三疣梭子蟹两种体色相关分子标记研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
三疣梭子蟹(Portunus trituberculatus)作为重要的海洋经济动物,其常见体色(头胸甲)为茶绿色。近年来,在我国东部沿海海域海捕三疣梭子蟹中开始出现体色为紫色的一类梭子蟹群体,除体色不同外,二者表型特征并无显著差异。为确定两种体色三疣梭子蟹之间的关系,本文对两种体色三疣梭子蟹不同个体的线粒体COI和16srRNA基因进行了比较分析以判定体色的差异是否由于种间或者种下的遗传差异引起的。以两种体色三疣梭子蟹个体基因组DNA为模板对线粒体两个保守序列基因(COI和16srRNA)分别进行了PCR扩增,而后,将扩增产物分别通过聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(PAGE),进行单链构象多态性分析(SSCP)。结果发现,两个保守序列基因在两种体色三疣梭子蟹群体中均没有特异性电泳条带出现;DNA测序及序列比对分析发现,COI和16srRNA基因在两种体色三疣梭子蟹群体中的核苷酸序列相似度分别达到了99.87%和99.88%,分子水平研究得到的较高的相似度也说明了二者较近的亲缘关系。这表明紫色三疣梭子蟹并未发生亚种的分化,即紫色和茶绿色梭子蟹群体属于同一个种。鉴于在体色统计的调查研究中发现了浅紫色、灰色及虎斑纹等一系列不同体色的三疣梭子蟹类型,并且在养殖实验中有蜕壳后体色发生改变的现象,因此推测三疣梭子蟹体色遗传调控基础是微效多基因控制的数量性状遗传。
     在确立两种体色三疣梭子蟹亲缘关系的基础之上,进一步对紫色和茶绿色三疣梭子蟹群体基因组DNA进行体色相关RAPD分子标记的筛选及其遗传多样性分析。首先通过正交实验设计对RAPD-PCR反应体系中的重要参数进行优化,并建立了一套适合三疣梭子蟹PCR扩增反应的体系;而后,通过混合分组分析法(BSA),从80个随机引物中共筛选了30个重复性好、多态性高的引物用于RAPD分析。结果表明:紫色和茶绿色群体中的多态性位点比例分别为61.29%和62.44%,可见紫色和茶绿色梭子蟹群体遗传背景相似,遗传多样性也较丰富;茶绿色梭子蟹的Nei氏基因多样性指数和Shannon信息指数均稍小于紫色梭子蟹的Nei氏基因多样性指数和Shannon信息指数,这表明紫色和茶绿色梭子蟹遗传多样性相似,但紫色梭子蟹较茶绿色梭子蟹遗传多样性更为丰富。而紫色和茶绿色三疣梭子蟹之间高度的Nei氏无偏差遗传相似性指数和较近的遗传距离,均反映了两者的亲缘关系十分相近。RAPD分析所用的30个随机引物在两个群体中扩增条带图谱基本一致,没有单一引物可作为体色相关分子标记用以严格区分两个群体,而有两个随机引物(SBS A09和SBS G16)分别产生的各一条可检测的体色相关的扩增DNA条带在两个群体内以不同概率的形式出现,微卫星分子标记初步分析结果也显示了引物MIH-SSR在紫色和茶绿色群体内产生一条不同比率的体色相关特异性条带。这一现象三疣梭子蟹的体色属于数量性状且由微效多基因控制的观点相一致;同时,这也说明两种体色梭子蟹的亲缘关系非常亲近。
There have been some crab individuals with purple carapaces and appendages newly discovered in the wild captured blue swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus in recent years, while the normal carapace color of the blue swimming crab is tea-green. Given the morphological characters of purple crabs identical with that of the tea-green ones except the body color, it is expected that the purple crabs and the tea-green ones were from the same species. In order to identify the phylogenetic relationships between them at the molecular level, we amplified and compared two conserved mitochondrial gene fragments of purple and tea-green crabs through PCR-SSCP and DNA sequencing analyses. The results showed that there was no distinct variation of DNA bands of both the COI and 16srRNA genes detected in polyacrylamide gels through SSCP analysis between purple and tea-green crab samples, and the following sequence analysis of color-different crab individuals presented 99.87% and 99.88% nucleotide sequence identity of the COI and 16srRNA genes respectively. These indicated that there was no species or subspecies differentiation between purple and tea-green crabs, meaning that they belonged to the same species, Portunus trituberculatus. And some crabs with other carapace colors were found in their natural habitats. It was expected that the carapace color may be regulated by multiple genes located on the chromosomes.
     Then the phylogenetic relationships and genetic differences were determined between purple and tea-green crab individuals of P. trituberculatus by RAPD technique. 40 color-different crab individuals were evaluated using 80 RAPD primers. 30 primers were selected using bulk segregation analysis (BSA) and RAPD-PCR analysis. The results showed that the ratio of polymorphic loci was 61.29%, Nei's gene diversity was 0.3756, Shannon's information index was 0.5545 among purple crab individuals; and 62.44% the ratio of polymorphic loci, 0.3451 Nei's gene diversity, 0.5099 Shannon's information index among tea-green crab individuals. It was clear that the genetic diversity between purple and tea-green crabs was similar, which indicated close phylogenetic relationships between the purple and tea-green crabs. In addition, two primers (SBS A09 and SBS G16) got specific DNA bands by comparing forty individuals of color-different crab individuals through RAPD-PCR analysis and the following electrophoresis. One specific DNA band (750~1000 bp) was discovered using the primer SBS A09, with 22.22% and 75.00% polymorphism within purple and tea-green crab individuals respectively; and one DNA band (1000~2000 bp) from the primer SBS G16 showed 35.00% and 75.00% polymorphism within purple and tea-green crab individuals respectively. And the SSR primer MIH-SSR also got specific DNA bands within color-different crab individuals. It indicated that the body color transmision was affected by the heredity of some quantitative characters. These indicated close phylogenetic relationships between purple and tea-green crabs.
引文
[1] Hamasaki K, Fukunaga K, Kitada S. Batch fecundity of the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus (Brachyura: Portunidae)[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 253: 59-365.
    [2]孙颖民,闫愚.三疣梭子蟹的幼体发育[J].水产学报, 1984, 8(3): 219-226.
    [3]施慧雄,蒋宏雷,金中文,王加邦.三疣梭子蟹健康苗种培育研究[J].现代农业科技, 2007, 4: 106-107.
    [4]高保全,刘萍,李健,戴芳钰.三疣梭子蟹野生群体同工酶的遗传多态性分析[J].水产学报, 2007, 31(1): 1-6.
    [5]郑天伦,王国良.对虾白斑综合症病毒的研究进展[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版), 2002(01): 57-61.
    [6]郭天慧,孔晓瑜,陈四清,喻子牛.三疣梭子蟹线粒体DNA 16srRNA和COI基因片段序列的比较研究[J].中国海洋大学学报, 2004, 4(1): 22-28.
    [7]宋微微,王春琳,母昌考.三疣梭子蟹个体发育早期的同工酶初步研究[J].湛江海洋大学学报, 2006, 26(1): 74-76.
    [8]李鹏飞,刘萍,李健,戴芳钰,何玉英.莱州湾三疣梭子蟹的生化遗传分析[J].海洋水产研究, 2007, 28(2): 90-96.
    [9]王国良,金珊,李政,陈寅儿.三疣梭子蟹养殖群体同工酶的组织特异性及生化遗传分析[J].台湾海峡, 2005, 24(4): 474-480.
    [10]余红卫,朱冬发,韩宝芹.三疣梭子蟹不同组织同工酶的分析[J].动物学杂志, 2005, 40(1): 84-87.
    [11]王俊,姜祖辉,陈瑞盛,张波,唐启升.三疣梭子蟹幼蟹的摄食和碳收支[J].海洋水产研究, 2004, 25(6): 25-29.
    [12]吕敢堂,王志铮,王海平,袁久尧.亚硝酸钠对三疣梭子蟹幼体的急性毒性[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版), 2006, 25(3): 244-248.
    [13]施建军,王志铮,吕敢堂,陈杰,郑松萍.氨水对三疣梭子蟹幼体的急性毒性影响[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 11(1): 8-12.
    [14]王吉桥,李君峰,纪谨,卢毅光,姜传俊,金彩霞,王欢.铜离子对三疣梭子蟹幼体的急性毒性[J].水产科学, 2004, 23(4): 16-19.
    [15]朱冬发,余红卫,王春琳.三疣梭子蟹个体发育早期的同工酶谱变化[J].水产学报, 2005, 29(6): 751-756.
    [16]薛俊增,堵南山,赖伟.三疣梭子蟹胚胎发育过程中卵内幼体形态[J].动物学报, 2001, 47(4): 447-452.
    [17]薛俊增,堵南山,赖伟.三疣梭子蟹胚胎发育早期的组织学研究[J].动物学研究, 2001, 22(1): 69-73.
    [18]薛俊增,堵南山,赖伟.三疣梭子蟹活体胚胎发育的观察[J].动物学杂志, 1998, 33(6): 45-48.
    [19]刘志明.三疣梭子蟹斑节对虾混养高产技术[J].河北渔业, 2007(3): 27.
    [20]曹建亭,韩伟涛.三疣梭子蟹稳产高效育苗技术[J].中国水产, 2006(2): 46-47.
    [21]黄则平,张沛花.三疣梭子蟹脊尾白虾池塘混养技术[J].水产养殖, 2004, 25(5): 8-9.
    [22]陈寅儿,王国良,金珊.三疣梭子蟹患“乳化病”后几种保护酶活力的变化[J].水产科学, 2006, 25(9): 448-451.
    [23]金珊,王国良,陈寅儿.三疣梭子蟹乳化病血液生化指标诊断技术的研究[J].台湾海峡, 2006, 25(4): 473-477.
    [24]李卢.三疣梭子蟹的常见病及其防治[J].水产科技情报, 2005, 32(6): 269-271.
    [25]高保全,刘萍,李健,戴芳钰,马甡.三疣梭子蟹4个野生群体形态差异分析[J].中国水产科学, 2007, 14(2): 223-228.
    [26]金珊,赵青松,王春琳,陈寅儿.梭子蟹科六种海产蟹的RAPD标记[J].动物学研究, 2004, 25(2): 172-176.
    [27]朱冬发,王春琳,薛良义,余红卫.三疣梭子蟹精卵相互作用的扫描电镜观察[J].动物学报, 2006, 52(1): 196-201.
    [28]李太武.三疣梭子蟹肝脏的结构研究[J].海洋湖沼, 1996, 27(5): 471-475.
    [29]李太武,三疣梭子蟹精子的发生及超微结构研究[J].动物学报, 1995, 41(1): 41-47.
    [30]邢晶晶.分子遗传标记及其技术在水产生物中的研究应用[J].水产学杂志, 2002, 15(1): 61-70.
    [31]杨东,余来宁. RAPD和AFLP在分析尼罗罗非鱼遗传多样性研究中的应用比较[J].江西农业学报, 2006, 18(2): 1-4.
    [32] Li Z X, Li J, Wang Q Y, He Y Y, Liu P. AFLP-based genetic linkage map of marine shrimp Penaeus (Fenneropenaeus) chinensis[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 261: 463-472.
    [33]李朝霞,李健,何玉英,刘萍,王清印.中国对虾人工选育快速生长群体不同世代间的AFLP分析[J].高科技通讯, 2006, 16(4): 435-440.
    [34]王伟继,高焕,孔杰,王清印.利用AFLP技术分析中国明对虾的韩国南海群和养殖群体的遗传差异[J].高技术通讯, 2005, 15(9): 81-86.
    [35]高志千,周开亚.中华绒螯蟹遗传变异的RAPD分析[J].生物多样性, 1998, 6(3): 186-190.
    [36] Place A R, Feng X J, Steven C R, Fourcade H M, Boore J L. Genetic markers in blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) II: Complete mitochondrial genome sequence and characterization of genetic variation[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2005, 319: 15-27.
    [37] Steven C R, Hill J, Masters B, Place A R. Genetic markers in blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus)I: Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2005, 319: 3-14.
    [38] Yamauchi M M, Miya M U, Nishida M. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the swimming crab, Portunus trituberculatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura)[J]. Gene, 2003, 311: 129-135.
    [39]文陇英.生境片断化对遗传多样性的影响[J].经济科学社会, 2006, 24(1): 70-72.
    [40]李兰花,周晓农.人芽囊原虫的致病性遗传多样性研究进展[J].国际医学寄生虫病杂志, 2007, 34(1): 28-33.
    [41]朱冬发,王春琳,李志强.三疣梭子蟹核型分析[J].水产学报, 2005, 29(5): 649-653.
    [42]明军,张启翔,张义,晏小兰,毛庆山.园林及园艺植物品种鉴定常规技术研究发展[J].世界林业研究, 2002, 15(6): 14-20.
    [43]乔德亮. RAPD技术在水产动物种质资源研究中的应用[J].水产科技情报, 2001, 28(3): 112-114.
    [44]麻慧芳,王宙,黄晋玲.分子标记的类型RAPD技术本身存在的问题及对策[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 21: 64-66.
    [45]张丕燕,谢庄,刘红林. RAPD技术及其在动物遗传育种的应用[J].生物工程进展, 2000, 20(4): 52-54.
    [46]周孟姣,刘臻. RAPD技术及其在虾、蟹类研究中的应用[J].水产科技情报, 2003, 30(1): 25-28.
    [47]杨东,余来宁.尼罗罗非鱼AFLP技术体系的优化[J].江西农业学报, 2006, 18(3): 48-51.
    [48]王伟继,孔杰,董世瑞,栾生,王清印.中国明对虾AFLP分子标记遗传连锁图谱的构建[J].动物学报, 2006, 52(3): 575-584.
    [49]陈红菊,陈烂菊,姜中伸.微卫星分子标记的研究进展[J].山东畜牧兽医, 2004, 5: 41-43.
    [50]孔杰,高焕,于飞,罗坤,王伟继,孟宪红,刘萍,张天时.微卫星三重PCR基因扫描技术在中国明对虾家系标识中的应用[J].中国水产科学, 2007, 14(1): 59-66.
    [51]孙效文,张晓锋,赵莹莹,张研,贾智英,常玉梅,鲁翠云,梁利群.水产生物微卫星标记技术研究进展及其应用[J].中国水产科学, 2008, 15(4): 689-703.
    [52]潘贤,梁利群,雷清泉.筛选鲤鱼抗寒性状相关的微卫星分子标记[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2008, 40(6): 915-918.
    [53]高焕,孔杰,于飞,王伟继,罗坤,孟宪红,刘萍,张天时.人工控制自然交尾条件下中国对虾父本的微卫星识别[J].海洋水产研究, 2007, 28(1): 1-5.
    [54]宋来鹏,刘萍,李健,刘振辉.三疣梭子蟹基因组微卫星特征分析[J].中国水产科学, 2008, 15(5): 738-744.
    [55] Hayashi K. PCR-SSCP: A method for detection of mutations[J]. Genetic Analysis: Biomolecular Engineering, 1992, 9(3): 73-79.
    [56]韩秀兰,沈法富. PCR-SSCP标记技术研究及其应用进展[J].山东科学, 2002, 15(4): 18-22.
    [57]杜波,迟德富. PCR-SSCP技术在昆虫学研究中的应用[J].昆虫知识, 2007, 44(3): 333-336.
    [58] Asensio L. PCR-based methods for fish and fishery products authentication[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2007, 18(11): 558-566.
    [59] Michelmore R W, Paran J, Kesseli R V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant regions by using segregationg populations[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1999, 88: 9828-9832.
    [60]张小明,李春寿,叶胜海.混合分组分析法在作物基因定位上的研究进展(综述)[J].上海农业学报, 2002, 18(3): 24-27.
    [61]许勇,欧阳新星,张海英,康国斌,王永健,陈杭.西瓜野生种质抗枯萎病基因连锁的RAPD标记[J].植物学报, 1999, 41(9): 952-955.
    [62]夏德全,王文君.动物线粒体DNA研究及在鱼类种群遗传结构研究中的应用[J].水产学报, 1998, 22(4): 364-370.
    [63]张辉,吴清江.一种改进的鱼类线粒体DNA的快速制备方法[J].水生生物学报, 1997, 21(3): 281-283.
    [64]徐敬明.蟹类线粒体DNA的研究应用[J].中国海洋大学学报, 2006, 36(6): 879-884.
    [65]王成辉,项松平,吕耀平,王剑,潘增云,何小珍.瓯江彩鲤红、白两种体色遗传关系的初步研究[J].上海水产大学学报, 2008, 17(4): 402-405.
    [66]刘晓东,陈再忠.鱼类色素细胞及体色调控[J].水产科技情报, 2008, 35(1): 13-18.
    [67]黄永政.鱼类体色研究进展[J].水产学杂志, 2008, 21(1): 89-94.
    [68]张国范.海洋贝类遗传育种研究20年[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 45(2):190-194.
    [69]郑怀平,张国范,刘晓,阙华勇.不同贝壳颜色海湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians)家系的建立及生长发育研究[J].海洋湖沼, 2003, 34(6): 632-639.
    [70] Horch K, Salmon M, Forward R. Evidence for a two pigment visual system in the fiddler crab, Uca thayeri[J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2002, 188(6): 493-499.
    [71] Detto T, Zeil J, Magrath R D, Hunti S. Sex, size and colour in a semi-terrestrial crab, Heloecius cordiformis (H. Milne Edwards, 1837)[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2004, 302(1): 1-15.
    [72]苏秀榕,李太武,欧阳芬,刘平.三疣梭子蟹营养成分的研究[J].营养学报,1996, 18(3): 342-346.
    [73]孙先交.三疣梭子蟹越冬、育苗及养殖[J].齐鲁渔业, 2001, 18(4): 18-20.
    [74]刘长军,陈挺,沈烈锋,夏武强,谢汉阳.三疣梭子蟹苗种繁育大规格蟹种培育实验[J].现代农业科技, 2008, (14): 205-225.
    [75]王亚维.提高三疣梭子蟹人工育苗产量的技术措施[J].水产科学, 2006, 25(5): 256-257.
    [76]王广成,王权,李欣,赵迎东.三疣梭子蟹高产高效养成技术[J].水产科技情报, 2005, 32(3): 110-12.
    [77] Zhu X Q, Beveridge I, Berger L, Barton, Gasser R B. Single-strand conformation polymorphism-based analysis reveals genetic variation within Spirometra erinacei (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from Australia[J]. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2002, 16: 159-165.
    [78]张桂蓉,严安生,邹桂伟,罗相忠,黄峰.两个人工雌核发育系鲢近交F1遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J].水产学报, 2005,29(2): 22-28.
    [79] Bandyopadhyay P K, Stevenson B J, Cady M T, Olivera B M, Wolstenholme D R. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of a Conoidean gastropod, Lophiotoma (Xenuroturris) cerithiformis: Gene order and gastropod phylogeny[J]. Toxicon, 2006, 48: 29-43.
    [80]陈丽梅,孔晓瑜,喻子牛,于珊珊,徐晖. 3种蛏类线粒体16S rRNA和COI基因片段的序列比较及其系统学初步研究[J].海洋科学, 2005, 29(8): 27-32.
    [81]徐琰,宋林生,李新正.用16S rDNA序列初步探讨部分真虾类的系统发育关系[J].海洋科学, 2005, 29(9): 36-41.
    [82]蒋钦杨,杨学明,郭亚芬,蒋和生,兰干球,莫毅. 3个不同群体罗氏沼虾线粒体16S rRNA基因序列分析及遗传差异[J].水产科学, 2005, 24(10): 28-31.
    [83]郭亚辉,郭坚华,李斌.根据16S rRNA序列对假单胞菌属分类学的研究进展[J].微生物学杂志, 2004, 24(2): 38-41.
    [84]刘佳文,吕红艳,吴雪琼. 16S rRNA基因序列在分枝杆菌分类鉴定的研究进展[J].国外医学临床生物化学检验学分册, 2001, 22(5): 265-268.
    [85]孔晓瑜,姜艳艳,相建海,喻子牛,刘亚军.魁蚶线粒体16S rRNA和COI基因片段序列测定及其应用前景[J].海洋科学, 2001, 25(12): 46-48.
    [86]张文治.微生物学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2005: p240.
    [87] Silbiger N, Munguia P. Carapace color change in Uca pugilator as a response to temperature [J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2008, 335: 41-46.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700