卫生事业管理专业多元化实践教学研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:本课题意在通过对卫生事业管理专业多元化实践教学的研究,发现多元化实践教学中存在的问题,为卫生事业管理专业多元化实践教学提出可行性建议,从而不断促进教学模式的改革与创新,不断更新实践教学内容与手段,并使多元化实践教学与应用型人才培养有机结合,培养卫生管理专业应用型人才,服务于社会。
     方法:利用文献分析法收集国内外与多元化实践教学及人才培养有关的文献,归纳出可借鉴的理论和方法。在此基础上,结合卫生事业管理专业人才培养的特点,确定本次研究的重点、研究思路,并设计调查问卷以及访谈提纲。在本研究中主要应用的研究方法有:(1)文献研究法;(2)问卷调查法;(3)深入访谈法;(4)统计学方法。
     结果:(1)95.38%的同学认为实践教学很重要和重要。96.53%的学生认为应该增加实践教学的时间,62.95%希望增加校外的实践教学时间。在需要增设的课程中,管理类课程、经济类课程和法学类课程的比率较高。
     (2)实践教学取得了一定的效果,认为实践教学效果很差的比重较少,对实践教学取得效果的评价主要集中于效果一般。
     (3)案例教学是参与度最高的教学方法之一,实验室模拟上机操作、见习、寒暑期的社会实践参与程度均已超过了60%。但跟老师做研究课题、角色扮演模拟教学等教学方法的参与度要相对低些。最有利于自身素质提高的教学方法中,实习、跟老师做课题、课下的调查研究权重较高,而这些恰恰是学生自认为参与较少的教学方法。
     (4)实践教学考核中开卷考试方式占32.00%,闭卷考试方式占到30.25%。此外,面试(口试、答辩)、递交报告或论文形式的考核也占据了一定的比重,其中面试占14.74%,递交报告占22.68%,其他考核方式占0.33%。考核不甚明显的原因,考核方式单一的占28.16%,考试内容单一的占45.31%,考试主体单一的占25.31%,其他原因选择人数6人次,占1.22%。
     结论:(1)学生对实践教学重要性的认识比较统一,学生也较倾向于课堂外的实践教学;多种教学方法已在实践教学中普遍采用,但是“教与学”的供需还存在着一定的差距;实践教学取得了一定的效果,但仍有很大的上升空间;目前考核已经不单纯地以闭卷考试为主,出现了多元化的趋势,但多种考核形式开展情况存在着较大的差距,并且学生对整体考核效果很满意的占据比重较少。故培养卫生管理专业应用人才,需整体优化课程体系;合理规划理论与实践授课,适当增加实践教学课时数;积极实施课堂外教学,提高学生综合素质;注重实践教学的实施过程,保证实践教学的质量;明确考核的目标,体现实践考核要求,保证实践考核效果的导向性。
     (2)实践教学是培养人才的重要手段之一。设计实践教学体系时,应遵循针对性原则、可操作性原则、动态调整性原则、系统性原则。在此基础上,还可根据卫生管理专业背景及学生认知特点,从实践教学目标多元化、内容多元化、形式多元化、考核多元化等方面,设计“层次+模块化”的多元化实践教学模式,以培养卫生事业管理专业应用型人才。
Objective : Through the research of diversification practical teaching of health management, this study tries to find problems in it, and make feasible suggestions for diversification practical teaching of health management. This will help to promote the reform of teaching, update content and means of practical teaching constantly, combine diversification practical teaching and applied talents cultivation, and train applied talents for society.
     Methods:Collecting domestic and foreign related literature about diversification practical teaching and talents cultivation by document analysis, summarize reference theories and methods. On this basis, combining with the talent training characteristics of health management, determining the focus and research ideas of this study, then design the questionnaire and in-depth interview outline. In this study, the main applications of methods are document analysis method, questionnaire method, in-depth interview method, and statistical method.
     Results:(1)95.38 percent students think that practice teaching is very important or important. 96.53% of the students think that increasing the time of practice teaching is essential and 62.95% hope to increase practice time outside. For the courses needed to added, management courses, economics courses and law courses take higher rates.
     (2)Practice teaching has achieved some good results, and people who have the opinion of practice teaching’s results is very poor take a lower rate. But overall, the evaluation of the results mostly is general.
     (3)Case teaching is one of the methods have the highest participation rate, and the rates of participation in laboratory simulation of the machine operation, trainee and the social practice in summer and winter period have all exceed 60%. But the rates of do research subjects with teachers and role-playing simulation teaching is lower. For the methods that conducive to the improvement of the students’quality, trainee, do research subjects with teachers and research after classes take higher rates, but those are the last choice of the students.
     (4)In the assessing methods of practice teaching, the percentage of open-book examination is 32%, and closed book exam 30.25%. Besides, interview (oral examination and reply) , handing reports or paper have some rates, in which interview 14.74%, handing reports 22.68%, and others 0.33%. For the reasons of no obvious assessment, 28.16% think that the accessing methods are single and 45.31% think the test is single. Meanwhile, students think the test subject is single account for 25.31%. 6 students choose other reasons, accounting for 1.22%.
     Conclusion: (1)The students have a common opinion on the practice teaching, and they prefer outside practice. Many teaching methods have been put into practice but there is still a certain gap between the supply and demand of“teaching and studying”. The practice teaching has achieved some good results, but there is still much room for improvement. Recently the methods of assessment are not simply dominated by closed book examination, and there is a trend of diversity. But there is a certain gap between the conducting situation of the assess methods, and students who are very satisfied with total assessment results take a lower rate.
     So for training that kind of personnel in health management, we need to optimize the curriculum overall, plan the theory and practice rationally, and increase the number of hours of practice teaching appropriately. For the same time, we need to implement outside teaching actively so as to improve the comprehensive quality, focus on process of teaching to ensure the quality, clear the objective assessment reflected the practical assessment requirements to ensure the results-oriented practice.
     (2)Practice teaching is an important method in training professional personnel. Designing practical teaching system should follow pertinence principle, operational principle, dynamic adjustment principle, and systematic principle. On this basis, we can also design the diversity of practice teaching model of "level + modular" from the diversity of objectives, content, form, based on the background and cognitive characteristics of health management students so as to train health personnel management specialty.
引文
[1]Martin Trow. Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education, Conference on Future Structures of Post-secondary Education, Paris 26th-29th June,1973.
    [2]Martin Trow, Elite and Mass Higher Education: American Models and European Realities, Contribution to the Conference on Research into Higher Education: Processes and Structures, June 12-16, 1978.
    [3]Martin Trow. From mass higher education to universal access, Paper of the meeting of the Japanese Society for Higher Education Research, Hiroshima, May 31, 1998.
    [4]丁小明.大学本科应用型人才培养研究[D].广西师范大学,2006.
    [5]张旭,陈立明.高等院校卫生事业管理专业课程设置问题的探讨[J].重庆医学,2006,35(6):564-566.
    [6]任毅,陈星位.健全卫生事业管理教育模式培养应用型卫生管理人才[J].医学信息,2008,2l(3):327-330.
    [7]杨敬宇,吴冰.卫生事业管理本科专业建设的探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,(12):814-816.
    [8]刘金波,王锦帆,马艳.卫生事业管理专业课程设置的探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理.2003,(12):740-741.
    [9]万川沸.卫生管理教育的困境与对策[J].医学教育,1992(10):27-29.
    [10]魏文娟.SWOT法分析卫生事业管理本科教育现状及对策[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(19):3694-3696.
    [11]陈家应.关于卫生管理教育若干问题的思考[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)[J],2004,2(6):100-103.
    [12]马红月,李鸿文.中医卫生管理教育有关问题思考[J].中医药管理杂志,1994,4 (4):26-29.
    [13]王建华,任光圆,潘传德.加强实践教学,培养应用型卫生管理人才[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2006,26(ll):23-26.
    [14]马瑞华,姜阵剑,张雷.论应用型人才培养中多元化实践教学体系的构建[J].成人教育,2008,(12):60-61.
    [15]孙兴民.构建高职高专多元化实践教学体系的探讨[J].河北工程技术高等专科学校学报,2007,12(4):53-55.
    [16]乔德君,张笑天,张亚林,等.对卫生事业管理专业实践教学模式的研讨[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,1992,12(12):16-17,24.
    [17]李桂霞,钟建珍,王立虹.构建应用型人才培养模式的探索[J].教育与职业,2005,20:4-6.
    [18]童亮,冀建平.高等院校应用型人才培养模式探讨[J].北京市经济管理干部学院学报.2008.23(2):58-60.
    [19]国家教育部高等教育司.中国高等医药院校课程指南[M].北京:北京中医药大学出版社,1998.
    [20]覃朝晖,卓朗,谷玉明,等.卫生事业管理学本科教学改革探讨[J].医学教育探索,2006,5(10):929-930.
    [21]张翔,薛军,张太明,等.基于STS教育思想的卫生事业管理专业人才培养研究[J].医学与社会,2008,22(3):41-43.
    [22]杨爱荣,姜经伟,赵红梅.卫生事业管理专业立体实践教学模式的构建[J].西北医学教育,2008,16(3):448,460.
    [23]褚金星.加强医学生社会实践活动的作法和体会[J].医学与社会,2005,18(1):63-65.
    [24]章帆,杨娟,田伟先,等.构建管理学科实践教学体系的研究[J].实验技术与管理,2007,24(10):19-21.
    [25]教育部社会科学研究与思想政治工作司.马克思主义哲学原理(本科本)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
    [26]张滨,戴敏华.试论卫生事业管理专业中法学课程设置[J].医学与社会,2001,14(3):53-55.
    [27]姚卫光,陈立明,王冬.卫生管理专业本科教学改革探索[J].西北医学教育,2008,16,(4):714-716.
    [28]马芳.STS模式对高等医学教育的启示[J].昆明医学院学报,2007,(28):292-294.
    [29]胡志,杨金侠,杨善发,等.卫生管理专业实施以学生为中心教学模式改革研究[J].中国高等医学教育,2005,(2):29-3l.
    [30]司淑梅.应用型本科教育实践教学体系研究[D].东北师范大学,2006.
    [31]王谢勇,郭辉,王红,等.构建多元化实践教学体系的改革与实践[J].实验技术与管理,2007,24(7):123-126,135.
    [32]郝晓鸣,梁升禄.公共卫生管理专业学生实践能力综合评价方案的设计与实施[J].卫生职业教育,2008(19):50-51.
    [33]郭蕊.案例式教学法在卫生服务营销教学中的应用[J].医学与社会,2009,22(9):66-67,71.
    [34]TAFE Australia National Capability Report 2007[DB\OL]. http://www.tda.edu.au/download_files/other/1-12.pdf.
    [35]Goozee Gillian. The Development of TAFE in Australia. National Center for Vocational Education Re search Ltd.3 edition.2001.
    [36]Davis, Paul. Technical colleges and industry partnerships: advancing workplace learning and organizational effectiveness. Industry & Commercial Training, 2004(36).
    [37]The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three Years after the Boyer Report, 2005.
    [38]Uden, L., Beaumont, C. Technology and Problem-Based Learning. London: Information Science, 2006.
    [39]Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course. Retrieved October 13, 2005.
    [40]Lezzy, Dominica Fioredistella. A Method to Measure the Quality on Teaching Evaluation of the University System: The Italian Case[J].Social Indicators Research, v73n3.2005.
    [41] Bruce Eq Michael Rq Charles GH,et al.Improving patient care outcomes by teaching quality improvement to medical students in community-based practices[J]. Academic Medicine. 2002, 77:1011.
    [42]Dun S.V Stockhausen L. The relationship between clinical education format and selected student learning outcomes[J]. Journal of nursing education, 1995, 34(1):16-24.
    [43]Jochanan B, Reuban B, Jeffrey MB, et al. Overcoming barriers to teaching the behavioral and sciences to medical students[J]. Academic Medicine. 2003,78:372.
    [44]Carol AP, Anthony JA, Heather M. The impact of a curriculum renewal project on students' performances on a fourth-year clinical skills assessment. Academic Medicine. 2001, 76:173.
    [45]Steve McRobb. Challenging Students: Reflections on the Development and Delivery of an Undergraduate Module That Introduces the Full Systems Development Life Cycle [M]. Journal of Education, 2003.
    [46]Paul D Umbach. How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education [M]. Journal of Higher Education, 2004.
    [1]任毅,陈星位.健全卫生事业管理教育模式培养应用型卫生管理人才[J].医学信息,2008,2l(3):327-329.
    [2]郝晓鸣,梁升禄.公共卫生管理专业学生实践能力综合评价方案的设计与实施[J].卫生职业教育,2008(19):50-51.
    [3]李桂霞,钟建珍,王立虹.构建应用型人才培养模式的探索[J].教育与职业,2005,(20):4-6.
    [4]季诚钧.应用型人才及其分类培养的探讨[J].中国大学教学,2006,(6):57-59.
    [5]童亮,冀建平.高等院校应用型人才培养模式探讨[J].北京市经济管理干部学院学报,2008,23(2):58-60.
    [6]廖平.高校专科实践教学体系多元化与开放型的研究[J].中国科教创新导刊,2008,(26):113.
    [7]孙兴民.构建高职高专多元化实践教学体系的探讨[J].河北工程技术高等专科学校学报,2007,12(4):53-55.
    [8]Martin Trow. Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education, Conference on Future Structures of Post-secondary Education, Paris 26th-29th June, 1973.
    [9]丁小明.大学本科应用型人才培养研究[D].广西师范大学,2006.
    [10]Martin Trow. From mass higher education to universal access, Paper of the meeting of the Japanese Society for Higher Education Research, Hiroshima, May 31,1998.
    [11]田中俊.多元化实践教学模式研究[J].实验室研究与探索,2007,26(10):103-105.
    [12]花向红,邹进贵,向东.多元化实践教学模式的理论研究与实践探索[J].实验室研究与探索,2008,27(7):114-118.
    [13]杨敬宇,吴冰.卫生事业管理本科专业建设的探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,(12):814-816.
    [14]刘金波,王锦帆,马艳.卫生事业管理专业课程设置的探讨[J].中国卫生事业管理,2003,(12):740-741.
    [15]张旭,陈立明.高等院校卫生事业管理专业课程设置问题的探讨[J].重庆医学,2006,35(6):564-566.
    [16]万川沸.卫生管理教育的困境与对策[J].医学教育,1992,(10):27-29.
    [17]魏文娟.SWOT法分析卫生事业管理本科教育现状及对策[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(19):3694-3696.
    [18]陈家应.关于卫生管理教育若干问题的思考[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(15):100-102.
    [19]马红月,李鸿文.中医卫生管理教育有关问题思考[J].医药管理杂志,1994,4 (4):26-29.
    [20]Christoph Führ. The German education system since 1945[M], Inter Nationes, 1997.
    [21]TAFE Australia National Capability Report 2007[DB\OL]. http://www.tda.edu.au/download_files/other/1-12.pdf
    [22]Goozee Gillian. The Development of TAFE in Australia. National Center for VocationalEducation Re search Ltd.3 edition.2001.
    [23]陈海英.本科院校应用型人才培养模式研究[J].才智,2008,9:243.
    [24]胡卫中,石瑛.澳大利亚应用型人才培养模式及启示[J].开放教育研究,2006,12(4):92-95.
    [25]梁宏,原松梅,武高辉.美国高校本科生培养模式及其发展趋势[J].黑龙江高教研究,2001,2:76-78.
    [26]马敬卫,明太.美国、新加坡、香港大学与国内高校课程设置的比较[J].山东电力高等专科学校学报,1999,2(1):32-34.
    [27]Davis, Paul. Technical colleges and industry partnerships: advancing workplace learning and organizational effectiveness. Industry & Commercial Training, 2004(36).
    [28]The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three Years after the Boyer Report, 2005.
    [29]Uden, L., Beaumont, C. Technology and Problem-Based Learning. London: Information Science, 2006.
    [30]Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course. Retrieved October 13, 2005.
    [31]P.Scott. The changing role of the university in the production of new knowledge [M]. Tertiary Education and Management, 1997.
    [32]Buchbinder, H. The market oriented university and changing role of knowledge [M], Higher Education,1993.
    [33]Steve McRobb. Challenging Students: Reflections on the Development and Delivery of an Undergraduate Module That Introduces the Full Systems Development Life Cycle [M]. Journal of Education, 2003.
    [34]Paul D Umbach. How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education [M]. Journal of Higher Education, 2004.
    [35]陈新叶.创新应用型人才培养模式,营建招生教学就业教育生态链[J].中国成人教育,2003,9:96-97.
    [36]张洪田,孟上九等.应用型人才培养体系的探索与实践[J].中国高教研究,2008,2:86-87.
    [37]卢新国.谈财务管理专业“3+1”人才培养模式[J].中国农业会计,2008,1:30-31.
    [38]刘宪亮,吕晓丽,邢鹏飞.卫生事业管理专业毕业生跟踪调查分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2005,(5):33-36.
    [39]陈然,李绍华,赵国子.卫生事业管理专业本科生就业现状分析与对策[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2008,28(7):510-511.
    [40]杨爱荣,姜经伟,赵红梅.卫生事业管理专业立体实践教学模式的构建[J].西北医学教育,2008,16(3):844-855.
    [41]郑万会,王净.以市场为导向的卫生事业管理人才培养模式探讨[J].西北医学教育,2008,16(4):316-318.
    [42]廖平.高校专科实践教学体系多元化与开放型的研究[J].中国科教创新导刊,2008,(26):113.
    [43]孙兴民.构建高职高专多元化实践教学体系的探讨[J].河北工程技术高等专科学校学报,2003,12(4):53-55.
    [44]李兆训,李青,李婧.构建“通信原理”多元化实践教学体系[J].实验技术与管理,2000,25(5):154-155.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700