穿越岩体接触带隧道施工围岩稳定与变形研究
|
摘要
我国南部为多山丘陵地区,地形、地质条件复杂,在高速公路隧道建设中遇到了很多复杂的地质灾害问题,而岩体接触带是隧道易发生施工地质灾害的主要地质问题之一,对此种情况下如何保证工程质量、降低工程损失的问题亟待解决。
本文以湖南省汝城至郴州高速公路半江子隧道为工程依托,根据收集、汇总到的隧道工程地质勘测报告、设计图纸及施工情况,通过对岩体接触带隧道围岩进行现场施工动态监测,结合室内岩样显微观察,数值模拟结果与现场实测结果进行对比,对半江子隧道岩体接触带围岩的地质特征、变形特征和围岩的稳定性进行分析的基础上,着重分析穿越岩体接触带隧道的围岩变形特征,并进行支护参数的优化研究。主要内容如下：
(1)通过综合分析大量文献资料,归纳总结目前国内外穿越岩体接触带隧道围岩变形控制的研究方法和发展现状,确定研究思路；
(2)通过对现场岩样进行室内显微观察,结合现场地质素描绘制岩体接触带剖面图,并对岩体接触带地质预报结果进行分析,研究岩体接触带隧道围岩渐变特征,分析半江子隧道岩体接触带结构面对隧道围岩稳定与变形的影响；
(3)考虑岩体接触带渐变特性对隧道围岩稳定与变形的影响,结合现场实测数据分析结果,利用离散元分析软件UDEC进行二维弹塑性数值模拟,建立数值计算模型,分析施工过程中围岩、支护结构的受力和变形规律以及岩体接触带对围岩稳定与变形的影响,并应用现场实测和数值模拟的结果,分析支护效果,优化支护参数。
There are mainly mountainous and hilly areas in southern China with topographic and geological conditions rather complex. The construction for highway tunnel encounters a number of complicated geological problems, and the tunnel rock contact zone is prone to geological disasters, under which engineering problems like how to ensure quality and reduce losses need to be solved.
This paper studies Ban Jiangzi Tunnel of Chenzhou to Rucheng highway in Hunan province. According to the collection of the tunnel engineering geology reports, design drawings and the tunnel construction, as well as the dynamic monitoring of the construction on the spot, microscopic observation of indoor rock, and comparison between numerical simulation and field test results, the paper bases the analysis on geological features, deformation characteristics and the stability of tunnel surrounding rocks around the rock contact zone in the Ban Jiangzi tunnel. The paper also focuses on rock deformation characteristics when tunnelling through rock contact zone and optimizes research on support parameters.The main ideas are as follows:
(1) Based on comprehensive analysis of document materials, the domestic and foreign research methods and development status of the deformation control of surrounding rocks when tunneling through rock contact zone are summarized, and the research ideas of the paper was determined;
(2) Through indoor microscopic analysis of on-site rock samples, combined with field mapping of geological sketch profiles of rock contact zone, and the geological forecast results of the rock contact zone, the paper studies the gradual change feature analysis of tunnel surrounding rock in rock contact zone, and analyzes the influence of structural surface of rock contact zone to the tunnel stability and deformation of surrounding rock in Ban Jiangzi tunnel;
(3) Considering the influence of gradual change feature of rock contact zone to the stability and deformation of tunnel surrounding rock, combined with field data analysis results, the numerical model was found by using discrete element analysis software UDEC to implement numerical simulation of two-dimensional elastic-plastic. The paper analyzes the impact of the stress from surrounding supporting structures and deformation rules, the rock contact zone to the stability and deformation of tunnel surrounding rocks in the construction process. By appllying to the field measurement and numerical simulation results, the paper also analyzes the supporting effect, and optimizes the supporting parameters.
本文以湖南省汝城至郴州高速公路半江子隧道为工程依托,根据收集、汇总到的隧道工程地质勘测报告、设计图纸及施工情况,通过对岩体接触带隧道围岩进行现场施工动态监测,结合室内岩样显微观察,数值模拟结果与现场实测结果进行对比,对半江子隧道岩体接触带围岩的地质特征、变形特征和围岩的稳定性进行分析的基础上,着重分析穿越岩体接触带隧道的围岩变形特征,并进行支护参数的优化研究。主要内容如下：
(1)通过综合分析大量文献资料,归纳总结目前国内外穿越岩体接触带隧道围岩变形控制的研究方法和发展现状,确定研究思路；
(2)通过对现场岩样进行室内显微观察,结合现场地质素描绘制岩体接触带剖面图,并对岩体接触带地质预报结果进行分析,研究岩体接触带隧道围岩渐变特征,分析半江子隧道岩体接触带结构面对隧道围岩稳定与变形的影响；
(3)考虑岩体接触带渐变特性对隧道围岩稳定与变形的影响,结合现场实测数据分析结果,利用离散元分析软件UDEC进行二维弹塑性数值模拟,建立数值计算模型,分析施工过程中围岩、支护结构的受力和变形规律以及岩体接触带对围岩稳定与变形的影响,并应用现场实测和数值模拟的结果,分析支护效果,优化支护参数。
There are mainly mountainous and hilly areas in southern China with topographic and geological conditions rather complex. The construction for highway tunnel encounters a number of complicated geological problems, and the tunnel rock contact zone is prone to geological disasters, under which engineering problems like how to ensure quality and reduce losses need to be solved.
This paper studies Ban Jiangzi Tunnel of Chenzhou to Rucheng highway in Hunan province. According to the collection of the tunnel engineering geology reports, design drawings and the tunnel construction, as well as the dynamic monitoring of the construction on the spot, microscopic observation of indoor rock, and comparison between numerical simulation and field test results, the paper bases the analysis on geological features, deformation characteristics and the stability of tunnel surrounding rocks around the rock contact zone in the Ban Jiangzi tunnel. The paper also focuses on rock deformation characteristics when tunnelling through rock contact zone and optimizes research on support parameters.The main ideas are as follows:
(1) Based on comprehensive analysis of document materials, the domestic and foreign research methods and development status of the deformation control of surrounding rocks when tunneling through rock contact zone are summarized, and the research ideas of the paper was determined;
(2) Through indoor microscopic analysis of on-site rock samples, combined with field mapping of geological sketch profiles of rock contact zone, and the geological forecast results of the rock contact zone, the paper studies the gradual change feature analysis of tunnel surrounding rock in rock contact zone, and analyzes the influence of structural surface of rock contact zone to the tunnel stability and deformation of surrounding rock in Ban Jiangzi tunnel;
(3) Considering the influence of gradual change feature of rock contact zone to the stability and deformation of tunnel surrounding rock, combined with field data analysis results, the numerical model was found by using discrete element analysis software UDEC to implement numerical simulation of two-dimensional elastic-plastic. The paper analyzes the impact of the stress from surrounding supporting structures and deformation rules, the rock contact zone to the stability and deformation of tunnel surrounding rocks in the construction process. By appllying to the field measurement and numerical simulation results, the paper also analyzes the supporting effect, and optimizes the supporting parameters.
引文
[1]周维垣.高等岩石力学[M].北京：水利电力出版社,1993.
[2]罗俊忠.断层对地下洞室围岩稳定性及其支护结构强度影响的数值试验研究[硕士学位论文].西安：西安理工大学.2006.
[3]沈永和.燧石石灰岩的接触变质[J].地质学报,1953,33(3)：217-226.
[4]沈永和.辽宁临江大栗子区千枚岩的接触变质川[J].地质学报,1955,36(1)：81-94.
[5]王德滋.江苏镇江的火成岩及其接触变质作用[J].地质论评,1958,18(2)：87-98.
[6]何镜宇.小兴安岭西南部神树附近中生代地层的接触变质[J].地质科学,1959(12)：365-370.
[7]杨保疆,丁云林.大余区寒武系地层接触变质特征及其在普查脉钨矿床中的意义[J].地质与勘探,1974,(6)：30-36.
[8]夏林圻.南秦岭勉—略地区某些阿尔卑斯型超基性侵入体的高温接触变质作用[J].地球化学,1975,(4)：250-256.
[9]翟裕生,石准立,曾庆丰,林新多.矿田构造与成矿[M].北京：地质出版社,1981.
[10]曲元贵,杨本楷.接触变质型硅灰石矿床地质特征及其成矿机理的研究[J].吉林地质,1988,5(2)：145-156.
[11]刘国惠,伍家善.北京房山地区的变质带[J].地球学报,1987,(2)：113-137.
[12]黄承周.侵入接触构造的控矿作用及其成矿机理探讨[J].江苏地质.1988,(4)：28-31.
[13]马昌前,杨坤光等.花岗岩类岩浆动力学—理论方法及鄂东花岗岩类例析[M].武汉：中国地质大学出版社,1994,217-225.
[14].尹家衡,黄光昭.中国东南沿海中、新生代火山旋回[J].火山地质与矿产,1997,18(3)：167-190.
[15]李东旭,张达,刘文灿等.凤凰山花岗岩体构造系统分析与侵位机制[J].地质力学学报,1996,2(2)：55-65.
[16]奚小双,何绍勋,张曾荣.西华山内接触带矿脉群的断裂力学成因[J].地质科学,1996,31(2)：122-129.
[17]张达,吴淦国,李东旭.铜陵凤凰山岩体接触带构造变形特征[J].地学前缘.2001,8(3)：223-229.
[18]宋明春,金振民,王来明等.鲁东官山榴辉岩与围岩接触关系的新发现及其 对年代学的启示[J].地质学报.2003,77(2)：238-244.
[19]张宏斌,余晓红,刘斌.华家岭花岗质侵入岩体的地质特征研究[J].甘肃地质学报.2004,13(2)：45-50.
[20]周祖杰.岩浆侵入接触破碎带的水利水电工程地质条件初探[J].水利科技.2008,(3)：22-25.
[21]赵海军,马凤山,丁德民等.采动影响下巷道围岩变形与破坏的弱结构面效应[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(2)：51-56.
[22]王大海,王忠安.河北某矿区蚀变围岩力学特性[J].黄金学报,2000,2(4)：283-285.
[23]黄润秋等.复杂岩体结构精细描述及其工程应用[M].北京：科学出版社.2004.
[24]郭方礼,张庆龙,厉建华.徐州西南部班井侵入杂岩体与围岩关系及其地质意义[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版).2004,40(2)：101-103.
[25]杨根兰,黄润秋,王奖臻等.某工程蚀变岩孔隙特征及其软弱程度研究[J].矿物岩石,2006,26(4)：111-115.
[26]余君鹏,秦松贤.湘南姑婆山岩体北西侧侵入接触带构造控矿研究[J].地质科技情报.2007,26(2)：25-29.
[27]于新华,翦波.蚀变花岗岩工程特性研究[J].西部探矿工程,2007,(6)：94-96.
[28]覃礼貌,许模.西南某水电站坝区岩体绿泥石化蚀变及其工程对策[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(1)：68-72.
[29]王旭东,付小敏.蚀变岩在三向应力状态下的力学及变形特性研究[J].实验室研究与探索,2007,26(10)：277-280.
[30]张国宝,宫海灵,张贺龙.琅琊山抽水蓄能电站地下厂房洞室群蚀变岩工程地质特性研究[C].中国水力发电工程学会第四届地质及勘探专业委员会第一次学术交流会论文集.2008,67-72.
[31]孟国涛,徐卫亚,杨圣奇等.某水电站坝基G23挤压蚀变破碎带成因及工程性质分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(6)：1691-1696.
[32]徐德敏,黄润秋,虞修竟等.蚀变岩水—岩相互作用试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2)：117-119.
[33]杨燕,付小敏.某工程蚀变岩抗剪强度特性的影响因素[J].实验室研究与探索.2009,28(1)：42-44.
[34]蒋爵光.在不同构造应力作用下节理岩体隧道的稳定性[J].西南交通大学学报,1982,(1)：20-23.
[35]石根华,Goodman R. E.块体理论及其在岩石工程中的应用[M].北京：科学出版社,1985.
[36]任德惠,张平.不同倾角结构面对洞室稳定性的影响[J].煤炭学报,1988,13(3)：51-53.
[37]李新平,朱瑞庚,夏元友.裂隙分布对地下硐室稳定性的影响研究[J].金属矿山,1997,(3)：10-15.
[38]刘东燕,叶晓明,朱凡.断续节理岩体强度评价及承载力预测[J].重庆建筑大学学报,1997,19(2)：21-30.
[39]王贵君.节理裂隙岩体中不同埋深无支护暗挖隧洞稳定性的离散元法数值分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(7)：1154-1157.
[40]胡夏嵩,赵法锁.低地应力区地下洞室初始和二次应力离散元模拟[J].金属矿山,2004,(11)：18-21.
[41]周亚宇.大别山隧道围岩破碎带全断面开挖施工方案研究[J].隧道建设,2006,26(4)：54-57.
[42]陈文胜,柏署,杨燕.离散元计算的位移控制方法[J].岩土力学,2007,28(7)：1304-1308.
[43]汪成兵,朱合华.隧道塌方机制及其影响因素离散元模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(3)：450-456.
[44]Barrow G On all intrusion of muscovite-biotite gneiss in the southeastern Highlands of Scotland,and its accompanying metamorphism[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society,1893,49:330-358.
[45]Harker A.. Metamorphism:metamorphism, a study of the transformation of rock masses[M].2nd ed. London:Methuen,1932,362.
[46]Miyashiro A. Evolution of metamorphic belts[J]. Journal of Petrology,1961,2(3): 277-311.
[47]Pitcher W. S., Read H. H.. Contact Metamorphism in Relation to Manner of Emplacement of the Granites of Donegal, Ireland[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1963,71(3):261-296.
[48]Wood J. R., Hewett T. A., Mecdonald D. A., Surdam R. C.. Reservoir diagenesis and convective fluid flow[A]. AAPG Bulletin.1982,66:99-110.
[49]Girard J. P., Deynoux M., Nahon D.. Diagenesis of the upper proterozoic siliciclastic sediments of the Taoudeni Basin(West Africa) and relation to diabase emplacement [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1989,59(2):233-248.
[50]Hutton D. H. W., T. J. Dempster. Brown P. E., S. D. Becker.. A new mechanism of granite emplacement:Intrusion in active extensional shear zone[J]. Nature, 1990,343:452-455.
[51]Winkler H. G. F.. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic rocks[M].2nd ed. Springers vedag,1967, New York.
[52]Summer N. S., Ayalon A.. Dike intrusion into unconsolidated sandstone and the development of quartzite contact zones [J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1995, 17(7):997-1010.
[53]Yoshida Y. The tunnelling at the crush zone in the Sanbagawa Metamorphic Belt[C]. International Symposium on Modern Tunneling Science and Technology Kyoto, Japan,2001.
[54]Yassaghi. A., Salari-rad H.. Squeezing rock conditions at an igneous contact zone in the Taloun tunnels, Tehran-Shomal freeway, Iran:a case study [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2005,42(1): 95-108.
[55]Jorn H. K., Ron H. V.. Syndeformational emplacement of a tonalitic sheet-complex in a late-variscan thrust regime:fabrics and mechanism of intrusion, monte'e senes, northeastern sardinia, italy[J]. Petrology and Structure. 2005,43(1):387-407.
[56]Jurg M. Matter, D. S. Goldberg, R. H. Morin, M. Stute. Contact zone permeability at intrusion boundaries:new results from hydraulic testing and geophysical logging in the Newark Rift Basin, New York, USA[J]. Hydrogeology Journal,2006,14(5):689-699.
[57]P. Tropper, D. Harlov, E. Krenn, F. Finger, D. Rhede, F. Bernhard. Zr-bearing minerals as indicators for the polymetamorphic evolution of the eastern, lower Austroalpine nappes (Stubenberg Granite contact aureole, Styria, Eastern Alps, Austria)[J]. Lithos,2007,95 (1/2):72-86.
[58]T. Kawakami, M. Aoya, S. R. Wallis, J. Lee, K. Terada, Y. Wang. M. Heizler. Contact metamorphism in the Malashan dome, North Himalayan gneiss domes, southern Tibet:an example of shallow extensional tectonics in the Tethys Himalaya[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology,2007,25(8):1-23.
[59]Cundall P. A.. A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in block rock system [C]. Proceedings of the Symposium ISRM, 1971,1(1):2-8.
[60]Rajinder Bhasin, Kaare Hqeg. Parametric study for a large cavern in jointed rock using a Distinct Element Model(UDECOBB) [J], International Journal of Mechanies & Mining Seienees,1998,35(1):17-29.
[61]Souley M, Homand F.. Stability of jointed rock masses evaluated by UDEC with an extended Saeb-Amadeiconstitutive law[J], International Journal of Mechanics & Mining Sciences,1996,33(3):233-234.
[62]Souley M, Homand F, Thoraval A.. The effect of joint constitutive laws on the modelling of an underground excavation and comparison with in-situ measurements[J], International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Seienees, 1997,34(1):97-115.
[63]Charles Fairhurst, Juemin Pei. A Comparison Between the Distinct Element Method and the Finite Element Method for Analysis of the Stability of an Excavation in Jointed Rock[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1990,5(1):111-117.
[64]柏道远,周亮,马铁球,王先辉.湘东南印支期花岗岩成因及构造背景[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2007,26(3)：197-212.
[65]孙希贤,易顺华,刘成社等.大云山岩体侵入接触构造体系的初步研究[J].中国区域地质.1985,(14)：97-108.
[66]韦立德,徐卫亚,朱珍德等.岩石粘弹塑性模型的研究[J].岩土力学,2002,23(5)：583-586.
[67]卫管一,张长俊.岩石学简明教程[M].北京：中国地质出版社,2004.
[68]杜时贵.岩体结构面的工程性质[M].北京：地震出版社.1999,1-13.
[69]黄润秋等.复杂岩体结构精细描述及其工程应用.北京：科学出版社,2004.
[70]朱永全,宋玉香.隧道工程[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[71]刘锦华,吕祖珩.关键块体理论及其应用[M].北京：水利水电出版社,1988.
[72]孙广忠.岩体力学基础[M].北京：科学出版社,1983.
[73]张强勇.岩土工程强度与稳定计算及工程应用[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[74]Hart. R. D.. An introduction to distinct element modeling for rock engineering[J]. Comprehensive Rock Engineering. Hudson. J. A. (ed.),1993,2:245-261.
[75]于学馥.岩石力学的数学描述与计算试验技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(1)：93-96.
[76]阳生权,阳军生.岩体力学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2008.
[77]常丽华,陈曼云,金巍等.透明矿物薄片鉴定手册[M].北京：地质出版社, 2006.
[78]李德惠.晶体光学(第二版)[M].北京：地质出版社,1993.
[79]鲁学悟.姑婆山-花山花岗岩体接触变质带特征研究[硕士学位论文].桂林：桂林工学院,2008.
[80]苏生瑞,黄润秋,王士天.断裂构造对地应力场的影响及其工程应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2002.
[81]翟裕生.矿田构造与成矿[M].北京：地质出版社,1981.
[82]Bjorlykke K.. Fluid flow processes and diagensis in sedimentary basins[J]. Geological Society,1994,78:127-140.
[83]廖红建,王铁行等.岩土工程数值分析[M].北京：机械工程出版社,2002.
[84]傅鹤林,彭思甜,韩汝才等.岩土工程数值分析新方法[M].长沙：中南大学出版社,2006.
[85]于学馥.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京：煤炭工业出版社,1983.
[86]廖巍,徐海清,刘贵应.岩体结构面组合对巷道围岩稳定性的影响[J].安全与环境工程,2004,11(2)：65-67.
[87]Harald Hokmark. Numerical study of the performances of tunnel plugs[J]. Engineering Geology,1998,49(304):327-335.
[88]陈进,袁文伯.巷道围岩渐进破坏的粘弹塑性软化分析[J].中国矿业学院学报,1988,(3)：38-45.
[89]熊良宵,杨林德.隧道开挖面接近地质界面时围岩位移特征及其影响因素分析[J].中国铁道科学,2009,30(1)：61-68.
[90]张强勇,朱维申,向文等.节理岩体断裂破坏强度计算及工程应用[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2005,35(1)：98-105.
[2]罗俊忠.断层对地下洞室围岩稳定性及其支护结构强度影响的数值试验研究[硕士学位论文].西安：西安理工大学.2006.
[3]沈永和.燧石石灰岩的接触变质[J].地质学报,1953,33(3)：217-226.
[4]沈永和.辽宁临江大栗子区千枚岩的接触变质川[J].地质学报,1955,36(1)：81-94.
[5]王德滋.江苏镇江的火成岩及其接触变质作用[J].地质论评,1958,18(2)：87-98.
[6]何镜宇.小兴安岭西南部神树附近中生代地层的接触变质[J].地质科学,1959(12)：365-370.
[7]杨保疆,丁云林.大余区寒武系地层接触变质特征及其在普查脉钨矿床中的意义[J].地质与勘探,1974,(6)：30-36.
[8]夏林圻.南秦岭勉—略地区某些阿尔卑斯型超基性侵入体的高温接触变质作用[J].地球化学,1975,(4)：250-256.
[9]翟裕生,石准立,曾庆丰,林新多.矿田构造与成矿[M].北京：地质出版社,1981.
[10]曲元贵,杨本楷.接触变质型硅灰石矿床地质特征及其成矿机理的研究[J].吉林地质,1988,5(2)：145-156.
[11]刘国惠,伍家善.北京房山地区的变质带[J].地球学报,1987,(2)：113-137.
[12]黄承周.侵入接触构造的控矿作用及其成矿机理探讨[J].江苏地质.1988,(4)：28-31.
[13]马昌前,杨坤光等.花岗岩类岩浆动力学—理论方法及鄂东花岗岩类例析[M].武汉：中国地质大学出版社,1994,217-225.
[14].尹家衡,黄光昭.中国东南沿海中、新生代火山旋回[J].火山地质与矿产,1997,18(3)：167-190.
[15]李东旭,张达,刘文灿等.凤凰山花岗岩体构造系统分析与侵位机制[J].地质力学学报,1996,2(2)：55-65.
[16]奚小双,何绍勋,张曾荣.西华山内接触带矿脉群的断裂力学成因[J].地质科学,1996,31(2)：122-129.
[17]张达,吴淦国,李东旭.铜陵凤凰山岩体接触带构造变形特征[J].地学前缘.2001,8(3)：223-229.
[18]宋明春,金振民,王来明等.鲁东官山榴辉岩与围岩接触关系的新发现及其 对年代学的启示[J].地质学报.2003,77(2)：238-244.
[19]张宏斌,余晓红,刘斌.华家岭花岗质侵入岩体的地质特征研究[J].甘肃地质学报.2004,13(2)：45-50.
[20]周祖杰.岩浆侵入接触破碎带的水利水电工程地质条件初探[J].水利科技.2008,(3)：22-25.
[21]赵海军,马凤山,丁德民等.采动影响下巷道围岩变形与破坏的弱结构面效应[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(2)：51-56.
[22]王大海,王忠安.河北某矿区蚀变围岩力学特性[J].黄金学报,2000,2(4)：283-285.
[23]黄润秋等.复杂岩体结构精细描述及其工程应用[M].北京：科学出版社.2004.
[24]郭方礼,张庆龙,厉建华.徐州西南部班井侵入杂岩体与围岩关系及其地质意义[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版).2004,40(2)：101-103.
[25]杨根兰,黄润秋,王奖臻等.某工程蚀变岩孔隙特征及其软弱程度研究[J].矿物岩石,2006,26(4)：111-115.
[26]余君鹏,秦松贤.湘南姑婆山岩体北西侧侵入接触带构造控矿研究[J].地质科技情报.2007,26(2)：25-29.
[27]于新华,翦波.蚀变花岗岩工程特性研究[J].西部探矿工程,2007,(6)：94-96.
[28]覃礼貌,许模.西南某水电站坝区岩体绿泥石化蚀变及其工程对策[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(1)：68-72.
[29]王旭东,付小敏.蚀变岩在三向应力状态下的力学及变形特性研究[J].实验室研究与探索,2007,26(10)：277-280.
[30]张国宝,宫海灵,张贺龙.琅琊山抽水蓄能电站地下厂房洞室群蚀变岩工程地质特性研究[C].中国水力发电工程学会第四届地质及勘探专业委员会第一次学术交流会论文集.2008,67-72.
[31]孟国涛,徐卫亚,杨圣奇等.某水电站坝基G23挤压蚀变破碎带成因及工程性质分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(6)：1691-1696.
[32]徐德敏,黄润秋,虞修竟等.蚀变岩水—岩相互作用试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2)：117-119.
[33]杨燕,付小敏.某工程蚀变岩抗剪强度特性的影响因素[J].实验室研究与探索.2009,28(1)：42-44.
[34]蒋爵光.在不同构造应力作用下节理岩体隧道的稳定性[J].西南交通大学学报,1982,(1)：20-23.
[35]石根华,Goodman R. E.块体理论及其在岩石工程中的应用[M].北京：科学出版社,1985.
[36]任德惠,张平.不同倾角结构面对洞室稳定性的影响[J].煤炭学报,1988,13(3)：51-53.
[37]李新平,朱瑞庚,夏元友.裂隙分布对地下硐室稳定性的影响研究[J].金属矿山,1997,(3)：10-15.
[38]刘东燕,叶晓明,朱凡.断续节理岩体强度评价及承载力预测[J].重庆建筑大学学报,1997,19(2)：21-30.
[39]王贵君.节理裂隙岩体中不同埋深无支护暗挖隧洞稳定性的离散元法数值分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(7)：1154-1157.
[40]胡夏嵩,赵法锁.低地应力区地下洞室初始和二次应力离散元模拟[J].金属矿山,2004,(11)：18-21.
[41]周亚宇.大别山隧道围岩破碎带全断面开挖施工方案研究[J].隧道建设,2006,26(4)：54-57.
[42]陈文胜,柏署,杨燕.离散元计算的位移控制方法[J].岩土力学,2007,28(7)：1304-1308.
[43]汪成兵,朱合华.隧道塌方机制及其影响因素离散元模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(3)：450-456.
[44]Barrow G On all intrusion of muscovite-biotite gneiss in the southeastern Highlands of Scotland,and its accompanying metamorphism[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society,1893,49:330-358.
[45]Harker A.. Metamorphism:metamorphism, a study of the transformation of rock masses[M].2nd ed. London:Methuen,1932,362.
[46]Miyashiro A. Evolution of metamorphic belts[J]. Journal of Petrology,1961,2(3): 277-311.
[47]Pitcher W. S., Read H. H.. Contact Metamorphism in Relation to Manner of Emplacement of the Granites of Donegal, Ireland[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1963,71(3):261-296.
[48]Wood J. R., Hewett T. A., Mecdonald D. A., Surdam R. C.. Reservoir diagenesis and convective fluid flow[A]. AAPG Bulletin.1982,66:99-110.
[49]Girard J. P., Deynoux M., Nahon D.. Diagenesis of the upper proterozoic siliciclastic sediments of the Taoudeni Basin(West Africa) and relation to diabase emplacement [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1989,59(2):233-248.
[50]Hutton D. H. W., T. J. Dempster. Brown P. E., S. D. Becker.. A new mechanism of granite emplacement:Intrusion in active extensional shear zone[J]. Nature, 1990,343:452-455.
[51]Winkler H. G. F.. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic rocks[M].2nd ed. Springers vedag,1967, New York.
[52]Summer N. S., Ayalon A.. Dike intrusion into unconsolidated sandstone and the development of quartzite contact zones [J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1995, 17(7):997-1010.
[53]Yoshida Y. The tunnelling at the crush zone in the Sanbagawa Metamorphic Belt[C]. International Symposium on Modern Tunneling Science and Technology Kyoto, Japan,2001.
[54]Yassaghi. A., Salari-rad H.. Squeezing rock conditions at an igneous contact zone in the Taloun tunnels, Tehran-Shomal freeway, Iran:a case study [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2005,42(1): 95-108.
[55]Jorn H. K., Ron H. V.. Syndeformational emplacement of a tonalitic sheet-complex in a late-variscan thrust regime:fabrics and mechanism of intrusion, monte'e senes, northeastern sardinia, italy[J]. Petrology and Structure. 2005,43(1):387-407.
[56]Jurg M. Matter, D. S. Goldberg, R. H. Morin, M. Stute. Contact zone permeability at intrusion boundaries:new results from hydraulic testing and geophysical logging in the Newark Rift Basin, New York, USA[J]. Hydrogeology Journal,2006,14(5):689-699.
[57]P. Tropper, D. Harlov, E. Krenn, F. Finger, D. Rhede, F. Bernhard. Zr-bearing minerals as indicators for the polymetamorphic evolution of the eastern, lower Austroalpine nappes (Stubenberg Granite contact aureole, Styria, Eastern Alps, Austria)[J]. Lithos,2007,95 (1/2):72-86.
[58]T. Kawakami, M. Aoya, S. R. Wallis, J. Lee, K. Terada, Y. Wang. M. Heizler. Contact metamorphism in the Malashan dome, North Himalayan gneiss domes, southern Tibet:an example of shallow extensional tectonics in the Tethys Himalaya[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology,2007,25(8):1-23.
[59]Cundall P. A.. A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in block rock system [C]. Proceedings of the Symposium ISRM, 1971,1(1):2-8.
[60]Rajinder Bhasin, Kaare Hqeg. Parametric study for a large cavern in jointed rock using a Distinct Element Model(UDECOBB) [J], International Journal of Mechanies & Mining Seienees,1998,35(1):17-29.
[61]Souley M, Homand F.. Stability of jointed rock masses evaluated by UDEC with an extended Saeb-Amadeiconstitutive law[J], International Journal of Mechanics & Mining Sciences,1996,33(3):233-234.
[62]Souley M, Homand F, Thoraval A.. The effect of joint constitutive laws on the modelling of an underground excavation and comparison with in-situ measurements[J], International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Seienees, 1997,34(1):97-115.
[63]Charles Fairhurst, Juemin Pei. A Comparison Between the Distinct Element Method and the Finite Element Method for Analysis of the Stability of an Excavation in Jointed Rock[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1990,5(1):111-117.
[64]柏道远,周亮,马铁球,王先辉.湘东南印支期花岗岩成因及构造背景[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2007,26(3)：197-212.
[65]孙希贤,易顺华,刘成社等.大云山岩体侵入接触构造体系的初步研究[J].中国区域地质.1985,(14)：97-108.
[66]韦立德,徐卫亚,朱珍德等.岩石粘弹塑性模型的研究[J].岩土力学,2002,23(5)：583-586.
[67]卫管一,张长俊.岩石学简明教程[M].北京：中国地质出版社,2004.
[68]杜时贵.岩体结构面的工程性质[M].北京：地震出版社.1999,1-13.
[69]黄润秋等.复杂岩体结构精细描述及其工程应用.北京：科学出版社,2004.
[70]朱永全,宋玉香.隧道工程[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[71]刘锦华,吕祖珩.关键块体理论及其应用[M].北京：水利水电出版社,1988.
[72]孙广忠.岩体力学基础[M].北京：科学出版社,1983.
[73]张强勇.岩土工程强度与稳定计算及工程应用[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[74]Hart. R. D.. An introduction to distinct element modeling for rock engineering[J]. Comprehensive Rock Engineering. Hudson. J. A. (ed.),1993,2:245-261.
[75]于学馥.岩石力学的数学描述与计算试验技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1997,16(1)：93-96.
[76]阳生权,阳军生.岩体力学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2008.
[77]常丽华,陈曼云,金巍等.透明矿物薄片鉴定手册[M].北京：地质出版社, 2006.
[78]李德惠.晶体光学(第二版)[M].北京：地质出版社,1993.
[79]鲁学悟.姑婆山-花山花岗岩体接触变质带特征研究[硕士学位论文].桂林：桂林工学院,2008.
[80]苏生瑞,黄润秋,王士天.断裂构造对地应力场的影响及其工程应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2002.
[81]翟裕生.矿田构造与成矿[M].北京：地质出版社,1981.
[82]Bjorlykke K.. Fluid flow processes and diagensis in sedimentary basins[J]. Geological Society,1994,78:127-140.
[83]廖红建,王铁行等.岩土工程数值分析[M].北京：机械工程出版社,2002.
[84]傅鹤林,彭思甜,韩汝才等.岩土工程数值分析新方法[M].长沙：中南大学出版社,2006.
[85]于学馥.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京：煤炭工业出版社,1983.
[86]廖巍,徐海清,刘贵应.岩体结构面组合对巷道围岩稳定性的影响[J].安全与环境工程,2004,11(2)：65-67.
[87]Harald Hokmark. Numerical study of the performances of tunnel plugs[J]. Engineering Geology,1998,49(304):327-335.
[88]陈进,袁文伯.巷道围岩渐进破坏的粘弹塑性软化分析[J].中国矿业学院学报,1988,(3)：38-45.
[89]熊良宵,杨林德.隧道开挖面接近地质界面时围岩位移特征及其影响因素分析[J].中国铁道科学,2009,30(1)：61-68.
[90]张强勇,朱维申,向文等.节理岩体断裂破坏强度计算及工程应用[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2005,35(1)：98-105.