知识型员工建言行为的影响机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
置身于一个变革的时代,环境的复杂多变使管理决策面临高度的不确定性,企业的创新能力和环境适应能力受到了极大的挑战,相应带来了更多对信息搜寻的要求。然而在许多企业中,面对组织发展的关键问题员工却选择了隐瞒自己的真实想法和意见,使得企业决策缺乏不同观点的碰撞与负面的反馈,存在的风险与问题不能及时被发现,创新想法不能顺畅地提出,组织内的知识分享与团队学习难以实现,极大地影响了企业的竞争力。尤其对于知识型员工而言,其工作性质往往具有很强的不确定性,更多地需要他们的创造力来应对瞬息万变的环境及工作当中存在的问题与风险;同时,他们具有相应的专业特长和较高的个人素质,拥有提出建议的能力并拥有实现自我价值的强烈需求,希望通过建言证明自己的价值,获得他人的认同与肯定,缺乏建言的环境往往会使他们非常沮丧,甚至心生退意,不利于其潜能的挖掘。因此,激发知识型员工建言的意愿与行为对于企业的组织管理实践意义重大。
     然而,我国传统文化强调和谐、顺从和忠诚,讲求沉默是金,建言行为在权力距离很大、注重集体主义的中国往往被看作对上级权威的挑战、对群体和谐的破坏,因此比西方个人主义社会具有更大的个人风险和群体压力。因此,在既定的文化情境下探索如何激发与提升知识型员工建言的积极性便构成了本研究的重要议题。
     本研究在质性探索研究与国内外现有文献梳理的基础上,立足于认知理论的S—C—R模型,通过打开“刺激——反应”作用黑箱,了解知识型员工对环境刺激的认知、释义过程,推导出“授权型领导风格、组织政治氛围——认知动机——员工建言行为”这一逻辑路线,深入地剖析了领导风格与组织氛围之于知识型员工建言行为的影响机理,并对之进行了大样本(N=515)的实证检验。主要研究内容与结论如下:
     (1)通过质性研究探索知识型员工建言的影响机制模型。研究在31名知识型员工的工作心得与深度访谈记录的基础上,对中国情境下员工建言行为的影响因素进行了质性的探索性研究,通过扎根理论,明确了研究的理论框架,对于影响员工建言的领导行为与特质、员工建言的心理认知动机、影响员工建言的组织情境因素以及个人特质与建言策略进行了分析。
     (2)明确了授权型领导风格对于知识型员工建言的影响。现有研究中关于领导风格与员工建言的关系未能得出一致的结论,本研究实证数据表明,在控制了人口统计因素以及员工个人主动性人格的基础上,授权型领导风格对于知识型员工的建言行为具有较强的解释力。知识型员工有较强的成就欲,期望通过自己的行为展现自己的价值,获得领导与同事的认同,.而授权型领导风格代表了领导范式上的转换,强调了员工自我影响而不是外在的由上而下的影响,相信员工是智慧和方向的重要来源,让员工拥有更多自主权、自我指导和控制权,很好地满足了知识型员工的心理需求,对于激发员工建言起到很好的促进作用,即使在风险较大的中国情境下仍能够有效地预测知识型员工的建言行为。
     (3)验证了主动性认知动机在领导风格与建言间的中介作用。以往研究多从建言可能带来的风险入手探讨了影响员工建言的心理机制——心理安全感,缺乏主动性视角的审视。本研究引入了主动性认知动机的概念,认为如果员工责任感较强,将许多角色外行为视作自己的职责范围,在较宽范围的职责上均具有较高的工作效能,同时对自己行为的后果有较强的控制感,才有可能会出现主动性行为。实证研究表明,拥有心理安全感只是建言的必要条件,尤其在权力距离较大的中国情境下,国人可能会出于对权威的崇拜和顺从而保持沉默,也可能会信奉“事不关己,高高挂起”,只有充分地激发员工的主动性认知动机,才可能使员工自动自发,积极为组织献言献策。主动性认知动机在授权型领导风格与员工建言间的中介作用得到了大样本实证结果的验证。
     (4)强调了组织政治氛围对知识型员工建言影响的跨层次分析。强调集体主义导向的文化背景下,群体氛围对于个体的建言水平的影响至关重要,本研究引入组织政治氛围这一对建言有着潜在影响的组织氛围变量,弥补了过去员工建言行为研究集中于个体层面探讨的不足。虽然质性的探索性研究中,访谈对象较多地提到了组织政治氛围对于员工建言的影响,但其对于授权型领导与知识型员工建言间的跨层次调节作用没有得到大规模实证调研的支持。可能的原因是对于这样一个特殊的群体而言,他们更多地需要他人对自己的肯定和认同,渴望自我价值的实现,而对于外在的组织氛围则不是那么敏感,虽然组织政治氛围一定程度上抑制了员工的控制感评估和心理安全感,但与授权型领导相比,组织政治氛围的影响作用相对较弱。该研究结论凸显了授权型领导风格对于知识型员工建言的重要性,对于组织的管理实践有着重要的指导意义。
     研究最后总结与归纳了研究结论对人力资源管理实践可能的启示,同时指出了自身存在的不足与未来的研究方向。
In an era of change, the complexity and variability of the environment make enterprise facing high uncertainty, and challenge its innovation ability and adaptability, which requires more information correspondingly. However, In many enterprises, employees have chosen to hide their true thoughts and opinions, that make the enterprise lack of collision of different points and negative feedback, and the risks and problems cannot be found in time, innovative ideas cannot be proposed smoothly, knowledge sharing and team learning within the organization is difficult to achieve, and so on. That greatly affects the competitiveness of enterprises.
     The voice behavior of knowledge workers is particularly important, because the highly uncertain nature of their work need more creativity to respond to the changing environment and the problems and risks in the work; in addition, they are expertise in their field and have the ability to put forword valuable suggestions. Moreover, they have a strong need to achieve self-worth and hope to get other people's recognition and affirmation by suggestions. If not, often make them depressed. Therefore, it is significant to stimulate the knowledge workers'willingness of voice for the organizations.
     However, our traditional culture embraces harmony, obedience and loyalty, says silence is golden. Voice is considered as challenges to higher authority and underminings of the group harmony, which bring more personal risks and pressures to voice in china than in the western society.Therefore, exploring how to motivate staff to upgrade the initiative of voice in specific cultural contexts constitute the important topic in our research.
     Based on qualitative research and previous theoretical and empirical studies, and drawing lessons from'Stimulus-Cognition-Response'(S-C-R) model in cognitive psychology, we try to open the balckboxs of how the knowledge workers understand and response to the environment. Following the logic line of "empowering leadership\organization politics climate——cognitional motivation——employee voice behavior", this paper presents an in-depth analysis of influence mechanism of the organizational context on the voice behavior. The main contents and conclusions are as follows:
     (1) Qualitative research exploring voice influence mechanism of the knowledge workers.
     Based on the work experience and depth interview of 31 knowledge workers, we explore the factors which influence the employee behavior in Chinese context, and propose the preliminary theoretical framework through grounding theory. Through qualitative research, we analysis the leader's traits and behavior and the organizational context which influence the employee voice behavior, the cognitive motivation of voice behavior, and so on. We also discuss the individual voice efficacy and strategy to enhance the impact of the voice.
     (2) Confirm the effect of the empowering leadership on employee voice behavior of the knowledge workers.
     Current research failed to reach a unanimous conclusion of the relationship of leadership style and employee voice behavior, our empirical data provide the evidence of the strong relationship of empowering leadership and the knowledge workers'voice behavior after controlling for demographic factors and proactive personality. The empowering leadership represent the transition of leadership style, emphasizing self-management rather than the external management, believing employees are an important source of wisdom and direction which meet the psychological needs of knowledge workers who have a strong desire for success, hope to obtain recognition of other'through their efforts. Therefore, even in high risk situations in China, the empowering leadership also serve as a stronger predictor of voice behavior of knowledge workers.
     (3) The impact of the empowering leadership is partially mediated by the proactive cognitive motivation. Current studies explain the psychological mechanisms of employee voice behavior with possible risks, but lack of initiative Perspective. Our research introduced the concept of proactive cognitive motivation, that if employees feel responsibility for change, say" that's my job", have role breadth efficacy and high control appraisal, may show more personal initiative. Empirical studies have shown that a psychological safety is a necessary condition for voice; in addition, the proactive motivation is more important especially in large power distance context of China.
     (4) Cross-level analysis of Organizational political climate on the voice behavior
     In the collectivism-oriented culture, the influence of the organizational climate on individual voice behavior is significant. In the research, we introduce the concept of organizational political climate, which make up the deficiencies of focusing on the individual level. However, although in the qualitative exploratory study, interviewees mentioned the significant influence of political climate, it has not been supported by empirical research that the organization political climate moderator the relationship of the empowering leadership and employee behavior. Possible reason is that for knowledge workers, they desire for self-realization, need more approval and recognition, but does not sensitive to external climate. If the leader encourages them to participate and affirm their value, they will show their initiative although the political climate also Restrain their control appraisal and psychological safety. The conclusions highlight the importance of the leadership which will guide the management practices.
     The article concludes with a discussion of avenues for future research on employee voice behavior and implications for management practice.
引文
1 Senge P. M. The Fifth Discipline:The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization [M]. London:Random House,1990.
    4 Drucker, P.F.,杨开峰等译,知识管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:18-39.
    5 知识工作的的非程序性、非规范性界定的相关论述主要引自国家自然科学基金项目(70172030)的相关成果(戴昌钧,陈臻袆.程序性和规范性——知识工作界定准则的探讨.华东经济管理,2006,20(110):54-58.)
    6 转引自:姚作为.基于品牌关系的服务消费决策行为研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文,2005.
    7 Bass B. M., Riggio R. E. (2006).Transformational Leadership. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    8 庄文静.遭遇“合理化建议”的尴尬——一位研发部经理的烦恼[J].中外管理,2006:111-112.
    9 Ashford, S.J., Rothbard, N.P., Piderit, S.K.,&Dutton, J.E. (1998).Outon a Limb:The Role of Context and Impression Managementin Selling Gender-equity Issues. Administrative Science Quarterly,43,23-57.
    10 LePine J A. Van Dyne L. (1998). Predicting Voice Behavior in Workgroups. Journal of Applied Psychology,83 (6),853-868.
    11 Milliken F J, Morrison EW, Hewlin P F. (2003). An Exploratory Study ofEmployee Silence:Issues that Employees Don't Communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1453-1476.
    12 Farrell D, Rusbult C. Understanding the retention function:A modelof the causes of exit, voice, loyalty and neglect behaviors. The Personnel Administrator,1985,30(4):129-136
    13 Burris E. R., Detert J. R. and D. S. Chiaburu. (2008). Quitting Before Leaving:The Mediating Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice. Journal of Applied Psychology,93(4):912-922.
    14 Anselm Srauss, Juliet Corbin质性研究入门:扎根理论研究方法.吴芝仪,廖梅花译.台湾:涛石文化事业有限公司,2001:107.
    15 Anselm Srauss, Juliet Corbin质性研究入门:扎根理论研究方法.吴芝仪,廖梅花译.台湾:涛石文化事业有限公司,2001:121.
    16 Michael Quinn Patton质的评鉴与研究[M].吴芝仪,李奉儒译.台北:桂冠图书公司,]990:38.
    17 Anselm Srauss, Juliet Corbin质性研究入门:扎根理论研究方法.吴芝仪,廖梅花译.台湾:涛石文化事业有限公司,2001:131-132.
    18 李志刚,李兴旺.蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究——扎根理论研究方法的运用[J].管理科学2006,19(3)
    19 Spreitzer, G. M.&Doneson,D.,2005,Musings on the Past and Future of Employee Empowerment, Handbook of Organizational Development.edited by Tom Cummings.
    20 张爱卿.20世纪动机心理研究的历史探索[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1999(3).
    21 Parker, S.,&Turner, J. (2002).Work design and individual work performance:Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance. Chichester, UK:John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.:78.
    22 Anderson N., West M A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation:Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior,19,235-258.
    23 Schuler, R.S.1980. Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,25,184-215.
    24 章益.新行为主义学习论[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1983:1.
    25 (美)A·班杜拉著,林颖等译.思想和行动的社会基础:社会认知论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
    26 Manz, C.C.,& Sims, H.P., Jr. (1990). SuperLeadership:Leading others to lead themselves. New York:Berkeley Books. Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P., Jr. (1991). SuperLeadership:Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics,19,18-35.
    27 汤磊,杨光.团队心理安全文献综述及未来研究方向[J].上海商学院学报2009,10(4).
    28 Detert, J.R., Burris, E.R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice:Is the Door Really Open?. Academy of Management Journal,50 (4):869-884.
    29 李忠民,马冰.中国传统文化观对员工沉默行为的影响分析[J].科学·经济·社会,2009,27(3):26-33.
    30 Cheung. F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M. & Zhang J.X. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,27,181-199.
    31 黄光国.人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏[A].见:杨国枢主编.中国人的心理[c].台北:桂冠图书公司,1988:289-318.
    32 问卷设计的步骤借鉴赵卓嘉.团队内部人际冲突、面子对团队创造力的影响研究[D].浙江大学博士论文2009中的做法。
    33 周浩、龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950.
    34 Chen,X.P.,Simon,S.K. (2002).Group organizational citizenship behavior:a conceptualization and preliminary test of its antecedents and consequences.Academy of Management Proceedings,12(4):223-254.
    Klein.K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W.(2000).From micro to meso:critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research.Organizational Research Methods,25(3):211-236.
    36 廖卉,庄瑗嘉.多层次理论模型的建立及研究方法[A].陈晓萍、徐淑英、樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法[C].北京大学出版社.北京,2008:337.
    37 Haynes, S.N., Richard, D.G.and Kubany E.S. (1995). Content validity in Psychological assessment:A functional approach to concepts and methods.Pychological Assessment,7,238-247.
    38 [加]弗朗西斯·赫瑞比.郑晓明等译.管理知识员工[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000.7.
    39 赵曙明.人力资源管理研究[M](第一版).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:167.
    40 转引自黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005.
    41 转引自廖卉、庄瑗嘉.多层次理论模型的建立及研究方法[A].陈晓萍、徐淑英、樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法[C].北京大学出版社.北京,2008:351。
    43 Frese, M.. Kring, W., Soose, A. and Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work:di.erences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal,39,37-63. Frese, M., Fay, D., Leng, K., Hilburger, T. & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,70,139-161.
    44 Tony Dundon, Adrian Wilkinson, Mick Marchington, & Peter Axkers. (2004). The meaning and purpose of employee voice. International Journal of Human Resource Management,2004,15(6):]] 49-1170
    45 Jerry Bryan Fuller (2007). An Exploratory Examination of Voice Behavior from anlmpression Management Perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, ⅩⅨ(1),134-151.
    [1]Abhishek Srivastava, Bartol, K. M., & Locke E.A. (2006). Empowering Leadership in Management Teams:Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Effcacy, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal,49(6):1239-1251.
    [2]Adler, P. S.,& Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital:Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,27,17-40.
    [3]Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,90,945-955.
    [4]Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior,10,123-176.
    [5]Anderson, N., West, M.A.(1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior,19,235-258.
    [6]Argyris, C.,& Schon, D.1978. Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [7]Arnold H.J. & Feldman D.C.(1981).Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-Report Choice Situations. Academy of Management Journal,24(2),377-385.
    [8]Arnold, J. J., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A.,& Drasgow, F.2000. The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire:The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior,21,249-269.
    [9]Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., & Budhwar, P. S.2004. Exchange fairness and employee performance:An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94,1-14.
    [10]Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L.1983. Feedback as an indi-vidual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,32:370-398.
    [11]Ashford, S. J. and G. B. Northcraft. (1992). Conveying More or Less Than We Realize:The Role of impression Management in Feedback Seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,53,310-334
    [12]Ashford, S. J., Rothband, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a Limb:The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly,43,23-57.
    [13]Ashforth, B. E.,& Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Labeling processes in the organization:Constructing the individual. In L. L. Cummings & B.W. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp.413-461). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
    [14]Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D.,&Waterson, P. E. 2000.Shopfloorinnovation:Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,73,265-285.
    [15]Bachrach D.G. & Jex S. M.(2000).Organizational Citizenship and Mood:An Experimental Test of Perceived Job Breadth. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,30(3),641-663.
    [16]Baer, M., & Frese M. (2003).Innovation is not enough:climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,24(1),45-68.
    [17]Bagozzi, R.P. Yi Y., & L.W. Phillips.(1991).Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative science quarterly,36(3),421-458.
    [18]Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action:A Cognitive View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cli.s, NJ.
    [19]Bandura, A.1997. Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York:Freeman.
    [20]Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
    [21]Bass,B. M.,& Riggo,R.E.(2006).Transformational leadership(2nd). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
    [22]Bass.B.M.,(1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of Leadership.Theory Research and Managerial Applications (3rd).New York:Free Press.
    [23]Bateman, T.S., & Crant, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior:A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior,14, 103-118.
    [24]Bindl, U.K., & Parker, S.K. (2009). Investigating self-regulatory elements of proactivity at work. Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, Working Paper.
    [25]Blanchard, K. (1985). Putting the one minute manager to work. New York: Berkley.
    [26]Boroff, K. and Lewin, D. (1997).Loyalty, Voice and Intent to Exit a Union Firm: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 51(1),50-63.
    [27]Botero, I.C.,& Van Dyne, L. (2009). Predicting voice:Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the U.S. and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly,,23,84-104.
    [28]Brief A.P. and S.J. Motowidlo.(1986). Prosocial Organizational Behaviors. The Academy of Management Review,11(4),710-725.
    [29]Burke, Peter J. (1991). Identity Processes and Social Stress. American Sociological Review,56,836-849.
    [30]Burke, Peter J. (1997). An Identity Model for Network Exchange. American Sociological Review,62,134-150.
    [31]Burris E. R., Detert J. R., & D. S. Chiaburu. (2008). Quitting Before Leaving: The Mediating Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice. Journal of Applied Psychology,93(4),912-922.
    [32]Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D.& Klesh J. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. Seashore, E. Lawler, P. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change:A guide to methods, measures and practices. New York:John Wiley. Items were taken from Table 4-2, p.84.Copyright 1983. Reprinted by permission of Jonh Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    [33]Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee:Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive,14,52-66.
    [34]Campbell, D. R. & D. W. Fiske. (1959).Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
    [35]Caryl E. Rusbult, Dan Farrell, Glen Rogers & Arch G. Mainous Ⅲ(1988) Impact of Exchange Variables on Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect:An Integrative Model of Responses to Declining Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal,31(3),599-627
    [36]Chang C.H., Rosen C.C. & Levy P.E.(2009). The Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Attitudes, Strain, and Behavior:a Meta-analytic Examination. Academy of Management Journal,52(4), 779-801.
    [37]Chen, X.P., Hui, C. & Sego D.J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover:Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology,83(6),922-931.
    [38]Chen, M.H. (2006).Understanding the Benefits and Detriments of Conflict on Team Creativity Process. Creativity and Innovation Management,15(1),105-116.
    [39]Claes, R., Beheydt, C.& B. Lemmens. (2005). Unidimensionality of Abbreviated Proactive Personality Scales across Cultures. Applied Psychology:An International Review,54(4),476-489.
    [40]Stamper, C.L.& Linn Van Dyne (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior:a field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior,22(5),517-536.
    [41]Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research method in education (6th edition).London:Routledge/Falmer.
    [42]Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process:Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review,3,471-482.
    [43]Cox, J.F. & Sims, H.P. (1996). Leadership and Team Citizenship Behavior:A Model and Measures. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams,3, 1-41.
    [44]Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (2004). Exploring organizationally directed citizenship behavior:Reciprocity or'it's my job?'. Journal of Management Studies,41,85-106.
    [45]Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology,80, 532-537.
    [46]Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26,435-462.
    [47]Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior,21, 63-75.
    [48]Cropanzano, R., Howes, J.C., Grandey, A.A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior,18,159-180.
    [49]Crossan, M. & Hulland, J. (2002). Leveraging Knowledge through Leadership of Organizational Learning, In Choo & Bontis (Eds.). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, New York:Oxford University Press,711-723.
    [50]Deluga, R. J.1998. American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership and rated performance. Leadership Quarterly,9,265-291.
    [51]Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W. B.2001. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology,86, 499-512.
    [52]Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice:Is the door really open?. Academy of Management Journal,50,869-884.
    [53]Dragano, N., Verde, P. E., & Siegrist, J. (2005). Organizational downsizing and work stress:Testing synergistic health effects in employed men and women. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,59,694-699.
    [54]Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., Lawrence, K. A., & Miner-Rubino, K. (2002). Red light, green light:Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science,13,355-369.
    [55]Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O'Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind:How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal,18,407-425.
    [56]Dyne L.V,Ang S.,Botero I.C..Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs. Journal of Management Studies,2003, 40(6),1359-1392.
    [57]Edmondson, A.C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,44(2),350-383.
    [58]Edmondson, A.C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room:How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies,40,1419-1452.
    [59]Edmondson, A.C., & Smith, D. M. (2006). Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict. California Management Review,49(1),6-31.
    [60]Erez, M. & Arad, R. (1986). Participative goal-setting:social, motivational, and cognitive factors. Journal of Applied Psychology,71,591-597.
    [61]Farr, J. L. and Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In:West, M. A. and Farr, J. L.(Eds),Innovation and Creativity at Work,63-80.Wiley, Chichester.
    [62]Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter,W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics:Theory and research directions. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues,179-254. Oxford, U.K.:Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
    [63]Ferris G.R., Fedor, D.B. Chachere J.G., & L. R. Pondy (1989). Myths and Politics in Organizational Contexts. Group & Ogranization studies,14,83-103.
    [64]Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management,18,93-116.
    [65]Ferris, GR., Perrewe, P.L., Anthony, W. P., & Gilmore, D.C. (2000). Political skill at work. Organizational Dynamics,28,25-37.
    [66]Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M. (1989). Politics in organizations. In R.A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.). Impression management in the organization, 143-170. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
    [67]Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes:A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46,839-852.
    [68]Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review,21,1112-1142.
    [69]Fornell, C. & Larcker D.F.(1981).Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error:Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),382-388.
    [70]Fred N. Kerlinger (1986). Foundation of Behavioral Research (3rd Edition). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, New York.
    [71]Frese M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999).Helping to improve suggestion systems:predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior.20,1139-1155.
    [72]Frese, M., & Fay, D.(2001). Personal initiative:An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior,23,133-187.
    [73]Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1999). On the importance of the objective environment in stress and attribution theory. Counterpoint to Perrewe and Zellars. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20,761-765.
    [74]Frese, M., Fay, D., Leng, K., Hilburger, T. and Tag, A. (1997).The concept of personal initiative:operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,70,139-161.
    [75]Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D.(2007). Making things happen:Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology,92, 1084-1102.
    [76]Frese, M., Kring,W., Soose, A. and Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39,37-63.
    [77]Ganster D.C., Hennessey H.W. & Luthans F.(1983).Social Desirability Response Effects:Three Alternative Models. Academy of Management Journal,26(2), 321-331.
    [78]Graham, J. W.(1986). Principled organizational dissent:A theoretical essay. In Cummings L.L.,& B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior,8, 1-52. Greenwich, CT:JAI
    [79]Graham, J. W., & Van Dyne, L. (2006). Gathering information and exercising influence:Two forms of civic virtue organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal,18,89-109.
    [80]Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work: Lessons from feedback-seeking and organizational citizenship behavior research. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior,28, 3-34. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
    [81]Hagedoorn M., Van Y.N. W., Van V.E., et al. (1999). Employees'reactions to problematic events:A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20(3),309-321.
    [82]Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Bowen, M. G.2004. The dark side of politics in organizations.In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O'Leary-Kelly (Eds.). The dark side of organizational behavior,237-261. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    [83]Harlos, K.P.(2001).When organizational voice systems fail. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,37,324-342.
    [84]Harrell-Cook, G., Ferris, G. R., & Dulebohn, J. H. (1999). Political behaviors as. moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics-work outcomes relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20:1093-1105.
    [85]Harris, K. (2004).What you don't know can't hurt you:The interactive relationship between leader member exchange and perceptions of politics on job satisfaction. Journal of Behavior and Applied Management,5(3),188-203.
    [86]Haworth C. L. & Levy P.E. (2001).The Importance of Instrumentality Beliefs in the Prediction of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior,59(1),64-75.
    [87]Hersey, P.,& Blanchard, K. (1982). Management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    [88]Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty:Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    [89]Hochwarter, W.A., Kiewitz, C., Castro, S. L., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R.(2003). Positive affectivity and collective efficacy as moderators of the relationship between perceived politics and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,33,1009-1035.
    [90]Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewe, P. L., Ferris, G. R., & Guercio, R. (1999). Commitment as an antidote to the tension and turnover consequences of organizational politics. Journal of Vocational Behavior,55,277-297.
    [91]Hochwarter, W.A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000).Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,85, 472-478.
    [92]Hofmann, D.A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship:Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology,88, 170-178.
    [93]Hooff, J., & Ridder, J.(2004).Knowledge sharing in context the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of knowledge management,8(6),117-130.
    [94]Houghton J.D. & S.K. Yoho. (2005). Toward a Contingency Model of Leadership and Psychological Empowerment:When Should Self-Leadership Be Encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,11,65.
    [95]Howell, J.M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation:The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly,15,123-143.
    [96]Howell, J.P., & Costley, D.L. (2001). Understanding behaviors for effective leadership (1st). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
    [97]Hu L. & Bentler P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparemeterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3,424-453.
    [98]Huang, X., Evert Van de Vliert, Gerben Van der Vegt. (2005).Breaking the Silence Culture:Stimulation of Participation and Employee Opinion Withholding Cross-nationally. Management and Organization Review,1(3),459-482.
    [99]Hui C., Lam S.S., & Law K.K. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion:a field quasi-experiment. Journal of applied psychology,85(5),822-828.
    [100]Hui, C. (1994). Effects of leadership empowerment behaviors and followers' personal control, voice, and self-efficacy on in-role and extra-role performance: An extension and empirical test of Conger and Kanungo's empowerment process model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University Bloomington.
    [101]Hutchison, S., Sowa, D., Eisenberger R.& R. Huntington.(1986). Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology,71,500-507.
    [102]Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D.,& Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,349-371.
    [103]Jakofsky, E.F.& J. W. Slocum.(1988). A longitudinal study of climates. Journal of Organizational Behavior,9,319-334.
    [104]James, L.R.& A.P. Jones. (1974).Organizational climate:A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin,1,1096-1112.
    [105]James, L.R.(1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,219-229.
    [106]James, L.R., Demaeree, R.G.& Wolf,G.(1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology,1984,69(1),85-98.
    [107]James, L.R., Demaeree, R.G.& Wolf, G.(1993). Rwg:an assessment of within-group inter-rater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(2), 306-309.
    [108]Janssen O., De Vries T., & Cozijnsen A J.(1998).Voicing by Adapting and Innovating Employees:An Empirical Study on How Personality and Environment Interact to Affect Voice Behavior. Human Relations,51 (7),945-967.
    [109]Janz, B.D.(1999).Self-directed Teams in IS:Correlates for Improved Systems Development and Work Outcomes. Information and Management,35,171-192.
    [110]Jay R.Galbraith (1974). Organization design:an information processing view. Interfaces,4(3),28-36.
    [111]Jeffrey A.L. & Linn V. D. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance:evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology,86(2),326-336.
    [112]Jehn, K.A.,& Shah, P.P. (1997). Interpersonal Relationships and Task Performance:An Examination of Mediating Processes in Friendship and Acquaintance Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 775-790.
    [113]Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart, J.R. Detert, Linda Klebe Trevin, Amy C. (2009).Silenced by fear:The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work Edmondson. Research in Organizational Behavior,29,163-193.
    [114]Joireman J., Kamdar D., Daniels D. & Duell B. (2006).Good citizens to the end? It depends:Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology,91(6),1307-1320.
    [115]Jones, A.P., & L.R. James. (1979). Psychological climate:Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,23,201-250.
    [116]Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (POP):A multisample approach. Journal of Management,23, 627-658.
    [117]Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (POP):Development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement,51,193-205.
    [118]Kahn W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal,33,692-724.
    [119]Kamdar, D., McAllister, D. J., & Turban, D. B. (2006). All in a day's work:How follower individual differences and justice perceptions predict OCB role definitions and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,91,841-855.
    [120]Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management:Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42,58-74.
    [121]Klaas, B., and A. DeNisi (1989).Managerial reactions to employee dissent:The impact of grievance activity on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal,32,705-718.
    [122]Klein, L. (1976). New forms of work organization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [123]Klein, K.J., Dansereau, F.& Hall, R.J.(1994). levels issues in theory development, Data collection, and Analyses. Academy of Management Review, 19,195-229.
    [124]Kozlowski, S.W.J., and M. Doherty (1989). Integration of climate and leadership: examination of a neglected issue. Journal of Applied Psychology,74,546-553.
    [125]Latham, G.P. Winters, D.C. & E.A. Locke.(1994).Cognitive and motivational effects of participation:A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1),49-63.
    [126]Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-Involvement Management:Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
    [127]Lawler, E. E. (1988). Substitutes for Hierarchy. Organizational Dynamics,17(1), 4-15.
    [128]Lederer, A.L. & sethi, V. (1991).Critical Dimensions of Strategic Information Systems Planning. Decision Sciences,22(1),104-119.
    [129]Lee, C., Pillutla, M., Law, K.S. (2000). Power distance, Gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management,26(4),695-704.
    [130]Lepine J. A.,&Van Dyne L. (1998). Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology,83(6),853-868.
    [131]LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L.(2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance:Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology,86,326-336.
    [132]LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A.(2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework:An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal,48,764-775.
    [133]Lewin, D. (1999). Theoretical and empirical research on the grievance procedure and arbitration:A critical review. In A. E. Eaton, and J. H. Keefe (eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace, 137-186. Champaign, IL:Industrial Relations Research Association.
    [134]Lewin, K.(1936).Principles of Topological. New York:McGraw-Hill
    [135]Lewin,K.(1951). Field theory in the social sciences. New York:Harper
    [136]Liang, J., & Farh, J.L. (2008). Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations:A two-wave longitudinal examination. Paper presented at the Third Conference of the International Association for Chinese Management Research, Guangzhou, China.
    [137]Liden, R. C. & Tewksbury, T. W. (1995). Empowerment and work teams. In: Re s, G. R., Rosen, S. D.and Barnum, D. T. (Eds.) Handbook of Human Resource Management,386-403, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, Mass.
    [138]Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P.(1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    [139]Manz, C.C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1991). SuperLeadership:Beyond the myth of heroic leadership.Organizational Dynamics,19,18-35.
    [140]Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves:The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,32,106-129.
    [141]Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P., Jr. (1990). Super Leadership:Leading others to lead themselves. New York:Berkeley Books.
    [142]Manz, C.C., & Sims, H.P. (1980).Selfmanagement as a substitute for leadership: a social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review,5, 361-367.
    [143]Mayes B.T., & Allen Robot W. (1977).Toward a Definition of Organizational Politics. Academy of management Review,10,672-678.
    [144]McAllister, Kamdar, Morrison, & Turban, (2007). Disentangling Role Perceptions:How Perceived Role Breadth, Discretion, Instrumentality, and Efficacy Relate to Helping and Taking Charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5),1200-1211.
    [145]Meichienbaum, D.(1977). Cognitive behavior Modification:an Integrative Approach. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
    [146]Miceli, M.P., & J.P. Near (1985).Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistleblowing Decision. Personnel Psychology,38,525-544.
    [147]Miceli, M.P., & J.P. Near (1992). Blowing the Whistle. Macmillan Publishing Company:Riverside, New Jersey.
    [148]Milliken, F.J., & E.W. Morrison (2003).Shades of silence:Emerging themes and future directions for research on silence in organizations. Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1563-1568.
    [149]Milliken, F.J., Morrison E.W., & Hewlin P.F. (2003).An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence:Issues that Employees Don't Communicate upward and Why. Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1453-1476.
    [150]Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal,37,1543-1567.
    [151]Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence:A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4),706-725.
    [152]Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work:Extra role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal,42(4), 403-419.
    [153]Naylor, J., R. Pritchard, & D. Ilgen (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York:Academic Press.
    [154]Near, J.P., M.T. Rehg, J.R. Van Scotter, & M.P. Miceli (2004). Does type of wrongdoing affect the whistle-blowing process?. Business Ethics Quarterly,14, 219-242.
    [155]Nemeth C.J.& B.M. Staw(1989). The Tradeoffs of Social Control and Innovation in Groups and Organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,22,175-210.
    [156]Nick Bontis, Mary M. Crossan, John Hulland (2002). Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows. Journal of Management Studies,39(4),437-469.
    [157]Nye, L.G.,& Witt, L.A. (1993). Dimensionality and construct validity of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (POP). Educational and Psychological Measurement,53,821-829.
    [158]Only, S.,& Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo:What motivates proactive behavior?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80,623-629.
    [159]Olson Buchanan J.B.& Boswell W.R.(2008). An integrative model of experiencing and responding to mistreatment at work. Academy of Management Review,33 (1):76-96.
    [160]Oppenheim, A.N. (1992).Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. New York:PinterPublieations.
    [161]Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.43-72). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
    [162]Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M., & MacKenzie, S.B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior:Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.143.
    [163]Park H., Rehg, M. T., Lee, D. (2005). The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on whistleblowing Intentions:A Study of South Korean Public Employees. Journal of Business Ethics,58(4),387-403.
    [164]Parker S.K. (2000).From passive to proactive motivation:the importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied psychology:an international review,49(3),447-469.
    [165]Parker S.K., Williams H.M., Turner N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,91,636-652.
    [166]Parker, C.P., Dipboye, R.L.,& Jackson, S.L. (1995). Perceptions of organizational politics:An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management,21,891-912.
    [167]Parker, S. K. (1998).Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy:The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology,83,835-852
    [168]Parker, S. K., Bindl, U.K.& K. Strauss (2010). Making Things Happen:A Model of Proactive Motivation. Journal of Management,36 (4),827-856.
    [169]Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D.,& Jackson, P. R. (1997). That's not my job: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal,40,899-929.
    [170]Parker, S. K., Williams, H.,& Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,91,636-652.
    [171]Parker, S.,&Turner, J. (2002).Work design and individual work performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance. Chichester, UK:John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
    [172]Parker, S.K., Sprigg, C.A. (1999).Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology,84,925-939.
    [173]Parker, C., Dipboye, C.,&Jackson, S. (1995). Perceptions of organizational politics:An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management,21(5),891-912.
    [174]Parker, S.K.(1998). Role Breadth Self-efficacy:Relationship with work Enrichment and Other Organizational Practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,835-852.
    [175]Parker, S.,&Turner, J. (2002).Work design and individual work performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance. Chichester, UK:John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
    [176]Pauhus D. L.(1984).Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of personality and social psychology,1984,6(3),598-609.
    [177]Pearce, C.L, Sims, H.P., Jr., Cox, J. F., Ball, G, Schnell, E., Smith, K. A., & Trevino, L. (2003). Transactors, transformers and beyond:A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management Development,22(4),273-307.
    [178]Pearce, C.L., Sims H.P., & Jr. (2002). Vertical Versus Shared Leadership as Predictors of the Effectiveness of Change Management Teams:An Examination of Aversive, Directive, Transactional, Transformational and Empowering Leader Behaviors. Group Dynamics:Theory, Research, and Practice,6(2),172-197.
    [179]Pearce, C.L.& Conger J.A. (2003).All Those Years Ago:The Historical Underpinnings of Shared Leadership. in C.L.Pearce,&J.A.Conger (Eds.),Shared Leadership:Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, California:Sage Publications.
    [180]Pearce, C.L., Perry, M.L. & Sims,H.P. (2001). Shared Leadership:Relationship Management to Improve NPO Effectiveness. in T.D.Connors (Ed.),The Nonprofit Handbook:Management, New York:Wiley.
    [181]Pfeffer, J.(1992).Managing with Power. Boston.
    [182]Piliavin, J. A., Grube, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (2002). Role asresource for action in public service. Journal of Social Issues,58,469-485.
    [183]Pinder, G.G., Harlos, H.P. (2001). Employee silence:Quiescense and Acquiesence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management,20,331-369.
    [184]Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P. & Lee, J.Y.(2003). The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. Leadership Quarterly,14(6),615-656.
    [185]Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A.2007.Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior:A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,92:438-454.
    [186]Podsakoff, P. M, MacKenzie, S. B, Lee, J. Y,& Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:Acritical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,88,879-903.
    [187]Porter, L.W. (1976).Ogranizations as Political Animals. Presidential address, Division of Industrial organizational Psychology,84th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
    [188]Premeaux, S.F., & Bedeian, A. G. (2003). Breaking the silence:The moderating effects of self-monitoring in predicting speaking in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1537-1562.
    [189]Randall, M.L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C.A., & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20,159-174.
    [190]Rosen, C. C., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,91,211-220.
    [191]Ryan, K.D., & D.K. Oestreich(1998). Driving fear out of the workplace,2nd ed. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    [192]Saunders, D. M., Sheppard, B. H., Knight, V.,& Roth, J.(1992). Employee voice to supervisors. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal,5,241-259.
    [193]Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J. L.,& Jennings, K. R.1989.Antecedents and consequences of role stress:A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior,10,35-58.
    [194]Schein, E.H.,& Bennis. W.G. (1965). Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Methods. New York:Wiley.
    [195]Schein, E.H. (1993). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
    [196]Schneider, B. (1990). The Climate for Service:an Application of The Climate Construct[C]. Schneider, B. Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass:383-412.
    [197]Seibert, S.E., Crant, J.M.,& Kraimer, M.L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology,84,416-427.
    [198]Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L.,& Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology,54,845-874.
    [199]Senge P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline:The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London:Random House.
    [200]Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace:Dimensions, measurement, validation. Academy of Management Journal,38,1442-1465.
    [201]Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. New Park:Sage.
    [202]Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000).The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly,63,284-297.
    [203]Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism:A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA:Benjamin Cummings.
    [204]Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Rangaraj Ramanujam. (2008). Exploring Nonlinearity in Employee Voice:the Effects of Personal Control and Organizational Identification. Academy of Management Journal,51(6), 1189-1203.
    [205]Tagiuri, R., Litwin, G.H. (1968). Organizational Climate:Explorations of a Concept. Boston:Harvard University:27.
    [206]Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., & Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship and role definition effects. Journal of Applied Psychology,86,789-796.
    [207]Thompson, J.A.. Proactive Personality and Job Performance:A Social Capital Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology,2005, (90):1011-1017.
    [208]Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D.S., & Chockalingam Viswesvaran. (2010).Employee proactivity in organizations:A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,83, 275-300.
    [209]Tsui, A. (2006). Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review,2(1),1-13.
    [210]Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D.,& Carter, A. (2005). Creative requirement:A neglected construct in the study of employee creativity? Group and Organization Manangement,30,541-560.
    [211]Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41,108-119.
    [212]Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies,40(6),1359-1392.
    [213]Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors:in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Research in Organizational Behavior,17,215-285.
    [214]Vigoda, E. (2000). Internal politics in public administration systems:An empirical examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, 29,185-210.
    [215]Walton, R. E. and Hackman, J. R. (1986). Groups under contrasting management strategies. In:Goodman, P. S. and Associates (Eds.) Designing Executive Work Groups, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
    [216]Withey, M. J., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly,34,521-539.
    [217]Wu Liu, Renhong Zhu, Yongkang Yang. (2010).I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly,21,189-202.
    [218]Xiaomeng ZHANG & Bartol K.M.(2010).Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity:the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1),107-128.
    [219]Xu Huang, Evert Van de Vliert & Gerben Van der Vegt. (2005). Breaking the Silence Culture:Stimulation of Participation and Employee Opinion Withholding Cross-nationally. Management and Organization Review,1(3), 459-482.
    [220]Yukl, G.A.(1998). Leadership in Organizations (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [221]Zhou, J. & Ferris G. R. (1995).The Dimensions and Consequences of Organizational Politics Perceptions:A Confirmatory Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,25(19):1747-1764.
    [222]Michael Quinn Patton著,吴芝仪、李奉儒译.质的评鉴与研究[M],台北:桂冠图书公司,1990.
    [223][加]弗朗西斯·赫瑞比.郑晓明等译.管理知识员工[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000.7.58-74.
    [224]宝贡敏,钱源源.多视角研究框架下的员工建言[J].软科学,2009,23(8):104-106.
    [225]贝斯特.认知心理学[M].黄希庭,张志杰,周榕等译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000
    [226]陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].教育科学出版社,2002.
    [227]戴昌钧,陈臻袆.程序性和规范性——知识工作界定准则的探讨[J].华东经济管理,2006,20(110):54-58.
    [228]段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71.
    [229]段文婷,江光荣.计划行为理论述评[J].心理科学进展2008,16(2):315-320.
    [230]何铨,马剑虹.沉默的声音:组织中的沉默行为[J].心理科学进展2006,14(3):413-417.
    [231]何轩.为何员工知而不言——员工沉默行为的本土化实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(3):45-52.
    [232]侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004:1-165
    [233]胡君辰,吴小云.组织行为学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社2010.
    [234]胡君辰杨林锋.企业人力资源管理[M].格致出版社,上海人民出版社2011.
    [235]黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005:1-194
    [236]黄光国.关系与面子:华人社会中的冲突化解模式[A].陈恒之,梁觉主编.迈进中的华人心理学[C].香港:香港中文大学出版社,2000:181-208
    [237]黄光国.面子:中国人的权力游戏[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:63-87
    [238]季晓芬.团队沟通对团队知识共享的作用机制研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008
    [239]江林.知识型员工的特点与管理[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002(9)
    [240]李安民.组织政治知觉对员工工作态度之影响[D].台湾中山大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2002.
    [241]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2004:118-146.
    [242]李锐,凌文辁,柳士顺.上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制[J].心理学报2009,41(12):1189-1202.
    [243]李志刚,李兴旺.蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究——扎根理论研究方法的运用[J].管理科学2006,19(3)
    [244]李忠民,马冰.中国传统文化观对员工沉默行为的影响分析[J].科学·经济·社会2009(3):26-33.
    [245]连榕.认知心理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010.
    [246]梁建,唐京.员工合理化建议的多层次分析:来自本土连锁超市的证据[J].南开管理评论,12(3):125-134.
    [247]廖卉、庄瑗嘉.多层次理论模型的建立及研究方法[A].陈晓萍、徐淑英、樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法[C].北京大学出版社.北京,2008:351。
    [248]林钲琴,萧淑月.社会支持、信任、关系质量与组织知识分享行为之关系研究[J].台湾:商管科技季刊,2005,6(3):373-400.
    [249]刘智强,荆波.组织政治行为组织沉默的影响实证研究[J].预测,2008,(3).
    [250]卢纹岱SPSS for Windows统计分析[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002
    [251]马超,凌文铨,人力资源管理的新视角:组织政治学[J].中国人力资源开发,2004(7).
    [252]马超、凌文辁、方俐洛.企业员工组织政治认知量表的构建[J].心理学报,2006,38(1).
    [253]马庆国.管理统计:数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:42-320.
    [254]荣泰生.企业研究方法[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005:88.
    [255]赛卡瑞安.企业研究方法[M].祝道松,林家五译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
    [256]宋维真,张建新,张建平等.编制中国人个性测量表(CPAI)的意义与程序[J].心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407
    [257]孙汉银.论组织行为学中的组织政治知觉[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004(1).
    [258]汤磊,杨光.团队心理安全文献综述及未来研究方向[J].上海商学院学报2009,10(4)
    [259]汪林,储小平,黄嘉欣,陈戈.与高层领导的关系对经理人“谏言”的影响机制[J].管理世界,2010(5)
    [260]王甦,汪安圣.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社1992.
    [261]王永丽,邓静怡,任荣伟.授权型领导、团队沟通对团队绩效的影响[J].管理世界,2009(4)
    [262]吴隆增,曹昆鹏,陈苑仪,唐贵瑶.变革型领导行为对员工建言行为的影响及其中介作用机制研究[J].管理学报,2011(1)
    [263]吴明隆.SPSS.统计应用实务—问卷分析与应用统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [264]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法[A].陈晓萍、徐淑英、樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法[C].北京大学出版社.北京,2008
    [265]徐碧祥.员工信任对其知识整合与共享意愿的作用机制研究[D].浙江大学管理学院.博士:1-209,2007.
    [266]杨国枢,文崇一,吴聪贤等.社会及行为科学研究法(上、下)[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2006.
    [267]杨国枢.中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点[A].杨国枢,余安邦主编.中国人的心理与行为:理论与方法篇(一九九二)[C].台北:桂冠图书公司,1993
    [268]杨国枢.中国人的心理与行为:本土化研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004
    [269]杨志蓉.团队快速信任、互动行为与团队创造力研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2006
    [270]姚圣娟,邓亚男,郑俊虎.中国背景下企业员工沉默行为的文化根源[J].华东经济管理,2009,23(6):135-138.
    [271]姚作为.基于品牌关系的服务消费决策行为研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文,2005.
    [272]于丹,董大海,刘瑞明,原永丹.理性行为理论及其拓展研究的现状与展望[J].心理科学进展2008,16(5):796-802.
    [273]袁庆宏,王双龙.基于计划行为理论的员工发言行为决定模型构建[J].现代管理科学,2009(11):6-9.
    [274]张桂平,廖建桥.用“圈子”文化管理员工沉默行为[J].中国人力资源开发,2009(6)
    [275]张敏.改进企业员工沉默行为的三个前置性问题[J].企业导报,2009(8):170-171.
    [276]张一驰等.个人——组织匹配在外资医药企业员工离职倾向决定中的调节效应研究[J].南开管理评论,2005(3):37-41.
    [277]赵冰.组织支持知觉与组织沉默的关系研究[D].河南大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [278]赵曙明.人力资源管理研究[M](第一版).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:167.
    [279]郑晓涛,柯江林,石金涛,郑兴山.中国背景下员工沉默的测量以及信任对其的影响[J].心理学报,2008,40(2).
    [280]郑晓涛,郑兴山,石金涛.透视员工沉默[J].企业管理.2006(12)
    [281]郑晓涛,郑兴山,石金涛.员工沉默的研究综述[J].经济管理,2009,31(3):173-179.
    [282]周浩、龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950.
    [283]周浩、龙立荣.共同方法偏差:来源、发生机制及控制[A].刘军主编.管理研 究方法原理与应用[C].中国人民大学出版社.北京,2008.
    [284]庄文静.遭遇“合理化建议”的尴尬——一位研发部经理的烦恼[J].中外管理,2006:111-112.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700