羊草种群空间分布微格局对刈割干扰的响应
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本实验运用种群生态学及景观生态学的原理和方法,研究不同刈割强度对羊草(Leymus chinensis)种群动态、种群空间分布、群落特征以及草地微景观和土壤环境的影响,由此解释植被对环境干扰(刈割)的反应及适应机制,为草地景观的有效分析与利用提供一定的理论依据。实验选择羊草分布相对均匀、以羊草为单优种群且地势比较平坦的样地,样地大小为6m×6m,共10块。干扰处理采用刈割方式,处理强度分别为M(中度刈割,留茬高度为植株高度的50%),H(重度刈割,留茬高度为植株高度的75%),HH(过度刈割,留茬高度为0cm),每个处理强度3次重复,另设CK(对照样地,不刈割)一个。实验方法主要采用网格法测量羊草种群分布格局规模及强度,并将获得的数据进行克立格插值得到羊草分布的空间格局图,将图形导入Arcgis9.0中进行矢量化数据分析。通过两年的刈割干扰,结果表明:
     (1)羊草种群特征随刈割强度增大发生不同程度的变化。首先,种群高度随刈割强度增加而降低,各刈割处理之间(M、H、HH)高度差异显著(P<0.05);其次,种群密度随着刈割强度增大而降低,但处理间的差异不显著;最后,刈割降低羊草单株生物量,2005与2006年各处理组羊草单株生物量与对照样地相比,分别下降了:41.61、54.14、61.30%和58.98、67.36、75.26%,且处理间的差异达到显著水平(P<0.05);刈割也使羊草种群地上生物量降低。
     (2)羊草种群的分布格局类型在各处理组均为集聚分布;种群聚集强度随刈割强度的增大而增强,且次年羊草种群的集聚强度高于第一年;种群的最大聚集规模未随刈割干扰强度增加发生明显变化,聚集面积维持在1.28m2,但连续的刈割使羊草种群聚集的小斑块数目增多。
     (3)刈割提高了羊草群落的物种多样性,物种多样性随着刈割强度的增大呈现上升趋势。
     (4)刈割对羊草微格局的影响体现在斑块数量、面积和周长上。随着刈割强度的增大,斑块数量增加,斑块面积缩小,周长减少,景观呈现破碎化;刈割增加了景观的边界密度,第二年与第一年相比景观边界密度有所升高,破碎化程度有所减轻;刈割增加了景观的破碎度指数;刈割同时也使羊草微斑块的形状指数发生变化,即刈割使斑块形状趋向规则化。
     (5)刈割对样地土壤有机质含量和pH值没有显著影响,即短期内的干扰不足以使土壤系统立即作出反应。
To explain the vegetable’s response and adaptive mechanism when suffered disturbance such as environmental interruption (defoliation) and provide the theoretical base for making the valid programming and using of grassland, one experiment was conducted to investigate the population dynamics, spatial distribution pattern, community characteristics, microlandscape and soil environment for the grassland of Leymus chinensis with different cutting intensities by applying the theory and method of population ecology and landscape ecology. In the experiment, we choose the area where the topography is smooth and the distribution of L. chinensis is relatively even. The defoliation experiment design was three treatments (medium cutting-M, heavy cutting-H and over-cutting-HH) with three paddocks per treatment and there was also a contrast (CK). We use gridding to measure the population distribution pattern and intensity, in the same time, using Kriging Spatial interpolating to obtain the figure of spatial pattern of L. chinensis and make vector analysis of data to explain the influence on the micropattern of L. chinensis under different cutting intensities. The results showed that:
     (1) The population characteristics varied with the increasing of cutting intensities. Firstly, the population height fell with the increasing of cutting intensities and differed significantly among treatments of medium (M), heavily (H) and over defoliation (HH) in the scale of P<0.05. Secondly, the population density decreased with increasing of defoliation intensity, but the difference is not significantly. Lastly, cutting made the biomass of L. chinensis per tiller fewer than CK significantly (p<0.05) and the biomass reduced by 41.61, 54.14, 61.30% and 58.98, 67.36, 75.26% respectively compared to contrast in 2005 and 2006; Cutting also reduced the population biomss in aboveground.
     (2) The spatial distribution patterns of L. chinensis in the treatments were aggregation after the last cutting; the aggregation intensity of population for L. chinensis enhanced with increasing of cutting intensities and the effects of continuous disturbance were embodied; the largest population aggregation pattern haven’t change distinctly with the aggregation area of 1.28m2, but small clumping patterns appeared with increasing of cutting intensities. Cutting also improved biodiversity of community.
     (3) Defoliation as a way of disturbance has an important influence on micro-patch of L. chinensis. In the same year, numbers of patch increased with cutting intensities enhanced, the area of patch reduced and the landscape appeared fragmentation. Degree of fragmentation had a little drop in the second year. The edge density in landscape and fragmentation index both have increased with the increasing of clipping intensities, that is to say, the landscape
引文
[1] White P S, Jentsch A. The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics[J]. Ecology, 2001, 62: 99-449
    [2] Grimes J P. Control of species diversity in herbaceous vegetation[J]. Journal of Environment Management, 1973, 1: 151-167
    [3] Huston M. A general hypothesis of species diversity[J]. The American Naturalist, 1979, 13: 81-101
    [4] 李永宏,汪诗平.放牧对草原植物的影响[J].中国草地,1999,3:11-19
    [5] Dyer M I, Turner C L, Seastedt T R. Herbivory and its consequences[J]. Ecological Application, 1993, 3(1): 10-16
    [6] Altesor A, Oesterheld M, Leoni E, et al. Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of a Uruguayan grassland[J]. Plant Ecology, 2005, 179(1): 83-91
    [7] Reategui K. Persistence of miaced pastures with different pasture management system on clay[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1999, 72(3): 16
    [8] 辛晓平,徐斌,王秀山,等.碱化草地群落恢复演替空间格局动态分析[J].生态学报,2001,21(6):877-882
    [9] Alados C L, Pueyo Y, Navas D, et al. Fractal analysis of plant spatial patterns: a monitoring tool for vegetation transition shifts[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2005, 14: 1453-1468
    [10] Forman R T. Landscape Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscape and Regions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995
    [11] 徐化成.景观生态学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996
    [12] O’Neill R V, DeAngelis D L, Waide J B, et al. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986
    [13] Karend H, Elizabeth E C. Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 41: 922-933
    [14] Harrison S, Taylor A D. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics[C]. In: Hanski I A, Gilpin M E, eds. Metapopulation Biology, San Diego, California, Academic Press, 1997
    [15] Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models[C]. In: Hanski I & Glpin M E, eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics & Evolution. London: Academic Press, 1997, 69-92
    [16] Brian Berkowitz, Robert P E. Percolation theory and network modeling applications in soil physics[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 1998, 19(1): 23-72
    [17] Zhu Ming, Xu Jiangang, Jiang Nan, et al. Impacts of road corridors on urban landscape pattern: a gradientanalysis with changing grain size in Shanghai, China[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21(5): 723-734
    [18] Sheryi B W, Wu Jiangguo. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2004, 7(3): 215-240
    [19] Forman R T T. Ecologically Sustainable Landscapes: The Role of Spatial Configuration[C]. In: Zonneveld I S, Forman R T T, eds. Changing Landscape: An Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York,1990, 261-277
    [20] 徐化成.大兴安岭北部林区原始林景观结构的研究[A].见:盛伟彤,徐孝庆主编.森林环境持续发展学术讨论会论文集[C].北京:中国林业出版社,1994,117-122
    [21] 常学礼,邬建国.科尔沁沙地景观格局特征分析[J].生态学报,1998,18(3):225-232
    [22] Baumann R H, Turner R E. Direct impacts of outer continental shelf activities on wetland loss in the central Gulf of Mexico[J]. Environmental Geology and Water Resources, 1990, 15: 189-198
    [23] Kingsford R T, Thomas R F. Use of satellite image analysis to track wetland loss on the Murrumbidgee River floodplain in arid Australia, 1975-1998[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 45(11): 45-53
    [24] 王宪礼,布仁仓,胡远满,等.辽河三角洲湿地景观破碎化分析[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(3):299-304
    [25] 王宪礼,肖笃宁,布仁仓,等.辽河三角洲湿地景观格局分析[J].生态学报,1997,17(3):317-323
    [26] Editorial. Geosimulation: object-based modeling of urban phenomena[N]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 1-8
    [27] Britaldo, Gustavo, Cassio. DINAMICA-a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2002, 154: 217-235
    [28] Goodchild M F, Steyaert L T, Parks B O, et al. GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues[M]. Fort Collins: GIS World Books, 1996
    [29] Bradshaw G A, Spies T A. Charactering canopy gap structure in forests using wavelet analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1992, 80: 205-215
    [30] Frohn R C. Remote sensing for landscape ecology[M], New York: CRC press, 1998
    [31] Luque S S. The challenge to manage the biological intergrity of nature reserves: a landscape ecology perspective[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(13-14): 2613-2644
    [32] Gulinck H. Landscape structure analysis of central Belgium using SPOT data[C]. Landscape ecology and geographic information systems, London: Taylor & Francis, 1993, 129-139
    [33] Quattrochi D A, Luvall J C. Thermal infrared remote sensing for analysis of landscape ecological process:methods and application[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1999, 14: 577-598
    [34] 邬建国.景观生态学-格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000
    [35] Liebhold A M, Rossi R E, Kemp W P. Geostatistics and geographic information systems in applied insect ecology[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1993, 38: 303-327
    [36] Delcourt H R, Delcourt P A. Quaternary landscape ecology: relevant scales in space and time[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1988, 2: 23-44
    [37] Wiens J A, Milne B T. Scaling of ‘landscape’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1989, 3(2): 87-96
    [38] Wiens J A, Crist T O, With K A, et al. Fractal patterns of insect movement in microlandscape mosaics[J]. Ecology, 1995, 3
    [39] Mcintyre N E, Wiens J A. How does habitat patch size affect animal movement? An experiment with darking beetles[J]. Ecology, 1999, 10
    [40] Greig-Smith P. Quantitative plant ecology[M]. London: Butterworths, 1987
    [41] Kershaw K A, Looney J H. Quantitative and dynamic ecology[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985
    [42] Krahulec F, Agnew A D Q, Agnew S, et al. Spatial processes in plant communities[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1993, 4(4): 577
    [43] Purves D W, Law R. Fine-scale spatial structure in a grassland community: quantifying the plant’s-eye view[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90: 121-129
    [44] 张卫国,黄文冰,杨振宇.草地微斑块与草地退化关系的研究[J].草业学报,2003,12(3):44-50
    [45] 辛晓平,高琼,李宜垠,等.放牧和水淹干扰对松嫩平原碱化草地空间格局影响的分形分析[J].植物学报,1999,41(3):307-313
    [46] 辛晓平,杨正宇,田新智,等.放牧和围封条件下羊草碱化草地中斑块分布格局研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(6):656-661
    [47] 辛晓平,李向林,杨桂霞,等.放牧和刈割条件下草山草坡群落空间异质性分析[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4):449-453
    [48] Levin S A. Pattern formation in ecological communities[C]. In: Steele J H, ed. Spatial pattern in plankton communities, New York: Plenum, 1978, 433-465
    [49] Roughgarden J D. Patchiness in the spatial distribution of a population caused by stochastic fluctuations in resources[J]. Oikos, 1977, 29: 52-59
    [50] Wines J A. Population response to patchy environments[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1976, 7: 81-120
    [51] 李海涛.植物种群分布格局研究概况[J].植物学通报,1995,12(2):19-26
    [52] 孙冰,杨国亭,迟福昌,等.白桦种群空间分布格局的研究[J].植物研究,1994,14(2):201-207
    [53] 刑福,宋日.草地有毒植物狼毒种群分布格局及动态[J].草业科学,2002,19(1):16-19
    [54] 杨在中,郝敦元,杨持.植物群落种群分布格局研究的新方法[J].生态学报,1984, 4(3): 237-246
    [55] 李亮亮,依艳丽,凌国鑫,等.地统计学在土壤空间变异研究中的应用[J].土壤通报,2005,36(2):265-268
    [56] 郭旭东,傅伯杰,马克明,等.基于 GIS 和地统计学的土壤养分空间变异特征研究-以河北省遵化市为例[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(4):557-563
    [57] 潘文斌,邓红兵,唐涛,等.地统计学在水生植物群落格局研究中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1692-1696
    [58] 何兴东,高玉葆,赵文智,等.科尔沁沙地植物群落圆环状分布成因地统计学分析[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(9):1512-1516
    [59] Li H, Reynolds J F. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 1995, 73(2): 280-284
    [60] 陈利顶,傅伯杰.干扰的类型、特征及其生态学意义[J].生态学报,2000,20(4):581-586
    [61] 仲廷凯,赖广东,王美萍,等.割草对羊草种群叶片数和株高的影响[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版),1993,24(4):414-420
    [62] Aiken G E, SladdenS E, Bransby D I. Cutting height and frequency effects on composition, yield and quality of a Burmuda grass Crabgrass mixture[J]. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1995, 8(1): 79-83
    [63] 曾希柏,刘更另.刈割对植被组成及土壤有关性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(1):57-60
    [64] 裴海昆.不同放牧强度对土壤养分及质地的影响[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,22(4):29-31
    [65] Jhon A. 拉德维,James F. 蓝诺兹.统计生态学-方法和计算入门[M].呼和浩特内蒙古大学出版社,1990
    [66] 杜鹃.羊草种群对放牧的表型可塑性研究[D]:[硕士论文].长春:东北师范大学,2004
    [67] 刘振国,李镇清.不同放牧强度下冷蒿种群小尺度空间格局[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):227-234
    [68] Greig-Smith. Quantitative plant ecology, 3ed edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1983
    [69] Law R, Herben T, Dieckmann U. Non-manipulative estimates of competition coefficients in a Montane grassland community[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1997, 85: 505-518
    [70] Levin S A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology[J]. Ecology, 1992, 73(6): 1943-1967
    [71] Lambers R H, Rietkerk M, et al. Vegetation pattern formation in semi-arid grazing systems[J]. Ecology, 2001, 82(1): 50-61
    [72] Alejandro B, Bertiller M. Grazing effects on patchy dryland vegetation in northern Patagonia[J]. 1997, 36: 639-653
    [73] 杨国靖,肖笃宁. 森林景观格局分析及破碎化评价――以祁连山西水自然保护区为例[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):56-61
    [74] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明,等.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001
    [75] 刘俊平.半干旱区农牧交错带平原景观空间格局分析――以凉城县岱海西岸为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,1999,13(1):82-90
    [76] Percival H J, Parfitt R L, Scott N A. Factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand grassland: Is clay content important?[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64: 1623-1630
    [77] 王艳芬,陈佐忠,Tieszen L T.人类活动对锡林郭勒地区主要草原土壤有机碳分布的影响[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(6):545-551
    [78] Keller A A, Goldstein R A. Impact of carbon storage through restoration of drylands on the global carbon cycle[J]. Environment Management, 1998, 22: 757-766
    [79] 仲廷凯,包青海.不同刈割强度对天然割草地的影响[J].中国草地,1999,5:15-18
    [80] Navas M L, Goulard M. Spatial pattern of a clonal perennial weed Rubia peregrisa (Rubuaceae) in vineyards of southern France[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28: 1118-1129
    [81] 李凌浩,邹厚远.长芒草草原群落种群空间格局的研究Ⅲ.集聚强度和规模及其生态成因的分析[J].西北植物学报,1994,14(3):225-231
    [82] Edwards G R, Parsons A J, Newman J A, et al. The spatial pattern of vegetation in cut and grazed grass/white clover pastures[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1996, 3(51): 219-231
    [83] 章家恩,刘文高,陈景青,等.刈割对牧草地下部根区土壤养分及土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态环境,2005,14(3):387-391
    [84] Coffin D P, Laycock W A, Lauenroth W K. Disturbance intensity and above-and below-groud herbivory effects on long-term (14 years) recovery of a semiarid grassland[J]. Plant Ecology, 1998, 139: 221-233
    [85] Milchunas D G, Laurenroth W K, Burke L C. Livestock grazing:animal and plant biodiversity of short grass steppe and the relationship to ecosystem functioning[J]. Oikos, 1998, 83: 65-74

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700