冠心病血瘀证的异质性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
[目的]
     通过对冠心病血瘀证的表征(包括症状体征与血栓前状态分子)、基因表达谱和易感基因启动子甲基化状态的研究,探讨冠心病血瘀证的证本质是否存在着异质性特征。
     [方法]
     1.文献研究:通过检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普(CQVIP)、万方(WANFANG DATA)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)及Pubmed等数据库,查询有关冠心病血瘀证的临床文献,主要集中在两个方面:①血府逐瘀汤治疗冠心病血瘀证的临床疗效;②冠心病血瘀证的客观化研究,包含采用高通量技术(基因组、蛋白质组、代谢组)及其他微观指标的文献。提取纳入文献的有关信息,采用meta分析等方法进行系统评价
     2.临床研究:采用系统聚类分析等方法,以组间间距大、组内间距小的原则,对冠心病血瘀证患者的临床表征---症状体征与血栓前状态分子进行分析。
     3.实验研究:应用基因表达谱芯片技术对研究各组(家系组:冠心病血瘀证、冠心病非血瘀证、非冠心病血瘀证、健康人;非家系组:冠心病血瘀证、健康人)的基因表达情况进行分析;采用实时荧光定量RT-PCR技术对挑选的若干差异表达基因进行验证;采用甲基化特异性PCR技术(MS-PCR)对若干基因启动子的甲基化状态进行分析。
     [结果]
     1.对纳入的近十年(2003-2012年)有关血府逐瘀汤治疗冠心病心绞痛血瘀证的18篇文献进行分析,结果表明血府逐瘀汤在改善中医证候疗效、心绞痛疗效和心电图疗效方面均有较好表现,但各独立研究内部在疗效程度上存在痊愈、有效、无效和加重的异质性。
     2.各数据库获取的冠心病血瘀证高通量研究的文献共21篇(基因表达谱研究3篇,蛋白质谱研究11篇,代谢组学研究6篇),其他微观指标的研究35篇(外周血白细胞DNA单核苷酸多态性研究13篇,其他22篇)。其中对符合纳入标准的ACE、ApoE和FⅦ基因多态性研究、其他微观指标研究(一氧化氮、血管性血友病因子、内皮素、可溶性细胞间黏附分子、组织纤维蛋白溶解酶原激活物抑制剂-1、组织型纤溶酶原激活物)进行了meta分析,结果表明不管是高通量技术研究还是还原分析方法的研究,现有的各研究在结局指标间均存在不同程度的异质性。
     3.对纳入的冠心病血瘀证患者66例(其中家系冠心病血瘀证患者39例,非家系冠心病血瘀证患者27例),以血瘀证的10类诊断要素胸闷、针刺痛、面紫、唇青、甲青、舌色、舌瘀斑、脉涩、脉结、脉代的评分结果进行症状体征的系统聚类分析(Ward法),结果表明,冠心病血瘀证的临床表征可以分为两个亚类,聚类1特征:以(胸闷+唇青+面紫)的症状组合为主要表现,其他症状体征少见;聚类2特征:以(胸闷+唇青+面紫)+(刺痛+舌色)的症状组合为常见症状,且舌瘀斑为极少见症状。通过统计学分析这2亚类分别与具有遗传背景的家系冠心病血瘀证和无遗传背景的非家系冠心病血瘀证有相关性,聚类1中家系冠心病血瘀证患者:非家系冠心病血瘀证患者为12/21(人),聚类2中非家系冠心病血瘀证患者:家系冠心病血瘀证患者为27/6(人),具有统计学意义。
     以冠心病血瘀证患者的外周血血栓前状态分子(PTS)的8个标记物:血浆血栓调节蛋白(TM)、血小板表面P-选择素(P-Selectin)、凝血酶原片段1、2(F1+2)、可溶性纤维蛋白单体(SFMC)、组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制物(PAI-1)、凝血酶-抗凝血酶Ⅲ复合物(TAT)和蛋白质C肽(PCP)为对象进行系统聚类和统计学分析。结果表明家系冠心病血瘀证与家系健康人比较在TN、P-Selectiin、F1+2、t-PA、TAT、PCP六个分子上有统计学差异,非家系冠心病血瘀证和非家系健康人间无统计学差异,而家系冠心病血瘀证与非家系冠心病血瘀证间在t-PA、PAI-1、TAT三个分子上有统计学差异。系统聚类分析(Ward法)表明PTS分子可以聚为两类,聚类1以8个分子表达相对高为特点,而聚类2以8个分子表达相对低为特点,且分别与遗传因素有关,聚类1中家系冠心病血瘀证:非家系冠心病血瘀证为14/4,聚类2中家系冠心病血瘀证:非家系冠心病血瘀证为10/17,二者间具有统计学差异。
     4.通过基因表达谱芯片技术分析的6组具有较好的区分度,通过对挑选出的5个差异基因进行实时荧光RT-PCR验证,与芯片结果有较好的一致性,芯片研究结果的可信度较高。
     5.对家系和非家系冠心病血瘀证差异表达基因谱进行比较,结果表明若以FC>2或FC<0.5的标准筛选,二者共同具有的基因探针数78个,分别只占家系和非家系冠心病血瘀证基因表达谱的比例为4.12%(78/1893)和3.69%(78/2113);以FC>3或FC<1/3筛选,二者共同具有的基因探针数35个,分别只占家系和非家系冠心病血瘀证基因表达谱的比例为5.11%(35/685)和4.62%(35/758)。且二者的不同表达基因谱在GO功能分布和Pathway通路中存在明显的区别。
     两组人群的异质性表达基因探针中有173个差异探针是相同的,只是表达的方向存在差异,即一组是“up”则另一组是‘'down"。对这部分基因通过SAS系统在线注释,结果表明目前这部分探针中已有81个基因在数据库中有注释。进一步对基因本体(GO)分析和通路(pathway)进行分析,以Enrichment test p value<0.05为筛选标准,通过筛选GO分析共有归属于不同类的34个有价值性的基因,Pathway分析可获得43个有意义的通路。在34个GO功能注释的基因中可能与冠心病血瘀证有关的基因有CEACAM1、CXCL1和IL8。而从43个通路来看,Adhesion and Diapedesis of Lymphocytes、Cells and Molecules involved in local acute inflammatory response、Adhesion Molecules on Lymphocyte、Free Radical Induced Apoptosis、Eph Kinasesand ephrins support platelet aggregation.Monocyte and its Surface Molecules. B Cell Survival Pathway. CD40L Signaling Pathway. Adhesion and Diapedesis of Granulocytes. IL17Signaling Pathway. Ras-Independent pathway in NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. PTEN dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.Cytokine Network和Cytokines and Inflammatory Response等炎症免疫相关通路也可能与冠心病血瘀证有潜在的关联。然而在家系冠心病血瘀证和非家系冠心病血瘀证两组中,这些基因或通路构成基因的表达是相反的。
     6.通过异病同证、同病异证相结合的方式筛选冠心病血瘀证的易感表达基因。其中异病同证方法筛选出易感基因探针数739个(FC>2或FC<0.5,已注释基因406个)或者易感基因探针数162个(FC>3或FC<1/3,已有注释的基因93个);同病异证方法筛选出易感基因探针数1357个(FC>2或FC<0.5,已有注释的基因830个)或易感基因探针数516个(FC>3或FC<1/3,已有注释的基因316个)。
     7.从易感基因中选取2条基因,即低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白12(LRP12)和Kruppel样因子5(KLF5),在23例人群(冠心病血瘀证组14例,健康人组9例)中进行启动子甲基化状态的分析。结果表明冠心病血瘀证与健康人之间,两基因的甲基化状态无差异;从冠心病血瘀证组内来看,不同个体间此二者基因的启动子甲基化状态存在差别的,分别存在甲基化、不完全甲基化和非甲基化三种状态。
     [结论]
     1.血府逐瘀汤治疗冠心病血瘀证的疗效的差异和冠心病血瘀证客观化研究结果的差异,提示冠心病血瘀证可能存在着证本质的异质性。
     2.冠心病血瘀证的表征存在着差异,这种差异可能与遗传因素有关,提示冠心病血瘀证的证本质可能存在遗传异质性。
     3.冠心病血瘀证的家系和非家系患者的基因表达谱结果的差异表明,冠心病血瘀证的证本质可能存在遗传异质性。
     4.冠心病血瘀证易感基因的启动子甲基化结果的差异结局提示,冠心病血瘀证的证本质异质性与表观遗传学的异质性可能有关。
     总之,从课题的研究结果来看,冠心病血瘀证的证本质存在着异质性,这种异质性产生的原因可能涉及到遗传和表观遗传等一系列调控网络体系。但这种证本质异质性也可能从表征的差别中有所体现。
Objective:By analyzing about the characterization of coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome, which including the symptoms, signs and prethrombotic state moleculars, gene expression profiling and susceptible gene promoter methylation status, to discuss that if coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome essence exists heterogeneity?
     Method:It is the literature research firstly. By searching the CNKI database, the VIP database, the Wanfang database, the Chinese biomedical literature database and the Pubmed database, to query the clinical literature on blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease roundly. The clinical literatures mainly include two aspects. One is the studies of the clinical effect of Xuefu Zhuyu decoction in the treatment of coronary heart disease with blood stasis. Other is objective studies of the coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome, including using high-throughput techniques (genome, proteome, metabolome, etc) and other microscopic indexes. Then we extract the information about the documents, and carry the system evaluation by utilizing the meta analysis method. Secondly, to analyze the clinical characterization of the coronary heart disease with blood stasis, including symptoms, signs and prethrombotic state molecule, by using the systematic cluster analysis method and according to the principle with large spacing between groups, small spacing within a group. Thirdly, micro array technology was used to analyze gene expression about study groups (family groups:coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome, non blood stasis syndrome, non blood stasis coronary heart disease and healthy people; non family group: health people, blood stasis in patients with coronary heart disease). And real time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR technique was used on numerous differences selected gene expression validation. More, by methylation specific PCR (MS-PCR) was applied to analyze the methylation status of the promoter.
     Results:The inclusion of the nearly ten years (2003-2012),18articles about Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome were analyzed, and the results showed that Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction could improve the performance of the TCM syndrome curative effect, angina pectoris effects and ECG efficacy, but the independent research within the effect extent existed the heterogeneity of cured, effective, ineffective and worse. Study on coronary heart disease of blood stasis with high-throughput technology access total21literatures study, included the gene expression profile of3articles,11articles on proteomics,6Metabonomics studies. And studies on other microscopic indexes have35articles(13single nucleotide polymorphism studies of peripheral blood white cells,22other articles).some studies, which met the inclusion criteria about ACE, ApoE and F VII gene polymorphism research, other microscopic indicators (nitric oxide, von Willebrand factor, endothelin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator) was analyzed by meta. The results showed that whether the research analysis method or not, the existing research have different degrees of heterogeneity in outcome indicators. In66patients with the coronary heart disease with blood stasis (including39family cases of patients with coronary heart disease with blood stasis,27non family cases of coronary heart disease with blood stasis), system cluster analysis of symptoms and signs in10diagnostic elements of tightness in the chest, the blood stasis prickling, face purple, lip green, nail green, tongue color, tongue petechiae, Knotted and Intermittent Pulse.The results showed that the clinical characterization of blood stasis syndrome could be divided into two subgroups. Cluster1feature:the combinations of symptoms (tightness in the chest, lip green and face purple) as the main performance, other symptoms and signs were rare. Cluster2features:the combinations of symptoms (tightness in the chest, lip green, face purple, blood stasis prickling and the tongue color) were the most common symptoms, tongue petechiaes was extremely atypical symptoms. Through the statistical analysis of the2subgroups respectively with the family blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease, which has a genetic background and non-family blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease without the chromosomal background. In cluster1, family patients with blood stasis syndrome had12cases, but non family patients with blood stasis syndrome had21cases. However, in cluster2, family patients had27cases, but non family previously had6cases, with statistical significance. In patients with coronary heart disease with blood stasis of the prethrombotic state molecular (PTS) included the8markers: the levels of plasma thrombomodulin (TM), P-selectin, prothrombin fragment1,2(F1+2), soluble fibrin monomer complex(SFMC), tissue type plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), thrombin antithrombin(TAT) and C protein peptide (PCP) as the object of system clustering analysis and statistics. The results show that the family of blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease and family health had statistical differences in TM, P-Selectin,F1+2, t-PA, TAT, PCP six molecules, there was no significant difference in non family blood stasis syndrome and non-family health of human, and the family of blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease and non-family of blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease, In t-PA, PAI-1, TAT three molecules there was statistical difference.Hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward) showed that PTS molecules could be clustered into two groups. In cluster1,8molecule expressed higher as the characteristic, and in cluster2,8molecules expressed relatively low as the characteristics, and were associated with hereditary factors. In cluster1,14pedigrees of blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease compared with4non family cases of coronary heart disease. In cluster2, family blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease had10cases, but non family Blood Stasis Syndrome of coronary heart disease had17cases, with statistical difference.6groups had a better distinction in gene expression by microarray analysis.5selected genes were detected by real-time RT-PCR validation and were better consistent with the chip results. So the chip results were reliable. The pedigree of blood stasis syndrome compared with non family in gene expression spectrum, results showed that by screening with FC<2or FC<0.5standards, the two groups had the same78gene probe number, respectively, accounted for only family and non family blood stasis syndrome gene expression ratio was4.12%(78/1893) and3.69%(78/2113). With FC>3or FC<1/3screening, the two groups had the same35gene probe number, respectively, accounted for single family and non family blood stasis syndrome gene expression ratio was5.11%(35/685) and4.62%(35/758).And the two distinct gene expression spectrum exist an obvious difference in the GO distribution and the pathway. Two groups of heterogeneous expression gene probe in173different probe are the same, but there is a difference in the expression of the direction, i.e. a group of "up" but another group of "down". This part of the gene by SAS system on-line comments, results show that at present this part probe had81genes annotated in the database. The gene ontology (GO) analysis and path analysis (pathway), Enrichment test p value<0.05as the selection criteria, by screening for GO analysis of a total of34valuable genes belong to different classes, Pathway analysis can obtain43meaningful pathway.In34GO functional annotations of genes may be associated with blood stasis syndrome gene were CEACAM1, CXCL1and IL8.From the43pathways, Adhesion and Diapedesis of Lymphocytes, Cells and Molecules involved in local acute inflammatory response, Adhesion Molecules on Lymphocyte, Free Radical Induced Apoptosis, Eph Kinases and ephrins support platelet aggregation, Monocyte and its Surface Molecules, B Cell Survival Pathway, CD40L Signaling Pathway, Adhesion and Diapedesis of Granulocytes, IL17Signaling Pathway, Ras-Independent pathway in NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, PTEN dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, Cytokine Network and Cytokines and Inflammatory Response and other inflammatory immune related pathways may also had potential association with blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease. However, in the family blood stasis syndrome and non-family blood stasis syndrome of coronary heart disease in two groups, these genes or pathways of gene expression were the opposite. Expression of susceptibility genes were screened through the identical syndrome in different diseases, the same disease with different combination way.The same syndrome in different diseases screening method of susceptible gene probe number739(FC<2or FC<0.5annotated genes,406) or susceptible gene probe number162(FC<3or FC<1/3,93genes have been annotated); the same disease with different method of screening susceptibility genes probe number1357(FC<2or FC<0.5, has annotated gene830) or susceptible gene probe number516(FC<3or FC <1/3,316genes have been annotated).2genes, namely low density lipoprotein receptor related protein12(LRP12) and Kruppel like factor5(KLF5), were selected from the susceptible genes. In23cases of the crowd (14cases of blood stasis syndrome group, and9cases of healthy adults) were analyzed the methylation status of the selected genes.The results show that between blood stasis syndrome and healthy people, no difference in methylation status of two genes. From the point of view of coronary heart disease with blood stasis group, promoter methylation status between different individuals of these two genes exist difference, there were methylated, not fully methylated and non-methylated three states.
     Conclusion:1. The difference of curative effect of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction in treating coronary heart disease with blood stasis and the objective results of blood stasis syndrome in the research, suggested the heterogeneity of syndrome essence.2. There exist differences in characterization of coronary heart disease with blood stasis. The differences may be related to hereditary factors, prompted that coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome essence may be genetic heterogeneity.3. Blood stasis syndrome pedigrees patients with non home show differences gene expression spectrum results, coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome essence may be genetic heterogeneity.4. Differences in outcome suggest that blood stasis syndrome in coronary heart disease susceptibility gene promoter methylation results, the nature of heterogeneity and scale heterogeneity in genetics might be related to coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome. In conclusion, from the results of view, coronary heart disease with blood stasis syndrome essence exists heterogeneity. This heterogeneity generated may be related to genetic and epigenetic and a series of control network system.However, the nature of heterogeneity may also reflect from the characterization of the differences.
引文
[1]安海燕,蔡红兵,周迎春,等.关于证本质研究现状的思考[J].四川中医,2007(6):18-20.
    [2]薛梅,殷惠军,陈可冀.从基因组学研究证候实质的若干思考[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2006(01):88-90.
    [3]胡学军,蔡光先,刘柏炎,等.蛋白质组学在中医“证”实质研究中的应用[J].中华中医药杂志,2008(02):87-91.
    [4]郑海生,蒋健,贾伟.浅论代谢组学在中医证本质研究中的应用[J].辽宁中医杂志,2008(05):693-694.
    [5]侯灿.用系统方法探讨中医证的本质[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007(05):461-465.
    [6]Longo D L. Tumor heterogeneity and personalized medicine[J]. N Engl J Med,2012,366(10):956-957.
    [7]Minoo P, Zlobec I, Peterson M, et al. Characterization of rectal, proximal and distal colon cancers based on clinicopathological, molecular and protein profiles[J]. Int J Oncol,2010,37(3):707-718.
    [8]张俊,陈海亮,张捷.帕金森病患者发病年龄与临床异质性分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2012(07):38-39.
    [9]蒋雪,李文艳,陈奇洁,等.医学遗传学中遗传异质性含义的解析[J].生物学通报,2011(03):10-12.
    [10]敖宁建.中医阴阳证的本质[J].亚太传统医药,2007(07):30-35.
    [11]王米渠,吴斌,严石林,等.论虚寒证基因芯片及生物信息的高起点切入研究——分子中医研究系列报道(1)[J].辽宁中医杂志,2003(03):169-171.
    [12]刘军莲,宋剑南.中医血瘀证本质研究概况[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006(09):1091-1093.
    [13]刘晓燕,申维玺,祁岩超.阴虚证本质研究的现状和进展[J].国际医药卫生导报,2005(24):116-118.
    [14]王阶,姚魁武.血瘀证诊断标准研究述要及思考[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2004(01):17-19.
    [15]李海霞,王阶,胡元会,等.不同地域血瘀证患者理化检查结果比较研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2007,14(11):16-17.
    [16]翟武杰,于春泉.肾阳虚证症状表现规律的临床研究[J].云南中医中药杂志,2011(8):22-23.
    [17]邹世洁,陈小野.与证候规范化相关的证候实证化[J].医学与哲学,1991(2):27-28.
    [18]陈小野,邹世洁.脾气虚证多态性的初步探讨[J].中医杂志,1996(2):113-116.
    [19]李炜弘,严石林,丁维俊,等.冠心病血瘀证家族史背景与疗效相关性初探[J].四川医学,2006,27(11):1106-1107.
    [20]杨杰,丁维俊,王米渠,等.一对双生子卵型鉴定与血瘀证研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2007,22(4):209-213.
    [21]张文富,凌江红,王爱坚,等.广西巴马长寿老人肾虚证候与ACE基因多态性的相关性研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010(3):259-263.
    [22]戴泽龙,陈慧,吴小盈.冠心病血瘀证患者细胞色素P4502C19*17基因型分布与氯吡格雷治疗后血小板聚集率及出血风险的关系[J].中西医结合学报,2012,10(6):647-654.
    [23]王萍,杨海燕,王丽萍,等.从表观遗传学开展复杂性疾病证候本质的研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2011(5):1208-1210.
    [24]李爱军.血府逐瘀汤佐治冠心病心血瘀阻证45例临床观察[J].中医药导报,2011,17(7):40-41.
    [25]吕干.联用血府逐瘀汤加减治疗心血瘀阻型冠心病心绞痛32例[J].广西中医药,2009,32(6):2.
    [26]李影华,吴欣芳.血府逐瘀汤加减治疗心血瘀阻型冠心病心绞痛临床观察[J].吉林中医药;Jilin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2011,31(11).
    [27]赵坤,吉中强,纪文岩,等.新血府逐瘀软胶囊对冠心病血瘀征象及OX40L、hs-CRP影响的临床研究[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2011,06(4):302-304.
    [28]李秋芳.中西医结合治疗心血瘀阻型冠心病心绞痛疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2011,20(22).
    [29]尚素芬.血府逐瘀汤加减治疗冠心病心绞痛40例疗效观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2011,04(22).
    [30]张明丽,王平.血府逐瘀汤联合西药治疗冠心病心绞痛心血瘀阻证疗效观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2010,32(4):2.
    [31]邓启学.血府逐瘀胶囊治疗52例瘀血痹阻型心绞痛的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(12):59-60.
    [32]高影.血府逐瘀汤对冠心病心绞痛血瘀证病人血管内皮功能及细胞因子的影响[J].中外健康文摘,2009,6(1):11-13.
    [33]马殿信.血府逐瘀汤治疗气滞血瘀型冠心病心绞痛的临床疗效观察[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2009,17(9):769-770.
    [34]殷富强.血府逐瘀胶囊治疗冠心病稳定型劳累性心绞痛临床观察[J].天津中医药,2006,23(3):260.
    [35]刘剑刚,徐浩,董国菊,等.血府逐瘀口服液对冠心病心绞痛血瘀证病人血管内皮功能及血液流变学的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(8):3.
    [36]李学勇.血府逐瘀汤治疗冠心病心绞痛(心血瘀阻型)124例[J].河南中医学院学报,2006,21(3):49-50.
    [37]贾满仓,朱薇.血府逐瘀汤治疗心血瘀阻型冠心病心绞痛疗效观察[J].河北中医,2005,27(3):193-195.
    [38]陈国新.血府逐瘀汤化裁治疗冠心病30例[J].陕西中医,2004,25(7):2.
    [39]王晨希.血府逐瘀汤结合单硝酸异山梨酯片治疗冠心病稳定型 心绞痛的临床研究[D].南京中医药大学,2011.
    [40]王永秀.血府逐瘀汤治疗气滞血瘀型冠心病心绞痛的临床疗效研究[D].湖南中医学院,2004.
    [41]胡爱玲.血府逐瘀口服液治疗冠心病心绞痛血瘀证病人70例[J].中外健康文摘:临床医师,2008(7).
    [42]邵丽娟,魏睦新.血府逐瘀汤在心血管疾病中的应用探讨[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2009,16(z1):2.
    [43]郑国华,谌海英,褚剑锋,等.血府逐瘀胶囊治疗冠心病心绞痛随机对照试验的系统评价[J].中医杂志,2012(02):117-121.
    [44]宋晓密.血府逐瘀汤辅佐消心痛加阿司匹林治疗冠心病心绞痛疗效Meta分析[J].实用医学杂志,2010,26(14):2633-2635.
    [45]周景想,唐明,李洁,等.2029例冠心病心绞痛中医证候特点及组合规律分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2011(06):753-755.
    [46]汤艳莉,王阶,何庆勇.冠心病心绞痛中医证候规律研究的比较分析[J].世界科学技术(中医药现代化),2009(03):352-355.
    [47]Kullo I J, Ding K. Mechanisms of disease:The genetic basis of coronary heart disease[J]. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med,2007,4(10):558-569.
    [48]杨保林,王阶,姜燕.应用差异显示筛查冠心病血瘀证相关基因及分析[J].北京中医药大学学报,2006,29(2):132-134,140.
    [49]马晓娟,殷惠军,陈可冀.血瘀证患者差异基因表达谱研究[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(4):355-360.
    [50]袁肇凯,王丽萍,黄献平,等.冠心病血瘀证遗传相关的差异基因筛选及其功能路径分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2012(10).
    [51]赵慧辉,王伟,李宏.双向电泳-质谱技术筛选心绞痛血瘀证相关蛋白的研究[J].北京中医药,2008,27(2):96-99.
    [52]周倩倩,李治国,黄力.冠心病血瘀证的血清差异蛋白质组学研究[J].微循环学杂志,2012,22(1):13-16.
    [53]李雪峰,蒋跃绒,高铸烨,等.冠心病血瘀证血小板差异功能蛋白筛选、鉴定及功能分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010,30(5):467-473.
    [54]赵慧辉,王伟.不稳定性心绞痛血瘀证的血浆蛋白质组学研究[J].化学学报,2009,67(2):167-173.
    [55]赵慧辉,郭淑贞,侯娜,等.差异凝胶电泳技术寻找冠心病心绞痛血瘀证的相关蛋白[J].中华中医药杂志,2008,23(12):1050-1053.
    [56]赵慧辉,陈建新,史琦,等.基于差异凝胶双向电泳技术的冠心病不稳定性心绞痛血瘀证患者血浆差异蛋白特征研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010,30(5):488-492.
    [57]吴红金,马增春,高月,等.蛋白质组学技术对冠心病血瘀证相关蛋白的研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2005,3(3):189-191.
    [58]赵慧辉,王伟,郭淑贞.冠心病不稳定型心绞痛血瘀证的蛋白质组学[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2008,16(7):545-548.
    [59]赵慧辉,王伟,王硕仁,等.冠心病心绞痛血瘀证的血浆双向电泳-质谱研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2008,26(4):724-726.
    [60]赵慧辉,侯娜,王伟,等.冠心病气虚血瘀证的蛋白质组学特征研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2009,29(6):489-492.
    [61]赵慧辉,杨帆,王伟,等.无标记定量法研究冠心病不稳定性心绞痛血瘀证的差异蛋白质组[J].高等学校化学学报,2010,31(2):285-292.
    [62]华何与,贾钰华,张红栓,等.冠心病心绞痛三种血瘀证的血浆代谢组学研究[J].热带医学杂志,2010,10(3):258-260,279,封2.
    [63]张红栓,贾钰华,华何与,等.冠心病心绞痛痰浊证、血瘀证的血浆代谢组学研究[J].新中医,2010(6):12-14.
    [64]简维雄,袁肇凯,黄献平,等.冠心病心血瘀阻证血浆代谢组学的检测分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010(6).
    [65]王娟,李中峰,赵慧辉,等.冠心病不稳定心绞痛血瘀证患者 尿液代谢组学特征的研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2012,35(4):284-288.
    [66]张红栓,贾钰华,华何与,等.冠心病心绞痛痰浊证、血瘀证的尿液代谢组学研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2010(2):126-128.
    [67]简维雄,袁肇凯,黄献平,等.冠心病心血瘀阻证尿液代谢组学的检测分析[J].中医杂志,2010(8).
    [68]王忠,王永炎,王阶.后基因组时代中医证候组学研究的思考[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2001,21(8):621-623.
    [69]张静,刘龙,颜新,等.中医证本质研究与代谢组学技术:现状与思考[J].中西医结合学报,2012(10):1069-1076.
    [70]朱明丹,杜武勋,姜民,等.中医证候与基因、蛋白质、代谢组学研究思路探讨[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2010(1):69-71.
    [71]毛以林,袁肇凯,黄献平,等.冠心病血瘀证与血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性的相关性研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2004,24(9):776-780.
    [72]黄献平,袁肇凯,谭光波,等.冠心病血瘀证患者血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性的检测分析[J].中医杂志,2007,48(1):65-68.
    [73]李建军,宋曙霞,陈克芳,等.冠心病血瘀证与血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性和内皮型一氧化氮合成酶基因G894T变异的关系[J].环球中医药,2012,05(3):180-184.
    [74]谭光波.冠心病血瘀证血管内皮细胞功能与ACE. FⅦ ApoE基因多态性的研究[D].湖南中医学院湖南中医药大学湖南省中医药研究院,2004.
    [75]陈娟.早发冠心病血瘀证与ACE基因多态性的相关性研究[D].湖南中医药大学,2009.
    [76]袁肇凯,黄献平,谭光波,等.冠心病血瘀证ApoE基因多态性的检测分析[J].北京中医药大学学报,2008,31(12):830-834.
    [77]黄献平,袁肇凯,毛以林,等.冠心病血瘀证凝血因子Ⅶ基因 多态性的检测分析[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(2):97-99.
    [78]毛以林.冠心病血瘀证与ACE、FⅦ基因多态性的相关性研究[D].湖南中医学院湖南中医药大学湖南省中医药研究院,2003.
    [79]鲍达.冠心病血瘀证与vWF基因多态性的相关性研究[D].湖南中医药大学,2012.
    [80]吴依芬.冠心病证型与GNB3基因和ABCA1基因多态性的相关研究[D].第一军医大学南方医科大学,2006.
    [81]曹美群,吴正治,吴伟康,等.冠心病伴抑郁发作血瘀证/痰浊证的相关基因多态性研究[J].中国中医药科技,2010,17(5):377-378,380.
    [82]Burrell L M, Harrap S B, Velkoska E, et al. The ACE2 gene:its potential as a functional candidate for cardiovascular disease[J]. Clin Sci (Lond),2013,124(2):65-76.
    [83]张明,赵英日,李强,等.“证”与基因多态性的相关性研究述评[J].陕西中医学院学报,2008(05):1-4.
    [84]沈庆乐,张存琪.血瘀证冠心病的GMP—140,VWF和NO的变化及临床意义[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2000,9(19):1855-1856.
    [85]杨军辉,欧阳玉燕.内皮细胞损伤与冠心病心绞痛血瘀证四亚型的相关性研究[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2009,7(5):14-16.
    [86]袁肇凯,黄献平,谭光波,等.冠心病血瘀证血管内皮细胞功能的检测分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2006,26(5):407-410.
    [87]胡志希,袁肇凯,陈洁,等.早发冠心病血瘀证痰浊证面部光电血流容积特征及与一氧化氮、内皮素含量的相关研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2009,16(3):19-21.
    [88]毛以林,李旭,彭素娟,等.冠心病血瘀证与高敏C-反应蛋白相关性研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2007,14(8):26-27.
    [89]林桂永,王子健.冠心病血瘀证气血辨证与内皮细胞损伤的关系[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2005,3(10):856-858.
    [90]吴松林.冠心病血瘀证与血管性血友病因子及P-选择素的相关 性研究[D].南京中医药大学,2011.
    [91]王佑华,王国维,张宏考,等.冠心病血瘀证39例患者血浆DD、 vWF改变研究[J].中医研究,2003,16(3):23-25.
    [92]黄召谊,董慧,吴汉卿,等.冠心病血瘀证与痰浊证辨证客观化的研究[J].中国中医急症,2010,19(11):1873-1875.
    [93]宋庆桥,胡元会,商秀洋,等.冠心病稳定型心绞痛血瘀证患者tPAI-1. sIC AM-1及MMP-9的表达变化[J].中国中医急症,2011(9):1377-1380.
    [94]毛以林,谭光波,袁肇凯,等.高敏C反应蛋白和可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1与冠心病血瘀证的相关性研究[J].新中医,2007,39(3):25-26.
    [95]李定祥,杨军辉,邓奕辉.冠心病血瘀证各亚型与纤溶系统活性相关性探讨[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2007,5(5):8-10.
    [96]吕中,祝光礼.冠心病血瘀证血浆纤溶活性改变及其与血脂水平的相关性研究[J].中国中医药科技,2009,16(6):425-426.
    [97]张天奉,张建军,吕金阳.走出中医证候客观化研究的误区[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2004(11):21-22.
    [98]赖旅洲,雷惠新.血栓前状态相关指标在脑梗死患者急性期的变化及与中医血瘀证型的关系[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2008(10):1195-1197.
    [99]管艳,苏式兵.生物芯片技术及其在中医药研究中的应用进展[J].中华中医药杂志,2012(02):422-425.
    [100]Kainkaryam R M, Bruex A, Gilbert A C, et al. poolMC:smart pooling of mRNA samples in microarray experiments[J]. BMC Bioinformatics,2010,11:299.
    [101]谭从娥,李炜弘,汤朝晖,等.应用基因表达谱芯片技术筛选老龄肾阳虚证特征功能类基因[J].辽宁中医杂志,2008(10):1441-1444.
    [102]倪红梅,吴艳萍,何裕民.用基因芯片技术研究青少年肾阳虚体质差异表达基因[J].上海中医药杂志,2004(06):3-5.
    [103]殷惠军,马晓娟,蒋跃绒,等.冠心病血瘀证差异基因表达谱的构建及疾病相关分子靶标的筛选[C].济南:2009.
    [104]王米渠,冯韧,严石林,等.5例寒证的宏观疗效及基因表达谱芯片分析研究[J].浙江中医学院学报,2003(06):60-63.
    [105]Cortessis V K, Thomas D C, Levine A J, et al. Environmental epigenetics:prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure-response relationships[J]. Hum Genet,2012,131(10):1565-1589.
    [106]Scheen A J, Junien C. [Epigenetics, interface between environment and genes:role in complex diseases] [J]. Rev Med Liege,2012,67(5-6):250-257.
    [107]王萍,杨海燕,王丽萍,等.从表观遗传学开展复杂性疾病证候本质的研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2011(05):1208-1210.
    [1]刘雁云.中医证的本质[J].医学与哲学:人文社会医学版,2006,27(1):49-50.
    [2]安海燕,蔡红兵,周迎春,等.关于证本质研究现状的思考[J].四川中医,2007,25(6):18-20.
    [3]刘蕾,郭淑贞,王伟.中医证候研究的现状及发展趋势[J].中华中医药杂志,2008,23(8):661-663.
    [4]侯灿.用系统方法探讨中医证的本质[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(5):461-465.
    [5]李晓红,梁媛,李晶晶,等.系统生物学与中医证本质研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2011(2):211-212.
    [6]杨裕华,李震.中医证候的基因芯片研究近况[J].时珍国医国药,2008,19(8):1821-1823.
    [7]刘家强,吴丽娜,王米渠.当今证候基因组研究的反思以及功能基因模块的运用[J].中华中医药学刊,2007,25(10):2152-2153.
    [8]李翠娟,烟建华,张喜德,等.从时证相应探讨中医证本质的研究[J].中医杂志,2010(2):104-105.
    [9]李翠娟,烟建华,巩振东.从整体关系探讨中医证的本质[J].中医杂志,2011,52(1):12-13.
    [10]李翠娟,巩振东.从象思维谈中医证本质的研究[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(4):10-11.
    [11]李翠娟,巩振东,张喜德.从全息性谈中医证本质研究[J].中医 杂志,2009,50(04):296-299.
    [12]李超贤.证的本质浅议[J].四川中医,2011,29(7):36-38.
    [13]邱鸿钟.中医证本质的现象学分析[J].中医研究,2010,23(7):1-3.
    [14]李翠娟,巩振东.证本质研究的困惑与对策[J].辽宁中医杂志,2009,36(04):531-533.
    [15]李翠娟,巩振东,烟建华.从模型性谈中医证本质的研究[J].中医杂志,2011,52(15):1267-1268.
    [16]史仁杰.对中医“证”本质研究之我见[J].吉林中医药,2006,26(3):1-2.
    [17]谌琦,郭小青.也谈中医证实质研究[J].河南中医,2010,30(3):221-223.
    [18]杨胜林.关于证的思考[J].云南中医学院学报,2006,29(5):4-6.
    [19]简维雄,袁肇凯,黄献平,等.冠心病心血瘀阻证血浆代谢组学的检测分析[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010,30(6):579-584.
    [20]袁肇凯,黄献平,谭光波,等.冠心病血瘀证ApoE基因多态性的检测分析[J].北京中医药大学学报,2008,31(12):830-834.
    [21]贺立娟,李运伦.高血压病肝阳上亢证中医病机与证候实质的研究进展[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2008(12):1449-1451.
    [22]蒋海强,聂磊,李运伦.气质联用技术检测高血压病肝阳上亢证患者与健康志愿者血清脂肪酸成分的差异[J].辽宁中医杂志,2011,38(6)1052-1054.
    [23]战丽彬,初艳,赵欣捷,等.基于代谢组学的脾气虚证本质研究[J].世界科学技术:中医药现代化,2011,13(4):622-625.
    [24]周小军,周福生,苟新敏,等.大肠癌气血亏虚证患者蛋白质差异性表达的研究[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2010,17(5):274-277.
    [25]曹东义.冲出西医病名围城中医才能卓然自立[J].湖北民族学院学报:医学版,2006,23(1):1-4.
    [26]杨丽萍,陈四清,丁维俊,等.家系虚寒证与非家系虚寒证基因表达 谱比较研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2011(07):1478-1481.
    [27]陈晓玲,高志芬,丁维俊.肾阳虚证患者血液生化、免疫指标与基因表达谱结果的对比研究[J].四川中医,2007,25(5):11-13.
    [28]赵海燕,郭勇.中医证本质研究中的血清蛋白质组学应用探讨[J].中华中医药学刊,2010(1):88-90.
    [29]李高申,阮晓龙.试探证与病机的关系[J].河南中医,2008,28(12):8-9.
    [30]任秀玲.论“证候”的本质[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2007,2(1):1-3.
    [31]邹世洁,陈小野.与证候规范化相关的证候实证化[J].医学与哲学,1991,(2):27-28.
    [32]张晓林,孙喜灵,刘琳,等.试论证候有限空间模型中客观存在的复杂证候群[J].中医杂志,2008,49(7):581-583.
    [33]黄开泰.证候存在的逻辑回答[J].医学与哲学:人文社会医学版,2007,28(3):74-75.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700