隔代抚养幼儿的心理理论、祖孙依恋、同伴接纳的特点及其关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在当今的中国社会,随着社会的变迁,家庭经济负担的增大以及家庭结构的不断改变,一大部分中国父母没有充足的时间和精力抚养子女,因此有些会把子女交由(外)祖父母抚养,即所谓的隔代抚养。隔代抚养在当今中国家庭的实际生活中已占有相当大的比例,隔代抚养儿童的心理现状也迫切需要得到研究界的关注与重视。幼儿心理理论、依恋关系与同伴关系是幼儿心理发展的热点问题,因此对隔代抚养幼儿的心理理论、依恋关系与同伴关系展开实证研究,不仅能进一步发展依恋理论和丰富生态系统理论,还能给隔代抚养幼儿的健康成长创设一个良好的环境并寻找更好的切入点以及为改善隔代抚养幼儿的社会化问题提供依据。
     本研究随机抽取温州地区两所幼儿园进行幼儿家庭抚养形式调查,从409名3-5幼儿中筛选出102名隔代抚养幼儿。随后向102名隔代抚养幼儿家长发放研究同意书,经家长同意配合,最终确定有效被试95名。本研究综合运用了实验法、量表测量法和社会测量法三种研究方法。首先运用错误信念任务、情绪理解任务、及欺骗任务三个情境性实验探究隔代抚养幼儿心理理论特点。错误信念任务(false belief task)包括两项子任务,分别为错误信念预测任务(false belief prediction task)与情绪错误信念的预测任务(emotion false belief prediction task);情绪理解任务,包括三项子任务,分别为面部表情识别任务、情绪观点采择任务,以及矛盾情绪的辨别任务;欺骗任务则包括两个情节相似的活动。本实验通过玩偶或图片呈现以及主试口述的方式一对一进行,主试复述受试幼儿的反应,以便记录受试幼儿所有答案,每位受试幼儿所需时间为30分钟左右。再由隔代抚养幼儿的(外)祖父母填写修订后《幼儿依恋关系量表》和修订后《幼儿依恋量表》来考察祖孙依恋关系特点;还运用同伴提名法考察同伴接纳特点,并进一步探究隔代抚养幼儿的心理理论、祖孙依恋和同伴接纳三者的关系。
     通过对实验数据结果进行分析,本研究主要得出如下结论:
     结论1隔代抚养幼儿的心理理论能力随年龄的增长而逐渐提高,但发展略迟于一般幼儿,其关键期也为4岁左右。
     结论2隔代抚养幼儿的依恋品质高于平均分,但安全型依恋比例略低于一般幼儿,而逃避混乱型比例多于一般幼儿。
     结论3隔代抚养的6岁幼儿社会偏好性低于5岁幼儿;女孩比男孩更容易受同伴喜欢和接纳:与一般幼儿同伴接纳水平相近,受欢迎幼儿、被拒绝幼儿、被忽略幼儿和矛盾型幼儿也占到全体的2/3,还有1/3为一般型幼儿。
     结论4隔代抚养幼儿祖孙依恋与心理理论的情绪理解表现存在显著正相关,与错误信念、欺骗任务表现不存在相关。
     结论5隔代抚养幼儿越受同伴欢迎,其心理理论的错误信念表现越好,同伴接纳与情绪理解的表现不存在相关,社会偏好性与欺骗任务表现存在低度相关。
     结论6隔代抚养幼儿的同伴接纳对心理理论的错误信念表现具有预测作用;祖孙依恋对心理理论的情绪理解表现具有显著预测作用。
Today in Chinese society, if parents do not have enough time and energy, their children were put to grandparents for raising, which is so-called skip-generation raising. With change of society, increasing of family economic burden and continual changing of family structure, number of skip-generation raising has occupied considerable proportion in contemporary family, therefore, psychological status of children with skip-generation raising also needs to be concerned by the research community. The Theory of Mind, attachment and peer relation are popular issues in psychological development among children aged 3~5, therefore, research on them among children aged 3~5 with skip-generation raising can not only further develop attachment theory and ecosystem theory, but also can look for better breakthrough point to create a good environment for the healthy growth of children aged 3-5 with skip-generation raising and provide the basis to improve the socialization problem of children aged 3~5 with skip-generation raising.
     So as to examine Theory of Mind's, attachment's to grandparents, peer acceptance's characteristics and their relationship, this research investigated 95 children aged 3~5 with skip-generation raising in Wenzhou city, Zhejiang province by three measures of Theory of Mind including false belief task, emotional understanding task and deception task, two attachment scales and peer nomination.
     Through analysis of the results of experimental data, this study reached the following conclusions:
     Conclusion 1. Like average children, theory of mind of children aged 3~5 with skip-generation raising gradually improved with the increase of age, whose key of the development was 4 years old. Gender was not the influence factor of it. False belief task, emotional understanding task and deception task were significantly positively related to each other.
     Conclusion 2. Attachment quality of children aged 3-5 with skip-generation raising was partial good, but secure-attached proportion was a little lower than that of average children, escaped and confused-attached proportion was higher. There were not significant gender differences on attachment to grandparents.
     Conclusion 3. Social preference of children aged 5 was lower than that of children aged 4, which was not same as average children. Girls were easier accepted and liked than boys. Like average children, the proportion of popular children, controversial children, neglected children and rejected children was 2/3 in the total number, and the rest 1/3 was average children.
     Conclusion 4. Attachment to grandparents in children with skip-generation raising was significantly related to emotional understanding task of Theory of Mind, and was not related to false belief task and deception task. Attachment to grandparents was mildly positively related to facial recognition, and was moderately positively related to emotional social perspective-taking. There were significant attachment type differences in emotional understanding task.
     Conclusion 5. The more popular children with skip-generation raising were, the better false belief performance were. The scoring order of false belief was popular children, controversial children, rejected children, average children and neglected children. Peer acceptance was not related to emotional understanding task, and social preference was mildly related to deception task.
     Conclusion 6. Peer acceptance of children with skip-generation raising can predict false belief of Theory of Mild. Attachment to grandparents can significantly predict emotional understanding of Theory of Mind. Attachment to grandparents and peer acceptance can not predict deception of Theory of Mind.
引文
[1]Dannison L,Smith A B,Tammy V H.When "grandma" is "mon":what today's teachers neec to know[J].Childhood Education,1998,75:12-16.
    [2]王春美.父母知觉与祖辈亲职教养行为一致性之研究[D].台湾:嘉义大学家庭教育研究所,2001.
    [3]郭俊豪.祖孙家庭相关因素之探讨[D].台湾:政治大学教育研究所,1998.
    [4]Fuller Tomson E,Minkler M.America's grandparent caregivers:Who are they? Grandparents raising grandchildren:Theoretical,empirical,and clinical perspectives[C]. New York:Springer,2003:3-21.
    [5]Fuller Tomson E,Minkler M.Central American grandparents raising grandchildren [J].Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,2007,29:5-18.
    [6]Hayslip B,Kaminski P L.Grandparents raising their grandchildren[J].Marriage and Family Review,2005,37:147-169.
    [7]Hayslip B,Shore R J,Henderson C,Lambert P.Custodial grandparenting and grandchildren with problems:Their impact on role satisfaction and role meaning[J]. Journal of Gerontology:Social Science,1998,53B:164-174.
    [8]Blackburn M L.American's grandchildren living in grandparent households[J]. Journal of Family and Cousumer Sciences,2000,92(2):30-36.
    [9]李雯婷.浅谈农村留守儿童问题—基于隔代教育对其的影响[J].四川教育学院学报,2005,21(10):22-23.
    [10]伍新春.隔代抚养与共亲职教育[C].第一届两岸三地家庭教育高峰论坛.杭州:2009:11.
    [11]陈丽欣,翁福元,许维素,许志忠.我国隔代教养家庭现况之分析(上)[J].成人教育通讯,2000,2:37-40.
    [12]陈丽欣,翁福元,许维素,许志忠.我国隔代教养家庭现况之分析(下)[J].成人教育通讯,2000,4:51-66.
    [13]张耐.老少配祖孙情——祖父母家庭亲职教育方案[J].师友月刊,2002,422:41-44.
    [14]Astington J W,Barriault T.Child's Theory of Mind:How young children come to understand that people have thoughts and feelings[J].Infant and Young Children,2001,13(3):1-12.
    [15]Bartsch K,Wellman H M.Young children's attribution of action to belief and desires[J].Child Development,1989,60:946-964.
    [16]Wellman H M.Understanding the psychological world:Developing a Theory of Mind[C].Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development.Oxford,UK: Blackwell,2002:167-187.
    [17]Dunn J,Brown J,Slomkowski C,Youngblade D. Young Children's Understanding of Other People's Feelings and Beliefs:Individual Differences and Their Antecedents [J].Child Development,1991,62:1352-1366.
    [18]Meins E.Security of Attachment and the Social Development of Cognition[M]. East Sussex,UK:Psychology Press,1997:279-280.
    [19]Van Hecke A V,Mundy P C,Acra C F,etal.Infant joint attention,temperament and social competence in preschool children[J].Child Development,2007,78(1):53-69.
    [20]Barr R.Developing social understanding in a social context[C].Handbook of Early Childhood Development.Malden,MA:Blackwell Pub,2006:56-60.
    [21]Feinman S.Social referencing in infancy[J].Merrill Palmer Quarterly,1982,28:445-470.
    [22]Legerstee M.Infants' Sense of People Precursors to a Theory of Mind[M].NY:Cambridge University Press,2005:267-271.
    [23]Flavell J H.Social Cognition[J].Cognitive Development.NJ:Prentice Hall,2002:177-232.
    [24]Cutting A L,Dunn J.Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background:Individual Differences and interrelations [J]. Child Development,1999,70:853-865.
    [25]Bartsch K,Wellman H M.Children talk about the mind[M].London:Oxford University Press,1995:55-58.
    [26]Leslie A.M.Pretence and representation:The origins of Theory of Mind[J]. Psychological Review,1987,94:412-426.
    [27]Lillard A.Ethnopsychologies:Cultural variation in theories of mind[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1998,23(1):3-32.
    [28]Baron Cohen S.Do people with Autism understand what causes emotion[J].Child Development,1991,62:385-395.
    [29]Harris P L.From simulation to folk psychology:The case for development[J].Mind and language,1992,7:120-144.
    [30]Meltzoff A N,Moore M.Imitation, memory and the representation of persons[J]. Infant behavior and Development,1994,17(1):83-99.
    [31]Meltzoff A,Gopnik A.The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind[M]. Understanding other minds Perspectives from autism. London:Oxford University Press,1994:335-366.
    [32]Field T M,Woodson R,Greenberg R,Cohen D.Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by neonates[J].Science,1982,218(4568):179-181.
    [33]Batki A,Baron Cohen S,Wheelwright S,Connellan J,Ahluwalia J.Is there an innate gaze module?Evidence from human neonates[J].Infant Behavior and Development,2000,23(2):223-229.
    [34]Repacholi B M,Gopnik A.Early reasoning about desires:Evidence from 14 and 18 month olds[J].Developmental Psychology,1997,33:12-21.
    [35]Astington J W,Jenkins J M.Theory of Mind development and social understanding[J].Cognition and Emotion,1995,9:151-165.
    [36]Wellman H M.The child's theory of mind[M].Cambridge MA:MIT Press,1990:534-547.
    [37]Wimmer H,Perner J.Beliefs about beliefs Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception[J]. Cognition,1983,13:103-128.
    [38]Wellman H M, Cross D, Watson J.Meta analysis of theory of mind development:The truth about false belief[J].Child Development,2001,72:655-648.
    [39]Thompson R A,Lagattuta K H.Feeling and understanding:Early emotional development[J].Early Childhood Development,2006.308-326.
    [40]Thompson R A.Early Sociopersonality Development[J]. Child Psychology,1998,3:25-104.
    [41]Thompson R A.The legacy of early attachments [J]. Child Development,2000,71:145-152.
    [42]Denham S A, Zoller D,Couchoud E A.Socialization of preschoolers' emotion understanding[J].Developmental Psychology,1994,30:928-936.
    [43]Brown J R,Dunn J.Continuities in emotion understanding from three to six years[J].Child Development,1996,67:789-802.
    [44]Martin R M,Green J A.The use of emotion explanations by mothers:relation to preschoolers' gender and understanding of emotions [J]. Social Development,2005,14(2):229-249.
    [45]Astington J W,Pelletier J,Homer B.Theory of mind and epistemological development:The relation between children's second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence[J].New Ideas in Psychology,2002,20(2-3):131-144.
    [46]Pemer J,Wimmer H.John thinks that Mary thinks that:Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children[J].Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1985,39:437-471.
    [47]Stone V E,Baron Cohen S,Calder A,Keane J, Young A. Acquired theory of mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdalelesions[J].Neuropsychologia, 2003,41(2):209-220.
    [48]Pemer J,Leekam S,Wimmer H.Three -year-olds' difficulty with false belief:The case for a conceptual deficit[J].Developmental Psychology,1987,5:125-137.
    [49]Laible D J,Thompson R A. Attachment and emotional understanding in preschool children[J].Developmental Psychology,1998,34:1038-1045.
    [50]Denham S A.Social cognition, prosocial behavior, and emotion in preschoolers:Contextual validation[J].Child Development,1986,57,194-201.
    [51]Chandler M J,Fritz A S,Hala S M.Small scale deceit:Deception as a marker of 2-,3-, and 4-year-olds' early theories of mind[J].Child Development,1989,60:1263-1277.
    [52]Sodian B.The development of deception in young children[J].British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1991,9:173-188.
    [53]Belsky J.Infant-Parent attachment[J].Child Psychology:A Handbook of Contemporary Issues,1999:45-63.
    [54]Bowlby J.Attachment and loss[J]. Attachment,1969,1:25-36.
    [55]Ainsworth M D.Infant Mother attachment[J].American Psychologist,1979,34(10):932-937.
    [56]Egeland B,Farber E A.Infant-mother attachment:Factors related to its development and change over time[J].Child Development,1984,55(3):753-771.
    [57]Zachariah R.Maternal-fetal attachment:influence of mother-daughter and husband-wife relationships[J].Research in Nursingand Health,1994,17(1):37-44.
    [58]Wartner U G,Grossmann K,Fremmer Bombik E,Suess G.Attachment patterns at age six in south Germany predictability from infancy and implications for preschool behavior [J]. Child Development,1994,65:1014-1027.
    [59]苏建文,黄乃毓.幼儿与母亲的依附关系与其学校社会能力表现之研究[J].教育心理学报,1993,26:23-51.
    [60]涂妙如,黄乃毓.母亲的依恋经验、婚姻调适与其学龄前子女依恋关系之相关研究[J].家政教育学报,2004,6:46-61.
    [61]苏建文,黄凯伦.幼儿与母亲依附关系及其社会行为之研究[J].教育研究信息,1993,1(4):29-46.
    [62]Cohn D A. Child-Mother attachment of six-year-olds and social competence at school[J].Child Development,1990,61:152-162.
    [63]苏建文,龚美娟.母亲的依附经验、教养方式与学前儿童依附关系之相关研究[J].教育心理学报,1994,27:1-33.
    [64]Holmes J.John Bowlby and attachment theory[M].London:Routledge,1993:232-253.
    [65]苏建文.家庭与个体发展[M].台北:台北心理,1991:189-204.
    [66]Shaffer D R.Social and Personality Development[M].California:Brooks,1998:321-324.
    [67]Ainsworth M D S,Blehar M C,Waters E,Walls S.Patterns of attachment:A psychological study of the strange situation[M].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,1978:145-156.
    [68]Sroufe L A.The role of infant caregiver attachment in development[J].Clinical implication ofattachment,1988:18-38.
    [69]Kerns K A,Klepac L,Cole A K.Peer relationship and preadolescents' perception of security in the child-mother relationship [J]. Developmental Psychology,1996,32(3):457-466.
    [70]Main M,Solomon J.Procedures for identify infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation[M].Attachment in the preschool years.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1990:121-160.
    [71]Jacobsen T,Edelstein W,Hofmann V.A longitudinal study of the relation between representations of attachment in childhood and cognitive functioning in childhood and adolescence[J].Developmental Psychology,1994,30(1):112-124.
    [72]Bartholomew K,Horowitz L M. Attachment style among young adult:A Test of a Four Category Model [J] Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61(2):216-244.
    [73]Cassidy J.Theoretical and methodological consideration in the study of attachment and the self in young children[M].Attachment in the preschool years.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1990:87-120.
    [74]杨芳彰.国小六年级学童依附关系与敌意、社交地位之相关研究[D].台湾:台湾师范大学,1997.
    [75]陈莹珊.国小学童依附关系、失落经验与生活适应之相关研究.台湾:台湾师范大学[D],1999.
    [76]Julie Poehlmann.An attachment perspective on grandparents raising their very young grandchildren:implications for intervention and research[J].Infant mental health journal,2003,24(2):149-173.
    [77]Albus K,Dozier M.Indiscriminate friendliness and terror of strangers in infancy:Contributions from the study of infants in foster care[J].Infant Mental Health Journal,1999,20(1):30-41.
    [78]林美珍.成年子女对与父母同住关系之研究[J].教育心理与研究,1990,13:61-94.
    [79]吴堃豪.国小高年级学童与主要照顾者依附质量、依附特质与情绪适应行为之研究[D]台湾:台北市立师院国民教育研究所,2003.
    [80]Marotta S.An ecological view of attachment theory:Implications for counseling[J]. Journal of Counselling and Development,2002,80(4):507-512.
    [81]张文新.儿童社会性发展[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999:8.
    [82]Coie,Dodge,Coppotelli.Dimensions and types of social status:Across-age perspective[J].Developmental Psychology,1982,18:557-570.
    [83]Feeney J A,Noller P. Attachment style as predictor of adult romantic relationships [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58:281-291.
    [84]Kobak R R,Sceery A.Attachment in late adolescence:Working models,affect regulation,an(?) representations of self and others [J]. Child Development,1988,59(1):135-146.
    [85]Suess G J,Grossmann K E,Sroufe L A.Effects of infant attachment to mother and father on quality of adaptation to preschool:From Dyadic to individual organization of the self[J].International Journal of Behavior Development,1992,15(1):43-65.
    [86]于海琴,周宗奎.儿童的两种亲密人际关系:亲子依恋与友谊[J].心理科学,2004,27(1):143-144.
    [87]陈珍如.隔代教养学童人际关系与生活适应相关之研究[D].台湾:中国文化大学生活应用科学研究所,2009.6.
    [88]叶晓璐.5岁儿童同伴关系的性别特点及教育启示[J].山西青年管理干部学院学报,2010,3:101-104.
    [89]Meins E.Security of Attachment and the Social Development of Cognition[M]. East Sussex,UK:Psychology Press,1997:118-234.
    [90]马伟娜,洪灵敏,桑标.同伴交往、亲子交往与儿童心理理论发展的关系[J].心理科学,2009,32(1):81-84.
    [91]Meins E,Fernyhough C,Russell J,Clark Carter D. Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities:A longitudinal study[J].Social Development,1998,7:1-24.
    [92]刘佳闵.幼儿的依附关系、语文智能及人际智能与心智理论能力之关系[D].台湾:政治大学,2005.6.
    [93]Lemche E,Kreppner J M,Joraschky P,Klann Delius G.Attachment organization and the early development of internal state language:A longitudinal perspective [J]. International Journal of Behavioral Development,2007,31(3):252-262.
    [94]Watson A C,Nixon C A,Wilson A,Capage L.Social interaction skills and theory of mind in young children[J].Developmental Psychology,1999.35.
    [95]武建芬.幼儿心理理论与同伴交往关系的研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2006.4.
    [96]沈悦,陈健芷.家庭环境、同伴关系对幼儿心理理论的影响[J].学前教育研究2009,3:31-34.
    [97]Denham S,McKinley M,Couchoud E,Holt R.Emotional and behavioral predictors of preschool peer ratings[J].Child Development,1990,61:1145-1152.·
    [98]Villanueva L,Clemente R,Garcia F.Theory of mind and peer rejection at school[J]. Social development,2000,9:271-283.·
    [99]潘苗苗,苏彦捷.幼儿情绪理解、情绪调节与其同伴接纳的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2007,2:6-13.
    [100]Badenes,Lidon Villanueva,Estevan,etal.Theory of Mind and Peer Rejection at School[J].Social Development,2000,9(3):271-283.
    [101]李克钦,隔代教育问题分析及对策[J].绥化学院学报,2006,6:163-164.
    [102]李亚妮.隔代抚养下的亲子关系分析[J].学理论,2010,9:53-54.
    [103]汪萍,宋璞,陈彩平,梁娟,简芳芳,张金宝.隔代抚养对1-3岁婴幼儿智能发展影响的对照研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2009.12:1006-1007.
    [104]Harris P L,Johnson C N,Hutton D, etal.Young children's theory of mind and emotion[J].Cognition and Emotion,1989,3:379-401.
    [105]保心怡,幼儿对于心之理解作业的理解情形及运用故事活动介入的效果研究[D].台湾台湾师范大学,2003.
    [106]陈璟,李红.幼儿心理理论愿望信念理解与情绪理解关系研究[J].心理发展与教育,2008,1:7-13.
    [107]刘安庆,幼儿情绪理解的发展及其与社会行为、同伴地位之间关系的研究[D].山东归范大学,2006.4.
    [108]王玲.学前儿童心理理论、情绪理解、分享行为的发展及其关系的研究[J].南京:南京归范大学,2007.5.
    [109]李佳,苏彦捷.儿童心理理论能力中的情绪理解[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(1):37-44.
    [110]谢惠君.幼儿心智理论与冲突情景下协商行为之相关研究[D].台湾:新竹教育大学,2004.
    [111]蔡丰如.幼儿错误信念与欺骗能力之研究——年龄与作业形态的差异[D].台湾:台北市立教育大学,2005.
    [112]吕紫菁.幼儿依附情形与心智理论之研究[D].台湾:新竹教育大学,2008.9.
    [113]王岫华.父母依恋、家庭表露与幼儿依恋三者关系的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006.1.
    [114]桑标,徐轶丽.幼儿心理理论的发展与其日常同伴交往关系的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,2:1-6.
    [115]李幼穗,赵莹.幼儿同伴关系与情绪理解能力关系的研究[J].心理科学,2009,32(2):349-351.
    [116]毛宏志.幼儿“心理理论”的发展及其与同伴接纳、社会行为的关系研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2004.4.
    [117]胡加福.浅谈提高隔代监护人监护能力的途径[J].当代教育论坛(教学研究),2010,6:17.
    [118]苏森永.国小高年级儿童祖孙依附品质与情绪调整关系之研究[D].台湾:嘉义大学,2004.
    [119]Berk L E.Child Development[M]. Massachusetts:A Pearson Education Company,2000:6.
    [120]Thompson R A.The legacy of early attachments[J].Child Development,2000,71:145-152.
    [121]叶光辉,郑欣佩,杨永瑞.母亲的后设情绪理念对国小子女依附倾向的影响[J].中华心理学刊,2005,47:181-195.
    [122]Sandi Connor.Grandparents raising grandchildren:formation,disruption and intergenerational transmission of attachment[J].Australian Social Work,2006,59(2):172-184.
    [123]张连云.小学儿童亲子依恋、教师接纳、同伴接纳、学业成就与孤独感的关系[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2007.3.
    [124]邹泓.同伴接纳、友谊与学校适应研究[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(3):55-59.程利国,高翔.影响小学生同伴接纳因素的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2003,2:36-42.
    [125]王雨晴.幼儿心理理论和元认知的关系研究[J].心理科,2008,31(2):319-323.
    [126]陈英和,崔艳丽,王雨晴.幼儿心理理论与情绪理解发展及关系的研究[J].心理科学,2005,28,(3):527-532.
    [127]商冲晨,莫书亮.家庭微系统对幼儿心理理论的影响:因素、过程和机制[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(6):914-923.
    [128]苏彦捷,覃婷立.亲子谈话和儿童心理理论获得与发展的关系[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2010,36(5):1-6.
    [129]赵景欣,申继亮,张文新.幼儿情绪理解、亲社会行为与同伴接纳之间的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2006,1:1-6.
    [130]于海琴,周宗奎.小学高年级儿童亲子依恋的发展及其与同伴交往的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2002,4:36-40.
    [131]王文忠,胡宇涵,徐金灿.幼儿社交地位及其与母子依恋和智力的关系[J].Chinese Mental Health Journal,2007,21(1):2-5.
    [132]方富熹,Henry M Wellman,刘玉娟,刘国雄,亢蓉.纵向再探学前儿童心理理论发展模式心理学报[J].2009,41(8):706-714.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700