区域社会经济系统脆弱性综合评价及应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着全球人口的不断增长以及社会经济的快速发展,生存环境及社会经济系统的脆弱性问题也随之凸显出来,它严重影响到生态和社会经济的可持续发展。脆弱性逐渐成为全球环境变化与如何实现可持续性发展问题研究的热点和科学前沿领域之一。随着社会经济发展,脆弱性的概念不仅被应用在自然灾害、生态环境、地下水等领域,而且脆弱性的应用领域在不断扩大。
     首先,本文系统阐述了区域社会经济系统脆弱性研究的背景、目的和意义,分析了国内外脆弱性的研究现状,总结了学者对脆弱性这一概念的不同看法及研究中所采用的不同方法,全面系统地对脆弱性的研究现状作出评述。
     其次,本文定义区域社会经济系统脆弱性的概念,提出了脆弱性综合评价指标体系建立的原则。在此原则基础上,构建了区域社会经济系统脆弱性综合评价指标体系,该体系由主要成因指标和结果表现指标两个一级指标构成。其中主要成因指标包含资源生态成因指标、人口成因指标和环境污染成因指标三个二级指标;结果表现指标包含经济结果指标、社会结果指标和自然灾害结果指标三个二级指标,每个二级指标又分别包括若干三级指标。同时根据相关标准,确定所有三级指标的标准值。
     第三,依据不同级别指标特点对各级指标采用不同的方法确定权重,对二级指标采用层次分析法确定权重,并对其进行一致性检验。针对三级指标数较多且所有原始信息直接来源于客观环境这一特点,采用熵值法确定三级指标的权重,有效地降低了调研时人为因素带来的主观性。
     第四,按照评价要求所需划分灰类,引进模糊数学的隶属函数代替白化权函数,对灰色聚类分析法进行了改进。在此基础上,构建了适合区域社会经济系统脆弱性综合评价模型,使区域社会经济系统脆弱性综合评价客观、准确。
     第五,运用典型相关分析法,对河北省区域经济系统脆弱性主要成因和结果表现指标间关联关系进行分析,从不同角度定量给出各二级指标在不同系统中的作用程度。选择改进的BP神经网络方法,定量度量主要成因中各指标的影响力和结果表现中各指标的感应度,为研究社会经济系统脆弱性两个一级指标间的关系关联提供新的方法。
     第六,根据各指标序列散点图形态,针对不同指标分别采用直线回归方程、曲线回归方程及神经网络法,对河北省区域社会经济系统脆弱性综合评价指标体系中各三级指标未来值进行预测,根据预测结果对河北省区域社会经济系统脆弱性进行综合评价。
     最后,本文根据对河北省经济系统脆弱性进行评价的结果及预测的数据,从资源生态、人口、环境污染、经济、社会及防灾等诸多方面指出其存在的问题,给出相应建议性的改进措施,为降低河北省社会经济系统脆弱性提供理论支持。
With the rapid growth of global population and the development of socio-economy,the vulnerability of living environment and socio-economic system also becomesprominent. It has seriously affected the ecology and the sustainable development of thesocio-economic system.The vulnerability is becoming a hot issue and one of thescientific frontiers on global environmental change and how to achieve sustainabledevelopment. With the socio-economic development, the concept of vulnerability is notonly applied in the field of natural disasters, ecological environment, groundwater, butalso used in other areas.
     First, the background and purpose and significance of the regional socio-economicvulnerability are systematically given. Researches of vulnerability both domestic andabroad are summarized and the different views and researching methods on vulnerabilityare analyzed. A comprehensive and systematic comment of vulnerability research statusis made.
     Secondly, the concept of vulnerability of the regional socio-economic system andthe principles of synthetic evaluation indicator system of the regional socio-economicvulnerability is given. On the basis of the principles, a synthetic evaluating system of theregional social and economic is established. The system includes two level-I indicatorswhich refer to the main causing indicators and the outcome performance indicators. Themain causing indicators include the resource ecological causing index, the populationcausing index and the environmental pollution causing index. The outcome performanceindex includes the economic outcome index, social outcome index and natural disasteroutcome index. There are a number of level-III indicators respectively in each type ofLevel-II indicators. In accordance with the relevant standards, the standard index’s valuesfor all the Level–III indicators are calculated.
     Thirdly, according to the characteristics of the different levels of indicators, differentapproaches are adopted to determine the weights. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)has been used in determining the weights of the Level-II indicators and the consistency test has been made. Considering that the Level-II indicators are more,and all the originalinformation is from the objective environment directly, the entropy method is adopted indetermining the weights for the Level-II indicators. It can effectively reduce thesubjectivity of the research caused by human factors by using these methods.
     Fourthly, with the classified gray cluster according to the need of evaluationrequirement, the improved Gray cluster analysis method and the membership function offuzzy mathematics, a synthetic evaluation model was conducted on the regionalsocio-economic vulnerability system. It may make the regional socio-economicvulnerability system evaluation objective and correct.
     Fifthly, by using the Canonical Correlation Analysis,the relationships between theindicators of main causing indicators and outcome performance of regionalsocio-economic system vulnerability in Hebei Province are analyzed. The effectingdegrees of level-II indicators in different systems are quantitatively given from differentperspectivies. The improved BP neural network is adopted quantitative to measure theinfluence of the main causing indicators and the sensitivity of outcome performanceindicators so as to provide a new method to research the relationships between the twoLevel-I indicators of the regional socio-economic system.
     Sixthly, according to the form of the sequence scatter plot morphology, the linerregression equations, the curve regression equations and the neural network method hasbeen adopted respectively to forecast the future value of the vulnerability of eachLevel-III indicators of Hebei regional socio-economic comprehensive evaluation system.Based on the forecasting results, the vulnerability of the socio-economic system of HebeiProvince is comprehensive evaluated.
     Lastly, according to the evaluated results and the forecasting data of economicsystem vulnerability in Hebei Province, some existing problems are pointed out from theperspectivies of resource ecology, population, environment pollution, economy, society,and disaster prevention. The relevant suggestions and the theoretical supports have beengiven for solving the problems and to reduce the socio-economic system vulnerability inHebei Province.
引文
[1] UITTO J. I. The Geography of Disaster Vulnerability in Megacities[J].AppliedGeography,1998,18(1):7-16.
    [2] Piers Blaikie,Terry Cannon,Iran Davis,Ben Wisner. At Risk: Natural Hazards,People’s Vulnerability and Disasters[M]. London: Routledge,1994:284.
    [3] George R. Walker. Modelling the vulnerability of buildings to wind—a review[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering.2011,38(9):1031–1039.
    [4] Rajendra Prasad Pandey, Ashish Pandey, Ravi V Galkate, et al. IntegratingHydro-Meteorological and Physiographic Factors for Assessment of Vulnerabilityto Drought[J]. Water Resources Management,2010,24(15):4199-4210.
    [5] Alexander Fekete, Marion Damm, J rn Birkmann. Scales as a challenge forvulnerability assessment[J]. Natural Hazards,2010,55(3):729.
    [6] Linnekamp, F. Koedam, A. Baud, I.S.A. Household vulnerability to climatechange: Examining perceptions of households of flood risks in Georgetown andParamaribo [J].Habitat International,2011,35(3):447.
    [7] Detraz, Nicole. Threats or Vulnerabilities? Assessing the Link between ClimateChange and Security[J]. Global Environmental Politics,2011,11(3):104-120.
    [8] Das Iswar,Kumar Gaurav,Stein Alfred,Bagchi Arunabha, Dadhwal Vinay.Stochastic landslide vulnerability modeling in space and time in a part of thenorthern Himalayas, India[J]. Environmental Monitoring&Assessment,2011,178(1-4):25-37.
    [9] Hans-Martin Fussel. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility,capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A synthetic indicator-basedassessment[J]. Global Environmental Change,2010,(20):597–611.
    [10] Jing Cheng, Jian ping Tao. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Drought VulnerabilityBased on the Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Empirical Study from XiaoganCity in Hubei Province[J], Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia,2010,(1):126–135.
    [11] A. Ippolito,S. Sala, J. H. Faber,M. Vighi. Ecological vulnerability analysis:A riverbasin case study [J]. Science of The Total Environment,2010,408(18):3880-3890.
    [12] Rupert Seidl, Werner Rammer, Manfred J. Lexer. Adaptation options to reduceclimate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the AustrianAlps[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research.2011,41(4):694-706.
    [13] Qiu Penghua, Xu Songjun, Xie Genzong, Tang Benan, Bi Hua, Yu Longshi.Analysis of the ecological vulnerability of the western Hainan Island based on itslandscape pattern and ecosystem sensitivity[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(4):1257-1264.
    [14] Yarrow M. M., Tironi A., Ramirez A., et al.An applied assessment model toevaluate the socioeconomic impact of water quality regulations in Chile[J].WaterResources Management,2008,22(11):1531-1543.
    [15] Beier C. M., Patterson T. M., Chapin F. S. Ecosystem services and emergentvulnerability in managed ecosystems:A geospatial decision-support tool[J].Ecosystems,2008,11(6):923-938.
    [16] Jose Luis Expósito, Maria Vicenta Esteller,Jorge Paredes,et al. GroundwaterProtection Using Vulnerability Maps and Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA): ACase Study in Mexico[J].Water Resources Management,2010,24(15):4219-4225.
    [17] Fabrice G. R., J rn B., Marion D., et al. Understanding multiple thresholds ofcoupled social-ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as externalshocks[J]. Natural Hazards,2010,55(3):749-758.
    [18] Heltbeg R., Siegel P. B., Jorgensen S. L. Addressing Human Vulner-ability toClimate Change:Toward No-regrets’Approach[J].Global Environmental Change,2009,19(1):89-99.
    [19] Omo-Irabor Omo, Olobaniyi Samuel, Akunna Joe, Venus Valentijn, Maina Joseph,Paradzayi Charles. Mangrove vulnerability modelling in parts of Western NigerDelta, Nigeria using satellite images, GIS techniques and Spatial Multi-CriteriaAnalysis (SMCA)[J].Environmental Monitoring&Assessment,2011,178(3):13,39-51.
    [20] Zabeo A., Pizzol L., Agostini P., Critto A., Giove S., Marcomini A. Regional riskassessment for contaminated sites Part1: Vulnerability assessment bymulticriteria decision analysis[J]. Environment International,2011,37(8):1295-1306.
    [21] M. Masetti, S. Poli, S. Sterlacchini. The Use of the Weights-of-EvidenceModeling Technique to Estimate the Vulnerability of Groundwater to NitrateContamination [J]. Natural Resources Research,2007,16(2):109-119.
    [22] Gogu R. C., Dssargues A.Current trends and future challenges in groundwatervulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods[J].EnvironmentalGeology,2000,39(6):549-561.
    [23] Dixon Barnali. Ground water vulnerability mapping:a GIS and fuzzy rule basedintegrated tool[J].Journal of Applied Geography,2005,25:327-347.
    [24] Pathak Dhundi Raj, Hiratsuka Akira. An integrated GIS based fuzzy patternrecognition model to compute groundwater vulnerability index for decisionmaking [J].Journal of Hydro-Environment Research,2011,5(1):3-77.
    [25] Cheng Yu,Yingying Yao,Gregory Hayes,Baoxiang Zhang,Chunmiao Zheng.Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system andtransport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China [J]. Science of the TotalEnvironment,2010,408(24):6108–6116.
    [26] Ionescu C.,Klein R. J., Hinkel J., et al. Towards a formal framework ofvulnerability to climate change[J].Environmental Modeling and Assessment,2009,14(1):1-16.
    [27] Vega-Leinert A. C, Schroter D., Leemans R.,et al. A stakeholder dialogue onEuropean vulnerability[J].Regional Environment Change,2008,8(4):109-124.
    [28] Berry P. M., Rounsevell M. D., Harrison P. A., et al. Assessing the vulnerabilityof agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy infacilitating adaptation[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2006,9(2):189-204.
    [29] Turner II B. L., Matson Pamela A., M. Carthy James, et al. Science andTechnology for Sustainable Development Special Feather: Illustrating theCoupled Human Environment System for Vulnerability Analysis: Three CaseStudies[J]. PNAS,2003,100(14):8080–8085.
    [30] Alex Julca, Oliver Paddison. Vulnerabilities and migration in Small IslandDeveloping States in the context of climate change [J].Natural Hazards,2010,55(3):717-731.
    [31] B. L. Turner II. Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approachesfor sustainability science [J]. Global Environmental Change,2010,20(4):570–576.
    [32] Hallie Eakin, Alexandra Winkels, Jan Sendzimir. Nested vulnerability: exploringcross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican andVietnamese coffee systems[J].Environmental Science&Policy.2009,12(4):398-412.
    [33] Kwo-Jean Farn,Shu-Kuo Lin, Andrew Ren-Wei Fung. A study on informationsecurity management system evaluation—Assets, threat and vulnerability[J].Computer Standards&Interfaces,2004,26(6):501-513.
    [34] Roberto S.R, Karen C.S, David S, et al. Science Plan: Urbanization and GlobalEnvironmental Change[R]. IHDP Report No.15, Bonn, Germany,2005:47-121.
    [35] Montalbano, Pierluigi. Trade Openness and Developing Countries’ Vulnerability:Concepts, Misconceptions, and Directions for Research [J].World Development,2011,39(9):1489-1502.
    [36] Imai Katsushi S.,Gaiha Raghav,Kang Woojin.Vulnerability and poverty dynamicsin Vietnam[J].Applied Economics,2011,43(25):3603-3618.
    [37] Roger Few, Pham Gia Tran. Climatic hazards, health risk and response in Vietnam:Case studies on social dimensions of vulnerability[J]. Global EnvironmentalChange,2010,20:529–538.
    [38] Istehad Chowdhury, Mohammad Zulkernine. Using complexity, coupling, andcohesion metrics as early indicators of vulnerabilities[J].Journal of SystemsArchitecture,2011,57(3):294–313.
    [39] Irina Petreska, Igor Tomovski, Eugenio Gutierrez, Ljupco Kocarev, Flavio Bono,Karmen Poljansek. Application of modal analysis in assessing attack vulnerabilityof complex networks[J], Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat,2010,15(4):1008–1018.
    [40] J. Nouri, N. Mansouri, M. Abbaspour, A. R. Karbassi, M. Omidvari. Designing adeveloped model for assessing the disaster induced vulnerability value ineducational centers [J]. Safety Science,2011,49(5):679–685.
    [41]沈珍瑶,杨志峰,曹瑜.环境脆弱性研究述评[J].地质科技情报,2003,22(3):91-94.
    [42] B. L. Turner II, Roger E. Kasperson, Pamela A.Matson, et al. A framework forvulnerability analysis in sustainability science [J]. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003,100(14):8074-8079.
    [43] Marco A. Janssen. An update on the scholarly networks on resilience,vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of globalenvironmental change[J]. Ecology and Society,2007,12(2):1-18.
    [44] Sánchez, Rodriguez R, Seto K C, et al. Science plan: urbanization and globalenvironmental Change[R]. IHDP Report NO.15/IGBP Report No.53. Stockholm:IGBP,2005:177.
    [45] Nina B, Jossep C, Lisa G, et al. Global land project: science plan and imp-lementation strategy[R]. IHDP Report No.19/IGBP Report No.53. Stockholm:IGBP,2005:64.
    [46] Oran R. Y..Science plan: Institutional dimensions of global environmentalchange[R]. IHDP Report NO.16/IGBP Report No.53. Stockholm: IGBP,2005:157-167.
    [47] Füssel H. M. vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework forclimatic change research[J]. Global Environmental Change,2007,(17):155-167.
    [48] Fraser E. D. G, Warren M., Frank F.. A framework for assessing the vulnerabilityof food system to future shocks[J]. Future,2005,(37):465-479.
    [49] Cutter S. L., Boruff B. J., Shirley W. L. Social vulnerability to environmentalhazards[J]. Social Science Quarterly,2003,84(2):242-261.
    [50] Eakin H., Luers A. L. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmentalsystems[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2006,(31):365-394.
    [51] Cutter S. L. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2003,93(1):1-12.
    [52]陈香.台风灾害脆弱性评价与减灾对策研究[J].防灾科技学院学报,2008,3(10):18-22.
    [53]武玉艳,葛兆帅,蒲英磊,等.基于熵值法的农业洪涝灾害脆弱性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(4):1681-1682.
    [54]周永娟,仇江啸,王效科,等.三峡库区消落带崩塌滑坡脆弱性评价[J].资源科学,2010,32(7):1301-1307.
    [55]张俊香,卓莉,刘旭拢.广东省台风暴潮灾害社会经济系统脆弱性分析—模糊数学方法[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(1):116-121.
    [56]张灵,翁毅,陈晓宏.基于支持向量机的防洪脆弱性评价模型研究[J].人民长江,2009,(24):3-5.
    [57]刘毅,黄建毅,马丽.基于DEA模型的我国自然灾害区域脆弱性评价[J].地理研理,2010,29(7):1153-1162.
    [58]程翠云,钱新,盛金保,等.基于数据包络分析的溃坝洪水灾害脆弱性评价[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):144-147.
    [59]何云玲.GIS支持下生态环境脆弱性评价研究概况[J].生态与技术,2008,28(3):65-68.
    [60]陈润羊,徐卫东.典型矿业城市生态环境脆弱性评价[J].采矿技术,2007,7(1):37-39.
    [61]李栋,邸利,彭静波,等.定西市安定区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(19):9101-9103.
    [62]黄宝荣,欧阳志云,张慧智,等.海南岛生态环境脆弱性评价[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):639-646.
    [63]黄黎,沈连峰,吴明作,等.河南省生态环境脆弱性评价与分析[J].河南科学,2006,24(4):596-599.
    [64]卢亚玲,颜磊,许学工.环渤海地区生态脆弱性评价及其空间自相关分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(2):303-307.
    [65]张鑫,杜朝阳,蔡焕杰.黄河中游区佳芦河流域生态脆弱性评价[J].中国人口资源与环境,2010,20(3):155-158.
    [66]李滨勇,陈海滨,唐海萍.基于AHP和模糊综合评判法的北疆各地州生态脆弱性评价[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,46(2):197-201.
    [67]赵冰,张杰,孙希华.基于GIS的淮河流域桐柏大别山区生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):135-138.
    [68]张振东,潘妮,梁川.基于改进TOPSIS的长江黄河源区生态脆弱性评价[J].人民长江,2009,40(16):81-84.
    [69]潘竟虎,冯兆东.基于熵权物元可拓模型的黑河中游生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2008,24(1):1-4.
    [70]张龙生,王建宏,尚立照.基于土地退化的甘肃省生态脆弱性评价研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):783-787.
    [71]王明全,王金达,刘景双,等.基于物元模型的吉林省西部生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(2):291-295.
    [72]白艳芬,马海州,张宝成,等.基于遥感和GIS技术的青海湖环湖地区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].遥感技术与应用,2009,24(5):635-641.
    [73]束龙仓,柯婷婷,刘丽红,等.基于综合法的岩溶山区生态系统脆弱性评价——以贵州省普定县为例[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(2):141-144.
    [74]唐凤德,蔡天革,陈中林,等.辽宁省生态环境脆弱性评价与分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):225-228.
    [75]赵艳霞,何磊,刘寿东,等.农业生态系统脆弱性评价方法[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(5):754-758.
    [76]乔青,高吉喜,王维,等.生态脆弱性综合评价方法与应用[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):117-123.
    [77]蔡海生,张学玲,周丙娟.生态环境脆弱性动态评价的理论与方法[J].中国水土保持,2009,(2):18-22.
    [78]顾康康,刘景双,王洋,等.辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性研究[J].地理科,2008,28(6):759-764.
    [79]刘丽梅.生态旅游资源的脆弱性研究[J].内蒙古财经学院学报,2007,(5):30-34.
    [80]张泰丽,冯小铭,刘红樱,等.DRASTIC评价模型在台州市浅层地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].资源调查与环境,2007,28(2):138-144.
    [81]刘香,王洁,邵传青,易立新.城市地下水脆弱性评价方法及应用[J].地下水,2007,29(5):90-92.
    [82]许可.地下水评价方法概述[J].水科学与工程技术,2007,(6):15-17.
    [83] Barnali Dixon, Li Daxiu, Julie Earls,et al.地下水脆弱性评价方法研究[J].环境保护科学,2007,33(5):54,64-67.
    [84]李志萍,许可.地下水脆弱性评价方法研究进展[J].人民黄河,2008,30(6):51-54.
    [85]姚文锋,唐莉华,张思聪.过程模拟法及其在唐山平原区地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].水力发电学报,2009,28(1):118-123.
    [86]姚文锋,张思聪,唐莉华,等.海河流域平原区地下水脆弱性评价[J].水力发电学报,2009,28(1):113-118.
    [87]孙丰英,许光泉,唐文锋.灰色关联度法在地下水脆弱性评价与分区中的应用[J].地下水,2009,31(4):15-17,64.
    [88]魏敬铤,李烨.基于DRASTIC模型的呼和浩特市平原区地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].科技创新导报,2010,(3):131-132.
    [89]单良,左海军.基于DRASTIC模型的下辽河平原地下水环境脆弱性评价体系[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(2):241-243.
    [90]周金龙,刘丰,李国敏,等.基于DRAV模型的塔里木盆地地下水脆弱性评价[J].人民黄河,2009,31(12):53-55.
    [91]张少坤,付强,张少东,等.基于GIS与嫡权的DRASCLP模型在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(4):134-137.
    [92]曾庆雨,田文英,王岩鑫.基于复合权重GIS的下辽河平原地下水脆弱性评价[J].水利水电科技进展,2009,29(2):23-26.
    [93]李梅,孟凡玲,李群,等.基于改进BP神经网络的地下水环境脆弱性评价[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(3):245-250.
    [94]刘仁涛,付强,李国良,等.基于熵权的DRASTIC模型及其在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2007,23(1):74-77.
    [95]孟宪萌,束龙仓,卢耀如.基于熵权的改进DRASTIC模型在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):94-99.
    [96]任化准,温忠辉,束龙仓,等.基于熵权的集对分析方法在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].工程勘察,2010,(4):44-47.
    [97]付强,刘仁涛,盖兆梅.几种地下水脆弱性评价方法之比较[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):46-48,52.
    [98]武强,庞炜上,戴迎春,等.煤层底板突水脆弱性评价的GIS与ANN藕合技术[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(3):314-319.
    [99]叶松,吕谋,宋旭鹭.模糊综合评价方法在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].青岛理工大学学报,2010,31(3):52-58.
    [100]苏飞,张平宇.基于集对分析的大庆市经济系统脆弱性评价[J].地理学报,2010,65(4):454-464.
    [101]苏飞,张平宇.石油城市经济系统脆弱性评价—大庆市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(7):1267-1274.
    [102]孙平军,修春亮.辽宁矿业城市经济系统应对能力分析及其脆弱性评价[J].云南地理环境研究,2010,22(2):47-51.
    [103]王建军,丁琳.区域经济脆弱性评价研究[J].新西部,2007,(2):6-10.
    [104]孙平军,修春亮.东北地区中老年矿业城市经济系统脆弱性[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(8):935-942.
    [105]孙平军,修春亮.阜新市经济系统脆弱性分区研究[J].资源与产业,2010,12(3):1-7.
    [106]孙平军,修春亮,许颖.阜新市经济系统脆弱性及与资金流的耦合分析[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2010,20(3):353-356.
    [107]王士君,王永超,冯章献.石油城市经济系统脆弱性发生过程、机理及程度研究——以大庆市为例[J].经济地理,2010,39(3):397-402.
    [108]王哲.河北省区域经济发展的脆弱性研究[J].经济论坛,2007,1:6-8.
    [109]夏建新,杨若明.西部地区社会经济系统的脆弱性及生态风险评估方法[J].中央民族大学学报(自然科学版),2003,12(4):331-335.
    [110]冯振环,赵国杰.区域经济发展的脆弱性及其评价体系研究—兼论脆弱性与可持续发展的关系[J].现代财经,2005,25(10):54-57.
    [111]张鹏.基于分形理论的三峡库区经济脆弱性分析[J].决策参考,2006,(12):138-139.
    [112]熊文,吴玉鸣.中国经济增长与环境脆弱性的因果及冲击响应分析[J].资源科学,2006,28(5):17-23.
    [113]吴建寨,李波,张新时,等.天山北坡生态经济的脆弱性[J].应用生态学报,2008,4:859-865.
    [114]苏飞,张平宇.阜新市社会系统脆弱性评价[J].资源与产业,2008,10(4):1-5.
    [115]李博,佟连军.阜新市社会系统的脆弱性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(14):6078-6079.
    [116]刘继生,那伟,房艳刚.辽源市社会系统的脆弱性及其规避措施[J].经济地理,2010,30(6):944-948.
    [117]苏飞,张平宇.矿业城市社会系统脆弱性研究—以阜新市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2009,28(2):71-74.
    [118]赵国杰,张炜熙.区域经济社会脆弱性研究—以河北省为例[J].上海经济研究,2006,1:65-69,96.
    [119]赵国杰,张炜熙.海岸带社会经济脆弱性研究[J].理论新探,2006,3:12-14.
    [120]秦正,秦青,张艺露.地质遗迹资源脆弱性评价方法及应用[J].河南科学,2009,27(2):230-235.
    [121]王建军,杨德礼.基于AHP_PROMETHEEII的外包信息系统脆弱性评价模型[J].管理工程学报,2010,24(2):94-99.
    [122]王航,高强,毓昌.基于攻击图和安全度量的网络脆弱性评价[J].计算机工程,2010,36(3):128-130.
    [123]肖振宇.基于熵值法我国银行体系脆弱性的评价[J].华东经济管理,2008,22(11):78-84.
    [124]文华,王湛,杨青.企业脆弱性评价指标体系研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,21(3):308-312.
    [125]方琳瑜,王智源.我国中小企业自主知识产权脆弱性的评价及其预警[J].经济管理,2009,10:141-146.
    [126]绍传青,易立新.重要基础设施脆弱性评价模型及其应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(11):153-158.
    [127]张永伟,刘怀念,刘元本,等.专家聚类法在青岛市城市地质环境脆弱性评价中的应用[J].山东国土资源,2008,24(10):21-24.
    [128]辛馨,张平宇.基于三角图法的矿业城市人地系统脆弱性分类[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(2):284-288.
    [129]王其藩,李旭.从系统动力学观点看社会经济系统的政策作用机制与优化[J].科技导报,2004,(4):27-31.
    [130]闫军印,马路遂.基于场控理论的区域社会经济系统运行管理问题探究[J].当代经济管理,2009,31(4):34-36.
    [131]贺彩霞,冉茂盛,廖成林.基于系统动力学的区域社会系统模型[J].管理世界,2009,(3):170-171.
    [132]许文来,张建强,赵玉强等.成都市生态环境与社会经济协调发展分析[J].灾害学,2007,22(1):129-133.
    [133]曹君.生态环境与社会经济协调发展度研究—以武汉市为例[J].当代经理人,2006,(5):237-238.
    [134]刘兆顺,尚金城,许文良,靳克.吉林省东部资源型县域经济与生态环境协调发展分析—以汪清县为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(2):265-269.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700