高新技术产业集群及运行效应研究
|
摘要
高新技术产业集群是指同一高新技术产业领域内相互联系的众多企业因空间集聚而形成的一种产业组织形式,因其培育了大量的优势产业和优势企业,因而在全球化经济中体现较高的创新优势。产业集群是硅谷等高新技术产业集群成功的首要原因,建立科技园区已成为世界许多国家用于发展高技术产业集群的普遍做法,高新技术产业集群已成为高新技术在地理空间存在的有效形式和重要载体。因此,有必要深入研究高新技术产业集群的演进规律,找出其运行的特征和要素,为我国高新技术产业集群的发展提供一条新思路。本文通过现有的研究成果发现,目前缺少高新技术产业集群的理论逻辑体系,来较为系统地认识和了解高新技术产业集群的动态发展和环境制约状况。基于此,本文提出了基于主导产业视角的高新技术产业集群理论逻辑合成体系,对高新技术产业集群及其相应的运行效应问题进行创新性的理论探索,希望借此为主导产业理论的进一步应用研究和如何发展高新技术产业集群的实践提供一条全新的思路。在研究方法上,本论文也率先将业已成熟的主导产业理论、增长极理论、自组织理论、产业集群理论、动态比较优势理论、技术创新理论、生命周期理论等纳入到一个综合应用于高新技术产业集群及其运行效应的理论分析框架中。在此基础上,探讨以主导产业为视角的高新技术产业集群培育、选择和发展的实现路径,并以我国高新技术产业为样本,测算了我国高新技术产业的运行效应,提出相应的政策建议。
全文研究分为八个部分:
首先,在文章的第一部分,论述了关于本篇论文的研究背景、研究目的和国内外研究的理论与实践现状。对高新技术产业集群的相关理论进行梳理,提出了由产业区理论、中心区位理论、主导产业理论、产业集聚理论、增长极理论、产业空间扩散理论构成的高新技术产业集群理论逻辑体系,并构建了基于主导产业的高新技术产业集群演进理论合成模型图,使本文的高新技术产业集群理论形成一个完整、闭合的理论体系。
第二部分,主要界定相关研究对象的基本概念,并分析了高新技术产业集群的各种特征,明晰论文研究对象的边界,为后续的研究提供依据。
第三部分,由于文本是以高新技术主导产业的发展和演进为主线来研究高新技术产业集群,因此正确的识别、评价和选择高新技术主导产业成为高新技术产业集群理论研究中的首要前提,本文基于这一需要,对高新技术产业集群中的主导产业的内涵界定、识别、评价和选择做了研究和探讨,并提出了高新技术主导产业的识别基准、评价指标和选择步骤,为实践中正确识别高新技术主导产业提供理论基础。
第四部分,对高新技术产业集群的形成、演进机理进行理论分析。基于自组织理论和产业发展理论的高新技术产业集群的形成和演进机理研究,找出带动高新技术产业集群不断演进发展的序参量(主导性力量),认识高新技术产业集群的演进特征。
第五部分,着重研究基于主导产业的高新技术产业集群运行机理,通过分析高新技术产业集群的生命周期和各阶段特征,用主导产业理论解释高新技术产业集群的形成、发展和衰退过程,以此来正确认识主导产业在高新技术产业集群的重要作用和运行效应。
第六部分,研究高新技术产业集群的运行效应,根据分析结果划分出高新技术产业集群的运行效应应包括:增长效应、带动效应、扩散效应、关联效应,并建立相应的效应测度模型。再结合我国高新技术产业发展的实际数据对我国高新技术产业集群的运行效应进行了测量和评价,以此验证我国高新技术产业集群实际发展状况,体现测算方法的可操作性。
第七部分,根据本文提出的高新技术产业集群理论逻辑体系,将制度安排与高新技术产业集群发展过程形成关联,目的是针对问题动态调整政策,实现高新技术产业集群的可持续发展。
第八部分,最后本文总结了研究的局限和不足之处,并对未来的研究提出了展望。
High-tech industry cluster refers to the same high-tech industries in the field of inter-related businesses as a result of numerous space and gather to form a form of industrial organization, because of the advantages of cultivating a large number of industries and enterprises, which in a globalized economy reflected a more High-edge innovation. Industrial clusters such as Silicon Valley high-tech industry clusters of the primary reasons for the success of the establishment of Science and Technology Park has become many countries around the world for the development of high-tech industry clusters common practice in high-tech industry has become a high-tech clusters in the presence of geospatial In the form of an effective and important carrier. As a result, the need for an in-depth study of the evolution of high-tech industry clusters law, come up with the running of the features and elements for China's high-tech industry cluster for the development of a new train of thought. This study, through the existing research found that the current lack of high-tech industry cluster theory of the logic of the system in order to be able to be more systematic knowledge and understanding of the dynamics of the high-tech industry cluster development and environmental constraints situation. For this reason, this paper, based on the perspective of the leading industries of high-tech industrial cluster theory of logic synthesis system for high-tech industry cluster and its corresponding effects of the operation issues to explore innovative theories in the hope of leading industries for the theory further Applied research and development of high-tech industry practice of clustering offers a new way of thinking. In the study, this paper also breaks new ground will be the first to have a mature industry leading theory, growth pole theory of self-organization theory, industrial cluster theory, dynamic comparative advantage theory, theory of technological innovation, integrated life-cycle theory applies to high-tech Technology Industry Cluster and effect of running on theoretical analysis. On this basis, to explore the perspective of the leading industries for high-tech industry cluster training, selection and development of the realization of the path, and China's high-tech industries for the sample, the estimates of China's high-tech industries run effect of the proposed policy recommendations .
The full text of the following research carried out in eight parts:
First of all, the article in the first part of the discussion on this paper's research background, the purpose of study and research the theory and practice of the status quo. On the high-tech industry clusters related to sort out the theory put forward by the theory of industrial district, central location theory, theory of leading industries, industrial clustering theory, growth pole theory, the theory of industrial space posed by the proliferation of high-tech industry cluster theory logic system, And to build on the leading industries of high-tech industry cluster theory of the evolution of synthetic model, so this study of high-tech industry cluster to form a complete theory, the theory of closed system.
The second part ,the main subjects related to define the basic concepts and an analysis of high-tech industry clusters of features, clear thesis research of the border, in order to provide a basis for follow-up study.
The third part, the correct identification, evaluation and selection of high-tech industries have become the leading high-tech industry clusters in the theoretical study of the primary prerequisite for this study was that, on the high-tech industry clusters in the leading industries of the identification, evaluation and selection Done research to identify the leading industry benchmarks, evaluation and selection steps, in order to correctly identify the management practices in leading high-tech industry to provide theoretical guidance.
The fourth part, the high-tech industry cluster formation, the mechanism of evolution theory analysis. Based on self-organization theory and the theory of high-tech industry cluster formation and mechanism of evolution, driven to find high-tech industry cluster development and the evolution of the order parameter (the dominant force) to understand the evolution of high-tech industry cluster features.
The fifth part, the leading industry-based focus on the operation mechanism of high-tech industry clusters, by analyzing the clusters of high-tech industry and the various stages of the life cycle characteristics of the leading industries with high-tech industry cluster theory to explain the formation, development and the process of recession In order to correct understanding of the leading industries in the high-tech industry clusters and the important role of running effect.
The sixth part, the study of high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation, according to the results of the analysis division of a high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation should include: effects of growth, driven effects, effects of proliferation, the association effect, and the establishment of a corresponding measure the effect of the model. China's high-tech industries combined with the actual data for the development of China's high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation were measured and evaluated in order to verify the actual clusters of high-tech industry development, reflects the calculation method of operation.
The seventh part, according to the proposed high-tech industry cluster theory of the logic of the system, institutional arrangements and the development of high-tech industry cluster formation associated with the aim of the problem for the dynamic adjustment of policy, high-tech industry clusters to achieve sustainable development.
The eighth part, the last of this article summed up the study of the limitations and deficiencies, and the future outlook of the study.
全文研究分为八个部分:
首先,在文章的第一部分,论述了关于本篇论文的研究背景、研究目的和国内外研究的理论与实践现状。对高新技术产业集群的相关理论进行梳理,提出了由产业区理论、中心区位理论、主导产业理论、产业集聚理论、增长极理论、产业空间扩散理论构成的高新技术产业集群理论逻辑体系,并构建了基于主导产业的高新技术产业集群演进理论合成模型图,使本文的高新技术产业集群理论形成一个完整、闭合的理论体系。
第二部分,主要界定相关研究对象的基本概念,并分析了高新技术产业集群的各种特征,明晰论文研究对象的边界,为后续的研究提供依据。
第三部分,由于文本是以高新技术主导产业的发展和演进为主线来研究高新技术产业集群,因此正确的识别、评价和选择高新技术主导产业成为高新技术产业集群理论研究中的首要前提,本文基于这一需要,对高新技术产业集群中的主导产业的内涵界定、识别、评价和选择做了研究和探讨,并提出了高新技术主导产业的识别基准、评价指标和选择步骤,为实践中正确识别高新技术主导产业提供理论基础。
第四部分,对高新技术产业集群的形成、演进机理进行理论分析。基于自组织理论和产业发展理论的高新技术产业集群的形成和演进机理研究,找出带动高新技术产业集群不断演进发展的序参量(主导性力量),认识高新技术产业集群的演进特征。
第五部分,着重研究基于主导产业的高新技术产业集群运行机理,通过分析高新技术产业集群的生命周期和各阶段特征,用主导产业理论解释高新技术产业集群的形成、发展和衰退过程,以此来正确认识主导产业在高新技术产业集群的重要作用和运行效应。
第六部分,研究高新技术产业集群的运行效应,根据分析结果划分出高新技术产业集群的运行效应应包括:增长效应、带动效应、扩散效应、关联效应,并建立相应的效应测度模型。再结合我国高新技术产业发展的实际数据对我国高新技术产业集群的运行效应进行了测量和评价,以此验证我国高新技术产业集群实际发展状况,体现测算方法的可操作性。
第七部分,根据本文提出的高新技术产业集群理论逻辑体系,将制度安排与高新技术产业集群发展过程形成关联,目的是针对问题动态调整政策,实现高新技术产业集群的可持续发展。
第八部分,最后本文总结了研究的局限和不足之处,并对未来的研究提出了展望。
High-tech industry cluster refers to the same high-tech industries in the field of inter-related businesses as a result of numerous space and gather to form a form of industrial organization, because of the advantages of cultivating a large number of industries and enterprises, which in a globalized economy reflected a more High-edge innovation. Industrial clusters such as Silicon Valley high-tech industry clusters of the primary reasons for the success of the establishment of Science and Technology Park has become many countries around the world for the development of high-tech industry clusters common practice in high-tech industry has become a high-tech clusters in the presence of geospatial In the form of an effective and important carrier. As a result, the need for an in-depth study of the evolution of high-tech industry clusters law, come up with the running of the features and elements for China's high-tech industry cluster for the development of a new train of thought. This study, through the existing research found that the current lack of high-tech industry cluster theory of the logic of the system in order to be able to be more systematic knowledge and understanding of the dynamics of the high-tech industry cluster development and environmental constraints situation. For this reason, this paper, based on the perspective of the leading industries of high-tech industrial cluster theory of logic synthesis system for high-tech industry cluster and its corresponding effects of the operation issues to explore innovative theories in the hope of leading industries for the theory further Applied research and development of high-tech industry practice of clustering offers a new way of thinking. In the study, this paper also breaks new ground will be the first to have a mature industry leading theory, growth pole theory of self-organization theory, industrial cluster theory, dynamic comparative advantage theory, theory of technological innovation, integrated life-cycle theory applies to high-tech Technology Industry Cluster and effect of running on theoretical analysis. On this basis, to explore the perspective of the leading industries for high-tech industry cluster training, selection and development of the realization of the path, and China's high-tech industries for the sample, the estimates of China's high-tech industries run effect of the proposed policy recommendations .
The full text of the following research carried out in eight parts:
First of all, the article in the first part of the discussion on this paper's research background, the purpose of study and research the theory and practice of the status quo. On the high-tech industry clusters related to sort out the theory put forward by the theory of industrial district, central location theory, theory of leading industries, industrial clustering theory, growth pole theory, the theory of industrial space posed by the proliferation of high-tech industry cluster theory logic system, And to build on the leading industries of high-tech industry cluster theory of the evolution of synthetic model, so this study of high-tech industry cluster to form a complete theory, the theory of closed system.
The second part ,the main subjects related to define the basic concepts and an analysis of high-tech industry clusters of features, clear thesis research of the border, in order to provide a basis for follow-up study.
The third part, the correct identification, evaluation and selection of high-tech industries have become the leading high-tech industry clusters in the theoretical study of the primary prerequisite for this study was that, on the high-tech industry clusters in the leading industries of the identification, evaluation and selection Done research to identify the leading industry benchmarks, evaluation and selection steps, in order to correctly identify the management practices in leading high-tech industry to provide theoretical guidance.
The fourth part, the high-tech industry cluster formation, the mechanism of evolution theory analysis. Based on self-organization theory and the theory of high-tech industry cluster formation and mechanism of evolution, driven to find high-tech industry cluster development and the evolution of the order parameter (the dominant force) to understand the evolution of high-tech industry cluster features.
The fifth part, the leading industry-based focus on the operation mechanism of high-tech industry clusters, by analyzing the clusters of high-tech industry and the various stages of the life cycle characteristics of the leading industries with high-tech industry cluster theory to explain the formation, development and the process of recession In order to correct understanding of the leading industries in the high-tech industry clusters and the important role of running effect.
The sixth part, the study of high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation, according to the results of the analysis division of a high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation should include: effects of growth, driven effects, effects of proliferation, the association effect, and the establishment of a corresponding measure the effect of the model. China's high-tech industries combined with the actual data for the development of China's high-tech industry cluster effect of the operation were measured and evaluated in order to verify the actual clusters of high-tech industry development, reflects the calculation method of operation.
The seventh part, according to the proposed high-tech industry cluster theory of the logic of the system, institutional arrangements and the development of high-tech industry cluster formation associated with the aim of the problem for the dynamic adjustment of policy, high-tech industry clusters to achieve sustainable development.
The eighth part, the last of this article summed up the study of the limitations and deficiencies, and the future outlook of the study.
引文
[1]AnnaLee Saxenian.The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley[J].Research Policy,1991(5):423-437.
[2]Biswas.B,R Ram.Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries:An Augumented Model and Further Evidence[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change 1986,(35):361-371.
[3]C.Watanabe,B.Asgari,A.Nagamatsu.Virtuous cycle between R&D,functionality development and assimilation capacity for competitive strategy in Japanese high technology industry[J].Technovation,2003(23):879-900.
[4]Chung-JenChen,Chin-ChenHuang.Amultiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan[J].Information &Management,2004(41):839-851.
[5]Feder,G.On Export and Economic Growth[J].Journal of Development Economics,1982(12):59-73.
[6]Fujita M.,Thisse,J.F.Economies of agglomeration[J].J.JPn.Int.Econ,1996(10):339-378.
[7]HelPman E.Intenationaltrade in the Presence of Produot differentiation,economics of scale and monopolistic competition[J].Jounal of Intenational Economies,1981(11):30-40.
[8]Helpman,E.Krugman,P.Market structure and foreign trade:increasing returns,imperfect competition and the intenational economy[M].London MIT Press,1985.
[9]Hsien-Che Lai,Joseph Z Shyu.A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait:The case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park[M].Technovation,2005.
[10]Humphry J,Schmitz H.Principle of Promoting Clusters and Network of SMEs.UNIDO Report,1995(11).
[11]Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat.The dynamic economic engine at Silicon Valley and US Government programmes in financing innovations[J].Technovation,2006(9):1081-1089.
[12]Jianfa Shen.Urban and Regional Development in Post-reform China:The Case of Zhujiang Delta.Progress in Planning,2002(57):91-140.
[13]John Phillimore.Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation-an analysis of western Australian technology park[J].Institute for Science and Technology Policy,Murdoch University,1999(7):75-82.
[14]Joon-Mo Yang,Tae-Wan Kim.A search for leading sectors over the business cycle:The case of Korea[J].Japan and the World Economy,2005(4):480-495.
[15]Krugman P.Geography and trade.Cambridge[M].MA:MIT press,1991a.
[16]Marshall,A.,Principles of Economics 8th ed.,London:Macmillan,1920.
[17]Mitsuru Kodama,Innovation and knowledge creation through leadership-based strategic community:Case study on high-tech company in Japan[J].Technovation,2007(27):115-132.
[18]Odedokun,M.O.Differential Impacts of Export Expansion on Economic Growth in the LDCs:A Comparison of Evidences Across Regional Income Groups and Between the Decades of 1970s and 1980s[J].Eastern Africa Economic Review,1991,7(2):69-73.
[19]Odedokun,M.O.Alternative Econometric Approaches For Analysing the Role of the Financial Sector in Economic Growth:Time series Evidence From LDCs[J].Journal of Development Economics,1996(50):119-146.
[20]Peter Gwynne,Directing Technology in Asia's Dragon[J].Research Technology Management,1993(3):12-15.
[21]Poter,M.E.Clusters and new economics competition[J].Harvard Business Review,1998(11).
[22]R.Pouder,C.H.St.John.Hot spots and blind spots:Geographical clusters of firms and inovation[J].Academy of Management review,1996(21).
[23]Ram,R.Exports and Economic Growth In Development Countries:Evidence from Time-series and Cross-section Data[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1987(1):57-72.
[24]Ram.R.Government Size and Economic Growth:A New Framework and Some Evidence From Cross-section and Time-series Data[J].American Economic Review,1986(3):191-208.
[25]Razita Carcofa.Technology transfer in the United States:Industrial research at engineering research centers and the technological needs of U.S.industry.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1991(39):397-410.
[26]Roelandt,T.andden Hertog,P ClusterAnalysis and Cluster-Based Policy Makingin DECD Countries:An Introduction to the Theme[R].Boosting Innovation:The Cluster Approach,OECD and Paris,1999.
[27]Rostow W.W,The Stage of Economic Growth[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1960.
[28]Stuart S.Rosenthal,William C,Strange.The Determinants of Agglomeration[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2001(50):191-229.
[29]Thomas W.Y.Man,Theresa Lau,K.F.Chan.The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises:A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2002(17).
[30]Vennables,Anthony J.,Cities and Trade:Extemal Trede and In Geography in Developing Economies[R].NBER Working Paper,2000.
[31]Bruno,Michael.Estimation of Factor Contribution to Growth Under Structural Disequilibrium[J].International Economic Review,1968(2).
[32]Wood,Gavin A.,Parr,Johnb.Transaction Costs.Agglomeration Economies and Industrial Location[J].Growth&Change,2005(1).
[33]Yiannis L Bakouros,Dimitri C Mardas,Nikos.Varsakelis Science park a high tech fantasy:an analysis of the science parks of Greece[M].Technovation,2002.
[34]艾伯特·赫希曼.经济发展战略[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1991:38-42.
[35]编委会.2006年中国高新技术产业发展年鉴.北京:中国言实出版社,2006.
[36]白永青,沈能,赵建强.对我国高技术产业与传统产业协调互动性的理性思考[J].统计与决策.2006(3):19-21.
[37]陈广文译.美国的高技术经济--都市区的增长、发展与风险[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004.
[38]陈至立在火炬计划十五周年总结表彰大会上的讲话,2003年9月19日.
[39]陈雨军,陈爱民.中国城市化:实证分析与对策研究[M].厦门:厦门大学 出版社,2002:37-68.
[40]陈其林.外商投资与中国产业结构的调整[M].福建:鹭江出版社,2000.
[41]陈柳钦.高新技术产业集群中社会资本的作用[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3).
[42]陈晓东.产业集群:发展我国高新技术产业的战略选择[D].福建师范大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[43]陈大雄,贺正楚.高新技术型主导产业评价体系及实证分析[J].求索,2004(3).
[44]陈大雄.高新技术型主导产业刍议[J].技术经济,2004(4).
[45]陈刚.区域主导产业选择的含义、原则与基准[J].理论探索,2004(2).
[46]陈宏宇.区域经济学新论[M].广州:广东经济出版社,1998.
[47]陈刚.区域主导产业选择的含义、原则与基准[J].理论探索,2004(2).
[48]储小平,李华.中小企业集群理论研究述评[J].学术研究,2002(5):60-63.
[49]楚尔鸣,李勇辉.高新技术产业经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[50]崔志明,万劲波,施琴芬.技术预见:高技术产业集群与集群式创新[J].科技进步与对策,2004(10).
[51]戴卫明,陈晓红.产业集群的起源:基于区域效应和聚集效应的博弈分析[J].财经理论与实践,2005(1).
[52]戴新.高技术发展与技术转移[J].咨询与决策,1992(1):27-32.
[53]董景荣,杨秀苔.高新技术向传统产业扩散的模型研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),1999(4).
[54]傅尤刚.成都高新技术产业集群发展研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[55]盖文启,张辉,吕文栋.国际典型高技术产业集群的比较分析与经验启示[J].中国软科学,2004(2).
[56]盖文启,朱华晟.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力[J].经济理论与经济管理,2001(10):25-30.
[57]谷兴荣.高新技术产业与发展中地区跨越式发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.
[58]顾海.发展高新技术及其产业促进产业结构升级[J].江苏企业管理,2000(9)
[59]郝宇,陈芳.我国高新技术产业集群的组织模式探析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(6).
[60]何宏伟,刘敏.产业集群的成因、特点与路径选择[J].大连民族学院学报2005(1):16-18.
[61]胡珑瑛,叶元煦.高技术产业集群的动因分析[J].技术经济,2002(8):50-52.
[62]胡珑瑛.高技术产业集群的动因分析[J].技术经济,2002(8).
[63]黄勤.论区域主导产业[D].博士学位论文,2002:24-60.
[64]惠宁.产业集群的区域经济效应研究[J].西北大学博士学位论文,2006.
[65]江泽民.亚太经合组织第四次领导非正式会议上讲话[R],1996年11月25日.
[66]经济合作与发展组织.创新集群:国家创新体系的推动力[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2005.
[67]科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心.中国高新技术产业化发展报告[R].科学出版社,1999:3.
[68]科学技术部火炬高新技术开发中心网站:http://168.160.200.181/default.aspx.
[69]李琦,姜山.意大利政府的技术发展措施及政府管理模式[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2005(12):16-9.
[70]李国麟,吴若陶.风险投资与科技企业[M].中国经济出版社,2000.[71][71]
李华君,彭玉兰.产业集群的制度分析[J].中国软科学,2003(9).
[72]李新,王敏晰.高新技术开发区主导产业的内涵[J].科技进步与对策,2008(5).
[73]李新春.企业家过程与国有企业的准企业家摸型[J].经济研究,2000(6).
[74]理查德·达夫特.组织理论与设计精要[M],北京:机械工业出版社,1999.
[75]梁文.高技术企业的区位因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003(5).
[76]梁靖廷,杨忠诚,修震威.高新区主导产业选择指标体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2002(6).
[77]刘乃全.外部性、递增收益与区域经济发展[J].外国经济与管理,2000,10(23):43-44.
[78]刘斌.产业集聚竞争优势的经济分析[M].中国发展出版社,2004:35.
[79]刘生元.张世晨.教育对经济增长的计量分析[J].理论与实践,2001(5):15-16.
[80]苗东升.他组织--系统科学的另一片视野[N].光明日报,1999年03月02日.
[81]钱纳里.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995.
[82]仇保兴.小企业集群研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:34-37.
[83]任家华,王成璋.基于全球价值链的高新技术产业集群转型升级[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(1).
[84]沈正平,刘海军,蒋涛.产业集群与区域经济发展探究[J].中国软科学,2004(2).
[85]沈常娥.区域经济发展中的主导产业选择[J].兰州商学院学报,1996(12).
[86]盛世豪.产业集群与区域经济发展[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[87]苏东水.产业经济学[M].高等教育出版社,2000.
[88]孙万松.高新区自主创新与核心竞争力[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006.
[89]唐杰等.城市产业经济分析:一项经济案例研究[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989.
[90]童旭红.企业区位决策影响因素分析对科技园区建设的启示[J].高科技与产业化,2004(10).
[91]万钢.国家高新区对经济的重要贡献和战略意义[N].中国企业报.2008年4月17日.
[92]汪炜,史晋川,孙福国.经济增长的区域影响与集聚效应分析[J].数量经济技术研究,2001(5).
[93]汪立鑫,曹江.外国直接投资对上海经济增长贡献的计量分析[J].上海经济研究,2000(5):36-39.
[94]王宏伟,朱德威.城市主导产业选择的模糊优选模型方法[J].经济地理,1994(3).
[95]王缉慈.创新空间-企业集群与区域发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[96]王缉慈.关于地方产业集群研究的几点建议[J].经济经纬,2004(2).
[97]王缉慈.地方产业群战略[J].中国工业经济,2002(3):47-54.
[98]王缉慈.高技术产业布局中的交通运输问题[J].地理科学,1993(4).
[99]王文博,刘生元.利用菲德模型测算教育投资的外溢效应[J].统计研究,2001(3):42-45.
[100]王兴元.高新技术向传统产业渗透途径、模型及促进对策[J].中国高新技 术企业,1997(04).
[101]王晓津.美国创业投资地域分布的理论探源和现实解释[J].世界经济研究,2005(6).
[102]王振颖.高新技术改造传统产业项目的技术经济评价研究[D].河北工业大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[103]王铮,毛可晶.高技术产业聚集区形成的区位因子分析[J].地理学报,2005(4).
[104]魏守华.集群竞争力的动力机制以及实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2002(10).
[105]魏江.产业集群:创新系统与技术学习[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:97-112.
[106]文晴晴.我国信息产业的产业关联效应研究[J].财经界,2007(10).
[107]吴国林.中小企业网络:发展中西部区域经济的关节点[J].经济问题探索,2001(9).
[108]熊晓云,张金隆.珠江三角洲产业集聚的分类研究[J].管理评论,2003(6).
[109]许陈生.高技术产业区位理论探析[J].软科学,1999(3).
[110]杨树旺,易明.影响产业集群的因素分析[J].西安财经学院学报,2006(6).
[111]姚凯.论高技术产业的区位因素[J].外国经济与管理,1996(1).
[112]于华钦,邵宇开,肖飞.区域主导产业选择的人力资本匹配基准研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3).
[113]翟慧娟,张梅青.高科技产业集群问题研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2004(3):6-7.
[114]张克俊.我国高新科技园区建设的比较研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2005.
[115]张圣祖.区域主导产业选择的基准分析[J].经济问题,2001(1).
[116]张威.中国装备制造业的产业集聚[J].中国工业经济,2002(3):55-63.
[117]赵冬梅,周荣征.高新技术产业集群持续竞争优势的形成机理分析[J].产业与科技论坛,2008(2).
[118]赵彦云,甄峰.我国区域自主创新和网络创新能力评价与分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(4).
[119]赵玉林,汪芳.高技术产业波及效应分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(6).
[120]赵玉林,汪芳.我国高技术产业关联效应实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2007(1).
[121]赵玉林.高技术产业化的界面管理原理[J].武汉理工大学学报,2004(3).
[122]钟坚.世界硅谷模式的制度分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001:126-129.
[123]周妍.对外商直接投资外溢效应的实证研究[J].经济问题探索,2002(6).
[124]周元,王维才.我国高新区阶段发展的理论框架[J].经济地理,2003(4).
[125]周振华.产业政策的选择标准:一个新的假设[J].经济研究,1989(3).
[126]朱华晟.浙江产业群:产业网络、成长轨迹与发展动力[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003.
[127]朱欣民.区域经济跨越式发展应该从何入手:德国巴伐利亚州经验剖析[J].工业技术经济,2004(3).
[128]佐贯利雄.产业结构[M].日本经济新闻社,1981.
[2]Biswas.B,R Ram.Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries:An Augumented Model and Further Evidence[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change 1986,(35):361-371.
[3]C.Watanabe,B.Asgari,A.Nagamatsu.Virtuous cycle between R&D,functionality development and assimilation capacity for competitive strategy in Japanese high technology industry[J].Technovation,2003(23):879-900.
[4]Chung-JenChen,Chin-ChenHuang.Amultiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan[J].Information &Management,2004(41):839-851.
[5]Feder,G.On Export and Economic Growth[J].Journal of Development Economics,1982(12):59-73.
[6]Fujita M.,Thisse,J.F.Economies of agglomeration[J].J.JPn.Int.Econ,1996(10):339-378.
[7]HelPman E.Intenationaltrade in the Presence of Produot differentiation,economics of scale and monopolistic competition[J].Jounal of Intenational Economies,1981(11):30-40.
[8]Helpman,E.Krugman,P.Market structure and foreign trade:increasing returns,imperfect competition and the intenational economy[M].London MIT Press,1985.
[9]Hsien-Che Lai,Joseph Z Shyu.A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait:The case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park[M].Technovation,2005.
[10]Humphry J,Schmitz H.Principle of Promoting Clusters and Network of SMEs.UNIDO Report,1995(11).
[11]Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat.The dynamic economic engine at Silicon Valley and US Government programmes in financing innovations[J].Technovation,2006(9):1081-1089.
[12]Jianfa Shen.Urban and Regional Development in Post-reform China:The Case of Zhujiang Delta.Progress in Planning,2002(57):91-140.
[13]John Phillimore.Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation-an analysis of western Australian technology park[J].Institute for Science and Technology Policy,Murdoch University,1999(7):75-82.
[14]Joon-Mo Yang,Tae-Wan Kim.A search for leading sectors over the business cycle:The case of Korea[J].Japan and the World Economy,2005(4):480-495.
[15]Krugman P.Geography and trade.Cambridge[M].MA:MIT press,1991a.
[16]Marshall,A.,Principles of Economics 8th ed.,London:Macmillan,1920.
[17]Mitsuru Kodama,Innovation and knowledge creation through leadership-based strategic community:Case study on high-tech company in Japan[J].Technovation,2007(27):115-132.
[18]Odedokun,M.O.Differential Impacts of Export Expansion on Economic Growth in the LDCs:A Comparison of Evidences Across Regional Income Groups and Between the Decades of 1970s and 1980s[J].Eastern Africa Economic Review,1991,7(2):69-73.
[19]Odedokun,M.O.Alternative Econometric Approaches For Analysing the Role of the Financial Sector in Economic Growth:Time series Evidence From LDCs[J].Journal of Development Economics,1996(50):119-146.
[20]Peter Gwynne,Directing Technology in Asia's Dragon[J].Research Technology Management,1993(3):12-15.
[21]Poter,M.E.Clusters and new economics competition[J].Harvard Business Review,1998(11).
[22]R.Pouder,C.H.St.John.Hot spots and blind spots:Geographical clusters of firms and inovation[J].Academy of Management review,1996(21).
[23]Ram,R.Exports and Economic Growth In Development Countries:Evidence from Time-series and Cross-section Data[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1987(1):57-72.
[24]Ram.R.Government Size and Economic Growth:A New Framework and Some Evidence From Cross-section and Time-series Data[J].American Economic Review,1986(3):191-208.
[25]Razita Carcofa.Technology transfer in the United States:Industrial research at engineering research centers and the technological needs of U.S.industry.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1991(39):397-410.
[26]Roelandt,T.andden Hertog,P ClusterAnalysis and Cluster-Based Policy Makingin DECD Countries:An Introduction to the Theme[R].Boosting Innovation:The Cluster Approach,OECD and Paris,1999.
[27]Rostow W.W,The Stage of Economic Growth[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1960.
[28]Stuart S.Rosenthal,William C,Strange.The Determinants of Agglomeration[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2001(50):191-229.
[29]Thomas W.Y.Man,Theresa Lau,K.F.Chan.The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises:A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2002(17).
[30]Vennables,Anthony J.,Cities and Trade:Extemal Trede and In Geography in Developing Economies[R].NBER Working Paper,2000.
[31]Bruno,Michael.Estimation of Factor Contribution to Growth Under Structural Disequilibrium[J].International Economic Review,1968(2).
[32]Wood,Gavin A.,Parr,Johnb.Transaction Costs.Agglomeration Economies and Industrial Location[J].Growth&Change,2005(1).
[33]Yiannis L Bakouros,Dimitri C Mardas,Nikos.Varsakelis Science park a high tech fantasy:an analysis of the science parks of Greece[M].Technovation,2002.
[34]艾伯特·赫希曼.经济发展战略[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1991:38-42.
[35]编委会.2006年中国高新技术产业发展年鉴.北京:中国言实出版社,2006.
[36]白永青,沈能,赵建强.对我国高技术产业与传统产业协调互动性的理性思考[J].统计与决策.2006(3):19-21.
[37]陈广文译.美国的高技术经济--都市区的增长、发展与风险[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004.
[38]陈至立在火炬计划十五周年总结表彰大会上的讲话,2003年9月19日.
[39]陈雨军,陈爱民.中国城市化:实证分析与对策研究[M].厦门:厦门大学 出版社,2002:37-68.
[40]陈其林.外商投资与中国产业结构的调整[M].福建:鹭江出版社,2000.
[41]陈柳钦.高新技术产业集群中社会资本的作用[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008(3).
[42]陈晓东.产业集群:发展我国高新技术产业的战略选择[D].福建师范大学硕士学位论文,2003.
[43]陈大雄,贺正楚.高新技术型主导产业评价体系及实证分析[J].求索,2004(3).
[44]陈大雄.高新技术型主导产业刍议[J].技术经济,2004(4).
[45]陈刚.区域主导产业选择的含义、原则与基准[J].理论探索,2004(2).
[46]陈宏宇.区域经济学新论[M].广州:广东经济出版社,1998.
[47]陈刚.区域主导产业选择的含义、原则与基准[J].理论探索,2004(2).
[48]储小平,李华.中小企业集群理论研究述评[J].学术研究,2002(5):60-63.
[49]楚尔鸣,李勇辉.高新技术产业经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[50]崔志明,万劲波,施琴芬.技术预见:高技术产业集群与集群式创新[J].科技进步与对策,2004(10).
[51]戴卫明,陈晓红.产业集群的起源:基于区域效应和聚集效应的博弈分析[J].财经理论与实践,2005(1).
[52]戴新.高技术发展与技术转移[J].咨询与决策,1992(1):27-32.
[53]董景荣,杨秀苔.高新技术向传统产业扩散的模型研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),1999(4).
[54]傅尤刚.成都高新技术产业集群发展研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[55]盖文启,张辉,吕文栋.国际典型高技术产业集群的比较分析与经验启示[J].中国软科学,2004(2).
[56]盖文启,朱华晟.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力[J].经济理论与经济管理,2001(10):25-30.
[57]谷兴荣.高新技术产业与发展中地区跨越式发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.
[58]顾海.发展高新技术及其产业促进产业结构升级[J].江苏企业管理,2000(9)
[59]郝宇,陈芳.我国高新技术产业集群的组织模式探析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(6).
[60]何宏伟,刘敏.产业集群的成因、特点与路径选择[J].大连民族学院学报2005(1):16-18.
[61]胡珑瑛,叶元煦.高技术产业集群的动因分析[J].技术经济,2002(8):50-52.
[62]胡珑瑛.高技术产业集群的动因分析[J].技术经济,2002(8).
[63]黄勤.论区域主导产业[D].博士学位论文,2002:24-60.
[64]惠宁.产业集群的区域经济效应研究[J].西北大学博士学位论文,2006.
[65]江泽民.亚太经合组织第四次领导非正式会议上讲话[R],1996年11月25日.
[66]经济合作与发展组织.创新集群:国家创新体系的推动力[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2005.
[67]科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心.中国高新技术产业化发展报告[R].科学出版社,1999:3.
[68]科学技术部火炬高新技术开发中心网站:http://168.160.200.181/default.aspx.
[69]李琦,姜山.意大利政府的技术发展措施及政府管理模式[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2005(12):16-9.
[70]李国麟,吴若陶.风险投资与科技企业[M].中国经济出版社,2000.[71][71]
李华君,彭玉兰.产业集群的制度分析[J].中国软科学,2003(9).
[72]李新,王敏晰.高新技术开发区主导产业的内涵[J].科技进步与对策,2008(5).
[73]李新春.企业家过程与国有企业的准企业家摸型[J].经济研究,2000(6).
[74]理查德·达夫特.组织理论与设计精要[M],北京:机械工业出版社,1999.
[75]梁文.高技术企业的区位因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003(5).
[76]梁靖廷,杨忠诚,修震威.高新区主导产业选择指标体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2002(6).
[77]刘乃全.外部性、递增收益与区域经济发展[J].外国经济与管理,2000,10(23):43-44.
[78]刘斌.产业集聚竞争优势的经济分析[M].中国发展出版社,2004:35.
[79]刘生元.张世晨.教育对经济增长的计量分析[J].理论与实践,2001(5):15-16.
[80]苗东升.他组织--系统科学的另一片视野[N].光明日报,1999年03月02日.
[81]钱纳里.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995.
[82]仇保兴.小企业集群研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:34-37.
[83]任家华,王成璋.基于全球价值链的高新技术产业集群转型升级[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(1).
[84]沈正平,刘海军,蒋涛.产业集群与区域经济发展探究[J].中国软科学,2004(2).
[85]沈常娥.区域经济发展中的主导产业选择[J].兰州商学院学报,1996(12).
[86]盛世豪.产业集群与区域经济发展[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[87]苏东水.产业经济学[M].高等教育出版社,2000.
[88]孙万松.高新区自主创新与核心竞争力[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006.
[89]唐杰等.城市产业经济分析:一项经济案例研究[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989.
[90]童旭红.企业区位决策影响因素分析对科技园区建设的启示[J].高科技与产业化,2004(10).
[91]万钢.国家高新区对经济的重要贡献和战略意义[N].中国企业报.2008年4月17日.
[92]汪炜,史晋川,孙福国.经济增长的区域影响与集聚效应分析[J].数量经济技术研究,2001(5).
[93]汪立鑫,曹江.外国直接投资对上海经济增长贡献的计量分析[J].上海经济研究,2000(5):36-39.
[94]王宏伟,朱德威.城市主导产业选择的模糊优选模型方法[J].经济地理,1994(3).
[95]王缉慈.创新空间-企业集群与区域发展[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[96]王缉慈.关于地方产业集群研究的几点建议[J].经济经纬,2004(2).
[97]王缉慈.地方产业群战略[J].中国工业经济,2002(3):47-54.
[98]王缉慈.高技术产业布局中的交通运输问题[J].地理科学,1993(4).
[99]王文博,刘生元.利用菲德模型测算教育投资的外溢效应[J].统计研究,2001(3):42-45.
[100]王兴元.高新技术向传统产业渗透途径、模型及促进对策[J].中国高新技 术企业,1997(04).
[101]王晓津.美国创业投资地域分布的理论探源和现实解释[J].世界经济研究,2005(6).
[102]王振颖.高新技术改造传统产业项目的技术经济评价研究[D].河北工业大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[103]王铮,毛可晶.高技术产业聚集区形成的区位因子分析[J].地理学报,2005(4).
[104]魏守华.集群竞争力的动力机制以及实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2002(10).
[105]魏江.产业集群:创新系统与技术学习[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:97-112.
[106]文晴晴.我国信息产业的产业关联效应研究[J].财经界,2007(10).
[107]吴国林.中小企业网络:发展中西部区域经济的关节点[J].经济问题探索,2001(9).
[108]熊晓云,张金隆.珠江三角洲产业集聚的分类研究[J].管理评论,2003(6).
[109]许陈生.高技术产业区位理论探析[J].软科学,1999(3).
[110]杨树旺,易明.影响产业集群的因素分析[J].西安财经学院学报,2006(6).
[111]姚凯.论高技术产业的区位因素[J].外国经济与管理,1996(1).
[112]于华钦,邵宇开,肖飞.区域主导产业选择的人力资本匹配基准研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3).
[113]翟慧娟,张梅青.高科技产业集群问题研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2004(3):6-7.
[114]张克俊.我国高新科技园区建设的比较研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2005.
[115]张圣祖.区域主导产业选择的基准分析[J].经济问题,2001(1).
[116]张威.中国装备制造业的产业集聚[J].中国工业经济,2002(3):55-63.
[117]赵冬梅,周荣征.高新技术产业集群持续竞争优势的形成机理分析[J].产业与科技论坛,2008(2).
[118]赵彦云,甄峰.我国区域自主创新和网络创新能力评价与分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2007(4).
[119]赵玉林,汪芳.高技术产业波及效应分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(6).
[120]赵玉林,汪芳.我国高技术产业关联效应实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2007(1).
[121]赵玉林.高技术产业化的界面管理原理[J].武汉理工大学学报,2004(3).
[122]钟坚.世界硅谷模式的制度分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001:126-129.
[123]周妍.对外商直接投资外溢效应的实证研究[J].经济问题探索,2002(6).
[124]周元,王维才.我国高新区阶段发展的理论框架[J].经济地理,2003(4).
[125]周振华.产业政策的选择标准:一个新的假设[J].经济研究,1989(3).
[126]朱华晟.浙江产业群:产业网络、成长轨迹与发展动力[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003.
[127]朱欣民.区域经济跨越式发展应该从何入手:德国巴伐利亚州经验剖析[J].工业技术经济,2004(3).
[128]佐贯利雄.产业结构[M].日本经济新闻社,1981.