基于农户经济视角的油茶供给研究
|
摘要
粮油安全问题及其所引起的社会经济稳定问题已经引起全世界的广泛关注。我国农业资源面临的刚性约束和居民膳食结构升级的矛盾日益突出,优质食用油的供给不足已经成为影响我国粮油安全战略的重要问题。油茶产业因具有“不与粮争地”的优点和安全、高品质的特征而受到决策部门和学术界的重视,它所具有的经济效益、生态效益和社会效益不仅能改善林业可持续经营模式,更在充分发挥我国丰富的林地资源食物供给能力方面具有战略意义。但是,现阶段与油茶产业发展相关的许多重要问题尚不明确,其中,最大的不确定体现为供给不足问题。油茶原料供给的经济可行性和供给潜力是决定油茶产业发展前景的关键环节,供给潜力主要取决于单位面积产量和种植面积。由于现阶段我国油茶的供给主体主要为农户,因此,除受自然约束外,油茶生产投入行为和种植面积的决策又主要取决于农户的供给决策特征和决策机制。这些问题的解决具有重要的现实意义,但当前尚未有系统的实证研究。
因此,本研究的总体目标是:从农户的微观层面入手,清晰把握油茶产业的发展现状及其主要的影响因素,揭示农户油茶供给的投入产出关系,在此基础上模拟分析不同情境下油茶的供给,并通过对农户油茶供给行为决策意愿和机制的实证研究,验证分析油茶供给现状和供给潜力实现的条件,为油茶产业政策的制定和推广提供实证依据。为实现研究目标,本研究综合运用了经济学、运筹学、社会学等学科的研究方法,做到规范研究与实证研究、定性与定量方法相结合,主要内容涉及以下6个方面:(1)采用文献研究法分析油茶产业发展的历史、现状以及每个发展阶段的产业政策变迁过程,从宏观层面描绘油茶产业的发展轮廓,为分析油茶供给的主要影响因素及原因奠定基础。主要包括第二、三章。(2)从农户供给行为理论出发,构建了影响农户油茶供给的影响因素框架,在此基础上构建了油茶生产函数和供给决策理论模型,奠基全文的理论框架结构。主要内容为第四章。(3)应用访谈问卷调查法设计调查问卷,收集基于农户油茶地块的投入产出数据,采用描述性统计分析法从微观层面刻画农户油茶供给行为特征并进行经济效益评价,为提出研究假设、构建供给决策模型提供依据。主要内容为第五、六章。(4)运用计量经济模型、专家访谈法估计并修正油茶生产函数模型,采用线性规划法编程求解油茶供给最优投入产出关系,并模拟不同情境下的油茶供给潜力,评价我国油茶规划发展目标实现的社会经济条件。主要内容包括第七、八章。(5)运用二元logistic回归法、净现值法实证农户油茶供给意愿及决策原因,并运用个案研究法进一步揭示农户油茶供给决策机制,验证农户油茶供给现状、主要影响因素和实现油茶供给潜力的社会经济条件。主要内容为第九、十章。(6)围绕研究结论展开政策讨论,提出政策建议,主要内容为第十一章。
本文通过理论和实证研究得出以下主要结论:(1)从油茶供给宏观层面看,油茶原料供应能力小于油茶计划加工产能,油茶市场发育尚不成熟。(2)从油茶供给微观层面看,当前油茶种植在农户家庭资源配置中处于劣势,且由于良种、技术供给不足,农户经营抚育投入水平低,油茶单位面积产出水平和生命周期内的经济效益相对低下。(3)当前影响油茶单位面积产出水平的主要影响因素有前期累计投入、当期劳动力投入和林地的适宜性。由于农户对油茶树的肥料投入很少,肥料对产量水平的影响暂不显著。(4)通过油茶供给决策模型规划求解得出,当前的油茶投入产出关系并未达到最优,尤其是肥料的投入水平与最优投入关系存在较大的差距,油茶供给有较大的增长潜力。(5)全国油茶供给潜力模拟显示,未来全国油茶供给潜力居前3位的分别为湖南、江西和福建。但在当前的投入产出水平下,即使在高发展方案下也难以实现油茶规划发展目标。只有当要素投入弹性、油茶产品价格、生产要素价格、贴现率等社会经济条件发生一定变化时才能实现发展目标。(6)从油茶供给意愿和决策机制看,当前农户种植油茶积极性不高,主要原因是油茶比较收益低、油茶产业政策未充分发挥激励效果、油茶产品市场尚未完善、社会化服务体系不完善等。
基于上述研究结论,本文认为:(1)油茶产业的发展具有现实性和紧迫性,但发展目标要适度,应通过提高油茶经营抚育水平增强供给目标的可实现性;(2)应通过扩大技术供给、强化政策激励效果等手段降低单位面积油茶产量供给成本,提高农户油茶供给意愿;
(3)通过培育油茶原料收购市场、清晰油茶产品市场定位等方式扩大油茶产品需求,为油茶供给注入稳定的动力。
由于当前从农户的经济视角研究油茶供给环节的前期积累很少,而供给环节和农户的供给决策是决定油茶产业能否顺利发展的关键,因此,本研究的视角和内容有一定的创新性。本文有机结合了计量经济学、运筹学和社会学的相关研究方法,在研究方法上做了一些新的尝试。此外,本文率先定量理清了农户油茶生产的投入产出关系,模拟出不同方案下油茶的供给潜力,对政策目标进行评价并提出实现的条件,研究结论具有一定的新意和实际应用价值。但由于研究条件所限,本研究的农户数据收集范围仅限于福建省,又由于油茶生长周期较长,近5年内新造的代表较高经营抚育水平的油茶林尚未投产,只有等这部分样本进入盛产期后,获取更大规模的样本投入产出数据才能更好地反映油茶的供给现状和潜力。因此,本课题今后有待进一步跟踪和研究。
Food security and its socio-economic impact has attracted worldwide attention. The strong constrain of agricultural resources faced by China and the upgrading of the structure of dietary become increasingly prominent, and the shortage of high-quality edible oil supply has been an important problem which impacts on China's food safety strategy. Because of the benefits of not occupying cultivated land and the good features of woody oil, policy-making authorities and academics start to focus on the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry. Camellia oleifera Abel industry has economic, ecological and social benefits, which can not only improve the business model of sustainable forestry, but also give full play to China's rich forest resources in the capability of food supply. However, many important issues related to the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry at this stage are still unknown, of which the largest uncertainty reflected is the problem of insufficient supply. The economic feasibility and the supply potentiality of raw materials are the key to determine the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, and the supply potentiality mainly depends on the per unit area yield and planting area. As the main supply body of Camellia oleifera Abel is farmer, therefore, in addition to natural constraints, the determination of input behavior and decision-making of growing area is depended on the characteristics and decision-making mechanisms of farming household. These problems have important practical significance, but there have not got systematic empirical researches currently.
Therefore, the overall objectives of this study are to grasp the present situation and its main influencing factors of Camellia oleifera Abel industry from micro level, to reveal the relationships between input and output, based on which to simulate the supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel in different situations. Then through the empirical research on supply behavior causes and decision-making mechanisms, validates and analyzes the present situation and conditions to achieve the supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, which can provide empirical evidences for the constituting and extending of the development policies of Camellia oleifera Abel.
To achieve the objectives of this study, the research comprehensively uses of normative study and empirical study, qualitative and quantitative methods of economics, operational research and sociology, which mainly involves the following six parts: (1) Analyses the history and present situation of Camellia oleifera Abel industry as well as the industrial policy changes to describe a clear picture of the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, laying the foundation for the analysis of the main factors affecting the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel. This part includes the second and third chapters. (2) Using farmers’supply behavior theory and behavioral science theory, the paper constructs the supply factors framework of Camellia oleifera Abel farming households. On this basis, constructs the production function and supply decision-making model of Camellia oleifera Abel, laying a foundation of theoretical framework for the text structure. This part includes the fourth chapter. (3) Applying interview questionnaire survey method to design questionnaire and collect data based on input-output land blocks. Using statistical analysis method to depict the behavioral characteristics of Camellia oleifera Abel farming households and make the economic evaluation, providing basis for proposing hypotheses and building supply decision model from micro level. The main contents are the fifth and sixth chapters. (4) Takes use of econometric models, expert interviews to estimate and correct the production function model of Camellia oleifera Abel. Uses linear programming theory to slove the optimal relationship between input and output, simulate the potential supply of Camellia oleifera Abel in different situations, and evaluate the socio-economic conditions to achieve the planning objectives. The main contents are the seventh and eighth chapters. (5) Use binary logistic regression analysis, net present value method to quantitatively measures farming household’s will to supply Camellia oleifera Abel and factors that affect the will, and use case studies to reveal the supply decision-making mechanism of Camellia oleifera Abel farmers. The conclusions are used to validate the current supply status, the main factors and the social and economic conditions to achieve supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel. This part mainly includes the ninth and tenth chapters. (6) Promotes policy recommendations according to the study conclusions. Include the eleventh chapter.
Through theoretical and empirical research, the paper reaches the following conclusions: (1) From the macro level, the supply capacity of raw materials is less than the planed processing capacity of Camellia oleifera Abel, and the development of Camellia oleifera Abel market is not yet mature. (2) From the micro level, the status of resources allocation for Camellia oleifera Abel is low in the farming households. Because of the poor quality, small-scale land parcel and the low level of tending, the per unit yield and economic benefits of Camellia oleifera Abel is relatively low. (3) Factors that affect the per unit yield of Camellia oleifera Abel are cumulative input, the current labor input and the suitability of forest land. Because the input of fertilizer is seldom at present, the effect of fertilizer is temporarily inapparent. (4) According to the conclusion based on the solving of Camellia oleifera Abel supply decision-making model, the current input-output relationship is not yet optimal, especially for fertilizer input. So there is a great potential for growth in Camellia oleifera Abel supply. (5) The simulation results of Camellia oleifera Abel supply potential shows that the top 3 provinces have the greatest Camellia oleifera Abel supply potential are Hunan, Jiangxi and Fujian Province. But in the current input-output level, even under the high growth program, it is also difficult to achieve the development objectives of Camellia oleifera Abel. Only when making a difference on elasticity of factor inputs, Camellia oleifera Abel product prices, factor prices, the discount rate and other socio-economic conditions can the development goals be achieved. (6) For the supply will and decision-making mechanism of Camellia oleifera Abel, farmers’enthusiasm to plant Camellia oleifera Abel is not high, which mainly due to the comparative low income, industrial policy that not fully demonstrated effects, incomplete market and imperfect social service system.
Based on the above conclusions, this paper makes the following recommendations: (1) The development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry is realistic and urgent, but it is necessary to formulat appropriate developing goals and to enhance the realizability of developing goals through improving tending level of Camellia oleifera Abel. (2) It is necessary to increase farming households’supply will through the expansion of technologies and strengthening the effect of policy incentive and other means to reduce the cost of unit area yield of Camellia oleifera Abel supply. (3) Expand demand of Camellia oleifera Abel by cultivating raw materials markets and clear market positioning, which can immit stable power for the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel.
Given there was little literature studying the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel from economic perspective of household, but the supply of household decision-making is the key to determine whether the Camellia oleifera Abel industry will develop successfully, this study is innovative in perspective and content. This paper also makes some new trial in research methods by combinating of econometrics, operational research and sociology methods. In addition, the conclusions of this study evaluates the policy objectives and proposes the conditions for implementation, which has some practical value. However, due to the limited research conditions, the collection of data is limited to farming households in Fujian Province. Also because of the long growth cycle of Camellia oleifera Abel, the new created Camellia oleifera Abel in recent 5 years which is on behalf of a higher tending level has not yet put into production. Only after the holocarpicing of this part of sample can we obtain a larger scale of input-output data to better reflect the status and potential supply of Camellia oleifera Abel. Therefore, this issue needs further concern and future research.
因此,本研究的总体目标是:从农户的微观层面入手,清晰把握油茶产业的发展现状及其主要的影响因素,揭示农户油茶供给的投入产出关系,在此基础上模拟分析不同情境下油茶的供给,并通过对农户油茶供给行为决策意愿和机制的实证研究,验证分析油茶供给现状和供给潜力实现的条件,为油茶产业政策的制定和推广提供实证依据。为实现研究目标,本研究综合运用了经济学、运筹学、社会学等学科的研究方法,做到规范研究与实证研究、定性与定量方法相结合,主要内容涉及以下6个方面:(1)采用文献研究法分析油茶产业发展的历史、现状以及每个发展阶段的产业政策变迁过程,从宏观层面描绘油茶产业的发展轮廓,为分析油茶供给的主要影响因素及原因奠定基础。主要包括第二、三章。(2)从农户供给行为理论出发,构建了影响农户油茶供给的影响因素框架,在此基础上构建了油茶生产函数和供给决策理论模型,奠基全文的理论框架结构。主要内容为第四章。(3)应用访谈问卷调查法设计调查问卷,收集基于农户油茶地块的投入产出数据,采用描述性统计分析法从微观层面刻画农户油茶供给行为特征并进行经济效益评价,为提出研究假设、构建供给决策模型提供依据。主要内容为第五、六章。(4)运用计量经济模型、专家访谈法估计并修正油茶生产函数模型,采用线性规划法编程求解油茶供给最优投入产出关系,并模拟不同情境下的油茶供给潜力,评价我国油茶规划发展目标实现的社会经济条件。主要内容包括第七、八章。(5)运用二元logistic回归法、净现值法实证农户油茶供给意愿及决策原因,并运用个案研究法进一步揭示农户油茶供给决策机制,验证农户油茶供给现状、主要影响因素和实现油茶供给潜力的社会经济条件。主要内容为第九、十章。(6)围绕研究结论展开政策讨论,提出政策建议,主要内容为第十一章。
本文通过理论和实证研究得出以下主要结论:(1)从油茶供给宏观层面看,油茶原料供应能力小于油茶计划加工产能,油茶市场发育尚不成熟。(2)从油茶供给微观层面看,当前油茶种植在农户家庭资源配置中处于劣势,且由于良种、技术供给不足,农户经营抚育投入水平低,油茶单位面积产出水平和生命周期内的经济效益相对低下。(3)当前影响油茶单位面积产出水平的主要影响因素有前期累计投入、当期劳动力投入和林地的适宜性。由于农户对油茶树的肥料投入很少,肥料对产量水平的影响暂不显著。(4)通过油茶供给决策模型规划求解得出,当前的油茶投入产出关系并未达到最优,尤其是肥料的投入水平与最优投入关系存在较大的差距,油茶供给有较大的增长潜力。(5)全国油茶供给潜力模拟显示,未来全国油茶供给潜力居前3位的分别为湖南、江西和福建。但在当前的投入产出水平下,即使在高发展方案下也难以实现油茶规划发展目标。只有当要素投入弹性、油茶产品价格、生产要素价格、贴现率等社会经济条件发生一定变化时才能实现发展目标。(6)从油茶供给意愿和决策机制看,当前农户种植油茶积极性不高,主要原因是油茶比较收益低、油茶产业政策未充分发挥激励效果、油茶产品市场尚未完善、社会化服务体系不完善等。
基于上述研究结论,本文认为:(1)油茶产业的发展具有现实性和紧迫性,但发展目标要适度,应通过提高油茶经营抚育水平增强供给目标的可实现性;(2)应通过扩大技术供给、强化政策激励效果等手段降低单位面积油茶产量供给成本,提高农户油茶供给意愿;
(3)通过培育油茶原料收购市场、清晰油茶产品市场定位等方式扩大油茶产品需求,为油茶供给注入稳定的动力。
由于当前从农户的经济视角研究油茶供给环节的前期积累很少,而供给环节和农户的供给决策是决定油茶产业能否顺利发展的关键,因此,本研究的视角和内容有一定的创新性。本文有机结合了计量经济学、运筹学和社会学的相关研究方法,在研究方法上做了一些新的尝试。此外,本文率先定量理清了农户油茶生产的投入产出关系,模拟出不同方案下油茶的供给潜力,对政策目标进行评价并提出实现的条件,研究结论具有一定的新意和实际应用价值。但由于研究条件所限,本研究的农户数据收集范围仅限于福建省,又由于油茶生长周期较长,近5年内新造的代表较高经营抚育水平的油茶林尚未投产,只有等这部分样本进入盛产期后,获取更大规模的样本投入产出数据才能更好地反映油茶的供给现状和潜力。因此,本课题今后有待进一步跟踪和研究。
Food security and its socio-economic impact has attracted worldwide attention. The strong constrain of agricultural resources faced by China and the upgrading of the structure of dietary become increasingly prominent, and the shortage of high-quality edible oil supply has been an important problem which impacts on China's food safety strategy. Because of the benefits of not occupying cultivated land and the good features of woody oil, policy-making authorities and academics start to focus on the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry. Camellia oleifera Abel industry has economic, ecological and social benefits, which can not only improve the business model of sustainable forestry, but also give full play to China's rich forest resources in the capability of food supply. However, many important issues related to the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry at this stage are still unknown, of which the largest uncertainty reflected is the problem of insufficient supply. The economic feasibility and the supply potentiality of raw materials are the key to determine the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, and the supply potentiality mainly depends on the per unit area yield and planting area. As the main supply body of Camellia oleifera Abel is farmer, therefore, in addition to natural constraints, the determination of input behavior and decision-making of growing area is depended on the characteristics and decision-making mechanisms of farming household. These problems have important practical significance, but there have not got systematic empirical researches currently.
Therefore, the overall objectives of this study are to grasp the present situation and its main influencing factors of Camellia oleifera Abel industry from micro level, to reveal the relationships between input and output, based on which to simulate the supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel in different situations. Then through the empirical research on supply behavior causes and decision-making mechanisms, validates and analyzes the present situation and conditions to achieve the supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, which can provide empirical evidences for the constituting and extending of the development policies of Camellia oleifera Abel.
To achieve the objectives of this study, the research comprehensively uses of normative study and empirical study, qualitative and quantitative methods of economics, operational research and sociology, which mainly involves the following six parts: (1) Analyses the history and present situation of Camellia oleifera Abel industry as well as the industrial policy changes to describe a clear picture of the development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry, laying the foundation for the analysis of the main factors affecting the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel. This part includes the second and third chapters. (2) Using farmers’supply behavior theory and behavioral science theory, the paper constructs the supply factors framework of Camellia oleifera Abel farming households. On this basis, constructs the production function and supply decision-making model of Camellia oleifera Abel, laying a foundation of theoretical framework for the text structure. This part includes the fourth chapter. (3) Applying interview questionnaire survey method to design questionnaire and collect data based on input-output land blocks. Using statistical analysis method to depict the behavioral characteristics of Camellia oleifera Abel farming households and make the economic evaluation, providing basis for proposing hypotheses and building supply decision model from micro level. The main contents are the fifth and sixth chapters. (4) Takes use of econometric models, expert interviews to estimate and correct the production function model of Camellia oleifera Abel. Uses linear programming theory to slove the optimal relationship between input and output, simulate the potential supply of Camellia oleifera Abel in different situations, and evaluate the socio-economic conditions to achieve the planning objectives. The main contents are the seventh and eighth chapters. (5) Use binary logistic regression analysis, net present value method to quantitatively measures farming household’s will to supply Camellia oleifera Abel and factors that affect the will, and use case studies to reveal the supply decision-making mechanism of Camellia oleifera Abel farmers. The conclusions are used to validate the current supply status, the main factors and the social and economic conditions to achieve supply potentiality of Camellia oleifera Abel. This part mainly includes the ninth and tenth chapters. (6) Promotes policy recommendations according to the study conclusions. Include the eleventh chapter.
Through theoretical and empirical research, the paper reaches the following conclusions: (1) From the macro level, the supply capacity of raw materials is less than the planed processing capacity of Camellia oleifera Abel, and the development of Camellia oleifera Abel market is not yet mature. (2) From the micro level, the status of resources allocation for Camellia oleifera Abel is low in the farming households. Because of the poor quality, small-scale land parcel and the low level of tending, the per unit yield and economic benefits of Camellia oleifera Abel is relatively low. (3) Factors that affect the per unit yield of Camellia oleifera Abel are cumulative input, the current labor input and the suitability of forest land. Because the input of fertilizer is seldom at present, the effect of fertilizer is temporarily inapparent. (4) According to the conclusion based on the solving of Camellia oleifera Abel supply decision-making model, the current input-output relationship is not yet optimal, especially for fertilizer input. So there is a great potential for growth in Camellia oleifera Abel supply. (5) The simulation results of Camellia oleifera Abel supply potential shows that the top 3 provinces have the greatest Camellia oleifera Abel supply potential are Hunan, Jiangxi and Fujian Province. But in the current input-output level, even under the high growth program, it is also difficult to achieve the development objectives of Camellia oleifera Abel. Only when making a difference on elasticity of factor inputs, Camellia oleifera Abel product prices, factor prices, the discount rate and other socio-economic conditions can the development goals be achieved. (6) For the supply will and decision-making mechanism of Camellia oleifera Abel, farmers’enthusiasm to plant Camellia oleifera Abel is not high, which mainly due to the comparative low income, industrial policy that not fully demonstrated effects, incomplete market and imperfect social service system.
Based on the above conclusions, this paper makes the following recommendations: (1) The development of Camellia oleifera Abel industry is realistic and urgent, but it is necessary to formulat appropriate developing goals and to enhance the realizability of developing goals through improving tending level of Camellia oleifera Abel. (2) It is necessary to increase farming households’supply will through the expansion of technologies and strengthening the effect of policy incentive and other means to reduce the cost of unit area yield of Camellia oleifera Abel supply. (3) Expand demand of Camellia oleifera Abel by cultivating raw materials markets and clear market positioning, which can immit stable power for the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel.
Given there was little literature studying the supply of Camellia oleifera Abel from economic perspective of household, but the supply of household decision-making is the key to determine whether the Camellia oleifera Abel industry will develop successfully, this study is innovative in perspective and content. This paper also makes some new trial in research methods by combinating of econometrics, operational research and sociology methods. In addition, the conclusions of this study evaluates the policy objectives and proposes the conditions for implementation, which has some practical value. However, due to the limited research conditions, the collection of data is limited to farming households in Fujian Province. Also because of the long growth cycle of Camellia oleifera Abel, the new created Camellia oleifera Abel in recent 5 years which is on behalf of a higher tending level has not yet put into production. Only after the holocarpicing of this part of sample can we obtain a larger scale of input-output data to better reflect the status and potential supply of Camellia oleifera Abel. Therefore, this issue needs further concern and future research.
引文
[1]Albert Park,任常青.自给自足和风险状态下的农户生产决策模型:中国贫困地区的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,1995,(5):22-26.
[2]Yujiro Hayami (速水佑次郎),Vernon W. Ruttan (弗农·拉坦).郭熙保,张进铭译.农业发展的国际分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:208-213.
[3][美]莱斯特·R·布朗.谁供得起中国所需的粮食[M].北京科学技术文献出版社,1995:1-10.
[4]阿马蒂亚·森.王宇译.贫困与饥饿[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:61-69.
[5]包庆丰,王剑.林农对林业社会化服务体系需求分析——基于内蒙古巴彦淖尔市林农调查[J].林业经济,2010,(5):88-90.
[6]卜范达,韩喜立.“农户经营”内涵的探析[J].当代经济研究,2003,(9):39-41.
[7]苍靖.环境保护约束下农户生产模型的研究[J].商业研究,2003,(11): 162-163.
[8]曹彦军,何立霞,柳鹏程.发展油菜籽生物柴油对4种主要农作物的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2008,27(3):462-466.
[9]柴沁虎,申威,张阿玲.中国木薯产业的供给价格弹性[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2009,49(6):897-900.
[10]陈百明.未来中国的农业资源综合生产能力与食物保障[J].地理研究,2002,21(3):294-303.
[11]陈长华,方晓军.江苏农户经营行为分化实证分析[J].中国农村经济,1999,(4):46-50.
[12]陈春霞.行为经济学和行为决策分析——一个综述[J].经济问题探索,2008,(1):124-128.
[13]陈和午.农户模型的发展与应用:文献综述[J].农业技术经济,2004,(3):2-10.
[14]陈进,郭全建,张媛斐,等.元宝枫生物学特性的初步观测[J].经济林研究,2001,19(l):40-42.
[15]陈其霆.理性的农户与农村经济的可持续发展[J].兰州大学学报:社会科学版,2001,29 (4):164-167.
[16]成健红,谭敦炎,艾尔肯,等.巴旦杏花物候学与形态学研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(2):339-344.
[17]成卫民.基于Multi-Agent的农户生产决策行为对环境的影响分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(增刊):324-328.
[18]程文明,杨柏珍,李春如.文冠果果壳中两种幽醇成分研究[J].安徽医药,2001,32(3):199-201.
[19]池泽新.农户行为的影响因素、基本特点与制度启示[J].农业现代化研究,2003,24(9):368-371.
[20]董润泉,习学良,张雨,等.美国山核桃在云南的引种适应性报告[J].西部林业科学,2004,33(1):49-54.
[21]都阳.贫困地区农户参与非农工作的决定因素研究[J].农业技术经济,1999,(4):32-36.
[22]樊胜根,莫塞迪塔·索姆比拉.中国未来粮食供求预测的差别[J].中国农村观察,1997,(3):17-24.
[23]范红霞.海南天然橡胶与甘蔗生产函数模型构建与应用[D].儋州:华南热带农业大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[24]范兰礼,黄井生.遂川县油茶物种和品种类型调查[J].江西林业科技,2001,(4):16-18.
[25]福建农办信息网.福建省人民政府办公厅关于稳步推进我省油茶产业科学发展的通知[EB/OL].(2010-09-21)[2010-09-30].http://www.fjnb.com.cn/html/9/277/20293_201092121.html.
[26]福建农业信息网.福建尤溪八大农业特色产业种植基地面积逾百万亩[EB/OL].(2009-09-04)[2010-12-30].http://nc.mofcom.gov.cn/news/P1P35I11207693.html.
[27]福建省林业厅.福建省油茶产业发展规划( 2009-2020年)[EB/OL].(2010-02-06)[2011-01-02].http://www.fjforestry.gov.cn/InfoShow.aspx?InfoID=8096&InfoTypeID=5.
[28]福建统计局.福建统计年鉴[EB/OL]. ( 2010-01-01 ) [2010-06-20]. http://www.stats-fj.gov.cn/tongjinianjian/dz10/index-cn.htm.
[29]高鸿业.西方经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:52-56.
[30]高疆生,易晓华.南疆巴旦杏与油料作物油脂及高级脂肪酸比较[J].西北农业学报,2001,10(2):36-38.
[31]耿生莲.沙棘固沙林生态特征研究[J].沙棘,2001,14(2):8-11.
[32]宫芳,吴志华.大粮食安全战略探析[J].经济问题,2004,(7):49-51.
[33]广西壮族自治区人民政府.广西壮族自治区人民政府办公厅关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2009-10-30)[2010-09-30]. http://www.law-lib.com/LAW/law_view.asp?id=315717.
[34]贵州林业种苗网.赴湖南、广西考察学习油茶产业发展的报告[EB/OL].(2010-05-19)[2010-09-30].http://www.gzlyzm.com/hydt/ArticleShow.asp?ArticleID=550.
[35]郭瑞华.福建省油茶产业现状及发展对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2009,21(2):42-44.
[36]郭忠兴.政策和制度因素对粮食供给的影响:以江苏为例[D].南京:南京农业大学博士学位论文,1999.
[37]国家林业局.全国油茶产业发展规划(2009-2020)[EB/OL].(2010-01-06)[2011-01-02].http://flower.aweb.com.cn/2009/11/6/11200911061453380.shtml.
[38]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2010-01-01)[2011-03-05].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/.
[39]国家油茶科学中心.油茶高效实用栽培技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:1,62-66.
[40]国土资源部地籍管理司.2008全国土地利用变更调查报告[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2009:5.
[41]韩喜平,谢振华.浅析农户行为与环境保护[J].中国环境管理,2006,(6):27-28.
[42]韩耀.中国农户生产行为研究[J].经济纵横,1995,(5):29-33.
[43]韩志荣,冯亚凡.中国农产品价格40年[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1992:111-122.
[44]洪燕真,刘伟平,戴永务.森林食物在人类营养结构中的贡献研究[J].林业经济问题,2009,29(5):400-405.
[45]洪燕真,余建辉,戴永务,等.基于食物当量计算的木本粮油生产能力研究[J].林业经济,2010,(11):58-61,81.
[46]胡靖.中国粮食安全:公共品属性与长期调控重点[J].中国农村观察,2000,(4):24-30.
[47]湖南省人民政府.湖南省人民政府关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2008-09-03)[2010-09-30].http://www.fsou.com/html/text/lar/170243/17024348.html.
[48]黄季焜,王巧军,陈庆根.农业生产资源合理配置研究:水稻生产的投入产出分析[J].中国水稻科学,1995,9(1):39-44.
[49]黄宗智.长江三角洲小农家庭与乡村发展[M].北京:中华数据出版发行,2000:1-2.
[50]黄宗智.华北小农经济与社会变迁[M].北京:中华书局出版发行,2000:306.
[51]黄祖辉,胡豹.经济学的新分支:行为经济学研究综述[J].浙江社会科学,2003,(2):72-79.
[52]黄祖辉,胡豹,黄莉莉.谁是农业结构调整的主体——农户行为及决策分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004:47-49,74-78.
[53]建瓯市政府.建瓯概况[EB/OL].(2006-10-07)[2010-12-30].http://www.jianou.gov.cn/cms/sitemanage/index.shtml?siteId=30160281120670000.
[54]江西省人民政府.江西省人民政府关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2010-03-25)[2010-09-30].http://law.baidu.com/pages/chinalawinfo/1719/46/f6925dbabaaa18d1a634a0b50e73e18f_0.html.
[55]杰弗瑞·A·杰里,菲利普·J·瑞尼.高级微观经济理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社:141-145.
[56]孔祥智,方松海,庞晓鹏,等.西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004,(12):85-95.
[57]孔祥智,韩纪江,张照新.中国农业需要加快发展的几个领域[J].经济问题,2000,(1):42-45.
[58]孔祥智.中国农家经济审视[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:54-60.
[59]李成贵.现阶段农户经济行为评析[J].农村经济社会,1992,(6):47-51.
[60]李建红,高力力,王花兰.阿月浑子引种试验研究初报[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2003,(4):436-441.
[61]李荣生.中国人不会使世界挨饿[J].自然资源学报,1996,11(4):306-317.
[62]李琐平,王利农.我国蔬菜供给对价格的反应程度分析[J].农业技术经济,2006,(5):59-62.
[63]李岳云.“谁来养活中国”的争论及其启示[J].农业经济问题,1996,(10):2-7.
[64]李子奈,潘文卿.计量经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:330-335.
[65]梁国儒,徐宝友.榛子丰产栽培技术的探讨[J].辽宁林业科技,2005,(3):33-35.
[66]梁鹰.中国能养活自己吗?[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996:1-20.
[67]梁跃龙,杨治国,黄红兰.中国油茶育种现状及其发展趋势[J].江西林业科学,2010,(2):10-13.
[68]林松金.漳平山油茶绿了山头富了农家[EB/OL].(2010-08-10)[2010-12-30].http://www.mxrb.cn/dzb/2010-08/10/content_754895.htm.
[69]林毅夫.90年代中国农村改革的主要问题与展望[J].管理世界,1994,(3):139-144.
[70]林毅夫.小农与经济理性[J].农村经济与社会,1988,(3):31-33.
[71]林毅夫.再论制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000:211.
[72]林玉蕊.C-D生产函数在林产品投入产出中的应用研究[J],运筹与管理,2003,12(4):99-102.
[73]刘莹,黄季焜,王金霞.线性规划方法中存在的加总偏误问题——以农户生产决策模型为例[J].农业技术经济,2007,(5):10-14.
[74]刘跃进,欧日明,陈永忠.我国油茶产业发展现状与对策[J].林业科技开发,2007,21(4):1-4.
[75]马广奇,张林云.行为经济学的理论贡献及其应用[J].经济论坛,2009,458(10)):8-11,12.
[76]马九杰,孟凡友.农民工迁移非持久性的影响因素分析——基于深圳市的实证研究[J].农村改革,2003,(4):77-86.
[77]马力.油茶籽的综合开发利用[J].中国食品添加剂,2007,(2):126-129.
[78]马庆国.管理统计:数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:1-10.
[79]马文杰,冯中朝.基于Nerlove模型的中国小麦供给反应研究[J].技术经济,2009,28(3):50-52,128.
[80]恰亚诺夫[苏].萧正洪译.农民经济组织[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996:99,218.
[81]任继周,侯扶江.改变传统粮食观,试行食物当量[J].草业学报,1999,(12):55-75.
[82]任继周,林慧龙.农田当量的涵义及其所揭示的我国土地资源的食物生产潜力:一个土地资源的食物生产能力评价的新量纲及其在我国的应用[J].草业学报,2006,(10):1-10.
[83]任继周,林慧龙,侯向阳.发展草地农业确保中国食物安全[J].中国农业科学,2007,4(3):614-621.
[84]任继周,南志标,林慧龙.以食物系统保证食物(含粮食)安全:实行草地农业,全面发展食物系统生产潜力[J].草业学报,2005,(6):1-10.
[85]申潞玲,刘执鲁,任红燕.农户生产线性规划技术系数的动态测定与应用[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,1996,12(1):55-57.
[86]史清华.农户经济增长与发展研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999:106-115.
[87]束庆龙,张良富.中国油茶栽培与病虫害防治[M].北京:中国林业出版社:27.
[88]司伟,王秀清.中国糖料作物的供给反应[J].中国农村观察,2006,(4):2-11.
[89]宋圭武.对小农问题的若干思考[J].农业经济问题,1999,(12):6-10.
[90]宋圭武.农户行为研究若干问题述评[J].农业技术经济,2002 ,(4):59-64.
[91]宋洪远.经济体制与农户行为:一个理论分析框架及其对中国农户问题的应用研究[J].经济研究,1994,(8):22-28,35.
[92]田洪舟,裘爱泳.茶籽多糖提取工艺的研究[J].中国油脂,2004,29(2):27-29.
[93]王德文,黄季焜.双轨制度下中国农户粮食供给反应分析[J].经济研究,2001,(11):55-65.
[94]王凤兰,吴明远和朱文卫.农户经济行为与农业产业化关系研究[J].经济问题探索,1998,(10):59-61.
[95]王济民.我国的大豆经济:供给与需求的重点分析[D].北京:中国农业科学院博士学位论文,2000.
[96]王金霞.地下水灌溉系统产权制度的创新、创新效率及政策[D].北京:中国农业科学院博士论文,2000.
[97]王莉,杜珉.我国棉花生产的价格反应研究[J].中国棉花,2009,36(6):2-5.
[98]王晓娟,李周.灌溉用水效率及影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2005,(7):13-20.
[99]王秀清,程厚思.蔬菜供给反应分析[J].经济问题探索,2003,(10):54-56.
[100]王永刚,王裕雄,彭博.我国油料供给反应的实证研究[J].新疆农垦经济,2006,(7):27-30.
[101]王铮,郑一萍.全球变化对中国粮食安全的影响分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(3):282-289.
[102]吴娟,王薇薇,魏丹,等.关于油茶产业发展的思考[J].林业经济,2010,(5):84-87.
[103]吴绍洪,李荣生.中国耕地与未来30年食物需求、保障与对策[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(2):121-128.
[104]吴伟光.我国西南地区生物柴油原料麻疯树发展潜力研究[D].北京:中国科学院博士论文,2010.
[105]西奥多·W·舒尔茨著.梁小民译.改造传统农业[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987:38.
[106]肖志红,陈永忠.油茶加工利用研究综述[J].林业科技开发,2005,19(2):10-13.
[107]新华网.为什么要加快构建新型农业社会化服务体系?[EB/OL].(2008-12-18)[2011-02-11].http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-12/18/content_10523768.htm.
[108]许海平.天然橡胶生产函数、弹性及共给与需求分析[D].儋州:华南热带农业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[109]严瑞珍,孔祥智,程淑兰,等.转轨时期农民行为与政府行为的轨迹[J].经济学家,1997,(5):63-70.
[110]杨坤国,黄明泉.茶皂素提取与精制方法的改进研究[J].林产化学与工业,2001,21(2):44-48.
[111]杨天和.基于农户生产行为的农产品质量安全问题的实证研究[D].南京:南京农业大学博士学位论文,2006.
[112]杨小凯.经济学——新兴古典与新古典框架[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:66-69.
[113]杨焰.油茶籽的综合开发与利用[J].经济林研究,2009,27(24):117-120.
[114]杨抑.中国油茶起源初探[J].中国农史,1992,(3):74-77,95.
[115]叶静渊.“楂”考辨[J].中国农史,2004,(2):28-31.
[116]尤小文.农户:一个概念的探讨[J].中国农村观察,1999,(5):17-20.
[117]余振国,胡小平.我国粮食安全与耕地质量和数量的关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,(5):36-40.
[118]袁新生,邵大宏,郁时炼.LINGO和EXCEL在数学建模中的应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:10-20.
[119]张春霞,许佳贤,黄森慰,等.基于木材供给生产目标下林农经营规模效率研究——以福建省杉木用材林为例[J].中南林业科学大学学报,2010,4(2):5-7,31.
[120]张峰,上官铁梁.山西翅果油树群落种间关系的数量分析[J].植物生态学报,2004,24(3):351-355.
[121]张广胜,吕杰,周小斌.诱致性制度变迁下的农户经济行为研究及启示[J].沈阳农业大学学报:社会科学版,2000,2(2):125-127.
[122]张林秀,徐晓明.农户生产在不同政策环境下行为研究——农户系统模型的应用[J].农业技术经济,1996,(4):27-32.
[123]张少云,李云峰.山杏丰产经营管理技术及效益分析[J].内蒙古林业科技,2002,(2):26-28.
[124]赵建欣.农户安全蔬菜供给决策机制研究——基于河北、山东和浙江菜农的实证[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[125]赵建欣,张忠根.农户安全农产品生产决策影响因素分析[J].统计研究,2007,(11):90-92.
[126]浙江省人民政府.浙江省人民政府办公厅关于加快发展油茶产业的若干意见[EB/OL].(2009-05-27)[2010-09-30].http://www.chinaacc.com/new/63_74_/2009_7_24_wa86232748151427900210669.shtml.
[127]中国社会科学院农村发展所等.农村经济绿皮书.2000～2001中国农村经济形势分析与预测[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002:10-15.
[128]中国食用油信息网.三大食用油进口量均跃居世界第一植物油自给率将进一步下降[EB/OL].(2007-11-22)[2010-09-24].http://www.chinafeed.org.cn/cms/_code/business/include/php/269206.htm.
[129]钟甫宁,叶春辉.GAMS在安徽省农业生产结构调整最优决策中的应用[J].安徽农业大学学报,2004,31(3):372-375.
[130]Aigner, D.J., L.C.A.K., Schmidt.Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, (6):21-37.
[131]Ajzen, I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[132]Ajzen, I.&Driver, B. L. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to leisure choice[J]. Leisure Res, 1992, 24(3): 207-231.
[133]Antle, J.&Crissman, C. Risk, efficiency, and the adoption of modern crop varieties: Evidence from the Philippines[J]. Economic, Social and Cultural Change, 1990, 38(4): 517-537.
[134]Arrow, K.J, H.B.Chenery, B.Minhas and R.M.Solow.Capital—Labor Substitutiont and Economic Efficiency[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1961, (43):225-250.
[135]Askari, H&Cummings, J. T. Estimating agricultural supp ly response with the Nerlove model: a survey[J].International economic review, 1977 (18) : 257 - 292.
[136]Austin, E. J., Willock, J., Deary, I. J. et al. Empirical models of farmer behaviour using psychological, social and economic models variables.Part II:nonlinear and expert modeling[J]. Agricultural Systems, 1998, 58(2): 203-224.
[137]Battese, G.E.Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics[J].Agricultural Economics, 1992, (7):185-208.
[138]Bazzani, G. M., A decision support for an integrated multi—scale analysis of irrigation:DSIRR[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 77(4):301-314.
[139]Bean, L.H.The Farmer’s response to price[J].Journal of Farm Economics, 1929(11):368-385.
[140]Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ.An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark:improving communication between authorities and owners[J].Seand J For Res, 2004, (4):45-55.
[141]Braulke, M.Note on the Nerlove model of agricultural supply response[J].International economic review, 1982, (23):241- 246.
[142]Casebow, A.Human motives in farming.Journal of Agricicultural economics[J].1981, 24(1):119-123.
[143] Christensen, L.R., D.W.Jorgenson and L.J. Lau.Conjugate Duality and the Transcendenral Produetion Funetlon[J]. Econometrica, 1971, (7):255-266.
[144]Christensen, L.R., D.W.Jorgenson & L.J. Lau.Transcendenral Logarthmic Production Frontiers[J]. Review of Economics and statistics, 1973, (2):28-45.
[145]Cornia, G. A..Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries[J]. Review of Economics and statistics, 1985, (13):513-534.
[146]Coughenour, M. C.&Swanson, E. Rewards, values and satisfaction with farm work[J]. Rural Sociology, 1988, 53(4): 442-459.
[147]Darby, M. R.&Karni. E. Free competition and the amount of fraud[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, 16(1): 67-88.
[148]EdwardsW. Behavioral Decision Theory[J].Annual Review of Psychology, 1954, (12): 473-498.
[149]FAO. FAO Production Yearbook [EB/OL]. (2002-01-01)[2009-11-10]. http://www.fao.org/waicent/faostat/agricult/landuse-c.htm.
[150]FAO.Agricultural Polieies, Protectionims and Trde:Selected working papers, 1985-1987[R].FAO, Eeonomic and Social Development Paper, Rome, 1988.
[151]FAO.FAOSTAT [EB/OL].(2009-08-05)[ 2009-08-05]. http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/zh/.
[152]FAO.Non-wood forest products: the way ahead[EB/OL].(1999-01-01)[ 2009-08-01]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0431E/t0431e00.
[153]FAO.World Food Security:A Reapparisal of the Concepts and Apporaches[R].Diretor-General’s Report, Rome, 1983.
[154]Gasson, R.&Potter, C. Conservation through land diversion: A farmers' attitudes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988, 39(3): 340-351.
[155]Gσmez-Limσn, J.A., Riesgo, L., Irrigation water pricing:differential impacts on irrigated farms[J].Agricultural Economies, 2004, (31):47-66.
[156]Hobbs, J.E.:Measuring the Importance of Transaction Costs in the Marketing[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, (79):1083–1095.
[157]Huang, J, S. Rozelle. Environmental Stress and Grain Yields in China[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995, (77):853-864.
[158]Huylenbroeck, G.V., Campos, E.M.U., Vanslembrouck, I., A (recursive)multiple objective approach to analyse changes in the utility function of farmers due to policy reforms[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2001,122(3):283-299.
[159]John Gafer, The supply response for sugar cane in Trinidad and Tobago: some preliminary results[J].Applied Economics, 1987, (19):1221-1231.
[160]Just, R.E., R.D. Pope. Production function estimation and related risk considerations[M]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979,61(2):276-284.
[161]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An analysis decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979,(47):263-291.
[162]Kaivan D. Munshi a, Kirit S. Parikh. Milk supply behavior in India: Data integration, estimation and implications for dairy development[J].Journal of Development Economics, 1994, 4(5): 201-223.
[163]Kalirajan, K. .An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production[J].Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1981, (29):283-294.
[164]Karppinen H.Forest values and the objectives of forest ownership[D].Helsinki:Metsa ntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 2000.
[165]Karppinen H.Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland[J].Silva Fenn, 1998, 32(1):43-59.
[166]Kline JD, Alig RJ, Johnson RL. Fostering the production of non-timber serviees among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives[J].Forest science, 2000, 46(2):302-311.
[167]Krueger, N. F. Reilly, M. D.&Carsrud, A. L., Competing models of enterpreneurial intentions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000, 15(5/6): 411-432.
[168]Kurtz WB, Lewis BJ. Decision-making framework for non-industrial private forest owners:an application in the Missouri Ozarks[J].J For, 1981, 79(5):285-288.
[169]Leon, H., Porez E., Herrero, M.The role of personal information sources on the decision-making Process of Costa Rican dairy farmers[J].Agricultural Systems, 2003, 76(l):3-18.
[170]Lonnstedt L. Non-industrial private forest owners’deeision Process: A qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives[J].Scand J For Res, 1997, 12(3):302-310.
[171]Lynne, D. G.& Rola, L. R. Improving attitude-behavior prediction models with economic variables: farmer actions toward soil conservation[J].The Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 128 (1):19-28.
[172]Maria del Carmen Vera-Diaz, Robert K. Kaufmanna, Daniel C. Nepstad, Peter Schlesinger:An interdisciplinary model of soybean yield in the Amazon Basin:The climatic, edaphic and economic determinants [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, (65):420-431.
[173]Marty TD, Kurtz WB, Gramann JH. PNIF owner attitudes in the Midwest: a case study in Missouri and Wiseonsin[J]. North J Appl For, 1988, 5(3):194-197.
[174]Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston, J. R., Green.Microecnomic Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1995:238-245.
[175]McClymont,D.Decision-making process of commercial farmers in Zimbabwe[J].Agricultural Administration, 1984, 17(3): 149-162.
[176]Meeusen, W., J.D. Broeck. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error[J].International Economic Review, 1977, 18(2):435-446.
[177]Mizaraite D, Mizaras S. The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with eeonomy in transition:observations from Lithuania[J].Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy, 2005, 4(4):437-450.
[178]Nerlove M. Estimates of elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1956, (38) : 496 - 509.
[179]NerloveM. and W. Addison, Statistical estimation of long-run elasticities of supply and demand[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1958, (40) :861-880.
[180]Parikh. A, Estimation of supply functions for coffee[J]. Applied Economics, 1979, (11) : 43-54.
[181]Perkin, P.&Rehman, T. Farmers' objectives and their interactions with business and life styles: Evidence from Berkshire, England[M]. In J. B. Dent& M. J. McGregor (Eds.), Rural and farming systems analysis: European perspectives Wallingford, UK: CAB. 1994: 193-212.
[182]Salamon, S.&Davis-Brown, K. Middle range farmers persisting through the agricultural crisis[J]. Rural Sociology, 1986, 51(4): 503-512.
[183]Simon H. A. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment[J].Psychological Review, 1956, (63):120–138.
[184]Solow, R.M.Technical change and aggregate production function[J].The review of economics and statistics, 1957, 39(3):312-320.
[185]Tversky A, Kahneman D.Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation under Certainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, (5):297-323.
[186]Tversky A, Kahneman D.Rational Choice and Framing of Decisions[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, (59):252-278.
[187]Wicken, M, R. and Greenfield, J. N. The econometrics of agricultural supply: an application to the world coffee market[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 1973, (55):433-440.
[188]Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA. Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: Characteristics and future potential[J]. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy, 2005, 4(l):l-19.
[189]Williamson, O.E..Economic Organization:Firms, Markets and Policy Control, Hertfordshire[M].UK:Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1986:287-292.
[2]Yujiro Hayami (速水佑次郎),Vernon W. Ruttan (弗农·拉坦).郭熙保,张进铭译.农业发展的国际分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:208-213.
[3][美]莱斯特·R·布朗.谁供得起中国所需的粮食[M].北京科学技术文献出版社,1995:1-10.
[4]阿马蒂亚·森.王宇译.贫困与饥饿[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:61-69.
[5]包庆丰,王剑.林农对林业社会化服务体系需求分析——基于内蒙古巴彦淖尔市林农调查[J].林业经济,2010,(5):88-90.
[6]卜范达,韩喜立.“农户经营”内涵的探析[J].当代经济研究,2003,(9):39-41.
[7]苍靖.环境保护约束下农户生产模型的研究[J].商业研究,2003,(11): 162-163.
[8]曹彦军,何立霞,柳鹏程.发展油菜籽生物柴油对4种主要农作物的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2008,27(3):462-466.
[9]柴沁虎,申威,张阿玲.中国木薯产业的供给价格弹性[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2009,49(6):897-900.
[10]陈百明.未来中国的农业资源综合生产能力与食物保障[J].地理研究,2002,21(3):294-303.
[11]陈长华,方晓军.江苏农户经营行为分化实证分析[J].中国农村经济,1999,(4):46-50.
[12]陈春霞.行为经济学和行为决策分析——一个综述[J].经济问题探索,2008,(1):124-128.
[13]陈和午.农户模型的发展与应用:文献综述[J].农业技术经济,2004,(3):2-10.
[14]陈进,郭全建,张媛斐,等.元宝枫生物学特性的初步观测[J].经济林研究,2001,19(l):40-42.
[15]陈其霆.理性的农户与农村经济的可持续发展[J].兰州大学学报:社会科学版,2001,29 (4):164-167.
[16]成健红,谭敦炎,艾尔肯,等.巴旦杏花物候学与形态学研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(2):339-344.
[17]成卫民.基于Multi-Agent的农户生产决策行为对环境的影响分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(增刊):324-328.
[18]程文明,杨柏珍,李春如.文冠果果壳中两种幽醇成分研究[J].安徽医药,2001,32(3):199-201.
[19]池泽新.农户行为的影响因素、基本特点与制度启示[J].农业现代化研究,2003,24(9):368-371.
[20]董润泉,习学良,张雨,等.美国山核桃在云南的引种适应性报告[J].西部林业科学,2004,33(1):49-54.
[21]都阳.贫困地区农户参与非农工作的决定因素研究[J].农业技术经济,1999,(4):32-36.
[22]樊胜根,莫塞迪塔·索姆比拉.中国未来粮食供求预测的差别[J].中国农村观察,1997,(3):17-24.
[23]范红霞.海南天然橡胶与甘蔗生产函数模型构建与应用[D].儋州:华南热带农业大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[24]范兰礼,黄井生.遂川县油茶物种和品种类型调查[J].江西林业科技,2001,(4):16-18.
[25]福建农办信息网.福建省人民政府办公厅关于稳步推进我省油茶产业科学发展的通知[EB/OL].(2010-09-21)[2010-09-30].http://www.fjnb.com.cn/html/9/277/20293_201092121.html.
[26]福建农业信息网.福建尤溪八大农业特色产业种植基地面积逾百万亩[EB/OL].(2009-09-04)[2010-12-30].http://nc.mofcom.gov.cn/news/P1P35I11207693.html.
[27]福建省林业厅.福建省油茶产业发展规划( 2009-2020年)[EB/OL].(2010-02-06)[2011-01-02].http://www.fjforestry.gov.cn/InfoShow.aspx?InfoID=8096&InfoTypeID=5.
[28]福建统计局.福建统计年鉴[EB/OL]. ( 2010-01-01 ) [2010-06-20]. http://www.stats-fj.gov.cn/tongjinianjian/dz10/index-cn.htm.
[29]高鸿业.西方经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:52-56.
[30]高疆生,易晓华.南疆巴旦杏与油料作物油脂及高级脂肪酸比较[J].西北农业学报,2001,10(2):36-38.
[31]耿生莲.沙棘固沙林生态特征研究[J].沙棘,2001,14(2):8-11.
[32]宫芳,吴志华.大粮食安全战略探析[J].经济问题,2004,(7):49-51.
[33]广西壮族自治区人民政府.广西壮族自治区人民政府办公厅关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2009-10-30)[2010-09-30]. http://www.law-lib.com/LAW/law_view.asp?id=315717.
[34]贵州林业种苗网.赴湖南、广西考察学习油茶产业发展的报告[EB/OL].(2010-05-19)[2010-09-30].http://www.gzlyzm.com/hydt/ArticleShow.asp?ArticleID=550.
[35]郭瑞华.福建省油茶产业现状及发展对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2009,21(2):42-44.
[36]郭忠兴.政策和制度因素对粮食供给的影响:以江苏为例[D].南京:南京农业大学博士学位论文,1999.
[37]国家林业局.全国油茶产业发展规划(2009-2020)[EB/OL].(2010-01-06)[2011-01-02].http://flower.aweb.com.cn/2009/11/6/11200911061453380.shtml.
[38]国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2010-01-01)[2011-03-05].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/.
[39]国家油茶科学中心.油茶高效实用栽培技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:1,62-66.
[40]国土资源部地籍管理司.2008全国土地利用变更调查报告[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2009:5.
[41]韩喜平,谢振华.浅析农户行为与环境保护[J].中国环境管理,2006,(6):27-28.
[42]韩耀.中国农户生产行为研究[J].经济纵横,1995,(5):29-33.
[43]韩志荣,冯亚凡.中国农产品价格40年[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1992:111-122.
[44]洪燕真,刘伟平,戴永务.森林食物在人类营养结构中的贡献研究[J].林业经济问题,2009,29(5):400-405.
[45]洪燕真,余建辉,戴永务,等.基于食物当量计算的木本粮油生产能力研究[J].林业经济,2010,(11):58-61,81.
[46]胡靖.中国粮食安全:公共品属性与长期调控重点[J].中国农村观察,2000,(4):24-30.
[47]湖南省人民政府.湖南省人民政府关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2008-09-03)[2010-09-30].http://www.fsou.com/html/text/lar/170243/17024348.html.
[48]黄季焜,王巧军,陈庆根.农业生产资源合理配置研究:水稻生产的投入产出分析[J].中国水稻科学,1995,9(1):39-44.
[49]黄宗智.长江三角洲小农家庭与乡村发展[M].北京:中华数据出版发行,2000:1-2.
[50]黄宗智.华北小农经济与社会变迁[M].北京:中华书局出版发行,2000:306.
[51]黄祖辉,胡豹.经济学的新分支:行为经济学研究综述[J].浙江社会科学,2003,(2):72-79.
[52]黄祖辉,胡豹,黄莉莉.谁是农业结构调整的主体——农户行为及决策分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004:47-49,74-78.
[53]建瓯市政府.建瓯概况[EB/OL].(2006-10-07)[2010-12-30].http://www.jianou.gov.cn/cms/sitemanage/index.shtml?siteId=30160281120670000.
[54]江西省人民政府.江西省人民政府关于加快油茶产业发展的意见[EB/OL].(2010-03-25)[2010-09-30].http://law.baidu.com/pages/chinalawinfo/1719/46/f6925dbabaaa18d1a634a0b50e73e18f_0.html.
[55]杰弗瑞·A·杰里,菲利普·J·瑞尼.高级微观经济理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社:141-145.
[56]孔祥智,方松海,庞晓鹏,等.西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004,(12):85-95.
[57]孔祥智,韩纪江,张照新.中国农业需要加快发展的几个领域[J].经济问题,2000,(1):42-45.
[58]孔祥智.中国农家经济审视[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:54-60.
[59]李成贵.现阶段农户经济行为评析[J].农村经济社会,1992,(6):47-51.
[60]李建红,高力力,王花兰.阿月浑子引种试验研究初报[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2003,(4):436-441.
[61]李荣生.中国人不会使世界挨饿[J].自然资源学报,1996,11(4):306-317.
[62]李琐平,王利农.我国蔬菜供给对价格的反应程度分析[J].农业技术经济,2006,(5):59-62.
[63]李岳云.“谁来养活中国”的争论及其启示[J].农业经济问题,1996,(10):2-7.
[64]李子奈,潘文卿.计量经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:330-335.
[65]梁国儒,徐宝友.榛子丰产栽培技术的探讨[J].辽宁林业科技,2005,(3):33-35.
[66]梁鹰.中国能养活自己吗?[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996:1-20.
[67]梁跃龙,杨治国,黄红兰.中国油茶育种现状及其发展趋势[J].江西林业科学,2010,(2):10-13.
[68]林松金.漳平山油茶绿了山头富了农家[EB/OL].(2010-08-10)[2010-12-30].http://www.mxrb.cn/dzb/2010-08/10/content_754895.htm.
[69]林毅夫.90年代中国农村改革的主要问题与展望[J].管理世界,1994,(3):139-144.
[70]林毅夫.小农与经济理性[J].农村经济与社会,1988,(3):31-33.
[71]林毅夫.再论制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000:211.
[72]林玉蕊.C-D生产函数在林产品投入产出中的应用研究[J],运筹与管理,2003,12(4):99-102.
[73]刘莹,黄季焜,王金霞.线性规划方法中存在的加总偏误问题——以农户生产决策模型为例[J].农业技术经济,2007,(5):10-14.
[74]刘跃进,欧日明,陈永忠.我国油茶产业发展现状与对策[J].林业科技开发,2007,21(4):1-4.
[75]马广奇,张林云.行为经济学的理论贡献及其应用[J].经济论坛,2009,458(10)):8-11,12.
[76]马九杰,孟凡友.农民工迁移非持久性的影响因素分析——基于深圳市的实证研究[J].农村改革,2003,(4):77-86.
[77]马力.油茶籽的综合开发利用[J].中国食品添加剂,2007,(2):126-129.
[78]马庆国.管理统计:数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:1-10.
[79]马文杰,冯中朝.基于Nerlove模型的中国小麦供给反应研究[J].技术经济,2009,28(3):50-52,128.
[80]恰亚诺夫[苏].萧正洪译.农民经济组织[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996:99,218.
[81]任继周,侯扶江.改变传统粮食观,试行食物当量[J].草业学报,1999,(12):55-75.
[82]任继周,林慧龙.农田当量的涵义及其所揭示的我国土地资源的食物生产潜力:一个土地资源的食物生产能力评价的新量纲及其在我国的应用[J].草业学报,2006,(10):1-10.
[83]任继周,林慧龙,侯向阳.发展草地农业确保中国食物安全[J].中国农业科学,2007,4(3):614-621.
[84]任继周,南志标,林慧龙.以食物系统保证食物(含粮食)安全:实行草地农业,全面发展食物系统生产潜力[J].草业学报,2005,(6):1-10.
[85]申潞玲,刘执鲁,任红燕.农户生产线性规划技术系数的动态测定与应用[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,1996,12(1):55-57.
[86]史清华.农户经济增长与发展研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999:106-115.
[87]束庆龙,张良富.中国油茶栽培与病虫害防治[M].北京:中国林业出版社:27.
[88]司伟,王秀清.中国糖料作物的供给反应[J].中国农村观察,2006,(4):2-11.
[89]宋圭武.对小农问题的若干思考[J].农业经济问题,1999,(12):6-10.
[90]宋圭武.农户行为研究若干问题述评[J].农业技术经济,2002 ,(4):59-64.
[91]宋洪远.经济体制与农户行为:一个理论分析框架及其对中国农户问题的应用研究[J].经济研究,1994,(8):22-28,35.
[92]田洪舟,裘爱泳.茶籽多糖提取工艺的研究[J].中国油脂,2004,29(2):27-29.
[93]王德文,黄季焜.双轨制度下中国农户粮食供给反应分析[J].经济研究,2001,(11):55-65.
[94]王凤兰,吴明远和朱文卫.农户经济行为与农业产业化关系研究[J].经济问题探索,1998,(10):59-61.
[95]王济民.我国的大豆经济:供给与需求的重点分析[D].北京:中国农业科学院博士学位论文,2000.
[96]王金霞.地下水灌溉系统产权制度的创新、创新效率及政策[D].北京:中国农业科学院博士论文,2000.
[97]王莉,杜珉.我国棉花生产的价格反应研究[J].中国棉花,2009,36(6):2-5.
[98]王晓娟,李周.灌溉用水效率及影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2005,(7):13-20.
[99]王秀清,程厚思.蔬菜供给反应分析[J].经济问题探索,2003,(10):54-56.
[100]王永刚,王裕雄,彭博.我国油料供给反应的实证研究[J].新疆农垦经济,2006,(7):27-30.
[101]王铮,郑一萍.全球变化对中国粮食安全的影响分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(3):282-289.
[102]吴娟,王薇薇,魏丹,等.关于油茶产业发展的思考[J].林业经济,2010,(5):84-87.
[103]吴绍洪,李荣生.中国耕地与未来30年食物需求、保障与对策[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(2):121-128.
[104]吴伟光.我国西南地区生物柴油原料麻疯树发展潜力研究[D].北京:中国科学院博士论文,2010.
[105]西奥多·W·舒尔茨著.梁小民译.改造传统农业[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987:38.
[106]肖志红,陈永忠.油茶加工利用研究综述[J].林业科技开发,2005,19(2):10-13.
[107]新华网.为什么要加快构建新型农业社会化服务体系?[EB/OL].(2008-12-18)[2011-02-11].http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-12/18/content_10523768.htm.
[108]许海平.天然橡胶生产函数、弹性及共给与需求分析[D].儋州:华南热带农业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[109]严瑞珍,孔祥智,程淑兰,等.转轨时期农民行为与政府行为的轨迹[J].经济学家,1997,(5):63-70.
[110]杨坤国,黄明泉.茶皂素提取与精制方法的改进研究[J].林产化学与工业,2001,21(2):44-48.
[111]杨天和.基于农户生产行为的农产品质量安全问题的实证研究[D].南京:南京农业大学博士学位论文,2006.
[112]杨小凯.经济学——新兴古典与新古典框架[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:66-69.
[113]杨焰.油茶籽的综合开发与利用[J].经济林研究,2009,27(24):117-120.
[114]杨抑.中国油茶起源初探[J].中国农史,1992,(3):74-77,95.
[115]叶静渊.“楂”考辨[J].中国农史,2004,(2):28-31.
[116]尤小文.农户:一个概念的探讨[J].中国农村观察,1999,(5):17-20.
[117]余振国,胡小平.我国粮食安全与耕地质量和数量的关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,(5):36-40.
[118]袁新生,邵大宏,郁时炼.LINGO和EXCEL在数学建模中的应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:10-20.
[119]张春霞,许佳贤,黄森慰,等.基于木材供给生产目标下林农经营规模效率研究——以福建省杉木用材林为例[J].中南林业科学大学学报,2010,4(2):5-7,31.
[120]张峰,上官铁梁.山西翅果油树群落种间关系的数量分析[J].植物生态学报,2004,24(3):351-355.
[121]张广胜,吕杰,周小斌.诱致性制度变迁下的农户经济行为研究及启示[J].沈阳农业大学学报:社会科学版,2000,2(2):125-127.
[122]张林秀,徐晓明.农户生产在不同政策环境下行为研究——农户系统模型的应用[J].农业技术经济,1996,(4):27-32.
[123]张少云,李云峰.山杏丰产经营管理技术及效益分析[J].内蒙古林业科技,2002,(2):26-28.
[124]赵建欣.农户安全蔬菜供给决策机制研究——基于河北、山东和浙江菜农的实证[D].杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[125]赵建欣,张忠根.农户安全农产品生产决策影响因素分析[J].统计研究,2007,(11):90-92.
[126]浙江省人民政府.浙江省人民政府办公厅关于加快发展油茶产业的若干意见[EB/OL].(2009-05-27)[2010-09-30].http://www.chinaacc.com/new/63_74_/2009_7_24_wa86232748151427900210669.shtml.
[127]中国社会科学院农村发展所等.农村经济绿皮书.2000～2001中国农村经济形势分析与预测[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002:10-15.
[128]中国食用油信息网.三大食用油进口量均跃居世界第一植物油自给率将进一步下降[EB/OL].(2007-11-22)[2010-09-24].http://www.chinafeed.org.cn/cms/_code/business/include/php/269206.htm.
[129]钟甫宁,叶春辉.GAMS在安徽省农业生产结构调整最优决策中的应用[J].安徽农业大学学报,2004,31(3):372-375.
[130]Aigner, D.J., L.C.A.K., Schmidt.Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, (6):21-37.
[131]Ajzen, I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[132]Ajzen, I.&Driver, B. L. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to leisure choice[J]. Leisure Res, 1992, 24(3): 207-231.
[133]Antle, J.&Crissman, C. Risk, efficiency, and the adoption of modern crop varieties: Evidence from the Philippines[J]. Economic, Social and Cultural Change, 1990, 38(4): 517-537.
[134]Arrow, K.J, H.B.Chenery, B.Minhas and R.M.Solow.Capital—Labor Substitutiont and Economic Efficiency[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1961, (43):225-250.
[135]Askari, H&Cummings, J. T. Estimating agricultural supp ly response with the Nerlove model: a survey[J].International economic review, 1977 (18) : 257 - 292.
[136]Austin, E. J., Willock, J., Deary, I. J. et al. Empirical models of farmer behaviour using psychological, social and economic models variables.Part II:nonlinear and expert modeling[J]. Agricultural Systems, 1998, 58(2): 203-224.
[137]Battese, G.E.Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics[J].Agricultural Economics, 1992, (7):185-208.
[138]Bazzani, G. M., A decision support for an integrated multi—scale analysis of irrigation:DSIRR[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 77(4):301-314.
[139]Bean, L.H.The Farmer’s response to price[J].Journal of Farm Economics, 1929(11):368-385.
[140]Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ.An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark:improving communication between authorities and owners[J].Seand J For Res, 2004, (4):45-55.
[141]Braulke, M.Note on the Nerlove model of agricultural supply response[J].International economic review, 1982, (23):241- 246.
[142]Casebow, A.Human motives in farming.Journal of Agricicultural economics[J].1981, 24(1):119-123.
[143] Christensen, L.R., D.W.Jorgenson and L.J. Lau.Conjugate Duality and the Transcendenral Produetion Funetlon[J]. Econometrica, 1971, (7):255-266.
[144]Christensen, L.R., D.W.Jorgenson & L.J. Lau.Transcendenral Logarthmic Production Frontiers[J]. Review of Economics and statistics, 1973, (2):28-45.
[145]Cornia, G. A..Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries[J]. Review of Economics and statistics, 1985, (13):513-534.
[146]Coughenour, M. C.&Swanson, E. Rewards, values and satisfaction with farm work[J]. Rural Sociology, 1988, 53(4): 442-459.
[147]Darby, M. R.&Karni. E. Free competition and the amount of fraud[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, 16(1): 67-88.
[148]EdwardsW. Behavioral Decision Theory[J].Annual Review of Psychology, 1954, (12): 473-498.
[149]FAO. FAO Production Yearbook [EB/OL]. (2002-01-01)[2009-11-10]. http://www.fao.org/waicent/faostat/agricult/landuse-c.htm.
[150]FAO.Agricultural Polieies, Protectionims and Trde:Selected working papers, 1985-1987[R].FAO, Eeonomic and Social Development Paper, Rome, 1988.
[151]FAO.FAOSTAT [EB/OL].(2009-08-05)[ 2009-08-05]. http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/zh/.
[152]FAO.Non-wood forest products: the way ahead[EB/OL].(1999-01-01)[ 2009-08-01]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0431E/t0431e00.
[153]FAO.World Food Security:A Reapparisal of the Concepts and Apporaches[R].Diretor-General’s Report, Rome, 1983.
[154]Gasson, R.&Potter, C. Conservation through land diversion: A farmers' attitudes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988, 39(3): 340-351.
[155]Gσmez-Limσn, J.A., Riesgo, L., Irrigation water pricing:differential impacts on irrigated farms[J].Agricultural Economies, 2004, (31):47-66.
[156]Hobbs, J.E.:Measuring the Importance of Transaction Costs in the Marketing[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, (79):1083–1095.
[157]Huang, J, S. Rozelle. Environmental Stress and Grain Yields in China[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995, (77):853-864.
[158]Huylenbroeck, G.V., Campos, E.M.U., Vanslembrouck, I., A (recursive)multiple objective approach to analyse changes in the utility function of farmers due to policy reforms[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2001,122(3):283-299.
[159]John Gafer, The supply response for sugar cane in Trinidad and Tobago: some preliminary results[J].Applied Economics, 1987, (19):1221-1231.
[160]Just, R.E., R.D. Pope. Production function estimation and related risk considerations[M]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979,61(2):276-284.
[161]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An analysis decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979,(47):263-291.
[162]Kaivan D. Munshi a, Kirit S. Parikh. Milk supply behavior in India: Data integration, estimation and implications for dairy development[J].Journal of Development Economics, 1994, 4(5): 201-223.
[163]Kalirajan, K. .An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production[J].Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1981, (29):283-294.
[164]Karppinen H.Forest values and the objectives of forest ownership[D].Helsinki:Metsa ntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 2000.
[165]Karppinen H.Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland[J].Silva Fenn, 1998, 32(1):43-59.
[166]Kline JD, Alig RJ, Johnson RL. Fostering the production of non-timber serviees among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives[J].Forest science, 2000, 46(2):302-311.
[167]Krueger, N. F. Reilly, M. D.&Carsrud, A. L., Competing models of enterpreneurial intentions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000, 15(5/6): 411-432.
[168]Kurtz WB, Lewis BJ. Decision-making framework for non-industrial private forest owners:an application in the Missouri Ozarks[J].J For, 1981, 79(5):285-288.
[169]Leon, H., Porez E., Herrero, M.The role of personal information sources on the decision-making Process of Costa Rican dairy farmers[J].Agricultural Systems, 2003, 76(l):3-18.
[170]Lonnstedt L. Non-industrial private forest owners’deeision Process: A qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives[J].Scand J For Res, 1997, 12(3):302-310.
[171]Lynne, D. G.& Rola, L. R. Improving attitude-behavior prediction models with economic variables: farmer actions toward soil conservation[J].The Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 128 (1):19-28.
[172]Maria del Carmen Vera-Diaz, Robert K. Kaufmanna, Daniel C. Nepstad, Peter Schlesinger:An interdisciplinary model of soybean yield in the Amazon Basin:The climatic, edaphic and economic determinants [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, (65):420-431.
[173]Marty TD, Kurtz WB, Gramann JH. PNIF owner attitudes in the Midwest: a case study in Missouri and Wiseonsin[J]. North J Appl For, 1988, 5(3):194-197.
[174]Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston, J. R., Green.Microecnomic Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1995:238-245.
[175]McClymont,D.Decision-making process of commercial farmers in Zimbabwe[J].Agricultural Administration, 1984, 17(3): 149-162.
[176]Meeusen, W., J.D. Broeck. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error[J].International Economic Review, 1977, 18(2):435-446.
[177]Mizaraite D, Mizaras S. The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with eeonomy in transition:observations from Lithuania[J].Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy, 2005, 4(4):437-450.
[178]Nerlove M. Estimates of elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1956, (38) : 496 - 509.
[179]NerloveM. and W. Addison, Statistical estimation of long-run elasticities of supply and demand[J]. Journal of Farm Economics, 1958, (40) :861-880.
[180]Parikh. A, Estimation of supply functions for coffee[J]. Applied Economics, 1979, (11) : 43-54.
[181]Perkin, P.&Rehman, T. Farmers' objectives and their interactions with business and life styles: Evidence from Berkshire, England[M]. In J. B. Dent& M. J. McGregor (Eds.), Rural and farming systems analysis: European perspectives Wallingford, UK: CAB. 1994: 193-212.
[182]Salamon, S.&Davis-Brown, K. Middle range farmers persisting through the agricultural crisis[J]. Rural Sociology, 1986, 51(4): 503-512.
[183]Simon H. A. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment[J].Psychological Review, 1956, (63):120–138.
[184]Solow, R.M.Technical change and aggregate production function[J].The review of economics and statistics, 1957, 39(3):312-320.
[185]Tversky A, Kahneman D.Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation under Certainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, (5):297-323.
[186]Tversky A, Kahneman D.Rational Choice and Framing of Decisions[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, (59):252-278.
[187]Wicken, M, R. and Greenfield, J. N. The econometrics of agricultural supply: an application to the world coffee market[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 1973, (55):433-440.
[188]Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA. Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: Characteristics and future potential[J]. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy, 2005, 4(l):l-19.
[189]Williamson, O.E..Economic Organization:Firms, Markets and Policy Control, Hertfordshire[M].UK:Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1986:287-292.