涌现视角的企业家机会的生成机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
无论是在企业家理论研究领域还是企业家实践领域,企业家机会都是一个非常重要的问题。如何获得或识别企业家机会,既有研究并未给出合理解释。既有研究往往从局部地、静态地研究这个问题,而不是从整体上、动态性地研究这个问题;既有研究往往聚焦于企业家个体能力或企业家环境条件,但对个体同环境之间的交互作用机理未予以充分注意。然而,现实中所存在的大量新创事业的启动、成长乃至快速成长的过程很难基于还原主义、决定论的立场用静态的、片段的、孤立的观点给出合理解释。针对以上问题,论文拟从整体性出发,利用复杂性理论,基于涌现视角,借助隐喻研究方法来建立相应的理论模型,以试图揭示企业家机会实现过程中所隐含的联系背景、初始条件、事件发展以及最终结果的内在动因和逻辑主线。
     之所以基于复杂性理论展开研究,是因为复杂性科学及其思维范式,其研究深度并不限于对客观事物的描述,而是更着重于揭示客观事物的构成原因及其演化历程,并力图尽可能准确地推测其未来的发展。从本质上讲,复杂性是一种关于过程的科学而不是关于状态的科学,是关于演化的科学而不是关于存在的科学。
     在理论建模方面,论文使用了隐喻研究方法,隐喻聚焦于不同概念领域之间、不同学科领域之间的映射关系。隐喻研究方法是运用比较具体的、或比较熟悉的、或有结构性的“源领域”作为比较抽象的、或不熟悉的、或无结构的领域的映像,来建构、解释和预言后一个领域,即“目标领域”的概念特征。在复杂性科学及其思维范式的基础上,论文建立了跨领域的概念群的映射关系,建立了相应的理论模型。基于复杂性科学的相关理论对理论模型的逻辑性、严密性进行了系统的规范论证。然后把既有企业家研究的文献成果同复杂适应系统理论的有关内容结合起来提出实证假设。在实证研究方面,质性研究运用到企业家研究中的必要性已为许多学者所认同,并已成为研究趋势。基于所研究问题的特点与要求,论文确定了案例研究的实证方法。结合拟研究问题的具体情况,进行了案例筛选及初步的试验性研究。在确认了研究的可行性后,进行了深入广泛的资料收集工作和证据分析工作。接下来撰写了案例研究报告,并进行了跨案例分析。
     论文形成以下研究结论:企业家动机、企业家心智图式以及企业家标识是企业家机会生成的三维支撑机制。具体而言,基于社会性需要和具有统摄机制的企业家动机对企业家机会生成具有积极作用,具有正反馈构型的、独特性的企业家心智图式对企业家机会生成具有积极作用,企业家学习对企业家机会生成具有积极作用,企业家标识同企业家机会生成具有相关性。以上这些因素构成了企业家机会的生成机理。
     论文的研究意义在于:首先,理论上,尝试利用新的方法论进行了既有研究的推进和发展,获得了新的研究视角和新的认识,实现了理论创新。其次,实践上,整体性的理论架构,对于投资人筛选投资机会、选择管理团队,对于企业家实施创业管理、在组织内营造企业家文化,对于职业经理人在经营创业型企业时实现能力转型,都具有积极意义。
     论文的创新点在于:第一,提出了只有处于“有效动机强度区间”以内的企业家动机才能发挥预期的积极作用,如果企业家动机所产生的张力处于区间以外,特别是超过了特定的临界值,将可能导致难以推测的结果,以上对企业家动机的研究有贡献;第二,强调了企业家心智图式的正反馈构型,指明了心智图式的内在规定性,揭示了企业家心智图式“杠杆解”导向的本质;第三,建立了企业家标识的新概念、新术语,并对其在企业家机会生成过程的作用进行了系统的阐释;第四,建立了整体性的企业家机会生成机理的理论框架,对新事业创建的层级演化、跃迁机制,企业家机会实现的偶然性和必然性,给出合理解释。
Entrepreneurial opportunity is a very important subject in the domain of both entrepreneurship theory and entrepreneurial practice. With regard to the problem of how to acknowledge or recognize entrepreneurial opportunity, reasonable explanation has not been found in the literatures yet. Literatures show an inclination that the relevant researches prefer the fragmented and static perspective to holistic and dynamic perspective, prefer the individuals or entrepreneurial circumstance to the mechanism between the individuals and circumstance. In fact, as to plenty of new ventures in reality, especially the new ventures having grown quickly, it is very difficult to explain the process of the positive feedback of their creation and development with static, fragmented, and isolated perspective on the stand point of reductionism and determinism. Therefore, based on the holism and complex theory, this paper will create the theory model with the metaphor methodology and the emergent viewpoint, so as to uncover the internal dynamics and logic implied in the realization process of entrepreneurial opportunity which relates the circumstance, initial conditions, sequential events and consequence.
     The research based on complex science and its paradigm includes but not limited the description of objective things, what is more important for it is to uncover the origin and evolution of the objective things and manage to speculate the future development accurately as far as possible. In substance, complex science is related to the science of evolution and process, not the science of existence and status.
     Research methodology of metaphor is adopted in paper. Metaphor is a mapping between different concepts, subjects. Research methodology of metaphor construct, explain, predict the concept characteristic of objective domain, which is more abstract, unfamiliar, non-structural, with the more specific, familiar, structural source domain as a mapping. Based on Complex Science and its paradigm, mapping relations of cross-domain concept cluster are established to constitute corresponding theoretical model. Normative Analysis based on the theory related to complex science is implemented to insure the validation, strictness, and logicality of the theoretical model. And then with the combination of the existing achievements of entrepreneurial literature and the content related to Complex Adaptive Systems theory, empirical hypothesis is made. As to the empirical analysis, the necessity of qualitative research used in entrepreneurial study has been agreed by many scholars, which has been a trend. In consideration of the characteristic and requirement, case study is chosen as empirical approach. Based on the specific circumstances, cases are filtrated and pilot studies are implemented. After the feasibility to proceed with the research is confirmed, collection of data and analysis of evidence with width and depth are conducted. Then to write the case research report and set about the cross-case analysis.
     The conclusion is:entrepreneurial motivation, entrepreneurial mental schemes, and entrepreneurial tagging are the three-dimension sustaining generating mechanism of entrepreneurial opportunity. To elaborate in detail, entrepreneurial motivation based on social needs and entrepreneurial motivation with unifying mechanism have positive effect on the generation of entrepreneurial opportunity, unique entrepreneurial mental scheme with configuration of positive feedback loop has positive effect on the generation of entrepreneurial opportunity, entrepreneurial learning has positive effect on the generation of entrepreneurial opportunity, and entrepreneurial tagging correlates with the generation of entrepreneurial opportunity. These mentioned above compose the generating mechanism of entrepreneurial opportunity
     The research value is:firstly, in theory, promote and develop the existing research with a new methodology, obtain new studying perspective, and achieve theoretical innovation; secondly, in practice, holistic theoretical framework will help investors to filter investment opportunities and choose entrepreneurial team, help entrepreneurs to implement entrepreneurship management and construct entrepreneurship culture, and help professional managers to change their competence while operating an company with entrepreneurship.
     The innovation is:first, point out that only the entrepreneurial motivation within the effective segment of motivation tension can have the anticipated positive effect, when the entrepreneurial motivation tension is outside of the segment, especially exceeds the critical value, the entrepreneurial motivation may lead to a result hard to be forecasted, which contributes to entrepreneurial motivation research; second, emphasize the configuration of positive feedback loop of entrepreneurial mental scheme, point out the essence of entrepreneurial mental scheme, and reveal that entrepreneurial mental scheme has a characteristic inclination to obtain leverage solution; third, create a new concept and new term which is entrepreneurial tagging, and elaborate its function in the generating process of entrepreneurial opportunity; fourth, establish holistic theoretical framework of the generating mechanism of entrepreneurial opportunity, and offer reasonable explanation for the hierarchy evolution, transition mechanism, contingency and inevitability of the achieving of entrepreneurial opportunity.
引文
[1]Aldrich, H. (1990). Using an ecological perspective to study organizational founding rates. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,14(3):7-24.
    [2]Aldrich, H. E.,& Kenworthy, A. (1999). The accidental entrepreneur:Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organizational science. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
    [3]Aldrich, H. E.,& M. C. Fiol. (1994) "Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.' Academy of Management Review,19(4):645-670
    [4]Aldrich, H. E.,& Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen:an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,25(4),41-56.
    [5]Alvarez, S.A.& Barney, J.B. (2007). Discovery and creation:Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,1(1),11-26.
    [6]Alvarez, Sharon.,& Lowell Busenitz. (2001) "The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory." Journal of Management.27(6):755-776.
    [7]Ardichvili, A.,& Cardozo, R. N. (2000). A model of the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process,. Journal of Enterprising Culture,8(2),103-119.
    [8]Ardichvilli, A., Cardozo, R.,& Ray, S. (2003). A theory ofentrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing,18,105-124.
    [9]Armitage, D., Berkes, F.,& Doubleday, N. (Eds.) (2007). Adaptive co-management:Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver, Canada:University of British Columbia Press.
    [10]Audretsch, D.,& Acs, Z. (1994). New firm startups, technology, and macroeconomic fluctuations. Small Business Economics,6:439-449.
    [11]Bak, (1996). How Nature Works:The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. New York:Copernicus.
    [12]Baker, T.& Pollock, T.G. (2007). Making the marriage work:The benefits of strategy's takeover of entrepreneurship for strategic organization. Strategic Organization,5(3),297-312.
    [13]Baker, T. and Nelson, R. (2005), "Creating Something from Nothing:Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.50, pp.329-366.
    [14]Barley, S.,& P. Tolbert. (1997) "Institutionalization and structuration:Studying the links between action and institution." Organization Studies,18(1):93-117
    [15]Barnes, J. (1984). " Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning." Strategic Management Journal (5):129-137.
    [16]Baron, R. A.,& Shane, S. (2005). Entrepreneurship:A Process Perspective. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Thomson.
    [17]Baron, R.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as patternrecognition:How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" toidentify new business opportunities. Academy of ManagementExecutive.
    [18]Baron, R.A.2004. The cognitive perspective:A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic "why" questions. Journal of Business Venturing.19:221-239.
    [19]Baron, Robert. (1998) "Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship:Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people." Journal of Business Venturing.13(4):275-295.
    [201 Bartlett, C.A.& Ghoshal, S. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action:The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal,15,91-112.
    [21]Baum, J. A. C. (2003). Entrepreneurs'start-up cognitions and behaviors:Dreams, surprises, shortages, andfast zigzags. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2003, Babson College.
    [22]Baum, R.,& Locke. E. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to newventure growth. Journal of Applied Psychology,89,587-598.
    [23]Bhave, M. P. (1994), "A Process Model of Entrepreneurial Venture Creation," Journal of Business Venturing,9,223-242.
    [24]Bhide, A.V. (2000). The Origin and Evolution of NewBusinesses. Oxford:University Press.
    [25]Boulding, K. (1968), "General Systems Theory-The Skeleton of Science", in Buckley, W. (ed). Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine Pub Co., Chicago.
    [261 Brittain, J. W. and J. H. Freeman (1980), Organizational Proliferation and Density Dependent Selection. In J. R. Kimberly & R. H. Miles (Eds.), The Organizational Life Cycle (pp.291-3388). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [271 Brockner, J.. Higgins, E. T.,& Low, M. B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal Business Venturing,19(2):203-220.
    [28]Brown Shona L. and Eisenhardt Kathleen M. (1997) The Art of Continuous Change:Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly,42:1-34.
    [29]Brown. S.L.& Eisenhardt, K.M. (1998). Competing on the edge:Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    [30]Burgelman, R.A.& Grove, A.S. (2007).. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos--repeatedly:Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal,28,965-979.
    [31]Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organisational change. International Journal of ManagementReviews,7(2),73-90.Int Entrep Manag J (2008) 4:1-1715
    [32]Busenitz, L.W.,& Barney, J.B. (1997). "Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations:biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making." Journal of Business Venturing,12: 9-30.
    [33]Busenitz, L.W.,West, I., Page, G., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., et al. (2003). Entrepreneurshipresearch in emergence:Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management,29, 285-308.
    [34]Bygrave, W. (1989a), "The Entrepreneurship Paradigm (Ⅰ):A Philosophical Look at its Research Methodologies." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.14(1),7-26.
    [35]Bygrave, W. (1989b), "The Entrepreneurship Paradigm (Ⅱ):Chaos and Catastrophes among Quantum Jumps." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.14(2),7-30.
    [36]Bygrave, W. and C. Hofer(1991), "Theorizing about Entrepreneurship." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,15,7-25.
    [37]Capra, F. (2005). Complexity and life. Emergence,4(1),15-33.
    [38]Carland, J. W., F. Hoy, and J. C. Carland (1988), " " Who is an Entrepreneur?" is a Question Worth Asking." American Journal of Small Business,13,33-39.
    [39]Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R.,& Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs fromowner managers. Academy of Management Review,9,354-359.
    [40]Carter, N., Gartner, W. B.,& Reynolds, P. (1996). Exploring start-up sequences, Journal of Business Venturing,11:3,151-166
    [41]Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur. An Economic Theory. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
    [42]Chandler, G. N., Dahlqvist, J.,& Davidsson, P. (2002). Opportunity recognition processes:A taxonomy and outcome implications. In W. D. Bygrave, C. G. Brush, P. Davidsson, J. Fiet, P. G. Greene, R. T. Harrison, M. Lerner, G. D. Meyer, J. Sohl & A. Zacharakis (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship. Wellesley, MA:Babson College.
    [43]Chen, C.C., Greene, P.G.,& Crick, A. (1998). "Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?" Journal of Business Venturing,13:295-316.
    [44]Chen, Y.& Van de Ven, A. (1996). Learning the innovation journey:Order out of chaos? Organization Science,7(6),593.
    [45]Choi, Y.R.& Shepherd, D.A. (2004). Entrepreneurs' decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management,30,377-395.
    [46]Christensen, C.& Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator's solution:Creating and sustaining successful growth. Cambridge, UK:Harvard Business School Press.
    [47]Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Cambridge, UK:Harvard Business School Press.
    [48]Christensen, P. S., O. O. Madsen, and R. Peterson (1994), Conceptualizing Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition. In G. E. Hills (ed.) Marketing and Entrepreneurship:Research Ideas and Opportunities (pp.61-75). Westport, CT:Quorum Books.
    [49]Cilliers, E (1998). Complexity and postmodernism:Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
    [50]Colander, David (2000). The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
    [51]Colander, David (2006) Post Walrasian Macroeconomics:Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
    [52]Covin, J.G.& Slevin, D.E (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,16(1),7-25.
    [53]Craig, J.,& Lindsay. N. (2001). " Quantifying 'Gut Feeling' in the Opportunity Recognition Process". In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp.124-137). Wellesley, Mass.:Babson College.
    [54]Cyert, R. M,& March, J. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firm (2 ed.). Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers Inc. (Original work published in 1963)
    [55]Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research:Some suggestions. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol.6). New York:Elsevier JAI.
    [56]De Koning, A. (2003) "Opportunity Development:A Socio-Cognitive Perspective." In J. Katz & D. Shepherd:Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth,6:265-314. Oxford:JAI Press/Elsevier
    [57]Dean, T.J.1995. New Venture Formations in United States Manufacturing:The Role of Industry Environments. (New York:Garland Publishing).
    [58]Delmar. F. and Shane, S. (2004), " Legitimating first:organizing activities and the survival of new ventures", Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.19, pp.385-410.
    [59]Dess, G. G.,& Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly,29:52-73.
    [60]Donald F.Kuratko (2009), New Venture Management:The Entrepreneur' Roadmap. N.J. Pearson Prentice Hall.
    [61]Down, S. (2006), Narratives of Enterprise:crafting entrepreneurial self-identity in a small firm, Elgar, Cheltenham.
    [62]Downing, S. (2005). The social construction of entrepreneurship:Narrative and dramatic processes in thecoproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,29,185-204.
    [63]Drucker, P. F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship:Practice and Principles. New York:Harper & Row.
    [64]Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review,76(6),149-155.
    [65]Dubini, P. and H. Aldrich (1991), "Personal and Extended Networks are Central to the Entrepreneurship Process." Journal of Business Venturing,6(5),305-313.
    [66]Duhaime, Irene M.& Charles R. Schwenk. (1985) "Conjectures on Cognitive Simplification in Acquisition and Divestment Decision Making." Academy of Management Review 10(2):287-295.
    [67]Earley, P. Christopher & Soon Ang. (2003) Cultural Intelligence:Individual Interactions Across Cultures. Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press.
    [68]Earley, P.Christopher, Terry Connolly,& Goran Ekgren. (1989) "Goals, Strategy Development, and Tack Performance:Some Limits on the Efficacy of Goal Setting." Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1):24-34.
    [69]Eckhardt, J. T.,& Shane, S. A. (2003). " Opportunities and Entrepreneurship." Journal of Management,29(3),333-349.
    [70]Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal,32(3):543-576.
    [71]Eisenhardt, K. M.,& Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes:Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly,40(1):84-110.
    [72]Eisenhardt, K.M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence:The new language of change and pluralism. The Academy of Management Review,25(4),703-705.
    [73]Eisenhardt, K.M., & Schoonhoven, C.B. (1990). Organizational growth:Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures,1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly.35(3):504-529.
    [74]Eliasson, G. (1991). Modeling the experimentally organized economy:Complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,16(1),153-182.
    [75]Evans, D.,& Leighton, L. (1989). Some empirical aspectsof entrepreneurship. American Economic Review,9,519-535.
    [76]Fiet, J. (1996). The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery. Small Business Economics,8(6), 419-430.
    [77]Fiet, J. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discoveries. Wesport, CT:Quorum Books.
    [78]Fiet, J. O. (1996). " The Informational Basis of Entrepreneurial Discovery." Small Business Economics,8,419-430.
    [79]Fiet, J. O. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discovery. Westport, CT:Quorum Books.
    [80]Fischer, E., Reuber, A.R., Hababou, M., Johnson, W. and Lee, S. (1997), "The Role of Socially Constructed Temporal Perspectives in the Emergence of Rapid Growth Firms", Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice Vol.22, No.2 (Winter), pp.13-30.
    [811 Fischhoff, B. (1982) For Those Condemned to Study the Past:Heurstics and Bias in Hindsight, Judgement Under Uncertainty:Heurstics and Bias. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
    [82]Flavell, John. (1987). "Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition." In Metacognition. Motivation, and Understanding, eds. F.E. Weinert and R.H. Kluwe,32-67. Erlbaum, Hillside, N.J.
    [83]Fleming, L.,& Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system. Research Policy, 30,1019-1039.
    [84]Fletcher, D. (2003), "Framing organizational emergence:discourse, identity and relationship", in Steyaert, C. and Hjorth, D. (eds.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship, Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 125-142.
    [85]Fletcher, D. (2006), " Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity' Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,18 (5), pp.421-440.
    [86]Fletcher, D. And Watson, T. (2007), Entrepreneurship, Management Learning and Negotiated Narratives:'Making it Otherwise for Us-Otherwise for Them', Management Learning, Vol.38, No. 1,9-26
    [87]Forbes, D.P.1999. Cognitive approaches to new venture creation. International Journal of Management Reviews.1(4):415-40.
    [88]Fowler, F. J. (1993) Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
    [89]Friedel, R. (2001). " Serendipity Is No Accident." The Kenyon Review,23(2),36-47.
    [90]Fuller, T. (1999). Complexity metaphors and the process of small business foresighting. In M. Lissack &H. Guntz (Eds.). Managing the complex (pp.336-351). Boston:Quorum Books.
    [91]Fuller, T. and Moran, P. (2000).'Moving beyond metaphor:towards a methodology for grounding complexity in small business and entrepreneurship research', Emergence; A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management 2,1:50-71.
    [92]Fuller, T. and Moran, P. (2001), "Small enterprises as complex adaptive systems:a methodological question?", Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,13 (1), pp.47-63.
    [93]Fuller. T. and Warren, L. (2006a), "Entrepreneurship as foresight:A complex social network perspective on organisational foresight", Futures, Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies, Vol. 38;No.7,pp.956-971.
    [94]Fuller, T. and Warren, L. (2006b), "Complex Explanations of Order Creation, Emergence and Sustainability as Situated Entrepreneurship" in Christensen, P.R. and Poulfelt, F. (eds), RENT XVIII Anthology 2005:Managing Complexity and Change in SMEs:Frontiers in European Research, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    [95]Fuller, T., F. Welter and L. Warren (2006). The contribution of emergence to entrepreneurship theory:a review. Research in Entrepreneurship (RENT) Brussels, EIASM.
    [96]Fuller, T., L. Warren and P. Argyle (2007b). "Sustaining entrepreneurial business; a complexity perspective on processes that produce emergent practice." International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4.
    [97]Fuller, T., Moran P. and Argyle, P. (2004), "Entrepreneurial foresight; a case study in reflexivity, experiments, sensitivity and reorganisation", in Tsoukas, H. and Shepherd, J. (eds), Managing The Future:Foresight in the Knowledge Economy, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp.171-78.
    [98]Fuller, T., Warren, L. and Welter, F, (2007a) Towards an Emergence Perspective on Entrepreneurship, RENT XXI 2007, Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Cardiff Nov 22-23
    [99]Fuller, T..& Lewis, J. (2003). Relationships mean everything. British Journal of Management,13,317-336.Fuller, T., & Moran, P. (2000). Moving beyond metaphor:Towards a methodology for groundingcomplexity in small business and entrepreneurship research. Emergence:A Journal of ComplexityIssues in Organizations and Management,2,50-71.
    [100]Gaglio, C. M. (1997) "Opportunity Identification:Review Critique and Suggested Research." In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, ed. J. A. Katz,139-202, Greenwich, Conn.:JAI Press.
    [101]Gaglio. C. M. and R. P. Taub (1992), "Entrepreneurs and Opportunity Recognition." Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA:Babson College,136-147.
    [102]Gaglio, C. M.,& Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics,16(2):95-111.
    [103]Gaglio, C.M. (2004). The role of mental simulations andcounterfactual thinking in the opportunity identificationprocess. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,28, Winter,533-552.
    [104]Gartner, W. B. (1988), ""Who is an Entrepreneur? " is the Wrong Question." American Journal of Small Business,13,11-32.
    [105]Gartner, W. B. (1990), " What are we talking about when we talk about Entrepreneurship?" Journal of Business Venturing,5,15-28.
    [106]Gartner, W. B. (1993). Words lead to deeds—Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing,8,231-239.
    [107]Gartner. W. B., Carter, N. M.,& Hills, G. E. (2003). "The Language of Opportunity". In C. Steyaert & D. Hjort (Eds.). New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
    [108]Gartner, W.B. (1985), "A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation", Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.4, pp.696-706.
    [109]Gartner, W.B. (1995), "Aspects of Organizational Emergence", in Bull, J.. Thomas, H., Willard G. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship. Perspectives on Theory Building, Oxford et al., pp.67-86.
    [110]Gartner, W.B., Bird, B.B. and Starr, J.A. (1992), "Acting as if:Differentiating Entrepreneurial from Organizational Behavior", Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol.16, pp.13-31.
    [111]Gartner, W.B., Carter, N.M. and Hills, G.E. (2003), "The language of opportunity", in Steyaert, C. and Hjorth, D. (eds.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship, Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.103-124.
    [112]Garud. R.,& Karnoe. P.2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough:distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy.32:277-300.
    [113]Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and V. Sambamurthy 2006.'Emergent by Design:Performance and Transformation at Infosys Technologies'. Organization Science 17:277-286.
    [114]Gell-Mann, Murray 2002'What is complexity? In Complexity and Industrial Clusters. A.Q. Curzio and M. Fortis (eds.),13-24. Heidelberg, Germany:Physica-Verlag.
    [115]Gentner, D. (1983). "Structure-mapping:a theoretical framework for analogy." Cognitive Science,7: 155-170.
    [116]Gentner, D. (1989). "The mechanisms of analogical learning." In Similarity and analogical reasoning, eds S. Vosniadou,& A. Ortony.199-241. Cambridge. UK:Cambridge University Press.
    [117]Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J.,& Kokinov, B.N. (Eds.) (2001). The Analogical Mind, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
    [118]Gentner, D., Rattermann, M.J.,& Forbus, K.D. (1993). "The roles of similarity in transfer:separating retrievability from inferential soundness." Cognitive Psychology,25:524-575.
    [119]Gentner, D., Rattermann, M.J., Markman, A.B.,& Kotovsky, L. (1995). "Two forces in the development of relational similarity." In Developing cognitive competence:New approaches to process modeling, eds T.J. Simon & G.S. Halford,263-313. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [120]Geyer, R. (2003). Beyond the third way:The science of complexity and the politics of choice. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,5(2),237-257.
    [121]Gick, M.L.& Holyoak, K.J. (1980). "Analogical problem solving." Cognitive Science,12:306-355.
    [122]Gick, Mary,& Keith Holyoak. (1983). "Schema induction and analogical transfer." Cognitive Psychology,15(1):1-34.
    [123]Gilad, B., S. Kaish, and J. Ronen (1989), "Information, Search and Entrepreneurship:A Pilot Study.' Journal of Behavioral Economics,18,217-235.
    [124]Gleick, J. (1987), Chaos:Making a New Science, Viking, Penguin, New York
    [125]Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct:History and issues. Emergence,1(1),49-62.
    [126]Gupta, A.K., Tesluk, P.E.,& Taylor, M.S. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science,18(6),885-897.
    [127]Hamel, Gary 1994'The concept of core competencies'in Competence Based Competition. G. Hamel and A. Heene, need pages. New York:Wiley.
    [128]Hamel, Gary, and C.K. Prahalad 1994 Competing for the Future. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
    [129]Hannan, M.T.,& Freeman, J.1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology.82:929-964.
    [130]Harper, D. A. (1996). Entrepreneurship and the market process:An enquiry into the growth of knowledge. London:Routledge.
    [131]Harvey, D.L. and Reed, M. (1996) "Social Science as the Study of Complex Systems", in Kiel, L.D. and Elliot, E. (eds), Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor pp. 295-323.
    [132]Helga Nowotny. The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction-Emergent interfaces between the natural science, humanities and social sciences[J].Theory,cultrue&Scociey.2005. Vol,22(5) 15:31
    [133]Hench, T. J.,& Sandberg, W. R. (2000). "'As the Fog Cleared, Something Changed'Opportunity Recognition as a Dynamic, Self-Organizing Process." Paper presented at the Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley, Mass.,8-10 June.
    [134]Heylighen, F., Cilliers, P.,& Gersick, C. (2007). Complexity and philosophy. In J. Bogg & R. Geyer (Eds.), Complexity, science and society (pp.11-32). London:Radcliffe Publishing.
    [135]Hill, R.C.& Levenhagen, M.1995. Metaphors and mental models:Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management.21:1057-1074.
    [136]Hills, G. E., G. T. Lumpkin, and R. P. Singh (1997). "Opportunity Recognition:Perceptions and Behaviors of Entrepreneurs." Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,17:168-182.
    [137]Hills, G. E., Shrader, R. C.,& Lumpkin, G. T. (1999). " Opportunity Recognition as a Creative Process". In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp.216-227). Wellesley, Mass.:Babson College.
    [138]Hills. G.,& Shrader, G.E. (1998) " Successful entrepreneurs' insights into opportunity recognition.' Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA:Babson College
    [139]Hitt, M.A., Beamish, P.W., Jackson, S.E.,& Mathieu, J.E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels:Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal,50(6), 1385-1399.
    [140]Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M.,& Sexton, D. (2001). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue:Strategic entrepreneurship:Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal,22(6/7),479-491.
    [141]Holland, J.H. (1998). Emergence:From chaos to order. New York:Perseus Books.
    [142]Holland, John H.1995 Hidden Order. Cambridge, MA:Perseus Books.
    [143]Holland, John H.2002'Complex adaptive systems and spontaneous emergence'in Complexity and Industrial Clusters. A.Q. Curzio and M. Fortis (eds.),24-34. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
    [144]Holyoak, K.J.& Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps:analogy in creative thought. Cambridge. MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
    [145]Hong, E.& O'Neil, H.F.Jr (2001). "Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model. International Journal of Psychology,36(3):186-94.
    [146]Honig, B.,& Karlsson, T. (2004) "Institutional forces and the written business plan." Journal of Management,30(1):29-48
    [147]Houchin, K. and MacLean, D. (2005).'Complexity theory and strategic change:an empirically informed critique', British Journal of Management,16,2:149-66.
    [1481 Hoyle,1995. (Ed.) Structural equation modeling, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
    [149]Ilinitch, A.Y., D'Aveni, R.,& Lewin, A.Y. (1996). New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science,7,211-220.
    [150]Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A.,& Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship:The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management.29(6),963-989.
    [151]Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Camp, S.M.,& Sexton, D. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive,15,49-63.
    [152]Jack, S.L. and Anderson, A.R. (2002), "The effects of embeddednesson the entrepreneurial process" Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.17,467-487.
    [153]Jenkins, M.,& Johnson, G.1997. Entrepreneurial Intentions and Outcomes:A Comparative Causal Mapping Study. Journal of Management Studies.34:895-920.
    [154]Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). "Mental models in cognitive science." Cognitive Science,4:71-115.
    [155]Judge, W. Q.,& Miller, A. (1991). Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Academy of Management Journal,34:449-463.
    [156]Kaish, S.,& Gilad, B. (1991). " Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs Versus Executives:Sources, Interests, General Alertness." Journal of Business Venturing,6(1),45-61.
    [157]Karlsson, T. (2003) The institutionalization process of business plans in young organizations. Unpublished manuscript, Jonkoping International Business School, Sweden.
    [158]Katz, J. and Gartner, W.B. (1988), " Properties of Emerging Organ izations ", Academy of Management Review, Vol.13, No.3, pp.429-441.
    [159]Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The origins of order:Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [160]Kauffman, Stuart A.1993 The Origins of Order. New York:Oxford University Press,
    [161]Keh, H.T., Foo, M.D.,& Lim, B.C.2002. Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions:The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.27(2):125-148.
    [162]Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process:An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature,35(1),60-85.
    [163]Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Entrepreneurship and competition. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    [164]Kirzner, I.M.1979. Perception, Opportunity and Profit:Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    [165]Klofsten, M. (2004) "New venture Ideas:Their Origin and Metamorphosis into Viable Business Concepts." Paper presented at the 12th annual High Technology Small Firms Conference, University of Twente, Enschede.
    [166]Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and profit. New York:Houghton Mifflin.
    [167]Koestler, A. (1969). Beyond reductionism:New pelwpectives in the life sciences. Hutchinson, KS: Houghton Mifflin.
    [168]Koestler, A. (1976) The Act of Creation. London:Hutchinson.
    [169]Krueger, Jr.,& F. Norris. (2000) "The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence." Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice,24 (3):5-23.
    [170]Krueger, N.F., Jr. (2003). The cognitive psychology ofentrepreneurship. In Z. Acs & D.B. Audretsch (Eds.).Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research. London:KluwerLaw International.
    [171]Lavie, D. (2006). Capability reconfiguration:An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review,31(1),153-174.
    [172]Lawrence, P. R.,& Lorsch, J. W.1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly.12:1-47.
    [173]Leibenstein, H.,1966, "Allocative Efficiency vs X-Efficiency", American Economic Review, vol.56, pp.392-415.
    [174]Leibenstein, H.1968:"Entrepreneurship and Development", American Review, Vol.58.
    [175]Levinthal, D. A.,& March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations,2,307-333.
    [176]Lewin, A.Y., Weigelt, C.B.,& Emery, J.D. (2003). Adaptation and selection in strategy and change: Perspectives on strategic change in organizations. In S.M. Poole (Ed.), Handbook of organizational change and development (pp.108-160). New York:Oxford University Press.
    [177]Lewin, Arie Y., and Henk W. Volberda 1999 'Prolegomena on coevolution:A framework for research on strategy and new organizational form'. Organization Science 10/5:519-534.
    [178]Lichtenstein, B. (2000a). The matrix of complexity:A multi-disciplinary approach for studying emergencein coevolution. In Arie Lewin and Henk Volberda (Eds.), Mobilizing the self-renewing organization:The co-evolution advantage. SAGE Publications, forthcoming.
    [179]Lichtenstein, B. B., Carter, N. M., Dooley, K. J.,& Gartner, W. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics ofnascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,22,236-261.
    [180]Lichtenstein, B. B., Dooley, K. J.,& Lumpkin, G. T. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics ofnew venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing,21,153-175.
    [181]Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000b). Emergence as a process of self-organizing—New assumptions andinsights fromthe study of non-linear dynamic systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management,13,526-544.
    [182]Lichtenstein, B. M. B. (2000c). Self-organized transitions:A pattern amid the chaos of transformativechange. Academy of Management Executive,14(4),1-14.
    [183]Lichtenstein, B. M. B.,& Mendenhall, M. (2002). Non-linearity and response-ability:Emergent order in21st-century careers. Human Relations,55,5-32.
    [184]Lichtenstein, B.B., Carter, N.M., Dooley, K.J. and Gartner, W.B. (2007), "Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship", Journal of Business Venturing,22:236-261.
    [185]Lichtenstein, B.B., Dooley, K.J. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2006), "Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation ", Journal of Business Venturing Vol.21, No 2, pp.153-75.
    [186]Lichtenstein, B.M.B. (2000c), "Self-organized transitions:A pattern amid the chaos of transformative change", Academy of Management Executive Vol.14, No.4 (Nov), pp.128-141.
    [187]Lichtenstein, B.M.B. and Brush, C.G. (2001), "How Do "Resource Bundles" Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration ", Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice Vol.25, No.3 (Spring2001), pp.37-59
    [188]Lissack, M. (1997).'Of chaos and complexity:managerial insights from a new science' Management Decision,35,3:205-218.
    [189]Loewenstein, Jeffery, Leigh Thompson,& Dedre Gentner. (1999). "Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation." Psychometric Bulletin and Review,6(4):586-97.
    [190]Loewenstein, Jeffery, Leigh Thompson,& Dedre Gentner. (2003). "Analogical learning in negotiation teams:comparing cases promotes learning and transfer." Academy of Management Learning and Education,2(2):119-27.
    [191]Lucas, R.,& Sargent, T. J. (1981). Rational expectations and econometric practices. In. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
    [192]Lumpkin, G. T. and G. G. Dess (1996), "Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance." Academy of Management Review,21,135-172.
    [193]Lumpkin, G.T. (In press). Intrapreneurship and innovation.In R. Baum, M. Frese, and F. Baron (Eds.), ThePsychology of Entrepreneurship. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
    [194]Mackenzie, A. (2005). The problem of the attractor:A singular generality between sciences and social theory. Theory Culture & Society,22(5),45-65.
    [195]MacMillan, I. C. (1986). " To Really Learn About Entrepreneurship, Let's Study Habitual Entrepreneurs." Journal of Business Venturing,1,241-243.
    [196]Maguire, S.,& Mckelvey, B. (1999). Complexity and management:Moving from fad to firm foundations.Emergence,1(2),19-61.
    [197]Maguire, Steve, Bill McKelvey, Laurent Mirabeau, and Nail Oztas 2006'Complexity Science and Organization Studies' in Handbook of Organization Studies. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, and W. Nord (eds.),165-214., Thousand Oaks:Sage.
    [198]Mainzer, Klaus 1994 Thinking in Complexity. New York:Springer-Verlag [5th ed. published in 2007].
    [199]Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). Thefractal geometry of nature. San Francisco:W.H. Freeman and Co.
    [200]March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2(1), 71-87.
    [201]Mario Bunge. The Power and Limits of Reduction[A]/Evandro Agazzi.the problem of reductionism in science[M]. Dordrecht/Boston/London.Kluwer Academic Publicshers.1991.33.
    [202]Markman, A.B.& Gentner, D. (1993). "Structural alignment during similarity comparisons.' Cognitive Psychology,25:431-467.
    [203]McCarthy, J;D.1996. Constraints and opportunities in adopting, adapting, and inventing. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald (Eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.141-151.
    [204]McGrath, R. G. (1996). " Options and the Entrepreneur:Toward a Strategic Theory of Entrepreneurial Wealth Creation." Academy of Management Proceedings'96,101-105.
    [205]McGrath, R. G.,& MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The Entrepreneurial Mindset:Strategies for Continously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Boston, Mass:Harvard Business School Press.
    [206]McKelvey, B. (1999a). Complexity theory in organization science:Seizing the promise or becoming afad? Emergence,1,5-32.
    [207]McKelvey, B. (1999b). Self-Organization, complexity catastrophe, and microstate models at the edge ofchaos. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science—In honor ofDonald T. Campbell, J. A. C. Baum and Bill McKelvey (eds). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage (Chapter 15).
    [208]McKelvey, B. (2004). Towards a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,19,313-342.
    [209]McKelvey, Bill 2001'Energizing order-creating networks of distributed intelligence'. International Journal of Innovation Management 5:181-212.
    [210]McKelvey, Bill 2004a'Toward a Oth law of thermodynamics:Order-creation complexity dynamics from physics & biology to bioeconomics'. Journal of Bioeconomics 6:65-96.
    [211]McKelvey. Bill 2008'Emergent strategy via complexity leadership:Using complexity science & adaptive tension to build distributed intelligence'in Complexity and Leadership Volume I:Conceptual Foundations. M. Uhl-Bien, and R. Marion (eds.),225-268. Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
    [212]McKelvey, Bill., Benyamin B. Lichtenstein, and Pierpaolo Andriani 2008'When systems and ecosystems collide:Is there a law of requisite fractality imposing on firms?'in Chaos and Complexity in Organizations and Society. M.J. Lopez Moreno (ed.). UNESA.
    [213]McKelvie, A.,& Wiklund, J. (in press). Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior. In J. Butler (Eds.), Research in Entrepreneurship and Management:Vol.4. Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
    [214]McMullan, W. E. and W. A. Long (1990), Developing New Ventures:The Entrepreneurial Option. San Diego, CA:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [215]McMullen, J.S.& Shepherd, A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review,31(1),132-152.
    [216]McMullen, J.S.& Shepherd, D.A. (2003). "Extending the theory of the entrepreneurs using a signal detection framework. " In Cognitive Approaches to Entrepreneurship Research, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, volume 6, eds J.A. katz & D.A. Shepherd,139-80. Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
    [217]McMullen, J.S.,& Shepherd, D.A. (2006). Entrepreneurialaction and the role of uncertainty in the theory of theentrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review,31,132-152.
    [218]Meyer, A., Gaba, V.,& Colwell, K. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium:Nonlinear change inorganizational fields. Organization Science,16,456-473.
    [219]Mill, J. S. (1843). System of logic. London:Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer (8th edn.,1872).
    [220]Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P.,& Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning:A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly,46:304-337.
    [221]Miner, J.B.,& Raju, N.S. (2004). When science divestsitself of its conservative stance:The case of riskpropensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers.Journal of Applied Psychology,89,3-13.
    [222]Mitchell, R.K., Buseniz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P.P.,Morse, E.A.,& Smith, J.B. (2004). The distinctive andinclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,28, Winter,505-518.
    [223]Mitchell, R.K., et al. (2002). "Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition:rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research." Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice,27(2):93-105.
    [224]Moorman, C.,& Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review,23(4):698-723.
    [225]Moorman, C.,& Miner, A. S. (1998b). The convergence of planning and execution:Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing,61:1-20.
    [226]Mosakowski, E. (1998). Entrepreneurial resources, organizational choices, and competitive outcomes. Organization Science.9,625-643.
    [227]Mulej, M. (2007), Systems theory:A worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans thinking, decisions and action, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24, pp.347-357.
    [228]Murray Gell-Mann. Let's Call it Plectics[J].Complexity.Vol.1.No.5,1995:96.
    [229]Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter 1982 An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    [230]Nicolis. G.,& Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity:An introduction. New York:Freeman.
    [231]Nicolis. Gregoire, and Ilya Prigogine.1989 Exploring Complexity:An Introduction. New York: Freeman.
    [232]O'Connor, E. (2004), "Storytelling to be real:narrative legitimacy building and venturing", in Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. (eds.), Narrative and Discursive Approaches in Entrepreneurship, Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.105-124.
    [233]O'Connor, G. C.,& Rice, M. P. (2001). Opportunity recognition and innovation in large established firms. California Management Review,43(2),95-116.
    [234]Ormerod, Paul 1994 The Death of Economics. New York:Wiley.
    [235]Ozgen, E.,& Baron, R.A. (In press). Social sources ofinformation in opportunity recognition:Effects ofmentors, industry networks, and professional forums.Journal of Business Venturing.
    [236]Palich, L.E.,& Bagby, D.R.1995. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing.10:425-438.
    [237]Paul Cilliers.Complexity and Postmodernism[M].Routledge:1998.ix、9、3-5
    [238]Penrose, Edith 1959 The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, UK:Basil Blackwell & Mott Ltd.
    [239]Pettigrew, A.M.:Woodman, R.W.,& Cameron, K.S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development:Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal,44(4),697-713.
    [240]Phan, P. (2004), " Introduction:Entrepreneurship theory:possibilities and future directions", Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.19, pp.617-620.
    [241]Phan, P., Siegel, D.S.,& Wright, M. (2005). Science parksand incubators:Observations, synthesis, and futureresearch. Journal of Business Venturing,20,165-182.
    [242]Phelps, R.; Adams, R.; Bessant, J., (2007), Life cycles of growing organizations:A review with implications for knowledge and learning, International Journal of Management Reviews, Volume 9, Number 1, March, pp.1-30
    [243]Pines, David (ed.) 1988 Emerging Syntheses in Science. Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute, Vol. 1. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
    [244]Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and DecisionMaking. New York:McGraw-Hill.
    [245]Potts, J. (2000). The new evolutionary micro-economics:Complexity, competence and adaptive behavior. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
    [246]Prahalad, C.K.& Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,68(3),79-91.
    [247]Priem, Richard,& David Harrison. (1994) "Exploring Strategic Judgement:Methods for testing the assumptions of prescriptive contingency theories." Strategic Management Journal 15(4):311-324.
    [248]Prigogine, I.& Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos:Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.
    [249]Prigogine, Ilya (with Isabelle Stengers) 1997 The End of Certainty:Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York:Free Press.
    [250]Prigogine, Ilya 1955 An Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
    [251]Ravetz, J.R. (2007). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity,3(4),275-284.
    [252]Robinson, P. B.,& Huefner, J. C. (1991) "Entrepreneurial research on student subjects does not generalize to real world entrepreneurs." Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.29:42.
    [253]Romaneili, E.1989. Environments and strategies of organization start-up:Effects on early survival. Administrative Science Quarterly.34:369-387.
    [254]Ronstadt,R.(1988). " The Corridor Principle." Journal of Business Venturing,3(1),31-40.
    [255]Ropo. A.& Hunt, J. (1995). Entrepreneurial processes as virtuous and vicious spirals in a changing opportunity structure:A paradoxical structure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,19(3),91-111.
    [256]Rothaermel, F.& Hess, A. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities:Innovation driven by individual-firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science,18(6),898-921.
    [257]Rozin, P. (1976) "The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious." Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (6):245-280.
    [258]Salthe, Stanley N.1998'The role of natural selection theory in understanding evolutionary systems' in Evolutionary Systems:Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization. G. Van de Vijver, S.N. Salthe, and M. Delpos (eds.),13-20. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer.
    [259]Samuelsson, M. (2001). " Modelling the Nascent Venture Opportunity Exploitation Process across Time". In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp.66-79). Wellesley, Mass.:Babson College.
    [260]Sandberg, W.R.& Hofer, C.W.1987. Improving new venture performance:The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing 2(1):5-28
    [261]Sanders, M. (2007). Scientific paradigms, entrepreneurial opportunities, and cycles in economic growth. Small Business Economics,28(4),339-354.
    [262]Sarason, Y., Dean. T.,& Dillard, F. (2006). Entrepreneurshipas the nexus of individual and opportunity: Astructuration view. Journal of Business Venturing,21,286-305.
    [263]Sarasvathy, S. Dew, N., Ramakrishna Velamurti, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2003), "Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity", in Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp.141-160.
    [264]Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001), "Causation and effectuation:Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency". Academy of Management Review, Vol.26, No.2, pp. 243-263.
    [265]Sarasvathy, S.D. (2004). The questions we ask and thequestion we care about:Reformulating some problems inentrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing.2004,19,707-717.
    [266]Sawyer, R.K. (2005), Social Emergence:Societies As Complex Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    [267]Schraw, Gregory,& David Moshman. (1995) "Metacognitive theories." Educational Psychology Review (7)4:351-371.
    [268]Schraw, Gregory,& Rayne Dennison. (1994) " Assessing Metacognitive Awareness." Contemporary Educational Psychology 19(4):460-475.
    [269]Schraw, Gregory. (1998) "Promoting general metacognitive awareness." Instructional Science (26)1-2:113-125.
    [270]Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development:An inquiry into profits, capital, credit,interest and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    [271]Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). From capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York:Harper.
    [272]Schwenk, Charles R. (1984) "Cognitive Simplification Processes in Strategic Decision-making.' Strategic Management Journal 5(2):111-128.
    [273]Scott, W. (2000) Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications Ltd.
    [274]Shane, S.& Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review,25(1).217-226.
    [275]Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science,11(4):448-469.
    [276]Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship:The individual--opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
    [277]Shane, S.,& Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise ofentrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy ofManagement Review,25,217-226.
    [278]Shane, S., Locke, E.A.,& Collins, C.J. (2003). Entrepreneurialmotivation. Human Resource Management Review,13,257-280.
    [279]Shanklin, W. L.,& J. K. Ryans. (1984) "Organizing for High-Tech Marketing." Harvard Business Review,62(6):164-171.
    [280]Sharfman, M.,& Dean, J. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment:A multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Management,17(4):681-700.
    [281]Sharma, P.& Chrisman, J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,23(3),11-27.
    [282]Shaver, K. G.,& L. R. Scott. (1991) "Person, Process, Choice:The Psychology of New Venture Creation." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,16(2):23-45.
    [283]Shepherd, D. A.,& DeTienne,D. R. (2001). " Discovery of Opportunities:Anomalities, Accumulation and Alertness". In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp.138-148). Wellesley, Mass.:Babson College.
    [284]Shepherd, D. A.,& Levesque, M. (2002).《A Search Strategy for Assessing a Business Opportunity.》 IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,49(2),140-154.
    [285]Shepherd, Dean, Richard Ettenson,& Andrew Crouch. (2000) "New venture strategy and profitability: A venture capitalist's assessment." Journal of Business Venturing 15(5.6):449-469.
    [286]Silberstein, M.& McGeever, J. (1999). The search for ontological emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly,49(195),182-200.
    [287]Simon, H. A. (1976), Administrative Behavior,3rd edition. New York:Free Press.
    [288]Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings, American Philosophical Society. 106(6),467482.
    [289]Simon, M.& Houghton, S.M. (2002). "The relationship among biases, misperceptions and introducing pioneering products:examining differences in venture decision contexts." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,27(2):105-24.
    [290]Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M.H. and Floyd, S.W. (2003), "Inter-Firm Networks and Entrepreneurial Behavior:A Structural Embeddedness Perspective", Journal of Management, Vol.29, No.3, pp. 427-442.
    [291]Singh, R. P. (2000), Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition through Social Networks. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [292]Singh, R. P. (2001). " A Comment on Developing the Field of Entrepreneurship through the Study of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation." Academy of Management Review,26(1),10-12.
    [293]Singh, R. P., Hills, G. E., Hybels, R. C.,& Lumpkin, G. T. (1999). " Opportunity Recognition through Social Network Characteristics of Entrepreneurs". In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 228-241). Wellesley, Mass.:Babson College.
    [294]Sirmon, D., Hitt, M.A.,& Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value:Looking inside the black box. The Academy of Management Review.32(1).273-292.
    [295]Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. (2006), "Conceptualising Entrepreneurship in a Transition Context" International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol.3. No.2, pp.190-206.
    [296]Smith, K. G.,& D. Di Gregorio. (2002) "Bisociation, Recognition, and The Role of Entrepreneurial Action." In Strategic Entrepreneurship-Creating a New Mindset, eds. M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp,& D. L. Sexton,129-150. UK:Blackwell.
    [297]Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing:Paradox and descriptive self awareness. Journal ofKnowledge Management.6(2),100-111.
    [298]Stacey, R. D.. Griffin, D.,& Shaw. P. (2002). Complexity and management, fad or radical challenge tosystems thinking? London:Routledge.
    [299]Stacey, R.D. (2003). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, the Challenge of Complexity London:FT Prentice Hall.
    [300]Stacey, R.D., Griffin. D. and Shaw, P. (2002). Complexity and management, Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London:Routledge.
    [301]Stearns. T. M. (1996) "Strategic Alliances and Performance of High Technology New Firms." Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA:Babson College.
    [302]Stevenson, H. H. and.J. C. Jarillo-Mossi (1986), "Preserving Entrepreneurship as Companies Grow." Journal of Business Strategy,7,10-23.
    [303]Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J.,& Grousbeck, H.I.1994. New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur 4th Edition. Irwin:Burr Ridge, IL.
    [304]Steyaert, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship:In between what'? On the "frontier":As a discourse of entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,2(1),2-16.
    [305]Steyaert. C. (2007),'Entrepreneuring'as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Volume 19, Issue 6 November 2007, pages 453-477
    [306]Sunny. Y.Auyang.Foundations of Complex-system Theories[M].Cambridge University Press,1998.53.
    [307]Swanson, H.,1990. Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology.82 306-314.
    [308]Swenson, R.1989'Emergent attractor and the law of maximum entropy production:Foundations to a theory of general evolution'. Systems Research 6:187-197.
    [309]Teach, R. D., R. G. Schwartz, and F. A. Tarpley (1989), "The Recognition and Exploitation of Opportunity in the Software Industry:A Study of Surviving Firms." Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA:Babson College,383-397.
    [310]Teece, David. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities:The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable Enterprise Performance, Strategic Management Journal 28:1319-1350.
    [311]Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M.,& Gioia, D.A.1993. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, actions, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 36(2):239-270.
    [312]Thompson, Leigh, Jeffery Loewenstein,& Dedre Gentner. (2000) "Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life:analogical training more powerful than individual case training." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,82(1):60-75.
    [313]Thornton, P.H. (1999).'The Sociology of Entrepreneurship'. Annual Review of Sociology 25:19-46.
    [314]Timmons, J.& Spinelli, S. (2003). New Venture Creation:Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. Columbus, OH:McGraw-Hill.
    [315]Timmons, J. A. (1990), New Business Opportunities:Getting to the Right Place at the Right Time. Acton, MA:Brick House Publishing Co.
    [316]Tornikoski, E.T. and Newbert, S.L. (2006), "Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective", Journal of Business Venturing, forthcoming.
    [317]Tsoukas, H.& Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming:Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science,13(5),567-582.
    [3181 Turner, D.,& Crawford, M. (1994). Managing current and future competitive performance:The role ofcompetence. In G. Hamel & A. Heene (Eds.), Competence based competition. Chichester:Wiley.
    [319]Ucbasaran, D.,& Westhead, P. (2002). " Does Entrepreneurial Experience Influence Opportunity Identification?" In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, Mass:Babson College.
    [320]Ucbasaran, D., Howorth, C.,& Westhead, P. (2000). " Habitual Entrepreneurs:Human Capital, Opportunity Search and Learning." Paper presented at the Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley
    [321]Venkataraman, S.& Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). "Strategy and entrepreneurship:outlines of an untold story." In Handbook of Strategic Management, eds M.A. Hitt. E. Freeman,& J. Harrison,650-68. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishers.
    [322]Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol.3, pp.119-138). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press Inc.
    [323]Vesper, K. (1996), New Venture Experience. Revised, Seattle. WA:Vector Books.
    [324]Vesper, K.H.1990. New venture strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    [325]Volberda, H.W.& Lewin, A.Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms:From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies,40(8),2111-2136.
    [326]von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory:Foundations, developments, applications. New York: Braziller.
    [327]Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity:The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon 8,:Schuster.
    [328]Wang Catherine L.. and Pervaiz K. Ahmed 2007:Dynamic Capabilities:A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews:31-50.
    [329]Ward, T. B. (2004) "Cognition, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship." Journal of Business Venturing,19, 173-188.
    [330]Warren, L. (2004), "Negotiating entrepreneurial identity:communities of practice and changing discourses", International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 5, No 2, pp.25-37
    [331]Weick, K. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd ed. ed.). Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
    [332]Welter, F. and Smallbone, D. (2006), "Exploring the Role of Trust for Entrepreneurial Activities", Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Special Issue on "Entrepreneurship and Trust", Vol.30, No.4, 465-475
    [333]Whittington, R. (2006), Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research, Organization Studies, Vol. 27, No.5,613-634
    [334]Wilby, J. (2005), Combining a systems framework with epidemiology in the study of emerging infectious disease, Systems Research and Behavioral Science,22,5,385-398.
    [335]Winder, N. (2007). Innovation and metastability:A systems model. Ecology and Society,12(2),28.
    [336]Winter, S.G. (2006). Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1),125-141.
    [337]Young, R.,& J. Francis. (1991) "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Small Manufacturing Firms." Social Science Quarterly,72(1):149-62.
    [338]Yu,T. (2001) "Entrepreneurial Alertness and Discovery." The Review of Austrian Economics,14(1): 47-63.
    [339]Zollo, Maurizio, and Sidney G. Winter 2002.'Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities'. Organization Science 3/3:339-351.
    [340]Zott, C.& Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science,18,181-199.
    [1]爱迪思(Adizes Ichak).企业生命周期(Corporate Lifecycles) (M).北京:华夏出版社,2004.
    [2]阿马尔·毕海德.新企业的起源与演进[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:27-54.
    [3]阿瑟.经济中的正反馈[J].经济社会体制比较,1998,6.
    [4]陈平.文明分岔、经济混沌、和演化经济动力学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
    [5]德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:1-26,127-152.
    [6]丁栋虹.论企业性质的异质型人力资本模式——兼论科斯交易费用模式的内在悖论性[J],财经研究,2000,5.
    [7]丁栋虹.企业的起源——企业分析四维模式的理论与实证[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2003:37-82.
    [8]丁栋虹.企业家成长制度论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000.
    [9]丁栋虹.制度变迁中企业家成长模式研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1999:41-99.
    [10]丁栋虹.中国企业家的兴起——理论与制度研究[M].北京:东方出版中心,2003:3-31
    [11]段伟文.走向整体论的认识论[N].光明日报,2007,7(17):学术版.
    [12]弗里德曼.张瑞玉译,资本主义与自由[M].上海:商务印书馆,1986.
    [13]关筱霞.扔出小鸟——混沌边缘的经济学[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2005:35-43,56-82.
    [14]郭建恩,许百华,吴旭晓.国外隐喻的理论研究与实践应用[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4).
    [15]哈耶克.王明毅等译,通往奴役之路.上海:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
    [16]荷华德·史蒂文森(Howard H. Stevenson)等.新企业与创业者[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
    [17]赫伯特·西蒙.人工科学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987.
    [18]亨利·N·波拉克.不确定的科学与不确定的世界[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2005:205-207.
    [19]黄欣荣.复杂性研究与隐喻方法[J],自然辩证法研究,2005.10.
    [20]霍兰.陈禹等译,涌现—从混沌到有序[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001:3.
    [21]霍兰.周晓牧,韩晖译,隐秩序——适应性造就复杂性[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000:4-5.
    [22]蒋京川,郭永玉.动机的目标理论[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(6).
    [23]杰克·J·弗罗门.经济演化[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
    [24]杰克逊.高飞等译,系统思考:适于管理者的创造性整体论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005..
    [25]金吾伦.生成哲学[M].保定:河北大学出版社,2000:104.
    [26]库尔特·多普菲.演化经济学:纲领与范围[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
    [27]科特勒.营销管理(第十版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
    [28]李兰.中国企业家成长15年.北京:机械工业出版社.2009:3-49.
    [29]李士勇等.非线性科学与复杂性科学[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2006.
    [30]李笑春,叶立国.决定性—决定论与非决定论本质的再分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2002(11):26-28.
    [31]理查德·H·戴等.混沌经济学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1996:9.
    [32]理查德·R.纳尔逊,悉尼·G.温特.经济变迁的演化理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
    [33]刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论(第2版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:88-93
    [34]刘劲杨.穿越复杂性丛林—复杂性研究的四种理论基点及其哲学反思[J].中国人民大学学报,2004,5:17-24.
    [35]刘啸霆.整体论的形态及其价值[N].光明日报,2007,9(18):学术版
    [36]刘兴堂等.复杂系统建模理论、方法与技术[M].北京:科学出版社.2008:53-57.
    [37]柳延延.决定论之谜—复杂性科学中的偶然性与必然性[J].自然辩证法通讯.1990(2):18-24
    [38]罗伯特·巴隆(Robert A Barron),斯科特·谢恩(Scott Shane).创业管理—基于过程的观点[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2005:41-58.
    [39]罗伯特·赫里斯,迈克尔·彼德斯.创业学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004
    [40]洛伦兹.刘式达等译,混沌的本质[M].北京:气象出版社,1997:3.
    [41]米歇尔·沃尔德罗普.陈玲译,复杂—诞生与秩序与混沌边缘的科学[M].北京:生活读书新知三联书店,1997.
    [42]苗东升.分形与复杂性[J].系统辩证法学报,2003,2:7-13.
    [43]苗东升.论复杂性[J].自然辩证法通讯,2000,6:87-96.
    [44]苗东升.系统科学大学讲稿[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2007:298-310,381-395.
    [45]迈克尔·波特.陈小悦译,竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997.
    [46]迈克尔·波特.陈小悦译,竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997年版
    [47]莫兰.陈一壮译,复杂性思维导论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:89-100.
    [48]聂锐,王元地.现代企业理论[M].经济管理出版社.2007:280-304.
    [49]欧阳莹之,田宝国等译,复杂系统理论基础[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002.
    [50]潘开灵,白烈湖.管理协同理论及其应用[M].经济管理出版社,2006:18-44.
    [51]培根.许宝骙译,新工具[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997:12.
    [52]普利高津.确定性的终结[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1998.55.
    [53]切克兰德.左晓斯等译,系统论的思想与实践[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990:74.
    [54]萨德尔,艾布拉姆斯.孙文龙译,田德蓓审译,视读混沌学[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,2007:112-118.
    [55]萨尔曼等.创业管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
    [56]舍伍德.邱昭良,刘听译.系统思考[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2008,25-35.
    [57]盛昭翰,蒋德鹏.演化经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,2003.
    [58]宋学锋.基于复杂性科学的管理理论与方法[J].经济管理,2001(14).
    [59]宋学锋.组织中的复杂性与创造性[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2000.
    [60]王小卫,宋澄宇.经济学方法——十一位经济学家的观点[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006,48-52.
    [61]王志康,谢惠媛.社会系统复杂性与社会科学方法[J].自然辩证法通讯.2005(2):43-49.
    [62]沃尔德罗普.陈玲译,复杂[M].北京:三联书店,1997:356-357.
    [63]吴彤.复杂性、科学与后现代思潮[J].内蒙古大学学报(人文.社会科学版),2003,4:8-12.
    [64]肖显静.自然的有机整体性与科学认识方法的变革[N].光明日报,2007,7(17):学术版.
    [65]熊彼特.财富增长论[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2007:88-128,183-217.
    [66]许国志.系统科学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000:299.
    [67]颜泽贤,范冬萍,张华夏.系统科学导论——复杂性探索[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:291-398,405-430.
    [68]杨博文,谭祖雪.自然辩证法新编:复杂性科学理论及其哲学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:99-128,207.
    [69]殷(Yin,R.K.).周海涛,李永贤,张衡译,案例研究设计与方法(第三版)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2005:65-70,94-106,124-146.
    [70]殷.周海涛等译,案例研究方法的应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:10-33,85-93.
    [71]于渌,郝柏林,陈晓松.边缘奇迹:相变和临界现象[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:67-92.
    [72]余菁.案例研究与案例研究方法[J].经济管理,2004,20.
    [73]张华夏.复杂系统与本体论的复兴[J].系统辩证学学报.2003,2:1-6
    [74]张梦中,马克·霍哲.案例研究方法论[J].中国行政管理,2002,1.
    [75]张曙光.张曙光经济学书评集[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1999
    [76]张彦、林德宏.系统自组织概论[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1990:116.
    [77]张冶,韩国照.哪根稻草压垮了骆驼:市场营销的方法论问题[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006:297-305.
    [78]张玉利,陈寒松,李乾文.创业管理与传统管理的差异与融合[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26.2-7.
    [79]张玉利,李新.创业管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
    [80]张玉利.创业与企业家精神:动态复杂环境下管理者的思维模式与行为规则[J],南开大学学报,2004,1.
    [81]郑春顺.混沌与和谐——现实世界的创造[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002:450-452,85.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700