煤炭企业科学发展评价系统研究
|
摘要
学习贯彻科学发展观是我国长期的战略任务,学习实践科学发展观的根本目的在于推进科学发展。煤炭作为能源支柱在我国社会经济中发挥着巨大作用。在未来相当长的时期内,我国以煤为主的能源格局不会改变,煤炭工业、企业能否科学发展关系着国家能源安全和国民经济的全局。近年来,煤炭工业、企业虽然取得了长足进步,但由于多种因素的影响,煤炭工业企业在发展过程中还存在着结构不合理、增长方式粗放、科学技术水平低、安全事故多发、资源浪费严重、环境治理滞后、行业管理能力差、历史遗留问题较多等突出问题,这些问题均不符合科学发展与科学发展观的要求。在新形势下,煤炭企业如何以邓小平理论、“三个代表”重要思想和科学发展观为指导,以保障国家煤炭资源稳定供给和能源安全为宗旨,认真贯彻落实煤炭工业“十二五”发展规划,不断提升煤炭企业科学发展能力,实现煤炭企业科学发展是煤炭工业领域、煤炭企业面临的主要课题。
关于科学发展观、科学发展的研究成果非常丰富,但系统地研究煤炭企业科学发展的成果较少,对煤炭企业科学发展进行定量研究的成果更少。开展煤炭企业科学发展力评价系统研究无论是对煤炭企业高度重视贯彻落实科学发展观,推进煤炭企业科学发展理论体系的形成；还是对煤炭企业、煤炭工业管理部门开展煤炭企业科学发展能力的纵向、横向比较,分析与协调煤炭企业科学发展的影响因素,从而为提升煤炭企业科学发展能力提出相应的对策与建议都具有非常重要的现实意义与学术价值。
因此,本文以煤炭企业科学发展力评价系统研究为主题,力争使煤炭企业科学发展力的理论与方法体系得到丰富和完善,为煤炭企业提升科学发展力提供理论和实践依据。
本文完整、系统地阐述了煤炭企业科学发展力的概念、内涵,构建了煤炭企业科学发展力系统框架。建立了煤炭企业科学发展力评价指标体系,提出将层次分析法、模糊综合评价法以及FCM算法相结合对煤炭企业科学发展力进行评价。根据对义马煤业集团股份有限公司(简称：义煤集团,下同)问卷调查数据和历史发展数据,对该公司科学发展力进行了实证评价研究。最后提出了煤炭企业科学发展力提升的对策。
全文共七章,具体研究内容如下
第一章介绍了研究的背景、意义和研究方法。全面梳理了相关的理论、国内外相关研究进展。通过文献综述,总结了煤炭企业科学发展力评价研究的主要成果和存在的不足,明确了论文研究的主要内容、方法及创新点。
第二章梳理了国外、我国及河南省煤炭资源概况,煤炭资源开发利用现状。对我国煤炭行业发展历程做了回顾,分析了我国煤炭企业的发展现状及存在的问题。目前,我国煤炭企业存在八个方面的主要问题：科学发展理念薄弱,管理水平不高；资源勘探能力不足,综合利用程度较低;产业结构比较单一,经济发展潜力不强;环境污染严重;从业人员素质低,分流困难；安全生产形势依然严峻。本章进一步明确了研究主题的现状与存在的问题,为以后章节研究我国煤炭行业、企业如何选择正确的发展道路打下了铺垫。
第三章提出了煤炭企业科学发展力(Degree of Scientific Development of Coal-based Enterprises,简称DSDCE)的概念、内涵并建立了概念模型。煤炭企业科学发展力是指：煤炭企业以科学发展观为统领,统筹兼顾人的全面发展、经济效益好、资源可持续、环境污染少、安全有保障、管理创新强等目标,实现企业全面、协调、可持续发展的能力。煤炭企业科学发展力(DSDCE)的概念模型可表示为：DSDCE=F (u1u2. U3, U4, u5, u6)。其中,u1表示人的全面发展,u2表示经济发展水平,u3表示资源可持续能力,u4表示环境控制水平,u5表示安全保障能力,u6表示管理与创新能力。另外,构建了煤炭企业科学发展力系统框架,煤炭企业科学发展力系统是煤炭工业中一个复杂的具体系统,该系统由人的全而发展、经济发展、资源能力、环境保护、安全生产、管理与科技创新等六个子系统组成。
第四章构建了煤炭企业科学发展力评价指标体系。指标体系包含日标层(煤炭企业科学发展力),准则层(6层,人的全面发展、经济发展水平、资源持续能力、环境控制水平、安全保障能力、管理创新能力),具体指标(28个)。在全面分析综合评价方法的基础上,提出将层次分析法、模糊综合评价法以及FCM算法相结合,对煤炭企业科学发展力进行评价。
第五章对义煤集团的发展历程、发展现状进行了深入的分析总结,明确了企业发展的困难与问题。根据对义煤集团问卷调查的数据,采用AHP、模糊综合评价相结合的方法对义煤集团科学发展力进行了综合评价,得出义煤集团2012年科学发展力“较强”的结论。根据义煤集团1996年至2011年评价指标的原始数据,采用AHP、FCM、模糊综合评价相结合的方法,对其1996年至2011年的科学发展力进行了综合评价,得出的结论基本符合义煤集团发展的历程,结果具有一定的可信度。并对两种评价的结果进行了深入分析。提出了义煤集团“要把经济发展始终作为科学发展力提升的第一要义;要把资源扩张与节约放在最基础地位：要把安全生产作为科学发展力提升的保障：要把增强管理创新能力作为科学发展力的源泉；要把人才工作作为科学发展力提升的核心;要把全面协调可持续作为科学发展力提升的基本要求”六个方面的建议。
第六章本章结合前面章节理论研究与实证研究的成果,从政府管理工作与企业自身两个方面提出了提升煤炭企业科学发展力的建议。政府应从加强法制建设、加强政策引导、加强监督管理三个方面加强对煤炭企业的引导,促进其科学发展力的提升。煤炭企业应根据国家产业政策的要求,按照深入贯彻落实科学发展观的要求,从“加强引才育才,完善考评机制；发展多种经营,转变经济发展模式；坚持资源扩张,提高资源利用率；减少矿区环境扰动,加强生态恢复;高度重视安全生产,落实保障措施；加强管理水平,重视技术创新”六个方面提升自身的科学发展力。
第七章对全文的主要研究内容进行了总结、归纳,指出本研究的不足及今后研究的设想。
Studying and implement of scientific development perspective are a long term strategic task in China. The fundamental purpose of studying and practice the scientific development perspective is to advacnce the scientific progress. As one of the most important energy resources in China, coal has a crucial role in the development of national economy. However, national energy structure relying mainly on coal temporary will not change in the long term future. Therefore, scientific development of coal-based enterprises is crucial to nantional energy security and social ecolomy. Recently, although some great progresses were obtained in coal-based enterprises, they are still facing such kind of problems like unresonable structure, extensive pattern of growth, low scientific and technological levels, frequenet security events, wasting resources, environmantal pollution, lax management, historical problems and so on. These problems are far away from the criterion of scientific development and its conception. In the new situation, how the coal-based enterprises can improve their degree of scientific development and make scientific development a reality have became a main issue, with the guiedes of Deng Xiao-ping theory, the important thought of " Three Representatives" and scientific development perspective. How the coal-based enterprises can improve their degree of scientific development and make scientific development a reality have became a main issue under new situation, with the guiedes of Deng Xiao-ping theory, the important thought of" Three Representatives", how can guarantee the coal energy stable supply and energy security, how can conscientiously imple the Twelfth Five-year Plan, continuesly improve the scientific develepment ability are the chanllages in coal-based enterprises.
Studying results on scientific development and its conception are fruitful, but sytermatic studies on scientific development in coal-based enterprises are relatively scarce, particularly the quatitantive researches are ralatively rare. Researching the evaluation system on degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises has important practical significance and academic values, not only for the implement of scientific development perspectiveion, promoting the forming of scientific development theoretical system, but also for the vertical and horizontal comparisions between managerial departments, analyzing and concerting impact factors of scientific developement in coal-based enterprises.
The main purposes of the dissertation are:1) to take evaluation system of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises as the main topic,2) to improve the theory and methodology of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, and3) to provide a theoretical and methodological basis for the improvement of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises.
This dissertation comprehensively summarized the conception and intention of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, constructed a scientific development systematic framework for coal-based enterprises, also built an evaluation index system of degree of scientific development, combined different kinds of methods including analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM). The study also investigated both the questionnaire and documentary archive data in Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability in Henan Province, focusing on the degree of scientific development evaluation. Finally, some advices on the ways to improve scientific degree of development in Chinese coal-based enterprises were proposed.
The dissertation include seven chapters, details are as following:
Chapter1is introduction section, summarized the studied background, significance, and methods. This chapter also comprehensively reviewed the relative theory, the latest progress, and essential problems in researches of scientific development perspective in coal-based enterprises. The thesis outlines, methods and innovations were also illustrated in this section.
Chapter2briefly introduced coal resources and exploration in abroad, domestic and Henan Province. The brief history of coal-based enterprises development was reviewed. There are six main problems in the development of coal-based enterprises:weakness of scientific development view, lacking of exploration ability, low degree pf comprehensive utilization, weak developing potential of economy, serious environmental pollution, unprofessional skills of workers, and pessimistic security situations.
Chapter3given the definition, intension and models for Scientific Degree of Development of Coal-based enterprises (DSDCE). The meaning of DSDCE is that take scientific development perspective as a guide. considering the aims include:full development of human beings, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation. The purpose of these aims are to achieve a comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development. The model of DSDCE can be expressed as following: DSDCE=F (u1,u2, u3,u4,u5,u6). Here u1is the full development of human beings, u2is developing levels of economy, u4is sustainable ability of resources, u4means the environmental healthy, u5is constitutional security, u6is management innovation. In addition, a scientific development systematic framework for coal-based enterprises was built, analyzed and explained.
Chapter4contains an evaluation index system of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. This index system includes the target layer (degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises), the criterion layer (full development of human beings, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation), and specific target (in which28individual index were included). Based on a comprehensive summarizing different methods, this dissertation combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) to evaluate the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises.
Chapter5is the assessment on degree of scientific development in Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability. According to the data of questionnaire, an comprehensive evaluation on degree of scientific development in this company was carried out using AHP and FCE methods. The results indicated that degree of scientific development of this company is relatively strong in2012. Further, according to the assessing index data in documentary archives from1996to2011, this study assessed degree of scientific development of the company by using the methods of AHP, FCE and FCM. The results are generally consistent with the historical development of the coal company, which indicated that the this study is reliability. Assessment results by two different methods were compared. Thus, some advices to the company are given:putting strengthen resource sustainability in the first place, enhancing security capabilities, increasing ability of management innovation, and improving degree of scientific development.
Chapter6given some advices on how to improve degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, considering both the two sides of government control and company operation. For government regulating roles, they should continuously perfect the related laws and policy systems in coal industry, enhance conduction on scientific development for coal-based enterprises, and strengthen supervision on coal industry. For coal-based enterprises roles, they should comprehensively consider the full development of human being, economic development, sustainable development of resources, environmental control, security guarantee, administration and innovation.
Chapter7summarized the full text of this study, perspectives and future works were illustrated in this section, Some shortages were also pointed out. The main innovations of this study are as following:
1. Systematically analyzed the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises, explained the conception and intension of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. The degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises should take scientific development perspective as a guide, comprehensively consider the aims like full development of human being, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation. On this basis, to make comprehensive, coordinated, sustainable development a reality. The new conception promoted a new view for studying and evaluating the development of coal-based enterprises, and in addition, provided a new direction for the self-development of coal-based companies. More importantly, it promoted a new way for studying and evaluation the development problem. It is a new exploration for the changes of developing conception according to the times movement. It is a deeper improvement for the perspective of scientific development in coal-based enterprises.
2. Built an assessment index system for degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. The index system includes the target layer (degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises), the criterion layer (six layers:full development of human being, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation), and specific target (28individual index). This is a new assessing system for scientific evaluation in coal-based enterprises. The index system cited the managers leading ability of scientific development as an index, which on one hand can overcome the disadvantage of quantities proxies in most evaluation systems, on the other hand can show the important roles of managers in company development. This index system is an new exploration for evaluation index. In short, the index system provided a new view on a more scientific and comprehensively evaluation for coal-base companies.
3. This dissertation combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and FCM to evaluate the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises. A fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained using the FCM method. The degree of scientific development of Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability during last16years was assessed using this method. It is a new approach to obtain the FEM by using of FCM and the original data set in company, which can make the study more scientific and deeper when assess the same topic according to different origins of data and its relative assessing methods. In addition, the evaluation system uses different assessing methods according to different origins of data, which make the assessment more scientific and powerful. The long term assessment not only can show the detail results of the evaluation, but also can compare the developing trends of companies and its relations to the assess index. Using FCM to obtain Fuzzy membership according to the original data in the companies is a new approach. It is an to an implication diversion assessing method for the development of coal based enterprises, and new exploration of FCM in evaluation systems as well. To sum up, the study made more exploration on evaluation methods in coal-base enterprises.
关于科学发展观、科学发展的研究成果非常丰富,但系统地研究煤炭企业科学发展的成果较少,对煤炭企业科学发展进行定量研究的成果更少。开展煤炭企业科学发展力评价系统研究无论是对煤炭企业高度重视贯彻落实科学发展观,推进煤炭企业科学发展理论体系的形成；还是对煤炭企业、煤炭工业管理部门开展煤炭企业科学发展能力的纵向、横向比较,分析与协调煤炭企业科学发展的影响因素,从而为提升煤炭企业科学发展能力提出相应的对策与建议都具有非常重要的现实意义与学术价值。
因此,本文以煤炭企业科学发展力评价系统研究为主题,力争使煤炭企业科学发展力的理论与方法体系得到丰富和完善,为煤炭企业提升科学发展力提供理论和实践依据。
本文完整、系统地阐述了煤炭企业科学发展力的概念、内涵,构建了煤炭企业科学发展力系统框架。建立了煤炭企业科学发展力评价指标体系,提出将层次分析法、模糊综合评价法以及FCM算法相结合对煤炭企业科学发展力进行评价。根据对义马煤业集团股份有限公司(简称：义煤集团,下同)问卷调查数据和历史发展数据,对该公司科学发展力进行了实证评价研究。最后提出了煤炭企业科学发展力提升的对策。
全文共七章,具体研究内容如下
第一章介绍了研究的背景、意义和研究方法。全面梳理了相关的理论、国内外相关研究进展。通过文献综述,总结了煤炭企业科学发展力评价研究的主要成果和存在的不足,明确了论文研究的主要内容、方法及创新点。
第二章梳理了国外、我国及河南省煤炭资源概况,煤炭资源开发利用现状。对我国煤炭行业发展历程做了回顾,分析了我国煤炭企业的发展现状及存在的问题。目前,我国煤炭企业存在八个方面的主要问题：科学发展理念薄弱,管理水平不高；资源勘探能力不足,综合利用程度较低;产业结构比较单一,经济发展潜力不强;环境污染严重;从业人员素质低,分流困难；安全生产形势依然严峻。本章进一步明确了研究主题的现状与存在的问题,为以后章节研究我国煤炭行业、企业如何选择正确的发展道路打下了铺垫。
第三章提出了煤炭企业科学发展力(Degree of Scientific Development of Coal-based Enterprises,简称DSDCE)的概念、内涵并建立了概念模型。煤炭企业科学发展力是指：煤炭企业以科学发展观为统领,统筹兼顾人的全面发展、经济效益好、资源可持续、环境污染少、安全有保障、管理创新强等目标,实现企业全面、协调、可持续发展的能力。煤炭企业科学发展力(DSDCE)的概念模型可表示为：DSDCE=F (u1u2. U3, U4, u5, u6)。其中,u1表示人的全面发展,u2表示经济发展水平,u3表示资源可持续能力,u4表示环境控制水平,u5表示安全保障能力,u6表示管理与创新能力。另外,构建了煤炭企业科学发展力系统框架,煤炭企业科学发展力系统是煤炭工业中一个复杂的具体系统,该系统由人的全而发展、经济发展、资源能力、环境保护、安全生产、管理与科技创新等六个子系统组成。
第四章构建了煤炭企业科学发展力评价指标体系。指标体系包含日标层(煤炭企业科学发展力),准则层(6层,人的全面发展、经济发展水平、资源持续能力、环境控制水平、安全保障能力、管理创新能力),具体指标(28个)。在全面分析综合评价方法的基础上,提出将层次分析法、模糊综合评价法以及FCM算法相结合,对煤炭企业科学发展力进行评价。
第五章对义煤集团的发展历程、发展现状进行了深入的分析总结,明确了企业发展的困难与问题。根据对义煤集团问卷调查的数据,采用AHP、模糊综合评价相结合的方法对义煤集团科学发展力进行了综合评价,得出义煤集团2012年科学发展力“较强”的结论。根据义煤集团1996年至2011年评价指标的原始数据,采用AHP、FCM、模糊综合评价相结合的方法,对其1996年至2011年的科学发展力进行了综合评价,得出的结论基本符合义煤集团发展的历程,结果具有一定的可信度。并对两种评价的结果进行了深入分析。提出了义煤集团“要把经济发展始终作为科学发展力提升的第一要义;要把资源扩张与节约放在最基础地位：要把安全生产作为科学发展力提升的保障：要把增强管理创新能力作为科学发展力的源泉；要把人才工作作为科学发展力提升的核心;要把全面协调可持续作为科学发展力提升的基本要求”六个方面的建议。
第六章本章结合前面章节理论研究与实证研究的成果,从政府管理工作与企业自身两个方面提出了提升煤炭企业科学发展力的建议。政府应从加强法制建设、加强政策引导、加强监督管理三个方面加强对煤炭企业的引导,促进其科学发展力的提升。煤炭企业应根据国家产业政策的要求,按照深入贯彻落实科学发展观的要求,从“加强引才育才,完善考评机制；发展多种经营,转变经济发展模式；坚持资源扩张,提高资源利用率；减少矿区环境扰动,加强生态恢复;高度重视安全生产,落实保障措施；加强管理水平,重视技术创新”六个方面提升自身的科学发展力。
第七章对全文的主要研究内容进行了总结、归纳,指出本研究的不足及今后研究的设想。
Studying and implement of scientific development perspective are a long term strategic task in China. The fundamental purpose of studying and practice the scientific development perspective is to advacnce the scientific progress. As one of the most important energy resources in China, coal has a crucial role in the development of national economy. However, national energy structure relying mainly on coal temporary will not change in the long term future. Therefore, scientific development of coal-based enterprises is crucial to nantional energy security and social ecolomy. Recently, although some great progresses were obtained in coal-based enterprises, they are still facing such kind of problems like unresonable structure, extensive pattern of growth, low scientific and technological levels, frequenet security events, wasting resources, environmantal pollution, lax management, historical problems and so on. These problems are far away from the criterion of scientific development and its conception. In the new situation, how the coal-based enterprises can improve their degree of scientific development and make scientific development a reality have became a main issue, with the guiedes of Deng Xiao-ping theory, the important thought of " Three Representatives" and scientific development perspective. How the coal-based enterprises can improve their degree of scientific development and make scientific development a reality have became a main issue under new situation, with the guiedes of Deng Xiao-ping theory, the important thought of" Three Representatives", how can guarantee the coal energy stable supply and energy security, how can conscientiously imple the Twelfth Five-year Plan, continuesly improve the scientific develepment ability are the chanllages in coal-based enterprises.
Studying results on scientific development and its conception are fruitful, but sytermatic studies on scientific development in coal-based enterprises are relatively scarce, particularly the quatitantive researches are ralatively rare. Researching the evaluation system on degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises has important practical significance and academic values, not only for the implement of scientific development perspectiveion, promoting the forming of scientific development theoretical system, but also for the vertical and horizontal comparisions between managerial departments, analyzing and concerting impact factors of scientific developement in coal-based enterprises.
The main purposes of the dissertation are:1) to take evaluation system of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises as the main topic,2) to improve the theory and methodology of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, and3) to provide a theoretical and methodological basis for the improvement of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises.
This dissertation comprehensively summarized the conception and intention of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, constructed a scientific development systematic framework for coal-based enterprises, also built an evaluation index system of degree of scientific development, combined different kinds of methods including analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM). The study also investigated both the questionnaire and documentary archive data in Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability in Henan Province, focusing on the degree of scientific development evaluation. Finally, some advices on the ways to improve scientific degree of development in Chinese coal-based enterprises were proposed.
The dissertation include seven chapters, details are as following:
Chapter1is introduction section, summarized the studied background, significance, and methods. This chapter also comprehensively reviewed the relative theory, the latest progress, and essential problems in researches of scientific development perspective in coal-based enterprises. The thesis outlines, methods and innovations were also illustrated in this section.
Chapter2briefly introduced coal resources and exploration in abroad, domestic and Henan Province. The brief history of coal-based enterprises development was reviewed. There are six main problems in the development of coal-based enterprises:weakness of scientific development view, lacking of exploration ability, low degree pf comprehensive utilization, weak developing potential of economy, serious environmental pollution, unprofessional skills of workers, and pessimistic security situations.
Chapter3given the definition, intension and models for Scientific Degree of Development of Coal-based enterprises (DSDCE). The meaning of DSDCE is that take scientific development perspective as a guide. considering the aims include:full development of human beings, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation. The purpose of these aims are to achieve a comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development. The model of DSDCE can be expressed as following: DSDCE=F (u1,u2, u3,u4,u5,u6). Here u1is the full development of human beings, u2is developing levels of economy, u4is sustainable ability of resources, u4means the environmental healthy, u5is constitutional security, u6is management innovation. In addition, a scientific development systematic framework for coal-based enterprises was built, analyzed and explained.
Chapter4contains an evaluation index system of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. This index system includes the target layer (degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises), the criterion layer (full development of human beings, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation), and specific target (in which28individual index were included). Based on a comprehensive summarizing different methods, this dissertation combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) to evaluate the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises.
Chapter5is the assessment on degree of scientific development in Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability. According to the data of questionnaire, an comprehensive evaluation on degree of scientific development in this company was carried out using AHP and FCE methods. The results indicated that degree of scientific development of this company is relatively strong in2012. Further, according to the assessing index data in documentary archives from1996to2011, this study assessed degree of scientific development of the company by using the methods of AHP, FCE and FCM. The results are generally consistent with the historical development of the coal company, which indicated that the this study is reliability. Assessment results by two different methods were compared. Thus, some advices to the company are given:putting strengthen resource sustainability in the first place, enhancing security capabilities, increasing ability of management innovation, and improving degree of scientific development.
Chapter6given some advices on how to improve degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises, considering both the two sides of government control and company operation. For government regulating roles, they should continuously perfect the related laws and policy systems in coal industry, enhance conduction on scientific development for coal-based enterprises, and strengthen supervision on coal industry. For coal-based enterprises roles, they should comprehensively consider the full development of human being, economic development, sustainable development of resources, environmental control, security guarantee, administration and innovation.
Chapter7summarized the full text of this study, perspectives and future works were illustrated in this section, Some shortages were also pointed out. The main innovations of this study are as following:
1. Systematically analyzed the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises, explained the conception and intension of degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. The degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises should take scientific development perspective as a guide, comprehensively consider the aims like full development of human being, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation. On this basis, to make comprehensive, coordinated, sustainable development a reality. The new conception promoted a new view for studying and evaluating the development of coal-based enterprises, and in addition, provided a new direction for the self-development of coal-based companies. More importantly, it promoted a new way for studying and evaluation the development problem. It is a new exploration for the changes of developing conception according to the times movement. It is a deeper improvement for the perspective of scientific development in coal-based enterprises.
2. Built an assessment index system for degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises. The index system includes the target layer (degree of scientific development in coal-based enterprises), the criterion layer (six layers:full development of human being, high economic returns, sustainable resources, healthy environment, constitutional security, and management innovation), and specific target (28individual index). This is a new assessing system for scientific evaluation in coal-based enterprises. The index system cited the managers leading ability of scientific development as an index, which on one hand can overcome the disadvantage of quantities proxies in most evaluation systems, on the other hand can show the important roles of managers in company development. This index system is an new exploration for evaluation index. In short, the index system provided a new view on a more scientific and comprehensively evaluation for coal-base companies.
3. This dissertation combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and FCM to evaluate the degree of scientific development of coal-based enterprises. A fuzzy evaluation matrix was obtained using the FCM method. The degree of scientific development of Yi-Ma Coal Company of Limited Liability during last16years was assessed using this method. It is a new approach to obtain the FEM by using of FCM and the original data set in company, which can make the study more scientific and deeper when assess the same topic according to different origins of data and its relative assessing methods. In addition, the evaluation system uses different assessing methods according to different origins of data, which make the assessment more scientific and powerful. The long term assessment not only can show the detail results of the evaluation, but also can compare the developing trends of companies and its relations to the assess index. Using FCM to obtain Fuzzy membership according to the original data in the companies is a new approach. It is an to an implication diversion assessing method for the development of coal based enterprises, and new exploration of FCM in evaluation systems as well. To sum up, the study made more exploration on evaluation methods in coal-base enterprises.
引文
[1]煤炭工业发展“十二五”规划国家发展和改革委员会,2012.3：1-4
[2]李鑫,基于可持续发展理论的古村镇旅游研究——以安徽西递宏村为例(D)辽宁师范大学,2010：15-17
[3]牛文元,中国可持续发展的理论与实践中国科学院院刊,2012.3：280-287
[4]黄明元,基于循环经济的企业竞争优势研究(D)湖南农业大学,2010：14-16
[5]王红征,中国循环经济的运行机理与发展模式研究(D) 河南大学,2012：65-67
[6]刘炜,科学发展与循环经济模式构建[M],北京：中国经济出版社,2009：226-227
[7]施芝鸿,实践科学发展观的辉煌篇章时事报告,2012.7：8-18
[8]徐崇温,科学发展观提出的背景和根据是什么——深入学习实践科学发展观系列讲座(1)北京支部生活,2009.1：18-20
[9]胡锦涛,高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为夺取全而建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗—在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告,2007年10月15日
[10]胡锦涛,坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进为全而建成小康社会而奋斗——在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告,2012.11.8
[11]毛泽东,《实践论》(1937年7月) 《毛泽东选集》,第2版第一卷：282-283
[12]毛泽东,《在中国共产党全国代表会议上的讲话》(1955年3月21日),《毛泽东选集》第六卷：393
[13]邓小平,《解放思想,实事求是,团结一致向前看》(1978年12月13日),《邓小平文选》第2卷：141
[14]邓小平,《关于经济工作的几点意见》(1979年10月4日),《邓小平文选》第2卷：196
[15]江泽民,《在党的十三届四中全会上的讲话》(1989年6月24日),《江泽民文选》第1卷：57
[16]江泽民,《国家宏观调控体系是社会主义市场经济体制的重要组成部分》(1993年8月27日),《论社会主义市场经济》：117
[17]胡锦涛,树立和落实科学发展观——在中共十八届三中全会第二次全体会议上的讲话2003年10月14日
[18]毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民论科学发展,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社2008：1,25,63
[19]深入学习实践科学发展观活动领导干部学习文件选编,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社 2008：4-5
[20]科学发展观重要论述摘编,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社,2008：1-47
[21]鲍宗豪,科学发展论[M],上海：上海社会科学出版社,2007：17-39
[22]孙显元,科学发展模式的解读《安徽电气工业职业技术学院学报》,2008.2：12-17
[23]马永庆,实践标准语境下的科学发展《理论学刊》,2008.5：6-7
[24]泥宏伟,科学发展的实践纲领《前沿》,2008.5：23-25
[25]尹丽霞等,影响我省科学发展观能力提高的因素分析《河北省社会主义学院学报》,2009.1
[26]阎刚平,县域科学发展方法论[M]北京：中共中央党校出版社,2009：25-40
[27]中共中央组织部党建研究所、党建读物出版社组织编,科学发展实例选,北京：党建读物出版社,2009：10-15
[28]中共中央组织部组织干部培训中心编著,《科学发展的探索与实践——市地党委主要同志专题研究班研究成果汇编》,北京：党建读物出版社,2009：28-30
[29]李丑小,浅析煤炭企业科学发展的内涵 中小企业管理与科技,2009.12：120
[30]李孟娟,河南煤炭工业科学发展的评价及对策研究[D]河南理工大学,2009：31-41
[31]杨建林,提高煤炭质量对煤炭企业可持续发展的作用煤,2000.6：63-64
[32]牛泰山等,能源与煤炭企业可持续发展分析煤炭加工与综合利用,2001.1：11-13
[33]程乐团,搞好资源综合利用,促进煤炭企业可持续发展煤炭工程,2002.7：4-5
[34]郭兴红,清洁生产是煤炭企业可持续发展的必然选择 洁净煤技术,2004.4：12-13
[35]吴金笛,在白音华矿区发展循环经济的探讨煤炭企业管理,2005.2：58-59
[36]穆书涛,浅谈产业集群在发展循环经济中的作用 煤炭经济研究,2005.5：25
[37]江涛等,煤炭行业循环经济发展模式与指标体系研究 中国人口.资源与环境,2007.6：87-90
[38]袁学良,煤炭行业循环经济发展理论及应用研究[D] 山东大学,2008：15-16
[39]夏青,煤炭城市循环经济发展综合评价指标体系研究 中国矿业,2010.6：19-21,37
[40]杨昌明等,煤炭工业循环经济支持力评价的指标体系与方法 中国国土资源经济,2011.7：29-31
[41]徐君,基于模糊神经网络的煤炭企业循环经济评价模型资源开发与市场,2011,(3)：205-209
[42]朱永华等,企业可持续发展的三维管理伦理观 生态经济,2005.3：46-48
[43]张麟,我国能源及煤炭工业发展战略新特点 焦作工学院学报(社会科学版)2000.1：14-16
[44]仝效,实现煤炭企业可持续发展新观 内蒙古科技与经济,2004.24：28-29
[45]付树林,国有煤炭企业可持续发展战略的构想 经营管理者,2004.8：85-86
[46]赵国浩等,煤炭工业可持续发展研究,北京：经济管理出版社,2008：81-86
[47]牛克洪,面对新形势应对新挑战徐州：中国矿业大学出版社2010：25
[48]满慎刚,国有煤炭企业可持续发展战略研究——以枣矿集团为例[D] 天津大学,2010：5-7
[49]王永保等,基于BP神经网络的煤炭企业可持续发展评价,辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007.10：669-771
[50]赵国浩等,可持续发展系统视角下煤炭工业评价指标体系管理学报,2008.9： 696-697
[51]牛克洪等,大型煤炭企业实践科学发展观研究2009煤炭企业管理现代化创新成果集：595-602
[52]叶柏青等,煤炭资源价值与可持续发展技术经济,2001.1：19-22
[53]吴吟,构建新型煤炭工业体系全面推进煤炭工业可持续发展 煤炭经济研究,2005.6：1
[54]淑姮等,关于山西煤炭J工业可持续发展政策的思考2010年中国煤炭学会青年科技工作者论坛,2010：331-335
[55]李维明,我国煤炭资源开发利用策略研究[D] 中国矿业大学(北京),2010：1-3
[56]曹庭珠,科学发展观系统研究[M] 郑州：黄河水利出版社,2009：29-38
[57]张宁,十六大以来科学发展观形成和发展的历史进程党的文献,2012.2：72-80
[58]王南湜,从中国社会主义市场经济的发展看科学的发展观 社会科学战线,2004.3：191-193
[59]王自力,科学发展观与法制现代化《社会科学》,2004.8：43-47
[60]张贺福,感悟十八大一十八大报告新思想新观点新论断党的文献,2013.1：95-101
[61]中共中央关于完善社会主义市场经济体制若干问题的决定人民日报,2003-10-22
[62]刘思华,关于科学发展观的几个问题内蒙古财经学院报(哲学社会科学版),2004.3：9-13
[63]侯长远,中国共产党与科学发展观 中州学刊,2004.7：5-9
[64]谭婷婷,关于科学发展观深刻内涵问题的研究综述法制与经济,2011.1：81-82
[65]陆春茂,对“科学发展观”的哲学思考唐山学院学报,2004.3：9-12
[66]李少莉,科学的发展与党的执政能力建设 石油大学学报(社会科学版),2004.4：60-62
[67]张舒平,领导科学发展能力是党执政能力建设的根本理论学习,2007.11：27-28
[68]王格芳,提高党领导科学发展的能力 山东农业管理干部学院学报,2009.1：116-118
[69]李伟,党政领导干部领导科学发展能力研究[D] 中共中央党校,2010：5-7
[70]中国中小城市科学发展评价体系研究课题组,2011年度中国中小城市科学发展体系研究成果光明日报,2011年9月20日
[71]姜涛,县域科学发展的内涵及实现路径 山东社会科学,2009.11：139-141
[72]姜涛,县域利学发展的测度与评价山东社会科学,2010.6：152-156
[73]姜涛,县域科学发展综合评价指标体系研究—以山东省商河县为例(D) 天津大学,2010：3
[74]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2009) 北京：科学出版社,2009：97
[75]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2010) 北京：科学出版社,2010：427
[76]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2011)北京：科学出版社,2011：310
[77]河南省煤炭利用现状调查,河南省国十资源科学研究院,2011：20-25
[78]田书华,我国煤炭产业政策发展及演化历程博客：2009-08-25
[79]评论,中国煤炭行业发展历程 国际煤炭网：2008-3-12
[80]中国煤炭行业发展现状以及前景分析,煤炭网：2007-12-19
[81]煤炭企业产权制度改革政策研究,中国煤炭经济研究会：2004.12
[82]关于制定煤矿整顿关闭工作三年规划的指导意见,安委办[2006)19号
[83]2012年煤炭行业研究报告：http://www.doc88.com/p-981461943198.html
[84]井健,现阶段我国煤炭企业安全发展存在的问题与对策中国煤炭,2011.6：94-98
[85]牛文元,持续发展导论[M]北京：科学出版社,1994：20
[86]吴见等,煤炭开采的生态环境承载力评价——以山西省为例安全与环境工程,2009.5：18-21
[87]王青春等,煤炭矿区规划环评生态承载力评价中存在的主要问题及对策探讨中国煤炭,2009.4：25-28
[88]姚晓军,煤炭开发区域的生态承载力研究[D]西北大学,2008：7
[89]姜云等,煤炭城市环境承载力评估的探讨中国煤炭,2004.3：25-28
[90]余敬等,矿产资源可持续力及其系统构建地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2002.1：85-89
[91]吴仲雄等,矿产资源可持续力评价研究,中国矿业,2007.7：24-27
[92]王青会,资源型企业可持续发展力的综合评价及政府行为研究[D]中国地质大学(武汉),(2008)：5-7
[93]杨昌明等,资源型企业核心竞争力北京：地质出版社,2009：52
[94]袁媛,煤炭企业核心竞争力评价及提升策略研究——以XJ集团为例[D] 安徽理工大学,2012：16
[95]李维明等,我国煤炭企业综合竞争力评价指标体系研究 中国煤炭,2012.5：11-20
[96]濮洪九,落实科学发展观促进煤炭工业可持续发展 中国能源,2005.6：9-13
[97]牛克洪,我国大型煤炭企业“十二五”总体思路、价值目标及战略取向探寻煤炭经济研究,2010.3：4-7
[98]魏同,中国煤炭[业可持续发展的系统分析中国煤炭经济学院学报,1996.1：3-10
[99]宋迎法等,资源节约型环境友好型煤炭企业评价体系研究中国能源,2010.10：9-14
[100]颉茂华等,煤炭企业可持续发展影响因素实证研究煤炭经济研究2011.7：4-18
[101]李宇凯,资源型企业可持续成长能力评价研究》—以紫金矿业集团股份有限公司为例(D)中国地质大学(武汉)2010：59-60
[102]张瑞等,矿区循环经济评价指标体系的构建及评价方法研究中国矿业,2009.11：42-44
[103]陈静,河南大型煤炭企业可持续发展战略研究(D)天津大学,2003：15
[104]田旭峰,鄂尔多斯煤炭企业吉持续发展战略研究(D) 内蒙古大学,2010：2-9
[105]尹宗成等,基于灰关联分析法的煤炭企业可持续发展水平比较研究 太原理工大学学报,2008.6：18-21
[106]刘元明等,煤炭企业节能减排评价指标体系及模型构建经济研究导刊,2011.25：34-35
[107]宋绍峰等,煤炭工业可持续发展评价指标体系构架煤炭经济研究,1999.8：2-7
[108]李堂车等,矿区可持续发展能力的实证分析与对策研究 中国软科学,2003.10：124-128
[109]陈衍泰等,综合评价方法分类及研究进展管理科学学报,2004.2：69-71
[110]蒋耀,基于综合评价理论的区域可持续发展研究—上海市青浦区和谐社会战略分析(D) 上海交通大学,2008：67-70
[111]马古新,数据包络分析方法在中国经济管理中的应用进展管理学报,2010.7：785-789
[112]杜栋等,现代综合评价方法与安全精选北京：清华大学出版社,2012：34-38
[113]岳超源,决策理论与方法北京：科学出版社,2006；365
[114]张乃尧,神经网络与模糊控制北京：清华大学出版社,1998：1
[115]李金林,管理统计学北京：清华大学出版社,2006；288
[116]李刚,基于科学发展观的人的全面发展评价模型及实证研究[D]大连理工大学,2010；1-3
[117]吴世斌等,基于主成分和聚类分析的我国区域循环经济发展评价研究.中国l工程咨询,2010,(2)3941.
[118]鸟兰,我国煤炭矿区可持续协调发展研究[D] 中国海洋大学,2008：6
[119]徐建中等,基于AHP的企业循环经济发展水平灰色综合评价研究科技管理研究,2008,(4)4649
[120]张波,我国石油企业可持续发展力评价研究[D] 中国地质大学(武汉),2011：30
[121]余敬等,资源型城市可持续发展模糊综合评价模型科技进步与对策,2001.12：69-70
[122]赵爱国,我国大型煤炭企业竞争力分析与评价研究[D] 辽宁工程技术大学,2003：2
[123]陈静等,社会、经济、资源、环境协调发展评价模型研究科学管理研究,2004.3：9-13
[124]陈明政等,资源型企业可持续发展定量研究方法综述湖北社会科学,2009.12：84-87
[125]曹晖等,建筑安装工程项目经理绩效测评系统研究武汉：中国地质大学出版社,2010：105-132
[126]刘亚臣等,基于层次分析法的城镇化水平模糊综合评价沈阳建筑大学学报,2008.1：132-135
[127]王宗军,综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势管理科学学报,1998.1：73-79
[128]余敬等,矿产资源可持续力 武汉：中国地质大学出版社,2009；124
[129]王显政,关于深化煤炭工业改革发展的几点建议中国产业,2011.5：7
[130]河南煤炭业要实施”走出去”发展战略,http://www.cwestc.com/newshtml/2005-4-21/91614.shtml
[131]蒙彦琼,神华宁煤集团核心竞争力提升研究[D]兰州大学,2009:36-40
[132]樊运策等,我国煤炭资源状况与节约煤炭资源的有效途径煤矿开采,2006.4：6-9
[133]吴同性等,关于煤炭资源型企业转变增长方式的探讨中州煤炭,2010.10:128-130
[134]张华等,中国煤炭企业效率评价——基于超效率DEA和Malmquist指数中国企业运筹学,2011.5：54-59
[135]政府规制在企业发展中的作用—通过考察日本相关企业立法 行政与法,2002.10：49-52
[136]玉平等,矿产资源经济承载力研究煤炭经济研究,1998.12：15-18
[137]Peter Mederly, Pavel Novacek, Jan Topercer.Sustainable development assessment:quality and sustainability of life indicators at global, national and regional, foresight V.5 no.5(2003):42-49
[138]Christine Byrch, Kate Kearins, Markus Milne, Richard Morgan. Sustainable "what"? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management V.4 no.1(2007):26-52
[139]Guler Aras, David Crowther, "Making sustainable development sustainable".management decision, Vol.47, No.6:975-988
[140]Aras, G., Crowther, D. (2008a), "Governance and sustainability:an investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability", Management Decision, Vol.46, No.3:433-48
[141]Aras, G., Crowther, D. (2008b), "Corporate sustainability reporting:a study in disingenuity?", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, No. Supplement 1:278-88
[142]Elliott, S.R. (2005), "Sustainability:an economic perspective", Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol.44:263-77
[143]Gray, R., Milne, M.J. (2002), "Sustainability reporting:who's kidding whom?", Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, Vol.81, No.6:66-70
[145]Hart, S.L., Milstein, M.B. (2003), "Creating sustainable value", Academy of Management Executive, Vol.17, No.2:56-67
[146]Marsden, C. (2000), "The new corporate citizenship of big business:part of the solution to sustainability", Business & Society Review, Vol.105, No.1:9-25
[147]O'Dwyer, B., Owen, D.L. (2005), "Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting:a critical evaluation", The British Accounting Review, Vol.37, No.2:205-29
[148]Reed, R., DeFillippi, R.J. (1990), "Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage", Academy of Management Review, Vol.15, No.1:88-102
[149]Spangenberg, J.H. (2004), "Reconciling sustainability and growth:criteria, indicators, policies", Sustainable Development, Vol.12:74-86
[150]Springett, D. (2003), "Business conceptions of sustainable development:a perspective from critical theory", Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.12, No.2:71-86
[151]van Marrewijk, M., Werre, M. (2003), "Multiple levels of corporate sustainability", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.44, No.2/3:107-19
[152]Learmont, D. R. Mining must show it is sustainable. Mining Engineering,Jan.1997
[153]Douglas C. Yearley. Sustainable development for the global mining and metalsndustry. Mining Engineering 55 no8(Ag 2003):45-48
[154]Morrison, Lisa. Reshaping the minerals and metals industry. Mining Engineering v.54 no8 (Aug.2002):20-21
[155]Thamir M. Salih. Sustainable economic development and the environment. International Journal of Social Economics v.30 nol (2003):153-162
[156]赵鹏大等,关于矿产资源竞争力评价问题世界科技研究与发展,1998：4-7
[157]余瑞祥等,资源竞争力的科学内涵及影响因素中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004.4：39-42
[158]王志宏,矿产资源竞争力及其评价指标体系煤炭学报,2002.1：103-107
[159]杨吕明等,焦点问题法—建立矿产资源可持续发展指标体系方法探讨地球科学—— 中国地质大学学报,2001.2：213-217
[160]王吉生等,国有煤炭企业可持续发展研究[M] 北京：经济管理出版社,2007：31-42
[161]岳福斌等,中国煤炭工业发展报告(2006—2010) 北京：社会科学文献出版社,2008：265
[162]纪成君,中国煤炭产业经济研究[M] 北京：经济管理出版社,2008：195-206
[163]国务院：国务院关于促进煤炭工业健康发展的若干意见(国发[2005]18号),2005.6.7
[164]黄盛初,2009中国煤炭发展报告北京：煤炭工业出版社,2009：50
[165]赵先贵等,基于科学发展观的区域发展评价系统研究水土保持通报,2008.3：193-197
[166]郭智渊,转型创新—中国煤炭企业发展的理论与策略[M] 北京：人民出版社,2011：238-258
[167]国务院发展研究中心发展战略和区域经济研究部课题组,中国区域科学发展研究[M]北京：中国发展出版社,2007：75
[168]田家华等,基于AHP法的资源型企业可持续发展力评价研究 理论月刊,2008.3：163-166
[169]濮洪九,坚持科学发展加快转变煤炭工业发展方式煤炭经济研究,2010.7：3-7
[170]张曦等,提升山西省煤炭产业竞争力路径研究煤炭经济研究,2010.11：23-26
[171]李国蓉等,资源型矿区可持续发展系统的协调性分析资源开发与市场,2004,20：409-410
[172]刘祥,论矿业城市可持续发展能力的综合测定煤炭经济研究,2004.5：11-13,38
[173]孔令曦等,我国矿业城市综合竞争力评价方法 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(2)：280-284
[174]李宏杰,浅析影响煤炭企业核心竞争力的因素及其提升途释 北方经济,2006.3：19-20
[175]姜德年,提升煤炭企业执行力的途释煤炭企业管理2005.2：38-38
[176]刘传庚等,煤炭企业循环经济综合评价指标体系构建及评价——以西山公司为例生态学报,2009.12：6748-6753
[177]姚平,基于IAHP-Entropy集成确权的煤炭企业可持续发展综合评价运筹与管理,2009.5：153-157
[2]李鑫,基于可持续发展理论的古村镇旅游研究——以安徽西递宏村为例(D)辽宁师范大学,2010：15-17
[3]牛文元,中国可持续发展的理论与实践中国科学院院刊,2012.3：280-287
[4]黄明元,基于循环经济的企业竞争优势研究(D)湖南农业大学,2010：14-16
[5]王红征,中国循环经济的运行机理与发展模式研究(D) 河南大学,2012：65-67
[6]刘炜,科学发展与循环经济模式构建[M],北京：中国经济出版社,2009：226-227
[7]施芝鸿,实践科学发展观的辉煌篇章时事报告,2012.7：8-18
[8]徐崇温,科学发展观提出的背景和根据是什么——深入学习实践科学发展观系列讲座(1)北京支部生活,2009.1：18-20
[9]胡锦涛,高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为夺取全而建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗—在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告,2007年10月15日
[10]胡锦涛,坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进为全而建成小康社会而奋斗——在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告,2012.11.8
[11]毛泽东,《实践论》(1937年7月) 《毛泽东选集》,第2版第一卷：282-283
[12]毛泽东,《在中国共产党全国代表会议上的讲话》(1955年3月21日),《毛泽东选集》第六卷：393
[13]邓小平,《解放思想,实事求是,团结一致向前看》(1978年12月13日),《邓小平文选》第2卷：141
[14]邓小平,《关于经济工作的几点意见》(1979年10月4日),《邓小平文选》第2卷：196
[15]江泽民,《在党的十三届四中全会上的讲话》(1989年6月24日),《江泽民文选》第1卷：57
[16]江泽民,《国家宏观调控体系是社会主义市场经济体制的重要组成部分》(1993年8月27日),《论社会主义市场经济》：117
[17]胡锦涛,树立和落实科学发展观——在中共十八届三中全会第二次全体会议上的讲话2003年10月14日
[18]毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民论科学发展,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社2008：1,25,63
[19]深入学习实践科学发展观活动领导干部学习文件选编,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社 2008：4-5
[20]科学发展观重要论述摘编,北京：中央文献出版社、党建读物出版社,2008：1-47
[21]鲍宗豪,科学发展论[M],上海：上海社会科学出版社,2007：17-39
[22]孙显元,科学发展模式的解读《安徽电气工业职业技术学院学报》,2008.2：12-17
[23]马永庆,实践标准语境下的科学发展《理论学刊》,2008.5：6-7
[24]泥宏伟,科学发展的实践纲领《前沿》,2008.5：23-25
[25]尹丽霞等,影响我省科学发展观能力提高的因素分析《河北省社会主义学院学报》,2009.1
[26]阎刚平,县域科学发展方法论[M]北京：中共中央党校出版社,2009：25-40
[27]中共中央组织部党建研究所、党建读物出版社组织编,科学发展实例选,北京：党建读物出版社,2009：10-15
[28]中共中央组织部组织干部培训中心编著,《科学发展的探索与实践——市地党委主要同志专题研究班研究成果汇编》,北京：党建读物出版社,2009：28-30
[29]李丑小,浅析煤炭企业科学发展的内涵 中小企业管理与科技,2009.12：120
[30]李孟娟,河南煤炭工业科学发展的评价及对策研究[D]河南理工大学,2009：31-41
[31]杨建林,提高煤炭质量对煤炭企业可持续发展的作用煤,2000.6：63-64
[32]牛泰山等,能源与煤炭企业可持续发展分析煤炭加工与综合利用,2001.1：11-13
[33]程乐团,搞好资源综合利用,促进煤炭企业可持续发展煤炭工程,2002.7：4-5
[34]郭兴红,清洁生产是煤炭企业可持续发展的必然选择 洁净煤技术,2004.4：12-13
[35]吴金笛,在白音华矿区发展循环经济的探讨煤炭企业管理,2005.2：58-59
[36]穆书涛,浅谈产业集群在发展循环经济中的作用 煤炭经济研究,2005.5：25
[37]江涛等,煤炭行业循环经济发展模式与指标体系研究 中国人口.资源与环境,2007.6：87-90
[38]袁学良,煤炭行业循环经济发展理论及应用研究[D] 山东大学,2008：15-16
[39]夏青,煤炭城市循环经济发展综合评价指标体系研究 中国矿业,2010.6：19-21,37
[40]杨昌明等,煤炭工业循环经济支持力评价的指标体系与方法 中国国土资源经济,2011.7：29-31
[41]徐君,基于模糊神经网络的煤炭企业循环经济评价模型资源开发与市场,2011,(3)：205-209
[42]朱永华等,企业可持续发展的三维管理伦理观 生态经济,2005.3：46-48
[43]张麟,我国能源及煤炭工业发展战略新特点 焦作工学院学报(社会科学版)2000.1：14-16
[44]仝效,实现煤炭企业可持续发展新观 内蒙古科技与经济,2004.24：28-29
[45]付树林,国有煤炭企业可持续发展战略的构想 经营管理者,2004.8：85-86
[46]赵国浩等,煤炭工业可持续发展研究,北京：经济管理出版社,2008：81-86
[47]牛克洪,面对新形势应对新挑战徐州：中国矿业大学出版社2010：25
[48]满慎刚,国有煤炭企业可持续发展战略研究——以枣矿集团为例[D] 天津大学,2010：5-7
[49]王永保等,基于BP神经网络的煤炭企业可持续发展评价,辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007.10：669-771
[50]赵国浩等,可持续发展系统视角下煤炭工业评价指标体系管理学报,2008.9： 696-697
[51]牛克洪等,大型煤炭企业实践科学发展观研究2009煤炭企业管理现代化创新成果集：595-602
[52]叶柏青等,煤炭资源价值与可持续发展技术经济,2001.1：19-22
[53]吴吟,构建新型煤炭工业体系全面推进煤炭工业可持续发展 煤炭经济研究,2005.6：1
[54]淑姮等,关于山西煤炭J工业可持续发展政策的思考2010年中国煤炭学会青年科技工作者论坛,2010：331-335
[55]李维明,我国煤炭资源开发利用策略研究[D] 中国矿业大学(北京),2010：1-3
[56]曹庭珠,科学发展观系统研究[M] 郑州：黄河水利出版社,2009：29-38
[57]张宁,十六大以来科学发展观形成和发展的历史进程党的文献,2012.2：72-80
[58]王南湜,从中国社会主义市场经济的发展看科学的发展观 社会科学战线,2004.3：191-193
[59]王自力,科学发展观与法制现代化《社会科学》,2004.8：43-47
[60]张贺福,感悟十八大一十八大报告新思想新观点新论断党的文献,2013.1：95-101
[61]中共中央关于完善社会主义市场经济体制若干问题的决定人民日报,2003-10-22
[62]刘思华,关于科学发展观的几个问题内蒙古财经学院报(哲学社会科学版),2004.3：9-13
[63]侯长远,中国共产党与科学发展观 中州学刊,2004.7：5-9
[64]谭婷婷,关于科学发展观深刻内涵问题的研究综述法制与经济,2011.1：81-82
[65]陆春茂,对“科学发展观”的哲学思考唐山学院学报,2004.3：9-12
[66]李少莉,科学的发展与党的执政能力建设 石油大学学报(社会科学版),2004.4：60-62
[67]张舒平,领导科学发展能力是党执政能力建设的根本理论学习,2007.11：27-28
[68]王格芳,提高党领导科学发展的能力 山东农业管理干部学院学报,2009.1：116-118
[69]李伟,党政领导干部领导科学发展能力研究[D] 中共中央党校,2010：5-7
[70]中国中小城市科学发展评价体系研究课题组,2011年度中国中小城市科学发展体系研究成果光明日报,2011年9月20日
[71]姜涛,县域科学发展的内涵及实现路径 山东社会科学,2009.11：139-141
[72]姜涛,县域利学发展的测度与评价山东社会科学,2010.6：152-156
[73]姜涛,县域科学发展综合评价指标体系研究—以山东省商河县为例(D) 天津大学,2010：3
[74]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2009) 北京：科学出版社,2009：97
[75]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2010) 北京：科学出版社,2010：427
[76]牛文元,《中国科学发展报告》(2011)北京：科学出版社,2011：310
[77]河南省煤炭利用现状调查,河南省国十资源科学研究院,2011：20-25
[78]田书华,我国煤炭产业政策发展及演化历程博客：2009-08-25
[79]评论,中国煤炭行业发展历程 国际煤炭网：2008-3-12
[80]中国煤炭行业发展现状以及前景分析,煤炭网：2007-12-19
[81]煤炭企业产权制度改革政策研究,中国煤炭经济研究会：2004.12
[82]关于制定煤矿整顿关闭工作三年规划的指导意见,安委办[2006)19号
[83]2012年煤炭行业研究报告：http://www.doc88.com/p-981461943198.html
[84]井健,现阶段我国煤炭企业安全发展存在的问题与对策中国煤炭,2011.6：94-98
[85]牛文元,持续发展导论[M]北京：科学出版社,1994：20
[86]吴见等,煤炭开采的生态环境承载力评价——以山西省为例安全与环境工程,2009.5：18-21
[87]王青春等,煤炭矿区规划环评生态承载力评价中存在的主要问题及对策探讨中国煤炭,2009.4：25-28
[88]姚晓军,煤炭开发区域的生态承载力研究[D]西北大学,2008：7
[89]姜云等,煤炭城市环境承载力评估的探讨中国煤炭,2004.3：25-28
[90]余敬等,矿产资源可持续力及其系统构建地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2002.1：85-89
[91]吴仲雄等,矿产资源可持续力评价研究,中国矿业,2007.7：24-27
[92]王青会,资源型企业可持续发展力的综合评价及政府行为研究[D]中国地质大学(武汉),(2008)：5-7
[93]杨昌明等,资源型企业核心竞争力北京：地质出版社,2009：52
[94]袁媛,煤炭企业核心竞争力评价及提升策略研究——以XJ集团为例[D] 安徽理工大学,2012：16
[95]李维明等,我国煤炭企业综合竞争力评价指标体系研究 中国煤炭,2012.5：11-20
[96]濮洪九,落实科学发展观促进煤炭工业可持续发展 中国能源,2005.6：9-13
[97]牛克洪,我国大型煤炭企业“十二五”总体思路、价值目标及战略取向探寻煤炭经济研究,2010.3：4-7
[98]魏同,中国煤炭[业可持续发展的系统分析中国煤炭经济学院学报,1996.1：3-10
[99]宋迎法等,资源节约型环境友好型煤炭企业评价体系研究中国能源,2010.10：9-14
[100]颉茂华等,煤炭企业可持续发展影响因素实证研究煤炭经济研究2011.7：4-18
[101]李宇凯,资源型企业可持续成长能力评价研究》—以紫金矿业集团股份有限公司为例(D)中国地质大学(武汉)2010：59-60
[102]张瑞等,矿区循环经济评价指标体系的构建及评价方法研究中国矿业,2009.11：42-44
[103]陈静,河南大型煤炭企业可持续发展战略研究(D)天津大学,2003：15
[104]田旭峰,鄂尔多斯煤炭企业吉持续发展战略研究(D) 内蒙古大学,2010：2-9
[105]尹宗成等,基于灰关联分析法的煤炭企业可持续发展水平比较研究 太原理工大学学报,2008.6：18-21
[106]刘元明等,煤炭企业节能减排评价指标体系及模型构建经济研究导刊,2011.25：34-35
[107]宋绍峰等,煤炭工业可持续发展评价指标体系构架煤炭经济研究,1999.8：2-7
[108]李堂车等,矿区可持续发展能力的实证分析与对策研究 中国软科学,2003.10：124-128
[109]陈衍泰等,综合评价方法分类及研究进展管理科学学报,2004.2：69-71
[110]蒋耀,基于综合评价理论的区域可持续发展研究—上海市青浦区和谐社会战略分析(D) 上海交通大学,2008：67-70
[111]马古新,数据包络分析方法在中国经济管理中的应用进展管理学报,2010.7：785-789
[112]杜栋等,现代综合评价方法与安全精选北京：清华大学出版社,2012：34-38
[113]岳超源,决策理论与方法北京：科学出版社,2006；365
[114]张乃尧,神经网络与模糊控制北京：清华大学出版社,1998：1
[115]李金林,管理统计学北京：清华大学出版社,2006；288
[116]李刚,基于科学发展观的人的全面发展评价模型及实证研究[D]大连理工大学,2010；1-3
[117]吴世斌等,基于主成分和聚类分析的我国区域循环经济发展评价研究.中国l工程咨询,2010,(2)3941.
[118]鸟兰,我国煤炭矿区可持续协调发展研究[D] 中国海洋大学,2008：6
[119]徐建中等,基于AHP的企业循环经济发展水平灰色综合评价研究科技管理研究,2008,(4)4649
[120]张波,我国石油企业可持续发展力评价研究[D] 中国地质大学(武汉),2011：30
[121]余敬等,资源型城市可持续发展模糊综合评价模型科技进步与对策,2001.12：69-70
[122]赵爱国,我国大型煤炭企业竞争力分析与评价研究[D] 辽宁工程技术大学,2003：2
[123]陈静等,社会、经济、资源、环境协调发展评价模型研究科学管理研究,2004.3：9-13
[124]陈明政等,资源型企业可持续发展定量研究方法综述湖北社会科学,2009.12：84-87
[125]曹晖等,建筑安装工程项目经理绩效测评系统研究武汉：中国地质大学出版社,2010：105-132
[126]刘亚臣等,基于层次分析法的城镇化水平模糊综合评价沈阳建筑大学学报,2008.1：132-135
[127]王宗军,综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势管理科学学报,1998.1：73-79
[128]余敬等,矿产资源可持续力 武汉：中国地质大学出版社,2009；124
[129]王显政,关于深化煤炭工业改革发展的几点建议中国产业,2011.5：7
[130]河南煤炭业要实施”走出去”发展战略,http://www.cwestc.com/newshtml/2005-4-21/91614.shtml
[131]蒙彦琼,神华宁煤集团核心竞争力提升研究[D]兰州大学,2009:36-40
[132]樊运策等,我国煤炭资源状况与节约煤炭资源的有效途径煤矿开采,2006.4：6-9
[133]吴同性等,关于煤炭资源型企业转变增长方式的探讨中州煤炭,2010.10:128-130
[134]张华等,中国煤炭企业效率评价——基于超效率DEA和Malmquist指数中国企业运筹学,2011.5：54-59
[135]政府规制在企业发展中的作用—通过考察日本相关企业立法 行政与法,2002.10：49-52
[136]玉平等,矿产资源经济承载力研究煤炭经济研究,1998.12：15-18
[137]Peter Mederly, Pavel Novacek, Jan Topercer.Sustainable development assessment:quality and sustainability of life indicators at global, national and regional, foresight V.5 no.5(2003):42-49
[138]Christine Byrch, Kate Kearins, Markus Milne, Richard Morgan. Sustainable "what"? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management V.4 no.1(2007):26-52
[139]Guler Aras, David Crowther, "Making sustainable development sustainable".management decision, Vol.47, No.6:975-988
[140]Aras, G., Crowther, D. (2008a), "Governance and sustainability:an investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability", Management Decision, Vol.46, No.3:433-48
[141]Aras, G., Crowther, D. (2008b), "Corporate sustainability reporting:a study in disingenuity?", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, No. Supplement 1:278-88
[142]Elliott, S.R. (2005), "Sustainability:an economic perspective", Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol.44:263-77
[143]Gray, R., Milne, M.J. (2002), "Sustainability reporting:who's kidding whom?", Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, Vol.81, No.6:66-70
[145]Hart, S.L., Milstein, M.B. (2003), "Creating sustainable value", Academy of Management Executive, Vol.17, No.2:56-67
[146]Marsden, C. (2000), "The new corporate citizenship of big business:part of the solution to sustainability", Business & Society Review, Vol.105, No.1:9-25
[147]O'Dwyer, B., Owen, D.L. (2005), "Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting:a critical evaluation", The British Accounting Review, Vol.37, No.2:205-29
[148]Reed, R., DeFillippi, R.J. (1990), "Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage", Academy of Management Review, Vol.15, No.1:88-102
[149]Spangenberg, J.H. (2004), "Reconciling sustainability and growth:criteria, indicators, policies", Sustainable Development, Vol.12:74-86
[150]Springett, D. (2003), "Business conceptions of sustainable development:a perspective from critical theory", Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.12, No.2:71-86
[151]van Marrewijk, M., Werre, M. (2003), "Multiple levels of corporate sustainability", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.44, No.2/3:107-19
[152]Learmont, D. R. Mining must show it is sustainable. Mining Engineering,Jan.1997
[153]Douglas C. Yearley. Sustainable development for the global mining and metalsndustry. Mining Engineering 55 no8(Ag 2003):45-48
[154]Morrison, Lisa. Reshaping the minerals and metals industry. Mining Engineering v.54 no8 (Aug.2002):20-21
[155]Thamir M. Salih. Sustainable economic development and the environment. International Journal of Social Economics v.30 nol (2003):153-162
[156]赵鹏大等,关于矿产资源竞争力评价问题世界科技研究与发展,1998：4-7
[157]余瑞祥等,资源竞争力的科学内涵及影响因素中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004.4：39-42
[158]王志宏,矿产资源竞争力及其评价指标体系煤炭学报,2002.1：103-107
[159]杨吕明等,焦点问题法—建立矿产资源可持续发展指标体系方法探讨地球科学—— 中国地质大学学报,2001.2：213-217
[160]王吉生等,国有煤炭企业可持续发展研究[M] 北京：经济管理出版社,2007：31-42
[161]岳福斌等,中国煤炭工业发展报告(2006—2010) 北京：社会科学文献出版社,2008：265
[162]纪成君,中国煤炭产业经济研究[M] 北京：经济管理出版社,2008：195-206
[163]国务院：国务院关于促进煤炭工业健康发展的若干意见(国发[2005]18号),2005.6.7
[164]黄盛初,2009中国煤炭发展报告北京：煤炭工业出版社,2009：50
[165]赵先贵等,基于科学发展观的区域发展评价系统研究水土保持通报,2008.3：193-197
[166]郭智渊,转型创新—中国煤炭企业发展的理论与策略[M] 北京：人民出版社,2011：238-258
[167]国务院发展研究中心发展战略和区域经济研究部课题组,中国区域科学发展研究[M]北京：中国发展出版社,2007：75
[168]田家华等,基于AHP法的资源型企业可持续发展力评价研究 理论月刊,2008.3：163-166
[169]濮洪九,坚持科学发展加快转变煤炭工业发展方式煤炭经济研究,2010.7：3-7
[170]张曦等,提升山西省煤炭产业竞争力路径研究煤炭经济研究,2010.11：23-26
[171]李国蓉等,资源型矿区可持续发展系统的协调性分析资源开发与市场,2004,20：409-410
[172]刘祥,论矿业城市可持续发展能力的综合测定煤炭经济研究,2004.5：11-13,38
[173]孔令曦等,我国矿业城市综合竞争力评价方法 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(2)：280-284
[174]李宏杰,浅析影响煤炭企业核心竞争力的因素及其提升途释 北方经济,2006.3：19-20
[175]姜德年,提升煤炭企业执行力的途释煤炭企业管理2005.2：38-38
[176]刘传庚等,煤炭企业循环经济综合评价指标体系构建及评价——以西山公司为例生态学报,2009.12：6748-6753
[177]姚平,基于IAHP-Entropy集成确权的煤炭企业可持续发展综合评价运筹与管理,2009.5：153-157