摘要
面对模糊、不确定和相互冲突的需求,以及承受的巨大压力,企业家必须做出正确的决策。相对于企业家心理世界的复杂性和战略决策的重要性说,决策过程的那种纯理性或纯学术描述与计算显得不够现实,而那种纯直觉或纯经验忠告与猜测则显得不够可信。应对不同决策情境确立适应性心理标准是企业家决策的基本内在机制,也是实现高效决策的关键环。
无论是最优决策理论还是满意决策理论,都未能很好地描述企业家决策现实状况。就最优化决策理论而言,最优标准的确定只适用于标准化、抽象化环境,这对经常面临高度不确定性的企业家来说,最优标准只是一个虚幻的、难以企及的标准。西蒙(H. A. Simon)因其决策理论荣获1978年度诺贝尔经济学奖,他提出了“有限理性”与“满意标准”理论,深刻批判了最优决策理论。但是,西蒙把满意标准直接运用到现实选择中,仍然存在一定的理理论缺陷。最低满意标准如何确定,满意是否具有程度性,不同主体的满意程度是否以及为什么存在差别,同一主体的满意标准为什么以及如何变化,这些同题都值得进一步探讨,需要得到再解释。西蒙力图用一个难以确定的“满意值”去否定一个不可能确定的“最优值”。同样卡尼曼(Kahneman)、Gigerenzetr、 Sarasvathy等西蒙理论继承者们,也未能清楚地阐述“满意标准”的构成与形成机理。
面对复杂的、高度不确定的决策情境,企业家有效决策的关键是关注、识别、选择合适的心理因素作为决策的心理标准。本文在理论分析、理论继承与批评基础上,提炼出“决策心理锚”这一核心概念。从理论与实践两方面,论证其存在性,剖析其内在结构,探讨其运行机理。决策心理锚是企业家决策的心理标准结构,由体现企业家决策本质特征的决策意志、决策预期和决策能力所构成。企业家决策为“决策心理锚”所锚定。决策意志主要有决策的成就导向与自控性两维度,决策预期主要有决策的信心与机会感知两维度,决策能力主要有决策的责任力与创造力两维度。通过理论探讨和实证分析,本文主要得出以下结论:(1)企业家决策心理锚是高阶的“三因素-双维度”结构,企业家至少存在三种类型:决策意志型、决策预期型和决策能力型,这在16名知名企业家的质性研究中得到验证。(2)验证性因素分析显示,决策心理锚内在结构“六因子"模型和“三因子”模型的拟合效果不相上下,均为良好的结构,而单因子竞争模型的拟合结构则逊色许多。(3)决策意志、决策预期和决策能力各自对风险决策行为具有正向影响,其中决策预期的影响力度更大。决策心理锚对风险决策行为的整体影响程度要高于其构成要素的部分影响。
本文尝试性的创新可归纳为:(1)提出核心概念。企业家决策心理锚是企业家决策的心理标准结构,企业家会关注决策方案是否符合其意志水平,是否具有一定的预期利益,是否可行。(2)系统性整合企业家决策行为理论。以多学科理论为理论支撑,以多种研究方法为技术支撑,整合并丰富了企业家决策行为理论研究。(3)运用"Vivo中编码”分析技术。从互联网中采集最新的信息资料,借助于NVivo最新版本NVivo10.0中的"Vivo中编码”技术,较全面和客观地分析了企业家决策心理特征,这与传统的手工式、“先入为主”式编码技术是完全不同的。(4)提出企业家决策心理锚评估模型。以决策心理锚的三标准因素的不同组合方式,构建评估企业家决策心理锚的“三维八分”模型,为评估企业家决策心理锚提供一种分析框架和基本方法。
决策心理锚理论是对西蒙满意决策理论的继承与发展,比较科学地解释了满意标准的构成与发生机理,也有效地回答了“马奇问题”。决策心理锚概念的提出,可帮助决策者正确认知与调适决策心理,使其决策达到满意状态,接近最优决策。也可对企业家进行培训与指导,使其愿意承受更大的风险来从事创新事业。囿于自身学力不足,本研究尚存诸多不足,寄望于未来之深入探究。
The entrepreneurs must make right decisions facing fuzzy, uncertain, conflicting requirements and bearing huge pressure. Relative to complexity of psychological world of entrepreneurs and importance of strategic decisions, the pure rationality or academic description and computation of decision-making process are unrealistic, and the kinds of pure intuition or experient advice and speculation are unreliable. To establish adaptive and psychological standard is the basic mechanism and also the key link in the process of efficient decision to cope with different decision situations.
Both the optimal decision theory and the satisfactory decision theory failed to describe entrepreneurs'decision-making reality well. In terms of the optimal decision theory, the determination of the optimal standard is only applicable to standardization and abstract environment.and the optimal standard is just a fantasy and beyond theoretical margin because entrepreneurs often face a high degree of uncertainty. Simon (H.A.S imon) was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics for its decision making theory in1978. He proposed the theories of'bounded rationality" and " satisfactory standard" to criticize the theory of optimal decision. However, Simon's satisfaction standard directly was applied to the realistic choice, However.there are still some certain theoretical defects. How to determine the lowest satisfactory standard. How to determine the degree of satisfactory standard? Whether satisfactory standard has degree level?Whether and why is there a difference among the different main body? Why and how satisfactory standard of the same subject change?These problems are worth further discussing and explaining. Simon was trying to use a certain satisfactory value to deny optimal value which was impossible to determine. Kahneman (Kahneman), Gigerenzer and Sarasvathy heired Simon theory.and they also failed to clearly expounded the composition and formation mechanism of " satisfactory standard ".
In the face of complex, highly uncertain situations, it is vital for the entrepreneur to foucs,dentify and select the appropriate psychological factors to make criteria decisions effectively. In this paper, on the basis of theoretical analysis, inheritance and criticism,we extract the core concept of "psychological anchor of decision". From theory and practice, we prove its existence, analyze its internal structure, discuss its operational mechanism. Entrepreneurs'"psychological anchor of decision" is the structure of psychological standard and embodies the substitutive characteristics of entrepreneur's decision. It is composed by the decision-making will, decision-making expection and decision-making ability. And it anchors the behavior of entrepreneurs' decision. Achievement orientation and self-control are mainly two dimensions of decision-making will. Confidence and opportunity are mainly two dimensions of decision-making expection. Responsibility force and creativity force are mainly two dimensions of decision-making ability.
Some important results and conclusions are presented as follow:(1) the psychological anchor of decision of entrepreneurs is the high order structure of "three factors-double dimensions". There are at least three types of entrepreneur:decision-making will decision-making expection and decision-making ability. It was verified in a qualitative study on the sixteen well-known entrepreneurs.(2) The analysis of confirmatory factor shows that the "six factors" and "three factors" model of fitting effect of inner structure of the psychological anchor of decision are close. Both are good structure, and fitting effect of competition model of single factor is much less.(3) Decision-making will, decision-making expection and decision-making ability have a positive influence on risk decision-making behavior, while decision-making expection has greater influence. The overall impact of psychological anchor of decision on risk decision-making behavior is higher than its component part.
In this paper, the trial innovation can be summarized as:(1) The core concepts are put forward, psychological anchor of decision is structure of psychological standard. Entrepreneurs will focus on whether decision-making plan is in line with the will whether it has a certain expected benefits, whether it is workable.(2) We Systematicly integrate the theory of entrepreneurs'decision-making behavior. We integrate and enrich the theory of entrepreneurs' decision-making behavior supported by Multidisciplinary theory and a variety of research methods.(3) Using the analysis technology of "code in Vivo". We hane collected the latest information from the Internet. By the analysis technology of "code in Vivo" of latest version NVivo10.0, we have analyzed comprehensively and objectively the entrepreneurial psychological characteristics.It is completely different from the traditional manual and "pre-conceived" coding technology.(4)The evaluation model of psychological anchor of decision is put forward. We have built the evaluation model of "three dimensional-eight branches" of psychological anchor of decision by using different combinations of the three psychological standard factors. We have provided a framework and basic method of analysis to assess the psychological anchor of decision.
The theory of psychological anchor of decision is the succession and development of Simon's decision theory. It scientifically explains the composition and mechanism of satisfactory standard. It also effectively answers the" problem of march". We can help entrepreneurs to cognize and djust decision-making mind correctly. We can help entrepreneurs to achieve satisfactory states which is close to optimal decision. We can also train and guid entrepreneurs to take more risk of Innovation.
Conditioned by professional qualification, there are some deficiencies in this study. Hope the further exploration in the future.
引文
[1]盛宇华,王平.战略决策行为研究[M].人民出版社,2006
[2]Powell T. C.,Lovallo D.,Fox C. R. Behavioral Strategy[J].Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(13):1369-1386
[3]詹姆斯G·马奇.决策是如何产生的[M].机械工业出版社,2007
[4]西蒙.现代决策理论的基石[M].北京经济学院出版社出版,1989
[5]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].科学出版社,2003
[6]崔西.雷军口述:如何让边缘化金山重回主流.http://www.iceo.com.cn/, 2013-06-24
[7]丹·洛瓦洛,丹尼尔·卡内曼.项目投资:为什么总是看走眼?[J].哈佛商业评论2003(9):23-24
[8]赫伯特A.西蒙.管理行为[M].机械工业出版社,2004
[9]桑特罗克.心理学导论[M].上海社会科学院出版社,2011
[10]Frank Knight, Risk. Uncertainty and profit[M].New York:Houghton Mifflin Co.,1921.
[11]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].九州出版社,2007
[12]Casson,M.C.the Entrepreneur:An Eeonomic Theory [M].Oxford,Martin Robertson,1982
[13]Hambrick D C,, Mason P A.Upperechelons:The organization as a reflection of its top managers [J].Academy of management Review,1984,9:195-206
[14]Finkelstein S., Hambrick D., Strategic leadership:Top executives and their effects on organizations.New York:West,1996
[15]朱振伟,金占明.战略决策过程中程序理性的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理2010(3):113-118
[16]孟冬妮.企业高层管理者战略决策风险研究[D].博士学位论文,辽宁大学,2011
[17]冯廷勇.一种不确定情境中决策过程的认知与神经机制研究[D].博士学位论文,西南大学,2007
[18]Mintzberg,H.,Raisinhgnai, D.Theoret,A.The structure of unstructured" decision processes [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1976,(2):246-275
[19]诺埃尔·蒂奇和沃伦·本尼斯.决断-成功的领导者怎样做出伟大的决断[M].中国人民大学出版社,2008
[20]庄锦英.决策心理学[M].上海教育出版社,2006
[21]盛宇华,方志军.管理问题难度的实证研究[J].经济管理,2006(10):4-8
[22]西蒙.管理决策新科学[M].中国社会科学出版社,1982
[23]盛宇华.管理决策难度评估模型[J].经济管理,2002(23):37-38
[24]李志,罗章利,张庆林.国内外知名企业家的人格特征研究.重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1):51-56
[25]张智光.决策科学与艺术[M].科学出版社,2006
[26]贝塔朗菲.一般系统论:基础、发展和应用[M].林康义,魏宏森,等译.清华大学出版社,1987
[27]卡斯特,罗森茨韦克.组织与管理-系统方法与权变方法[M].中国社会科学出版社,1987
[28]巴纳德.经理人员的职能[M].机械工业出版社,2007
[29]西蒙.现代决策理论的基石[M].北京经济学院出版社,1989
[30]张雄.哲学理性概念与经济性理性概念辨析[J].江海学刊,1999(6):81-86
[31]赫伯特·A·西蒙.西蒙选集(黄涛)[M].首都经济贸易大学出版社,2002
[32]西蒙.关于人为事物的科学(修订版).杨砾译.解放军出版社.1987
[33]张结海,张玲.现实理性:一个理解经济行为的框架[J].心理科学进展2003,11(3):267-273
[34]盛宇华.建立行为决策学的几点构想[J].社会科学家,1989(04):82-84
[35]Simon, H.A.What we know about the creative proeess:frontiers in creative and Innovation management[M].Ballinger Publishing Company,1986
[36]詹姆斯G·马奇.决策是如何产生的[M].机械工业出版社,2007
[37]赛尔特,马奇.企业行为理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1963
[38]波特.竞争战略[M].陈小悦译.华夏出版社,1997
[39]项保华,李庆华.企业战略理论综述[J].经济学动态,2000(07):70-74
[40]申荷永.论勒温心理学中的动力[J].心理学报1991(3):306-312
[41]Lewin, K. Resolving socialconflicts.(Ed.By G. W.Lewin),New York:Harper & Brother Publishers.Pxiv,1948
[42]刘九林.当代社会心理学中“勒温传统”的内涵及影响[J].菏泽学院学报2005(3):88-92
[43]司马贺.人类的认知-思维的信息加工理论.荆其诚,张厚粲译[M].科学出版社,1986
[44]王军.管理决策中的个体认知偏差研究[D].博士学位论文,辽宁大学,2009
[45]叶浩生.认知心理学:困境与转向[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2010(1):44-50
[46]Stogdill R M.Personal factors with leadership:A survey of the literature[J].The Journal of Psycholgy,1947,28:35-71.
[47]MaClellnad,D.C..Motivational Pattern in Southeast Asia with special reference to the Chinese case[J].Journal of social issues,1963,19(1):6-19.
[48]Atkinson,J.W..Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior [J].Psycholgoical Review,1957,64(3),359-372
[49]Dweek,C.S.Motivational Porcesses affecting learning[J].American Psychologist, 1986,41:1041-1048
[50]杜红.经理人员成就动机的结构、评价与机制研究[D].博士学位论文,浙江大学,2001
[51]王沛.当代领导心理学的理论与研究述评[J].西北师大学报,2001(3):86-92
[52]Bandura,A..Social foundation of thoughtand action:A social cognitive theory.Englewood, Cliffs,NJ:Prentice, Hall,1986
[53]Fred Luthans,Carolyn M.Youssef,Bruce J. Avolio.心理资本[J].李超平译中国轻工业出版社,2007
[54]高英.心理资本对知识型员工工作绩效影响的实证研究[D].博士学位论文,辽宁大学,2011
[55]Luthans,F, Avey,J B,and Avolio,B J. Psychological capital development:Toward a micro-intervention[J]. Journal of Organziational Behavior,2006,27:387-393
[56]柯江林,孙健敏,李永瑞.心理资本:本土量表的开发及中西比较[J].心理学报,2009,9(41):875-888
[57]Allais M.Le comportement de I'homme rationanel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axioms de I'ecole Americaine.Econometrica,1953,21:503-546
[58]Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk[M]. Econometrica.1979
[59]Weinstein.Overconfidence and Market Efficiency with Heterogeneous Agents[J].Economic Theory,1996,30(2):313-336.
[60]Weinstein,Neil D.Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1980,39:806-820.
[61]Kunda, Ziv.Motivated Inference:Self-serving Generation and Evaluation of Causal Theories[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,53:636-647
[62]Shiller, R.J., Market Volatility and Investor Behavior[J]. American Economic Review, vol.80,no.2,1990
[63]Busenitz L. W., Barney J. B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations:Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9-30
[64]陈震红,董俊武.中国创业者的风险感知与创业决策——以武汉“中国光谷”的创业者为例[J].当代财经,2007(9):10-16
[65]李心丹,王冀宁,傅浩.中国个体证券投资者交易行为的实证研究[J].经济研究,2002(11):54-64
[66]王宁,茅宁.对有限理性个体投资者心理偏差的研究新进展[J].经济理论与经济管理,2005(6):58-63
[67]Anderson,N.H..A cognitive theory of judgment and decision.In B.Brehmer,H.Jungermann,P.Lurens & G Sevon(Eds.),New direction in research on decision making.Amsterdam:Elsever,1986
[68]Kozielecki J.Psychological decision theory.D.Reidel publishing company,1977
[69]Selten R.Aspiration adaptation theory [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1998,42:191-214
[70]莱茵哈特·泽尔滕,高雷.有限理性论[J].审计与经济研究.2011(01):3-9
[71]Li S.A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters[J].Applied Intelligence,2004,20(2):147-163
[72]Li S.Equate to differentiate theory:A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk.Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of New South Wales,1994
[73]刘永芳.快速节俭启发式-基于有限理性和生态理性的简单决策规程[J].心理科学,2003(1):56-59
[74]Peter M,Todd,Gigerenzer G. Putting Naturalistic Decision Making into the Adaptive Toolbox. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2001,14(5):381-382
[75]Brandstatter E,Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R.The priority heuristic:Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review,2006,113(2):409-432
[76]Sarasvathy,S D.Causation and effectuation:Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency [J].Academy of Management Review,2001,26(2):243-164
[77]Sarasvathy,S.D. Making it happen:Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design[J].Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice,2004,28(6):519-532
[78]秦剑.基于创业研究视角的效果推理理论及实证研究前沿探析与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2010(7):1-7
[79]徐文政,盛宇华.预期组合:将不确定性纳入预期理论的新方法[J].南京社会 科学,2011(8):25-27
[80]郭新强,盛宇华.有限理性决策选择性预期形成机制及影响因素分析[J].学术论坛,2011(8):63-68
[81]刘霞,潘晓良.不确定性风险选择的抱负水平一相对效用整合理论[J].心理科学,1998(21):412-416
[82]叶泽方.非确定型决策方法决策目标及决策结果可靠性研究[J].管理工程学报,2000(2):59-61
[83]李广海,陈通.基于有限理性行为决策机理与评价研究[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6):30-33
[84]唐馨.浅谈实际工作中决策理论“满意准则”的运用[J].经营管理者,2009(6):280
[85]Nandini Raj agopalan, Abdul M.A.Rasheed,Deepak K.Datta Nandini Rajagopalan,Abdul M.A.Rasheed, Deepak K.Datta.苗莉(译)战略决策过程:批判性回顾与未来研究展望[J].管理世界,2012(1):157-169
[86]Papadakis V M, Lioukas S, Chambers D. Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19 (2):115-147
[87]宋继承,潘建伟.企业战略决策中SWOT模型的不足与改进[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2010(1):116-120
[88]Tversky A, Kahneman D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment[J].Psychological Review,1983,90 (4):293-315
[89]Cooper A C,Woo C Y,Dunkelbcrg W C. Entrcprcncurs'Perceived Chance for success[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1988 3(2):97-108
[90]李怀祖.决策理论导引[M].机械工业出版社,1993
[91]Lisa Sayegh, William P, Anthony, et al., Managerial decision-making under crisis: The role of emotion in an intuitive decision process[J]. Human Resource Management Review,2004,14(2):179-199)
[92]Velasquez,M G,& Rostankowski,C.Ethics:theory and practice[M].E nglewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1985
[93]Jones, T.M.Ethical Decision Making by Individualsin Organizations:An Issue Contingent Model[J].Academy of Management Review,1991(160):366-395
[94]张坊.领导者德才素质及岗位匹配研究[D].博士学位论文,南京师范大学,2005
[95]谭艳艳,汤湘希.会计伦理决策影响因素研究-基于计划行为理论的检验[J]. 会计研究2012(9):24-32
[96]甘怡群,张妙清,宛小昂,孙增霞.用中国人个性量表(CPAI)预测国有企业中高层管理者的绩效[J].应用心理学,2002(3):35-39
[97]Fishbein M,AjzenI. Belief, Attitude,Intention an Behavior,an Introduction to theory and research[M]. Mass:Addison-Wesley,1975.11-56
[98]Ajzen I,Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behavior[M] Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1980.132-201
[99]Ajzen I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational behavior and human decision processes,1991,50 (2):179-211
[100]Letcher,L,and Niehoff,B.Psychological capital and wagesr:A behavioral economic approach[R].paper submitted to beconsidered for presentation at the Midwest Academy of Management,Minneapolis,M N,2004
[101]Holyoak,K.J.Analogical thinking and Human intelligence. Advances in the Psychology of Hunan Intelligence,1984
[102]Senge Peter M.The Fifth Discipline:The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,1990
[103]姚凯, 陈曼.企业家心智模式对企业多元化战略决策的影响经济理论与经济管理2009(12):60-65
[104]骆志豪,胡金星.高层管理者的心智模式研究[J].学海.2010(06):56-59
[105]Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms[J]. M anagement Science,1983,29:770-791.
[106]Lumpkin G T, Dess G G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance [J]. Academy of Management Review,1996,21:135-172
[107]Judge T,Bono J,Llies R,Gerhardt M.Personality and Leadership:A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87:765-780
[108]贾良定,唐翌,李宗卉,乐军军,朱宏俊.愿景型领导:中国企业家的实证研究及其启示[J].管理世界,2004(2):84-96
[109]刘向东.战略领导特征及其对企业战略选择和绩效影响机制研究[D].博士学位论文,南开大学,2011
[110]Epley, N.,& Gilovich,T.Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic:Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science,2001,12,391-396
[111]李斌,徐富明,王伟,邓子鹃,张军伟.锚定效应的种类、影响因素及干预 措施[J].心理科学进展2010(1):34-45
[112]施恩.职业锚:发现你的价值[M].中国财政经济出版社,2004
[113]罗珉.企业战略行为研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2012(5):35-44
[114]刘应宗.决策本质简论[J].北京理工大学学报,2001(3):3-9
[115]E.L.Deci& R.M.Ryan(Eds.),Handbookofself- deter-mination research. Rochester, NY [M].University of RochesterPress,2003
[116]Alchain,A.A.,and Demsetz,H. Production,Information Costand Economic Organization[J].American Economic Review,1972 (5)
[117]杨其静.企业家的企业理论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2005
[118]丁栋虹.企业家主导下的企业合约模式研究[J].中国工业经济,2002(05):79-85
[119]王广亮,张屹山.权力视角下的企业契约分解与变迁[J].中国工业经济,2007(10):87-94
[120]朱国泓,杜兴强.控制权的来源与本质:拓展、融合及深化[J].会计研究2010(5):54-62
[121]林毅夫.自生能力、经济转型与新古典经济学的反思[J].经济研究,2002(12) :15-24
[122]Mises, L V. Human action:A treatise on economics[M]. London:Hodge,1949: 325-326
[123]托尔.曼动物和人的目的性行为[M].北京大学出版社,2010
[124]沙彦飞.基于企业生命周期的企业家社会责任及精神耦合研究[J].管理学报,2012(07):1278-1283
[125]何大安.行为经济人有限理性的实现程度[J].中国社会科学.2004(04):91-101
[126]艾瑞里.怪诞行为学[M].中信出版社,2008
[127]张国锋,李祖枢.不确定行为选择情绪机制[J].计算机科学,2011(5):252-257
[128]叶泽方.新的决策准则:“满意”与“最优”结合-谈西蒙决策理论在实际工作中的运用[J].决策探索.1996(01):18-19
[129]王炳书.浅论决策合理性的标准[J].青海社会科学,1997(4):55-60
[130]王垒.人格结构的动态分析[J].心理学报,1998(4):409-418
[131]Bratman M E.Practical intention[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1987
[132]Brockhaus R.H.Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs.Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:509-520
[133]周三多,陈传明.管理学[M].高等教育出版社,2010
[134]贺小刚,李新春.企业家能力与企业成长:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005(10):101-111
[135]Miller, G.A., Galanter, E.,& Pribram, K.H. Plans and the structure of behavior.New York:Holt, Rinehart,&Winston,1960
[136]何大安.理性选择向非理性选择转化的行为分析[J].经济研究,2005(8):73-83
[137]李新春,宋丽红.传承意愿、行业潜能与家族控制-基于全国私营企业调查的实证检验[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2013(1):111-114
[138]杜晓.2012年度报告详解企业家犯罪深层原因[N].法制日报,2013-01-21
[139]惠青山.中国职工心理资本内容结构及其与态度行为变量关系实证研究[D].博士学位论文,暨南大学,2009
[140]Warneryd,K-E.Demystifying Rational Expectations Theory through an Economic-Psychological Model.In:Gerrit Antonides, W.Fed van Raaij and Shlomo Maital:Advances in Economic Psychology John Wiley&Sons Ltd,1997
[141]Keynes,J.M.The General Theory of Employment,Interest and Money,London:Macmillan,1936
[142]Muth,J.F.Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.Econometrica,1961
[143]Gervaisand, Odean.Does Trading Improve Individual Investor Performance[J].Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,2003,22(3):199-217
[144]陈刚,谢科范,郭伟.创业者机会感知、风险感知、风险偏好的机理及量度[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009(6):1-5
[145]Kirzner,I.M.,Competition and Entrepreneurship[M].Chicago and London The University of Chicago Press,1973
[146]陈震红.创业者创业决策的风险行为研究[D].博士学位论文,武汉理工大学,2004
[147]Kahneman D., Lovallo D.Timid choices and bold forecasts:A cognitive perspective on risk-taking[J]. Management Science,1994,39(1):17-31
[148]Palich & Baghy.Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking:Challenging conventional wisdom.Journal of Business Venturing, 1995,10(6),425-438
[149]Sitkin SB,Pablo AL.Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior.Academy of Management Review,1992,17(1):9-38
[150]白云涛,郭菊娥,席酉民.高层管理团队风险偏好异质性对战略投资决策影响效应的实验研究[J].南开管理评论,2007(10):25-30
[151]Fiegenbaum A,Tomas H. Attitudes towards risk and the risk-return paradox:Prospect theory explanations[J].Academy of Management Journal,1988 (31):85-106
[152]Sitkin S.B.,Weingart L.R., Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior:A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity.Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(6):1573-1592
[153]李志,李慧.张庆林企业家创新决策能力现状的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2009(1):42-47
[154]方志军,盛宇华.企业高管测评模式分析[J].经济管理.2004(01):60-62
[155]刘进,揭筱纹.企业家战略领导能力战略决策机制与企业绩效关系的实证研究[J].经济经纬,2012(6):87-92
[156]Slovic, P.,M.Finucane and E. Peters. Rational Actors or Rational Fools: Implications of the Affect Heuristic for Behavioral Economics[J].Journal of Socio-Economics,2002,31(4):329-342
[157]罗珉.企业战略行为研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2012(5):35-44
[158]穆尔.竞争的衰亡:商业生态系统时代的领导与战略[M].北京出版社,1999
[159]Freeman E.Strategic Management.A Stakeholder Approach[M].Pitman Boston MA,1984
[160]Trevino L K.Ethical decision making in organizations:A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(3):601-617
[161]欧阳润平,宁亚春.西方企业社会责任战略管理相关研究述评[J].湖南大学学报,2009(2):48-52
[162]Alexander C S, Becker H J.The use of vignettes in survey research.Public Opinion Quarterly,1978,42:93-104
[163]McMahon J, Harvey R. An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones' Moral Intensity Construct. Journal of Business Ethics,2006,64(4):381-404
[164]张茉楠,李汉铃.给予人之资源观的企业家创造性决策研究[J].中国软科学,2005(8):113-120
[165]井润田,刘萍.创新决策过程中团队领导的控制模型研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2006(5):40-43
[166]Riegel,K.F.Towards a dialectic theory of development.Human Development, 1975,18:50-64
[167]Plomin,R.,& Daniels,D..Why are children in the same family so different from one another? [J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1987,10:1-16
[168]毕研玲,李纾.有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为-当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):682-688
[169]罗宾斯.组织行为学[M].中国人民大学出版社,1997
[170]张玉利,田新,王瑞.创业决策:Effectuation理论及其发展[J].研究与发展管理,2011(2):48-57
[171]Richard O.C.,B.P.S.Murthi,and K.Ismail.The Impact of Raecial Diversity on Intermediate and Long-Term Performance:The Moderating Role of Environmental Context.Strategic Management Joumal,2007,28
[172]Dess G.& Beard D.Dimensions of organizational task environments.Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:52-73
[173]HovaKimian A.The role of target leverage in security issues and repurchases.Journal of Business,2004,77:1041-1071
[174]Lawrence R.R.,Lorsch J.W.Organization and Environment,Boston Harvard University,Graduate School of Business Administration.1967
[175]张茉楠.企业家环境扫描的影响要素及理论框架研究[J].现代管理科学,2005(4):37-40
[176]茅宁,王宁.有限理性个体投资者行为机理的实证研究[J].管理科学,2008(1):91-100
[177]刘东华,和金生.企业战略决策动态能力构建-利益相关者方法[J].经济问题探索,2011(5):85-90
[178]刘洪.组织复杂性:动因、控制与利用[J].经济管理,2007(01):32-35
[179]刘洪.组织复杂性管理研究评述[J].管理学家(学术版),2008(03):270-280
[180]Vanden Abeele, P:Economic Agents Expectations in a Psychological Perspective.In:Van Raaij, WF., G.Van Veldhoven and K.E.Warneryd(eds.),Handbook of Economic Psychology, Dordrecht:Kluwer,1988
[181]谢晓非,王晓田.成就动机与机会威胁-认知[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):236-239
[182]谢晓非,李育辉.风险情景中机会和威胁认知[J].心理学报,2002,34(3): 319-326
[183]Feather,N.T.Expectations and Actions.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.P63 gy,1982,14(4):615-633
[184]周菲.风险决策中的认知心理学问题[J].辽宁大学学报:哲社版,1999(04):24-28
[185]邱皓政.量化研究与统计分析[M].重庆大学出版社,2009
[186]贺小刚.企业家能力与企业成长:一个能力理论的拓展模型[J].科技进步与对策,2006(09):45-49
[187]张焕勇.企业家能力与企业成长关系研究[D].博士学位论文,复旦大学,2007
[188]金杨华,吕福新.关系取向与企业家伦理决策—基于“浙商”的实证研究[J].管理世界,2008(8):100-106
[189]凌文辁,方俐洛.心理与行为测量[M].机械工业出版社,2003
[190]温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194
[191]张平.高层管理团队的异质性与企业绩效的实证研究[J].管理学报,2007(04):501-508
[192]魏立群,王智慧.我国上市公司高管特征与企业绩效的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2002(4):16-22
[193]古家军,胡蓓.企业TMT特征异质性对战略决策的影响[J].管理工程学报,2008(3):30-35
[194]陈传明,孙俊华.企业家人口背景特征与多元化战略选择——基于中国上市公司面板数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2008(05):124-135
[195]陈忠卫,常极.高层管理团队异质性理论的研究视角及其比较[J].统计与决策,2009(3):173-176
[196]杨鑫,金占明.从个体特征到企业绩效——战略管理研究路径解析[J].管理学报,2011(2):220-225,232
[197]陈守明,范嘉斯,余光胜.企业家人口背景特征与企业社会绩效的相关性研究[J].统计与决策,2012(06):174-177