父母教养方式对初中生在校行为的影响:心理资本的中介作用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在全面推行素质教育的背景下,中小学心理健康教育蓬勃发展,对中小学生进行积极心理素质的培养成为心理健康教育的重要内容之一。心理资本是个体在成长和发展过程中表现出来的一种积极的心理状态,对个体的思想认知、主观体验、行为表现产生显著的影响。本研究选取了潍坊市两所初中和济宁市一所初中共483人作为研究对象,以积极心理资本问卷(PPQ)、在校行为问卷、父母教养方式问卷为研究工具,考察心理资本在父母教养方式对初中生在校行为的影响中的中介作用。运用Spss13.0对调查数据进行统计分析,主要结论如下:
     第一,初中生心理资本总体状况良好,心理资本总分在性别、独生非独生、年级、家庭所在地上无明显差异。自我效能维度独生子得分显著高于非独生子,农村学生希望维度得分较高。
     第二,女生在校行为总分及常规、课业、师生关系、同学关系维度上的得分显著高于男生;自我接受水平维度的得分独生子显著高于非独生子;家在农村的初中生常规、自我接受水平维度的得分显著高于家在城镇的学生;师生关系维度存在明显的年级差异,初一学生在师生关系维度上得分最高。
     第三,父亲教养方式拒绝维度上男生比女生得分高;父、母情感温暖维度独生子得分显著高于非独生子;父、母亲情感拒绝维度上家庭在城镇的初中生得分明显高于农村的初中生。
     第四,教养方式中父、母情感温暖与学生的在校行为呈显著正相关,而拒绝、过度保护与在校行为呈显著负相关。父母教养方式对在校行为有预测作用。
     第五,教养方式中父、母情感温暖与学生的在校行为、心理资本呈显著正相关,而拒绝、过度保护与在校行为、心理资本呈显著负相关。心理资本与在校行为呈显著正相关;心理资本对学生在校行为有预测作用。
     第六,总体而言,心理资本在母亲教养方式对初中生在校行为的影响中起着中介作用,即父母教养方式通过心理资本影响在校行为。
In the background of the full implementation of the quality education, thepsychological health education of primary and middle school developed vigorously,Students,positive mental quality training to become one of the important contents ofpsychological health education. Psychological capital shows a positive mental state ofthe individual in their growth and development process, which affects their cognitiveprocess, behavior and happiness significantly.
     This study selected 483 students of two junior middle schools in Weifang and oneschool in Jining as the research object. By using positive psychological capitalquestionnaire (PPQ), behavior at school questionnaire, parenting styles questionnaireas research tools, the mediating role of psychological capital will be investigatedbetween the parenting styles and the behavior at school of junior middle schoolstudents.Spss13.0 is used to analysis the survey data of statistic. The main conclusionsare as follows:
     1. Junior high school students' psychological capital is generally in a goodcondition; Psychological capital has no obvious differences among the gender, onlychild, grade,and the family seat ; The only son' self-efficacy was significantly higherthan the non only child; The students whose home in the countryside hope todimensions higher scores.
     2. The girls' overall school performance is better than the boys'; The selfacceptance of the only child is higher than that of the non only child; The schoolroutines and self acceptance of the students whose family seat in the countryside arebetter than the students whose family seat in the town. The teacher-student relationship dimension exist obvious differences in different grades, which scores thehighest in first grade of junior high school.
     3. Boys' fathers score higher than girls' fathers in parenting style and refusaldimension; parents’understanding and emotional warmth of only child is higher thanthat of the non only child. Parents of junior high school students in cities and townsscore significantly higher in refusal dimension than the parents in rural areas.
     4. There is a significant negative correlation between parents refuse, parentsprotect and the behavior at school. The relationship between parental warmth andbehavior at school of students is a significant positive correlation; Parental RearingPatterns on the behavior of school students can be used to predict.
     5. There is a significant negative correlation between parents refuse, parentsprotect and the psychological capital. The relationship between parental warmth andpsychological capital of students is a significant positive correlation; The relationshipbetween psychological capital and behavior at school present a significant positivecorrelation; Psychological capital on the behavior of school students can be used topredict.
     6. The psychological capital plays a mediating role in the influence of parentalrearing patterns on the junior middle school students' behavior at school. Parentalrearing patterns affect the school behavior through the Psychological CapitalAppreciation.
引文
[1]程学超,谷传华.(2001).母亲行为与小学儿童自尊的关系.心理发展与教育,4:23-27.
    [2]董会琴,张文新.(2005).家庭对儿童欺负受欺负的影响.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),50(3):127-131.
    [3]付立菲,张阔.(2010).大学生积极心理资本与学习倦怠状况的关系.中国健康心理学杂志,11:1356-1359.
    [4]关培兰,罗东霞.(2009).女性创业者积极心理资本与创业发展.经济管理,8:81-88.
    [5]龚艺华.(2006).四种不同类型父母教养方式对个体成就动机水平的影响.中国临床康复,10(46):50-52.
    [6]葛静霞.(2007).父母教养方式与青少年心理健康的关系研究.东北师大,24-25.
    [7]胡烨妃,骆宏.(2010).心理资本在学习领域的应用.中国校外教育下旬刊,4:4-5.
    [8]黄玉梅.(2006).父母教养方式与城乡青少年学校适应的关系比较.山东师范大学硕士学位论文.
    [9]金铭琦,刘新民.(2008).家庭教养方式评价量表(父母版)的编制[C].中国行为医学科学第十次全国行为医学学术会议论文汇编,11:74-75.
    [10]蒋奖,鲁峥嵘,蒋苾菁,许燕.(2010).简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订.心理发展与教育,(1):94-99 .
    [11]柯江林,孙健敏,李永瑞.(2009).心理资本:本土量表的开发及中西比较.心理学报,41(9):875-888.
    [12]李超平译.(2008).心理资本.北京:中国轻工业出版社.
    [13]李敏,甘怡群.(2011).高中生学业倦怠感倾向与父母教养方式的关系分析.中国学校卫生,01.
    [14]刘佰桥,陈秀敏,王希海.(2009).父母教养方式对大学生心理健康的影响.社会心理科学,24(106):739-742.
    [15]刘旺,冯建新.(2002).初中生学校适应及其与一般生活满意度的关系.中国特殊教育,6:77-80.
    [16]廉串德,郑日昌.(2002).高一学生学校适应与教师领导行为关系之初探.心理发展与教育,4:61-64.
    [17]梁军林.(1999).父母教养方式对初中生学习成绩的影响初探.四川精神卫生,12:88-89.
    [18]潘清泉.(2009).贫困大学生心理资本、应对方式与心理健康的关系.中国健康心理学杂志,5:844-846.
    [19]强麟.(2009).组织承诺、心理资本与工作绩效关系研究.天津师范大学硕士学位论文.
    [20]申艳娥.(2007).自我效能感理论及研究现状.教学与管理,9:3-5.
    [21]唐强(,2008).企业员工心理资本结构维度及其因果关系的初步验证.浙江大学硕士论文.
    [22]田喜洲.(2009).从人力资本、社会资本到心理资本—人力资源管理的新取向.商业研究,(01):77-79.
    [23]陶庆兰,刘阳,耿婷.(2007).大学生抑郁障碍与父母教养方式的关系.上海精神医学,19(5):267.
    [24]谭千宝.(2010).城市流动儿童的学校欺负与学校适应.当代教育理论与实践,4:94-96.
    [25]王蓓苗,元江,蒋苏芹.(2011).大学生心理资本状况及其相关研究.校园心理,9(4):222-225.
    [26]魏球.(2009).心理资本对职业生涯成功预测作用的实证研究.广东外语外贸大学硕士学位论文.
    [27]吴武典.(1997).国中偏差行为学生学校生活适应之探讨.教育心理学报,29:25-50.
    [28]王春莉,廖凤林.(2005).父母教养方式小学与高中生抑郁情绪的相关性,中国临床康复. 9(20):35-37.
    [29]王燕,张雷.(2005).儿童学业自我概念在父母教养风格与学业成就的中介效应[J].应用心理学,(11),2,186-192.
    [30]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.(2005).调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用.心理学报.37(2):268-270.
    [31]许玉燕,谢广田(.2010).家庭教养方式影响小学生自我效能感的调查与研究.2:46-47.
    [32]岳冬梅,李鸣果.(1993).父母教养方式:EMBU的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用.中国心理卫生杂志,7(3):97-101.
    [33]尤瑾,郭永玉.大学生人格、社会支持与主观幸福感的关系.(2007).心理与行为研究, 5(1): 65-69.
    [34]张文新.(1999).儿童社会性发展,北京师范大学出版社.
    [35]张文新.(1997).城乡青少年父母教养方式的比较研究.心理发展与教育,3:44-49.
    [36]张文新.(1998).独生与非独生青少年父母教育方式的比较研究.山东师大学报,4:56-59.
    [37]张丽华.(1997).父母的教养方式与儿童社会化发展研究综述.辽宁师范大学学报,3:19-22.
    [38]张阔,张赛,董颖红.(2010).积极心理资本:测量及其与心理健康的关系.心理与行为研究,8(1):58~64.
    [39]张文.(2010).中小学教师心理资本问卷的编制及其特征分析.西南大学硕士论文.
    [40]仲理峰.(2007).心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展,15(3):482-487.
    [41]仲理峰.(2007).心理资本对员工的工作绩效、组织承诺及组织公民行为的影响.心理学报,39(2):328-324
    [42]赵西萍,杨晓萍.(2009).复杂工作环境下心理资本的研究.科技管理研究,(6):409-411.
    [43]朱晓庆.(2010).初中生心理资本及其影响因素的研究.南京师大硕士学位论文.
    [44]周巧英,洛宏.(2011).大学生心理资本、学业情绪、英语学习效能的关系.CollegeEnglish,(9):18-22.
    [45]周阿妮.(2011).中学教师家庭工作冲突、心理资本和心理健康的关系研究.山东师范大学硕士论文.
    [46]郑立新、彭金维、奚燕娟.(2001).独生与非独生子女家庭父母养育方式的比较研究.中国儿童保健杂志,6(3):159-161.
    [1] Cole,K.wellbeing.(2006).psychological capital and unemployment: An integrated theory[R]. the joint annual conference of the International Association for Research in EconomicPsychology(IAREP) and the Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Eeonomies(SABE).Paris, Franee.
    [2] Goldsmith AH, Veum JR , and Darity W. (1997). The impact of psyehologieal andhuman eapitalon-wages. Economie Inquiry. 35: 815- 829.
    [3]Gordon Parker,Hilary Tupling and L.B.Brown.(1979).A Parental BondingInstrument.British Journal of Medical Psychology,52(5),1-10.
    [4] Luthans F,Avolio BJ,Walumbwa FO,Li W.(2005).The psychological capital ofChinese workers:Exploring therelationshipt11 performance.Management andOquzationReview, 1:247—269.
    [5] Luthans F, Norman S M, Avolio B J, Avey J B.(2008).The Mediat Role ofPsychological Capital in the Supportive Organizationa Climate-Employee PerformanceRelationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2): 219-238.
    [6]Snyder.CR,Harris.C,Anderson.JR,Holleran.SA,Irving.LM, Sigmon.ST.(1991).The willand the ways:development and validation of an individual-differences measure ofhope.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,60:570–585.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700