摘要
呼和浩特市是内蒙古自治区的经济文化、政治中心,近年来社会经济发展迅猛,与此同时,该地区水资源问题越来越严重,呼和浩特平原已经出现地下水降落漏斗、浅层含水层局部疏干等严重环境地质问题,城市的可持续发展面临地下水资源的严峻挑战。
本文以可持续性评?为切入点,在DPSIR (驱动—压力—状态—影响—响应)指标理论框架下,从自然条件、社会经济发展、环境地质制约三个方面考虑指标的构建,通过理论分析、数值规律统计等方法建立了面向呼和浩特地区地下水可持续性评价的指标体系。联合运用层次分析法、信息熵法等确定指标的评价权重,选择指标综合分析方法,对呼和浩特平原地下水现状、不同开采方案条件下的地下水可持续水平、趋势做了研究。
通过评价研究,取得如下进展:
(1)引入了地下水可持续性评价指标体系,并应用于呼和浩特平原区的地下水资源可持续利用评价中。根据呼和浩特存在的地下水资源问题,构建了DPSIR框架下的适用于呼和浩特实际情况的评价指标体系,利用理论分析和数理统计方法,筛选了适用于呼和浩特平原的评价指标。
(2)创建了联合层次分析法和信息熵法的指标权重计算方法。地下水可持续性评价指标的权重是评价过程的核心,是决定评价结果的最主要因素,通过联合层次分析法和信息熵方法确定权重的方法,相比单纯一种方法要更为合理,减少了人为判定权重的误差和数据量化脱离实际的矛盾。
(3)解析了呼和浩特平原现状条件下可持续性水平的空间分布规律及原因。评价结果显示,呼和浩特平原地下水可持续性程度空间分布差异很大,城区、西部经济开发区是可持续水平最差的地区:而山前补给区、大黑河流中上游地区,地下水的可持续性水平最好。从环境地质问题的空间分布趋势分析,东南部地区含水层厚度大,地面沉降易发性大,超采导致的问题更为严重:该地区又处于大小黑河的下游,易于受上游的污染,水质相对更差,资源可利用水平更低,因此该地区是区域发展中资源环境问题突出的地区。
(4)结合研究区十二五规划和地下水开发利用方案,预测分析了区内地下水可持续性变化趋势和规律。针对研究区超采的现实问题和开采方案,分析了2015年2020年两个时期的评价结果,显示一半以上地区地下水的可持续利用趋势有良性趋势,方案中的面状压缩开采量措施相对集中压缩开采量措施达到的效果更好:从趋势分析结果看,双层含水层结构区可持续性水平比单层结构区差,这为地区的地下水资源规划提供了方向。(5)丰富了地下水资源评价结果的区划方法,使不同研究区地下水可持续性的横向对比更为合理。在可持续评价的基础上,创新利用评价结果数据的累计分布函数,对现状年地下水可持续性评价结果做了区划,并针对每种区划提出了合理化的开采利用建议。
In recent years, with the rapid social and economic development, an increasingly serious problem of water resources occurred in Hohhot, the capital city of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. In Hohhot plain, intensive abstractions of groundwater lead to depletion of shallow aquifer and a water depression cone in confined aquifer. Such serious environmental geological problems presented severe challenges to groundwater resources on urban sustainable development.
This thesis selected sustainability assessment as the starting point by the DPSIR (Driver Pressure-State-Impact-Response) framework of indicators assessment theory, the indicators system of groundwater sustainable evaluation was built through theoretical analysis, numerical laws of statistics and other methods in Hohhot. Considering the respects of natural conditions, socio-economic development and environmental and geological constraints for indicator frame, indicator evaluation weight was determined by utilizing analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method. Then through indicators integrated analysis methods, it assessed groundwater state and groundwater sustainable levels and trend under different mining plans.
Through evaluation and analysis, it obtained following conclusions:
(1) It introduced the indicators system of sustainability evaluation of groundwater, and applied for assessment of groundwater resources sustainable utilization in Hohhot plain. According to the existing problems of groundwater resources in Hohhot, the system was established under the DPSIR framework to address the practical problems and by analysis and mathematical statistics methods, these indicators were filtrated for evaluation.
(2) It created a method to calculate indicators weight by jointing analytic hierarchy process and information entropy method. The weight of groundwater sustainability assessment indicators was the core process and mostly determined the evaluation results. Compared with single method, it was a more reasonable method to determine weight, reducing man-made error and quantization error from actual condition.
(3) It analyzed the spatial distribution of groundwater sustainable level and its reason under present state in Hohhot plain. Assessment results showed that, there was a big difference on spatial distribution of groundwater sustainability. In urban area and western economic development zone, the level was the worst, and the contrary in the Piedmont recharge area, Big Black River upstream region. From the spatial distribution trend analysis of environmental geological problems, overexploitation led to more severe problem in south-east because of big aquifer thickness and easy surface subsidence; located at Heihe downstream, water quality was relatively poor due to easily be polluted by upstream, and resource utilization level was lower, so this area is prominent in resources and environment problems during regional development.
(4) Groundwater sustainable variety and rule were predicted and analyzed, combining the "twelfth-five" plan and groundwater utilization scheme of the study area.. In view of the overdraft problem and mining scheme, it analyzed the assessment results of2015and2020two periods, which demonstrated the trend was benign in more than half area of the research region. It could achieve better effect by scheme of planar compression comparing to by scheme of concentration compression. From the trend analysis result, the sustainable level was poor in double aquifer structure zone than in monolayer structure area, providing direction for groundwater resources planning.
(5) Zoning method of groundwater resources sustainability assessment was developed, and made it more reasonable in lateral correlation of groundwater sustainability in different study region. Based on sustainability assessment, by cumulative distribution function of data from evaluation, the division was made depending on groundwater sustainable assessment result in current year, and reasonable exploitation and utilization suggestions were proposed about each division.
引文
[1]Zektser, I.S. and Everet, L.G 2004. Groundwater resources of the world and their use. UNESCO IHP-VI Series on Groundwater No.6., Paris, France.
[2]Daniel P, Sustainability criteria for water resource systems,2002
[3]Asit K.Biswas. Sustainable Water Development for Developing Countries[J]. Water Resources Development,1988,4(4):232-250.
[4]Meadows D. Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development:A Report to the Balaton
[5]Biswas, Margaret R. and Asit K.Biswas. Environment and Development: A Review of the Past Decade [J].Third World Quarterly,1982,4(2):479-491.
[6]夏军.可持续水资源系统管理研究与展望[J].水科学进展,1997,8(4):370-375
[7]左其亭,城市水资源承载能力—理论方法应用
[8]Marios Sophocleous, Groundwater recharge and sustainability in the High Plains aquifer in Kansas, USA, Hydrogeol J (2005) 13:351-365
[9]周仰效,地下水可持续开发:概念、原理与方法,水文地质工程地质,2010.1
[10]FalkenmarkM.Forward to the Future:A Conceptual Frame work for waterDependence, AmbioVol.28No.4June1999,356-361
[11]IUGG. Volume A and B, XXI General Assembly of International Union of Geodesy and Geo-Physies[J]. July 2-14, Boulder, Colorado, USA.1995,35-129
[12]SimomovieAP(ed.).Modeling and Management of Sustainable Basin-Scale Water Resource Systems. Proceeding of IAHS SymPosium 6, IAHS Publication.1995, (231):434.
[13]Z.J.U. Malley, Environmental sustainability and water availability: Analyses of the scarcity and improvement opportunities in the Usangu plain, Tanzania, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 34 (2009) 3-13
[14]Huu-Hao Ngo, Evaluation of a novel sponge-submerged membrane bioreactor (SSMBR) for sustainable water reclamation, Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 2429-2435
[15]M. Sophocleous, From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources--the Kansas experience, Journal of Hydrology 235 (2000) 27-43
[16]MULTISCALE METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKTO DERIVE CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION OF PEASANT NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, Environment, Development and Sustainability (2005)7:51-69
[17]J. Bernard Prendergast, Sustainability of conjunctive water use for salinity control in irrigation areas:theory and application to the Shepparton region, Irrig Sci (1994) 14:177-187
[18]Kostas Bithas, The sustainable residential water use: Sustainability, efficiency and social equity. The European experience, ecological economics68 (2008)221-229
[19]J. CROWTHER and A.F. PITTY, John H. Tellaml,TOWARDS MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS.
[20]WATER TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY AS AN INDICATOR OF SHALLOW-DEPTH GROUNDWATER BEHAVIOUR IN LIMESTONE AREAS IN WEST MALAYSIA, Journal of Hydrology,57 (1982) 137-146.
[21]http://epress.anu.edu.au/cs/mobile_devices/index.html
[22]Sandra Postel, The Last Oasis:Facing Water Scarcity[M],1997,ISBN:039331744
[23]Bossel,H.1999.Indicators of sustainable development:Theory, method, applications, International Institute of Sustainable Development. Winnipeg.1999
[24]E. Peters, Drought in groundwater--drought distribution and performance indicators, Journal of Hydrology 306 (2005) 302-317
[25]A. Oktem, Effect of water shortage on yield, and protein and mineral compositions of drip-irrigated sweet corn in sustainable agricultural systems, agriculture water management 95 (2008)1003-1010
[26]M. Sultan, Natural discharge: A key to sustainable utilization of fossil groundwater, Journal of Hydrology (2007) 335,25-36
[27]P.S. Lake, Perturbation, restoration and seeking ecological sustainability in Australian flowing waters, Hydrobiologia (2005) 552:109-120
[28]William Shotyk, Pore-water indicators of rainwater-dominated versus groundwaterdominated peat bog profiles (Jura Mountains, Switzerland), Chemical Geology 116 (1994) 137-146
[29]Hiroaki Furumai, Rainwater and reclaimed wastewater for sustainable urban water use., hysics and Chemistry of the Earth 33 (2008) 340-346
[30]B.R. Sharma, Regional salt- and water-balance modeling for sustainable irrigated agriculture, Agricultural Water Management 40 (1999) 129-134
[31]Elham Mahmoud, Renewable energy and sustainabledevelopments in Egypt:photovoltaic ater pumping in remote areas, Applied Energy 74 (2003) 141-147
[32]Welsch H. Corruption, Growth, and the Environment: A Cross-country Analysis [J]. Environment and Development Economics 2004,9:663-693.
[33]Rees W. Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity:What Urban Economies Leaves Out[J]. Environ. Urban.1992,4:121-130.
[34]Ilyas Masih, Analysing streamflow variability and water allocation for sustainable management of water resources in the semi-arid Karkheh river basin, Iran, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 34 (2009) 329-340
[35]Yueqing Xu, Analysis on groundwater table drawdown by land use and the quest for sustainable water use in the Hebei Plain in China, Agricultural Water Management 75 (2005) 38-53
[36]Hans Jorgen Henriksen, Assessment of exploitable groundwater resourcesof Denmark by use of ensemble resource indicators and a numerical groundwater-surface water model, Journal of Hydrology (2008) 348,224-240
[37]Noel Mkandla, Bulawayo water supplies:Sustainable alternatives for the next decade, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 30 (2005) 935-942
[38]Ray Ison, Challenges to science and society in the sustainablemanagement and use of water: investigating the role of social learning, environmental science & policy 10(2007)499-5 11
[39]Peter Nijkamp, Sustainability assessment of development scenarios:methodology and application to Thailand, Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 7-27
[40]Jaroslav Vrba and Annukka Lipponen, Groundwater Resources Sustainability Indicators, I H P-VISERIESON GROUNDWAT E RNO.14,2007
[41]ROSS,12th National Annual Conference of the Environmental Institute of Australia.3-5 Dec 1999, Hobart, Tasmania.
[42]Venkatesh Uddameri, Sustainability and groundwater management, Clean Techn Environ Policy (2005) 7:231-232
[43]Marri Lavapuro, Groundwater sustainability indicaotrs:testing with Finnish data,BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH 13:381-402,
[44]UNESCO-IHP, IGRAC, WWAP, GEF Transboundary Waters Assessment Programme (TWAP) Methodology and Execution Arrangements, February 2011
[45]黄初龙,中国水资源可持续利用评价指标体系研究进展,资源科学,2006
[46]王惠敏.流域复合系统可持续发展测度[J].河海大学学报,1999,27(3):4548
[47]夏军,王中根,穆宏强.可持续水资源管理评价指标体系研究(一)[J].长江职工大学学报,2000,17(2):1-7.
[48]徐良芳,冯国章,刘俊民.区域水资源可持续利用及其评价指标体系研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),200230(4):119-122.
[49]王玮,鄂尔多斯白坚系地下水盆地地下水资源可持续性研究,博士论文,2004
[50]郝晓辉.中国可持续发展评价指标体系探讨[J].科技导报.1998,11:42-46.Group[J].The Sustainabilit Institute. Hartland, USA,1998.
[51]RICARDO HIRATA, Groundwater resources in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil):the application of indicators, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias (2007) 79(1):141-152
[52]WCED. Sustainable DeveloPment and Water: Statement on the WCED RePort"Our Cormrnon Future, [J].W IterIntemational.1989,14(3):151-152
[52]可持续发展评价模型与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007人口·资源与环境,2006,16(1):19-24
[53]杜斌,张坤民,彭立颖.国家环境可持续能力的评价研究:环境可持续性指数2005[J].中国
[54]汪恕诚.加强科技创新促进水利现代化[J].水利水电技术,2001,32(5),1-5
[55]宋松柏,区域水资源可持续利用评价的人工神经网络模型,农业工程学报,2004.11
[56]冯尚友,刘国全.水资源持续利用的框架[J1.水科学进展.1997,8(4):301-307.
[57]21世纪初期中国地下水资源开发利用,水利部水资源司,中国水利水电出版社,2004
[58]呼和浩特十二五规划报送稿,2011
[59]冯尚友,梅亚东.水资源持续利用系统规划[J].水科学进展.1998,9(1):1-9.
[60]张久川,基于GIS的地下水资源可持续性评价,农业工程学报,2005.21
[61]陈康宁,基于生态经济理论的水资源可持续利用问题探讨,2007年11月
[62]陈洋波,基于DPSIR模型的深圳市水资源承载能力评价指标体系,水利学报,2004年7月
[63]傅春,冯尚友.水资源持续利用(生态水利)原理的探讨[J].水科学进展.2000,11(4):436-440.
[64]黄林楠,水资源生态足迹计算方法[J],生态学报,2008
[65]李红礼,基于BP神经网络的河南省土地可持续利用评价研究,国土与自然资源研究,2009.No.1
[66]内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市地下水资源评价报告,1999
[67]呼和浩特市区域水资源可持续利用问题及其对策,内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008.7
[68]元淑清,呼和浩特市地表水资源浅析,内蒙古水利2009年第6期(总第124期)
[69]张翼龙等,呼和浩特市城区地下水源地保护区环境地质调查及防污性能评价
[70]张光辉,区域地下水功能可持续性评价理论与方法研究,地质出版社,2009
[71]李天政,贾子超,层次分析法原理及应用举例,[J]内江职业技术学院学报,2008
[72]许树柏,实用决策方法——层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社.1988
[73]陈植华,应用信息熵方法对地下水观测网的层次分类—以河北平原地下水观测网为例,水文地质工程地质,2002,3
[74].李元章,丛树铮.熵及其在水文频率计算中的应用.水文,1985(1),22-2
[75]张继国,降水时空分布的信息熵研究,博士论文,河海大学,2004
[76]郭显光,改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用,系统工程理论与实践,1998.12
[77]陈植华,地下水观测网的若干问题与基于信息熵的研究方法,地学前缘(中国地质大学, 北京),2001,3
[78]管华,蒋银娣,地下水系统信息熵分析方法初探,河南大学学报(自然科学版),1998.12
[79]呼和浩特市郊区水利志,内蒙古人民出版社,2002
[80]呼和浩特经济统计年鉴,2008—2010
[81]内蒙古自治区呼和浩特地下水资源评价简要报告,内蒙自治区地质环境监测总站,1999.8
[82]张荣旺,呼和浩特城市污水处理及污水资源化,内蒙古农业大学学报,2008.6
[83]张翼龙,等,内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市地下水资源评价报告,1999
[84]内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市地下水资源评价报告,内蒙自治区地质环境监测总站,1999.8
[85]胡雪媛,呼和浩特市水资源供需平衡分析,内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),第37卷第2,2008年3月
[86]朱学晰,呼和浩特市水资源可持续利用对策分析,现代商贸工业,2010年第5期
[87]内蒙古自治区呼包鄂区域经济“十一五”发展规划
[88]内蒙古自治区行业用水定额标准,DB15/T385—2003
[89]内蒙古自治区主要城市地下水环境监测综合报告,内蒙古自治区地质环境监测院,2006.12
[90]中国地下水资源(内蒙古自治区),中华人民共和国国土资源部,中国地图出版社