菊芋及其腌渍品的流变特性和质地评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
菊芋是一种常见的块茎类蔬菜,一般被用来提取菊糖或腌渍咸菜。它具有营养价值高、便于种植管理等优点,因此是极具开发价值的半野生资源。流变特性与质地特性参数是果蔬质量评定的重要参数,往往是影响消费者选择果蔬的主要因素之一。因此,研究菊芋等果蔬采后的流变特性及其质地的变化,对其采后处理及品质评价具有十分重要的意义。
     本论文以菊芋和腌渍菊芋为主要研究对象,用质构仪对菊芋进行了如下测试:松弛和蠕变等“小变形”的基本流变力学测试,穿刺、压缩、剪切、弯曲、拉伸等破坏力学测试,TPA等模拟力学测试。
     为了得到实验最佳的测试条件,对菊芋和腌渍菊芋分别用不同的测试参数进行各项测试,结果表明,实验测试速率、位移和时间对实验结果均有不同程度的影响,不同测试方法的主要影响因素不同,因此,分别对测试条件进行了优化:对于新鲜菊芋的测定,取样时应尽量选在芯部取样,应采用去皮测试,探头采用P/3较好。穿刺速率建议取0.2~5mm/s之间,穿刺深度应大于3mm;剪切测试速率应选取0.2~4mm/s之间;TPA测试速率应选取0.2~4mm/s之间,压缩量大于2mm松弛测试得到优化的实验组合为加载速率1mm/s、0.5加载量mm、松弛时间60s;蠕变测试得到优化的实验组合为加载速率0.5mm/s、载荷3000g、时间60s。
     通过对菊芋在不同贮藏温度和不同贮藏方式下的流变和质地特性的变化趋势进行研究,以及对贮存期间的菊芋进行感官评价,结果表明:不同贮藏温度对菊芋最终保藏效果的影响是显著的,1℃的贮藏温度条件对菊芋品质的保持具有较好的保藏效果;PE保鲜膜(袋)包装对菊芋来说是比较好的常温保藏方法,CaCl_2处理的方式也有不错的保鲜效果;菊芋在贮存过程中的流变和质地力学变化与其感官品质、水分含量等的变化具有一定的关联性。特别是脆性、质地、新鲜度等感官指标分别与空间破裂次数NSR、刺破深度D、TPA测试的回复性等质地力学指标具有很好的相关性(R分别为0.952、-0.955、0.957)。
     通过研究新鲜菊芋和腌渍菊芋在质地力学和流变特性上的差异性,以及热处理过程对菊芋和腌渍菊芋质地特性、流变特性和感官品质的影响。结果表明:新鲜菊芋和腌渍菊芋在质地和流变学特性上的差异较大,热处理过程对二者质地力学和流变特性的变化具有明显的影响。
     通过上述研究,将菊芋和腌渍菊芋抽象的流变特性和质地力学性质具体化、数字化,建立了简易评价二者综合品质有效方法;通过对其进行感官评价,进一步研究了感官评价和质构分析仪测定结果的相关性。为利用仪器分析代替感官评价测定腌渍菊芋的质地品质提供了理论依据。
Jerusalem artichoke is a kind of familiar tuber vegetable,and it is usually be used to extract inulin or make pickled vegetable. Jerusalem artichoke has the advantage of high nutrition value and easily growth,so it is semi-wild resource with very important development value. The parameters of rheology and texture are important parameter to evaluate the quality of fruit and vegetable ,they are always primary factors to affects customer to choose fruit and vegetable. So, investigating changes of rheology and texture quality of fruit and vegetable such as Jerusalem artichoke after gathering has very important meaning to dispose and evaluate their quality.
     With "Jerusalem artichoke and pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber" as the main objects and texture analyzer as the main instrument, this thesis mainly focuses on the aspects as follows: the "slight deformation" tests such as stress relaxation and creep test,the destructive tests such as puncture test,compression test,shearing test,bending test,tension test,and the simulative test such as TPA (Texture Profile Analysis) test.
     Different test conditions had been respectively applied to every kind of test in order to get the best test conditions. The results show that speed,time and distance affect the tests differently,and the main influencing factors are different with different measurement. So the test conditions has to be optimized respectively: For Jerusalem artichoke, taking of samples should be in the core region of it and samples should be taken peel out. The probe of P/3 is chosen in the puncture test. The optimal test conditions are as follows: Test speed 0.2~5mm/s,distance > 3mm in the puncture test; Test speed 0.2~4 mm/s in the shearing test; Test speed 0.2~4mm/s,distance > 2mm in the TPA test; Test speed lmm/s,distance 0.5mm,time 60s in the stress relaxation test; Test speed 0.5mm/s,force 3000g,time 60s in the creep test.
     The trends of rheological and texture properties of Jerusalem artichoke under different storage temperature and Jerusalem artichoke under different storage measure were studied. Meanwhile,sensory assessment was also be made .The results show that ultimately quality of Jerusalem artichoke under different storage temperature is different distinctly. The condition under 1℃is good for keeping its quality;Packing with PE fresh-keeping film or PE fresh-keeping bag is all-right measure for keeping quality of Jerusalem artichoke. Dealing it with CaCl_2 is also a good measure;Changes of texture and rheological properties of Jerusalem artichoke are relational with change of its sensory property and water content in course of storage. Specially,there are good correlation between Crispy,Texture,Greenness (sensory parameters) and NSR, Fracture distance of puncture test, Resilience of TPA test (texture parameters),their R is respectively 0.952,-0.955,0.957.
     The difference of Jerusalem artichoke and pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber in texture and rheological properties,and the change of texture properties, rheological properties and sensory property of Jerusalem artichoke and pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber by heating them up are studied. The results show that the difference between Jerusalem artichoke and Pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber is notable. The effect of heating them up for their rheological and texture properties is distinct.
     The nonfigurative texture quality of Jerusalem artichoke and Pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber is be made embodiment and digital by above research,and handy methods are established for estimating their integrated quality. Sensory estimate is also be made simultaneity. The correlation between sensory estimate and texture analyse will be studied farther .The study provides basis for the using of instrumental analysis instead of sensory estimate in the assessment for texture quality of Jerusalem artichoke and Pickled Jerusalem artichoke tuber.
引文
[1] 胡小松.中国果蔬加工产业现状与发展态势.[J]食品与机械,2005,(03):4-9.
    [2] 日本糖尿食研株式会社主页 http://www.tounyou.co.jp/.
    [3] 自然植物数据库 http://www.pfaf.org/database/.
    [4] James A. Duke. 1983. Handbook of Energy Crops. unpublished.
    [5] 陈铭达,刘兆普.菊芋的加工及开发利用[J]中国林副特产,2004,(04)
    [6] 鲁海波.菊芋的贮藏与果聚糖提取研究[J]食品与机械,2005,(02).
    [7] 江体乾.工业流变学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1995.
    [8] 陈克复等.食品流变学及其测量[M].北京:轻工出版社出版,1989.
    [9] 李里特.食品物性学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
    [10] [英]H.A巴勒斯,J.H赫顿,K瓦尔特斯.流变学导论[M].北京:中国石化出版社,1992.
    [11] 金万浩等.食品物性学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1991.
    [12] 赵学笃等.农业物料学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1987.
    [13] 牛建彪.菊芋的特征特性及高产栽培技术[J]甘肃农业科技,2005,(07).
    [14] 金绍黑.菊芋的开发利用前景广阔[J]农村实用工程技术.农业产业化,2004,(06)
    [15] USER MANUAL FOR TEXTURE ANALYSER. SMS CO., LTD. UK.
    [16] Bourne M. C. Food Texture and viscosity, 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press, March 2002.
    [17] Bourne M. C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food technol. 32(7): 62-66, 72.
    [18] http://www.texturetechnologies.com/.
    [19] Harker F. R., et al. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2002, 24: 225-239.
    [20] Harker F. R.,, et al. Texture of parenchymatous plant tissue: a comparison between tensile and other instrumental and sensory measurements of tissue strength and juiciness. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1997, 11: 63-72.
    [21] ALVAREZ, M. D., SAUNDERS, D. E. J. & VINCENT, J. F. V. (2000). Fracture properties of stored fresh and osmotically manipulated apple tissue. European Food Research and Technology, 211(4), 284-290.
    [22] ALVAREZ, M. D., CANET, W. & LOPEZ, M. E. (2002). Influence of deformation rate and degree of compression on textural parameters of potato and apple tissues in texture profile analysis. European Food Research & Technology, 215(1), 13-20.
    [23] MARQUINA, P. L., BURGOS, J. & ORIA, R. (2001). Application of a compression-relaxation test for the characterisation of burlat sweet cherry. Journal of Texture Studies, 32, 15-30.
    [24] 李小昱,王为等.苹果机械损伤应力松弛特性的研究[J].农业机械学报,1997,28:66-70.
    [25] 李小昱,王为等.苹果蠕变特性与静载损伤机理的研究[J].西北农业大学学报,1997,25(6):64-68.
    [26] 李小昱,王为.苹果压缩特性的研究[J].西北农业大学学报,1998,26(2):107-110.
    [27] 王俊,杜尧舜等.梨的各项机械特性差异[J].农业机械学报,2000,31(6):58-64.
    [28] 王俊,陆秋君等.绿云梨的动态特性试验研究[J].农业机械学报,2002,33(6)68-71.
    [29] 王俊,王剑平等.梨肉松弛特性各向差异研究[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(4):123-126.
    [30] 马洪顺等.薇菜类蔬菜生物力学性质试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(5):74-77.
    [31] DOLORES-ALVAREZ, M., SAUNDERS, D. E. J., VINCENT, J. F. V & JERONIMIDIS, G. (2000). An engineering method to evaluate the crisp texture of fruit and vegetables. Journal of Texture Studies, 31, 457-473.
    [32] DE BELIE, N., DE SMEDT, V., DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. (2000). Principal component analysis of chewing sounds to detect differences in apple crispness. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 18, 109-119.
    [33] VINCENT, J. F. V. & SAUNDERS, D. E. J. (2002). The use of critical stress intensity factor to quantify "hardness" and "crunchiness" objectively. Journal of Texture Studies, 33, 149-159.
    [34] Valles Pamies B, Roudaut G, Dacremont C et al. Understanding the texture of low moisture cereal products part Ⅰ mechanical and sensory measurements of crispness [J] 1 Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2000, 80: 1679~1685.
    [35] LORENZO, M. A., GERHARDS, C. & PELEG, M. (1997). Imperfect squeezing flow viscosimetry of selected tomato products. Journal of Texture Studies, 28, 543-567.
    [36] 余纪柱,石内伝治.黄瓜果实脆度的简易评价方法[J].园艺学报,1996,23(1):91~93.
    [37] KARLSEN, A. M., AABY, K., SIVERTSEN, H., BAARDSETH, P. & ELLEJKAER, M. T. (1999). Instrumental and sensory analysis of fresh Norwegian and imported apples. Food Quality and Preference, 10 (4), 305-314.
    [38] Emira Mehinagic, Gaelle Royer, Ronan Symoneaux, et al. Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements. Postharvests Biology and Technology, 2004, 34: 257-269.
    [39] BARREIRO, P., ORTIZ, C., RUIZ-ALTISENT, M., DE SMEDT, V., SCHOTTE, S., ANDANI, Z., WAKELING, I. & BEYTS, P. K. (1998). Comparison between sensory and instrumental measurements for mealiness assessment in apples. A collaborative test. Journal of Texture Studies, 29, 509-525.
    [40] CAEZ-RAMIREZ, G., RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ, M. F. & AGUILAR, H. J. (2001). Relation between physico-chemical and rheological properties for the Manguifera indica L. var. Tommy Atkins upon its apparent harvest index. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Engineering and Food (ICEF 8) Puebla City, April 2000, p. 184-188.
    [41] SMED, E. (1998). Sugar loss in beet tails as related to the morphology and the shear strength of the beet. Zuckerindustrie, 123(2), 128-134.
    [42] AFOAKWA, E. O. & SEFA-DEDEH, S. (2001). Chemical composition and quality changes occurring in Dioscorea dumetorum pax tubers after harvest. Food Chemistry, 75 (1), 85-91.
    [43] ZIVANOVIC, S. & BUESCHER, R. W. (1999). Textural changes of mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) associated with tissue ultrastructure and composition. Poster presented at IFT Conference, Chicago, June 1999.
    [44] ALVAREZ, M. D., SAUNDERS, D. E. J., VINCENT, J. F. V. (2000). Effect of turgor pressure on the cutting energy of stored potato tissue. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 210, 331-339.
    [45] 王俊,陆秋君,王剑平.鲜桃坚实度和糖度分布差异的实验研究[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(4):248-253.
    [46] 陆秋君,王俊,陈善锋.桃子糖度和坚实度的相关性研究[J].浙江农业学报,2000,12(2):97-100.
    [47] Lau M. H., Tang J., Swanson B. G.. Kinetics of textural and color changes in green asparagus during thermal treatments. Journal of Food Engineering, 2000, 45: 231-236.
    [48] Aivarez M. D., Canet W. L. A comparison of various rheological properties for modelling the kinetics of thermal softening of potato tissue (c.v. Monalisa) by water cooking and pressure steaming. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2002, 37: 41-55.
    [49] DESMET, M., LAMMERTYN, J., VERLINDEN, B. E. & N/COLA/, B. M. (2002). Mechanical properties of tomatoes as related to puncture injury susceptibility. Journal of Texture Studies, 33, 415-429.
    [50] 赵玉生.从流变特性分析烫漂对马铃薯组织结构的影响[J].冷饮与速冻食品工业,2000,(02).
    [51] 赵玉生.从力学性质测试与感官鉴定分析加热方式对马铃薯组织结构的影响[J].食品科学,2000,(12)
    [52] 李正国,罗爱民,刘勤晋.钙处理对水蜜桃果实成熟的影响[J].食品科学,2000,21(7):15-16.
    [53] 雷得天,马小愚.马铃薯组织破坏时的力学性能及其流变学模型[J].农业机械学报,1991,2:63-67.
    [54] 晏绍庆,刘宝林,华泽钊,彭海柱,缪松,周培根.漂烫和冻结对马铃薯细胞结构和质地特性影响的实验研究[J].食品科学,2000,(08).
    [55] M. M. Lana, L. M. M. Tijiskens, O. van Kooten. Effects of storage temperature and fruit ripening on firmness of fresh cut tomatoes. Postharvests Biology and Technology, 2005, 35: 87-95.
    [56] GEORGET, D. M. R, SMITH, A. C. & WALDRON, K. W. (2001). Effect of ripening on the mechanical properties of Portuguese and Spanish varieties of olive (Olea europaea L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81 (4), 448-458.
    [57] SEFA-DEDEH, S. & AFOAKWA, E. O. (2002). Biochemical and textural changes in trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum tubers after harvest. Food Chemistry, 79 (1), 27-40.
    [58] AFOAKWA, E. O. & SEFA-DEDEH, S. (2001). Chemical composition and quality changes occurring in Dioscorea dumetorum pax tubers after harvest. Food Chemistry, 75 (1), 85-91.
    [59] HONG, J. H. & GROSS, K. C. (2001). Maintaining quality of fresh-cut tomato slices through modified atmostpher packaging and low temperature storage. Journal of Food Science, 66 (7), 960-965.
    [60] ERRINGTON, N., MITCHELL, J. R. & TUCKER, G. A. (1997). Changes in the force relaxation and compression responses of tomatoes during ripening: the effect of continual testing and polygalacturonase activity. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 11, 141-147.
    [61] KAABER, L., BRATHEN, E., MARTINSEN, B. K. & SHOMER, I. (2001). The effect of storage conditions on chemical content of raw potatoes and texture of cooked potatoes. Potato Research.
    [62] JOHNSTON, J. W., HEWETT, E. W., BANKS, N. H., HARKER, F. R. & HERTOG, M. L. A. T. M. (2001). Physical change in apple texture with fruit temperature: effects of cultivar and time in storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 23 (1), 13-21.
    [63] 李小昱,王为.基于灰色系统理论用机械特性指标预测苹果贮藏品质特性[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(2):1-6.
    [64] 姜松,陈巧林.水蜜桃在贮藏期间的质地变化规律的研究[J].食品研究与开发,2006(05).
    [65] 屠康等.质地仪质地多面分析(TPA)方法对苹果采后质地变化的检测[J].农业工程学报.2005,21(3):166-170.
    [66] 陆秋君,王俊等.常温贮藏中番茄应力松弛特性试验[J].农业机械学报,2005,36(7):77-80,88.
    [67] 中国食物营养资讯网http://www.neasiafoods.org/.
    [68] 王昕,李建桥等.番茄果实采收后的硬度测定及其变化规律[J].农业机械学报,2005,36(6):65-67.
    [69] 蒙名燕,李汴生,阮征等.食品质构的仪器测量和感官测试之间的相关性[J].食品工业科技,2006,27(9):198-201
    [70] 余恺,胡卓炎,余小林等.荔枝果肉质构特性测定参数的研究[J].中国食品学报,2006,(01).
    [71] 张安宁,杨卫美,陈洁.草莓保存过程中的质构与理化性质变化研究[J].食品科技,2006,31(12):150-153
    [72] 周情操,徐跃进,潘思轶.不同腌制条件下豇豆品质变化规律研究[J].食品科学.2006,27(10):122-125
    [73] 郑铁松,李雪枝.草莓1-MCP保鲜过程中质构性能的研究[J].食品科学.2006,27(11):41-44.
    [74] 戴志远,梁辉.物性分析仪在食品质构测定方面的应用[J].食品研究与开发,2006,(27)4.
    [1] 张政,罗庆熙等.黄瓜品质研究进展[J].长江蔬菜,2004.06.p37.
    [2] 郭文川,朱新华,郭康权.果品内在品质无损检测技术的研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(5):1-5.
    [3] 陈斌,黄星奕.食品与农产品品质无损检测新技术[M].北京-化学工业出版社,2004.
    [4] (日)伊藤启二等.李玉振等译.食品科学手册[M].北京:轻工业出版社.1989.
    [5] 雷得天,马小愚.马铃薯组织破坏时的力学性能及其流变学模型[J].农业机械学报,1991,2:63-67.
    [6] 王俊,陆秋君,王剑平.鲜桃坚实度和糖度分布差异的实验研究[J].农业工程学报,1999,15(4):248-25
    [7] 于泓鹏等.脆度的研究方法及其控制参数[J].食品与发酵工业,2004,30(3):85-89.
    [8] 吴德光,蒋小明.农产品压缩试验及其应用(Ⅰ)——压缩试验方法[J].云南农业大学学报,1990,5(3):171-176
    [9] Alvarez, M. D., Saunders, D. E. J. & Vincent, J. F. W. An engineering method to evaluate the crisp texture of fruit and vegetables. Journal of Texture Studies, 2000, 31, 457-473.
    [10] 金万浩等.食品物性学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1991.
    [11] Valles Pamies B, Roudaut G, Dacremont C et al. Understanding the texture of low moisture cereal products part Ⅰ mechanical and sensory measurements of crispness [J] 1 Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2000, 80: 1679~1685
    [12] Alvarez M. D. Influence of deformation rate and degree of compression on textural parameters of potato and apple tissues in texture profile analysis. Europe Food Research Technology, 2002, 215: 13-20.
    [13] Bourne M. C. Food Texture and viscosity, 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press, March 2002
    [14] Bourne M. C. 1968. The texture profile of ripening pears. J. Food Sci. 33: 223.
    [15] Bourne M. C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food technol. 32(7): 62-66, 72
    [16] 赵学笃,陈元生,张守勤.农业物料学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1987:19-54.
    [17] Juming Tang. Characterization of Gellan Gels Using Stress Relaxation. Journal of Food Engineering, 1998, 38: 279-295.
    [18] A. Nussinovitch, Peleg. A Modified Maxwell and a Nonexponential Model for Characterization of the Stress Relaxation of Agar and Alginate Gels. Journal of Food Science. 1989, 54(4): 1013-1016.
    [19] Errero. Stress Relaxation Test for Monitoring Post Mortem Textural Changes of Ice-stored Cod. Journal of Food Science, 2004, 69(4): 178-181.
    [20] 穆霞英.蠕变力学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1990:1-34.
    [21] USER MANUAL FOR TEXTUREANALYSER. SMS CO., LTD. UK.
    [1] 李敏,吕家龙,祝金明,孙利祥.大白菜质地品质与组织结构的关系[J]浙江农业大学报.1997,23(2):201~204.
    [2] 王俊,胥芳.桃子硬度和质量分级参数研究[J].中国果品研究,1997,1:26-27.
    [3] 马永强等.食品感官检验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005:1~32.
    [4] 赵玉生.从力学性质测试与感官鉴定分析加热方式对马铃薯组织结构的影响[J]食品科学,2000,(12).
    [5] 5. M. M. Lana, L. M. M. Tijiskens, O. van Kooten. Effects of storage temperature and fruit ripening on firmness of fresh cut tomatoes. Postharvests Biology and Technology, 2005, 35: 87-95.
    [6] GEORGET, D. M. R, SMITH, A. C. & WALDRON, K. W. (2001). Effect of ripening on the mechanical properties of Portuguese and Spanish varieties of olive (Olea europaea L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81 (4), 448-458.
    [7] SEFA-DEDEH, S. & AFOAKWA, E. O. (2002). Biochemical and textural changes in trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum tubers after harvest. Food Chemistry, 79 (1), 27-40.
    [8] AFOAKWA, E. O. & SEFA-DEDEH, S. (2001). Chemical composition and quality changes occurring in Dioscorea dumetorum pax tubers after harvest. Food Chemistry, 75 (1), 85-91.
    [9] HONG, J. H. & GROSS, K. C. (2001). Maintaining quality of fresh-cut tomato slices through modified atmostpher packaging and low temperature storage. Journal of Food Science, 66(7), 960-965.
    [10] 于泓鹏等.脆度的研究方法及其控制参数[J].食品与发酵工业,2004,30(3):85-89.
    [11] Alvarez, M. D., Saunders, D. E. J. & Vincent, J. F. V. Fracture properties of stored fresh and osmotically manipulated apple tissue. European Food Research and Technology, 2000, 211(4), 284-290.
    [12] 穆霞英.蠕变力学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1990:1-34.
    [13] 李正国,罗爱民,刘勤晋.钙处理对水蜜桃果实成熟的影响[J].食品科学,2000,21(7):15-16.
    [14] 黄邦彦,杨谦.果蔬采后生理与贮藏保鲜[M].农业出版社,1990.18-33.
    [15] 关军锋.果品品质研究[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2001.
    [16] 李小昱,王为.基于灰色系统理论用机械特性指标预测苹果贮藏品质特性[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(2):1-6.
    [17] 吴洪华.梨的流变特性及其质地评价研究[D]江苏大学,2005.
    [18] 潘秀娟.苹果采后质地变化的破坏与非破坏检测研究.[D]南京农业大学,2004
    [1] 中国食物营养资讯网 http://www.neasiafoods.org/.
    [2] 李兴春、王丽茹.泡菜·腌菜·酱菜配方与制法[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999.
    [3] 腌制食品生产技术及食品标准规范实施手册[M].当代中国音像出版社,2005.
    [4] 马永强等.食品感官检验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005:1~32.
    [5] Malcolm C, Bourne. Texture Profil Analysis[J]. Food Tectmology, 1979, 7: 62~66.
    [6] Batey I L, et al. Optimization of rapid-visco analyzer teat condition for predicting asina noodle quality. Cereal Chem, 1999, 74: 387~391.
    [7] 赵学笃,陈元生,张守勤.农业物料学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1987:19-54.
    [8] 周情操,徐跃进,潘思轶.不同腌制条件下豇豆品质变化规律研究[J].食品科学.2006,27(10):122-125.
    [9] 孙哲浩,赵谋明,.食品的质构特性与新产品开发[J].食品研究与开发,2006,(02).
    [10] 张洪霞,李大勇,陶桂香.果蔬的力学—流变学特性的研究进展[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2005,(03).
    [11] 吴洪华.梨的流变特性及其质地评价研究[D]江苏大学,2005.
    [12] 潘秀娟.苹果采后质地变化的破坏与非破坏检测研究.[D]南京农业大学,2004.
    [1] 章克昌.酒精与蒸馏酒工艺学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1995.
    [2] 马永强等.食品感官检验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005:1~32.
    [3] 赵玉生.从流变特性分析烫漂对马铃薯组织结构的影响[J].冷饮与速冻食品工业,2000,(02).
    [4] 赵玉生.从力学性质测试与感官鉴定分析加热方式对马铃薯组织结构的影响[J].食品科学,2000,(12).
    [5] 晏绍庆,刘宝林,华泽钊,彭海柱,缪松,周培根.漂烫和冻结对马铃薯细胞结构和质地特性影响的实验研究[J].食品科学,2000,(08).
    [6] LORENZO, M. A., GERHARDS, C. & PELEG, M. (1997). Imperfect squeezing flow viscosimetry of selected tomato products. Journal of Texture Studies, 28, 543-567.
    [7] Lau M. H., Tang J., Swanson B. G.. Kinetics of textural and color changes in green asparagus during thermal treatments. Journal of Food Engineering, 2000, 45: 231-236.
    [8] Alvarez M. D., Canet W. L. A comparison of various rheological properties for modelling the kinetics of thermal softening of potato tissue (c.v. Monalisa) by water cooking and pressure steaming. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2002, 37: 41-55.
    [9] DESMET, M., LAMMERTYN, J., VERLINDEN, B. E. & NICOLAI, B. M. (2002). Mechanical properties of tomatoes as related to puncture injury susceptibility. Journal of Texture Studies, 33, 415-429.
    [10] 谭兴和,夏延斌,柳建良,李映武.热烫条件对速冻黄花菜颜色和脆度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2004,(04).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700