中药临床试验重复测量设计与分析方法的探讨
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
研究背景
     中药防治疾病基于中医学“整体观念”和“恒动观念”等辩证观点和认识,中药临床试验中对其临床疗效的评价应体现中医学理论特点。中药临床试验研究与化学药物临床研究相比,具有不同的特点——治疗理念不同且更需要对主观评测指标和客观评测指标的动态观测和评价。在中药临床疗效评价中应用重复测量设计与分析方法可以更为合理和客观地评价中药干预措施对疾病临床结局的时间上的总体效应。
     目的
     探讨重复测量设计与分析方法在中药临床试验的临床疗效评价中的应用以及存在问题和解决办法,以客观、全面地评价中药临床疗效的时间变化趋势以及可能影响因素。
     方法
     本研究以此生脉胶囊治疗慢性心力衰竭临床试验为载体,探索在中药临床试验中采用重复测量设计与分析方法的适用条件和存在问题。生脉胶囊治疗慢性心力衰竭临床试验采用具有一个重复测量因素的双盲随机安慰剂对照试验设计。该试验为平行对照,试验组142例受试者接受生脉胶囊治疗,对照组139例接受安慰剂治疗,两组同时给予包括利尿剂、扩血管剂、洋地黄类、β-受体阻滞剂和ACE抑制剂等标准治疗。所有受试者心功能分级在Ⅱ~Ⅳ、射血分数小于45%。本研究分析的效应指标包括左室设想分数(EF)、中医症状总分、生存质量和NYHA心功能评级。该试验进行了临床疗效分析、安全性评价和重复测量分析。临床疗效分析分析采用依从方案受试者分析(PPS)和意图治疗分析(ITT)。重复测量分析中采用了单变量、多变量多元方差分析、线性混合模型拟合、多水平模型拟合和GEE算法等对不同类型重复测量数据进行分析。通过该试验的一般临床疗效分析与各种重复测量分析方法的分析结果对比,就重复测量设计与分析方法做出评价。同时,比较多种重复测量分析方法在临床疗效评价中的差别,采用敏感性分析的方法,对比、评价各种方法的适应性。
     结果
     生脉胶囊治疗慢性心力衰竭临床试验临床疗效分析的PPS和ITT分析结果显示,试验组和对照组的病死率、非致死性重要临床事件发生率以及EF、中医症状总分、生存质量和NYHA心功能评级的比较均无显著性差异。该试验安全性评
BackgroundThe preventions and treatments of diseases with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) are based on the concepts of wholism and dynamics, which regards the various parts of the human body as an organic whole, and emphasizes the body being in a continuous dynamic status both in physiologically and pathologically. Therefore, the evaluations for clinical effectiveness in Clinical trials for TCM should be an embodiment of the concepts. The clinical trials of TCM were difference from the clinical research of artificial drugs, because it is on two distinct therapeutic theories. The clinical research of TCM will pay more attention to dynamical trends of clinical outcome. It should be more rational and objective that the repeated measures designs and analysis is used to assess the temporal effects on clinical outcome of treatments of diseases in the clinical trials of TCM.ObjectivesThe main interest of this study is methodological: to explore the advantages gained and problems encountered while applying repeated measures designs and analysis for the clinical trials of TCM, and in order to evaluate more roundly the dynamical trends and affecting factors of clinical effectiveness of TCM.
    MethodsThis study was performed its methodological practise with the example of clinical trial for chronic heart failure (CHF) to treatment with Shengmai Capsule. The clinical trial for CHF with Shengmai Capsule was designed as a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with one factor of repeated measures. In the trial, we assigned 142 patients with chronic heart failure to treatment with Shengmai Capsule and 139 to placebo. Patients were required to have chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV), previous admission for an ejection fraction of less than 45%, and to have been treated optimally with diuretics, vasodilator, digitalis, beta- blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors unless not tolerated. The four response variables selected for the study were measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), total scores of symptoms of TCM, quality of life (QOL) and NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional classification. Per-protocol subjects' analysis (PPS) and intention-to-treat analysis(ITT) for clinical effectiveness, safety evaluation and repeated measures analysis were performed in the trial. In data analysis for this trial, univariate analysis, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), linear mixed effects model, multilevel model and generalized estimating equations (GEE) method were selected to employ. The results of PPS and ITT were compared with that of repeated measures analysis. Meanwhile, a sensitivity analysis for different repeated measures analysis and replacing missing values was dealt to, appraise applicability of these methods.ResultsThe results from PPS and ITT analysis for this trial showed that there were no statistical significant differences between Shengmai group and placebo group in all-cause mortality, incidence rate of important clinical events, measurements of EF, total scores of symptoms, QOL and NYHA functional classification. The safety evaluation in the trial also indicated that there were no significant increase at risk of adverse reactions in Shengmai group. The results of repeated measures analysis showed that time effects of EF, QOL, total scores of symptoms and changes of NYHA functional classification were high significant, but grouped effect was no significant. The results
    revealed that there were obvious tendency in each group, which the several outcome variables were changed along with period points. There were differences among the tendencies of several variables. The temporal tendencies of EF and QOL were an approximative linearity, but the total scores of symptoms and the changes of NYHA functional classification were displayed non-linear tendencies. The results also showed that the tendencies of several variables were affected by some covariates. The result of MANOVA of repeated measures for EF, total scores of symptoms and QOL showed that age and centers were the significant covariates. The findings indicated age and centers affected the tendencies of outcome variables. Hereinto, the affecting of age factor was mostly on EF and QOL, but that of the centers factor focused on EF and total scores of symptoms. The findings from linear mixed effects modelling and multilevel modelling methods revealed that a desirable trend in temporal effect, however, there was no significant difference in the trend between two groups. The temporal tendency of EF was affected by using of digitalis and centers, that of total scores of symptoms was affected by course of CHF, and that of QOL was affected by the interaction of time point by centers. The findings from GEE method indicated that there was a clear tendency in the changes of NYHA functional classification, which was affected by baseline of functional classification. It is suitable for replacing missing values with the means in the same group through the sensitivity analysis. An affect on the results of MANOVA of repeated measures was appeared with or without replacing missing values, but the modeling methods got less impact without replacing missing values. The test power of both univariate ANOVA and MANOVA of repeated measures was higher than that of PPS and ITT analysis. Comparing between several methods of repeated measures analysis, the results from linear mixed modelling and multilevel modelling were no distinguishable change. This indicated that the results from modelling methods were reliable.ConclusionsIn summary, the power of ANOVA and MANOVA of repeated measures were higher. The repeated measures design and analysis can roundly describe and evaluate the changes over time, and analyze the tendency of changes of outcome variables and its affecting factors. Therefore, the repeated measures
    design and analysis can entirely and dynamically evaluate the repeated measures data in clinical trials. Applying the repeated measures design and analysis to clinical effectiveness in clinical trials for TCM, it was in accord with the conception of wholism and dynamics in the therapeutical effects in TCM theories. It is important in practicality to applying the repeated measures design and analysis reasonably.
引文
[1] 赖世隆主编.中药临床试验.第1版.广州:广东人民出版社,2001:1-10
    [2] 赖世隆主编.中西医结合临床科研方法学.第1版.北京:科学出版社,2003:1-5
    [3] 刘汝深主编.中医学辩证法概论.第1版.广州:广东科技出版社,1983:6-20
    [4] 李家邦主编.中医学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:7-10
    [5] 刘康德.淮南子直解.第1版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2001:1066
    [6] 甄志亚主编.中国医学史.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1991:23-24
    [7] 宋·苏颂编撰.尚志均辑校.本草图经.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1994:92
    [8] Differences between the people compared. [2005-11-05]. http://www. jameslindlibrary, org/essays/bias/allocation_bias. html
    [9] Medical research council. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ, 1948;769-781
    [10] 陈易新,李少丽,曹立亚,等.现代药品不良反应制度的建立与其医药背景.中国心血管病研究杂志,2004:2(3):233-235
    [11] International Conference on Harmonisation.The ICH GCP Guideline.见:郑筱庾主编.《药品临床试验管理规范》培训教材.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2000:318-345,607-644
    [12] World Health Organization. Research guideline for evaluating the safety and efficacy of herbal medicines. Manila: WHO Regional Office for Western Pacific, 1993
    [13] World Health Organization. Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products. Sixth Report, WHO Technical Report Series, No. 050, 1995, Annex 3
    [14] 国家食品药品监督管理局.药物临床试验质量管理规范.2003年9月
    [15] 黄宗文,于迎春,王蕾,等.《江苏中医》随机对照临床治疗试验文献评价:1980-1998手检分析.华西医学,2001:16(3):257-258
    [16] 吴滨,何竟,李宁,等.循证医学与《中国针灸》临床研究报道的质量评价.中国针灸,2000:20(8):504-506
    [17] 郭新峰,赖世隆,杨小波,等.中医药治疗中风研究文献的质量评价.广州中医药大学学报。20001 17(1):15-19
    [18] 李廷谦,王刚,王蕾,等.我国中医药临床研究的现状和评价.中国循证医学杂志,2005:5(6):431-437
    [19] Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959;(24): 95-112
    [20] Douglas C.Montgomery著,汪仁官,陈荣昭译.实验设计与分析(Design and Analysisof Experiments).北京.中国统计出版社,1998:142—145
    [21] Fugua RW, Bartsch TW, Phye GD. An investigation of the relationship between cognitive tempo and creativity in preschool-age children. Child Dev, 1975;46(3): 779-82
    [22] Lefley HP. Differential self-concept in American Indian children as a function of language and examiner. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1975;31(1): 36-41
    [23] Arsenault A, Lussier A. Gastro-intestinal microbleeding under acetylsalicylic acid, ketoprofen and placebo. Rheumatol Rehabil, 1976;Suppl: 87-93
    [24] 陈长生,徐勇勇.重复测量的研究设计与统计分析.中国卫生统计。2002:19(2):124-126
    [25] 严琦.重复测量设计的分析.京师大学报(自然科学版),2001:24(4):43-46
    [26] Ronald P. Cody, Jeffrey K. Smith. Applied statistics and the SAS programming language. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1997: 181-220
    [27] 马金凤,薛茜.临床研究中重复测量资料的辨别与统计分析.新疆医科大学学报,2005: 28(5): 482-484
    [28] Finney DJ. Repeated measurements: what is measured and what repeats? Statisticsin Medicine, 1990, 9: 639-644 (Abstract)
    [29] 赵晋芳,刘桂芬.重复测量资料分析常见统计错误与软件实现.现代预防医学,2002:29(3):314-320
    [30] 楚沽,臧桐华,叶冬青,等.重复测量设计与随机区组设计原理及应用.中国卫生统计,2004;21(3):174-177
    [31] Huynh H, Feldt L. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970;(65): 1582-1589
    [32] Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959;24: 95-112
    [33] Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976;1: 69-82
    [34] McCall RB, Appelbaum MI. Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: Some alternative approaches. Child Development, 1973;44: 401-415
    [35] Huynh H. Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 1978;43: 161-175
    [36] Johansen S. The Welch-James approximation to the distribution of the residual sum of squares in a weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 1980;67: 85-92
    [37] Barcikowski RS, Robey RR. Decisions in single group repeated measures analysis: Statistical tests and three computer packages. The American Statistician, 1984;38: 148-150
    [38] Looney SW, Stanley WB. Exploratory repeated measures analysis for two or more groups: Review and update. The American Statistician, 1989;43: 220-225
    [39] Algina J, Oshima TC. Type I error rates for Huynh' s general approximation and improved general approximation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1994;47: 151-165
    [40] Keselman HJ, Keselman JC, Lix LM. The analysis of repeated measurements: Univariate tests, multivariate tests, or both? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1995;48: 319-338
    [41] Keselman JC, Lix LM, Keselman HJ. The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1996;49: 275-298
    [42] Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK, Wolfinger RD. The analysis of repeated measurements: A comparison of mixed-model Satterthwaite F tests and a nonpooled adjusted degrees of freedom multivariate test. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 1999;28: 2967-2999
    [43] Keselman HJ, Atgina J, Kowalchuk RK, Wolfinger RD. A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1999: 52: 63-78
    [44] Keselman HJ, Carriere KC, Lix LM. Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1993;18: 305-319
    [45] Littell RC, Milliken GA, StroupWW, Wolfinger RD. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1996
    [46] Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK. The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2001;54: 1-20
    [47] Boik RJ. Analysis of repeated measures under second-stage sphericity: An empirical Bayes approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1997;22: 155-192
    [48] Goldstein H, Healy MJR, Rasbash J. Multilevel time series models with applications to repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 1994;13: 1643-1655
    [49] Goldstein H(editor),李晓松译.多水平统计模型.第2版.成都:四川科技出版社.1999
    [50] 曹秀堂,姚晨,徐勇勇.多层次模型在处理多变量重复测量数据中的应用.中国卫生统计,1995;12(6):8-11
    [51] 曹秀堂,赵清波,徐勇勇,等.不等距重复观测数据的多层次模型分析方法.第四军医大学学报,1997:18(2):172-175
    [52] 陈长生,徐勇勇,曹秀堂.不等距重复观测数据组间比较的正交回归模型.中国卫生统计,1996:13(3):1-5
    [53] 任仕泉,陈峰,杨树勤,吴先萍.多反应变量重复测量的混合效应模型及其应用.生物数学学报,1999;14(2):299-234
    [54] 陈平雁.定量数据重复测量的方差分析.中华创伤骨科杂志,2003;5(1):67-70
    [55] 温泽淮,王奇,赖世隆.中药临床试验重复测量数据的分析:中药复方胃康胶囊治疗十二指肠溃疡期临床试验疗效分析.广州中医药大学学报,1998;15(4):287-292
    [56] 宋艳艳,何清波,苏炳华.分类数据的重复测量及其在临床试验中的应用.上海第二医科大学学报,2005;25(3):297-300
    [57] J.D.霍森普德,B.H.格林伯格主编,陈新,江洪译.充血性心力衰竭:病理生理、诊断和治疗.北京:科学出版社,2004:85-95
    [58] 浦寿月,姜楞,廖埔.心功能不全.见:陈灏珠主编.实用内科学.第10版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1997:1091-1111
    [59] 张子彬,Tsung O.Cheng,张玉传主编.充血性心力衰竭学.第1版.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002:3-24
    [60] Kleber FX, Wensel R. Current guidelines for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Drugs, 1996;51(1): 89
    [61] Cowie MR, Mosterd A, Wood DA, et al. The epidemiology of heart failure. Eur Heart J, 1999;18: 208-225
    [62] Cleland JGF. Improving patient outcomes in heart failure: Evidence and barriers. Heart, 2000;84(Suppl Ⅰ): 8-10
    [63] American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2006 Update. [2006-03-01]. http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier_2007
    [64] KannelWB. Incidence and epidemiology of heart failure. Heart Fail Rev, 2000;5(2): 167-73
    [65] 顾东风,黄广勇,何红,等.中国心力衰竭流行病学调查及其患病率.中华心血管病杂志,2003;31(1):3-6
    [66] Katz A. The myocardium in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol, 1989;63: 13A
    [67] Historic Figures: William Withering. [2006-03-11]. http://www. bbc. co. uk/history/historic_figures/withering_william. shtml
    [68] Forker AD. A cardiologist's perspective on evolving concepts in the management of congestive heart failure. J Clin Pharmacol, 1996;36(11): 973-984
    [69] The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med, 1987;316: 1429-1435
    [70] The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med, 1991;325: 293-302
    [71] The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. N Engl J Med, 1992;327: 685-691
    [72] Packer M, O'Connor CM, Ghali JK, et al. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med, 1996;335: 1107-1114
    [73] CIBIS Investigators and Committees. A randomized trial of β-blockade in heart failure. The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study(CIBIS). Circulation, 1994;90: 1765-1773
    [74] CIBIS-Ⅱ Investigators and Committees. The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study Ⅱ (CIBIS Ⅱ): a randomized trial. Lancet, 1999;353: 9-13
    [75] MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet, 1999;353: 2001-2007
    [76] Milton Packer, Andrew J. S. Coats, Michael B. Fowler, et al. for The Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study Group. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med, 2001;344: 1651-1658
    [77] Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, et al.;for Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Investigators. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2003;362(9377): 7-13
    [78] 唐炯.慢性心力衰竭治疗现状.心血管病学进展,2005:26(6):569-572
    [79] Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd Edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000
    [80] Alain L, Philippe L, Michel C, et al. Bisoprolol for the treatment of chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis on individual data of two placebo-controlled studies—CIBIS and CIBIS Ⅱ. Am Heart J, 2002;143(2): 301-307
    [81] 中华医学会心血管病学分会.慢性收缩性心力衰竭治疗建议.中华心血管病杂志,2002:30(1):7-23
    [82] 杜昕,马长生.心力衰竭诊断与治疗的几个问题.中华心血管病杂志,2003:31(7):539-541
    [83] 晋·王叔和.脉经(影印本).第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1956:14-16
    [84] 宋·赵估编.圣济总录.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1982:809-813
    [85] 唐·王冰注解,宋·林亿补注.重广补注黄帝内径素问.第1版.北京:学苑出版社,2004:164-228
    [86] 成都中医学院主编.金匮要略选读.第1版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980:119
    [87] 明·张介宾.景岳全书.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1991:426
    [88] 唐·王焘撰.外台秘要(影印版).第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1959:254
    [89] 李莉,关继华.古代中医对心衰的认识.新疆中医药,2000:18(2):6-8
    [90] 李南夷.邓铁涛教授治疗心衰的思路与方法.新中医,1995:9(10):6-8
    [91] 成启予,方祝元.浅谈充血性心力衰竭的中医诊断及其证治.南京中医学院学报,1994:10(2):23-24
    [92] 霍根红.试论充血性心力衰竭的中医病理实质.河南中医,1996:16(5):274-276
    [93] 廖家桢,许心如,陈可冀,等.心力衰竭的中医辨证论治.北京中医杂志,1989:(3):3-13
    [94] 张志勇,王桂平.益气活血汤治疗缺血性心肌病心力衰竭65例观察。北京中医,2000:2(1):39-40
    [95] 刘宗莲,徐淑文.陈鼎祺治疗心力衰竭经验.中医杂志,2000:41(4):204-205
    [96] 杜丽,熊曼琪,梅国强,等.充血性心力衰竭少阴病阳虚水停证的探讨.中国中西医结合杂志,2001:21(2):136-137
    [97] 蔡辉,胡婉英.中医药治疗充血性心力衰竭的理论研究概况.河北中医药学报,2000: 15(3):41-43
    [98] 傅亚龙.120例慢性充血型心力衰竭患者的临床证候学研究.中国医药学报,1999:14(5):65-66
    [99] 贺泽龙,郭振球.充血性心力衰竭中医证候的临床回顾性调查研究.湖南中医学院学报,2003:23(5):33-36
    [100] 曹雪滨,浦斌红,胡元会.充血性心力衰竭的中医辨证分型特点.甘肃中医学院学报,1999:16(3):13-16
    [101] 翁明翰,陈珠,黄天珍.心宝治疗慢性心功能不全73例报告.中医杂志,1985:(1):32-33
    [102] 王保和,孙兰军,于志强.滋阴温阳、活血利水治疗充血性充血心力衰竭的舌象资料分析.天津中医,1988;5(1):16
    [103] 林慧娟,王翠萍,郭伟星,等.强心灵流浸膏治疗充血性心力衰竭的临床研究.中国中西医结合杂志,1998:18(8):468-471
    [104] 吴红全,鲁燕吗,张琦,等.参麦注射液对心力衰竭患者血浆神经肽内皮素和心纳素的影响.中国中西医结合杂志,1999;19(1):653-655
    [105] 周仲瑛,金妙文,吴勉华,等.益阴助阳、活血通脉法治疗充血性心力衰竭的临床研究.南京中医药大学学报,2000:16(1):13-16
    [106] 蔡辉,胡婉英,王艳君,等.鹿角方治疗充血性心力衰竭疗效观察.安徽中医学院学报,2002:21(8):14
    [107] 王瑞娟,茅惠明,张芬.复方丹参、黄芪注射液对充血性心力衰竭患者血浆ANP、NO的影响.上海中医药杂志,1999:6(1):14-15
    [108] 李立志,张京春,徐凤芹,等.利心丸治疗充血性心力衰竭的临床研究.中国中西医结合杂志,2000:20(5):34-343、
    [109] 黄衍寿,冼绍祥,丁有钦,等.保心康治疗气阳虚型充血性心力衰竭的临床研究.中药新药与临床药理,2000:11(5):261-265
    [110] 邓德明,顾光.心煎宁治疗充血性心力衰竭50例临床研究.中医杂志,2002:43(8):593
    [111] 洪永敦,冼绍祥,陈宇鹏,等.益气温阳活血利水中药对充血性心力衰竭患者内皮素及一氧化氮的影响.中药新药与临床药理,2000;11(2):71-73
    [112] 张道亮,白民刚,胡有志,等.抗心衰Ⅰ号合剂治疗充血性心力衰竭的临床疗效和抗脂质过氧化作用.中国中西医结合急救杂志,2000:7(2):89-91
    [113] Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996;17: 1-12
    [114] Search PubMed. [2005-12-26], http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/auery.fcgi
    [115] 黄峻,王文主编.心脑血管疾病大型临床试验.第1版.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1998
    [116] Parmley WW, Nesto RW, Singh BN, et al. Attenuation of the circadian patterns of myocardial ischemia with nifedipine GITS in patients with chronic stable angina. JACC, 1992;19: 1380
    [117] Waters D, Higginson L, Gladstone P, et al. Effect of monotherapy with an HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor on progression of coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by serial quantitative arteriography. Circulation, 1994;89: 959
    [118] 夏彦,潘晓平,刘元元,等.广义估计方程在临床试验重复测量资料中的应用.现代预防医学,2005:32(5):444-445
    [119] Donald DB. Problems with repeated measures analysis: Demonstration with a study of the diversification and performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 1995;38(6): 1692-1708
    [120] 姜志安,王士昌.生脉散治疗充血性心力衰竭作用机制.河北中西医结合杂志,1997:6(4):598
    [121] 秦腊梅,杨金铎,廖家桢.生脉散对大鼠心肌细胞膜ATP酶活性影响的进一步观察.中国急救医学,1983:3(2):6
    [122] 徐亚利,董建英,李子瑜,等.参脉注射液强心效应的实验性研究.江西医药,1993,28(6):324
    [123] 吕宝经,荣烨之,赵美华,等.生脉散对急性心肌梗死患者抗脂质过氧化作用.中国中西医结合杂志,1994:14(12):712
    [124] 赵美华,荣烨之,吕宝经,等.生脉散对急性病毒性心肌炎患者血清脂质过氧化物的影响.中国中西医结合杂志,1996:16(3):144
    [125] 冯培芳,刘鲁明,沈玉英.参脉注射液对晚期癌症患者sIL-2R、LAK及NI(细胞活性影响.中国中西医结合杂志,1995:15(2):87-89
    [126] 许青媛,王惠成,刘旺轩.生脉注射液对家兔体外血栓形成及凝血功能的影响.中西医结合杂志,1986:6(7):428
    [127] 郑坤华,贾连旺.生脉注射液治疗老年充血性心力衰竭的疗效评价.现代中西医结合杂志,2005:14(6):716-717
    [128] 陈国华,段明珉.黄芪加生脉注射液辅助治疗老年性心力衰竭60例疗效观察.中华临床医学研究杂志,2005:11(3):349-350
    [129] 张少华.中西医结合治疗老年顽固性心力衰竭32例.陕西中医2004:25(2):112-113
    [130] 迟静荔,隋旭涛,李尚艾,等.氯沙坦、卡维地洛和参麦注射液治疗老年缺血性心脏病心衰的影响.中华实用中西医杂志 2003:16(11):1658-1659
    [131] 刘炼庆.参麦注射液和硫酸镁佐治老年人慢性充血性心力衰竭的临床研究.新医学,2003:34(7):427-428
    [132] 刘洪.参麦注射液辅助治疗老年慢性充血性心力衰竭78例疗效观察.右江医学,2003:31(4):333-334
    [133] 杨晓群,张维明,谈艳,等.生脉注射液治疗老年充血性心力衰竭50例.山东中医杂志,2002:21(11):660-661
    [134] 钟红卫,杨思进,林勇.中西医结合治疗老年性CHF54例.四川中医,2001;19(10):22-23
    [135] 赵成元,周正学.参麦注射液联合常规西药治疗老年急性左心衰竭42例.遵义医学院学报,2000:23(3):269-270
    [136] 陈佳山,王树山,曾闽新,等.参麦注射液治疗老年心力衰竭疗效观察.中国中西医结合急救杂志,1999:6(7):309-311
    [137] 赵艺,赵燕.生脉注射液治疗老年人心力衰竭的临床观察.云南中医中药杂志,1998:19(3):13-14
    [138] 顾中浩.生脉饮合黄连素治疗充血性心力衰竭58例.中西医结台实用临床急救 1997;4(5):227
    [139] 杨清华,南红梅,杨丽华,.参麦注射液治疗左心功能不全的临床观察.吉林中医药,1997.07.20:17(4):12-13
    [140] 杨文明,周宜轩.参麦注射液治疗心力衰竭疗效观察.中西医结合实用临床急救,1997;4(7):295-297
    [141] Hunt S A, Baker D W, Chin M H, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2001;104: 2996
    [142] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编委会.慢性收缩性心力衰竭治疗建议.中华心血管病杂志,2002;30(1):7-23
    [143] 国家药品监督管理局.中药新药治疗心力衰竭的临床研究指导原则.见:郑筱萸主编.中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行).第1版.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:77-85
    [144] 温泽淮,王奇,梁伟雄,等.生脉胶囊治疗慢性心衰双盲随机对照试验中盲法的实施.广州中医药大学学报,2004:21(4):315-318
    [145] 余松林.随机临床试验中的成组序贯设计与期中分析方法.中国临床药理学与治疗学杂志,1998:3(3):206
    [146] 郭静,何大卫.期中分析方法在临床试验中的应用.山西医科大学学报,2001;32(6):506
    [147] 何清波,苏炳华.成组序贯试验的原理和方法.现代预防医学,1999:26(3):310
    [148] NCSS Trial and PASS Trial. Released: April 28, 2003. [2003-4-28]. http://www.NCSS.com/download, htlm
    [149] Thomas S. Rector, Jay N. Cohn. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. American Heart Journal, 1992, 124(4): 1017-1025
    [150] 余松林,向惠云.重复测量资料分析方法与SAS程序.第1版.北京:科学出版社,2004:78-102
    [151] John M Lachin. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2000;21: 168-189
    [152] Stevens 5. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996: 450
    [153] Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, et al. Applied linear statistical model. 4th Ed. Chicago, IL: Irwin, 1996: 1165
    [154] Mendoza JL. A significance test for multisample sphericity. Psychometrika, 1980;45: 495-498.
    [155] Keselman HS, Kowalchuk RK, Algina J, Lix L M, Wilcox RR. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 200;53: 175-191
    [156] Littell RC, Milliken GA, StroupWW, Wolfinger RD. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1996: 101-102
    [157] Laurence S Magder. Simple approaches to assess the possible impact of missing outcome information on estimates of risk ratios, odds ratios, and risk differences. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2003~ 24:411-421

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700