摘要
以曲靖马龙烟区为基础,分析了烟区的土壤养分和烟叶化学成分的含量状况,利用地统计学方法对烟区土壤养分及烟叶品质进行了空间分析,研究了不同海拔高度土壤养分和烟叶品质的差异。主要研究结论如下:
1、马龙县烤烟主要种植在1800-2100米海拔范围,不同海拔高度土壤养分差异较小,烤烟化学成分差异不显著。在海拔1950~2050米种植区域烟叶评吸得分最好,该海拔范围生态条件较好,是典型的高海拔烤烟种植区。
2、马龙县植烟土壤类型以红壤、水稻土为主,大部分土壤以强酸性和弱酸性为主;有机质分布较平均属高水平范围;全氮、碱解氮含量都处于中高范围;全磷含量属于中等偏下的水平,速效磷含量属于中等偏上水平;全钾含量较低,效钾含量属中高水平;有效钙、.有效镁、有效硫、水溶性氯含量均比其他县低;有效铜、有效锌、有效铁、有效锰含量均丰富;有效硼和有效钼整体处于缺失水平。
3、马龙烤烟样品成熟度较好,以桔黄色为主,油分、色度较好,身份适中,叶片结构疏松,等级符合度较高;烤烟总糖和还原糖含量高,总氮、烟碱和钾含量适中,油醚提取物等主要香气物质含量相对稳定;烟叶评吸质量好,以清香型为主,香气质量稳定,烟气特性良好。
4、烟叶评吸质量得分与土壤pH、有机质含量、全氮含量、碱解氮含量、速效磷含量、有效硫含量呈二次曲线关系;烟叶评吸质量得分与土壤全磷含量、速效钾含量呈对数函数关系;烟叶评吸质量得分与土壤水溶性氯含量呈线性负相关关系;烟叶评吸质量得分与土壤全钾含量关系不显著。
On the basis of Malong tobacco-growing areas in Qujing, the flue-cured tobacco chemical composition and soils nutrients were spatial analyzed by method of geostatistics. The difference of soil elements contents and tobacco qulity in different altitude areas were also studied. Main results were as follows:
1. MaLong flue-cured tobacco mainly grows in 1800-2100 meters altitude, the difference of soil nutrient in different height was less, and chemical constituents were not significant. In 1950-2050 meters altitude area, tobacco smoking is best, ecological condition is good, is the typical of flue-cured tobacco harvested scope at high altitude.
2. MaLong mostly tobacco soil types are red and rice soil, most soil are strong acidic soil and weak acidity, Organic in high level and distribute even, Total nitrogen, alkali-hydro nitrogen in the middle or high scope, Total phosphorus belongs to middle rdi level, rapidly-available phosphorus were belongs to the medium level, Total potassium is low, available potassium in high levels, Calcium, magnesium, sulfur, water-soluble chlorine content than other counties are low, Effective copper, zinc, iron, manganese are high, Effective boron and molybdenum in the whole level of missing.
3. Malong flue-cured tobacco samples with good maturity, orange mostly, oil and chroma is good, identity moderate, blade structure loose, and grade degrees higher. Tobacco sugar and reducing sugar contents are higher, total nitrogen, nicotine and potassium content are moderate, oil ether extract etc mainly fragrance content relative stability. Tobacco smoking with good quality and Qing scent mostly, stable scent quality, good smoke characteristics.
4. Realitionship between Sensory quality score and pH, organic matter content, total N, available N, available P, available S were quadratic curve; Realitionship between Sensory quality score and soil total P, available K were logarithmic function relation; Realitionship between Sensory quality score and Cl were linear; Therewas no significant relationship between Sensory quality score and total Kof soil.
引文
[1]曹鹏云,鲁世军,张务水.植烟土壤有机质含量与有机肥施用概况[J].中国烟草学报,2004,10(6):40-42.
[2]张忠锋,厉昌坤,王丽卿,等.农业生态措施对改善土壤性状及烟叶品质效应研究初报[J].中国烟草科学,2001,(3):11-14.
[3]许自成,王林,王金平,等.湖南烤烟化学成分与土壤有机质含量的关系分析[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(10):1186-1190.
[4]梁颁捷,林毅,朱其清,等.福建植烟土壤pH值与土壤有效养分的相关性[J].中国烟草科学,2001,(1):25-27.
[5]徐晓燕,孙五三,李章海,等.烤烟根系合成烟碱的能力及pH值对其根系和品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2004,31(3):315-319.
[6]方先兰,肖林长,郭伟.品种和施氮量对烤烟优质高产的效应初探[J].江西农业科技,2003,(11):18-19.
[7]陈顺辉,李文卿,江荣风,等.施氮量对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2003,(增刊):37-40.
[8]陈江华,李志宏,刘建利,等.全国主要烟区土壤养分丰缺状况评价[J].中国烟草学报,2004,10(3):14-18.
[9]张晓煌,刘静,袁海燕,等.构杞多糖与土壤养分、气象条件的量化关系研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(3):43-47.
[10]薛剑波,符云鹏,尹永强.影响烟草中烟碱含量的因素及调控措施[J].安徽农业科学,2005,33(6):1053-1055.
[11]许自成,张莉,石俊雄,等.施磷对烤烟硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐含量的影响[J].烟草科技,2003,(2):32-35.
[12]颜丽,关连珠,栗双,等.土壤供钾状况及土壤湿度对我国北方烤烟烟叶含钾量的影响研究[J].土壤通报,2001,32(2):84-87.
[13]程辉斗,温永琴,陆富,等.土壤供钾水平与云南烤烟含钾量关系的研究[J].烟草科技,2000,(3):41-43.
[14]刘国顺,叶协锋,王彦亭,等.不同钾肥施用量对烟叶香气成分含量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2004,(4):1-4.
[15]陈建忠.山地黄壤烤烟中微肥施用试验研究[J].烟草科技,2000,(9):39-41.
[16]周毓华.微肥施用对烟叶产质量的影响研究[J].中国烟草科学,2000,(4):29-31.
[17]崔国明,张辉.Mo肥对烟叶产量品质的影响[J].烟草科技,2000,(3):39-41.
[18]崔国明,黄必志,柴家荣,等.硼对烤烟生理生化及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2000,(3):14-18。
[19]刘勤,赖辉比,曹志洪.不同供硫水平下烟草硫营养及对N, P, Cl等元素吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2000,6(1):63-68
[20]李玉梅,徐茜,熊德忠.不同硫肥用量对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2000,(4):20-22.
[21]李春英,高伟民,陈腊梅,等.福建烟区土壤镁营养状况及其施用效果研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(1):63-66.
[22]秦松.贵州植烟土壤氯素特征与含氯钾肥施用探讨[J].西南农业学报,2001,(5):471-473.
[23]胡国松,郑伟,王震东,等.烤烟营养原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[24]刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
[25]刘国顺.国内外烟叶质量差距分析和提高烟叶质量技术途径探讨[J].中国烟草学报,2003,(增刊):54-58.
[26]程昌新,卢秀萍,许自成,等.基因型和生态因素对烟草香气物质含量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(11):137-139.
[27]许自成,刘国顺,刘金海,等.铜山烟区生态因素和烟叶质量特点[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1748-1753.
[28]邵丽,晋艳,杨宇虹,等.生态条件对不同烤烟品种烟叶产质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2002,(10):40-45.
[29]尹启生,陈江华,王信民,等.2002年度全国烟叶质量评价分析[J].中国烟草学报,2003,(增刊):59-70.
[30]阎克玉,袁志永,吴殿信,等.烤烟质量评价指标体系研究[J].郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版),2001,16(4):57-61.
[31]于川芳,李晓红,罗登山,等.玉溪烤烟外观质量因素与其主要化学成分之间的关系[J].烟草科技,2005,(1):5-7.
[32]蔡宪杰,王信民,尹启生.烤烟外观质量指标量化分析初探[J].烟草科技,2004,(6): 37-39.42.
[33]蔡宪杰,王信民,尹启生.成熟度与烟叶质量的量化关系研究[J].中国烟草学报,2005,11(4):42-46.
[34]高家合,秦西云,谭仲夏,等.烟叶主要化学成分对评吸质量的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2004,23(6):497-501.
[35]毕淑峰.烤烟主要化学成分的因子分析[J].安徽农业科学,2004,32(2):342-343.
[36]黎妍妍,许自成,肖汉乾,等.湖南省主要植烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J],西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(11):179-183.
[37]李春燕,王家海,郑艳.通用地理坐标转换类设计与实现.辽宁工程技术大学学报.2006,25:66-68
[38]胡溶容,周冀衡,张一扬,等.烤烟糖含量的空间变异特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1804-1810.
[39]邓小华,周冀衡,杨虹琦,等.湖南烤烟外观质量量化评价体系的构建与实证分析[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(9):2036-2044.
[40]胡志明,周冀衡,王勇,等.湖南烤烟(Nicotiana tabacum)铅含量的空间变异特性研究[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(10):1688-1693.
[41]高博超,娄翼来,金广远,等.基于GIS和地统计学的植烟土壤养分空间分析[J].中国烟草学报,2009,15(1):35-38
[42]庄舜尧,刘国群,徐梦洁,王明光.不同海拔高度下森林土壤中氮的矿化.土壤学报,2008,45(6):1194-1198.
[43]祝锦霞,许红卫,王珂,陈祝炉.基于GIS和地统计学的低丘红壤地区三种土壤性质空间变异性研究.土壤,2008,40(6):960-965.
[44]肖协忠.烟草化学.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997:168-216.
[45]杨虹琦,周冀衡,杨述元等.不同产区烤烟中主要潜香型物质对评吸质量的影响研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005(1):11-14