渤海海域低勘探程度区古近系岩性圈闭预测
|
摘要
渤海海域属于发育在华北克拉通上的裂陷盆地，在多幕裂陷、多旋回叠加、多成因机制复合的构造背景下，渤海海域古近系充填沉积中可识别出15个主要的等时界面，其中一级层序界面2个，二级层序界面3个，三级层序界面10个，相应的将渤海海域古近系划分为一个一级层序，四个二级层序，十四个三级层序。
渤海海域古近系断陷湖盆可划分为断裂陡坡带、缓坡带、凹中隆起带、洼陷-轴向带四种类型三级构造单元，其中缓坡带可分为断裂缓坡带和简单缓坡带，简单缓坡带包括沉积坡折型缓坡带和斜坡型缓坡带。不同构造带的构造活动方式、构造演化过程各不相同，因而其所形成的地貌形态有较大的差别，可容空间和沉积基准面的变化各具特色，从而导致不同的构造带具有不同的层序格架模式和沉积体系构成。
对辽东湾、渤中地区层序地层的平面展布特征研究表明，沙四-孔店层序分布局限，沙三层序沉积在全区广布，地层分布主要受凹陷边界大断层的控制，沙一、二层序全区厚度稳定，但厚度总体较薄，东营组沉积时期早、中、晚期各有不同的沉积特点，形成其不同的地层分布特征。辽东湾古近系的沉积中心在辽中凹陷北部，且由南向东北发生迁移。渤中凹陷有古近系沉积中心位于渤东凸起的西侧，具有良好的继承型。
渤海海域古近系发育冲积扇、扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲、河流三角洲、湖底扇、碳酸盐岩台地、湖泊(滨浅湖和半深湖)等7种沉积体系类型。构造-层序地层格架内的沉积体系的展布研究表明，总体上，渤海海域沙三层序沉积时期以短源、内源沉积为主，陡坡发育近岸水下扇，缓坡发育扇三角洲，局部较大规模砂体前端可发育浊积扇。沙一二时期仍是以短源、内源沉积为主，洼陷区主要以半深湖沉积为主，滨浅湖在缓坡边缘发育，陡坡发育近岸水下扇，局部发育扇三角洲，缓坡发育扇三角洲，局部由于受断层影响，发育有水下扇(缓坡浊积扇)。东三段沉积时期，低位体系域主要发育湖底扇沉积，高位体系域除辽东带发育辫状三角洲沉积外，其它地区主要以泥质沉积为主。东二层序沉积时期沉积充填特征明显，湖区范围明显缩小，以远源、外源沉积为主，局部有短源、内源沉积，长轴方向多以发育大型的河流三角洲为主，三角洲分期性明显，常伴有较大规模的滑塌浊积扇；短轴方向或低凸起上发育辫状三角洲，局部为扇三角洲。东一段时期整体地形变缓，水体较浅，大多数地区以滨浅湖或三角洲平原为主。
渤海海域大型砂体的分布主要与“山—沟—坡—面”耦合带有关。“山—沟—坡—面”耦合是指影响陆相盆地砂体发育的主要因素是物源体系(山)、碎屑物质供给体系(沟)、坡折体系(坡)、基准面(面)等四大要素时空上的有效配置。渤海海域古近系复杂的构造体系，造就了渤海海域古近系丰富而有层次的坡折类型，根据坡折带的成因、平面组合样式以及控相的差异性，可将渤海海域古近系坡折带划分为伸展型边界断裂坡折带、走滑型边界断裂坡折带、沉积坡折带和基底先存地形坡折带等四种类型。“山—沟—坡—面”耦合带是渤海古近系寻找大中型油气田的主要方向。
渤海海域发育地层不整合圈闭、地层超覆圈闭、砂岩上倾尖灭型圈闭、砂岩透镜体圈闭、构造岩性复合圈闭、岩性构造复合圈闭等6种岩性圈闭或者构造—岩性复合圈闭。渤海海域古近系不同的构造单元具有特征的层序构成样式和沉积体系域构成模式，这种特殊的层序地层构成样式也决定了不同构造单元具有特殊的岩性圈闭分布模式。通过层序地层、沉积体系和三级构造带的配置分析，对渤海重点凹陷岩性圈闭有利发育区进行了预测，指出了辽东湾地区辽中凹陷东部陡坡—洼槽带等5个区带、渤中地区石臼坨凸起西南部低凸起及凸起边缘等7个区带是渤海古近系岩性圈闭发育的有利区带，在以后的岩性圈闭勘探中值得关注。
通过对渤中西部427构造带西侧渤中2-1地区和辽东湾中部锦州31-6地区进行了高精度层序地层分析和岩性圈闭预测及其成藏条件综合研究，认为，渤中2—1构造除了构造圈闭外，还发育构造岩性圈闭，构造岩性圈闭规模较大，预期勘探效益较好；锦州31—6岩性圈闭除了已经钻探的岩性体外，在周边还有成群的岩性圈闭，资源量较大，具有良好的勘探潜力。这两个地区是目前渤海海域岩性圈闭勘探比较现实的地区。
本次研究对渤海古近系低勘探程度区岩性圈闭预测技术方法进行了总结，认为在低勘探程度区由于钻井资料稀少，其岩性圈闭研究思路不同于高勘探程度区，低勘探程度区岩性圈闭的核心思想可概括为：构造研究找背景：“山(物源体系)—沟(输砂体系)—坡(坡折体系)—面(基准面旋回体系)”分析找砂体；砂体与构造配置分析找区带；地震地质一体化技术精雕岩性圈闭。
Bohai sea area is a faulted basin developed in Huabei craton. In the tectonic setting of multiple phase faulted depression, multicycle superimpose and multiple genesis mechanism, the fifteen main chronohorizons including two 1~(st)-order sequence boundaries, three 2~(nd)-sequence boundaries and ten 3~(rd)-order sequence boundaries can be recognized in the Palaeogene of Bohai sea area. The Palaeogene in Bohai sea area can be divided into one 1~(st)-order sequence, four 2~(nd)-sequences and fourteen 3~(rd)-order sequences.
The paper builds the models of the sequence framework and sedimentary systems constituent of the different structural units in Bohai sea area in Palaeogene. Bohai faulted depression in Palaeogene can be divided into four kands of 3~(rd)-order structural units which are faulted steep slope zone, gentle slope zone, uplift zone in the sag and sag-axial zone. The physiognomy shapes and characteristics of the accommodation and base level change in the different structural units are very different, which results in the different sequence models in the different structural units.
In Liaodongwan area and Bozhong area, the distribution of 4~(th) member of Sha He Jie Formation-Kong Dian Formation is limited. The distribution of 3~(rd) member of Sha He Jie Formation which is controlled by the boundary faults is very wide. The thickness of l~(st) and 2~(nd) member of Sha He Jie Formation is steady in the whole area, although it is thin as a whole. There are different deposition characteristics in the different period of Dongying Formation, which forms the different strata distribution characteristic. The depocenter of Palaeogene in Liaodongwan area located in the north of Liaozhong Sag and it moved from south to north of Liaozhong Sag. The depocenter of Palaeogene in Bozhong area with good inheritance located in the west of Bodong uplift.
The paper analyses the characteristic of sedimentary system in the area. There are seven types of sedimentary systems including alluvial fan, fan delta, braided delta, fluvial delta, sublacustrine fan, carbonatite platform and lacustrine. In 3~(rd) member of Sha He Jie Formation, the coarse clastic deposit from the proximal and internal source is developed. The proximal sublacustrine fan is developed in the steep slope. Fan delta is developed in the gentle slope. In 1~(st)-2~(nd) member of Sha He Jie formation, the deposition is proximal and internal still and the lake district expands farther. The sedimentary system in the sag area is mainly the semi-deep lacustrine facies,
and it is mainly proximal sublacustrine fan in the steep slope existing partly the fan delta, and it is mainly fan delta in gentle slope existing partly the sublacustrine fan. In 3~(rd) member of Dongying Formation, the low stand system developed the sublacustrine fan and the high stand system developed deep or semi-deep lacustrine facies except for the HST of Liaodong zone that developed braided delta. In 2~(nd) member of Dongying formation, the fluvial delta in the long axis and braided delta in minor axis are developed in the whole area. In 1~(st) member of Dongying formation, the topography was gentle in the whole area and the lake was shallow and the sedimentary system was mainly the shallow lacustrine or the delta plain in the most of the areas.
It is the complicated and ordered fault systems with different time, different scale, different attitude and different attribute in the Bohai sea area in Palaeogene that make the slope break zone in the basin have obvious characteristic. The slope break zone in Paleogene in Bohai sea area can be divided into 4 types, viz. extensional boundary faulted slope break zone, strike-slip boundary faulted slope break zone, depositional slope break zone and basement antecedent topographic slope break zone according to the geneses, the plane combination styles and the differences in sedimentary facies control. The extensional boundary faulted slope break zone can be divided into single-fault steep slope break zone, step fault slope break zone and transitional structure slope break zone. Although the plane combination styles of the single-fault steep slope break zone are complicated, there are mainly two types, viz. straight style and "wall-corner" style. Step fault terrace slope break zone can be divided into synthetic step fault slope break zone and antithetic step fault zone according to the relation between fault trend and center of subsidence. The classification of transitional structure slope break zone is complex. Transitional structure slope break zone in Bohai sea area can be divided into strike-slope transitional structure slope break zone and transverse uplift transitional structure slope break zone according to the differences in the sandstone control characteristics in the view of the oil and gas exploration. The sand-control characteristics of different slope break zone are different. The slope break zones in continental faulted basin are the main location in which the sandstone is rich. But this doesn't draw a conclusion that the sand body must be found in the slope break. The matching of "hill (provenance system)-canyon (sediment discharge system)-slope (slope break zone)-boundary (base level system)" is the necessary condition of the sandstone enrichment in continental fault basin.
There are 6 kinds of lithologic traps including stratigraphic unconformity trap, stratigrapbic
overlapping trap, sandstone updip pinchout trap, sandstone lenticular trap, tectonic-lithologic compounding trap and lithologic-tectonic compounding trap in Bohai sea area, Palaeogene. The paper analyzes the distribution models of lithologic trap in the different tectonic zone in Palaeogene in Bohai sea area resulted from the characteristic constituent styles of the sequence and depositional system tract. According to the couple of the sequence, sedimentary system and tectonic setting, there are 5 blocks in Liaosongwan area such as the eastern steep slop of Liaozhong Sag and 7 blocks in Bozhong area such as the southwestern low uplift of Shijiutuo Uplift, which are favor of lithologic trap development.
The high resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary system are analyzed and the lithologic trap are recognized and described in Bozhong 2-1 block in the west of 427 Tectonic Zone and Jinzhou 31-6 block in the center of Liaozhong Sag in the paper. Bozhong 2-1 block developed the tectonic-lithologic trap with a good exploration potentiality besides the structural trap. There are several turbidite sandstone lithologic traps with a good exploration potentiality near Jinzhou 31-6 lithologic trap. The two blocks are the tangible area of the lithologic trap exploration in Bohai sea area.
Furthermore, the technique methods of the lithologic trap predication in the low degree of exploration in Bohai sea area in Palaeogene are summarized in the paper. The core contents of the lithologic trap research under the exploration degree are the structure research seeking the development setting of the lithologic trap, the couple research of "provenance system- sediment discharge system-slope break system-base level system" seeking the sand body, the couple research of the sand body and structure seeking the favor zone of the lithologic trap development and the integration analysis of seismic and geologic data for describing subtly the lithologic trap.
Sequence stratigraphy, Sedimentary system,
Lithologic trap Predication, Under the exploration degree area, Palaeogene, Bohai sea area
渤海海域古近系断陷湖盆可划分为断裂陡坡带、缓坡带、凹中隆起带、洼陷-轴向带四种类型三级构造单元，其中缓坡带可分为断裂缓坡带和简单缓坡带，简单缓坡带包括沉积坡折型缓坡带和斜坡型缓坡带。不同构造带的构造活动方式、构造演化过程各不相同，因而其所形成的地貌形态有较大的差别，可容空间和沉积基准面的变化各具特色，从而导致不同的构造带具有不同的层序格架模式和沉积体系构成。
对辽东湾、渤中地区层序地层的平面展布特征研究表明，沙四-孔店层序分布局限，沙三层序沉积在全区广布，地层分布主要受凹陷边界大断层的控制，沙一、二层序全区厚度稳定，但厚度总体较薄，东营组沉积时期早、中、晚期各有不同的沉积特点，形成其不同的地层分布特征。辽东湾古近系的沉积中心在辽中凹陷北部，且由南向东北发生迁移。渤中凹陷有古近系沉积中心位于渤东凸起的西侧，具有良好的继承型。
渤海海域古近系发育冲积扇、扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲、河流三角洲、湖底扇、碳酸盐岩台地、湖泊(滨浅湖和半深湖)等7种沉积体系类型。构造-层序地层格架内的沉积体系的展布研究表明，总体上，渤海海域沙三层序沉积时期以短源、内源沉积为主，陡坡发育近岸水下扇，缓坡发育扇三角洲，局部较大规模砂体前端可发育浊积扇。沙一二时期仍是以短源、内源沉积为主，洼陷区主要以半深湖沉积为主，滨浅湖在缓坡边缘发育，陡坡发育近岸水下扇，局部发育扇三角洲，缓坡发育扇三角洲，局部由于受断层影响，发育有水下扇(缓坡浊积扇)。东三段沉积时期，低位体系域主要发育湖底扇沉积，高位体系域除辽东带发育辫状三角洲沉积外，其它地区主要以泥质沉积为主。东二层序沉积时期沉积充填特征明显，湖区范围明显缩小，以远源、外源沉积为主，局部有短源、内源沉积，长轴方向多以发育大型的河流三角洲为主，三角洲分期性明显，常伴有较大规模的滑塌浊积扇；短轴方向或低凸起上发育辫状三角洲，局部为扇三角洲。东一段时期整体地形变缓，水体较浅，大多数地区以滨浅湖或三角洲平原为主。
渤海海域大型砂体的分布主要与“山—沟—坡—面”耦合带有关。“山—沟—坡—面”耦合是指影响陆相盆地砂体发育的主要因素是物源体系(山)、碎屑物质供给体系(沟)、坡折体系(坡)、基准面(面)等四大要素时空上的有效配置。渤海海域古近系复杂的构造体系，造就了渤海海域古近系丰富而有层次的坡折类型，根据坡折带的成因、平面组合样式以及控相的差异性，可将渤海海域古近系坡折带划分为伸展型边界断裂坡折带、走滑型边界断裂坡折带、沉积坡折带和基底先存地形坡折带等四种类型。“山—沟—坡—面”耦合带是渤海古近系寻找大中型油气田的主要方向。
渤海海域发育地层不整合圈闭、地层超覆圈闭、砂岩上倾尖灭型圈闭、砂岩透镜体圈闭、构造岩性复合圈闭、岩性构造复合圈闭等6种岩性圈闭或者构造—岩性复合圈闭。渤海海域古近系不同的构造单元具有特征的层序构成样式和沉积体系域构成模式，这种特殊的层序地层构成样式也决定了不同构造单元具有特殊的岩性圈闭分布模式。通过层序地层、沉积体系和三级构造带的配置分析，对渤海重点凹陷岩性圈闭有利发育区进行了预测，指出了辽东湾地区辽中凹陷东部陡坡—洼槽带等5个区带、渤中地区石臼坨凸起西南部低凸起及凸起边缘等7个区带是渤海古近系岩性圈闭发育的有利区带，在以后的岩性圈闭勘探中值得关注。
通过对渤中西部427构造带西侧渤中2-1地区和辽东湾中部锦州31-6地区进行了高精度层序地层分析和岩性圈闭预测及其成藏条件综合研究，认为，渤中2—1构造除了构造圈闭外，还发育构造岩性圈闭，构造岩性圈闭规模较大，预期勘探效益较好；锦州31—6岩性圈闭除了已经钻探的岩性体外，在周边还有成群的岩性圈闭，资源量较大，具有良好的勘探潜力。这两个地区是目前渤海海域岩性圈闭勘探比较现实的地区。
本次研究对渤海古近系低勘探程度区岩性圈闭预测技术方法进行了总结，认为在低勘探程度区由于钻井资料稀少，其岩性圈闭研究思路不同于高勘探程度区，低勘探程度区岩性圈闭的核心思想可概括为：构造研究找背景：“山(物源体系)—沟(输砂体系)—坡(坡折体系)—面(基准面旋回体系)”分析找砂体；砂体与构造配置分析找区带；地震地质一体化技术精雕岩性圈闭。
Bohai sea area is a faulted basin developed in Huabei craton. In the tectonic setting of multiple phase faulted depression, multicycle superimpose and multiple genesis mechanism, the fifteen main chronohorizons including two 1~(st)-order sequence boundaries, three 2~(nd)-sequence boundaries and ten 3~(rd)-order sequence boundaries can be recognized in the Palaeogene of Bohai sea area. The Palaeogene in Bohai sea area can be divided into one 1~(st)-order sequence, four 2~(nd)-sequences and fourteen 3~(rd)-order sequences.
The paper builds the models of the sequence framework and sedimentary systems constituent of the different structural units in Bohai sea area in Palaeogene. Bohai faulted depression in Palaeogene can be divided into four kands of 3~(rd)-order structural units which are faulted steep slope zone, gentle slope zone, uplift zone in the sag and sag-axial zone. The physiognomy shapes and characteristics of the accommodation and base level change in the different structural units are very different, which results in the different sequence models in the different structural units.
In Liaodongwan area and Bozhong area, the distribution of 4~(th) member of Sha He Jie Formation-Kong Dian Formation is limited. The distribution of 3~(rd) member of Sha He Jie Formation which is controlled by the boundary faults is very wide. The thickness of l~(st) and 2~(nd) member of Sha He Jie Formation is steady in the whole area, although it is thin as a whole. There are different deposition characteristics in the different period of Dongying Formation, which forms the different strata distribution characteristic. The depocenter of Palaeogene in Liaodongwan area located in the north of Liaozhong Sag and it moved from south to north of Liaozhong Sag. The depocenter of Palaeogene in Bozhong area with good inheritance located in the west of Bodong uplift.
The paper analyses the characteristic of sedimentary system in the area. There are seven types of sedimentary systems including alluvial fan, fan delta, braided delta, fluvial delta, sublacustrine fan, carbonatite platform and lacustrine. In 3~(rd) member of Sha He Jie Formation, the coarse clastic deposit from the proximal and internal source is developed. The proximal sublacustrine fan is developed in the steep slope. Fan delta is developed in the gentle slope. In 1~(st)-2~(nd) member of Sha He Jie formation, the deposition is proximal and internal still and the lake district expands farther. The sedimentary system in the sag area is mainly the semi-deep lacustrine facies,
and it is mainly proximal sublacustrine fan in the steep slope existing partly the fan delta, and it is mainly fan delta in gentle slope existing partly the sublacustrine fan. In 3~(rd) member of Dongying Formation, the low stand system developed the sublacustrine fan and the high stand system developed deep or semi-deep lacustrine facies except for the HST of Liaodong zone that developed braided delta. In 2~(nd) member of Dongying formation, the fluvial delta in the long axis and braided delta in minor axis are developed in the whole area. In 1~(st) member of Dongying formation, the topography was gentle in the whole area and the lake was shallow and the sedimentary system was mainly the shallow lacustrine or the delta plain in the most of the areas.
It is the complicated and ordered fault systems with different time, different scale, different attitude and different attribute in the Bohai sea area in Palaeogene that make the slope break zone in the basin have obvious characteristic. The slope break zone in Paleogene in Bohai sea area can be divided into 4 types, viz. extensional boundary faulted slope break zone, strike-slip boundary faulted slope break zone, depositional slope break zone and basement antecedent topographic slope break zone according to the geneses, the plane combination styles and the differences in sedimentary facies control. The extensional boundary faulted slope break zone can be divided into single-fault steep slope break zone, step fault slope break zone and transitional structure slope break zone. Although the plane combination styles of the single-fault steep slope break zone are complicated, there are mainly two types, viz. straight style and "wall-corner" style. Step fault terrace slope break zone can be divided into synthetic step fault slope break zone and antithetic step fault zone according to the relation between fault trend and center of subsidence. The classification of transitional structure slope break zone is complex. Transitional structure slope break zone in Bohai sea area can be divided into strike-slope transitional structure slope break zone and transverse uplift transitional structure slope break zone according to the differences in the sandstone control characteristics in the view of the oil and gas exploration. The sand-control characteristics of different slope break zone are different. The slope break zones in continental faulted basin are the main location in which the sandstone is rich. But this doesn't draw a conclusion that the sand body must be found in the slope break. The matching of "hill (provenance system)-canyon (sediment discharge system)-slope (slope break zone)-boundary (base level system)" is the necessary condition of the sandstone enrichment in continental fault basin.
There are 6 kinds of lithologic traps including stratigraphic unconformity trap, stratigrapbic
overlapping trap, sandstone updip pinchout trap, sandstone lenticular trap, tectonic-lithologic compounding trap and lithologic-tectonic compounding trap in Bohai sea area, Palaeogene. The paper analyzes the distribution models of lithologic trap in the different tectonic zone in Palaeogene in Bohai sea area resulted from the characteristic constituent styles of the sequence and depositional system tract. According to the couple of the sequence, sedimentary system and tectonic setting, there are 5 blocks in Liaosongwan area such as the eastern steep slop of Liaozhong Sag and 7 blocks in Bozhong area such as the southwestern low uplift of Shijiutuo Uplift, which are favor of lithologic trap development.
The high resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary system are analyzed and the lithologic trap are recognized and described in Bozhong 2-1 block in the west of 427 Tectonic Zone and Jinzhou 31-6 block in the center of Liaozhong Sag in the paper. Bozhong 2-1 block developed the tectonic-lithologic trap with a good exploration potentiality besides the structural trap. There are several turbidite sandstone lithologic traps with a good exploration potentiality near Jinzhou 31-6 lithologic trap. The two blocks are the tangible area of the lithologic trap exploration in Bohai sea area.
Furthermore, the technique methods of the lithologic trap predication in the low degree of exploration in Bohai sea area in Palaeogene are summarized in the paper. The core contents of the lithologic trap research under the exploration degree are the structure research seeking the development setting of the lithologic trap, the couple research of "provenance system- sediment discharge system-slope break system-base level system" seeking the sand body, the couple research of the sand body and structure seeking the favor zone of the lithologic trap development and the integration analysis of seismic and geologic data for describing subtly the lithologic trap.
Sequence stratigraphy, Sedimentary system,
Lithologic trap Predication, Under the exploration degree area, Palaeogene, Bohai sea area
引文
1．A．I．莱复生．石油地质学．华东石油学院勘探系译．北京：地质出版社，1975
2．C．E．佩顿著，牛毓荃、徐怀大译．1980．地震地层学(在油气勘探中的应用)．北京：石油工业出版社
3．蔡希源，李思田等著．陆相盆地高精度层序地层学—隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践．基础理论篇．北京：地质出版社，2003．1～271
4．陈发景、贾庆素、张洪年．2004．传递带及其在砂体发育中的作用．石油与天然气地质．25(2)：144-148
5．陈发景、汪新文等编著．2004．伸展断陷盆地分析．北京：地质出版社
6．陈发景．2003．调节带(或传递带)的基本概念和分类，现代地质，17(2)，186．
7．崔永谦，武耀辉等．岩性地层油气藏勘探技术．中国石油勘探．2004，9(3)：17～25
8．戴俊生，陆克政，1998．渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式的演化．石油学报，19(4)：16-20．
9．邓宏文，王红亮，王居峰，等．层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似性特征——以三角洲—浊积扇体系为例．石油与天然气地质，2004，25(5)：491～495
10．邓宏文，王红亮、Cross T A．等．2002．高分辨率层序学—原理及应用．北京：地质出版社，2002
11．邓宏文，王洪亮等．古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制．石油与天然气地质．2001，22(4)：293-303
12．邓宏文．美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学．石油与天然气地质，1995，16(2)：89～97
13．杜金虎，易士威等．华北油田隐蔽油藏勘探实践与认识．中国石油勘探．2002，8(1)：1-10
14．樊太亮，李卫东．1999．层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例．石油学报，20(2)：12-17
15．樊太亮，吕延仓，丁明华．层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律．地学前缘，2000，7(4)：315—321．
16．冯有良，李思田，解习农．陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式．地学前缘，2000，7(3)：119～131
17．冯有良，邱以钢．高精度层序地层学在济阳塌陷下第三系隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用．石油学报．2003，24(1)：1～5
18．冯有良．东营凹陷下第三系层序地层格架及盆地充填模式．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，1999．24(6)：635～642
19．高瑞棋．渤海湾盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探．北京：石油工业出版社，2001
20．何仕斌．1998．渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷下第三系沉积相研究及储层分析，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
21．何仕斌等，渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷中深层东营组-沙河街组高精度层序学和储层储集物性条件研究，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
22．侯贵廷，钱祥麟，宋新民．1998．渤海湾盆地的形成机制，北京大学学报，34(4)：503-509。
23．侯贵廷，钱祥麟等，2000．渤海中、新生代盆地构造活动与沉积作用的时空关系，石油与天然气地质，21(3)．
24．侯明才，陈洪德，田景春，2001．层序地层学的研究进展．沉积学报，2001，19(2)：249-255”
25．胡见义，徐树宝．非构造油气藏．北京：石油工业出版社，1986：81～83
26．胡见义，中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集．黑龙江：黑龙江科学技术出版社，1984
27．胡少华．2004．基于地震资料的构造—沉积综合分析法——一种剥蚀厚度恢复新方法[J]．石油地球物理勘探，39(4)：479～48
28．胡宗全．2004．层序地层研究的新思路——构造-层序地层研究．现代地质．18(4)：549-554
29．贾承造，池英柳．中国岩性地层油气藏资源潜力与勘探技术．石油勘探与开发，2004，1～12
30．贾承造，赵文智，邹才能，等．岩性地层油气藏勘探研究的两项核心技术．石油勘探与开发，2004，31(3)：3～9
31．焦养泉，1999．渤中坳陷地层结构、构造演化与富生烃凹陷形成条件分析．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
32．金武弟，王英民，刘书会，等，东营凹陷下第三系低位域沉积及非构造圈闭，石油和天然气地质，2003，24(3)：249～252
33．李德生．渤海湾含油气盆地德地质和构造特征．石油学报，1980，1(1)
34．李德生．中国东部含油气盆地的构造特征．石油勘探与开发，1982，9(2)
35．李宏伟，邓宏文，肖乾华，等．热欧地区残留可容纳空间分布及储集砂体预测．石油学报，2002，23(4)：29～32
36．李建平，毕力刚，1996．渤海海域早第三纪地层研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
37．李丕龙，陈冬霞，庞雄奇，等．岩性油气藏成因机理研究现状及展望．油气地质与采收率，2002，9(5)：1～3
38．李丕龙，庞雄奇．隐蔽油气藏形成与勘探实践．北京：石油工业出版社，2004-11-11
39．李丕龙，庞雄奇等．陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成——以济阳凹陷为例．北京：石油工业出版社．2004
40．李丕龙，庞雄奇主编．隐蔽油气藏形成机理与勘探实践．北京：石油工业出版社，2004
41．李思田，2004．大型油气系统形成的盆地动力学背景．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，29(5)：505-512．
42．李思田，林畅松，张启明，杨士恭，吴培康，1998，南海北部大陆边缘盆地幕式裂陷的 动力学过程及10Ma以来的构造事件，科学通报，43(8)：797-810．
43．李思田，潘元林，陆永潮，等．断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术—高精度地震探测基础上德层序地层学研究．地球科学，2002，27(5)：592～596
44．李思田，潘元林等．断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术——高精度地震探测基础上的层序地层学研究．地球科学．2002，27(5)：1-7
45．李思田，王华等，1999．中国近海富生烃凹陷形成机制、充填和发育特征．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
46．李思田、林畅松、解习农等，1995，大型陆相盆地地层层序学研究-以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例，地学前缘，2(4)：133-136．
47．李阳，蔡进功，刘建民．东营凹陷下第三系高分辨率层序地层研究．沉积学报，2002，20(2)：210～216
48．林畅松，李思田，任建业，1995．断陷湖盆层序地层研究和计算机模拟，地学前缘，2(3)：124-77。
49．林畅松，潘元林，肖建新，孔凡仙，刘景彦，郑和荣．2000．“构造坡折带”—断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念．地球科学—中国地质大学学报．25(3)：260-266
50．林畅松，郑和荣，任建业等，2003．渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制，中国科学(D辑)，33(11)：1025-1036．
51．刘豪，王英民．2004．坳陷湖盆坡折带特征及其对非构造圈闭的控制．石油学报．25(2)：30-35
52．罗毓晖，蔡东升，侯廷贵等，1999，渤海盆地构造演化及成因动力学研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
53．罗毓晖，蔡东升等，1999．渤海断裂构造演化对成油体系及油气富集规律的控制和影响研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
54．罗毓辉 蔡东升等，渤海盆地沉积、成岩场演化与构造活动关系及下第三系储层预测研究，1999(内部资料)
55．米立军，王茂山等．1995．渤海重点探区下第三系碎屑岩沉积特征及储层评价，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)。
56．米立军、赵建臣、徐长贵等，渤海下第三系、潜山勘探现状及勘探潜力，2002．渤海研究院(内部资料)
57．牟中海，唐勇，崔炳富，等．2002．塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J]．石油学报，23(1)：40-44
58．潘元林，孔凡仙等主编．中国隐蔽油气藏．北京：地质出版社，1998
59．潘元林，李思田．2004．大型陆相断陷盆地层序底层与隐蔽油气藏研究—以济阳坳陷为例．北京：石油工业出版社．
60．潘元林，张善文，肖焕钦，等著．济阳断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探．北京：石油工业出版 社，2003
61．漆家福，陆克政等，1995．渤海湾盆地区新生代构造与油气的关系．石油大学学报(自然科学版)，第19卷增刊．
62．漆家福，杨桥，陈发景，陈昭年．1994．辽东湾-下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程，现代地质，8：34-42。
63．漆家福，张一伟．1995．渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化．石油大学学报(自然科学版)，第19卷增刊．
64．任安身，1996．渤海湾坳陷区构造单元的划分．复式油气田，1(1)：40-45．
65．任安身，1998．渤海湾坳陷区构造特征及其成生机制探讨．复式油气田，6(2)：51-54．
66．任建业，刘文龙，林畅松，李思田，1996，中国东部晚中生代裂陷特征及其幕式伸长作用，现代地质，10(4)：526-531。
67．任建业，陆永潮．2004．断陷盆地构造坡折带形成机制及其对层序发育样式的控制．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：596-602
68．沈守文，彭大均等．试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路．石油学报．2000，21(1)：16-22
69．沈守文，彭大均等．层序地层学预测隐蔽油气藏的原理与方法．地球学报．2000，21(3)：300～305
70．万天丰．2004．中国大地构造学纲要．北京：地质出版社．
71．王洪亮，邓宏文．2000．渤海湾盆地第三系层序地层特征与大中型气田分布．中国海上油气(地质)，14(2)：100-117．
72．王鸿祯，史晓颖．1998．沉积层序及海平面旋回的分类级别．现代地质，12(1)：1～16
73．王纪祥，陈发景，李趁义．2003．山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征．现代地质．17(2)：203-209
74．王良忱，张金亮．1996，沉积环境和沉积相，北京：石油工业出版社
75．王善书等编，1990．沿海大陆架及毗邻海域油气区(上册)，中国石油地质志，卷十六，石油工业出版社
76．王英民，金武弟，刘书会．2003．断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义．石油与天然气地质，24(3)：199-203，214
77．王英民，刘豪，李立诚，等．准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，2002，27(6)：683～688
78．王英民，刘豪，辛仁臣，王颖．2005．坡折带——岩性油气藏勘探的重要领域．见：中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探与生产分公司．岩性地层油气藏勘探理论与实践．北京．石油工业出版社．468-518
79．威尔格斯主编．徐怀大，魏魁生，洪卫东等译．层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)．石油工业出版社，1993，47-254
80．魏刚，1999．渤中25-1油田沉积相研究及储层评价．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
81．邬金华，张哲，王柏轩．2000．内陆凹陷层序地层的关键界面及其有关问题．地层学杂志．24(1)：78-83
82．肖焕钦，等．陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏分类及勘探．特种油气藏，2002，9(5)：10～
83．肖焕钦，王宝言，陈宝宁，等．济阳坳陷陡坡带断裂控砂模式．油气地质与采收率，2002，9(5)：20～22
84．肖军，王华．2003．琼东南盆地构造坡折带特征及其对沉积的控制作用．海洋地质与第四纪地质，23(3)：55-63
85．肖尚斌，高喜龙等，2000．渤海湾盆地新生代的走滑活动及其石油地质意义．大地构造与成矿学，24(4)：321-328．
86．谢玉洪，王振峰．2004．莺歌海盆地坡折带特征及其对沉积体系的控制．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：569-574
87．辛仁臣，王英民．2004．松辽盆地北部青山口—姚家组西部坡折带成因及演化．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：621-624
88．徐长贵，赖维成．2004．古地貌分析在渤海下第三系储集层预测中的应用．石油勘探与开发，31(5)：53-56
89．徐长贵，赖维成等．2005．渤海海域古近系中深层储层预测技术探索与实践．中国海上油气．
90．徐长贵，许效松，丘东洲．2005．渤海海域辽西凹陷中南部下第三系构造层序地层格架与古地理分析．古地理学报．7(5)：449-459
91．徐长贵．2006．渤海海域古近系坡折带成因类型及其对砂体的控制作用．中国海上油气，18(6)：365-371
92．徐怀大等．1990．地震地层学解释基础．湖北武汉：中国地质大学出版社
93．许浚远，1994．歧口凹陷断裂形成机制和构造演化，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)．
94．许浚远，王艳萍，王磊，等．1997．多轴水平拉伸盆地三维古构造重建探讨[J]．石油与天然气地质，18(1)：1-5
95．许效松等．2002．辽西凹陷中南段下第三系层序分析与沉积体系预测．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
96．薛良清．论沉积层序级别的划分．石油勘探与开发，1998，25(3)：10～14
97．叶加仁，陆明德．1995．盆地地史模拟述评[J]．地质科技情报，14(2)：45-49
98．于兴河 编著，2002．碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学，北京，石油工业出版社
99．张功成，2000．渤海海域构造格局与富生烃凹陷分布，中国海上油气(地质)，14(2)
100．张建林，林畅松，郑和荣．2002．断陷湖盆断裂、古地貌及物源对沉积体系的控制作用[J]．油气地质与采收率，9(4)：25～27
101．张立勤，付立新，王濮，等．2005．一种古构造恢复方法探讨—以乌马营构造为例[J]．矿物岩石，25(2)：1-3
102．张善文，王英民，李群．如何在高精度勘探地区寻找隐蔽油气藏．石油勘探与开发，2003，30(3)：5～7
103．张善文，王英民．2003．应用坡折带理论寻找隐蔽油气藏．石油勘探与开发，30(3)：5-7
104．张善文，王永诗等．网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳新近系为例．石油勘探与开发，2002，30(1)：1～10
105．张万选、张厚福、曾洪流．1993．陆相地震地层学．山东东营：石油大学出版社
106．赵澄林，杨丛笑，刘孟慧．1996．渤海盆地早第三纪陆源碎屑岩相古地理学．北京：石油工业出版社，87～105
107．赵澄林等．1991．辽东湾下第三系陆相碎屑岩储层砂体微相和成岩作用研究，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)。
108．赵红格，刘池阳等．2000．调节带和转换带及其在伸展区的分段作用[J]．世界地质，19(2)：105-111
109．赵文智，邹才能，汪泽成，等．富油气凹陷“满凹含油”论一内涵与意义．石油勘探与开发，2004，31(2)：5～13
110．赵玉光，王剑，唐锦玉，等．层序界面及其附近的地质特征与地质过程的表现．1997，71(4)：374～380
111．赵重远，刘池洋，1990．华北克拉通沉积盆地形成与演化及油气赋存，西北大学出版社，129。
112．中国地震局，1999．渤海晚第三纪以来的构造应用场与断裂活动关系及其在油气勘探开发中的应用，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
113．周建生，杨池银，陈发景1997．黄骅坳陷横向变换带的构造特征及成因[J]．11(4)：425-433
114．周瑶琪，吴智平．2000．地层间断面的时间结构研究．北京：地质出版社，
115．朱夏，陈焕疆，孙兆才，张渝昌．1983．中国新生代构造与含油气盆地，地质学报，3：235-242
116．朱夏．中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集．黑龙江：黑龙江科学技术出版社，1984
117．朱筱敏，康安等．2003．陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨，沉积学报，第21卷，第2期
118. Allen P. A. and Allen J. R., 1995, Basin analysis, principles and application. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, p464
119. Brown L F, Fisher W L. Seismic Stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems: example from Braxilian rift and pull-apart application to hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Mem. 26 1977: 213～248
120. Campagna D. and Aydin A., 1994. Basin genesis associated with strike-slip faulting in the basin and range, Southeastern Nevada. Tectonics, 13(2): 327-341
121. Campagna D. and Aydin A., 1994. Basin genesis associated with strike-slip faulting in the basin and range, Southeastern Nevada. Tectonics, 13(2): 327-341
122. Dahlstrom C D A. 1970,.Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 18(1): 407—1 422
123. Dahlstrom C D A. 1970. Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 18(1): 407—1 422
124. Douglas J. Geometric modeling of faces migration: Theoretical development of faces successions and local unconformities. Basin Research, 1991, 3:51～62
125. Dow W G. 1977. Kerogen studies and geological interpretations. Journal of Geochemical Exploration[J], 7:79—99
126. Faulds J E, Varga R J. 1998. The role of accommodation zones and transfer zones in the regional segmentation of extend terranes. Geology Society of America Special Paper, 323: 1-45
127. Fisher W L, Brown L F, Soctt A J, et al. Delta system in the exploration for oil and gas. Burecon. Geol. Univ. Texas, Austin, 1969: 78
128. Fisher W L, McGowon J H. Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oii and gas. Bull. AAPG.,1969,53(1):30～54
129. Galloway W E, Hobday D K. Terrigenous classic depositional system. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1983
130. Gallowny W E. Reservoir faces architecture of microtonal barrier systems. AAPG. 1986,70(7):787～808
131. Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I: architecture and genesis of flooding-surface bounded depositional units. AAPG Bulletin, 1989,73: 125-142
132．Galloway W E著．徐长贵译．1999．硅质碎屑岩斜坡与坡底沉积体系—相组成、地层格架和分析．海上油气译丛，1999，3：1-27
133. Hans E, Mandana H, Woligang S. Tectonic and climatic control of Paleocene sedimentation in Rhenodanubian Flysch basin (Eastern Alps, Austria). Basin Research, 2002, 14: 247～262
134．Harland W B，Cox A V，Llewellyn P G et．al．地质年代表，袁相国，姬再良，刘椿译．北京：地质出版社，1987，84-105
135. Jerveyt M T. Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expression. Sea-level changes: An integrated approach. 1988, Soc Econ Placental Mineral Spec Pub142:47～69
136.Klein G dev. Current aspects of basin analysis. Sedimentary Geology, 1987, 50:95-118
137. Liangqing Xue, W. E. Galloway. Genetic Sequence Stratigraphic Framework, Depositional Style, and Hydrocarbon Occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN Formations in the Songliao Lacustrine Basin, Northeastern China. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, (10):1792-1808
138. Marr J, Harff P. Shanmugam G, Parker G. 1997, Experiments on subaqueous sandy debris flows. Supplement to EOS Transactions AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco. 78, Number46: 347
139. Mckenzie D P. Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins. Earth and Planetary Science Letters ,1978,48:25-32
140. Morley C K, Nelson R A, Patton T L. 1990. Transfer zones in the East African rift system andtheir relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in rifts. AAPG Bulletin, 74(8):1234- 1253.
141. Morley C K, Nelson R A, Patton T L. 1990. Transfer zones in the East African rift system andtheir relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in rifts. AAPG Bulletin, 74(8): 1234- 1253.
142.Mutti E.& Ricci Lucchi F.,1972. Le torbiditi dell' Appennino Settentrionale:introduzion all" analisi di facies. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital.,
143. Mutti E. & Ricci Lucchi F., 1975. Turbidite Facies and Facies Associations. Field Trip Guidebook, A-11, 21-36, 9th Int. Sedimentology Congr., Nice, France.
144. Nardin T. R. , Heln F. J. .Gorsline D.S. and Edwards B. D., 1979. A review of mass movement processes, sediment and acoustic characteristics, and contrasts in slope and base-of-slope systems versus canyon-fan-basin floor system. In:Geology of Continental Slopes(Ed. By L.J.Doyle and 0. H. Pilkey), 61-73. Spc. Publ. SOC. econ. Paleont. Miner., 19, Tulsa
145. Normark W. R. , 1970. Growth patterns of deep sea fans. Bulletin AAPG. 54:2170-2195
146. Normark W. R. , 1974. Submarine canyons and fan valleys:Factors affecting growth patterns of deep-sea fans. In:Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation, 56-68. Spc. Publ. SOC. econ. Paleont. Miner., 19, Tulsa
147.Prosser S. Tectonics and Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy. Geol Soc London Spec Publication No 71. 1993:35-66
148. Scholz C A. Deltas of the Lake Malawi rift, east Africa: Seismic expression and exploration implication. AAPG, 1995, 79(11):1679-1697
149. Serpa L. and Pavlis T. L., 1996. Three-dimensional model of the late Cenozoic history of the Death Valley region, southeastern California. Tectonic, 15(6):1113-1128
150. Serpa L. and Pavlis T. L. 1996. Three-dimensional model of the late Cenozoic history of the Death Valley region, southeastern California. Tectonic, 15(6):1113-1128
151.U.S. Geodynamics Committee. The dynamics of sedimentary basins. National Academy Press (Washington D C). 1997
152. Vail PR, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, ecstasy and sedimentology—an overview. In: Einsele G, Ricken W, Seilacher A (Eds.). Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy. Berlin Heidberg: Springer-Verlag, 1991, 617-659
153. Vail P R, Mitchum R M, Todd R G. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level. In: Payton C E. Seismic stratigraphy application of hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Memoir, 26: 49-212.
154. Vail P R, Mitchum R P Jr, Thompson SIII. Seismic stratigrphy and global change of sea level, part four: global cycles of relative changes of sea level. AAPG Mem, 1977, 26: 83-98
155. Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et al. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, core and outcrops: Concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and faces. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series. 1990 , (7)
156. Van Wagoner J C. Overview of Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits: Terminology, summary of papers, and glossary of sequence stratigraph, In: Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T (eds.), Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits, outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America, 1995, AAPG Memoir, 64:9-21.
157. Walker R. G., 1978. Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans:models for exploration for stratigraphic traps. Bulletin AAPG, 62:932-966
158. Wang H, Shi X. A scheme of the hierarchy for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of China University of Geoscience, 1996, 7(1): 1-12
159. Wang Hongzhen, Wang Xunlian. 1991. The tectono-paleogeography and biogeography of China and adjacent regions in the Carboniferous period. 11th International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie duarbonifere, Beijing, 1987, Compte. Rendu. 1:97-116.
160. Weimer, P. & H. Posamentier, Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy - Recent Developments and Applications. 1994, AAPG Memoir 58: P492
2．C．E．佩顿著，牛毓荃、徐怀大译．1980．地震地层学(在油气勘探中的应用)．北京：石油工业出版社
3．蔡希源，李思田等著．陆相盆地高精度层序地层学—隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践．基础理论篇．北京：地质出版社，2003．1～271
4．陈发景、贾庆素、张洪年．2004．传递带及其在砂体发育中的作用．石油与天然气地质．25(2)：144-148
5．陈发景、汪新文等编著．2004．伸展断陷盆地分析．北京：地质出版社
6．陈发景．2003．调节带(或传递带)的基本概念和分类，现代地质，17(2)，186．
7．崔永谦，武耀辉等．岩性地层油气藏勘探技术．中国石油勘探．2004，9(3)：17～25
8．戴俊生，陆克政，1998．渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式的演化．石油学报，19(4)：16-20．
9．邓宏文，王红亮，王居峰，等．层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似性特征——以三角洲—浊积扇体系为例．石油与天然气地质，2004，25(5)：491～495
10．邓宏文，王红亮、Cross T A．等．2002．高分辨率层序学—原理及应用．北京：地质出版社，2002
11．邓宏文，王洪亮等．古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制．石油与天然气地质．2001，22(4)：293-303
12．邓宏文．美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学．石油与天然气地质，1995，16(2)：89～97
13．杜金虎，易士威等．华北油田隐蔽油藏勘探实践与认识．中国石油勘探．2002，8(1)：1-10
14．樊太亮，李卫东．1999．层序地层应用于陆相油藏预测的成功实例．石油学报，20(2)：12-17
15．樊太亮，吕延仓，丁明华．层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律．地学前缘，2000，7(4)：315—321．
16．冯有良，李思田，解习农．陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式．地学前缘，2000，7(3)：119～131
17．冯有良，邱以钢．高精度层序地层学在济阳塌陷下第三系隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用．石油学报．2003，24(1)：1～5
18．冯有良．东营凹陷下第三系层序地层格架及盆地充填模式．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，1999．24(6)：635～642
19．高瑞棋．渤海湾盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探．北京：石油工业出版社，2001
20．何仕斌．1998．渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷下第三系沉积相研究及储层分析，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
21．何仕斌等，渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷中深层东营组-沙河街组高精度层序学和储层储集物性条件研究，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
22．侯贵廷，钱祥麟，宋新民．1998．渤海湾盆地的形成机制，北京大学学报，34(4)：503-509。
23．侯贵廷，钱祥麟等，2000．渤海中、新生代盆地构造活动与沉积作用的时空关系，石油与天然气地质，21(3)．
24．侯明才，陈洪德，田景春，2001．层序地层学的研究进展．沉积学报，2001，19(2)：249-255”
25．胡见义，徐树宝．非构造油气藏．北京：石油工业出版社，1986：81～83
26．胡见义，中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集．黑龙江：黑龙江科学技术出版社，1984
27．胡少华．2004．基于地震资料的构造—沉积综合分析法——一种剥蚀厚度恢复新方法[J]．石油地球物理勘探，39(4)：479～48
28．胡宗全．2004．层序地层研究的新思路——构造-层序地层研究．现代地质．18(4)：549-554
29．贾承造，池英柳．中国岩性地层油气藏资源潜力与勘探技术．石油勘探与开发，2004，1～12
30．贾承造，赵文智，邹才能，等．岩性地层油气藏勘探研究的两项核心技术．石油勘探与开发，2004，31(3)：3～9
31．焦养泉，1999．渤中坳陷地层结构、构造演化与富生烃凹陷形成条件分析．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
32．金武弟，王英民，刘书会，等，东营凹陷下第三系低位域沉积及非构造圈闭，石油和天然气地质，2003，24(3)：249～252
33．李德生．渤海湾含油气盆地德地质和构造特征．石油学报，1980，1(1)
34．李德生．中国东部含油气盆地的构造特征．石油勘探与开发，1982，9(2)
35．李宏伟，邓宏文，肖乾华，等．热欧地区残留可容纳空间分布及储集砂体预测．石油学报，2002，23(4)：29～32
36．李建平，毕力刚，1996．渤海海域早第三纪地层研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
37．李丕龙，陈冬霞，庞雄奇，等．岩性油气藏成因机理研究现状及展望．油气地质与采收率，2002，9(5)：1～3
38．李丕龙，庞雄奇．隐蔽油气藏形成与勘探实践．北京：石油工业出版社，2004-11-11
39．李丕龙，庞雄奇等．陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成——以济阳凹陷为例．北京：石油工业出版社．2004
40．李丕龙，庞雄奇主编．隐蔽油气藏形成机理与勘探实践．北京：石油工业出版社，2004
41．李思田，2004．大型油气系统形成的盆地动力学背景．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，29(5)：505-512．
42．李思田，林畅松，张启明，杨士恭，吴培康，1998，南海北部大陆边缘盆地幕式裂陷的 动力学过程及10Ma以来的构造事件，科学通报，43(8)：797-810．
43．李思田，潘元林，陆永潮，等．断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术—高精度地震探测基础上德层序地层学研究．地球科学，2002，27(5)：592～596
44．李思田，潘元林等．断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术——高精度地震探测基础上的层序地层学研究．地球科学．2002，27(5)：1-7
45．李思田，王华等，1999．中国近海富生烃凹陷形成机制、充填和发育特征．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
46．李思田、林畅松、解习农等，1995，大型陆相盆地地层层序学研究-以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例，地学前缘，2(4)：133-136．
47．李阳，蔡进功，刘建民．东营凹陷下第三系高分辨率层序地层研究．沉积学报，2002，20(2)：210～216
48．林畅松，李思田，任建业，1995．断陷湖盆层序地层研究和计算机模拟，地学前缘，2(3)：124-77。
49．林畅松，潘元林，肖建新，孔凡仙，刘景彦，郑和荣．2000．“构造坡折带”—断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念．地球科学—中国地质大学学报．25(3)：260-266
50．林畅松，郑和荣，任建业等，2003．渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制，中国科学(D辑)，33(11)：1025-1036．
51．刘豪，王英民．2004．坳陷湖盆坡折带特征及其对非构造圈闭的控制．石油学报．25(2)：30-35
52．罗毓晖，蔡东升，侯廷贵等，1999，渤海盆地构造演化及成因动力学研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
53．罗毓晖，蔡东升等，1999．渤海断裂构造演化对成油体系及油气富集规律的控制和影响研究．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
54．罗毓辉 蔡东升等，渤海盆地沉积、成岩场演化与构造活动关系及下第三系储层预测研究，1999(内部资料)
55．米立军，王茂山等．1995．渤海重点探区下第三系碎屑岩沉积特征及储层评价，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)。
56．米立军、赵建臣、徐长贵等，渤海下第三系、潜山勘探现状及勘探潜力，2002．渤海研究院(内部资料)
57．牟中海，唐勇，崔炳富，等．2002．塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J]．石油学报，23(1)：40-44
58．潘元林，孔凡仙等主编．中国隐蔽油气藏．北京：地质出版社，1998
59．潘元林，李思田．2004．大型陆相断陷盆地层序底层与隐蔽油气藏研究—以济阳坳陷为例．北京：石油工业出版社．
60．潘元林，张善文，肖焕钦，等著．济阳断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探．北京：石油工业出版 社，2003
61．漆家福，陆克政等，1995．渤海湾盆地区新生代构造与油气的关系．石油大学学报(自然科学版)，第19卷增刊．
62．漆家福，杨桥，陈发景，陈昭年．1994．辽东湾-下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程，现代地质，8：34-42。
63．漆家福，张一伟．1995．渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化．石油大学学报(自然科学版)，第19卷增刊．
64．任安身，1996．渤海湾坳陷区构造单元的划分．复式油气田，1(1)：40-45．
65．任安身，1998．渤海湾坳陷区构造特征及其成生机制探讨．复式油气田，6(2)：51-54．
66．任建业，刘文龙，林畅松，李思田，1996，中国东部晚中生代裂陷特征及其幕式伸长作用，现代地质，10(4)：526-531。
67．任建业，陆永潮．2004．断陷盆地构造坡折带形成机制及其对层序发育样式的控制．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：596-602
68．沈守文，彭大均等．试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路．石油学报．2000，21(1)：16-22
69．沈守文，彭大均等．层序地层学预测隐蔽油气藏的原理与方法．地球学报．2000，21(3)：300～305
70．万天丰．2004．中国大地构造学纲要．北京：地质出版社．
71．王洪亮，邓宏文．2000．渤海湾盆地第三系层序地层特征与大中型气田分布．中国海上油气(地质)，14(2)：100-117．
72．王鸿祯，史晓颖．1998．沉积层序及海平面旋回的分类级别．现代地质，12(1)：1～16
73．王纪祥，陈发景，李趁义．2003．山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征．现代地质．17(2)：203-209
74．王良忱，张金亮．1996，沉积环境和沉积相，北京：石油工业出版社
75．王善书等编，1990．沿海大陆架及毗邻海域油气区(上册)，中国石油地质志，卷十六，石油工业出版社
76．王英民，金武弟，刘书会．2003．断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义．石油与天然气地质，24(3)：199-203，214
77．王英民，刘豪，李立诚，等．准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征．地球科学—中国地质大学学报，2002，27(6)：683～688
78．王英民，刘豪，辛仁臣，王颖．2005．坡折带——岩性油气藏勘探的重要领域．见：中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探与生产分公司．岩性地层油气藏勘探理论与实践．北京．石油工业出版社．468-518
79．威尔格斯主编．徐怀大，魏魁生，洪卫东等译．层序地层学原理(海平面变化综合分析)．石油工业出版社，1993，47-254
80．魏刚，1999．渤中25-1油田沉积相研究及储层评价．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
81．邬金华，张哲，王柏轩．2000．内陆凹陷层序地层的关键界面及其有关问题．地层学杂志．24(1)：78-83
82．肖焕钦，等．陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏分类及勘探．特种油气藏，2002，9(5)：10～
83．肖焕钦，王宝言，陈宝宁，等．济阳坳陷陡坡带断裂控砂模式．油气地质与采收率，2002，9(5)：20～22
84．肖军，王华．2003．琼东南盆地构造坡折带特征及其对沉积的控制作用．海洋地质与第四纪地质，23(3)：55-63
85．肖尚斌，高喜龙等，2000．渤海湾盆地新生代的走滑活动及其石油地质意义．大地构造与成矿学，24(4)：321-328．
86．谢玉洪，王振峰．2004．莺歌海盆地坡折带特征及其对沉积体系的控制．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：569-574
87．辛仁臣，王英民．2004．松辽盆地北部青山口—姚家组西部坡折带成因及演化．地球科学：中国地质大学学报，29(5)：621-624
88．徐长贵，赖维成．2004．古地貌分析在渤海下第三系储集层预测中的应用．石油勘探与开发，31(5)：53-56
89．徐长贵，赖维成等．2005．渤海海域古近系中深层储层预测技术探索与实践．中国海上油气．
90．徐长贵，许效松，丘东洲．2005．渤海海域辽西凹陷中南部下第三系构造层序地层格架与古地理分析．古地理学报．7(5)：449-459
91．徐长贵．2006．渤海海域古近系坡折带成因类型及其对砂体的控制作用．中国海上油气，18(6)：365-371
92．徐怀大等．1990．地震地层学解释基础．湖北武汉：中国地质大学出版社
93．许浚远，1994．歧口凹陷断裂形成机制和构造演化，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)．
94．许浚远，王艳萍，王磊，等．1997．多轴水平拉伸盆地三维古构造重建探讨[J]．石油与天然气地质，18(1)：1-5
95．许效松等．2002．辽西凹陷中南段下第三系层序分析与沉积体系预测．渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
96．薛良清．论沉积层序级别的划分．石油勘探与开发，1998，25(3)：10～14
97．叶加仁，陆明德．1995．盆地地史模拟述评[J]．地质科技情报，14(2)：45-49
98．于兴河 编著，2002．碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学，北京，石油工业出版社
99．张功成，2000．渤海海域构造格局与富生烃凹陷分布，中国海上油气(地质)，14(2)
100．张建林，林畅松，郑和荣．2002．断陷湖盆断裂、古地貌及物源对沉积体系的控制作用[J]．油气地质与采收率，9(4)：25～27
101．张立勤，付立新，王濮，等．2005．一种古构造恢复方法探讨—以乌马营构造为例[J]．矿物岩石，25(2)：1-3
102．张善文，王英民，李群．如何在高精度勘探地区寻找隐蔽油气藏．石油勘探与开发，2003，30(3)：5～7
103．张善文，王英民．2003．应用坡折带理论寻找隐蔽油气藏．石油勘探与开发，30(3)：5-7
104．张善文，王永诗等．网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳新近系为例．石油勘探与开发，2002，30(1)：1～10
105．张万选、张厚福、曾洪流．1993．陆相地震地层学．山东东营：石油大学出版社
106．赵澄林，杨丛笑，刘孟慧．1996．渤海盆地早第三纪陆源碎屑岩相古地理学．北京：石油工业出版社，87～105
107．赵澄林等．1991．辽东湾下第三系陆相碎屑岩储层砂体微相和成岩作用研究，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)。
108．赵红格，刘池阳等．2000．调节带和转换带及其在伸展区的分段作用[J]．世界地质，19(2)：105-111
109．赵文智，邹才能，汪泽成，等．富油气凹陷“满凹含油”论一内涵与意义．石油勘探与开发，2004，31(2)：5～13
110．赵玉光，王剑，唐锦玉，等．层序界面及其附近的地质特征与地质过程的表现．1997，71(4)：374～380
111．赵重远，刘池洋，1990．华北克拉通沉积盆地形成与演化及油气赋存，西北大学出版社，129。
112．中国地震局，1999．渤海晚第三纪以来的构造应用场与断裂活动关系及其在油气勘探开发中的应用，渤海石油研究院(内部资料)
113．周建生，杨池银，陈发景1997．黄骅坳陷横向变换带的构造特征及成因[J]．11(4)：425-433
114．周瑶琪，吴智平．2000．地层间断面的时间结构研究．北京：地质出版社，
115．朱夏，陈焕疆，孙兆才，张渝昌．1983．中国新生代构造与含油气盆地，地质学报，3：235-242
116．朱夏．中国隐蔽油气藏勘探论文集．黑龙江：黑龙江科学技术出版社，1984
117．朱筱敏，康安等．2003．陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨，沉积学报，第21卷，第2期
118. Allen P. A. and Allen J. R., 1995, Basin analysis, principles and application. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, p464
119. Brown L F, Fisher W L. Seismic Stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems: example from Braxilian rift and pull-apart application to hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Mem. 26 1977: 213～248
120. Campagna D. and Aydin A., 1994. Basin genesis associated with strike-slip faulting in the basin and range, Southeastern Nevada. Tectonics, 13(2): 327-341
121. Campagna D. and Aydin A., 1994. Basin genesis associated with strike-slip faulting in the basin and range, Southeastern Nevada. Tectonics, 13(2): 327-341
122. Dahlstrom C D A. 1970,.Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 18(1): 407—1 422
123. Dahlstrom C D A. 1970. Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 18(1): 407—1 422
124. Douglas J. Geometric modeling of faces migration: Theoretical development of faces successions and local unconformities. Basin Research, 1991, 3:51～62
125. Dow W G. 1977. Kerogen studies and geological interpretations. Journal of Geochemical Exploration[J], 7:79—99
126. Faulds J E, Varga R J. 1998. The role of accommodation zones and transfer zones in the regional segmentation of extend terranes. Geology Society of America Special Paper, 323: 1-45
127. Fisher W L, Brown L F, Soctt A J, et al. Delta system in the exploration for oil and gas. Burecon. Geol. Univ. Texas, Austin, 1969: 78
128. Fisher W L, McGowon J H. Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oii and gas. Bull. AAPG.,1969,53(1):30～54
129. Galloway W E, Hobday D K. Terrigenous classic depositional system. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1983
130. Gallowny W E. Reservoir faces architecture of microtonal barrier systems. AAPG. 1986,70(7):787～808
131. Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysis I: architecture and genesis of flooding-surface bounded depositional units. AAPG Bulletin, 1989,73: 125-142
132．Galloway W E著．徐长贵译．1999．硅质碎屑岩斜坡与坡底沉积体系—相组成、地层格架和分析．海上油气译丛，1999，3：1-27
133. Hans E, Mandana H, Woligang S. Tectonic and climatic control of Paleocene sedimentation in Rhenodanubian Flysch basin (Eastern Alps, Austria). Basin Research, 2002, 14: 247～262
134．Harland W B，Cox A V，Llewellyn P G et．al．地质年代表，袁相国，姬再良，刘椿译．北京：地质出版社，1987，84-105
135. Jerveyt M T. Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expression. Sea-level changes: An integrated approach. 1988, Soc Econ Placental Mineral Spec Pub142:47～69
136.Klein G dev. Current aspects of basin analysis. Sedimentary Geology, 1987, 50:95-118
137. Liangqing Xue, W. E. Galloway. Genetic Sequence Stratigraphic Framework, Depositional Style, and Hydrocarbon Occurrence of the Upper Cretaceous QYN Formations in the Songliao Lacustrine Basin, Northeastern China. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, (10):1792-1808
138. Marr J, Harff P. Shanmugam G, Parker G. 1997, Experiments on subaqueous sandy debris flows. Supplement to EOS Transactions AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco. 78, Number46: 347
139. Mckenzie D P. Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins. Earth and Planetary Science Letters ,1978,48:25-32
140. Morley C K, Nelson R A, Patton T L. 1990. Transfer zones in the East African rift system andtheir relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in rifts. AAPG Bulletin, 74(8):1234- 1253.
141. Morley C K, Nelson R A, Patton T L. 1990. Transfer zones in the East African rift system andtheir relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in rifts. AAPG Bulletin, 74(8): 1234- 1253.
142.Mutti E.& Ricci Lucchi F.,1972. Le torbiditi dell' Appennino Settentrionale:introduzion all" analisi di facies. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital.,
143. Mutti E. & Ricci Lucchi F., 1975. Turbidite Facies and Facies Associations. Field Trip Guidebook, A-11, 21-36, 9th Int. Sedimentology Congr., Nice, France.
144. Nardin T. R. , Heln F. J. .Gorsline D.S. and Edwards B. D., 1979. A review of mass movement processes, sediment and acoustic characteristics, and contrasts in slope and base-of-slope systems versus canyon-fan-basin floor system. In:Geology of Continental Slopes(Ed. By L.J.Doyle and 0. H. Pilkey), 61-73. Spc. Publ. SOC. econ. Paleont. Miner., 19, Tulsa
145. Normark W. R. , 1970. Growth patterns of deep sea fans. Bulletin AAPG. 54:2170-2195
146. Normark W. R. , 1974. Submarine canyons and fan valleys:Factors affecting growth patterns of deep-sea fans. In:Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation, 56-68. Spc. Publ. SOC. econ. Paleont. Miner., 19, Tulsa
147.Prosser S. Tectonics and Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy. Geol Soc London Spec Publication No 71. 1993:35-66
148. Scholz C A. Deltas of the Lake Malawi rift, east Africa: Seismic expression and exploration implication. AAPG, 1995, 79(11):1679-1697
149. Serpa L. and Pavlis T. L., 1996. Three-dimensional model of the late Cenozoic history of the Death Valley region, southeastern California. Tectonic, 15(6):1113-1128
150. Serpa L. and Pavlis T. L. 1996. Three-dimensional model of the late Cenozoic history of the Death Valley region, southeastern California. Tectonic, 15(6):1113-1128
151.U.S. Geodynamics Committee. The dynamics of sedimentary basins. National Academy Press (Washington D C). 1997
152. Vail PR, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, ecstasy and sedimentology—an overview. In: Einsele G, Ricken W, Seilacher A (Eds.). Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy. Berlin Heidberg: Springer-Verlag, 1991, 617-659
153. Vail P R, Mitchum R M, Todd R G. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level. In: Payton C E. Seismic stratigraphy application of hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Memoir, 26: 49-212.
154. Vail P R, Mitchum R P Jr, Thompson SIII. Seismic stratigrphy and global change of sea level, part four: global cycles of relative changes of sea level. AAPG Mem, 1977, 26: 83-98
155. Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et al. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, core and outcrops: Concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and faces. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series. 1990 , (7)
156. Van Wagoner J C. Overview of Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits: Terminology, summary of papers, and glossary of sequence stratigraph, In: Van Wagoner J C and Bertram G T (eds.), Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits, outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America, 1995, AAPG Memoir, 64:9-21.
157. Walker R. G., 1978. Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans:models for exploration for stratigraphic traps. Bulletin AAPG, 62:932-966
158. Wang H, Shi X. A scheme of the hierarchy for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of China University of Geoscience, 1996, 7(1): 1-12
159. Wang Hongzhen, Wang Xunlian. 1991. The tectono-paleogeography and biogeography of China and adjacent regions in the Carboniferous period. 11th International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie duarbonifere, Beijing, 1987, Compte. Rendu. 1:97-116.
160. Weimer, P. & H. Posamentier, Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy - Recent Developments and Applications. 1994, AAPG Memoir 58: P492