政府投资项目代建人信用评价体系与信用管理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
我国自2004年大力推行代建制至今,全国47个副省级市均已开展了代建制改革的相关工作,代建人在代建项目中掌握着巨额的投资资金、决定着项目目标的实现程度。随着近年来政府投资项目数量和规模的逐年上涨,代建人承担了巨大的风险,对代建人的信用要求越来越高。在我国大力建设社会信用体系的同时,国务院出台了《关于社会信用体系建设的若干意见》,明确指出行业信用建设是社会信用体系建设的重要组成部分,工程建设行业则是信用治理的重点领域,在这种背景下研究代建人信用的评价及管理问题,有利于代建人明确自身在行业中的位置,找准发展目标督促代建人在经营活动中遵守市场经济秩序,能促进代建制健康发展,同时也能推动建筑行业的信用体系构建,加快诚信社会的建设。
     本文首先从信用的内涵引出了对代建人信用的定义,从三个层面分析了代建人信用风险,并对代建人信用风险表现进行了识别。分析出代建人信用风险产生的根本原因是由于信息不对称、不完全契约和信用突发事件导致的,现实原因是因为法律法制不健全、政府监管缺失、缺少激励机制和代建人风险和利益不对等,针对以上原因,构建了基于代建人信用风险控制的代建人信用管理框架,该框架包括代建人信用评价体系、代建人信用管理体系和代建人信用管理机制,三部分相辅相成,共同作用,使代建人信用风险得到有效控制。
     本文结合频率统计法和WBS技术建立了代建人信用评价内容层次图,并从中筛选出指标,通过专家调研法进行调整,完成了信用评价指标的初步确定;然后再基于粗糙集的属性约简算法进行指标优化,最终确定代建人信用评价指标体系,该体系共分四个层次,64个决策指标,文章对每个评价指标的涵义及考察内容逐一进行了详细说明。
     本文根据代建人信用评价的特征,建立了基于AHP-熵的代建人信用模糊物元评价模型,该评价模型中指标的权重是首先通过层次分析法得到主观权重,通过熵得到客观权重,再以最小二乘法为工具得到优化组合权重,而指标的评价得分是通过模糊物元模型的指标关联值得到,最后加权计算得到代建人的信用值。最后以信用分值为基础通过K-平均聚类划分方法对所有代建人进行信用评级,文中用简单算例进行了验证。
     本文通过对代建人信用管理特点的研究,构建了由政府组织,发改委牵头的代建人信用虚拟组织,并对该虚拟组织的组成部门及各部门的职责进行了分析。通过借鉴国外的信用管理模式,构建了以政府为主导,行业协会、社会监督、司法机构、信用专业机构参与的外部宏观监督,以及企业内部信用自控六位一体的代建人信用协同管理模式,并从内部和外部分别详细介绍了代建人信用监管的实施方式和实施内容,并梳理了代建人信用管理的总流程。
     本文从管理机制的概念入手,从管理机制的运行机制、动力机制和约束机制三个基本构成方面构建了代建人信用管理机制,代建人信用管理的运行机制涵盖信用信息传递、信用认证和信用公示三个主要内容;信用管理动力机制包括激励机制和失信惩戒机制;信用约束机制包括监管机制和社会心理约束两方面的因素,文章还对每一机制进行了详细阐述。
     最后,本文还对代建人信用评价及管理平台进行了设计,该信息平台融合了本文所研究的代建人信用评价和信用管理内容,该系统要实现代建人、政府部门、评审专家、委托人和公众不同权限的登录,能实现代建人信用数据的收集、审核、公示,代建人信用评价及评价的查询、公示,实现对代建人监管信息的发布和查询,并留有建言和举报的窗口,提供交流的平台。
     本文的项目支持—北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(北京政府投资项目代建人信用评价体系与管理机制研究,09BaJG260)已结题并通过验收,本文的相关研究成果对北京市代建市场信用体系的建立给予了理论和方法的支持,推动了相关政策的出台。
With active promotion of Agent Construction System (ACS) in China since2004, there are47sub-provincial cities in the whole country, have already carried out relevant works of ACS reform. In an agent project, the agent holds huge amounts of investment capital and determines the achievement of project goals. With the yearly increasing number and scale of government investment projects in the recent years, the agents take huge risks, and the credit requirements on agents are also getting higher and higher. While China vigorously builds the social credit system, the State Council issued Several Opinions on Social Credit System Construction, which indicates clearly that industry credit construction is an important part of the social credit system construction, and engineering construction industry is the focus of the credit governance. In this context, researching problems of agents' credit evaluation and management will be conductive for agent to clear its own position in the industry and to identify its development goals. To urge the agents comply with market economy orders in operating activities, and it will stimulate the healthy development of ACS, promote the credit system establishment in construction industry simultaneously, and speed up the construction of credibility society.
     This paper firstly draws the definition of agent credit from the credit connotation, and analyzes agent credit risks in three levels. Then, with analysis of agent's responsibilities and obligations in different agent modes, agent credit risks performance is recognized. It analyzes that the root cause of agent credit risk is information asymmetry, incomplete contract and credit emergencies, and the practical reason includes imperfect legal system, lack of government regulation, lack of the incentives, asymmetry of agent risks and benefits. According to these reasons, based on agent credit risk control, the agent credit management framework is built. The framework includes credit evaluation system, credit management system and credit management mechanism, which three parts complements each other and work together to make the agent credit risk being effectively controlled.
     With the frequency statistics method and WBS technique, establishes hierarchical graph of agent's credit evaluation context, after which, indicators are selected from the context and adjusted with expert investigation, in which way credit performance evaluation indicators are initially identified. After then, indicators are optimized with attribute reduction algorithm based on Rough Sets, and it is finally determined that agent's credit evaluation would be carried out in terms of four levels, and64decision indicators, besides, the article describes each indicator's meanings and examining contents in detail.
     Based on research on evaluation methods, agent's credit evaluation model builds agent's credit fuzzy element model on the basis of AHP entropy, compromising subjective and objective weighting methods weight according to agent's credit evaluation characteristics. In the evaluation model, subjective weights are obtained with analytic hierarchy process and objective weights are obtained with entropy, and least square method is used as a tool to build an optimization model of determining indicators' weights to obtain optimized weights combination. And the score of evaluating is get by fuzzy matter-element model, finally get the credit value through weighting caculation. Finally, based on credit score, grading all the agents'credit through K-The average clustering partition method. This is verified by an example.
     This paper studies the specialty of agent credit management. The paper builds a virtual organization of agent'credit which is consisted of governmental departments and leaded by the Development and Reform Commission. The departments' composition and responsibilities of the virtual organization are analyzed. By referring to foreign credit management model, the paper builds a government-led agent's credit collaborative management and a six-in-one model:external macro supervision of industry associations, social supervision, the judiciary and the credit professional organizations, as well as credit self-control in internal corporate. It also respectively introduces implementation mode and content in detail from internal and external supervision aspect, and combs the general process of agent's credit management.
     Starting from the concept of management mechanism, the paper establishes agent's credit management mechanism in three basic components, which are operation mechanism, dynamic mechanism and restraint mechanism of management. The operation mechanism of agent's credit management covers three main elements:credit information transfer, credit certification and credit publicity; credit management dynamic mechanism includes incentives and penalizing mechanism; credit constraint mechanism includes two aspects of regulatory mechanisms and social psychological constraints. The article also elaborates the each mechanism in detail.
     Finally, agent's credit evaluation and management platform is designed in the paper. The information platform combines content and process of agent's credit evaluation and credit management researched in the article. The system realizes the login of users with different permission, such as the agent, government departments, evaluation experts, principal and the public. It also realizes the agent's credit data collection, audit and publicity, and agent's credit evaluation, the evaluation query, the evaluation publicity, and the project-based agent's credit supervision, besides, it provides an exchange platform with suggesting and reporting windows.
     The research is sponsored by Beijing philosophy and social science plan, the title is that The Research of Agent Credit Evaluation System and Management Mechanism in Beijing Government Investment Project(NO.09BaJG260). The achievement of the research project has passed the examination, and it providers theory and method for Beijing agent market's credit system construction, some polices are put forward follow the plan's implementation.
引文
[1]乌云娜,牛东晓.政府投资建设项目代建制理论与实务[M].北京:电子工业出版,2007:11-16
    [2]谢朦.代建单位风险识别与研究研究[J].管理科学,2009,10:61-62
    [3]JASKOWSKI P,BIRUK S,BUCONR. Assessing Contractor Selection Criteria Weights With Fuzzy AHP Method Application in Group Decision Environment[J].Automation in Construction.2010,19(2):120-126
    [4]Dabla-Norris Era, Brumby Jim, Kyobe Annette etc. Investing in Public Investment:An Index of Public Investment Efficiency[J]. Journal of Economic Growth.2012(17): 235-266.
    [5]D.J.Watt, B.Kayis, K.Willey. The Relative Importance of Tender Evaluation and Contractor Selection Criteria[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2010(28):51-60.
    [6]Bielsa, MMC, Ramon, MC, Cerezo, EC. A Model for Forecasting Credit Risk Indicators Through Structural Models and Panel Data Model Using Financial Ratios:An Application to the Spanish Market[J]. AC ADEMIA-RE VISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ADMINISTRACION,2012(50):118-147.
    [7]Ozturk, Ilhan. On the Causality Between Imf Credits and Macroeconomic Indicators: Evidence From Developing Countries[J]. Ekonomska Istrazivanja -economic Research. 2009(22):1-8.
    [8]Ji-de Sun, Yi-nan Zhu; Xin-fu Xu. Research on selecting the credit evaluation indexes to the project managers in construction enterprises[C].2010 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2010(2):1846-1850.
    [9]韩美贵,金德智.政府投资项目代建人绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(7):56-59.
    [10]宋砚秋,戴大双,冯超.基于专家意见遴选的政府投资项目代建人能力评测模型研究[J].管理学报.2009,(3):20-22.
    [11]邓曦,刘幸.政府投资工程代建人绩效考核灰色评价法[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版).2008,(2):135-137.
    [12]刘鹏.代建项目成功指标与成功因素研究[D].济南:山东大学,2010:12-13.
    [13]LiJie Zou, Patrick X. W. Fuzzy AHP-Based Risk Assessment Methodology for PPP Projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.2011(12):1205-1209.
    [14]JUAN Y K, PERNG Y H, LACOUTURE D C, et al. Housing Refurbishment Contractors Selection Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy-QFD Approach[J]. Automation in Construction. 2010,18(2):139-144.
    [15]Lee Y.C, Min J. H. A Pratical Approach to Credit Scoring[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2007,35(12):1762-1770.
    [16]LIN Yong-huang, LEE Pin-Chan, CHANG Ta-Peng, TING Hsin-I. Multi-attributes Group Decision Making Model Under the Condition of Uncertain Information [J]. Automation in Construction,2008,17:792-797.
    [17]F-M.Tseng, Y-C.Hu. Comparing Four Bankruptcy Prediction Models:Logit, Quadratic Interval Logit, Neural and Fuzzy Neural Networks[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(3):1846-1853.
    [18]P.Wang. Qos-aware Web Services Selection with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Under Consumer's Vague Perception[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(3):4460-4466.
    [19]J-Q.Wang, J-J.Li, Multi-criteria Fuzzy Decision-making Method Based on Cross Entrophy and Score Functions[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011, 38(7):1032-1038.
    [20]J-H.Chen, J-Z.Lin. Developing an SVM Based Risk Hedging Prediction Model for Construction Material Suppliers[J]. Automation in Construction.2010,19(6):702-708.
    [21]MacKenzie, Ian A. Ohndorf, Markus. Optimal Monitoring of Credit-based Emissions Trading Under Asymmetric Information[J]. Journal of Rerulatory Economics. 2012(2):180-203.
    [22]姜明辉等.分类树在个人信用评估中的应用[J].商业研究,2003(21):86-88
    [23]季峰,方兆本等.基于SenV-RBF的个人信用评分模型[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2007,37(7):767-772.
    [24]叶中行,余敏杰.基于遗传算法和分类树的信用分类方法[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(4):424-428.
    [25]Nan-Chen Hsien. Hybrid mining approach in the design of credit scoring models[J]. Expert Systems withApplications,2005(28):655-665.
    [26]Adnan Khashman. Neural networks for credit risk evaluation:Investigation ofdifferent neural models and learning schemes [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010(37):6233-6239.
    [27]Cheng-Lung Hwang, Mu-Chen Chen. Credit scoring with a data miningapproach based on support vector machines[J]. Expert Systems withApplications,2007(33):847-856.
    [28]Ammeter,A.P.Ceasar, D.&Ferris, G.R. Et al. A Social Relationship Conceptualization of Trust and Accountability in Organizations[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2004,14(1):47-65.
    [29]Lee, D.Y.& Dawes, P.L. Guanxi, Trust and Long Term Orientation in Chinese Business Markets[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2005,13(2):28-56.
    [30]Ruth A.H.& Todd L. Collaboration, Trust and Innovative Change[J]. Journal of Change Management,2004,4(2):97-104.
    [31]Zhou Z F, Mou TY and Shi Y. The Mathematical Structure on Credit Evaluation[J]. Far East Jounal of Applied Mathematics,2005,1(20):113-119.
    [32]LIN Yong-huang, LEE Pin-chan, TING Hsin-I. Dynamic Multi-attributes Decision Making Model with Grey Number Evaluations [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008,35:1638-1644.
    [33]Eric T G, Wang H, Jessica H F. The Influence of Governance Equilibrium on ERP Project Success[J]. Decision Support Systems,2006 (4):708-727.
    [34]J.Wang, J.Liu, L.Huang.Study on The Professional Liability Insurance System of The Supervision Engineer in China[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2007,25(7):801-810.
    [35]U.Blaurock. Control and Responsibility of Credit Rating Agencies[R]. General Reports of the XVIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law. Utrecht,2007:25
    [36]Turvey, C.G. Liberty Hyde Bailey.the Country Life Commission and the formalization of farm credit in the USA[J]. Agricultural Finance Review,2009(69):133-48.
    [37]Borman, Mark. Understanding the cosourcing decision:A case study of credit unions in australia[J]. Association for Information Systems.2006(5):3143-3147.
    [38]Lazarus, Jeanne. Moral economics, poverty, credit and trust in pre-industrial Europe[J]. SOCIOLOGIE DU TRAVAIL.2011,53(2):288-290.
    [39]Christodoulakis, George A.; Olupeka, Taiwo. Pricing and momentum of syndicated credit in Europe[J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE. 2010,38 (5):325-332.
    [40]Dincecco, Mark. Political regimes and sovereign credit risk in Europe[J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF ECONOMIC HISTORY,2009,13:31-63.
    [41]Dincecco, Mark. Weak and strong states:Fiscal regimes and sovereign credit risk in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century continental Europe[J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY,2007,67(2):524-524.
    [42]Paul, Helen Julia The empire of credit:the financial revolution in Britain, Ireland and America,1688-1815[J]. ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW.2012(4):1578-1579.
    [43]Lindenberg, Nannette; Westermann, Frank. How strong is the case for dollarization in Central America? An empirical analysis of business cycles, credit market imperfections and the exchange rate[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS. 2012,17(2):147-166.
    [44]Ruef, M (Ruef, Martin), Patterson, K (Patterson, Kelly). Credit and Classification:The Impact of Industry Boundaries in Nineteenth-century America[J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY.2009,54, (3):486-520.
    [45]Fujiwara, Y, Aoyama, H, Ikeda, Y, Iyetomi, H, Souma, W. Structure and Temporal Change of the Credit Network between Banks and Large Finns in Japan[J]. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL,2009(7): 135-150.
    [46]戴若林.基于复杂系统理论的建筑市场信用机制研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2009:73-78.
    [47]杨威.国家自然科学基金的科研信用评价问题的研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008:35-37,67-69
    [48]张瑛.新兴技术企业信用风险评估方法研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2009:78-82
    [49]沈雯雯.基于灰色系统理论的粮食企业信用风险评价研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009:34-37
    [50]李晓红.中国转型期社会信用环境研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010:23-27
    [51]方俊,饶涛.政府投资工程委托代建主体博弈分析闭[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(3):141-145.
    [52]楼新荣.广东省代建模式下代建项目信息管理探讨[J].建筑经济,2009,32 1(7):3436.
    [53]张伟,朱宏亮.政府投资项目代建制下的信息沟通与披露机制田[J].中国港湾建设,2008,154(2):72-75.
    [54]邓中美.基于委托代理理论的代建制项目管理模式研究田[J].重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(2):128-132.
    [55]Marcus Jefferies, W.D. McGeorge. Using Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to Procure Social Infrastructure in Australia[J].Engineering,Construction and Architectural Management,2009,16(5):415-437.
    [56]Mark Hall,Robin Holt,Andrew Graves. Private Finance, Public Roads:Configuring the Supply Chain in PFI Highway Construction[J]. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,2000, (6):27-235.
    [57]Khaled Al-Reshaid,Nabil Kartam. Design-Build Pre-qualification and Tendering Approach For Public projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2005, (23):309-320.
    [58]石锦峰.学习美国公共工程管理的体会与建议[J].广东审计,2004,(2):33-36.
    [59]任树本,江显华.美国政府投资项目监管的特点及启示[J].中国投资,2001,(4):46-50.
    [60]赵超,王淑荣,孙旺明.美国政府投资项目管理[J].中国财政,2008,(15):58-59.
    [61]胡苗.法、美两国公共投资监督借鉴[J].财政监督,2006,(7):55-56.
    [62]Bryde.D.J. Modeling project management performance[J]. International Journal of Quality Reliability Management,2003,20(2):229-254.
    [63]Tahir Masood Qureshi, Aamir Shahzad Warraich, Syed Tahir Hijazi. Significance of project management performance assessment(PMPA) model[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2009, (27):378-388.
    [64]Sai Nudurpati, Tanweer Arshad, Trevor Turner. Performance Measurement in the Construction Industry:an Action Case Investigating Manufacturing Methodologies[J]. Computers in Industry,2007,58(7):667-676.
    [65]Guillaume Marques, Didier Gourc, Matthieu Lauras. Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2010, (29):1057-1069.
    [66]Carlos F. Gomes, Mahmoud M. Yasin, Joa-o V. Lisboa. Project Management in the Context of Organizational Change:The Case of the Portuguese Public Sector[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management,2008,21(6):573-585.
    [67]Carol Jacobson, Sang Ok Choi. Success Factors:Public Works and Public-Private Partnerships[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management,2008,21(6):637-657.
    [68]Ektewan Manowong,Stephen O. Ogunlana. Public Hearings in Thailand's Infrastructure Projects:Effective Participations[J]. Engineering,Construction and Architectural Management,2006,13(4):343-363.
    [69]Robin Holt,David Rowe.Total Quality, Public Management and Critical Leadership in Civil Construction Projects[J].International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2000,17(4):541-55
    [70]乌云娜,黄勇,李泽众等.政府投资项目代建人前期代理管理成果评价及案例研究[J].华东经济管理,2012,26(5):146-152.
    [71]乌云娜,黄勇,张硕等.政府投资项目代建人质量自控及监管机制研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2012,18(3):101-109.
    [72]乌云娜,黄勇,王青等.政府投资项目前期环境与安全监管评价实证研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,25(3):309-314.
    [73]兰定筠,李世蓉.政府投资项目代建制的监管机制研究[J].建筑经济,2007,(11):68-70.
    [74]张涛,贺昌政.基于系统动力学的非经营性政府投资项目监督管理研究[J].软科学,2009,23(11):25-31.
    [75]孙继宁,包锡盛.美国政府投资项目的监管[J].中国投资,2011(11):103-105.
    [76]傅仲保,张康民,仇轶.英国政府投资监管体系的构架和内容[J].中国投资,2010,(4):102-105.
    [77]向强,黄一冈.国外政府投资项目监管的特色与借鉴[J].科技情报开发与经济,2004,14(10):146-148
    [78]刘湃.新时期我国政府投资研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2011:121-122.
    [79]吴敬琏.信用担保与国民信用体系建设[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001:28
    [80]林钧跃.社会信用体系原理[M].北京:中国正方出版社.2003:3-4.
    [81]吴晶妹.现代信用学[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2002:13.
    [82]孙智英.信用问题的经济学分析[M].北京:中国城市出版社,2002:9.
    [83]李伟,企业信用系统的结构性研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007:19.
    [84]陈祥槐,倪建平.企业信用及其制度模式探讨[J].现代财经,2002(11):34.
    [85]颜晓峰.信用与文明[J].新东方,2002(4):55.
    [86]林江鹏.市场主体信用关系的理论与实证研究[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2011:27-28,49
    [87]沈雯雯.基于灰色系统理论的粮食企业信用风险评价研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009:24-25
    [88]叶蜀君.信用风险的博弈分析与度量模型[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2008:28-29
    [89]孙杰.建设工程契约信用制度与体系构建[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2007:79-81
    [90]张天森,李元生.建筑市场信息不对称研究[J].建筑经济,2003,(9):23-25
    [91]张瑛.新兴技术企业信用风险评估方法研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2009:61-65
    [92]李英攀,蒋沧如.构建代建制政府投资项目有效监管体制的探讨[J].沈阳建筑大学学报,2009(1):60-62
    [93]范柏乃,朱文斌.中小企业信用评价指标的理论遴选与实证分析[J].科研管理,2003(24):83-88
    [94]金晶.基于第三方评级机构的我国中小企业信用评级体系研究[D].西安:西安电子科技大学,2008:37
    [95]王国胤.Rough集理论与知识获取[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2001:23-25
    [96]周彪,周晓猛,杨勇等.镇域生态环境风险评价指标体系探究[J].安全与环境学报,2010,4(10):112-114
    [97]孙杰.建设工程契约信用制度与体系构建[D].大连:东北财经大学,2007:125
    [98]王晓宁,盛洪飞,孟祥海.基于物元分析的交通影响评价模型[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(3):102-106
    [99]郑长江,陈淑燕,王炜.交叉口公交优先通行方案的物元分析评价方法[J].公路交通科技,2004,21(11):98-101
    [100]张俊艳,李俊杰.基于物元分析的资源节约型社会综合评价研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(6):538-541
    [101]胡宝清.可拓评价方法在围岩稳定性分类中的应用[J].水力学报,2000,(2):66-70
    [102]王广月,刘健.围岩稳定性的模糊物元评价方法[J].水利学报,2004,(5):20-24
    [103]姜永生,李忠富,徐淑红.基于模糊物元的城市居住水平预警研究[J].软科学,2011,6(25):40-41
    [104]李如忠.基于模糊物元分析原理的区域生态环境评价[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(5):597-601
    [105]刘娜,艾南山,方艳等.基于熵权的模糊物元模型在城市生态系统健康评价中的应 用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(5):589-595
    [106]潘峰,梁川,王志良等.模糊物元模型在区域水资源可持续利用综合评价中的应用[J].水科学进展,2003,14(3):271-275
    [107]黄乾,彭世彰,田守岗等.模糊物元模型在区域水安全评价中应用[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(4):379-383
    [108]范志清,孙慧,任政旭.基于模糊物元分析的BOT高速公路社会效益综合评价[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2010,12(2):173-176
    [109]范志清.基于治理的监理工程师信用改善研究[D].天津:天津大学,2010:37-40
    [110]范志清,王雪青,李宝龙.基于物元分析的建筑市场执业资格人员信用评价研究[J].软科学,2009,23(7):41-45
    [111]Abdelkhalek H A. Determination and weighing of criteria that affect BOT tenders using AHP theory [J]. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science,2005,52(4):715-731.
    [112]陈国宏,李美娟,陈衍泰.组合评价及其计算机集成系统研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:41-42.
    [113]周宗放,张瑛,陈林等.新兴技术企业信用风险演化机理及评价方法研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:156.
    [114]董楠楠,钟昌标,熊伟清.互信程度、公共产品建设及虚拟组织建设对集群内创新企业数量的影响[J].管理学报,2012,(6):871-873.
    [115]钱黎阳.基于虚拟组织的地方高校师资人力资源管理开发对策[J].价值工程,2012,(24):244-246.
    [116]汪圣.基于虚拟组织理论的我国工程咨询企业发展战略研究[J].建筑经济,2011,(1):77-80.
    [117]周启迪.网络时代我国体育虚拟组织成长研究[D].北京:北京体育大学,2012:21-26.
    [118]吴晶妹.北京市信用活动分析与建议[J].北京社会科学,2003,(4):19-26.
    [119]喻敬明.国家信用管理体系[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:12-13.
    [120]林清泉,张建龙,杨丰.中国信用体系建设中的个人信用模糊评估[J].山西财经大学学报,2007(6):14-15.
    [121]李家勋,李功奎,高晓梅.国外社会信用体系发展模式比较及启示[J].现代管理科学,2008(18):80-81.
    [122]吴义国.建设中国中小企业政策性金融支持体系[J].管理世界,2004(6):129-130.
    [123]林英杰.我国征信体系中失信惩戒机制研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2009:43-45.
    [124]陈根强.行政失信惩戒制度研究[J].兰州学刊,2007,(10):52-56.
    [125]朱冬辉.金融失信惩戒机制建设初探[J].南方金融,2006,(06):43-45.
    [126]戴长林.惩戒失信企业[J].经营与管理,2005,(06):54.
    [127]王富全.征信体系建设中的失信惩戒机制分析[J].金融研究,2008,(05):186-193.
    [128]高翔.中国药品市场信用监管体系研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2007:52-54.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700