保华.企业网络理论发展脉络与研究内容综述[J].科研管理,2006(1)：114-119.
[35].杨志刚,吴贵生.复杂产品系统的创新及其管理闭.研究与发展管理,2003,15(3)：32-37.
[36].姚小涛、席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003年第3期.
[37].喻小军,江涛.复杂产品系统的技术创新及其风险分析[J].科技进步与对策,2006(9)：29-36
[38].张梦中.(美)马克·霍哲.案例研究方法论[J].《中国行政管理》2002年第1期(总199期)
[39].张伟峰,万威武.企业创新网络的构建动因与模式研究[J].研究与发展管理,2004(6)：62-68.
[40].赵凌云.结构洞与政治精英的控制优势——个分化型村庄的个案研究[J].社会学研究,2006(5)：165-167.
[41].周九常.产业集群网络组织间竞争情报模式.图书情报知识,2007(11)：16-20.
[42].周九常.产业集群网络组织间竞争情报模式[J].图书·情报·知识,2007(120)
[43].徐芳,孙媛媛,沙伟影.结构洞理论与中介组织的网络招聘[J].经济理论与经济管理,200710)
[44].周长城.经济社会学[M].中国人民大学出版社,2003-04.
[45].邹树梁,陈甲华和刘兵.面向复杂产品系统的虚拟企业建模研究-以核电站项目为例田[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2005,6(1)：20-25.
[46]. Andrew Davies. Competitive Complex Product Systems:the Case of Mobile Communications [R]. IPIS Report,1997,19:26-31.
[47]. Andrew V. Shipilov Insead. Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006, Vol.49, No.3,590-604.
[48].Barlow J. Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):973-989.
[49].Blair M, M. Ownership and control; rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century, The Brooking Institution, Washington D C,1995.
[50].Bogdon, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. Qualitative Research for Education:An Introduction to Theory and Methods, (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, Mass:Allyn & Bacon,1992.
[51].Bonaccorsi, A. & Giuri, P. When shakeout doesn't occur:The evolution of the turboprop engine industry[J]. Research Policy.2000,29:847-870
[52].Brusoni S, Prencipe A. Managing knowledge in loosely coupled networks:Exploring the links between product and knowledge dynamics [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2001,38(7):1019-1035.
[53].Carroll, A, B. Ethics and stakeholder management(2nd ed). Cincinnati:SouthWestern,
1993.
[54].Chakravarthy, B. S. and Doz, Y. L.,1992, "Strategy Process Research", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.5-14.
[55].Clarkson, M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory, Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,1994.
[56].Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. Introduction:Entering the field of qualitative research.. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (eds.). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, pp.1-34. Thousand Oaks, Califonia:Sage,1998.
[57].Eisenhardt, K.M.,1989. "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, pp.532-550.
[58].Eisenhardt, K. M. Better Stories and Better Constructs:the Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic. Academy of Management Review,16, pp.620-627.
[59].Freeman, R, E. Strategic Management, A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Pitman, Boston, 1984.
[60]. Freeman C. Networks of innovators:A synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy, 1991,20:499-514.
[61].Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973(78): 1365.
[62].Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. Effective Evaluation. San Francisco:Massachusetts:Ally & Bacon,1981.
[63].Hansen K, Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product Systems:Emerging issues in innovation management[J]. Technovation,1998,18(9):555-561.
[64].Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization[J]. Research Policy,1998,26:689-710.
[65].Hansen K, Rush H. Hotspots in Complex Product Systems:Emerging issues in innovation management[J]. Technovation,1998,18(9):555-561.
[66].Hobday M, Rush H. Technology management in complex product systems(CoPS):Ten question answered [J]. International Journal of Technology Management,1999(17): 618-638.
[67].Hobday M, Rush H, Tidd J. Innovation in complex products and system [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):793-804.
[68].Imai K,, Y Baba. Systemic innovation and erues-border networks:Transcending markets and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system, OECD(1991), Technology and productivity:The Challenge for Economic Policy, OECD, Paris,1989.
[69]. Jones O, Conway Teward S. Social interaction & Organizational Change:An Analytical Review of Innovation Networks. November,1999.
[70].Kash D E, Rycoft RW. Patterns of innovating complex technologies:A framework for adaptive net-work strategies [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(7/8):819-831.
[71].Kash D E, Rycroft R. Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2002(69):581-606.
[72].Kumpe and Bolwijn, PletT. Towards the innovative firm-Challenge for R&D management.R.T.M. Jan-Feb,1994,13, (4):42-49.
[73].LeCompte, M. D. & Preissle, J. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, (2nd ed.). San Diego:Academic Press,1993, pp.69.
[74]. Marshall, N. & Brady, T. Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: illustrations from complex products and systems[J]. European Journal of Information Systems.2001,10:99-112.
[75].Merriam, S. B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in education. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1998, pp.60-61.
[76].Miller R, Hobday M. Innovation in complex systems industries:The case of flight simulation [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1995,4(2):362-400.
[77].Nightingale, P. The Product-process-organization relationship in complex development project[J]. Research Policy.2000,29:913-930.
[78].Mitchell, R, K,, Agle, B, R, and Wood, D, J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4),853-886.
[79].Nonaka, I, Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-creating Company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation[M]. Oxford University Press,1995.
[80].Paoli M, Prencipe A. The role of knowledge bases in complex product systems:Some empirical evidence from the aero engine industry [J]. Journal of Management and Governance,1999,3:137-160.
[81].Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Reaearch Methods, (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: sage,1990.
[82].Pettigrew, A. M. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change:Theory and Practice"[J]. Organization Science,1990, Vol.1, No.3, pp.97-115.
[83].Prahalad C K, Hamel G Strategic Intent[J]. McKinsey Quarterly,1990(2):36-61.
[84].R Burt. Structural Holes[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[85].Scott J. Social network analysis is a handbook [M]. Sage Publications,2000.
[86]. Starik, M. Should trees have managiral standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,1995,14 (1):207-217.
[87].Wellman Barry, S D Berkowitz. Social Structures:A Network Approach[M]. Cambridge University Press,1988.
[88].Yin, R. K. Case Study Research:Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi:sage,2002.
[89].Zhixing Xiao, Anne S. Tsui. When Brokers May Not Work:The Cultural Contingency of Social Capital in Chinese High-tech Firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007, 52:1-31.