城市化对南京市土壤资源、人口承载力和生态足迹的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着我国经济的快速发展,城市化的进程加快,城市化对我国社会、经济、资源、环境、人口承载力、资源承载力都具有强烈的影响。这些问题的研究不仅是当今的学术研究热点,而且是社会可持续发展的需要,探索它们的发生发展规律和演化机制,提供可行性对策和宏观决策系统,使社会-经济-环境系统实现良性循环。利用多学科知识和依靠信息化等先进技术和手段研究这些问题,使所需的信息具有及时性、准确性和可靠性,使理论研究具有充实的基础。本文研究1985年到2002年的近20年间城市化对南京市的土壤资源的数量、质量及人口承载力和生态足迹的影响。
    在第二次土壤普查资料和野外采样分析基础上建立土壤属性数据库,用主成分分析法和多元回归法对南京不同类型土壤进行生产潜力评价,建立南京土壤质量评价体系。利用RS、GIS和GPS技术,对南京市1985年和2000年遥感图像解译,得到南京市城市扩展图,把扩展图和南京市土壤图叠加;充分发挥GIS技术在管理空间、属性数据和空间分析与输出成果图等强大功能,计算出南京市由于城市扩展而使人口承载力减少的数量及其空间分布。
    引用生态学原理,研究城市化对南京土壤多样性影响。利用GIS统计分析和遥感解译相结合,得到原始状态和1985年、2000年的各种土壤面积;计算三个时期的土壤多样性指数和丰富度指数,计算结果,土壤多样性和均匀性都变小。说明城市化使南京市土壤稳定性降低,使南京土壤资源质量降低。
    根据1992-2002年《南京统计年鉴》,计算南京市近11年来的人均生态足迹、人均生态承载力和生态赤字的变化。计算结果,南京市的人均生态足迹和生态赤字都比较大,而且呈现变大趋势。说明南京市的可持续发展已超出生态承载力范围,城市化使这一情况更加严重。根据近5年南京市人均生态足迹和人均生态承载力情况,用灰色模型和灰色分析方法分别预测了南京市2003、2004、2005年三年的人均生态足迹和人均生态承载力,从而得出这三年的生态赤字情况。
    在分析的同时,对南京市的土壤资源的利用和保护,提高人口承载力,减小人均生态足迹和生态赤字,减轻城市发展对自然资源的压力提出具体的策略,为南京市自然资源管理、经济和社会生态可持续发展宏观政策的制定提供参考。
With the great speed of economic development, the acceleration progress of urbanization, the urbanization has great impact on the society, economy, environment and the carrying capacity of population of our society. The study of the problem is not only the hot subject, but also the need of the sustainable development of society, and the exploring of the laws of their development and evolution mechanism can provide feasible countermeasures and macro decision-making to make the system of society-economy-environment a benign circulation. Using the knowledge of different disciplines and depending on the advanced technology and measures can make the information needed fresh, accurate and reliable and make the theory a sound foundation. This paper studies the impact of Nanjing urbanization on the quality and quantity of soil resource, population carrying capacity and ecological footprint from 1985 to 2000, nearly 20 years.
    The soil attribute data are built based on the second soil general investigation and samples got outside and analyzed inside. The assessment system of Nanjing soil quality is built by taking advantage of principal component analysis and multiple linear regression equation. With the help of RS, GIS, GPS, the interpreted maps of 1985 and 2000 remote sensing images overlay the digitized soil map to get the area of very kind of soil that the city covered during its progress of urbanization. The function of GIS are elaborated , such as managing spatial data and attribute data, spatial analyzing and outputting ultimate maps to get the reduced number of Nanjing population carrying capacity and its spatial distribution because of the expansion of city.
    The ecological principles are quoted to study the impact of urbanization on the soil diversity of Nanjing city. With the help of the statistical function of GIS and remote sensing interpretation, the areas of very kind of soil of original state, 1985 and 2000 are got. Then the evenness indices and diversity indices of soil three times are calculated and the results show that the evenness indices and diversity indices are
    
    
    becoming smaller. It means that the urbanization makes the stability and the quality of Nanjing soil decline.
    Based on the Nanjing yearbook of 1992-2002,the average ecological footprint, average ecological carrying capacity and ecological deficit are calculated, and the results show that the average ecological footprint and average ecological deficit are big, furthermore there is a trend of becoming bigger and bigger. The sustainable development of Nanjing city is beyond the ecological carrying capacity, and the urbanization has aggravated this situation. The grey model grey analysis are used to predict the average ecological footprint and average ecological carrying capacity of 2003,2004 and 2005 based on the situation of the ecological footprint of newly five years, getting the ecological deficit of the three years simultaneously.
    At the same time, the paper gives countermeasures on the utilization and preservation of the soil resource, the average ecological footprint, the ecological deficit to alleviate the pressure of urbanization on the nature resource, gives the references for the management of nature resource and the decision-making of macro strategy on sustainable development of society, economy and ecology for Nanjing city.
引文
[1]杨小波,吴庆书等.城市生态学.北京:科学出版社.2000
    [2]王晓云等.利用“3S”技术进行北京地区土壤水分监测应用技术研究[J].应用气象学报,2002,13(8):423-429.
    [3]王桥,毛锋,吴纪桃.GIS中的地理信息系统综合.遥感学报,1998,2(2):155-60.
    [4]张超,陈丙咸,邬伦.地理信息系统.北京:高等教育出版社,1995.
    [5]刘基余等.全球定位系统原理与应用.北京:测绘出版社,1993.
    [6]刘盛和.城市土地利用扩展的空间模式与动力机制[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(43-50).
    [7]A.Garon YEH,Fulong Wu.The New Land Development Process and Urban Development in Chinese Cities [J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies,1996(20).
    [8]Brown LR. Who Will Feed China[M].Notton﹠Company,1995.
    [9]Huang Guangyu ﹠ Huang Tianqi,Ecopolis:Concepts and Criteria,Earth Summit the 92 Globe Forum,Rio de Janeiro[Z].
    [10]黄光宇.中国生态城市规划与建设进展[J].城市环境与城市生态,2001,14(3):6-8.
    [11]陈述彭,谢传节.城市遥感与城市信息系统[J].测绘科学,2000,23(1):1-9.
    [12]J.J.Ibá?,S.DE-Alba,F.F.Bermúdez,A.Garcí-álvarez.Catena 24(1995)215-232.
    [13]Ibá?ez J.J,Jiménez-Ballesta R,García- A.Soil landscapes and drainage basins in Mediterranean areas.Catena,1990,17:573-583.
    [14] Odeh L. O. A. In Discussion of Ibá?ez, J. J., Alba, S., Lobo A, Zucarello V. Pedodiversity and global soil pattern at coarse scales[J]. Geoderma, 1998,3:203-205.
    [15]Ibá?ez, J. J., De-Alba, S., Lobo, A. and Zucarello, V. Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales (with discussion). Geoderma. 1998, 83: 171~192.
    [16]Yallon, D. H. Discussion of the paper by J.J. Ibá?ez et al. Geoderma. 1998,83: 193~214.
    [17]Yallon, D. H. The soils we classify:Essay review of recent publication on soil taxonomy[J]. Catena,1995,24:233~241.
    [18]Ibá?ez, J. J., A Garc?a-álvarez suelos y cambio global. Un enfoque histórico-termodinámico[J]. Rev. Ecol. Biol.Dol.,1991,28:349~375.
    [19]Ibá?ez J. J., S De-Alba, F F Bermúdez, A Garc?a-álvarez. Pedidiversity: concepts and measures[J].Catena,1995,24:215-232.
    [20]Ibá?ez J. J., G Benito, A Garc?a-álvarez, A Salda?a. Mediterranean soils and
    
    
    landscapes. An overview [C]. In: Rubio, J.L and Calvo, A.(Eds.): Soil Degradation and Desertification in Mediterranean Environments, Geoforma, Logro?o,1996.7-36.
    [21]Ibá?ez, J. J., Jiménez-Ballesta,R.,and García-álvarez,A., Soil Landscapes and Drainage Basins in Mediterranean Mountain Areas[J]. Catena,1990,17,573~583.
    [22]Salda?a, A., Ibá?ez, J. J., Zinck, A., Pérez-González,A.,and de Alba,S., Repercusiones de la evolución de los sistemas de incision fluvial sobre la complejidad de los paisajes geomorfológicos en áreas con superficies de tipoo ra?a. In: Symposium sobre la Ra?a, (October,1992) , (pp.81-93), (SECS-CSIC-CAM).1993.
    [23]Ibá?ez J J, Pérez A, Jiménez-Ballesta R et al. Evolution of fluvial dissection landscapes in Mediterranean environments. Quantitative estimates and geomorphological, pedological and phytocenotic repercussions. Z. Geophorphol.N.F., 1994b,38:105-119.
    [24]Ibá?ez J. J., De-Alba,S., Lobo,A., and Zucarello,V., Pedodiversity and Global Soil Patterna at Coarser Scales(with Discussion)[J]. Geoderma,1998a,83,199-201.
    [25]Briggs,D.J., and Martin ,N.H., CORINE: an Environment Information System for the European Community[J]. Environment Review 1998.2,29-34.
    [26]Platou,S.W., nor,A.M., and Madsen,H.B., Digitizing of the EU Soil Map. In: R.J.A. Jones and B. Biagi(eds.),(pp.12-24),In: Agriculture: Computerization of Land Use Data[M]. EUR 11151 EN,CEC,Luxembourg.1989.
    [27]CEC, Soil Map of the European Communities at 1:1,000,000 .CEC DG VI. Luxembourg.1985.
    [28]FAO-UNESCO, Soil Map of the World,1:5,000,000.Vols1-10. Paris,UNESCO.1971-1981.
    [29]FAO,Digital Soil Map of the World and Derived Soil Properties(CD-ROM). FAO, Rome.1995.
    [30]Johnson, M.P., and Simberloff,D.S., Environment Determinants of Island Species Numbers in the British Isles[J]. Biogeography ,1974.1,149-154.
    [31]Meulenkamp,J.E., Aspects of the Late Cenozoic Evolution of the Aegean Region. In: D.J. Stanley and F-C Wezel, Geological Evolution of the Mediterranean Basin [M](pp.307-319); Springer Verlag,1988.589.
    [32]Bridges,E.M., World Geomorphology[M]. Cambridge Univ. Press. N.Y. 1990.260.
    
    [33]Udias, A., The Seismicity of the Mediterranean Basin (pp.55-63)[M]. Springer Verlag.1985.589.
    [34]Economou,A., Seismic Activity and Vulcanism into the Aegean Area. Their Relationships. Annales Géologiques des Pays Helléniques, Le serie T. 1987/1988. XXXⅢ/2,297-308.
    [35]Paton, T.R., Humphreys,G.S., and Mitchell,P.B.,Soils, A New Global View[M]. UCL Press. London,1995.213
    [36]Chen Jie, Zhang Xuelei, Gong Zitong et al. Pedodiversity: a controversial concept[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2001,11(1):110-116.
    [37]Zhang Xuelei, CHEN Jie, ZHANG Ganlin, TAN Manzhi. Pedodiversity analysis in Hainan, Island China. Journal of Geographical Sciences.2003,13(2):181~186.
    [38]陈杰,张学雷,赵文君等. 土壤多样性及其测度——以海南岛不同母岩上育的土壤为例〔J〕. 地理科学,2001,21(2):145-151.
    [39]张志强等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):599-610.
    [40]Wackernagel M,Rees W E.Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact On the Earth[M].Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers,1996.
    [41]Wackernagel M,Onistol,Bello petal.Ecological Footprints OF Nations:How much nature do they use? How much mature do they have? [R].Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio+5 Forum.International Counciol for Local Environmental Initiatives,Toronto.1997.
    [42]Wackernagel M,Onistol,Bello petal.National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J].Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390.
    [43]何昌垂.21世纪空间遥感与信息发展的机遇与挑战[J].遥感信息,1996(3):13-18.
    [44]沙志刚.遥感在耕地保护中的应用[M].遥感与新世纪,北京:气象出版社.1999.
    [45]陈德峰.农业遥感论文集[M].北京:测绘出版社.1991.
    [46]沈非.基于RS、GIS的福建土地利用动态变化研究[M].安徽师范大学硕士论文.2001.
    [47]宫鹏等.对地观测技术与地球系统科学[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
    [48]黄福奎.论遥感技术在土地利用动态监测中的应用[J].中国土地科学,1998,12(3):21-25.
    [49]南京市土壤普查办公室编著.南京土壤志[M].1988,5.
    [50]何同康.土壤(土地)资源评价的主要方法及其特点比较[J].土壤学进展,1983,(6):1-12.
    [51]徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002,10.
    
    [52]倪绍祥,陈传康.我国土地评价研究进展[J].地理学报,1993,48():75-83.
    [53]李昌爱,顾也萍.主成分分析和回归分析在水稻土质量评价中的应用-以桐城市为例[J].安徽师范大学学报,2001,24(4):395-399.
    [54]黄方,刘湘南,张养贞.GIS支持下的吉林西生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):95-101.
    [55]刘文元.持续发展导轮[M].北京,科学出版社,1994,1-6.
    [56]黄宁生.广东相对资源承载力与可持续发展问题[J].经济地理,2000(2):52-56.
    [57]Ushe M B. Species diversity: a comment on a paper by W B. Yapp.〔J〕. Field Stud.,1997,5(4):825-832.
    [58]Magurran A E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement[J]. Croom Helm,London,1988,179.
    [59]Gaston, K.J., Species Richness: Measure and Measurement. In:.K.J., Gaston(ed.)(pp.77-113) Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference[M]. Blakwell,1996.396.
    [60]Tokeshi, M., 1993. Species Abundance Patterns and Community Structure. Advances in Ecological Research, 24,111-186.
    [61]Kolmogorov, A. N., 1941. über das logarithmisch normale Verteilungsgesetz der Dimensionen der Teilchen bei Zerstückelung. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 31, 99-101.
    [62]Hatch, T., 1933. Determination of Average Particle Size from the Screen-Analysis of Non-Uniform Particulate Substances, J. of the Franklin Institute, 207, 369-388.
    [63]Ibá?ez J J,S De-Alba, On the concept of pedodiversity and its measurement: A reply, Geoderma〔J〕.1999,93:339-344.
    [64]Ugihara E. Mininmal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns〔J〕.Am.Nat. 1980,116:770-787.
    [65]Williams P. Measuring biodiversity value[J]. World Conservation.1996,96(1):12-14.
    [66]孙儒泳等.普通生态学[M].高等教育出版社,1992,5.
    [67]马克平. 生物群落多样性的测度方法[M].中国科学院生物多样性委员会,2001
    [68]徐中民,张志强,陈国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5)607-616.
    [69]徐中民,张志强,陈国栋.可持续发展定量研究的几种新方法评价[J].中国人口、资源与环境.
    [70]李利锋,成升魁.生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标[J].资源科学,2000,15(4): [375~382Li Li-feng, CHENG Sheng kui. Ecological footprint: a new indicator for sustainability. Resources Science, 2000.15 4]: 375~382]
    
    [71]Wackernagel M, Rees W E.Pereeeplual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective [J]. Ecological Economics, 1997,20:3-24.
    [72]徐中民等.中国1999年的生态足迹分析[J].土壤学报,2002,39(3):441-445.
    [73]Wackernagel M, Onisto L,Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the econogical footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics.1999,29:375-390.
    [74]Wackernagel M, Onisto L,Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the econogical footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics.1999,29:375-390.
    [75]Wackernagel M, Onisto L,Bello P, et al. Econogical footprint of Nations[M]. Commissined by the Earth Council for the rio+ 5 Forum. InternationalCouncilforLocalEnvironmentInitiatives.Toronto.1997,4-12.
    [76]Wackernagel M, Lew an L, Hansson C B .Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: applications in Sweden and subregions[J].Ambio,1999,28(7):604-612.
    [77]徐中民,程国栋,王根绪.生态环境损失价值计算初步研究——以张掖地区为例[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(5):498-504. [XuZhongmin, ChengGuodong, WangGenxu. A study on the estimation of economic logical deterioration——take Zhangye Prefecture as an example[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences,1999, 14(5):498-504.
    [78]Herendeen R A. Should sustain ability nalyses include biophysical assessments[J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29:17-18.
    [79]牛文元.持续发展导论[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.[NIU Wen-yuan.The Conspectus of Sustainable Development. Beijing: Science Press.1994.
    [80]张志强,孙成权,程国栋,等.可持续发展研究:进展与趋向[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(6):589~595. [ZHANG Zhi-qiang, CHENG Guo-dong, et. Progress and Trends of sustainable development research. Advance in Earth Sciences, 1999,14 6: 589-595.]
    [81]Wackernagel M, Why sustain ability analyses must include biophysical assessments [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29:13-15.
    [82]Whittaker R H. Communities and Ecosystems [M]. New York: Macm illan Publishing,1975.[6]
    [83]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态足迹的概念及计算模型评介[J].生态经济,2000,(10):8-10.[ Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, ChengGuodong. Review on the concept and computable model of ecological footprints[J]. Ecological ecnomcis, 2000,(10):8-10.
    [84]Van den Bergh JC JM, Verbruggen H. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29(1):61-72.
    [85]An Vuuren D P, Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,34:115-130.
    [86]Foke C, Jansson A, Larsson Jetal. Ecosystem appropriation by cities[J]. Ambio,1997,26(3):167-172.
    [87]Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers Jetal. Limits to Growth[M]. New York:
    
    
    Universe Books,1972.
    [88]Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J. Beyond the Limits[M]. Toronto: McClelland & StewartInc,1992.
    [89]赵秀勇等.生态足迹分析法在生态持续发展定量研究中的应用-以南京市1998年的生态足迹计算为例[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(2):58-60.
    [90] Holdren J, Ehrlich P. Human population and the global environment [J]. Am Sci, 1974,62:282-292.
    [91]邱大雄.能源规划与系统分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1995.
    [92] Odum H T.Ecological and General System[M]. Revised edition. Boulder: University of Colorado Press,1994.
    [93]Christian A C, Holmberg J, Lindgren K. Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics,1996,18:89-112.
    [94]杨永兴等.三江平原湿地生态系统生物量及其季节动态研究[J].中国草地,2002,24(1):1-7.
    [95]张福林,王柏钧.气象因素与出生缺陷发生的一种回归分析模型[J].成都气象学院学报,1994,28(1):58-63.
    [96]李多松.城市街道汽车污染的多元回归分析[J].城市环境与城市,1994,7(4):22-26.
    [97]方开泰.实用回归分析.科学出版社,1988(1)版.
    [98]葛吉崎.污染损失与环境效益分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,1994,3(2):162-166.
    [99]郝强,朱梅林.基于模糊灰色分析的方案排序及应用[J].系统工程,1995,13(5):57-62.
    [100]张跃编著.模糊数学方法及其应用.煤炭工业出版社,1992,4.
    [101]吴绍龙.水质评价的模糊综合-灰色分析复合模型应用. [J].上海环境科学,1996,15(4):10-13.
    [102]苏永春等.东北高寒地区土壤动物和微生物的生态特征研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(10):1613-1619.
    [103]易德生,郭萍著.灰色理论与方法.北京:石油出版社,1992.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700