鲫鱼的几种种质鉴定方法的比较研究
|
摘要
本文采用形态学(个体水平),养殖性能(群体水平)、遗传学上核型分析三种不同方法和水平来对几种鲫鱼进行种质鉴定和评价。形态学(个体水平)方面主要通过传统形态学测定和框架测定相结合,采用SAS统计软件方差分析和聚类分析二种为主分析方法,对我国白鲫、普通鲫、红鲫、洞庭青鲫、彭泽鲫等五个品系的形态学特征进行了综合分析。差异分析中传统参数贡献较大的参数为:头长/眼径、头长/吻长、全长/体长、体长/体高、体重/体长3,100,F值分别为39.74,31.19,26.9,22.67,19.17。
传统加框架分析结果表明对形态差异分析贡献较大的参数有:头长/眼径、头长/吻长、全长/体长、体长/提高、体重/体长~3*100,框架参数中的15、4、1、12、7。
方差结果表明,红鲫,白鲫品系分别与普通鲫鱼、洞庭青鲫、彭泽鲫差异显著。两种分析方法结果比较一致,都比较好地对洞庭青鲫进行了种质鉴定。
养殖性能(群体水平)方面主要采用Von-Bertalanffy生长方程和数理统计的方法,对洞庭青鲫和白鲫的生长特性,进行生长比较研究,结果表明,洞庭青鲫体长和鳞径的关系为:L=-163.265+22.72559R(r=0.999066);体重与体长的关系为:W=0.41348L2.20259(r=0.99787),Von-Bertalanffy生长方程为:Lt=39.72111*(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587));Wt=1375.322(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587))2.202599,其拐点年龄为3.742龄。生长特性作为鱼类养殖性能重要评价指标在洞庭青鲫与白鲫在生长特性的研究中得到确切的论证。
发现苗云鲫、芙蓉鲫、洞庭鲫和普通鲫均为2倍体,染色体数2 n=100。核型公式依次为2n=26m+30sm+34st+10t:2n=20m+32sm+32st+16t;2n=30m+20sm+26st+24t:2n=26m+36sm+26st+12t。湘云鲫为3倍体,染色体数为3n=150,核型公式为3n=36m+42sm+45st+27t。
综合三种方法比较研究表明,形态学、养殖学和遗传学的方法来鉴定鲫鱼鱼类的种质都比较有效。框架分析和判别函数分析、聚类分析中不同的指标贡献大小不一样,因此要注意选择最有效的指标,不同的鱼类在研究前也应进行筛选。三种方法中所采用的有效指标都是从不同层次、方面来反应不同的鱼类不同的质或者质的规定性,因此它们对建立鱼类种质数据库都不可缺少。
Three kinds different method and horizontal are adopted on adopt the morphology (individual level),breeding the function(group level),the genetics to carry out the kind of quality appraisal and valuation on several kinds crucian in this text.
Morphology(individual level) aspect combines mainly each other by the tradition morphology admeasurement and the frame admeasurement,adopt SAS to count software method difference analysis and clustering analysing two kinds give first place to analysis method,the characteristic has carried out comprehensive analysis on five strain morphologies such as white crucian carp of our country,this locality crucian carp,red crucian carp,hole court green crucian carp,Peng Ze county crucian carp.
Difference analyses the middle tradition parameter contributing bigger parameter By:Strong point,the overall length/experience and observe strong point,long body/ body height,the weight/body grows 3,100 the head the long/eye footpath,the long/ kiss of head,F value is 39.74,31.19,26.9,22.67,19.17 respectively.
Tradition adds a frame analyse result indicating pair of forms difference analysing contribution bigger parameter has:The head grows/the eye footpath,strong point,the overall length/experience and observe strong point,long/rise of body,the weight/body grow 3~* the head long/kiss 100,that the frame parameter is hit the target 15,4,1,12, 7.
Analytical result indicates clustering,this locality crucian carp and white crucian carp form difference are not notable,other almost plants in a form to go ahead difference is all notable.Method difference result is indicated,red crucian carp,white crucian carp strain parts for and this locality crucian,green hole court crucian carp,Peng Ze county crucian carp difference are notable.Two kinds analysis method result is comparatively consistent,the quality having carried out a kind on green hole court crucian carp all comparatively good identifies that.
The cultivation performance(community level) the aspect mainly uses Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation and the mathematical statistic method,to the Tungting lake blue crucian carp and the white crucian carp's growth characteristic,conducts the growth comparison research,with Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation and the mathematical statistic method,This article showed the preliminary exploration of the growth characteristic of blue crucian carp,.The result indicated that,we can express the relations between the body length and the scale diameter of the blue crucian carp with this equation:L=-163.265+22.72559R(r=0.999066);as well as The body weight and the body length relations are:W=0.41348L2.20259(r=0.99787),Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation is:Lt=39.72111~*(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587));Wt=1375.322 (1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587)) 2.202599.the growth flection point of the body weight locates on 3.724.The growth characteristic gets definite demonstration as important fish cultivation function valuation index in green hole court crucian carp and the white crucian carp research in the growth characteristic.
Discover a seedling saying that crucian carp Seremban crucian carp hole court crucian carp and this locality crucian carp are the 2 times bodies without exception,the chromosome counts 2 ns=100.Core type formula is that Hunan says that crucian carp is 2n=26m+30sm+34st+10t;2n=20m+32sm+32st+16t;2n=30m+20sm+26st+24t;2n= 26m+36sm+26st+12t。the 3 times bodies in proper order,the chromosome counts 3ns= 150,core type formula is 3n=36m+42sm+45st+27t.
That synthetical three kinds method comparison research indicates crucian fish species quality,comes identify the morphology,study of cultivation and the genetics method is all comparatively effective.Analysis and discriminant function analyse a frame,different index size of self's contribution is different in clustering analysis,need to pay attention to choosing the most effective index therefore,different fish also should carry out preparation by screening before studying.Among three kinds method,the what be adopted effective index all is that they all are not allowed to be short of therefore to building the fish kind of quality data base never with arrangement of ideas,quality or the quality regulation that be unlike fish of reaction is unlike coming aspect.
传统加框架分析结果表明对形态差异分析贡献较大的参数有:头长/眼径、头长/吻长、全长/体长、体长/提高、体重/体长~3*100,框架参数中的15、4、1、12、7。
方差结果表明,红鲫,白鲫品系分别与普通鲫鱼、洞庭青鲫、彭泽鲫差异显著。两种分析方法结果比较一致,都比较好地对洞庭青鲫进行了种质鉴定。
养殖性能(群体水平)方面主要采用Von-Bertalanffy生长方程和数理统计的方法,对洞庭青鲫和白鲫的生长特性,进行生长比较研究,结果表明,洞庭青鲫体长和鳞径的关系为:L=-163.265+22.72559R(r=0.999066);体重与体长的关系为:W=0.41348L2.20259(r=0.99787),Von-Bertalanffy生长方程为:Lt=39.72111*(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587));Wt=1375.322(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587))2.202599,其拐点年龄为3.742龄。生长特性作为鱼类养殖性能重要评价指标在洞庭青鲫与白鲫在生长特性的研究中得到确切的论证。
发现苗云鲫、芙蓉鲫、洞庭鲫和普通鲫均为2倍体,染色体数2 n=100。核型公式依次为2n=26m+30sm+34st+10t:2n=20m+32sm+32st+16t;2n=30m+20sm+26st+24t:2n=26m+36sm+26st+12t。湘云鲫为3倍体,染色体数为3n=150,核型公式为3n=36m+42sm+45st+27t。
综合三种方法比较研究表明,形态学、养殖学和遗传学的方法来鉴定鲫鱼鱼类的种质都比较有效。框架分析和判别函数分析、聚类分析中不同的指标贡献大小不一样,因此要注意选择最有效的指标,不同的鱼类在研究前也应进行筛选。三种方法中所采用的有效指标都是从不同层次、方面来反应不同的鱼类不同的质或者质的规定性,因此它们对建立鱼类种质数据库都不可缺少。
Three kinds different method and horizontal are adopted on adopt the morphology (individual level),breeding the function(group level),the genetics to carry out the kind of quality appraisal and valuation on several kinds crucian in this text.
Morphology(individual level) aspect combines mainly each other by the tradition morphology admeasurement and the frame admeasurement,adopt SAS to count software method difference analysis and clustering analysing two kinds give first place to analysis method,the characteristic has carried out comprehensive analysis on five strain morphologies such as white crucian carp of our country,this locality crucian carp,red crucian carp,hole court green crucian carp,Peng Ze county crucian carp.
Difference analyses the middle tradition parameter contributing bigger parameter By:Strong point,the overall length/experience and observe strong point,long body/ body height,the weight/body grows 3,100 the head the long/eye footpath,the long/ kiss of head,F value is 39.74,31.19,26.9,22.67,19.17 respectively.
Tradition adds a frame analyse result indicating pair of forms difference analysing contribution bigger parameter has:The head grows/the eye footpath,strong point,the overall length/experience and observe strong point,long/rise of body,the weight/body grow 3~* the head long/kiss 100,that the frame parameter is hit the target 15,4,1,12, 7.
Analytical result indicates clustering,this locality crucian carp and white crucian carp form difference are not notable,other almost plants in a form to go ahead difference is all notable.Method difference result is indicated,red crucian carp,white crucian carp strain parts for and this locality crucian,green hole court crucian carp,Peng Ze county crucian carp difference are notable.Two kinds analysis method result is comparatively consistent,the quality having carried out a kind on green hole court crucian carp all comparatively good identifies that.
The cultivation performance(community level) the aspect mainly uses Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation and the mathematical statistic method,to the Tungting lake blue crucian carp and the white crucian carp's growth characteristic,conducts the growth comparison research,with Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation and the mathematical statistic method,This article showed the preliminary exploration of the growth characteristic of blue crucian carp,.The result indicated that,we can express the relations between the body length and the scale diameter of the blue crucian carp with this equation:L=-163.265+22.72559R(r=0.999066);as well as The body weight and the body length relations are:W=0.41348L2.20259(r=0.99787),Von-the Bertalanffy growth equation is:Lt=39.72111~*(1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587));Wt=1375.322 (1-e-0.25038(t+0.55587)) 2.202599.the growth flection point of the body weight locates on 3.724.The growth characteristic gets definite demonstration as important fish cultivation function valuation index in green hole court crucian carp and the white crucian carp research in the growth characteristic.
Discover a seedling saying that crucian carp Seremban crucian carp hole court crucian carp and this locality crucian carp are the 2 times bodies without exception,the chromosome counts 2 ns=100.Core type formula is that Hunan says that crucian carp is 2n=26m+30sm+34st+10t;2n=20m+32sm+32st+16t;2n=30m+20sm+26st+24t;2n= 26m+36sm+26st+12t。the 3 times bodies in proper order,the chromosome counts 3ns= 150,core type formula is 3n=36m+42sm+45st+27t.
That synthetical three kinds method comparison research indicates crucian fish species quality,comes identify the morphology,study of cultivation and the genetics method is all comparatively effective.Analysis and discriminant function analyse a frame,different index size of self's contribution is different in clustering analysis,need to pay attention to choosing the most effective index therefore,different fish also should carry out preparation by screening before studying.Among three kinds method,the what be adopted effective index all is that they all are not allowed to be short of therefore to building the fish kind of quality data base never with arrangement of ideas,quality or the quality regulation that be unlike fish of reaction is unlike coming aspect.
引文
[1]郑光明,张跃,张跃.鱼类种质鉴定技术与渔业管理,《中国水产科学》,1999,6(02):108-111
[2]李思发,等.中国主要淡水养殖鱼类种质研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1998.
[3]李思发.主要养殖鱼类种质研究进展[J].水产学报,1993,17(4):343-355.
[4]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[5]李思发,王强,吴力钊,等.长江、珠江、黑龙江鲢、鳙、草鱼种质资源研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.145-162.
[6]宿秉义.渔业资源评估[M].北京:中国农业出版杜,1995,130-142.
[7]陈新军.渔业资源与渔场学[M].北京:海洋出版杜,2004.
[8]蔡完其,周碧云.团头鲂种群间的形态差异和生化遗传差异[刀.水产学报,1991,15(3).
[9]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)IM].上海出版社,1997.
[10]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[11]李思发,李晨虹,李家乐.尼罗罗非鱼品系间形态差异分析[J),动物学报,1998,44(4):450-457.
[12]李辉,等.鲤鱼转铁蛋白和血清酯酶多态性研究CJ),水生生物学报,1993,17(3):278-281.
[13]余来宁,等。长江白鲢酯酶同工酶的类型与生长的相关性及其在原种中的应用[J].中国水产科学,1995,2(5):8-14.
[14]李思发,李晨虹等.华东地区中华鳖地疗群体形态差异初步研究[J].中国水产学报,1997,4(5).
[15]张尧庭等.多元统计分析引论CUL北京:科学出版社,1982.
[16]蔡完其,周碧云.团头鲂种群间的形态差异和尘化遗传差异[刀.水产学报,1991,15(3).
[17]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)[M].上海出版社,1997.
[18]高文.鱼类染色体研究进展[J].宁德师专学报(自然科学版).2005.17(5):15-18
[19]韩荣成.岳永生,姜中伸.鱼类染色体核型分析方法概述[J].水利渔业,2003,23(5):38-40
[20]毛连菊,李雅娟.5种海水鱼类染色体的组型分析[J].大连水产学院学报,2002,17(2):108-113
[21]牛文涛,蔡泽平.中国海水鱼类核型研究概述[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2006,45(2):125-131
[22]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[23]李思发,王强,吴力钊,等.长江、珠江、黑龙江鲢、鳙、草鱼种质资源研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.145-162.
[24]许加武,任明荣,李思发.长江、辽河、瓯江中华绒鳌蟹种群的形态判别[J].水产学报,1997,21(3):269-274.
[25]李晨虹,李思发.中国大陆沿海六大水系绒鳌蟹(中华绒鳌蟹和日本绒鳌蟹)群体亲缘关系:形态判别分析CJ),.水产学报,1999,23(4):337-342.
[26]李勇,李思发,王成辉,等.三水系中华绒鳌蟹幼蟹形态判别程序的建立和使用[J].水产学报,2001,25(2):120-126.
[27]李家乐,李思发,李勇,等.尼奥鱼[尼罗罗非鱼(早)*奥利亚罗非鱼(§)]同其亲本 的形态和判别CJ).水产学报,1999,23(3):261-265.
[28]殷名称.鱼类生念学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,45-61.
[29]明道绪.生物统计附试验设计[M].中国农业出版社,2001,67-89:175-200.
[30]李晓青,何丹.洞庭湖区渔业发展探析[J].湖南文理学院学报,2005,(30):49-51.
[31]高四新.浅析东洞庭湖渔业资源衰退的主要原因与对策[J].内陆水产,2003,(5):36-38.
[32]陆忠康.简明中国水产养殖百科全书[M].北京:中国农业出老江河南省版社,2001,695-698
[33]Downing J A,Plante C,1993,Production of fish populations inlakes.J Fish Aquat Sci,50(1):110-120.
[34]杨品红.洞庭青鲫增、养殖技术讲座(一)—洞庭青鲫的生物学特性[J].内陆水产,2005,(30):44-45.
[35]杨品红.洞庭青鲫增、养殖技术讲座(五)[J].内陆水产,2005.(7),23-26.
[36]湖北水生生物研究所.长江鱼类[M].北京:科学出版社,1976.115-116;121-123.
[37]宿秉义.渔业资蔼评估[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,130-142.
[38]陈宜瑜.中国动物志中卷[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.158-15-60.
[39]伍献文.中国鲤科鱼类志-上卷[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1964,64-67;107.
[40]武汉大学生物系细胞遗传学实验室.长江水系各种鱼的染色体研究初报[J].武汉大学学报(自然科技版),1983,(3):123-124.
[41]吴珊.洞庭青鲫和彭泽鲫生长速度的比较研究[J].内陆水产,2006,40-41.
[42]吴立新,姜志强,秦克静等.碧流河水库斑鳜年龄和生长的研究[J].大连水产学院学报,1996,11(2):30-38.
[43]沈建忠.用鳞片和耳石鉴定鲫年龄的比较研究[J],水生生物学报,2001,462-466.
[44]华元渝,胡传林.鱼种重量与长度相关公式(W=aLb)的生物学意义及其应用[J].鱼类学论文集(第一辑)[M].北京:科学出版社,1981,125-131.
[45]W E 里克.鱼类种群生物统计量的计算与解析 M.北京:科学出版社,1984,175-178.
[46]薛正楷.黑尾近红的年龄和生产研究.西南师范大学报[J],2001,712-717.
[47]龚世园.八汊水库翘嘴红鲌的生长及种群控制的研究[J].水利渔业,1990,(1):23-26.
[48]王武.鱼类增养殖学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000,11-12.
[49]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)[M].上海出版社,1997
[50]余志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群变异和生态资料[J].水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209
[51]聂智敏等.彭泽鲫鱼具有广阔的推广前景.中国水产[J],1994,(12):22
[52]咎瑞光等.滇池两种类型鲫鱼的性染色体和C-带核型的研究.遗传学报[J],1982,9(1):32-39
[53]刘筠等.红鲫(♀)湘江野鲤(♂)杂交一代生殖腥的细胞学研究.水生生物学报[J],
1986,10(2):101-108
[54]俞豪祥等.天然雌核发育贵州普安鲫(A型)染色体组型的研究.水生生物学报,1992,16(1):87-89
[55]俞豪祥等.广东雌核发育鲫鱼的生物学及养殖试验的初步研究.水生生物学报[J],1987,11(3)287-288
[56]楼允东等.淇河鲫鱼遗传学和同工酶的初步研究.水产学报[J],1989,13(3):254-258
[57]陈玉林等.大阪鲫生物学的研究.水产学报[J],1986,10(3)
[58]陶乃舒等.以白鲫取代部分鲢鱼提高经济效益的探讨.淡水渔业[J],1986,(3):17-19
[59]吴端生等.红鲫与湘江野鲤杂交的受精细胞学研究.动物学研究[J],1993,14(3):277-282
[60]殷名称.鱼类生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1993,191
[61]谢建明.优质鲫鱼养殖技术[M].中国农业出版社,1999,18-30
[62]丁时斌等.彭泽鲫与常见四种鲫鱼对比养殖效果分析.内陆水产[J],1996(8):9
[63]蓝菲等.银鲫不同雌核发育系的生物学特性比较研究.水生生物学报[J],1993,17(2):112-120
[64]蒋一硅等.鲫鱼的人工和天然雌核发育.水生生物学集刊[J],1982,7(4):471-476
[65]陈敏容等.两性天然雌核发育彭泽鲫染色体组型的研究.水生生物学报[J],1996,20(1):25-31
[66]杨和荃等.高邮鲫(鲫♀×白鲫♂)及其双亲的食性分析.水产科技情报[J],1991,18(6):173-176
[67]李德林等.芙蓉鲫池塘养殖对比试验.内陆水产[J],2003,12:8
[68]A.Fujiwara,C.NishidaUmehara,T.Sakamoto,N.Okamoto,I.Nakayama&S.Abe Ⅰ
[69]孔庆亮,李宗芸,傅美丽,等.鳙鱼染色体的DAPI核型分析[J].四川动物,2006,25(1):64-67
[70]秦伟,倪建国,张学斌,等.乌鳢及鳢科鱼类染色体组型的比较研究[J].水利渔业,2004,24(5):14-16
[71]张春丹,张晓波.李明云.香鱼染色体核型分析[J].水利渔业,2005,25(4):16-20
[2]李思发,等.中国主要淡水养殖鱼类种质研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1998.
[3]李思发.主要养殖鱼类种质研究进展[J].水产学报,1993,17(4):343-355.
[4]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[5]李思发,王强,吴力钊,等.长江、珠江、黑龙江鲢、鳙、草鱼种质资源研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.145-162.
[6]宿秉义.渔业资源评估[M].北京:中国农业出版杜,1995,130-142.
[7]陈新军.渔业资源与渔场学[M].北京:海洋出版杜,2004.
[8]蔡完其,周碧云.团头鲂种群间的形态差异和生化遗传差异[刀.水产学报,1991,15(3).
[9]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)IM].上海出版社,1997.
[10]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[11]李思发,李晨虹,李家乐.尼罗罗非鱼品系间形态差异分析[J),动物学报,1998,44(4):450-457.
[12]李辉,等.鲤鱼转铁蛋白和血清酯酶多态性研究CJ),水生生物学报,1993,17(3):278-281.
[13]余来宁,等。长江白鲢酯酶同工酶的类型与生长的相关性及其在原种中的应用[J].中国水产科学,1995,2(5):8-14.
[14]李思发,李晨虹等.华东地区中华鳖地疗群体形态差异初步研究[J].中国水产学报,1997,4(5).
[15]张尧庭等.多元统计分析引论CUL北京:科学出版社,1982.
[16]蔡完其,周碧云.团头鲂种群间的形态差异和尘化遗传差异[刀.水产学报,1991,15(3).
[17]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)[M].上海出版社,1997.
[18]高文.鱼类染色体研究进展[J].宁德师专学报(自然科学版).2005.17(5):15-18
[19]韩荣成.岳永生,姜中伸.鱼类染色体核型分析方法概述[J].水利渔业,2003,23(5):38-40
[20]毛连菊,李雅娟.5种海水鱼类染色体的组型分析[J].大连水产学院学报,2002,17(2):108-113
[21]牛文涛,蔡泽平.中国海水鱼类核型研究概述[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2006,45(2):125-131
[22]金志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群离异和生态资料[J).水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209.
[23]李思发,王强,吴力钊,等.长江、珠江、黑龙江鲢、鳙、草鱼种质资源研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.145-162.
[24]许加武,任明荣,李思发.长江、辽河、瓯江中华绒鳌蟹种群的形态判别[J].水产学报,1997,21(3):269-274.
[25]李晨虹,李思发.中国大陆沿海六大水系绒鳌蟹(中华绒鳌蟹和日本绒鳌蟹)群体亲缘关系:形态判别分析CJ),.水产学报,1999,23(4):337-342.
[26]李勇,李思发,王成辉,等.三水系中华绒鳌蟹幼蟹形态判别程序的建立和使用[J].水产学报,2001,25(2):120-126.
[27]李家乐,李思发,李勇,等.尼奥鱼[尼罗罗非鱼(早)*奥利亚罗非鱼(§)]同其亲本 的形态和判别CJ).水产学报,1999,23(3):261-265.
[28]殷名称.鱼类生念学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,45-61.
[29]明道绪.生物统计附试验设计[M].中国农业出版社,2001,67-89:175-200.
[30]李晓青,何丹.洞庭湖区渔业发展探析[J].湖南文理学院学报,2005,(30):49-51.
[31]高四新.浅析东洞庭湖渔业资源衰退的主要原因与对策[J].内陆水产,2003,(5):36-38.
[32]陆忠康.简明中国水产养殖百科全书[M].北京:中国农业出老江河南省版社,2001,695-698
[33]Downing J A,Plante C,1993,Production of fish populations inlakes.J Fish Aquat Sci,50(1):110-120.
[34]杨品红.洞庭青鲫增、养殖技术讲座(一)—洞庭青鲫的生物学特性[J].内陆水产,2005,(30):44-45.
[35]杨品红.洞庭青鲫增、养殖技术讲座(五)[J].内陆水产,2005.(7),23-26.
[36]湖北水生生物研究所.长江鱼类[M].北京:科学出版社,1976.115-116;121-123.
[37]宿秉义.渔业资蔼评估[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,130-142.
[38]陈宜瑜.中国动物志中卷[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.158-15-60.
[39]伍献文.中国鲤科鱼类志-上卷[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1964,64-67;107.
[40]武汉大学生物系细胞遗传学实验室.长江水系各种鱼的染色体研究初报[J].武汉大学学报(自然科技版),1983,(3):123-124.
[41]吴珊.洞庭青鲫和彭泽鲫生长速度的比较研究[J].内陆水产,2006,40-41.
[42]吴立新,姜志强,秦克静等.碧流河水库斑鳜年龄和生长的研究[J].大连水产学院学报,1996,11(2):30-38.
[43]沈建忠.用鳞片和耳石鉴定鲫年龄的比较研究[J],水生生物学报,2001,462-466.
[44]华元渝,胡传林.鱼种重量与长度相关公式(W=aLb)的生物学意义及其应用[J].鱼类学论文集(第一辑)[M].北京:科学出版社,1981,125-131.
[45]W E 里克.鱼类种群生物统计量的计算与解析 M.北京:科学出版社,1984,175-178.
[46]薛正楷.黑尾近红的年龄和生产研究.西南师范大学报[J],2001,712-717.
[47]龚世园.八汊水库翘嘴红鲌的生长及种群控制的研究[J].水利渔业,1990,(1):23-26.
[48]王武.鱼类增养殖学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000,11-12.
[49]武献文等.中国鲤科鱼类志(下册)[M].上海出版社,1997
[50]余志堂等.黑龙江流域鲫鱼的种群变异和生态资料[J].水生生物学集刊,1959,(2):200-209
[51]聂智敏等.彭泽鲫鱼具有广阔的推广前景.中国水产[J],1994,(12):22
[52]咎瑞光等.滇池两种类型鲫鱼的性染色体和C-带核型的研究.遗传学报[J],1982,9(1):32-39
[53]刘筠等.红鲫(♀)湘江野鲤(♂)杂交一代生殖腥的细胞学研究.水生生物学报[J],
1986,10(2):101-108
[54]俞豪祥等.天然雌核发育贵州普安鲫(A型)染色体组型的研究.水生生物学报,1992,16(1):87-89
[55]俞豪祥等.广东雌核发育鲫鱼的生物学及养殖试验的初步研究.水生生物学报[J],1987,11(3)287-288
[56]楼允东等.淇河鲫鱼遗传学和同工酶的初步研究.水产学报[J],1989,13(3):254-258
[57]陈玉林等.大阪鲫生物学的研究.水产学报[J],1986,10(3)
[58]陶乃舒等.以白鲫取代部分鲢鱼提高经济效益的探讨.淡水渔业[J],1986,(3):17-19
[59]吴端生等.红鲫与湘江野鲤杂交的受精细胞学研究.动物学研究[J],1993,14(3):277-282
[60]殷名称.鱼类生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1993,191
[61]谢建明.优质鲫鱼养殖技术[M].中国农业出版社,1999,18-30
[62]丁时斌等.彭泽鲫与常见四种鲫鱼对比养殖效果分析.内陆水产[J],1996(8):9
[63]蓝菲等.银鲫不同雌核发育系的生物学特性比较研究.水生生物学报[J],1993,17(2):112-120
[64]蒋一硅等.鲫鱼的人工和天然雌核发育.水生生物学集刊[J],1982,7(4):471-476
[65]陈敏容等.两性天然雌核发育彭泽鲫染色体组型的研究.水生生物学报[J],1996,20(1):25-31
[66]杨和荃等.高邮鲫(鲫♀×白鲫♂)及其双亲的食性分析.水产科技情报[J],1991,18(6):173-176
[67]李德林等.芙蓉鲫池塘养殖对比试验.内陆水产[J],2003,12:8
[68]A.Fujiwara,C.NishidaUmehara,T.Sakamoto,N.Okamoto,I.Nakayama&S.Abe Ⅰ
[69]孔庆亮,李宗芸,傅美丽,等.鳙鱼染色体的DAPI核型分析[J].四川动物,2006,25(1):64-67
[70]秦伟,倪建国,张学斌,等.乌鳢及鳢科鱼类染色体组型的比较研究[J].水利渔业,2004,24(5):14-16
[71]张春丹,张晓波.李明云.香鱼染色体核型分析[J].水利渔业,2005,25(4):16-20