小学数学教师信念结构及特征的个案研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
课程与教学的改革寄希望于教师的改变,教师对课程改革的成败具有重要影响作用。教师信念作为教师头脑中内在的相对稳定系统的认知变量,其形成与发展的过程来自于教师个体与外在系统的双向互动,信念一旦形成就很难改变。信念对新想法和新知识具有一种过滤作用,并影响教师的决策和判断。教师信念是个体改变的最显著的观测变量(Smylie,1998)只有教师的信念发生变化,才会引起真正的变革。信念既是影响变革的因素,也是变革过程所产生的结果。(Richardson&Placier,2001)
     了解发现教师的信念是对课程改革之于个人层面主观意义的关注。历经了十多年的新课程改革,教师信念的真实样态是什么?信念作为“认知的过滤器”,教师到底真正接受了哪些新课程的理念并贯彻到课堂教学,而哪些理念而仅仅停留在“认同”的层面?哪些倡导的理念在教师信念的系统中存在着理解上与执行上差别?探查并发现教师的信念有助于我们更好地理解教师的课堂教学实践,为改进教育教学以及教师专业发展提供理论指南与案例参考。
     本研究从信念的内容构成以及信念形成和来源两个维度构建了教师信念结构框架,采用了民族志与个案研究相结合的研究方法,以3位小学数学教师作为研究对象,通过课堂观察、访谈等具体研究方法,勾画出了教师信念结构图,并针对教师信念结构以及特征进行分析,将不同教师信念结构所展现的教学取向分别归纳为:传统保守派、模仿跟随派、改革践行派。
     本研究得出以下结论:(1)教师信念内容构成与形成和来源是信念结构的两个维度;(2)教师信念系统中存在着没有被宣称却对实践产生重要影响的信念;(3)教师信念结构反映出信念与实践之间复杂的关系与变式。研究者发现教师信念结构具有以下特征:(1)教师的学科信念是信念系统中的关键要素。(2)宣称的信念与实践中信念之间的关系表现为从互动走向互构。同时针对形成教师信念结构的因素进行分析,发现教师对个人实践经验超强的确认程度、个人的知识与能力是影响教师信念结构的因素,而观念的宣传与倡导并不构成影响教师信念结构差异的因素。基于此,本研究为如何发展教师信念提出了建议:
     一是鼓励并创造机会反思和揭示教师个人信念。教师信念的内隐性、无意识导致教师很难自我觉知个人的信念。信念发展的前提是为教师提供反思与觉知个人信念的机会。教师可以通过录像带观察、同事听课、观察他人等方法收集发现个人的信念,为教师的自我诊断与反思提供前提与基础。
     二是丰富和完善教师知识,促进信念与情境之间的有效连接。信念既可以依赖知识而存在,也会由于知识的缺乏而产生。教师信念真正影响实践,需要调取其关于信念与情境的相关教学知识与学科知识。教师的学科知识与教学知识的不足则是影响信念转变为行为的因素之一。建议在具体情境下同步关注教师知识与信念的协同发展,实现专业知识与信念的良性互动。
     三是关注数学学科信念的形成与发展。教师所持有的学科信念直接影响教师决策和行为的稳定性。在数学课程改革向纵深推进的今天,教师的数学学科信念亟待需要整理与重建。树立积极正向的数学学科信念不仅仅是教师教育(职前或职后)应该关注的问题,而应该渗透在当前数学教育的过程之中。
     四是立足于教师信念的特点设计培训项目。针对信念的转变设计教师培训项目具体应该具有以下特点:(1)相对较长的周期。(2)聚焦于某一具体的问题情境。(3)反思与合作是信念改变的基本途径。
More expectation is given to the change of teachers.Teachers are the vital factors whichimpact on the success on the failure in the reform. Teachers’ beliefs are stable cognitivevariables in the brain, and they are formed and developed from the interaction between theprivates and the outside system. The beliefs are hard to be changed when they have formed.Beliefs have the filtration to the new ideas and new knowledge., and influence theirperceptions and judgment. Through more than ten years of new curriculum reform, few wouldargue what is the true beliefs teachers hold influence their practice, what beliefs have beenaccepted and implemented in the classroom, what difference is between the espoused and theenacted in practice. The research on teachers’ beliefs is helpful to the understanding theteachers’ practice in the classroom and improvement the teacher development and theteaching.
     Thus, the fundamental question is: What is the beliefs structure of the mathematicsteachers? What is the characteristics on the beliefs structure? The research inclined that thereare two dimensions in the beliefs structure: the contents of beliefs and the level of beliefs. Inthis research the micro-ethnographic and case-study methods, including the in-depthinterview and field observation based on3primary mathematics teachers, were adopted toinquire into teachers’ beliefs and the characteristics of the belief system. The paper found thedifferent belief system model based on the data of3mathematics teachers’ beliefs and impliedthe core beliefs teachers hold influence the practice. The analysis of the characteristics sshows that there are3different types of the beliefs structure, which is correspondence to the3reform orientation: tradition-keeper, blindness-follower and practitioner.Also, it could befound that the confirmation to the practice and personal knowledge and capability have theeffect on the formation of the beliefs system.
     From the research, some conclusion can be produced.(1) there are two dimesions-thecontent and the level of beliefs in the belief structure.(2)the unconscious beliefs have animportant effect on the beliefs system (3) the system can refect the complexity and variantbetween the espoused beliefs and the enacted beliefs.Some characteristic on the structure canbe found that (1) the subject beliefs is the key element in the structure;(2) the relaitionshipbetween the espoused beliefs and enacted beliefs are interactive and mutual constructive.
     Based on the findings and conclusion, some suggestion on the improving the teachers’beliefs are rendered as below. Encouragement and opportunity should be given to reflect andexposure the teacher’ beliefs. The teachers’ knowledge should be enriched and improved tomake the connection between beliefs and context. The mathematics beliefs should be thefocus in the formation and improvement of the beliefs system. The professional developmentitems should be designed according to the characteristics of beliefs.
引文
①佐藤学著,钟启泉译.课程与教师[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2001.385,387.
    ②谢翌.教师信念论[M]。广州:广东高等教育出版社,2010.4.
    ③Clark.C.M&Peterson.P. L. Teachers’ thought Processes[J]. National Inst ofEducation,Washington, DC,1944,23.
    ④Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.)[M]. New York: Teachers CollegePress,2001.
    ①杨骞.论数学观的教育[J].课程·教材·教法,1994(10):22-24.
    ②Ernest, P..The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of mathematics:A model [M]. Journal of Education forTeachers,1989:15.
    ①Thompson, A. The Teachers’ beliefs and conception: A Synthesis of the research [C].In D. Grouws.Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York:Macmillan,1992:127
    ②Schoenfeld, A. H. Purpose and methods of research in mathematics education [J]. Notices of theAmercian Mathematical Society.2000,641-649.
    ①柏拉图(著),张竹明(译).理想国[M].南京:凤凰出版传媒集团,2009.241.
    ②Kagan,D.M. Research on teacher cognition[C].A. C. Ornstein. Teaching: Theory into Practice. Boston:Ally and Bacon,1991.
    ①Pajares,M. F. Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct[J]. Review ofEducational Research,1992,62(3),307-322.
    ①Abelson,R. Different between belief systems&knowledge systems[J]. Cognitive Science,1979(3):355-366.
    ②Rokeach,M. Beliefs, attitudes and values[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1968.
    ③俞国良,辛自强.教师信念及其对教师培养的意义[J].教育研究,2009(5):16-21.
    ④赵昌木.论教师信念[J].当代教育科学,2004(9):11-14.
    ①Fishbein,M.,&Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introduction to theory andresearch[M]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley,1975.
    ②王恭志.教师教学信念与教学实务之探析[J].教育研究信息.2000,8(2):99-124.
    ①Pajares,M. F. Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct[J]. Review ofEducational Research,1992,62(3):307-322.
    ①张春兴.张氏心理学辞典[Z].台北:东华书局.1989.
    ②高强华.论信念的意义、结构与特性[J].现代教育,1993(3):74-89.
    ③Bem, D. J.(1970). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
    ④Rokeach,M. Beliefs, attitudes and values[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1968.
    ①高潇怡,庞丽娟.论教师教育观念的本质与结构[J].社会科学战线,2009,(3):250-253.
    ②辛涛,申继亮.论教师的教育观念[J].北京师范大学学报,1999,(1):14-19.
    ①赵昌木.论教师信念[J].当代教育科学,2004(9):11-14.
    ②俞国良,辛自强.教师信念及其对教师培养的意义[J].教育研究,2000(5):16-20.
    ①谭彩凤.香港中文教师教学信念及背景因素之研究[J].当代教育研究,2006(16):113-146.
    ②Guskey, T. R. Staff development and process of teachet change[J]. Educational Research,1986,15(5):5-12.
    ①徐泉.英语教师的教学信念:构成与特征[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2012.34.
    ①Op’Teynde P, DeCorte E, Verschaffel L. Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest forconceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen,&G. T ner (Eds.),Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education. Boston, MA, U.S.A.: Kluwer AcademicPublishing.2002,13-38.
    ①Ernest P. The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics[A]. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state ofthe art[M]. New York, U.S.A.: The Falmer Press.1989:249-254.
    ①Beswick K. Teacher beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms[J]. Educational Studies inMathematics,2007(65):95-120.
    ②Skemp, R. R. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding[J]. Arithmetic Teacher,197826(3):9-15.
    ③Kuhs, T. M.,&Ball, D. L. Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge,skills, and dispositions [M]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center on TeacherEducation.1986.
    ④Lernan S. Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching ofmathematics [J]. British Educational Research Journal,1990,16(1):53-61.
    ①张侨平.数学教师专业知识和信念对其教学的影响[D].香港:香港中文大学,2010.
    ②黄秦安.数学教师的数学观和数学教育观[J].数学教育学报,2004(4):38-41.
    ①黄毅英,林智中,黄家鸣,马云鹏,韩继伟.中国内地中学教师的数学观[J].课程教材教法,2002(1):68.
    ①Handal B. Teachers’ Mathematics Beliefs: A Review [J]. The Mathematics Educator,2003,13(2):47.
    ②Ernest,P. The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed), Mathematics teaching:The state of the art[M]. New York: The Flamer Press,1989:249-254.
    ③Doyle. Work in Mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction[J]. EducationalPsychologist,1988(23):167-180.
    ①Clark. C. M&Peterson.P. L. Teachers’ thought Processes[J]. National Inst of Education, Washington,DC,1994(23).
    ②马复.试论数学理解的两种类型[J].数学教育学报,2001(3).50-53.
    ③李士锜.PME·数学教育心理[M].华东师范大学出版社,2001.
    ④Grant Wiggins, Jay McTighe. Understanding by Design [M]. ASCD,1998转引自刘良华.数学理解的种维度观及其启示[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教科版),2009(6):132-135.
    ①Strauss, A.,&Corbin, J.. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, C A: Sage Publication.1990.89.
    ②陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社.2000(12)
    ③陈向明.质性研究:反思与评论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社.2008(3)
    ①潘慧玲.教育研究的取径——概念与应用[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2005.36.
    ②陈向明.质性研究:反思与评论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社.2008.9.
    ③陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社.2000.54.
    ④张爽.中国大陆统整课程的教师信念:两所学校的个案研究[D].香港中文大学.2006,121.
    ①Yin R. Case Study Research Design and Methods[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage,1994.
    ②Strauss&Corbin. Badsics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for DevelopmentGrounded Theory,2nedition. London: Sage
    ①转引自诺曼K邓津,伊冯娜S林肯主编,风笑天等译.定性研究:经验资料收集与分析的方法(第三卷)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007(685).
    ①陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社.2000.390.
    ①罗晓杰.国内外教师专业发展阶段研究述评[J].教育科学研究,2006(7):53-56.
    ①指代X老师的第一节课,下同。
    ①曹一鸣.数学课堂教学模式的实证系列研究[M].南宁:广西教育出版社,2009.9.
    ①黄荣金,李业平.数学课堂教学研究[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2010.86.
    ②黄荣金,李业平.数学课堂教学研究[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2010.87.
    ①Clark. C. M&Peterson.P. L. Teachers’ thought Processes[J]. National Inst of Education, Washington,DC,1994.23.
    ①Kaplan,R,G.(1991,October).Teacher beliefs and practices: Asquare peg in a square hole. Proceedings ofthe Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology ofMathematics Education,Blacksburg,VA
    ①史宁中主编,义务教育数学课程标准修订组编写.义务教育数学课程标准(2011版).北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012.65.
    ①马立平.小学数学的掌握和理解[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011(109)
    ①史宁中.小学数学教学中的核心问题:基本概念与运算法则[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013(54)
    ①朱莉亚·安吉莱瑞(著),徐文彬(译).如何培养学生的数感[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2014.62.
    ①转自张丹.小学数学教学策略[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011.157
    ①Mary Kay Stein,Barbara W. Grover&Marjorie Henningsen. Building Student Capacity for mathematicsThinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms [M].American Educational Research Journal,1996(33):455-488.
    ①谢翌.教师信念论[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,2010.36.
    ①靳玉乐,尹弘飚.课程改革中教师的适应性探讨[J].全球教育展望,2008(9):37-42.
    ①金美月,郭艳敏,代枫.数学教师信念研究综述[J].数学教育学报,2009(2):25-28.
    ①Fennema, E.,&Franke, M. L.(1992). Teacher knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbookof research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.147-164). New York, U.S.A.: Macmillan.
    ①辛涛,申继亮.论教师的教育观念[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1999(1):14-19.
    ①谢翌.教师信念论[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,2010:374.
    ①金美月,郭艳敏,代枫.数学教师信念研究综述[J].数学教育学报,2009(2):25-28.
    ②Ernest P.The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics[A]. In: P Ernest. MathematicsTeaching:The State of the Art[C]. London: Falmer Press.1989.
    ①Shahvirani A, Savizi B. Analyzing some Iranian High School Teachers’Beliefs on Mathematics,Mathematics Learning and Mathematics Teaching[J]. Journal of Environmental and Science Education,2007,2(2):54.
    ①金爱冬.数学教师信念变化特征及其影响因素研究[D].长春:东北师范大学.2013
    ①尹弘飚,李子健.论课程改革中的教师改变[J].教育研究.2007(3):23-29.
    [1]鲍建生.追求卓越:从TIMSS看影响学生数学成就的因素[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
    [2]柏拉图(著),张竹明(译).理想国[M].南京:凤凰出版传媒集团,2009:241.
    [3]曹一鸣.数学课堂教学模式的实证系列研究[M].广西教育出版社.2009:9.
    [4]陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社.2000:54.
    [5]陈向明.质性研究:反思与评论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社.2008:3.
    [6]戴维·霍普金斯(英).教师课堂研究指南[M].杨晓琼译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2009.
    [7]费耶阿本德[美].知识、科学与相对主义[M].陈健,等译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2006.
    [8]高强华.论信念的意义、结构与特性[J].现代教育,1993(3):74-89.
    [9]高潇怡,庞丽娟.论教师教育观念的本质与结构[J].社会科学战线,2009,(3):250-253.
    [10]顾泠沅,易凌峰.寻找中间地带:国际数学教育改革的大趋势[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.
    [11]郭晓娜.教师教学信念研究的现状、意义及趋势[J].外国教育研究,2008(10)
    [12]哈塞尔·海格(英),马晓梅,张昔阳译向经验教师学习指南[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2009
    [13]黄荣金,李业平.数学课堂教学研究.上海:上海教育出版社,2010(87)
    [14]黄毅英,林智中,黄家鸣,马云鹏,韩继伟.中国内地中学教师的数学观[J].课程教材教法,2002(1):68.
    [15]黄毅英,林智中,黄家鸣,韩继伟,王倩婷.香港教师数学观研究[J].数学教育学报,2003(5)
    [16]吉尔德·德兰逖[英].社会科学——超越建构论和实在论[M].张茂元译,长春:吉林人民出版社,2005
    [17]金爱冬.数学教师信念变化特征及其影响因素研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2013
    [18]金美月,郭艳敏,代枫.数学教师信念研究综述[J].数学教育学报,2009(2):25-28.
    [19]靳玉乐,尹弘飚.课程改革中教师的适应性探讨[J].全球教育展望,2008(9):37-42.
    [20]姜美玲.课程改革情境中的教师信念与教学实践:一项叙事探究[J].当代教育科学,2005(20):29-31.
    [21]克里斯·阿吉里斯(美),唐纳德·A.舍恩.实践理论——提高专业效能[M].刑清清、赵宁宁译,北京:教育科学出版社,2008
    [22]劳伦斯·纽曼.社会研究方法(第五版)——定性和定量的取向[M].郝大海译,北京:中国人民大学出版社(2007)
    [22]李琼.教师专业发展的知识基础:教学专长研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009
    [23]李士锜. PME·数学教育心理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001
    [24]林智中,张爽.如何通过质化研究探求教师的信念[J].全球教育展望,2008(8):52-56.
    [25]林一钢.教师信念研究述评[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3):79-84.
    [26]刘莉,杨艳芳.教师教育信念研究综述[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版),2008(12):45-48.
    [27]刘良华.数学理解的六种维度观及其启示[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教科版),2009(6):132-135.
    [28]罗晓杰.国内外教师专业发展阶段研究述评[J].教育科学研究.2006(7):53-56.
    [29]潘慧玲.教育研究的取径——概念与应用.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2005:36.
    [30]马复.试论数学理解的两种类型[J].数学教育学报,2001(3).50-53.
    [31]马立平.小学数学的掌握和理解[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011:109.
    [32]马云鹏.课程实施探索——小学数学课程实施的个案研究[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2001
    [33]迈克尔·波兰尼[英].科学、信仰与社会[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2000.
    [34]诺曼K邓津,伊冯娜S林肯主编,风笑天等译.定性研究:经验资料收集与分析的方法(第三卷)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007:920.
    [35]斯图尔特·夏皮罗(美).数学哲学——对数学的思考[M].郝兆宽,杨睿之译,上海:复旦大学出版社,2009
    [36]史宁中.小学数学教学中的核心问题:基本概念与运算法则[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013:54.
    [37]苏子.香港幼儿教师的教学信念:个案研究[D].香港:香港中文大学教育学院哲学博士论文,2004:2-50.
    [38]孙亚玲.课堂教学有效性标准研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2009
    [39]谭彩凤.香港中文教师教学信念及背景因素之研究[J].当代教育研究,2006(16):113-146.
    [40]唐纳德·A.舍恩(美).反映的实践者——专业工作者如何在行动中思考[M].夏林清译,北京:教育科学出版社,2006
    [41]谢翌.教师信念论[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,2010
    [42]辛涛,申继亮.论教师的教育观念[J].北京师范大学学报,1999,(1):14-19.
    [43]徐泉.英语教师的教学信念:构成与特征[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2012:34.
    [44]杨翠蓉.小学数学专家教师和新教师教学过程中的认知比较研究[D].上海:华东师范大学.2006
    [45]杨骞.论数学观的教育[J].课程教材教法,1994(10):22-24.
    [46]义务教育数学课程标准修订组编写.义务教育数学课程标准(2011版).北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012:65.
    [47]尹弘飚,李子健.论课程改革中的教师改变[J].教育研究.2007(3):23-29.
    [48]俞国良,辛自强.教师信念及其对教师培养的意义[J].教育研究,2009(5):16-21.
    [49]张丹.小学数学教学策略[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011:157.
    [50]张春兴.张氏心理学辞典[Z].台北:东华书局.1989.
    [51]张奠宙等.数学“双基”教学的理论与实践[M].南宁:广西教育出版社,2008.
    [52]张爽.中国大陆统整课程的教师信念:两所学校的个案研究[D].香港中文大学.2006:121.
    [53]张侨平,黄毅英,林智中.中国内地数学信念研究的综述[J].数学教育学报,2009(12):16-21.
    [54]赵昌木.论教师信念[J].当代教育科学,2004(9):11-14.
    [55]赵明仁.教师反思与教师专业发展[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009
    [56]周仕荣.师范生数学教学信念的发展研究[D].华东师范大学,2007
    [57]朱莉亚·安吉莱瑞(著),徐文彬(译).如何培养学生的数感[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2014:62.
    [1] Ajzen,I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. J. Kuhl and J. Bechmann. Actioncontrol: From cognition to Behavior [C]. Heidelberg: Springer,1985:11.
    [2] Anne M. Raymond. Inconsistency Between a Beginning Elementary School Teacher’s MathematicsBeliefs and Teaching Practice[J]. Research in Mathematics Education,1997(5):550-576.
    [3] Bardwick,J.M. Danger in Comfort Zone[M]. New York: American Management Association.,1991.
    [4] Bem, D. J. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.1970.
    [5] Beswick K. Teacher beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms [J]. Educational Studies inMathematics,2007(65):95-120.
    [6] Beswick K. The Beliefs/Practice Connection in Broadly Defined Contexts [J]. Mathematics EducationResearch Journal,2005(17):39-68.
    [7] Ernest P. The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics [A]. In: P Ernest. MathematicsTeaching: The State of the Art[C]. London: Falmer Press.1989.
    [8] Calderhead J.Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge[A]. In D. C. Calfee (eds.), Handbook of EducationalPsychology[M]. New York: Macmillan,1996:709-725.
    [9] Celia Hoyles. Mathematics Teaching and Mathematics Teachers: A Meta-Case Study[J].For theLearning of Mathematics,1992(3):32-44.
    [10] Civil.M. Prospective elementary teachers’ thinking about teaching mathematics. Journal ofMathematical Behavior,1993(12):79-109.
    [11] Clark. C. M&Peterson.P. L. Teachers’ thought Processes[J]. National Inst of Education,Washington, DC,1944(23).
    [12] Cooney, T, Shealy,B.,&Arvold, B. Conceptualizing belief structures pre-service teachers secondarymathematics teachers. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education,1998(29),306-333.
    [13] Cross D I. Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures andtheir influence on instructional practices[J]. Journal of Mathmatics Teacher Education,2009,12:325-346.
    [14] Dionne I. Cross. Alignment, cohesion,and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structuresand their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Math Teacher Education,2009(12).325-346.
    [15] Doyle. Work in Mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction[J].Educational Psychologist,1988(23):167-180.
    [16] Edward A. Sliver, Vilma M. Mesa, Katherine A. Morris, Jon R. Star and Babetta M. Benken.Teaching Mathematics for Understanding: An Analysis of Lessons Submitted by Teachers SeekingNBPTS Certification [J].American Educational Research Journal,2009(46):501-531.
    [17] Elbaz, P.(1983). Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge [M].London: Croom Helm
    [18] Ernest, P.. The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of mathematics:A model[J]. Journal of Education forTeachers,1989:15.
    [19] Fennema, E.,&Franke, M. L.(1992). Teacher knowledge and its impact. In D.Grouws (Ed.),Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning New York, U.S.A.: Macmillan,1992:147-164.
    [20] Fishbein,M.,&Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introduction to theory andresearch[M].Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley,1975.
    [21] Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.)[M]. New York: Teachers College Press,2001.
    [22] Grouws. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning[M]. New York:Macmillan,1992:127.
    [23] Guskey T R. Staff development and the process of teacher change[J]. Educational Researcher.1986,15(5):5-12.
    [24] Goldin G A. Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen,&G.Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in Mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer AcademicPublishers.2002:59-72.
    [25] Green T F. The activities of teaching[M]. New York, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.1971.
    [26] Handal B. Teachers’ Mathematics Beliefs: A Review [J]. The Mathematics Educator,2003,13(2):47.
    [27] Jacobs,J.K.,Yoshida,M.,Fernandez,C.,&Stigler, J. Japanese and American teachers’ evaluations ofmathematics lessons: A new technique for exploring beliefs[J].Journal of Mathematical Behavior,1997(16):7-24.
    [28] Jennifer K.Jacobs,Eiji Morita.J. Japanese and American Teachers’ Evaluations of VideotapedMathematics Lessons.Research in Mathematics Education,2002(33):3,154-175.
    [29] Jinfa Cai&Tao Wang..Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context:Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States[J]. Journal of Mathematics TeacherEducation,2009.
    [30] Jesse L. M. Wilkins. The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitude, beliefs,and practices[M].Journal of Math Teacher Education,2008(11):139-164.
    [31] Kagan, D.M.(1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the GoldilocksPrinciple. Review of Educational Research,1990(60):419-469.
    [32] Kagan,D.M. Research on teacher cognition[C].A. C. Ornstein. Teaching: Theory into Practice. Boston:Ally and Bacon,1991
    [33] Kaplan,R,G.(1991,October).Teacher beliefs and practices: A square peg in a square hole. Proceedingsof the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychologyof Mathematics Education,Blacksburg,VA
    [34] Kaur. B (2009). Characteristics of good mathematics teaching in Singapore grade8classrooms: ajuxtaposition of teachers’ practice and students’ perception.ZDM Mathematics Education (2009)41:333-347.
    [35] Kuhs, T. M.,&Ball, D. L. Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge,skills, and dispositions [M]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center on TeacherEducation.1986.
    [36] Lave, J. and Wenger, E.,Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.[M]Cambridge,Cambridge University Press,1991.
    [37] Leichardt. G. Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational Researcher,1990(19):18-25.Lernan S. Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching ofmathematics [J]. British Educational Research Journal,1990,16(1):53-61.
    [38] Mary Kay Stein,Barbara W. Grover&Marjorie Henningsen. Building Student Capacity formathematics Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in ReformClassrooms [M]. American Educational Research Journal,1996(33):455-488.
    [39] Munby H. The place of teachers’ beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, and analternative methodology. Instructiional Science,1982,11:201-225.
    [40] Munby H. Metaphor in the thinking of teachers: an exploratory study[M]. Journal of CurriculumStudies,1986,18(2):197-209.
    [41] Natasha M. Speer Connecting Belief and Practices: A Fine-Grained Analysis of A CollegeMathematics Teacher’s Collections of Beliefs and Their Relationship to His Instructional Practices[J].Cognition and Instruction2008,26(2):218-267.
    [42] Nasir, N.s., Hand, V.,&Tailor, E.V.Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural”and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond [M]. Review of EducationalResearch,2008(32):187-240.
    [43] Nespor, J. The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching [M]. Journal of Curriculum Studies,1987(19):317-328.
    [44] Op’Teynde P, DeCorte E, Verschaffel L. Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest forconceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen,&G. T ner (Eds.),Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education. Boston, MA, U.S.A.: Kluwer AcademicPublishing.2002:13-38.
    [45] Pajares.M. F. Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct [J]. Review ofEducational Research,1992,62(3):307-322.
    [46] Peterson,P.L.,Fennema,E.,Carpenter,T.P.,&Loef, M. Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs inmathematics[M]. Cognition and Instruction,1989(6):1-40.
    [47] Perer Gates.Going beyond belief systems: exploring a Model for the social influence on mathematicsteacher beliefs[M].Educational Studies in Mathematics,2006(63):347-369.
    [48] Philipp, R.A..Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F.K. Lester Jr.(Ed.),Second handbook onresearch on mathematics teaching and learning [M]. Charlotte, NC: Age Publishing,2007:257-315.
    [49] Ponte J P. Mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge[A]. In J. P. Ponte&J. F. Matos(Eds.),Proceedings of18th conference of PME[C]. Lisbon, Portugal: PME.1994, I:195-210.
    [50] Raymond, A.Inconsistencies between a beginning elementary teacher’s mathematics beliefs andteaching practice[M]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,1997,28(5):550-567.
    [51] Richardson, V.(1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula, J., Buttery,T.&Guyton, E.(Eds)[M]. Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) London: Prentice Hall,1996:102-119.
    [52] Rokeach,M. Beliefs, attitudes and values[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1968.
    [53] Schoenfeld, A. H. Purpose and methods of research in mathematics education [J]. Notices of theAmercian Mathematical Society.2000:641-649.
    [54] Shahvirani A,Savizi B. Analyzing some Iranian High School Teachers’ Beliefs on Mathematics,Mathmatics Learning and Mathematics Teaching[J].Journal of Environmental and Science Education,2007,2(2):54.
    [55] Skemp, R. R. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding[J]. Arithmetic Teacher,1978,26(3):9-15.
    [56] Strauss,A.,&Corbin,J.. Basics of qualitative research[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.1990:89.
    [57] Sullivan P, Mousley J. Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers[A].In F. L. Lin&T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education[M]. Dordrecht,the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.2001:147-163.
    [58] Thompson A. Teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching: Three case studies[M].University of Georgia,1982.
    [59] Thompson A. The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching toinstructional practice [J].Educational Studies in Mathematics,1984(15):105-127.
    [60] Wilson, P.,&Cooney, T.(2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E.Pehkonen,&G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs:A hidden variable in mathematics education. Dordrecht, TheNetherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers,2002:127-147.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700